
This paper reviews circumstances where governance arrangements and organizational innovations assign value to carbon emission mitigations or energy demand reductions. The creation of such value hinges upon 1) the effective governance of financial mechanisms to create demand; and 2) the ability of organizations to assetize and supply carbon emission mitigations and energy demand reductions as commodified private goods. To analyse the political and organizational governance of such demand and supply systems, this paper uses insights from transaction cost economics. On the demand side, transaction costs are reduced through the innovative governance of markets at national level, such as white certificate markets for energy savings, and international level, such as baseline-and-credit systems for carbon emissions reductions. Strict rules regarding accountability, transparency, measurement, reporting, verification, and inclusion reduce transaction costs for organizations to assetize reductions and mitigations on the supply side. Despite limited success to date, these innovations provide the basis for international carbon emissions mitigation governance through climate clubs based on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This paper concludes that such clubs provide the basis for creating consistent demand for carbon emission mitigations and associated energy demand reductions through the positive pricing of mitigation actions.
Citation: Colin Nolden. Collecting silences: creating value by assetizing carbon emission mitigations and energy demand reductions[J]. Green Finance, 2022, 4(2): 137-158. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022007
[1] | Yangtao Wang, Kelin Li . Exponential synchronization of fractional order fuzzy memristor neural networks with time-varying delays and impulses. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(2): 164-179. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025012 |
[2] | Weisong Zhou, Kaihe Wang, Wei Zhu . Synchronization for discrete coupled fuzzy neural networks with uncertain information via observer-based impulsive control. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(1): 17-31. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024003 |
[3] | Yanchao He, Yuzhen Bai . Finite-time stability and applications of positive switched linear delayed impulsive systems. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(2): 178-194. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024016 |
[4] | M. Haripriya, A. Manivannan, S. Dhanasekar, S. Lakshmanan . Finite-time synchronization of delayed complex dynamical networks via sampled-data controller. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(1): 73-84. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025006 |
[5] | Yunsi Yang, Jun-e Feng, Lei Jia . Recent advances of finite-field networks. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(3): 244-255. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023021 |
[6] | Gani Stamov, Ekaterina Gospodinova, Ivanka Stamova . Practical exponential stability with respect to h−manifolds of discontinuous delayed Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with variable impulsive perturbations. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2021, 1(1): 26-34. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2021003 |
[7] | Hongyu Ma, Dadong Tian, Mei Li, Chao Zhang . Reachable set estimation for 2-D switched nonlinear positive systems with impulsive effects and bounded disturbances described by the Roesser model. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(2): 152-162. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024014 |
[8] | Hongwei Zheng, Yujuan Tian . Exponential stability of time-delay systems with highly nonlinear impulses involving delays. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(1): 103-120. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025008 |
[9] | Tengda Wei, Xiang Xie, Xiaodi Li . Persistence and periodicity of survival red blood cells model with time-varying delays and impulses. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2021, 1(1): 12-25. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2021002 |
[10] | Lusong Ding, Weiwei Sun . Neuro-adaptive finite-time control of fractional-order nonlinear systems with multiple objective constraints. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(4): 355-369. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023029 |
This paper reviews circumstances where governance arrangements and organizational innovations assign value to carbon emission mitigations or energy demand reductions. The creation of such value hinges upon 1) the effective governance of financial mechanisms to create demand; and 2) the ability of organizations to assetize and supply carbon emission mitigations and energy demand reductions as commodified private goods. To analyse the political and organizational governance of such demand and supply systems, this paper uses insights from transaction cost economics. On the demand side, transaction costs are reduced through the innovative governance of markets at national level, such as white certificate markets for energy savings, and international level, such as baseline-and-credit systems for carbon emissions reductions. Strict rules regarding accountability, transparency, measurement, reporting, verification, and inclusion reduce transaction costs for organizations to assetize reductions and mitigations on the supply side. Despite limited success to date, these innovations provide the basis for international carbon emissions mitigation governance through climate clubs based on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This paper concludes that such clubs provide the basis for creating consistent demand for carbon emission mitigations and associated energy demand reductions through the positive pricing of mitigation actions.
Currently, the study of non-linear fractional differential equations (NLFDEs) play a key role in the arena of solitary wave theory. The analysis of such models [1,2,3], is significant to understand the everyday physical phenomena in non-linear evolution models. Nowadays technological developments have exposed that, fractional calculus have developed as a dominant instrument in numerous fields of applied sciences and engineering [4,5]. A big advantage of fractional models is that their narrative is more suitable than the ordinary models [6]. These properties motivate our interest to yield consideration in a noteworthy and appropriate model for (4+1)-dimensional fractional-order non-linear Fokas equation. Non-linear Fokas equation is one of the well-known physical models [7,8] that defines a huge diversity of phenomena, such as non-linear optics, fluid mechanics, condensed matter, and plasmas. The properties of fractional derivatives are complex, therefore, it is not easy to solve fractional-order problems using novel derivatives. As for as we know, there is no regular scheme to answer the fractional-order non-linear models. A number of novel arithmetical and analytical schemes [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], are suggested for fractional-order models by using ordinary calculus, however, it's static task for the scholars. Fokas [21] improved the Lax couples of integrable non-linear KP and DS equations, and consequent the simple wave equation. In wave systems, DS and KP models are proposed to define the surface and internal waves in canals with altering depth and breadth [22,23]. The Fokas equation has many applications in quantum mechanics and plasma physics to explore the transmission of solitons. The important applications of the Fokas equation lie in real world problems considered as a higher dimensional integrable model in mathematical physics. The importance of the Fokas equation suggests that the idea of complexifying time can be investigated in the context of modern field theories via the existence of integrable nonlinear equations in four spatial dimensions involving complex time [24,25]. In this paper, we deal the non-linear fractional-order (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation (FE),
4∂2αu∂tα∂xα−∂3α∂x3α(∂u∂y)+∂α∂xα(∂3u∂y3)+12∂αu∂xα∂u∂y+12u∂α∂xα(∂u∂y)−6∂2u∂z∂w=0, | (1.1) |
where u is a function and wave velocity physically also 0<α<1. While α=1 then Eq (1.1) converts to simple (4+1)-dimensional FE. Assume this general Eq (1.1) to designate the gesture of waves in multifaceted broadcasting. It shows the distortion or dispersion of the external wave. So, various types of solution of FE will offer us proposals to instruct the multifaceted system of DS and KD models. Also, according above-stated evidences and the significant uses of the FE, it is crucial to discover the innovative solitons solutions of Eq (1.1). In recent times, physicists and mathematicians have great concern to discover the Eq (1.1), such as Zhang et al. [26] applied the sub-equation method (SM) to determine the solution of Eq (1.1) using some derivative in the form of rational, trigonometric, and functions of hyperbolic. Zhang et al. [27] utilized the new SM, in fractional form of (G0=G)-expansion scheme. Choi et al. [28] applied the SM using different schemes and attained the novel analytical solutions of Eq (1.1). Zhang [29] used Exp-function method to explore the solitary wave solution of Eq (1.1). Zhao et al.[30] suggested the improved fractional (G0=G)-expansion scheme and acquire the exact solutions. Solitons are used to denote the particle-like properties of non-linear pulses. The significance of solitons is due to their existence in a variety of non-linear differential equations representing many complex nonlinear phenomena, such as acoustics, optics, convictive fluids, condensed matter, and solid-state physics. There are numerous type of solitary wave and solitons solutions [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
The study of non-linear PDEs has become much significant in pure and applied mathematics from many years. Through the aid of computer technology, the new horizons are opened in the field of applied sciences for the mathematicians. There has been a growing interest in PDEs which are frequently used in engineering sciences and mathematical physics. The PDEs arise commonly in biological and physical sciences as well. Many problems of physics, chemistry, and engineering lead naturally to the resolution of PDEs. In the light of the literature review, there are various models of PDEs, particularly, PDEs whose exact solutions need to be discussed. The application of non-linear PDEs in mathematical modeling has induced a motivation for research in the field of differential problems.
The prominent concern of this existing study is to utilize the novel meanings of fractional-order derivative, named conformable derivative, for space-time fractional-order (4+1)-dimensional FE. As our best knowledge the considered methods have not been utilized for such model in the literature. Several type of solutions in the form of bright soliton, dark soliton, combined dark-bright soliton, periodic soliton and general solitary waves solutions of FE are missing in the literature. As compared our obtained results with previous existing results in literature, some of results are not available in literature with other methods lies in [42,43,44,45,46]. In this article our goal is to discover novel various soliton solutions of (4+1)-dimensional fractional-order non-linear Fokas equation using Sardar-subequation [47,48] and new extended hyperbolic function method [49,50,51,52]. As a result, novel soliton solutions are more generalized and in different form which have never been obtained before. To the best of our knowledge, these novel properties and interesting structures are investigated for the first time in (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation. Our results enrich the variety of the dynamics of higher-dimensional non-linear wave field. It is hoped that these results will provide some valuable information in the higher-dimensional non-linear field.
The layouts of this paper are: Section 2 contains the governing model. Section 3 consists on the analysis of the methods. In section 4 the applications of the proposed methods are presented. Section 5 describes results and discussion and conclusion of this work is presented in section 6.
Progress in fractional-calculus is more beneficial for scholars to express the physical phenomena with novel techniques. Newly, Caputo et al. [53] modified the Caputo derivative [54], Atangana-Baleanu (AB) presented a novel fractional derivative (FD), known as AB derivative [55]. In 2014, Khalil et al. [56] proposed a conformable derivative. The Caputo, Riemann-Liouville (RL) [57,58], and further derivatives do not follow the simple instructions, which are supposed by Newtonian kind simple derivative. Such as:
(1) For RL derivative, DαtP≠0, P is any constant.
(2) For Caputo and RL derivative,
Dαt(f(t)g(t))≠f(t)Dαtg(t)+g(t)Dαtf(t). |
(3) For Caputo and RL derivative,
Dαtf(t)g(t)≠g(t)Dαtf(t)−f(t)Dαtg(t)g(t)2. |
Definition 2.1: [56] The FD of a function k=k(t):[0,∞)⟶ℜ of order ς>0 is described as
Dςtk(t)=limϵ→0k(ϵt1−ς+t)−k(t)ϵ,0<ς≤1. | (2.1) |
At ς=1, the fractional-order derivative converted to integer-order derivative.
Theorem 2.2: We have the following properties when ς∈(0,1] and k,k1 are conformable functions as follows:
∙Dςtk(t)=t1−ςdk(t)dt.
∙Dςtth=htn−ς,∀h∈R.
∙Dςtc=0, ∀ constant functions k(t)=0.
∙Dςt(p1∗k(t)+p2∗k1(t))=p1∗Dςtk(t)+p2∗Dςtk1(t),∀p1,p2∈R.
∙Dςt(k(t)k1(t))=k(t)Dςtk1(t)+k1(t)Dςth(t).
∙Dςtk(t)k1(t)=k1(t)Dςt−k(t)Dςtk1(t)k1(t)2.
∙Dςt(kok1)(t)=t1−ςk′1(t)k′(k1(t)).
In this section, we have analyzed two methods that are applied to construct novel solitons solutions of the given model.
In this section, we describe the offered methods to solve the fractional model, we assume the proposed model as
H(u,∂αu∂tα,∂αu∂xα,∂αu∂yα,∂αu∂zα,∂αu∂wα,∂2αu∂t2α,∂2αu∂x2α,∂2αu∂y2α,....)=0, |
where u is a function. Using following wave transformations in (3.1)
u(x,y,z,w,t)=U(η),η=β1xαα+β2yαα+β3zαα+β4wαα−vtαα, |
here v is frequency while β1,β2,β3,β4 are wave lengths, respectively. Using (3.2) into (3.1), we yield an ODE as follows
P(U,U′,U″,...)=0. | (3.1) |
Where U′, U″ and U‴ are the first, second and the third derivatives of U, respectively w. r. t η and so on.
U(η)=M∑j=0FjΦi(η), | (3.2) |
where Fj are constants and Φ(η) accept the (3.7) as follows
(Φ′(η))2=ϵ+δΦ2(η)+Φ4(η), | (3.3) |
here ϵ and δ are constants.
Case 1: When δ>0andϵ=0, then
Φ±1(η)=±√−δpqsechpq(√δη), |
Φ±2(η)=±√δpqcschpq(√δη), |
where, sechpq(η)=2peη+qe−η,cschpq(η)=2peη−qe−η.
Case 2: When δ<0andϵ=0, then
Φ±3(η)=±√−δpqsecpq(√−δη), |
Φ±4(η)=±√−δpqcscpq(√−δη), |
where, secpq(η)=2peιη+qe−ιη,cscpq(η)=2ιpeιη−qe−ιη.
Case 3: When δ<0andϵ=δ24b, then
Φ±5(η)=±√−δ2tanhpq(√−δ2η), |
Φ±6(η)=±√−δ2cothpq(√−δ2η), |
Φ±7(η)=±√−δ2(tanhpq(√−2δη)±ι√pqsechpq(√−2δη)), |
Φ±8(η)=±√−δ2(cothpq(√−2δη)±√pqcschpq(√−2δη)), |
Φ±9(η)=±√−δ8(tanhpq(√−δ8η)+cothpq(√−δ8η)), |
where, tanhpq(η)=peη−qe−ηpeη+qe−η,cothpq(η)=peη+qe−ηpeη−qe−η.
Case 4: When δ>0andϵ=δ24, then
Φ±10(η)=±√δ2tanpq(√δ2η), |
Φ±11(η)=±√δ2cotpq(√δ2η), |
Φ±12(η)=±√δ2(tanpq(√2δη)±√pqsecpq(√2δη)), |
Φ±13(η)=±√δ2(cotpq(√2δη)±√pqcscpq(√2δη)), |
Φ±14(η)=±√δ8(tanpq(√δ8η)+cotpq(√δ8η)), |
where, tanpq(η)=−ιpeιη−qe−ιηpeιη+qe−ιη,cotpq(η)=ιpeιη+qe−ιηpeιη−qe−ιη.
The new EHFM has two phases as follows.
Form 1: Consider FPDE is taken in (3.1) and using the wave transformations in (3.2) to obtain (3.3). Assume (3.3) admits the solution as follows:
U(η)=M∑j=0FjΦi(η), | (3.4) |
where Fj are constants and Φ(η) accept the (3.7)
dΦdη=Φ√Λ+ΔΦ2,Λ,Θ∈R. | (3.5) |
On balancing in (3.3) the value of N is obtained. Inserting (3.6) into (3.3) along with (3.7), yields a set of equations. By resolving the equations, we get the solutions that accepts (3.5), as
Set 1: When Λ>0 and Δ>0,
Φ(η)=−√ΛΔcsch(√Λ(η+η0)). | (3.6) |
Set 2: When Λ<0 and Δ>0,
Φ(η)=√−ΛΔsec(√−Λ(η+η0)). | (3.7) |
Set 3: When Λ>0 and Δ<0,
Φ(η)=√Λ−Δsech(√Λ(η+η0)). | (3.8) |
Set 4: When Λ<0 and Δ>0,
Φ(η)=√−ΛΔcsc(√−Λ(η+η0)). | (3.9) |
Set 5: When Λ>0 and Δ=0,
Φ(η)=exp(√Λ(η+η0)). | (3.10) |
Set 6: When Λ<0 and Δ=0,
Φ(η)=cos(√−Λ(η+η0))+ιsin(√−Λ(η+η0)). | (3.11) |
Set 7: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,
Φ(η)=±1(√Δ(η+η0)). | (3.12) |
Set 8: When Λ=0 and Δ<0,
Φ(η)=±ι(√−Δ(η+η0)). | (3.13) |
Form 2: Adopting the procedure as earlier, consider that Φ(η) accept the following ODE as
dΦdη=Λ+ΔΦ2,Λ,Δ∈R. | (3.14) |
Substituting (3.6) into (3.3) along with (3.16), gets a set of equations with the values of Fj(j=1,2,3,...M). We assume that (3.5) has solutions as
Set 1: When ΛΔ>0,
Φ(η)=sn(Λ)√ΛΔtan(√ΛΔ(η+η0)). | (3.15) |
Set 2: When ΛΔ>0,
Φ(η)=−sn(Λ)√ΛΔcot(√ΛΔ(η+η0)). | (3.16) |
Set 3: When ΛΔ<0,
Φ(η)=sn(Λ)√Λ−Δtanh(√−ΛΔ(η+η0)). | (3.17) |
Set 4: When ΛΔ<0,
Φ(η)=sn(Λ)√Λ−Δcoth(√−ΛΔ(η+η0)). | (3.18) |
Set 5: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,
Φ(η)=−1Δ(η+η0). | (3.19) |
Set 6: When Λ∈R and Δ=0,
Φ(η)=Λ(η+η0). | (3.20) |
Note: sn is well-known sign function.
Here, we construct the solitons solutions of fractional-order Fokas equation. The Eq (1.1) with Eq (3.2) becomes
β1β2(β21−β22)U″+(4β1v+6β3β4)U−6β1β2U2=0. | (4.1) |
Now, we apply the SSM to solve the (4+1)-dimensional FE. Using balance method on (4.1), gets M=2, so (3.6) decreases to
U(η)=F0+F1Φ(η)+F2Φ(η)2, | (4.2) |
where F0, F1 and F2 are constants. Inserting (4.2) into (4.1) and comparing the coefficients of Φ(η) to zero, we get a set of equations in F0,F1,F2,ϵandv.
Working on the set of equations, yields
F0=F0,F1=0,F2=(β21−β22), |
ϵ=2δβ21F0−2δβ22F0−3F20(β21−β22)2, |
v=−2δβ31β2+2δβ1β32−3β3β4+6β1β2F02β1. | (4.3) |
Case 1: When δ>0andϵ=0, then
u±1,1(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−pqδsechpq(√δ(η)))2, | (4.4) |
u±1,2(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√pqδcschpq(√δ(η)))2. | (4.5) |
Case 2: When δ<0andϵ=0, then
u±1,3(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−pqδsecpq(√−δ(η)))2, | (4.6) |
u±1,4(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−pqδcscpq(√−δ(η)))2. | (4.7) |
Case 3: When δ<0andϵ=δ24b, then
u±1,5(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−δ2tanhpq(√−δ2(η))2, | (4.8) |
u±1,6(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−δ2cothpq(√−δ2(η))2, | (4.9) |
u±1,7(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−δ2(tanhpq(√−2δ(η))±ι√pqsechpq(√−2δ(η))))2, | (4.10) |
u±1,8(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−δ2(cothpq(√−2δ(η))±√pqcschpq(√−2δ(η))))2, | (4.11) |
u±1,9(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√−δ8(tanhpq(√−δ8(η))+cothpq(√−δ8(η))))2. | (4.12) |
Case 4: When δ>0andϵ=δ24, then
u±1,10(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√δ2tanpq(√δ2(η)))2, | (4.13) |
u±1,11(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√δ2cotpq(√δ2(η)))2, | (4.14) |
u±1,12(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√δ2(tanpq(√2δ(η))±√pqsecpq(√2δ(η))))2, | (4.15) |
u±1,13(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√δ2(cotpq(√2δ(η))±√pqcscpq(√2δ(η))))2, | (4.16) |
u±1,14(x,y,z,w,t)=F0+(β21−β22)(±√δ8(tanpq(√δ8(η))+cotpq(√δ8(η))))2. | (4.17) |
Form 1: Now, we apply the new EHFM to solve the (4+1)-dimensional FE. Using balance method in (4.1), yields M=2, so (3.6) changes to
U(η)=F0+F1Φ(η)+F2Φ(η)2, | (4.18) |
where F0, F1 and F2 are constants. Inserting (4.18) into (4.1) and associating the constants of Φ(η) with zero, we yield the equations in F0,F1,F2,ΛandΔ.
On working set of equations, we achieve
F0=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2,F1=0, |
F2=F2,Λ=2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22). |
Δ=F2(β21−β22). | (4.19) |
Set 1: When Λ>0 and Δ>0,
u1(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(√2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2csch(√2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0)))2. | (4.20) |
Set 2: When Λ<0 and Δ>0,
u2(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(√2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2sec(√−2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0)))2. | (4.21) |
Set 3: When Λ>0 and Δ<0,
u3(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(√2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2sech(√−2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0)))2. | (4.22) |
Set 4: When Λ<0 and Δ<0,
u4(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(√2vβ1+3β3β42F2β1β2csc(√−2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0)))2. | (4.23) |
Set 5: When Λ>0 and Δ=0,
u5(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(exp(√2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0)))2. | (4.24) |
Set 6: When Λ<0 and Δ=0,
u6(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(cos(√−2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0))+ιsin(√−2vβ1+3β3β42β1β2(β21−β22)(η+η0)))2. | (4.25) |
Set 7: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,
u7(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(±1(√F2(β21−β22)(η+η0))2. | (4.26) |
Set 8: When Λ=0 and Δ<0,
u8(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β43β1β2+F2(±ι(√−F2(β21−β22)(η+η0))2, | (4.27) |
where η=β1xαα+β2yαα+β3zαα+β4wαα−vtαα.
Form 2: Utilizing balance method in (4.1), gives M=2, so (3.6) converts to
u(η)=F0+F1Φ(η)+F2Φ(η)2, | (4.28) |
where F0, F1 and F2 are numbers. Inserting (4.28) into (4.1) and associating the constants of Φ(η) with zero, we attain set of equations in F0,F1,F2,Λ,andΔ.
On working the set of equations, we achieve
F0=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2,F1=0, |
F2=(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22),Λ=Λ, |
Δ=√(2vβ1+3β3β4)22Λβ31β2−2Λβ1β32. | (4.29) |
Set 1: When ΛΔ>0,
u9(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22)(χ√2Λ2β1β2(β21−β22)√(2vβ1+3β3β4)2tan(√(2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β2−2β1−β32)(η+η0)))2. | (4.30) |
Set 2: When ΛΔ>0,
u10(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22)(−χ√2Λ2β1β2(β21−β22)√(2vβ1+3β3β4)2cot(√(2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β2−2β1−β32)(η+η0)))2. | (4.31) |
Set 3: When ΛΔ<0,
u11(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22)(χ√2Λ2β1β2(β21−β22)√(2vβ1+3β3β4)2tanh(√(2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β2−2β1−β32)(η+η0)))2. | (4.32) |
Set 4: When ΛΔ<0,
u12(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22)(χ√2Λ2β1β2(β21−β22)√(2vβ1+3β3β4)2coth(√(2vβ1+3β3β4)22β31β2−2β1−β32)(η+η0)))2. | (4.33) |
Set 5: When Λ=0 and Δ>0,
u13(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22)(−1√(2vβ1+3β3β4)22Λβ31β2−2Λβ1β32(η+η0))2. | (4.34) |
Set 6: When Λ∈R and Δ=0,
u14(x,y,z,w,t)=2vβ1+3β3β4−2√(2vβ1+3β3β4)26β1β2+(2vβ1+3β3β4)24Λ2β21β22(β21−β22)(Λ(η+η0))2, | (4.35) |
where χ=sgn(Λ), η=β1xαα+β2yαα+β3zαα+β4wαα−vtαα.
Herein study, we have successfully built various solitons solutions for the (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation applying SSM and new EHFM. The proposed methods are measured most efficient techniques in this field and that are not applied to this model previous. To analyze physically, 3D and 2D graphs of some selected results are added with suitable parameters. These obtained solutions determine their applications in propagation to carry information since solitons have the competency to mobile long spaces without drop and shifting their systems. In this study, we added only certain figures (see Figures 1–7) to dodge overloading the document. Absolutely the achieved results are fresh and different from that reported results.
We have constructed novel multi solitons solutions for the nonlinear fractional-order Fokas equation by applying the SSM and new EHFM. From results we obtained multi solitons solutions such as dark, singular, bright and periodic solitons. By the purpose of describe the behavior of achieved solutions of the model, we plotted some particular solutions by assigning the suitable values to the parameters involved. The obtained results may have much inspiration in various fields of physical sciences. From obtained results, we can know that the under study techniques are proficient, consistent and beneficial for rescuing the exact solutions of nonlinear FPDEs in a wide range. Also, these results are supportive to learn the dynamics of nonlinear waves in optics, hydrodynamics, solid state physics, and plasma. In future, we anticipate that this study is a step towards the solutions of such kinds of higher dimensional problems by using the proposed methods in this study. This work may be extended for a novel fractional order Fokas dynamical model in future.
The work in this paper has been supported by the Polish National Science Centre under the grant OPUS 14 No. 2017/27/B/ST8/01330.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Adams G, Converse B, Hales A, et al. (2021) People systematically overlook subtractive change. Nature 592: 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03380-y doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03380-y
![]() |
[2] |
Aldrich E, Koerner C (2018) White certificate trading: A dying concept or just making its debut? Part 1: Market status and trends. Elec J 31: 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2018.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.tej.2018.03.002
![]() |
[3] |
Anderson T, Parker D (2013) Transaction Costs and Environmental Markets: The Role of Entrepreneurs. Rev Env Econ Policy 7: 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ret011 doi: 10.1093/reep/ret011
![]() |
[4] | Aspers P, Beckert J (eds) (2011) The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[5] | Barrett J, Pye S, Betts-Davies S, et al. (2021) The role of energy demand reduction in achieving net-zero in the UK, Oxford: Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions. |
[6] |
Birch K (2017) Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy: Finance, Assetization, and the Management of Value. Sci Technol Hum Val 42: 460-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916661633 doi: 10.1177/0162243916661633
![]() |
[7] | Bertoldi P (2011) Assessment and Experience of White Certificate Schemes in the European Union. European Commission, Directorate General, Joint Research Centre. Available from: https://www.iea.org/media/workshops/2011/aupedee/Paolo_Bertoldi.pdf. |
[8] | Bertoldi P, Rezessy S (2006) Tradable certificates for energy savings (white certificates)-theory and practice. EUR 22196 EN. Luxembourg: Institute for Environment and Sustainability, JRC, European Commission. |
[9] | BMF (2021) Steps towards an alliance for climate, competitiveness and industry-building blocks of a cooperative and open climate club. Available from https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Downloads/Climate-Action/key-issues-paper-international-climate-club.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4. |
[10] | Böhm S, Dabhi S (2009) Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: MayFly. |
[11] |
Böhm S, Misoczky M, Moog S (2012) Greening Capitalism? A Marxist Critique of Carbon Markets. Organ Stud 33: 1617-1638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612463326 doi: 10.1177/0170840612463326
![]() |
[12] | Böll H (1963) Murke's Collected Silences. London: Redwood Press. |
[13] | Born R (2018) Distributed Ledger Technology for Climate Action Assessment. Zürich: Climate-KIC. |
[14] | Bowers J (1997) Sustainability and Environmental Economics: An Alternative Perspective. London: Longman. |
[15] | Boscan L, Poudineh R (2016) Flexibility-Enabling Contracts in Electricity Markets. Oxford Energy Comment, July 2016. Available from: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Flexibility-Enabling-Contracts-in-Electricity-Markets.pdf. |
[16] | Boza-Kiss B, Bertoldi P, Economidou M (2017) Energy Service Companies in the EU-Status review and recommendations for further market development with a focus on Energy Performance Contracting. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. |
[17] |
Calel R (2013) Carbon markets: a historical overview. WIREs Clim Change 2013: 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.208 doi: 10.1002/wcc.208
![]() |
[18] | CEER (2020) CEER Paper on DSO Procedures of Procurement of Flexibility-C19-DS-55-05. Brussels: Council of European Regulators. |
[19] |
Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M (2016). Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 4: 2292-2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339
![]() |
[20] | Clark J, Knox-Hayes J (2011) An Emerging Geography of Intangible Assets: Financialization in Carbon Emission Credit and Intellectual Property Markets, School of Public Policy Working Papers, Georgia Institute of Technology. |
[21] |
Clemens H, Bailis R, Nyambane A, et al. (2018) Africa Biogas Partnership Program: A review of clean cooking implementation through market development in East Africa. Energy Sustain Dev 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.012 doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.012
![]() |
[22] | Coase R (1959) The Federal Communications Commission. J Law Econ 2: 1-40. |
[23] | Coase R (1960) The Problem of Social Cost. J Law Econ 3: 1-44. |
[24] | Coase R (1998) The New Institutional Economics. Am Econ Rev 88: 72-74. |
[25] | Coulon M, Stua M (2015) A Dynamic Mechanism for Transparent and Equitable Distribution of Global Emissions Reductions. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2665100 |
[26] |
Creutzig F, Roy J, Lamb W, et al. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Chang 8: 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1 doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
![]() |
[27] | Das K (2015) Climate clubs: carrots, sticks and more. Econ Polit Wkly 50: 24-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24482588 |
[28] | De Serres A, Murtin F, Nicoletti G (2010) A Framework for Assessing Green Growth Policies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Economics Department Working Papers no. 774. |
[29] | Dreyfuss R, Frankel S (2015) From Incentive to Commodity to Asset: How International Law is Reconceptualising Intellectual Property. Mich J Int Law 36: 557-602. |
[30] | EC (2021) Questions and Answers-Emissions Trading-Putting a price on carbon. European commission. European Commission. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_3542. |
[31] | Ecosystem Marketplace (2021) EM Insights on Voluntary Carbon Markets. Available from: https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/whos-buying-carbon-offsets/. |
[32] | EU (2019) Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union L158/125. |
[33] | Eyre N, Killip G (eds.) (2019) Shifting the focus: energy demand in a net-zero carbon UK. Oxford: Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions. |
[34] |
Fawcett T, Killip G (2018) Re-thinking energy efficiency in European policy: Practitioners' use of 'multiple benefits' arguments. J Clean Prod 210: 1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.026 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.026
![]() |
[35] |
Giraudet LG, Bodineau L, Finon D (2012) The cost and benefits of white certificates schemes. Energy Effic 5: 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6 doi: 10.1007/s12053-011-9134-6
![]() |
[36] |
Grubler A, Wilson C, Bento N, et al. (2018) A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nat Energy 3: 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6
![]() |
[37] | IEA (2017a) Market-based Instruments for Energy Efficiency-Policy Choice and Design. Paris: International Energy Agency. |
[38] | IEA (2017b) Energy Efficiency 2017. Paris: International Energy Agency. |
[39] |
Imbault F, Swiatek M, de Beaufort R, et al. (2017) The green Blockchain-Managing decentralized energy production and consumption. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2017.7977613 doi: 10.1109/EEEIC.2017.7977613
![]() |
[40] | IPCC (2014) AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. |
[41] | IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5 ℃. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. |
[42] |
Karltorp K, Guo S, Sanden B (2017). Handling financial resource mobilisation in technological innovation systems-The case of Chinese wind power. J Clean Prod 142: 3872-3882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.075 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.075
![]() |
[43] | Kitchin R (2014) The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and their Consequences. London: Sage. |
[44] |
Knox-Hayes J (2010) Creating the Carbon Market Institution: Analysis of the organizations and relationships that build the market. Compet Change 14: 176-202. https://doi.org/10.1179/102452910X12587274068277 doi: 10.1179/102452910X12587274068277
![]() |
[45] |
Kondziella H, Bruckner T (2016) Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems: a review of research results and methodologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53: 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.199 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.199
![]() |
[46] | Kornberger M, Justesen L, Koed Madsen A, et al. (Eds.) (2015) Making Things Valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[47] |
Kragh-Furbo M, Walker G (2018) Electrictiy as (Big) Data: Metering, spatiotemporal granularity and value. Big Dat Soc 5: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718757254 doi: 10.1177/2053951718757254
![]() |
[48] |
Leonelli S (2014) What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of Big Data in biology. Big Dat Soc 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714534395 doi: 10.1177/2053951714534395
![]() |
[49] | Lohmann L (2012) Financialization, commodification and carbon: The contradiction of neoliberal climate policy. Soc Regist 48: 107. |
[50] | Lütken S (2017) Foreword, In: Stua M., From the Paris Agreement to a Low-Carbon Bretton Woods, Cham: Springer, ix-xii. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54699-5 |
[51] | Luttrell C, Loft L, Fernanda Gebara M, et al. (2013) Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecol Soc 18: 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05834-180452 |
[52] |
MacKenzie D (2009) Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Account Org Soc 34: 440-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
![]() |
[53] | Marcantonini C, Teixido-Figueras J, Verde S, et al. (2017) Low-carbon Innovation and Investment in the EU ETS. Florence School of Regulation Policy Brief 2017/22. Florence: Florence School of Regulation. |
[54] |
Mears A, Martin J (2020) Fully Flexible Loads in Distributed Energy Management: PV, Batteries, Loads and Value Stacking in Virtual Power Plants. Eng London 6: 736-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.004
![]() |
[55] |
Mehling M, van Asselt H, Das K, et al. (2018) Beat Protectionism and Emissions at a Stroke. Nature 559: 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05708-7 doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05708-7
![]() |
[56] | Meyer A (2000) Contraction and convergence: The global solutions to climate change. Cambridge: Schumacher Briefings Paperback. |
[57] | Michaelowa A (Ed.) (2012) Carbon Markets of Climate Finance? Abingdon: Routledge. |
[58] | Morris S (2012) Armstrong DLW GmbH vs Winnington Networks Ltd. EWHC 10 (Ch). Available from: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2012/10.html. |
[59] |
Nolden C, Sorrell S, Polzin F (2016) Catalysing the energy service market: The role of intermediaries. Energ Policy 98: 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.041 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.041
![]() |
[60] | Nolden C, Stua M (2020) Carbon and Climate, In: Parker M (ed.), Life After COVID-19-The Other Side of Crisis, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 135-144. |
[61] |
Nordhaus W (2015) Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. Am Econ Rev 105: 1339-1370. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001 doi: 10.1257/aer.15000001
![]() |
[62] | North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[63] |
Palmer PI, O'Doherty S, Allen G, et al. (2018) A measurement-based verification framework for UK greenhouse gas emissions: An overview of the Greenhouse gAs Uk and Global Emissions (GAUGE) project. Atmospheric Chem Phys 18: 11753-11777. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11753-2018 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-11753-2018
![]() |
[64] |
Parag Y, Butbul G (2018) Flexiwatts and seamless technology: Public perceptions of demand flexibility through smart home technology. Energy Res Soc Sci 39: 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.012
![]() |
[65] |
Pei Q, Liu L, Zhang D (2013) Carbon emission right as a new property right: rescue CDM developers in China from 2012. Int Environ Agreem P 13: 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9191-0 doi: 10.1007/s10784-012-9191-0
![]() |
[66] |
Penasco C, Diaz Anadon L, Verdolini E (2021) Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments. Nat Clim Chang 11: 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00971-x doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-00971-x
![]() |
[67] | Peskett L, Brodnig G (2011). Carbon rights in REDD+: exploring he implications for poor and vulnerable people. Washington DC: World Bank and REDD-net. |
[68] | Pigou A (1932) The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan. |
[69] |
Pihl H (2020) A Climate Club as a complementary design to the UN Paris agreement. Pol Design Pract 3: 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1710911 doi: 10.1080/25741292.2019.1710911
![]() |
[70] |
Pirlot A (2021) Carbon Border Adjustment Measures: A Straightforward Multi-Purpose Climate Instrument? J Environ Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab028 doi: 10.1093/jel/eqab028
![]() |
[71] |
Ringinus A, Torvanger A, Underdal A (2002) Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int Environ Agreements 2: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1015041613785 doi: 10.1023/A:1015041613785
![]() |
[72] | Rinkinen J, Shove E, Marsden G (2021) Conceptualising Demand-A distinct approach to consumption and practice. Abingdon: Routledge. |
[73] |
Rosenow J, Cowart R, Thomas S (2019) Market-based instruments for energy efficiency: a global review. Energy Effic 12: 1379-1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9766-x doi: 10.1007/s12053-018-9766-x
![]() |
[74] |
Schneider L (2011) Perverse incentives under the CDM: an evaluation of HFC-23 destruction projects. Clim Pol 11: 851-864. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0096 doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0096
![]() |
[75] | Sergson K (2013) Price Instruments, In: Shogen J (ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, Elsevier, 3: 185-192. |
[76] |
Shove E (2018) What is wrong with energy efficiency? Build Res Inf 46: 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746 doi: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746
![]() |
[77] | Sirkis A, Hourcade JC, Dasgupta D, et al. (2015) Moving the trillions: A debate on positive pricing of mitigation actions. Rio de Janeiro: Brasil No Clima. |
[78] |
Sorrell S (2007) The economics of energy service contracts. Energ Policy 35: 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.009 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.009
![]() |
[79] | Stavins R (2001) Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments. Washington DC: Resources for the Future. |
[80] |
Steinberger J, van Niel J, Bourg D (2009) Profiting from negawatts: Reducing absolute consumption and emissions through a performance-based energy economy. Energ Policy 37: 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.030 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.030
![]() |
[81] |
Stua M (2013) Evidence of the clean development mechanism impact on the Chinese electric power system's low-carbon transition. Energ Policy 62: 1309-1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.039 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.039
![]() |
[82] | Stua M (2017) From the Paris Agreement to a Low-Carbon Bretton Woods. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54699-5 |
[83] |
Stua M, Nolden C, Coulon M (2022) Climate clubs embedded in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Resour Conserv Recycl 180: 106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106178 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106178
![]() |
[84] | UK Government (2018) Smart meters: a guide. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/smart-meters-how-they-work. |
[85] | UNEA (2019) The Case for a Digital Ecosystem for the Environment: Bringing together data, algorithms and insights for sustainable development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Assembly and Science Policy Business Forum. |
[86] | UNEP (2018) Emissions Gap Report 2018. Nairobi: United National Environment Programme. |
[87] | UNFCCC (2015) The Paris Agreement. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. |
[88] |
Weischer L, Morgan J, Patel M (2012) Climate clubs: Can small groups on countries make a big difference in addressing climate change? RECIEL 21: 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12007 doi: 10.1111/reel.12007
![]() |
[89] | Williamson O (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press. |
[90] | World Bank (2018) Blockchain and Emerging Digital Technologies for Enhancing Post-2020 Climate Markets. Washington DC: World Bank. |
1. | Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, Mohammed M.M. Jaradat, Asim Zafar, Mamdouh E. Elbrolosy, Adel A. Elmandouh, Mohammed Sallah, Bifurcation of some new traveling wave solutions for the time–space M- fractional MEW equation via three altered methods, 2022, 41, 22113797, 105896, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105896 | |
2. | Imran Siddique, Arshad M. Mirza, Kausar Shahzadi, M. Ali Akbar, Fahd Jarad, Yusuf Gurefe, Diverse Precise Traveling Wave Solutions Possessing Beta Derivative of the Fractional Differential Equations Arising in Mathematical Physics, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/5613708 | |
3. | Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, M. Ali Akbar, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, Asim Zafar, Yusuf Gurefe, Diverse Exact Soliton Solutions of the Time Fractional Clannish Random Walker’s Parabolic Equation via Dual Novel Techniques, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/1680560 | |
4. | Neslihan Ozdemir, M-truncated soliton solutions of the fractional (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation, 2023, 13, 2146-5703, 123, 10.11121/ijocta.2023.1321 | |
5. | Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, Fahd Jarad, Mamdouh E. Elbrolosy, Adel A. Elmandouh, Novel precise solutions and bifurcation of traveling wave solutions for the nonlinear fractional (3 + 1)-dimensional WBBM equation, 2023, 37, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S021797922350011X | |
6. | Muhammad Raheel, Asim Zafar, Adem Cevikel, Hadi Rezazadeh, Ahmet Bekir, Exact wave solutions of truncated M-fractional new hamiltonian amplitude equation through two analytical techniques, 2023, 37, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979223500030 | |
7. | Wael W. Mohammed, Clemente Cesarano, Farah M. Al-Askar, Solutions to the (4+1)-Dimensional Time-Fractional Fokas Equation with M-Truncated Derivative, 2022, 11, 2227-7390, 194, 10.3390/math11010194 | |
8. | Sadaf Irshad, Muhammad Shakeel, Aysha Bibi, Muhammad Sajjad, Kottakkran Sooppy Nisar, A comparative study of nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation in optics, 2023, 37, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984922502190 | |
9. | Riaz Ur Rahman, Waqas Ali Faridi, Magda Abd El-Rahman, Aigul Taishiyeva, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Emad Ahmad Az-Zo’bi, The Sensitive Visualization and Generalized Fractional Solitons’ Construction for Regularized Long-Wave Governing Model, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 136, 10.3390/fractalfract7020136 | |
10. | Sadaf Irshad, Muhammad Shakeel, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muhammad Sajjad, A Comparative Study for Fractional Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation in Optics, 2022, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4112847 | |
11. | Muath Awadalla, Aigul Taishiyeva, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Jihan Alahmadi, Abdullah A. Zaagan, Ahmet Bekir, Exact analytical soliton solutions of the M-fractional Akbota equation, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-64328-6 | |
12. | Umair Asghar, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Ali Akgül, Novel solitonic structure, Hamiltonian dynamics and lie symmetry algebra of biofilm, 2024, 9, 26668181, 100653, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100653 | |
13. | M. Raheel, Asim Zafar, Jian-Guo Liu, New periodic-wave, periodic-cross-kink wave, three wave and other analytical wave solitons of new (2+1)-dimensional KdV equation, 2024, 139, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04831-3 | |
14. | Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Ravi P. Agarwal, Iver Brevik, Mohamed Abdelwahed, Artion Kashuri, Majeed A. Yousif, On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 553, 10.3390/sym16050553 | |
15. | Abdullah A. Zaagan, Ali Altalbe, Ahmet Bekir, Dynamical analysis and soliton solutions of a variety of quantum nonlinear Zakharov–Kuznetsov models via three analytical techniques, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1427827 | |
16. | Fazal Badshah, Kalim U. Tariq, Mustafa Inc, Rizwan Javed, On soliton solutions of Fokas dynamical model via analytical approaches, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-023-06198-2 | |
17. | Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi, Modelling of KdV-Soliton Through Fractional Action and Emergence of Lump Waves, 2024, 23, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01141-6 | |
18. | Kai Fan, Jiankang Liu, Jinbin Wang, Chen Jin, Evolution Analysis of Strain Waves for the Fractal Nonlinear Propagation Equation of Longitudinal Waves in a Rod, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 586, 10.3390/fractalfract7080586 | |
19. | Khush Bukht Mehdi, Zubia Mehdi, Shamaila Samreen, Imran Siddique, Adel A. Elmandouh, Mamdouh E. Elbrolosy, M.S. Osman, Novel exact traveling wave solutions of the space-time fractional Sharma Tasso-Olver equation via three reliable methods, 2024, 11, 26668181, 100784, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100784 | |
20. | Naeem Ullah, Hamood Ur Rehman, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Hameed Ashraf, Asma Taskeen, Dynamic study of Clannish Random Walker’s parabolic equation via extended direct algebraic method, 2024, 56, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05767-9 | |
21. | Asim Zafar, M. Raheel, Ali M. Mahnashi, Ahmet Bekir, Mohamed R. Ali, A.S. Hendy, Exploring the new soliton solutions to the nonlinear M-fractional evolution equations in shallow water by three analytical techniques, 2023, 54, 22113797, 107092, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107092 | |
22. | Abdulaziz Khalid Alsharidi, Ahmet Bekir, Discovery of New Exact Wave Solutions to the M-Fractional Complex Three Coupled Maccari’s System by Sardar Sub-Equation Scheme, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1567, 10.3390/sym15081567 | |
23. | Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Computational soliton solutions for the fractional nonlinear dynamical model arising in water wave, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102950, 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102950 | |
24. | Haitham Qawaqneh, Jalil Manafian, Mohammed Alharthi, Yasser Alrashedi, Stability Analysis, Modulation Instability, and Beta-Time Fractional Exact Soliton Solutions to the Van der Waals Equation, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2257, 10.3390/math12142257 | |
25. | Asim Zafar, M. Raheel, Khalid K. Ali, Ahmet Bekir, New optical wave solutions of M-fractional nonlinear Schrödinger’s complex hyperbolic model by an efficient method, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924502257 | |
26. | Haitham Qawaqneh, Ali Altalbe, Ahmet Bekir, Kalim U. Tariq, Investigation of soliton solutions to the truncated M-fractional (3+1)-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation with periodic potential, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 23410, 10.3934/math.20241138 | |
27. | Boyu Liu, Wenyan Wang, An efficient numerical scheme in reproducing kernel space for space fractional partial differential equations, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 33286, 10.3934/math.20241588 | |
28. | Abdulrahman Alomair, Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, Ahmet Bekir, New Abundant Analytical Solitons to the Fractional Mathematical Physics Model via Three Distinct Schemes, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3691, 10.3390/math12233691 | |
29. | Abdulrahman Alomair, Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, Ahmet Bekir, Exploration of Soliton Solutions to the Special Korteweg–De Vries Equation with a Stability Analysis and Modulation Instability, 2024, 13, 2227-7390, 54, 10.3390/math13010054 | |
30. | Mahmoud Soliman, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen Badra, Islam Samir, Mostafa Eslami, Novel optical soliton solutions using improved modified extended tanh function method for fractional beta time derivative (2+1)-dimensional Schrödinger equation, 2024, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984925500848 | |
31. | M. B. Almatrafi, Solitary Wave Solutions to a Fractional-Order Fokas Equation via the Improved Modified Extended Tanh-Function Approach, 2024, 13, 2227-7390, 109, 10.3390/math13010109 | |
32. | Hongwei Ma, Riaz Ur Rahman, Solomon Manukure, Dynamical analysis and bifurcations in a fractional integrable equation, 2025, 125, 11100168, 600, 10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.138 | |
33. | Sevil Çulha Ünal, Solutions of the Fractional Combined KdV-mKdV Equation Using the Special Generalized Hyperbolic and Trigonometric Functions, 2025, 14, 1304-7981, 1, 10.54187/jnrs.1619374 | |
34. | Shami A. M. Alsallami, Exploring the interaction between lump, stripe and double-stripe, and periodic wave solutions of the Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky–Kaup–Kupershmidt system, 2025, 14, 2192-8029, 10.1515/nleng-2025-0129 |