Review

Implication of bidirectional promoters containing duplicated GGAA motifs of mitochondrial function-associated genes

  • Mitochondria are well known as the primary required organelle in all eukaryotic cells. They have their own mtDNA containing genes that encode tRNAs, rRNAs and a set of functional proteins required for energy (ATP) production. However, almost all (99%) of mitochondrial proteins are encoded by host nuclear genes. Therefore, expression of mitochondrial protein-encoding genes should be regulated similarly to genes that are present in the host nuclear chromosomes. Interestingly, from genomic database assisted surveillance, it was revealed that a lot of mitochondrial function associated protein-encoding genes are oppositely linked in a head-head manner. If the two head-head conjugated genes are regulated by the same transcription factor(s), their expression would be dependent on the direction of transcription machinery that contains RNA polymerase II to execute mRNA synthesis. In this article, we will focus on several examples of the mitochondrial and the partner gene sets and discuss putative functions of transcription factor binding elements in the bidirectional promoters of mitochondrial function-associated genes in chromosomes.

    Citation: Fumiaki Uchiumi, Makoto Fujikawa, Satoru Miyazaki, Sei-ichi Tanuma. Implication of bidirectional promoters containing duplicated GGAA motifs of mitochondrial function-associated genes[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2014, 1(1): 1-26. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2013.1.1

    Related Papers:

    [1] Fohona S. Coulibaly, Bi-Botti C. Youan . Current status of lectin-based cancer diagnosis and therapy. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(1): 1-27. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.1.1
    [2] Fohona S. Coulibaly, Danielle N. Thomas, Bi-Botti C. Youan . Anti-HIV lectins and current delivery strategies. AIMS Molecular Science, 2018, 5(1): 96-116. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2018.1.96
    [3] Atsushi Tsubota, Hidenori Ichijo, Kengo Homma . Mislocalization, aggregation formation and defect in proteolysis in ALS. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(2): 246-268. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.2.246
    [4] Mohamed A. Eldeeb . Aging: when the ubiquitin–proteasome machinery collapses. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(2): 219-223. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.2.219
    [5] Mohamed Amine Ben Mlouka, Thomas Cousseau, Patrick Di Martino . Application of fluorescently labelled lectins for the study of polysaccharides in biofilms with a focus on biofouling of nanofiltration membranes. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(3): 338-356. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.3.338
    [6] M.Bansbach Heather, H.Guilford William . Actin nitrosylation and its effect on myosin driven motility. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(3): 426-438. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.3.426
    [7] Isabel Saez, David Vilchez . Protein clearance mechanisms and their demise in age-related neurodegenerative diseases. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 1(1): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.1.1
    [8] Ana Jalles, Patrícia Maciel . The disruption of proteostasis in neurodegenerative disorders. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(3): 259-293. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.3.259
    [9] Renata Tisi, Marco Rigamonti, Silvia Groppi, Fiorella Belotti . Calcium homeostasis and signaling in fungi and their relevance for pathogenicity of yeasts and filamentous fungi. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 505-549. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.505
    [10] Mohammad Shboul, Hela Sassi, Houweyda Jilani, Imen Rejeb, Yasmina Elaribi, Syrine Hizem, Lamia Ben Jemaa, Marwa Hilmi, Susanna Gerit Kircher, Ali Al Kaissi . The phenotypic spectrum in a patient with Glycine to Serine mutation in the COL2A1 gene: overview study. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 76-85. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021006
  • Mitochondria are well known as the primary required organelle in all eukaryotic cells. They have their own mtDNA containing genes that encode tRNAs, rRNAs and a set of functional proteins required for energy (ATP) production. However, almost all (99%) of mitochondrial proteins are encoded by host nuclear genes. Therefore, expression of mitochondrial protein-encoding genes should be regulated similarly to genes that are present in the host nuclear chromosomes. Interestingly, from genomic database assisted surveillance, it was revealed that a lot of mitochondrial function associated protein-encoding genes are oppositely linked in a head-head manner. If the two head-head conjugated genes are regulated by the same transcription factor(s), their expression would be dependent on the direction of transcription machinery that contains RNA polymerase II to execute mRNA synthesis. In this article, we will focus on several examples of the mitochondrial and the partner gene sets and discuss putative functions of transcription factor binding elements in the bidirectional promoters of mitochondrial function-associated genes in chromosomes.


    1. Introduction

    Biomineralization is found in multiple animal groups and involves the interaction between cells and secreted extracellular matrix components [1,2,3]. Calcium is transported through cells in vesicles and deposited on the extracellular material, where it forms the crystalized mineral. This process has been extensively studied, and a large number of secreted proteins have been identified, but the functional role of these proteins and how they are organized to form mineralized structures in a controlled pattern has remained elusive. Echinoderms have been used as a simple model system to study the process of biomineralization. The proteins found in the sea urchin skeleton have been most extensively studied. Using the genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus [4], proteomic studies have identified over four hundred proteins found occluded within the sea urchin skeleton [5,6,7,8]. The most abundant of these proteins are unusual C-type lectins called spicule matrix proteins. These are secreted proteins that are acidic, contain a C-type lectin domain as well as a repetitive domain with varying numbers of a six to eight amino acid repeats [9]. The exact sequence of the amino acids in the repeat vary, but all are similar in nature. Of the spicule matrix proteins examined, all are found in the organic matrix onto which calcium is precipitated.

    In a recent study we examined the conservation of these spicule matrix proteins in a related group of echinoderms, the brittle stars, or Ophiuroids, using the Caribbean brittle star Ophiocoma wendtii [10].Isolation of skeletal proteins followed by proteomic analysis revealed 44 proteins. Of these, four were C-type lectins. These proteins were secreted, had similar amino acid content and had a similar overall charge as the sea urchin spicule matrix proteins, but lacked the repetitive domains. An analysis of the relationship between the sea urchin and brittle star C-type lectin proteins indicated they likely arose independent of one another, but the confidence levels of the analysis were weak. Having only a single representative of the ophiuroids to compare to sea urchins makes it difficult to determine how conserved the C-type lectins are in this group, which is something we address in this study. We also identified a diversity of other proteins in the brittle star skeleton, some of which are also present in the sea urchin, but the importance of these proteins was not clear. Many of these proteins had not previously been implicated in skeleton formation in echinoderms. We wished to examine another brittle star to ensure the presence of these proteins was not an artifact of our analysis.

    Here we examine the skeletal proteome of a brittle star from the Pacific coast, Ophiothrix spiculata. We detect 77 proteins occluded with the skeleton, most of which were homologous to the proteins found in the Caribbean brittle star, including C-type lectins. We compare these proteins to those in both Ophiocoma wendtii and the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. The results indicate that the proteins we have identified are highly conserved, and suggests that C-type lectins play a role in skeleton formation. However, they indicate that the extensive gene duplication and highly repetitive regions of the sea urchin spicule matrix proteins are not required for biomineralization.


    2. Materials and methods


    2.1. Skeletal preparation

    Isolation of clean skeletal elements was as described in Seaver and Livingston [10]. Arms of 2-8 adult brittle stars were rinsed with deionized water (DI) water then stirred vigorously in cold sodium hypochlorite (5% active chlorine, Acros Organics). The resulting skeletal elements were washed 5X in cold, DI water, then ground with a mortar and pestle. Ground mineral was homogenized with homogenization buffer (4.5 M Guanidine Isothiocyanate, 0.05 M Sodium Citrate, 5% (v/v) b-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% (w/v) Sarkosyl) in a 40 mL homogenizer. Ground, homogenized skeletal elements were transferred to sterile 50 mL conical tubes and washed 5X in cold, sterile DI water. This treatment resulted in finely ground mineral, free of attached organic material.


    2.2. Purification of skeletal proteins

    Purified skeletal elements were de-mineralized in cold acetic acid (~40 mL 25% (v/v)/g mineral) under gentle agitation until mineral was dissolved. The supernatant was transferred to Spectra/Por 6 Dialysis Membrane MWCO 6-8000 (Spectrum Laboratories, Greensboro, NC) for dialysis. Dialysis was against 1% acetic acid, DI water, then 0.001 M and 0.0001 M TRIS base solutions. Dialysis solution was changed after 12 hours. After dialysis, a small amount of precipitate remained, but was removed before further processing. The soluble fraction was concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter units, followed by Amicon Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter units (3000 NMWL) (Millipore, Bellerica, MA). Samples were dissolved in NuPAGE LDS sample buffer under reducing conditions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and the proteins separated by SDS-PAGE using NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris Polyacrylamide gels 1.0 mm, 10-well in the MES buffer system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Running times, protocols, and reagents were used as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Gels were incubated on an orbital shaker in gel fix (45% (v/v) methanol, 10% (v/v) acetic acid) for one hour, followed by 3X ten minute washes in DI water. Gels were stained with SYPRO RUBY Protein Gel Stain.


    2.3. Sample preparation

    Protein quantitation was performed by Qubit Fluorometry (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). A total of 20 µg of material was separated on a 4-12% Bis Tris NuPage gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in the MOPS buffer system. The gel lane was excised into twenty equally sized segments. Using a robot (ProGest, DigiLab), gel pieces were reduced with 8 mM dithiothreitol at 60 °C followed by alkylation with 10 mM iodoacetamide at RT. Samples were then digested with sequencing grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) at 37 °C for 4 h and quenched with formic acid. The supernatant was analyzed directly without further processing.


    2.4. Mass spectrometry

    For each of the 20 fractioned gel slices, LC-MS/MS was performed identically. The digested sample was analyzed by nano LC/MS/MS with a Waters NanoAcquity HPLC system interfaced to a ThermoFisher LTQ Orbitrap Velos. Peptides were loaded on a trapping column and eluted over a 75 µm analytical column at 350 nL/min; both columns were packed with Jupiter Proteo resin (Phenomenex). The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, with MS performed in the Orbitrap at 60,000 FWHM resolution and MS/MS performed in the LTQ. The 15 most abundant ions from each precursor scan from each gel slice were selected for MS/MS. There were several thousand precursor scans in each LC-MS/MS experiment.


    2.5. Data processing

    Data were searched using a local copy of Mascot against the NCBI non-redundant protein database as well as 454-sequenced brittle star tube foot transcriptome and genomic contigs. The Contigs and Singletons database was also translated in all six frames using Proteomatic 1.2.1 (University of Munster) to visualize reading frame. The translated database was appended with common contaminants, reversed and concatenated. Trypsin was input as the digestive enzyme, mass values were monoisotopic, the peptide mass tolerance was 10 ppm, the fragment mass tolerance was 0.8 Da, and the maximum number of missed cleavages was 2. Carbamidomethylation (C) was set as a fixed modification and variable modifications included oxidation (M), acetyl (N-term), pyro-glu (N-term Q), and deamidation (NQ). Mascot DAT files were parsed into the Scaffold software for validation, filtering and to create a non-redundant list per sample. The data were filtered using a minimum protein value of 95%, a minimum peptide value of 50% (Prophet scores) and requiring at least one unique peptide per protein.


    3. Results and Discussion

    Skeletal proteins from O. spiculata were isolated and resolved into a number of major bands on SDS-PAGE gels. The proteins are clearly intact and span a large range of molecular weight (Figure 1). This is critical since SDS-PAGE was used to fractionate the proteins for LC/MS/MS analysis. The O. spiculata gel lane was divided into 20 equal slices and each slice was processed independently. The proteins in the gel slices were digested with trypsin and analyzed by LC/MS/MS. The top 15 ions for every precursor scan from liquid chromatography of each gel slice were subjected to MS/MS. The data was compared to O. spiculata nucleotide sequence databases as described for O. wendtii [9]. A total of 3959 spectra identified ninety proteins. After removal of common contaminants and peptides that mapped to short open reading frames, 73 proteins were identified.

    Figure 1. SDS PAGE gel of Ophiothrix spiculata skeletal proteins. 1 = Molecular weight markers, 2 = O. spiculata proteins. Partitioning of the gel into slices is shown at the left with the slices numbered

    When placed into functional groups the distribution of identified proteins resembled that seen in the skeletal proteome of the brittle star Ophiocoma wendtii [9]. The largest classes of proteins with defined functions observed were extracellular matrix (ECM) and transmembrane proteins (26%), proteases and protease inhibitors (19%), C-type lectins (6%) (Figure 2). There were also a number of common intracellular proteins as well as proteins of unknown function.

    Figure 2. Protein functional classes in Ophiothris spiculata skeletal proteome

    Comparison of the proteins found in the two brittle stars by reciprocal blasts showed a high degree of conservation between the two species (Figure 3). Seventy-seven percent of the proteins that were identified in O. wendtii were homologous to proteins identified in O. spiculata. These two species have been separated for at least three million years, but clearly maintain considerable homology in the proteins used for skeleton formation. Table 1 shows the major proteins that are conserved between the two brittle star species. The proteins that matched the largest percentage of the observed spectra correspond to visible bands on the SDS-PAGE gel (Figure 1), although the sensitivity of the LC/MS/MS identifies proteins spread over a wider range of the gel than would be predicted by the Molecular Weight (MW). Fibrinogen C was found in slice 11, C-type lectins in slices 12 to 15. The C-type lectins ran slightly higher than their predicted MW, but these proteins are often glycosylated. The major band in this region appears composed of a C-type lectin, a novel protein, an agrin-like protein and a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP). The ldl-receptor is found in slice 4, Cub domain containing proteins in slices 5-6, Ig-domain containing proteins in slice 8, and the syndecan/SEA protein identified in O. wendtii in slice 10 [9]. The predominant proteins found in slices 16-17 were agrin/kazal proteinase inhibitors and a matrix metalloproteinase, which also appears higher in the gel and may represent a proteolytic fragment. Most of these proteins are also found in the S. purpuratus skeletal proteome, and some have been found in vertebrate bone. We discuss these further below.

    Figure 3. Overlap between brittle star skeletal proteomes
    Table 1.Major proteins in skeletal proteome
    Protein Number in proteome
    Matrix Metalloproteinase 5
    Fibrinogen C 5
    Semaphorin 5
    C-type lectins 4
    Agrin-like 4
    Ig domains 3
    Actin 3
    Tolloid-like/Cub domain 2
    EGF_CA family 2
    Transferrin 2
    Collagen 2
    ras/rab family protein 2
    Carbonic anhydrase 1
    Syndecan/SEA protein 1
    Calmodulin 1
    Novel protease 1
    Ldl receptor-like 1
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Secreted matrix metalloproteases have been found in all echinoderm skeletal proteomes. This suggests that proteolytic modification of extracellular material may play a role in skeleton formation. Similarly, there is also a novel secreted protease with similarity to neurotrypsin [10] found in both sea urchin and brittle star skeletons. Agrin-like proteins are also found in all of the echinoderm skeletons studied. Agrin interacts with neurotrypsin at the neuromuscular junction and is believed to have a signaling role [11]. Such an interaction could play a role in echinoderm skeleton formation as well.

    Carbonic anhydrase was also found in all echinoderm skeletal proteomes, and has been shown to play a role in the formation of calcium carbonate skeletons in a number of invertebrates [12,13,14,15]. Recently it has been shown to be required for skeleton formation in sea urchins [16]. Calmodulin was also found, along with several other proteins with calcium binding sites. These include an Ldl receptor-like protein. Related proteins have been implicated in the formation of vertebrate bone [17]. Other proteins identified in the O. spiculata and O. wendtii skeletal proteomes that have also been found in the human bone [18] or matrix vesicle [19] proteomes include actin, collagen, agrin/scavenger receptor proteins, carbonic anhydrase, calmodulin and fibrinogen C. One protein that is unique to the brittle star skeletal proteome contains a C-terminal syndecan domain followed by a SEA domain, an agrin like domain. This combination of protein domains was previously observed in O. wendtii, but had not previously been described elsewhere. Detection of the homologous protein in O. spiculata verifies the protein is not a sequence artifact and suggests it plays a role in the brittle star skeleton.

    A fibrinogen C or ficolin-like molecule was prominent in the brittle star skeletal proteome. This is a protein with a lectin domain that binds carbohydrate in a calcium dependent manner. This lectin protein is one of the most abundant in both brittle star skeletal proteomes, and is also present in the sea urchin skeleton [4,5,6], although it is not as abundant.

    The most prevalent proteins in the sea urchin skeletal proteomes are C-type lectins called spicule matrix (SM) proteins [4,5,6]. These proteins are characterized by lectin domains as well as unusual repetitive regions [7]. The importance and evolution of these proteins is still unclear and needs to be elucidated. To further our knowledge of the role of such proteins, we have analyzed the brittle star C-type lectins in more detail. The O. spiculata skeletal proteome contained four C-type lectins. They are all in the mid-twenty kilodalton range in molecular weight (MW) as derived from their nucleotide sequence and all are acidic (Table 2). The phylogenetic relationships between the O. spiculata and O. wendtii skeletal C-type lectins is shown in Figure 4. Os SM22 and Ow SM22 seem to be direct homologues, as do O. spiculata SM23 and O. wendtii SM24. The exact relationship between the other lectins is unclear. Figure 5 shows an alignment of the C-type lectins from both O. spiculata and O. wendtii. The proteins have the typical double loop structure of C-type lectins [20,21]. There are five beta strands and two alpha-helices in each protein. The Beta 2 strand can be identified by the WIGL sequence in the O. spiculata 5681/SM22 and the O. wendtii SM22 proteins [21]. These proteins, along with O. spiciulata 46342/SM24 proteins have an additional beta-strand at the NH2 terminal of the protein. The O. spiculata 62832/SM 23 and 9997/SM 27 proteins have a potential alpha helix in the same position. All of the proteins have six conserved cysteines capable of forming disulfide bonds. The first two could potentially aid in stabilizing a hairpin at the N terminal of the proteins. This has been found in some C-type lectins [21]. The other four cysteines are in positions suggesting they play a conserved role in stabilizing the C-type lectin double loop structure [20]. There are also four conserved calcium binding sites. The second calcium binding site lies adjacent to sequences that have been implicated in binding carbohydrate. Either an EPN sequence, which binds mannose, or a QPD sequence, that binds galactose, lie adjacent to the second calcium binding site [21]. Downstream is another sequence involved in calcium binding, normally WND. Only the O. wendtii SM 20 protein contains the canonical carbohydrate binding sequences that indicate it would bind galactose. The other proteins have variations in the canonical sequences that have been implicated in binding to carbohydrates. It is not clear how these variations could affect carbohydrate binding. Interestingly, the variation in these sequences follows the evolution of these proteins, suggesting that changes in these sequences occurred before the divergence of the two species, and that the changes have been conserved. This suggest that the changes are functional.

    Table 2.Ophiothrix spiculata C-type lectins
    Identifier Domain architecture MW pI Designation
    5681 C-type lectin domain 22,584 4.77 Os SM22
    9997 C-type lectin domain 27,822 4.81 Os SM27
    62832 C-type lectin domain 23,240 5.15 Os SM23
    46342 C-type lectin domain 23,853 4.69 Os SM24
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 4. Neighbor joining tree of brittle star C-type lectins. Os = Ophiothrix spiculata, Ow = Ophiocoma wendtii
    Figure 5. Annotated alignment of brittle star C-type lectins. Os = Ophiothrix spiculata, Ow = Ophiocoma wendtii. --- = Alpha helix, > = Beta strand, + = Calcium binding site, ccc = carbohydrate binding site

    Overall we have found a high degree of conservation of the proteins found in the skeleton of two brittle stars from opposite sides of North America. Many of these proteins are also found in sea urchins. This suggests that these proteins play a functional role in skeleton formation. Included in the proteins conserved between the two brittle stars are C-type lectins, which are the predominant proteins found in sea urchin skeletal proteomes. The brittle star C-type lectins contain protein domains characteristic of this class of protein, suggesting functional conservation of the ability to bind carbohydrates in a calcium dependent manner. There are fewer C-type lectins found in the brittle star skeleton, however, and they lack the repetitive domains characteristic of sea urchin spicule matrix proteins.


    Acknowledgements

    We would like to thank Andy Cameron (CalTech) and the Echinobase genomic database (http://www.echinobase.org/Echinobase/) for providing genomic resources. This work was supported by a grant from the California State University CSUPERB organization. RLF was supported by NIH T34 GM008074. This work was conducted all or in part by data generated and shared from NSF award #1036416 Collaborative Research: Assembling the Echinoderm Tree of Life.


    Conflict of interest

    None declared.


    [1] Carey MF, Peterson CL, Smale ST (2009) Transcription and preinitiation complex assembly in vitro, In: Carey, M.F., Peterson, C.L., Smale, S.T. Eds., Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes, 2nd Ed, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 439-538.
    [2] Scarpulla RC, (2008) Transcriptional paradigms in mammalian mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Physiol Rev 88: 611-638. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2007
    [3] Campbell CT, Kolesar JE, Kaufman BA, (2012) Mitochondrial transcription factor A regulates mitochondrial transcription initiation, DNA packaging, and genome copy number. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819:921-929. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.03.002
    [4] Vafai SB, Mootha VK, (2012) Mitochondrial disorders as windows into an ancient organelle. Nature 491: 374-383. doi: 10.1038/nature11707
    [5] Pagliarini DJ, Calvo SE, Chang B et al. (2008) A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology. Cell 134: 112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.016
    [6] Schmidt O, Pfanner N, Meisinger C, (2010) Mitochondrial protein import: from proteomics to functional mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 655-667. doi: 10.1038/nrm2959
    [7] Reinders J, Zahedi RP, Pfanner N et al. (2006) Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics. J. Proteome Res 5: 1543-1554. doi: 10.1021/pr050477f
    [8] Evans MJ, Scarpulla RC (1989) Interaction of nuclear factors with multiple sites in the somatic cytochrome c promoter. Characterization of upstream NRF-1, ATF and intron Sp1 recognition sites. J Biol Chem 264: 14361-14368.
    [9] Scarpulla RC (1997) Nuclear control of respiratory chain expression in mammalian cells. J Bioenerg Biomembr 29: 109-119. doi: 10.1023/A:1022681828846
    [10] Whatcott CJ, Meyer-Ficca ML, Meyer RG, et al. (2009) A specific isoform of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase is targeted to the mitochondrial matrix by a N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence. Exp Cell Res 315: 3477-3485. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.04.005
    [11] Meyer RG, Meyer-Ficca ML, Jacobson EL, Jacobson MK (2003) Human poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) gene and the common promoter sequence it shares with inner mitochondrial membrane translocase 23 (TIM23). Gene 314: 181-190. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00738-8
    [12] Uchiumi F, Sakakibara G, Sato J, et al. (2008) Characterization of the promoter region of the human PARG gene and its response to PU.1 during differentiation of HL-60 cells. Genes Cells 13: 1229-1248.
    [13] Uchiumi F, Enokida K, Shiraishi T, et al. (2010) Characterization of the promoter region of the human IGHMBP2 (Smbp-2) gene and its response to TPA in HL-60 cells. Gene 463: 8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.04.014
    [14] Koc EC, Burkhart W, Blackburn K, et al. (2001) Large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. J Biol Chem 276: 43958-43969. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106510200
    [15] Uchiumi F, Larsen S, Tanuma S (2013) Biological systems that control transcription of DNA repair-and telomere maintenance-associated genes, In: Chen, C. Ed., DNA repair, Rijeka, Croatia, InTech Open Access Publisher, 309-325.
    [16] Matoba S, Kang JG, Patino WD, et al. (2006) p53 regulates mitochondrial respiration. Science 312: 1650-1653. doi: 10.1126/science.1126863
    [17] Green DR, Kroemer G (2009) Cytoplasmic functions of the tumor suppressor p53. Nature 458: 1127-1130. doi: 10.1038/nature07986
    [18] Sahin E, DePinho RA (2012) Axis of aging: telomeres, p53 and mitochondria. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 397-404.
    [19] Szczesny B, Tann AW, Longley MJ, et al. (2008) Long patch base excision repair in mammalian mitochondrial genomes. J Biol Chem 283: 26349-26356. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803491200
    [20] Martin SA (2011) Mitochondrial DNA repair, In: Storici, F. Ed., DNA Repair - On the Pathways to Fixing DNA Damage and Errors, Rijeka, Croatia: InTech-Open Access Publisher, 313-338.
    [21] Sementchenko VI, Watson DK (2000) Ets target genes: past, present and future. Oncogene 19: 6533-6548. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204034
    [22] Baillat D, Laitem C, Leprivier G, et al. (2009) Ets-1 binds cooperatively to the palindromic Ets-binding sites in the p53 promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 378: 213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.11.035
    [23] Molloy-Simard V, St-Laurent JF, Vigneault F, et al. (2012) Altered expression of the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation enzymes in uveal melanoma and regulation of PARG gene expression by the transcription factor ERM. Invest Ophthamol Vis Sci 53: 6219-6231. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8853
    [24] Uchiumi F, Watanabe T, Tanuma S (2010) Characterization of various promoter regions of the human DNA helicase-encoding genes and identification of duplicated ets (GGAA) motifs as an essential transcription regulatory element. Exp Cell Res 316: 1523-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.03.009
    [25] Uchiumi F, Miyazaki S, Tanuma S (2011) The possible functions of duplicated ets (GGAA) motifs located near transcription start sites of various genes. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 2039-2051. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0674-x
    [26] Smeitink JA, Loeffen JL, Triepels RH, et al. (1998) Nuclear genes of human complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain: state of the art. Hum Mol Genet 7: 1573-1579. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.10.1573
    [27] Starker LF, Delgado-Verdugo A, Udelsman R, et al. (2010) Expression and somatic mutations of SDHAF2 (SDH5), a novel endocrine tumor suppressor gene in parathyroid tumors of primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocrine 38: 397-401. doi: 10.1007/s12020-010-9399-0
    [28] Harris KA, Jones V, Bilbille Y, et al. (2011) YrdC exhibits properties expected of a subunit for a tRNA threonylcarbamoyl transferase. RNA 17: 1678-1687. doi: 10.1261/rna.2592411
    [29] Yang C, Bolotin E, Jiang T, et al. (2007) Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identification of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters. Gene 389: 52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.029
    [30] Trinklein ND, Aldred SF, Hartman SJ, et al. (2004) An aboundance of bidirectional promoters in the human genome. Genome Res 14: 62-66.
    [31] Yang MQ, Elnitski LL (2008) Diversity of core promoter elements comprising human bidirectional promoters. BMC Genomics 9 (Suppl. 2): S3.
    [32] Collins PJ, Kobayashi Y, Nguyen L, et al. (2007) The ets-related transcription factor GABP directs bidirectional transcription. PLoS Genet 3: e208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030208
    [33] Lin JM, Collins PJ, Trinklein ND, et al. (2007) Transcription factor binding and modified histones in human bidirectional promoters. Genome Res 17: 818-827. doi: 10.1101/gr.5623407
    [34] Anno YN, Myslinski E, Ngondo-Mbongo RP, et al. (2011) Genome-wide evidence for an essential role of the human Staf/ZNF143 transcription factor in bidirectional transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 3116-3127. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1301
    [35] Orekhova AS, Rubtsov PM (2013) Bidirectional promoters in the transcription of mammalian genomes. Biochem (Moscow) 78: 335-341. doi: 10.1134/S0006297913040020
    [36] Adachi N, Lieber MR (2002) Bidirctional gene organization: a common architectural feature of the human genome. Cell 109: 807-809. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00758-4
    [37] Wakano C, Byun JS, Di LJ, et al. (2012) The dual lives of bidirectional promoters. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 688-693. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.006
    [38] Xu C, Chen J, Shen B (2012) The preservation of bidirectional promoter architecture in eukaryotes: what is the driving force? BMC Systems Biol 6 (Suppl. 1): S21.
    [39] Uchiumi F, Larsen S, Masumi A, et al. (2013) The putative implications of duplicated GGAA-motifs located in the human interferon regulated genes (ISGs), In: iConcept Ed., Genomics I- Humans, Animals and Plants, Hong Kong: iConcept Press, 87-105.
    [40] Gotea V, Petrykowska HM, Elnitski L (2013) Bidirectional promoters as important drivers for the emergence of species-specific transcripts. PLoS One 8: e57323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057323
    [41] Yang MQ, Koehly LM, Elinitski LL (2007) Comprehensive annotation of bidirectional promoters identifies co-regulation among breast and ovarian cancer genes. PLoS Comput Biol 3, e72.
    [42] Lin R, Paz S, Hiscott J (2010) Tom70 imports antiviral immunity to the mitochondria. Cell Res 20: 971-973. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.113
    [43] Liu XY, Wei B, Shi HX, et al. (2010) Tom70 mediates activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 on mitochondria. Cell Res 20: 994-1011. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.103
    [44] Kim SW, Kim JB, Kim JH, et al. (2007) Interferon-gamma-induced expressions of heat shock protein 60 and heat shock protein 10 in C6 astroglioma cells: identification of the signal transducers and activators of transcription 3-binding site in bidirectional promoter. Neuroreport 18: 385-389. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32801299cc
    [45] Mauxion F, Chen CY, Séraphin B, et al. (2009) BTG/TOB factors impact deadenylases. Trends Biochem Sci 34: 640-647. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.008
    [46] Koshiba T (2013) Mitochondrial-mediated antiviral immunity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833: 225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.005
    [47] Okazaki T, Higuchi M, Gotoh Y (2013) Mitochondrial localization of the antiviral signaling adaptor IPS-1 is important for its induction of caspase activation. Genes Cells 18: 493-501. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12052
    [48] Wei GH, Badis G, Berger MF, et al. Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J 29: 2147-2160.
    [49] Chen YQ, Sengchanthalangsy LL, Hackett A, et al. (2000) F-kappaB p65 (RelA) homodimer uses distinct mechanisms to recognize DNA targets. Structure 8: 419-428. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00123-4
    [50] Wei L, Fan M, Xu L, et al. (2008) Bioinformatic analysis reveals cRel as a regulator of a subset of interferon-stimurated genes. J Interferon Cytokine Res 28: 541-552. doi: 10.1089/jir.2007.0136
    [51] Nguyen VT, Benveniste EN (2000) Involvement of STAT-1 and Ets family members in interferon-g induction of CD40 transcription in microglia/macrophages. J Biol Chem 275: 23674-23684. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002482200
    [52] Aittomäki S, Yang J, Scott EW, et al. (2004) Molecular basis of Stat1 and PU.1 cooperation in cytokine-induced Fcgamma receptor 1 promoter activation. Int Immunol 16: 265-274.
    [53] Meraro D, Gleit-Kielmanowicz M, Hauser H, et al. (2002) IFN-stimulated gene 15 is synergistically activated through interactions between the myelocyte/lymphocyte-specific transcription factors, PU.1, IFN regulatory factor-8/IFN consensus sequence binding protein, and IFN regulatory factor-4: characterization of a new subtype of IFN-stimulated response element. J Immunol 168: 6224-6231.
    [54] Kroeger PE, Morimoto RI (1994) Selection of new HSF1 and HSF2 DNA-binding sites reveals differences in tumor cooperativity. Mol Cell Biol 14: 7592-7603.
    [55] Wang G, Qi K, Zhao Y, et al. (2013) Identification of regulatory regions of bidirectional genes in cervical cancer. BMC Med Genet 6 (Suppl. 1): S5.
    [56] Bachman NJ, Wu W, Schmidt TR, et al. (1999) The 5' region of the COX4 gene contains a novel overlapping gene, NOC4. Mamm Genome 10: 506-512. doi: 10.1007/s003359901031
    [57] FitzGerald PC, Shlyakhtenko A, Mir AA, et al. Clustering of DNA sequences in human promoters. Genome Res 14: 1562-1574.
    [58] Bellizzi D, Dato S, Cavalcante P, et al. (2005) Characterization of a bidirectional promoter shared between two human genes related to aging: SIRT3 and PSMD13. Genomics 89: 143-150.
    [59] Patton J, Block S, Coombs C, et al. (2005) Identification of functional elements in the murine Gabp alpha/ATP synthase coupling factor 6 bi-directional promoter. Gene 369: 35-44.
    [60] Gaston K, Fried M (1994) YY1 is involved in the regulation of the bi-directional promoter of the Surf-1 and Surf-2 genes. FEBS Lett 347: 289-294. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00567-2
    [61] Orii KE, Orii KO, Souri M, et al. (1999) Genes for the human mitochondrial trifunctional protein a- and b-subunits are divergently transcribed from a common promoter region. J Biol Chem 274: 8077-8084. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8077
    [62] Zanotto E, Häkkinen A, Teku G, et al. (2009) NF-Y influences directionality of transcription from the bidirectional Mrps12/Sarsm promoter in both mouse and human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789: 432-442. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.05.001
    [63] Merika M, Thanos D (2011) Enhanceosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11: 205-208.
    [64] Sahin E, Colla S, Liesa M, et al. (2011) Telomere dysfunction induces metabolic and mitochondrial compromise. Nature 470: 359-365. doi: 10.1038/nature09787
    [65] O'Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J (2010) Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 171-181.
    [66] Yu BP, Chung HY (2006) Adaptive mechanisms to oxidative stress during aging. Mech Ageing Dev 127: 436-443. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.01.023
    [67] Wolff S, Dillin A (2013) Beneficial miscommunication. Nature 497: 442-443. doi: 10.1038/497442a
    [68] Houtkooper RH, Mouchiroud L, Ryu D, et al. (2013) Mitochondrial protein imbalance as a conserved longevity mechanism. Nature 497: 451-457. doi: 10.1038/nature12188
    [69] Schmacher B (2009) Transcription-blocking DNA damage in aging: a mechanism for hormesis. Bioessays 31: 1347-1356. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900107
    [70] Calabrese EJ, Mattson MP, Calabrase V (2010) Resveratrol commonly displays hormesis: Occurrence and biomedical significance. Hum Exp Toxicol 29: 980-1015. doi: 10.1177/0960327110383625
    [71] Howitz KT, Bitterman KJ, Cohen HY, et al. (2003) Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae life span. Nature 425: 191-196. doi: 10.1038/nature01960
    [72] Wood JG, Rogina B, Lavul S, et al. (2004) Sirtuin activators mimic caloric restriction and delay aging in metazoans. Nature 430: 686-689. doi: 10.1038/nature02789
    [73] Stefani M, Markus MA, Lin RC, et al. (2007) The effect of resveratrol on a cell model of human aging. Ann NY Acad Sci 1114: 407-418. doi: 10.1196/annals.1396.001
    [74] Kroemer G (1997) Mitochondrial implication in apoptosis. Towards an endosymbiont hypothesis of apoptosis evolution. Cell Death Differ 4: 443-546.
    [75] Tait SW, Green DR (2010) Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 621-632. doi: 10.1038/nrm2952
    [76] Estaquier J, Vallette F, Vayssiere JL, et al. (2012) The mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis, In: Scatena, R., Bottoni, P., Giardina B. Eds., Advances in Mitochondrial Medicine, Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 157-183.
    [77] Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Berghe TV (2010) Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 700-714. doi: 10.1038/nrm2970
    [78] Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Kroemer G (2012) Mitochondria: master regulators of danger signaling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13: 780-788. doi: 10.1038/nrm3479
    [79] Buchakjian MR, Kornbluth S (2010) The engine driving the ship: metabolic steering of cell proliferation and death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 715-727. doi: 10.1038/nrm2972
    [80] Gut P (2013) The nexus of chromatin regulation and intermediary metabolism. Nature 502: 489-498. doi: 10.1038/nature12752
    [81] Pearce EL, Poffenberger MC, Chang CH, et al. (2013) Fueling Immunity: Insights into metabolism and lymphocyte function. Science 342: 1242454. doi: 10.1126/science.1242454
    [82] Tan-Wong SM, Zaugg JB, Camblong J, et al. (2012) Gene loops enhance transcriptional directionality. Science 338: 671-675. doi: 10.1126/science.1224350
    [83] Ansari A, Hampsey M (2005) A role for the CPF 3'-end processing machinery in RNAP II-dependent gene looping. Genes Dev 19: 2969-2978. doi: 10.1101/gad.1362305
    [84] Hampsey M (2012) A new direction for gene loops. Science 338: 624-625. doi: 10.1126/science.1230576
    [85] Lykke-Andersen S, Mapendano CK, Jensen TH (2011) An ending is a new beginning. Cell Cycle 10: 863-865. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.6.14931
    [86] Perkins KJ, Lusic M, Mitar I, et al. (2008) Transcription-dependent gene looping of the HIV-1 provirus is dictated by recognition of pre-mRNA processing signals. Mol Cell 29: 56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.030
    [87] Barrett LW, Fletcher S, Wilton SD (2012) Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression by the untranslated gene regions and other non-coding elements. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 3613-3634. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0990-9
    [88] McCue AD, Nuthikattu S, Reeder S.H, et al. (2012) Gene expression and stress response mediated by the epigenetic regulation of a transposable element small RNA. PLoS Genet 8: e1002474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002474
    [89] Kapitonov VV, Jurka J (2005) RAG1 core and V(D)J recombination signal sequences were derived from Transib transposons. PLoS Biol 3: 181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030181
    [90] Acquaviva L, Székvölgyi L, Dichtl B, et al. (2013) The COMPASS subunit Spp1 links histone methylation to initiation of meiotic recombination. Science 339: 215-218. doi: 10.1126/science.1225739
    [91] Core LT, Waterfall JJ, Lis JT (2008) Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322: 1845-1848. doi: 10.1126/science.1162228
    [92] Seila AC, Calabrese JM, Levine SS, et al. (2008) Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science 322: 1849-1851. doi: 10.1126/science.1162253
    [93] Preker P, Nielsen J, Kammler S, et al. (2008) RNA exosome depletion reveals transcription upstream of active human promoters. Science 322: 1851-1854. doi: 10.1126/science.1164096
    [94] Almada AE, Wu X, Kriz AJ (2013) Promoter directionality is controlled by U1 snRNP and polyadenylation signals. Nature 499: 360-363. doi: 10.1038/nature12349
    [95] Ntini E, Järvelin AI, Bornholdt J et al. (2013) Polyadenylation site-induced decay of upstream transcripts enforces promoter directionality. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 923-928. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2640
    [96] Zhang L, Ding Q, Wang P, et al. (2013) An upstream promoter element blocks the reverse transcription of the mouse insulin-degrading enzyme gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 430: 26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.052
    [97] Szklarczyk R, Huynen MA (2010) Mosaic origin of the mitochondrial proteome. Proteomics 10: 4012-4024. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000329
    [98] Yang D, Oyaizu Y, Oyaizu H, et al. (1985) Mitochondrial origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 4443-4447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4443
    [99] Viale AM, Arakaki AK (1994) The chaperone connection to the origins of the eukaryotic organelles. FEBS Lett 341: 146-151. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80446-X
    [100] Andersson SG, Zomorodipour A, Andersson JO, et al. (1998) The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature 396: 133-143. doi: 10.1038/24094
    [101] Dunning Hotopp JC (2011) Horizontal gene transfer between bacteria and animals. Trends Genet 27: 157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.01.005
    [102] Schönknecht G, Chen WH, Ternes CM, et al. (2013) Gene transfer from bacteria and archaea facilitated evolution of an extremophilic eukaryote. Science 339: 1207-1210. doi: 10.1126/science.1231707
    [103] Martin WF (2013) Early evolution without a tree of life. Biol Direct 6: 36.
    [104] Rocha EPC (2013) With a little help from prokaryotes. Science 339: 1154-1155. doi: 10.1126/science.1234938
    [105] ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489: 57-74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247
    [106] Scatena R (2012) Mitochondria and cancer, In: Scatena, R., Bottoni, P., Giardina B. Eds., Advances in Mitochondrial Medicine, Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 287-308.
    [107] Schultze A, Harris AL (2012) How cancer metabolism is turned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption. Nature 491: 364-373. doi: 10.1038/nature11706
    [108] Camara AK, Bienengraeber M, Stowe DF (2011) Mitochondrial approaches to protect against cardiac ischemia and reperfusion injury. Front Physiol 2: 1-34.
    [109] Griffiths EJ (2012) Mitochondria and Heart Disease, In: Scatena, R., Bottoni, P., Giardina B. Eds., Advances in Mitochondrial Medicine, Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science Business Media B.V., 249-267.
    [110] Swerdlow LE, Swerdlow RH (2012) Mitochondria in nerodegeneration, In: Scatena, R., Bottoni, P., Giardina B. Eds., Advances in Mitochondrial Medicine, Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science Business Media B.V., 269-286.
    [111] Petit A, Kawarai T, Paitel E, et al. (2005) Wild-type PINK1 prevents basal and induced neuronal apoptosis, a protective effect abrogated by Parkinson-disease-related mutations. J Biol Chem 280: 34025-34032. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505143200
    [112] Dagda RK, Chu CT (2009) Mitochondrial quality control: insights on how Parkinson's disease related genes PINK1, parkin, and Omi/HtrA2 interact to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis. J Bioenerg Biomembr 41: 473-479. doi: 10.1007/s10863-009-9255-1
    [113] Hertz NT, Berthet A, Sos ML, et al. (2013) A neo-substrate that amplifies catalytic activity of Parkinson's-disease-related kinase PINK1. Cell 154: 737-747. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.030
    [114] Courchet J, Lewis TL, Lee S, et al. (2013) Terminal axon branching is regulated by the LKB1-NUAK1 kinase pathway via presynaptic mitochondrial capture. Cell 153: 1510-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.021
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Rachel L. Flores, Brian T. Livingston, The skeletal proteome of the sea star Patiria miniata and evolution of biomineralization in echinoderms, 2017, 17, 1471-2148, 10.1186/s12862-017-0978-z
    2. Tomohisa Ogawa, Rie Sato, Takako Naganuma, Kayeu Liu, Agness Ethel Lakudzala, Koji Muramoto, Makoto Osada, Kyosuke Yoshimi, Keiko Hiemori, Jun Hirabayashi, Hiroaki Tateno, Glycan Binding Profiling of Jacalin-Related Lectins from the Pteria Penguin Pearl Shell, 2019, 20, 1422-0067, 4629, 10.3390/ijms20184629
    3. Nicola Conci, Martin Lehmann, Sergio Vargas, Gert Wörheide, Dennis Lavrov, Comparative Proteomics of Octocoral and Scleractinian Skeletomes and the Evolution of Coral Calcification, 2020, 12, 1759-6653, 1623, 10.1093/gbe/evaa162
    4. Nathalie Le Roy, Philippe Ganot, Manuel Aranda, Denis Allemand, Sylvie Tambutté, The skeletome of the red coral Corallium rubrum indicates an independent evolution of biomineralization process in octocorals, 2021, 21, 2730-7182, 10.1186/s12862-020-01734-0
    5. Yongxin Li, Akihito Omori, Rachel L. Flores, Sheri Satterfield, Christine Nguyen, Tatsuya Ota, Toko Tsurugaya, Tetsuro Ikuta, Kazuho Ikeo, Mani Kikuchi, Jason C. K. Leong, Adrian Reich, Meng Hao, Wenting Wan, Yang Dong, Yaondong Ren, Si Zhang, Tao Zeng, Masahiro Uesaka, Yui Uchida, Xueyan Li, Tomoko F. Shibata, Takahiro Bino, Kota Ogawa, Shuji Shigenobu, Mariko Kondo, Fayou Wang, Luonan Chen, Gary Wessel, Hidetoshi Saiga, R. Andrew Cameron, Brian Livingston, Cynthia Bradham, Wen Wang, Naoki Irie, Genomic insights of body plan transitions from bilateral to pentameral symmetry in Echinoderms, 2020, 3, 2399-3642, 10.1038/s42003-020-1091-1
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2014 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6632) PDF downloads(1132) Cited by(9)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog