The relative biologic effectiveness versus linear energy transfer
curve as an output-input relation for linear cellular systems
-
1.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
-
2.
Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
-
Received:
01 September 2008
Accepted:
29 June 2018
Published:
01 June 2009
-
-
MSC :
Primary: 92C99, 93A30; Secondary: 92B05.
-
-
Experiments have established that different radiation types have different magnitudes of biological response. When biological response is defined in terms of the Relative Biologic Effectiveness (RBE) and different radiation type is characterized by Linear Energy Transfer (LET), the plot of the RBE versus LET (RBE-LET) curve shows RBE to increase with increasing LET, to reach a maximum, and to decrease with further increasing LET. Perhaps due to the descriptive nature of biology, most quantitative models for the RBE-LET curve ignore the reality of the underlying molecular biology. On the other hand, the molecular basis for the RBE-LET curve is not completely known despite recent efforts.
Here we introduce a differential equation formulation for a signal-and-system model that sees cells as systems, different radiation types as input, and cellular responses as output. Because of scant knowledge of the underlying biochemical network, the current version is necessarily a work in progress. It explains the RBE-LET curve using not just input parameters but also systems internal state parameters. These systems internal state parameters represent parts of a biochemical network within a cell. Although multiple biochemical parts may well be involved, the shape of the RBE-LET curve is reproduced when only three system parameters are related to three biochemical parts: the molecular machinery for DNA double strand break repair; the molecular pathways for handling oxidative stress; and the radiolytic products of the cellular water.
Despite being a simplified ''toy model,'' changes in the systems state parameters lead to model curves that are refutable in a modern molecular biology laboratory. As the parts in the biochemical network of the radiation response are being further elucidated, this model can incorporate new systems state parameters to allow a more accurate fit.
Citation: Quoc T. Luu, Paul DuChateau. The relative biologic effectiveness versus linear energy transfercurve as an output-input relation for linear cellular systems[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2009, 6(3): 591-602. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.591
Related Papers:
[1] |
Anissa Guillemin, Michael P. H. Stumpf .
Non-equilibrium statistical physics, transitory epigenetic landscapes, and cell fate decision dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 7916-7930.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020402
|
[2] |
Cristina De Ambrosi, Annalisa Barla, Lorenzo Tortolina, Nicoletta Castagnino, Raffaele Pesenti, Alessandro Verri, Alberto Ballestrero, Franco Patrone, Silvio Parodi .
Parameter space exploration within dynamic simulations of signaling networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(1): 103-120.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.103
|
[3] |
Eugene Kashdan, Dominique Duncan, Andrew Parnell, Heinz Schättler .
Mathematical methods in systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(6): i-ii.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.201606i
|
[4] |
Juexin Wang, Yan Wang .
Towards Machine Learning in Molecular Biology. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 2822-2824.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020156
|
[5] |
Hilla Behar, Alexandra Agranovich, Yoram Louzoun .
Diffusion rate determines balance between extinction and proliferationin birth-death processes. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 523-550.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.523
|
[6] |
Janine Egert, Clemens Kreutz .
Realistic simulation of time-course measurements in systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10570-10589.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023467
|
[7] |
Gerardo Aquino, Andrea Rocco .
Bimodality in gene expression without feedback: from Gaussian white noise to log-normal coloured noise. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 6993-7017.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020361
|
[8] |
Adam Peddle, William Lee, Tuoi Vo .
Modelling chemistry and biology after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Part Ⅱ: Cell proliferation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(5): 1117-1135.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018050
|
[9] |
Heyrim Cho, Ya-Huei Kuo, Russell C. Rockne .
Comparison of cell state models derived from single-cell RNA sequencing data: graph versus multi-dimensional space. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8505-8536.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022395
|
[10] |
Hal L. Smith .
Tribute to Horst R. Thieme on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(1): i-iii.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.1i
|
-
Abstract
Experiments have established that different radiation types have different magnitudes of biological response. When biological response is defined in terms of the Relative Biologic Effectiveness (RBE) and different radiation type is characterized by Linear Energy Transfer (LET), the plot of the RBE versus LET (RBE-LET) curve shows RBE to increase with increasing LET, to reach a maximum, and to decrease with further increasing LET. Perhaps due to the descriptive nature of biology, most quantitative models for the RBE-LET curve ignore the reality of the underlying molecular biology. On the other hand, the molecular basis for the RBE-LET curve is not completely known despite recent efforts.
Here we introduce a differential equation formulation for a signal-and-system model that sees cells as systems, different radiation types as input, and cellular responses as output. Because of scant knowledge of the underlying biochemical network, the current version is necessarily a work in progress. It explains the RBE-LET curve using not just input parameters but also systems internal state parameters. These systems internal state parameters represent parts of a biochemical network within a cell. Although multiple biochemical parts may well be involved, the shape of the RBE-LET curve is reproduced when only three system parameters are related to three biochemical parts: the molecular machinery for DNA double strand break repair; the molecular pathways for handling oxidative stress; and the radiolytic products of the cellular water.
Despite being a simplified ''toy model,'' changes in the systems state parameters lead to model curves that are refutable in a modern molecular biology laboratory. As the parts in the biochemical network of the radiation response are being further elucidated, this model can incorporate new systems state parameters to allow a more accurate fit.
-
-
This article has been cited by:
1.
|
Quoc T. Luu, Paul DuChateau,
The Relative Biologic Effectiveness versus Linear Energy Transfer Curve as a Cell Trait,
2013,
04,
2152-7385,
23,
10.4236/am.2013.411A3004
|
|
2.
|
Quoc T. Luu, Paul DuChateau, Michael Dingfelder,
Fourier analysis of energy transfer data obtained by simulating a 14-MeV α-particle in water,
2010,
268,
0168583X,
219,
10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.170
|
|
3.
|
Hongshan Zhu, Stephan Heinitz, Koen Binnemans, Steven Mullens, Thomas Cardinaels,
225Ac/213Bi radionuclide generators for the separation of 213Bi towards clinical demands,
2024,
2052-1553,
10.1039/D4QI00326H
|
|
-
-