%C | %Si | %Mn | %P | %S | %Ni | %Cr | %Fe |
0.140 | 0.180 | 0.700 | 0.070 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | Balance |
Citation: Wouter Huberts, E. Marielle H. Bosboom, Frans N. van de Vosse. A lumped model for blood flow and pressure in the systemic arteriesbased on an approximate velocity profile function[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2009, 6(1): 27-40. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.27
[1] | Mette S. Olufsen, Ali Nadim . On deriving lumped models for blood flow and pressure in the systemic arteries. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2004, 1(1): 61-80. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.61 |
[2] | Scott R. Pope, Laura M. Ellwein, Cheryl L. Zapata, Vera Novak, C. T. Kelley, Mette S. Olufsen . Estimation and identification of parameters in a lumped cerebrovascular model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2009, 6(1): 93-115. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.93 |
[3] | Li Cai, Qian Zhong, Juan Xu, Yuan Huang, Hao Gao . A lumped parameter model for evaluating coronary artery blood supply capacity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5838-5862. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024258 |
[4] | Panagiotes A. Voltairas, Antonios Charalambopoulos, Dimitrios I. Fotiadis, Lambros K. Michalis . A quasi-lumped model for the peripheral distortion of the arterial pulse. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(1): 175-198. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.175 |
[5] | Benchawan Wiwatanapataphee, Yong Hong Wu, Thanongchai Siriapisith, Buraskorn Nuntadilok . Effect of branchings on blood flow in the system of human coronary arteries. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(1): 199-214. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.199 |
[6] | B. Wiwatanapataphee, D. Poltem, Yong Hong Wu, Y. Lenbury . Simulation of Pulsatile Flow of Blood in Stenosed Coronary Artery Bypass with Graft. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2006, 3(2): 371-383. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.371 |
[7] | Fan He, Minru Li, Xinyu Wang, Lu Hua, Tingting Guo . Numerical investigation of quantitative pulmonary pressure ratio in different degrees of stenosis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 1806-1818. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024078 |
[8] | Nattawan Chuchalerm, Wannika Sawangtong, Benchawan Wiwatanapataphee, Thanongchai Siriapisith . Study of Non-Newtonian blood flow - heat transfer characteristics in the human coronary system with an external magnetic field. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 9550-9570. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022444 |
[9] | Lorenzo Civilla, Agnese Sbrollini, Laura Burattini, Micaela Morettini . An integrated lumped-parameter model of the cardiovascular system for the simulation of acute ischemic stroke: description of instantaneous changes in hemodynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3993-4010. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021200 |
[10] | Meiyuan Du, Chi Zhang, Sheng Xie, Fang Pu, Da Zhang, Deyu Li . Investigation on aortic hemodynamics based on physics-informed neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 11545-11567. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023512 |
Steel is one of the metals types used in machine construction such as gears, shafts and sprocket [1]. Low to high strength steel can be easily formed into a desired product depend on the needs, properties and characters. Generally, steel has a variety of alloying elements such as Sulphur (S), Carbon (C), Silicon (Si), Phosphorus (P), Manganese (Mn) and another element. The most dominant element influencing the steel core is the carbon [2,3]. The amount of carbon content will have an impact on the mechanical properties of steel namely hardness, ductility and formability. Adding carbon content to steel able to increase the hardness and tensile strength, but make it brittle and reduce its tenacity [2].
Surface hardening process is one of the finishing stages to improve the product quality of steel. Several researchers reported that surface hardening make steel become hard on the surface and toughness in the core, for example in case of gears component: the surface must be hardened due to this component work in contact with one another component. The gear will wear out quickly if the surface hardness is low [1,4].
Sprocket is one of the most important driving gears from motor vehicle parts, the two-wheeled sprocket as a successor of transmission power which generated by the vehicle's engine. It is directly related to the chain in connected to the rear gear that functions to move the wheels. Therefore, the sprocket has to fulfill a requirement hardness on the edge of its teeth to prevent the sprocket from worn out due to friction caused by the chain [5,6].
Previous researcher conducted a study on the analysis of the effect carburizing media on the wear and hardness of a Supra X 125 motorcycle sprocket. In that case, they used 35% BaCO3 as activator with a temperature of 900 ℃ and holding time for 2 h. The hardness value before carburizing process of Supra X 125 motorcycle sprocket was 179.67 HV, whereas after the carburizing process achieved by the carburizing media of the “sirep” charcoal achieved in 629 HV [7].
Alias et al. stated that the increasing of hardness number is effective with surface hardening using carburizing method. Carburizing process is one phenomenon of the addition carbon into steel surface. The carbon will diffuse due to the activator and high temperature in the isolated pack. The active carbon content of each charcoal type is different depend on the source and process [8].
The research on surface hardening in SS400 steel was investigated by Sujita et al. using snail shell powder as an activator with teak (Tectona grandis) charcoal as a carburizing media. In that study, they did not report a hardness testing [9]. Therefore, this study examined the different things from previous studies namely surface hardening on SS400 steel with mahoni wood charcoal (MWC) as carburizing media and BaCO3 as an activator. Research information about surface hardening on SS400 steel is still enough considered limited, while SS400 steel is very applicable in the automotive industrial world for example sprocket and gear products. The variation of surface hardening was in volume fraction ratio of (MWC:BaCO3) and carburizing temperature. After carburizing, all samples were tested by using hardness and microstructural imaging.
Mahoni wood charcoal (MWC) was taken from a charcoal factory in Karang Duren village, Balung sub-district, Jember, East Java, Indonesia. The carbon content of MWC was calculated by using Equation 1 as according to previous research [10]. BaCO3 as activator was purchased from CV. Aneka Kimia, Jember, Indonesia. The SS400 steel was used as a steel material for surface hardened which has a carbon content for 0.140%. The detail chemical composition of SS400 steel can be seen in Table 1.
%C | %Si | %Mn | %P | %S | %Ni | %Cr | %Fe |
0.140 | 0.180 | 0.700 | 0.070 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | Balance |
The MWC was crushed and sieved with a size of 60 mesh. The results of the 60 mesh sieve were sieved again in 80 mesh sieve. The results of charcoal powder that did not pass the 80 mesh sieve were used for the pack carburizing process. The chemical composition of the specimens of SS400 low carbon steel was shown in Table 1. The specimen and pack carburizing dimension were 3 cm × 3 cm × 0.6 cm and 15.9 cm × 10 cm × 9.5 cm, respectively. The BaCO3 activator was mixed with MWC in variations of 20, 30 and 40 wt%. The specimen was replicated for three pieces for each variation.
Before carburizing process, all specimens were weighted. Then, it was placed in a closed container pack steel which the content a mixed material of MWC and BaCO3 powder. The carburizing process was carried out at a temperature variation for 850 ℃ and 900 ℃ with a holding time 1 h. After that, it was quenched (rapid cooling) by distilled water for 8 s. All specimens were weighted to determine the mass changes after carburizing process. Then, it was prepared for hardness test and metallography observation.
The chemical composition of MWC was calculated using Equation 1 as reported by previous research [10]. Before determine the carbon content, there were several steps to obtain the fixed carbon from MWC namely: moisture, ash content and volatile matter calculation. After three steps above, we got fixed carbon. To determine the moisture, ash content and volatile matter, the extraction process accorded to [10,11]. The calculation of fixed carbon as Eq 1 below:
Fixed carbon(%)=100%−[(moisture,%)+(ash,%)+(volatil matter,%)] | (1) |
Rockwell type C (HRC) with a 150 kg load was used to determine the hardness number of all specimens tested. All specimens were formed according to ASTM E18-15 standard [12]. The test was conducted with transversely direction on the surface. There were five times point of data test on the specimen surface. The results of hardness test were converted in Vickers Hardness Number (VHN). The Illustration of hardness test was presented in Figure 1.
Optical microscope BX451M was used to characterize the metallographic with magnification reaching 1000×. The specimens tested were raw materials (SS400 steel) and carburized materials. The carburized specimens were cut in the middle and then it was prepared for etching process. Before etching process, all specimens were sanded by using sandpaper until shiny (grid 80–2000). After that, metal polish autosol and velvet fabric material were applied for final etching. The etching process was conducted using comparison mixing between HNO3 (Nitridic acid) and ethanol for 2%: 98%. Finally, all specimens ready to be observed by optical microscope. As be noted, this observation aims to determine the total case depth of MWC in SS400 steel after carburizing.
The carbon percentage diffusion (CPD) into SS400 steel was calculated using a simple weighing method as the change in mass before and after the carburizing process. The CPD can be calculated using Eq 2:
Carbon Percentage Diffusion(%)=wt−W0Wo×100% | (2) |
where, Wt and W0 were the specimen weight after and before carburizing process, respectively.
The chemical composition of MWC is presented in Table 2. The chemical composition test includes carbon, water, ash and vapor content. This test aims to determine the purity carbon after the carbonization process.
No. | Water (%) | Ash (%) | Vapor (%) | Carbon (%) |
1. | 2 | 3 | 13 | 82 |
It can be seen in Table 2 that the carbon content of MWC is 82%. This result was higher than previous report about charcoal wood from acacia (Acacia mangium) for 79% [13] and teak wood for 80.18% [14]. According to previous researcher, the high carbon content describes the level of purity of the charcoal produced. This case may be influenced by low levels of volatile matter and ash content. The place of the wood grows greatly influences the chemical composition of the wood, especially its carbon component [13].
Figure 2 shows the hardness number of all samples tested by the Rockwell method. All samples tested were raw material, 60%MWC:40%BaCO3, 70%MWC:30%BaCO3, and 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 with different heating temperature for 850 ℃ and 900 ℃, respectively. The test was repeated three times for each variation. Each variation was carried out on five times point to determine the accurately hardness value.
It can be seen at the figure; the hardness value of raw material is lower than other materials tested for 122.6 HV. This value increase after carburizing process. The highest hardness value was obtained sample 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 with heating temperature 900 ℃ for 677.5 HV (increased 452% from raw material). High heating temperature makes the parent atomic (Fe) has the energy to vibrate, the vibration between the parent atomic affected in stretching (gaps between the parent atoms). The gap between the parent atoms is used by the C atomic to diffuse. The diffusion occurs in this case is interstitial due to the radius of the C atomic is less than 15% of the radius of the parent atomic (Fe) [15]. The heating temperature of 900 ℃ makes the raw material reach the austenite temperature in the Fe3C phase diagram. During the change phase to the austenite temperature, the raw material changes the its crystal structure from Body Center Cubic (BCC) to Face Centered Cubic (FCC) [16,17,18]. This change probably due to the metal has crossed the A3 line in the phase diagram Fe3C. Changing in crystal structure (BCC to FCC) make the carbon solubility in steel increased from 0.02% to 2.14% [16]. This phenomenon proves that the variations in the temperature of 900 ℃ have a higher hardness value than variations in 850 ℃.
The catalyst acts as a supplier of CO2 which able to bind C atomic directly to charcoal. The sample with variation of 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 produced more CO2 than another variation. According to previous report, the catalyst works as a CO2 carrier in binding the C atomic in the mahogany wood charcoal (MWC) to become CO. The C atomic transported by CO then bounded by Fe in steel. The Fe + CO bond produces [C] Fe + CO2 which [C] is denoted as a dissolved carbon to the Fe in this case steel [19].
Meanwhile, 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ has an average hardness for 452.5 HV. This value is lower than 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ sample. This is due to the differences in the volume fraction of MWC makes the low diffusion process. However, this sample is still in the austenite temperature. The diffusion process of C atoms continues until the C atoms in the environment have been used up, other than that the cooling method is influential on the pack carburizing method.
The cooling method used in this study was quenching. After the carburizing process was carried out at temperatures 850 ℃ and 900 ℃ with a holding for 1 h, the steel was removed and cooled quickly with water as a cooling medium. This case makes FCC crystal structure change to BCC structure quickly, but in rapid cooling is not enough time for carbon to diffuse out of the austenite in solid solution. Austenite has higher carbon content than ferrite due to the diffusion process should remove carbon from the solution. However, carbon is trapped because there is no more diffusion due to cold temperatures. This phenomenon affected in BCC structure become Body Centered Tetragonal (BCT) structure or martensite phase which indicated hard properties in steel material [16].
Microstructure observations were carried out to determine the changes in microstructure due to the influence of temperature and volume fraction of MWC before and after carburizing process (Figure 3). Figure 3a displays the microstructure of raw material (before carburizing process). It can be seen that raw material has ferrite and pearlite phase. The ferrite phase is shown in bright colors while the pearlite is shown in a dark color. The number of ferrite phases looks more than the pearlite phase. It synchronized with the hardness number result that raw material has low hardness for 122.6 HV. The ferrite phase makes a ductile property in a steel [20]. This is similar with the previous report which indicated ferrite phenomenon [9].
Figure 3b displays the specimen after carburizing process with 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃. It shows the ferrite, pearlite and martensite structure. The martensite structure is formed on the surface while in the steel core material is formed pearlite-ferrite structure which is more dominated by ferrite phase. The martensite structure is formed due to the diffusion of C atom during pack carburizing process which is followed by the quenching process with the water as cooling media. This variation has the lowest total case depth diffusion for 0.20 mm compared to other variations. This phenomenon due to the carburizing process at 850 ℃ which affirmed by the carbon diffusion takes place on the body centered cubic (BCC) crystal structure. In this body, the carbon solubility value is 0.02%. The BaCO3 catalyst serves to produce CO2 which effected in C binding from MWC. This process produces CO which diffuses in the steel [19]. In contrast with Figure 3c (60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 850 ℃), this specimen has total case depth diffusion for 0.32 mm even though the structure is similar with Figure 3b. The 40% catalyst helps to accelerate the rate of carbon diffusion due to the abundant supply of CO2.
Figure 3d shows the specimen microstructure in composition 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃. The structure in this composition is ferrite, pearlite and martensite (lath martensite). The total case depth diffusion is 0.40 mm. This is due to the carburizing process carried out at 900 ℃ which occurs the structural changes from BCC to FCC with carbon solubility increases from 0.02% to 2.14%. This case effected in increasing the number of C atoms diffusion [21,22]. The different case was showed by Figure 3e (60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃). The structure has similar with Figure 3d. But the different is in total case depth diffusion. The total case depth diffusion in this specimen is 0.55 mm. This result was higher than all specimen tested. It is due to the role of temperature and activator during carburizing process which resulting in CO2 supply during carburizing [21].
Table 3 presents the percentage of carbon diffusion (CPD) from MWC into SS400 steel after carburizing treatment. The highest CPD was in specimen with composition 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ for 0.98%. This phenomenon was probably indicated by the addition of MWC which diffuses from the pack environment to the steel surface. The similar phenomenon was reported in previous report [23].
Specimen | W0 (g) | Wt (g) | ΔW (g) | Percentage of diffusion (%) |
60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 37.24630 | 37.55024 | 0.30394 | 0.81 |
70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 36.27071 | 36.42082 | 0.15011 | 0.41 |
80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 38.04883 | 38.05864 | 0.00981 | 0.02 |
60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 40.03520 | 40.42880 | 0.39360 | 0.98 |
70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 39.22458 | 39.57023 | 0.34565 | 0.88 |
80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 38.04883 | 38.36106 | 0.31223 | 0.82 |
Meanwhile, the specimen with composition 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ has the lowest CPD. From Table 3, it presents a little weight addition from 38.04883 to 38.05864 (CPD 0.02%). This phenomenon due to the slow process of carbon diffusion from the pack environment to the steel surface. The higher of the temperature and activator content then the deeper of carbon diffusion rate in steel.
The following conclusion could be derived from this study:
1. Pack carburizing process with temperature and volume faction variation influences SS400 steel hardness value, where the highest hardness value in composition 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 with temperature 900 ℃ for 677.4 HV, while the lowest hardness value in composition 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ for 278 HV. The higher temperature resulting in faster carbon diffusion.
2. Microstructure observation after carburizing process displays more dominant martensite phase but ferrite and pearlite phases are still present. Martensite phase in composition 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 sample is formed more due to the deeper carbon diffusion. The hardness value is recommended to improve the quality product and probably as potential material for sprocket parts application.
3. The mass changes occur in the pack carburizing process. The variation of 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 experienced as the highest mass increase of 0.39360 g. Meanwhile, the variation of 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 become the lowest variation of carbon additions which was 0.00981 g.
We thanks to University of Jember for its funding and supporting this research in the year of 2020.
We declare no conflict of interest.
1. | Hermann B. Frieboes, Fang Jin, Yao-Li Chuang, Steven M. Wise, John S. Lowengrub, Vittorio Cristini, Three-dimensional multispecies nonlinear tumor growth—II: Tumor invasion and angiogenesis, 2010, 264, 00225193, 1254, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.036 | |
2. | Ying Chen, Steven M. Wise, Vivek B. Shenoy, John S. Lowengrub, A stable scheme for a nonlinear, multiphase tumor growth model with an elastic membrane, 2014, 30, 20407939, 726, 10.1002/cnm.2624 | |
3. | Dylan A. Goodin, Hermann B. Frieboes, Simulation of 3D centimeter-scale continuum tumor growth at sub-millimeter resolution via distributed computing, 2021, 134, 00104825, 104507, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104507 | |
4. | J S Lowengrub, H B Frieboes, F Jin, Y-L Chuang, X Li, P Macklin, S M Wise, V Cristini, Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours, 2010, 23, 0951-7715, R1, 10.1088/0951-7715/23/1/R01 | |
5. | Ying Chen, John S. Lowengrub, Tumor growth in complex, evolving microenvironmental geometries: A diffuse domain approach, 2014, 361, 00225193, 14, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.06.024 | |
6. | Luigi Preziosi, Andrea Tosin, Multiphase modelling of tumour growth and extracellular matrix interaction: mathematical tools and applications, 2009, 58, 0303-6812, 625, 10.1007/s00285-008-0218-7 | |
7. | Riccardo Sacco, Paola Causin, Chiara Lelli, Manuela T. Raimondi, A poroelastic mixture model of mechanobiological processes in biomass growth: theory and application to tissue engineering, 2017, 52, 0025-6455, 3273, 10.1007/s11012-017-0638-9 | |
8. | S.N. Antontsev, А.А. Papin, M.A. Tokareva, E.I. Leonova, E.A. Gridushko, Modeling of Tumor Occurrence and Growth – II, 2021, 1561-9451, 72, 10.14258/izvasu(2021)1-12 | |
9. | Dylan A. Goodin, Hermann B. Frieboes, Evaluation of innate and adaptive immune system interactions in the tumor microenvironment via a 3D continuum model, 2023, 559, 00225193, 111383, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111383 | |
10. | S.M. Wise, J.S. Lowengrub, V. Cristini, An adaptive multigrid algorithm for simulating solid tumor growth using mixture models, 2011, 53, 08957177, 1, 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.007 | |
11. | Andrea Tosin, Initial/boundary-value problems of tumor growth within a host tissue, 2013, 66, 0303-6812, 163, 10.1007/s00285-012-0505-1 |
%C | %Si | %Mn | %P | %S | %Ni | %Cr | %Fe |
0.140 | 0.180 | 0.700 | 0.070 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | Balance |
No. | Water (%) | Ash (%) | Vapor (%) | Carbon (%) |
1. | 2 | 3 | 13 | 82 |
Specimen | W0 (g) | Wt (g) | ΔW (g) | Percentage of diffusion (%) |
60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 37.24630 | 37.55024 | 0.30394 | 0.81 |
70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 36.27071 | 36.42082 | 0.15011 | 0.41 |
80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 38.04883 | 38.05864 | 0.00981 | 0.02 |
60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 40.03520 | 40.42880 | 0.39360 | 0.98 |
70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 39.22458 | 39.57023 | 0.34565 | 0.88 |
80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 38.04883 | 38.36106 | 0.31223 | 0.82 |
%C | %Si | %Mn | %P | %S | %Ni | %Cr | %Fe |
0.140 | 0.180 | 0.700 | 0.070 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | Balance |
No. | Water (%) | Ash (%) | Vapor (%) | Carbon (%) |
1. | 2 | 3 | 13 | 82 |
Specimen | W0 (g) | Wt (g) | ΔW (g) | Percentage of diffusion (%) |
60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 37.24630 | 37.55024 | 0.30394 | 0.81 |
70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 36.27071 | 36.42082 | 0.15011 | 0.41 |
80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ | 38.04883 | 38.05864 | 0.00981 | 0.02 |
60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 40.03520 | 40.42880 | 0.39360 | 0.98 |
70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 39.22458 | 39.57023 | 0.34565 | 0.88 |
80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ | 38.04883 | 38.36106 | 0.31223 | 0.82 |