Mini review Special Issues

Mast cells in severe respiratory virus infections: insights for treatment and vaccine administration

  • Mast cells (MCs) are a part of the innate immune system and express receptors for microbial and viral pathogens characteristic of this system. The pathological role of MCs has been demonstrated for a number of highly virulent viral infections. The role of MCs and their Fc receptors for IgE in the immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and in immunocomplex reactions is well-known, although the role of MCs and their Fc receptors for IgG (FcγR) in immunocomplex processes is much less studied. Antibody-dependent enhancement syndrome (ADE) has been observed in a number of viral infections and is associated with greater secondary infection. ADE is enhanced by virus-specific antibodies, which are not involved in the virus penetration into the cell but are capable of forming immune complexes. The role of MCs in ADE is well-established for dengue infection, RSV infection and coronavirus (CoV) infection. The involvement of IgG-mediated mast cell responses in other human viral infections including Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is poorly understood. Recently discovered mast cell activation disease is considered one of the causes of severe post-infectious complications in COVID-19. If the role of MCs in the pathogenesis of severe viral infections, including ADE in recurrent viral infection is clarified, these cells and the products they release may serve as promising targets for such therapeutic agents as histamine receptor blockers or membrane stabilizers to prevent possible complications.

    Citation: Andrey Mamontov, Alexander Polevshchikov, Yulia Desheva. Mast cells in severe respiratory virus infections: insights for treatment and vaccine administration[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Darrell O. Ricke . Antibodies and infected monocytes and macrophages in COVID-19 patients. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(2): 64-70. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022007
    [2] Yu. A. Desheva, A. S. Mamontov, P. G. Nazarov . Contribution of antibody-dependent enhancement to the pathogenesis of coronavirus infections. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2020, 4(3): 50-59. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2020005
    [3] Ling Wang, Shunbin Ning . “Toll-free” pathways for production of type I interferons. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(3): 143-163. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.3.143
    [4] Daniel Danladi Gaiya, Jonathan Danladi Gaiya, Richard Auta, Aliyu Muhammad, Bege Jonathan, Stella Kuyet Udu, Ekpa Emmanuel, Amina Shehu Bature . The journey so far with SARS-CoV-2 variants: Pathogenesis, immunity and treatments. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(4): 222-250. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023016
    [5] Anastasiia D. Kurenkova, Peter S. Timashev . Mast cells: A dark horse in osteoarthritis treatment. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(4): 228-247. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022017
    [6] Issam Tout, Marie Marotel, Isabelle Chemin, Uzma Hasan . HBV and the importance of TLR9 on B cell responses. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(3): 124-137. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.3.124
    [7] Lia Tsverava, Nazibrola Chitadze, Gvantsa Chanturia, Merab Kekelidze, David Dzneladze, Paata Imnadze, Amiran Gamkrelidze, Vincenzo Lagani, Zaza Khuchua, Revaz Solomonia . Antibody profiling reveals gender differences in response to SARS-COVID-2 infection. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(1): 6-13. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022002
    [8] Darrell O. Ricke . Etiology model for many vaccination adverse reactions, including SARS-CoV-2 spike vaccines. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(4): 200-215. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022015
    [9] Kamyar Nasiri, Zohreh Mortezania, Sanaz Oftadehbalani, Mohammad Khosousi Sani, Amin Daemi, Seyyedeh Touran Hosseini, Yusuf Döğüş, Zafer Yönden . Parasitology and Covid-19: epidemiological, immunological, pathological, and therapeutic aspects. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(1): 92-103. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023007
    [10] Peter Jandus . Arachidonic acid metabolism and its use in the diagnosis of mastocytosis. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(1): 82-91. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023006
  • Mast cells (MCs) are a part of the innate immune system and express receptors for microbial and viral pathogens characteristic of this system. The pathological role of MCs has been demonstrated for a number of highly virulent viral infections. The role of MCs and their Fc receptors for IgE in the immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and in immunocomplex reactions is well-known, although the role of MCs and their Fc receptors for IgG (FcγR) in immunocomplex processes is much less studied. Antibody-dependent enhancement syndrome (ADE) has been observed in a number of viral infections and is associated with greater secondary infection. ADE is enhanced by virus-specific antibodies, which are not involved in the virus penetration into the cell but are capable of forming immune complexes. The role of MCs in ADE is well-established for dengue infection, RSV infection and coronavirus (CoV) infection. The involvement of IgG-mediated mast cell responses in other human viral infections including Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is poorly understood. Recently discovered mast cell activation disease is considered one of the causes of severe post-infectious complications in COVID-19. If the role of MCs in the pathogenesis of severe viral infections, including ADE in recurrent viral infection is clarified, these cells and the products they release may serve as promising targets for such therapeutic agents as histamine receptor blockers or membrane stabilizers to prevent possible complications.


    Abbreviations

    ADE:

    antibody-dependent enhancement; 

    APC:

    antigen presenting cells; 

    CNS:

    central nervous system; 

    CoV:

    coronavirus; 

    COVID-19:

    coronavirus disease; 

    DENV:

    dengue virus; 

    EV:

    extracellular vesicles; 

    FcϵR:

    high-affinity IgE receptor; 

    FcγR:

    Fc receptors for IgG; 

    IIV:

    inactivated influenza vaccines; 

    IL:

    interleukin; 

    MC:

    mast cell; 

    MDA5:

    melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5; 

    MCET:

    mast cells extracellular trap; 

    MCT:

    MCs, containing only tryptase; 

    MCTC:

    MCs containing tryptase and chymase; 

    MCC:

    MCs containing only chymase; 

    NOD:

    nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain; 

    RIG-I:

    Retinoic acid-inducible gene I; 

    RSV:

    respiratory syncytial virus; 

    RV:

    rhinovirus; 

    SARS:

    severe acute respiratory syndrome; 

    TLRs:

    Toll-like receptors; 

    TNFα:

    tumor necrosis factor alpha; 

    VAERD:

    vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease

    Influenza viruses and coronaviruses (CoV) are some of the pathogens that cause pandemics in the modern world. The influenza virus is one of the few respiratory viruses against which vaccines have been developed and widely used. At the same time, a large group of non-influenza respiratory viruses contributes to the overall structure of the respiratory infection incidence. Several acute respiratory viral infections caused by a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus or parainfluenza viruses may be complicated by post-infectious bronchial hyperreactivity [1][4], and vaccines have not yet been used against these infections. When developing vaccines against new emergent viruses, it is necessary to study immune-pathogenesis taking into account the role of various factors of innate and adaptive immunity including those in recurrent infections.

    Mast cells (MCs) and basophils originate from the same myeloid lineage of hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34+) with the difference that basophils come out the bone marrow mature. On contrary, MCs mature after migrating to tissues, and MC properties depend on their localization. MCs are located near the skin and mucous membranes, where infectious pathogens or foreign antigens most often enter the body [5]. MCs inhabit almost all peripheral tissues with the exception of the retina and the body's few types of avascular tissue [5]. MCs have been recognized for decades to be present in not only the tissues of the peripheral nervous system but also the central nervous system [6]. MCs synthesize and accumulate biologically active substances (histamine, prostaglandine, leukotrienes) and chronic inflammation factors (cytokines, chemokines), as well as tissue remodeling factors (proteases, growth factors) in cytoplasmic granules [7]. The components of MC granules are classified based on MC function characteristics into preformed components, providing for immediate MC reactions, and components synthesized in response to activation signals, which are associated with long-term forms of their response reactions [8]. Human MCs are usually classified depending on the content of neutral proteases—tryptases and chymases—in their granules. This classification includes three types of MC: MCT, containing only tryptase; MCTC containing tryptase and chymase; MCC containing only chymase in the composition of the granules [9]. In addition to pro-inflammatory action, MCs have the ability to suppress immunological responses; for example, by producing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 or through the destruction of cytokines by proteases are released from granules [9]. Based on the induced ability of MCs to synthesize both pro-inflammatory cytokines and a variety of growth factors, there are proposals to separate MCs into pro-inflammatory MC1 and anti-inflammatory MC2 by analogy with macrophage populations [10].

    Elimination of biologically active substances from MCs can occur gradually as necessary for homeostasis. On the contrary, in response to external pathogens and antigens effects, MC granules released immediately by cell degranulation. Following degranulation, MCs can restore the synthesis and accumulation process, i.e. capable of regranulation [11].

    The most important mediator in the rapid degranulation phase is histamine, which affects the nerve structures of the immediate environment (afferent nerves—C-fibers and stretch receptors, efferent nerves, histamine receptors), epithelium, smooth muscle and mast cells themselves. Normally, histamine is an integral component of almost all organs, tissues, cavity fluids, secretions, and blood; its greatest content is noted in the skin (especially the eyelids, head, and neck) and in the lungs [12]. The content of calcium ions in cells producing histamine, as well as the permeability of cell membranes for these ions, is of great importance in the mechanism of synthesis and secretion of histamine [13]. The consequences of an increased release of histamine depend on its binding to a specific type of histamine receptor. The H1-receptor drives cellular migration, activity in afferent nerve fibers, vasodilatation and bronchoconstriction, whereas the H2-receptor modifies gastric acid secretion, airway mucus production, and vascular permeability [14].

    Spatial colocalization of MCs and nerve terminals was shown for the mucous membranes in various organs and tissues, including airways [15]. A direct membrane-membrane interaction is shown between MC and nerve terminals [15]. Neuro-MC signaling occurs mainly through the secretion of mediators, but moving the whole granule to the neuron cytoplasm also possible [16]. Importantly, that MC can act as both a receptor cell and an effector cell. The results of numerous experiments indicate that mediators secreted by MCs are able to influence neuronal activity, providing the CNS with information about the onset of the inflammatory process and its localization [17].

    There is also the mechanism of cross-communication of MCs using extracellular vesicles (EV). EVs can be released from several cell types that are implicated in allergy processes, including MCs, dendritic cells, T-lymphocytes, and the ciliary epithelium of the respiratory system. For example, EV secreted by MCs induces dendritic cell maturation [18]. The ability of EVs obtained from human and mouse mast cell lines to transfer biologically active RNA to other MCs was noted [19]. In vitro experiments have shown that MC-derived EV can induce epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human lung adenocarcinoma cell line (A-549) [20].

    MCs express recognition receptors for pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as superficial and intracellular Toll-like receptors (TLRs), intracellular Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) and Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (Rig-I) family receptors [21]. Also, complement binding receptors (CR3, CR5) and Fc receptors for immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) are expressed on the surface of MCs [9],[21],[22]. Accordingly, the activation of MCs occurs with the participation of both innate and adaptive immunity factors. However, special attention is paid to allergic inflammation, where the antigen-antibody complexes are the damaging agents. The role of MCs and their high-affinity IgE receptors (FcϵR) in immediate hypersensitivity and immunocomplex reactions (the Arthus phenomenon, etc.) is well known. IgE binds to FcϵR and persists for a long time on the MC surface. When the organism re-meets the allergen, IgE antibodies, formed during the first contact with this allergen and fixed on the surface of MCs, bind the allergen, which leads to degranulation of MCs with the release of mediators [23]. On the contrary, the role of MC receptors for IgG (Fcγ), which are not related to allergies and hypersensitivity, is much less studied [24].

    MCs may play a positive role in clearing pathogens in many bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections through degranulation, antimicrobial peptide secretion, neutrophil recruitment, or extracellular DNA trapping [25],[26]. Data from epidemiological studies indicate that IgE antibodies play a protective role in parasitic infections in humans, since the levels of parasite-specific IgE and resistance to infection are positively correlated [27]. Moreover, mechanisms for killing bacteria with MCs continue to be elucidated. Thus, MC are able to perform phagocytosis like neutrophils and macrophages, which kill bacteria using a combination of oxidative and non-oxidative bactericidal systems, also inherent in MC [28]. Recently, it was shown that MCs exhibit extracellular activity involved in destroying bacteria. Extracellular traps, originally identified for neutrophils (NETs) [29] are able to provide physiological barriers, prevent the spread of microorganisms and increase the interstitial content of antimicrobial substances [30]. It turned out that MCs are also able to secrete their nuclear DNA to form extracellular traps [31]. The key components of mast cell extracellular traps (MCETs) are DNA molecules and histones of nuclear chromatin; bactericidal substances, such as tryptase and cathelicidin LL-37 [26].

    In addition to secretory function, MCs may also act as non-typical antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [32]. It has been shown that there is an increase in the expression of MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules in activated MCs in vitro. It was demonstrated in animal studies that MCs can present antigens while interacting with different lymphocyte subsets including regulatory T cells (Treg) and CD8+ T lymphocytes thus participating in the adaptive immune response [33],[34].

    Alveolar epithelial cells, endothelial cells, resident alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, and several MC types are involved in protecting the lung from pathogens. Of the various types of MСs, MCT predominates in the alveoli, whereas MCTC was found in the submucosa. MCC, being a rare type of mast cell, is sometimes found in the nasal mucosa, as well as in the alveoli and lymph nodes [8],[10]. As mentioned earlier, MCs can have different properties depending on the localization, so MCs of the same type may differ in the expression patterns in terms of the number of receptors, enzymes, and growth factors. For example, MCT in the bronchi are characterized by a higher level of expression of the enzyme histidine decarboxylase compared to MCT in the alveoli; MCT and MCTC in the conducting airways have a high level of FcϵRI expression, while similar cells in the alveolar parenchyma practically do not contain this receptor on their surface [35]. Pathogenic roles of MCs in airways include immune-modulatory, pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic activities. The released MC histamine increases vascular permeability, causes vasodilation and stimulates the contraction of bronchial smooth muscles. The inflammatory cytokine TNF-α promotes local and systemic inflammation while enhancing the recruitment of neutrophils to the site of infection. Granular proteases are also capable of increasing vascular permeability and enhancing the recruitment of neutrophils to the site of inflammation, or may act directly to degrade toxic proteins [36]. Nasal and bronchial MCs are involved in allergic rhinitis and asthma, as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory infections and lung fibrosis [37],[38].

    MCs can be infected with a number of viruses, including HIV, hantavirus, reovirus, rhinovirus, dengue virus (DENV) and influenza A virus [39][43], and have been shown to selectively produce neurotransmitters that activate the vascular endothelium and recruit immune effector cells [43],[44]. MC activation in viral infections occurs by: (1) inflammatory mediators of epithelial infection (IFN, chemokines, IL-33); (2) viral particles; (3) viral replication intermediates. The importance of mast cells in viral infections is well-studied in dengue fever [39],[41]. DENV, which enters the body through the skin, can directly bind to the MC surface [40]. MCs react to the impact of DENV by degranulation and the release of preformed mediators. The eicosanoid leukotriene B4 and proteases released by MCs increase vascular permeability, and synthesized TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-α, and chemoattractants recruit NK cells and T cells to the site of infection [41].

    Viral replication intermediates, such as single-stranded or double-stranded RNA molecules can be recognized by membrane-bound and endosomal TLRs (TLR-3, TLR-7/8) and intracellular antiviral sensors (RIG-I, MDA-5) of MCs [21],[45]. The dsRNA, an important intermediate in viral replication, induces the expression of type 1 interferons and other pro-inflammatory cytokines during the early stage of dengue or influenza infections. [46],[47]. MC TLR-9 can recognize methylated regions of viral DNA, such as in Herpes Simplex Virus [40]. Additionally, IgG and IgE receptors can interact with MC by cross-linking with virus-specific antibodies and thus enhancing MC activation [40].

    The main preformed mediators and components synthesized upon MC activation in viral infections are presented in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Effect of mast cell activation on viral-induced inflammatory responses. (1) Viruses infect epithelial cells, in response to this, pro-inflammatory cytokines are released. (2) Tissue mast cells can be activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines or directly by viruses. (3) Viral replication intermediates, such as single-stranded or double-stranded RNA molecules can be recognized by membrane-bound and endosomal TLRs and intracellular antiviral sensors (RIG-I, MDA-5). (4) Mast cells activation leads to the secretion of effector molecules. IL: interleukin; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor-α; MCP-1: monocytic chemoattractant protein-1; MIP-1: macrophage inflammatory protein-1; RANTES: chemokine CCL5; TARC: chemokine CCL-17. (5) Mast cell products can activate and increase the permeability of endothelial cells, which, together with chemotactic molecules, leads to migration of inflammatory cells in infected tissues.

    IL-31, a cytokine produced by CD4+ T helper cells, was identified for the first time in 2004 [48]. IL-31 controls signaling, induces proinflammatory cytokines, and regulates cell proliferation. The main targets of IL-31 are fibroblasts and eosinophils, which are activated through the IL-31 receptor (IL-31R). To date, several isoforms of the IL-31 receptor have been identified. Among them, CRL and the IL-31 receptor alpha (RA)v2 are the soluble forms showing no transmembrane region, whereas IL-31RAv1 and IL-31RAv4 display the classical features of type I cytokine receptors [49].

    IL-33 is also known as an “alarmin” because its serum level increases as a consequence of necrosis processes and induces the augmentation of inflammatory cytokines. IL-31 and IL-33 seem to activate and enhance the maturation of MCs [50],[51]. IL-33 increases its expression after cell death, and most likely results in the induction of other cytokines including IL-31. In many cases, IL-31 and IL-33 are related to each other and their expression correlates with the severity of the disease. The presence of one interleukin might stimulate the induction of the other, amplifying inflammation. Influencing their balance could be helpful in modulating the first responses of the immune system in order to prevent the development of many inflammation-related diseases. IL-33 plays an important role in many pathologies, especially in inflammatory ones, as well as in the balance of the immune response (Th2-associated). Thus IL-33 seems to be closely associated with allergic inflammatory diseases, including atopic dermatitis and asthma [52]. IL-33 could induce bronchial asthma because it is increased during the production of inflammatory cytokines by Th2 cells [53]. Th2 cells are one of the main producers of IL-31. Some studies demonstrated a positive correlation between IL-31 and atopic dermatitis (AD) severity, this suggests an important role of IL-31 in the regulation of AD. Some researchers demonstrated that the expression of IL-31 [54] and IL-31R [55] was increased in allergic diseases, especially in asthma.

    Vocca et al. found very high serum levels of IL-31 and IL-33 in many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, especially in lung illnesses [52],[56]. According to these data, IL-33 has main target tissues like airways and skin. The activation of the IL-33/ST2 axis can be considered also as a biomarker of both Th2/IL-31 and Th17 immune response for diseases associated with cell damage like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, AD, rheumatoid arthritis, and heart failure. For this reason, IL-33 can be useful for the diagnosis and the evaluation of the activity and progression of many inflammatory diseases [50],[57],[58].

    Experimental mice models demonstrated that IL-33 blockade worsened contact hypersensitivity, and, on the other hand, injection of IL-33 inhibited contact hypersensitivity and induced regulatory T cells (Tregs) [59]. The study by Wang et al. [60] confirmed these results, noticing that IL-33 plays an anti-inflammatory effect targeting microRNA-155 in MCs. Moreover, a study conducted in a mouse model of poison ivy allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) showed that IL-33/ST2 signaling is present in primary sensory neurons and promotes pruritus in affected mice [61]. The involvement of IL-31 and IL-33 was also confirmed among human models. More specifically, IL-31 was found to be expressed in skin biopsies of ACD patients, whereas IL-33 was induced in keratinocytes [62]. Beyond the effects on immune response, mast cells can modify bone metabolism and are capable of intervening in the genesis of pathologies such as osteoporosis and osteopenia [63].

    Vitamin D (VD) induces changes in bone metabolism, but it is also able to influence immune response, suppressing mast cell activation and IgE synthesis from B cells and increasing the number of dendritic cells and IL-10-generating regulatory T cells. Connections were revealed between MCs and VD, which contribute, through the activation of different molecular or cellular activation pathways, to the determination of bone pathologies and the onset of allergic diseases. B cells can produce VD [64] while naïve T cells grown with VD-primed B cells demonstrated decreased proliferation, provoked by the presence of CD86 on B cells [65]. VD receptors (VDr) connected to the promoter of TNF-α reduce the acetylation of RNA polymerase II and histone H3/H4, reducing the production of TNF-α in MCs. These findings make it evident that VD is necessary to preserve the steadiness of MCs, whereas the deficit of VD provokes the stimulation of MCs [66],[67]. It is well known that the release of granules and the discharge of histamine from MCs are involved in the genesis of urticaria [68],[69]. VD has been suggested for this therapy, as MCs have the VDr capable of blocking degranulation of compounds provoked by IgE [70]. As VD can produce IL-10, this indicates that VD/VDr-dependent stimulation of IL-10 generation by skin MCs can participate in the MCs' capability of reducing skin inflammation after chronic UVB irradiation [67]. These findings suggest that stimulating the anti-inflammatory effects of MCs by adding VD might be a new strategy for decreasing tissue injury and inflammation in different pathological conditions. The relationship between MCs and VD is not limited to the possibility of VD influencing the activity of MCs in allergic manifestations and both have been shown to have a role in determining bone pathology [63]. In fact, MCs generate mediators that alter bone metabolism. VD not only have a significant effect on DC development but also instructs the DCs to stimulate Tregs to generate IL-10 [71]. Almerighi, et al. have confirmed that VD reduces inflammation caused by CD40L and increases IL-10 generation by CD4+ T cells [72], stimulating the Tregs. There is growing evidence that the VD pathway is an important factor in the impact of gut microbiota on inflammatory diseases [73]. On the other hand, the gut microbiome, by participating in metabolism, modulates innate and adaptive immunity and mediates human interactions with pathogens [74]. Evidence shows that specific probiotic strains induce expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and IL-10 cytokines with anti-inflammatory action thus counteracting inflammatory response and affecting immune cells [75]. Molecules of microbial origin such as short chain fatty acids (SCFAs, butyric acid, acetic acid, propionic acid) can induce MC activation [76]. Recent studies have demonstrated that probiotic strains, such as Bifidobacterium longum or L. casei, are able to counteract the inflammatory response and act on immune cells to reduce allergy-associated MC activation by downregulating IgE and histamine receptor gene expression or by controlling the amount of MC in the lamina propria [76],[77]. Thus, the gut microbiota may influence the severity of inflammatory diseases through the release of cytokines and the activation of MC.

    It has recently been shown that MCs can be directly activated in response to influenza infection, releasing histamine, inflаmmatory cytokines and antiviral chеmokines, which are involved in the excessive inflammatory and pаthological responses during the course of the disease [78][81]. It has been shown in mice that MCs can contribute to the pathological changes during infections cаused by highly pathogenic influenza viruses [78]. MCs can become infected with influenza viruses in vitro, and signаling pаthways can differ depending on the subtype of the virus [43],[81]. In vitro MC stimulation by influenza viruses A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 produced different expression profiles of cytokines, chemokines and аntiviral genes [82].

    Degranulation of MC in influenza infection may not be associated with direct exposure to dsRNA, as shown in the model of its synthetic analog: polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (Poly I:C) [83], but is associated with a cytokine storm.

    In addition to influenza infection, MCs are also of great importance in other respiratory seasonal infections of non-influenza etiology. For multiple paramyxoviruses (including RSV) as well as for rhinoviruses, the risk of developing allergic diseases increases after severe viral infections [84]. Despite low levels of infection, human MCs produce multiple chemokines in response to RSV through mechanisms that include responses to type I interferons. Such MC responses might enhance effector cell recruitment during RSV-induced disease [85]. It was shown that RSV infection of human lung fibroblasts contributes to inflammation via hyaluronan-dependent mechanisms that enhance MC binding as well as MC protease expression via direct interactions with the extracellular matrix [86].

    Rhinovirus (RV) infection is strongly associated with asthma exacerbations, and induction of histamine release and IL-8 or granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor production were the first observations regarding the rhinovirus-induced MC response [87]. The RV14 and RV16 infection of human mast cell-1 (HMC-1) cells in vitro lead to increased histamine and early cytokine response, as well as elevated caspase 3 activity and apoptotic responses [87],[88].

    The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the hardest challenges of the 21st century. All CoV infections are primarily recognized by immune cells, including MCs, which are located near the body's physical barriers. SARS CoV-2 through TLRs can activate MCs [89][91] that secrete preformed inflammatory compounds, whereas late activation provokes the generation of members of the pro-inflammatory IL-1 family, including IL-1 and IL-33 [89]. In COVID-19, MC activation in the respiratory tract can contribute to the cytokine storm which exacerbates lung failure [92].

    It was noted that COVID-19 patients had increased perivascular and septal MC density in the lungs, which was even more than in A/H1N1 pandemic influenza patients [93]. A study of pulmonary fibrosis biopsy specimens obtained from patients with COVID-19 showed a higher density of CD117+ cells, suggesting MCs proliferation/differentiation in the alveolar septa. In addition to proinflammatory cytokines, activated mast cells can release matrix metalloproteinase 9 and transforming growth factor beta, which can promote pulmonary fibrosis, as well as thromboxanes (thromboxane B2) and platelet-activating factor, which lead to the formation of microthrombosis in lungs as was identified in the lungs of deceased COVID-19 patients. Long-term multisystem lesions noted in many patients, even those who have undergone a mild form of COVID-19, are also potentially associated with idiopathic MC activation [93]. It is hypothesized that the activation and degranulation of MCs, leading to Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS), is associated with antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 interacting with the Fc receptor [94]. It is known that hyperactivated MCs play a role in the development of fibrotic diseases. Therefore, people with these conditions may be at increased risk of developing chronic respiratory, neurological, or other complications following an acute COVID-19 infection [95],[96].

    SARS-CoV-2 infection can become a great threat for people affected by comorbidities, causing increasingly severe clinical manifestations and death [97]. Data confirmed that about half of the rheumatologic patients (46%) who contracted the infection needed hospitalization, and 10% required invasive ventilation. Received data induced regulatory organizations and scientific societies worldwide to recommend vaccination to immunocompromised patients and patients affected by rheumatologic diseases [98][101].

    The prevalence of systemic sclerosis (SSc) ranges from 7 to 700 cases per million worldwide [102]. Even if SSc pathogenesis is not completely clear [103] the excessive collagen production and the constant inflammatory state can lead to multi-organ involvement and several different and serious disease presentations [104]. Strong immunosuppressants are often used to reduce the chronic autoimmune insult, leading to a higher risk of communicable diseases. In fact, SSc mortality is the highest among rheumatic diseases [97], and infections are one of the leading causes of both hospital admission and mortality [105].

    In patients with SSc at risk of severe COVID-19 because of organ involvement or use of specific immunosuppressive drugs, including rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil, early treatment with monoclonal antibodies (when available) should be considered, independent of vaccination status, to prevent hospitalization or death [106]. It is important to note that several of the monoclonal antibody therapies have been shown to be ineffective against the omicron variant [107],[108].

    The effectiveness of vaccines might be reduced in patients taking immunosuppressive therapy, because antibody responses might be blunted. New data on the use of the COVID-19 vaccines in patients with SSc continue to be collected [109],[110] and will provide evidence for the most appropriate timing of vaccination as a preventive measure. Several studies have shown that in patients with rheumatic diseases a third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine is associated with an increased humoral response; as such, a third (and fourth) vaccination is advised for patients treated with immunosuppression, especially B-cell depleting agents [111].

    A prospective observational study in 478 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases, including 265 patients with systemic sclerosis, evaluated seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccination compared with 502 healthy people (i.e., people with no systemic autoimmune diseases) [112]. In SSc patients, antibody concentrations were significantly lower than in the control group, and patients were more likely than controls to have no detectable anti-spike antibodies (13% vs 3%). In another study including 264 patients with a stable inflammatory rheumatic disease, of whom 50 had SSc, non-response was reported in 14%. Furthermore, a significantly lower percentage of patients with rheumatic diseases who were taking rituximab seroconverted in both studies [113].

    Thus, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and having a far worse outcome in patients suffering from immune-mediated diseases outweighs the risk of a wasted vaccine dose or the risk of a lower response rate. For such patients, a third or fourth revaccination may be recommended, although, no specific recommendations are available regarding the different vaccine platforms. Perhaps, oral immunization using probiotics as live vectors for mucosal delivery of viral antigens may provide a safe and effective way to induce mucosal immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in frail patients [114],[115].

    For some viral infections, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has been described, which is manifested by a severe course of recurrent infection. ADE is used by various viruses as an alternative way of infecting host cells after natural primary infections with heterotypic viruses of the same type or after infection with antigenic variants in the course of chronic infection or due to immunizations that cause incomplete protective immunity [116]. In addition to the interaction between the viral protein and host cell receptors, viruses can enter cells (for example, monocytes/macrophages) through the binding of virus/antibody immune complexes to Fc receptors (FcRs) or complement receptors [117],[118]. ADE syndrome is characteristic of dengue fever which first attracted attention and was described. Primary DENV infection induces lifelong immunity to the infecting virus serotype. It is assumed that serum antibodies after primary infection with DENV are not able to neutralize upon reinfection with DENV of a different serotype. Instead, antibodies can potentiate the endocytosis of the virus into myeloid cells (monocytes and macrophages), which are the main site of DENV replication after entering the [119]. Viruses belonging to the flavivirus family, influenza viruses, RSV, coronaviruses and many others use ADE for the infection of cells through Fc receptors [120][125]. Especially attention is drawn to such an important cause of bronchial complications, especially for children, as RSV infection. In young children, immunopathological pulmonary reactions involving Th2-type immunopathological reaction in the lung have been observed, when a formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine is administered, and later RSV infection occurs [126]. Most of these children suffered from severe infections, which led to a high rate of hospitalizations; two children died from the infection. Thus, RSV lung disease has been exacerbated by prior vaccination. A possible reason is the formation of high levels of antibodies with weak neutralizing activity, which contribute to increased infection of myeloid cells. Subsequent studies in animal models showed that the inactivated RSV vaccine causes an increase in the response of Th2 T lymphocytes, primarily CD4+ cells, and the formation of immunocomplex pathology in the lungs [127]. In mice, it was shown that virus-specific IgE plays a role in airway hyperreactivity through FcϵRI in RSV infection [128]. Virus-specific IgE also increase in a number of other infections (Dengue, herpesvirus infection, parainfluenza) [129][131]. However, the MC activation mechanism through FcR is not a single pathway of MC involvement in the immunocomplex process. MC involvement in ADE through IgG is well established in dengue fever [132] when life-threatening complications that lead to hemorrhagic manifestations are more common after secondary infection than after primary infection.

    There is an assumption that non-neutralizing antibodies to influenza can participate in ADE. During the events of the 2009 influenza pandemic, the use of seasonal vaccines and the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies against the A/H1N1pdm09 were correlated with an increased risk of more severe influenza-like-illness in infected people [133][137]. Whole-virion inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may provide partial protection against drifted influenza viruses, but have been shown to induce vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) when challenged with an antigenic variant of the same haemagglutinin (HA) subtype [138],[139]. It was demonstrated in a swine model that aggravated pneumonia can result from a mismatch between the vaccine strain HA used in a IIV and the challenge strain [4]. Previously, it was shown that A/H1N2 IIV may provide only partial protection against drift variants of HA subtype in pigs, but also may induce VAERD [139]. It was shown that mismatched HA between vaccine and challenge virus was necessary to induce this, although vaccines containing a matched NA facilitated severity of infection due to HA mismatch and this was correlated with NA-inhibiting (NI) antibodies [140].

    The problem in developing vaccines against the CoV causing severe respiratory syndrome (SARS) is that, after vaccination, eosinophilic reactions in the lungs or allergic reactions are observed—in an experiment, an increase in infection is observed [141][144]. Antibodies to the S-protein of the coronavirus envelope, produced in response to infection, promote the penetration of SARS-CoV-1 into monocytes (CD68+) and macrophages through the FcγRIIA receptor and aggravate the course of the disease [144].

    During the SARS CoV-2 pandemic, severe post-infectious inflammation can be a direct result of ADE in infants previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 or in infants who have maternal SARS-CoV-2 antibodies or antibodies acquired through breast-feeding [94].

    The involvement of antibody-mediated MCs responses in human CoV infections is poorly understood. At the same time, there is evidence of MC involvement in the pathogenesis of peritonitis in severe CoV infection in cats [145]. Cases of feline CoV peritonitis have been reported in cats immunized with the coronavirus vaccine [146],[147]. Improved macrophage infection following antibody-mediated entry of feline CoV leads to overcoming the resistance of the gut-associated immune barrier, this cause hematogenous infection [147]. It has been shown that mainly IgG2a class of anti-feline CoV spike has a leading role in the initiation of ADE.

    Thus, there are enough data indicating the possibility of ADE development in various viral infections. But the role of MCs in these reactions is not well studied. If MC involvement in ADE is proven, it will open up new perspectives for the use of drugs targeting MCs and their products to prevent adverse reactions in the development of new vaccines.

    Many MС-related components such as proteinases, cell adhesion molecules, chemoattractant receptors, and individual components of signaling pathways are potential therapeutic targets [148]. However, there is still insufficient clinical data on the use of these substances in viral infections.

    A number of studies have suggested that H2 receptor antagonists may be beneficial among many other drugs. Since there is evidence that the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is associated with dysfunctional MC degranulation, various medical interventions using commercially available drugs useful for treating mast cell disorders can help reduce disease severity and mortality. These data are confirmed by the use of histamine receptor blockers in complex COVID-19 therapy [149],[150]. Famotidine was included in the clinical guidelines for COVID-19 therapy. (https://www.evms.edu/media/evms_public/departments/internal_medicine/Marik_Critical_Care_COVID-19_ Protocol.pdf).

    From previous studies, the immunomodulatory effects of H2 receptor antagonists are well characterized, but further investigations are required to explore their potential implications in managing the immune response in COVID-19 [151]. Although, histamine receptor blockers affect only the sensitivity of tissues to the released histamine, but not the quantity and quality of MCs, nor the level of released histamine. Administration of MC stabilizing drugs or the leukotriene B4 antagonist montelukast leads to a decrease in vascular permeability. Use of MC stabilizing drugs such as sodium cromoglycate and ketotifen, which prevent MCs degranulation and release of histamine, and inhibitors receptors that bind MC products such as leukotrienes have been shown promising in animal models of influenza and dengue virus infection [152].

    Nevertheless, the therapeutic focus on MCs or their products will require careful scrutiny in order not to negate the beneficial effects of MC in both regulation and suppression of inflammation and immune response. Blocking anti-inflammatory functions or enhancing pro-inflammatory functions can lead to excessive tissue damage through infiltration and activation of cytotoxic cells [153]. Thus, the administration of a TNFα inhibitor to mice, which is usually used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, irritable bowel syndrome and psoriasis [154], although it increased survival, delayed the resolution of pathological changes in the lungs. This raises concerns about the risk of aggravated influenza infection in patients who are prescribed drugs that block TNFα.

    Thus, it becomes apparent that MCs, being a part of the innate immune system, are involved in the reactions of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Together with this, the MCs appear truly universal cells involved in complex processes, providing direct effects and indirect regulation of other cells and their functioning in various biological processes.

    In the respiratory tract, MCs are active participants in a wide range of immunological mechanisms, including functions of local immunomodulators, and balancing pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses. MCs are involved in the development of lung pathology in a number of viral infections. MCs can contribute to the development of asthma and other inflammatory and fibrotic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

    ADE in severe, often fatal infectious diseases, is believed to be caused by the binding of IgG-containing immune complexes to cellular Fc or complement receptors, which facilitates the penetration of the pathogen into cells and increases the severity of the disease. However, the involvement of MCs in antibody-dependent reactions has so far been clearly established only for dengue fever and systemic CoV infection in cats.

    Obviously, the role of MC in respiratory infections can be twofold. Surprisingly, as a result of a 2016–2019 study in the Netherlands, pollen bioaerosols associated with seasonal hay fever have been recognized as one of the factors involved in curbing the incidence of influenza and influenza-like illnesses. One of the reasons is called the initiation of the immune system, in particular MC activation [155].

    If the role of MCs in the pathogenesis of severe viral infections, including ADE in recurrent viral infection is clarified, these cells and the products they release may serve as promising targets for such therapeutic agents as histamine receptor blockers or membrane stabilizers to prevent possible complications. A new pathogenetic link in the development of severe viral and mixed infections will be identified, requiring special attention of doctors and health authorities to risk groups, and new targets (in the form of MCs and their activation products) will be discovered for therapeutic and prophylactic effects for the prevention and treatment of severe post-infectious or post-vaccination complications of viral infections.


    Acknowledgments



    Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, № 075-15-2022-302 (20.04.2022), Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Institute of Experimental Medicine” (FSBSI (IEM)), “Molecular bases of interaction of microorganisms and human” Scientific and educational center of the world-class research center “Center for personalized Medicine” FSBSI (IEM).
    The Authors thanks Maria Kozlova for her editorial work.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no commercial or financial conflict of interest.

    Author contributions



    AM: data analysis, manuscript preparation; AP: general leadership, data analysis, manuscript editing; YD: data analysis, manuscript preparation, final editing.

    [1] Mahalingam S, Schwarze J, Zaid A, et al. (2006) Perspective on the host response to human metapneumovirus infection: what can we learn from respiratory syncytial virus infections?. Microbes Infect 8: 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.07.001
    [2] Liu H, Tan J, Liu J, et al. (2020) Altered mast cell activity in response to rhinovirus infection provides novel insight into asthma. J Asthma 57: 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2019.1585870
    [3] Vargas SO, Kozakewich HP, Perez-Atayde AR, et al. (2004) Pathology of human metapneumovirus infection: insights into the pathogenesis of a newly identified respiratory virus. Pediatr Devel Pathol 7: 478-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10024-004-1011-2
    [4] Pawełczyk M, Kowalski ML (2017) The role of human parainfluenza virus infections in the immunopathology of the respiratory tract. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 17: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-017-0685-2
    [5] Krystel-Whittemore M, Dileepan KN, Wood JG (2016) Mast cell: a multi-functional master cell. Front Immunol 6: 620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00620
    [6] Xanthos DN, Gaderer S, Drdla R, et al. (2011) Central nervous system mast cells in peripheral inflammatory nociception. Mol Pain 7: 1744-8069. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-7-42
    [7] Agier J, Różalska S, Wiktorska M, et al. (2018) The RLR/NLR expression and pro-inflammatory activity of tissue mast cells are regulated by cathelicidin LL-37 and defensin hBD-2. Sci Rep 8: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30289-w
    [8] Forsythe P (2019) Mast cells in neuroimmune interactions. Trends Neurosci 42: 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.09.006
    [9] Erjefält JS (2014) Mast cells in human airways: the culprit?. Eur Respir Rev 23: 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00005014
    [10] Huber M, Cato ACB, Ainooson GK, et al. (2019) Regulation of the pleiotropic effects of tissue-resident mast cells. J Allergy Clin Immun 144: S31-S45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.02.004
    [11] Dawicki W, Marshall JS (2007) New and emerging roles for mast cells in host defence. Curr Opin Immunol 19: 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2006.11.006
    [12] Tiligada E, Ennis M (2020) Histamine pharmacology: from Sir Henry Dale to the 21st century. Brit J Pharmacol 177: 469-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14524
    [13] Hoth M, Penner R (1992) Depletion of intracellular calcium stores activates a calcium current in mast cells. Nature 355: 353-356. https://doi.org/10.1038/355353a0
    [14] Thangam EB, Jemima EA, Singh H, et al. (2018) The role of histamine and histamine receptors in mast cell-mediated allergy and inflammation: the hunt for new therapeutic targets. Front Immunol 9: 1873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01873
    [15] Weigand LA, Myers AC, Meeker S, et al. (2009) Mast cell-cholinergic nerve interaction in mouse airways. J Phy 587: 3355-3362. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.173054
    [16] Wilhelm M, Silver R, Silverman AJ (2005) Central nervous system neurons acquire mast cell products via transgranulation. Eur J Neurosci 22: 2238-2248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04429.x
    [17] Schiller M, Ben-Shaanan TL, Rolls A (2021) Neuronal regulation of immunity: why, how and where?. Nat Rev Immunol 21: 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0387-1
    [18] Fujita Y, Yoshioka Y, Ito S, et al. (2014) Intercellular communication by extracellular vesicles and their microRNAs in asthma. Clin Ther 36: 873-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.006
    [19] Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, et al. (2007) Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 9: 654-659. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1596
    [20] Yin Y, Shelke GV, Lässer C, et al. (2020) Extracellular vesicles from mast cells induce mesenchymal transition in airway epithelial cells. Resp Res 21: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01346-8
    [21] Marshall JS, Portales-Cervantes L, Leong E (2019) Mast cell responses to viruses and pathogen products. Int J Mol Sci 20: 4241. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174241
    [22] Ding J, Fang Y, Xiang Z (2015) Antigen/IgG immune complex-primed mucosal mast cells mediate antigen-specific activation of co-cultured T cells. Immunology 144: 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12379
    [23] Galli SJ, Tsai M (2012) IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat Med 18: 693-704. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2755
    [24] Seneviratne SL, Maitland A, Afrin L (2017) Mast cell disorders in Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Am J Med Genet 175: 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31555
    [25] Dudeck A, Köberle M, Goldmann O, et al. (2019) Mast cells as protectors of health. J Allergy Clin Immunol 144: S4-S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.10.054
    [26] Möllerherm H, von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Branitzki-Heinemann K (2016) Antimicrobial activity of mast cells: role and relevance of extracellular DNA traps. Front Immunol 7: 265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00265
    [27] Mukai K, Tsai M, Starkl P, et al. (2016) IgE and mast cells in host defense against parasites and venoms. Springer Semin Immun 38: 581-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-016-0565-1
    [28] Malaviya R, Ross EA, MacGregor JI, et al. (1994) Mast cell phagocytosis of FimH-expressing enterobacteria. J Immunol 152: 1907-1914.
    [29] Bruns S, Kniemeyer O, Hasenberg M, et al. (2010) Production of extracellular traps against Aspergillus fumigatus in vitro and in infected lung tissue is dependent on invading neutrophils and influenced by hydrophobin RodA. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000873
    [30] Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A (2007) Beneficial suicide: why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 577-582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1710
    [31] von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Goldmann O, Thulin P, et al. (2008) Phagocytosis-independent antimicrobial activity of mast cells by means of extracellular trap formation. Blood 111: 3070-3080. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-07-104018
    [32] Lotfi-Emran S, Ward BR, Le QT, et al. (2018) Human mast cells present antigen to autologous CD4+ T cells. J Allergy Clin Immun 141: 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.048
    [33] Stelekati E, Bahri R, D'Orlando O, et al. (2009) Mast cell-mediated antigen presentation regulates CD8+ T cell effector functions. Immunity 31: 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.022
    [34] Kambayashi T, Allenspach EJ, Chang JT, et al. (2009) Inducible MHC class II expression by mast cells supports effector and regulatory T cell activation. J Immunol 182: 4686-4695. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803180
    [35] Varricchi G, de Paulis A, Marone G, et al. (2019) Future needs in mast cell biology. Int J Mol Sci 20: 4397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184397
    [36] Bruhns P, Frémont S, Daëron M (2005) Regulation of allergy by Fc receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 17: 662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2005.09.012
    [37] Overed-Sayer C, Rapley L, Mustelin T, et al. (2014) Are mast cells instrumental for fibrotic diseases?. Front Pharmacol 4: 174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00174
    [38] Andersson CK, Andersson-Sjöland A, Mori M, et al. (2011) Activated MCTC mast cells infiltrate diseased lung areas in cystic fibrosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Resp Res 12: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-139
    [39] Londono-Renteria B, Marinez-Angarita JC, Troupin A, et al. (2017) Role of mast cells in dengue virus pathogenesis. DNA Cell Biol 36: 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2017.3765
    [40] Rathore APS, St John AL (2020) Protective and pathogenic roles for mast cells during viral infections. Curr Opin Immunol 66: 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2020.05.003
    [41] Furuta T, Murao LA, Lan NT, et al. (2012) Association of mast cell-derived VEGF and proteases in Dengue shock syndrome. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001505
    [42] Akoto C, Davies DE, Swindle EJ (2017) Mast cells are permissive for rhinovirus replication: potential implications for asthma exacerbations. Clin Exp Allergy 47: 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12879
    [43] Huo C, Wu H, Xiao J, et al. (2019) Genomic and bioinformatic characterization of mouse mast cells (P815) upon different influenza a virus (H1N1, H5N1, and H7N2) infections. Front Genet 10: 595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00595
    [44] Portales-Cervantes L, Haidl ID, Lee PW, et al. (2017) Virus-infected human mast cells enhance natural killer cell functions. J Innate Immun 9: 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450576
    [45] Brisse M, Ly H (2019) Comparative structure and function analysis of the RIG-I-like receptors: RIG-I and MDA5. Front Immunol 10: 1586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01586
    [46] St John AL, Rathore APS, Yap H, et al. (2011) Immune surveillance by mast cells during dengue infection promotes natural killer (NK) and NKT-cell recruitment and viral clearance. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 9190-9195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105079108
    [47] Graham AC, Temple RM, Obar JJ (2015) Mast cells and influenza a virus: association with allergic responses and beyond. Front Immunol 6: 238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00238
    [48] Dillon SR, Sprecher C, Hammond A, et al. (2004) Interleukin 31, a cytokine produced by activated T cells, induces dermatitis in mice. Nat Immunol 5: 752-760. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1084
    [49] Zhang Q, Putheti P, Zhou Q, et al. (2008) Structures and biological functions of IL-31 and IL-31 receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 19: 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.08.003
    [50] Gangemi S, Franchina T, Minciullo PL, et al. (2013) IL-33/IL-31 axis: a new pathological mechanisms for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors-associated skin toxicity. J Cell Biochem 114: 2673-2676. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.24614
    [51] Guarneri F, Minciullo PL, Mannucci C, et al. (2015) IL-31 and IL-33 circulating levels in allergic contact dermatitis. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 47: 156-158.
    [52] Bonanno A, Gangemi S, La Grutta S, et al. (2014) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, IL-31, and IL-33 in children with allergic disease of the airways. Mediat Inflamm 2014: 520241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/520241
    [53] Angulo EL, McKernan EM, Fichtinger PS, et al. (2019) Comparison of IL-33 and IL-5 family mediated activation of human eosinophils. PLoS One 14: e0217807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217807
    [54] Stott B, Lavender P, Lehmann S, et al. (2013) Human IL-31 is induced by IL-4 and promotes Th2-driven inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immun 132: 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.050
    [55] Lai T, Wu D, Li W, et al. (2016) Interleukin-31 expression and relation to disease severity in human asthma. Sci Rep 6: 22835. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22835
    [56] Vocca L, Di Sano C, Uasuf CG, et al. (2015) IL-33/ST2 axis controls Th2/IL-31 and Th17 immune response in allergic airway diseases. Immunobiology 220: 954-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2015.02.005
    [57] Musolino C, Allegra A, Mannucci C, et al. (2015) Possible role of interleukin-31/33 axis in imatinib mesylate-associated skin toxicity. Turk J Haematoly 32: 168-171. https://doi.org/10.4274/Tjh.2014.0021
    [58] Nygaard U, Hvid M, Johansen C, et al. (2016) TSLP, IL-31, IL-33 and sST2 are new biomarkers in endophenotypic profiling of adult and childhood atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol 30: 1930-1938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13679
    [59] Bruhs A, Proksch E, Schwarz T, et al. (2018) Disruption of the epidermal barrier induces regulatory T cells via IL-33 in mice. J Invest Dermatol 138: 570-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.032
    [60] Wang Z, Yi T, Long M, et al. (2018) Involvement of the negative feedback of IL-33 signaling in the anti-inflammatory effect of electro-acupuncture on allergic contact dermatitis via targeting MicroRNA-155 in mast cells. Inflammation 41: 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-018-0740-8
    [61] Liu B, Tai Y, Achanta S, et al. (2016) IL-33/ST2 signaling excites sensory neurons and mediates itch response in a mouse model of poison ivy contact allergy. P Natl Acad Sci USA 113: E7572-E7579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606608113
    [62] Murdaca G, Greco M, Tonacci A, et al. (2019) IL-33/IL-31 axis in immune-mediated and allergic diseases. Int J Mol Sci 20: 5856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235856
    [63] Murdaca G, Allegra A, Tonacci A, et al. (2022) Mast cells and vitamin D status: A clinical and biological link in the onset of allergy and bone diseases. Biomedicines 10: 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081877
    [64] Heine G, Niesner U, Chang HD, et al. (2008) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) promotes IL-10 production in human B cells. Eur J Immunol 38: 2210-2218. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200838216
    [65] Drozdenko G, Scheel T, Heine G, et al. (2014) Impaired T cell activation and cytokine production by calcitriol-primed human B cells. Clin Exp Immunol 178: 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12406
    [66] Liu Z, Li X, Qiu S, et al. (2017) Vitamin D contributes to mast cell stabilization. Allergy 72: 1184-1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13110
    [67] Biggs L, Yu C, Fedoric B, et al. (2010) Evidence that vitamin D(3) promotes mast cell-dependent reduction of chronic UVB-induced skin pathology in mice. J Exp Med 207: 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20091725
    [68] Asero R, Ferrucci S, Casazza G, et al. (2019) Total IgE and atopic status in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria unresponsive to omalizumab treatment. Allergy 74: 1561-1563. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13754
    [69] Lakin E, Church MK, Maurer M, et al. (2019) On the lipophilic nature of autoreactive IgE in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Theranostics 9: 829-836. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.29902
    [70] Redegeld FA, Yu Y, Kumari S, et al. (2018) Non-IgE mediated mast cell activation. Immunol Rev 282: 87-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12629
    [71] Bakdash G, van Capel TM, Mason LM, et al. (2014) Vitamin D3 metabolite calcidiol primes human dendritic cells to promote the development of immunomodulatory IL-10-producing T cells. Vaccine 32: 6294-6302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.075
    [72] Almerighi C, Sinistro A, Cavazza A, et al. (2009) 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits CD40L-induced pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activity in human monocytes. Cytokine 45: 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2008.12.009
    [73] Ly NP, Litonjua A, Gold DR, et al. (2011) Gut microbiota, probiotics, and vitamin D: interrelated exposures influencing allergy, asthma, and obesity?. J Allergy Clin Immun 127: 1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.015
    [74] Suvorov A (2013) Gut microbiota, probiotics, and human health. Biosci Microb Food H 32: 81-91. https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.32.81
    [75] Traina G (2021) The role of mast cells in the gut and brain. J Integr Neurosci 20: 185-196. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin.2021.01.313
    [76] Conte C, Sichetti M, Traina G (2020) Gut–brain axis: focus on neurodegeneration and mast cells. Appl Sci 10: 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051828
    [77] Lynn DJ, Benson SC, Lynn MA, et al. (2022) Modulation of immune responses to vaccination by the microbiota: implications and potential mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol 22: 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-021-00554-7
    [78] Hu Y, Jin Y, Han D, et al. (2012) Mast cell-induced lung injury in mice infected with H5N1 influenza virus. J Virol 86: 3347-3356. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.06053-11
    [79] Zarnegar B, Westin A, Evangelidou S, et al. (2018) Innate immunity induces the accumulation of lung mast cells during influenza infection. Front Immunol 9: 2288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02288
    [80] Liu B, Meng D, Wei T, et al. (2014) Apoptosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine response of mast cells induced by influenza A viruses. PLoS One 9: e100109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100109
    [81] Wu H, Zhang S, Huo C, et al. (2019) iTRAQ-based proteomic and bioinformatic characterization of human mast cells upon infection by the influenza A virus strains H1N1 and H5N1. FEBS Lett 593: 2612-2627. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13523
    [82] Ng K, Raheem J, St Laurent CD, et al. (2019) Responses of human mast cells and epithelial cells following exposure to influenza A virus. Antivir Res 171: 104566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104566
    [83] Kulka M, Alexopoulou L, Flavell RA, et al. (2004) Activation of mast cells by double-stranded RNA: evidence for activation through Toll-like receptor 3. J Allergy Clin Immun 114: 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.049
    [84] Pelaia G, Vatrella A, Gallelli L, et al. (2006) Respiratory infections and asthma. Resp Med 100: 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.025
    [85] Al-Afif A, Alyazidi R, Oldford SA, et al. (2015) Respiratory syncytial virus infection of primary human mast cells induces the selective production of type I interferons, CXCL10, and CCL4. J Allergy Clin Immun 136: 1346-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.042
    [86] Reeves SR, Barrow KA, Rich LM, et al. (2020) Respiratory syncytial virus infection of human lung fibroblasts induces a hyaluronan-enriched extracellular matrix that binds mast cells and enhances expression of mast cell proteases. Front Immunol 10: 3159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03159
    [87] Hosoda M, Yamaya M, Suzuki T, et al. (2002) Effects of rhinovirus infection on histamine and cytokine production by cell lines from human mast cells and basophils. J Immunol 169: 1482-1491. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.3.1482
    [88] Liu H, Tan J, Liu J, et al. (2020) Altered mast cell activity in response to rhinovirus infection provides novel insight into asthma. J Asthma 57: 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2019.1585870
    [89] Kritas SK, Ronconi G, Caraffa AL, et al. (2020) Mast cells contribute to coronavirus-induced inflammation: new anti-inflammatory strategy. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 34: 9-14.
    [90] Theoharides TC, Tsilioni I, Ren H (2019) Recent advances in our understanding of mast cell activation–or should it be mast cell mediator disorders?. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 15: 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2019.1596800
    [91] Theoharides TC (2021) Potential association of mast cells with coronavirus disease 2019. Ann Allerg Asthma Im 126: 217-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.003
    [92] Kempuraj D, Selvakumar GP, Ahmed ME, et al. (2020) COVID-19, mast cells, cytokine storm, psychological stress, and neuroinflammation. Neuroscientist 26: 402-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420941476
    [93] Junior JSM, Miggiolaro AFRDS, Nagashima S, et al. (2020) Mast cells in alveolar septa of COVID-19 patients: a pathogenic pathway that may link interstitial edema to immunothrombosis. Front Immunol 11: 574862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.574862
    [94] Ricke DO, Gherlone N, Fremont-Smith P, et al. (2020) Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: antibody-induced mast cell activation hypothesis. J Pediatrics Pediatr Med 4: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-2940/2020/2.1157
    [95] Afrin LB, Weinstock LB, Molderings GJ (2020) Covid-19 hyperinflammation and post-Covid-19 illness may be rooted in mast cell activation syndrome. Int J Infect Dis 100: 327-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.016
    [96] Weinstock LB, Brook JB, Walters AS, et al. (2021) Mast cell activation symptoms are prevalent in Long-COVID. Int J Infect Dis 112: 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.043
    [97] Nagaraja V, Matucci-Cerinic M, Furst DE, et al. (2020) Current and future outlook on disease modification and defining low disease activity in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol 72: 1049-1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41246
    [98] Arnold J, Winthrop K, Emery P (2021) COVID-19 vaccination and antirheumatic therapy. Rheumatology 60: 3496-3502. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab223
    [99] Creech CB, Walker SC, Samuels RJ (2021) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. JAMA 325: 1318. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3199
    [100] Hazlewood GS, Pardo JP, Barnabe C, et al. (2021) Canadian rheumatology association recommendation for the use of COVID-19 vaccination for patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol 48: 1330-1339. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210288
    [101] European Medicines Agency.Comirnaty and Spikevax: EMA Recommendations on Extra Doses Boosters. European Medicines Agency (2021) . Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/comirnaty-spikevax-ema-recommendations-extra-doses-boosters.
    [102] Elhai M, Avouac J, Walker U, et al. (2016) A gender gap in primary and secondary heart dysfunctions in systemic sclerosis: A EUSTAR prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 75: 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206386
    [103] Khedoe P, Marges E, Hiemstra P, et al. (2020) Interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: Toward personalized-medicine-based prediction and drug screening models of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Front Immunol 11: 19090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01990
    [104] Alba MA, Velasco C, Simeón CP, et al. (2014) Early-versus late-onset systemic sclerosis: differences in clinical presentation and outcome in 1037 patients. Medicine 93: 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000018
    [105] Murdaca G, Noberasco G, Olobardi D, et al. (2021) Current take on systemic sclerosis patients' vaccination recommendations. Vaccines 9: 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121426
    [106] Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, et al. (2021) REGN-COV2, a neutralizing antibody cocktail, in outpatients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med 384: 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2035002
    [107] Iketani S, Liu L, Guo Y, et al. (2022) Antibody evasion properties of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages. Nature 604: 553-556. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04594-4
    [108] Hirsch C, Park YS, Piechotta V, et al. (2022) SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID-19. Cochrane Datebase Syst Rev 2021: CD014945. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014945
    [109] Gordon JK, Showalter K, Wu Y, et al. (2022) Systemic sclerosis and COVID-19 vaccines: a SPIN cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol 4: e243-e246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00416-1
    [110] Sampaio-Barros PD, Medeiros-Ribeiro AC, Luppino-Assad AP, et al. (2022) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with systemic sclerosis: impact of disease subtype and therapy. Rheumatology 61: SI169-SI174. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab886
    [111] Aikawa NE, Kupa LDVK, Medeiros-Ribeiro AC, et al. (2022) Increment of immunogenicity after third dose of a homologous inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large population of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 81: 1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-222096
    [112] Ferri C, Ursini F, Gragnani L, et al. (2021) Impaired immunogenicity to COVID-19 vaccines in autoimmune systemic diseases. High prevalence of non-response in different patients' subgroups. J Autoimmun 125: 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102744
    [113] Braun-Moscovici Y, Kaplan M, Braun M, et al. (2021) Disease activity and humoral response in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases after two doses of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Ann Rheum Dis 80: 1317-1321. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220503
    [114] Taghinezhad-S S, Mohseni AH, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, et al. (2021) Probiotic-based vaccines may provide effective protection against COVID-19 acute respiratory disease. Vaccines 9: 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9050466
    [115] Suvorov A, Gupalova T, Desheva Y, et al. (2021) Construction of the enterococcal strain expressing immunogenic fragment of SARS-Cov-2 virus. Front Pharmacol 12: 807256-807256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.807256
    [116] Ubol S, Halstead SB (2010) How innate immune mechanisms contribute to antibody-enhanced viral infections. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 1829-1835. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00316-10
    [117] Taylor A, Foo SS, Bruzzone R, et al. (2015) Fc receptors in antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infections. Immunol Rev 268: 340-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12367
    [118] Cardosa MJ, Porterfield JS, Gordon S (1983) Complement receptor mediates enhanced flavivirus replication in macrophages. J Exp Med 158: 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.158.1.258
    [119] Halstead SB, O'rourke EJ (1977) Antibody-enhanced dengue virus infection in primate leukocytes. Nature 265: 739-741. https://doi.org/10.1038/265739a0
    [120] Anderson R (2003) Manipulation of cell surface macromolecules by flaviviruses. Adv Virus Res 59: 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(03)59007-8
    [121] Winarski KL, Tang J, Klenow L, et al. (2019) Antibody-dependent enhancement of influenza disease promoted by increase in hemagglutinin stem flexibility and virus fusion kinetics. P Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 15194-15199. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821317116
    [122] Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, et al. (2014) Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem Bioph Res Co 451: 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.090
    [123] Kam YW, Kien F, Roberts A, et al. (2007) Antibodies against trimeric S glycoprotein protect hamsters against SARS-CoV challenge despite their capacity to mediate FcγRII-dependent entry into B cells in vitro. Vaccine 25: 729-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.08.011
    [124] Wan Y, Shang J, Sun S, et al. (2020) Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J Virol 94: e02015-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02015-19
    [125] Castilow EM, Olson MR, Varga SM (2007) Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine-enhanced disease. Immunol Res 39: 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-007-0071-6
    [126] Polack FP, Teng MN, Collins PL, et al. (2002) A role for immune complexes in enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease. J Exp Med 196: 859-865. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20020781
    [127] Dakhama A, Park JW, Taube C, et al. (2004) The role of virus-specific immunoglobulin E in airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Resp Crit Care 170: 952-959. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200311-1610OC
    [128] Koraka P, Murgue B, Deparis X, et al. (2003) Elevated levels of total and dengue virus-specific immunoglobulin E in patients with varying disease severity. J Med Virol 70: 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.10358
    [129] McKenna DB, Neill WA, Norval M (2001) Herpes simplex virus-specific immune responses in subjects with frequent and infrequent orofacial recrudescences. Br J Dermatol 144: 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04068.x
    [130] Votava M, Bartosova D, Krchnakova A, et al. (1996) Diagnostic importance of heterophile antibodies and immunoglobulins IgA, IgE, IgM and low-avidity IgG against Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen in children. Acta Virol 40: 99-101.
    [131] Welliver RC, Wong DT, Middleton E, et al. (1982) Role of parainfluenza virus-specific IgE in pathogenesis of croup and wheezing subsequent to infection. J Pediatr 101: 889-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80005-X
    [132] Boonnak K, Slike BM, Burgess TH, et al. (2008) Role of dendritic cells in antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection. J Virol 82: 3939-3951. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02484-07
    [133] Skowronski DM, De Serres G, Crowcroft NS, et al. (2010) Association between the 2008–09 seasonal influenza vaccine and pandemic H1N1 illness during spring–summer 2009: four observational studies from Canada. PLoS Med 7: e1000258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000258
    [134] Monsalvo AC, Batalle JP, Lopez MF, et al. (2011) Severe pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza disease due to pathogenic immune complexes. Nat Med 17: 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2262
    [135] Guihot A, Luyt CE, Parrot A, et al. (2014) Low titers of serum antibodies inhibiting hemagglutination predict fatal fulminant influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection. Am J Resp Crit Care 189: 1240-1249. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201311-2071OC
    [136] Kilbourne ED, Smith C, Brett I, et al. (2002) The total influenza vaccine failure of 1947 revisited: major intrasubtypic antigenic change can explain failure of vaccine in a post-World War II epidemic. P Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 10748-10752. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.162366899
    [137] Ferdinands JM, Fry AM, Reynolds S, et al. (2017) Intraseason waning of influenza vaccine protection: evidence from the US influenza vaccine effectiveness network, 2011–2012 through 2014–2015. Clin Infect Dis 64: 544-550. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw816
    [138] Escalera-Zamudio M, Cobián-Güemes G, de los Dolores Soto-del M, et al. (2012) Characterization of an influenza A virus in Mexican swine that is related to the A/H1N1/2009 pandemic clade. Virology 433: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.08.003
    [139] Rajao DS, Sandbulte MR, Gauger PC, et al. (2016) Heterologous challenge in the presence of maternally-derived antibodies results in vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease in weaned piglets. Virology 491: 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2016.01.015
    [140] Khurana S, Loving CL, Manischewitz J, et al. (2013) Vaccine-induced anti-HA2 antibodies promote virus fusion and enhance influenza virus respiratory disease. Sci Transl Med 5: 200ra114. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006366
    [141] Arvin AM, Fink K, Schmid MA, et al. (2020) A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 584: 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2538-8
    [142] Lee WS, Wheatley AK, Kent SJ, et al. (2020) Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies. Nat Microbiol 5: 1185-1191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-00789-5
    [143] Wen J, Cheng Y, Ling R, et al. (2020) Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus. Int J Infect Dis 100: 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.015
    [144] Yip MS, Leung NHL, Cheung CY, et al. (2014) Antibody-dependent infection of human macrophages by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Virol J 11: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-11-82
    [145] Bauer BS, Kerr ME, Sandmeyer LS, et al. (2013) Positive immunostaining for feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) in a Sphinx cat with cutaneous lesions and bilateral panuveitis. Vet Ophthalmol 16: 160-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12044
    [146] Takano T, Kawakami C, Yamada S, et al. (2008) Antibody-dependent enhancement occurs upon re-infection with the identical serotype virus in feline infectious peritonitis virus infection. J Vet Med Sci 70: 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.70.1315
    [147] Vennema H, Poland A, Foley J, et al. (1998) Feline infectious peritonitis viruses arise by mutation from endemic feline enteric coronaviruses. Virology 243: 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1998.9045
    [148] Harvima IT, Levi-Schaffer F, Draber P, et al. (2014) Molecular targets on mast cells and basophils for novel therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134: 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.007
    [149] Fidan C, Aydoğdu A (2020) As a potential treatment of COVID-19: Montelukast. Med Hypotheses 142: 109828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109828
    [150] Malone RW, Tisdall P, Fremont-Smith P, et al. (2021) COVID-19: famotidine, histamine, mast cells, and mechanisms. Front Pharmacol 12: 633680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.633680
    [151] Ennis M, Tiligada K (2021) Histamine receptors and COVID-19. Inflamm Res 70: 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-020-01422-1
    [152] Han NR, Moon PD, Nam SY, et al. (2016) Inhibitory effects of atractylone on mast cell-mediated allergic reactions. Chem-Biol Interact 258: 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.08.015
    [153] Murphy-Schafer AR, Paust S (2021) Divergent mast cell responses modulate antiviral immunity during influenza virus infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11: 580679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.580679
    [154] Shale M, Czub M, Kaplan GG, et al. (2010) Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and influenza: keeping it in perspective. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 3: 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X10366368
    [155] Hoogeveen MJ, van Gorp EC, Hoogeveen EK (2020) Can pollen explain the seasonality of flu-like illnesses in the Netherlands?. Sci Total Environ 755: 143182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143182
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3121) PDF downloads(191) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog