Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Heritability, genetic gain and detection of gene action in hexaploid wheat for yield and its related attributes

  • Received: 12 April 2018 Accepted: 03 January 2019 Published: 10 January 2019
  • Selection of promising genotypes from a diverse genetic pool and their utilization for hybridization is an important strategy for wheat crop improvement. The data from ten parents and their F1 progenies using line × tester mating scheme were analyzed to assess the effects of combining ability for yield and its cognate characters using randomized complete block design with three replications. Data were taken for grain yield and its associated characters like plant height, peduncle and spike length, flag leaf area, per plant tillers, spikelets spike−1, grains spike−1, spike density, thousand-grain weight and grain yield plant−1. Analysis of variance was used to statistically analyze the data. Line × tester analysis was used to find out association among traits and to estimate the effects of GCA and SCA. Highly significant differences were found among parents (lines, testers) and their F1 hybrids for all the parameters under study. Among parents, Line 9796 and tester 107 manifested as best general combiners and exhibited significant GCA effects for almost all the mentioned traits. In the case of F1 hybrids, 9793 × 118 and Punjab-2011 × 108 were recognized as best specific combiners exhibiting significant SCA effects. A higher value of SCA variance than the variance of GCA revealed the preponderance of non-additive genetic action. The degree of dominance revealed the involvement of both type of gene action for the traits under investigation. The deviations among total variation were mainly due to genotypes. Most of the yield associated traits were highly heritable with more than 80% heritability. These findings were confirmed by genetic gain. Thus, potential homozygous lines can be selected from transgressive segregants to improve yield and these crosses will be beneficial for commercial exploitation to heterosis.

    Citation: Muhammad Umer Farooq, Iqra Ishaaq, Rizwana Maqbool, Iqra Aslam, Syed Muhammad Taseer Abbas Naqvi, Sana e Mustafa. Heritability, genetic gain and detection of gene action in hexaploid wheat for yield and its related attributes[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(1): 56-72. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.56

    Related Papers:

    [1] Shen Helvig, Intan D. M. Azmi, Seyed M. Moghimi, Anan Yaghmur . Recent Advances in Cryo-TEM Imaging of Soft Lipid Nanoparticles. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 116-130. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.116
    [2] David Kirchenbuechler, Yael Mutsafi, Ben Horowitz, Smadar Levin-Zaidman, Deborah Fass, Sharon G. Wolf, Michael Elbaum . Cryo-STEM Tomography of Intact Vitrified Fibroblasts. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(3): 259-273. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.3.259
    [3] Gayane Semerjyan, Inesa Semerjyan, Mikayel Ginovyan, Nikolay Avtandilyan . Characterization and antibacterial/cytotoxic activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Dicranum scoparium moss extracts growing in Armenia. AIMS Biophysics, 2025, 12(1): 29-42. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2025003
    [4] Vittoria Raimondi, Alessandro Grinzato . A basic introduction to single particles cryo-electron microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(1): 5-20. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022002
    [5] Kazushige Yokoyama, Christa D. Catalfamo, Minxuan Yuan . Reversible peptide oligomerization over nanoscale gold surfaces. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 649-665. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.649
    [6] James C. L. Chow . Recent progress in Monte Carlo simulation on gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(4): 231-244. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.4.231
    [7] Adam Redzej, Gabriel Waksman, Elena V Orlova . Structural studies of T4S systems by electron microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 184-199. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.184
    [8] Zaynah Sheeraz, James C.L. Chow . Evaluation of dose enhancement with gold nanoparticles in kilovoltage radiotherapy using the new EGS geometry library in Monte Carlo simulation. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(4): 337-345. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021027
    [9] Michael B. Sherman, Juan Trujillo, Benjamin E. Bammes, Liang Jin, Matthias W. Stumpf, Scott C. Weaver . Decontamination of digital image sensors and assessment of electron microscope performance in a BSL-3 containment. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 153-162. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.153
    [10] Sebastian Kube, Petra Wendler . Structural comparison of contractile nanomachines. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 88-115. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.88
  • Selection of promising genotypes from a diverse genetic pool and their utilization for hybridization is an important strategy for wheat crop improvement. The data from ten parents and their F1 progenies using line × tester mating scheme were analyzed to assess the effects of combining ability for yield and its cognate characters using randomized complete block design with three replications. Data were taken for grain yield and its associated characters like plant height, peduncle and spike length, flag leaf area, per plant tillers, spikelets spike−1, grains spike−1, spike density, thousand-grain weight and grain yield plant−1. Analysis of variance was used to statistically analyze the data. Line × tester analysis was used to find out association among traits and to estimate the effects of GCA and SCA. Highly significant differences were found among parents (lines, testers) and their F1 hybrids for all the parameters under study. Among parents, Line 9796 and tester 107 manifested as best general combiners and exhibited significant GCA effects for almost all the mentioned traits. In the case of F1 hybrids, 9793 × 118 and Punjab-2011 × 108 were recognized as best specific combiners exhibiting significant SCA effects. A higher value of SCA variance than the variance of GCA revealed the preponderance of non-additive genetic action. The degree of dominance revealed the involvement of both type of gene action for the traits under investigation. The deviations among total variation were mainly due to genotypes. Most of the yield associated traits were highly heritable with more than 80% heritability. These findings were confirmed by genetic gain. Thus, potential homozygous lines can be selected from transgressive segregants to improve yield and these crosses will be beneficial for commercial exploitation to heterosis.


    1. Introduction

    Investment is an important means of earning profit for insurance companies, reinsurance is in use for controlling insurers' risk exposure. Recently, it became a hot point in optimization and control fields to consider reinsurance and investment synthetically under risk models. There are two main models of reinsurance-investment problem, that is, maximizing the insurer's expected utility of terminal wealth and minimizing the probability of ruin under reinsurance-investment strategies, and each model is based on the quantitative description for insurer's surplus processes. From the known literature, we see that two major types of mathematical model for the surplus of the insurance company are usually exploited, which are the Cramer-Lundberg model and the diffusion model, the former is the so called classical risk process, and the later is an approximation to the former which is feasible as one deals with large insurance portfolios, where an individual claim is relatively small compared to the size of the surplus.

    In our paper, the continuous-time mean-variance reinsurance-investment problem is to be considered, where multiple risky assets for investment exist in the market and diffusion model is exploited to describe the risk process of the insurance company. Under diffusion model of the risk process, related reinsurance-investment problems have attracted a great deal of interest. Promislow et al. (2005) studied the optimal reinsurance-investment strategy to minimize the probability of ruin for insurance companies. Taksar et al. (2003) also obtained the optimal reinsurance-investment strategy to minimize the probability of ruin for insurance companies under diffusion model of surplus process. By solving the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, Cao et al. (2009) obtained the optimal reinsurance-investment strategies for maximizing the utility of terminal wealth with exponential and power utility functions. Luo et al. (2008) studied the similar problem as Cao et al. (2009) in Black-Scholes market subject to some investment constraints. All of the literature (Browne, 1995; Promislow et al., 2005; Taksar et al., 2003; Cao et al., 2009; Luo et al., 2008) researched their optimization problems in Black-Scholes market with single risky asset. Bai et al. (2008) considered the reinsurance-investment problem in Black-Scholes market with multiple risky assets and no-shorting constraint. Zhang et al. (2009) studied the optimal reinsurance-investment problem of maximizing the expected exponential utility of terminal wealth and solve it by using the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. It is noted that the transaction costs when investing in the risky assets and conditional Value-at-Risk to control the whole risk have been considered.

    For the sack of practical need in management, mean-variance portfolio selection model initiated by Markowitz has attracted much attention all the time. There has been few literature up to now which devoted themselves to studying the continuous-time mean-variance reinsurance-investment problem, however, the continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection problem was researched by Zhou et al. (2000)with the help of stochastic linear-quadratic method. As the subsequent paper, Lim et al. (2002) pointed out: there are many advantages of using the framework of stochastic linear-quadratic control to study dynamic mean-variance problems, meanwhile it was recognized that the solution to the problem could also have been obtained via dynamic programming and the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation when the market coefficients are assumed to be deterministic. It is observed that, when the market coefficients are assumed to be deterministic, the Lagrange method can be applied to solving the continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection problems, which was expounded in Chow (1997) in a general way and was applied to investment decisions and pricing of contingent claims in Chow (1996) and Chow (1999), respectively. The Lagrange method is more popular than other dynamic optimization methods. For our continuous-time mean-variance reinsurance-investment problem with deterministic market coefficients, the Lagrange method is also a simple one to obtain our results, which is the main reason for this research. It should be recognized that the Lagrange method is limited to complex circumstances such as random market coefficients, which induces more complex backward stochastic differential equation for solving the process of the Lagrange multiplier. For more details on the subject, we refer to the recent work such as Chen et al. (2013), Shen et al. (2015), and so on.

    This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we state the mean-variance optimization problem. In Section 3, we use the Lagrange method to analysis the mean-variance problem, necessary and sufficient conditions for the problem are discussed, the optimal strategy and its effective frontier in explicit forms are obtained. In Section 4, we show a numerical example.


    2. Problem Formulation

    Throughout this paper we denote by M the transpose of any matrix or vector M=(mij), ||M||=i,jm2ij its norm, Rm the mdimensional real space, 1 the vector with unit entries, [0,T] the finite horizon of investment and Et the expectation at time t[0,T].

    Market uncertainty is modeled by a filtered complete probability space (Ω,F,P,{Ft}t[0,T]). Assume that the filtration {Ft}t[0,T] is generated by an (m+1)-dimensional standard Brownian motion {(W0t,W1t,,Wmt):t[0,T]} for a positive integer m. F0={Φ,Ω}, FT=F.

    We recall that the space LF,2([0,T];Rm) of mean square integrable functions u(t,x) from R×Ω to Rm possesses a natural Hilbert space structure, inducing the norm

    ||u||F,2=(E0T0||u(t,X)||2dt)12<+.

    Following the framework of Promislow and Young (2005), we model the insurer's claim process C according to a Brownian motion with drift as follows:

    dC(t)=adtbdW0t, (1)

    where a and b are positive constants. Assume that the premium be paid continuously at the constant rate c0=(1+θ)a with safety loading θ>0, and that the insurer purchase the proportional reinsurance to reduce the underlying risk. Let q(t) represent the proportion reinsured at time t. Similar to the premium paid to the insurer, the reinsurance premium is paid continuously at the constant rate c1=(1+η)aq with safety loading η>θ>0. Based on Eq. (1), the surplus process R(t) is given by the dynamics

    dR(t)=c0dt(1q(t))dC(t)c1dt=(θηq(t))adt+b(1q(t))dW0t. (2)

    In addition to reinsurance, the insurer is allowed to invest its surplus in a financial market in which (m+1) assets are traded continuously over [0,T] in a self-financing fashion (i.e., there is no consumption nor income). The 0th asset is a bond whose price S0(t) is subject to the following deterministic ordinary differential equation:

    dS0(t)=r(t)S0(t)dt,S0(0)=1, (3)

    where r(t)C([0,T];R+) is the interest rate of the risk-free asset. The remaining m assets are risky and their price processes S1(t),S2(t),,Sm(t) satisfy the following stochastic differential equations:

    dSi(t)=μi(t)Si(t)dt+σi(t)Si(t)dWt,Si(0)=si>0,i=1,2,,m, (4)

    where μi(t) and σi(t)=[σi1(t),,σim(t)] are the appreciation rate and dispersion (or volatility) rate of the ith asset, respectively, and W=(W1t,,Wmt). We assume that μi(t) and σi(t) are scalar-valued deterministic bounded functions. Denoting

    σ(t)=[σ1(t)σm(t)]Rm×m, (5)

    we assume throughout that σ(t) is uniformly nondegenerate: that is, there exists δ>0 such that

    σ(t)σ(t)δI,t[0,T]. (6)

    A strategy s is described by a stochastic process (q(t),π(t)), where π(t) :=(π1(t),π2(t),,πm(t)), πi(t) is the dollar amount invested in asset i(i=1,2,,m) at time t.

    Let X(t) denote the resulting surplus process after incorporating strategy s into (2). The dynamics of X(t) can be represented as follows.

    dX(t)=[r(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+τ(t)π(t)]dt+b(1q(t))dW0t+π(t)σ(t)dWt, (7)

    where τ(t)=(μ1(t)r(t),,μm(t)r(t)), X(0)=x0.

    The admissible strategy set with initial wealth x0 is defined as

    A(x0):={s=(q(t),π(t))|q(t),π(t)satisfies(2.7)}

    The objective of the insurer is to determine an optimal strategy sA(x0) such that the variance of the terminal wealth, Var[X(T)], is minimized, subject to that the expected terminal wealth, E0[X(T)], takes a given level K>x0exp(T0r(t)dt). This can be expressed as the optimization problem:

    {minsA(x0)Var[X(T)]=E0[X2(T)K],s.t.E0[X(T)]=K. (8)

    We introduce a Lagrange multiplier 2ξR and after rearranging terms arrive at the new cost function,

    E0[(X(T)2K)2+2ξ(X(T)K)]=E0[X(T)(Kξ)]2ξ2.

    Letting γ=Kξ leads to the following optimal stochastic control problem,

    maxsA(x0){(Kγ)2E0[X(T)2γ]2}. (9)

    Remark 2.1. The link between problem (8) and (9) is provided by the Lagrange duality theorem, see e.g. Luenberger (1968)

    minsA(x0)Var[X(T)]=maxγRmaxsA(x0){(Kγ)2E0[X(T)2γ]2}.

    3. Mean-Variance Analysis by the Lagrange Method

    For the first step, we consider problem (9) for a fixed γ. Follow the Lagrange method introduced by Chow (1997), recognizing dX(t)=X(t+dt)X(t), and let dt be a very small time interval. The Lagrange expression for the optimization problem (9) beginning from t=0 is

    L=(Kγ)2Et[X(T)2γ]2
    T0Etλ(t+dt)[X(t+dt)X(t)(r(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+τ(t)π(t))dt
    b(1q(t))dW0tπ(t)σ(t)dWt]. (10)

    For simplicity, denote by

    f(X(t),q(t),π1(t),,πm(t))=r(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+τ(t)π(t),
    R(q(t))=b(1q(t)).

    The Lagrange expression (10) can be rewritten as follows.

    L=(Kγ)2Et[X(T)2γ]2
    T0Etλ(t+dt)[X(t+dt)fdtR(q)dW0tπ(t)σ(t)dWt]. (11)

    Remark 3.1: By theorem 4.2 of Yong and Zhou(1999), problem (9) with dynamic constraint (7) admits a pathwise unique admissible strategy in A(x0), which implies, for a given γR, maximization of the cost function L in (11) is uniquely solvable, henceforth, the Lagrange multiplier λ=λ(t,X(t)) can be uniquely determined.


    3.1. Necessary conditions

    Let the function λ be in the form λ=λ(t,X(t)), applying Ito's differentiation rule to evaluate dλ yields

    dλ=[λt+λXf+122λX2(R2(q)+||π(t)σ(t)||2)]dt
    +λXR(q)dW0t+λXπ(t)σ(t)dWt. (12)

    Differentiating (11) with respect to X(T), we have

    λ(T)=2X(T)+2γ. (13)

    Differentiating (11) with respect to q(t) gives

    Lq=fqEtλ(t+dt)dt+EtdW0tRqλ(t+dt)
    =fq(λdt+Etdλdt)+EtdW0tRqλ(t+dt)
    =[fqλ(t)+RqλXR(q)]dt+o(dt)
    =[aηλ(t)bR(q)λX]dt+o(dt)=0.

    Hence

    aηλ(t)+bR(q)λX=0. (14)

    Differentiating (11) with respect to π(t) yields

    Lπ=[λ(t)τ(t)+λXσ(t)σ(t)π(t)]dt+o(dt)=0.

    Hence

    λ(t)τ(t)+λXσ(t)σ(t)π(t)=0. (15)

    Noting the term λ(t)[X(t)] in the integrand of (11), differentiating (11) with respect to X(t)(0t<T) gives

    LX=λ(t)+Etλ(t+dt)+fXEtλ(t+dt)dt
    =λ(t)+Et(λ(t)+dλ(t))+fXEt(λ(t)+dλ(t))dt
    =[λt+λXf+fXλ(t)+122λX2(R2(q)+||π(t)σ(t)||2)]dt+o(dt)
    =0.

    Hence

    λt+λXf+fXλ(t)+122λX2(R2(q)+||π(t)σ(t)||2)=0. (16)

    Now we state the necessary conditions for the optimization problem (9) as follows.

    Proposition 3.1. Let s=(q(t),π(t)) be the optimal reinsurance-investment strategy for the optimization problem (9), then the equations (12)-(16) hold.


    3.2. Sufficient conditions

    First, we give the explicit expression of the wealth process X(t). Let

    Y(t)=X(t)exp(t0r(s)ds),

    which yields

    dY(t)=exp(t0r(s)ds)[dX(t)r(t)X(t)dt],

    In view of (7), we have

    dY(t)=exp(t0r(s)ds)[((θηq(t))a+τ(t)π(t))dt+R(q)dW0t+π(t)σ(t)dWt],

    and thus

    Y(t)Y(0)=t0exp(s0r(u)du)[((θηq(s))a+τ(s)π(s))ds+R(q)dW0s+π(s)σ(s)dWs].

    So, we have

    X(t)=x0exp(t0r(s)ds)+t0exp(tsr(u)du)[(θηq(s))a+τ(s)π(s))ds.
    +R(q)dW0s+π(s)σ(s)dW. (17)

    In view of (17), it is not difficulty to find that both Et[X(T)2/q2] and Et[X(T)2/πi2] are positive, which guarantees that the necessary conditions stated in proposition 3.1 are also sufficient conditions for the optimization problem (9) according to Chow (1997).


    3.3. Optimal reinsurance-investment strategy

    Noting that f=r(t)X(t)(θηq(t))a+(θηq(t))a+τ(t)π(t), from (3.7) and (3.4), we have

    {λt+[r(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+τ(t)π(t)]λX    12[R2(q)+||π(t)σ(t)||2]2λX2+r(t)λ(t)=0,λ(T)=2X(T)+2γ. (18)

    According to Remark 3.1, problem (18) has an unique solution λ(t,X(t)). So, in view of (14) and (15), the components of admissible strategy, q(t) and π(t), are uniquely determined. For purpose of getting the unique solution of (18), we start by finding q(t) and π(t) in linear feedback form as follows.

    q(t)=ϕ1(t)X(t)+φ1(t),π(t)=ϕ2(t)X(t)+φ2(t), (19)

    where ϕ1,φ1C1[0,T;R] and ϕ2,φ2C1[0,T;Rm] are deterministic functions to be determined.

    From (14) and (19), remarking that R(q)=b(1q(t)), we have

    aηλ(t)+b2(1ϕ1(t)X(t)φ1(t))λX=0. (20)

    Differentiating (20) with respect to X(t) arrives at

    (aηb2ϕ1(t))λX+bR(q)2λX2=0.

    Hence

    R2(q)2λX2=(ϕ1(t)aη/b2)bR(q)2λX2=aη(ϕ1(t)aη/b2)λ, (21)

    where (14) is incorporated in the second equality in (21).

    From (15) and (19), we have

    λ(t)τ(t)+λXσ(t)σ(t)(ϕ2(t)X(t)+φ2(t))=0. (22)

    Differentiating (22) with respect to X(t) arrives at

    λX(τ(t)+σ(t)σ(t)ϕ2(t))+2λX2σ(t)σ(t)π(t)=0. (23)

    Hence

    ||π(t)σ(t)||22λX2=λXπ(t)(τ(t)+σ(t)σ(t)ϕ2(t)).
    =λXτ(t)π(t)+λ(t)ϕ2(t)τ(t), (24)

    where (15) is incorporated in the second equality in (23). Substituting from (21) and (24) into (18) gives

    {λt+[r(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+12τ(t)π(t)]λX    +12[2r(t)aη(ϕ1(t)aη/b2)+ϕ2(t)τ(t)]λ=0,λ(T)=2X(T)+2γ. (25)

    Characteristic equation of the first order partial differential equation in (25) is

    dt1=dXr(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+12τ(t)π(t)
    =dλ12(2r(t)aη(ϕ1(t)aη/b2)+ϕ2(t)τ(t))

    In view of

    dt1=dXr(t)X(t)+(θηq(t))a+12τ(t)π(t)

    we obtain a first integration as follows.

    C1=X(t)exp(t0(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)ϕ2(s)ds)
    Tt(aθaηφ1(u)+12τ(u)ϕ2(u))×exp(u0(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)ϕ2(s)ds)du,

    where C1 is constant. In view of

    dt1=dλ12(2r(t)aη(ϕ1(t)aη/b2)+ϕ2(t)τ(t)),

    we get another first integration:

    C2=λ(t)+12Tt[2r(s)aη(ϕ1(s)aη/b2)+ϕ2(s)τ(s)]ds,

    where C2 is constant. It is obvious that both the first integrations obtained above are mutual independent. Invoking the boundary condition in (25), that is, λ(T)=2X(T)+2γ, relationship between C1 and C2 is

    C2=2exp(T0(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)ϕ2(s))ds)C1+2γ

    so we get the solution of (25) as following.

    λ(t)+12Tt[2r(s)aη(ϕ1(s)aη/b2)+ϕ2(s)τ(s)]ds
    =2exp(T0(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)ϕ2(s))ds)
    ×[X(t)exp(t0(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)ϕ2(s)ds)
    Tt(aθaηφ1(u)+12τ(u)φ2(u))
    ×exp(u0(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)φ2(s))du]+2γ. (26)

    From (26), we see that

    {λX=2exp(Tt(r(s)aηϕ1(s)+12τ(s)ϕ2(s)ds)0,2λX2=0. (27)

    By (21) and the second equation in (27), we get ϕ1(t)=aη/b2. By (23) and (27), we get ϕ2(t)=(σ(t)σ(t))1τ(t). Substituting from the results of ϕ1(t) and ϕ2(t) into (27) shows

    λX=2exp(Tt(r(s)a2η2b212||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds):=H(t). (28)

    Substituting from the results of ϕ1(t) and ϕ2(t) into (26) gives

    λ(t)=H(t)X(t)+h(t), (29)

    where

    h(t)=2Tt(aθaηφ1(u)+12τ(u)φ2(u))
    ×exp(Tu(r(s)a2η2b212||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)du
    12Tt[2r(s)||σ1(s)τ(s)||2]ds+2γ.

    Then h(T)=2γ, and

    dhdt=[(aθaηφ1(t)+12τ(t)φ2(t))]H(t)
    +12[2r(s)||σ1(t)τ(t)||2], (30)

    where H(t) is given by (28).

    By (22), (29) and ϕ2(t)=(σ(t)σ(t))1τ(t), we have

    H(t)φ2(t)=h(t)(σ(t)σ(t))1τ(t). (31)

    By (20), (29) and ϕ1(t)=aη/b2, we have

    H(t)φ1(t)=aηb2h(t)+H(t). (32)

    Substituting from (31) and (32) into (30) gives

    dhdt=(a2η2b2+12||σ1(t)τ(t)||2)h(t)+aθH(t)+12[2r(t)||σ1(t)τ(t)||2].

    Remarking that h(T)=2γ, we have

    h(t)=2γexp(a2η2b2(Tt)+12Tt||σ1(s)τ(s)||2ds)
    Ttexp(a2η2b2(ut)+12ut||σ1(s)τ(s)||2ds)
    ×[aθH(u)+(r(u)12||σ1(u)τ(u)||2]du. (33)

    From (31) and (32), we have

    φ2(t)=h(t)H(t)(σ(t)σ(t))1τ(t),φ1(t)=aηb2h(t)H(t)+1,

    so we have

    {q(t)=ϕ1(t)X(t)+φ1(t)=aηb(X(t)+h(t)H(t))+1;π(t)=ϕ2(t)X(t)+φ2(t)=(σ(t)σ(t))1τ(t)(X(t)+h(t)H(t)), (34)

    and

    λ(t)=H(t)X(t)+h(t), (35)

    where H(t) and h(t) are given by (28) and (33), respectively. We state one of our main results as follows.

    Proposition 3.2. Let τ(t)=(μ1(t)r(t),,μm(t)r(t)), and γR be given. The optimal reinsurance-investment strategy for problem (2.9) are given by (34), and the Lagrange multiplier λ(t,X(t)) is a linear function of X(t) which is given by (35).


    3.4. The effective frontier

    From (35), we have

    λt=dHdtX(t)+dhdt,λX=H(t),2λX2=0.

    From equations (12) and (13), we have the backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE, for short) with terminal value for the Lagrange multiplier λ.

    {dλ=[dHdtX(t)+dhdt+H(t)f]dt+H(t)R(q)dW0t+H(t)π(t)σ(t)dWt,λ(T)=2X(T)+2γ. (36)

    From (18) we have dHdtX(t)+dhdt+H(t)f=λr(t). Substituting from (34) into (36), one obtains

    {dλ=λ[r(t)dt+aηbdW0t+(σ1(t)τ(t))dWt],λ(T)=2X(T)+2γ. (37)

    BSDE (37) has the following solution.

    λ=2(X(T)γ)exp[Tt(r(s)l(s)2)ds]
    ×exp[aηb(W0TW0t)+Tt(σ1(s)τ(s))dWs], (38)

    where l=a2η2/b2+||σ1τ||2. By λ obtained in (38), we then have

    λ(0,X(0))=H(0)X(0)+h(0)
    =2(X(T)γ)exp[T0(r(t)l(t)2)dt]×exp[aηbW0T+T0(σ1(t)τ(t))dWt].

    Hence

    X(T)=12(H(0)x0+h(0))exp(T0(r(t)l(t)2)dt)
    ×exp(aηbW0TT0(σ1(t)τ(t))dWt)+γ,

    which implies

    E0[X(T)]=12(H(0)x0+h(0))exp(T0(r(t)l(t))dt)+γ.

    From (28) and (33), we have

    H(0)=2exp(T0(r(s)a2η2b212||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds),

    and

    h(0)=2γexp(a2η2b2T+12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)h(0),

    where

    h(0)=T0exp(a2η2b2u+12u0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2ds)
    ×[aθH(u)+(r(u)12||σ1(u)τ(u)||2)]du.

    Denoting by A=H(0)x0h(0), we have

    E0[X(T)]=12Aexp(T0(r(t)l(t))dt)
    +γ[1exp(T0(r(s)2l(s))ds12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)]. (39)

    Furthermore, we have

    X2(T)=14(H(0)x0+h(0))2exp(T0(2r(t)l(t))dt)
    ×exp(2aηbW0T2T0(σ1(t)τ(t))dWt)+γ2
    γ(H(0)x0+h(0))exp(T0(r(t)l(t)2)dt)
    ×exp(aηbW0TT0(σ1(t)τ(t))dWt),

    which yields

    E0[X2(T)]=14A2exp(T0(2r(t)3l(t))dt)
    +A[exp(T0(2r(s)4l(s))ds12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)exp(T0(r(s)l(s))ds)]γ
    +[1+exp(T0(2r(s)5l(s))dsT0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)]
    2exp(T0(r(s)2l(s))ds12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)γ2. (40)

    Using (39) and (40) we can thus give an explicit expression for the optimal cost in problem (8), as a one parameter family in γ

    (Kγ)2E0[X(T)γ]2=K22γK+2γE0[X(T)]E0[X2(T)]=K214A2exp(T0(2r(t)3l(t))dt)  [2K+Aexp(T0(2r(s)4l(s))ds12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)]γ  [exp(T0(2r(s)5l(s))dsT0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)1]γ2.

    Assume that

    T0(5l(s)2r(s))dsT0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds
    =T0[4||σ1(s)τ(s)||22r(s)]ds+5a2η2T/b2:=ρ>0 (41)

    hold, using remark 2.1, we see that the minimum Var[X(T)] is achieved for

    γ=K+A2exp(T0(2r(s)4l(s))ds12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2ds)eρ1 (42)

    and

    minsA(x0)Var[X(T)]=eρeρ1[K+A2exp(T0l(s)ds+12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)]2. (43)

    Now we state the conclusion of the effective frontier of our mean-variance problem as follows.

    Proposition 3.3. Let K=E0[X(T)], τ(t)=(μ1(t)r(t),,μm(t)r(t)), l(t)=a2η2/b2+||σ1(t)τ(t)||2, A=H(0)x0h(0). Assume that (41) hold. The effective frontier of the mean-variance reinsurance-investment strategy for problem (8) is given by

    Var[X(T)]=eρeρ1[K+A2exp(T0l(s)ds+12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)]2. (44)

    4. Numerical Example

    Let x0=1, r(t)=0.06, m=3, μ1(t)=0.08, μ2(t)=0.10, μ3(t)=0.15, a=1, b=0.5, θ=0.2, η=0.3, and

    σ(t)=(0.200.150.060.100.300.250.400.050.50).

    Then

    σ1(t)=(2.8701.3570.9481.9712.1570.7652.1740.8701.304),τ(t)=(0.02,0.04,0.09),

    and

    ||σ1(t)τ(t)||2=0.022865,(σ(t)σ(t))1=(16.84801.53454.04781.53457.25101.80214.04781.80213.1843).

    Hence l(t)=a2η2/b2+||σ1(t)τ(t)||2=0.382865. In view of (28) and (33), and let e2.718, direct calculation gives h(t)/H(t)=0.07320.9268×1.9794Tt. According to proposition 3.2, the mean-variance optimal reinsurance-investment strategy are given by (34), that is,

    {q(t)=aηb2(X(t)+h(t)H(t))+1=1+1.2(X(t)+0.07320.9268×1.9794Tt)    =1.0878+1.2X(t)1.1122×1.9794Tt;π(t)=(σ(t)σ(t))1τ(t)(X(t)+h(t)H(t))    =(0.63990.09720.2955)(X(t)++0.07320.9268×1.9794Tt)    =(0.04680.00710.0216)(0.63990.09720.2955)X(t)+(0.59310.09010.2739)×1.9794Tt,

    Remark that

    ρ=T0[4||σ1(s)τ(s)||22r(s)]ds+5a2η2T/b2=1.77146T>0, A=H(0)x0h(0)=0.13082.5858×1.3653T+0.4550×1.4498T. In view of (44), the effective frontier of the mean-variance reinsurance-investment strategy is given by

    Var[X(T)]=eρeρ1[K+A2exp(T0l(s)ds+12T0||σ1(s)τ(s)||2)ds)]2
    =5.8784T5.8784T1(0.0654×1.4498T+0.2775×2.1019T1.2929×1.0619T+E0[X(T)])2.

    Furthermore, let T=1, we have

    Var[X(1)]=1.2050(0.6948+E0[X(1)])2.

    Acknowledgments

    This work is supported by the Foundation of Guangzhou Academy of International Finance (No: 16GFR01A04, 16GFR01A07).


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.




    [1] Widyaratne G, Zijlstra R (2007) Nutritional value of wheat and corn distiller's dried grain with solubles: Digestibility and digestible contents of energy, amino acids and phosphorus, nutrient excretion and growth performance of grower-finisher pigs. Can J Anim Sci 87: 103–114. doi: 10.4141/A05-070
    [2] Pakistan G (2018) Ministry of Food and Agriculture. Economic Wing Islamabad, Pakistan.
    [3] Cleland J (2013) World population growth; past, present and future. Environ Resour Econ 55: 543–554. doi: 10.1007/s10640-013-9675-6
    [4] Ahmad N, Shabbir G, Akram Z, et al. (2013) Combining ability effects of some phenological traits in bread wheat. Sarhad J Agric 29: 15–20.
    [5] Liang Y, Farooq MU, Hu Y, et al. (2018) Study on Stability and Antioxidant Activity of Red Anthocyanidin Glucoside Rich Hybrid Rice, its Nutritional and Physicochemical Characteristics. Food Sci Technol Res 24: 687–696. doi: 10.3136/fstr.24.687
    [6] Liang Y, Farooq MU, Zeng R, et al. (2018) Breeding of Selenium Rich Red Glutinous Rice, Protein Extraction and Analysis of the Distribution of Selenium in Grain. Int J Agric Biol 20: 1005–1011.
    [7] Farooq MU, Zhicheng T, Zeng R, et al. (2018) Accumulation, mobilization and transformation of selenium in rice grain provided with foliar sodium selenite. J Sci Food Agr.
    [8] Farooq MU, Cheema AA, Ishaaq I, et al. (2018) Correlation and genetic component studies for peduncle length affecting grain yield in wheat. Int J Adv Appl Sci 5: 67–75.
    [9] Steel R, TORRIE JC (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill.
    [10] Kempthorne O (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley And Sons, Inc.; New York.
    [11] Dabholkar AR (1992) Elements of biometrical genetics.
    [12] Fellahi ZEA, Hannachi A, Bouzerzour H, et al. (2013) Line × tester mating design analysis for grain yield and yield related traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Agron, 2013.
    [13] Farooq MU, Khan AS, Ishaaq I, et al. (2018) Growing Degree Days during the Late Reproductive Phase Determine Spike Density and Cognate Yield Traits. Agronomy 8: 217. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8100217
    [14] Menon U, Sharma S (1997) Genetics of yield determining factors in spring wheat over environments. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 57: 301–306.
    [15] Javaid A, Masood S, Minhas N (2001) Analysis of combining ability in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using F2 generation. Pak J Biol Sci 4: 1303–1305.
    [16] Yadav NK, Yadav PC, Shweta, et al. (2014) Combining ability and heterotic response for yield and its attributing traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Plant Sci 9: 377–380.
    [17] Nazir S, Khan AS, Ali Z (2005) Combining ability analysis for yield and yield contributing traits in bread wheat. J Agric Soc Sci 1: 129–132.
    [18] Ahmad E, Akhtar M, Badoni S, et al. (2017) Combining ability studies for seed yield related attributes and quality parameters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Genet Genomics Plant Breed 1: 21–27.
    [19] Saeed A, Chowdhry MA, Saedd N, et al. (2001) Line × tester analysis for some morpho-physiological traits in bread wheat. Int J Agric Biol 3: 444–447.
    [20] Bao YG, Wang S, Wang XQ, et al. (2009) Heterosis and Combining Ability for Major Yield Traits of a New Wheat Germplasm Shannong 0095 Derived from Thinopyrum intermedium. Agric Sci China 8: 753–760. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60275-8
    [21] Akram Z, Ajmal SU, Khan KS, et al. (2011) Combining ability estimates of some yield and quality related traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pak J Bot 43: 221–231.
    [22] Malik MFA, Awan SI, Ali S (2005) Genetic behavior and analysis of quantitative traits in five wheat genotypes. J Agric Soc Sci 1: 313–315.
    [23] Baloch MJ, Mallano IA, Baloch AW, et al. (2011) Efficient methods of choosing potential parents and hybrids: Line Tester analysis of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. 54: 117–121.
    [24] Ammar A, Irshad A, Liaqat S, et al. (2014) Combining ability studies for yield components in wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Food Agric Environ 12: 383–386.
    [25] Mahpara S, Ali Z, Ahsan M (2008) Combining ability analysis for yield and yield related traits among wheat varieties and their F1 hybrids. Int J Agric Biol 10: 599–604.
    [26] Lohithaswa H, Desai S, Hanchinal R, et al. (2014) Combining ability in tetraploid wheat for yield, yield attributing traits, quality and rust resistance over environments. Karnataka J Agric Sci, 26.
    [27] Hussain B, Khan AS, Farid MZ (2014) Inheritance of Plant Height, Yield and Yield Related Traits in Bread Wheat. Inter J Modern Agri 3: 74–80.
    [28] Hasnain Z, Abbas G, Saeed A, et al. (2006) Combining ability for plant height and yield related traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric Res 44: 167–173.
    [29] Jatav M, Jatav S, Kandalkar V (2014) Combining ability and heterosis analysis of morpho-physiological characters in wheat. Ann Plant Soil Res 16: 79–83.
    [30] Awan SI, Malik MFA, Siddique M (2005) Combining ability analysis in intervarietal crosses for component traits in hexaploid wheat. J Agric Soc Sci 1: 316–317.
    [31] Zeeshan M, Arshad W, Ali S, et al. (2013) Estimation of combining ability effects for some yield related metric traits in intra-specific crosses among different spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Int J Adv Res 1: 6–10.
    [32] Akbar M, Anwar J, Hussain M, et al. (2009) Line tester analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric Res, 47.
    [33] Anwar J, Akbar M, Hussain M, et al. (2011) Combining ability estimates for grain yield in wheat. J Agric Res, 49.
    [34] Yao J, Ma H, Yang X, et al. (2014) Inheritance of grain yield and its correlation with yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Afr J Biotechnol 13: 1379–1385. doi: 10.5897/AJB12.2169
    [35] Topal A, Aydın C, Akgün N, et al. (2004) Diallel cross analysis in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.): Identification of best parents for some kernel physical features. Field Crop Res 87: 1–12.
    [36] Iqbal M, Khan A (2006) Analysis of combining ability for spike characteristics in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Agric Biol 8: 684–687.
    [37] Cheema NM, Muhammad I, Mian MA, et al. (2007) Gene action studies for some economic traits in spring wheat. Pak J Agric Res 20: 99–104.
    [38] Seboka H, Ayana A, Zelleke H (2009) Combining ability analysis for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). East Afr J Sci, 3.
    [39] Tiwari D, Pandey P, Giri S, et al. (2011) Prediction of gene action, heterosis and combining ability to identify superior rice hybrids. Int J Bot 7: 126–144. doi: 10.3923/ijb.2011.126.144
    [40] Çifci EA, Yagdi K (2010) The research of the combining ability of agronomic traits of bread wheat in F1 and F2 generations. J Agric Fac Uludag U 24: 85–92.
    [41] Ahmad F, Khan S, Ahmad SQ, et al. (2011) Genetic analysis of some quantitative traits in bread wheat across environments. Afr J Agric Res 6: 686–692.
    [42] Jain S, Sastry E (2012) Heterosis and combining ability for grain yield and its contributing traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric All Sci 1: 17–22.
    [43] Yadav AK, Maan RK, Kumar S, et al. (2011) Research Note Variability, heritability and genetic advance for quantitative characters in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Elect J Plant Breed 2: 405–408.
    [44] Hussain Q, Aziz T, Khalil IH, et al. (2017) Estimation of heritability and selection response for some yield traits in F3 populations of wheat. Int J Agric Appl Sci 9: 6–13.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. L. Pascucci, G. Scattini, Imaging extracelluar vesicles by transmission electron microscopy: Coping with technical hurdles and morphological interpretation, 2021, 1865, 03044165, 129648, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129648
    2. A G Hegazi, A S El-Houssiny, E A Fouad, Egyptian propolis 14: Potential antibacterial activity of propolis-encapsulated alginate nanoparticles against different pathogenic bacteria strains, 2019, 10, 2043-6262, 045019, 10.1088/2043-6254/ab52f4
    3. Ana M. Milosevic, Laura Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Sandor Balog, Christophe A. Monnier, Alke Petri-Fink, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Assessing the Stability of Fluorescently Encoded Nanoparticles in Lysosomes by Using Complementary Methods, 2017, 56, 14337851, 13382, 10.1002/anie.201705422
    4. Tobias Köthe, Stefan Martin, Gabriele Reich, Gert Fricker, Dual asymmetric centrifugation as a novel method to prepare highly concentrated dispersions of PEG-b-PCL polymersomes as drug carriers, 2020, 579, 03785173, 119087, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119087
    5. Ana M. Milosevic, Laura Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Sandor Balog, Christophe A. Monnier, Alke Petri-Fink, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Assessing the Stability of Fluorescently Encoded Nanoparticles in Lysosomes by Using Complementary Methods, 2017, 129, 00448249, 13567, 10.1002/ange.201705422
    6. Quy Ong, Ting Mao, Neda Iranpour Anaraki, Łukasz Richter, Carla Malinverni, Xufeng Xu, Francesca Olgiati, Paulo Henrique Jacob Silva, Anna Murello, Antonia Neels, Davide Demurtas, Seishi Shimizu, Francesco Stellacci, Cryogenic electron tomography to determine thermodynamic quantities for nanoparticle dispersions, 2022, 9, 2051-6347, 303, 10.1039/D1MH01461G
    7. Raphaël Cornu, Gautier Laurent, Arnaud Beduneau, 2023, 9780323912150, 27, 10.1016/B978-0-323-91215-0.00012-1
    8. Inga C. Kuschnerus, Haotian Wen, Xinrui Zeng, Yee Yee Khine, Juanfang Ruan, Chun-Jen Su, U-Ser Jeng, Hugues A. Girard, Jean-Charles Arnault, Eiji Ōsawa, Olga Shenderova, Vadym Mochalin, Ming Liu, Masahiro Nishikawa, Shery L.Y. Chang, Fabrication process independent and robust aggregation of detonation nanodiamonds in aqueous media, 2023, 09259635, 110199, 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110199
    9. Aysegul Ekmekcioglu, Ozgul Gok, Devrim Oz-Arslan, Meryem Sedef Erdal, Yasemin Yagan Uzuner, Meltem Muftuoglu, Mitochondria-Targeted Liposomes for Drug Delivery to Tumor Mitochondria, 2024, 16, 1999-4923, 950, 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070950
    10. Fatma Hande Osmanagaoglu, Aysegul Ekmekcioglu, Busel Ozcan, Gunseli Bayram Akcapinar, Meltem Muftuoglu, Preparation and Characterization of Hydrophobin 4-Coated Liposomes for Doxorubicin Delivery to Cancer Cells, 2024, 17, 1424-8247, 1422, 10.3390/ph17111422
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5635) PDF downloads(1104) Cited by(7)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog