
Intelligent manufacturing (IM), sometimes referred to as smart manufacturing (SM), is the use of real-time data analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) in the production process to achieve the aforementioned efficiencies. Human-machine interaction technology has recently been a hot issue in smart manufacturing. The unique interactivity of virtual reality (VR) innovations makes it possible to create a virtual world and allow users to communicate with that environment, providing users with an interface to be immersed in the digital world of the smart factory. And virtual reality technology aims to stimulate the imagination and creativity of creators to the maximum extent possible for reconstructing the natural world in a virtual environment, generating new emotions, and transcending time and space in the familiar and unfamiliar virtual world. Recent years have seen a great leap in the development of intelligent manufacturing and virtual reality technologies, yet little research has been done to combine the two popular trends. To fill this gap, this paper specifically employs Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a systematic review of the applications of virtual reality in smart manufacturing. Moreover, the practical challenges and the possible future direction will also be covered.
Citation: Yu Lei, Zhi Su, Xiaotong He, Chao Cheng. Immersive virtual reality application for intelligent manufacturing: Applications and art design[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 4353-4387. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023202
[1] | Christian Cortés García . Bifurcations in a discontinuous Leslie-Gower model with harvesting and alternative food for predators and constant prey refuge at low density. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 14029-14055. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022653 |
[2] | Jinxing Zhao, Yuanfu Shao . Bifurcations of a prey-predator system with fear, refuge and additional food. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3700-3720. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023173 |
[3] | Peter A. Braza . A dominant predator, a predator, and a prey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(1): 61-73. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.61 |
[4] | Yuanfu Shao . Bifurcations of a delayed predator-prey system with fear, refuge for prey and additional food for predator. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 7429-7452. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023322 |
[5] | Shuangte Wang, Hengguo Yu . Stability and bifurcation analysis of the Bazykin's predator-prey ecosystem with Holling type Ⅱ functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7877-7918. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021391 |
[6] | Hongqiuxue Wu, Zhong Li, Mengxin He . Dynamic analysis of a Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with the fear effect and nonlinear harvesting. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18592-18629. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023825 |
[7] | Rajalakshmi Manoharan, Reenu Rani, Ali Moussaoui . Predator-prey dynamics with refuge, alternate food, and harvesting strategies in a patchy habitat. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(4): 810-845. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025029 |
[8] | Weijie Lu, Yonghui Xia, Yuzhen Bai . Periodic solution of a stage-structured predator-prey model incorporating prey refuge. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3160-3174. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020179 |
[9] | Tingting Ma, Xinzhu Meng . Global analysis and Hopf-bifurcation in a cross-diffusion prey-predator system with fear effect and predator cannibalism. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 6040-6071. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022282 |
[10] | Rongjie Yu, Hengguo Yu, Chuanjun Dai, Zengling Ma, Qi Wang, Min Zhao . Bifurcation analysis of Leslie-Gower predator-prey system with harvesting and fear effect. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18267-18300. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023812 |
Intelligent manufacturing (IM), sometimes referred to as smart manufacturing (SM), is the use of real-time data analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) in the production process to achieve the aforementioned efficiencies. Human-machine interaction technology has recently been a hot issue in smart manufacturing. The unique interactivity of virtual reality (VR) innovations makes it possible to create a virtual world and allow users to communicate with that environment, providing users with an interface to be immersed in the digital world of the smart factory. And virtual reality technology aims to stimulate the imagination and creativity of creators to the maximum extent possible for reconstructing the natural world in a virtual environment, generating new emotions, and transcending time and space in the familiar and unfamiliar virtual world. Recent years have seen a great leap in the development of intelligent manufacturing and virtual reality technologies, yet little research has been done to combine the two popular trends. To fill this gap, this paper specifically employs Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a systematic review of the applications of virtual reality in smart manufacturing. Moreover, the practical challenges and the possible future direction will also be covered.
The predator-prey model is a model in biomathematics used, and modified, by many researchers to describe the dynamics between a prey and predator species in order to determine conditions in their parameters that allow for either the conservation or extinction of one or both species, where such models are generally posed by systems of ordinary [1,2,3,4,5] or partial differential equations [6,7,8,9,10].
In particular, the Leslie-Gower models assumes that the intrinsic growth of both species is described by logistic functions, whose carrying capacity between prey and predators is subject to the capacity of the environment or directly proportional to the population size of the prey, respectively [11]. Similarly, this model assumes a functional response of the predator that is generally described by Holling-type functions [12,13,14,15,16].
For example, assuming that the predator response functional is given by a Holling Ⅱ function f(x)=axx+d [17,18,19], where a>0 is the maximum per capita consumption rate of predators, and 0<d<K is the semi-saturating rate of capture, where predators can be harvested [20,21], the dynamics of population sizes of prey x(t)≥0 and predators y(t)≥0 is given by
{˙x=rx(1−xK)−axyx+d˙y=sy[1−ynx+c]−qEy, | (1.1) |
where K>0 is the carrying capacity of prey in the environment, which normally determines the resources available for prey survival, n>0 is the quantity of prey consumed by the predator and converted into new births, q>0 is the catchability coefficient, E>0 is the harvesting efforty, and r,s>0 are the intrinsic birth rates of prey and predators, respectively. In particular, if the diet of predators is based exclusively on prey consumption, then c=0 [22,23,24]; otherwise, c>0 describes the alternative food for predators, so their diet is not based exclusively on prey consumption [25,26].
However, given the existence of prey that take refuge from the predator to subsist in the environment [1,29,30,31,32], and whose intrinsic growth is subject to an auxiliary parameter b>0 (half-saturation) that affects the hyperbolic function of the per capita birth rate curve of the prey [27,28], in addition to the maximum birth rate r>0, then model (1.1) is modified by
{˙x=rxx+b(1−xK)−a(x−P)y(x−P)+d˙y=sy[1−yn(x−P)+c]−qEy, | (1.2) |
where P<K is the population size of refugia in prey. In particular, the intrinsic growth of prey approximates logistic growth for a large x; however, if x is small, the parameter b>0 influences its dynamics, of which it may represent examples such as inbreeding, ease of reproduction, difficulty in finding mates, or mating resistance at low temperatures.
Observe that the model (1.2) is used if the initial prey population size is above the critical refuge population size, that is, if P<x(0). For the case where x(0)<P, the entire prey population size is refugeed from the predator whenever x<P, so there is no interaction between the two species and, hence, the functional response of the predator is deactivated when x<P. In this case, the dynamics of the prey is described by a logistic differential equation ˙x=rx(1−xK) for the case in which there are either no external factors inhibiting its growth, or by an autonomous differential equation ˙x=rxx+b(1−xK), until they exceed their critical refuge population size and the quantity x−P becomes susceptible to predator consumption.
On the other hand, if the predator's diet is based only on the consumption of prey, they are forced to change their diet due to the deficit of prey in order to survive in the environment [33,34,35], so the model (1.2) should be modified by
Z0(x,y):{˙x=rxx+b(1−xK)−aϵ(x−P)y(x−P)+d˙y=sy[1−ynϵ(x−P)+(1−ϵ)c]−qEy, | (1.3) |
with
ϵ={1,ifx>P0,ifx<P. | (1.4) |
However, if the predator's diet is not based exclusively on prey consumption, but has equal probability of consumption with the alternative food provided in the environment, the predator's diet is not affected and depends only on the alternative food provided by the environment in the absence of prey. In this case, the model (1.2) is modified by
Zc(x,y):{˙x=rxx+b(1−xK)−aϵ(x−P)y(x−P)+d˙y=sy[1−ynϵ(x−P)+c]−qEy, | (1.5) |
with ϵ as described in (1.4).
Consequently, and given the possible scenarios for predator growth and survival at low and high prey densities subject to their refuge, the objective of this paper is to perform a qualitative and bifurcation analyses to models (1.3) and (1.5), as shown in Sections 2 and 3, respectively, to determine similarities or difference in both models.
Let x(t)≥0 and y(t)≥0 be considered as the population sizes of prey and predators, respectively, whose dynamics are given by the model (1.3), defined in the biological sense region
Ω={(x,y)∈R2:0≤x≤K,0≤y≤M} | (2.1) |
with M=max{n(K−P),c}. In particular, the vector fields of the model (1.3) are given by
Z0(x,y)={X(x,y)=(rxx+b(1−xK)−a(x−P)y(x−P)+dsy[1−yn(x−P)]−qEy),x>PY(x,y)=(rxx+b(1−xK)sy(1−yc)−qEy),x<P | (2.2) |
where X and Y are defined in Σ+={(x,y)∈Ω:P<x≤K} and Σ−={(x,y)∈Ω:0<x<P}, respectively.
Since the model (2.2) is equivalent to a Filippov system [36,37,38,39], if f(x,y)=x−P, Xf(p)=⟨X(p),gradf(p)⟩ and Yf(p)=⟨Y(p),gradf(p)⟩, then Xf(p)=Yf(p)=rPP+b(1−PK)>0 for all p∈Σ={(x,y)∈Ω:x=P}. Therefore, since the vector field Y is composed of a system of autonomous and independent differential equations, the trajectories φZ0 with initial condition (x(0),y(0))∈Σ− must cross Σ and remain in Σ+. Additionally, φZ0 with the initial condition p=(P,y(0))∈Σ is defined as φZ0(p,t)=φX(p,t) for all t∈I∩{t>0} and φZ0(p,t)=φY(p,t) for t∈I∩{t≤0}.
Lemma 1. For an arbitrary initial condition (x(0),y(0))∈Ω, the model (2.2) has a unique φZ0 trajectory and remains in Ω.
Proof. Since the vector fields X and Y are continuously differential and the trajectories φZ0 cross Σ or remain Σ+ for all initial conditions (x(0),y(0))∈Σ− or (x(0),y(0))∈Σ+, by the existence and uniqueness theorem [40] for every vector field the uniqueness of the trajectories are guaranteed. Additionally, for all 0≤x<P, if x=0 then ˙x=0 for all y≥0. Similarly, if y=0, then ˙y=0, and if y=M, we have that ˙y≤0. Thus, the trajectories φZ0 do not cross Σ−. Moreover, for all P<x≤K, if x=K, then ˙x=0; if y=0, then ˙y=0; and if y=n(K−L)+c, then ˙y≤0, so φZ0 does not cross Σ+. The dynamics of the model at points (P,0) and (P,M) do not cross Ω and remain to be analyzed. In this case, since the trajectories φZ0 with the initial condition (x(0),y(0))∈Σ−∪Σ+ cross Σ, we have that the trajectories φZ0 do not escape from the points (P,0) and (P,M).
The equilibria in the model (2.2) over the coordinate axes are given by P0=(0,0)∈Σ−, P1=(K,0)∈Σ+, and P2=(0,c(s−qE)s)∈Σ− if s−qE>0. The local stability of the equilibria is summarized in the following result.
Lemma 2. If s−qE<0, then P0 and P1 are saddle points. If s−qE>0, then P0 is a locally unstable node, P1 a locally stable node and P2 is a saddle point.
Proof. The local stability of P1∈Σ+ and P0,P2∈Σ− are guaranteed from the computation of the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix DX of the vector field X computed in P1∈Σ+ and of the Jacobian matrix DY of the vector field Y computed in P0,P2∈Σ−.
On the other hand, since the vector field Y has no interior equilibria, the intersections in Σ+ of nullclines
y=f1(x):=nx(s−qE)s−nP(s−qE)s,y=f2(x):=rx(P−d−x)(x−K)aK(x−P)(x+b), | (2.3) |
are defined in the vector field X, and determine the number of interior equilibria in the model (2.2). In particular, note that the model (2.2) has no interior equilibria if s−qE<0 since the nullclines (2.3) do not intersect in Σ+.
For s−qE>0, the possible positive roots of the polynomial
Q(x)=Ax3+Bx2+Cx+D, | (2.4) |
with
A=rs+aKn(s−qE)>0,B=rs(d−K−P)+aKn(b−2P)(s−qE),C=−K[anP(2b−P)(s−qE)+rs(d−P)],D=abnKP2(s−qE)>0, | (2.5) |
determine the number of interior equilibria in the model (2.2).
The following result shows the existence of a unique interior equilibrium P3=(x∗,y∗) in the model (2.2), with x∗ as the positive root of the polynomial (2.5) and y∗=f1(x∗), as observed in Figure 1.
Lemma 3. If s−qE>0, the model (2.2) has a unique interior equilibrium P3.
Proof. By Descartes' sign criterion, we have that the polynomial Q(x) (2.4) must have two positive roots: x∗ and x+. However, since y=f1(x) is a straight line with a positive slope and intercept at (P,0), f2(x)→−∞ when x→±∞ and f2(x)→±∞ for x→P±, and by constraint, we have that x+<P and P<x∗. Therefore, the model (2.2) has a unique interior equilibrium.
The local dynamics of the interior equilibrium P3 remain to be analyzed. In this case, since Ω is invariant and the equilibria P0, P1, and P2 are unstable, by the Poincare - Bendixson Theorem [41,42] we have that P3 cannot be a local saddle point, that is, det DX(P3)>0, with DX the Jacobian matrix of the vector field X computed in P3.
On the other hand, the sign of the trace in the Jacobian matrix DX of the vector field X computed in P3, with
tr DX(P3)=br(b+K)K(x+b)2+ad2n(s−qE)s(x∗+d−P)2−adn(s−qE)s(x∗+d−P)−(s−qE)−rK, |
which determines the local stability of the equilibrium P3, and is summarized in the following result. In particular, if P3 is locally unstable, by the Poincare -Bendixson Theorem it guarantees the existence of at least one stable ΓX limit cycle in Σ+, which does not collide with Σ.
Lemma 4. For s−qE>0 and △:=[trDX(P3)]2−4detDX(P3)<0, then P3 is either a locally stable or unstable focus if trDX(P3)<0 or 0<trDX(P3), respectively. For s−qE>0 and △:=[trDX(P3)]2−4detDX(P3)>0, then P3 is either a locally stable or unstable node if trDX(P3)<0 or 0<trDX(P3), respectively.
In the first instance, the following result shows conditions on the model parameters (2.2) for which guarantees the global stability of P1.
Theorem 1. If s−qE<0, then P1 is globally asymptotically stable in Ω.
Proof. Since P0 is a saddle point, P2,P3∈Ω and ˙y=(s−qE)y−sy2n(x−P)<0 for all (x,y)∈Σ+, then the model (2.2) has no limit cycles in Σ+. Furthermore, since the model (2.2) has no interior equilibria and no limit cycles in Σ−, and the differential equations describing the vector field Y are autonomous and independent, all trajectories φZ0 with initial condition (x(0),y(0))∈Σ− cross Σ and remain in Σ+, so the trajectories φZ0 converge to P1.
On the other hand, by using the Bendixon-Dilac [40] criterion on the model (2.2), the following result shows a first sufficient condition on the model parameters (2.2) for which guarantees the global stability of P3.
Theorem 2. If s−qE>0 and b(b+P)<(b+K)(d−P), then P3 is globally asymptotically stable in Ω.
Proof. If
g1(x,y)=rxx+b(1−xK)−a(x−P)y(x−P)+d,g2(x,y)=sy[1−yn(x−P)]−qEy, | (2.6) |
are functions describing the vector field X in Σ+, and
h(x,y)=(x−P)+dxy |
is a Dirac function, then
∂hg1∂x(x,y)+∂hg2∂y(x,y)=−{αryK(x+b)2+aPx2+rKy+s[(x−P)+d]nx(x−P)}<0 |
with α=b(d−K−P)+K(d−P)−b2>0 for all (x,y)∈Σ+, so the model (2.2) has no limit cycles in Σ+. Therefore, and analogous to the proof of Theorem 1, we have that P3 is globally asymptotically stable in Ω.
From the Lyapunov criterion [40], the following result shows a second sufficient condition on the parameters of the model (2.2) for which the global stability of P3 is guaranteed in Ω.
Theorem 3. If s−qE>0 and d+2P>K, the equilibrium P3 is globally asymptotically stable in Ω.
Proof. Similarly to what we proved in Theorem 1, it is sufficient to prove that P3 is globally asymptotically stable in Σ+. Indeed, if
V(x,y)=∫xx∗u−x∗(u−P)ρ(u)du+1s−qE∫yy∗v−y∗vdv |
for all (x,y)∈Σ+ and ρ(x)=a(x−P)(x−P)+d is a Lyapunov function, g(x)=rxx+b(1−xK)ρ(x) and (2.3), we have that
˙V=x−x∗(x−P)ρ(x)˙x+y−y∗y(s−qE)˙y=x−x∗x−P[rxx+b(1−xK)ρ(x)−y]+y−y∗s−qE[s(1−yn(x−P))−qE]=x−x∗x−P[rxx+b(1−xK)ρ(x)−y∗]−(x−x∗)(y−y∗)x−P+y−y∗s−qE[sy∗n(x∗−P)−syn(x−P)]=x−x∗x−P[g(x)−g(x∗)]−(x−x∗)(y−y∗)x−P+s(y−y∗)s−qE[(y−y∗)P+xy∗−xyn(x−P)(x∗−P)]=x−x∗x−P[g(x)−g(x∗)]−(x−x∗)(y−y∗)x−P+y−y∗y∗[(y−y∗)P+xy∗−xyx−P]=x−x∗x−P[g(x)−g(x∗)]−(x−x∗)(y−y∗)x−P+(y−y∗)2y∗[y∗(x−x∗)−(y−y∗)(x∗−P)x−P]=x−x∗x−P[g(x)−g(x∗)]−(x∗−P)(y−y∗)2y∗(x−P)=1x−P{(x−x∗)[g(x)−g(x∗)]−s(y−y∗)2n(s−qE)}. |
Since P<x, a sufficient condition for ˙V<0 is to prove that g(x) is non-increasing. Indeed, by substituting ˉx=x−P, then
g(ˉx)=r(ˉx+P)(ˉx+d)(K−ˉx−P)aKˉx(ˉx+P+b) |
and so
g′(ˉx)=−r{ˉx+2ˉx(b+P)+ˉx[βb+d(K−P)+P]+2dPˉx(K−P)+d(b+P)(K−P)}aˉx2K(ˉx+b+P)2<0, |
with β=d−K+2P>0.
In the first instance, the model (2.2) has a Hopf bifurcation if tr DX(P3)=0, as observed in the following result. In particular, and as observed in Lemma 4, if tr DX(P3)<0, then P3 is unstable with at least one stable limit cycle ΓX around P3, where ΓX collides with P3 if tr DX(P3)=0. However, if tr DX(P3)>0, then P3 is stable.
Theorem 4. The model (2.2) has a Hopf bifurcation around P3 if trDX(P3)=0.
Proof. Since
∂tr DX(P3)∂a=−dn(s−qE)(x∗−P)s(x∗+d−P)2<0, |
the transversality condition for existence of the Hopf bifurcation is guaranteed [43].
Moreover, the model (2.2) has a transcritical bifurcation when s−qE=0, as summarized by the following result. In this case, if s−qE>0, then P3∈Σ+ and P1 is a saddle point. For s−qE=0, P3 collides with P1, so P1 is a stable saddle-node equilibrium since det DX(P1)=0 and tr DX(P1)=−r<0. However, if s−qE<0, then P3∉Σ+, and P1 is locally stable.
Theorem 5. The model (2.2) has a transcritical bifurcation around P1 if s−qE=0.
Proof. Let Xs(x,y,s)=(0,y(1−yn(x−P)))T be the derivative of the vector field X(x,y,s) with respect to s, U=(a(K−P)(b+K)r(d+K−P),−1)T is the eigenvector associated with the null eigenvalue in the Jacobian matrix DX calculated in P1, and W=(0,−1)T is the eigenvector associated with the null eigenvalue in the Jacobian matrix DXT calculated in P1.
If s=s0:=qE, by the transcritical bifurcation theorem [44], three conditions must be guaranteed: WTXs(P1,s0)=0, WT[DXs(P1,s0)U]≠0, and WT[D2X(P1,s0)(U,U)]≠0. Indeed,
● Since Xs(P1,s0)=(0,0)T, then WTXs(P1,s0)=0.
● Since DXs(P1,s0)U=(0,−1)T, then WT[DXs(P1,s0)U]=1>0.
● If X=(g1(x,y,s),g2(x,y,s))T, with g1 and g2 as described in (2.6), and U=(u1,u2), then
D2X(P1,s0)(U,U)=(∂2g1∂x2u1u1+2∂2g1∂x∂yu1u2+∂2g1∂y2u2u2∂2g2∂x2u1u1+2∂2g2∂x∂yu1u2+∂2g2∂y2u2u2)=(2a2(K−P)[bdP−b(K−P)2+dK2]rK(d+K−P)3−2s0n(K−P)), |
and so WT[D2f(P1,s0)(U,U)]=2s0n(K−P)>0.
To conclude, and as shown in Lemmas 2 and 4, Figure 2 shows the bifurcation diagram of the model (2.2) in the plane (P,E), realized by the numerical bifurcation package SlideCont [45], whose selected fixed parameters were chosen in order to show all possible dynamics of the model (2.2) in the bifurcation plane (P,E).
In particular, since the trajectories φX and φY in the model (2.2) do not collide in Σ, that is, the trajectories φZ0 with initial condition (x(0),y(0))∈Σ− must cross Σ and remain in Σ+, the phase portraits characterizing each bifurcation region, shown in Figures 3, are drawn by the two vector fields X and Y, separated by the straight line x=P, and simulated in Matlab [46], where Y can be defined for all x≤P because the trajectory φZ0 with initial condition p=(P,y(0))∈Σ is defined as φZ0(p,t)=φX(p,t) for all t∈I∩{t>0} and φZ0(p,t)=φY(p,t) for t∈I∩{t≤0}. The bifurcation regions are described below.
● If s−qE<0, represented in region Ⅰ, the model (2.2) has no interior equilibria, so the φZ0 trajectories converge to equilibrium P1, as observed in Figure 3(b). However, if s−qE>0, then P3∈Ω, as observed in regions Ⅱa, IIb and Ⅲ. Note that the transcritical bifurcation separates region Ⅰ from regions Ⅱa, IIb, and Ⅲ.
● In regions Ⅱa and IIb we have that P3 is a stable node or focus, as observed in Figures 3(c, d), respectively. In both regions, the trajectories φZ0 converge to the equilibrium P3. Moreover, the curve △=0 separates regions Ⅱa and IIb.
● The model (2.2) has a stable limit cycle ΓX in Σ+, characterized in region Ⅲ, and which will not collide with Σ. Moreover, P3 is unstable, so the φZ0 trajectories converge to ΓX, as observed in Figure 3(e). In particular, the Hopf bifurcation separates region Ⅲ from regions Ⅱa and IIb.
Let x(t)≥0 and y(t)≥0 be the population size of prey and predators, respectively, whose dynamics are given by the model (1.5) in the biological sense region:
˜Ω={(x,y)∈R2:0≤x≤K,0≤y≤n(K−P)+c}. | (3.1) |
In this case, the vector field of the model (1.5) is given by
Zc(x,y)={˜X(x,y)=(rxx+b(1−xK)−a(x−P)y(x−P)+bsy[1−yn(x−P)+c]−qEy),x>PY(x,y)=(rxx+b(1−xK)sy(1−yc)−qEy),x<P | (3.2) |
where the vector fields ˜X and Y are defined in ˜Σ+={(x,y)∈˜Ω:P<x≤K} and ˜Σ−={(x,y)∈˜Ω:0≤x<P}, respectively.
If ˜Σ={(x,y)∈˜Ω:x=P} and similarly to the dynamics of the model (2.2) in Σ, the trajectories φZc with initial condition p=(P,y)∈˜Σ is defined as φZc(p,t)=φ˜X(p,t) for t∈I∩{t>0} and φZc(p,t)=φY(p,t) for t∈I∩{t≤0} because ˜Xf(p)=Yf(p)=rP(1−PK)>0.
Analogous to the proof shown in Lemma 1, some results are guaranteed in the model (3.2).
Lemma 5. ˜Ω is an invariant set and the trajectory (x(0),y(0))∈˜Ω exists and is unique.
The equilibria of the model (3.2) on the coordinate axes (x,y) is given by P0,P2∈˜Σ−, and ˜P1=(K,0)∈˜Σ+, where P0 and P2 are equivalent to the equilibria of the model (2.2), so that their local stability is described in Lemma 2. In addition, and equivalently to what is shown in Lemma 2, ˜P1 is either a locally stable node or saddle point if s−qE<0 or s−qE>0, respectively.
On the other hand, the intersections in the nullclines of the vector field ˜X in ˜Σ+
y=f2(x),y=f3(x):=nx(s−qE)s−(s−qE)(nP−c)s, | (3.3) |
with y=f2(x) as represented in (2.3), and y=f3(x) a line with slope nx(s−qE)s and intercept at (0,−(s−qE)(nP−c)s) and (nP−cn,0), determine the number of interior equilibria of the model (3.2), equivalent to determining the positive roots of the polynomial
˜Q(x)=˜Ax3+˜Bx2+˜Cx+˜D, | (3.4) |
with
˜A=rs+aKn(s−qE)>0,˜B=rs(d−K−P)+aKn(bn−2nP+c)(s−qE),˜C=−K[ab(2nP−P)+aP(c−nP)](s−qE)−rsK(d−P),˜D=abP(c−nP)(s−qE). | (3.5) |
In this case, it is evident that the nullclines (3.3) do not intersect at ˜Σ+ if s−qE<0. Similarly, if s−qE>0 and nP−c>0, it follows that there is a unique point of the intersection at the nullclines (3.3) in ˜Σ+, which corresponds to a unique interior equilibrium ˜P∗=(x∗1,y∗1)∈˜Σ+ in the model (3.2), with y∗1=f3(x∗1), as observed in Figure 4, and whose proof is analogous to what is shown in Lemma 3.
Lemma 6. If s−qE<0, the model (3.2) has no interior equilibria. If s−qE>0 and nP−c>0, the model (3.2) has only one equilibrium.
On the other hand, if s−qE>0 and nP−c<0, then y∗1=f3(x∗1)>0 for all x∗1>0, so the positive roots of the polynomial (3.4) are interior equilibria of the model (3.2). In this case, assuming that ˜P∗=(x∗1,y∗1) is an interior equilibrium that always exists in ˜Ω with s−qE>0 and nP−c<0, a division between the polynomial ˜Q(x) (3.4) and x∗1 leads to the polynomial
ˉQ(x)=˜Ax2+(˜B+˜Ax∗1)x+˜C+x∗(˜B+˜Ax∗1) | (3.6) |
as a factor of ˜Q(x) and the rest of the division is ˜Q(x∗1)=0.
By clearing ˜B+˜Ax∗1 from (3.4) and substituting it in (3.6), we have
ˉQ(x)=˜Ax2+(˜B+˜Ax∗1)x−˜Dx∗1. | (3.7) |
If s−qE>0 and nP−c<0, then the following result shows conditions on the coefficients of the polynomial ˉQ(x) that determine the number of interior equilibria in the model (3.2).
Lemma 7. Let s−qE>0, nP−c<0 and ˜△=(˜B+˜Ax∗1)2+4˜A˜Dx∗1.
1) If ˜△<0, the model (3.2) has only one interior equilibrium.
2) If ˜△=0, the model (3.2) has two interior equilibria.
3) For ˜△>0,
(a) If ˜B+˜Ax∗1<0, the model (3.2) has three interior equilibria.
(b) If ˜B+˜Ax∗1≥0, the model (3.2) has only one interior equilibrium.
In particular, if the model (3.2) has a unique interior equilibrium point ˜P∗, and since ˜Ω is an invariant with equilibria on the unstable coordinate axes, by constraint, we have that ˜P∗ must be locally either a node or a focus, stable or unstable, so its local stability result is equivalent to what is shown in Lemma 4, where the trace in the Jacobian matrix D˜X computed on ˜P∗ is given by:
tr D˜X(˜P∗)=br(b+K)K(x∗1+b)2−ad(c−nd)(s−qE)s(x∗1+d−P)2−adn(s−qE)s(x∗1+d−P)−(s−qE)−rK. | (3.8) |
On the other hand, if the model (3.2) has three different interior equilibria ˜P3=(x∗1,g3(x∗1)), ˜P4=(x∗−,g3(x∗−)) and ˜P5=(x∗+,g3(x∗+)), with x∗1<x∗−<x∗+, the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix D˜X computed at each interior equilibrium ˜Pi,i=3,4,5, shows that ˜P4 is a saddle point; therefore, ˜P3 and ˜P5 must be locally stable or unstable nodes and/or focus, as summarized by the following result.
Lemma 8. If the model (3.2) has three different interior equilibriums ˜P3=(x∗1,f3(x∗1)), ˜P4=(x∗−,f3(x∗−)), and ˜P5=(x∗+,f3(x∗+)), with x∗1<x∗−<x∗+, then ˜P4 is a saddle point.
For the case of local stability of the equilibria ˜P3 and ˜P5, the following section generalizes the cases of local stability for both equilibria.
Let us consider the case where the model (3.2) has three interior equilibria ˜P3, ˜P4, and ˜P5, with ˜P3 stable and Ws+(˜P4), Wu+(˜P4) the upper stable and unstable varieties to the right in ˜Σ+ of the saddle point ˜P4, respectively, and whose dynamics is observed in Figure 5.
In this case, since ω-limit of Wu+(˜P4) could be the equilibrium ˜P5, when locally stable, or a stable limit cycle surrounding ˜P5 when locally unstable, or the equilibrium ˜P3 as observed in Figure 5, if (˜x0,˜ya)∈Wu+(˜P4) and (˜x0,˜yb)∈Ws+(˜P4), with P<˜x0<K, ˜ya=˜f1(a,b,c,d,E,K,P,q,r,s) and ˜yb=˜f2(a,b,c,d,E,K,P,q,r,s) continuous functions in X, then there exist (˜x0,˜y∗a),(˜xo,˜y∗b)∈˜Σ+ such that ˜y∗a=˜y∗b; therefore, the varieties Wu+(˜P4) and Ws+(˜P4) intersect and form a homoclinic curve ˜γ created by ˜P4 and surrounding ˜P5 as shown in the following result.
Theorem 6. If ˜P3 is stable and Ws+(˜P4)∩Wu+(˜P4)≠∅, then the model (3.2) has a homoclinic curve ˜γ surrounding ˜P5.
In particular, since the trace of DX is calculated in the equilibria ˜P3, ˜P5 is equivalent to that shown in (3.8), replacing x∗1 by x∗− or x∗+, respectively, the following result shows a generalization about the local stability of the equilibria ˜P3 and ˜P5.
Theorem 7. If ˜P3 is unstable, that is, trD˜X(˜P3)>0, then
1) ˜P5 is stable if trD˜X(˜P5)<0.
2) ˜P5 is unstable if trD˜X(˜P5)>0. In this case, at least one stable cycle is formed surrounding ˜P3, ˜P4, and ˜P5.
For ˜P3 stable, that is, trD˜X(˜P3)<0,
1) If ˜yb<˜ya,
(a) ˜P5 is unstable if trD˜X(˜P5)>0
b) ˜P5 is stable if trD˜X(˜P5)<0. In this case, at least one unstable cycle is formed, surrounding ˜P5.
2) If ˜yb>˜ya, ˜P5 is a stable node or focus.
In addition, if ˉ△(˜Pi):=[trD˜X(˜Pi)]2−4detD˜X(˜Pi), i=3,5, then ˜Pi is locally a node or a focus if ˉ△(˜Pi)>0 or ˉ△(˜Pi)<0, respectively.
Proof. The Theorem is immediate in view of the results shown in Lemma 4 and the Poincare - Bendixson Theorem [40]. Moreover, since there is a stable limit cycle surrounding the equilibrium ˜P3, this cycle increases until it coincides with the homoclinic curve ˜γ that joins the equilibrium ˜P2. Upon breaking ˜γ, that is, if ˜yb<˜ya, the local stability of ˜P3 is not altered.
In the first instance, if ˜P is a locally non saddle point equilibrium, then the model (3.2) has a Hopf bifurcation if tr D˜X(˜P)<0, the proof of which is analogous to what is shown in Theorem 4. Similarly, the model (3.2) has a transcritical bifurcation if s−qE=0, that is, when the equilibrium ˜P∗ collides with ˜P1, and whose proof is similar to that shown in Theorem 4, so it is omitted for brevity. On the other hand, since the model (3.2) has a homoclinic curve ˜γ if ˜P3 is unstable and the varieties Ws+(˜P4) and Wu+(˜P4) intersect, then such a model has a homoclinic bifurcation as shown in the following result, the proof of which is deduced from Theorems 6 and 7.
Theorem 8. If the model (3.2) has three interior equilibria ˜P3, ˜P4 and ˜P5, with ˜P3 stable and ˜ya−˜yb=0, the model (3.2) has a homoclinic bifurcation.
Finally, if ˜P3,˜P4,˜P5∈˜Ω, the model (3.2) has a saddle-node bifurcation if the saddle point ˜P4 collides with ˜P3 or ˜P5, forming the saddle-node equilibria ˜P+=(˜x+,f2(˜x+)) with ˜x+=−˜B+˜Ax∗12˜A or ˜P−=(˜x−,f3(˜x−)) with ˜x−=x∗−, as observed in the following result. In particular, given that the Jacobian matrix D˜X in the vector field ˜X of the model (3.2) calculated in ˜P+ is
D˜X(˜P+)=[an(s−qE)(˜x+−P)s[(˜x+−P)+d]−a(˜x+−P)(˜x+−P)+dn(s−qE)2s−(s−qE)], | (3.9) |
with det D˜X(˜P+)=0 and
tr D˜X(˜P+)=an(s−qE)(˜x+−P)s[(˜x+−P)+d]−(s−qE), |
then ˜P+ is a stable or unstable saddle-node equilibrium if tr DX(˜P+)<0 or tr DX(˜P+)>0, respectively. Analogously for ˜P− if ˜x+ is replaced by ˜x−.
Theorem 9. If ˜P3 and ˜P4, or ˜P5 and ˜P4, collide, the model (3.2) has a saddle-node bifurcation around ˜P+ o ˜P−, respectively.
Proof. The case in which ˜P4 collides with ˜P5 will be proved, similarly for the case in which ˜P3 and ˜P4 collide. Let ˜Xc(x,y,c) be the derivative of the vector field ˜X(x,y,c) with respect to c, that is, ˜Xc(x,y,c)=(0,sy2[n(x−P)+c]2)T, and U=(sn(s−qE),1)T, W=((s−qE)[(˜x+−P)+d]a(˜x+−P),−1) the eigenvectors associated with the null eigenvalue in D˜X and D˜XT calculated in ˜P+, respectively.
If c0 satisface ˜△(c0)=0, by the saddle-node bifurcation Theorem [44], two conditions must be guaranteed: WT˜Xc(˜P+,c0)≠0 and WT[D2˜X(˜P+,c0)(U,U)]≠0. Indeed,
1) Since ˜Xc(˜P+,c0)=(0,(s−qE)2s)T then WT˜Xc(˜P+,c0)(s−qE)2s>0.
2) If ˜X=(˜g1(x,y,c),˜g2(x,y,c))T, with ˜g1=rxx+b(1−xK)−a(x−P)y(x−P)+d and ˜g2=sy[1−yn(x−P)]−qEy, and U=(u1,u2), then
D2˜X(˜P+,c0)(U,U)=(∂2˜g1∂x2u1u1+2∂2˜g1∂x∂yu1u2+∂2˜g1∂y2u2u2∂2˜g2∂x2u1u1+2∂2˜g2∂x∂yu1u2+∂2˜g2∂y2u2u2)=(−2s(3˜Ax++˜B)n2K[(˜x+−P)+d](s−qE)20), |
and WT[D2˜X(˜P+,c0)(U,U)]=2s(3˜A˜x++˜B)n2K[(x+−P)+b](s−qE)2≠0.
Figure 6 shows the bifurcation curves in the (P,E) plane, and realized by the numerical bifurcation package SlideCont [45], which the transcritical bifurcation separates regions Ⅰ and Ⅱ, the homoclinic bifurcation separates regions Ⅵ and Ⅶ and the Hopf bifurcation divides regions Ⅱ and Ⅲ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ, and Ⅶ and Ⅷ. In this case, the stability of ˜P∗, ˜P3 and ˜P5 are altered in the curves separating regions Ⅱ-Ⅲ, Ⅴ-Ⅵ, and Ⅶ-Ⅷ, respectively.
Furthermore, in regions Ⅴ and Ⅷ, we observe the existence of three interior equilibria in the model (3.2), which the chair-node bifurcation formed between regions Ⅱ and Ⅴ shows the collision of P3 and ˜P4. However, the collision between ˜P4 and ˜P5 is shown by the curve between regions Ⅶ and Ⅷ. Similarly, the curve separating regions Ⅴ and Ⅲ represents a saddle-node bifurcation.
On the other hand, since the selected fixed parameters were chosen in order to show all possible dynamics of the model (3.2) in the bifurcation plane (P,E) in Figure 6, Figure 7 shows the phase portraits of each bifurcation region, whose dynamics are described as:
● Regions Ⅰ-Ⅲ are equivalent to that shown in Figure 2, so there is a single equilibrium ˜P∗ and its local stability is observed in Figures 7(a, b, c).
● For the case where ˜P3 and ˜P5 are unstable equilibria, we observe the formation of a limit cycle Γ˜X surrounding the three interior equilibria in region Ⅳ as observed in Figure 7(d), so that the trajectories φZc converge to Γ˜X.
● If ˜P3 is unstable and ˜P5 is stable, in region Ⅴ the trajectories φZc converge to ˜P3 as observed in Figure 7(e).
● For the case where ˜P3 and ˜P5 are stable, we have either the formation of a locally unstable limit cycle surrounding ˜P5, or a homoclinic curve joining ˜P4 and surrounding ˜P5, or the breaking of such a curve without altering the stability of ˜P5. In this case, in region Ⅶ we have a locally unstable limit cycle as observed in Figure 7(g), which vanishes as shown in region Ⅵ of Figure 7(f).
● In region Ⅷ we have that φZc converges to ˜P3 as observed in Figure 7(h).
Since the predator-prey Leslie-Gower models proposed by several researchers which consider constant prey refuge are valid only when the initial population size of the prey is above their refuge [1,29], that is, when P<x(0), in this paper, we make a general modification to these models in order to show the dynamics of both species without restrictions on the initial condition of the proposed Leslie-Gower models.
On the other hand, given the hypotheses on the dynamics of predators in the presence or absence of prey for their food, the proposed model (1.3) considers that the predator's diet depends only on prey; in the absence of prey, they are forced to obtain other types of food for their subsistence. However, the model (1.5) considers that the predator's diet is given by prey and alternative food provided by the environment, and in the absence of prey, predators are not forced to change their diet.
In both proposed models (1.3) and (1.5), all trajectories with initial condition in the vector field Y cross the line x=P, and remain in the vector field X or ˜X, respectively, because the system of differential equations describing the vector field Y are independent and the only stable interior equilibrium does not belong to the biological sense region, though the trajectories try to make a convergence to this point. Similarly, the stable or unstable varieties of each interior equilibrium in both models do not cross the straight line x=P, unlike the unstable variety of P0, which connects to P1 or ˜P1, and P2. Biologically, the growth of the prey described by both models (1.3) and (1.5) cannot be controlled below P>0, so prey growth over time is higher than P.
The model (1.3) has a unique interior equilibrium point if the intrinsic birth rates of the predators are greater than the product of the catchability coefficient and hasvesting effort of the predators, that is s−qE>0; otherwise, the prey converge to their carrying capacity K>0 and the predators become extinct. Moreover, the model (1.3) has a stable limit cycle as long as the interior equilibrium is unstable, so both species stabilize over time if the interior equilibrium is stable. In this model we have two types of bifurcations: Transcritical and Hopf. These are what separates the extinction or not of predators and the long-term stabilization of the population size of both species, respectively.
The bifurcation cases of model (1.3) can be transferred to model (1.5). However, model (1.5) has two additional bifurcations: saddle-node and homoclinic. In this case, the model can have between one or three interior equilibria as long as s−qE>0; otherwise, analogous to model (1.3), predators die out and prey converge to the carrying capacity.
For the case where model (1.5) has three interior equilibria, there exists a stable limit cycle surrounding all its interior equilibria if ˜P3 and ˜P5 are unstable. Similarly, the model (1.5) could have a locally unstable limit cycle if ˜P3 and ˜P5 are stable, and the homoclinic bifurcation is given by the formation of a homoclinic curve ˜γ given by ˜P4.
In addition to the homoclinic bifurcation, the model (1.5) could have a heteroclinic bifurcation, whose bifurcation curve coincides with the homoclinic, from which a variety connection transition is made between ˜P1 and ˜P3 or ˜P1 and ˜P5, where the locally unstable limit cycle is given by the formation of the heteroclinic curve connecting ˜P1 and ˜P5.
On the other hand, if the model (1.5) has a unique interior equilibrium, equivalently to the model (1.3), we have that the growth of both species stabilizes with time, or on the contrary has oscillatory solutions, when the equilibrium is stable or unstable, respectively. However, if the model (1.5) has three interior equilibria, the growth of the prey converges to its minimum quantity, regardless of the initial condition, if ˜P3 is stable and ˜P5 is unstable. However, if ˜P3 and ˜P5 are stable, and there is no unstable cycle surrounding ˜P5, then prey converges to its minimum quantity if the initial condition of the species is above the stable variety of ˜P4, otherwise prey converges to its maximum quantity. Similarly, if the model (1.5) has three equilibria where ˜P3 and ˜P5 are stable, with an unstable cycle surrounding ˜P5, prey converges to its minimum quantity if the initial condition is above the limit cycle.
Similarly, if the model (1.5) has three interior equilibria, where ˜P3 is unstable and ˜P5 is stable, the prey converge to their maximum quantity regardless of their initial condition. However, if ˜P3 and ˜P5 are unstable, both species have oscillatory solutions. In particular, alternative food for predators could lead to a possible maximum or minimum choice in the amount of prey over time as long as the model (1.5) has three interior equilibria, with appropriate stability for each of these, and an appropriate selection in the initial condition of prey and predators.
To conclude, if in both proposed models (1.3) and (1.5) no external factors inhibiting the intrinsic growth of prey are considered, that is, if ˙x=rx(1−xK) in the absence of predators, the bifurcation cases for the two models (1.3) and (1.5) hold, and the interior equilibria still need to be computed computationally, so the alteration of ˙x=rx(1−xK) or ˙x=rxx+b(1−xK) in the absence of predators does not affect the overall mathematical results in both proposed models.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This research was supported by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 through grant BADS, no. PID2019-109320GB-100, and the associated FPI contract PRE2019-088899 to Christian Cortés García. The Spanish MICINN has also funded the "Severo Ochoa" Centers of Excellence to CNB, SEV 2017-0712.
The author declare there is no conflict of interest.
[1] | L. K. Johnson, Smart intelligence, Foreign Policy, (1992), 53–69. |
[2] | J. Wang, C. Xu, J. Zhang, R. Zhong, Big data analytics for intelligent manufacturing systems: A review, J. Manuf Syst., (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.005 |
[3] |
W. H. Zijm, Towards intelligent manufacturing planning and control systems, OR-Spektrum, 22 (2000), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002919900032 doi: 10.1007/s002919900032
![]() |
[4] | W. Qi H. Su, A cybertwin based multimodal network for ecg patterns monitoring using deep learning, IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3159583 |
[5] |
L. Monostori, J. Prohaszka, A step towards intelligent manufacturing: Modelling and monitoring of manufacturing processes through artificial neural networks, CIRP Ann., 42 (1993), 485–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62491-3 doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62491-3
![]() |
[6] | X. Yao, J. Zhou, J. Zhang, C. R. Boër, From intelligent manufacturing to smart manufacturing for industry 4.0 driven by next generation artificial intelligence and further on, in 2017 5th international conference on enterprise systems (ES). IEEE, (2017), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ES.2017.58 |
[7] |
J. Yi, C. Lu, G. Li, A literature review on latest developments of harmony search and its applications to intelligent manufacturing, Math. Biosci. Eng., 16 (2019), 2086–2117. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2019102 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019102
![]() |
[8] |
S. Shan, X. Wen, Y. Wei, Z. Wang, Y. Chen, Intelligent manufacturing in industry 4.0: A case study of sany heavy industry, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 37 (2020), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2709 doi: 10.1002/sres.2709
![]() |
[9] |
H. Yoshikawa, Manufacturing and the 21st century intelligent manufacturing systems and the renaissance of the manufacturing industry, Technol. Forecast Soc. Change, 49 (1995), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(95)00008-X doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(95)00008-X
![]() |
[10] | J. Zheng, K. Chan, I. Gibson, Virtual reality, IEEE Potent., 17 (1998), 20–23. |
[11] |
M. J. Schuemie, P. Van Der Straaten, M. Krijn, C. A. Van Der Mast, Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey, Cyberpsychol. & Behav., 4 (2001), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300117884 doi: 10.1089/109493101300117884
![]() |
[12] | C. Anthes, R. J. García-Hernández, M. Wiedemann, D. Kranzlmüller, State of the art of virtual reality technology, in IEEE Aerosp. Conf.. (2016), 1–19. 10.1109/AERO.2016.7500674 |
[13] | F. Biocca, B. Delaney, Immersive virtual reality technology, Communication in the age of virtual reality, 15 (1995). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603128 |
[14] | T. Mazuryk, M. Gervautz, Virtual reality-history, applications, technology and future, 1996. |
[15] |
N.-N. Zhou, Y.-L. Deng, Virtual reality: A state-of-the-art survey, Int. J. Autom. Comput., 6 (2009), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-009-0319-9 doi: 10.1007/s11633-009-0319-9
![]() |
[16] |
J. Egger, T. Masood, Augmented reality in support of intelligent manufacturing–a systematic literature review, Comput. Ind. Eng., 140 (2020), 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106195 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106195
![]() |
[17] |
B.-H. Li, B.-C. Hou, W.-T. Yu, X.-B. Lu, C.-W. Yang, Applications of artificial intelligence in intelligent manufacturing: a review, Front. Inform. Tech. El., 18 (2017), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601885 doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1601885
![]() |
[18] |
B. He, K.-J. Bai, Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: A review, Adv. Manuf., 9 (2021), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00302-5 doi: 10.1007/s40436-020-00302-5
![]() |
[19] | G.-J. Cheng, L.-T. Liu, X.-J. Qiang, Y. Liu, Industry 4.0 development and application of intelligent manufacturing, in 2016 international conference on information system and artificial intelligence (ISAI). IEEE, (2016), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAI.2016.0092 |
[20] |
G. Y. Tian, G. Yin, D. Taylor, Internet-based manufacturing: A review and a new infrastructure for distributed intelligent manufacturing, J. Intell. Manuf., 13 (2002), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019907906158 doi: 10.1023/A:1019907906158
![]() |
[21] |
H. Su, W. Qi, J. Chen, D. Zhang, Fuzzy approximation-based task-space control of robot manipulators with remote center of motion constraint, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2022), 1564–1573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3157075 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3157075
![]() |
[22] | M.-S. Yoh, The reality of virtual reality, in Proceedings seventh international conference on virtual systems and multimedia. IEEE, (2001), 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2001.969726 |
[23] |
V. Antoniou, F. L. Bonali, P. Nomikou, A. Tibaldi, P. Melissinos, F. P. Mariotto, et al., Integrating virtual reality and gis tools for geological mapping, data collection and analysis: An example from the metaxa mine, santorini (greece), Appl. Sci., 10 (2020), 8317. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238317 doi: 10.3390/app10238317
![]() |
[24] |
A. Kunz, M. Zank, T. Nescher, K. Wegener, Virtual reality based time and motion study with support for real walking, Proced. CIRP, 57 (2016), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.053 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.053
![]() |
[25] | M. Serras, L. G.-Sardia, B. Simes, H. lvarez, J. Arambarri, Dialogue enhanced extended reality: Interactive system for the operator 4.0, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113960 |
[26] |
A. G. da Silva, M. V. M. Gomes, I. Winkler, Virtual reality and digital human modeling for ergonomic assessment in industrial product development: A patent and literature review, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031084 doi: 10.3390/app12031084
![]() |
[27] |
J. Kim, J. Jeong, Design and implementation of opc ua-based vr/ar collaboration model using cps server for vr engineering process, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 7534. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157534 doi: 10.3390/app12157534
![]() |
[28] |
J.-d.-J. Cordero-Guridi, L. Cuautle-Gutiérrez, R.-I. Alvarez-Tamayo, S.-O. Caballero-Morales, Design and development of a i4. 0 engineering education laboratory with virtual and digital technologies based on iso/iec tr 23842-1 standard guidelines, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 5993. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12125993 doi: 10.3390/app12125993
![]() |
[29] |
H. Heinonen, A. Burova, S. Siltanen, J. Lähteenmäki, J. Hakulinen, M. Turunen, Evaluating the benefits of collaborative vr review for maintenance documentation and risk assessment, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 7155. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147155 doi: 10.3390/app12147155
![]() |
[30] |
V. Settgast, K. Kostarakos, E. Eggeling, M. Hartbauer, T. Ullrich, Product tests in virtual reality: Lessons learned during collision avoidance development for drones, Designs, 6 (2022), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020033 doi: 10.3390/designs6020033
![]() |
[31] |
D. Mourtzis, J. Angelopoulos, N. Panopoulos, Smart manufacturing and tactile internet based on 5g in industry 4.0: Challenges, applications and new trends, Electronics-Switz, 10 (2021), 3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10243175 doi: 10.3390/electronics10243175
![]() |
[32] |
Y. Saito, K. Kawashima, M. Hirakawa, Effectiveness of a head movement interface for steering a vehicle in a virtual reality driving simulation, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 1645. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12101645 doi: 10.3390/sym12101645
![]() |
[33] |
Y.-P. Su, X.-Q. Chen, T. Zhou, C. Pretty, G. Chase, Mixed-reality-enhanced human–robot interaction with an imitation-based mapping approach for intuitive teleoperation of a robotic arm-hand system, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 4740. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094740 doi: 10.3390/app12094740
![]() |
[34] |
F. Arena, M. Collotta, G. Pau, F. Termine, An overview of augmented reality, Computers, 11 (2022), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020028 doi: 10.3390/computers11020028
![]() |
[35] | P. C. Thomas, W. David, Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes, in Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin New York, NY, USA, 1992. |
[36] |
J. Safari Bazargani, A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, S.-M. Choi, Design, implementation, and evaluation of an immersive virtual reality-based educational game for learning topology relations at schools: A case study, Sustainability-Basel, 13 (2021), 13066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313066 doi: 10.3390/su132313066
![]() |
[37] |
K. Židek, J. Pitel', M. Balog, A. Hošovskỳ, V. Hladkỳ, P. Lazorík, et al., CNN training using 3d virtual models for assisted assembly with mixed reality and collaborative robots, Appl. Sci., 11 (2021), 4269. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094269 doi: 10.3390/app11094269
![]() |
[38] | S. Mandal, Brief introduction of virtual reality & its challenges, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 4 (2013), 304–309. |
[39] | D. Rose, N. Foreman, Virtual reality. The Psycho., (1999). |
[40] | G. Riva, C. Malighetti, A. Chirico, D. Di Lernia, F. Mantovani, A. Dakanalis, Virtual reality, in Rehabilitation interventions in the patient with obesity. Springer, (2020), 189–204. |
[41] |
J. N. Latta, D. J. Oberg, A conceptual virtual reality model, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 14 (1994), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.250915 doi: 10.1109/38.250915
![]() |
[42] | J. Lanier, Virtual reality: The promise of the future. Interactive Learning International, 8 (1992), 275–79. |
[43] | S. Serafin, C. Erkut, J. Kojs, N. C. Nilsson, R. Nordahl, Virtual reality musical instruments: State of the art, design principles, and future directions, Comput. Music. J., 40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00372 |
[44] |
W. Qi, H. Su, A. Aliverti, A smartphone-based adaptive recognition and real-time monitoring system for human activities, IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst., 50 (2020), 414 - 423. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.2984181 doi: 10.1109/THMS.2020.2984181
![]() |
[45] |
P. Kopacek, Intelligent manufacturing: present state and future trends, J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 26 (1999), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008168605803 doi: 10.1023/A:1008168605803
![]() |
[46] |
Y. Feng, Y. Zhao, H. Zheng, Z. Li, J. Tan, Data-driven product design toward intelligent manufacturing: A review, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 17 (2020), 1729881420911257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881420911257 doi: 10.1177/1729881420911257
![]() |
[47] |
H. Su, W. Qi, Y. Hu, H. R. Karimi, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, An incremental learning framework for human-like redundancy optimization of anthropomorphic manipulators, IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform., 18 (2020), 1864–1872. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3036693 doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3036693
![]() |
[48] | E. Hozdić, Smart factory for industry 4.0: A review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 7 (2015), 28–35. |
[49] | R. Burke, A. Mussomeli, S. Laaper, M. Hartigan, B. Sniderman, The smart factory: Responsive, adaptive, connected manufacturing, Deloitte Insights, 31 (2017), 1–10. |
[50] |
R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, S. T. Newman, Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review, Engineering-Prc, 3 (2017), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015
![]() |
[51] | A. Kusiak, Intelligent manufacturing, System, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (1990). |
[52] |
G. Rzevski, A framework for designing intelligent manufacturing systems, Comput. Ind., 34 (1997), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(97)00056-0 doi: 10.1016/S0166-3615(97)00056-0
![]() |
[53] | E. Oztemel, Intelligent manufacturing systems, in Artificial intelligence techniques for networked manufacturing enterprises management. Springer, (2010), pp. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-119-6_1 |
[54] |
J. Zhou, P. Li, Y. Zhou, B. Wang, J. Zang, L. Meng, Toward new-generation intelligent manufacturing, Engineering-Prc, 4 (2018), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.01.002
![]() |
[55] |
R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, S. T. Newman, Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review, Engineering-Prc, 3 (2017), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015
![]() |
[56] |
H. S. Kang, J. Y. Lee, S. Choi, H. Kim, J. H. Park, J. Y. Son, B. H. Kim, S. D. Noh, Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions, Int. J. Pr. Eng. Man-Gt., 3 (2016), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5 doi: 10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5
![]() |
[57] | R. Jardim-Goncalves, D. Romero, A. Grilo, Factories of the future: challenges and leading innovations in intelligent manufacturing, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 30 (2017), 4–14. |
[58] | A. Kusiak, Smart manufacturing, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56 (2018), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 |
[59] |
B. Wang, F. Tao, X. Fang, C. Liu, Y. Liu, T. Freiheit, Smart manufacturing and intelligent manufacturing: A comparative review, Engineering-Prc, 7 (2021), 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.017 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.017
![]() |
[60] |
P. Zheng, Z. Sang, R. Y. Zhong, Y. Liu, C. Liu, K. Mubarok, et al., Smart manufacturing systems for industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives, Front. Mech. Eng., 13 (2018), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5 doi: 10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5
![]() |
[61] | P. Osterrieder, L. Budde, T. Friedli, The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 221 107476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.011 |
[62] | D. Guo, M. Li, R. Zhong, G. Q. Huang, Graduation intelligent manufacturing system (gims): an industry 4.0 paradigm for production and operations management, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0489 |
[63] |
A. Barari, M. de Sales Guerra Tsuzuki, Y. Cohen, M. Macchi, Intelligent manufacturing systems towards industry 4.0 era, J. Intell. Manuf., 32 (2021), 1793–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01769-0 doi: 10.1007/s10845-021-01769-0
![]() |
[64] | C. Christo, C. Cardeira, Trends in intelligent manufacturing systems, in 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics-Switz.. IEEE, (2007), 3209–3214. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2007.4375129 |
[65] |
M.-P. Pacaux-Lemoine, D. Trentesaux, G. Z. Rey, P. Millot, Designing intelligent manufacturing systems through human-machine cooperation principles: A human-centered approach, Comput. Ind. Eng., 111 (2017), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.014 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.014
![]() |
[66] |
W. F. Gaughran, S. Burke, P. Phelan, Intelligent manufacturing and environmental sustainability, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 23 (2007), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.016 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.016
![]() |
[67] | Y. Boas, Overview of virtual reality technologies, in Inter. Mult. Confer., 2013 (2013). |
[68] |
lvaro Segura, H. V. Diez, I. Barandiaran, A. Arbelaiz, H. lvarez, B. Simes, J. Posada, A. Garca-Alonso, R. Ugarte, Visual computing technologies to support the operator 4.0, Comput. Ind. Eng., 139 (2020), 105550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.060 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.060
![]() |
[69] | D. Romero, J. Stahre, T. Wuest, O. Noran, P. Bernus, Fasth, Fast-Berglund, D. Gorecky, Towards an operator 4.0 typology: A human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies, 10 (2016). |
[70] | H. Qiao, J. Chen, X. Huang, A survey of brain-inspired intelligent robots: Integration of vision, decision, motion control, and musculoskeletal systems, " IEEE T. Cybernetics, 52 (2022), 11267 - 11280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3071312 |
[71] | F. Firyaguna, J. John, M. O. Khyam, D. Pesch, E. Armstrong, H. Claussen, H. V. Poor et al., Towards industry 5.0: Intelligent reflecting surface (irs) in smart manufacturing, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2201.02214, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2200016 |
[72] | A. M. Almassri, W. Wan Hasan, S. A. Ahmad, A. J. Ishak, A. Ghazali, D. Talib, C. Wada, Pressure sensor: state of the art, design, and application for robotic hand, J. Sensors, 2015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/846487 |
[73] | B. Munari, Design as art. Penguin UK, (2008). |
[74] | B. De La Harpe, J. F. Peterson, N. Frankham, R. Zehner, D. Neale, E. Musgrave, R. McDermott, Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design? IJADE., 28 (2009), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01591.x |
[75] | C. Gray, J. Malins, Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Routledge, (2016). |
[76] | M. Barnard, Art, design and visual culture: An introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing, (1998). |
[77] | C. Crouch, Modernism in art, design and architecture. Bloomsbury Publishing, (1998). |
[78] | M. Biggs, The role of the artefact in art and design research, Int. J. Des. Sci. Technol., 2002. |
[79] | H. Su, W. Qi, Y. Schmirander, S. E. Ovur, S. Cai, X. Xiong, A human activity-aware shared control solution for medical human–robot interaction, Assembly Autom., (2022) ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-12-2021-0174 |
[80] | R. D. Gandhi, D. S. Patel, Virtual reality–opportunities and challenges, Virtual Real., 5 (2018). |
[81] |
A. J. Trappey, C. V. Trappey, M.-H. Chao, C.-T. Wu, Vr-enabled engineering consultation chatbot for integrated and intelligent manufacturing services, J. Ind. Inf. Integrat., 26 (2022), 100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100331 doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2022.100331
![]() |
[82] |
K. Valaskova, M. Nagy, S. Zabojnik, G. Lăzăroiu, Industry 4.0 wireless networks and cyber-physical smart manufacturing systems as accelerators of value-added growth in slovak exports, Mathematics-Basel, 10 (2022), 2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10142452 doi: 10.3390/math10142452
![]() |
[83] |
J. de Assis Dornelles, N. F. Ayala, A. G. Frank, Smart working in industry 4.0: How digital technologies enhance manufacturing workers' activities, Comput. Ind. Eng., 163 (2022), 107804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107804 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107804
![]() |
[84] |
V. Tripathi, S. Chattopadhyaya, A. K. Mukhopadhyay, S. Sharma, C. Li, S. Singh, W. U. Hussan, B. Salah, W. Saleem, A. Mohamed, A sustainable productive method for enhancing operational excellence in shop floor management for industry 4.0 using hybrid integration of lean and smart manufacturing: An ingenious case study, Sustainability-Basel, 14 (2022), 7452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127452 doi: 10.3390/su14127452
![]() |
[85] |
S. M. M. Sajadieh, Y. H. Son, S. D. Noh, A conceptual definition and future directions of urban smart factory for sustainable manufacturing, Sustainability-Basel, 14 (2022), 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031221 doi: 10.3390/su14031221
![]() |
[86] |
Y. H. Son, G.-Y. Kim, H. C. Kim, C. Jun, S. D. Noh, Past, present, and future research of digital twin for smart manufacturing, J. Comput. Des. Eng., 9 (2022), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwab067 doi: 10.1093/jcde/qwab067
![]() |
[87] |
G. Moiceanu, G. Paraschiv, Digital twin and smart manufacturing in industries: A bibliometric analysis with a focus on industry 4.0, Sensors-Basel, 22 (2022), 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041388 doi: 10.3390/s22041388
![]() |
[88] |
K. Cheng, Q. Wang, D. Yang, Q. Dai, M. Wang, Digital-twins-driven semi-physical simulation for testing and evaluation of industrial software in a smart manufacturing system, Machines, 10 (2022), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10050388 doi: 10.3390/machines10050388
![]() |
[89] |
S. Arjun, L. Murthy, P. Biswas, Interactive sensor dashboard for smart manufacturing, Procedia Comput. Sci., 200 (2022), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.204 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.204
![]() |
[90] |
J. Yang, Y. H. Son, D. Lee, S. D. Noh, Digital twin-based integrated assessment of flexible and reconfigurable automotive part production lines, Machines, 10 (2022), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10020075 doi: 10.3390/machines10020075
![]() |
[91] |
J. Friederich, D. P. Francis, S. Lazarova-Molnar, N. Mohamed, A framework for data-driven digital twins for smart manufacturing, Comput. Ind., 136 (2022), 103586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103586 doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103586
![]() |
[92] |
L. Li, B. Lei, C. Mao, Digital twin in smart manufacturing, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 26 (2022), 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100289 doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100289
![]() |
[93] |
D. Nåfors, B. Johansson, Virtual engineering using realistic virtual models in brownfield factory layout planning, Sustainability-Basel, 13 (2021), 11102. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911102 doi: 10.3390/su131911102
![]() |
[94] |
A. Geiger, E. Brandenburg, R. Stark, Natural virtual reality user interface to define assembly sequences for digital human models, Appl. System Innov., 3 (2020), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3010015 doi: 10.3390/asi3010015
![]() |
[95] |
G. Gabajova, B. Furmannova, I. Medvecka, P. Grznar, M. Krajčovič, R. Furmann, Virtual training application by use of augmented and virtual reality under university technology enhanced learning in slovakia, Sustainability-Basel, 11 (2019), 6677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236677 doi: 10.3390/su11236677
![]() |
[96] |
W. Qi, S. E. Ovur, Z. Li, A. Marzullo, R. Song, Multi-sensor guided hand gesture recognition for a teleoperated robot using a recurrent neural network, IEEE Robot Autom Lett., 6 (2021), 6039–6045. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3089999 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3089999
![]() |
[97] |
L. Pérez, S. Rodríguez-Jiménez, N. Rodríguez, R. Usamentiaga, D. F. García, Digital twin and virtual reality based methodology for multi-robot manufacturing cell commissioning, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020), 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103633 doi: 10.3390/app10103633
![]() |
[98] |
J. Mora-Serrano, F. Muñoz-La Rivera, I. Valero, Factors for the automation of the creation of virtual reality experiences to raise awareness of occupational hazards on construction sites, Electronics-Switz., 10 (2021), 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10111355 doi: 10.3390/electronics10111355
![]() |
[99] |
C. McDonald, K. A. Campbell, C. Benson, M. J. Davis, C. J. Frost, Workforce development and multiagency collaborations: A presentation of two case studies in child welfare, Sustainability-Basel, 13 (2021), 10190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810190 doi: 10.3390/su131810190
![]() |
[100] |
Z. Xu, N. Zheng, Incorporating virtual reality technology in safety training solution for construction site of urban cities, Sustainability-Basel, 13 (2020), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010243 doi: 10.3390/su13010243
![]() |
[101] |
L. Frizziero, L. Galletti, L. Magnani, E. G. Meazza, M. Freddi, Blitz vision: Development of a new full-electric sports sedan using qfd, sde and virtual prototyping, Inventions, 7 (2022), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7020041 doi: 10.3390/inventions7020041
![]() |
[102] | N. Lyons, Deep learning-based computer vision algorithms, immersive analytics and simulation software, and virtual reality modeling tools in digital twin-driven smart manufacturing, Econom. Manag. Financ. Markets, 17 (2022). |
[103] |
H. Qiao, S. Zhong, Z. Chen, H. Wang, Improving performance of robots using human-inspired approaches: A survey, Sci. China Inf. Sci., 65 (2022), 221201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3606-1 doi: 10.1007/s11432-022-3606-1
![]() |
[104] |
H. Su, A. Mariani, S. E. Ovur, A. Menciassi, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, Toward teaching by demonstration for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, IEEE Trans. Autom, 18 (2021), 484 - 494. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2020.3045655 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2020.3045655
![]() |
[105] |
H. Su, W. Qi, Z. Li, Z. Chen, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, Deep neural network approach in EMG-based force estimation for human–robot interaction, IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., 2 (2021), 404 - 412. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2021.3066565 doi: 10.1109/TAI.2021.3066565
![]() |
[106] |
A. A. Malik, T. Masood, A. Bilberg, Virtual reality in manufacturing: immersive and collaborative artificial-reality in design of human-robot workspace, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 33 (2020), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1690685 doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2019.1690685
![]() |
[107] |
A. Corallo, A. M. Crespino, M. Lazoi, M. Lezzi, Model-based big data analytics-as-a-service framework in smart manufacturing: A case study, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 76 (2022), 102331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102331 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102331
![]() |
[108] |
Y.-M. Tang, G. T. S. Ho, Y.-Y. Lau, S.-Y. Tsui, Integrated smart warehouse and manufacturing management with demand forecasting in small-scale cyclical industries, Machines, 10 (2022), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10060472 doi: 10.3390/machines10060472
![]() |
[109] | M. Samardžić, D. Stefanović, U. Marjanović, Transformation towards smart working: Research proposal, in 2022 21st International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH). IEEE, (2022), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOTEH53737.2022.9751256 |
[110] |
T. Caporaso, S. Grazioso, G. Di Gironimo, Development of an integrated virtual reality system with wearable sensors for ergonomic evaluation of human–robot cooperative workplaces, Sensors-Basel, 22 (2022), 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062413 doi: 10.3390/s22062413
![]() |
[111] |
W. Qi, N. Wang, H. Su, A. Aliverti DCNN based human activity recognition framework with depth vision guiding, Neurocomputing, 486 (2022), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.044 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.044
![]() |
[112] |
W. Zhu, X. Fan, Y. Zhang, Applications and research trends of digital human models in the manufacturing industry, VRIH, 1 (2019), 558–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2019.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.vrih.2019.09.005
![]() |
[113] |
O. Robert, P. Iztok, B. Borut, Real-time manufacturing optimization with a simulation model and virtual reality, Procedia Manuf., 38 (2019), 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.198 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.198
![]() |
[114] |
I. Kačerová, J. Kubr, P. Hořejší, J. Kleinová, Ergonomic design of a workplace using virtual reality and a motion capture suit, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 2150. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042150 doi: 10.3390/app12042150
![]() |
[115] |
M. Woschank, D. Steinwiedder, A. Kaiblinger, P. Miklautsch, C. Pacher, H. Zsifkovits, The integration of smart systems in the context of industrial logistics in manufacturing enterprises, Procedia Comput. Sci., 200 (2022), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.271 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.271
![]() |
[116] |
A. Umbrico, A. Orlandini, A. Cesta, M. Faroni, M. Beschi, N. Pedrocchi, A. Scala, P. Tavormina, S. Koukas, A. Zalonis et al., Design of advanced human–robot collaborative cells for personalized human–robot collaborations, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 6839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146839 doi: 10.3390/app12146839
![]() |
[117] |
W. Qi, A. Aliverti, A multimodal wearable system for continuous and real-time breathing pattern monitoring during daily activity, IEEE JBHI., 24 (2019), 2199–2207. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2963048 doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2963048
![]() |
[118] |
J. M. Runji, Y.-J. Lee, C.-H. Chu, User requirements analysis on augmented reality-based maintenance in manufacturing, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 22 (2022), 050901. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053410 doi: 10.1115/1.4053410
![]() |
[119] | D. Wuttke, A. Upadhyay, E. Siemsen, A. Wuttke-Linnemann, Seeing the bigger picture? ramping up production with the use of augmented reality, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1070 |
[120] |
M. Catalano, A. Chiurco, C. Fusto, L. Gazzaneo, F. Longo, G. Mirabelli, L. Nicoletti, V. Solina, S. Talarico, A digital twin-driven and conceptual framework for enabling extended reality applications: A case study of a brake discs manufacturer, Procedia Comput. Sci., 200 (2022), 1885–1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.389 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.389
![]() |
[121] | J. S. Devagiri, S. Paheding, Q. Niyaz, X. Yang, S. Smith, Augmented reality and artificial intelligence in industry: Trends, tools, and future challenges, Expert Syst. Appl., (2022), 118002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118002 |
[122] |
P. T. Ho, J. A. Albajez, J. Santolaria, J. A. Yagüe-Fabra, Study of augmented reality based manufacturing for further integration of quality control 4.0: A systematic literature review, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041961 doi: 10.3390/app12041961
![]() |
[123] |
Z.-H. Lai, W. Tao, M. C. Leu, Z. Yin, Smart augmented reality instructional system for mechanical assembly towards worker-centered intelligent manufacturing, J. Manuf. Syst., 55 (2020), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.010
![]() |
[124] |
J. Xiong, E.-L. Hsiang, Z. He, T. Zhan, S.-T. Wu, Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives, Light Sci. Appl., 10 (2021), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00658-8 doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00658-8
![]() |
[125] |
M.-G. Kim, J. Kim, S. Y. Chung, M. Jin, M. J. Hwang, Robot-based automation for upper and sole manufacturing in shoe production, Machines, 10 (2022), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10040255 doi: 10.3390/machines10040255
![]() |
[126] |
P. Grefen, I. Vanderfeesten, K. Traganos, Z. Domagala-Schmidt, J. van der Vleuten, Advancing smart manufacturing in europe: Experiences from two decades of research and innovation projects, Machines, 10 (2022), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10010045 doi: 10.3390/machines10010045
![]() |
[127] |
Y. Zhou, J. Zang, Z. Miao, T. Minshall, Upgrading pathways of intelligent manufacturing in china: Transitioning across technological paradigms, Engineering-Prc, 5 (2019), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.016 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.016
![]() |
[128] |
K. S. Kiangala, Z. Wang, An experimental safety response mechanism for an autonomous moving robot in a smart manufacturing environment using q-learning algorithm and speech recognition, Sensors-Basel, 22 (2022), 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22030941 doi: 10.3390/s22030941
![]() |
[129] |
S. Fernandes, Which way to cope with covid-19 challenges? contributions of the iot for smart city projects, Big Data Cogn. Comput., 5 (2021), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5020026 doi: 10.3390/bdcc5020026
![]() |
[130] | C. Thomay, U. Bodin, H. Isakovic, R. Lasch, N. Race, C. Schmittner, G. Schneider, Z. Szepessy, M. Tauber, Z. Wang, Towards adaptive quality assurance in industrial applications, in 2022 IEEE/IFIP NOMS.. IEEE, (2022), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS54207.2022.9789928 |
[131] |
D. Stadnicka, P. Litwin, D. Antonelli, Human factor in intelligent manufacturing systems-knowledge acquisition and motivation, Proced. CIRP, 79 (2019), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.023 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.023
![]() |
[132] |
H.-X. Li, H. Si, Control for intelligent manufacturing: A multiscale challenge, Engineering-Prc, 3 (2017), 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.016 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.016
![]() |
[133] |
T. Kalsoom, N. Ramzan, S. Ahmed, M. Ur-Rehman, Advances in sensor technologies in the era of smart factory and industry 4.0, Sensors-Basel, 20 (2020), 6783. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236783 doi: 10.3390/s20236783
![]() |
[134] |
J. Radianti, T. A. Majchrzak, J. Fromm, I. Wohlgenannt, A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda, Comput. Educ., 147 (2020), COMPUT EDUC103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
![]() |
[135] |
D. Kamińska, T. Sapiński, S. Wiak, T. Tikk, R. E. Haamer, E. Avots, A. Helmi, C. Ozcinar, G. Anbarjafari, Virtual reality and its applications in education: Survey, Information, 10 (2019), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100318 doi: 10.3390/info10100318
![]() |
[136] |
T. Joda, G. Gallucci, D. Wismeijer, N. U. Zitzmann, Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: A systematic review, Comput. Biol. Med., 108 (2019), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.012
![]() |
[137] | C. Li, Y. Chen, Y. Shang, A review of industrial big data for decision making in intelligent manufacturing, J. Eng. Sci. Technol., (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.001 |
[138] |
L. Zhou, Z. Jiang, N. Geng, Y. Niu, F. Cui, K. Liu, N. Qi, Production and operations management for intelligent manufacturing: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Prod. Res., 60 (2022), 808–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2017055 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.2017055
![]() |
[139] |
L. Adriana Crdenas-Robledo, scar Hernndez-Uribe, C. Reta, J. Antonio Cantoral-Ceballos, Extended reality applications in industry 4.0. a systematic literature review, Telemat. Inform., 73 (2022), 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101863 doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101863
![]() |
[140] |
Z. Wang, X. Bai, S. Zhang, M. Billinghurst, W. He, P. Wang, W. Lan, H. Min, Y. Chen, A comprehensive review of augmented reality-based instruction in manual assembly, training and repair, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 78 (2022), 102407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102407 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102407
![]() |
[141] |
N. Kumar, S. C. Lee, Human-machine interface in smart factory: A systematic literature review, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 174 (2022), 121284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121284 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121284
![]() |
[142] | M. Javaid, A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, R. Suman, Enabling flexible manufacturing system (fms) through the applications of industry 4.0 technologies, Int. Things Cyber-Phys. Syst., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.05.005 |
[143] | A. Künz, S. Rosmann, E. Loria, J. Pirker, The potential of augmented reality for digital twins: A literature review, in 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, (2022), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00058 |
[144] |
I. Shah, C. Doshi, M. Patel, S. Tanwar, W.-C. Hong, R. Sharma, A comprehensive review of the technological solutions to analyse the effects of pandemic outbreak on human lives, Medicina (Kaunas), 58 (2022), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58020311 doi: 10.3390/medicina58020311
![]() |
[145] |
R. P. Singh, M. Javaid, R. Kataria, M. Tyagi, A. Haleem, R. Suman, Significant applications of virtual reality for covid-19 pandemic, Diabetes Metab. Syndr., 14 (2020), 661–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.011 doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.011
![]() |
[146] |
A. O. Kwok, S. G. Koh, Covid-19 and extended reality (xr), Curr. Issues Tour., 24 (2021), 1935–1940. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1798896 doi: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1798896
![]() |
[147] | G. Czifra, Z. Molnár et al., Covid-19, industry 4.0, Research papers faculty of materials science and technology slovak university of technology, 28 (2020), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2020-0005 |
[148] | Q. Yu-ming, D. San-peng et al., Research on intelligent manufacturing flexible production line system based on digital twin, in 2020 35th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), IEEE, (2020), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1109/YAC51587.2020.9337500 |
[149] |
L. O. Alpala, D. J. Quiroga-Parra, J. C. Torres, D. H. Peluffo-Ordóñez, Smart factory using virtual reality and online multi-user: Towards a metaverse for experimental frameworks, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022), 6258. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126258 doi: 10.3390/app12126258
![]() |
[150] |
E. Chang, H. T. Kim, B. Yoo, Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements, Int. J. Hum-Comput. Int., 36 (2020), 1658–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351 doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351
![]() |
[151] |
H. Su, W. Qi, C. Yang, J. Sandoval, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, Deep neural network approach in robot tool dynamics identification for bilateral teleoperation, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 5 (2020), 2943–2949. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2974445 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.2974445
![]() |
[152] |
H. Su, Y. Hu, H. R. Karimi, A. Knoll, G. Ferrigno, E. De Momi, Improved recurrent neural network-based manipulator control with remote center of motion constraints: Experimental results, Neural Netw., 131 (2020), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.033 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.033
![]() |
[153] |
S. Phuyal, D. Bista, R. Bista, Challenges, opportunities and future directions of smart manufacturing: A state of art review, Sustain. Fut., 2 (2020), 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100023 doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100023
![]() |
1. | Christian Cortés García, Jasmidt Vera Cuenca, Additive Allee effect on prey in the dynamics of a Gause predator–prey model with constant or proportional refuge on prey at low or high densities, 2023, 126, 10075704, 107427, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107427 | |
2. | Christian Cortés-García, Population dynamics in a Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with proportional prey refuge at low densities, 2025, 543, 0022247X, 128993, 10.1016/j.jmaa.2024.128993 | |
3. | Christian Cortés García, Population dynamics in a Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with predator harvesting at high densities, 2024, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10359 | |
4. | Christian Cortés-García, Dynamics in a Filippov–Gause Predator–Prey Model with Hunting Cooperation or Competition Among Predators for High or Low Prey Densities, 2025, 35, 0218-1274, 10.1142/S0218127425500142 |