The current study presents a bimodal therapeutic platform for cancer treatment. Bimodal implies that the presented drug loaded core-shell structure is capable of elevating the tumor tissue temperature (hyperthermia) through the superparamagnetic iron oxide core and simultaneously release a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(PARP-1)-modifying agent from the thermoresponsive shell. Magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite MTN was synthesized via an in situ free radical polymerization of thermo-responsive (N-isopropylacrylamide) (NIPAAm) monomer in the presence of 11-nm monodisperse SPIONs. The composite was allowed to swell in various concentrations of the PARP inhibitor: 5-aminoisoquinoline (5-AIQ) forming drug-loaded magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite (MTN-5.AIQ). Structural characterization of the formed composite is studied via various experimental tools. To assess the coil to globule transition temperature, the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) is determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) method and the cloud point (Tp) is determined by turbidometry. Magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite (MTN) is formed with excellent potential for hyperthermia. A high drug loading efficiency (85.72%) is obtained with convenient temperature dependent drug release kinetics. Biocompatibility and cytotoxic efficacy are tested on an in vivo and in vitro colorectal-adenocarcinoma model, respectively. MTN.5-AIQ administration exhibits normal hepatic and renal functions as well as lower toxic effect on normal tissue. In addition, the composite effectively inhibits Caco-2 cells viability upon incubation. Based on the obtained results, the proposed therapeutic platform can be considered as a novel, promising candidate for dual therapy of colorectal adenocarcinoma exhibiting a PARP-1 overexpression. as well as increased the inhabiting efficacy of 5-AIQ.
Citation: Alaa AL-Rahman Gamal, El-Sayed Mahmoud El-Sayed, Tarek El-Hamoly, Heba Kahil. Development and bioevaluation of controlled release 5-aminoisoquinoline nanocomposite: a synergistic anticancer activity against human colon cancer[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(1): 21-41. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022003
[1] | Alina Alb Lupaş, Georgia Irina Oros . Differential sandwich theorems involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of q-hypergeometric function. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4930-4943. doi: 10.3934/math.2023246 |
[2] | Alina Alb Lupaş, Shujaat Ali Shah, Loredana Florentina Iambor . Fuzzy differential subordination and superordination results for q -analogue of multiplier transformation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15569-15584. doi: 10.3934/math.2023794 |
[3] | Ekram E. Ali, Nicoleta Breaz, Rabha M. El-Ashwah . Subordinations and superordinations studies using q-difference operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18143-18162. doi: 10.3934/math.2024886 |
[4] | Ekram E. Ali, Georgia Irina Oros, Abeer M. Albalahi . Differential subordination and superordination studies involving symmetric functions using a q-analogue multiplier operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27924-27946. doi: 10.3934/math.20231428 |
[5] | Ekram E. Ali, Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Rabha M. El-Ashwah . New results about fuzzy γ-convex functions connected with the q-analogue multiplier-Noor integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5451-5465. doi: 10.3934/math.2024263 |
[6] | Madan Mohan Soren, Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlǎ . Fuzzy differential subordination and superordination results for the Mittag-Leffler type Pascal distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21053-21078. doi: 10.3934/math.20241023 |
[7] | Ekram E. Ali, Rabha M. El-Ashwah, Abeer M. Albalahi, R. Sidaoui, Abdelkader Moumen . Inclusion properties for analytic functions of q-analogue multiplier-Ruscheweyh operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6772-6783. doi: 10.3934/math.2024330 |
[8] | K. Saritha, K. Thilagavathi . Differential subordination, superordination results associated with Pascal distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7856-7864. doi: 10.3934/math.2023395 |
[9] | Shujaat Ali Shah, Ekram Elsayed Ali, Adriana Cătaș, Abeer M. Albalahi . On fuzzy differential subordination associated with q-difference operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6642-6650. doi: 10.3934/math.2023336 |
[10] | Ekram E. Ali, Rabha M. El-Ashwah, R. Sidaoui . Application of subordination and superordination for multivalent analytic functions associated with differintegral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11440-11459. doi: 10.3934/math.2023579 |
The current study presents a bimodal therapeutic platform for cancer treatment. Bimodal implies that the presented drug loaded core-shell structure is capable of elevating the tumor tissue temperature (hyperthermia) through the superparamagnetic iron oxide core and simultaneously release a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(PARP-1)-modifying agent from the thermoresponsive shell. Magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite MTN was synthesized via an in situ free radical polymerization of thermo-responsive (N-isopropylacrylamide) (NIPAAm) monomer in the presence of 11-nm monodisperse SPIONs. The composite was allowed to swell in various concentrations of the PARP inhibitor: 5-aminoisoquinoline (5-AIQ) forming drug-loaded magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite (MTN-5.AIQ). Structural characterization of the formed composite is studied via various experimental tools. To assess the coil to globule transition temperature, the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) is determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) method and the cloud point (Tp) is determined by turbidometry. Magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite (MTN) is formed with excellent potential for hyperthermia. A high drug loading efficiency (85.72%) is obtained with convenient temperature dependent drug release kinetics. Biocompatibility and cytotoxic efficacy are tested on an in vivo and in vitro colorectal-adenocarcinoma model, respectively. MTN.5-AIQ administration exhibits normal hepatic and renal functions as well as lower toxic effect on normal tissue. In addition, the composite effectively inhibits Caco-2 cells viability upon incubation. Based on the obtained results, the proposed therapeutic platform can be considered as a novel, promising candidate for dual therapy of colorectal adenocarcinoma exhibiting a PARP-1 overexpression. as well as increased the inhabiting efficacy of 5-AIQ.
5-aminoisoquinoline;
Alternating magnetic field;
Energy dispersive X-ray;
Face centered cubic;
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy;
Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase;
Glutamic pyruvic transaminase;
High performance liquid chromatography;
High resolution transmission electron microscope;
Lower critical solution temperature;
Magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite;
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1;
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide);
Specific absorption rate;
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles;
Cloud point temperature;
X-ray diffraction
More and more fields of research have used fractional calculus to develop and find new applications. Similarly, q-calculus is involved in several engineering domains, physics, and in mathematics. The combination of fractional and q-calculus in geometric functions theory and some interesting applications were obtained by Srivastava [1].
Jackson [2,3] established the q-derivative and the q-integral in the field of mathematical analysis via quantum calculus. The foundations of quantum calculus in the theory of geometric functions were laid by Srivastava [4]. Continued research in this field has led to the obtaining of numerous q-analogue operators, such as the q-analogue of the Sălăgean differential operator [5], giving new applications in [6,7,8]; the q-analogue of the Ruscheweyh differential operator introduced by Răducanu and Kanas [9] and studied by Mohammed and Darus [10] and Mahmood and Sokół [11]; and the q -analogue of the multiplier transformation [12,13].
This study involves an operator defined by applying the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral to the q-analogue of the multiplier transformation. Many operators have been defined and studied in recent years by using the Riemann-Liouville or Atagana-Baleanu fractional integrals.
First, we recall the classically used notations and notions from geometric functions theory.
Working on the open unit disc U={z∈C:|z|<1}, we establish here the class of analytic functions denoted by H(U) and its subclasses H[a,n] containing the functions f∈H(U) defined by f(z)=a+anzn+an+1zn+1+…, with z∈U, a∈C, n∈N, as well as An, containing the functions f∈H(U) of the form f(z)=z+an+1zn+1+…, z∈U. When n=1, the notation A1=A is used.
We also recall the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral definition introduced in [13,15]:
Definition 1. ([13,15]) The fractional integral of order λ applied to the analytic function f in a simply-connected region of the z -plane which contains the origin is defined by
D−λzf(z)=1Γ(λ)∫z0f(t)(z−t)1−λdt, |
where λ>0 and the multiplicity of (z−t)λ−1 is removed by the condition that log(z−t) is real when (z−t)>0.
The q-analogue of the multiplier transformation is defined below.
Definition 2 ([13]) The q-analogue of the multiplier transformation, denoted by Im,lq, has the following form:
Im,lqf(z)=z+∞∑j=2([l+j]q[l+1]q)majzj, |
where q∈(0,1), m,l∈R, l>−1, and f(z)=z+∑∞j=2ajzj∈A, z∈U.
Remark 1. We notice that limq→1Im,lqf(z)=limq→1(z+∑∞j=2([l+j]q[l+1]q)majzj)=z+∑∞j=2(l+jl+1)majzj =I(m,1,l). The operator I(m,1,l) was studied by Cho and Srivastava [16] and Cho and Kim [17]. The operator I(m,1,1) was studied by Uralegaddi and Somanatha [18], and the operator I(α,λ,0) was introduced by Acu and Owa [19]. Cătaş [20] studied the operator Ip(m,λ,l) which generalizes the operator I(m,λ,l). Alb Lupaş studied the operator I(m,λ,l) in [21,22,23].
Now, we introduce definitions from the differential subordination and differential superordination theories.
Definition 3. ([24]) Between the analytic functions f and g there is a differential subordination, denoted f(z)≺g(z), if there exists ω, a Schwarz analytic function with the properties |ω(z)|<1, z∈U and ω(0)=0, such that f(z)=g(ω(z)), ∀ z∈U. In the special case where g is an univalent function in U, the above differential subordination is equivalent to f(U)⊂g(U) and f(0)=g(0).
Definition 4. ([24]) Considering a univalent function h in U and ψ:C3×U→C, when the analytic function p satisfies the differential subordination
ψ(p(z),zp′(z),z2p′′(z);z)≺h(z), z∈U, | (1.1) |
then p is a solution of the differential subordination. When p≺g for all solutions p, the univalent function g is a dominant of the solutions. A dominant ˜g with the property ˜g≺g for every dominant g is called the best dominant of the differential subordination.
Definition 5. ([25]) Considering an analytic function h in U and φ:C3ׯU→C, when p and φ(p(z),zp′(z),z2p′′(z);z) are univalent functions in U fulfilling the differential superordination
h(z)≺φ(p(z),zp′(z),z2p′′(z);z), | (1.2) |
then p is a solution of the differential superordination. When g≺p for all solutions p, the analytic function g is a subordinant of the solutions. A subordinant ˜g with the property g≺˜g for every subordinant g is called the best subordinant of the differential superordination.
Definition 6. ([24]) Q denotes the class of injective functions f analytic on ¯U∖E(f), with the property f′(ζ)≠0 for ζ∈∂U∖E(f), when E(f)={ζ∈∂U:limz→ζf(z)=∞}.
The obtained results from this paper are constructed based on the following lemmas.
Lemma 1. ([24]) Considering the univalent function g in U and the analytic functions θ, η in a domain D⊃g(U), such that η(w)≠0, ∀ w∈g(U), define the functions G(z)=zg′(z)η(g(z)) and h(z)=θ(g(z))+G(z). Assuming that G is starlike univalent in U and Re(zh′(z)G(z))>0, ∀ z∈U, when the analytic function p having the properties p(U)⊆D and p(0)=g(0), satisfies the differential subordination θ(p(z))+zp′(z)η(p(z))≺θ(g(z))+zg′(z)η(g(z)), for z∈U, then p≺g and g is the best dominant.
Lemma 2. ([26]) Considering the convex univalent function g in U and the analytic functions θ, η in a domain D⊃g(U), define the function G(z)=zg′(z)η(g(z)). Assuming that G is starlike univalent in U and Re(θ′(g(z))η(g(z)))>0, ∀ z∈U, when p∈H[g(0),1]∩Q, with p(U)⊆D, the function θ(p(z))+zp′(z)η(p(z)) is univalent in U, and the differential superordination θ(g(z))+zg′(z)η(g(z))≺θ(p(z))+zp′(z)η(p(z)) is satisfied, then g≺p and g is the best subordinant.
The operator obtained by applying the the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral to the q-analogue of the multiplier transformation is written as follows:
Definition 7. Let q,m,l be real numbers, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ∈N. The fractional integral applied to the q-analogue of the multiplier transformation is defined by
D−λzIm,lqf(z)=1Γ(λ)∫z0Im,lqf(t)(z−t)1−λdt= | (2.1) |
1Γ(λ)∫z0t(z−t)1−λdt+∞∑j=2([l+j]q[l+1]q)maj∫z0tj(z−t)1−λdt. |
After a laborious computation, we discover that the fractional integral applied to the q-analogue of the multiplier transformation takes the following form:
D−λzIm,lqf(z)=1Γ(λ+2)zλ+1+∞∑j=2([l+j]q[l+1]q)mΓ(j+1)Γ(j+λ+1)ajzj+λ, | (2.2) |
when f(z)=z+∑∞j=2ajzj∈A. We note that D−λzIm,lqf(z)∈H[0,λ+1].
Remark 2. When q→1, we obtain the classical case, and the fractional integral applied to the multiplier transformation is defined by
D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)=1Γ(λ)∫z0I(m,1,l)f(t)(z−t)1−λdt= | (2.3) |
1Γ(λ)∫z0t(z−t)1−λdt+∞∑j=2(l+jl+1)maj∫z0tj(z−t)1−λdt, |
which, after several calculus can be written in the form
D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)=1Γ(λ+2)zλ+1+∞∑j=2(l+jl+1)mΓ(j+1)Γ(j+λ+1)ajzj+λ, | (2.4) |
when f(z)=z+∑∞j=2ajzj∈A. We note that D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)∈H[0,λ+1].
The main subordination result product regarding the operator introduced in Definition 7 is exposed in the following theorem:
Theorem 1. Consider f∈A and g an analytic function univalent in U with the property that g(z)≠0, ∀ z∈U, with real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. Assuming that zg′(z)g(z) is a starlike function univalent in U and
Re(1+bdg(z)+2cd(g(z))2−zg′(z)g(z)+zg′′(z)g′(z))>0, | (2.5) |
for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, z∈U, denote
ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z):=a+b[D−λzIm,lqf(z)z]n+ | (2.6) |
c[D−λzIm,lqf(z)z]2n+dn[z(D−λzIm,lqf(z))′D−λzIm,lqf(z)−1]. |
If the differential subordination
ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z)≺a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z), | (2.7) |
is satisfied by the function g, for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, then the differential subordination
(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺g(z), | (2.8) |
holds and g is the best dominant for it.
Proof. Setting p(z):=(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n, z∈U, z≠0, and differentiating with respect to z, we get
p′(z)=n(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n−1[(D−λzIm,lqf(z))′z−D−λzIm,lqf(z)z2]= |
n(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n−1(D−λzIm,lqf(z))′z−nzp(z) |
and
zp′(z)p(z)=n[z(D−λzIm,lqf(z))′D−λzIm,lqf(z)−1]. |
Defining the functions θ and η by θ(w):=a+bw+cw2 and η(w):=dw, it can be easily certified that θ is analytic in C, η is analytic in C∖{0}, and that η(w)≠0, w∈C∖{0}.
Considering the functions G(z)=zg′(z)η(g(z))=dzg′(z)g(z) and
h(z)=θ(g(z))+G(z)=a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z),
we deduce that G(z) is starlike univalent in U.
Differentiating the function h with respect to z we get
h′(z)=bg′(z)+2cg(z)g′(z)+d(g′(z)+zg′′(z))g(z)−z(g′(z))2(g(z))2 |
and
zh′(z)G(z)=zh′(z)dzg′(z)g(z)=1+bdg(z)+2cd(g(z))2−zg′(z)g(z)+zg′′(z)g′(z). |
The condition
Re(zh′(z)G(z))=Re(1+bdg(z)+2cd(g(z))2−zg′(z)g(z)+zg′′(z)g′(z))>0 |
is satisfied by relation (2.5), and we deduce that
a+bp(z)+c(p(z))2+dzp′(z)p(z)=a+b[D−λzIm,lqf(z)z]n+ |
c[D−λzIm,lqf(z)z]2n+dγ[z(D−λzIm,lqf(z))′D−λzIm,lqf(z)−1]=ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z), |
which is the function from relation (2.6).
Rewriting the differential subordination (2.7), we obtain
a+bp(z)+c(p(z))2+dzp′(z)p(z)≺a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z). |
The hypothesis of Lemma 1 being fulfilled, we get the conclusion p(z)≺g(z), written as
(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺g(z) |
and g is the best dominant.
Corollary 1. Suppose that the relation (2.5) is fulfilled for real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. If the differential subordination
ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z)≺a+bαz+1βz+1+c(αz+1βz+1)2+d(α−β)z(αz+1)(βz+1) |
is verified for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, −1≤β<α≤1, and the function ψm,l,qλ is given by relation (2.6), then the differential subordination
(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺αz+1βz+1 |
is satisfied with the function g(z)=αz+1βz+1 as the best dominant.
Proof. Considering in Theorem 1 the function g(z)=αz+1βz+1, with −1≤β<α≤1, the corollary is verified.
Corollary 2. Assume that relation (2.5) is satisfied for real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. If the differential subordination
ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z)≺a+b(z+11−z)s+c(z+11−z)2s+2sdz1−z2 |
holds for a,b,c,d∈C, 0<s≤1, d≠0, and the function ψm,l,qλ is defined by relation (2.6), then the differential subordination
(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺(z+11−z)s |
is satisfied with the function g(z)=(z+11−z)s as the best dominant.{}
Proof. Considering in Theorem 1 the function g(z)=(z+11−z)s, with 0<s≤1, the corollary is obtained.
When q→1 in Theorem 1, we get the classical case:
Theorem 2. Consider f∈A and g an analytic function univalent in U with the property that g(z)≠0, ∀ z∈U, with real numbers m,l, l>−1, and λ,n∈N. Assuming that zg′(z)g(z) is a starlike function univalent in U and
Re(1+bdg(z)+2cd(g(z))2−zg′(z)g(z)+zg′′(z)g′(z))>0, | (2.9) |
for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, z∈U, denote
ψm,l,λ(n,a,b,c,d;z):=a+b[D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)z]n+ | (2.10) |
c[D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)z]2n+dn[z(D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z))′D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)−1]. |
If the differential subordination
ψm,l,λ(n,a,b,c,d;z)≺a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z), | (2.11) |
is satisfied by the function g, for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, then the differential subordination
(D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)z)n≺g(z) | (2.12) |
holds and g is the best dominant for it.
Proof. The proof of the theorem follows the same steps as the proof of Theorem 1 and it is omitted.
The corresponding superordination results regarding the operator introduced in Definition 7 are exposed in the following:
Theorem 3. Consider f∈A and g an analytic function univalent in U with the properties g(z)≠0 and zg′(z)g(z) is starlike univalent in U, with real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. Assuming that
Re(2cd(g(z))2+bdg(z))>0,forb,c,d∈C,d≠0 | (2.13) |
and the function ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) is defined in relation (2.6), if the differential superordination
a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z)≺ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) | (2.14) |
is fulfilled for the function g, for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, then the differential superordination
g(z)≺(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n | (2.15) |
holds and g is the best subordinant for it.
Proof. Set p(z):=(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n, z∈U, z≠0.
Defining the functions θ and η by θ(w):=a+bw+cw2 and η(w):=dw, it is evident that η(w)≠0, w∈C∖{0} and we can certify that θ is analytic in C and η is analytic in C∖{0}.
With easy computation, we get that
θ′(g(z))η(g(z))=g′(z)[b+2cg(z)]g(z)d |
and relation (2.13) can be written as
Re(θ′(g(z))η(g(z)))=Re(2cd(g(z))2+bdg(z))>0, |
for b,c,d∈C, d≠0.
Following the same computations as in the proof of Theorem 1, the differential superordination (2.14) can be written as
a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z)≺a+bp(z)+c(p(z))2+dzp′(z)p(z). |
The hypothesis of Lemma 2 being fulfilled, we obtain the conclusion
g(z)≺p(z)=(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n |
and g is the best subordinant.
Corollary 3. Assume that relation (2.13) is verified for real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. If the differential superordination
a+bαz+1βz+1+c(αz+1βz+1)2+d(α−β)z(αz+1)(βz+1)≺ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) |
is satisfied for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, −1≤β<α≤1, and the function ψm,l,qλ is defined by the relation (2.6), then the differential superordination
αz+1βz+1≺(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n |
holds with the function g(z)=αz+1βz+1 as the best subordinant.
Proof. Considering in Theorem 3 the function g(z)=αz+1βz+1, with −1≤β<α≤1, the corollary is proved.
Corollary 4. Suppose that relation (2.13) is fulfilled for real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. If the differential superordination
a+b(z+11−z)s+c(z+11−z)2s+2sdz1−z2≺ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) |
is satisfied for a,b,c,d∈C, 0<s≤1, d≠0, and the function ψm,l,qλ is given by the relation (2.6), then the differential superordination
(z+11−z)s≺(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n |
is satisfied with the function g(z)=(z+11−z)s as the best subordinant.
Proof. Considering in Theorem 3 the function g(z)=(z+11−z)s, with 0<s≤1, the corollary is obtained.
When q→1 in Theorem 3, we get the classical case:
Theorem 4. Consider f∈A and g an analytic function univalent in U with the properties g(z)≠0 and zg′(z)g(z) is starlike univalent in U, with real numbers m,l, l>−1, and λ,n∈N. Assuming that
Re(2cd(g(z))2+bdg(z))>0,forb,c,d∈C,d≠0, | (2.16) |
and the function ψm,l,λ(n,a,b,c,d;z) is defined in relation (2.10), if the differential superordination
a+bg(z)+c(g(z))2+dzg′(z)g(z)≺ψm,l,λ(n,a,b,c,d;z) | (2.17) |
is fulfilled for the function g, for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, then the differential superordination
g(z)≺(D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)z)n | (2.18) |
holds and g is the best subordinant for it.
Proof. The proof of the theorem follows the same steps as the proof of Theorem 3 and it is omitted.
The sandwich-type result is obtained by combining Theorems 1 and 3.
Theorem 5. Consider f∈A and g1, g2 analytic functions univalent in U with the properties that g1(z)≠0, g2(z)≠0, ∀ z∈U, and, respectively, zg′1(z)g1(z), zg′2(z)g2(z) are starlike univalent, with real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. Assuming that relation (2.5) is verified by the function g1 and the relation (2.13) is verified by the function g2, and the function ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) defined by relation (2.6) is univalent in U, if the sandwich-type relation
a+bg1(z)+c(g1(z))2+dzg′1(z)g1(z)≺ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z)≺a+bg2(z)+c(g2(z))2+dzg′2(z)g2(z) |
is satisfied for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, then the below sandwich-type relation
g1(z)≺(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺g2(z) |
holds for g1 as the best subordinant and g2 the best dominant.
Considering in Theorem 5 the functions g1(z)=α1z+1β1z+1, g2(z)=α2z+1β2z+1, with −1≤β2<β1<α1<α2≤1, the following corollary holds.
Corollary 5. Suppose that relations (2.5) and (2.13) are fulfilled for real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. If the sandwich-type relation
a+bα1z+1β1z+1+c(α1z+1β1z+1)2+d(α1−β1)z(α1z+1)(β1z+1)≺ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) |
≺a+bα2z+1β2z+1+cχ(α2z+1β2z+1)2+d(α2−β2)z(α2z+1)(β2z+1) |
is satisfied for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, −1≤β2≤β1<α1≤α2≤1, and the function ψm,l,qλ is defined by the relation (2.6), then the following sandwich-type relation
α1z+1β1z+1≺(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺α2z+1β2z+1 |
holds for g1(z)=α1z+1β1z+1 as the best subordinant and g2(z)=α2z+1β2z+1 the best dominant.
Considering in Theorem 5 the functions g1(z)=(z+11−z)s1, g2(z)=(z+11−z)s2, with 0<s1,s2≤1, the following corollary holds.
Corollary 6. Assume that the relations (2.5) and (2.13) are satisfied for real numbers q,m,l, q∈(0,1), l>−1, and λ,n∈N. If the sandwich-type relation
a+b(z+11−z)s1+c(z+11−z)2s1+2s1dz1−z2≺ψm,l,qλ(n,a,b,c,d;z) |
≺a+b(z+11−z)s2+v(z+11−z)2s2+2s2dz1−z2 |
holds for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, −1≤β2≤β1<α1≤α2≤1, and the function ψm,l,qλ is defined by the relation (2.6), then the following sandwich-type relation
(z+11−z)s1≺(D−λzIm,lqf(z)z)n≺(z+11−z)s2 |
is satisfied for g1(z)=(z+11−z)s1 as the best subordinant and g2(z)=(z+11−z)s2 the best dominant.
The sandwich-type result is obtained by combining Theorems 2 and 4 for the classical case when q→1.
Theorem 6. Consider f∈A and g1, g2 analytic functions univalent in U with the properties that g1(z)≠0, g2(z)≠0, ∀ z∈U, and, respectively, zg′1(z)g1(z), zg′2(z)g2(z) are starlike univalent, with real numbers m,l, l>−1, and λ,n∈N. Assuming that relation (2.9) is verified by the function g1 and relation (2.16) is verified by the function g2, and the function ψm,l,λ(n,a,b,c,d;z) from relation (2.10) is univalent in U, if the sandwich-type relation
a+bg1(z)+c(g1(z))2+dzg′1(z)g1(z)≺ψm,l,λ(n,a,b,c,d;z)≺a+bg2(z)+c(g2(z))2+dzg′2(z)g2(z), |
is satified for a,b,c,d∈C, d≠0, then the below sandwich-type relation
g1(z)≺(D−λzI(m,1,l)f(z)z)n≺g2(z) |
holds for g1 as the best subordinant and g2 the best dominant.
The results presented in this paper are determined as applications of fractional calculus combined with q-calculus in geometric functions theory. We obtain a new operator described in Definition 7 by applying a fractional integral to the q-analogue of the multiplier transformation. The new fractional q-analogue of the multiplier transformation operator introduced in this paper yields new subordination and superordination results.
The subordination theory used in Theorem 1 gives the best dominant of the differential subordination and, considering well-known functions in geometric functions theory as the best dominant, some illustrative corollaries are obtained. Using the duality, the superordination theory used in Theorem 3 gives the best subordinant of the differential superordination, and illustrative corollaries are established taking the same well-known functions. Combining Theorem 1 and Theorem 3, we present a sandwich-type theorem involving the two dual theories of differential subordination and superordination. Considering the functions studied in the previous corollaries, we establish the other sandwich-type results. The classical case when q→1 is also presented.
For future studies, using the fractional integral of the q-analogue of the multiplier transformation introduced in this paper, and following [27] and [28], we can define q- subclasses of univalent functions and study some properties, such as coefficient estimates, closure theorems, distortion theorems, neighborhoods, radii of starlikeness, convexity, and close-to-convexity of functions belonging to the defined subclass.
The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence tools in the creation of this article.
The publication of this research was supported by the University of Oradea, Romania and Mustansiriyah University (www.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq) in Baghdad, Iraq. All thanks to their support.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
James HP, John R, Alex A, et al. (2014) Smart polymers for the controlled delivery of drugs–a concise overview. Acta Pharm Sin B 4: 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2014.02.005 ![]() |
[2] |
Ward MA, Georgiou TK (2011) Thermoresponsive polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers (Basel) 3: 1215-1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym3031215 ![]() |
[3] | Gould P (2006) Nanomagnetism shows in vivo potential. Nano Today 1: 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1748-0132(06)70115-3 |
[4] |
Abenojar EC, Wickramasinghe S, Bas-Concepcion J, et al. (2016) Structural effects on the magnetic hyperthermia properties of iron oxide nanoparticles. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 26: 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.09.004 ![]() |
[5] |
Sharifi I, Shokrollahi H, Amiri S (2012) Ferrite-based magnetic nanofluids used in hyperthermia applications. J Magn Magn Mater 324: 903-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.10.017 ![]() |
[6] |
Ba XQ, Garg NJ (2011) Signaling mechanism of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) in inflammatory diseases. Am J Pathol 178: 946-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.004 ![]() |
[7] |
Virág L, Szabó C (2002) The therapeutic potential of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev 54: 375-429. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.54.3.375 ![]() |
[8] |
D Threadgill M (2015) 5-Aminoisoquinolin-1-one (5-AIQ), a water-soluble inhibitor of the poly(ADP-Ribose)polymerases (PARPs). Curr Med Chem 22: 3807-3829. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867322666151002110602 ![]() |
[9] |
Vinod KR, Chandra S, Sharma SK (2010) Evaluation of 5-aminoisoquinoline (5-AIQ), a novel PARP-1 inhibitor for genotoxicity potential in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Mech Methods 20: 90-95. https://doi.org/10.3109/15376510903572870 ![]() |
[10] | Romano B, Pagano E, Iannotti FA, et al. (2021) N-Acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA) is dysregulated in colorectal cancer patients and its inhibition reduces experimental cancer growth. Brit J Pharmacol 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15737 |
[11] |
Pagano E, Venneri T, Lucariello G, et al. (2021) Palmitoylethanolamide reduces colon cancer cell proliferation and migration, influences tumor cell cycle and exerts in vivo chemopreventive effects. Cancers (Basel) 13: 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081923 ![]() |
[12] |
Pagano E, Borrelli F, Orlando P, et al. (2017) Pharmacological inhibition of MAGL attenuates experimental colon carcinogenesis. Pharmacol Res 119: 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.02.002 ![]() |
[13] |
Toğaçar M (2021) Disease type detection in lung and colon cancer images using the complement approach of inefficient sets. Comput Biol Med 137: 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104827 ![]() |
[14] |
Raftery L, Goldberg RM (2010) Optimal delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy for colon cancer. Cancer J 16: 214-219. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181ddc5ac ![]() |
[15] |
Fernández J, Silván B, Entrialgo-Cadierno R, et al. (2021) Antiproliferative and palliative activity of flavonoids in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 143: 112241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112241 ![]() |
[16] |
Küpeli Akkol E, Genç Y, Karpuz B, et al. (2020) Coumarins and coumarin-related compounds in pharmacotherapy of cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12: 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071959 ![]() |
[17] |
Ahmed S, Khan H, Aschner M, et al. (2020) Anticancer potential of furanocoumarins: mechanistic and therapeutic aspects. Int J Mol Sci 21: 5622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165622 ![]() |
[18] |
Nosho K, Yamamoto H, Mikami M, et al. (2006) Overexpression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) in the early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer 42: 2374-2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.061 ![]() |
[19] |
Augustine T, Maitra R, Zhang J, et al. (2019) Sensitization of colorectal cancer to irinotecan therapy by PARP inhibitor rucaparib. Invest New Drug 37: 948-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-00717-9 ![]() |
[20] |
Zhang J, Misra RDK (2007) Magnetic drug-targeting carrier encapsulated with thermosensitive smart polymer: core-shell nanoparticle carrier and drug release response. Acta Biomater 3: 838-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.05.011 ![]() |
[21] |
Hegazy M, Zhou P, Wu G, et al. (2017) Construction of polymer coated core-shell magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles with triple responsive drug delivery. Polym Chem 8: 5852-5864. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7PY01179B ![]() |
[22] |
Purushotham S, Ramanujan RV (2010) Thermoresponsive magnetic composite nanomaterials for multimodal cancer therapy. Acta Biomater 6: 502-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.004 ![]() |
[23] |
Meerod S, Rutnakornpituk B, Wichai U, et al. (2015) Hydrophilic magnetic nanoclusters with thermo-responsive properties and their drug controlled release. J Magn Magn Mater 392: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.022 ![]() |
[24] | Sharma R, Bisen DP, Shukla U, et al. (2012) X-ray diffraction: a powerful method of characterizing nanomaterials. Recent Res Sci Technol 4: 77-79. |
[25] | Suryanarayana C, Norton MG (2013) X-ray diffraction: A practical approach. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[26] |
Spirou SV, Basini M, Lascialfari A, et al. (2018) Magnetic hyperthermia and radiation therapy: Radiobiological principles and current practice. Nanomaterials 8: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060401 ![]() |
[27] | Page DL Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(83)80171-3 |
[28] | Wang B, Wei Q, Qu S (2013) Synthesis and characterization of uniform and crystalline magnetite nanoparticles via oxidation-precipitation and modified co-precipitation methods. Int J Electrochem Sci 8: 786-3793. |
[29] |
Idris MI, Zaloga J, Detsch R, et al. (2018) Surface modification of SPIONs in PHBV microspheres for biomedical applications. Sci Rep 8: 7286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25243-9 ![]() |
[30] | Lopez JA, González F, Bonilla FA, et al. (2010) Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4 magnetic nanofluid. Rev Latinoam Metal y Mater 30: 60-66. |
[31] | Coates J (2000) Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encycl Anal Chem 10815–10837. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a5606 |
[32] |
Omer M, Haider S, Park SY (2011) A novel route for the preparation of thermally sensitive core-shell magnetic nanoparticles. Polymer 52: 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.011 ![]() |
[33] | Narain R Engineered carbohydrate-based materials for biomedical applications: polymers, surfaces, dendrimers, nanoparticles, and hydrogels (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470944349 |
[34] |
Mohapatra S, Rout SR, Panda AB (2011) One-pot synthesis of uniform and spherically assembled functionalized MFe2O4 (M = Co, Mn, Ni) nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 384: 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.05.001 ![]() |
[35] | Shindo D, Oikawa T (2013) Analytical Electron Microscopy for Materials Science. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[36] |
Mutharani B, Ranganathan P, Chen SM (2019) Highly sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of antipsychotic drug chlorpromazine in biological samples based on poly-N-isopropylacrylamide microgel. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 96: 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.10.029 ![]() |
[37] |
Osváth Z, Iván B (2017) The dependence of the cloud point, clearing point, and hysteresis of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) on experimental conditions: The need for standardization of thermoresponsive transition determinations. Macromol Chem Phys 218: 1600470. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201600470 ![]() |
[38] |
Xia Y, Burke NAD, Stöver HDH (2006) End group effect on the thermal response of narrow-disperse poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 39: 2275-2283. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0519617 ![]() |
[39] |
Shokrollahi H (2017) A review of the magnetic properties, synthesis methods and applications of maghemite. J Magn Magn Mater 426: 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.11.033 ![]() |
[40] | Khairy M (2013) Synthesis, characterization and magnetic properties of gamma irradiated and unirradiated magnetic nanopowders. Int J Mater Chem 3: 106-111. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijmc.20130305.04 |
[41] |
Li Q, Kartikowati CW, Horie S, et al. (2017) Correlation between particle size/domain structure and magnetic properties of highly crystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Sci Rep 7: 9894. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09897-5 ![]() |
[42] |
Piñeiro-Redondo Y, Bañobre-López M, Pardiñas-Blanco I, et al. (2011) The influence of colloidal parameters on the specific power absorption of PAA-coated magnetite nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 6: 383. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-383 ![]() |
[43] |
Wu WF, Wang JN, Li Z, et al. (2020) 7-Hydroxycoumarin protects against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by inhibiting necroptosis and promoting Sox9-mediated tubular epithelial cell proliferation. Phytomedicine 69: 153202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153202 ![]() |
[44] | Le Chang XLL, Dai Di Fan YQM, Huan Zhang HPM, et al. (2016) The efficiency of magnetic hyperthermia and in vivo histocompatibility for human-like collagen protein-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed 11: 1175-1185. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S101741 |
[45] |
Vihola H, Laukkanen A, Valtola L, et al. (2005) Cytotoxicity of thermosensitive polymers poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) and amphiphilically modified poly(N-vinylcaprolactam). Biomaterials 26: 3055-3064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.008 ![]() |
[46] | Gamal A, El-sayed ES, El-Hamoly T, et al. Magnetic thermoresponsive nanocomposite for targeted PARP-1 in colorectal adenocarcinoma, an approach for tumor dual therapy research square (2021). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-295938/v1 |
![]() |
![]() |