
Citation: M Saad Bin Arif, Uvais Mustafa, Shahrin bin Md. Ayob. Extensively used conventional and selected advanced maximum power point tracking techniques for solar photovoltaic applications: An overview[J]. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(5): 935-958. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.935
[1] | Amjid Ali, Teruya Minamoto, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . A novel numerical method for solution of fractional partial differential equations involving the ψ-Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2137-2153. doi: 10.3934/math.2023110 |
[2] | Muhammad Aslam, Muhammad Farman, Hijaz Ahmad, Tuan Nguyen Gia, Aqeel Ahmad, Sameh Askar . Fractal fractional derivative on chemistry kinetics hires problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1155-1184. doi: 10.3934/math.2022068 |
[3] | Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Nauman Raza, Jan Martinovic, Abu Bakar, Osman Tunç . Modeling and simulations for the mitigation of atmospheric carbon dioxide through forest management programs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22712-22742. doi: 10.3934/math.20241107 |
[4] | Amjad E. Hamza, Arshad Ali, Khaled Aldwoah, Hicham Saber, Ria Egami, Amel Touati, Amal F. Alharbi . Mathematical analysis of tri-trophic food webs with carrying capacity and Holling-type predation using fractal-fractional Caputo derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 13130-13150. doi: 10.3934/math.2025589 |
[5] | Shabir Ahmad, Aman Ullah, Mohammad Partohaghighi, Sayed Saifullah, Ali Akgül, Fahd Jarad . Oscillatory and complex behaviour of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order HIV-1 infection model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4778-4792. doi: 10.3934/math.2022265 |
[6] | Hashem Najafi, Abdallah Bensayah, Brahim Tellab, Sina Etemad, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Shahram Rezapour, Jessada Tariboon . Approximate numerical algorithms and artificial neural networks for analyzing a fractal-fractional mathematical model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28280-28307. doi: 10.3934/math.20231447 |
[7] | Amnah E. Shammaky, Eslam M. Youssef . Analytical and numerical techniques for solving a fractional integro-differential equation in complex space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32138-32156. doi: 10.3934/math.20241543 |
[8] | Kamel Guedri, Rahat Zarin, and Mowffaq Oreijah . Evaluating the impact of vaccination and progression delays on tuberculosis dynamics with disability outcomes: A case study in Saudi Arabia. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 7970-8001. doi: 10.3934/math.2025366 |
[9] | Mohamed Akel, Muajebah Hidan, Salah Boulaaras, Mohamed Abdalla . On the solutions of certain fractional kinetic matrix equations involving Hadamard fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15520-15531. doi: 10.3934/math.2022850 |
[10] | Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson, Weerawat Sudsutad . Dynamics of a fractal-fractional mathematical model for the management of waste plastic in the ocean with four different numerical approaches. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8827-8872. doi: 10.3934/math.2025405 |
Mathematical modelling is the best way to formulating problems from an application area and it is well known that several mathematical characterization of numerous growth in chemical and physical sciences is described by differential equations (DEs). In chemistry, chemical kinetics problem and CO2 with PGE problems are described by system of nonlinear (DEs) with different kind of Neumann boundary and Drichlet type conditions in different published work such as chemistry problem by Jawary and Raham [1], chemistry problem by Abbasbandy and Shirzadi [2], CO2 absorbed into PGE problem by Jawary et al. [3], Choe et al. [4], Singha et al. [5], CO2 absorbed into PGE problem by Robertson [6], chemistry problem by Matinfar et al. [7], chemistry problem by Ganji et al. [8], Dokoumetzidis et al. [9]. In the past few years, fractional calculus (FC) has found many diverse and robust applications in various research areas such as fluid dynamics, image processing, viscoelasticity and other physical phenomena. Many definitions of fractional derivatives are discovered by several mathematicians but two most famous definitions of fractional derivative are Riemann − Liouville and Caputo. Some interesting and fundamental works on various direction of the FC is given in several famous books such as by Mainardi [10], fractional differential equations by Podlubny [11], Diethelm [12], Kilbas et al. [13] and Das [14].
In the past few years, wavelets have become an increasingly newly developed famous mechanism in the several research areas of physical, chemical, computational sciences, Image manipulation, signal analysis, data compression, numerical analysis and several others research areas such as a primer on wavelets and their scinentific applications by Walker [15], wavelet: mathematics and applications by Benedetto [16], a mathematical tool for signal analysis by Chui [17], wavelet methods for dynamical problems by Gopalakrishnan and Mitra [18], Wang [19] and a wavelet operational matrix method by Wu [20]. Due to this reason, wavelets have been applied for the solution of differential equations (DEs) since the 1980s. The interesting features in this method are possibility to find-out singularities, irregular structure and transient phenomena exhibited by the analysed equations such as by Heydari et al. [21], Wang and Fan [19], Balaji [22], Rehman and Khan [23], Hosseininia [24], Pirmohabbati et al. [25], Hosseininia [26], Heydari [27] and Kumar et al. [28].
Among the several wavelet families most simple are the Haar wavelets and it has been successfully applied to several linear and nonlinear problems of physical science and other research areas such as fractional order stationary neutron transport equation, neutron point kinetics equation, fractional order nonlinear oscillatory van der pol system and fractional bagley torvik equation by Ray and Patra [29,30,31,32], a comparative study on haar wavelet and hybrid functions, nonlinear integral and integro −differential equation of first and higher order and parabolic differential equatons by Aziz et al. [33,34,35], burgers equation by Jiwari [36], fractional integral equations by Lepik [37], Poisson and biharmonic equations by Shi and Cao [38], delamination detection in composite beams by Hein and Feklistova [39], fractional order integral equations by Gao and Liao [40], lumped and distributed parameters systems by Chen and Hsiao [41], FDEs by Chen et al. [42], free vibration analysis by Xie et al. [43], fractional nonlinear differential equations by Saeed and Rehman [44], magnetohydrodynamic flow equations by Celik and Brahin [45,46], fishers equations by Hariharan et al. [47], FPDEs by Wang et al. [48], nonlinear oscillators equations Kaur et al. [49], poisson and biharmonic equations by Shi et al. [50] and free vibration analysis of functionally graded cylindrical shells by Jin et al. [51].
It is compulsory to note that the fractional chemical kinetics and condensations of CO2 and PGE problems is the first one to be solved by the Haar wavelet and generalization of Adams– Bashforth−Moulton method by us. It is also noted that there are no similar works with these methods for fractional chemical kinetics and condensations of CO2 and PGE problems available in any present published literature. It is well known by the several published research papers that the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville is most popular definition of fractional calculus.
The complete work is systematized in the following sections: Overview of basic FC are provided in section 2. Fractional Model of both Chemical Kinetics and CO2 absorbed into PHE problems are provided in section 3. In section 4, a haar wavelet and Adam Bashforth's-Moulton methods are discussed and presented for both chemistry problems. The proposed methods for solutions of both chemistry problem are provided in section 5. Numerical result and discussions are provided in section 6. Conclusion and future scope are given in sections 7.
There are numerous definition of derivative and integration are available in literature [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61].
Definition 1. The (left sided) Riemann−Liouville fractional integral of order α>0 of a function Θ(t)∈Cα,α≥−1 is defined as,
IαtΘ(t)=1Γ(α)t∫0(t−ξ)α−1Θ(ξ)dξ,α>0,t>0; | (2.1) |
where Γ(.) is well known Gamma function.
Definition 2. The next two equations define Riemann – Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives of order a, respectively,
RLDαtΘ(t)=dmdtm(Im−αtΘ(t))={dmΘ(t)dtm,α=m∈N,1Γ(m−α)dmdtmt∫0Θ(ξ)(t−ξ)α−m+1dξ,0≤m−1<α<m,
and,
CDαtΘ(t)=Im−αt(dmdtmΘ(t))={dmΘ(t)dtm,α=m∈N,1Γ(m−α)t∫0Θm(ξ)(t−ξ)α−m+1dξ,0≤m−1<α<m,
where t>0 and m is an integer. Two basic properties for m−1<α≤m and Θ∈L1[a,b] are given as
{(CDαtIαΘ)(t)=Θ(t),(IαCDαtΘ)(t)=Θ(t)−∑m−1k=0Θk(0+)(t−a)kk!. | (2.2) |
Let D,E and H are different location of a model of chemical process then the reactions are presented as
D⟶E, | (3.1) |
E+H⟶D+H, | (3.2) |
E+E⟶H, | (3.3) |
The concetrations of all three spaces of D,E and H are denoted by Θ1,Θ2 and Θ3 respectively. Let r1,r2 and r3 denotes the reaction rate of Eqs (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3) respectively. We consider an integer order model of chemical kinetics problem as [1,2,6,7,8]
{dΘ1(t)dt=−r1Θ1(t)+r2Θ2(t)Θ3(t),dΘ2(t)dt=r1Θ1(t)−r2Θ2(t)Θ3(t)−r3Θ22(t),dΘ3(t)dt=r3Θ22(t), | (3.4) |
with the initial conditions, Θ1(0)=1, Θ2(0)=0, Θ3(0)=0. The main target of this section is converted above inter order CK problem into fractional order CK problem. The fractional model of CK problem is presented as
{CDαtΘ1(t)=−r1Θ1(t)+r2Θ2(t)Θ3(t),0<α≤1,CDβtΘ2(t)=r1Θ1(t)−r2Θ2(t)Θ3(t)−r3Θ22(t),0<β≤1,CDγtΘ3(t)=r3Θ22(t),0<γ≤1, | (3.5) |
with the initial conditions, Θ1(0)=1, Θ2(0)=0, Θ3(0)=0 where, Dαt=dαdtα,Dβt=dβdtβ,Dγt=dγdtγ are fractional derivative with 0<α,β,γ≤1. If r1=1,r2=0, and r3=1 then
{CDαtΘ1(t)=−Θ1(t),0<α≤1,CDβtΘ2(t)=Θ1(t)−Θ22(t),0<β≤1,CDγtΘ3(t)=Θ22(t),0<γ≤1, | (3.6) |
with the initial conditions, Θ1(0)=1, Θ2(0)=0, Θ3(0)=0. The above system is representing a nonlnear reaction which was taken from litrature [2,7,8,62].
The CO2 causes in ocean acidification because it dissolves in water to form carbonic acid [63].The mathematical formulation of the concentration of CO2 and PGE is shown in Muthukaruppan et al. [64]. Now, the two nonlinear reactions equations in normalized form is presented as
{d2Υ1dt2=α1Υ1Υ21+β1Υ1+β2Υ2,d2Υ2dt2=α2Υ1Υ21+β1Υ1+β2Υ2, | (3.7) |
with boundary conditions, Υ1(0)=0, Υ1(1)=1m, Υ′2(0)=1m, Υ2(1)=1m. The whole chemistry of the above problem is given in several litratures [1,3,4]. The fractional model of the condensation of CO2 and PGE in operator form is given as,
{CDαtΥ1(t)=α1Υ1Υ21+β1Υ1+β2Υ2,1<α≤2,CDβtΥ2(t)=α2Υ1Υ21+β1Υ1+β2Υ2,1<β≤2, | (3.8) |
with the same boundary conditions Υ1(0)=0, Υ1(1)=1m and Υ′2(0)=1m,Υ2(1)=1m; where m≥3 and fractional operator is taken in Caputo sence.
The Haar functions have been discovered by Alfred Haar in 1910 and Haar wavelets are the simplest wavelet among all wavelet. The Haar sequence was also introduced by itself Alfred Haar in 1909 which is recognised as wavelet basis. The Haar wavelets are the mathematical operations which are known as Haar transform. These wavelets are build up by piecewise constant function on the real line. We used Haar wavelet operational matrix method because of its flexibility, simplicity and require very less effort of computation. Usually Haar wavelet is defined for [0, 1) but in general case we extend it up to certain interval. Haar functions are very useful in many applications as image coding, extraction of edge, binary logic design etc [20,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. The Haar scaling function is defined as
ϕ(x)={10≤x<1,0otherwise. | (4.1) |
The Haar wavelet mother function is defined as
ψ(x)={10≤x<12,−112≤x<1,0otherwise. | (4.2) |
The orthogonal set of Haar wavelet functions for t∈[0,1] are defined as
hi(t)=1√m{2j/2,k−12j≤t<k−0.52j,−2j/2,k−0.52j≤t<k2j,0,otherwise, | (4.3) |
where i=0,1,2,...,m−1, m=2r+1 and r is positive integer known as resolution of Harr wavelet. Also j and k represent integer decomposition of i=2j+k−1.
Any function Θ(t)∈L2([0,1)) can be expanded in terms of Haar wavelet by
Θ(t)=∞∑i=0cihi(t);Whereci=1∫0Θ(t)hi(t)dt. | (4.4) |
If we approximated as piecewise constant during each interval, Eq. 4.4 will terminated at finite terms as [65]:
Θ(t)≈m−1∑i=0cihi(t)=CTmHm(t), | (4.5) |
where Cm=[c0,c1,c2,...,cm−1]T and Hm(t)=[h0(t),h1(t),h2(t),...,hm−1(t)]T,
Using collocation points tl=(l−0.5)m, where l=0,1,...,m−1, we obtained the discrete form as
H=[h0(t0)h0(t1)⋯h0(tm−1)h1(t0)h1(t1)⋯h1(tm−1)⋮⋮⋱⋮hm−1(t0)hm−1(t1)⋯hm−1(tm−1)]. | (4.6) |
The HWOM of fractional order integration without using block pulse functions we integrate Hm(t) using Reimann-Liouville integration operator [41,66]. Then the HWOM of fractional order integration Qα is given by
QαHm(t)=IαHm(t)=[Iαh0(t),Iαh1(t),Iαh2(t),...,Iαhm−1(t)]T =[Qh0(t),Qh1(t),Qh2(t),...,Qhm−1(t)]T, | (4.7) |
where
Qh0(t)=1√mtαΓ(1+α),0≤t≤1,
Qhi(t)=1√m{0,0≤t<k−12j,2j/2ζ1(t)k−12j≤t<k−0.52j,2j/2ζ2(t)k−0.52j≤t<k2j,2j/2ζ3(t)k2j≤t<1,
where
ζ1(t)=1Γ(1+α)(t−k−12j)α,
ζ2(t)=1Γ(1+α)(t−k−12j)α−2Γ(1+α)(t−k−0.52j)α,
ζ3(t)=1Γ(1+α)(t−k−12j)α−2Γ(1+α)(t−k−0.52j)α+1Γ(1+α)(t−k2j)α.
If we take, α=1/2,m=8, then we have the operational matrix as given below:
Q1/2H8 = [0.09970.17270.22300.26390.29920.33080.35960.38630.09970.17270.22300.26390.0997−0.0147−0.0864−0.14150.24430.0333−0.1154−0.0666−0.0343−0.0223−0.0193−0.013200000.14100.24430.033−0.11540.1995−0.0534−0.0455−0.0188−0.0111−0.0075−0.0055−0.0043000.1995−0.0534−0.0455−0.0188−0.0111−0.007500000.1995−0.0534−0.0455−0.01880000000.1995−0.0534].
The above matrix is the operational matrix of Haar wavelets.
In this section we discuss about Predictor-Corrector scheme (PECE), which is the genralization of (ABM) mehod [67,68]. We obtain the numerical solution of nonlinear FDES as
DαΘ(t)=f(t,Θ(t)),0<t≤T,Θ(k)(0)=Θ(k)0, | (4.8) |
where derivative in Caputo's sense. which is equivalent to the Volterra integral equation
Θ(t)=α−1∑k=0Θk0tkk!+1Γ(α)∫t0(t−τ)α−1f(t,Θ(τ))dτ. | (4.9) |
Assume h=T/N, tn=nh, n=0,1,2,...,N ∈Z+ then the discrete form for the above equation will be
Θh(tn+1)=α−1∑k=0Θ(k)0tkn+1k!+hαΓ(α+2)f(tn+1,Θph(tn+1))+hαΓ(α+2)n∑j=0aj,n+1f(th,Θh(tj)), | (4.10) |
aj,n+1={nα+1−(n−α)(n+1)α,ifj=0,(n−j+2)α+1+(n−j)α+1−2(n−j+1)α+1,if0≤j≤n,1,ifj=1, | (4.11) |
Θph(tn+1)=α−1∑k=0Θ(k)0tkn+1k!+1Γ(α)n∑j=0bj,n+1f(tj,Θh(tj)), | (4.12) |
bj,n+1=hαα((n+1−j)α−(n−j)α). | (4.13) |
The corrector values for chemistry problem is
Θ1(n+1)=Θ1(0)+hαΓ(α+2)(−r1Θp1(n+1)+r2Θp2(n+1)Θp3(n+1))+hαΓ(α+2)n∑j=0αj,n+1(−r1Θ1(j)+r2Θ2(j)Θ3(j)),Θ2(n+1)=Θ2(0)+hβΓ(β+2)(r1Θp1(n+1)−r2Θp2(n+1)Θp3(n+1)−r3Θp2(n+1)2)+hβΓ(β+2)n∑j=0βj,n+1(r1Θ1(j)−r2Θ2(j)Θ3(j)−r3Θ22(j)),Θ3(n+1)=Θ3(0)+hγΓ(γ+2)(r3Θp2(n+1)2)+hγΓ(γ+2)n∑j=0γj,n+1r3Θ22(j). |
The corresponding predictor values are,
Θp1(n+1)=Θ1(0)+1Γ(α)n∑j=0Bj,n+1(−r1Θ1(j)+r2Θ2(j)Θ3(j)),Θp2(n+1)=Θ2(0)+1Γ(β)n∑j=0Cj,n+1(r1Θ1(j)−r2Θ2(j)Θ3(j)−r3Θ22(j)),Θp3(n+1)=Θ3(0)+1Γ(γ)n∑j=0Dj,n+1(r3Θ22(j)). |
From Eqs (4.12) and (4.14) we can calculate {αj,n+1}, {βj,n+1}, {γj,n+1}, and Bj,n+1, Cj,n+1, Dj,n+1.
Example: 1 We assume a fractional model of chemical kinetics problem is given as
{CDαtΘ1=−r1Θ1+c2Θ2Θ3,0<α≤1,CDβtΘ2=r1Θ1−r2Θ2Θ3−r3Θ22,0<β≤1,CDγtΘ3=r3Θ22,0<γ≤1, | (5.1) |
with the initial conditions, Θ1(0)=1, Θ2(0)=0 Θ3(0)=0, where r1, r2 and r3 are reaction rates. Let us assume higher derivatives in the terms of haar wavelet series.
{CDαtΘ1=CTHm(t),CDβtΘ2=GTHm(t),CDγtΘ3=KTHm(t), | (5.2) |
where C=[c0,c1,c2,...,cm−1]T, G=[g0,g1,g2,...,gm−1]T and K=[k0,k1,k2,...,km−1]T are unknown vectors. Applying Riemann-Liouville fractional integral in Eq. (5.2) and using initial conditions, we obtained
{Θ1=CTQαHm(t)+1,Θ2=GTQβHm(t),Θ3=KTQγHm(t). | (5.3) |
Now substituting the values of Θ1, Θ2 and Θ3 into the Eq. (5.1), we obtained.
{CTHm(t)=−r1(CTQαHm(t)+1)+r2(GTQβ)(KTQγ),GTHm(t)=r1(CTQαHm(t)+1)−r2(GTQβ)(KTQγ)−r3(KTQγ)(KTQγ),KTHm(t)=r3(GTQβ)2. | (5.4) |
Let r1=0.1, r2=0.02 and r3=0.009 as given in Aminikhah [69]. Now disperse the Eq. (5.4) at the collocation points tl=(l−0.5)m, where l=1,2,3,...,m. We obtained 3m nonlinear algebraic equations which can be solved by Newton iteration method, after solving we obtained the coefficients ci, gi and ki. Substitute these coefficients into the Eq. (5.3) we get desired solutions Θ1, Θ2 and Θ3.
Example 2: Consider the system of condensations of CO2 and PGE problem of arbitrary order.
{Υα1(t)=α1Υ1(t)Υ2(t)−Υα1(t)(β1Υ1(t)+β2Υ2(t)),1<α≤2,Υβ1(t)=α2Υ1(x)Υ2(x)−Υβ2(t)(β1Υ1(t)+β2Υ2(t)),1<β≤2, | (5.5) |
with boundary conditions Υ1(0)=0, Υ1(1)=1m, and Υ′2(0)=1m, Υ2(1)=1m where Υα1(t)= CDαtΥ1(t). Here for simplicity we have taken m=3 and we will take the value of α1=1, α2=2, β1=1 and β2=3 as given in Duan et al. [70], AL-jawary ad Radhi [71]. Further, we assume the higher derivative in terms of Haar wavelet series.
{Υα1(t)=CTHm(t),Υβ1(t)=KTHm(t), | (5.6) |
applying Riemann-Liouville integral operator on the above equation and using boundary conditions, we obtained
Υ1(t)−Υ′1(0)t=CTQαHm(t), | (5.7) |
substituting t=1 into Eq. (5.7) we obtained
Υ1(1)−Υ′1(0)=CTQαHm(1)
Υ′1(0)=13−CTQαHm(1), | (5.8) |
and
Υ2(0)=−KTQβHm(1). | (5.9) |
Therefore,
Υ1(t)=(13−CTQαHm(1))t+CTQαHm(t), | (5.10) |
similarly
Υ2(t)=t3−KTQβHm(1)+KTQβHm(t). | (5.11) |
Substituting the values of Υ1, Υ2 into the Eq. (5.5) and using Eq. (5.6) we obtained
CTHm(t)=(t3−CTQαHm(1)t+CTQαHm(t))(t3−KTQβHm(1)+KTQβHm(t))−CTHm(t)((t3−CTQαHm(1)t+CTQαHm(t))+3(t3−KTQβHm(1)+KTQβHm(t))).} | (5.12) |
KTHm(t)=2(t3−CTQαHm(1)t+CTQαHm(t))(t3−KTQβHm(1)+KTQβHm(t))−KTHm(t)((t3−CTQαHm(1)t+CTQαHm(t))+3(t3−KTQβHm(1)+KTQβHm(t))).} | (5.13) |
Now disperse the Eqs (5.12) and (5.13) at the collocation points tl=(l−0.5)m, where l=0,1,...,m−1. We obtained a system of nonlinear algebraic equations which can be easily solved by Newton-Iteration method using mathematical softwares, after solving we obtained the unknowns coefficients ci and ki. Substituting these coefficients into the Eqs (5.10) and (5.11) we get desired solutions Υ1 and Υ2.
All numerical simulation and graphical results of both examples are depicted through the Figures 1–14 where Figures 1–6 and Figures 7–14 are depicted for examples 1 and 2 respectively. We have depicted a comparison between numerical obtained solutions using by Haar wavelet and Adam's-Bashforth-Moulton predictor-corrector schemes through the Figures 1–3 and these figures are depicted for the values of m=64. It is clear from all figures that both obtained solutions by HWM and ABM are identical. The obtained solutions Θ1, Θ2 and Θ3 are plotted through the Figures 3–6 where the nature of solution Θ1 is of decreasing nature while other solutions Θ2 and Θ3 is of increasing nature. We plotted the resolutions Figures 7–14 for better understanding the nature of obtained solution of example 2. We plotted resolutions figures due to non-availability of its exact solution.
t | Θ1(HWM) | Θ1(ABM) | Θ2(HWM) | Θ2(ABM) |
0.1 | 0.9901 | 0.9893 | 0.0100 | 0.0107 |
0.2 | 0.9802 | 0.9794 | 0.0198 | 0.0206 |
0.3 | 0.9704 | 0.9697 | 0.0296 | 0.0303 |
0.4 | 0.9608 | 0.9600 | 0.0393 | 0.0400 |
0.5 | 0.9512 | 0.9505 | 0.0489 | 0.0495 |
0.6 | 0.9418 | 0.9410 | 0.0585 | 0.0590 |
0.7 | 0.9324 | 0.9317 | 0.0680 | 0.0683 |
0.8 | 0.9231 | 0.9224 | 0.0775 | 0.0776 |
0.9 | 0.9139 | 0.9132 | 0.0869 | 0.0868 |
1.0 | 0.9048 | 0.9041 | 0.0963 | 0.0962 |
t | Θ3(HWM) | Θ3(ABM) |
0.1 | 3.0×10−8 | 4.0×10−8 |
0.2 | 2.4×10−7 | 2.7×10−7 |
0.3 | 7.9×10−7 | 8.6×10−7 |
0.4 | 1.8×10−6 | 1.9×10−6 |
0.5 | 3.6×10−6 | 3.8×10−6 |
0.6 | 6.2×10−6 | 6.4×10−6 |
0.7 | 9.8×10−6 | 1.0×10−5 |
0.8 | 1.5×10−5 | 1.5×10−5 |
0.9 | 2.0×10−5 | 2.0×10−5 |
1.0 | 2.8×10−5 | 2.8×10−5 |
In this work, Haar wavelet operational matrix and Adam Bashforth's Moulton scheme are proposed to solve fractional chemical kinetics and another problem that relates the condensations of carbon dioxide CO2 numerically. A comparative study between fractional chemical kinetics and another problem that relates the conden sations of carbon dioxide CO2 has been done for m=64 in this work. Our tabulated and graphical results indicate that the solution will ameliorate if we will take more collocation points, i.e greater values of m. The essential advantage of HWM is that it converts problems into the system of linear or nonlinear algebraic equations so that the computation is facile and computer-oriented. Furthermore, wavelet method is much easier than other numerical methods for system of FDEs. Again, we have solved the chemistry problems at different resolutions, which produced the same results at each resolution. The precision of the solution will ameliorate if we increase the resolution. This new comparative study between the Haar wavelet operational matrix and Adam Bashforth's Moulton scheme for fractional chemical kinetics and another problem that relates the condensations of carbon dioxide CO2 indicates that both approaches can be applied successfully to the chemistry problems of chemistry science.
The first author Dr. Sunil Kumar would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the National Board for Higher Mathematics, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (Approval No. 2/48(20)/2016/ NBHM(R.P.)/R and D II/1014). The authors are also grateful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and valuable suggestions to improve the quality of article.
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this manuscript.
[1] | Parida B, Iniyan S, Goic R (2011) A review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15: 1625-1636. |
[2] | Balamuralikrishnan B, Deepika B, Nagajothi K, et al. (2014) Efficiency enhancement of photovoltaic cell. Int J Adv Res Electr, Electron Instrum Eng, 3. |
[3] | Berrera M, Dolara A, Faranda R, et al. (2009) Experimental test of seven widely-adopted mppt algorithms. 2009 IEEE Bucharest Power Tech, 1-8. |
[4] | Rezk H, Eltamaly AM (2015) A comprehensive comparison of different mppt techniques for photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy 112: 1-11. |
[5] | Ali ANA, Saied MH, Mostafa MZ, et al. (2012) A survey of maximum ppt techniques of pv systems. 2012 IEEE Energy Tech, 1-17. |
[6] | Motahhir S, El Hammoumi A, El Ghzizal A (2018) Photovoltaic system with quantitative comparative between an improved mppt and existing INC and P & O methods under fast varying of solar irradiation. Energy Rep 4: 341-350. |
[7] | Tajuddin MFN, Arif MS, Ayob SM, et al. (2015) Perturbative methods for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of photovoltaic (PV) systems: A review. Int J Energy Res 39: 1153-1178. |
[8] | Baba AO, Liu G, Chen X (2020) Classification and evaluation review of maximum power point tracking methods. Sustainable Futures 2: 100020. |
[9] | Husain MA, Tariq A, Hameed S, et al. (2017) Comparative assessment of maximum power point tracking procedures for photovoltaic systems. Green Energy Environ 2: 5-17. |
[10] | Enrique J, Andújar J, Bohorquez M (2010) A reliable, fast and low cost maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic applications. Sol Energy 84: 79-89. |
[11] | Arif M, Ayob S, Salam Z (2018) Asymmetrical nine-level inverter topology with reduce power semicondutor devices. Telkomnika 16: 38-45. |
[12] | Kakar S, Ayob S, Nordin N, et al. (2019) A novel single-phase pwm asymmetrical multilevel inverter with number of semiconductor switches reduction. Int J Power Electron Drive Syst 10: 1133-1140. |
[13] | Elgendy MA, Zahawi B, Atkinson DJ (2012) Assessment of the incremental conductance maximum power point tracking algorithm. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 4: 108-117. |
[14] | Liu F, Duan S, Liu F, et al. (2008) A variable step size inc mppt method for pv systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55: 2622-2628. |
[15] | Masoum MA, Dehbonei H, Fuchs EF (2002) Theoretical and experimental analyses of photovoltaic systems with voltageand current-based maximum power-point tracking. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 17: 514-522. |
[16] | Noguchi T, Togashi S, Nakamoto R (2002) Short-current pulse-based maximum-power-point tracking method for multiple photovoltaic-and-converter module system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49: 217-223. |
[17] | Kota VR, Bhukya MN (2016) A simple and efficient mppt scheme for pv module using 2-dimensional lookup table. 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), 1-7. |
[18] | Subudhi B, Pradhan R (2011) Characteristics evaluation and parameter extraction of a solar array based on experimental analysis. 2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 340-344. |
[19] | Batzelis EI, Kampitsis GE, Papathanassiou SA (2017) Power reserves control for pv systems with real-time mpp estimation via curve fitting. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 8: 1269-1280. |
[20] | Yu WL, Lee TP, Yu GH, et al. (2010) A DSP-based single-stage maximum power point tracking pv inverter. In Proc. 25th IEEE Annual Conference Applied Power Electronics, China, Jun. 12-15, 2010, 948-952. |
[21] | Chen Y, Smedley KM (2004) A cost-effective single-stage inverter with maximum power point tracking. IEEE Trans Power Electron 19: 1289-1294. |
[22] | Femia N, Granozio D, Petrone G, et al. (2006) Optimized one-cycle control in photovoltaic grid connected applications. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 42: 954-972. |
[23] | Salas V, Olias E, Barrado A, et al. (2006) Review of the maximum power point tracking algorithms for stand-alone photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90: 1555-1578. |
[24] | López-Lapeñ a O, Penella MT, Gasulla M (2009) A new mppt method for low-power solar energy harvesting. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57: 3129-3138. |
[25] | Salas V, Olias E, Lazaro A, et al. (2005) Evaluation of a new maximum power point tracker (mppt) applied to the photovoltaic stand-alone systems. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 87: 807-815. |
[26] | Hua C, Shen C (1998) Study of maximum power tracking techniques and control of dc/dc converters for photovoltaic power system, PESC 98 Record. 29th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (Cat. No. 98CH36196), IEEE, 86-93. |
[27] | Kottas TL, Boutalis YS, Karlis AD (2006) New maximum power point tracker for pv arrays using fuzzy controller in close cooperation with fuzzy cognitive networks. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 21: 793-803. |
[28] | Chiu CS (2010) Ts fuzzy maximum power point tracking control of solar power generation systems. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 25: 1123-1132. |
[29] | Karthika S, Rathika P, Devaraj D (2013) Fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracking designed for 10kw solar photovoltaic system. Int J Comput Sci Manage Res 2: 1421-1427. |
[30] | Altas I, Sharaf A (2008) A novel maximum power fuzzy logic controller for photovoltaic solar energy systems. Renewable Energy 33: 388-399. |
[31] | Mahmoud A, Mashaly H, Kandil S, et al. (2000) Fuzzy logic implementation for photovoltaic maximum power tracking, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation. 21st Century Technol, IEEE, 735-740. |
[32] | Wilamowski BM, Li X (2002) Fuzzy system based maximum power point tracking for pv system. IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 02, IEEE, 3280-3284. |
[33] | Patcharaprakiti N, Premrudeepreechacharn S, Sriuthaisiriwong Y (2005) Maximum power point tracking using adaptive fuzzy logic control for grid-connected photovoltaic system. Renewable Energy 30: 1771-1788. |
[34] | Rezvani A, Gandomkar M (2017) Simulation and control of intelligent photovoltaic system using new hybrid fuzzy-neural method. Neural Comput Appl 28: 2501-2518. |
[35] | Rezvani A, Esmaeily A, Etaati H, et al. (2019) Intelligent hybrid power generation system using new hybrid fuzzy-neural for photovoltaic system and rbfnsm for wind turbine in the grid connected mode. Front Energy 13: 131-148. |
[36] | Hiyama T, Kitabayashi K (1997) Neural network based estimation of maximum power generation from pv module using environmental information. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 12: 241-247. |
[37] | Veerachary M, Yadaiah N (2000) ANN based peak power tracking for pv supplied dc motors. Sol Energy 69: 343-350. |
[38] | Esram T, Chapman PL (2007) Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 22: 439-449. |
[39] | Hiyama T, Kouzuma S, Imakubo T (1995) Identification of optimal operating point of pv modules using neural network for real time maximum power tracking control. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 10: 360-367. |
[40] | Izadbakhsh M, Rezvani A, Gandomkar M (2015) Dynamic response improvement of hybrid system by implementing ann-ga for fast variation of photovoltaic irradiation and flc for wind turbine. Arch Electr Eng 64: 291-314. |
[41] | Cavalcanti M, Oliveira K, Azevedo G, et al. (2007) Comparative study of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic systems. Eletrô nica de Potência 12: 163-171. |
[42] | Esram T, Kimball JW, Krein PT, et al. (2006) Dynamic maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic arrays using ripple correlation control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 21: 1282-1291. |
[43] | Casadei D, Grandi G, Rossi C (2006) Single-phase single-stage photovoltaic generation system based on a ripple correlation control maximum power point tracking. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 21: 562-568. |
[44] | Noguchi T, Matsumoto H (2003) Maximum power point tracking method of photovoltaic using only single current sensor. EPE2003, Toulouse, 8. |
[45] | Kim IS, Kim MB, Youn MJ (2006) New maximum power point tracker using sliding-mode observer for estimation of solar array current in the grid-connected photovoltaic system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53: 1027-1035. |
[46] | Chu CC, Chen CL (2009) Robust maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic cells: A sliding mode control approach. Sol Energy 83: 1370-1378. |
[47] | Hsiao YT, Chen CH (2002) Maximum power tracking for photovoltaic power system. Conference Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 37th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No. 02CH37344), IEEE, 1035-1040. |
[48] | Verma D, Nema S, Shandilya A, et al. (2016) Maximum power point tracking (mppt) techniques: Recapitulation in solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 54: 1018-1034. |
1. | Ann Al Sawoor, Stability analysis of fractional-order linear neutral delay differential–algebraic system described by the Caputo–Fabrizio derivative, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02980-8 | |
2. | Amr MS Mahdy, Yasser Abd Elaziz Amer, Mohamed S Mohamed, Eslam Sobhy, General fractional financial models of awareness with Caputo–Fabrizio derivative, 2020, 12, 1687-8140, 168781402097552, 10.1177/1687814020975525 | |
3. | Gustavo Asumu Mboro Nchama, Angela Leon Mecias, Mariano Rodriguez Ricard, Perona-Malik Model with Diffusion Coefficient Depending on Fractional Gradient via Caputo-Fabrizio Derivative, 2020, 2020, 1085-3375, 1, 10.1155/2020/7624829 | |
4. | Juan Bory‐Reyes, Marco Antonio Pérez‐de la Rosa, Local fractional Moisil–Teodorescu operator in quaternionic setting involving Cantor‐type coordinate systems, 2021, 44, 0170-4214, 605, 10.1002/mma.6767 | |
5. | Xiuying Li, Boying Wu, Reproducing kernel functions-based meshless method for variable order fractional advection-diffusion-reaction equations, 2020, 59, 11100168, 3181, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.034 | |
6. | Zeyad Al-Zhour, Fundamental fractional exponential matrix: New computational formulae and electrical applications, 2021, 129, 14348411, 153557, 10.1016/j.aeue.2020.153557 | |
7. | Hu Ge-JiLe, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Arshiya Suhail, Yu-Ming Chu, Some unified bounds for exponentially tgs-convex functions governed by conformable fractional operators, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6108, 10.3934/math.2020392 | |
8. | Doddabhadrappla Gowda Prakasha, Naveen Sanju Malagi, Pundikala Veeresha, Ballajja Chandrappa Prasannakumara, An efficient computational technique for time‐fractional Kaup‐Kupershmidt equation , 2021, 37, 0749-159X, 1299, 10.1002/num.22580 | |
9. | Naveed Ahmad Khan, Muhammad Sulaiman, Carlos Andrés Tavera Romero, Fawaz Khaled Alarfaj, Theoretical Analysis on Absorption of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) into Solutions of Phenyl Glycidyl Ether (PGE) Using Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous Neural Networks, 2021, 26, 1420-3049, 6041, 10.3390/molecules26196041 | |
10. | Devendra Kumar, Hunney Nama, Dumitru Baleanu, Numerical and computational analysis of fractional order mathematical models for chemical kinetics and carbon dioxide absorbed into phenyl glycidyl ether, 2023, 53, 22113797, 107003, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107003 | |
11. | Khushbu Agrawal, Sunil Kumar, Ali Akgül, An algorithm for numerical study of fractional atmospheric model using Bernoulli polynomials, 2024, 70, 1598-5865, 3101, 10.1007/s12190-024-02084-6 | |
12. | Khushbu Agrawal, Sunil Kumar, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Sara S. Alzaid, The use of Hermite wavelet collocation method for fractional cancer dynamical system, 2024, 32, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2024.2352745 | |
13. | G. Manohara, S. Kumbinarasaiah, Fibonacci wavelets operational matrix approach for solving chemistry problems, 2023, 9, 2731-6734, 393, 10.1007/s43994-023-00046-5 | |
14. | Khushbu Agrawal, Sunil Kumar, Badr S.T. Alkahtani, Sara S. Alzaid, A numerical study on fractional order financial system with chaotic and Lyapunov stability analysis, 2024, 60, 22113797, 107685, 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107685 | |
15. | R. Yeshwanth, S. Kumbinarasaiah, Dynamics and Study of Atmospheric Model Using New Modified Hermite Wavelet Collocation Method, 2025, 2731-8095, 10.1007/s40995-025-01811-3 |
t | Θ1(HWM) | Θ1(ABM) | Θ2(HWM) | Θ2(ABM) |
0.1 | 0.9901 | 0.9893 | 0.0100 | 0.0107 |
0.2 | 0.9802 | 0.9794 | 0.0198 | 0.0206 |
0.3 | 0.9704 | 0.9697 | 0.0296 | 0.0303 |
0.4 | 0.9608 | 0.9600 | 0.0393 | 0.0400 |
0.5 | 0.9512 | 0.9505 | 0.0489 | 0.0495 |
0.6 | 0.9418 | 0.9410 | 0.0585 | 0.0590 |
0.7 | 0.9324 | 0.9317 | 0.0680 | 0.0683 |
0.8 | 0.9231 | 0.9224 | 0.0775 | 0.0776 |
0.9 | 0.9139 | 0.9132 | 0.0869 | 0.0868 |
1.0 | 0.9048 | 0.9041 | 0.0963 | 0.0962 |
t | Θ3(HWM) | Θ3(ABM) |
0.1 | 3.0×10−8 | 4.0×10−8 |
0.2 | 2.4×10−7 | 2.7×10−7 |
0.3 | 7.9×10−7 | 8.6×10−7 |
0.4 | 1.8×10−6 | 1.9×10−6 |
0.5 | 3.6×10−6 | 3.8×10−6 |
0.6 | 6.2×10−6 | 6.4×10−6 |
0.7 | 9.8×10−6 | 1.0×10−5 |
0.8 | 1.5×10−5 | 1.5×10−5 |
0.9 | 2.0×10−5 | 2.0×10−5 |
1.0 | 2.8×10−5 | 2.8×10−5 |
t | Θ1(HWM) | Θ1(ABM) | Θ2(HWM) | Θ2(ABM) |
0.1 | 0.9901 | 0.9893 | 0.0100 | 0.0107 |
0.2 | 0.9802 | 0.9794 | 0.0198 | 0.0206 |
0.3 | 0.9704 | 0.9697 | 0.0296 | 0.0303 |
0.4 | 0.9608 | 0.9600 | 0.0393 | 0.0400 |
0.5 | 0.9512 | 0.9505 | 0.0489 | 0.0495 |
0.6 | 0.9418 | 0.9410 | 0.0585 | 0.0590 |
0.7 | 0.9324 | 0.9317 | 0.0680 | 0.0683 |
0.8 | 0.9231 | 0.9224 | 0.0775 | 0.0776 |
0.9 | 0.9139 | 0.9132 | 0.0869 | 0.0868 |
1.0 | 0.9048 | 0.9041 | 0.0963 | 0.0962 |
t | Θ3(HWM) | Θ3(ABM) |
0.1 | 3.0×10−8 | 4.0×10−8 |
0.2 | 2.4×10−7 | 2.7×10−7 |
0.3 | 7.9×10−7 | 8.6×10−7 |
0.4 | 1.8×10−6 | 1.9×10−6 |
0.5 | 3.6×10−6 | 3.8×10−6 |
0.6 | 6.2×10−6 | 6.4×10−6 |
0.7 | 9.8×10−6 | 1.0×10−5 |
0.8 | 1.5×10−5 | 1.5×10−5 |
0.9 | 2.0×10−5 | 2.0×10−5 |
1.0 | 2.8×10−5 | 2.8×10−5 |