Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Multifunctional farm advisory services in promoting change in agricultural systems: The case of Campania region of Italy

  • Entrepreneurial contexts may be marked by the presence of a 'cultural environment' that stimulates knowledge and innovation adoption, while other contexts may act as barriers toward change and innovation. Moreover, multiple paths of multifunctional agriculture bring about a call for "multifunctional farm advisory services" (MFAS), which consider both private and public goods provided by the farming sector. Set against the background of multiple roles of agriculture, how to identify sound and pertinent knowledge becomes of paramount, to specify the roles of agricultural extensionists and the mechanisms of governance of MFAS within the setting up of the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS). Our aim of the study is either to analyze attitudes toward the privatization of extension services within a predominantly public system of regional governance and to identify advisors' profile and their suitability with the modern vision of multifunctional agriculture through the emergence of MFAS. Empirical analysis evidences the presence of a diversified set of advisory services with different degrees of coherence with the multifunctional agricultural model. Also, the more advisory services are oriented towards empowering multifunctional agriculture the less the propensity towards their privatization. The cluster analysis has demonstrated a relatively good advisor's capability to deal with the new demands of multifunctional agriculture. The idea of MFAS has important theoretical implications that the paper tries to excavate through the analysis of the mechanisms of governance (public/private) and the identification of the advisors' profile facing the growing complexity of the farming sector, grounded on multifunctional agriculture. The study tries to fill a gap in the literature, by providing an original contribution to modeling the profile of advisors in charge of supporting the transition towards multifunctionality.

    Citation: Marcello De Rosa, Giuseppina Olivieri, Concetta Menna, Ferdinando Gandolfi, Teresa Del Giudice. Multifunctional farm advisory services in promoting change in agricultural systems: The case of Campania region of Italy[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 962-977. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023051

    Related Papers:

    [1] Noel Pabalan, Neetu Singh, Eloisa Singian, Caio Parente Barbosa, Bianca Bianco, Hamdi Jarjanazi . Associations of CYP1A1 gene polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer in Indian women: a meta-analysis. AIMS Genetics, 2015, 2(4): 250-262. doi: 10.3934/genet.2015.4.250
    [2] Khalid Eltahir Khalid . Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in Sudanese children with type 1 diabetes. AIMS Genetics, 2016, 3(3): 167-176. doi: 10.3934/genet.2016.3.167
    [3] Harem Othman Smail . The epigenetics of diabetes, obesity, overweight and cardiovascular disease. AIMS Genetics, 2019, 6(3): 36-45. doi: 10.3934/genet.2019.3.36
    [4] Mohammad Hashemi, Fatemeh Bizhani, Hiva Danesh, Behzad Narouie, Mehdi Sotoudeh, Mohammad Hadi Radfar, Mehdi Honarkar Ramezani, Gholamreza Bahari, Mohsen Taheri, Saeid Ghavami . MiR-608 rs4919510 C>G polymorphism increased the risk of bladder cancer in an Iranian population. AIMS Genetics, 2016, 3(4): 212-218. doi: 10.3934/genet.2016.4.212
    [5] Harem Othman Smail . The roles of genes in the bitter taste. AIMS Genetics, 2019, 6(4): 88-97. doi: 10.3934/genet.2019.4.88
    [6] Alena V Malakhova, Olga I Rudko, Vladimir V Sobolev, Artemii V Tretiakov, Elena A Naumova, Zarema G Kokaeva, Julia E Azimova, Eugene A Klimov . PDE4B gene polymorphism in Russian patients with panic disorder. AIMS Genetics, 2019, 6(3): 55-63. doi: 10.3934/genet.2019.3.55
    [7] Carina Ladeira, Susana Viegas, Mário Pádua, Elisabete Carolino, Manuel C. Gomes, Miguel Brito . Relation between DNA damage measured by comet assay and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism in antineoplastic drugs biomonitoring. AIMS Genetics, 2015, 2(3): 204-218. doi: 10.3934/genet.2015.3.204
    [8] Tú Nguyen-Dumont, Jenna Stewart, Ingrid Winship, Melissa C. Southey . Rare genetic variants: making the connection with breast cancer susceptibility. AIMS Genetics, 2015, 2(4): 281-292. doi: 10.3934/genet.2015.4.281
    [9] Carina Ladeira, Lenka Smajdova . The use of genotoxicity biomarkers in molecular epidemiology: applications in environmental, occupational and dietary studies. AIMS Genetics, 2017, 4(3): 166-191. doi: 10.3934/genet.2017.3.166
    [10] Vladlena Tiasto, Valeriia Mikhailova, Valeriia Gulaia, Valeriia Vikhareva, Boris Zorin, Alexandra Kalitnik, Alexander Kagansky . Esophageal cancer research today and tomorrow: Lessons from algae and other perspectives. AIMS Genetics, 2018, 5(1): 75-90. doi: 10.3934/genet.2018.1.75
  • Entrepreneurial contexts may be marked by the presence of a 'cultural environment' that stimulates knowledge and innovation adoption, while other contexts may act as barriers toward change and innovation. Moreover, multiple paths of multifunctional agriculture bring about a call for "multifunctional farm advisory services" (MFAS), which consider both private and public goods provided by the farming sector. Set against the background of multiple roles of agriculture, how to identify sound and pertinent knowledge becomes of paramount, to specify the roles of agricultural extensionists and the mechanisms of governance of MFAS within the setting up of the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS). Our aim of the study is either to analyze attitudes toward the privatization of extension services within a predominantly public system of regional governance and to identify advisors' profile and their suitability with the modern vision of multifunctional agriculture through the emergence of MFAS. Empirical analysis evidences the presence of a diversified set of advisory services with different degrees of coherence with the multifunctional agricultural model. Also, the more advisory services are oriented towards empowering multifunctional agriculture the less the propensity towards their privatization. The cluster analysis has demonstrated a relatively good advisor's capability to deal with the new demands of multifunctional agriculture. The idea of MFAS has important theoretical implications that the paper tries to excavate through the analysis of the mechanisms of governance (public/private) and the identification of the advisors' profile facing the growing complexity of the farming sector, grounded on multifunctional agriculture. The study tries to fill a gap in the literature, by providing an original contribution to modeling the profile of advisors in charge of supporting the transition towards multifunctionality.



    The variable coefficient homogeneous differential equations (VCHDE) provide a more vivid and comprehensive description of various phenomena and processes in the real world. Specifically, VCHDE are commonly applied in the study of fluctuation equations in physics to describe the propagation of fluctuations within a medium, where the variable coefficients are related to the density, elastic modulus, and other properties of the medium. For instance, they are used to derive design methods for high-resolution imaging optical systems [1]. Thus, exploring the existence of solutions to VCHDE is crucial for their broader applications.

    In many early studies, certain progress had been made in researching the existence of solutions to lower-order VCHDE. Zhao and Ma applied the Leray–Schauder extension theorem to study a class of nonlinear fourth-order ordinary differential equation boundary value problems, obtaining existence results for the solutions [2]. Zhang et al. extended some results concerning the estimation of the growth of the full solution of a certain class of two-linear differential equations to nonlinear two-linear differential equations [3]. Yang and Chen et al. found the existence of solutions to impulsive mixed boundary value problems involving derivatives of Caputo fractions and Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem, and the Arzela–Ascoli theorem gave some examples to illustrate the main results [4]. Alyusof and Jeelani et al. used the technical method of factorization to derive properties such as partial dichotomy, several properties of dichotomy of polynomials, partial differential expressions for Gould–Hopper–Frobenius–Genocchi polynomials, etc. [5]. Tian and Chen et al. obtained the general solution formula for the corresponding second-order second derivative equation from the prime decomposition of a quadratic matrix polynomial and the general solution formula for the corresponding second-order disjunctive equation [6]. Hasil and Vesel' et al. used the Riccati transformation, identified a new type of conditionally oscillatory linear differential equations together with the critical oscillation constant, and proved that they remained conditionally oscillatory with the same critical oscillation constant [7]. Bazighifan et al. studied the oscillation of solutions for a fourth-order neutral nonlinear differential equation, driven by a p-Laplace differential operator and obtained an oscillatory criterion for these equations [8]. Zheng et al. introduced the elastic transformation method into the process of solving ordinary differential equations. A class of first-order and a class of third-order ordinary differential equations with variable coefficients could be transformed into the Laguerre equation through elastic transformation. The general solution of these two types of ordinary differential equations was obtained [9]. Soto et al. studied a class of singular nonlinear partial differential equations and constructed unique solutions that were continuous in a certain interval [10]. According to the properties and initial conditions of the Chebyshev polynomials, Fan et al. could obtain the solutions of the initial value problems of the original first-order differential equations and the third-order differential equations by the elastic inverse transformation and then plot the curves [11]. Fan et al. studied the positive solutions of the periodic-parabolic logistic equation with indefinite weight function and a non homogeneous diffusion coefficient, and obtained the existence, uniqueness, and stability of positive periodic solutions [12]. Zhang et al. studied the initial value problem for higher-order Caputo type modified nonlinear differential equations with Erdelyi–Kober fractional derivatives. According to the transmutation method, the good solvability of the initial value problem for higher-order linear models was proved and explicit solutions were given. Some new Gronwall-type inequalities involving Erdelyi–Kober fractional integrals were then established. By applying these results and some fixed point theorems, the existence and uniqueness of positive solutions of nonlinear differential equations were proved [13]. The results of Albidah et al. showed that the solution was continuous in the domain of the problem in the limit of the given initial conditions, whereas the first-order derivatives were discontinuous at a point and lay in the domain of the delay equation [14]. Al-Mazmumy et al. improved the standard Adomian decomposition method by combining Taylor series with orthogonal polynomials [15]. Bendouma et al. investigated the existence of solutions to a system of fourth-order differential equations when a function lay on the right-hand side. The concept of a solution tube was proposed for these problems. According to this concept, the concepts of the upper and lower solutions of fourth-order differential equations were extended to systems of fourth-order differential equations [16]. Wang et al. studied a certain higher-order uncertain differential equation, focusing mainly on the second-order case. We introduced the notion of a path for uncertain differential equations and proved its properties. On this basis, we derived the inverse uncertainty distribution of the solution [17]. AlKandari et al. studied a certain oscillatory behaviour of the solutions of a class of multi-delayed third-order neutral differential equations and proposed a new oscillatory criterion that refined and simplified some previous results [18]. Turo et al. proved an existence and uniqueness theorem for first-order stochastic partial differential equations [19]. Zhang et al. numerically investigated the spatially variable coefficient fractional convection–diffusion wave equation with single and multiple delays when the exact solution satisfied certain regularities [20]. Borrego-Morell et al. studied linear second-order differential equations. Under some assumptions on a certain class of descending and ascending operators, it was shown that, for a certain sequence of polynomials to be orthogonal on the unit circle in order to satisfy the differential equations, the polynomials must be of a particular form involving extensions of Gaussian and confluent hypergeometric series [21]. Akhmetkaliyeva et al. considered the third-order differential equation with unconstrained coefficients, proved some new existence and uniqueness results, and gave exact estimates of the norm of the solution [22]. Padhi et al. obtained sufficient conditions for the existence of at least two non-negative periodic solutions for a system of first-order nonlinear functional differential equations, giving some applications to ecological [23]. Mohamed et al. studied the conditions under which Schrödinger-type operators with matrix potentials were separated and the Schrödinger equation had a unique solution in a weighted space [24]. Khaliq et al. presented a series of second-order methods for the numerical solution of fourth-order parabolic partial differential equations with variable coefficients in one spatial variable [25]. Mohammed et al. introduced a class of second-order ordinary differential equations with variable coefficients whose closed-form solutions could be obtained by the same methods used to solve differential equations with constant coefficients. General solutions in the homogeneous case were also discussed [26]. Lynch et al. presented a large class of second-order variable coefficient ordinary differential equations with known solutions. This class of equations formed the basis of a large number of examples that could be used to explore the theory of solutions to linear differential equations [27]. Camporesi et al. proposed an impulse response method based on the factorization of differential operators for solving linear ordinary differential equations with constant coefficients [28]. Jia et al. used the relationship between the higher-order variable coefficients, the conditions for constant coefficient of the fifth-order variable coefficient linear non-homogeneous equations were obtained by appropriate linear transformations [29]. To sum up, although these research achievements have made some contributions in the field of lower-order VCHDE, there is still much room for exploration in the research of higher-order VCHDE, especially in the aspect of extending the conditions for the existence of particular solutions to higher orders.

    Generally speaking, previous research efforts have predominantly concentrated on lower-order VCHDE. The investigations into second-order and third-order VCHDE have, to a certain degree, established the groundwork and proffered ideas for higher-order scenarios. However, fourth-order VCHDE are far more intricate than their second-order and third-order counterparts, and frequently manifests in practical applications. For instance, Hu and Li et al. [30] furnished the sufficient conditions for the existence of polynomial particular solutions for a class of second-order linear VCHDE with polynomial coefficients through recursive formulas. Subsequently, Li and Jiang et al. [31] leveraged the concept of coefficient matrices to deduce the solutions of third-order linear VCHDE with polynomial coefficients, building upon the work of Hu et al. [30]. Notably, although fourth-order VCHDE are typically more complex than second or third order ones, they are inescapable in certain problems. This present work, for the first time, extends the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of particular solutions of VCHDE to the fourth-order and nth-order cases. By delving into the relationship between the coefficient matrix of the VCHDE and the existence of polynomial particular solutions, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions of fourth-order VCHDE and those for the nth-order VCHDE are derived. In this way, we are able to address the problem of the existence of solutions of VCHDE with polynomial coefficients for any order. It should be emphasized that although the ultimate conclusion pertains to the nth-order case, the exploration of the fourth-order VCHDE is indispensable. The fourth-order case serves as a crucial stepping-stone, bridging the gap between the lower-order studies and generalization to the nth-order, providing valuable insights and intermediate results that are essential for the overall theoretical framework.

    The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 derives the existence of solutions to fourth-order VCHDE, Section 3 proves the existence of solutions to nth-order VCHDE, and Section 4 provides the discussion and conclusion.

    In this section, we study the existence of particular solutions to fourth-order VCHDE subject to the following constraints.

    Lemma 1. Let A be an n×m matrix and let X be an m-dimensional column vector. There then exists a non-zero solution X=0 to the system of homogeneous linear equations AX=0, and the sufficient and necessary condition that its first component is not zero is:

    rank(ˆA)=rank(A),

    where ˆA is the submatrix of A minus the first column.

    Now, the existence of solutions of fourth-order VCHDE is investigated

    P(x)y+Q(x)y+R(x)y+S(x)y+T(x)y=0, (2.1)

    based on the Lemma, where the coefficients of the differential equation are

    (P(x)Q(x)R(x)S(x)T(x))=[k1,nk1,n1k1,1k1,0k2,nk2,n1k2,1k2,0k3,nk3,n1k3,1k3,0k4,nk4,n1k4,1k4,0k5,nk5,n1k5,1k5,0](xnxn1x1), (2.2)

    where ki,j(i=1,2,3,4,5. j=0,1,,n) is a constant.

    Theorem 1. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a particular solution of the polynomial type of the mth-order for the VCHDE (2.1) with fourth-order polynomial coefficients (where the coefficients are given by (2.2)) is

    k5,n=0,rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm),

    where Fm is the (m+n)×(m+1) matrix.

    Fm=[mk4,n+k5,n1k5,n00A2mk3,n+mk4,n1+k5,n2A3mk2,n+A2mk3,n1+mk4,n2+k5,n3A4mk1,n+A3mk2,n1+A2mk3,n2+mk4,n3+k5,n4A4mk1,n1+A3mk2,n2+A2mk3,n3+mk4,n4+k5,n5Fm1A4mk1,4+A3mk2,3+A2mk3,2+mk4,1+k5,0A4mk1,3+A3mk2,2+A2mk3,1+mk4,0A4mk1,2+A3mk2,1+A2mk3,0A4mk1,1+A3mk2,0A4mk1,000],
    F1=[k4,n+k5,nk5,nk4,n1+k5,n1k5,n1k4,1+k5,1k5,1k4,0k5,0].

    Proof. Let the coefficients be nth-degree polynomials, i.e.,

    (P(x)Q(x)R(x)S(x)T(x))=[k1,nk1,n1k1,1k1,0k2,nk2,n1k2,1k2,0k3,nk3,n1k3,1k3,0k4,nk4,n1k4,1k4,0k5,nk5,n1k5,1k5,0](xnxn1x1). (2.2)

    When m=1, the equation is assumed to have a first-order solution

    y=K1x+K0,

    where Ki(i=0,1) is a constant. Substituting this into Eq (2.1) yields

    P(x)y+Q(x)y+R(x)y+S(x)y+T(x)y=K1k5,nxn+1+(xnxn11)[k4,n+k5,nk5,nk4,n1+k5,n1k5,n1k4,1+k5,1k5,1k4,0k5,0][K1K0].

    Let

    F1=[k4,n+k5,nk5,nk4,n1+k5,n1k5,n1k4,1+k5,1k5,1k4,0k5,0].

    The sufficient condition for the existence of a first-order solution to Eq (2.1) with coefficients (2.2) is given by the Lemma

    k5,n=0,rank(F1)=rank(F0).

    When m=2, the equation is assumed to have a second-order solution

    y=K2x2+K1x+K0,

    where Ki(i=0,1,2.) is a constant. Substituting this into Eq (2.1) yields

    P(x)y+Q(x)y+R(x)y+S(x)y+T(x)y=K2k5,nxn+2+(xn+1xnx1)[2k4,n+k5,n1k5,n02k4,n1+k5,n2F1k4,1+k5,1k4,0][K2K1K0].

    Let

    F2=[2k4,n+k5,n1k5,n02k4,n1+k5,n2F1k4,1+k5,1k4,0].

    The sufficient condition for the existence of an mth-order solution to Eq (2.1) with coefficients (2.2) is given by the lemma

    k5,n=0,rank(F2)=rank(F1).

    By analogy, the equation is assumed to have mth-order solutions when m4

    y=Kmxm+Km1xm1++K1x+K0,

    where Ki(i=0,1,,m.) is a constant. Substituting this into Eq (2.1) yields

    P(x)y+Q(x)y+R(x)y+S(x)y+T(x)y=Kmk5,nxm+n+(xn+m1xn+m2xm3xm4)×[mk4,n+k5,n1k5,n00A2mk3,n+mk4,n1+k5,n2A3mk2,n+A2mk3,n1+mk4,n2+k5,n3A4mk1,n+A3mk2,n1+A2mk3,n2+mk4,n3+k5,n4A4mk1,n1+A3mk2,n2+A2mk3,n3+mk4,n4+k5,n5Fm1A4mk1,4+A3mk2,3+A2mk3,2+mk4,1+k5,0A4mk1,3+A3mk2,2+A2mk3,1+mk4,0A4mk1,2+A3mk2,1+A2mk3,0A4mk1,1+A3mk2,0A4mk1,000][KmKm1K1K0].

    Let

    Fm=[mk4,n+k5,n1k5,n00A2mk3,n+mk4,n1+k5,n2A3mk2,n+A2mk3,n1+mk4,n2+k5,n3A4mk1,n+A3mk2,n1+A2mk3,n2+mk4,n3+k5,n4A4mk1,n1+A3mk2,n2+A2mk3,n3+mk4,n4+k5,n5Fm1A4mk1,4+A3mk2,3+A2mk3,2+mk4,1+k5,0A4mk1,3+A3mk2,2+A2mk3,1+mk4,0A4mk1,2+A3mk2,1+A2mk3,0A4mk1,1+A3mk2,0A4mk1,000].

    In summary, it follows from the lemma that the sufficient condition for the existence of a particular solution to this VCHDE is

    k5,n=0,rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm).

    Proof completed (PC).

    The existence of unique solutions to this fourth-order VCHDE is investigated next.

    Theorem 2. When k4,n0, there is a unique number of polynomial particular solutions to VCHDE (2.1) with fourth-order polynomial coefficients of (2.2).

    Proof. By Theorem 1, the differential Eq (2.1) has mth-order polynomial particular solutions if and only if

    k5,n=0,rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm),

    where

    Fm=[mk4,n+k5,n1k5,n00A2mk3,n+mk4,n1+k5,n2A3mk2,n+A2mk3,n1+mk4,n2+k5,n3A4mk1,n+A3mk2,n1+A2mk3,n2+mk4,n3+k5,n4A4mk1,n1+A3mk2,n2+A2mk3,n3+mk4,n4+k5,n5Fm1A4mk1,4+A3mk2,3+A2mk3,2+mk4,1+k5,0A4mk1,3+A3mk2,2+A2mk3,1+mk4,0A4mk1,2+A3mk2,1+A2mk3,0A4mk1,1+A3mk2,0A4mk1,000].

    It is clear that f11=mk4,n+k5,n1, f1j=0, j=2,3,,m1 in the matrix Fm=(fij).

    Then from rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm), we conclude

    mk4,n+k5,n1=0.

    In other words,

    m=k5,n1k4,nN+,

    and the other elements on the diagonal of the matrix Fm satisfy

    lk4,n+k5,n10,l=0,1,,m1.

    Otherwise, it does not satisfy rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm),

    where we let ¯Fm be the matrix obtained by removing the first row of Fm.

    Thus

    ¯Fm=[A2mk3,n+mk4,n1+k5,n2A3mk2,n+A2mk3,n1+mk4,n2+k5,n3A4mk1,n+A3mk2,n1+A2mk3,n2+mk4,n3+k5,n4A4mk1,n1+A3mk2,n2+A2mk3,n3+mk4,n4+k5,n5A4mk1,4+A3mk2,3+A2mk3,2+mk4,1+k5,0Fm1A4mk1,3+A3mk2,2+A2mk3,1+mk4,0A4mk1,2+A3mk2,1+A2mk3,0A4mk1,1+A3mk2,0A4mk1,000].

    It is clear that rank(Fm)=rank(¯Fm)=m.

    Subject to the above conditions, the VCHDE (2.1) has mth-order polynomial particular solutions.

    Proof completed (PC).

    The proof of Theorem 2 includes the proof of the following corollary, so by the same reasoning.

    Corollary 1. When k4,n0, the sufficiently and necessary condition for the existence of mth-order polynomial particular solutions to the fourth-order VCHDE (2.1) with the coefficients (2.2) is

    m=k5,n1k4,nN+,rank(¯Fm)=m,

    where we let ¯Fm be the matrix obtained by removing the first row of Fm.

    Theorem 3. When k3,n0, the sufficient and necessary condition for the coefficients (2.2) of fourth-order VCHDE (2.1) to have two linearly independent particular solutions is

    k4,n=k5,n=k5,n1=0,

    and

    h(x)=A2xk3,n+xk4,n1+k5,n2,

    has two positive integer roots m1,m2, where m1m2, and

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm11),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm21).

    Proof. With loss of generality, we can assume that m1<m2. By Theorems 1 and 2, the equation with coefficients of (2.2) has two linearly independent particular solutions if and only if

    k5,n=0,k4,n=0,rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm),m=m1,m2.

    In other words,

    mk4,n+k5,n1=0.

    Thus

    k5,n1=0.

    So under the above condition, the constraints at this point have

    Fm=[000A2mk3,n+mk4,n1+k5,n2A3mk2,n+A2mk3,n1+mk4,n2+k5,n3A4mk1,n+A3mk2,n1+A2mk3,n2+mk4,n3+k5,n4A4mk1,n1+A3mk2,n2+A2mk3,n3+mk4,n4+k5,n5Fm1A4mk1,4+A3mk2,3+A2mk3,2+mk4,1+k5,0A4mk1,3+A3mk2,2+A2mk3,1+mk4,0A4mk1,2+A3mk2,1+A2mk3,0A4mk1,1+A3mk2,0A4mk1,000].

    It is clear that for Fm=(fij), we have fii=0, fi,i+1=0, for i=1,2,,m, and

    rank(Fm11)=rank(^Fm1),rank(Fm21)=rank(^Fm2),

    from rank(Fm1)=rank(^Fm1) and rank(Fm2)=rank(^Fm2), we obtain

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm11),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm21),
    A2m1k3,n+m1k4,n1+k5,n2=0,
    A2m2k3,n+m2k4,n1+k5,n2=0,

    In other words,

    h(m1)=0,h(m2)=0.

    Because h(x) is a quadratic polynomial, m1,m2 are exactly two different positive integer roots of h(x).

    Proof completed (PC).

    Using the same ideas and methods as in Theorem 3, we continue to explore the rank of the coefficient matrix Fm, proving the following corollary, so by the same reasoning.

    Corollary 2. When k2,n0, the sufficiently and necessary condition for a fourth-order VCHDE (2.1) with the coefficients (2.2) to have three linearly independent particular solutions is

    k4,n=k5,n=k5,n1=0,
    k3,n=k4,n1=k5,n2=0,
    h1(x)=A3xk2,n+A2xk3,n1+xk4,n2+k5,n3,

    where there exist three positive integer roots m1,m2,m3, where m1,m2,m3 are pairwise distinct, and

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm12),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm22),rank(Fm3)=rank(Fm32).

    Corollary 3. When k1,n0, the sufficiently and necessary condition for a fourth-order VCHDE (2.1) with the coefficients (2.2) to have four linearly independent particular solutions is

    k4,n=k5,n=k5,n1=0,
    k3,n=k4,n1=k5,n2=0,
    k2,n=k3,n1=k4,n2=k5,n3=0,
    h2(x)=A4xk1,n+A3xk2,n1+A2xk3,n2+xk4,n3+k5,n4,

    where there exist four positive integer roots m1,m2,m3,m4, where m1,m2,m3,m4 are pairwise distinct, and

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm13),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm23),rank(Fm3)=rank(Fm33),rank(Fm4)=rank(Fm43).

    In this section, we study the existence of solutions to VCHDE of the nth-order.

    Pn(x)y(n)+Pn1(x)y(n1)++P1(x)y+P0(x)y=0, (3.1)

    where the coefficients of the VCHDE are

    (Pn(x)Pn1(x)P1(x)P0(x))=[k1,nk1,n1k1,1k1,0k2,nk2,n1k2,1k2,0kn,nkn,n1kn,1kn,0kn+1,nkn+1,n1kn+1,1kn+1,0](xnxn1x1). (3.2)

    We extend the conclusions for all particular solutions of VCHDE of the fourth-order to VCHDE of the nth-order.

    Theorem 4. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a particular solution of the polynomial type of the mth-order for the VCHDE (3.1) with nth-order polynomial coefficients (where the coefficients are given by (3.2)) is

    kn+1,n=0,rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm),

    where Fm is the (m+n)×(m+1) matrix.

    Fm=

    [mkn,n+kn+1,n1kn+1,n00A2mkn1,n+mkn,n1+kn+1,n2A3mkn2,n+A2mkn1,n1+mkn,n2+kn+1,n3Anmk1,n+An1mk2,n1++A3mkn2,3+A2mkn1,2+mkn,1+kn+1,0Fm1Anmk1,n1+An1mk2,n2++A3mkn2,2+A2mkn1,1+mkn,0Anmk1,n2+An1mk2,n3++A3mkn2,1+A2mkn1,0Anmk1,000],
    F1=[kn,n+kn+1,nkn+1,nkn,n1+kn+1,n1kn+1,n1kn,1+kn+1,1kn+1,1kn,0kn+1,0].

    Proof. If there exist mth-order polynomial particular solutions to the nth-order VCHDE (3.1) with the coefficients (3.2)

    y=Kmxm+Km1xm1++K1x+K0,

    where Ki(i=0,1,,m) is a constant.

    For ease of computation, without loss of generality, let us assume mn>0. Then bringing y into the Eq (3.1) yields

    Pn(x)y(n)+Pn1(x)y(n1)++P1(x)y+P0(x)y=Km[AnmPn(x)xmn+An1mPn1(x)xmn+1++mP1(x)xm1+P0(x)xm]+Em1
    =Kmkn+1,nxm+n+Km[Anm(xmxm1xmn+1xmn)(k1,nk1,n1k1,0k1,0)
    +An1m(xm+1xmxmn+2xmn+1)(k2,nk2,n1k2,1k2,0)+
    +m(xn+m1xn+m2...xmxm1)(kn,nkn,n1kn,1k4,0)
    +(xn+m1xn+m2xm+1xm)(kn+1,n1kn+1,n2kn+1,1kn+1,0)+Em1
    =Kmkn+1,nxm+n+(xn+m1xn+m2xmn+1xmn)Fm(KmKm1K1K0),

    where Fm is the (m+n)×(m+1) matrix.

    Fm=

    [mkn,n+kn+1,n1kn+1,n00A2mkn1,n+mkn,n1+kn+1,n2A3mkn2,n+A2mkn1,n1+mkn,n2+kn+1,n3Anmk1,n+An1mk2,n1++A3mkn2,3+A2mkn1,2+mkn,1+kn+1,0Fm1Anmk1,n1+An1mk2,n2++A3mkn2,2+A2mkn1,1+mkn,0Anmk1,n2+An1mk2,n3++A3mkn2,1+A2mkn1,0Anmk1,000],
    F1=[kn,n+kn+1,nkn+1,nkn,n1+kn+1,n1kn+1,n1kn,1+kn+1,1kn+1,1kn,0kn+1,0].

    By Lemma 1, it follows that if and only if it satisfies

    kn+1,n=0,rank(^Fm)=rank(Fm),

    There exist mth polynomial particular solutions to the nth-order VCHDE (3.1) with the coefficients (3.2).

    Proof completed (PC).

    We can now extend the conclusions about the specific solutions of the fourth-order VCHDE (2.1) to the conclusions about the specific solutions of the nth-order VCHDE (3.1), and therefore the following conclusions can be proved as well.

    Theorem 5. When kn,n0, there is a unique number of polynomial particular solutions to VCHDE (3.1) with nth-order polynomial coefficients of (3.2).

    Corollary 4. When kn,n0, the sufficiently and necessary condition for the existence of mth-order polynomial particular solutions to the nth-order VCHDE (3.1) with the coefficients (3.2) is

    m=kn+1,n1kn,nN+rank(^Fm)=m,

    where ^Fm is the matrix obtained by removing the first row of Fm.

    Theorem 6. When kn1,n0, the sufficient and necessary condition for the coefficients (3.2) of nth-order VCHDE (3.1) to have two linearly independent particular solutions is

    kn,n=kn+1,n=kn+1,n1=0,
    h(x)=A2mkn1,n+mkn,n1+kn+1,n2,

    has two positive integer roots m1,m2, where m1m2, and

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm11),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm21).

    Corollary 5. When kn2,n0, the sufficiently necessary condition for an nth-order VCHDE (3.1) with the coefficients (3.2) to have three linearly independent particular solutions is

    kn,n=kn+1,n=kn+1,n1=0,
    kn1,n=kn,n1=kn+1,n2=0,
    h1(x)=A3mkn2,n+A2mkn1,n1+mkn,n2+kn+1,n3,

    where there exist three positive integer roots m1,m2,m3, where m1,m2,m3 are pairwise distinct, and

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm12),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm22),rank(Fm3)=rank(Fm32).

    Corollary 6. When kn3,n0, the sufficiently necessary condition for a fourth-order VCHDE (3.1) with the coefficients (3.2) to have four linearly independent particular solutions is

    kn,n=kn+1,n=kn+1,n1=0,
    kn1,n=kn,n1=kn+1,n2=0,
    kn2,n=kn1,n1=kn,n2=kn+1,n3=0,
    h2(x)=A4mkn3,n+A3mkn2,n1+A2mkn1,n2+mkn,n3+kn+1,n4,

    where there exist four positive integer roots m1,m2,m3,m4, where m1,m2,m3,m4 are pairwise distinct, and

    rank(Fm1)=rank(Fm13),rank(Fm2)=rank(Fm23),rank(Fm3)=rank(Fm33),rank(Fm4)=rank(Fm43).

    In this work, we used the lemma about the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the solutions of homogeneous differential equations, and the relationship between the coefficient matrix of VCHDE and the existence of polynomial particular solutions was studied. Especially, compared with prior works [30,31], this work extends, for the first time, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of particular solutions of VCHDE to the fourth-order and nth-order cases. The main results are as follows:

    (1) The necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions of fourth-order variable coefficient VCHDE and the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions of nth-order VCHDE were obtained.

    (2) The necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of only one polynomial particular solution, or the existence of two, three, or four linearly independent polynomial particular solutions of fourth-order VCHDE are proved.

    (3) The necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of only one polynomial particular solution, or the existence of two, three, or four linearly independent polynomial particular solutions of nth-order VCHDE are proved.

    These results not only expand the class of solvable differential equations but also provide a new way of thinking about the existence of solutions to polynomial coefficient VCHDE and a systematic and unified analytical framework for studying VCHDE.

    However, the results of this work have not yet been validated numerically, and we plan to validate the results in future work. Many early studies have demonstrated that numerical validation methods are indeed feasible. Hu designed an algorithm to automatically determine and solve the polynomial particular or general solutions of the equation [30]. The algorithm judges and calculates on the basis of the equation's coefficient conditions, including evaluating the polynomial coefficient values, calculating the roots of relevant functions, and constructing matrices to determine the rank and determinant. Examples are verified in Maple software. Li designed an algorithm for solving the third-order VCHDE with polynomial coefficients [31]. The process entails inputting the polynomial coefficients, making multi-step judgments according to the coefficients' conditions, such as verifying that the coefficient elements are zero, calculating the roots of relevant functions, and constructing matrices to judge the rank, ultimately outputting the expressions of particular or general solutions. MATLAB software is used to solve and verify specific examples. Specifically, by substituting specific coefficient values into the equation and employing numerical computation methods to solve it, followed by comparing the outcomes with the theoretical results, the existence of particular solutions under various conditions can be vividly illustrated. Thus, this method can be applied in our future validation work.

    Additionally, the current work has limitations in terms of the polynomial coefficients and the number of linearly independent solutions. Therefore, we plan to address these limitations in future work. On one hand, we will consider various types of VCHDE, including those with non-polynomial coefficients, such as exponential and trigonometric functions, and explore the feasibility of establishing similar conditions for the existence of solutions. On the other hand, the influence of boundary value conditions on the equations is an important aspect. If VCHDEs 2.1 and 3.1 are subject to boundary value conditions, they may alter the existence and uniqueness of solutions, requiring reanalysis and the derivation of relevant conclusions. Zhao et al. confirmed that the interaction between boundary value conditions and the rank of the coefficient matrix has a significant effect on VCHDE [2].

    The theoretical results presented in this work have potential applications to real-world problems. In materials science, VCHDE can describe processes like heat conduction and mass diffusion in materials, with coefficients varying according to the material's physical properties. Wang's optical system design research shows precise analysis of differential equation solutions' properties is crucial in material physical process modeling. This study's results help determine the heat conduction equation solutions' existence, the aiding understanding of heat transfer in alloys [1]. In communication, signal propagation models in complex media often involve VCHDE. For instance, in time-varying channels, signal attenuation and velocity may change with time or space. Zhang et al.'s research on nonlinear differential equation solutions shows that this study's findings may help analyze propagation model solutions' characteristics, providing theoretical support for signal processing and communication system design [20]. However, further in-depth studies and real-data verification are needed for specific applications.

    The first author was mainly responsible for the formulas' derivation and programming. The second author guided the crucial steps from theoretical hypothesis to derivation of the conclusion. The third author participated in the writing and review of the paper. The fourth author provided technical support for the research. The fifth author was in charge of the literature research and data analysis. The sixth author took part in the formulation of the research plan.

    The authors declare they have not used artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    We thank the anonymous referee for valuable and helpful comments and suggestions. This work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (12463009), the Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (grant Nos. 202301AV070007, 202401AU070026, 202401AT070955, and 202401AU070296), the "Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program" Innovation Team Project (grant No. 202405AS350012), the Scientific Research Foundation Project of Yunnan Education Department (2023J0624, 2024Y469, 2025Y0720, 2025Y0721, and 2025J0502), and the GHfund A (202407016295).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Van Huylenbroeck G, Vandermeulen V, Mettepenningen E, et al. (2007) Multifunctionality of agriculture: A review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Rev Landsc Res 1: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2007-3 doi: 10.12942/lrlr-2007-3
    [2] Rogers E M (1983) Diffusion of innovations. 3rd Ed., New York: Free Press, 15.
    [3] Hermans F, Klerkx L, Roep D (2015) Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: Using an innovation system performance lens to analyze agricultural knowledge systems. J Agric Educ Ext 21: 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.991113 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2014.991113
    [4] Lioutas ED, Charatsari C, Černič Istenič M, et al. (2019) The challenges of setting up the evaluation of extension systems by using a systems approach: the case of Greece, Italy and Slovenia. J Agric Educ Ext 25: 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2019.1583818 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2019.1583818
    [5] Klerkx L, Van Mierlo B, Leeuwis C (2012) Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis, and interventions, In: Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, Springer Dordrecht, 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_20
    [6] Klerkx L, Leeuwis C (2008) Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation 28: 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.005
    [7] EU SCAR (2012) Agricultural knowledge, and innovation systems in transition—a reflection paper, Brussels, p.13. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/publications/agricultural-knowledge-and-innovation-systems.html.
    [8] EU SCAR AKIS (2019) Preparing for Future AKIS in Europe.
    [9] Klerkx L (2020) Advisory services and transformation, plurality and disruption of agriculture and food systems: Towards a new research agenda for agricultural education and extension studies. J Agric Educ Ext 26: 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1738046 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1738046
    [10] Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrep Theory Pract 35: 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
    [11] McElwee G, Smith R (2014) Chapter 14 Researching rural enterprise. In: Fayolle A (Ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurship: What We Know and What We Need to Know, Edward Elgar Publishing, 307. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936929.00022
    [12] Labarthe P, Laurent C (2013) Privatization of agricultural extension services in the EU: Towards a lack of adequate knowledge for small-scale farms? Food Policy 38: 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.10.005
    [13] Davis K (2019) Agricultural Extension and Education for the Future, Closing keynote in 24th European Seminar on Extension and Education. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa = t & rct = j & q = & esrc = s & source = web & cd = & ved = 2ahUKEwiRjPnbrJuBAxW3xwIHHVGeA1gQFnoECBAQAQ & url = https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reterurale.it%2Fflex%2Fcm%2Fpages%2FServeAttachment.php%2FL%2FIT%2FD%2F2%25252Fb%25252F2%25252FD.b2f20be86583c28041cc%2FP%2FBLOB%253AID%253D19744%2FE%2Fpdf & usg = AOvVaw0tuNdggviVs-Zu1iIVxlLW & opi = 89978449.
    [14] EU Commission (2012) The future of food and farming.
    [15] ASHBY J (2009) Fostering farmer first methodological innovation: Organizational learning and change in international agricultural research. Farmer First Revisited: Innovation Agric Res Dev 2009: 39–45.
    [16] Sutherland LA, Madureira L, Dirimanova V, et al. (2017) New knowledge networks of small-scale farmers in Europe's periphery. Land Use Policy 63: 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.028 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.028
    [17] EU Commission (2009) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application of the Farm Advisory System as Defined in Article 12 and 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. Available from: ttps: //eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ: L: 2009: 030: 0016: 0099: en: PDF.
    [18] Knierim A, Labarthe P, Laurent C, et al. (2017) Pluralism of agricultural advisory service providers—Facts and insights from Europe. J Rural Stud 55: 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.018
    [19] Vecchio Y, De Castro P, Masi M, et al. (2021) Do rural development policies really help small farms? A reflection from Italy. EuroChoices 20: 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12338 doi: 10.1111/1746-692X.12338
    [20] van der Ploeg JD, Barjolle D, Bruil J, et al. (2019) The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe. J Rural Stud 71: 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.003
    [21] Birner R, Davis K, Pender J, et al. (2009) From best practice to best fit: A framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. J Agric Educ Ext 15: 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240903309595 doi: 10.1080/13892240903309595
    [22] Klerkx L, Petter Stræ te E, Kvam G T, et al. (2017) Achieving best-fit configurations through advisory subsystems in AKIS: case studies of advisory service provisioning for diverse types of farmers in Norway. J Agric Educ Ext 23: 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1320640 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1320640
    [23] Marsden T, Sonnino R (2012) Human health and wellbeing and the sustainability of urban-regional food systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4: 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.004
    [24] Landini F, Brites W, Mathot y Rebolé M I (2017) Towards a new paradigm for rural extensionists' in-service training. J Rural Stud 51: 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.010
    [25] OECD (2000) Multifunctionality. Towards an Analytical Framework.
    [26] Wilson G (2008) From 'weak' to 'strong' multifunctionality: Conceptualizing farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. J Rural Stud 24: 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.010
    [27] Poppe K (2014) The role of the European innovation partnership in linking innovation and research in agricultural knowledge and innovation systems. Agriregionieuropa 10: 37.
    [28] Foti R, Nyakudya I, Moyo M, et al. (2007) Determinants of farmer demand for 'fee-for-service' extension in Zimbabwe: The case of Mashonaland Central province. J Agric Educ Ext 14: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2007.14108 doi: 10.5191/jiaee.2007.14108
    [29] Vanni F (2014) Agriculture and Public Goods: The Role of Collective Action. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7457-5
    [30] Acheson JM (2006) Institutional failure in resource management. Annu Rev Anthropol 35: 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123238 doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123238
    [31] Andrew B (2008) Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: The case for a carbon tax. Public Adm Dev 28: 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.517 doi: 10.1002/pad.517
    [32] Stiglitz J (2009) Government failure vs. market failure: Principles of regulation. In: Balleisen E, Moss D (Eds.), Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657504.002
    [33] Randall A (2002) Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture. Eur Rev Agric Econ 29: 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289 doi: 10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289
    [34] Eastwood C, Klerkx L, Nettle R (2017) Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies. J Rural Stud 49: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008
    [35] Faure G, Desjeux Y, Gasselin P (2012) New challenges in agricultural advisory services from a research perspective: A literature review, synthesis and research agenda. J Agric Educ Ext 18: 461–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.707063 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2012.707063
    [36] Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2017) Service-dominant logic 2025. Int J Res Mark 34: 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001
    [37] Prager K, Labarthe P, Caggiano M, et al. (2016) How does commercialization impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK. Land Use Policy 52: 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.024 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.024
    [38] Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58: 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
    [39] Pigford AAE, Hickey GM, Klerkx L (2018) Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agric Syst 164: 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007
    [40] Van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (2008) Unfolding webs: The dynamics of regional rural development van Gorcum, Assen.
    [41] Renting H, Rossing WAH, Groot JCJ, et al. (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J Environ Manage 90: S112–S123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1984) PDF downloads(140) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog