Research article Special Issues

Mathematical analysis of time-fractional nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation

  • Received: 03 February 2025 Revised: 09 March 2025 Accepted: 25 March 2025 Published: 22 April 2025
  • MSC : 34G20, 35A20, 35A22, 35R11

  • This research explored fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation analytical solutions through application of the residual power series transform method (RPSTM). The Caputo derivative approach served as the basis to analyze fractional systems since it offered a strong foundation for modeling intricate nonlinear processes. Researchers extended the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation through fractional domain application to capture anomalous behavior and memory effects since it showed practical uses in turbulence and plasma dynamics and flame propagation. The RPSTM proposed solution united residual power series method capabilities with integral transforms features to develop an accurate and efficient method for fractional nonlinear partial differential equation solutions. The method enabled accurate approximate solution acquisition while the procedure underwent complete convergence examination. This paper demonstrated the effectiveness and reliability of the developed method through numerical simulation results. The RPSTM proved itself as an effective analytical method for fractional differential problems which reveals vital information about the fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation behavior. The research added value to existing fractional calculus studies focused on nonlinear science applications.

    Citation: Qasem M. Tawhari. Mathematical analysis of time-fractional nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9237-9255. doi: 10.3934/math.2025424

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ye Yue, Ghulam Farid, Ayșe Kübra Demirel, Waqas Nazeer, Yinghui Zhao . Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized k-fractional integrals involving further extension of Mittag-Leffler function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 681-703. doi: 10.3934/math.2022043
    [2] Khaled Matarneh, Suha B. Al-Shaikh, Mohammad Faisal Khan, Ahmad A. Abubaker, Javed Ali . Close-to-convexity and partial sums for normalized Le Roy-type q-Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 14288-14313. doi: 10.3934/math.2025644
    [3] Xiuzhi Yang, G. Farid, Waqas Nazeer, Muhammad Yussouf, Yu-Ming Chu, Chunfa Dong . Fractional generalized Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for m-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6325-6340. doi: 10.3934/math.2020407
    [4] Ghulam Farid, Maja Andrić, Maryam Saddiqa, Josip Pečarić, Chahn Yong Jung . Refinement and corrigendum of bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7332-7349. doi: 10.3934/math.2020469
    [5] Maryam Saddiqa, Ghulam Farid, Saleem Ullah, Chahn Yong Jung, Soo Hak Shim . On Bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions for generalized exponentially convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6454-6468. doi: 10.3934/math.2021379
    [6] Bushra Kanwal, Saqib Hussain, Thabet Abdeljawad . On certain inclusion relations of functions with bounded rotations associated with Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7866-7887. doi: 10.3934/math.2022440
    [7] Sabir Hussain, Rida Khaliq, Sobia Rafeeq, Azhar Ali, Jongsuk Ro . Some fractional integral inequalities involving extended Mittag-Leffler function with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35599-35625. doi: 10.3934/math.20241689
    [8] Gauhar Rahman, Iyad Suwan, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Thabet Abdeljawad, Muhammad Samraiz, Asad Ali . A basic study of a fractional integral operator with extended Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12757-12770. doi: 10.3934/math.2021736
    [9] Hengxiao Qi, Muhammad Yussouf, Sajid Mehmood, Yu-Ming Chu, Ghulam Farid . Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6030-6042. doi: 10.3934/math.2020386
    [10] Mohra Zayed, Maged G. Bin-Saad, Waleed K. Mohammed . On Mittag-Leffler-Gegenbauer polynomials arising by the convolution of Mittag-Leffler function and Hermite polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(7): 16642-16663. doi: 10.3934/math.2025746
  • This research explored fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation analytical solutions through application of the residual power series transform method (RPSTM). The Caputo derivative approach served as the basis to analyze fractional systems since it offered a strong foundation for modeling intricate nonlinear processes. Researchers extended the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation through fractional domain application to capture anomalous behavior and memory effects since it showed practical uses in turbulence and plasma dynamics and flame propagation. The RPSTM proposed solution united residual power series method capabilities with integral transforms features to develop an accurate and efficient method for fractional nonlinear partial differential equation solutions. The method enabled accurate approximate solution acquisition while the procedure underwent complete convergence examination. This paper demonstrated the effectiveness and reliability of the developed method through numerical simulation results. The RPSTM proved itself as an effective analytical method for fractional differential problems which reveals vital information about the fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation behavior. The research added value to existing fractional calculus studies focused on nonlinear science applications.



    Geometric function theory is a fascinating branch of complex analysis that delves into the beautiful interplay between complex-valued functions and their geometric properties. It centers around understanding how these functions distort and transform shapes in the complex plane. Let ˜F(Ω) denote the space of all analytic functions in the open unit disk Ω={ϖC:|ϖ|<1} and let ˜F denote the class of functions ˜F(Ω) which has the form

    (ϖ)=ϖ+m=2amϖm. (1.1)

    Let ˜S denote the subclass of ˜F that includes all univalent functions within the domain Ω. The convolution, or Hadamard product, of two analytic functions and g, both of which belong to ˜F, is defined as follows: here, is given by (1.1), while the function g takes the form g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm, as

    (g)(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2ambmϖm.

    This research aims to define new starlike functions using the concepts of (u,v)-symmetrical functions and quantum calculus. Before delving into the discussion on (u,v)-symmetrical functions and quantum calculus (q-calculus), let us briefly review the essential concepts and symbols related to these theories.

    The theory of (u,v)-symmetrical functions is a specific area within geometric function theory that explores functions exhibiting a unique kind of symmetry. Regular symmetric functions treat all variables alike, but (u,v)-symmetrical functions introduce a twist. Here, v denotes a fixed positive integer, and u can range from 0 to v1, (see [1]). A domain ˜D is said to be v-fold symmetric if a rotation of ˜D about the origin through an angle 2πv carries ˜D onto itself. A function is said to be v-fold symmetric in ˜D if for every ϖ in ˜D and (e2πivϖ)=e2πiv(ϖ). A function is considered (u,v)-symmetrical if for any element ϖ˜D and a complex number ε with a special property (ε=e2πiv), the following holds:

    (εϖ)=εu(ϖ),

    where ε term introduces a rotation by a specific angle based on v, and the key concept is that applying this rotation to an element ϖ and then applying the function has the same effect as applying h to ϖ first and then rotating the result by a power of ε that depends on u. In our work we need the following decomposition theorem

    Lemma 1.1. [1] For every mapping :ΩC and a v-fold symmetric set Ω, there exists a unique sequence of (u,v)-symmetrical functions u,v, such that

    (ϖ)=v1u=0u,v(ϖ),u,v(ϖ)=1vv1n=0εnu(εnϖ),ϖΩ. (1.2)

    Remark 1.2. In other words, (1.2) can also be formulated as

    u,v(ϖ)=m=1δm,uamϖm,a1=1, (1.3)

    where

    δm,u=1vv1n=0ε(mu)n={1,m=lv+u;0,mlv+u;, (1.4)
    (lN,v=1,2,,u=0,1,2,,v1).

    The theory of (u,v)-symmetrical functions has many interesting applications; for instance, convolutions, fixed points and absolute value estimates. Overall, (u,v)-symmetrical functions are a specialized but powerful tool in geometric function theory. Their unique symmetry property allows researchers to delve deeper into the geometric behavior of functions and uncover fascinating connections. Denote be ˜F(u,v) for the family of all (u,v)-symmetric functions. Let us observe that the classes ˜F(1,2), ˜F(0,2) and ˜F(1,v) are well-known families of odd, even and of vsymmetrical functions, respectively.

    The interplay between q-calculus and geometric function theory is a fascinating emerging area of mathematical research The literature recognizes the fundamental characteristics of q-analogs, which have various applications in the exploration of quantum groups, q-deformed super-algebras, fractals, multi-fractal measures, and chaotic dynamical systems. Certain integral transforms within classical analysis have their counterparts in the realm of q-calculus. Consequently, many researchers in q-theory have endeavored to extend key results from classical analysis to their q-analogs counterparts. To facilitate understanding, this paper presents essential definitions and concept explanations of q-calculus that are utilized. Throughout the discussion, it is assumed that the parameter q adheres to the condition 0<q<1. Let's begin by reviewing the definitions of fractional q-calculus operators for a complex-valued function . In [2], Jackson introduced and explored the concept of the q-derivative operator q(ϖ) as follows:

    q(ϖ)={(ϖ)(qϖ)ϖ(1q),ϖ0,(0),ϖ=0. (1.5)

    Equivalently (1.5), may be written as

    q(ϖ)=1+m=2[m]qamϖm1ϖ0,

    where

    [m]q=1qm1q=1+q+q2+...+qm1. (1.6)

    Note that as q1, [m]qm. For a function (ϖ)=ϖm, we can note that

    q(ϖ)=q(ϖm)=1qm1qϖm1=[m]qϖm1.

    Then

    limq1q(ϖ)=limq1[m]qϖm1=mϖm1=(ϖ),

    where (ϖ) represents the standard derivative.

    The q-integral of a function was introduced by Jackson [3] and serves as a right inverse, defined as follows:

    ϖ0(ϖ)dqϖ=ϖ(1q)m=0qm(ϖqm),

    provided that the series m=0qm(ϖqm) converges. Ismail et al. [4] was the first to establish a connection between quantum calculus and geometric function theory by introducing a q-analog of starlike (and convex) functions. They generalized a well-known class of starlike functions, creating the class of q-starlike functions, denoted by Sq, which consists of functions ˜F that satisfy the inequality:

    |ϖ(q(ϖ))(ϖ)11q|11q,ϖΩ.

    Numerous subclasses of analytic functions have been investigated using the quantum calculus approach in recent years by various authors, like how Naeem et al. [5], explored subclesses of q-convex functions. Srivastava et al. [6] investigated subclasses of q-starlike functions. Govindaraj and Sivasubramanian in [7], identified subclasses connected with q-conic domain. Alsarari et al. [8,9]. examined the convolution conditions of q-Janowski symmetrical functions classes and studied (u,v)-symmetrical functions with q-calculus. Khan et al. [10] utilized the symmetric q-derivative operator. Srivastava [11] published a comprehensive review paper that serves as a valuable resource for researchers.

    The (u,v)-symmetrical functions are crucial for the exploration of various subclasses of ˜F. Recently, several authors have studied subclasses of analytic functions using the (u,v)-symmetrical functions approach, (see [12,13,14,15]). By incorporating the concept of the q-derivative into the framework of (u,v)-symmetrical functions, we will establish the following classes:

    Definition 1.3. Let q and α be arbitrary fixed numbers such that 0<q<1 and 0α<1. We define Sq(α,u,v) as the family of functions ˜F that satisfy the following condition:

    {ϖq(ϖ)u,v(ϖ)}>α,forallϖΩ, (1.7)

    where u,v is defined in (1.2).

    By selecting specific values for parameters, we can derive a variety of important subclasses that have been previously investigated by different researchers in their respective papers. Here, we enlist some of them:

    Sq(α,1,1) = Sq(α) which was introduced and examined by Agrawal and Sahoo in [16].

    Sq(0,1,1) = Sq which was initially introduced by Ismail et al. [4].

    S1(α,1,2) = S(α) the renowned class of starlike functions of order α established by Robertson [17].

    S1(0,1,1)=S the class introduced by Nevanlinna [18].

    S1(0,1,v) = S(0,k) the class introduced and studied by Sakaguchi [19].

    We denote by Tq(α,u,v) the subclass of ˜F that includes all functions for which the following holds:

    ϖq(ϖ)Sq(α,u,v). (1.8)

    We must revisit the neighborhood concept initially introduced by Goodman [20] and further developed by Ruscheweyh [21].

    Definition 1.4. For any ˜F, the ρ-neighborhood surrounding the function can be described as:

    Nρ()={g˜F:g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm,m=2m|ambm|ρ}. (1.9)

    For e(ϖ)=ϖ, we can see that

    Nρ(e)={g˜F:g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm,m=2m|bm|ρ}. (1.10)

    Ruschewegh [21] demonstrated, among other findings, that for all ηC, with |μ|<ρ,

    (ϖ)+ηϖ1+ηSNρ()S.

    Our main results can be proven by utilizing the following lemma.

    Lemma 1.5. [20] Let P(ϖ)=1+m=1pmϖm,(ϖΩ), with the condition {p(ϖ)}>0, then

    |pm|2,(m1).

    In this paper, our main focus is on analyzing coefficient estimates and exploring the convolution property within the context of the class Sq(α,u,v). Motivated by Definition 1.4, we introduce a new definition of neighborhood that is specific to this class. By investigating the related neighborhood result for Sq(α,u,v), we seek to offer a thorough understanding of the properties and characteristics of this particular class.

    We will now examine the coefficient inequalities for the function in Sq(α,u,u) and Tq(α,u,v).

    Theorem 2.1. If Sq(α,u,v), then

    |am|m1n=1(12α)δn,u+[n]q[n+1]qδn+1,u, (2.1)

    where δn,u is given by (1.4).

    Proof. The function p(ϖ) is defined by

    p(ϖ)=11α(ϖq(ϖ)u,v(ϖ)α)=1+m=1pmϖm,

    where p(ϖ) represents a Carathéodory function and (ϖ) belongs to the class Sq(α,u,v).

    Since

    ϖq(ϖ)=(u,v(ϖ))(α+(1α)p(ϖ)),

    we have

    m=2([m]qδm,u)amϖm=(ϖ+m=2amδm,uϖm)(1+(1α)m=1pmϖm),

    where δm,u is given by (1.4), δ1,u=1.

    By equating the coefficients of ϖm on both sides, we obtain

    am=(1α)([m]qδm,u)m1i=1δmi,uamipi,a1=1.

    By Lemma 1.5, we get

    |am|2(1α)|[m]qδm,u|.m1i=1δi,u|ai|,a1=1=δ1,u. (2.2)

    It now suffices to prove that

    2(1α)[m]qδm,u.m1n=1δm,u|au|m1n=1(12α)δn,u+[n]q[n+1]qδn+1,u. (2.3)

    To accomplish this, we utilize the method of induction.

    We can easily see that (2.3) is true for m=2 and 3.

    Let the hypotheses is be true for m=i.

    From (2.2), we have

    |ai|2(1α)[i]qδi,ui1n=1δn,u|an|,a1=1=δ1,u.

    From (2.1), we have

    |ai|i1n=1δn,u(12α)+[n]q[1+n]qδ1+n,u.

    By the induction hypothesis, we have

    (1α)2[i]qδi,ui1n=1δn,u|an|i1n=1(12α)δn,u+[n]q[1+n]qδ1+n,u.

    Multiplying both sides by

    (12α)δi,u+[i]q[1+i]qδ1+i,u,

    we have

    in=1(12α)δn,u+[n]q[n+1]qδn+1,u(12α)δi,u+[i]q[i+1]qδi+1,u[2(1α)[i]qδi,ui1n=1δn,u|an|]
    ={2(1α)δi,u[i]qδi,ui1n=1δn,u|an|+i1n=1δn,u|an|}.(1α)2[1+i]qδ1+i,u
    2(1α)[i+1]qδi+1,u{δi,u|ai|+i1n=1δn,u|an|}
    2(1α)[i+1]qδi+1,uin=1δn,u|an|.

    Hence

    (1α)2[1+i]qδ1+i,uin=1δn,u|an|in=1δn,u(12α)+[n]q[1+n]qδ1+n,u,

    This demonstrates that the inequality (2.3) holds for m=i+1, confirming the validity of the result.

    For q1,u=1 and v=1, we obtain the following well-known result (see [22]).

    Corollary 2.2. If S(α), then

    |ak|k1s=1(s2α)(k1)!.

    Theorem 2.3. If Tq(α,u,v), then

    |am|1[m]qm1n=1(12α)δn,u+[n]q[1+n]qδ1+n,u,form=2,3,4,..., (2.4)

    where δm,u is given by (1.4).

    Proof. By using Alexander's theorem

    (ϖ)Tq(α,u,v)ϖq(ϖ)Sq(α,u,v). (2.5)

    The proof follows by using Theorem 2.1.

    Theorem 2.4. A function Sq(α,u,v) if and only if

    1ϖ[{k(ϖ)(1eiϕ)+f(ϖ)(1+(12α)eiϕ)}]0, (2.6)

    where 0<q<1, 0α<1,0ϕ<2π and f,k are given by (2.10).

    Proof. Suppose that fSq(α,u,v), then

    11α(zϖq(ϖ)u,v(ϖ)α)=p(ϖ),

    if and only if

    ϖq(ϖ)u,v(ϖ)1+(12α)eiϕ1eiϕ. (2.7)

    For all ϖΩ and 0ϕ<2π, it is straightforward to see that the condition (2.7) can be expressed as

    1ϖ[ϖq(ϖ)(1eiϕ)u,v(ϖ)(1+(12α)eiϕ)]0. (2.8)

    On the other hand, it is well-known that

    u,v(ϖ)=(ϖ)f(ϖ),ϖq(ϖ)=(ϖ)k(ϖ), (2.9)

    where

    f(ϖ)=1vv1n=0ε(1u)nϖ1εnϖ=ϖ+m=2δm,uϖm,k(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2[m]qϖm. (2.10)

    Substituting (2.9) into (2.8) we get (2.6).

    Remark 2.5. From Theorem 2.4, it is straightforward to derive the equivalent condition for a function to be a member of the class Sq(α,u,v) if and only if

    (Tϕ)(ϖ)ϖ0,ϖΩ, (2.11)

    where Tϕ(ϖ) has the form

    Tϕ(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2tmϖm,tm=[m]qδm,u(δm,u(12α)+[m]q)eiϕ(α1)eiϕ. (2.12)

    In order to obtain neighborhood results similar to those found by Ruschewegh [21] for the classes, we define the following concepts related to neighborhoods.

    Definition 2.6. For any ˜F, the ρ-neighborhood associated with the function is defined as:

    Nβ,ρ()={g˜F:g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm,m=2βm|ambm|ρ},(ρ0). (2.13)

    For e(ϖ)=ϖ, we can see that

    Nβ,ρ(e)={g˜F:g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm,m=2βm|bm|ρ},(ρ0), (2.14)

    where [m]q is given by Eq (1.6).

    Remark 2.7.For βm=m, from Definition 2.6, we get Definition 1.4.

    For βm=[m]q, from Definition 2.6, we get the definition of neighborhood with q-derivative Nq,ρ(),Nq,ρ(e).

    For βm=|tm| given by (2.12), from Definition 2.6, we get the definition of neighborhood for the class Sq(α,u,v) with Nq,ρ(α,u,v;).

    Theorem 2.8. Let Nq,1(e), defined in the form (1.1), then

    |ϖq(ϖ)u,v(ϖ)1|<1, (2.15)

    where 0<q<1,ϖΩ.

    Proof. Let ˜F, and (ϖ)=ϖ+m=2amϖm,u,v(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2δm,uamϖm, where δm,u is given by (1.4).

    Consider

    |ϖq(ϖ)u,v(ϖ)|=|m=2([m]qδm,u)amϖm1|
    <|ϖ|m=2[m]q|am|m=2δm,u|am|.|ϖ|m1=|ϖ|m=2δm,u|am|.|ϖ|m1|u,v(ϖ)|,ϖΩ.

    This provides us with the desired result.

    Theorem 2.9. Let ˜F, and for any complex number η where |μ|<ρ, if

    (ϖ)+ηϖ1+ηSq(α,u,v), (2.16)

    then

    Nq,ρ(α,u,v;)Sq(α,u,v).

    Proof. Assume that a function g is defined as g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm and is a member of the class Nq,ρ(α,u,v;). To prove the theorem, we need to demonstrate that gSq(α,u,v). This will be shown in the following three steps.

    First, we observe that Theorem 2.4 and Remark 2.5 are equivalent to

    Sq(α,u,v)1ϖ[(Tϕ)(ϖ)]0,ϖΩ, (2.17)

    where Tϕ(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2tmϖm and tm is given by (2.12).

    Second, we find that (2.16) is equivalent to

    |(ϖ)Tϕ(ϖ)ϖ|ρ. (2.18)

    Since (ϖ)=ϖ+m=2amϖm˜F which satisfies (2.16), then (2.17) is equivalent to

    TϕSq(α,u,v)1ϖ[(ϖ)Tϕ(ϖ)1+η]0,|η|<ρ.

    Third, letting g(ϖ)=ϖ+m=2bmϖm we notice that

    |g(ϖ)Tϕ(ϖ)ϖ|=|(ϖ)Tϕ(ϖ)ϖ+(g(ϖ)(ϖ))Tϕ(ϖ)ϖ|
    ρ|(g(ϖ)(ϖ))Tϕ(ϖ)ϖ|(by using (2.18))
    =ρ|m=2(bmam)tmϖm|
    ρ|ϖ|m=2[m]qδm,u|[m]q+δm,u(12α)|1α|bmam|
    ρ|ϖ|ρ>0.

    This prove that

    g(ϖ)Tϕ(ϖ)ϖ0,ϖΩ.

    Based on our observations in (2.17), it follows that gSq(α,u,v). This concludes the proof of the theorem.

    When u=v=1, q1, and α=0 in the above theorem, we obtain (1.10), which was proven by Ruscheweyh in [21].

    Corollary 2.10. Let S represent the class of starlike functions. Let ˜F, and for all complex numbers η such that |μ|<ρ, if

    (ϖ)+ηϖ1+ηS, (2.19)

    then Nσ()S.

    In conclusion, this research paper successfully introduces and explores a novel category of q-starlike and q-convex functions, specifically Sq(α,u,v) and Tq(α,u,v), that are fundamentally linked to (u,v)-symmetrical functions. The findings highlight the intricate interplay between q-starlikeness, q-convexity, and symmetry conditions, offering a rich framework for further investigation. Through detailed analysis, including coefficient estimates and convolution conditions, this work lays a solid foundation for future studies in this area. The established properties within the (ρ,q)-neighborhood not only deepen our understanding of these function classes but also open avenues for potential applications in complex analysis and geometric function theory. Overall, this pioneering research marks a significant advancement in the study of special functions, inviting further exploration and development in this dynamic field.

    Hanen Louati conceptualized and led the development of the study's methodology, focusing on the formulation of new mathematical frameworks for q-starlike and q-convex functions. Afrah Al-Rezami contributed significantly to data validation and the theoretical exploration of (u,v)-symmetrical functions. Erhan Deniz conducted the primary analysis of coefficient inequalities and convolution properties, offering critical insights into the results. Abdulbasit Darem provided computational support and assisted in exploring the applications of the (ρ,q)-neighborhood framework. Robert Szasz contributed to the literature review, linking the study to prior research and assisting in the interpretation of findings. All authors participated in drafting the manuscript, revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA, for funding this research work through the project number "NBU-FPEJ-2024- 2920-02". This study was also supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, project number (PSAU/2024/R/1445).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] J. G. Liu, X. J. Yang, Symmetry group analysis of several coupled fractional partial differential equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 173 (2023), 113603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113603 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113603
    [2] J. G. Liu, Y. F. Zhang, J. J. Wang, Investigation of the time fractional generalized (2+1)-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with single-power law nonlinearity, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2350033. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500330 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23500330
    [3] B. Shiri, H. Kong, G. C. Wu, C. Luo, Adaptive learning neural network method for solving time-fractional diffusion equations, Neural Comput., 34 (2022), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01482 doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01482
    [4] M. K. Sadabad, A. J. Akbarfam, B. Shiri, A numerical study of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of fractional Sturm-Liouville problems via Laplace transform, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 51 (2020), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-020-0436-2 doi: 10.1007/s13226-020-0436-2
    [5] Z. Li, S. Zhao, Bifurcation, chaotic behavior and solitary wave solutions for the Akbota equation, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 22590–22601. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241100 doi: 10.3934/math.20241100
    [6] L. C. Yu, Zero-r law on the analyticity and the uniform continuity of fractional resolvent families, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 96 (2024), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-024-02785-4 doi: 10.1007/s00020-024-02785-4
    [7] Y. Z. Guo, L. Z. Guo, S. A. Billings, D. Coca, Z. Q. Lang, Volterra series approximation of a class of nonlinear dynamical systems using the Adomian decomposition method, Nonlinear Dyn., 74 (2013), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0975-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-0975-8
    [8] S. H. Chang, A variational iteration method involving Adomian polynomials for a strongly nonlinear boundary value problem, East Asian J. Appl. Math, 9 (2019), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.4208/eajam.041116.291118 doi: 10.4208/eajam.041116.291118
    [9] N. Herisanu, V. Marinca, An iteration procedure with application to Van der Pol oscillator, Int. J. Nonlin. Sci. Num. Simul., 10 (2009), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.353 doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.353
    [10] Y. Khan, A novel Laplace decomposition method for non-linear stretching sheet problem in the presence of MHD and slip condition. Int. J. Num. Meth. Heat Fl. Flow, 24 (2013), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-02-2012-0048 doi: 10.1108/HFF-02-2012-0048
    [11] M. Kurulay, A. Secer, M. A. Akinlar, A new approximate analytical solution of Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation using homotopy analysis method, Appl. Math. Inform. Sci., 7 (2013), 267–271.
    [12] A. Shah, S. Hussain, An analytical approach to the new solution of family of Kuramoto Sivashinsky equation by q-Homotopy analysis technique, Int. J. Differ. Equat., 2024 (2024), 6652990. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6652990 doi: 10.1155/2024/6652990
    [13] A. H. Khater, R. S. Temsah, Numerical solutions of the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation by Chebyshev spectral collocation methods, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.03.013 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.03.013
    [14] M. Lakestani, M. Dehghan, Numerical solutions of the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation using B-spline functions, Appl. Math. Model., 36 (2012), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.028 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.028
    [15] Y. Kuramoto, T. Tsuzuki, Persistent propagation of concentration waves in dissipative media far from thermal equilibrium, Prog. Theor. Phys., 55 (1976), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.55.356 doi: 10.1143/PTP.55.356
    [16] G. I. Sivashinsky, Instabilities, pattern formation, and turbulence in flames, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 15 (1982), 179–199.
    [17] G. D. Akrivis, Finite difference discretization of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, Numer. Math., 63 (1992), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385844 doi: 10.1007/BF01385844
    [18] M. Benlahsen, G. Bognar, Z. Csati, M. Guedda, K. Hriczo, Dynamical properties of a nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky growth equation, Alex. Eng. J., 6 (2021), 3419–3427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.003
    [19] S. R. Jena, G. S. Gebremedhin, Numerical treatment of Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation on B-spline collocation, Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci., 28 (2021), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2021.1949846 doi: 10.1080/25765299.2021.1949846
    [20] W. S. Yin, F. Xu, W. P. Zhang, Y. X. Gao, Asymptotic expansion of the solutions to time-space fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations, Adv. Math. Phy., 2016 (2016), 4632163. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4632163 doi: 10.1155/2016/4632163
    [21] P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, Solution for fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation using novel computational technique, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 7 (2021), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-021-00956-0 doi: 10.1007/s40819-021-00956-0
    [22] J. W. Wang, X. X. Jiang, X. H. Yang, H. X. Zhang, A new robust compact difference scheme on graded meshes for the time-fractional nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, Comp. Appl. Math., 43 (2024), 381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-024-02883-4 doi: 10.1007/s40314-024-02883-4
    [23] R. Choudhary, S. Singh, P. Das, D. Kumar, A higher order stable numerical approximation for time-fractional non-linear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation based on quintic B-spline, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 47 (2024), 11953–11975. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9778 doi: 10.1002/mma.9778
    [24] R. Shah, H. Khan, D. Baleanu, P. Kumam, M. Arif, A semi-analytical method to solve family of Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 14 (2020), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2020.1741920 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1741920
    [25] M. Ali, M. Alquran, I. Jaradat, N. A. Afouna, D. Baleanu, Dynamics of integer-fractional time-derivative for the new two-mode Kuramoto-Sivashinsky model, Rom. Rep. Phys, 72 (2020), 103.
    [26] A. Burqan, R. Saadeh, A. Qazza, S. Momani, ARA-residual power series method for solving partial fractional differential equations, Alex. Eng. J., 62 (2023), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.022 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.022
    [27] A. Qazza, A. Burqan, R. Saadeh, Application of ARA-Residual power series method in solving systems of fractional differential equations, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022 (2022), 6939045. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6939045 doi: 10.1155/2022/6939045
    [28] J. K. Zhang, X. D. Tian, Laplace-residual power series method for solving fractional generalized long wave equations, Ocean Eng., 310 (2024), 118693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118693 doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118693
    [29] A. Shafee, Y. Alkhezi, R. Shah, Efficient solution of fractional system partial differential equations using Laplace residual power series method, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7060429 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7060429
    [30] M. A. N. Oqielat, T. Eriqat, O. Ogilat, A. El-Ajou, S. E. Alhazmi, S. Al-Omari, Laplace-residual power series method for solving time-fractional reaction-diffusion model, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7040309 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7040309
    [31] R. Pant, G. Arora, H. Emadifar, Elzaki residual power series method to solve fractional diffusion equation, Plos One, 19 (2024), e0298064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298064 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298064
    [32] G. A. Anastassiou, On right fractional calculus, Chaos Solition. Fract., 42 (2009), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2008.12.013
    [33] S. Kumar, A. Yildirim. Y. Khan, L. Wei, A fractional model of the diffusion equation and its analytical solution using Laplace transform, Sci. Iran., 19 (2012), 1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.016 doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.016
    [34] K. Shah, H. Khalil, R. A. Khan, Analytical solutions of fractional order diffusion equations by natural transform method, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 42 (2018), 1479–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-016-0136-2 doi: 10.1007/s40995-016-0136-2
    [35] A. S. Alshehry, M. Imran, A. Khan, R. Shan, W. Weera, Fractional view analysis of Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations with non-singular kernel operators, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071463 doi: 10.3390/sym14071463
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. H. M. Srivastava, Sarem H. Hadi, Maslina Darus, Some subclasses of p-valent γ
    -uniformly type q-starlike and q-convex functions defined by using a certain generalized q-Bernardi integral operator, 2023, 117, 1578-7303, 10.1007/s13398-022-01378-3
    2. Alina Alb Lupaş, Applications of the q-Sălăgean Differential Operator Involving Multivalent Functions, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 512, 10.3390/axioms11100512
    3. Ali Mohammed Ramadhan, Najah Ali Jiben Al-Ziadi, New Class of Multivalent Functions with Negative Coefficients, 2022, 2581-8147, 271, 10.34198/ejms.10222.271288
    4. Sarem H. Hadi, Maslina Darus, Alina Alb Lupaş, A Class of Janowski-Type (p,q)-Convex Harmonic Functions Involving a Generalized q-Mittag–Leffler Function, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 190, 10.3390/axioms12020190
    5. Abdullah Alatawi, Maslina Darus, Badriah Alamri, Applications of Gegenbauer Polynomials for Subfamilies of Bi-Univalent Functions Involving a Borel Distribution-Type Mittag-Leffler Function, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 785, 10.3390/sym15040785
    6. Abdulmtalb Hussen, An application of the Mittag-Leffler-type Borel distribution and Gegenbauer polynomials on a certain subclass of bi-univalent functions, 2024, 10, 24058440, e31469, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31469
    7. Sarem H. Hadi, Maslina Darus, Firas Ghanim, Alina Alb Lupaş, Sandwich-Type Theorems for a Family of Non-Bazilevič Functions Involving a q-Analog Integral Operator, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 2479, 10.3390/math11112479
    8. Sarem H. Hadi, Maslina Darus, Rabha W. Ibrahim, Third-order Hankel determinants for q -analogue analytic functions defined by a modified q -Bernardi integral operator , 2024, 47, 1607-3606, 2109, 10.2989/16073606.2024.2352873
    9. Haewon Byeon, Manivannan Balamurugan, T. Stalin, Vediyappan Govindan, Junaid Ahmad, Walid Emam, Some properties of subclass of multivalent functions associated with a generalized differential operator, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-58781-6
    10. Timilehin Gideon Shaba, Serkan Araci, Babatunde Olufemi Adebesin, 2023, Investigating q-Exponential Functions in the Context of Bi-Univalent Functions: Insights into the Fekctc-Szcgö Problem and Second Hankel Determinant, 979-8-3503-5883-4, 1, 10.1109/ICMEAS58693.2023.10429891
    11. Sarem H. Hadi, Maslina Darus, 2024, 3023, 0094-243X, 070002, 10.1063/5.0172085
    12. Sarem H. Hadi, Maslina Darus, Badriah Alamri, Şahsene Altınkaya, Abdullah Alatawi, On classes of ζ -uniformly q -analogue of analytic functions with some subordination results , 2024, 32, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2024.2312803
    13. Sarem H. Hadi, Khalid A. Challab, Ali Hasan Ali, Abdullah A. Alatawi, A ϱ-Weyl fractional operator of the extended S-type function in a complex domain, 2024, 13, 22150161, 103061, 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103061
    14. Ehsan Mejeed Hameed, Elaf Ali Hussein, Rafid Habib Buti, 2025, 3264, 0094-243X, 050109, 10.1063/5.0258939
    15. Girish D. Shelake, Sarika K. Nilapgol, Priyanka D. Jirage, 2025, 3283, 0094-243X, 040016, 10.1063/5.0265526
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(436) PDF downloads(32) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog