
Citation: Gérald Gaibelet, François Tercé, Sophie Allart, Chantal Lebrun, Xavier Collet, Nadège Jamin, Stéphane Orlowski. Fluorescent probes for detecting cholesterol-rich ordered membrane microdomains: entangled relationships between structural analogies in the membrane and functional homologies in the cell[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(1): 121-151. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.1.121
[1] | Leonid A. Kaledin, Fred Tepper, Tatiana G. Kaledin . Electrokinetic aspects of water filtration by AlOOH-coated siliceous particles with nanoscale roughness. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(2): 470-486. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.2.470 |
[2] | Jiyu Cai, Qian Sun, Xiangbo Meng . Novel nanostructured materials by atomic and molecular layer deposition. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(5): 957-999. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.5.957 |
[3] | Francesco Parrinello, Giuseppe Marannano . Cohesive delamination and frictional contact on joining surface via XFEM. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(1): 127-144. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.1.127 |
[4] | Yuan Guo, Xiong (Bill) Yu . Characterizing the surface charge of clay minerals with Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 582-593. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.582 |
[5] | Mark A. Atwater, Kris A. Darling, Mark A. Tschopp . Synthesis, characterization and quantitative analysis of porous metal microstructures: Application to microporous copper produced by solid state foaming. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 573-590. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.573 |
[6] | Thomas Debesay, Sam-Shajing Sun, Messaoud Bahoura . Multi-functional organic field effect transistor based on a dual doped P3HT. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(5): 823-835. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021050 |
[7] | Ravinder Kataria, Jatinder Kumar, B. S. Pabla . Experimental investigation of surface quality in ultrasonic machining of WC-Co composites through Taguchi method. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 1222-1235. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1222 |
[8] | Anna Godymchuk, Alexey Ilyashenko, Yury Konyukhov, Peter Ogbuna Offor, Galiya Baisalova . Agglomeration and dissolution of iron oxide nanoparticles in simplest biological media. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 642-652. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022039 |
[9] | Alexandre Lavrov, Kamila Gawel, Malin Torsæter . Manipulating cement-steel interface by means of electric field: Experiment and potential applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 1199-1207. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1199 |
[10] | Huazhuo Liang, Jiabin Lu, Qiusheng Yan . Catalysts based on Fenton reaction for SiC wafer in chemical magnetorheological finishing. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1112-1123. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1112 |
Coating sand and diatomaceous earth particles with aluminum oxyhydroxide changes the zeta potential of filtration media from negative to positive in a pH range from 3 to 11 [1] due to the fact that it modifies the surface properties of the filter media by coating it with an electropositive material [2,3,4,5,6,7]. As an alternative, aluminum hydroxides have been used for treatment of water to reverse the surface charge on microorganisms, facilitating their coagulation and flocculation [8]. For this reason, media such as coated sand and diatomaceous earth have been showed to improve removal efficacy of submicron particles, i.e., viruses and bacteria [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In spite of some success in describing better removal efficacy of submicron particles by electropositive media, a fundamental understanding of why deposition is improved to a greater degree in some coatings is missing [4].
The role of the electrical double layer (EDL) and van der Waals forces in particle deposition is often viewed in terms of Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory [9,10], which was developed for smooth, homogeneous particles with ideal geometries and with no DL overlap. The influence of surface roughness of filter media on streaming potential measurements is well documented [11]. The samples made from the same material with different surface roughness, measured by the same method, in the same device showed zeta potential values significantly different from each other, while the isoelectric point (IEP) values were identical between the measurements [11]. Moreover, the velocity profiles for two different spots along the surface of a multifilament fabric showed circulation pattern between two yarns during the streaming potential measurement. The general impact of roughness is to amplify the long-range behaviour of noncontact DLVO forces with the approximate amplification factor of exponential force between rough and smooth surfaces (σroughness2/λDebye2), where σroughness is the mean roughness [12]. Furthermore, the influence of particle shape and particle size on the zeta potential of colloidal suspensions is well known for the case of ultrapure silica powders where the authors found that the maximum zeta potential occurs for particle size ranging between 100 nm and 1 µm [13].
A variety of analytical and numerical models have been developed to describe the pressure-driven flow over heterogeneous surfaces. The vast majority of these models assume that the local EDL field is independent of the flow field [14,15,16,17]. However, for pressure-driven flow over a surface with heterogeneous patches, the local EDL fields are not uniform. This means that they are more different above a patch than in the region between the patches. This irregularity produces distortions in the equilibrium electrostatic field. Consequently, the electrostatic potential can alter the value of the zeta potential from its expected value over a surface with uniformly smeared surface under conditions of moderate surface charge [18,19,20,21]. The characteristic symptom of field distortion is the generation of flow velocities in all three coordinate directions, including a circulation pattern perpendicular to the main flow axis.
One of the purposes of this paper is to investigate the effect of nanoscale surface roughness on filtration of micron and sub-micron biological particles from aqueous solution by 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH-coated siliceous and cellulosic particles associated with pressure-driven flow through a 3-mm deep precoat and through a non-woven filter media [5,6,7]. The other one is to present the great ageing characteristics of the 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH crystallites, which showed no degradation in performance (i.e., TEM and XRD patterns, particle size distribution, etc.) over periods of seven and fourteen years, respectively. This is a very important finding since a large-scale manufacturing of siliceous and cellulosic substrates coated with 2D and 1D arrays are being proposed. The 1D filter media is manufactured and sold as non-woven media by Ahlstrom Filtration LLC under the tradename Disruptor™. The 2D filter aid media is manufactured by Argonide Corporation in large scale processes.
Synthesis of 2D quantum-sized and 1D nanometer-sized γ-AlOOH crystals adhered to siliceous and cellulosic substrates with BET (Brunauer, Emmett, Teller) specific surface area from 3 to 80 m2/g was accomplished via a reaction of aluminum powder with alkaline water [5,6,7]:
(1) |
The step-by step descriptions of the 2D quantum-sized γ-AlOOH crystals synthesis adhered to siliceous substrate were initially reported in reference [7]. The siliceous powder, in form of diatomaceous earth was dispersed in 4 liters of RO water and allowed to react with 17.5 g of micron size aluminum powders in the presence of 40 mL of 10 M NaOH at ambient pressure. It was heated to boiling point while mixing with an air-driven mixer at 300 rpm. Then, the suspension was cooled down to 40–50 ℃ and neutralized to pH 6–8 with 10% sulfuric acid. Decantation was allowed. Then, it was dried overnight at 100 ℃. Finally, the media was crushed and sieved through a 170-mesh sieve. The synthesis of one-dimensional (1D) nanometer-sized γ-AlOOH atomic crystals adhered to siliceous and cellulosic substrates was accomplished via the same Eq 1 of aluminum powder with alkaline water [5]. Amounts of 0.5 g of aluminum metal powder and 1.5 g of amorphous borosilicate glass microfiber with average diameter of 0.6 μm were dispersed in 0.5 L liter of RO water and were reacted in a 1 L stainless steel pot in the presence of 1 mL of 10 M NaOH at ambient pressure. The suspension was heated to its boiling point at ambient pressure while mixing with an air-driven mixer equipped with 5 cm diameter impeller at 300 rpm. The suspension was cooled down to 40–50 ℃, neutralized with 10% sulfuric acid to pH 6–8. The non-woven paper-like mat was formed by conventional wet-laid paper making technology. Nitrogen BET specific surface area of dry sample of γ-AlOOH nanofibers 2.7 ± 0.5 nm in diameter and 250 ± 50 nm long (Figure 1a) was = 475 m2/g [5]. Nitrogen BET surface area of dry samples of microglass fibers with an average diameter of 0.6 μm [5] (see Figure 1c) increased by approximately 50 times from = 3 m2/g to = 150–200 m2/g and in the case of lyocell cellulosic fibers [6] (see Figure 1b) the BET value increased by a factor of two from estimated value of = 80 m2/g to estimated value of = 150–200 m2/g. This suggests formation of additional surfaces on the substrates as seen in Figure 1b, c.
The TEM images (Figure 1a, c) were recorded on the JEOL JEM2010 TEM at 200 kV accelerating voltage. The high resolution TEM (HRTEM) images (Figure 1d) were recorded on the Tecnai F30 at 300 kV accelerating voltage.
Representative samples of 2D and 1D materials obtained by the procedures described previously [5,6,7] were investigated further by TEM and HRTEM. In Figure 1a, γ-AlOOH nanofibers 2.7 ± 0.5 nm in diameter and 250 ± 50 nm long are presented. Figure 1b, c shows examples of the TEM images of the 1D γ-AlOOH crystallites, 2–3 nm in diameter and approximately l = 250 nm long that are electroadhesively grafted via van der Waals (VDW)-type interlayer bonds to a 50 nm diameter cellulosic lyocell nanofiber and to a 0.6 μm glass microfiber, respectively [6]. Figure 1d shows an example of the atomic-resolution HRTEM image of 2D γ-AlOOH crystallites grafted via VDW type interlayer bonds to a 5 μm diameter diatomaceous earth (DE) particle. Thickness of the 2D γ-AlOOH crystallites was estimated to be in the range from 1 to 5 nm based on a HRTEM image of the DE particle edge (Figure 1d).
Figure 2 shows a sketch of the 2D γ-AlOOH crystallites deposited onto siliceous substrate. When the lateral dimensions of 2D structures are approximated by a circle, they are 7–10 times greater than the boehmite a–c unit cell dimensions. This is consistent with boehmite crystal growth, which occurs mainly along the a–c plane where atomic in-plane bonds are stronger than the weak, VDW type, interlayer bonds along the b-axis [22]. Assuming that the crystals seen in Figure 1d are fully dense γ-AlOOH cylinders (Figure 2) with diameter (d), length (l), silica surface fraction coverage (θ) with nitrogen BET specific surface area values of = 51 m2/g and = 69 m2/g, the ratio l/d = 1.2 ± 0.7 translates into l = 3 ± 2 nm. This implies that the average height (length l) of the 2D γ-AlOOH crystals seen in Figure 1d is comparable to the boehmite cell dimension b = 12 Å [22].
It was found that aluminized 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH /siliceous particles are highly electropositive in aqueous solution with zeta potential ζ ≥ 40 mV [23] at γ-AlOOH loading greater than 15 weight percent (wt%) as compared to the highly electronegative character of the bare siliceous substrates (ζ ≤ —70 mV, Figure 3). The point of zero charge (PZC) of aluminized γ-AlOOH siliceous particles was determined to be 11.6 ± 0.2 for 1D and 11.4 ± 0.2 for 2D structures, respectively [23]. This is three pH units higher as compare to the flat crystalline γ-AlOOH surface. Borghi et al. [24] observed a remarkable reduction by several pH units of the isoelectric point (IEP) on rough nanostructured surfaces, with respect to flat crystalline rutile TiO2. In order to explain the observed behavior of IEP, Borghi et al. [24] considered the roughness-induced self-overlap of the electrical double layers as a potential source of deviation from the trend expected for flat surfaces. Contrary to the acidic behavior of nanostructured surfaces crystalline rutile (Lewis acid sites), aluminized surfaces of siliceous particles with quantum size 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH behave preferentially as basic loci [23].
Table 1 shows initial removal efficacy of biological particles from aqueous solution associated with pressure-driven flow through micrometer size pores of either 2D γ-AlOOH/DE particles packed into a 3-mm deep precoat [25] or through a 1D γ-AlOOH/microglass non-woven filter media [5,6]. A striking feature of Table 1 is that 2D and 1D structures result in a high removal efficacy (in all cases greater than 99.9%) of biological particles regardless of zeta potential value in the range from 15 mV to 56 mV. Estimations show that Brownian displacement does not play significant role in removal efficacy of submicron size RT bacteria in a 3-mm deep γ-AlOOH/DE precoat with mean flow pore size of dmean-flow = 24 ± 4 μm for aluminized DE with average particle size of 80 μm [1]. When the Stokes-Einstein equation [26] is applied to a spherical particle suspended in water, it produces an estimated root-mean-square displacement during a contact time of 4.5 s in a 3-mm deep precoat of only 1.8 μm in the case of RT bacteria. Furthermore, the electrostatic attraction should not play significant role due to highly efficient shielding by the EDL layer with Debye length as short as 1.6 Å in the case of RT suspension in the 3.4 M NaCl electrolyte (Table 1). Anisotropic characteristics of EDL layer have been observed in numerous material systems. Charging behavior of the EDL layer has been studied for various metal oxide/hydroxide surfaces in aqueous solutions [24,27,28,29]. Van Olphen has shown a pH-dependent charge at the edges and faces of kaolinite platelets [30] and concluded that the double-layer structure is complicated by the fact that two crystallographically different surfaces are carrying a different type of double layers that under certain condition can have opposite signs. Recent measurements of the EDL properties of CaF2 [27], α-Al2O3 (Sapphire) [28], TiO2 (Rutile) [24,29] indicated significant differences (up to 2 pH units) between the isoelectric points in various crystallographic orientations of surfaces.
Material | Zeta potential (mV) | pH | Electrolyte ionic strength (mM) | λDa (nm) | RT removal efficacy (LRV) | MS2 removal efficacy (LRV) |
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 47 ± 9 | 7.0 | 0.002(1) | 215 | > 7.0 | 5.1 |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 56 ± 9 | > 7.0 | 6.3 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 47 ± 9 | 3400 | 0.16 | 7.7d | 3.8d | |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 56 ± 9 | > 7.1 | 5.3 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 23 ± 6 | 10.5 | 0.33(3)e | 17 | > 6.9 | 7.4 |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 15 ± 3 | > 4.5 | 3.1 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 23 ± 6 | 3400 | 0.16 | 7.7d | 3.8d | |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 15 ± 3 | 5.5 | 4.0 | |||
*Note: (a) For NaCl electrolyte with bulk concentration at T = 25 ℃ the Debye length equals to (in nm) where is the concentration of the salt, in mol/dm3, (b) non-woven γ-AlOOH media, (c) 3-mm γ-AlOOH/DE precoat, (d) by 2 layers of non-woven γ-AlOOH media and (e) elevated due to pH adjustment with NaOH. |
In this section, we will discuss the 3D flow structure associated with pressure-driven flow through micrometer size pores of a mixture of equal but opposite charged particles packed into a 3-mm deep precoat [25]. The surfaces of DE and aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE have similar but opposite values of zeta potentials (Figure 3). In such a case, there is an excess of positive ions over the DE surface, but negative ions dominate over the aluminized DE surface to balance out the positive surface charge. The difference in the surface potential results in an electrostatic potential gradient within the local electrical double layer (EDL) fields near the transition zone between the two regions. The presence of this potential gradient results in a body force on the microbes and/or ions in the double layer; however, in this case, an opposite body force is applied to the negative ions over the positively charged particle. As a result, the net body force over the region is zero and the circulation velocity perpendicular to the main flow becomes negligible [18,19,20,21]. The aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE and DE particles have equal average size of d = 80 ± 3 μm. It was assumed to be packed in simple cubic cell with particles only at the corners as seen in Figure 4a, b. DE particles were mixed with aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles with DE content in the mix of 10-, 25-, 50-, and 75-wt% and formed a 3-mm deep precoats (Δthickness = 3 mm). Assuming a simple cubic cell packing, the number of layers is estimated as Nlayers = Δthickness/daverage ~38.
Table 2 shows removal efficacy of MS2 bacteriophages and RT bacteria by a 3 mm precoats of aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE80 and DE80 mix at a flow velocity of 0.67 mm/s, neutral pH 7 and ionic strength of 2 ± 1 μM. The mean flow pore diameter of the precoat layer was determined to be 24 ± 5 μm [1]. Results in Table 2 provides experimental evidence of a behavior when a 3 mm precoat is losing adsorption properties of the aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE tested in the same configuration at much faster rate than one can expect based on the weight fraction of DE in the mix. For example, for a 50/50-wt% mix one can expect a reduction in adsorption efficacy by a factor of two or by log10(1/2) = —0.3 based on weight percent of the aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE fraction in the mix while experimental reductions are 3.5 ± 1.0 LRV for MS2 and greater than 4.7 LRV for RT bacteria (Table 2). This is consistent with the case when at least one of the neighboring particles on the side of the cube perpendicular to the flow direction has opposite sign of the surface charge, i.e., —|σ2| for DE than the other neighboring particles, i.e., +|σ1| for aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE ceasing the circulation pattern in that pore involving four neighboring particles. That is, one DE particle is cancelling out high removal efficacy of three aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles situated on the same side of the cube perpendicular to the flow direction (Figure 4b).
DE in aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE and DE mix precoat (%) | Average number of layers formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles | Average layer thickness formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles (mm) | MS2 removal efficacy (LRV) | RT removal efficacy (LRV) |
0 | 38 | 3.00 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | > 7.7 |
10 | 29 | 2.28 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.5 |
25 | 13 | 1.02 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
50 | 5 | 0.38 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.3 |
75 | 1 | 0.11 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
100 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
The average number of layers in a pore formed by a group of four aluminized DE particles with no DE particle in the group decreased rapidly as DE loadings in the mix increases. Table 2 presents average number of layers in a pore formed by a group of four aluminized DE particles with no DE particle in the group together with the average layer thickness in the 3-mm precoat formed by four neighboring aluminized DE particles with no DE particle in the group.
Electrokinetic phenomena are typically second-order phenomena, e.g., in streaming current measurements, an applied mechanical force produces an electric current [14]. When treated phenomenologically, the second order phenomena can be treated by irreversible thermodynamics [15]. Classical thermodynamics describes EDL at rest, while in electrokinetics EDL is not at rest although usually the deviations from the equilibrium distribution of charge are disregarded [15].
Figure 4 shows removal efficacy of MS2 bacteriophages and RT bacteria by 3-mm deep precoat of aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE80 and DEAL80 mix as a function of average layer thickness formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles. Figure 4 also reveals good correlation (coefficient of determination R2 > 0.99) between LRV values of microbial removal efficacy and average layer thickness formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE (Table 2):
(2) |
where a is a constant and x0 is the average thickness of aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE layer within a mix that would reduce the initial concentration, Cinitial, by a factor of 10. The thickness of aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE precoat layer that would reduce concentration of biological particles in the water stream by a factor of 10 is equal to x0(MS2) = 0.8 mm for MS2 bacteriophage and x0(RT) = 0.5 mm for RT bacteria.
The main application of the prepared 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH crystallites is as water purification media. Additionally, since we are proposing a low cost and large-scale production of these crystallites, it was important to know their stability throughout the time. For this reason, the removal efficacy of aqueous particles suspended by the prepared 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH crystallites was evaluated after seven and fourteen years, respectively.
From the results presented in Table 3, it was found that the prepared 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH crystallites remain monocrystalline under ambient conditions and no degradation in performance (i.e., TEM and XRD patterns, particle size distribution, etc.) was noticed over periods of several years. Table 3 shows the performance of the media to remove biological particles from aqueous solution after seven to fourteen years of manufacturing. This finding makes the crystallites to be industrially applicable.
Material | Ageing time | RT removal efficacya (LRV) | MS2 removal efficacya (LRV) |
–AlOOH/glass | As produced | > 6.5 | > 7.0 |
Aged for 14 years | > 7.0 | > 7.3 | |
–AlOOH/DEb | As produced | > 7.3 | > 7.0 |
Aged for 7 years | > 7.3 | > 6.2 | |
*Note: (a) average of 5 replicates and (b) DE with average particle size of 18 μm. |
In conclusion, aluminum-water reaction (Eq 1) has successfully been used to produce 2D and 1D quantum-sized γ-AlOOH structures deposited onto siliceous and cellulosic substrates in a one-step process at moderate temperature [5,6,7]. Low cost, large scale manufacturing (several metric tons per year) of siliceous and cellulosic substrates coated with 2D and 1D arrays of γ-AlOOH crystallites was demonstrated. The efficacy for removal of biological particles was improved by increasing the surface roughness of the material. Finally, the prepared 2D and 1D γ-AlOOH crystallites remain monocrystalline under ambient conditions and no degradation in performance (i.e., TEM and XRD patterns, particle size distribution, etc.) was noticed over periods of several years (i.e., seven to fourteen years).
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
[1] |
Klymchenko AS, Kreder R (2014) Fluorescent probes for lipid rafts: from model membranes to living cells. Chem Biol 21: 97-113. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.11.009
![]() |
[2] |
Sankaram MB, Thompson TE (1991) Cholesterol-induced fluid-phase immiscibility in membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 8686-8690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8686
![]() |
[3] |
Veatch SL, Keller SL (2005) Seeing spots: complex phase behavior in simple membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1746: 172-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.06.010
![]() |
[4] |
Daly TA, Wang M, Regen SL (2011) The origin of cholesterol's condensing effect. Langmuir 27: 2159-2161. doi: 10.1021/la105039q
![]() |
[5] |
Hakobyan D, Heuer A (2014) Key molecular requirements for raft formation in lipid/cholesterol membranes. PLoS One 9: e87369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087369
![]() |
[6] |
Krause MR, Regen SL (2014) The structural role of cholesterol in cell membranes: from condensed bilayers to lipid rafts. Acc Chem Res 47: 3512-3521. doi: 10.1021/ar500260t
![]() |
[7] |
Feigenson GW (2006) Phase behavior of lipid mixtures. Nat Chem Biol 2: 560-563. doi: 10.1038/nchembio1106-560
![]() |
[8] |
Rog T, Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M, Vattulainen I, et al. (2009) Ordering effects of cholesterol and its analogues. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788: 97-121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.08.022
![]() |
[9] |
Garcia-Saez AJ, Schwille P (2010) Stability of lipid domains. FEBS Lett 584: 1653-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.036
![]() |
[10] |
Shaw JE, Epand RF, Epand RM, et al. (2006) Correlated fluorescence-atomic force microscopy of membrane domains: structure of fluorescence probes determines lipid localization. Biophys J 90: 2170-2178. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.073510
![]() |
[11] |
Mouritsen OG, Zuckermann MJ (2004) What's so special about cholesterol? Lipids 39: 1101-1113. doi: 10.1007/s11745-004-1336-x
![]() |
[12] |
Wang J, Megha, London E (2004) Relationship between sterol/steroid structure and participation in ordered lipid domains (lipid rafts): implications for lipid raft structure and function. Biochemistry 43: 1010-1018. doi: 10.1021/bi035696y
![]() |
[13] |
Wenz JJ, Barrantes FJ (2003) Steroid structural requirements for stabilizing or disrupting lipid domains. Biochemistry 42: 14267-14276. doi: 10.1021/bi035759c
![]() |
[14] |
Xu X, Bittman R, Duportail G, et al. (2001) Effect of the structure of natural sterols and sphingolipids on the formation of ordered sphingolipid/sterol domains (rafts) Comparison of cholesterol to plant, fungal, and disease-associated sterols and comparison of sphingomyelin, cerebrosides, and ceramide. J Biol Chem 276: 33540-33546. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104776200
![]() |
[15] |
Xu X, London E (2000) The effect of sterol structure on membrane lipid domains reveals how cholesterol can induce lipid domain formation. Biochemistry 39: 843-849. doi: 10.1021/bi992543v
![]() |
[16] | Bernardino de la Serna J, Schutz GJ, Eggeling C, et al. (2016) There is no simple model of the plasma membrane organization. Front Cell Dev Biol 4: art106. |
[17] |
van Meer G, Stelzer EH, Wijnaendts-van-Resandt RW, et al. (1987) Sorting of sphingolipids in epithelial (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells. J Cell Biol 105: 1623-1635. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1623
![]() |
[18] |
Simons K, Ikonen E (1997) Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387: 569-572. doi: 10.1038/42408
![]() |
[19] |
Gupta N, DeFranco AL (2007) Lipid rafts and B cell signaling. Semin Cell Dev Biol 18: 616-626. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.07.009
![]() |
[20] |
Ikonen E (2001) Roles of lipid rafts in membrane transport. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13: 470-477. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00238-6
![]() |
[21] |
Lasserre R, Guo XJ, Conchonaud F, et al. (2008) Raft nanodomains contribute to Akt/PKB plasma membrane recruitment and activation. Nat Chem Biol 4: 538-547. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.103
![]() |
[22] |
Orlowski S, Comera C, Terce F, et al. (2007) Lipid rafts: dream or reality for cholesterol transporters? Eur Biophys J 36: 869-885. doi: 10.1007/s00249-007-0193-8
![]() |
[23] |
Orlowski S, Martin S, Escargueil A (2006) P-glycoprotein and 'lipid rafts': some ambiguous mutual relationships (floating on them, building them or meeting them by chance?). Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 1038-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5554-9
![]() |
[24] |
Owen DM, Magenau A, Williamson D, et al. (2012) The lipid raft hypothesis revisited—new insights on raft composition and function from super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Bioessays 34: 739-747. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200044
![]() |
[25] | Simons K, Toomre D (2000) Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1: 31-39. |
[26] |
Carquin M, D'Auria L, Pollet H, et al. (2016) Recent progress on lipid lateral heterogeneity in plasma membranes: From rafts to submicrometric domains. Prog Lipid Res 62: 1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.12.004
![]() |
[27] |
Jacobson K, Mouritsen OG, Anderson RG (2007) Lipid rafts: at a crossroad between cell biology and physics. Nat Cell Biol 9: 7-14. doi: 10.1038/ncb0107-7
![]() |
[28] |
Mayor S, Rao M (2004) Rafts: scale-dependent, active lipid organization at the cell surface. Traffic 5: 231-240. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00172.x
![]() |
[29] |
Pike LJ (2004) Lipid rafts: heterogeneity on the high seas. Biochem J 378: 281-292. doi: 10.1042/bj20031672
![]() |
[30] |
Simons K, Gerl MJ (2010) Revitalizing membrane rafts: new tools and insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 688-699. doi: 10.1038/nrm2977
![]() |
[31] |
Wustner D (2007) Fluorescent sterols as tools in membrane biophysics and cell biology. Chem Phys Lipids 146: 1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2006.12.004
![]() |
[32] |
Baker BY, Epand RF, Epand RM, et al. (2007) Cholesterol binding does not predict activity of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StAR. J Biol Chem 282: 10223-10232. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611221200
![]() |
[33] |
Honigmann A, Pralle A (2016) Compartmentalization of the Cell Membrane. J Mol Biol 428: 4739-4748. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.09.022
![]() |
[34] |
Lenne PF, Wawrezinieck L, Conchonaud F, et al. (2006) Dynamic molecular confinement in the plasma membrane by microdomains and the cytoskeleton meshwork. EMBO J 25: 3245-3256. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601214
![]() |
[35] | van Zanten TS, Mayor S (2015) Current approaches to studying membrane organization. F1000Research: 6868. |
[36] |
Lingwood D, Simons K (2010) Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327: 46-50. doi: 10.1126/science.1174621
![]() |
[37] |
Devaux PF, Morris R (2004) Transmembrane asymmetry and lateral domains in biological membranes. Traffic 5: 241-246. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.0170.x
![]() |
[38] |
Lorent JH, Levental I (2015) Structural determinants of protein partitioning into ordered membrane domains and lipid rafts. Chem Phys Lipids 192: 23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.07.022
![]() |
[39] |
Chum T, Glatzova D, Kvicalova Z, et al. (2016) The role of palmitoylation and transmembrane domain in sorting of transmembrane adaptor proteins. J Cell Sci 129: 95-107. doi: 10.1242/jcs.175190
![]() |
[40] |
Levental I, Grzybek M, Simons K (2010) Greasing their way: lipid modifications determine protein association with membrane rafts. Biochemistry 49: 6305-6316. doi: 10.1021/bi100882y
![]() |
[41] |
Anderson RG, Jacobson K (2002) A role for lipid shells in targeting proteins to caveolae, rafts, and other lipid domains. Science 296: 1821-1825. doi: 10.1126/science.1068886
![]() |
[42] |
Kaiser HJ, Orlowski A, Rog T, et al. (2011) Lateral sorting in model membranes by cholesterol-mediated hydrophobic matching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 16628-16633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103742108
![]() |
[43] |
Nyholm TK (2015) Lipid-protein interplay and lateral organization in biomembranes. Chem Phys Lipids 189: 48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.05.008
![]() |
[44] |
Fujiwara T, Ritchie K, Murakoshi H, et al. (2002) Phospholipids undergo hop diffusion in compartmentalized cell membrane. J Cell Biol 157: 1071-1081. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200202050
![]() |
[45] | Braccia A, Villani M, Immerdal L, et al. (2003) Microvillar membrane microdomains exist at physiological temperature. Role of galectin-4 as lipid raft stabilizer revealed by "superrafts". J Biol Chem 278: 15679-15684. |
[46] |
Hansen GH, Immerdal L, Thorsen E, et al. (2001) Lipid rafts exist as stable cholesterol-independent microdomains in the brush border membrane of enterocytes. J Biol Chem 276: 32338-32344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102667200
![]() |
[47] |
Danielsen EM, Hansen GH (2003) Lipid rafts in epithelial brush borders: atypical membrane microdomains with specialized functions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1617: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.09.005
![]() |
[48] |
Meder D, Moreno MJ, Verkade P, et al. (2006) Phase coexistence and connectivity in the apical membrane of polarized epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 329-334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509885103
![]() |
[49] |
Lingwood D, Ries J, Schwille P, et al. (2008) Plasma membranes are poised for activation of raft phase coalescence at physiological temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 10005-10010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804374105
![]() |
[50] |
Mizuno H, Abe M, Dedecker P, et al. (2011) Fluorescent probes for superresolution imaging of lipid domains on the plasma membrane. Chem Sci 2: 1548-1553. doi: 10.1039/c1sc00169h
![]() |
[51] |
Carquin M, Conrard L, Pollet H, et al. (2015) Cholesterol segregates into submicrometric domains at the living erythrocyte membrane: evidence and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 72: 4633-4651. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1951-x
![]() |
[52] |
Carquin M, Pollet H, Veiga-da-Cunha M, et al. (2014) Endogenous sphingomyelin segregates into submicrometric domains in the living erythrocyte membrane. J Lipid Res 55: 1331-1342. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M048538
![]() |
[53] |
D'Auria L, Van der Smissen P, Bruyneel F, et al. (2011) Segregation of fluorescent membrane lipids into distinct micrometric domains: evidence for phase compartmentation of natural lipids? PLoS One 6: e17021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017021
![]() |
[54] |
Frisz JF, Klitzing HA, Lou K, et al. (2013) Sphingolipid domains in the plasma membranes of fibroblasts are not enriched with cholesterol. J Biol Chem 288: 16855-16861. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.473207
![]() |
[55] |
Frisz JF, Lou K, Klitzing HA, et al. (2013) Direct chemical evidence for sphingolipid domains in the plasma membranes of fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: E613-622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216585110
![]() |
[56] |
Magenau A, Benzing C, Proschogo N, et al. (2011) Phagocytosis of IgG-coated polystyrene beads by macrophages induces and requires high membrane order. Traffic 12: 1730-1743. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01272.x
![]() |
[57] |
Stancevic B, Kolesnick R (2010) Ceramide-rich platforms in transmembrane signaling. FEBS Lett 584: 1728-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.026
![]() |
[58] |
Garcia-Ruiz C, Morales A, Fernandez-Checa JC (2015) Glycosphingolipids and cell death: one aim, many ways. Apoptosis 20: 607-620. doi: 10.1007/s10495-015-1092-6
![]() |
[59] |
Contreras FX, Sot J, Ruiz-Arguello MB, et al. (2004) Cholesterol modulation of sphingomyelinase activity at physiological temperatures. Chem Phys Lipids 130: 127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.02.003
![]() |
[60] |
Cheng JP, Nichols BJ (2016) Caveolae: One Function or Many? Trends Cell Biol 26: 177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.010
![]() |
[61] |
Parton RG, del Pozo MA (2013) Caveolae as plasma membrane sensors, protectors and organizers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 98-112. doi: 10.1038/nrm3512
![]() |
[62] |
Parton RG, Simons K (2007) The multiple faces of caveolae. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 185-194. doi: 10.1038/nrm2122
![]() |
[63] |
Shvets E, Ludwig A, Nichols BJ (2014) News from the caves: update on the structure and function of caveolae. Curr Opin Cell Biol 29: 99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.04.011
![]() |
[64] |
Fridolfsson HN, Roth DM, Insel PA, et al. (2014) Regulation of intracellular signaling and function by caveolin. FASEB J 28: 3823-3831. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-252320
![]() |
[65] |
Banning A, Tomasovic A, Tikkanen R (2011) Functional aspects of membrane association of reggie/flotillin proteins. Curr Protein Pept Sci 12: 725-735. doi: 10.2174/138920311798841708
![]() |
[66] |
Ortegren U, Yin L, Ost A, et al. (2006) Separation and characterization of caveolae subclasses in the plasma membrane of primary adipocytes; segregation of specific proteins and functions. FEBS J 273: 3381-3392. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05345.x
![]() |
[67] |
Sinha B, Koster D, Ruez R, et al. (2011) Cells respond to mechanical stress by rapid disassembly of caveolae. Cell 144: 402-413. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.031
![]() |
[68] |
Roper K, Corbeil D, Huttner WB (2000) Retention of prominin in microvilli reveals distinct cholesterol-based lipid micro-domains in the apical plasma membrane. Nat Cell Biol 2: 582-592. doi: 10.1038/35023524
![]() |
[69] |
Zimmerman B, Kelly B, McMillan BJ, et al. (2016) Crystal structure of a full-length human tetraspanin reveals a cholesterol-binding pocket. Cell 167: 1041-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.056
![]() |
[70] |
Hemler ME (2005) Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 801-811. doi: 10.1038/nrm1736
![]() |
[71] |
Yanez-Mo M, Barreiro O, Gordon-Alonso M, et al. (2009) Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol 19: 434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.06.004
![]() |
[72] |
Zhang XA, Huang C (2012) Tetraspanins and cell membrane tubular structures. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 2843-2852. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0954-0
![]() |
[73] |
Hugel B, Martinez MC, Kunzelmann C, et al. (2005) Membrane microparticles: two sides of the coin. Physiology (Bethesda) 20: 22-27. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00029.2004
![]() |
[74] |
Raposo G, Stoorvogel W (2013) Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 200: 373-383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201211138
![]() |
[75] |
van der Pol E, Boing AN, Harrison P, et al. (2012) Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol Rev 64: 676-705. doi: 10.1124/pr.112.005983
![]() |
[76] | Kravets FG, Lee J, Singh B, et al. (2000) Prostasomes: current concepts. Prostate 43: 169-174. |
[77] |
Llorente A, van Deurs B, Sandvig K (2007) Cholesterol regulates prostasome release from secretory lysosomes in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. Eur J Cell Biol 86: 405-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2007.05.001
![]() |
[78] |
Arvidson G, Ronquist G, Wikander G, et al. (1989) Human prostasome membranes exhibit very high cholesterol/phospholipid ratios yielding high molecular ordering. Biochim Biophys Acta 984: 167-173. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(89)90212-5
![]() |
[79] |
Llorente A, de Marco MC, Alonso MA (2004) Caveolin-1 and MAL are located on prostasomes secreted by the prostate cancer PC-3 cell line. J Cell Sci 117: 5343-5351. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01420
![]() |
[80] |
Kastelowitz N, Yin H (2014) Exosomes and microvesicles: identification and targeting by particle size and lipid chemical probes. ChemBioChem 15: 923-928. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201400043
![]() |
[81] |
Bagnat M, Keranen S, Shevchenko A, et al. (2000) Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3254-3259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3254
![]() |
[82] |
Dupre S, Haguenauer-Tsapis R (2003) Raft partitioning of the yeast uracil permease during trafficking along the endocytic pathway. Traffic 4: 83-96. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.40204.x
![]() |
[83] |
Lauwers E, Andre B (2006) Association of yeast transporters with detergent-resistant membranes correlates with their cell-surface location. Traffic 7: 1045-1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00445.x
![]() |
[84] |
Malinska K, Malinsky J, Opekarova M, et al. (2003) Visualization of protein compartmentation within the plasma membrane of living yeast cells. Mol Biol Cell 14: 4427-4436. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-04-0221
![]() |
[85] |
Malinska K, Malinsky J, Opekarova M, et al. (2004) Distribution of Can1p into stable domains reflects lateral protein segregation within the plasma membrane of living S. cerevisiae cells. J Cell Sci 117: 6031-6041. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01493
![]() |
[86] |
Spira F, Mueller NS, Beck G, et al. (2012) Patchwork organization of the yeast plasma membrane into numerous coexisting domains. Nat Cell Biol 14: 640-648. doi: 10.1038/ncb2487
![]() |
[87] | Bagnat M, Simons K (2002) Lipid rafts in protein sorting and cell polarity in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol Chem 383: 1475-1480. |
[88] | Wachtler V, Balasubramanian MK (2006) Yeast lipid rafts?—an emerging view. Trends Cell Biol 16: 1-4. |
[89] |
Klose C, Ejsing CS, Garcia-Saez AJ, et al. (2010) Yeast lipids can phase-separate into micrometer-scale membrane domains. J Biol Chem 285: 30224-30232. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.123554
![]() |
[90] |
Aresta-Branco F, Cordeiro AM, Marinho HS, et al. (2011) Gel domains in the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: highly ordered, ergosterol-free, and sphingolipid-enriched lipid rafts. J Biol Chem 286: 5043-5054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.154435
![]() |
[91] |
Mongrand S, Stanislas T, Bayer EM, et al. (2010) Membrane rafts in plant cells. Trends Plant Sci 15: 656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.003
![]() |
[92] |
Tapken W, Murphy AS (2015) Membrane nanodomains in plants: capturing form, function, and movement. J Exp Bot 66: 1573-1586. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv054
![]() |
[93] |
Malinsky J, Opekarova M, Grossmann G, et al. (2013) Membrane microdomains, rafts, and detergent-resistant membranes in plants and fungi. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 501-529. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120103
![]() |
[94] |
Lopez D, Kolter R (2010) Functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Genes Dev 24: 1893-1902. doi: 10.1101/gad.1945010
![]() |
[95] |
Lopez D (2015) Molecular composition of functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Chem Phys Lipids 192: 3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.08.015
![]() |
[96] |
Saenz JP, Grosser D, Bradley AS, et al. (2015) Hopanoids as functional analogues of cholesterol in bacterial membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 11971-11976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515607112
![]() |
[97] |
Huang Z, London E (2016) Cholesterol lipids and cholesterol-containing lipid rafts in bacteria. Chem Phys Lipids 199: 11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2016.03.002
![]() |
[98] |
Haidekker MA, Theodorakis EA (2007) Molecular rotors--fluorescent biosensors for viscosity and flow. Org Biomol Chem 5: 1669-1678. doi: 10.1039/B618415D
![]() |
[99] |
Demchenko AP, Mely Y, Duportail G, et al. (2009) Monitoring biophysical properties of lipid membranes by environment-sensitive fluorescent probes. Biophys J 96: 3461-3470. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.012
![]() |
[100] |
Bagatolli LA (2006) To see or not to see: lateral organization of biological membranes and fluorescence microscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758: 1541-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.05.019
![]() |
[101] |
Gaus K, Zech T, Harder T (2006) Visualizing membrane microdomains by Laurdan 2-photon microscopy. Mol Membr Biol 23: 41-48. doi: 10.1080/09687860500466857
![]() |
[102] |
Gaus K, Gratton E, Kable EP, et al. (2003) Visualizing lipid structure and raft domains in living cells with two-photon microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15554-15559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2534386100
![]() |
[103] |
Sezgin E, Sadowski T, Simons K (2014) Measuring lipid packing of model and cellular membranes with environment sensitive probes. Langmuir 30: 8160-8166. doi: 10.1021/la501226v
![]() |
[104] |
Kucherak OA, Oncul S, Darwich Z, et al. (2010) Switchable nile red-based probe for cholesterol and lipid order at the outer leaflet of biomembranes. J Am Chem Soc 132: 4907-4916. doi: 10.1021/ja100351w
![]() |
[105] |
Baumgart T, Hunt G, Farkas ER, et al. (2007) Fluorescence probe partitioning between Lo/Ld phases in lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768: 2182-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.05.012
![]() |
[106] | Solanko KA, Modzel M, Solanko LM, et al. (2015) Fluorescent sterols and cholesteryl esters as probes for intracellular cholesterol transport. Lipid Insights 8: 95-114. |
[107] |
Gimpl G, Gehrig-Burger K (2007) Cholesterol reporter molecules. Biosci Rep 27: 335-358. doi: 10.1007/s10540-007-9060-1
![]() |
[108] |
Fujimoto T, Hayashi M, Iwamoto M, et al. (1997) Crosslinked plasmalemmal cholesterol is sequestered to caveolae: analysis with a new cytochemical probe. J Histochem Cytochem 45: 1197-1205. doi: 10.1177/002215549704500903
![]() |
[109] |
Shimada Y, Maruya M, Iwashita S, et al. (2002) The C-terminal domain of perfringolysin O is an essential cholesterol-binding unit targeting to cholesterol-rich microdomains. Eur J Biochem 269: 6195-6203. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03338.x
![]() |
[110] | Liu SL, Sheng R, Jung JH, et al. (2017) Orthogonal lipid sensors identify transbilayer asymmetry of plasma membrane cholesterol. Nat Chem Biol 13: 268-274. |
[111] |
Koivusalo M, Alvesalo J, Virtanen JA, et al. (2004) Partitioning of pyrene-labeled phospho- and sphingolipids between ordered and disordered bilayer domains. Biophys J 86: 923-935. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74168-5
![]() |
[112] |
Koivusalo M, Jansen M, Somerharju P, et al. (2007) Endocytic trafficking of sphingomyelin depends on its acyl chain length. Mol Biol Cell 18: 5113-5123. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-04-0330
![]() |
[113] |
Pagano RE, Watanabe R, Wheatley C, et al. (1999) Use of N-[5-(5,7-dimethyl boron dipyrromethene difluoride-sphingomyelin to study membrane traffic along the endocytic pathway. Chem Phys Lipids 102: 55-63. doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(99)00075-4
![]() |
[114] |
Scheidt HA, Muller P, Herrmann A, et al. (2003) The potential of fluorescent and spin-labeled steroid analogs to mimic natural cholesterol. J Biol Chem 278: 45563-45569. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303567200
![]() |
[115] |
Smutzer G, Crawford BF, Yeagle PL (1986) Physical properties of the fluorescent sterol probe dehydroergosterol. Biochim Biophys Acta 862: 361-371. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(86)90239-7
![]() |
[116] |
Ohvo-Rekila H, Akerlund B, Slotte JP (2000) Cyclodextrin-catalyzed extraction of fluorescent sterols from monolayer membranes and small unilamellar vesicles. Chem Phys Lipids 105: 167-178. doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(00)00122-5
![]() |
[117] |
Hao M, Lin SX, Karylowski OJ, et al. (2002) Vesicular and non-vesicular sterol transport in living cells The endocytic recycling compartment is a major sterol storage organelle. J Biol Chem 277: 609-617. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108861200
![]() |
[118] |
Wustner D, Herrmann A, Hao M, et al. (2002) Rapid nonvesicular transport of sterol between the plasma membrane domains of polarized hepatic cells. J Biol Chem 277: 30325-30336. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202626200
![]() |
[119] |
Wustner D, Mondal M, Tabas I, et al. (2005) Direct observation of rapid internalization and intracellular transport of sterol by macrophage foam cells. Traffic 6: 396-412. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00285.x
![]() |
[120] |
Frolov A, Petrescu A, Atshaves BP, et al. (2000) High density lipoprotein-mediated cholesterol uptake and targeting to lipid droplets in intact L-cell fibroblasts A single- and multiphoton fluorescence approach. J Biol Chem 275: 12769-12780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12769
![]() |
[121] | Wustner D, Mondal M, Huang A, et al. (2004) Different transport routes for high density lipoprotein and its associated free sterol in polarized hepatic cells. J Lipid Res 45: 427-437. |
[122] |
Liu J, Chang CC, Westover EJ, et al. (2005) Investigating the allosterism of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) by using various sterols: in vitro and intact cell studies. Biochem J 391: 389-397. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050428
![]() |
[123] |
Mukherjee S, Zha X, Tabas I, et al. (1998) Cholesterol distribution in living cells: fluorescence imaging using dehydroergosterol as a fluorescent cholesterol analog. Biophys J 75: 1915-1925. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77632-5
![]() |
[124] |
Sato SB, Ishii K, Makino A, et al. (2004) Distribution and transport of cholesterol-rich membrane domains monitored by a membrane-impermeant fluorescent polyethylene glycol-derivatized cholesterol. J Biol Chem 279: 23790-23796. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313568200
![]() |
[125] |
Mazeres S, Schram V, Tocanne JF, et al. (1996) 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4-yl-labeled phospholipids in lipid membranes: differences in fluorescence behavior. Biophys J 71: 327-335. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79228-7
![]() |
[126] |
Loura LM, Fedorov A, Prieto M (2001) Exclusion of a cholesterol analog from the cholesterol-rich phase in model membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1511: 236-243. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(01)00269-3
![]() |
[127] | Sezgin E, Can FB, Schneider F, et al. (2016) A comparative study on fluorescent cholesterol analogs as versatile cellular reporters. J Lipid Res 57: 299-309. |
[128] |
Gaibelet G, Allart S, Terce F, et al. (2015) Specific cellular incorporation of a pyrene-labelled cholesterol: lipoprotein-mediated delivery toward ordered intracellular membranes. PLoS One 10: e0121563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121563
![]() |
[129] |
Dagher G, Donne N, Klein C, et al. (2003) HDL-mediated cholesterol uptake and targeting to lipid droplets in adipocytes. J Lipid Res 44: 1811-1820. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M300267-JLR200
![]() |
[130] | Sparrow CP, Patel S, Baffic J, et al. (1999) A fluorescent cholesterol analog traces cholesterol absorption in hamsters and is esterified in vivo and in vitro. J Lipid Res 40: 1747-1757. |
[131] | Wiegand V, Chang TY, Strauss JF, 3rd, et al. (2003) Transport of plasma membrane-derived cholesterol and the function of Niemann-Pick C1 Protein. FASEB J 17: 782-784. |
[132] |
Shrivastava S, Haldar S, Gimpl G, et al. (2009) Orientation and dynamics of a novel fluorescent cholesterol analogue in membranes of varying phase. J Phys Chem B 113: 4475-4481. doi: 10.1021/jp808309u
![]() |
[133] |
Huang H, McIntosh AL, Atshaves BP, et al. (2010) Use of dansyl-cholestanol as a probe of cholesterol behavior in membranes of living cells. J Lipid Res 51: 1157-1172. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M003244
![]() |
[134] |
Li Z, Mintzer E, Bittman R (2006) First synthesis of free cholesterol-BODIPY conjugates. J Org Chem 71: 1718-1721. doi: 10.1021/jo052029x
![]() |
[135] |
Bergstrom F, Mikhalyov I, Hagglof P, et al. (2002) Dimers of dipyrrometheneboron difluoride (BODIPY) with light spectroscopic applications in chemistry and biology. J Am Chem Soc 124: 196-204. doi: 10.1021/ja010983f
![]() |
[136] |
Marks DL, Bittman R, Pagano RE (2008) Use of Bodipy-labeled sphingolipid and cholesterol analogs to examine membrane microdomains in cells. Histochem Cell Biol 130: 819-832. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0509-5
![]() |
[137] |
Ariola FS, Li Z, Cornejo C, et al. (2009) Membrane fluidity and lipid order in ternary giant unilamellar vesicles using a new bodipy-cholesterol derivative. Biophys J 96: 2696-2708. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3922
![]() |
[138] |
Wustner D, Solanko L, Sokol E, et al. (2011) Quantitative assessment of sterol traffic in living cells by dual labeling with dehydroergosterol and BODIPY-cholesterol. Chem Phys Lipids 164: 221-235. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2011.01.004
![]() |
[139] |
Solanko LM, Honigmann A, Midtiby HS, et al. (2013) Membrane orientation and lateral diffusion of BODIPY-cholesterol as a function of probe structure. Biophys J 105: 2082-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.09.031
![]() |
[140] |
Holtta-Vuori M, Uronen RL, Repakova J, et al. (2008) BODIPY-cholesterol: a new tool to visualize sterol trafficking in living cells and organisms. Traffic 9: 1839-1849. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00801.x
![]() |
[141] |
Mazeres S, Lagane B, Welby M, et al. (2001) Probing the lateral organization of membranes: fluorescence repercussions of pyrene probe distribution. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 57: 2297-2311. doi: 10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00486-3
![]() |
[142] |
Le Guyader L, Le Roux C, Mazeres S, et al. (2007) Changes of the membrane lipid organization characterized by means of a new cholesterol-pyrene probe. Biophys J 93: 4462-4473. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.112821
![]() |
[143] |
Lagane B, Mazeres S, Le Grimellec C, et al. (2002) Lateral distribution of cholesterol in membranes probed by means of a pyrene-labelled cholesterol: effects of acyl chain unsaturation. Biophys Chem 95: 7-22. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(01)00235-6
![]() |
[144] |
Lecompte MF, Gaibelet G, Lebrun C, et al. (2015) Cholesterol and sphingomyelin-containing model condensed lipid monolayers: heterogeneities involving ordered microdomains assessed by two cholesterol derivatives. Langmuir 31: 11921-11931. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02646
![]() |
[145] | Astarie-Dequeker C, Le Guyader L, Malaga W, et al. (2009) Phthiocerol dimycocerosates of M. tuberculosis participate in macrophage invasion by inducing changes in the organization of plasma membrane lipids. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000289. |
[146] |
Rohrl C, Meisslitzer-Ruppitsch C, Bittman R, et al. (2012) Combined light and electron microscopy using diaminobenzidine photooxidation to monitor trafficking of lipids derived from lipoprotein particles. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 13: 331-340. doi: 10.2174/138920112799095338
![]() |
[147] |
Holtta-Vuori M, Sezgin E, Eggeling C, et al. (2016) Use of BODIPY-Cholesterol (TF-Chol) for Visualizing Lysosomal Cholesterol Accumulation. Traffic 17: 1054-1057. doi: 10.1111/tra.12414
![]() |
[148] |
Gaibelet G, Terce F, Bertrand-Michel J, et al. (2013) 21-Methylpyrenyl-cholesterol stably and specifically associates with lipoprotein peripheral hemi-membrane: a new labelling tool. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 440: 533-538. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.101
![]() |
[149] |
Storey SM, Gallegos AM, Atshaves BP, et al. (2007) Selective cholesterol dynamics between lipoproteins and caveolae/lipid rafts. Biochemistry 46: 13891-13906. doi: 10.1021/bi700690s
![]() |
[150] |
Ohsaki Y, Cheng J, Suzuki M, et al. (2009) Biogenesis of cytoplasmic lipid droplets: from the lipid ester globule in the membrane to the visible structure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1791: 399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.10.002
![]() |
[151] |
Mukherjee S, Soe TT, Maxfield FR (1999) Endocytic sorting of lipid analogues differing solely in the chemistry of their hydrophobic tails. J Cell Biol 144: 1271-1284. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1271
![]() |
[152] |
Prinz WA (2007) Non-vesicular sterol transport in cells. Prog Lipid Res 46: 297-314. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2007.06.002
![]() |
1. | Leonid A. Kaledin, Fred Tepper, Yuly Vesga, Tatiana G. Kaledin, Boehmite and Akaganeite 1D and 2D Mesostructures: Synthesis, Growth Mechanism, Ageing Characteristics and Surface Nanoscale Roughness Effect on Water Purification, 2019, 2019, 1687-4110, 1, 10.1155/2019/9516156 |
Material | Zeta potential (mV) | pH | Electrolyte ionic strength (mM) | λDa (nm) | RT removal efficacy (LRV) | MS2 removal efficacy (LRV) |
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 47 ± 9 | 7.0 | 0.002(1) | 215 | > 7.0 | 5.1 |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 56 ± 9 | > 7.0 | 6.3 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 47 ± 9 | 3400 | 0.16 | 7.7d | 3.8d | |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 56 ± 9 | > 7.1 | 5.3 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 23 ± 6 | 10.5 | 0.33(3)e | 17 | > 6.9 | 7.4 |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 15 ± 3 | > 4.5 | 3.1 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 23 ± 6 | 3400 | 0.16 | 7.7d | 3.8d | |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 15 ± 3 | 5.5 | 4.0 | |||
*Note: (a) For NaCl electrolyte with bulk concentration at T = 25 ℃ the Debye length equals to (in nm) where is the concentration of the salt, in mol/dm3, (b) non-woven γ-AlOOH media, (c) 3-mm γ-AlOOH/DE precoat, (d) by 2 layers of non-woven γ-AlOOH media and (e) elevated due to pH adjustment with NaOH. |
DE in aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE and DE mix precoat (%) | Average number of layers formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles | Average layer thickness formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles (mm) | MS2 removal efficacy (LRV) | RT removal efficacy (LRV) |
0 | 38 | 3.00 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | > 7.7 |
10 | 29 | 2.28 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.5 |
25 | 13 | 1.02 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
50 | 5 | 0.38 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.3 |
75 | 1 | 0.11 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
100 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
Material | Ageing time | RT removal efficacya (LRV) | MS2 removal efficacya (LRV) |
–AlOOH/glass | As produced | > 6.5 | > 7.0 |
Aged for 14 years | > 7.0 | > 7.3 | |
–AlOOH/DEb | As produced | > 7.3 | > 7.0 |
Aged for 7 years | > 7.3 | > 6.2 | |
*Note: (a) average of 5 replicates and (b) DE with average particle size of 18 μm. |
Material | Zeta potential (mV) | pH | Electrolyte ionic strength (mM) | λDa (nm) | RT removal efficacy (LRV) | MS2 removal efficacy (LRV) |
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 47 ± 9 | 7.0 | 0.002(1) | 215 | > 7.0 | 5.1 |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 56 ± 9 | > 7.0 | 6.3 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 47 ± 9 | 3400 | 0.16 | 7.7d | 3.8d | |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 56 ± 9 | > 7.1 | 5.3 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 23 ± 6 | 10.5 | 0.33(3)e | 17 | > 6.9 | 7.4 |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 15 ± 3 | > 4.5 | 3.1 | |||
γ-AlOOH/glassb | 23 ± 6 | 3400 | 0.16 | 7.7d | 3.8d | |
γ-AlOOH/DEc | 15 ± 3 | 5.5 | 4.0 | |||
*Note: (a) For NaCl electrolyte with bulk concentration at T = 25 ℃ the Debye length equals to (in nm) where is the concentration of the salt, in mol/dm3, (b) non-woven γ-AlOOH media, (c) 3-mm γ-AlOOH/DE precoat, (d) by 2 layers of non-woven γ-AlOOH media and (e) elevated due to pH adjustment with NaOH. |
DE in aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE and DE mix precoat (%) | Average number of layers formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles | Average layer thickness formed by four neighboring aluminized γ-AlOOH/DE particles (mm) | MS2 removal efficacy (LRV) | RT removal efficacy (LRV) |
0 | 38 | 3.00 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | > 7.7 |
10 | 29 | 2.28 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.5 |
25 | 13 | 1.02 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
50 | 5 | 0.38 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.3 |
75 | 1 | 0.11 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
100 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
Material | Ageing time | RT removal efficacya (LRV) | MS2 removal efficacya (LRV) |
–AlOOH/glass | As produced | > 6.5 | > 7.0 |
Aged for 14 years | > 7.0 | > 7.3 | |
–AlOOH/DEb | As produced | > 7.3 | > 7.0 |
Aged for 7 years | > 7.3 | > 6.2 | |
*Note: (a) average of 5 replicates and (b) DE with average particle size of 18 μm. |