Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Advancing document-level event extraction: Integration across texts and reciprocal feedback

  • The primary objective of document-level event extraction is to extract relevant event information from lengthy texts. However, many existing methods for document-level event extraction fail to fully incorporate the contextual information that spans across sentences. To overcome this limitation, the present study proposes a document-level event extraction model called Integration Across Texts and Reciprocal Feedback (IATRF). The proposed model constructs a heterogeneous graph and employs a graph convolutional network to enhance the connection between document and entity information. This approach facilitates the acquisition of semantic information enriched with document-level context. Additionally, a Transformer classifier is introduced to transform multiple event types into a multi-label classification task. To tackle the challenge of event argument recognition, this paper introduces the Reciprocal Feedback Argument Extraction strategy. Experimental results conducted on both our COSM dataset and the publicly available ChFinAnn dataset demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms previous methods in terms of F1 value, thus confirming its effectiveness. The IATRF model effectively solves the problems of long-distance document context-aware representation and cross-sentence argument dispersion.

    Citation: Min Zuo, Jiaqi Li, Di Wu, Yingjun Wang, Wei Dong, Jianlei Kong, Kang Hu. Advancing document-level event extraction: Integration across texts and reciprocal feedback[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 20050-20072. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023888

    Related Papers:

    [1] Saima Rashid, Rehana Ashraf, Fahd Jarad . Strong interaction of Jafari decomposition method with nonlinear fractional-order partial differential equations arising in plasma via the singular and nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7936-7963. doi: 10.3934/math.2022444
    [2] Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15994-16016. doi: 10.3934/math.2022876
    [3] Kishor D. Kucche, Sagar T. Sutar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Analysis of nonlinear implicit fractional differential equations with the Atangana-Baleanu derivative via measure of non-compactness. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27058-27079. doi: 10.3934/math.20241316
    [4] Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Fatimah S. Bayones . On new computations of the fractional epidemic childhood disease model pertaining to the generalized fractional derivative with nonsingular kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4552-4573. doi: 10.3934/math.2022254
    [5] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [6] Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736
    [7] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241
    [8] Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Aqeel Ahmad, Mustafa Inc, Muhammad Farman, Hadi Rezazadeh, Lanre Akinyemi, Muhammad Mannan Akram . Analysis of dengue transmission using fractional order scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8408-8429. doi: 10.3934/math.2022469
    [9] Veliappan Vijayaraj, Chokkalingam Ravichandran, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Kasthurisamy Jothimani . Existence and data dependence results for neutral fractional order integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1055-1071. doi: 10.3934/math.2023052
    [10] Eman A. A. Ziada, Salwa El-Morsy, Osama Moaaz, Sameh S. Askar, Ahmad M. Alshamrani, Monica Botros . Solution of the SIR epidemic model of arbitrary orders containing Caputo-Fabrizio, Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18324-18355. doi: 10.3934/math.2024894
  • The primary objective of document-level event extraction is to extract relevant event information from lengthy texts. However, many existing methods for document-level event extraction fail to fully incorporate the contextual information that spans across sentences. To overcome this limitation, the present study proposes a document-level event extraction model called Integration Across Texts and Reciprocal Feedback (IATRF). The proposed model constructs a heterogeneous graph and employs a graph convolutional network to enhance the connection between document and entity information. This approach facilitates the acquisition of semantic information enriched with document-level context. Additionally, a Transformer classifier is introduced to transform multiple event types into a multi-label classification task. To tackle the challenge of event argument recognition, this paper introduces the Reciprocal Feedback Argument Extraction strategy. Experimental results conducted on both our COSM dataset and the publicly available ChFinAnn dataset demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms previous methods in terms of F1 value, thus confirming its effectiveness. The IATRF model effectively solves the problems of long-distance document context-aware representation and cross-sentence argument dispersion.



    The Hermite-Hadamard inequality, which is one of the basic inequalities of inequality theory, has many applications in statistics and optimization theory, as well as providing estimates about the mean value of convex functions.

    Assume that f:IRR is a convex mapping defined on the interval I of R where a<b. The following statement;

    f(a+b2)1babaf(x)dxf(a)+f(b)2

    holds and known as Hermite-Hadamard inequality. Both inequalities hold in the reversed direction if f is concave.

    The concept of convex function, which is used in many classical and analytical inequalities, especially the Hermite-Hadamard inequality, has attracted the attention of many researchers see [4,7,8,9], and has expanded its application area with the construction of new convex function classes. The introduction of this useful class of functions for functions of two variables gave a new direction to convex analysis. In this sense, in [6], Dragomir mentioned about an expansion of the concept of convex function, which is used in many inequalities in theory and has applications in different fields of applied sciences and convex programming.

    Definition 1.1. Let us consider the bidimensional interval Δ=[a,b]×[c,d] in R2 with a<b,c<d. A function f:ΔR will be called convex on the co-ordinates if the partial mappings fy:[a,b]R,fy(u)=f(u,y) and fx:[c,d]R,fx(v)=f(x,v) are convex where defined for all y[c,d] and x[a,b]. Recall that the mapping f:ΔR is convex on Δ if the following inequality holds,

    f(λx+(1λ)z,λy+(1λ)w)λf(x,y)+(1λ)f(z,w)

    for all (x,y),(z,w)Δ and λ[0,1].

    Transferring the concept of convex function to coordinates inspired the presentation of Hermite-Hadamard inequality in coordinates and Dragomir proved this inequality as follows.

    Theorem 1.1. (See [6]) Suppose that f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]R is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ. Then one has the inequalities;

     f(a+b2,c+d2)12[1babaf(x,c+d2)dx+1dcdcf(a+b2,y)dy]1(ba)(dc)badcf(x,y)dxdy14[1(ba)baf(x,c)dx+1(ba)baf(x,d)dx+1(dc)dcf(a,y)dy+1(dc)dcf(b,y)dy]f(a,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,c)+f(b,d)4. (1.1)

    The above inequalities are sharp.

    To provide further information about convexity and inequalities that have been established on the coordinates, see the papers [1,2,5,10,11,12,13,14,15]).

    One of the trending problems of recent times is to present different types of convex functions and to derive new inequalities for these function classes. Now we will continue by remembering the concept of n-polynomial convex function.

    Definition 1.2. (See [16]) Let nN. A non-negative function f:IRR is called n-polynomial convex function if for every x,yI and t[0,1],

    f(tx+(1t)y)1nns=1(1(1t)s)f(x)+1nns=1(1ts)f(y).

    We will denote by POLC(I) the class of all n-polynomial convex functions on interval I.

    In the same paper, the authors have proved some new Hadamard type inequalities, we will mention the following one:

    Theorem 1.2. (See [16]) Let f:[a,b]R be an n-polynomial convex function. If a<b and fL[a,b], then the following Hermite-Hadaamrd type inequalities hold:

    12(nn+2n1)f(a+b2)1babaf(x)dxf(a)+f(b)nns=1ss+1. (1.2)

    Since some of the convex function classes can be described on the basis of means, averages have an important place in convex function theory. In [3], Awan et al. gave the harmonic version on the n-polynomial convexity described on the basis of the arithmetic mean as follows. They have also proved several new integral inequalities of Hadamard type.

    Definition 1.3. (See [3]) Let nN and H(0,) be an interval. Then a nonnegative real-valued function f:H[0,) is said to be an n-polynomial harmonically convex function if

    f(xytx+(1t)y)1nns=1(1(1t)s)f(y)+1nns=1(1ts)f(x)

    for all x,yH and t[0,1].

    Theorem 1.3. (See [3]) Let f:[a,b](0,)[0,) be an n-polynomial harmonically convex function. Then one has

    12(nn+2n1)f(2aba+b)abbabaf(x)x2dxf(a)+f(b)nns=1ss+1 (1.3)

    if fL[a,b].

    The main motivation in this study is to give a new modification of (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions on the coordinates and to obtain Hadamard type inequalities via double integrals and by using Hö lder inequality along with a few properties of this new class of functions.

    In this section, we will give a new classes of convexity that will be called (m,n)-polynomial convex function as following.

    Definition 2.1. Let m,nN and Δ=[a,b]×[c,d] be a bidimensional interval. Then a non-negative real-valued function f:ΔR is said to be (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ on the co-ordinates if the following inequality holds:

    f(xztz+(1t)x,ywsw+(1s)y)1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)f(x,y)+1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1sj)f(x,w)+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)f(z,y)+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1sj)f(z,w)

    where (x,y),(x,w),(z,y),(z,w)Δ and t,s[0,1].

    Remark 2.1. If one choose m=n=1, it is easy to see that the definition of (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions reduces to the class of the harmonically convex functions.

    Remark 2.2. The (2,2)-harmonically polynomial convex functions satisfy the following inequality;

    f(xztx+(1t)z,ywsz+(1s)w)3tt223ss22f(x,y)+3tt222ss22f(x,w)+2tt223ss22f(z,y)+2tt222ss22f(z,w)

    where (x,y),(x,w),(z,y),(z,w)Δ and t,s[0,1].

    Theorem 2.1. Assume that b>a>0,d>c>0,fα:[a,b]×[c,d][0,) be a family of the (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions on Δ and f(u,v)=supfα(u,v). Then, f is (m,n)- harmonically polynomial convex function on the coordinates if K={x,y[a,b]×[c,d]:f(x,y)<} is an interval.

    Proof. For t,s[0,1] and (x,y),(x,w),(z,y),(z,w)Δ, we can write

    f(xztz+(1t)x,ywsw+(1s)y)=supfα(xztz+(1t)x,ywsw+(1s)y)1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)supfα(x,y)+1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1sj)supfα(x,w)+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)supfα(z,y)+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1sj)supfα(z,w)=1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)f(x,y)+1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1sj)f(x,w)+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)f(z,y)+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1sj)f(z,w)

    which completes the proof.

    Lemma 2.1. Every (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on the co-ordinates.

    Proof. Consider the function f:ΔR is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ. Then, the partial mapping fx:[c,d]R,fx(v)=f(x,v) is valid. We can write

    fx(vwtw+(1t)v)=f(x,vwtw+(1t)v)=f(x2tx+(1t)x,vwtw+(1t)v)1nni=1(1(1t)i)f(x,v)+1nni=1(1ti)f(x,w)=1nni=1(1(1t)i)fx(v)+1nni=1(1ti)fx(w)

    for all t[0,1] and v,w[c,d]. This shows the (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convexity of fx. By a similar argument, one can see the (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convexity of fy.

    Remark 2.3. Every (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on the co-ordinates may not be (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ.

    A simple verification of the remark can be seen in the following example.

    Example 2.1. Let us consider f:[1,3]×[2,3][0,), given by f(x,y)=(x1)(y2). It is clear that f is harmonically polynomial convex on the coordinates but is not harmonically polynomial convex on [1,3]×[2,3], because if we choose (1,3),(2,3)[1,3]×[2,3] and t[0,1], we have

    RHSf(22t+(1t),93t+3(1t))=f(21t,3)=1+t1tLHS1nni=1(1(1t)i)f(1,3)+1nni=1(1ti)f(2,3)=0.

    Then, it is easy to see that

    f(22t+(1t),93t+3(1t))>1nni=1(1(1t)i)f(1,3)+1nni=1(1ti)f(2,3).

    This shows that f is not harmonically polynomial convex on [1,3]×[2,3].

    Now, we will establish associated Hadamard inequality for (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions on the co-ordinates.

    Theorem 2.2. Suppose that f:ΔR is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex on the coordinates on Δ. Then, the following inequalities hold:

    14(mm+2m1)(nn+2n1)f(2aba+b,2cdc+d)14[(mm+2m1)abbabaf(x,2cdc+d)x2dx+(nn+2n1)cddcdcf(2aba+b,y)y2dy]abcd(ba)(dc)badcf(x,y)x2y2dxdy12[1n(cd(dc)dcf(a,y)y2dy+cd(dc)dcf(b,y)y2dy)ns=1ss+1+1m(ab(ba)baf(x,c)x2dx+ab(ba)baf(x,d)x2dx)mt=1tt+1](f(a,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,c)+f(b,d)nm)(ns=1ss+1mt=1tt+1). (2.1)

    Proof. Since f is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on the co-ordinates, it follows that the mapping hx and hy are (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions. Therefore, by using the inequality (1.3) for the partial mappings, we can write

    12(mm+2m1)hx(2cdc+d)cddcdchx(y)y2dyhx(c)+hx(d)mms=1ss+1 (2.2)

    namely

    12(mm+2m1)f(x,2cdc+d)cddcdcf(x,y)y2dyf(x,c)+f(x,d)mns=1ss+1. (2.3)

    Dividing both sides of (2.2) by (ba)ab and by integrating the resulting inequality over [a,b], we have

    ab2(ba)(mm+2m1)baf(x,2cdc+d)dxabcd(ba)(dc)badcf(x,y)x2y2dydxabbaf(x,c)x2dx+abbaf(x,d)x2dxm(ba)ms=1ss+1. (2.4)

    By a similar argument for (2.3), but now for dividing both sides by (dc)cd and integrating over [c,d] and by using the mapping hy is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function, we get

    cd2(dc)(nn+2n1)dcf(2aba+b,y)y2dyabcd(ba)(dc)badcf(x,y)x2y2dydxcddcf(a,y)y2dy+cddcf(b,y)y2dyn(dc)nt=1tt+1. (2.5)

    By summing the inequalities (2.4) and (2.5) side by side, we obtain the second and third inequalities of (2.1). By the inequality (1.3), we also have:

    12(mm+2m1)f(2aba+b,2cdc+d)cddcdcf(2aba+b,y)y2dy

    and

    12(nn+2n1)f(2aba+b,2cdc+d)abbabaf(x,2cdc+d)x2dx

    which give by addition the first inequality of (2.1). Finally, by using the inequality (1.3), we obtain

    cddcdcf(a,y)y2dyf(a,c)+f(a,d)mns=1ss+1,
    cddcdcf(b,y)y2dyf(b,c)+f(b,d)mns=1ss+1,
    abbabaf(x,c)x2dxf(a,c)+f(b,c)nnt=1tt+1,

    and

    abbabaf(x,d)x2dxf(a,d)+f(b,d)nnt=1tt+1

    which give by addition the last inequality of (2.1).

    In order to prove our main findings, we need the following identity.

    Lemma 2.2. Assume that f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d](0,)×(0,)R be a partial differentiable mapping on Δ and 2ftsL(Δ). Then, one has the following equality:

    Φ(f)=f(a,c)+f(b,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,d)4+abcd(ba)(dc)badcf(x,y)x2y2dxdy12[cddcdcf(a,y)y2dy+cddcdcf(b,y)y2dy+abbabaf(x,c)x2dx+abbabaf(x,d)x2dx]=abcd(ba)(dc)4×1010(12t)(12s)(AtBs)22fts(abAt,cdBs)dsdt

    where At=tb+(1t)a,Bs=sd+(1s)c.

    Theorem 2.3. Let f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d](0,)×(0,)R be a partial differentiable mapping on Δ and 2ftsL(Δ). If |2fts|q is (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex function on Δ, then one has the following inequality:

    |Φ(f)|bd(ba)(dc)4ac(p+1)2p×[c1|2fts(a,c)|q+c2|2fts(a,d)|q+c3|2fts(b,c)|q+c4|2fts(b,d)|q]1q (2.6)

    where

    c1=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    c2=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],
    c3=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    c4=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],

    and At=tb+(1t)a,Bs=sd+(1s)c for fixed t,s[0,1],p,q>1 and p1+q1=1.

    Proof. By using the identity that is given in Lemma 2.2, we can write

    |Φ(f)|=abcd(ba)(dc)41010|(12t)||(12s)|(AtBs)2|2fts(abAt,cdBs)|dsdt

    By using the well known Hölder inequality for double integrals and by taking into account the definition of (m,n)-harmonically polynomial convex functions, we get

    |Φ(f)|abcd(ba)(dc)4(1010|12t|p|12s|pdtds)1p×(1010(AtBs)2q|2fts(abAt,cdBs)|qdtds)1qabcd(ba)(dc)4(1010(AtBs)2q×(1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)|2fts(a,c)|q+1nni=1(1(1t)i)1mmj=1(1sj)|2fts(a,d)|q+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1(1s)j)|2fts(b,c)|q+1nni=1(1ti)1mmj=1(1sj)|2fts(b,d)|q)dtds)1q

    By computing the above integrals, we can easily see the followings

    1010(AtBs)2q(1(1t)i)(1(1s)j)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    1010(AtBs)2q(1(1t)i)(1sj)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],
    1010(AtBs)2q(1ti)(1(1s)j)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],

    and

    1010(AtBs)2q(1ti)(1sj)dtds=(ab)2q[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)]

    where 2F1 is Hypergeometric function defined by

    2F1(2q,1;2;1ba)=1B(b,cb)10tb1(1t)cb1(1zt)adt,

    for c>b>0,|z|<1 and Beta function is defind as B(x,y)=10tx1(1t)y1dt,x,y>0. This completes the proof.

    Corollary 2.1. If we set m=n=1 in (2.6), we have the following new inequality.

    |Φ(f)|bd(ba)(dc)4ac(p+1)2p×[c11|2fts(a,c)|q+c22|2fts(a,d)|q+c33|2fts(b,c)|q+c44|2fts(b,d)|q]1q

    where

    c11=[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    c22=[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],
    c33=[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    c44=[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],

    Corollary 2.2. Suppose that all the conditions of Theorem 2.3 hold. If we set |2f(t,s)ts|q is bounded, i.e.,

    2f(t,s)ts=sup(t,s)(a,b)×(c,d)|2f(t,s)ts|q<,

    we get

    |Φ(f)|bd(ba)(dc)4ac(p+1)2p2f(t,s)ts×[c1+c2+c3+c4]1q

    where c1,c2,c3,c4 as in Theorem 2.3.

    c1=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    c2=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],
    c3=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,1;j+2;1cd)],
    c4=1nni=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1ab)1i+1.2F1(2q,i+1;i+2;1ab)]×1mmj=1[2F1(2q,1;2;1cd)1j+1.2F1(2q,j+1;j+2;1cd)],

    N. Mlaiki and T. Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for funding this work through research group Nonlinear Analysis Methods in Applied Mathematics (NAMAM) group number RG-DES-2017-01-17.

    S. Butt would like to thank H. E. C. Pakistan (project 7906) for their support.

    The authors declare that no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] X. Wu, J. Wu, X. Fu, J. Li, P. Zhou, X. Jiang, Automatic knowledge graph construction: A report on the 2019 icdm/icbk contest, in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), (2019), 1540–1545. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2019.00204
    [2] Z. Chen, H. Yu, J. Li, X. Luo, Entity representation by neighboring relations topology for inductive relation prediction, in PRICAI 2022: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, (2022), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20865-2_5
    [3] C. Y. Liu, C. Zhou, J. Wu, H. Xie, Y. Hu, L. Guo, CPMF: A collective pairwise matrix factorization model for upcoming event recommendation, in 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), (2017), 1532–1539. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966033
    [4] L. Gao, J. Wu, Z. Qiao, C. Zhou, H. Yang, Y. Hu, Collaborative social group influence for event recommendation, in Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, (2016), 1941–1944. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983323.2983879
    [5] J. Liu, Y. Chen, K. Liu, W. Bi, X. Liu, Event extraction as machine reading comprehension, in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), (2020), 1641–1651. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.128
    [6] F. Li, W. Peng, Y. Chen, Q. Wang, L. Pan, Y. Lyu, et al., Event extraction as multi-turn question answering, in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, (2020), 829–838. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.73
    [7] X. Ma, J. Wu, S. Xue, J. Yang, C. Zhou, Q. Z. Sheng, et al., A comprehensive survey on graph anomaly detection with deep learning, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2021.3118815 doi: 10.1109/tkde.2021.3118815
    [8] L. Li, L. Jin, Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, X. Sun, H. Wang, Graph convolution over multiple latent context-aware graph structures for event detection, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 171435–171446. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3024872 doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3024872
    [9] Y. Diao, H. Lin, L. Yang, X. Fan, D. Wu, Z. Yang, et al., FBSN: A hybrid fine-grained neural network for biomedical event trigger identification, Neurocomputing, 381 (2020), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.042 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.042
    [10] W. Yu, M. Yi, X. Huang, X. Yi, Q. Yuan, Make it directly: Event extraction based on tree-LSTM and Bi-GRU, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 14344–14354. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2965964 doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2965964
    [11] L. Huang, H. Ji, K. Cho, C. R. Voss, Zero-shot transfer learning for event extraction, arXiv preprint, (2017), arXiv: 1707.01066. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.01066
    [12] W. Shi, F. Li, J. Li, H. Fei, D. Ji, Effective token graph modeling using a novel labeling strategy for structured sentiment analysis, in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2022), 4232–4241.
    [13] Y. Wang, N. Xia, X. Luo, H. Yu, Event extraction based on the fusion of dynamic prompt information and multi-dimensional features, in 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), (2023), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN54540.2023.10191308
    [14] Z. Zhao, H. Yu, X. Luo, J. Gao, X. Xu, S. Guo, Ia-icgcn: Integrating prior knowledge via intra-event association and inter-event causality for chinese causal event extraction, in Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2022, (2022), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15931-2_43
    [15] H. Zhang, D. Zhang, Z. Wei, Y. Li, S. Wu, Z. Mao, et al., Analysis of public opinion on food safety in Greater China with big data and machine learning, Curr. Res. Food Sci., 6 (2023), 100468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100468 doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100468
    [16] M. Siegrist, C. Hartmann, Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies, Nat. Food, 1 (2020), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x
    [17] M. Zuo, Y. Wang, W. Dong, Q. Zhang, Y. Cai, J. Kong, Visual description augmented integration network for multimodal entity and relation extraction, Appl. Sci., 13 (2023), 6178. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106178 doi: 10.3390/app13106178
    [18] W. Lu, D. Roth, Automatic event extraction with structured preference modeling, in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2012), 835–844.
    [19] H. Fei, Y. Ren, D. Ji, Boundaries and edges rethinking: An end-to-end neural model for overlapping entity relation extraction, Management, 57 (2020), 102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102311 doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102311
    [20] T. N. Kipf, M. Welling, Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks, arXiv preprint, (2016), arXiv: 1609.02907. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.02907
    [21] K. Shalini, H. B. Ganesh, M. A. Kumar, K. Soman, Sentiment analysis for code-mixed Indian social media text with distributed representation, in 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), (2018), 1126–1131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2018.8554835
    [22] R. Zhao, K. Mao, Fuzzy bag-of-words model for document representation, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 26 (2018), 794–804. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2017.2690222 doi: 10.1109/tfuzz.2017.2690222
    [23] L. Zhang, S. Wang, B. Liu, Deep learning for sentiment analysis: A survey, WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discovery, 8 (2018), e1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1253 doi: 10.1002/widm.1253
    [24] T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, J. Dean, Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, arXiv preprint, (2013), arXiv: 1301.3781. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781
    [25] J. Pennington, R. Socher, C. D. Manning, Glove: Global vectors for word representation, in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), (2014), 1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162
    [26] M. Peters, M. Neumann, M. Iyyer, M. Gardner, C. Clark, K. Lee, et al., Deep contextualized word representations, in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, (2018), 2227–2237.
    [27] J. Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, arXiv preprint, (2018), arXiv: 1810.04805. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
    [28] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, et al., Attention is all you need, (2023), arXiv: 1706.03762. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
    [29] S. Liu, Y. Chen, S. He, K. Liu, J. Zhao, Leveraging framenet to improve automatic event detection, in Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2016), 2134–2143. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1201
    [30] Y. Hong, J. Zhang, B. Ma, J. Yao, G. Zhou, Q. Zhu, Using cross-entity inference to improve event extraction, in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, (2011), 1127–1136.
    [31] H. Fei, F. Li, B. Li, D. Ji, Encoder-decoder based unified semantic role labeling with label-aware syntax, in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2021), 12794–12802. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i14.17514
    [32] J. Li, H. Fei, J. Liu, S. Wu, M. Zhang, C. Teng, et al., Unified named entity recognition as word-word relation classification, in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36 (2022), 10965–10973.
    [33] Y. Chen, L. Xu, K. Liu, D. Zeng, J. Zhao, Event extraction via dynamic multi-pooling convolutional neural networks, in Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, (2015), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P15-1017
    [34] Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE, 86 (1998), 2278–2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791 doi: 10.1109/5.726791
    [35] T. H. Nguyen, K. Cho, R. Grishman, Joint event extraction via recurrent neural networks, in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, (2016), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1034
    [36] K. Cho, B. Van Merriënboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, et al., Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation, arXiv preprint, (2014), arXiv: 1406.1078. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.1078
    [37] X. Liu, Z. Luo, H. Huang, Jointly multiple events extraction via attention-based graph information aggregation, arXiv preprint, (2018), arXiv: 1809.09078. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1156
    [38] S. Yang, D. Feng, L. Qiao, Z. Kan, D. Li, Exploring pre-trained language models for event extraction and generation, in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2019), 5284–5294. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1522
    [39] X. Du, C. Cardie, Event extraction by answering (almost) natural questions, arXiv preprint, (2020), arXiv: 2004.13625. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.13625
    [40] Y. Zhou, Y. Chen, J. Zhao, Y. Wu, J. Xu, J. Li, What the role is vs. what plays the role: Semi-supervised event argument extraction via dual question answering, in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2021), 14638–14646. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i16.17720
    [41] A. P. B. Veyseh, M. Van Nguyen, F. Dernoncourt, B. Min, T. Nguyen, Document-level event argument extraction via optimal transport, in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, (2022), 1648–1658. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.130
    [42] Y. Ren, Y. Cao, F. Fang, P. Guo, Z. Lin, W. Ma, et al., CLIO: Role-interactive Multi-event Head Attention Network for Document-level Event Extraction, in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, (2022), 2504–2514.
    [43] F. Wang, F. Li, H. Fei, J. Li, S. Wu, F. Su, et al., Entity-centered cross-document relation extraction, in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (2022), 9871–9881. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.16541
    [44] H. Yang, Y. Chen, K. Liu, Y. Xiao, J. Zhao, Dcfee: A document-level chinese financial event extraction system based on automatically labeled training data, in Proceedings of ACL 2018, System Demonstrations, (2018), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-4009
    [45] S. Zheng, W. Cao, W. Xu, J. Bian, Doc2EDAG: An end-to-end document-level framework for Chinese financial event extraction, in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), (2019), 337–346.
    [46] R. Xu, T. Liu, L. Li, B. Chang, Document-level event extraction via heterogeneous graph-based interaction model with a tracker, arXiv preprint, (2021), arXiv: 2105.14924. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.14924
    [47] H. Yang, D. Sui, Y. Chen, K. Liu, J. Zhao, T. Wang, Document-level event extraction via parallel prediction networks, in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, (2021), 6298–6308. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.492
    [48] Q. Wan, C. Wan, K. Xiao, D. Liu, C. Li, B. Zheng, et al., Joint document-level event extraction via token-token bidirectional event completed graph, in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2023), 10481–10492. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.584
    [49] J. Li, K. Xu, F. Li, H. Fei, Y. Ren, D. Ji, MRN: A locally and globally mention-based reasoning network for document-level relation extraction, in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, (2021), 1359–1370.
    [50] Y. Huang, W. Jia, Exploring sentence community for document-level event extraction, in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, (2021), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.32
    [51] R. Hu, H. Liu, H. Zhou, Role knowledge prompting for document-level event argument extraction, Appl. Sci., 13 (2023), 3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053041 doi: 10.3390/app13053041
    [52] J. Lafferty, A. Mccallum, F. Pereira, Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data, in Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, (2001), 282–289.
    [53] Z. Huang, W. Xu, K. Yu, Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging, arXiv preprint, (2015), arXiv: 1508.01991. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1508.01991
    [54] D. P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint, (2014), arXiv: 1412.6980. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Hua Mei, Aying Wan, Bai-Ni Guo, Basil Papadopoulos, Coordinated MT- s 1 , s 2 -Convex Functions and Their Integral Inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard Type, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/5586377
    2. Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Nadeem, Maria Alessandra Ragusa, Some new integral inequalities for a general variant of polynomial convex functions, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 20461, 10.3934/math.20221121
    3. Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Saowaluck Chasreechai, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for convex stochastic processes, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 11989, 10.3934/math.2021695
    4. Suphawat Asawasamrit, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard and quantum Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in the second sense with applications, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 13327, 10.3934/math.2021771
    5. Artion Kashuri, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Muhammad Tariq, Ahmed A. Hamoud, Homan Emadifar, Faraidun K. Hamasalh, Nedal M. Mohammed, Masoumeh Khademi, Guotao Wang, Integral Inequalities of Integer and Fractional Orders for n –Polynomial Harmonically t g s –Convex Functions and Their Applications, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/2493944
    6. Farhat Safdar, Muhammad Attique, Some new generalizations for exponentially (s, m)-preinvex functions considering generalized fractional integral operators, 2021, 1016-2526, 861, 10.52280/pujm.2021.531203
    7. Ying-Qing Song, Saad Ihsan Butt, Artion Kashuri, Jamshed Nasir, Muhammad Nadeem, New fractional integral inequalities pertaining 2D–approximately coordinate (r1,ℏ1)-(r2,ℏ2)–convex functions, 2022, 61, 11100168, 563, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.044
    8. Waqar Afzal, Sayed M. Eldin, Waqas Nazeer, Ahmed M. Galal, Some integral inequalities for harmonical cr-h-Godunova-Levin stochastic processes, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 13473, 10.3934/math.2023683
    9. Serap Özcan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponential type multiplicatively convex functions, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 9777, 10.2298/FIL2328777O
    10. Serap Özcan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicatively p-convex functions, 2023, 2023, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-023-03032-x
    11. Serap Özcan, Saad Ihsan Butt, Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicatively harmonic convex functions, 2023, 2023, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-023-03020-1
    12. Serap Özcan, Simpson, midpoint, and trapezoid-type inequalities for multiplicatively s-convex functions, 2025, 58, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2024-0060
    13. Serap Özcan, Ayça Uruş, Saad Ihsan Butt, Hermite–Hadamard-Type Inequalities for Multiplicative Harmonic s-Convex Functions, 2025, 76, 0041-5995, 1537, 10.1007/s11253-025-02404-4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1953) PDF downloads(65) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog