The existence and uniqueness of solutions to fractional-order functional and neutral functional integrodifferential equations with infinite delay and multi-term fractional integral boundary conditions are investigated in this paper. Rigorous mathematical frameworks for analyzing these hybrid equations are established utilizing fixed point theorems. Notably, the fractional derivative is defined in the Liouville-Caputo sense, allowing for a comprehensive examination of nonlocal dynamics. Illustrative examples are provided to complement the theoretical results and demonstrate the applicability and practicality of the main results.
Citation: Manal Elzain Mohamed Abdalla, Hasanen A. Hammad. Solving functional integrodifferential equations with Liouville-Caputo fractional derivatives by fixed point techniques[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6168-6194. doi: 10.3934/math.2025281
[1] | Yujun Cui, Chunyu Liang, Yumei Zou . Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a class of fractional differential equation with lower-order derivative dependence. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3797-3818. doi: 10.3934/math.2025176 |
[2] | Subramanian Muthaiah, Manigandan Murugesan, Muath Awadalla, Bundit Unyong, Ria H. Egami . Ulam-Hyers stability and existence results for a coupled sequential Hilfer-Hadamard-type integrodifferential system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16203-16233. doi: 10.3934/math.2024784 |
[3] | Asghar Ahmadkhanlu, Hojjat Afshari, Jehad Alzabut . A new fixed point approach for solutions of a p-Laplacian fractional q-difference boundary value problem with an integral boundary condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23770-23785. doi: 10.3934/math.20241155 |
[4] | Saima Rashid, Abdulaziz Garba Ahmad, Fahd Jarad, Ateq Alsaadi . Nonlinear fractional differential equations and their existence via fixed point theory concerning to Hilfer generalized proportional fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 382-403. doi: 10.3934/math.2023018 |
[5] | Bashir Ahmad, Ahmed Alsaedi, Ymnah Alruwaily, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . Nonlinear multi-term fractional differential equations with Riemann-Stieltjes integro-multipoint boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1446-1461. doi: 10.3934/math.2020099 |
[6] | Abdelatif Boutiara, Kaddour Guerbati, Maamar Benbachir . Caputo-Hadamard fractional differential equation with three-point boundary conditions in Banach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 259-272. doi: 10.3934/math.2020017 |
[7] | Zohreh Heydarpour, Maryam Naderi Parizi, Rahimeh Ghorbnian, Mehran Ghaderi, Shahram Rezapour, Amir Mosavi . A study on a special case of the Sturm-Liouville equation using the Mittag-Leffler function and a new type of contraction. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18253-18279. doi: 10.3934/math.20221004 |
[8] | Bashir Ahmad, Manal Alnahdi, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Ahmed Alsaedi . On a mixed nonlinear boundary value problem with the right Caputo fractional derivative and multipoint closed boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11709-11726. doi: 10.3934/math.2023593 |
[9] | Sumaiya Tasneem Zubair, Kalpana Gopalan, Thabet Abdeljawad, Nabil Mlaiki . Novel fixed point technique to coupled system of nonlinear implicit fractional differential equations in complex valued fuzzy rectangular b-metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10867-10891. doi: 10.3934/math.2022608 |
[10] | Xiaoping Li, Dexin Chen . On solvability of some p-Laplacian boundary value problems with Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13622-13633. doi: 10.3934/math.2021792 |
The existence and uniqueness of solutions to fractional-order functional and neutral functional integrodifferential equations with infinite delay and multi-term fractional integral boundary conditions are investigated in this paper. Rigorous mathematical frameworks for analyzing these hybrid equations are established utilizing fixed point theorems. Notably, the fractional derivative is defined in the Liouville-Caputo sense, allowing for a comprehensive examination of nonlocal dynamics. Illustrative examples are provided to complement the theoretical results and demonstrate the applicability and practicality of the main results.
FDE, fractional differential equation
LC, Liouville-Caputo
RL, Riemann-Liouville
BS, Banach space
FFIDE, fractional functional integrodifferential equation
BVP, boundary value problems
The theory of fractional differential equations (FDEs) generalizes classical differential equations by introducing fractional derivatives, enabling the modeling of complex phenomena exhibiting non-locality, memory, and power-law behavior [1,2]. FDEs have been extensively developed using various fractional derivatives, such as Riemann-Liouville (RL), Caputo, and Grü nwald-Letnikov [3]. These equations describe anomalous diffusion, relaxation, and oscillation processes, making them suitable for modeling real-world problems in physics, engineering, and biology. FDEs have diverse applications across disciplines, including viscoelasticity [4], chaotic dynamics [5], image processing [6], model financial systems [7], population dynamics [8], and electrical circuits [9]. Recent studies have explored fractional-order controllers in robotics [10] and biomedical signal processing[11]. These applications demonstrate the versatility and potential of FDEs in describing complex systems.
Fractional calculus and fixed point theory have emerged as powerful tools in addressing optimization and inverse problems across various scientific and engineering disciplines. Fractional derivatives and integrals, with their inherent nonlocal properties, are particularly well-suited for modeling systems exhibiting memory effects and long-range dependencies, which are often encountered in optimization problems involving complex systems. Furthermore, fixed point (FP) methods, especially those tailored for non-smooth or set-valued mappings, provide robust frameworks for solving inverse problems, including those arising in image processing and signal reconstruction. The combination of fractional calculus and FP theory offers a synergistic approach, enabling the analysis and solution of challenging optimization and inverse problems that are often intractable using classical techniques. See [12,13,14,15,16] for more information.
Recent years have witnessed significant interest in boundary value problems (BVPs) of FDEs, encompassing various boundary conditions such as the existence and uniqueness of solutions to fractional boundary value problems [17,18,19,20], the existence and uniqueness of solutions to hybrid fractional systems under multi-point, periodic, and anti-periodic boundary conditions [21,22], and the stability of mixed integral fractional delay dynamic system equations and pantograph differential equations under impulsive effects and nonlocal conditions [23,24]. Integral boundary conditions, in particular, have far-reaching implications in applied fields like heat conduction, electric power networks, elastic stability, telecommunications and electric railway systems. Multi-point BVPs, arising from practical applications, also warrant attention. For example, the existence results for FDEs are established in [25,26,27,28,29]. Alos, the existence of solutions to fractional functional differential equations [30], semilinear fractional differential inclusions [31], Hadamard fractional integro-differential equations [32], systems of multi-point boundary value problems [33], fractional hybrid delay differential equations [34], and nonlinear Atangana-Baleanu-type fractional differential equations [35,36,37,38] have been established. The theory of fractional functional BVPs remains underdeveloped, necessitating further research in mathematical modeling, numerical methods, and computational simulations to address the unresolved aspects.
Benchohra et al. [26] proved the existence of a solution via Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative and uniqueness via Banach's FP theorem for fractional functional differential equations with infinite delay. Chauhan et al. [20] explored existence solutions for fractional integro-differential equations with impulses, infinite delay, and integral boundary conditions. Dabas and Gautam [39] examined existence results for impulsive neutral fractional integrodifferential equations featuring state-dependent delays and integral boundary conditions.
Inspired by the contributions of [20,26,39], first, our study focuses on establishing existence and uniqueness results for a fractional functional integrodifferential equation (FFIDE) featuring infinite delay. It takes the form
{LCDpϖ(ς)=g(ς,ϖς,∫ς0Ω(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ,∫σ0Υ(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ), p∈(2,3], ς∈U=[0,σ]ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0]ϖ(σ)=u∑j=1bj(Iqj0+ϖ)(λj), 0<λ1<λ2<⋯<λu<σ, | (1.1) |
where LCDp is the Liouville-Caputo (LC) fractional derivative with order p. Assume that ℧={(ς,ϑ):0≤ϑ≤ς≤σ}, Ξ is a BS, and Θ is a phase space. Then g:U×Θ×Ξ→Ξ, Ω,Υ:℧×Θ→Ξ are continuous functions and ψ∈Θ. Furthermore, Iqj0+ refers to the RL fractional integral of order qj>0, and bj represents suitable real constants for j=1,2,…,u.
Supposing that ϖ:(−∞,σ]→Θ and ς∈U, we denote ϖς∈Θ as an element defined by
ϖς(ξ)=ϖ(ς+ξ), ξ∈(−∞,0]. |
Throughout this manuscript, we suppose that ϖς(.) is the historical state trajectory from time −∞ to ς, and ϖς∈Θ, where Θ is an abstract phase space.
The second main result here is to investigate the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the neutral FFIDE with BVPs. It takes the form
{LCDpς[ϖ(ς)−∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,∫ϑ0Ω1(ϑ,μ,ϖμ)dμ,∫σ0Υ1(ϑ,μ,ϖμ)dμ)]=g(ς,ϖς,∫ς0Ω2(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ,∫σ0Υ2(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ) p∈(2,3], ς,ϑ∈U=[0,σ]ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0]ϖ(σ)=u∑j=1bj(Iqj0+ϖ)(λj), 0<λ1<λ2<⋯<λu<σ, | (1.2) |
where h,g:U×Θ×Ξ→Ξ, Ω1,Υ1,Ω2, and Υ2:℧×Θ→Ξ are continuous functions.
● This paper provides a systematic exploration of fractional functional integrodifferential equations.
● Section 2 lays the groundwork by establishing the foundational definitions, notation, and preliminary results.
● Existence and uniqueness criteria for FFIDEs are developed in Section 3, employing both Krasnoselskii's FP and Banach's FP theorem.
● Building upon these findings, Section 4 extends the existence and uniqueness results to neutral FFIDEs with BVPs.
● The applicability and practicality of the theoretical framework are demonstrated through illustrative examples provided in Section 5.
This section presents fundamental definitions, notation, and lemmas essential for the subsequent analysis. Let Ξ denote a BS equipped with the norm ‖.‖. Furthermore, C(U,Ξ) represents the BS of continuous functions from the interval U to Ξ, endowed with a uniform convergence topology and the norm ‖.‖C.
Definition 2.1. [2] For the function g∈L1(R+)
(ⅰ) The RL fractional integral of order p>0 is given by
Ip0+g(ς)=1Γ(p)∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1g(ϑ)dϑ, |
whenever the integral exists.
(ⅱ) The LC fractional derivative of order p∈(v−1,v] is described as
LCDpςg(ς)=1Γ(v−p)∫ς0(ς−ϑ)v−p−1g(v)(ϑ)dϑ, |
where g has absolutely continuous derivatives up to order (v−1).
Remark 2.2. It should be noted that, if we take v=1 in Definition 2.1 (ⅱ), we have 0<p≤1 and
LCDpςg(ς)=1Γ(1−p)∫ς0(ς−ϑ)pg′(ϑ)dϑ, |
where g′(ϑ)=dg(ϑ)dϑ.
Now, for simplicity, we denote LCDpς and Ip0+ by LCDp and Ip, respectively.
Lemma 2.3. [2] Assume that p,q≥0, and g∈L1[b,c]. Then, for all ς∈[b,c], we have
(i) IqIpg(ς)=Iq+pg(ς)=IpIqg(ς);
(ii) LCDpςIqg(ς)=g(ς).
Theorem 2.4. [40] (Krasnoselskii's theorem) Assume that Λ≠∅ is a closed and convex subset of a BS Ξ and that ℑ,ℜ are two operators satisfying
(i) for ϖ,ϱ∈Λ, ℑϖ+ℜϱ∈Λ,
(ii) ℑ is continuous and compact,
(iii) ℜ is a contraction.
Then, w∈Λ exists such that w=ℑw+ℜw.
This paper considers a seminormed linear state space (Θ,‖.‖Θ) of functions from (−∞,0] to Ξ satisfying the following hypotheses of Hale and Kato [41]:
(H1) On the interval (−∞,σ], if ϖ:(−∞,σ]→Ξ is continuous and ϖ0∈Θ, then for ς∈U, we have the following stipulations:
(1) ϖς∈Θ,
(2) ‖ϖ(ς)‖Θ≤κ‖ϖς‖Θ, where κ is a non-negative constant and is independent of ϖ(.),
(3) There is a continuous function N1:[0,∞)→[0,∞) and a locally bounded function N2:[0,∞)→[0,∞) in order that
‖ϖς‖Θ≤N1(ς)sup{‖ϖ(ϑ)‖:0≤ϑ≤ς}+N2(ς)‖ϖ(.)‖Θ, |
where N1 and N2 are independent of ϖ(.).
(H2) The space Θ is complete.
(H3) On the interval U, ϖς is a B-valued continuous function, where ϖ(.) is described in (H1).
Here, we consider N∗1=supς∈UN1(ς) and N∗2=supς∈UN2(ς).
This section is devoted to investigating the existence and uniqueness of solution to the considered problem (1.1) by applying Krasnoselskii's and Banach's FP theorems.
Assume the space
˜℧={ϖ:(−∞,σ]→Ξ:ϖ(−∞,0]∈Θ and ϖU is continuous}, |
and select Pϖ(ς)=∫ς0Ω(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ, and Qϖ(ς)=∫σ0Υ(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ.
Definition 3.1. We say that the function ϖ∈˜℧ is a solution to the FFIDE (1.1) if it fulfills the problem
{LCDpϖ(ς)=g(ς,ϖς,Pϖ(ς),Qϖ(ς)),ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],ϖ(σ)=u∑j=1bj(Iqjϖ)(λj), 0<λ1<λ2<⋯<λu<σ. |
We initiate our analysis of the nonlinear problem (1.1) by examining its linear counterpart, thereby obtaining a foundational solution.
Lemma 3.2. Assume that ϖ(ς)∈C(U,Ξ) satisfies the following problem:
{LCDpϖ(ς)=g(ς),p∈(2,3],ς∈U,ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς),ς∈(−∞,0],ϖ(σ)=u∑j=1bj(Iqjϖ)(λj),0<λ1<λ2<⋯<λu<σ. | (3.1) |
Then the unique solution of the fractional BVP (3.1) can be written as
ϖ(ς)={ψ(ς),ς∈(−∞,0],Ipg(ς)+ςB(u∑j=1bjIqj+pg(λj)−Ipg(σ))+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bjλqijΓ(qi+1)−1)),ς∈U, |
where B=σ−u∑j=1bjλqi+1jΓ(qi+2)≠0, provided that u∑j=1bjλqijΓ(qi+1)>1.
Proof. Suppose that ρ0,ρ1∈Ξ are vector constants. Based on [2], the solution of (3.1) takes the form
ϖ(ς)=Ipg(ς)+ρ0+ρ1ς. | (3.2) |
Applying the condition ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς), we get
ρ0=ψ(0). | (3.3) |
Using the condition ϖ(σ)=u∑j=1bj(Iqjϖ)(λj), we have
ρ1=1(σ−u∑j=1bj λqi+1jΓ(qi+2)){u∑j=1bjIqj+pg(λj)+ψ(0)(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)−Ipg(σ)}. | (3.4) |
From (3.3) and (3.4) in (3.2), we can write
ϖ(ς)=Ipg(ς)+ςB(u∑j=1bjIqj+pg(λj)−Ipg(σ))+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)). |
After that, we need the following assertions:
(A1) For all ς,ϑ∈U, ψ1,ψ2∈Θ and ϖ1,ϖ2,˜ϖ1,˜ϖ2∈Ξ, ℓg,ℓP,ℓQ exist in order that
{‖g(ς,ψ1,ϖ1,˜ϖ1)−g(ς,ψ2,ϖ2,˜ϖ2)‖Ξ≤ℓg(‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ+‖ϖ1−ϖ2‖Ξ+‖˜ϖ1−˜ϖ2‖Ξ),‖P(ς,ϑ,ψ1)−P(ς,ϑ,ψ2)‖Ξ≤ℓP‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ,‖Q(ς,ϑ,ψ1)−Q(ς,ϑ,ψ2)‖Ξ≤ℓQ‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ. |
(A2) For all (ς,ψ,ϖ1,ϖ2)∈U×Θ×Ξ×Ξ and (ς,ϑ,ψ)∈℧×Θ, Vj∈L1(U,R+) (j=1,2,3,4,5) exists such that
{‖g(ς,ψ,ϖ1,ϖ2)‖Ξ≤V1(ς)‖ψ‖Θ+V2(ς)‖ϖ1‖Ξ+V3(ς)‖ϖ2‖Ξ,‖P(ς,ϑ,ψ)‖Ξ≤V4(ς)‖ψ‖Θ,‖Q(ς,ϑ,ψ)‖Ξ≤V5(ς)‖ψ‖Θ. |
(A3) We consider S=ℓgN∗1{ξ1+ξ2(ℓP+ℓQ)}<1, where
{ξ1=(1+σ|B|)ν1+σ|B|ν3,ξ2=(1+σ|B|)ν2+σ|B|ν4,ν1=σpΓ(1+p), ν2=σp+1Γ(2+p),ν3=u∑j=1|bj|λqi+pjΓ(qi+p+1), ν4=u∑j=1|bj| λqi+p+1jΓ(qi+p+2). |
Now, the first main result in this part is as follows:
Theorem 3.3. Under Assertions (A1) and (A2), the BVP (1.1) has at least one solution on (−∞,σ], provided that
ℓ=σ|B|ℓgN∗1{(ν1+ν3)+(ν2+ν4)(ℓP+ℓQ)}<1. |
Proof. The FP technique involves equating a given operator to the problem at hand and seeking a unique FP, which corresponds to the problem's unique solution. Therefore, we convert the BVP (1.1) to an FP problem. Define the operator M:˜℧→˜℧ as
(Mϖ)(ς)={ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϖϑ,Pϖ(ϑ),Qϖ(ϑ))dϑ+ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϖϑ,Pϖ(ϑ),Qϖ(ϑ))dϑ−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϖϑ,Pϖ(ϑ),Qϖ(ϑ))dϑ)+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)), ς∈U. | (3.5) |
Assume that ϱ(.):(−∞,σ]→Ξ is a function described as
ϱ(ς)={ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],0, ς∈U. |
It is clear that ϱ0=0. For every ω∈C(U,Ξ) with ω(0)=0, we select
˜ω(ς)={0, ς∈(−∞,0],ω(ς), ς∈U. |
If ϖ(.) fulfills (3.5), then we decompose ϖ(.) as ϖ(ς)=ϱ(ς)+˜ω(ς), which leads to ϖς=ϱς+˜ως for all ς∈U, and ω(.) satisfies
ω(ς)=∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ+ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ)+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)). |
Put G0={ω∈C(U,Ξ):ω0=0} and consider ‖.‖G0 to be the seminorm in G0 given by
‖ω‖G0=supς∈U‖ω(ς)‖Ξ+‖ω0‖Θ=supς∈U‖ω(ς)‖Ξ, ω∈G0. |
Hence, (G0,‖.‖G0) is a BS. Describe the operator Φ:G0→G0 as
(Φω)(ς)=∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ+ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ)+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)). |
The existence of an FP for an operator M is equivalent to the operator Φ having an FP. Hence, we focus on establishing the existence of an FP for Φ.
Consider the set Hs={ω∈G0:‖ω‖G0≤s}. Hence, Hs is a bounded, closed, and convex subset of G0. Assume that there is a positive constant ε such that ε<s, where
ε=‖q‖L1s∗[(1+σ|B|)(ν1+ν2)+σ|B|(ν3+ν4)]+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)). |
Now, we decompose Φ as Φ1+Φ2 on Hs, where
(Φ1ω)(ς)=∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ, |
and
(Φ2ω)(ς)=ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])dϑ)+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)). |
Now, if we let ω,ω∗∈Hs and ς∈U, we get
‖(Φ1ω)(ς)+(Φ2ω∗)(ς)‖Ξ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ)+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj| λqijΓ(qi+1)−1))≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)(V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ)dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)(V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ)dϑ)+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj| λqijΓ(qi+1)−1))≤‖V‖L1s∗[(1+σ|B|)(ν1+ν2)+σ|B|(ν3+ν4)]+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1))=ε. |
Hence,
‖Φ1ω+Φ2ω∗‖Ξ≤ε, | (3.6) |
where V(ς)=max{V1(ς),V2(ς),V3(ς),V4(ς)} and
‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ≤‖ϱϑ‖Θ+‖˜ωϑ‖Θ≤N1(ϑ)sup0≤μ≤ϑ‖ϱ(μ)‖+N2(ϑ)‖ϱ(0)‖+N1(ϑ)sup0≤μ≤ϑ‖˜ω(μ)‖+N2(ϑ)‖˜ω(0)‖≤N∗1s+N∗2‖ψ‖Θ≤s∗. |
It follows from (3.6) that Φ1ω+Φ2ω∗∈Hs. Now, we show that Φ2 is a contraction. For this, assume that ω,ω∗∈Hs, and ς∈U. We then
‖(Φ2ω)(ς)−(Φ2ω∗)(ς)‖Ξ≤ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)×‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖dϑ)≤ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)ℓg(‖(ϱϑ+˜ωϑ)−(ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ)‖Θ+‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]−P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ+‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]−Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ)dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(‖(ϱϑ+˜ωϑ)−(ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ)‖Θ+‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]−P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ+‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]−Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)]‖Ξ)dϑ)≤ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)dϑ)≤ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)ℓg(N∗1supϑ∈[0,ς]‖ω(ϑ)−ω∗(ϑ)‖+ℓPN∗1supμ∈[0,ϑ]‖ω(μ)−ω∗(μ)‖ϑ+ℓQN∗1supμ∈[0,ϑ]‖ω(μ)−ω∗(μ)‖ϑ)dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(N∗1supϑ∈[0,ς]‖ω(ϑ)−ω∗(ϑ)‖+ℓPN∗1supμ∈[0,ϑ]‖ω(μ)−ω∗(μ)‖ϑ+ℓQN∗1supμ∈[0,ϑ]‖ω(μ)−ω∗(μ)‖ϑ)dϑ)≤ς|B|N∗1ℓg(u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+pΓ(qj+p+1)+(ℓP+ℓQ)u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+p+1Γ(qj+p+2)+σpΓ(p+1)+(ℓP+ℓQ)σp+1Γ(p+2))‖ω−ω∗‖G0≤σ|B|ℓgN∗1{(ν1+ν3)+(ν2+ν4)(ℓP+ℓQ)}‖ω−ω∗‖G0=ℓ‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
It follows that
‖Φ2ω−Φ2ω∗‖G0≤ℓ‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
Since ℓ<1, then, Φ2 is contraction. Because g, P and Q are continuous, and thus Φ1 is continuous. Consider
‖(Φ1ω)(ς)‖Ξ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dϑ≤‖V‖L1s∗(ν1+ν2). |
This proves that Φ1 is uniformly bounded on Hs. Finally, we prove that Φ1 is compact. Indeed, we claim that Φ1 is equicontinuous. For ς1,ς2∈U, with ς1<ς2 and ω∈Hs, one can write
‖(Φ1ω)(ς2)−(Φ1ω)(ς1)‖Ξ≤∫ς10(ς2−ϑ)p−1−(ς1−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫ς2ς1(ς2−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ≤∫ς10(ς2−ϑ)p−1−(ς1−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dϑ+∫ς2ς1(ς2−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dϑ≤‖V‖L1s∗(∫ς10(ς2−ϑ)p−1−(ς1−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)(1+ϑ)dϑ+∫ς2ς1(ς2−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)(1+ϑ)dϑ). |
Clearly, ‖(Φ1ω)(ς2)−(Φ1ω)(ς2)‖Ξ→0 as ς1→ς2. Consequently, Φ1 is equicontinuous. Applying the Arzelà -Ascoli theorem, we establish that Φ1 is compact on Hs. Consequently, invoking Krasnoselskii's FP theorem, we prove the existence of an FP ω∈G0, satisfying Φω=ω, thereby yielding a solution to the fractional BVP (1.1).
Now, for the uniqueness, we apply Banach's FP theorem as follows:
Theorem 3.4. Via Assertions (A1) and (A3), the BVP (1.1) owns a unique solution on (−∞,σ].
Proof. Recall the set Hs={ω∈G0:‖ω‖G0≤s} and assume that ω,ω∗∈G0. For ς∈U, one has
‖(Φω)(ς)−(Φω∗)(ς)‖Ξ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ)≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)dϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)dϑ)≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(N∗1‖ω−ω∗‖G0+ℓP‖ω−ω∗‖G0ϑ+ℓQ‖ω−ω∗‖G0ϑ)+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)ℓg(N∗1‖ω−ω∗‖G0+ℓP‖ω−ω∗‖G0ϑ+ℓQ‖ω−ω∗‖G0ϑ)dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)ℓg(N∗1‖ω−ω∗‖G0+ℓP‖ω−ω∗‖G0ϑ+ℓQ‖ω−ω∗‖G0ϑ)dϑ)≤ℓgN∗1{[σpΓ(p+1)+σ|B|u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+pΓ(qj+p+1)+σp+1|B|Γ(p+1)]+(ℓP+ℓQ)[σp+1Γ(p+2)+σ|B|u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+p+1Γ(qj+p+2)+σp+2|B|Γ(p+2)]}‖ω−ω∗‖G0≤ℓgN∗1{ξ1+ξ2(ℓP+ℓQ)}‖ω−ω∗‖G0=S‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
Hence,
‖Φ(ω)−Φ(ω∗)‖G0≤S‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
By (A3), S<1, Φ is a contraction. By Banach's FP theorem, Φ possesses a unique FP, which is a unique solution to the problem (1.1) on the interval (−∞,σ].
In this section, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of solution to the considered problem (1.2) by applying Krasnoselskii's and Banach's FP theorems.
Assume that the space ˜℧ is defined as in the section above and choose
{P1ϖ(ς)=∫ς0Ω1(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ,P2ϖ(ς)=∫ς0Ω2(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ,Q1ϖ(ς)=∫σ0Υ1(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ,Q2ϖ(ς)=∫σ0Υ2(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)dϑ. |
Definition 4.1. We say that the function ϖ∈˜℧ is a solution to the FFIDE (1.1) if it fulfills the problem
{LCDp[ϖ(ς)−∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P1ϖ(ϑ),Q1ϖ(ϑ))]=g(ς,ϖς,P2ϖ(ς),Q2ϖ(ς)), ς∈U,ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],ϖ(σ)=u∑j=1bj(Iqjϖ)(λj), 0<λ1<λ2<⋯<λu<σ. |
With the aid of Lemma 3.2, the solution of the neutral FFIDE (1.2) takes the form
ϖ(ς)={ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϖϑ,P2ϖ(ϑ),Q2ϖ(ϑ))+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P1ϖ(ϑ),Q1ϖ(ϑ))+ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϖϑ,P2ϖ(ϑ),Q2ϖ(ϑ))+u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P2ϖ(ϑ),Q2ϖ(ϑ))−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϖϑ,P2ϖ(ϑ),Q2ϖ(ϑ))−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P1ϖ(ϑ),Q1ϖ(ϑ)))+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)), ς∈U, |
where B=σ−u∑j=1bj λqi+1jΓ(qi+2)≠0.
To accomplish our main task here, we needs the following assertions:
(A4) For all ς,ϑ∈U, ψ1,ψ2∈Θ and ϖ1,ϖ2,˜ϖ1,˜ϖ2∈Ξ, ℓg,ℓh,ℓP1,ℓQ1,ℓP2,ℓQ2 exist such that
{‖g(ς,ψ1,ϖ1,˜ϖ1)−g(ς,ψ2,ϖ2,˜ϖ2)‖Ξ≤ℓg(‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ+‖ϖ1−ϖ2‖Ξ+‖˜ϖ1−˜ϖ2‖Ξ),‖h(ς,ψ1,ϖ1,˜ϖ1)−h(ς,ψ2,ϖ2,˜ϖ2)‖Ξ≤ℓh(‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ+‖ϖ1−ϖ2‖Ξ+‖˜ϖ1−˜ϖ2‖Ξ),‖P1(ς,ϑ,ψ1)−P1(ς,ϑ,ψ2)‖Ξ≤ℓP1‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ,‖P2(ς,ϑ,ψ1)−P2(ς,ϑ,ψ2)‖Ξ≤ℓP2‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ,‖Q1(ς,ϑ,ψ1)−Q1(ς,ϑ,ψ2)‖Ξ≤ℓQ1‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ,‖Q2(ς,ϑ,ψ1)−Q2(ς,ϑ,ψ2)‖Ξ≤ℓQ2‖ψ1−ψ2‖Θ. |
(A5) For all (ς,ψ,ϖ1,ϖ2)∈U×Θ×Ξ×Ξ and (ς,ϑ,ψ)∈℧×Θ, Vj∈L1(U,R+) (j=1,2,3,4,5) exists in order that
{‖g(ς,ψ,ϖ1,ϖ2)‖Ξ≤V1(ς)‖ψ‖Θ+V2(ς)‖ϖ1‖Ξ+V3(ς)‖ϖ2‖Ξ,‖h(ς,ψ,ϖ1,ϖ2)‖Ξ≤V4(ς)‖ψ‖Θ+V5(ς)‖ϖ1‖Ξ+V6(ς)‖ϖ2‖Ξ,‖P1(ς,ϑ,ψ)‖Ξ≤V7(ς)‖ψ‖Θ,‖P2(ς,ϑ,ψ)‖Ξ≤V8(ς)‖ψ‖Θ,‖Q1(ς,ϑ,ψ)‖Ξ≤V9(ς)‖ψ‖Θ,‖Q2(ς,ϑ,ψ)‖Ξ≤V10(ς)‖ψ‖Θ. |
(A6) Assume that S∗=ℓgN∗1{ξ1+ξ2(ℓP2+ℓQ2)}+ℓhN∗1{ξ1+ξ2(ℓP1+ℓQ1)}<1, where
{ξ1=(1+σ|B|)ν1+σ|B|ν3,ξ2=(1+σ|B|)ν2+σ|B|ν4,ν1=σpΓ(1+p), ν2=σp+1Γ(2+p),ν3=u∑j=1|bj|λqi+pjΓ(qi+p+1), ν4=u∑j=1|bj| λqi+p+1jΓ(qi+p+2). |
Theorem 4.2. Under Assertions (A4) and (A5), the neutral BVP (1.2) has at least one solution on (−∞,σ], provided that
ℓ∗=σN∗1|B|(ℓg[(ν1+ν3)+(ℓP2+ℓQ2)(ν2+ν4)]+ℓh[(ν1+ν3)+(ℓP1+ℓQ1)(ν2+ν4)])<1. |
Proof. Define the operator ⅁:˜℧→˜℧ as
(⅁ϖ)(ς)={ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ς,ϖς,P2ϖ(ς),Q2ϖ(ς))dς+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P1ϖ(ϑ),Q1ϖ(ϑ))dς+ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ς,ϖς,P2ϖ(ς),Q2ϖ(ς))dς+u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P1ϖ(ϑ),Q1ϖ(ϑ))dς−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ς,ϖς,P2ϖ(ς),Q2ϖ(ς))dς−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϖϑ,P1ϖ(ϑ),Q1ϖ(ϑ))dς)+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)), ς∈U. | (4.1) |
Analogous to Theorem 3.3, define the operator ℜ:G0→G0 as
(ℜϖ)(ς)={∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])+ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])+u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]))+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)), ς∈U. |
Describe the set Hˆs as Hˆs={ω∈G0:‖ω‖G0≤ˆs}. Let there be a positive constant ε∗ such that ε∗<ˆs, where
ε∗=2‖V∗‖L1ˆs∗[ξ1+ξ2]+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)), |
where
V∗(ς)=max{V1(ς),V2(ς),V3(ς),V4(ς),V5(ς),V6(ς),V7(ς),V8(ς),V9(ς),V10(ς)}. |
Now, we decompose ℜ as ℜ1+ℜ2 on Hˆs, where
(ℜ1ϖ)(ς)={∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]), |
and
(ℜ2ϖ)(ς)={ςB(u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])+u∑j=1bj∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]))+ψ(0)(1+ςB(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1)), ς∈U. |
Now, for ω,ω∗∈Hˆs and ς∈U, we have
‖(ℜ1ω)(ς)+(ℜ2ω∗)(ς)‖Ξ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ)+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj| λqijΓ(qi+1)−1))≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V4(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V5(ϑ)‖P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V6(ϑ)‖Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V4(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V5(ϑ)‖P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V6(ϑ)‖Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dθ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+q2(ϑ)‖P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+q3(ϑ)‖Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V4(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V5(ϑ)‖P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V6(ϑ)‖Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dθ+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj| λqijΓ(qi+1)−1))≤2‖V∗‖L1ˆs∗[ξ1+ξ2]+‖ψ(0)‖(1+ς|B|(u∑j=1bj λqijΓ(qi+1)−1))=ε∗, |
where V∗(ς)=max{V1(ς),V2(ς),V3(ς),V4(ς),V5(ς),V6(ς)} and
‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ≤N∗1ˆs+N∗2ˆs‖ψ(0)‖Θ≤ˆs∗. |
Hence,
‖ℜ1ω+ℜ2ω∗‖G0≤ε∗. |
Thus, ℜ1ω+ℜ2ω∗∈Hˆs. Now, we prove that ℜ2 is a contraction. Let ω,ω∗∈Hˆs and ς∈U. We then
‖(ℜ2ω)(ς)−(ℜ2ω∗)(ς)‖Ξ≤ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)[‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξ+‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξ]dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξ+‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξ]dϑ≤ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)[ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP2‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ2‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)+ℓh(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP1‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ1‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)]dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP2‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ2‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)+ℓh(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+ℓP1‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ+ℓQ1‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)]dϑ)≤σN∗1|B|[ℓg{(ν1+ν3)+(ν2+ν4)(ℓP2+ℓQ2)}+ℓh{(ν1+ν3)+(ν2+ν4)(ℓP1+ℓQ1)}]‖ω−ω∗‖G0=ℓ∗‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
It follows that
‖ℜ2ω−ℜ2ω∗‖G0≤ℓ∗‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
Since ℓ∗<1, then, ℜ2 is contraction. Since g, P1,P2,Q1 and Q2 are continuous, then ℜ1 is continuous. Furthermore,
‖(ℜ1ω)(ς)‖Ξ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V2(ϑ)‖P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V3(ϑ)‖Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dϑ+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V4(ϑ)‖ϱϑ+˜ωϑ‖Θ+V5(ϑ)‖P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ+V6(ϑ)‖Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)]‖Ξ]dϑ≤2‖q∗‖L1ˆs∗(ν1+ν2). |
Hence, ℜ1 is uniformly bounded on Hs. Ultimately, we claim that ℜ1 is compact. Indeed, we prove that ℜ1 is equicontinuous. For ς1,ς2∈U, with ς1<ς2 and ω∈Hˆs, one has
‖(ℜ1ω)(ς2)−(ℜ1ω)(ς1)‖Ξ≤∫ς10(ς2−ϑ)p−1−(ς1−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξ+‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξ]dϑ+∫ς2ς1(ς2−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξ+‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])‖Ξ]dϑ≤∫ς10(ς2−ϑ)p−1−(ς1−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)ˆs∗+V2(ϑ)V8(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ+V3(ϑ)V10(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ+V4(ϑ)ˆs∗+V5(ϑ)V7(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ+V6(ϑ)V9(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ]dϑ+∫ς2ς1(ς2−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[V1(ϑ)ˆs∗+V2(ϑ)V8(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ+V3(ϑ)V10(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ+V4(ϑ)ˆs∗+V5(ϑ)q7(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ+V6(ϑ)V9(ϑ)ˆs∗ϑ]dϑ≤2‖V∗‖L1ˆs∗(∫ς10(ς2−ϑ)p−1−(ς1−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)(1+ϑ)dϑ+∫ς2ς1(ς2−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)(1+ϑ)dϑ). |
Therefore, ‖(ℜ1ω)(ς2)−(ℜ1ω)(ς2)‖Ξ→0 as ς1→ς2. Hence, Φ1 is equicontinuous. By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, we establish that ℜ1 is compact on Hˆs. Consequently, invoking Krasnoselskii's FP theorem, ω∈G0 exists such that ℜω=ω, which is a solution the neutral BVP (1.2).
For the uniqueness, we have the following theorem:
Theorem 4.3. Via Assertions (A4) and (A6), the neutral BVP (1.2) has a unique solution on (−∞,σ].
Proof. Define the set Hˆs={ω∈G0:‖ω‖G0≤s} and assume that ω,ω∗∈G0. For ς∈U, we get
‖(ℜω)(ς)−(ℜω∗)(ς)‖Ξ≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−g(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q2[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)‖h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ωϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω(ϑ)])−h(ϑ,ϱϑ+˜ω∗ϑ,P1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)],Q1[ϱ(ϑ)+˜ω∗(ϑ)])‖Ξdϑ)≤∫ς0(ς−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+(ℓP2+ℓQ2)‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)+ℓh(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+(ℓP1+ℓQ1)‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)]dϑ+ς|B|(u∑j=1|bj|∫λj0(λj−ϑ)qj+p−1Γ(qj+p)[ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+(ℓP2+ℓQ2)‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)+ℓh(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+(ℓP1+ℓQ1)‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)]dϑ+∫σ0(σ−ϑ)p−1Γ(p)[ℓg(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+(ℓP2+ℓQ2)‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)+ℓh(‖˜ωϑ−˜ω∗ϑ‖Θ+(ℓP1+ℓQ1)‖˜ωμ−˜ω∗μ‖Θϑ)]dϑ)≤{ℓgN∗1[σpΓ(p+1)+σ|B|u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+pΓ(qj+p+1)+σp+1|B|Γ(p+1)+(ℓP2+ℓQ2)(σp+1Γ(p+2)+σ|B|u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+p+1Γ(qj+p+2)+σp+2|B|Γ(p+2))]+ℓhN∗1[σpΓ(p+1)+σ|B|u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+pΓ(qj+p+1)+σp+1|B|Γ(p+1)+(ℓP1+ℓQ1)(σp+1Γ(p+2)+σ|B|u∑j=1|bj|(λj)qj+p+1Γ(qj+p+2)+σp+2|B|Γ(p+2))]}‖ω−ω∗‖G0≤ℓgN∗1{ξ1+ξ2(ℓP2+ℓQ2)}+ℓhN∗1{ξ1+ξ2(ℓP1+ℓQ1)}‖ω−ω∗‖G0=S∗‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
Hence,
‖ℜ(ω)−ℜ(ω∗)‖G0≤S∗‖ω−ω∗‖G0. |
By (A6), S∗<1. Thus, ℜ is a contraction. By Banach's FP theorem, ℜ has a unique FP, which is a unique solution to the problem (1.2) on (−∞,σ].
This section is devoted to testing the conditions of the proposed systems and their effectiveness, which leads to supporting and enhancing the theoretical results we obtained.
Example 5.1. Assume the following FFIDE:
{LCD52ϖ(ς)=1(ς+7)2e−νς|ϖς|1+|ϖς|+132∫ς0ςϑe−νς16(1+ϑ)cos(ϖϑ)1+cos(ϖϑ)dϑ+164∫σ0ςϑe−νς20(1+ϑ)sin(ϖϑ)1+sin(ϖϑ)dϑ, ς∈[0,1],ϖ(ς)=ψ(ς), ς∈(−∞,0],ϖ(1)=3∑j=1bj(Iqj0+ϖ)(λj), 0<λ1<λ2<λ3<1, | (5.1) |
where ν>0 is a real constant and define the set Hν as
Hν={ω∈C((−∞,0],R):limϕ→−∞eνϕω(ϕ) exists in R}, |
under the norm
‖ω‖ν=supϕ∈(−∞,0]eνϕ|ω(ϕ)|. |
Assume that ϖ:(−∞,σ]→Ξ in order that ϖ0=ψ∈Hν. Then
limϕ→−∞eνϕως(ϕ)=limϕ→−∞eνϕω(ς+ϕ)=limϕ→−∞eν(ϕ−ς)ω(ϕ)=e−νςlimϕ→−∞eνϕω0(ϕ)<∞. |
Therefore, ως∈Hν. Select N1=N2=κ=1. Hence, we show the condition
‖ως‖ν≤N1(ς)sup{|ϖ(ϑ)|:0≤ϑ≤ς}+N2(ς)‖ϖ0‖ν. |
Clearly, |ως(ϕ)|=|ω(ς+ϕ)|. If ς+ϕ≤0, we get
|ως(ϕ)|≤sup{|ϖ(ϑ)|:−∞<ϑ≤0}. |
In the case of ς+ϕ≥0, we have
|ως(ϕ)|≤sup{|ϖ(ϑ)|:0<ϑ≤ς}. |
Hence, if ς+ϕ∈[0,1], we can write
|ως(ϕ)|≤sup{|ϖ(ϑ)|:−∞<ϑ≤0}+sup{|ϖ(ϑ)|:0≤ϑ≤ς}, |
which implies that
‖ως‖ν≤sup{|ϖ(ϑ)|:0≤ϑ≤ς}+‖ϖ0‖ν. |
Furthermore, the pair (Hν,‖ω‖) is a BS and Hν is a phase space. Here, p=52, u=3, and we choose
b1=16,b2=18,b3=4,λ1=19,λ2=14,λ3=711,q1=13,q2=12,q3=65. |
By simple calculation, we have
{B=σ−u∑j=1bj λqi+1jΓ(qi+2)=1−3∑j=1bj λqi+1jΓ(qi+2)≈0.3729≠0,ν1=σpΓ(1+p)≈0.3009, ν2=σp+1Γ(2+p)≈0.0859,ν3=u∑j=1|bj|λqi+pjΓ(qi+p+1)≈0.0088, ν4=u∑j=1|bj|λqi+p+1jΓ(qi+p+2)≈0.0008,ξ1=(1+σ|B|)ν1+σ|B|ν3≈1.1314,ξ2=(1+σ|B|)ν2+σ|B|ν4≈0.3184. |
From (5.1), we have
g(ς,ϖς,P(ς),Q(ς))=1(ς+7)2e−νς|ϖς|1+|ϖς|+132Pϖ(ς)+164Qϖ(ς), |
where
Pϖ(ς)=∫ς0ςϑe−νς16(1+ϑ)cos(ϖϑ)1+cos(ϖϑ)dϑ,Qϖ(ς)=∫σ0ςϑe−νς20(1+ϑ)sin(ϖϑ)1+sin(ϖϑ)dϑ. |
Now, for ϖς,ϱς∈Hν, we have
|P(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)−P(ς,ϑ,ϱϑ)|=|ςϑe−νς16(1+ϑ)cos(ϖϑ)1+cos(ϖϑ)−ςϑe−νς16(1+ϑ)cos(ϱϑ)1+cos(ϱϑ)|≤116‖ϖ−ϱ‖ν, | (5.2) |
|Q(ς,ϑ,ϖϑ)−Q(ς,ϑ,ϱϑ)|=|ςϑe−νς20(1+ϑ)sin(ϖϑ)1+sin(ϖϑ)−ςϑe−νς20(1+ϑ)sin(ϱϑ)1+sin(ϱϑ)|≤120‖ϖ−ϱ‖ν, | (5.3) |
|g(ς,ϖς,Pϖ(ς),Qϖ(ς))−g(ς,ϱς,Pϱ(ς),Qϱ(ς))|≤1(ς+7)2e−νς|ϖς−ϱς|(1+|ϖς|)(1+|ϱς|)+132|Pϖ(ς)−Pϱ(ς)|+164|Qϖ(ς)−Pϱ(ς)|≤164(‖ϖ−ϱ‖ν+18‖ϖ−ϱ‖ν+120‖ϖ−ϱ‖ν), | (5.4) |
|g(ς,ψ,ϖ,ϱ)|=|1(ς+7)2e−νς|ψς|1+|ψς|+132∫ς0ςϑe−νς16(1+ϑ)cos(ϖϑ)1+cos(ϖϑ)dϑ+164∫σ0ςϑe−νς20(1+ϑ)sin(ϱϑ)1+sin(ϱϑ)dϑ|≤164|ψ|+132|ϖ|+164|ϱ|, | (5.5) |
\begin{equation} \left\vert P\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi \right) \right\vert = \left\vert \frac{\varsigma \vartheta e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{16(1+\vartheta )} \frac{\cos (\varpi _{\vartheta })}{1+\cos (\varpi _{\vartheta })}\right\vert \leq \frac{1}{32}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert , \end{equation} | (5.6) |
and
\begin{equation} \left\vert Q\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi \right) \right\vert = \left\vert \frac{\varsigma \vartheta e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{20(1+\vartheta )} \frac{\sin (\varpi _{\vartheta })}{1+\sin (\varpi _{\vartheta })}\right\vert \leq \frac{1}{40}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert . \end{equation} | (5.7) |
It follows from (5.2)–(5.7) that \ell _{g} = \frac{1}{64}, \ell _{P} = \frac{1}{16}, \ell _{Q} = \frac{1}{20}, V_{1}(\varsigma) = \frac{1 }{64}, V_{2}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{32}, V_{3}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{64}, V_{4}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{32}, V_{5}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{40}, and N_{1}^{\ast } = 1. Hence
\begin{equation*} \ell = \frac{\sigma }{\left\vert B\right\vert }\ell _{g}N_{1}^{\ast }\left\{ \left( \nu _{1}+\nu _{3}\right) +\left( \nu _{2}+\nu _{4}\right) \left( \ell _{P}+\ell _{Q}\right) \right\} \approx 0.0138 < 1, \end{equation*} |
and
\begin{equation*} S = \ell _{g}N_{1}^{\ast }\left\{ \xi _{1}+\xi _{2}\left( \ell _{P}+\ell _{Q}\right) \right\} \approx 0.0182 < 1. \end{equation*} |
Therefore, all the requirements of Theorems 3.3 and 3.4 are satisfied. Then, the considered problem (5.1) has a unique solution on (-\infty, \sigma ].
Example 5.2. Assume the following neutral FFIDE:
\begin{equation} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} ^{LC}D_{\varsigma }^{\frac{5}{2}}\left[ \varpi (\varsigma )-\int_{0}^{\varsigma }\sqrt{\frac{(\varsigma -\vartheta )^{p-1}}{\pi }} \left( \frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{20}\frac{\varpi _{\varsigma }^{2}}{ 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }^{2}}+\frac{1}{20}\int_{0}^{\varsigma }\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{6}\ln \left( 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }\right) d\vartheta +\frac{1}{ 25}\int_{0}^{\sigma }\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{4}\frac{\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }{1+\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }d\vartheta \right) \right] \\ = \frac{\left( 1+e^{-\varsigma }\right) e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{\left( 34+e^{\varsigma }\right) }\frac{\left\vert \varpi _{\varsigma }\right\vert }{ 1+\left\vert \varpi _{\varsigma }\right\vert }+\frac{1}{15} \int_{0}^{\varsigma }e^{-\nu \varsigma }\cos (\frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{5} )d\vartheta +\frac{1}{35}\int_{0}^{\sigma }e^{-\nu \varsigma }\sin (\frac{ \varpi _{\vartheta }}{6})d\vartheta ,\text{ }\varsigma \in \lbrack 0,1], \\ \varpi (\varsigma ) = \psi \left( \varsigma \right) ,\text{ }\varsigma \in (-\infty ,0], \\ \varpi (1) = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{3}b_{j}\left( I_{0^{+}}^{q_{j}}\varpi \right) \left( \lambda _{j}\right) ,\text{ }0 < \lambda _{1} < \lambda _{2} < \lambda _{3} < 1. \end{array} \right. \end{equation} | (5.8) |
Assume that H_{\nu } is the phase space, which is defined in Example 5.1, where p = \frac{5}{2}, u = 3 , and
\begin{equation*} \begin{array}{ccc} b_{1} = \frac{1}{5}, & b_{2} = \frac{1}{4}, & b_{3} = 5, \\ \lambda _{1} = \frac{1}{7}, & \lambda _{2} = \frac{1}{2}, & \lambda _{3} = \frac{7 }{12}, \\ q_{1} = \frac{1}{2}, & q_{2} = \frac{1}{3}, & q_{3} = \frac{7}{2}. \end{array} \end{equation*} |
By simple calculation, we have
\begin{equation*} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} B\approx 0.5231\neq 0, \\ \nu _{1} = \frac{\sigma ^{p}}{\Gamma (1+p)}\approx 0.4187,\text{ }\nu _{2} = \frac{\sigma ^{p+1}}{\Gamma (2+p)}\approx 0.3979, \\ \nu _{3} = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{u}\left\vert b_{j}\right\vert \frac{\lambda _{j}^{q_{i}+p}}{\Gamma \left( q_{i}+p+1\right) }\approx 0.0132,\text{ }\nu _{4} = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{u}\left\vert b_{j}\right\vert \frac{\lambda _{j}^{q_{i}+p+1}}{\Gamma \left( q_{i}+p+2\right) }\approx 0.0037, \\ \xi _{1} = \left( 1+\frac{\sigma }{\left\vert B\right\vert }\right) \nu _{1}+ \frac{\sigma }{\left\vert B\right\vert }\nu _{3}\approx 1.5841, \\ \xi _{2} = \left( 1+\frac{\sigma }{\left\vert B\right\vert }\right) \nu _{2}+ \frac{\sigma }{\left\vert B\right\vert }\nu _{4}\approx 0.7239. \end{array} \right. \end{equation*} |
From (5.8), one can write
\begin{eqnarray*} g\left( \varsigma ,\varpi _{\varsigma },P_{2}(\varsigma ),Q_{2}(\varsigma )\right) & = &\frac{\left( 1+e^{-\varsigma }\right) e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{ \left( 34+e^{\varsigma }\right) }\frac{\left\vert \varpi _{\varsigma }\right\vert }{1+\left\vert \varpi _{\varsigma }\right\vert }+\frac{1}{15} P_{2}\varpi (\varsigma )+\frac{1}{35}Q_{2}\varpi (\varsigma ), \\ h\left( \varsigma ,\varpi _{\varsigma },P_{1}(\varsigma ),Q_{1}(\varsigma )\right) & = &\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{20}\frac{\varpi _{\varsigma }^{2}}{ 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }^{2}}+\frac{1}{20}P_{1}\varpi (\varsigma )+\frac{1}{25} Q_{1}\varpi (\varsigma ), \end{eqnarray*} |
where
\begin{eqnarray*} P_{2}\varpi (\varsigma ) & = &\int_{0}^{\varsigma }\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{6 }\ln \left( 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }\right) d\vartheta , \\ Q_{2}\varpi (\varsigma ) & = &\int_{0}^{\sigma }\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{4} \frac{\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }{1+\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }d\vartheta , \\ P_{1}\varpi (\varsigma ) & = &\int_{0}^{\varsigma }e^{-\nu \varsigma }\cos ( \frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{5})d\vartheta , \\ Q_{1}\varpi (\varsigma ) & = &\int_{0}^{\sigma }e^{-\nu \varsigma }\sin (\frac{ \varpi _{\vartheta }}{6})d\vartheta . \end{eqnarray*} |
Now, for \varpi _{\varsigma }, \varrho _{\varsigma }\in H_{\nu }, we have
\begin{eqnarray} \left\vert P_{2}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi _{\vartheta }\right) -P_{2}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varrho _{\vartheta }\right) \right\vert & = &\left\vert \frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{6}\ln \left( 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }\right) -\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{6}\ln \left( 1+\varrho _{\varsigma }\right) \right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{6}\left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }, \end{eqnarray} | (5.9) |
\begin{eqnarray} \left\vert Q_{2}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi _{\vartheta }\right) -Q_{2}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varrho _{\vartheta }\right) \right\vert & = &\left\vert \frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{4}\frac{\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }{1+\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) } d\vartheta -\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{4}\frac{\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }{1+\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) } d\vartheta \right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{4}\left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }, \end{eqnarray} | (5.10) |
\begin{eqnarray} \left\vert P_{1}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi _{\vartheta }\right) -P_{1}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varrho _{\vartheta }\right) \right\vert & = &\left\vert e^{-\nu \varsigma }\cos (\frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{5} )-e^{-\nu \varsigma }\cos (\frac{\varrho _{\vartheta }}{5})\right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{5}\left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }, \end{eqnarray} | (5.11) |
\begin{eqnarray} \left\vert Q_{1}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi _{\vartheta }\right) -Q_{1}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varrho _{\vartheta }\right) \right\vert & = &\left\vert e^{-\nu \varsigma }\sin (\frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{6} )-e^{-\nu \varsigma }\sin (\frac{\varrho _{\vartheta }}{6})\right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{6}\left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }, \end{eqnarray} | (5.12) |
\begin{eqnarray} &&\left\vert g\left( \varsigma ,\varpi _{\varsigma },P_{2}\varpi (\varsigma ),Q_{2}\varpi (\varsigma )\right) -g\left( \varsigma ,\varrho _{\varsigma },P_{2}\varrho (\varsigma ),Q_{2}\varrho (\varsigma )\right) \right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\left( 1+e^{-\varsigma }\right) e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{\left( 34+e^{\varsigma }\right) }\frac{\left\vert \varpi _{\varsigma }-\varrho _{\varsigma }\right\vert }{\left( 1+\left\vert \varpi _{\varsigma }\right\vert \right) \left( 1+\left\vert \varrho _{\varsigma }\right\vert \right) }+\frac{1}{15}\left\vert P_{2}\varpi (\varsigma )-P_{2}\varrho (\varsigma )\right\vert +\frac{1}{35}\left\vert Q_{2}\varpi (\varsigma )-P_{2}\varrho (\varsigma )\right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{5}\left( \left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }+ \frac{1}{3}\left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }+\frac{1}{7} \left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }\right) , \end{eqnarray} | (5.13) |
\begin{eqnarray} &&\left\vert h\left( \varsigma ,\varpi _{\varsigma },P_{1}\varpi (\varsigma ),Q_{1}\varpi (\varsigma )\right) -h\left( \varsigma ,\varrho _{\varsigma },P_{1}\varrho (\varsigma ),Q_{1}\varrho (\varsigma )\right) \right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{20}\frac{\varpi _{\varsigma }^{2}}{ 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }^{2}}+\frac{1}{20}\left\vert P_{2}\varpi (\varsigma )-P_{2}\varrho (\varsigma )\right\vert +\frac{1}{25}\left\vert Q_{2}\varpi (\varsigma )-P_{2}\varrho (\varsigma )\right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{4}\left( \left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }+ \frac{1}{5}\left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }+\frac{1}{5} \left\Vert \varpi -\varrho \right\Vert _{\nu }\right) , \end{eqnarray} | (5.14) |
\begin{eqnarray} &&\left\vert g\left( \varsigma ,\psi ,\varpi ,\varrho \right) \right\vert \\ & = &\left\vert \frac{\left( 1+e^{-\varsigma }\right) e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{ \left( 34+e^{\varsigma }\right) }\frac{\left\vert \psi _{\varsigma }\right\vert }{1+\left\vert \psi _{\varsigma }\right\vert }+\frac{1}{15} \int_{0}^{\varsigma }e^{-\nu \varsigma }\cos (\frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{5} )d\vartheta +\frac{1}{35}\int_{0}^{\sigma }e^{-\nu \varsigma }\sin (\frac{ \varrho _{\vartheta }}{6})d\vartheta \right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{35}\left\vert \psi \right\vert +\frac{1}{15}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert +\frac{1}{35}\left\vert \varrho \right\vert , \end{eqnarray} | (5.15) |
\begin{eqnarray} &&\left\vert h\left( \varsigma ,\psi ,\varpi ,\varrho \right) \right\vert \\ & = &\left\vert \frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{20}\frac{\psi _{\varsigma }^{2}}{ 1+\psi _{\varsigma }^{2}}+\frac{1}{20}\int_{0}^{\varsigma }\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{6}\ln \left( 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }\right) d\vartheta +\frac{1}{ 25}\int_{0}^{\sigma }\frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{4}\frac{\tan ^{-1}\left( \varrho _{\varsigma }\right) }{1+\tan ^{-1}\left( \varrho _{\varsigma }\right) }d\vartheta \right\vert \\ &\leq &\frac{1}{20}\left\vert \psi \right\vert +\frac{1}{160}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert +\frac{1}{100}\left\vert \varrho \right\vert , \end{eqnarray} | (5.16) |
\begin{equation} \left\vert P_{2}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi \right) \right\vert = \left\vert \frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{6}\ln \left( 1+\varpi _{\varsigma }\right) \right\vert \leq \frac{1}{6}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert , \end{equation} | (5.17) |
\begin{equation} \left\vert Q_{2}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi \right) \right\vert = \left\vert \frac{e^{-\nu \varsigma }}{4}\frac{\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) }{1+\tan ^{-1}\left( \varpi _{\varsigma }\right) } \right\vert \leq \frac{1}{4}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert , \end{equation} | (5.18) |
\begin{equation} \left\vert P_{1}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi \right) \right\vert = \left\vert e^{-\nu \varsigma }\cos (\frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{5} )\right\vert \leq \frac{1}{5}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert , \end{equation} | (5.19) |
and
\begin{equation} \left\vert Q_{1}\left( \varsigma ,\vartheta ,\varpi \right) \right\vert = \left\vert e^{-\nu \varsigma }\sin (\frac{\varpi _{\vartheta }}{6} )\right\vert \leq \frac{1}{60}\left\vert \varpi \right\vert . \end{equation} | (5.20) |
From (5.9)–(5.20), we have \ell _{g} = \ell _{P_{1}} = V_{7}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{5}, \ell _{h} = \ell _{Q_{2}} = V_{10}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{4}, \ell _{P_{2}} = \ell _{Q_{1}} = V_{8}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{6}, V_{1}(\varsigma) = V_{3}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{35}, V_{2}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{15}, V_{4}(\varsigma) = \frac{1 }{20}, V_{5}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{160}, V_{6}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{100}, , V_{9}(\varsigma) = \frac{1}{60}, N_{1}^{\ast } = 1. Thus, we can write
\begin{equation*} S^{\ast } = \ell _{g}N_{1}^{\ast }\left\{ \xi _{1}+\xi _{2}\left( \ell _{P_{2}}+\ell _{Q_{2}}\right) \right\} +\ell _{h}N_{1}^{\ast }\left\{ \xi _{1}+\xi _{2}\left( \ell _{P_{1}}+\ell _{Q_{1}}\right) \right\} \approx 0.8395 < 1, \end{equation*} |
and
\begin{equation*} \ell ^{\ast } = \frac{\sigma N_{1}^{\ast }}{\left\vert B\right\vert }\left( \ell _{g}\left[ \left( \nu _{1}+\nu _{3}\right) +\left( \ell _{P_{2}}+\ell _{Q_{2}}\right) \left( \nu _{2}+\nu _{4}\right) \right] +\ell _{h}\left[ \left( \nu _{1}+\nu _{3}\right) +\left( \ell _{P_{1}}+\ell _{Q_{1}}\right) \left( \nu _{2}+\nu _{4}\right) \right] \right) \approx 0.5059 < 1. \end{equation*} |
Hence, all the assertions of Theorems 3.4 and 4.2 are fulfilled. Therefore, the supposed problem (5.8) has a unique solution on (-\infty, \sigma ].
The study of FFIDEs presents a formidable challenge due to the inherent complexities arising from the interplay of fractional-order derivatives, functional arguments, and integral operators. Traditional methods often fall short in addressing these equations due to the non-local nature of fractional derivatives and the intricate dependence on past states introduced by functional arguments. Overcoming these difficulties requires the development and application of sophisticated mathematical tools, including specialized FP theorems tailored for fractional settings, careful treatment of infinite delay, and the construction of appropriate function spaces that accommodate the combined effects of these operators. Furthermore, the presence of multi-term fractional integral boundary conditions adds another layer of complexity, demanding innovative techniques for handling the non-local and distributed nature of the boundary constraints. Successfully navigating these hurdles necessitates a deep understanding of fractional calculus, functional analysis, and operator theory, ultimately paving the way for a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics governed by FFIDEs. This paper investigates the existence and uniqueness of solutions for a class of hybrid fractional-order functional and neutral functional integrodifferential equations, featuring infinite delay and multi-term fractional integral boundary conditions. A rigorous mathematical framework is developed, leveraging FP theorems, to analyze these complex equations. The LC definition of fractional derivatives is employed, facilitating a comprehensive study of nonlocal dynamics. Illustrative examples are provided to demonstrate the applicability and practical relevance of the theoretical results. Future work includes exploring more complex equations (e.g., variable-order, generalized functional arguments), investigating stability, controllability, and numerical methods, and applying these equations to real-world problems. Developing new fixed point theorems tailored for fractional functional integrodifferential equations and studying associated inverse problems are also promising research avenues. Finally, we also look forward to extending the study period outside the proposed period [2,3].
Manal Elzain Mohamed Abdalla: Writing–review-editing, formal analysis, funding acquisition; Hasanen A. Hammad: Writing–original draft, conceptualization, investigation, methodology. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare they have not used artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
Data sharing is not applicable to the article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through the Large Research Project under grant number R.G.P. 2/217/45.
All authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, New York: Academic Press, 1999. |
[2] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, 2006. |
[3] | K. Diethelm, The analysis of fractional differential equations, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2 |
[4] | F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity, World Scientific, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1142/p926 |
[5] |
X. Gao, J. Yu, Chaos in the fractional order periodically forced complex Duffing's oscillators, Chaos Soliton Fract., 24 (2005), 1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.090 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.090
![]() |
[6] | J. Che, Q. Guan, X. Wang, Image denoising based on adaptive fractional partial differential equations, In: 2013 6th International congress on image and signal processing, 2013,288–292. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP.2013.6744004 |
[7] |
E. Scalas, R. Gorenflo, F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus and continuous-time finance, Physica A, 284 (2000), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00255-7 doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00255-7
![]() |
[8] |
H. Jafari, R. M. Ganji, N. S. Nkomo, Y. P. Lv, A numerical study of fractional order population dynamics model, Results Phys., 27 (2021), 104456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104456 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104456
![]() |
[9] | B. Zhang, X. Shu, Fractional-order electrical circuit theory, Singapore: Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2822-1 |
[10] |
M. Kaur, S. Sondhi, V. K. Yanumula, Design of fractional order PDD controller for robotic arm using partial cancellation of non minimum phase zero, Alex. Eng. J., 110 (2025), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.121 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.121
![]() |
[11] |
Y. Ferdi, Some applications of fractional order calculus to design filters for biomedical signal processing, J. Mech. Med. Bio., 12 (2012), 1240008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519412400088 doi: 10.1142/S0219519412400088
![]() |
[12] | H. W. Engl, M. Hanke, A. Neubauer, Regularization of inverse problems, Dordrecht: Springer, 2000. |
[13] | B. Ross, Fractional calculus and its applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0067095 |
[14] |
Y. Zhang, B. Hofmann, On fractional asymptotical regularization of linear ill-posed problems in Hilbert spaces, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 22 (2019), 699–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2019-0039 doi: 10.1515/fca-2019-0039
![]() |
[15] |
D. H. Chen, J. Li, Y. Zhang, A posterior contraction for Bayesian inverse problems in Banach spaces, Inverse Prob., 40 (2024), 045011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ad2a03 doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ad2a03
![]() |
[16] |
A. Shcheglov, J. Li, C. Wang, A. llin, Y. Zhang, Reconstructing the Absorption function in a quasi-linear sorption dynamic model via an iterative regularizing algorithm, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 16 (2023), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.4208/aamm.OA-2023-0020 doi: 10.4208/aamm.OA-2023-0020
![]() |
[17] |
T. Abdeljawad, P. O. Mohammed, H. M. Srivastava, E. Al-Sarairah, A. Kashuri, K. Nonlaopon, Some novel existence and uniqueness results for the Hilfer fractional integro-differential equations with non-instantaneous impulsive multi-point boundary conditions and their application, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 3469–3483. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023177 doi: 10.3934/math.2023177
![]() |
[18] |
B. Ahmad, R. P. Agarwal, Some new versions of fractional boundary value problems with slit-strips conditions, Bound. Value Prob., 2014 (2014), 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0175-6 doi: 10.1186/s13661-014-0175-6
![]() |
[19] |
A. Alsaedi, M. Alsulami, H. M. Srivastava, B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, Existence theory for nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations with nonlocal multi-point and multi-strip boundary conditions, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020281 doi: 10.3390/sym11020281
![]() |
[20] | A. Chauhan, J. Dabas, M. Kumar, Integral boundary-value problem for impulsive fractional functional differential equations with infinite delay, Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 2012 (2012), 229. |
[21] | Y. Chen, D. Chen, Z. Lv, The existence results for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations with multi-point boundary conditions, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc., 38 (2012), 607–624. |
[22] |
S. Choudhary, V. Daftardar-Gejji, Nonlinear multi-order fractional differential equations with periodic/anti-periodic boundary conditions, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 17 (2014), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13540-014-0172-6 doi: 10.2478/s13540-014-0172-6
![]() |
[23] |
H. A. Hammad, M. De la Sen, Stability and controllability study for mixed integral fractional delay dynamic systems endowed with impulsive effects on time scales, Fractal Frac., 7 (2023), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7010092 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7010092
![]() |
[24] |
H. A. Hammad, R. A. Rashwan, A. Nafea, M. E. Samei, S. Noeiaghdam, Stability analysis for a tripled system of fractional pantograph differential equations with nonlocal conditions, J. Vib. Control, 30 (2024), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463221149232 doi: 10.1177/10775463221149232
![]() |
[25] |
K. Balachandran, S. Kiruthika, Existence results for fractional integrodifferential equations with nonlocal condition via resolvent operators, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1350–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.05.001
![]() |
[26] |
M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, S. K. Ntouyas, A. Ouahab, Existence results for fractional order functional differential equations with infinite delay, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021
![]() |
[27] |
Y. Jalilian, R. Jalilian, Existence of solution for delay fractional differential equations, Mediterr. J. Math., 10 (2013), 1731–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-013-0281-1 doi: 10.1007/s00009-013-0281-1
![]() |
[28] |
T. Jankowski, Initial value problems for neutral fractional differential equations involving a Riemann-Liouville derivative, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2013), 7772–7776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.02.001
![]() |
[29] |
T. Jankowski, Existence results to delay fractional differential equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2013), 9155–9164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.045 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.045
![]() |
[30] |
H. Wang, Existence results for fractional functional differential equations with impulses, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 38 (2012), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-010-0465-9 doi: 10.1007/s12190-010-0465-9
![]() |
[31] |
V. Obukhovskii, G. Petrosyan, M. Soroka, J. C. Yao, On topological properties of solution sets of semilinear fractional differential inclusions with non-convex right-hand side, J. Nonlinear Var. Anal., 8 (2024), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.23952/jnva.8.2024.1.05 doi: 10.23952/jnva.8.2024.1.05
![]() |
[32] |
C. Zhai, L. Bai, Positive solutions for a new system of Hadamard fractional integro-differential equations on an infinite interval, J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal., 2024 (2024), 27. https://doi.org/10.23952/jnfa.2024.27 doi: 10.23952/jnfa.2024.27
![]() |
[33] |
H. A. Hammad, H. Aydi, M. Zayed, Involvement of the topological degree theory for solving a tripled system of multi-point boundary value problems, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 2257–2271. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023117 doi: 10.3934/math.2023117
![]() |
[34] |
H. A. Hammad, R. A. Rashwan, A. Nafea, M. E. Samei, M. De la Sen, Stability and existence of solutions for a tripled problem of fractional hybrid delay differential equations, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122579 doi: 10.3390/sym14122579
![]() |
[35] |
H. A. Hammad, M. Zayed, Solving systems of coupled nonlinear Atangana-Baleanu-type fractional differential equations, Bound. Value Probl., 2022 (2022), 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-022-01684-0 doi: 10.1186/s13661-022-01684-0
![]() |
[36] | G. Wang, W. Liu, C. Ren, Existence of solutions for multi-point nonlinear differential equations of fractional orders with integral boundary conditions, Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 2012 (2012), 54. |
[37] |
Z. Yang, J. Cao, Initial value problems for arbitrary order fractional differential equations with delay, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18 (2013), 2993–3005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.03.006
![]() |
[38] |
X. Zhang, X. Huang, Z. Liu, The existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for impulsive fractional equations with nonlocal conditions and infinite delay, Nonlinear Anal. Hybri., 4 (2010), 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2010.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2010.05.007
![]() |
[39] | J. Dabas, G. Ram, Impulsive neutral fractional integro-differential equations with state dependent delays and integral condition, Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 2013 (2013), 273. |
[40] | A. Granas, J. Dugundji, Fixed point theory, New York: Springer, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21593-8 |
[41] | J. Hale, J. Kato, Phase space for retarded equations with infinite delay, Funkc. Ekvacioj, 21 (1978), 11–41. |