Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Knowledge, attitudes on falls and awareness of hospitalized patient's fall risk factors among the nurses working in Tertiary Care Hospitals

  • Background 

    Fall is the most common patient safety incident in health care organizations. This study was initiated to obtain information regarding knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of fall risk factors among nurses to device evidence-based and multidisciplinary educational and training programs to improve patient safety and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality associated with falls.

    Methods 

    A descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 339 registered nurses working in Tertiary care hospitals across Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. A modified version of the previously validated standard questionnaire was administered by the investigators through an online survey method to explore the level of knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of inpatient fall risk factors among Nurses.

    Results 

    In this study, 15.6% of participants had adequate knowledge of falls, 57.2% had a favorable attitude towards falls and 38.3% had adequate awareness of fall risk factors. Years of experience in nursing has a statistically significant association with the level of knowledge on fall. The participant's attitude towards falls had a statistically significant relationship with age, education, experience in nursing, and previous patient fall experience. The correlation between fall knowledge, the attitude toward falls, and awareness of fall risk factors were highly significant. The majority of the participants expressed their favorable attitude toward the need for fall preventive education.

    Conclusion 

    In our study, it is evident that there is a void that has to be filled to improve the knowledge, attitude, and awareness of falls and their risk factors. There is a need for extensive education and holistic, multifactorial, and interdisciplinary training program to be undertaken through various health care organizations.

    Citation: Kavin Mozhi James, Divya Ravikumar, Sindhura Myneni, Poonguzhali Sivagananam, Poongodi Chellapandian, Rejili Grace Joy Manickaraj, Yuvasree Sargunan, Sai Ravi Teja Kamineni, Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan, Malathi Kullappan, Surapaneni Krishna Mohan. Knowledge, attitudes on falls and awareness of hospitalized patient's fall risk factors among the nurses working in Tertiary Care Hospitals[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 304-321. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022013

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xueqi Sun, Yongqiang Fu, Sihua Liang . Normalized solutions for pseudo-relativistic Schrödinger equations. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2024, 16(1): 217-236. doi: 10.3934/cam.2024010
    [2] Wang Xiao, Xuehua Yang, Ziyi Zhou . Pointwise-in-time α-robust error estimate of the ADI difference scheme for three-dimensional fractional subdiffusion equations with variable coefficients. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2024, 16(1): 53-70. doi: 10.3934/cam.2024003
    [3] Yining Yang, Cao Wen, Yang Liu, Hong Li, Jinfeng Wang . Optimal time two-mesh mixed finite element method for a nonlinear fractional hyperbolic wave model. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2024, 16(1): 24-52. doi: 10.3934/cam.2024002
    [4] Shengbing Deng, Qiaoran Wu . Existence of normalized solutions for the Schrödinger equation. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2023, 15(3): 575-585. doi: 10.3934/cam.2023028
    [5] Enzo Vitillaro . Nontrivial solutions for the Laplace equation with a nonlinear Goldstein-Wentzell boundary condition. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2023, 15(4): 811-830. doi: 10.3934/cam.2023039
    [6] Zhen Wang, Luhan Sun . The Allen-Cahn equation with a time Caputo-Hadamard derivative: Mathematical and Numerical Analysis. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2023, 15(4): 611-637. doi: 10.3934/cam.2023031
    [7] Luhan Sun, Zhen Wang, Yabing Wei . A second–order approximation scheme for Caputo–Hadamard derivative and its application in fractional Allen–Cahn equation. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2025, 17(2): 630-661. doi: 10.3934/cam.2025025
    [8] Ho-Sik Lee, Youchan Kim . Boundary Riesz potential estimates for parabolic equations with measurable nonlinearities. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2025, 17(1): 61-99. doi: 10.3934/cam.2025004
    [9] Mohamed Karim Hamdani, Lamine Mbarki, Mostafa Allaoui . A new class of multiple nonlocal problems with two parameters and variable-order fractional p()-Laplacian. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2023, 15(3): 551-574. doi: 10.3934/cam.2023027
    [10] Yan Guo, Lei Wu . L2 diffusive expansion for neutron transport equation. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2025, 17(2): 365-386. doi: 10.3934/cam.2025015
  • Background 

    Fall is the most common patient safety incident in health care organizations. This study was initiated to obtain information regarding knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of fall risk factors among nurses to device evidence-based and multidisciplinary educational and training programs to improve patient safety and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality associated with falls.

    Methods 

    A descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 339 registered nurses working in Tertiary care hospitals across Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. A modified version of the previously validated standard questionnaire was administered by the investigators through an online survey method to explore the level of knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of inpatient fall risk factors among Nurses.

    Results 

    In this study, 15.6% of participants had adequate knowledge of falls, 57.2% had a favorable attitude towards falls and 38.3% had adequate awareness of fall risk factors. Years of experience in nursing has a statistically significant association with the level of knowledge on fall. The participant's attitude towards falls had a statistically significant relationship with age, education, experience in nursing, and previous patient fall experience. The correlation between fall knowledge, the attitude toward falls, and awareness of fall risk factors were highly significant. The majority of the participants expressed their favorable attitude toward the need for fall preventive education.

    Conclusion 

    In our study, it is evident that there is a void that has to be filled to improve the knowledge, attitude, and awareness of falls and their risk factors. There is a need for extensive education and holistic, multifactorial, and interdisciplinary training program to be undertaken through various health care organizations.



    Ostrowski proved the following interesting and useful integral inequality in 1938, see [18] and [15, page:468].

    Theorem 1.1. Let f:IR, where IR is an interval, be a mapping differentiable in the interior I of I and let a,bI with a<b. If |f(x)|M for all x[a,b], then the following inequality holds:

    |f(x)1babaf(t)dt|M(ba)[14+(xa+b2)2(ba)2] (1.1)

    for all x[a,b]. The constant 14 is the best possible in sense that it cannot be replaced by a smaller one.

    This inequality gives an upper bound for the approximation of the integral average 1babaf(t)dt by the value of f(x) at point x[a,b]. In recent years, such inequalities were studied extensively by many researchers and numerous generalizations, extensions and variants of them appeared in a number of papers, see [1,2,10,11,19,20,21,22,23].

    A function  f:IRR is said to be convex (AAconvex) if the inequality

    f(tx+(1t)y)tf(x)+(1t)f(y)

    holds for all x,yI  and t[0,1].

    In [4], Anderson et al. also defined generalized convexity as follows:

    Definition 1.1. Let f:I(0,) be continuous, where I is subinterval of (0,). Let M and N be any two Mean functions. We say f is MN-convex (concave) if

    f(M(x,y))()N(f(x),f(y))

    for all x,yI.

    Recall the definitions of AGconvex functions, GGconvex functions and GA functions that are given in [16] by Niculescu:

    The AGconvex functions (usually known as logconvex functions) are those functions f:I(0,) for which

    x,yI and λ[0,1]f(λx+(1λ)y)f(x)1λf(y)λ, (1.2)

    i.e., for which logf is convex.

    The GGconvex functions (called in what follows multiplicatively convex functions) are those functions f:IJ (acting on subintervals of (0,)) such that

    x,yI and λ[0,1]f(x1λyλ)f(x)1λf(y)λ. (1.3)

    The class of all GAconvex functions is constituted by all functions f:IR (defined on subintervals of (0,)) for which

    x,yI and λ[0,1]f(x1λyλ)(1λ)f(x)+λf(y). (1.4)

    The article organized three sections as follows: In the first section, some definitions an preliminaries for Riemann-Liouville and new fractional conformable integral operators are given. Also, some Ostrowski type results involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals are in this section. In the second section, an identity involving new fractional conformable integral operator is proved. Further, new Ostrowski type results involving fractional conformable integral operator are obtained by using some inequalities on established lemma and some well-known inequalities such that triangle inequality, Hölder inequality and power mean inequality. After the proof of theorems, it is pointed out that, in special cases, the results reduce the some results involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals given by Set in [27]. Finally, in the last chapter, some new results for AG-convex functions has obtained involving new fractional conformable integrals.

    Let [a,b] (<a<b<) be a finite interval on the real axis R. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals Jαa+f and Jαbf of order αC ((α)>0) with a0 and b>0 are defined, respectively, by

    Jαa+f(x):=1Γ(α)xa(xt)α1f(t)dt(x>a;(α)>0) (1.5)

    and

    Jαbf(x):=1Γ(α)bx(tx)α1f(t)dt(x<b;(α)>0) (1.6)

    where Γ(t)=0exxt1dx is an Euler Gamma function.

    We recall Beta function (see, e.g., [28, Section 1.1])

    B(α,β)={10tα1(1t)β1dt((α)>0;(β)>0)Γ(α)Γ(β)Γ(α+β)             (α,βCZ0). (1.7)

    and the incomplete gamma function, defined for real numbers a>0 and x0 by

    Γ(a,x)=xetta1dt.

    For more details and properties concerning the fractional integral operators (1.5) and (1.6), we refer the reader, for example, to the works [3,5,6,7,8,9,14,17] and the references therein. Also, several new and recent results of fractional derivatives can be found in the papers [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].

    In [27], Set gave some Ostrowski type results involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, as follows:

    Lemma 1.1. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable mapping on (a,b) with a<b. If fL[a,b], then for all x[a,b] and α>0 we have:

    (xa)α+(bx)αbaf(x)Γ(α+1)ba[Jαxf(a)+Jαx+f(b)]=(xa)α+1ba10tαf(tx+(1t)a)dt(bx)α+1ba10tαf(tx+(1t)b)dt

    where Γ(α) is Euler gamma function.

    By using the above lemma, he obtained some new Ostrowski type results involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators, which will generalized via new fractional integral operators in this paper.

    Theorem 1.2. Let f:[a,b][0,)R be a differentiable mapping on (a,b) with a<b such that fL[a,b]. If |f| is sconvex in the second sense on [a,b] for some fixed s(0,1] and |f(x)|M, x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional integrals with α>0 holds:

    |(xa)α+(bx)αbaf(x)Γ(α+1)ba[Jαxf(a)+Jαx+f(b)]|Mba(1+Γ(α+1)Γ(s+1)Γ(α+s+1))[(xa)α+1+(bx)α+1α+s+1]

    where Γ is Euler gamma function.

    Theorem 1.3. Let f:[a,b][0,)R be a differentiable mapping on (a,b) with a<b such that fL[a,b]. If |f|q is sconvex in the second sense on [a,b] for some fixed s(0,1],p,q>1 and |f(x)|M, x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional integrals holds:

    |(xa)α+(bx)αbaf(x)Γ(α+1)ba[Jαxf(a)+Jαx+f(b)]|M(1+pα)1p(2s+1)1q[(xa)α+1+(bx)α+1ba]

    where 1p+1q=1, α>0 and Γ is Euler gamma function.

    Theorem 1.4. Let f:[a,b][0,)R be a differentiable mapping on (a,b) with a<b such that fL[a,b]. If |f|q is sconvex in the second sense on [a,b] for some fixed s(0,1],q1 and |f(x)|M, x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional integrals holds:

    |(xa)α+(bx)αbaf(x)Γ(α+1)ba[Jαxf(a)+Jαx+f(b)]|M(1+α)11q(1+Γ(α+1)Γ(s+1)Γ(α+s+1))1q[(xa)α+1+(bx)α+1ba]

    where α>0 and Γ is Euler gamma function.

    Theorem 1.5. Let f:[a,b][0,)R be a differentiable mapping on (a,b) with a<b such that fL[a,b]. If |f|q is sconcave in the second sense on [a,b] for some fixed s(0,1],p,q>1, x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional integrals holds:

    |(xa)α+(bx)αbaf(x)Γ(α+1)ba[Jαxf(a)+Jαx+f(b)]|2s1q(1+pα)1p(ba)[(xa)α+1|f(x+a2)|+(bx)α+1|f(b+x2)|]

    where 1p+1q=1, α>0 and Γ is Euler gamma function.

    Some fractional integral operators generalize the some other fractional integrals, in special cases, as in the following integral operator. Jarad et. al. [13] has defined a new fractional integral operator. Also, they gave some properties and relations between the some other fractional integral operators, as Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, Hadamard fractional integrals, generalized fractional integral operators etc., with this operator.

    Let βC,Re(β)>0, then the left and right sided fractional conformable integral operators has defined respectively, as follows;

    βaJαf(x)=1Γ(β)xa((xa)α(ta)αα)β1f(t)(ta)1αdt; (1.8)
    βJαbf(x)=1Γ(β)bx((bx)α(bt)αα)β1f(t)(bt)1αdt. (1.9)

    The results presented here, being general, can be reduced to yield many relatively simple inequalities and identities for functions associated with certain fractional integral operators. For example, the case α=1 in the obtained results are found to yield the same results involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, given before, in literatures. Further, getting more knowledge, see the paper given in [12]. Recently, some studies on this integral operators appeared in literature. Gözpınar [13] obtained Hermite-Hadamard type results for differentiable convex functions. Also, Set et. al. obtained some new results for quasiconvex, some different type convex functions and differentiable convex functions involving this new operator, see [24,25,26]. Motivating the new definition of fractional conformable integral operator and the studies given above, first aim of this study is obtaining new generalizations.

    Lemma 2.1. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. Then the following equality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    (xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]=(xa)αβ+1ba10(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)a)dt+(bx)αβ+1ba10(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)b)dt.

    where α,β>0 and Γ is Euler Gamma function.

    Proof. Using the definition as in (1.8) and (1.9), integrating by parts and and changing variables with u=tx+(1t)a and u=tx+(1t)b in

    I1=10(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)a)dt,I2=10(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)b)dt

    respectively, then we have

    I1=10(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)a)dt=(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)a)xa|10β10(1(1t)αα)β1(1t)α1f(tx+(1t)a)xadt=f(x)αβ(xa)βxa(1(xuxa)αα)β1(xuxa)α1f(u)xaduxa=f(x)αβ(xa)β(xa)αβ+1xa((xa)α(xu)αα)β1(xu)α1f(u)du=f(x)αβ(xa)Γ(β+1)(xa)αβ+1βJαxf(a),

    similarly

    I2=10(1(1t)αα)βf(tx+(1t)b)dt=f(x)αβ(bx)+Γ(β+1)(bx)αβ+1βxJαf(b)

    By multiplying I1 with (xa)αβ+1ba and I2 with (bx)αβ+1ba we get desired result.

    Remark 2.1. Taking α=1 in Lemma 2.1 is found to yield the same result as Lemma 1.1.

    Theorem 2.1. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. If |f| is convex on [a,b] and |f(x)|M with x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|Mαβ+1B(1α,β+1)[(xa)αβ+1ba+(bx)αβ+1ba] (2.1)

    where α,β>0, B(x,y) and Γ are Euler beta and Euler gamma functions respectively.

    Proof. From Lemma 2.1 we can write

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1ba10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)a)|dt+(bx)αβ+1ba10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)b)|dt(xa)αβ+1ba[10(1(1t)αα)βt|f(x)|dt+10(1(1t)αα)β(1t)|f(a)|dt]+(bx)αβ+1ba[10(1(1t)αα)βt|f(x)|dt+10(1(1t)αα)β(1t)|f(b)|dt]. (2.2)

    Notice that

    10(1(1t)αα)βtdt=1αβ+1[B(1α,β+1)B(2α,β+1)],10(1(1t)αα)β(1t)dt=B(2α,β+1)αβ+1. (2.3)

    Using the fact that, |f(x)|M for x[a,b] and combining (2.3) with (2.2), we get desired result.

    Remark 2.2. Taking α=1 in Theorem 3.1 and s=1 in Theorem 1.2 are found to yield the same results.

    Theorem 2.2. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. If |f|q is convex on [a,b], p,q>1 and |f(x)|M with x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|M[B(βp+1,1α)αβ+1]1p[(xa)αβ+1ba+(bx)αβ+1ba] (2.4)

    where 1p+1q=1, α,β>0, B(x,y) and Γ are Euler beta and Euler gamma functions respectively.

    Proof. By using Lemma 2.1, convexity of |f|q and well-known Hölder's inequality, we have

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1ba[(10(1(1t)αα)βp)1p(10|f(tx+(1t)a)|qdt)1q]+(bx)αβ+1ba[(10(1(1t)αα)βp)1p(10|f(tx+(1t)b)|qdt)1q]. (2.5)

    Notice that, changing variables with x=1(1t)α, we get

    10(1(1t)αα)βp=B(βp+1,1α)αβ+1. (2.6)

    Since |f|q is convex on [a,b] and |f|qMq, we can easily observe that,

    10|f(tx+(1t)a)|qdt10t|f(x)|qdt+10(1t)|f(a)|qdtMq. (2.7)

    As a consequence, combining the equality (2.6) and inequality (2.7) with the inequality (2.5), the desired result is obtained.

    Remark 2.3. Taking α=1 in Theorem 3.2 and s=1 in Theorem 1.3 are found to yield the same results.

    Theorem 2.3. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. If |f|q is convex on [a,b], q1 and |f(x)|M with x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|Mαβ+1B(1α,β+1)[(xa)αβ+1ba+(bx)αβ+1ba] (2.8)

    where α,β>0, B(x,y) and Γ are Euler Beta and Euler Gamma functions respectively.

    Proof. By using Lemma 2.1, convexity of |f|q and well-known power-mean inequality, we have

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1ba(10(1(1t)αα)βdt)11q(10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)a)|qdt)1q+(bx)αβ+1ba(10(1(1t)αα)βdt)11q(10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)b)|qdt)1q. (2.9)

    Since |f|q is convex and |f|qMq, by using (2.3) we can easily observe that,

    10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)a)|qdt10(1(1t)αα)β[t|f(x)|q+(1t)|f(a)|q]dtMqαβ+1B(1α,β+1). (2.10)

    As a consequence,

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1ba(1αβ+1B(1α,β+1))11q(Mqαβ+1B(1α,β+1))1q+(bx)αβ+1ba(1αβ+1B(1α,β+1))11q(Mqαβ+1B(1α,β+1))1q=Mαβ+1B(1α,β+1)[(xa)αβ+1ba+(bx)αβ+1ba]. (2.11)

    This means that, the desired result is obtained.

    Remark 2.4. Taking α=1 in Theorem 3.2 and s=1 in Theorem 1.4 are found to yield the same results.

    Theorem 2.4. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. If |f|q is concave on [a,b], p,q>1 and |f(x)|M with x[a,b], then the following inequality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|[B(βp+1,1α)αβ+1]1p[(xa)αβ+1ba|f(x+a2)|+(bx)αβ+1ba|f(x+b2)|] (2.12)

    where 1p+1q=1, α,β>0, B(x,y) and Γ are Euler Beta and Gamma functions respectively.

    Proof. By using Lemma 2.1 and well-known Hölder's inequality, we have

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1ba[(10(1(1t)αα)βp)1p(10|f(tx+(1t)a)|qdt)1q]+(bx)αβ+1ba[(10(1(1t)αα)βp)1p(10|f(tx+(1t)b)|qdt)1q]. (2.13)

    Since |f|q is concave, it can be easily observe that,

    |f(tx+(1t)a)|qdt|f(x+a2)|,|f(tx+(1t)b)|qdt|f(b+x2)|. (2.14)

    Notice that, changing variables with x=1(1t)α, as in (2.6), we get,

    10(1(1t)αα)βp=B(βp+1,1α)αβ+1. (2.15)

    As a consequence, substituting (2.14) and (2.15) in (2.13), the desired result is obtained.

    Remark 2.5. Taking α=1 in Theorem 3.2 and s=1 in Theorem 1.5 are found to yield the same results.

    Some new inequalities for AG-convex functions has obtained in this chapter. For the simplicity, we will denote |f(x)||f(a)|=ω and |f(x)||f(b)|=ψ.

    Theorem 3.1. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. If |f| is AGconvex on [a,b], then the following inequality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]||f(a)|(xa)αβ+1αβ(ba)[ω1lnω(ωlnαβ1(ω)(Γ(αβ+1)Γ(αβ+1,lnω)))]+|f(b)|(bx)αβ+1αβ(ba)[ψ1lnψ(ψlnαβ1(ψ)(Γ(αβ+1)Γ(αβ+1,lnψ)))]

    where α>0,β>1, Re(lnω)<0Re(lnψ)<0Re(αβ)>1,B(x,y),Γ(x,y) and Γ are Euler Beta, Euler incomplete Gamma and Euler Gamma functions respectively.

    Proof. From Lemma 2.1 and definition of AGconvexity, we have

    (xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)](xa)αβ+1ba10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)a)|dt+(bx)αβ+1ba10(1(1t)αα)β|f(tx+(1t)b)|dt(xa)αβ+1ba[10(1(1t)αα)β|f(a)|(|f(x)||f(a)|)tdt]+(bx)αβ+1ba[10(1(1t)αα)β|f(b)|(|f(x)||f(b)|)tdt]. (3.1)

    By using the fact that |1(1t)α|β1|1t|αβ for α>0,β>1, we can write

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1αβ(ba)[10(1|1t|αβ)|f(a)|(|f(x)||f(a)|)tdt]+(bx)αβ+1αβ(ba)[10(1|1t|αβ)|f(b)|(|f(x)||f(b)|)tdt].

    By computing the above integrals, we get the desired result.

    Theorem 3.2. Let f:[a,b]R be a differentiable function on (a,b) with a<b and fL[a,b]. If |f|q is AGconvex on [a,b] and p,q>1, then the following inequality for fractional conformable integrals holds:

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(B(βp+1,1α)αβ+1)1p[|f(a)|(xa)αβ+1ba(ωq1qlnω)1q+|f(b)|(bx)αβ+1ba(ψq1qlnψ)1q].

    where 1p+1q=1, α,β>0, B(x,y) and Γ are Euler beta and Euler gamma functions respectively.

    Proof. By using Lemma 2.1, AGconvexity of |f|q and well-known Hölder's inequality, we can write

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(xa)αβ+1ba[(10(1(1t)αα)βp)1p(|f(a)|q10(|f(x)||f(a)|)qtdt)1q]+(bx)αβ+1ba[(10(1(1t)αα)βp)1p(|f(b)|q10(|f(x)||f(b)|)qtdt)1q].

    By a simple computation, one can obtain

    |(xa)αβ+(bx)αβ(ba)αβf(x)Γ(β+1)ba[βxJαf(b)+βJαxf(a)]|(B(βp+1,1α)αβ+1)1p×[|f(a)|(xa)αβ+1ba(ωq1qlnω)1q+|f(b)|(bx)αβ+1ba(ψq1qlnψ)1q].

    This completes the proof.

    Corollary 3.1. In our results, some new Ostrowski type inequalities can be derived by choosing |f|M. We omit the details.

    The authors declare that no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    Acknowledgments



    We are thankful to Dr. S. Porchelvan, MSc, MBA, PGDCA, PhD, Professor in Biostatistics for assisting with the statistical analyses.

    Availability of data and material



    The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

    Authors' contributions



    Conceptualisation: SKM; Methodology: Investigation: KMJ and SKM; KMJ, DR, SM, PS, YS, VPV: contributed to data curation, validation, visualization; PC, RGJM, SRTK, VPV: contributed to formal analysis, validation, visualization; KMJ and SKM: contributed to writing the Original Draft of the Manuscript; MK and SKM: Contributed to Writing–Review and Editing of the Manuscript; SKM: Supervision and Project Administration; KMJ, DR, SM, PS, PC, RGJM, YS, SRTK, VPV, MK & SKM: All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the submitted manuscript.

    Funding



    This research received no external funding.

    Conflicts of interests



    All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Lamb SE, Jørstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, et al. (2005) Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 53: 1618-1622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53455.x
    [2] World Health OrganizationThe global burden of disease: 2004 update (‎2008). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43942
    [3] Healey F, Darowski A (2012) Older patients and falls in hospital. Clin Risk 18: 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1258/cr.2012.012020
    [4] Healey FM (2011) The prevention of patient falls in healthcare settings, with particular emphasis on the effect of bedrail use on falls and injury as part of multi-faceted interventions. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University .
    [5] Kumar A, Srivastava DK, Verma A, et al. (2013) The problems of fall, risk factors and their management among geriatric population in India. Indian J Community Health 25: 89-94.
    [6] Dsouza SA, Rajashekar B, Dsouza HS, et al. (2014) Falls in Indian older adults: a barrier to active ageing. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 9: 33-40.
    [7] Williams JS, Kowal P, Hestekin H, et al. (2015) Prevalence, risk factors and disability associated with fall-related injury in older adults in low- and middle-incomecountries: results from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Med 13: 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0390-8
    [8] World Health OrganizationAgeing, Life Course Unit. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age (2008). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563536
    [9] Mitchell-Fearon K, James K, Waldron N, et al. (2014) Falls among community-dwelling older adults in Jamaica. SAGE Open 4: 2158244014564351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564351
    [10] Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, et al. (2007) Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc 55: 780-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x
    [11] Smith G, Kydd A (2016) Editorial: getting care of older people right. The need for appropriate frailty assessment. J Clin Nurs 26: 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13618
    [12] Tzeng HM, Yin CY (2013) Frequently observed risk factors for fall-related injuries and effective preventive interventions: a multihospital survey of nurses' perceptions. J Nurs Care Qual 28: 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182780037
    [13] Campbell B (2016) Patient falls: preventable, not inevitable. Nurs Made Incred Easy 14: 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NME.0000475168.08103.37
    [14] Shojania KG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ (2015) Temporal trends in patient safety in the Netherlands: reductions in preventable adverse events or the end of adverse events as a useful metric?. BMJ Qual Saf 24: 541-544. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004461
    [15] Cangany M, Back D, Hamilton-Kelly T, et al. (2015) Bedside nurses leading the way for falls prevention: an evidence-based approach. Crit Care Nurse 35: 82-84. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2015414
    [16] Seo OI (2008) Influence of knowledge and attitude on behaviors of falls prevention activities in patient among university hospital nurse. Unpublished master's thesis, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul .
    [17] Kim CG (2011) Nurses' knowledge and attitude toward fall in hospitalized patients. J Ind Sci Res 28: 275-281.
    [18] Kim MH, Jeon HW, Chon MY (2015) Study on the knowledge and attitudes of falls and awareness of fall risk factors among nursing students. Indian J Sci Technol 8: 74. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/57593
    [19] Laing SS, Silver IF, York S, et al. (2011) Fall prevention knowledge, attitude, and practices of community stakeholders and older adults. J Aging Res 2011. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/395357
    [20] Choi BH (2011) The nursing student's attitude and preventive activities on inpatients falls. Unpublished master's thesis, Keimyung University .
    [21] Asiri F, ALMohiza MA, Faia Aseeri M, et al. (2018) Fall prevention knowledge and practice patterns among home healthcare professionals in southern Saudi Arabia: an observational study. J Int Med Res 46: 5062-5073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518789816
    [22] Gutta S, Joseph A, Chakraborty A, et al. (2013) Study on the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding prevention of recurrent falls in the elderly. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 9: 32-38. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-0933238
    [23] Kalu ME, Vlachantoni A, Norman KE (2019) Knowledge about risk factors for falls and practice about fall prevention in older adults among physiotherapists in Nigeria. Physiother Res Int 24: e1742. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1742
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6565) PDF downloads(499) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog