
In this paper, a fractional-order two delays neural network with ring-hub structure is investigated. Firstly, the stability and the existence of Hopf bifurcation of proposed system are obtained by taking the sum of two delays as the bifurcation parameter. Furthermore, a parameters delay feedback controller is introduced to control successfully Hopf bifurcation. The novelty of this paper is that the characteristic equation corresponding to system has two time delays and the parameters depend on one of them. Selecting two time delays as the bifurcation parameters simultaneously, stability switching curves in (τ1,τ2) plane and crossing direction are obtained. Sufficient criteria for the stability and the existence of Hopf bifurcation of controlled system are given. Ultimately, numerical simulation shows that parameters delay feedback controller can effectively control Hopf bifurcation of system.
Citation: Yuan Ma, Yunxian Dai. Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis of a fractional-order ring-hub structure neural network with delays under parameters delay feedback control[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 20093-20115. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023890
[1] | Chaudry Masood Khalique, Kentse Maefo . A study on the (2+1)–dimensional first extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii- Schiff equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5816-5835. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021293 |
[2] | Weidong Zhao, Mobeen Munir, Ghulam Murtaza, Muhammad Athar . Lie symmetries of Benjamin-Ono equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9496-9510. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021466 |
[3] | Ivan Tsyfra, Wojciech Rzeszut . On reducing and finding solutions of nonlinear evolutionary equations via generalized symmetry of ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(7): 6962-6984. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022328 |
[4] | Raghu Raghavan . Growth and form, Lie algebras and special functions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3598-3645. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021181 |
[5] | Boris Andreianov, Carlotta Donadello, Ulrich Razafison, Massimiliano D. Rosini . Riemann problems with non--local point constraints and capacity drop. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2015, 12(2): 259-278. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.259 |
[6] | Francesca Marcellini . The Riemann problem for a Two-Phase model for road traffic with fixed or moving constraints. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1218-1232. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020062 |
[7] | Salvador Chulián, Álvaro Martinez-Rubio, María Luz Gandarias, María Rosa . Lie point symmetries for generalised Fisher's equations describing tumour dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3291-3312. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021164 |
[8] | Abdulaziz Alsenafi, M. Ferdows . Effects of thermal slip and chemical reaction on free convective nanofluid from a horizontal plate embedded in a porous media. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4817-4833. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021245 |
[9] | Paola Goatin, Matthias Mimault . A mixed system modeling two-directional pedestrian flows. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2015, 12(2): 375-392. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.375 |
[10] | Hyun Geun Lee, Yangjin Kim, Junseok Kim . Mathematical model and its fast numerical method for the tumor growth. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2015, 12(6): 1173-1187. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1173 |
In this paper, a fractional-order two delays neural network with ring-hub structure is investigated. Firstly, the stability and the existence of Hopf bifurcation of proposed system are obtained by taking the sum of two delays as the bifurcation parameter. Furthermore, a parameters delay feedback controller is introduced to control successfully Hopf bifurcation. The novelty of this paper is that the characteristic equation corresponding to system has two time delays and the parameters depend on one of them. Selecting two time delays as the bifurcation parameters simultaneously, stability switching curves in (τ1,τ2) plane and crossing direction are obtained. Sufficient criteria for the stability and the existence of Hopf bifurcation of controlled system are given. Ultimately, numerical simulation shows that parameters delay feedback controller can effectively control Hopf bifurcation of system.
Many problems in the real world, such as in the area of physics, engineering, natural sciences, economics and so on, can be represented by many nonlinear partial differential equations. Therefore, it is of great significance to determine the exact solutions of such equations to better understand their physical properties. Generally speaking, no direct expression formulas are available for these solutions, even for simple nonlinear partial differential equations. For the past few decades, many effective techniques have been developed by researchers for searching explicit solutions including the Lie symmetry analysis method [1,2,3,4], the Darboux transformation method [5], the inverse scattering transform method [6], the Jacobi elliptic function expansion method [7], the Kudryashov method [8], the (G′/G)−expansion method [9,10], the (G′/G2)−expansion method [11], the Painlevé analysis method [12] and so on.
In the middle of the 19th century, Norwegian mathematician Sophus Lie (1842–1899) pioneered the Lie symmetry analysis. Lie inaugurated the theory of Lie symmetries and applied it to differential equations. These research results have formed an important branch of mathematics in the 20th century, which is known as a Lie group and Lie algebra theory. By utilizing the invariance of solutions under a symmetry group for a partial differential equation, one can obtain solutions of a PDE via solving a reduced differential equation with lesser independent variables. Unfortunately, Lie symmetry analysis involves in a large number of complex calculations. With the rapid development of computing software, the Lie symmetry analysis method has become the most effective and powerful technique for obtaining closed form solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations. Many exact solutions with an important physical significance, such as the similarity solutions and travelling wave solutions, can be obtained by using the Lie symmetry analysis method [13,14,15,16].
During the investigation of differential equations, conservation laws play an important role and have been receiving increased attention [17]. On one hand, they can be used to judge whether a partial differential equation is complete integrable. On the other hand, conservation laws can also be used to verify the validity of numerical solution methods. Moreover, exact solutions of partial differential equations can be constructed by using conservation laws [18,19,20]. Therefore, the most important thing is how to derive conservation laws for a given differential equation. With the development of research, some methods for constructing conservation laws of equations have emerged. For example, Noether's theorem provides an efficient approach to construct conservation laws for systems with the Lagrangian formulation [21,22]. Furthermore, the Ibragimov theorem [23,24,25] and the multiplier method [26] have more wider applications in deriving conservation laws, as they can be used for arbitrary differential equations without the limitation of the Lagrangian formulation.
The investigations of shallow water waves and solitary have gained a great significance to describe characteristics of nonlinear wave phenomena. Stable dynamics and excitations of single- and double-hump solitons in the Kerr nonlinear media have been achieved in Ref. [27]. Bidirectional solitons and interaction solutions for a new integrable fifth-order nonlinear equation have been investigated in Ref. [28]. Nonlinear dynamic behaviors of the generalized (3+1)-dimensional KP equation have been studied in Ref. [29]. Ten years ago, Wazwaz [30] derived a (2+1)-dimensional Korteweg–de Vries 4 (KdV4) equation by using the recursion operator of the KdV equation, which reads
vxy+vxxxt+vxxxx+3(v2x)x+4vxvxt+2vxxvt=0. | (1.1) |
As a KdV type equation, Eq (1.1) can be used to model the shallow-water waves, surface, and internal waves. In Ref. [30], Wazwaz derived multiple soliton solutions by invoking Hirota's bilinear method and other travelling wave solutions by using hyperbolic functions and trigonometric function methods. The Bäcklund transformations and soliton solutions have been investigated in Ref. [31]. In Ref. [32], the authors derived breather wave solutions by using the extend homoclinic test method and some travelling wave solutions by using the (G′/G2)−expansion method.
In this work, we aim to investigate the (2+1)-dimensional KdV4 equation (1.1) by invoking the Lie symmetry analysis method and consider its conservation laws. In Section 2, we perform the Lie symmetry analysis method to Eq (1.1) and present two symmetry reductions. In Section 3, we present solutions of symmetry reductions obtained in Section 2 by different methods. In Section 4, we present the conservation laws of the equation by invoking the multiplier method and Noether's theorem, respectively. A few concluding remarks will be given in the final section.
First, we employ the Lie classical method on Eq (1.1) to find its symmetries. In this end, we consider a parameter (ϵ) Lie symmetry group of infinitesimal transformations as:
x⋆=x+ϵφ(x,y,t,v)+O(ϵ2),y⋆=y+ϵω(x,y,t,v)+O(ϵ2),t⋆=t+ϵτ(x,y,t,v)+O(ϵ2),v⋆=v+ϵη(x,y,t,v)+O(ϵ2), | (2.1) |
in which φ,ω,τ and η are infinitesimal generators. The corresponding vector field on transformation (2.1) is given by
R=φ(x,y,t,v)∂∂x+ω(x,y,t,v)∂∂y+τ(x,y,t,v)∂∂t+η(x,y,t,v)∂∂v. | (2.2) |
Noticeably, symmetries of Eq (1.1) can be derived according to the symmetry conditions
pr(4)R(vxy+vxxxt+vxxxx+3(v2x)x+4vxvxt+2vxxvt)|(1.1)=0, | (2.3) |
where pr(4)R is the fourth prolongation formula of Eq (2.2), which is given by
pr(4)R=R+ηx∂∂vx+ηxx∂∂vxx+ηxxxx∂∂vxxxx+ηt∂∂vt+ηxt∂∂vxt+ηxy∂∂vxy+ηxxxt∂∂vxxxt. |
By utilizing the invariance condition (2.3), we have
ηx(6vxx+4vxt)+ηxx(6vx+2vt)+ηxxxx+2ηtvxx+4ηxtvx+ηxy+ηxxxt=0. | (2.4) |
As the original equation is vxy+vxxxt+vxxxx+3(v2x)x+4vxvxt+2vxxvt=0, when substituting differential prolongations of η into (2.4) and separating on different derivatives of v, we set the coefficients of vxy, vxxxt, vxxxx, 3(v2x)x, 4vxvxt, 2vxxvt to be equal and other derivatives of v to be zero. Thereafter, we obtain the following homogeneous PDEs:
φv=0,ωv=0,τv=0,ηvv=0,τx=0,ωx=0,ωt=0,φxx=0,φxt=0,ηxx=0,ηxy=0,ηxv=0,ηtv=0,6ηx+2ηt−φy=0,4ηx−τy=0,4ηxt+ηyv−φxy=0,ηv−3φx−τt=ηv−4φx−φt=2ηv−φt−3φx=2ηv−2φx−τt=ηv−φx−ωy. |
By calculating the above PDEs, the symmetries of the KdV4 equation (1.1) can be given as
σ1=f(y)∂∂x+∂∂y+f′(y)t2∂∂v,σ2=g(y)∂∂x+∂∂t+g′(y)t2∂∂v,σ3=h(y)∂∂x+4y∂∂t+(h′(y)t2−3t+x)∂∂v,σ4=(t−x)∂∂x−2y∂∂y+v∂∂v,σ5=(3t−x)∂∂x+2t∂∂t+v∂∂v,σ6=2(t+x)y∂∂x+4y2∂∂y+4ty∂∂t+(xt−t2−2yv)∂∂v. |
According to the results of the infinitesimal transformation, the corresponding single parameter transformation groups are:
G1:(x∗,y∗,t∗,v∗)→(x+∫y+εf(a)da,y+ε,t,v+f(y+ε)t2),G2:(x∗,y∗,t∗,v∗)→(x+∫y+εg(a)da,y,t+ε,v+g(y+ε)t2),G3:(x∗,y∗,t∗,v∗)→(x+∫y+εh(a)da,y,t+4εy,v+h(y+ε)t2−3εt+εx),G4:(x∗,y∗,t∗,v∗)→(εt+e−εx,e−2εy,t,eεv),G5:(x∗,y∗,t∗,v∗)→(3εt+e−εx,y,e2εt,eεv),G6:(x∗,y∗,t∗,v∗)→(2εty+x1−2εy,y1−4εy,t1−4εy,ε(xt−t2)√1−4εy+v√1−4εy). |
As a result, if v=ρ(x,y,t) is a solution of the KdV4 equation (1.1), so are
v1=f(y+ε)t2+ρ(x−∫y+εf(a)da,y−ε,t),v2=g(y+ε)t2+ρ(x−∫y+εg(a)da,y,t−ε),v3=h(y+ε)t2−3εt+εx+ρ(x−∫y+εh(a)da,y,t−4εy),v4=e−ερ(eε(x−εt),e2εy,t),v5=e−ερ(eε(x−3εt),y,e−2εt),v6=ε(xt−t2)1−4εy+1√1−4εyρ((1−2εy)(x−2εty),y1+4εy,(1−4εy)t). |
In what follows, we implement symmetry reductions of the KdV4 equation (1.1) by employing its translation symmetries. We choose two combinations kσ1+σ2 and 2σ3+σ4−σ5 as examples to perform symmetry reductions.
(ⅰ) For symmetry kσ1+σ2, by taking f(y)=1,g(y)=0, then it gives three invariants
X=x−kt,Y=y−kt,v=H(X,Y). | (2.5) |
By substituting (2.5) into Eq (1.1), we have
HXY−kHXXXY+(1−k)HXXXX+3(HX)2X−4kHX(HXX+HXY)−2kHXX(HX+HY)=0. | (2.6) |
By calculation, Γ1=(k−1)∂∂X+k∂∂Y and Γ2=∂∂X are Lie point symmetries of Eq (2.6). Considering the symmetry Γ=Γ1+lΓ2, where l being an arbitrary constant, it provides us with two invariants
χ=X−l+k−1kY,H=F(χ). | (2.7) |
By substituting (2.7) into Eq (2.6), we have
klFχχχχ+6klFχFχχ−(l+k−1)Fχχ=0. | (2.8) |
(ⅱ) For symmetry −2σ4+σ5, it admits three invariants
α=x−ty14,β=t√y,v=P(α,β)y14. | (2.9) |
By substituting (2.9) into Eq (1.1), we have
−14Pαα−12βPαβ+12Pα+Pαααβ+4PαPαβ+2PααPβ=0. | (2.10) |
By calculation, Γ=−12α∂∂α+β∂∂β+(116β+12P)∂∂P is a Lie point symmetrie of Eq (2.10), and here Γ provides us with two invariants
γ=α2β,P=Q(γ)α+β8. | (2.11) |
By substituting (2.11) into Eq (2.10), we have
8γ3Qγγγγ+24γ2QγγQγ−γ2Qγγ+24γ2Qγγγ−8γQQγγ+4γQ2γ+6γQγγ−32γQγ+12Q=0. | (2.12) |
Upon integrating Eq (2.8) twice, we get
12klF2χχ+klF3χ−(l+k−1)2F2χ+mFχ+n=0. | (3.1) |
where m and n are constants. Denote Fχ as Ω, then Eq (3.1) can be written as
Ω2χ=−2Ω3+(k+l−1)klΩ2−2mklΩ−2nkl. | (3.2) |
If the polynomial equation
−2Ω3+(k+l−1)klΩ2−2mklΩ−2nkl=0. |
has three roots p1,p2,p3 and p1>p2>p3, then Eq (3.2) can be rewritten as
Ω2χ=−2(Ω−p1)(Ω−p2)(Ω−p3), | (3.3) |
whose solution is
Ω=p2+(p1−p2)cn2(√12(p1−p3)χ,√p1−p2p1−p3), | (3.4) |
in which cn denotes cosine elliptic function. As Ω=Fχ, integrating (3.4) once and going back to variables x,y and t, we acquire a periodic solution of the KdV4 equation
v(x,y,t)=√2(p1−p3)[EllipticE(sn(√12(p1−p3)χ,√p1−p2p1−p3),√p1−p2p1−p3)]+p3χ+C, | (3.5) |
where χ=x−l+k−1ky+(l−1)t, and C is a constant of integration. Comparing Eqs (3.2) and (3.3), we can easily find that the following relationship between p1, p2, p3 and k, l needs to satisfy
2p1+2p2+2p3=k+l−1kl. | (3.6) |
Furthermore
EllipticE(z,μ)=∫z0√1−μ2m2√1−m2dm |
denotes the incomplete elliptic integral. By selecting k=2, l=3, p1=5, p2=3, p3=1, C=0 in (3.7), we present the profiles of Eq (3.5) in Figure 1 with t=0.
By analysis, we can see the physical characteristics in Figure 1. On one hand, the features of the elliptic function are shown in Figure 1(a), (c); on the other hand, it exhibits certain periodicities in Figure 1(b).
If the roots satisfy p2=p3, then the solution (3.5) can be reduced to the following form
v(x,y,t)=√2p1−2p2tanh(√2(p1−p2)χ2)+p2χ+C. |
When p1=2h2(h is a constant) and p2=p3=0, then the solution (3.5) can be reduced by
v(x,y,t)=2htanh(hχ)+C, | (3.7) |
which is similar to the solution obtained in [30]. By selecting h=2, k=3, l=4, C=2 in (3.5), we present the profiles of Eq (3.7) in Figure 2 with t=1. By observing Figure 2, we can see that Eq (3.7) is a kink-type hyperbolic function solution.
In what follows, we investigate the solutions of Eq (2.8) by invoking the (G′/G) expansion method [9]. By balancing the highest order derivative Fχχχχ and the nonlinear term of the highest order FχFχχ, we assume the solution of Eq (2.8) in this form
F=b1(G′(χ)G(χ))−1+a0+a1(G′(χ)G(χ)), | (3.8) |
where G(χ) satisfies the following Riccati equation
G″(χ)+λG′(χ)+μG(χ)=0. | (3.9) |
Substituting Eq (3.8) into Eq (2.8), using Eq (3.9) for reduction, collecting all the powers of (G′(χ)G(χ))−1 and (G′(χ)G(χ)), then equating all the obtained coefficients to zero, eleven algebraic equations can be obtained:
−12a21kl+24a1kl=0,−30a21klλ+60a1klλ=0,12b21klμ3+24b1klμ4=0,30b21klλμ2+60b1klλμ3=0,−24a21klλ2−24a21klμ+50a1klλ2+12a1b1kl+40a1klμ+2a1k−2a1l−2a1=0,−12a1b1klμ3+24b21klλ2μ+50b1klλ2μ2+24b21klμ2+40b1klμ3+2b1kμ2−2b1lμ2−2b1μ2=0,−24a1b1klλμ2+6b21klλ3+15b1klλ3μ+36b21klλμ+60b1klλμ2+3b1kλμ−3b1lλμ−3b1λμ=0,−6a21klλ3−36a21klλμ+15a1klλ3+24a1b1klλ+60a1klλμ+3a1kλ−3a1lλ−3a1λ=0,−6a21klλμ2+a1klλ3μ+8a1klλμ2+b1klλ3+6b21klλ+8b1klλμ+a1kλμ−a1lλμ−a1λμ+b1kλ−b1lλ−b1λ=0,−12a1b1klλ2μ+b1klλ4−12a1b1klμ2+12b21klλ2+22b1klλ2μ+12b21klμ+16b1klμ2+b1kλ2−b1lλ2+2b1kμ−2b1lμ−b1λ2−2b1μ=0,−12a21klλ2μ+a1klλ4−12a21klμ2+12a1b1klλ2+22a1klλ2μ+12a1b1klμ+16a1klμ2+a1kλ2−a1lλ2+2a1kμ−2a1lμ−a1λ2−2a1μ=0. |
Solving above equations with Maple, two kinds of solutions are obtained:
Case 1:
b1=−2μ,a0=a0,a1=0,k=l+1lλ2−4lμ+1,l=l. |
Case 2:
a0=a0,a1=2,b1=0,k=l+1lλ2−4lμ+1,l=l. |
As a result, six kinds of solutions to the KdV4 equation (1.1) can be obtained accordingly.
For the first case, when λ2−4μ>0, we get one hyperbolic function solution
v(x,y,t)=λμ−4μ√λ2−4μ(C1cosh(Λ1χ)+C2sinh(Λ1χ)C1sinh(Λ1χ)+C2cosh(Λ1χ))+a0, | (3.10) |
where Λ1=√λ2−4μ2, χ=x−l+k−1ky+(l−1)t with k=l+1lλ2−4lμ+1 and C1,C2 are arbitrary constants. By selecting λ=3, μ=2, l=3, c1=13, c2=14, a0=1, we present the profiles of Eq (3.10) in Figure 3 with t=1.
Noticeably, Eq (3.10) is the combination of hyperbolic sine function and hyperbolic cosine function. When choosing special parameters, its expression may have discontinuities, and multiple peaks and valleys appeared in Figure 3.
When λ2−4μ<0, we acquire one trigonometric function solution
v(x,y,t)=λμ−4μ√4μ−λ2(C1cos(Λ2χ)+C2sin(Λ2χ)−C1sin(Λ2χ)+C2cos(Λ2χ))+a0, | (3.11) |
where Λ2=√4μ−λ22, χ=x−l+k−1ky+(l−1)t with k=l+1lλ2−4lμ+1 and C1,C2 are arbitrary constants. By selecting λ=2, μ=2, l=2, c1=−1, c2=3, a0=0, we present the profiles of Eq (3.11) in Figure 4 with t=1.
Noticeably, Eq (3.11) is the combination of sine function and cosine function. When choosing special parameters, its denominator is similar to its numerator, so features of cotangent function appeared in Figure 4.
When λ2−4μ=0, we achieve one rational function solution
v(x,y,t)=λμ−2μ(C1+C2(x−2ll+1y+(l−1)t)C2)+a0, | (3.12) |
where C1,C2 are arbitrary constants. Noticeably, Eq (3.12) is a plane wave solution.
For the second case, when λ2−4μ>0, we get the other hyperbolic function solution
v(x,y,t)=−λ+√λ2−4μ(C1sinh(Λ1χ)+C2cosh(Λ1χ)C1cosh(Λ1χ)+C2sinh(Λ1χ))+a0, | (3.13) |
where Λ1=√λ2−4μ2, χ=x−l+k−1ky+(l−1)t with k=l+1lλ2−4lμ+1 and C1,C2 are arbitrary constants. By selecting λ=−3, μ=2, l=3, c1=14, c2=13, a0=2, we present the profiles of Eq (3.13) in Figure 5 with t=0.
Noticeably, Eq (3.13) is the combination of hyperbolic sine function and hyperbolic cosine function and is seeming like the inverse of Eq (3.10). When choosing special parameters, its expression may also have discontinuities, and multiple peaks and valleys appeared in Figure 5.
When λ2−4μ<0, we acquire the other trigonometric function solution
v(x,y,t)=−λ+√4μ−λ2(−C1sin(Λ2χ)+C2cos(Λ2χ)C1cos(Λ2χ)+C2sin(Λ2χ))+a0, | (3.14) |
where Λ2=√4μ−λ22, χ=x−l+k−1ky+(l−1)t with k=l+1lλ2−4lμ+1 and C1,C2 are arbitrary constants. By selecting λ=2, μ=2, l=2, c1=−1, c2=3, a0=0, we present the profiles of Eq (3.14) in Figure 6 with t=1.
Noticeably, Eq (3.14) is the combination of sine function and cosine function and is seeming like the inverse of Eq (3.11). When choosing special parameters, its denominator is similar to its numerator, so features of cotangent function appeared in Figure 6.
When λ2−4μ=0, we achieve the other rational function solution
v(x,y,t)=−λ+2μC2C1+C2(x−2ll+1y+(l−1)t)+a0, | (3.15) |
where C1,C2 are arbitrary constants. Evidently the denominator of Eq (3.15) is a plane, so Eq (3.15) is a curved surface.
First, we suppose the solution of (2.12) is given by
Q=∞∑k=0Qkγk, |
where Q0,Q1,⋯,Qk,⋯ are constants to be determined. By substituting the expressions of Qγ,Qγγ, Qγγγ, Qγγγγ into Eq (2.12), we have
12Q0+(12Q2+4Q21−Q1−16Q0Q2)γ+(48a2a1−48a3a0+180a3−92a2)γ2+(−96a0a4+120a1a3+96a22−10a3+840a4)γ3+(224a4a1+416a2a3−160a5a0+2520a5−352a4)χ4+⋯+((8k4+8k3−2k2−2k)Qk+1+(24k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)(k−l)lQlQk+1−l−8k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)(k−l)QlQk+1−l+4k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)lQlQk+1−l)−(k2+k−12)Qk)γk+⋯=0, | (3.16) |
By equating the coefficients of the powers of γ in Eq (3.16) to be zero, we get
Q0=0,Q2=112Q1−13Q21,Q3=140Q2−415Q1Q2,Qk+1=1(8k4+8k3−2k2−2k)(−24k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)(k−l)lQlQk+1−l+8k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)(k−l)QlQk+1−l−4k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)lQlQk+1−l)+(k2+k−12)Qk). |
Therefore, the power series solution of Eq (2.12) is
Q(γ)=Q1γ+(112Q1−13Q21)γ2+(140Q2−415Q1Q2)χ3+⋯+1(8k4+8k3−2k2−2k)(−24k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)(k−l)lQlQk+1−l+8k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)(k−l)QlQk+1−l−4k+1∑l=1(k+1−l)lQlQk+1−l+(k2+k−12)Qk)γk+1+⋯. | (3.17) |
Hence, the particular solution of Eq (1.1) is given by
v(x,y,t)=y14Q((x−t)2ty)x−t+t8√y, |
where Q((x−t)2ty) is determined by Eq (3.17).
In this section, we derive the conservation laws of the KdV4 equation (1.1) by means of the multiplier method and Noether's theorem, respectively.
In the beginning, we invoke the multiplier method to determine conserved quantities of the KdV4 equation (1.1). In order to obtain the first order multipliers R, namely
R=R(x,y,t,v,vx,vy,vt). |
These multipliers are derived by
δδv[R(vxy+vxxxt+vxxxx+3(v2x)x+4vxvxt+2vxxvt)]=0. | (4.1) |
in which
δδv=∂∂v−Dx∂∂vx−Dy∂∂vy−Dt∂∂vt+D2x∂∂vxx+DxDy∂∂vxy+DxDt∂∂vxt+D4x∂∂vxxxx+D3xDt∂∂vxxxt |
denotes the Euler operator and Dx,Dy,Dt are total derivative operators. Expanding (4.1) and collecting on derivatives of v from second order to fourth order, then equating their coefficients to be zero, we get twenty-four PDEs:
Rxx=0,Rxv=0,Rtv=0,Rxtvx=0,Rxvy=0,Rxvt=0,Rtvy=0,Rvv=0,Rvvx=0,Rvvy=0,Rvvt=0,Rvxvy=0,Rvxvt=0,Rvyvt=0,Rvxvx=0,Rvyvy=0,Rvtvt=0,2Rxvx+2Rv−Ryvy=0,2Rv+Rtvx−Rtvt+3Rxvx−Ryvy=0,4Rxtvx+Ryvvx+Rxy=0,2Rv−Rtvt=0,(6Rv−2Rtvt+2Rxvx−2Ryvy)vt+(18Rv−6Rtvt+4Rtvx+6Rxvx−6Ryvy)vx+6Rx+2Rt+Ryvx=0,4Rxtvx+Ryvvx+Rxy=0,12Rvvx−4Ryvyvx+4Rx+Ryvt=0. |
By solving above equations with Maple, we obtain
R=g′(y)t−2vxg(y)+f(y)+C1(tvx+2tvt+xvx+6yvx+4yvy+v−x)+C2vx+C3vy+C4vt. |
where C1, C2, C3, C4 are arbitrary constants and g,f are functions of y. The conserved quantities of Eq (1.1) can be derived by employing the following divergence expression
DxCx+DyCy+DtCt=R(vxy+vxxxt+vxxxx+3(v2x)x+4vxvxt+2vxxvt), |
with Cx,Cy are spatial fluxes and Ct is the conserved density. Therefore, we obtain the following conserved vectors (Cx,Cy,Ct) with regard to the six multipliers:
Case 1. For R1=tvx+2tvt+xvx+6yvx+4yvy+v−x, we get the corresponding conserved vector corresponding to R1 as follows
Cx1=tvxvxx+tvxvxxx−12tv2xx+2tv3x+7tv2xvt+tvyvt+2tvxxtvt−tv2xt+2tvxxxvt−2tvxxvxt+4tvxv2t+xvxvxxt+xvxvxxx−12xv2xx−2vxvxx+2xv3x+xv2xvt+6yvxvxxt+6yvxvxxx−3yv2xx+12yv3x+6yv2xvt+2yv2y+2yvxxtvy+2yvxxyvt−2yvxyvxt−2vvxxt+4yvxxxvy−4yvxxvxy+12yv2xvy−83yvxyvtv+83yvxtvyv+8yvxvyvt−83vxvtv+vxxtv+vxxxv+3v2xv+2vxvtv−xvy−xvxxt+vxt−xvxxx+vxx−3xv2x−2xvxvt+2∫vxvtdx,Cy1=12tv2x+tvxvt+12xv2x+3yv2x+2yvvxxxt+2yv2xx−4yv3x+83yvxxvtv+163yvxvxtv+v+vxv,Ct1=tv2xx−tv3x−tvxvy+tv2xx−12xv2xx+xv3x−3yv2xx+6yv3x−2yvvxxxy−163yvxvxyv−83yvxxvyv−13v2xv−xv2x. |
Case 2. For R2=vx, we get the corresponding conserved vector corresponding to R2 as follows
Cx2=2v3x+vxvxxx−12v2xx+vxvxxt+v2xvt,Cy2=12v2x,Ct2=v3x−12v2xx. |
Case 3. For R3=vy, we get the corresponding conserved vector corresponding to R3 as follows
Cx3=12v2y+12vxxtvy+12vxxyvt−12vxyvxt+vxxxvy−vxxvxy+3v2xvy−23vvxyvt+23vvxtvy+2vxvyvt,Cy3=12vvxxxt+12v2xx−v3x+23vvxxvt+43vvxvxt,Ct3=−12vvxxxy−43vvxvxy−23vvxxvy. |
Case 4. For R4=vt, we get the corresponding conserved vector corresponding to R4 as follows
Cx4=12vyvt+vxxtvt−12v2xt+vxxxvt−vxxvxt+3v2xvt+2vxv2t,Cy4=12vxvt,Ct4=−12vxvy+12v2xx−v3x. |
Case 5. For R5=g′(y)t−2vxg(y), we get the corresponding conserved vector corresponding to R5 as follows
Cx5=vyg′(y)t+vxxtg′(y)t+vxxxg′(y)t+3v2xg′(y)t+2vxvtg′(y)t−2vxvxxtg(y)−2vxvxxxg(y)+v2xxg(y)−4v3xg(y)−2v2xvtg(y),Cy5=2vxvxtg(y)t,Ct5=−2vxyvxg(y)t+v2xxg(y)−2v3xg(y). |
Case 6. For R6=f(y), we get the corresponding conserved vector corresponding to R6 as follows
Cx6=−f′(y)v+f(y)vxxx+3f(y)v2x−2f(y)vvxt,Cy6=f(y)vx,Ct6=f(y)vxxx+3f(y)v2x+2f(y)vvxx. |
Next, we construct the conservation laws of Eq (1.1) by utilizing the classical Noether's theorem [20]. The second order Lagrangian of equation (1.1) is
L=−12vxvy+12vxxvxt+12v2xx−v3x−v2xvt, | (4.2) |
Therefore, the Noether symmetries
R=φ(x,y,t,v)∂∂x+ω(x,y,t,v)∂∂y+τ(x,y,t,v)∂∂t+η(x,y,t,v)∂∂v |
of the KdV4 equation (1.1) are established by applying the Lagrangian equation (4.2) on the following equation
R[2]L+L(Dx(φ)+Dy(ω)+Dt(τ))+Dx(Bx)+Dy(By)+Dt(Bt)=0, | (4.3) |
where R[2] is the second prolongation of R and Bx, By, Bt are gauge functions. Expanding the above equation (4.3) and seeking solutions for the resulting system of partial differential equations, the following Noether symmetries as well as their corresponding gauge functions can be obtained:
σ1=f(y)∂∂x+∂∂y+f′(y)t2∂∂v,Bx=−14f″(y)tv,By=0,Bt=0,σ2=g(y)∂∂x+∂∂t+g′(y)t2∂∂v,Bx=−14g″(y)tv,By=0,Bt=0,σ3=h(y)∂∂x+4y∂∂t+(h′(y)t2−3t+x)∂∂v,Bx=−14h″(y)tv,By=−12v,Bt=0,σ4=(t+x)∂∂x+4y∂∂y+2t∂∂t−v∂∂v,Bx=0,By=0,Bt=0,σ5=2(t+x)y∂∂x+4y2∂∂y+4ty∂∂t+(xt−t2−2yv)∂∂v,Bx=12v2+12vx,By=−12tv,Bt=0. |
By using the above Noether symmetries and invoking the following formula [21]
Ck=Lξk+(η−uxjξj)(∂L∂uxk−Σkl=1Dxl(∂L∂uxlxk))+Σnl=k(ζl−uxlxjξj)∂L∂uxkxl−Bk. |
We obtain the corresponding conserved vectors, which are given by
Ct1=−12f′(y)tv2x+f(y)v3x+v2xvy−12f(y)v2xx−12vxxvxy,Cx1=−12f(y)v2xx+2f(y)v3x+f(y)v2xvt+3v2xvt−14f′(y)tvy+12vyvt−32f′(y)tv2x−f′(y)tvxvt+2vxv2t−12f′(y)tvxxt+f(y)vxvxxt+vxxtvt−12f′(y)tvxxx+f(y)vxvxxx+vxxxvt−12v2xt−vxxvxt+14f″(y)tv,Cy1=−12vxvy+12vxxvxt+12v2xx−v3x−v2xvt−14f′(y)tvx+12f(y)v2x+12vxvt. |
Ct2=−12vxvy+12v2xx−v3x−12g′(y)tv2x+g(y)v3x−12g(y)v2xx,Cx2=−12g(y)v2xx+2g(y)v3x+g(y)v2xvt−14g′(y)tvy+12vyvt−32g′(y)tv2x+3v2xvt−g′(y)tvxvt+2vxv2t−12g′(y)tvxxx+g(y)vxvxxx+vxxxvt−12g′(y)tvxxt+g(y)vxvxxt+vxxtvt−12v2xt−vxxvxt+14g″(y)tv,Cy2=−14g′(y)tvx+12g(y)v2x+12vxvt. |
Ct3=−2yvxvy+2yv2xx−4yv3x−12h′(y)tv2x+3tv2x−xv2x+h(y)v3x+12vxx−12h(y)v2xx,Cx3=−12h(y)v2xx+2h(y)v3x+h(y)v2xvt−14h′(y)tvy+32tvy−12xvy+2yvyvt−32h′(y)tv2x+9tv2x−3xv2x+12yv2xvt−h′(y)tvxvt+6tvxvt−2xvxvt+8yvxv2t−12h′(y)tvxxt+3tvxxt−xvxxt+h(y)vxvxxt+4yvxxtvt−12h′(y)tvxxx+3tvxxx−xvxxx+h(y)vxvxxx+4yvxxxvt+12vxt+vxx−2yv2xt−4yvxxvxt+14h″(y)tv,Cy3=−14h′(y)tvx+32tvx−12xvx+12h(y)v2x+2yvxvt+12v. |
Ct4=−tvxvy+12tv2xx−tv3x+v2xv+xv3x+4yv2xvy−12vxvxx−12xv2xx−2yvxxvxy,Cx4=−12tv2xx+2tv3x+5tv2xvt+xvxvy−12xv2xx−xv3x+xv2xvt+12vvy+2yv2y+tvyvt+3vv2x+3xv3x+12yv2xvy+2vvxvt+2tv2xvt+8yvxvyvt+4tvxv2t+vvxxt+tvxvxxt+xvxvxxt+4yvxxtvy+2tvxxtvt+vvxxx+tvxvxxx+xvxvxxx+4yvxxxvy+2tvxxxvt−12vxvxt−2yvxyvxt−tv2xt−vxvxx−4yvxxvxy−2tvxxvxt,Cy4=2yvxxvxt+2yv2xx−4yv3x−4yv2xvt+12vvx+12tv2x+12xv2x+tvxvt. |
Ct5=−2tyvxvy+tyv2xx−2tyv3x−xtv2x+t2v2x+2yvv2x+2xyv3x+4y2v2xvy+12tvxx−2yvxvxx−xyv2xx−2y2vxxvxy,Cx5=−xyv2xx+4xyv3x+2xyv2xvt−ytv2xx+4ytv3x+14ytv2xvt−12xtvy+12t2vy+yvvy+2y2v2y+2ytvyvt−3xtv2x+3t2v2x+6yvv2x+12y2v2xvy−2xtvxvt+2t2vxvt+4yvvxvt+8y2vxvyvt+8ytvxv2t−xtvxxt+t2vxxt+2yvvxxt+2xyvxvxxt+2ytvxvxxt+4y2vxxtvy+4ytvxxtvt−xtvxxx+t2vxxx+2yvvxxx+2xyvxvxxx+2ytvxvxxx+4y2vxxxvy+4ytvxxxvt+12tvxt−2yvxvxt−2y2vxyvxt−2ytv2xt+tvxx−4yvxvxx−4y2vxxvxy−4ytvxxvxt−12v2−12vx,Cy5=2y2vxxvxt+2y2v2xx−4y2v3x−4y2v2xvt−12vxvt+12t2vx+yvvx+xyv2x+tyv2x+2tyvxvt+12tv. |
In this paper, we performed the Lie symmetry analysis method to a (2+1)-dimensional KdV4 equation and derived Lie symmetries of this equation, then used these symmetries to perform symmetry reductions. By using translation symmetries, two fourth-order ordinary differential equations were obtained. Different methods were adopted in order to derive the solutions of the obtained differential equations. For one fourth-order ordinary differential equation, we presented its solutions by using the direct integration method and the (G′/G)-expansion method, respectively. Furthermore, their corresponding solutions were shown with the appropriate graphical representations. For the other fourth-order ordinary differential equation, we derived its solutions by using the power series technique. Finally, two kinds of conserved vectors of this equation are presented by invoking the multiplier method and Noether's theorem, respectively. Six multipliers were obtained from the multiplier method, and thus six local conservation laws for the KdV4 equation (1.1) were given, while five local conservation laws were obtained by Noether's theorem. It is necessary to point out that the multiplier method has more wider applications in deriving conservation laws than Noether's theorem. Although we successfully presented the power series solution for the KdV4 equation (1.1), we had difficulties in discussing the corresponding convergence analysis. Its convergence analysis is worth studying in our future work. For the Lie symmetry analysis method, many attentions have been concentrated on (1+1)-dimensional and (2+1)-dimensional differential equations. For (3+1)-dimensional differential equations, there are not many relevant documents. We will investigate the (3+1)-dimensional differential equations by using the Lie point symmetry analysis method in the future.
This work was supported by Henan Youth Backbone Teacher Project (No. 2019GGJS204) and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (No.232300420361).
The author declares there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
V. Perez-Munuzuri, V. Perez-Villar, L. Chua, Autowaves for image processing on a two-dimensional CNN array of excitable nonlinear circuits: flat and wrinkled labyrinths, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Fundam. Theory Appl., 40 (1993), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.222798 doi: 10.1109/81.222798
![]() |
[2] |
L. Cheng, Z. Hou, Y. Lin, M. Tan, W. Zhang, F. Wu, Recurrent neural network for non-smooth convex optimization problems with application to the identification of genetic regulatory networks, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 22 (2011), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2011.2109735 doi: 10.1109/TNN.2011.2109735
![]() |
[3] |
Y. Sheng, Z. Zeng, T. Huang, Global stability of bidirectional associative memory neural networks with multiple time-varying delays, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 52 (2020), 4095–4104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3011581 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3011581
![]() |
[4] |
F. Hoppensteadt, E. Izhikevich, Pattern recognition via synchronization in phase-locked loop neural networks, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 11 (2000), 734–738. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846744 doi: 10.1109/72.846744
![]() |
[5] |
M. Yang, X. Zhang, Y. Xia, Q. Liu, Q. Zhu, Adaptive neural network-based sliding mode control for a hydraulic rotary drive joint, Comput. Electr. Eng., 102 (2022), 108189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108189 doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108189
![]() |
[6] |
C. Napoli, G. De Magistris, C. Ciancarelli, F. Corallo, F. Russo, D. Nardi, Exploiting Wavelet Recurrent Neural Networks for satellite telemetry data modeling, prediction and control, Expert Syst. Appl., 206 (2022), 117831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117831 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117831
![]() |
[7] |
H. Liang, Evaluation of fitness state of sports training based on self-organizing neural network, Neural Comput. Appl., 33 (2021), 3953–3965. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00521-020-05551-W doi: 10.1007/S00521-020-05551-W
![]() |
[8] |
R. Jia, Finite-time stability of a class of fuzzy cellular neural networks with multi-proportional delays, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 319 (2017), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2017.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2017.01.003
![]() |
[9] |
R. Rakkiyappan, J. Cao, G. Velmurugan, Existence and uniform stability analysis of fractional-order complex-valued neural networks with time delays, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 26 (2014), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2311099 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2311099
![]() |
[10] |
Y. Zheng, Delay-induced dynamical transitions in single Hindmarsh–Rose system, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 23 (2013), 1350150. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127413501502 doi: 10.1142/S0218127413501502
![]() |
[11] |
Y. Song, M. Han, J. Wei, Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis on a simplified BAM neural network with delays, Physica D, 200 (2005), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2004.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2004.10.010
![]() |
[12] | Z. Wang, L. Li, Y. Li, Z. Cheng, Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a three-neuron network with multiple discrete and distributed delays, Neural Process. Lett., 48 (2018), 1481–1502. |
[13] |
N. Ozcan, S. Arik, Global robust stability analysis of neural networks with multiple time delays, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap., 53 (2006), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2005.855724 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2005.855724
![]() |
[14] | S. Campbell, S. Ruan, G. Wolkowicz, J. Wu, Stability and bifurcation of a simple neural network with multiple time delays, Fields Inst. Commun., 21 (1999), 65–79. |
[15] | D. Baleanu, V. Balas, P. Agarwal, Fractional Order Systems and Applications in Engineering, Academic Press, 2023. |
[16] | R. Hilfer, Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/3779 |
[17] |
N. Tuan, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A mathematical model for COVID-19 transmission by using the Caputo fractional derivative, Chaos, 140 (2020), 110107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110107 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110107
![]() |
[18] | A. Bukhari, M. Raja, M. Sulaiman, S. Islam, M. Shoaib, P. Kumam, Fractional neuro-sequential ARFIMA-LSTM for financial market forecasting, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 71326–71338. |
[19] |
C. Huang, H. Wang, J. Cao, Fractional order-induced bifurcations in a delayed neural network with three neurons, Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci., 33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135232 doi: 10.1063/5.0135232
![]() |
[20] |
C. Xu, Local and global Hopf bifurcation analysis on simplified bidirectional associative memory neural networks with multiple delays, Math. Comput. Simul., 149 (2018), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2018.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.02.002
![]() |
[21] |
M. Xiao, W. Zheng, G. Jiang, J. Cao, Undamped oscillations generated by Hopf bifurcations in fractional-order recurrent neural networks with Caputo derivative, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 26 (2015), 3201–3214. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2425734 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2425734
![]() |
[22] |
B. Tao, M. Xiao, W. Zheng, J. Cao, J. Tang, Dynamics analysis and design for a bidirectional super-ring-shaped neural network with n neurons and multiple delays, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 32 (2020), 2978–2992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3009166 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3009166
![]() |
[23] |
Y. Lu, M. Xiao, J. He, Z. Wang, Stability and bifurcation exploration of delayed neural networks with radial-ring configuration and bidirectional coupling, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 2023 (2023), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3240403 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3240403
![]() |
[24] |
J. Chen, M. Xiao, Y. Wan, C. Huang, F. Xu, Dynamical bifurcation for a class of large-scale fractional delayed neural networks with complex ring-hub structure and hybrid coupling, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 34 (2021), 2659–2669. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3107330 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3107330
![]() |
[25] |
S. Ma, Q. Lu, Z. Feng, Double Hopf bifurcation for van der Pol-Duffing oscillator with parametric delay feedback control, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.05.072 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.05.072
![]() |
[26] |
Z. Mao, H. Wang, D. Xu, Z. Cui, Bifurcation and hybrid control for a simple hopfield neural networks with delays, Math. Prob. Eng., 2013 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/315367 doi: 10.1155/2013/315367
![]() |
[27] |
H. Zhao, W. Xie, Hopf bifurcation for a small-world network model with parameters delay feedback control, Nonlinear Dyn., 63 (2011), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9808-1 doi: 10.1007/s11071-010-9808-1
![]() |
[28] |
Q. An, E. Beretta, Y. Kuang, C. Wang, H. Wang, Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential equations with two delays and delay dependent parameters, J. Differ. Equations, 266 (2019), 7073–7100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.11.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.11.025
![]() |
[29] |
D. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Gao, C. Wang, D. Fan, Dynamics of an HIV infection model with two time delays, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 28 (2023), 5641–5661. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2023069 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2023069
![]() |
[30] |
Z. Jiang, Y. Guo, Hopf bifurcation and stability crossing curve in a planktonic resource–consumer system with double delays, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 30 (2020), 2050190. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127420501904 doi: 10.1142/S0218127420501904
![]() |
[31] | D. Matignon, Stability results for fractional differential equations with applications to control processing, Comput. Eng. Syst. Appl., 2 (1996), 963–968. |
1. | Sixing Tao, Lie symmetry analysis, particular solutions and conservation laws for the dissipative (2 + 1)- dimensional AKNS equation, 2023, 15, 2836-3310, 494, 10.3934/cam.2023024 | |
2. | Ghauss ur Rahman, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Energy balance approach to an optical solitons of (2+1)-dimensional fourth-order Korteweg–de Vries equation with two contemporary integration norms using a new mapping method, 2024, 0924-090X, 10.1007/s11071-024-10659-y |