Research article

Identifying the insured and uninsured in rural America: an empirical discriminant analysis

  • Received: 05 February 2021 Accepted: 09 May 2021 Published: 17 May 2021
  • Purpose 

    This present study sought to investigate whether there were factors that could discriminate insured from uninsured rural Americans.

    Methods 

    Data for four groups were used: 34 uninsured, 102 government-insured (GP), 324 private- or employer-insured (PEP), and 96 both government- and private- or employer-insured (GPEP). A discriminant analysis was conducted on the four groups, using group membership as the dependent variable; age, education, income, attitude to insurance, emergency room visit, chronic disease prevalence were the independent variables.

    Findings 

    The analysis yielded three discriminant functions, however the only significant function was the one that discriminated the PEP-insured individuals from the other groups. About 48% of the cases were classified correctly with the significant discriminant function.

    Conclusion 

    The findings of this study can serve as a baseline for future research seeking to eradicate barriers to getting health insurance among the uninsured in rural America.

    Citation: Promise Tewogbola, Norah Aung. Identifying the insured and uninsured in rural America: an empirical discriminant analysis[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(3): 421-427. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021032

    Related Papers:

    [1] David V. McQueen, Erma Manoncourt, Yuri N. Cartier, Irina Dinca, Ülla-Karin Nurm . The Transferability of Health Promotion and Education Approaches Between Non-communicable Diseases and Communicable Diseases—an Analysis of Evidence. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(4): 182-198. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.4.182
    [2] Christopher A Birt . Food and Agriculture Policy in Europe. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 131-140. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.131
    [3] Niclas Olofsson . A life course model of self-reported violence exposure and illhealth with a public health problem perspective. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(1): 9-24. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.1.9
    [4] Dorra Djebbi-Simmons, Mohammed Alhejaili, Marlene Janes, Joan King, Wenqing Xu . Survival and inactivation of human norovirus GII.4 Sydney on commonly touched airplane cabin surfaces. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 574-586. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020046
    [5] Sandra Racionero-Plaza, Itxaso Tellado, Antonio Aguilera, Mar Prados . Gender violence among youth: an effective program of preventive socialization to address a public health problem. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(1): 66-80. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021005
    [6] Jean-François Pelletier . The transcendent voice of recovery mentors in mental health: a philosophical reflection. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(2): 135-142. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.2.135
    [7] Amogh Auti, Madhura Tathode, Maria Michela Marino, Antonio Vitiello, Andrea Ballini, Francesco Miele, Valeria Mazzone, Alessia Ambrosino, Mariarosaria Boccellino . Nature's weapons: Bioactive compounds as anti-cancer agents. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 747-772. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024038
    [8] Nityanand Jain, Islam Kourampi, Tungki Pratama Umar, Zahra Rose Almansoor, Ayush Anand, Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Shivani Jain, Aigars Reinis . Global population surpasses eight billion: Are we ready for the next billion?. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 849-866. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023056
    [9] Akari Miyazaki, Naoko Kumada Deguchi, Tomoko Omiya . Difficulties and distress experienced by Japanese public health nurses specializing in quarantine services when dealing with COVID-19: A qualitative study in peri-urban municipality. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 235-251. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023018
    [10] Peng Wang, Zhenyi Li, Alice Jones, Michael E. Bodner, Elizabeth Dean . Discordance between lifestyle-related health behaviors and beliefs of urban mainland Chinese: A questionnaire study with implications for targeting health education. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(1): 49-66. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.1.49
  • Purpose 

    This present study sought to investigate whether there were factors that could discriminate insured from uninsured rural Americans.

    Methods 

    Data for four groups were used: 34 uninsured, 102 government-insured (GP), 324 private- or employer-insured (PEP), and 96 both government- and private- or employer-insured (GPEP). A discriminant analysis was conducted on the four groups, using group membership as the dependent variable; age, education, income, attitude to insurance, emergency room visit, chronic disease prevalence were the independent variables.

    Findings 

    The analysis yielded three discriminant functions, however the only significant function was the one that discriminated the PEP-insured individuals from the other groups. About 48% of the cases were classified correctly with the significant discriminant function.

    Conclusion 

    The findings of this study can serve as a baseline for future research seeking to eradicate barriers to getting health insurance among the uninsured in rural America.



    Airplane ear or ear discomfort during flight is common irrespective of ticket price we pay for our flights according to class. Whether we get extra leg space or extra facilities during flying in business class, air travelers often face this problem of airplane ear (Figure 1). Airplane ear is also known as ear barotrauma, barotitis media or aerotitis media [1][5]. Severe earache affects individuals of varying levels of social determinants of health as it is entirely a physiological phenomenon [3]. Airplane ear is commonly experienced when the airplane is ascending or descending, which makes it one of the commonest health problems for people travelling in air routes.

    Generally, airplane ear occurs due to quick changes in altitude and quick changes in air pressure [4]. In normal physiological conditions, the air pressure in our middle ear cavity is nearly equivalent to that of the external ear canal. This equalization of air pressure is maintained physiologically and contributes to regular auditory function and maintenance of normal balance among individuals.

    However, the eustachian tube dysfunction may occur with any changes in pressure and failure to ventilate through the middle ear space. This may result in outward bulging of the tympanic membrane causing moderate to severe earache. This phenomenon can be compared with a bread expanding while baking [3],[5].

    Conversely, due to the vacuum effect, if the air pressure inside the middle ear space reduces rapidly compared to the external ear pressure, the tympanic membrane may be pulled inside due to the pressure gradient. The eustachian tube becomes flattened during the pressure changes and it necessitates bringing air into the middle ear (Figure 2). During sudden ascend or descend of an aeroplane, ear cavity pressure is often decreased complemented by an increase in the cabin compared to the outside air pressure. In such a scenario, the unusual stretching of the eardrum or tympanic membrane may precipitate pain in the ear. At the same time, individuals may also experience decreased hearing abilities and muffled sounds as the eardrum as it becomes unable to vibrate normally [2][4].

    The pathophysiology remains the same in cases of scuba diving, in hyperbaric oxygen chambers, and during explosions happening nearby [2].

    Airplane ear can in occur unilaterally or in both ears. Signs and symptoms of Airplane air include discomfort, pain, and fullness in ear, and mild to moderate hearing loss in acute cases. Moreover, for severe cases, affected individuals may experience severe pain, moderate to severe hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, and hemotympanum (severe form).

    Figure 1.  Airplane ear.

    The common risk factors for airplane ear include—small eustachian tube (infants and toddlers), common cold, acute or chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, otitis media, and napping on an airplane during rapid pressure change in our middle ear. Permanent damage may occur in the membranous linings of the middle ear or eustachian tube, which agammaavates the problem further [6].

    Figure 2.  Imbalance of air pressure in the middle ear.

    Generally, airplane ear does not pose problems unless there is any structural damage in the middle ear. Rare complications may include permanent hearing loss and chronic tinnitus [6],[7].

    It is very surprising that despite being a very common condition, no prior preventive instruction is given by the air hostesses/airplane authority about this phenomenon. Although the airline authorities provide a lot of instructions to the passengers regarding emergency landing in the water, power failures, low oxygen supply to the cabin and so on; airplane ear remains a neglected health issue in aerospace safety measures.

    Furthermore, if a baby suddenly cries or elderly adults feel ear discomfort or pain during rapid descent of ascent of an airplane, then the flight attendants would rush to the sufferers and offer instructions/help. Sometimes, they may have to manage emergencies like ear bleeding by apply ear packs. All these health hazards and associated challenges can be easily prevented if airplane authorities include following preventive instructions for airplane air with existing life-saving instructions.

  • Yawning, chewing and swallowing is helpful: During take-off and landing chewing gum and swallowing activate the muscles that make patent the eustachian tubes bi-laterally.
  • Don't sleep during ascent and descent of flights: If we are awake during the period of sudden pressure change, we can practice health promotive measures whenever we feel discomfort on our ears.
  • Reschedule travel plans: If possible, it is better to not travel by plane if an individual is suffering from the common cold, sinusitis, nasal congestion, recent ear surgery or ear infection.
  • Use of earplugs: Earplugs slowly equalize the pressure against our eardrum during take-off and landing of airplane.
  • Use of decongestants: It is helpful if taken before 30 minutes to an hour before the travel.
  • Valsalva manoeuvre: The valsalva manoeuvre can be performed by the passengers during passengers feel ear discomfort in the aeroplane. It (Figure 3) is performed by moderately forceful exhalation against the closed glottis. Commonly it is done by closing one's mouth, pinching one's nose shut while pressing out as if blowing up a balloon. This manoeuvre is often used to clear the ears and sinuses (that is to equalize pressure between them) during ambient pressure changes. It helps to maintain the air pressure in the middle air, by contracting several muscles in the pharynx to elevate the soft palate and open the throat. Especially, the muscle, tensor veli palatini, also acts to open the eustachian tube and sucking or bulging of eardrum is prevented/corrected during pressure changes in the flight.
  • Bleeding ear: In case of bleeding, immediate ear packing is often recommended, followed by early exploration in the OT under expert physician is required.
  • Figure 3.  Valsalva manoeuvre.

    For frequent fliers, surgically placed tube in the eardrums is generally helpful to aid fluid drainage in the middle air, particularly for those who are prone to severe airplane ear. This tube helps in ventilating air to the middle ear, and equalize the pressure between the outer and middle ear.

    Airplane ear is a common yet, ignored public health problem. It can be handled effectively if proper precautions/corrective measures are adopted. Previously in the airlines, lozenges were offered, which may have helped the passengers to avoid this problem, but now a days it is less commonly practiced. The airplane authority should explore socio-culturally appropriate and evidence-based strategies and incorporate them with the preventive and curative instructions for the passengers. Moreover, the flight attendants may be trained in recognizing and managing airplane ear alongside other life-saving instructions to their passengers. It may decrease the air discomforts and empower the air passengers during air travel.


Acknowledgments



The authors would like to thank Dr. Tamara Kang for introducing us to the statistical approach used in this article.

Conflicts of interest



The author declares no conflicts of interest.

[1] Benitez JA, Seiber EE (2018) US health care reform and rural America: results from the ACA's Medicaid expansions. J Rural Health 34: 213-222. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12284
[2] Gong G, Phillips SG, Hudson C, et al. (2019) Higher US rural mortality rates linked to socioeconomic status, physician shortages, and lack of health insurance. Health Aff 38: 2003-2010. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00722
[3] Huguet N, Angier H, Hoopes MJ, et al. (2019) Prevalence of pre-existing conditions among community health center patients before and after the Affordable Care Act. J Am Board Fam Med 32: 883-889. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190087
[4] Cha AE, Cohen RA (2020) Reasons for Being Uninsured Among Adults Aged 18–64 in the United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 1: 1-8.
[5] Foutz J, Artiga S, Garfield R (2017)  The role of Medicaid in rural America Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation.
[6] Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M (2017)  Multiple chronic conditions in the United States Santa Monica, CA: Rand. doi: 10.7249/TL221
[7] Berkowitz SA, Terranova J, Hill C, et al. (2018) Meal delivery programs reduce the use of costly health care in dually eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Health Aff 37: 535-542. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0999
[8] Makowska M (2018) Uninsured America: problem of lack of health insurance cover-age in the US. JPHNMR 253: 33-39.
[9] Wippold GM, Nmezi N, Williams JL, et al. (2020) An Exploratory Study to Understand Factors Associated with Health-related Quality of Life Among Uninsured/Underinsured Patients as Identified by Clinic Providers and Staff. J Prim Care Community Health 11: 2150132720949412. doi: 10.1177/2150132720949412
[10] Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Adams DP, Fernandez-Lazaro D, et al. (2019) Medication adherence and barriers among low-income, uninsured patients with multiple chronic conditions. Res Social Adm Pharm 15: 744-753. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.006
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Alicia Mehl, Francois Bergey, Caoimhe Cawley, Andreas Gilsdorf, Syndromic Surveillance Insights from a Symptom Assessment App Before and During COVID-19 Measures in Germany and the United Kingdom: Results From Repeated Cross-Sectional Analyses, 2020, 8, 2291-5222, e21364, 10.2196/21364
    2. Matthew J. Wu, Elliott D. Kozin, 2024, 9780323874823, 149, 10.1016/B978-0-323-87482-3.00010-7
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
  • 通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Metrics

    Article views(3142) PDF downloads(115) Cited by(0)

    Figures and Tables

    Tables(2)

    Other Articles By Authors

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return

    Catalog