
Citation: Shequn Gu, Jihui Luo, Wenxiu Yao. The regulation of miR-139-5p on the biological characteristics of breast cancer cells by targeting COL11A1[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1428-1441. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020073
[1] | Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Wael W. Mohammed, Meshari Alesemi, Sahar Albosaily . The effect of multiplicative noise on the exact solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2970-2980. doi: 10.3934/math.2021180 |
[2] | Jalil Manafian, Onur Alp Ilhan, Sizar Abid Mohammed . Forming localized waves of the nonlinearity of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2461-2483. doi: 10.3934/math.2020163 |
[3] | Yongyi Gu, Najva Aminakbari . Two different systematic methods for constructing meromorphic exact solutions to the KdV-Sawada-Kotera equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3990-4010. doi: 10.3934/math.2020257 |
[4] | P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, Jagdev Singh . Solution for fractional forced KdV equation using fractional natural decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 798-810. doi: 10.3934/math.2020054 |
[5] | M. Hafiz Uddin, M. Ali Akbar, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Abdul Haque . New exact solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional differential equations with conformable derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 199-214. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.199 |
[6] | Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264 |
[7] | Weiping Gao, Yanxia Hu . The exact traveling wave solutions of a class of generalized Black-Scholes equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(3): 385-399. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.3.385 |
[8] | Yousef Jawarneh, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi . A new solitary wave solution of the fractional phenomena Bogoyavlenskii equation via Bäcklund transformation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35308-35325. doi: 10.3934/math.20241678 |
[9] | S. Owyed, M. A. Abdou, A. Abdel-Aty, H. Dutta . Optical solitons solutions for perturbed time fractional nonlinear Schrodinger equation via two strategic algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2057-2070. doi: 10.3934/math.2020136 |
[10] | Safoura Rezaei Aderyani, Reza Saadati, Javad Vahidi, Nabil Mlaiki, Thabet Abdeljawad . The exact solutions of conformable time-fractional modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation by Direct algebraic method and Sine-Gordon expansion method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10807-10827. doi: 10.3934/math.2022604 |
In recent years, nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs) are widely used to describe complex phenomena in various fields of sciences, such as fluid mechanics, plasma, chemical reactions, optical fibers, solid state physics, relativity, ecology, gas dynamics physics and optical fiber, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, exploring exact solutions for NPDEs plays an important role in nonlinear science. These solutions might be essential and important for the exploring some physical phenomena. Therefore investigating new technique to solve so many problems is so interesting topic. Thus, many new methods have been introduced, such as the F-expansion method [12,13], (G′G)− expansion method [14,15], tanh-sech method [16,17,18], exp-expansion method [19,20], the homogeneous balance method [21,22], Jacobi elliptic function method [23,24], sine-cosine method [25,26,27], extended tanh-method [28,29] and the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method [30,31,32,33] proposed for solving more complicated problems. Indeed, there are recent development in analytical methods for investigation solutions for NPDEs, see [34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The nonlinear Schrödinger equations (NLSEs) are so important models in nonlinear evolution equations, which come in many areas of applied sciences such as nonlinear optics, quantum mechanics, fluid dynamics, molecular biology, elastic media, hydrodynamics, biology and plasma physics.
This paper is concerned with the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation (UNS) [41,42] given by
iqt+qxx+2η∣q∣2q−2γq=0,i=√−1, | (1.1) |
where, η,γ is a free parameter and q=q(x,t) is a complex-valued function. Equation (1.1) is a type of nonlinear Schrödinger equation with space and time exchanged. This equation prescribes a time evolution of disturbances in unstable media. The behavior of type occurs for the two-layer baroclinic instability and the lossless symmetric two-stream plasma instability [43]. To the best of our knowledge, no previous research work has been done using the proposed methods for solving the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Actually, many numerical and analytical methods have been also implemented to get solutions for Eq (1.1) such as modified Kudraysov method, the sine-Gordon expansion approach [41], expa method and hyperbolic function method [42], the new Jacobi elliptic function rational expansion method and the exponential rational function method [44], the extended simple equation method[45].
The main aim of this paper is to explore the UNS equation using exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method, sine-cosine method and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method. We also show that the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE technique gives infinite solutions. Actually, we introduce new types of exact analytical solutions. Comparing our results with other results, one can see that our results are new and most extensive. Indeed the new solutions presented in this article are so important in the theory of soliton. Moreover these solutions turn out to be very useful for Physicists to explain many interesting physical phenomena.
The rest of the paper is arranged as follows: In Section 2, the exp-function method, sine-cosine method and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method are briefly reviewed. In Section 3, some new exact solutions of the unstable Schrödinger equation are presented. Discussion of our results and comparing with the results of other authors is in Section 4. Conclusion and future works will appear in Section 5.
We present a brief description about the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method, sine-cosine method and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method to obtain new exact solutions for a given NPDE. For this goal, consider a NPDE in two independent variables x and t as
G(ϑ,ϑt,ϑx,ϑtt,ϑxx,....)=0, | (2.1) |
where G is a polynomial in ϑ(x,t) and its partial derivatives. The main steps are as follows [30]:
Step 1. Introducing the transformation
ϑ(x,t)=ϑ(ξ),ξ=k(x+ςt), | (2.2) |
varies Eq (2.1) to the following ordinary differential equation (ODE):
D(ϑ,ϑ′,ϑ″,ϑ‴,.....)=0, | (2.3) |
where D is a polynomial in ϑ(ξ) and its derivatives such that the superscripts denote the ordinary derivatives with respect to ξ.
According to the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion technique [19,20,31], we assume that the solution of Eq (2.3) can be written in a polynomial form of exp(−φ(ξ)) as follows
ϑ(ξ)=Am(exp(−φ(ξ)))m+....., am≠0, | (2.4) |
where φ(ξ) obeys the following ODE
φ′(ξ)=exp(−φ(ξ))+νexp(φ(ξ))+λ. | (2.5) |
Eq (2.5) has the following solutions:
1. At λ2−4ν>0,ν≠0,
φ(ξ)=ln(−√λ2−4ν tanh(√λ2−4ν2(ξ+C))−λ2ν), | (2.6) |
2. At λ2−4ν<0,ν≠0,
φ(ξ)=ln(√4ν−λ2 tan(√4ν−λ22 (ξ+C))−λ2ν), | (2.7) |
3. At λ2−4ν>0,ν=0,λ≠0
φ(ξ)=−ln(λexp(λ(ξ+C))−1), | (2.8) |
4. At λ2−4ν=0,ν≠0,λ≠0,
φ(ξ)=ln(−2(λ(ξ+C)+2)λ2(ξ+C)), | (2.9) |
5. At λ2−4ν=0,ν=0,λ=0,
φ(ξ)=ln(ξ+C). | (2.10) |
Here C is an arbitrary constant.
Finally, superseding Eq (2.4) with Eq (2.5) into Eq (2.3) and agammaegating all terms of the same power exp(−mφ(ξ)), m=0,1,2,3,.... After that equating them to zero, we get algebraic equations solved by Mathematica or Maple to obtain the values of ai. Hence, we get the solutions (2.4), which give the exact solutions of Eq (2.3).
The solutions of Eq (2.3) can be expressed in the form [46,47]
ϑ(x,t)={αsinr(βξ),∣ξ∣≤πβ,0,otherwise,, | (2.11) |
or in the form
ϑ(ξ)(x,t)={αcosr(βξ),∣ξ∣≤π2μ,0,otherwise,, | (2.12) |
where α,β and r≠0, are parameters determined in sequel. From (2.11) we have
ϑ(ξ)=αsinr(βξ),ϑn(ξ)=αnsinnr(βξ),(ϑn)ξ=nβrαncos(βξ)sinnr−1(βξ),(ϑn)ξξ=−n2β2rαnsinnr(βξ)+nβ2αnr(nr−1)sinnr−2(βξ), | (2.13) |
and from (2.12) we have
ϑ(ξ)=αcosr(βξ),ϑn(ξ)=αncosnr(βξ),(ϑn)ξ=−nβrαnsin(βξ)cosnr−1(βξ),(ϑn)ξξ=−n2β2rαncosnr(βξ)+nβ2αnr(nr−1)cosnr−2(βξ). | (2.14) |
Finally, superseding Eq (2.13) or Eq (2.14) into Eq (2.3), then balance the terms of the cosine functions (2.14) or the sine functions (2.13). Then, we sum all terms with the same power in cosr(βξ) or sinr(βξ) and equating their coefficients to zero in order to obtain an algebraic equations in the unknowns β,α and r. Solving this system yields these unknown constants.
According to description of this method [30,31,32,33,48,49], we assume that Eq (2.3) has the following solution:
ϑ′=aϑ2−n+bϑ+cϑn, | (2.15) |
where a,b,c and n are constants calculated later. From Eq (2.15), we get
ϑ″=ab(3−n)ϑ2−n+a2(2−n)ϑ3−2n+nc2ϑ2n−1+bc(n+1)ϑn+(2ac+b2)ϑ, | (2.16) |
ϑ‴=(ab(3−n)(2−n)ϑ1−n+a2(2−n)(3−2n)ϑ2−2n +n(2n−1)c2ϑ2n−2+bcn(n+1)ϑn−1+(2ac+b2))ϑ′. | (2.17) |
The exact solutions of Eq (2.15), for an arbitrary constant μ are given as follow:
1. For n=1, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=μe(a+b+c)ξ. | (2.18) |
2. For n≠1, b=0 and c=0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(a(n−1)(ξ+μ))1n−1. | (2.19) |
3. For n≠1, b≠0 and c=0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(−ab+μeb(n−1)ξ)1n−1. | (2.20) |
4. For n≠1, a≠0 and b2−4ac<0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a+√4ac−b22atan((1−n)√4ac−b22(ξ+μ)))11−n | (2.21) |
and
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a−√4ac−b22acot((1−n)√4ac−b22(ξ+μ)))11−n. | (2.22) |
5. For n≠1, a≠0 and b2−4ac>0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a−√b2−4ac2acoth((1−n)√b2−4ac2(ξ+μ)))11−n | (2.23) |
and
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a−√b2−4ac2atanh((1−n)√b2−4ac2(ξ+μ)))11−n. | (2.24) |
6. For n≠1, a≠0 and b2−4ac=0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(1a(n−1)(ξ+μ)−b2a)11−n. | (2.25) |
Bäcklund transformation
When ϑm−1(ξ) and ϑm(ξ)(ϑm(ξ)=ϑm(ϑm−1(ξ))) are the solutions of Eq (2.15), we obtain
dϑm(ξ)dξ=dϑm(ξ)dϑm−1(ξ)dϑm−1(ξ)dξ=dϑm(ξ)dϑm−1(ξ)(aϑ2−nm−1+bϑm−1+cϑnm−1), |
namely
dϑm(ξ)aϑ2−nm+bϑm+cϑnm=dϑm−1(ξ)aϑ2−nm−1+bϑm−1+cϑnm−1. | (2.26) |
Integrating Eq (2.26) once with respect to ξ, we obtain the following Bäcklund transformation of Eq (2.15):
ϑm(ξ)=(−cK1+aK2(ϑm−1(ξ))1−nbK1+aK2+aK1(ϑm−1(ξ))1−n)11−n, | (2.27) |
where K1 and K2 are arbitrary constants. If we get a solution for this equation, we use Eq (2.27) to obtain infinite sequence of solutions of Eq (2.15), as well of Eq (2.1).
In order to solve the Eq (1.1), using exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method and the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method, the following solution structure is selected
q(x,t)=eiχ(x,t)u(ξ),χ(x,t)=px+νt,ξ=kx+ωt, | (3.1) |
where p, ν, k and ω are constants. Substituting (3.1) into (1.1), we have the ODE
k2u″−2u3−(p2+ν+2γ)u=0,ω=−2pk,η=−1. | (3.2) |
Now we apply exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion and the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE methods for Eq (3.2).
According to the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion technique, Eq (3.2) has the following solution
u=A0+A1exp(−φ), | (3.3) |
where A0 and A1 are constants and A1≠0. It is easy to see that
u″=A1(2exp(−3φ)+3λexp(−2φ)+(2μ+λ2)exp(−φ)+λμ), | (3.4) |
u3=A31exp(−3φ)+3A0A21exp(−2φ)+3A20A1exp(−φ)+A30. | (3.5) |
Superseding u, u″, u3 into Eq (3.2) and hence equating the coefficients of exp(−φ) to zero, we obtain
k2A1λμ−2A30−(p2+ν+2γ)A0=0, | (3.6) |
k2A1(λ2+2μ)−6A20A1−(p2+ν+2γ)A1=0, | (3.7) |
k2A1λ−2A0A21=0, | (3.8) |
k2A1−A31=0. | (3.9) |
Solving Eqs (3.6)–(3.9), we get
A0=±kλ2,A1=±k,ν=−12(4γ+k2(λ2−4μ)+2p2). |
We consider only one case, whenever the other cases follow similarly. In this case, the solution of Eq (3.3) reads as:
u(ξ)=±k2(λ+2exp(−φ(ξ))). | (3.10) |
Superseding Eqs (2.6)–(2.7) into Eq (3.10), we obtain:
Case 1. At λ2−4μ>0,μ≠0,
u1,2(x,t)=±k2(λ−4μ√λ2−4μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(ξ+C))+λ). | (3.11) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.11) the solutions of equation (1.1) are
q1,2(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ−4μ√λ2−4μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(ξ+C))+λ). | (3.12) |
Case 2. At λ2−4μ<0,μ≠0,
u3,4(x,t)=±k2(λ+4μ√4μ−λ2tan(√4μ−λ22(ξ+C))−λ). | (3.13) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.13) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q3,4(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ+4μ√4μ−λ2tan(√4μ−λ22(ξ+C))−λ). | (3.14) |
Case 3. At λ2−4μ>0,μ=0,λ≠0
u5,6(x,t)=±k2(λ+2λexp(λ(ξ+C))−1). | (3.15) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.15) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q5,6(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ+2λexp(λ(ξ+C))−1). | (3.16) |
Case 4. At λ2−4μ=0,μ≠0,λ≠0,
u7,8(x,t)=±k2(λ−λ2(ξ+C)λ(ξ+C)+2). | (3.17) |
Using Eq (3.1) and (3.17) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q7,8(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ−λ2(ξ+C)λ(ξ+C)+2). | (3.18) |
Case 5. At λ2−4μ=0,μ=0,λ=0,
u9,10(x,t)=±k2(1ξt+C). | (3.19) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.19) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q9,10(x,t)=±k2eiχ(1ξt+C). | (3.20) |
Here k,λ,μ,C are constants, ξ=k(x−2pt) and χ=px−12(4γ+k2(λ2−4μ)+2p2)t.
We have plotted these solutions in Figures 1–5. Figure 1(a) shows the real part of q=q1(x,t) in (3.12), while Figure 1(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 1.5, p = 1.5, γ = 1.3, λ = 2.3, μ=1, ω = -4.5, ν = -6.3012 and C = 1.4.
Figure 2(a) shows the real part of q=q3(x,t) in (3.14), while Figure 2(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 1.2, p = 1.2, γ = 1.8, λ = 1.2, μ=2, ω = -2.88, ν = -0.3168 and C = 0.4.
Figure 3(a) shows the real part of q=q5(x,t) in (3.16), while Figure 3(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.4, p = 0.6, γ = 0.3, λ = 1.2, μ=0, ω = -0.48, ν = -1.0752 and C = 1.
Figure 4(a) shows the real part of q=q7(x,t) in (3.18), while Figure 4(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.5, p = 0.5, γ = 2.3, λ = 2, μ=1, ω = -0.5, ν = -4.85 and C = 4.
Figure 5(a) shows the real part of q=q9(x,t) in (3.20), while Figure 5(b) shows imaginary part of this solution k = -0.7, p = -0.5, γ = 0.8, λ=μ = 0, ω = -0.7, ν = -1.85 and C = 4.
According to sine-cosine technique, subtitling Eq (2.13) into Eq (3.2), gives
k2(−β2r2αsinr(βξ)+β2αr(r−1)sinr−2(βξ))−2α3sin3r(βξ)−(p2+ν+2γ)λsinr(βξ)=0. | (3.21) |
Thus by comparing the coefficients of the sine functions, we get
r−1≠0,r−2=3r, k2β2αr(r−1)−2α3=0, −k2β2r2α−(p2+ν+2γ)α=0. | (3.22) |
Solving this system gives
r=−1,α=±√−p2−ν−2γ,β=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)k, | (3.23) |
for p2+ν+2γ<0 and k≠0. We get the same result if we also use the cosine method (2.14). Thus, the periodic solutions are
˜u1,2(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γsec(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),∣√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)∣<π2 | (3.24) |
and
˜u3,4(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γcsc(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),0<√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)<π. | (3.25) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.19) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
˜q1,2(x,t)=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)ei(px+νt)sec(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),∣√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)∣<π2 | (3.26) |
and
˜q3,4(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γei(px+νt)csc(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),0<√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)<π. | (3.27) |
However, for p2+ν+2γ>0 and k≠0. we obtain the soliton and complex solutions
˜u5,6(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γsech(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)) | (3.28) |
and
˜u7,8(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γcsch(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)). | (3.29) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.19) the solutions of equation
˜q5,6(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γei(px+νt)sech(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)) | (3.30) |
and
˜q7,8(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γei(px+νt)csch(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)). | (3.31) |
Figure 6(a) shows the real part of q=˜q1(x,t) in (3.26), while Figure 6(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for p = 2, ν = -2, γ = -3, k = 2 and ω = 1.
Figure 7(a) shows the real part of q=˜q5(x,t) in (3.30), while Figure 7(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for p = 2.6, ν = 2.1, γ = 3.1, k = 1.2 and ω = 2.
According to Riccati-Bernoulli Sub-ODE technique, substituting Eq (2.16) into Eq (3.2), we get
k2(ab(3−n)u2−n+a2(2−n)u3−2n+nc2u2n−1+bc(n+1)un+(2ac+b2)u)−2u3−(p2+ν+2γ)u=0. | (3.32) |
Putting n=0, Eq (3.32) becomes
k2(3abu2+2a2u3+bc+(2ac+b2)u)−2u3−(p2+ν+2γ)u=0. | (3.33) |
Putting each coefficient of ui(i=0,1,2,3) to zero, we get
bc=0, | (3.34) |
k2(2ac+b2)−(p2+ν+2γ)=0, | (3.35) |
3ab=0, | (3.36) |
k2a2−1=0. | (3.37) |
Solving Eqs (3.34)–(3.37), we have
b=0, | (3.38) |
ac=p2+ν+2γ2k2, | (3.39) |
c=±p2+ν+2γ2k, | (3.40) |
a=±1k. | (3.41) |
Hence, we give the cases of solutions for Eq (3.2) as follows
Rational function solutions: (When b=0 and c=0, i.e., p2+ν+2γ=0)
The solution of Eq (3.2) is
ˆu1(x,t)=(−a(kx+ωt+μ))−1. | (3.42) |
Therefore, using Eqs (3.1) and (3.42), the following new explicit exact solution of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be acquired
ˆq1(x,t)=ei(px+νt)(−a(kx+ωt+μ))−1, | (3.43) |
where p,ν,γ,k,ω,μ are arbitrary constants.
Trigonometric function solution: (When p2+ν+2γ>0)
Superseding Eq (3.1) and Eqs (3.38)–(3.41) into Eqs (2.21) and (2.22), then the exact solutions of Eq (1.1) are
ˆu2,3(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.44) |
and
ˆu4,5(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)). | (3.45) |
Consequently, using Eqs (3.1) and (3.42), the following new explicit exact solution for the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be obtained
ˆq2,3(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.46) |
and
ˆq4,5(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.47) |
where p,ν,γ,k,ω,μ are arbitrary constants.
Hyperbolic function solution : (When p2+ν+2γ<0)
Substituting Eq (3.1) and Eqs (3.38)–(3.41) into Eqs (2.23) and (2.24), then the exact solutions of Eq (1.1) are
ˆu6,7(x,t)=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.48) |
and
ˆu8,9(x,t)=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)). | (3.49) |
Subsequently, the following new explicit exact solution to the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be gained
ˆq6,7(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.50) |
and
ˆq8,9(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.51) |
where p,ν,γ,k,ω,μ are arbitrary constants.
We have plotted these solutions in Figures 8–10. Figure 8(a) shows the real part of q=ˆq2(x,t) in (3.46), while Figure 8(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.5, p = -1.3, ω = 1.3, ν = 1.4, γ = 1.5 and μ = 1.
Figure 9(a) shows the real part of q=ˆq6(x,t) in (3.50), while Figure 9(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 1.5, p = 1.3, ω = -3.9, ν = -2.4, γ = -1.3 and μ = 1.
Figure 10(a) shows the real part of q=ˆq1(x,t) in (3.43), while Figure 10(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.2, a = 5, p = 1.2, ω = -0.48, ν = 1.4 and μ = 1.
Remark 1. Using Eq (2.27) for ui(x,y), i = 1, ..., 9, once, then Eq (3.2) as well as for Eq (1.1) has an infinite solutions. In sequence, by applying this process again, we get new families of solutions.
ˆu⋆1(x,t)=B3−aB3(kx+ωt+μ)±1, | (3.52) |
ˆu⋆2,3(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.53) |
ˆu⋆4,5(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.54) |
ˆu⋆6,7(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.55) |
ˆu⋆8,9(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.56) |
where B3,p,ν,γ,k,ω and μ are arbitrary constants.
In this article, the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion, the sine-cosine and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE techniques have been efficiently applied to construct many new solutions. As an outcome, a number of new exact solutions for the UNS equation were formally derived. Namely, the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method gives a first family of ten solutions. Whereas, sine-cosine method give another different second family of eight solutions. Indeed, Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method gives a wide range of new explicit exact solutions including rational functions, trigonometric functions, hyperbolic functions and exponential functions in a straightforward manner. The effectiveness and helpfulness of the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion, the sine-cosine and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE methods to deal with UNS equation was proved. As a success, a wide range of new explicit exact solutions were obtained in a straightforward manner. Our study shows that the proposed three methods are reliable in handling NPDEs to establish a variety of exact solutions. Finally, we have plotted some 3D graphs of these solutions and we have shown that these graphs can be controlled by adjusting the parameters.
Remark 2.
1. Comparing our results concerning the UNS equation with the results in [41,42,44,45], one can see that our results are new and most extensive. Indeed, choosing suitable values for the parameters similar solutions can be verified.
2. The Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method has an interesting feature, that admits infinite solutions, which has never given for any other method.
3. The three proposed methods in this article are efficient, powerful and adequate for solving other types of NPDEs and can be easily extended to solve nonlinear fractional differential equations, see [32,33,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
The exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion, sine-cosine and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE techniques have successfully been applied for the UNS equation. Many new exact solutions are obtained during the analytical treatment. The availability of computer systems like Matlab or Mathematica facilitates avoids us the tedious algebraic calculations. Indeed, the obtained solutions are of significant importance in the studies of applied science as they help in explaining some interesting physical mechanism for the complex phenomena. The 3D graphs of some exact solutions are plotted for suitable parameters. Finally, the proposed methods can be applied for a wide range of nonlinear partial differential equations arising in natural sciences. Currently, work is in progress on the applications of the proposed methods in this paper in order to solve the other nonlinear partial differential equations. Indeed these methods can be extended to solve fractional partial differential equations.
The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, A. Jemal, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA. Cancer J. Clin., 68 (2018), 394-424. |
[2] | H. Fang, J. Xie, M. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Y. Wan, Y. Yao, miRNA-21 promotes proliferation and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells through targeting PTEN, Am. J. Transl. Res., 9 (2017), 953-961. |
[3] | Y. Xie, P. Zong, W. Wang, D. Liu, B. Li, Y. Wang, Hypermethylation of potential tumor suppressor miR-34b/c is correlated with late clinical stage in patients with soft tissue sarcomas, Exp. Mol. Pathol., 98 (2015), 446-454. |
[4] | D. Wu, P. Lu, X. Mi, J. Miao, Downregulation of miR-503 contributes to the development of drug resistance in ovarian cancer by targeting PI3K p85, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 297 (2018), 699-707. |
[5] | X. Zhang, D. Ren, X. Wu, X. Lin, L. Ye, C. Lin, miR-1266 Contributes to Pancreatic Cancer Progression and Chemoresistance by the STAT3 and NF-kappaB Signaling Pathways, Mol. Ther. Nucleic. Acids., 11 (2018), 142-158. |
[6] | Y. You, X. Wang, M. Xu, J. Zhao, Expression and clinical significance of miR-139-5p in non-small cell lung cancer, J. Int. Med. Res., 47 (2019), 867-874. |
[7] | J. Tu, Z. Zhao, M. Xu, X. Lu, L. Chang, J. Ji, NEAT1 upregulates TGF-beta1 to induce hepatocellular carcinoma progression by sponging hsa-mir-139-5p, J. Cell. Physiol., 233 (2018), 8578-8587. |
[8] | B. Yang, W. Zhang, D. Sun, X. Wei, Y. Ding, Y. Ma, Downregulation of miR-139-5p promotes prostate cancer progression through regulation of SOX5, Biomed. Pharmacother., 109 (2019), 2128-2135. |
[9] | H. Fischer, R. Stenling, C. Rubio, A. Lindblom, Colorectal carcinogenesis is associated with stromal expression of COL11A1 and COL5A2, Carcinogenesis, 22 (2001), 875-878. |
[10] | Y. Shintani, M. A. Hollingsworth, M. J. Wheelock, K. R. Johnson, Collagen I promotes metastasis in pancreatic cancer by activating c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase 1 and up-regulating N-cadherin expression, Cancer Res., 66 (2006), 11745-11753. |
[11] | A. Menke, C. Philippi, R. Vogelmann, B. Seidel, M. P. Lutz, G. Adler, Down-regulation of E-cadherin gene expression by collagen type I and type III in pancreatic cancer cell lines, Cancer Res., 61 (2001), 3508-3517. |
[12] | H. Yoshioka, P. Greenwel, K. Inoguchi, S. Truter, Y. Inagaki, Y. Ninomiya, Structural and functional analysis of the promoter of the human alpha 1(XI) collagen gene, J. Biol. Chem., 270 (1995), 418-424. |
[13] | D. Sun, H. Jin, J. Zhang, X. Tan, Integrated whole genome microarray analysis and immunohistochemical assay identifies COL11A1, GJB2 and CTRL as predictive biomarkers for pancreatic cancer, Cancer Cell Int., 18 (2018), 174. |
[14] | V. Maire, F. Nemati, M. Richardson, A. V. Salomon, B. Tesson, G. Rigaill, Polo-like kinase 1: A potential therapeutic option in combination with conventional chemotherapy for the management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, Cancer Res., 73 (2013), 813-823. |
[15] | C. Clarke, S. F. Madden, P. Doolan, S. T. Aherne, H. Joyce, L. O'Driscoll, Correlating transcriptional networks to breast cancer survival: a large-scale coexpression analysis, Carcinogenesis, 34 (2013), 2300-2308. |
[16] | M. Xie, T. Ma, J. Xue, H. Ma, M. Sun, Z. Zhang, The long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 707 promotes proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer by interacting with mRNA stabilizing protein HuR, Cancer Lett., 443 (2019), 67-79. |
[17] | D. Diaz, A. Prieto, E. Reyes, H. BarcenillaJorge, M. Melchor, A. Mon, Flow cytometry enumeration of apoptotic cancer cells by apoptotic rate, Methods Mol. Biol., 1219 (2015), 11-20. |
[18] | Z. L. Sun, S. C. Zhang, H. L. Li, Y. C. Gao, EBP50 inhibits the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells through Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling pathway, Chin. J. Biochem. Mol. Bio. (2016), 1027-1032. |
[19] | J. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Wusiman, Y. Yin, Synergistic inhibition of migration and invasion of breast cancer cells by dual docetaxel/quercetin-loaded nanoparticles via Akt/MMP-9 pathway, Int. J. Pharm., 523 (2017), 300-309. |
[20] | L. Badea, V. Herlea, S. O. Dima, T. Dumitrascu, I. Popescu, Combined gene expression analysis of whole-tissue and microdissected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma identifies genes specifically overexpressed in tumor epithelia, Hepatogastroenterology, 55 (2008), 2016-2027. |
[21] | I. W. Chong, M. Y. Chang, H. C. Chang, Y. P. Yu, C. C. Sheu, J. R. Tsai, Great potential of a panel of multiple hMTH1, SPD, ITGA11 and COL11A1 markers for diagnosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, Oncol. Rep., 16 (2006), 981-988. |
[22] | Y. H. Wu, Y. F. Huang, C. C. Chen, C. Y. Chou, Akt inhibitor SC66 promotes cell sensitivity to cisplatin in chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells through inhibition of COL11A1 expression, Cell. Death. Dis., 10 (2019), 322. |
[23] | T. Rizou, F. Perlikos, M. Lagiou, M. Karaglani, S. Nikolopoulos, I. Toumpoulis, Development of novel real-time RT-qPCR methodologies for quantification of the COL11A1 mRNA general and C transcripts and evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer specimens, J. BU ON., 23 (2018), 1699-1710. |
[24] |
A. Li, J. Li, J. Lin, W. Zhuo, J. Si, COL11A1 is overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues and regulates proliferation, migration and invasion of HGC-27 gastric cancer cells in vitro, Oncol. Rep., 37 (2017), 333-340. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5276
![]() |
[25] | Y. H. Wu, Y. F. Huang, T. H. Chang, C. Y. Chou, Activation of TWIST1 by COL11A1 promotes chemoresistance and inhibits apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells by modulating NF-kappaB-mediated IKKbeta expression, Int. J. Cancer, 141 (2017), 2305-2317. |
[26] | K. Tu, X. Zheng, C. Dou, C. Li, W. Yang, Y. Yao, MicroRNA-130b promotes cell aggressiveness by inhibiting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in human hepatocellular carcinoma, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 15 (2014), 20486-20499. |
[27] | X. Zhu, J. Qiu, T. Zhang, Y. Yang, S. Guo, T. Li, MicroRNA-188-5p promotes apoptosis and inhibits cell proliferation of breast cancer cells via the MAPK signaling pathway by targeting Rap2c, J. Cell Physiol. 2019 (2019). |
[28] | M. N. Menbari, K. Rahimi, A. Ahmadi, S. M. Yeganeh, A. Elyasi, N. Darvishi, MiR-483-3p suppresses the proliferation and progression of human triple negative breast cancer cells by targeting the HDAC8 oncogene, J. Cell Physiol. 2019 (2019). |
[29] | Z. Ghaemi, B. M. Soltani, S. J. Mowla, MicroRNA-326 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Breast Cancer by Targeting ErbB/PI3K Signaling Pathway, Front. Oncol., 9 (2019), 653. |
[30] | Q. Li, X. Liang, Y. Wang, X. Meng, Y. Xu, S. Cai, MiR-139-5p Inhibits the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Enhances the Chemotherapeutic Sensitivity of Colorectal Cancer Cells by Downregulating BCL2, Sci. Rep., 6 (2016), 27157. |
[31] | J. Liu, C. Li, Y. Jiang, Y. Wan, S. Zhou, Wen. Cheng, Tumor-suppressor role of miR-139-5p in endometrial cancer, Cancer Cell Int., 18 (2018), 51. |
[32] | M. Yonemori, N. Seki, H. Yoshino, R. Matsushita, K. Miyamoto, M. Nakagawa, Dual tumor-suppressors miR-139-5p and miR-139-3p targeting matrix metalloprotease 11 in bladder cancer, Cancer Sci., 107 (2016), 1233-1242. |
[33] | H. D. Zhang, D. W. Sun, L. Mao, J. Zhang, L. Jiang, MiR-139-5p inhibits the biological function of breast cancer cells by targeting Notch1 and mediates chemosensitivity to docetaxel, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 465 (2015), 702-713. |
[34] | K. Krishnan, A. L. Steptoe, H. C. Martin, D. R. Pattabiraman, K. Nones, N. Waddell, MiR-139-5p is a regulator of metastatic pathways in breast cancer, RNA, 19 (2013), 1767-1780. |
1. | Mostafa M.A. Khater, Mustafa Inc, K.S. Nisar, Raghda A.M. Attia, Multi–solitons, lumps, and breath solutions of the water wave propagation with surface tension via four recent computational schemes, 2021, 20904479, 10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.029 | |
2. | Mostafa M. A. Khater, Yu-Ming Chu, Raghda A. M. Attia, Mustafa Inc, Dianchen Lu, On the Analytical and Numerical Solutions in the Quantum Magnetoplasmas: The Atangana Conformable Derivative (1+3)-ZK Equation with Power-Law Nonlinearity, 2020, 2020, 1687-9120, 1, 10.1155/2020/5809289 | |
3. | Usman Younas, Muhammad Bilal, Tukur Abdulkadir Sulaiman, Jingli Ren, Abdullahi Yusuf, On the exact soliton solutions and different wave structures to the double dispersive equation, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-03445-2 | |
4. | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Iqra Zainab, Observations of fractional effects of β-derivative and M-truncated derivative for space time fractional Phi-4 equation via two analytical techniques, 2022, 154, 09600779, 111645, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111645 | |
5. | Mojtaba Shahraki, Hossein Malekpoor, The effects of polarization on soliton interactions inside optical fibers, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-022-03514-0 | |
6. | Md. Abdul Kayum, Ripan Roy, M. Ali Akbar, M. S. Osman, Study of W-shaped, V-shaped, and other type of surfaces of the ZK-BBM and GZD-BBM equations, 2021, 53, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-03031-6 | |
7. | Khalid K. Ali, Hadi Rezazadeh, Nauman Raza, Mustafa Inc, Highly dispersive optical soliton perturbation with cubic–quintic–septic law via two methods, 2021, 35, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979221502763 | |
8. | Delmar Sherriffe, Diptiranjan Behera, P. Nagarani, Different forms for exact traveling wave solutions of unstable and hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equations, 2024, 38, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979224501315 | |
9. | Handenur Esen, Neslihan Ozdemir, Aydin Secer, Mustafa Bayram, Tukur Abdulkadir Sulaiman, Hijaz Ahmad, Abdullahi Yusuf, M. Daher Albalwi, On the soliton solutions to the density-dependent space time fractional reaction–diffusion equation with conformable and M-truncated derivatives, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05109-9 | |
10. | Hira Tariq, Hira Ashraf, Hadi Rezazadeh, Ulviye Demirbilek, Travelling wave solutions of nonlinear conformable Bogoyavlenskii equations via two powerful analytical approaches, 2024, 39, 1005-1031, 502, 10.1007/s11766-024-5030-7 | |
11. | Rui Cui, New waveform solutions of Calogero–Degasperis (CD) and potential Kadomtsev–Petviashvili (pKP) equations, 2024, 7, 2520-8160, 1673, 10.1007/s41939-023-00254-w | |
12. | Kang-Jia Wang, Ming Li, Variational Principle of the Unstable Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with Fractal Derivatives, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 376, 10.3390/axioms14050376 |