
In this paper, we conducted an in-depth study of a generalized Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey Dodd Gibbon (gKdV–CDG) equation modeling specific oceanic waves. Through the Bell polynomial approach (BPA), the Hirota D-operator expression of the gKdV–CDG equation was first constructed. An integrability test of the governing model was then carried out, and consequently, multi solitons were constructed using the Hirota method. Ultimately, using symbolic computations, breather and complexiton waves were derived from the gKdV–CDG equation by serving distinct ansatzes. A few representations positioned two- and three-dimensionally were provided to characterize the nonlinear wave's physical features. Based on the results, suitable methods were suggested to assess the height and width of nonlinear waves in the ocean.
Citation: Kamyar Hosseini, Farzaneh Alizadeh, Sekson Sirisubtawee, Chaiyod Kamthorncharoen, Samad Kheybari, Kaushik Dehingia. Integrability, Hirota D-operator expression, multi solitons, breather wave, and complexiton of a generalized Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey Dodd Gibbon equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5248-5263. doi: 10.3934/math.2025242
[1] | Sixing Tao . Breathers, resonant multiple waves and complexiton solutions of a (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11651-11665. doi: 10.3934/math.2023590 |
[2] | Jianhong Zhuang, Yaqing Liu, Ping Zhuang . Variety interaction solutions comprising lump solitons for the (2+1)-dimensional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Kotera-Sawada equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5370-5386. doi: 10.3934/math.2021316 |
[3] | Ihsan Ullah, Aman Ullah, Shabir Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad, Taher A. Nofal . A survey of KdV-CDG equations via nonsingular fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18964-18981. doi: 10.3934/math.2023966 |
[4] | Sixing Tao . Breather wave, resonant multi-soliton and M-breather wave solutions for a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15795-15811. doi: 10.3934/math.2022864 |
[5] | Noufe H. Aljahdaly . Study tsunamis through approximate solution of damped geophysical Korteweg-de Vries equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10926-10934. doi: 10.3934/math.2024534 |
[6] | Jin Hyuk Choi, Hyunsoo Kim . Exact traveling wave solutions of the stochastic Wick-type fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Sawada-Kotera equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 4053-4072. doi: 10.3934/math.2021240 |
[7] | M. A. El-Shorbagy, Sonia Akram, Mati ur Rahman, Hossam A. Nabwey . Analysis of bifurcation, chaotic structures, lump and $ M-W $-shape soliton solutions to $ (2+1) $ complex modified Korteweg-de-Vries system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16116-16145. doi: 10.3934/math.2024780 |
[8] | Ibrahim Alraddadi, Faisal Alsharif, Sandeep Malik, Hijaz Ahmad, Taha Radwan, Karim K. Ahmed . Innovative soliton solutions for a (2+1)-dimensional generalized KdV equation using two effective approaches. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34966-34980. doi: 10.3934/math.20241664 |
[9] | Khalid Khan, Amir Ali, Muhammad Irfan, Zareen A. Khan . Solitary wave solutions in time-fractional Korteweg-de Vries equations with power law kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 792-814. doi: 10.3934/math.2023039 |
[10] | A. K. M. Kazi Sazzad Hossain, M. Ali Akbar . Solitary wave solutions of few nonlinear evolution equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1199-1215. doi: 10.3934/math.2020083 |
In this paper, we conducted an in-depth study of a generalized Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey Dodd Gibbon (gKdV–CDG) equation modeling specific oceanic waves. Through the Bell polynomial approach (BPA), the Hirota D-operator expression of the gKdV–CDG equation was first constructed. An integrability test of the governing model was then carried out, and consequently, multi solitons were constructed using the Hirota method. Ultimately, using symbolic computations, breather and complexiton waves were derived from the gKdV–CDG equation by serving distinct ansatzes. A few representations positioned two- and three-dimensionally were provided to characterize the nonlinear wave's physical features. Based on the results, suitable methods were suggested to assess the height and width of nonlinear waves in the ocean.
As known, nonlinear partial differential (NLPD) equations have found wide applications in modeling nonlinear phenomena in vast areas of scientific disciplines, such as optics, plasma physics, and fluid mechanics. Owing to such capabilities, researchers have devoted an incredible amount of their lives to creating and exploring such models. Nowadays, scholars deal with a wide range of specific nonlinear waves for NLPD equations such as multi-soliton waves, breather waves, complexiton waves, etc. Wazwaz [1], by applying the Hirota method, extracted multi-soliton waves of KP equations. The author in [2] found breather waves of Kairat-Ⅱ and Kairat-X equations using an ansatz composed of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Hosseini et al. [3] employed a systematic method to construct complexiton waves of a generalized KdV equation. Papers [4,5,6,7] include more details on NLPD equations and their nonlinear waves.
One of the key characteristics of NLPD equations, which is usually explored in Mathematical Physics, is integrability. Although the literature does not provide a unified definition for integrability, an integrable NLPD equation includes multi-soliton waves, bilinear Bäcklund transformation (BBT), etc. An effective method for analyzing the integrability of NLPD equations is the Painlevè method [8]. Ma et al. [9] assessed the integrability of the Sakovich equation using the Painlevè method. Chu et al. [10], in a comprehensive study, applied the Painlevè method to check the integrability of a 2D KdV equation with variable coefficient. Zhang et al. [11] explored the integrability of a variable coefficient Boussinesq equation via the Painlevè method.
According to the classical Bell polynomials theory [12] proposed in 1934, Lambert et al. [13] introduced a generalized Bell's polynomials to establish a systematic procedure for discovering the bilinear form, bilinear Bäcklund transformation, and Lax pairs for NLPD equations. The Bell polynomial approach [14,15,16,17] has extensively been used in recent decades to deal with NLPD equations. Some authors have tried to apply such an effective method to deal with a series of well-known NLPD equations. For example, Hosseini et al. [18] utilized the BPA to acquire the bilinear representation of a generalized KdV equation. Umar et al. [19] found the BBT of a 2D generalized KP equation using the BPA. Asadi et al. [20] employed the BPA to construct Lax pairs and conservation laws of a 3D extended BLMP equation.
Wazwaz in [21] proposed the Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey Dodd Gibbon equation, i.e.,
ut+c1(u2x+15u2)x+c2(115u3+uu2x+u4x)x=0, |
which has been composed of KdV and CDG equations, and constructed its multi solitons using the Hirota method. Later, some researchers conducted a complete study on the KdV–CDG equation and its different wave structures. For instance, Biswas et al. [22] applied the F-expansion method to acquire solitons of the KdV–CDG equation. Ma et al. [23] constructed hybrid solutions of the KdV–CDG equation using some particular operations. Hosseini et al. [24] employed systematic methods to extract solitons and complexiton of the KdV–CDG equation. Almusawa and Jhangeer [25] obtained invariant solutions of the KdV–CDG equation using the Lie method.
In this paper, we aim to conduct a detailed exploration of the following generalized Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey Dodd Gibbon equation
ut+c1(u+u2x+15u2)x+c2(115u3+uu2x+u4x)x=0, | (1.1) |
with some applications in modeling water waves in the ocean. More precisely, we:
● Examine the integrability of the gKdV–CDG equation using the Painlevè method;
● Establish the Hirota D-operator expression of the gKdV–CDG equation by employing the Bell polynomial approach;
● Obtain multi solitons of the gKdV–CDG equation through exerting the Hirota method;
● Construct breather and complexiton waves of the gKdV–CDG equation using distinct methods.
The paper's structure is as follows: In Section 2, an integrability test of the governing equation is carried out based on the Painlevè method. In Section 3, a short review of Bell's polynomials is presented, and the Hirota D-operator expression for the gKdV–CDG equation is constructed. In Section 4, multi solitons along with breather and complexiton waves to the gKdV–CDG equation are derived by serving distinct ansatzes. Additionally, in Section 4, we provide several figures positioned two- and three-dimensionally to illustrate the dynamic features of nonlinear waves. The results are summarized at the end of the paper.
Owing to the efforts of Weis et al. [8], the Painlevé property of the governing equation can be formally investigated. The key idea of their method is to seek the solution of Eq (1.1) as follows
u(x,t)=∑∞j=0uj(x,t)Φj−α(x,t), |
where Φ(x,t) is a singular manifold, uj(x,t) are expansion coefficients, and α is a pole order of the solution u(x,t).
The Painlevé test, however, can rarely be performed directly using the above method because of numerous complications. To overcome this shortcoming, we use Kruskal's simplification [26,27], which employs a specific form for the singular manifold function as
Φ(x,t)=x−ψ(t). |
The Painlevé's test consists of three steps as follows:
First step: It involves determining the leading-order terms in Eq (1.1). To achieve this, substituting
u(x,t)=u0Φ−α, |
into Eq (1.1) results in the values of α and u0(t) as
● 1st branch: α=2,u0=−60ψ2x;
● 2nd branch: α=2, u0=−30ψ2x.
Second step: For the above-specified values of α and u0, the non-negative integer values of j referred to as resonances are computed. To this end, setting
u(x,t)=u0Φ−2+ujΦj−2, |
in Eq (1.1) gives
● resonances of 1st branch: j=−2,−1,5,6,12;
● resonances of 2nd branch:j=−1,2,3,6,10.
Third step: The expansion
u(x,t)=u0Φ−2+∑∞j=1ujΦj−2, |
is substituted into Eq (1.1). For the first branch, it is found that
u0=−60, u1=0, u2=−c1c2, u3=0, |
u4=−5c2ψt+c21−5c1c220c22, u5=u5, u6=u6, u7=0, |
u8=−25c22ψ2t+(10c21c2−50c1c22)ψt+c41−10c31c2+25c21c2272000c42, |
u9=−5ψ2t−180c2u5ψt+(180c1c2−36c21)u579200c22, |
u10=30c2u6ψt+5c2u5t−120c22u25+(6c21−30c1c2)u626400c22, |
u11=−30c2u5u6−u6t4680c2, u12=u12, |
whereas for the second branch
u0=−30, u1=0, u2=u2, u3=u3, |
u4=−−5ψt+c2u22+2c1u2+5c110c2, u5=−u3(c2u2+c1)15c2, u6=u6, |
u7=−30c2u3ψt+5c2u2t+(8c22u22+16c1c2u2+2c21+30c1c2)u32400c22, |
u8=127000c22(−75ψ2t+(30c2u22+60c1u2+150c1)ψt+25c2u3t+(30c22u2+30c1c2)u23+(−3c22u22−12c1c2u2−12c21−30c1c2)u22−60c21u2−75c21), |
u9=1126000c32(50c2ψtt+90(c22u2u3+c1c2u3)ψt−15(c1c2+c22u2)u2t+(2c31−90c21c2+20c32u23)u3−(90c1+30c21c2+48c1c22u2+16c32u22)u2u3), |
u10=u10. |
Since u5, u6 and u12 in the first branch and u2,u3, u6, and u10 in the second branch are arbitrary functions of t, the necessary condition for the integrability of Eq (1.1) is satisfied. These show that Eq (1.1) satisfies the Painlevé test for the integrability.
As early as the 20th century, Bell [12] established his polynomial in the form
Ynt(y)=Yn(yt,…,ynt)=e−y∂ntey,y=eαt−α0. |
The above definition leads to the following results
Y0=1, |
Y1=yt, |
Y2=y2t+y2t, |
⋮ |
The classical Bell polynomial, which was generalized by Lambert et al. [13], for f(x1,…,xl) is
Yn1x1,…,nlxl(f)=e−f∂n1x1…∂nlxlef, |
where the outcomes of such a generalization when f=f(x,t) are
Yx(f)=fx, |
Y2x(f)=f2x+f2x, |
Yx,t(f)=fx,t+fxft, |
⋮ |
Following Bell's definition, the binary Bell polynomial is
Yn1x1,…,nlxl(v,w)=Yn1x1,…,nlxl(f)|fr1x1,…,rlxl={vr1x1,…,rlxl,wr1x1,…,rlxl,r1+r2+⋯+rl is odd,r1+r2+⋯+rl is even, |
where rk=0,1,…,nk,k=0,1,…,l. It is easy to check that
Yx(v)=vx, |
Y2x(v,w)=w2x+v2x, |
Yx,t(v,w)=wx,t+vxvt |
⋮ |
Theorem 1 (See [13]). For Yn1x1,…,nlxl(v,w) and Dn1x1…DnlxlF.G, we have
Yn1x1,…,nlxl(v=ln(F/G),w=ln(FG))=(FG)−1Dn1x1…DnlxlF.G, | (3.1) |
where n1+n2+⋯+nl≥1, and
Dn1x1…DnlxlF.G=(∂x1−∂x′1)n1…(∂xl−∂x′l)nlF(x1,x2,…,xl)×G(x′1,x′2,…,x′l)|x′1=x1,…,x′l=xl. |
Equation (3.1) for F=G is
G−2Dn1x1…DnlxlG.G=Yn1x1,…,nlxl(0,2ln(G))={0,Pn1x1,…,nlxl(q),n1+n2+⋯+nl is odd,n1+n2+⋯+nl is even, |
where
P2x(q)=q2x, |
Px,t(q)=qx,t, |
P4x(q)=q4x+3q22x, |
P6x(q)=q6x+15q2xq4x+15q32x, |
⋮ |
Theorem 2. If u=30(ln(G))xx, then the Hirota D-operator expression of Eq (1.1) is
(DxDt+c1D2x+c1D4x+c2D6x)G.G=0. |
Proof. To prove such an assertion, we introduce
u=c(t)q2x, | (3.2) |
with c(t) is a function to connect Eq (1.1) with P-polynomials. Inserting Eq (3.2) into Eq (1.1) gives
c′(t)q2x+c(t)q2x,t+c1c(t)(q3x+q5x+25c(t)q2xq3x) +c2c(t)(15c(t)2q22xq3x+c(t)q3xq4x+c(t)q2xq5x+q7x)=0. |
Integrating with respect to x yields
c′(t)qx+c(t)qx,t+c1c(t)(q2x+q4x+15c(t)q22x)+c2c(t)(115c(t)2q32x+c(t)q2xq4x+q6x)=0. |
A direct result of comparing 115c(t)2q32x+c(t)q2xq4x+q6x with P6x(q) is c(t)=15. Now, the above equation can be expressed as
Px,t(q)+c1P2x(q)+c1P4x(q)+c2P6x(q)=0. | (3.3) |
Through the transformation
q=2ln(G)⟺u=15q2x=30(ln(G))xx, |
and Eq (3.3), then the Hirota D-operator expression of Eq (1.1) is given by
(DxDt+c1D2x+c1D4x+c2D6x)G.G=0, |
with the following bilinear representation
(GGxt−GxGt)+c1(GG2x−G2x)+c1(GG4x−4G3xGx+3G22x)+c2(GG6x−6GxG5x+ 15G2xG4x−10G23x)=0. | (3.4) |
In this section, we focus on the governing model in order to establish its multi solitons, breather wave, and complexiton. The first kind of such results is supported by analyzing the three-soliton condition as a criterion for the existence of a triple-soliton wave.
To arrive at the single-soliton wave, we assume
u=eθi,θi=kix+ωit, |
and insert it into
ut+c1ux+c1u3x+c2u5x=0. |
After simplifying, we have
(ωi+c1(k3i+ki)+c2k5i)ekix+ωit=0. |
A direct result of the above expression gives the dispersion relation as
ωi=−(c1(k3i+ki)+c2k5i), |
and so, the phase variable θi can be constructed as
θi=kix−(c1(k3i+ki)+c2k5i)t. |
Now, the single-soliton wave of Eq (1.1) is
u=30(ln(G))xx, |
where
G=1+eθ1,θ1=k1x−(c1(k31+k1)+c2k51)t. |
The double-soliton wave of the governing equation can be determined by inserting
G=1+eθ1+eθ2+a12eθ1+θ2, |
where
θ1=k1x−(c1(k31+k1)+c2k51)t, |
θ2=k2x−(c1(k32+k2)+c2k52)t, |
into Eq (1.1) and discovering the phase shift a12 through some systematic computations as
a12=5c2k41−15c2k31k2+20c2k21k22−15c2k1k32+5c2k42+3c1k21−6c1k1k2+3c1k225c2k41+15c2k31k2+20c2k21k22+15c2k1k32+5c2k42+3c1k21+6c1k1k2+3c1k22. |
Hence, the double-soliton wave of the governing equation is
u=30(ln(G))xx,G=1+eθ1+eθ2+a12eθ1+θ2, |
where
θ1=k1x−(c1(k31+k1)+c2k51)t, |
θ2=k2x−(c1(k32+k2)+c2k52)t, |
a12=5c2k41−15c2k31k2+20c2k21k22−15c2k1k32+5c2k42+3c1k21−6c1k1k2+3c1k225c2k41+15c2k31k2+20c2k21k22+15c2k1k32+5c2k42+3c1k21+6c1k1k2+3c1k22. |
In order to have the triple-soliton wave, the three-soliton condition [28,29,30]
∑μ1,μ2,μ3=±1P(μ1V1+μ2V2+μ3V3)P(μ1V1−μ2V2)P(μ2V2−μ3V3)P(μ1V1−μ3V3)=2∑(μ1,μ2,μ3)∈SP(μ1V1+μ2V2+μ3V3)P(μ1V1−μ2V2)P(μ2V2−μ3V3)P(μ1V1−μ3V3), |
in which
P=XT+c1X2+c1X4+c2X6, |
Vi=(ki,ωi),i=1,2,3, |
S={(1,1,1),(1,1,−1),(1,−1,1),(−1,1,1)}, |
must be zero. The results show that
2∑(μ1,μ2,μ3)∈SP(μ1V1+μ2V2+μ3V3)P(μ1V1−μ2V2)P(μ2V2−μ3V3)P(μ1V1−μ3V3)=2(e1+e2+e3+e4), |
where
e1=−81k22(k1−k2)2(k2−k3)2k23(k2+k3)(k1−k3)2(k1+k3)(53(k22−k2k3+k23)c2+c1)k21(k1+k2+k3)(53(k21−k1k2+k22)c2+c1)(53(k21+(k2+k3)k1+k22+k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(k1+k2)(53(k21−k1k3+k23)c2+c1), |
e2=−81k22(k1−k2)2(k2−k3)k23(53(k21+(k2−k3)k1+k22−k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(k2+k3)2(53(k22+k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(k1−k3)(k1+k3)2(k1+k2−k3)(53(k21+k1k3+k23)c2+c1)k21(53(k21−k1k2+k22)c2+c1)(k1+k2), |
e3=81k22(k1−k2)(53(k21+(−k2+k3)k1+k22−k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(53(k21+k1k2+k22)c2+c1)(k2−k3)k23(k2+k3)2(53(k22+k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(k1−k2+k3)(k1−k3)2(k1+k3)k21(k1+k2)2(53(k21−k1k3+k23)c2+c1), |
e4=81k22(k1−k2)(53(k21+k1k2+k22)c2+c1)(k2−k3)2k23(k2+k3)(53(k21+(−k2−k3)k1+k22+k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(k1−k3)(k1+k3)2(k1−k2−k3)(53(k22−k2k3+k23)c2+c1)(53(k21+k1k3+k23)c2+c1)k21(k1+k2)2, |
is zero. For Eq (1.1), the triple-soliton wave exists as a result of the above condition.
Now, the triple-soliton wave of Eq (1.1) is
u=2(ln(G))xx,G=1+eθ1+eθ2+eθ3+a12eθ1+θ2+a13eθ1+θ3+a23eθ2+θ3+a12a13a23eθ1+θ2+θ3, |
where
θ1=k1x−(c1(k31+k1)+c2k51)t, |
θ2=k2x−(c1(k32+k2)+c2k52)t, |
θ3=k3x−(c1(k33+k3)+c2k53)t, |
a12=5c2k41−15c2k31k2+20c2k21k22−15c2k1k32+5c2k42+3c1k21−6c1k1k2+3c1k225c2k41+15c2k31k2+20c2k21k22+15c2k1k32+5c2k42+3c1k21+6c1k1k2+3c1k22, |
a13=5c2k41−15c2k31k3+20c2k21k23−15c2k1k33+5c2k43+3c1k21−6c1k1k3+3c1k235c2k41+15c2k31k3+20c2k21k23+15c2k1k33+5c2k43+3c1k21+6c1k1k3+3c1k23, |
a23=5c2k42−15c2k32k3+20c2k22k23−15c2k2k33+5c2k43+3c1k22−6c1k2k3+3c1k235c2k42+15c2k32k3+20c2k22k23+15c2k2k33+5c2k43+3c1k22+6c1k2k3+3c1k23. |
The single, double, and triple solitons for (a) {c1=1,c2=1,k1=0.7}, (b) {c1=1,c2=1,k1=0.7,k2=1}, and (c) {c1=1,c2=1,k1=45,k2=1,k3=97} have been portrayed in Figure 1. Using the above parameter regimes, the height and width of such waves can be assessed.
To obtain the breather wave of the governing equation, we apply an ansatz as
G=e−kX+b0cos(hY)+b1ekX, | (4.1) |
where
X=a1x+a2t+a3, |
Y=a4x+a5t+a6, |
and k, b0, h, b1, and ai, i=1,2,…,6 are unknowns. Inserting Eq (4.1) into Eq (3.4) results in
h6c2a64−a44(15k2a21c2+c1)h4+a4(15k4a41a4c2+6k2a21a4c1+c1a4+a5)h2−k2a1(c2a51k4+c1k2a31+c1a1+a2)=0, |
h4c2a1a54−23a1a34(5k2a21c2+c1)h2+c2k4a51a4+23c1k2a31a4+(13c1a4+16a5)a1+16a2a4=0, |
(−16h6c2a64+4c1a44h4+(−a24c1−a4a5)h2)b20+16a1b1(4c2a51k4+c1k2a31+14c1a1+14a2)k2=0, |
whose solution is
a2=−a1(5a44h4c2−10h2a24k2a21c2+k4a41c2−3h2a24c1+k2a21c1+c1), |
a5=−h4a54c2+10h2k2a21a34c2−5k4a41a4c2+h2a34c1−3k2a21a4c1−c1a4, |
b1=−(15h2a24c2−5k2a21c2−3c1)b20a24h24(5h2a24c2−15k2a21c2−3c1)k2a21. |
As a consequence, the breather wave of the governing equation is
u=30(ln(G))xx,G=e−kX+b0cos(hY)+b1ekX, |
where
X=a1x−a1(5a44h4c2−10h2a24k2a21c2+k4a41c2−3h2a24c1+k2a21c1+c1)t+a3, |
Y=a4x−(h4a54c2−10h2k2a21a34c2+5k4a41a4c2−h2a34c1+3k2a21a4c1+c1a4)t+a6, |
b1=−(15h2a24c2−5k2a21c2−3c1)b20a24h24(5h2a24c2−15k2a21c2−3c1)k2a21. |
Figure 2 represents the dynamical characteristics of the breather wave for
{c1=0.5,c2=1,a1=−0.6,a3=0.5,a4=−1,a6=1,b0=0.1,h=1,k=1}, |
in three- and two-dimensional postures. This figure demonstrates the height and width of such a wave for the above parameter regime.
To derive the complexiton wave, the following assumptions are taken:
μ=μ1+iμ2,ν=ν1+iν2,P(x,t)=xt+c1x2+c1x4+c2x6. |
Due to P(μ,ν)=0, we obtain a nonlinear system of algebraic equations as
6c2μ51μ2−20c2μ31μ32+6c2μ1μ52+4c1μ31μ2−4c1μ1μ32+2c1μ1μ2+ν2μ1+ν1μ2=0, |
c2μ61−15c2μ41μ22+15c2μ21μ42−c2μ62+c1μ41−6c1μ21μ22+c1μ42+c1μ21−c1μ22+ν1μ1−ν2μ2=0. |
The solution set for the above system is
ν1=−μ1(c2μ41−10c2μ21μ22+5c2μ42+c1μ21−3c1μ22+c1), |
ν2=−5c2μ41μ2+10c2μ21μ32−c2μ52−3c1μ21μ2+c1μ32−c1μ2. |
Additionally, the phase shift can be found as
a12=−p(2iμ2,2iν2)p(2μ1,2ν1)=−−64c2μ62+16c1μ42−4c1μ22−4(−5c2μ41μ2+10c2μ21μ32−c2μ52−3c1μ21μ2+c1μ32−c1μ2)μ264c2μ61+16c1μ41+4c1μ21−4μ21(c2μ41−10c2μ21μ22+5c2μ42+c1μ21−3c1μ22+c1). |
Now, the complexiton wave of the governing equation is
u=30(ln(G))xx, |
where
G=1+2eϑ1cos(ϑ2)+a12e2ϑ1, |
ϑi=μix+νit, i=1,2, |
ν1=−μ1(c2μ41−10c2μ21μ22+5c2μ42+c1μ21−3c1μ22+c1), |
ν2=−5c2μ41μ2+10c2μ21μ32−c2μ52−3c1μ21μ2+c1μ32−c1μ2, |
a12=−−64c2μ62+16c1μ42−4c1μ22−4(−5c2μ41μ2+10c2μ21μ32−c2μ52−3c1μ21μ2+c1μ32−c1μ2)μ264c2μ61+16c1μ41+4c1μ21−4μ21(c2μ41−10c2μ21μ22+5c2μ42+c1μ21−3c1μ22+c1). |
The dynamical feature of the complexiton wave positioned three- and two-dimensionally for
{c1=1,c2=1.75,μ1=1,μ2=−1.5}, |
has been given in Figure 3. Through the above parameter regime, the height and width of such a wave can be analyzed. More details about the origin of the complexiton wave can be found in [31].
Other nonlinear waves of the governing equation can be derived by serving the following ansatzes [32]:
1) u=ASN2(x−wt,k),
2) u=ACN2(x−wt,k),
3) u=ADN2(x−wt,k),
where A and w are unknowns.
By setting the first ansatz in Eq (1.1), we have a nonlinear system as
((k2+1)c2−120c1)(30k2+A)=0, |
(60k2+A)(30k2+A)=0, |
10(8k4+52k2+A+8)c2−20k2c1−5w−15c1=0, |
for which the solution set is
A=−30k2,w=16k4c2−4k2c1+44k2c2−3c1+16c2. |
As a result, the Jacobi elliptic solution of the governing equation is
u=−30k2SN2(x−(16k4c2−4k2c1+44k2c2−3c1+16c2)t,k). |
Considering k=1, it gives the following bright soliton
u=−30tanh2(x−(76c2−7c1)t). |
Additionally, by substituting the second ansatz in Eq (1.1), we arrive at the following nonlinear system
(−30k2+A)((−20k2+A−20)c2+c1)=0, |
(−30k2+A)(−60k2+A)=0, |
(A2+(−20k2−30)A+80k4+520k2+80)c2−20c1k2+2c1A−5w−15c1=0, |
whose solution is
A=30k2,w=76k4c2+8c1k2−76k2c2−3c1+16c2. |
Accordingly, the Jacobi elliptic solution of the governing equation is
u=30k2CN2(x−(76k4c2+8c1k2−76k2c2−3c1+16c2)t,k). |
Assuming k=1, we yield the following soliton wave
u=30sech2(x−(5c1+16c2)t). |
Now, setting the third ansatz in Eq (1.1) leads to a nonlinear system as
(A−30)(A−60)=0, |
(A−30)k4(−20k2c2+(A−20)c2+c1)=0, |
80k4c2+((−30A+520)c2−20c1)k2+(A2−20A+80)c2+2c1A−5w−15c1=0, |
with the following solution set
A=30,w=16k4c2−4c1k2−76k2c2+9c1+76c2. |
As a consequence, the Jacobi elliptic solution of the governing equation is
u=30DN2(x−(16k4c2−4c1k2−76k2c2+9c1+76c2)t,k). |
Letting k=1, it can obtain the following soliton wave
u=30sech2(x−(5c1+16c2)t). |
The first continuous wave and its corresponding bright wave have been depicted in three- and two-dimensional postures in Figure 4 when (a) {c1=1,c2=1,k=0.1} and (b) {c1=1,c2=1}. This figure illustrates the height and width of such waves for the above parameter regimes.
In this paper, we presented an in-depth study of specific oceanic waves based on a generalized Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey Dodd Gibbon equation. As a starting point, we constructed the Hirota D-operator expression of the gKdV–CDG equation by using the Bell polynomial approach. Based on the Painlevè analysis, the governing model was tested for integrability, and multi solitons were formally retrieved. As a result of symbolic computations, breather and complexiton waves were derived from the gKdV–CDG equation based on distinct ansatzes. For the dynamical features of nonlinear waves, a few representations positioned two- and three-dimensionally have been provided. Our findings suggest useful ways for assessing the height and width of nonlinear waves in the ocean. In light of the fact that some other waves are missing in this paper, future work can be devoted to finding these waves.
Kamyar Hosseini: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing–original draft; Farzaneh Alizadeh: Writing–original draft, Methodology, Investigation; Sekson Sirisubtawee: Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Writing–original draft, Funding acquisition; Chaiyod Kamthorncharoen: Methodology, Investigation, Writing–review & editing; Samad Kheybari: Writing – review & editing; Kaushik Dehingia: Writing–review & editing.
All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare they have used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools (Grammarly and Wordtune) to improve their writing quality.
This research budget was allocated by National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), and King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (Project no. KMUTNB-FF-68-B-18).
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
A. M. Wazwaz, Painlevé integrability and lump solutions for two extended (3+1)- and (2+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 3623–3632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-08074-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-08074-2
![]() |
[2] |
A. M. Wazwaz, Extended (3+1)-dimensional Kairat-Ⅱ and Kairat-X equations: Painleve integrability, multiple soliton solutions, lump solutions, and breather wave solutions, Int. J. Numer. Method. H., 34 (2024), 2177–2194. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-01-2024-0053 doi: 10.1108/HFF-01-2024-0053
![]() |
[3] |
K. Hosseini, S. Salahshour, D. Baleanu, M. Mirzazadeh, K. Dehingia, A new generalized KdV equation: Its lump-type, complexiton and soliton solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 36 (2022), 2250229. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222502290 doi: 10.1142/S0217979222502290
![]() |
[4] |
W. Hereman, A. Nuseir, Symbolic methods to construct exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations, Math. Comput. Simulat., 43 (1997), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(96)00053-5 doi: 10.1016/S0378-4754(96)00053-5
![]() |
[5] |
A. M. Wazwaz, S. A. El-Tantawy, Solving the (3+1)-dimensional KP–Boussinesq and BKP–Boussinesq equations by the simplified Hirota's method, Nonlinear Dyn., 88 (2017), 3017–3021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3429-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3429-x
![]() |
[6] |
K. Hosseini, R. Ansari, R. Pouyanmehr, F. Samadani, M. Aligoli, Kinky breather-wave and lump solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional Burgers equations, Anal. Math. Phys., 10 (2020), 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13324-020-00405-z doi: 10.1007/s13324-020-00405-z
![]() |
[7] |
Y. Zhou, W. X. Ma, Complexiton solutions to soliton equations by the Hirota method, J. Math. Phys., 58 (2017), 101511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4996358 doi: 10.1063/1.4996358
![]() |
[8] |
J. Weiss, M. Tabor, G. Carnevale, The Painlevé property for partial differential equations, J. Math. Phys., 24 (1983), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525721 doi: 10.1063/1.525721
![]() |
[9] |
Y. L. Ma, A. M. Wazwaz, B. Q. Li, A new (3+1)-dimensional Sakovich equation in nonlinear wave motion: Painlevé integrability, multiple solitons and soliton molecules, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 21 (2022), 158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-022-00689-5 doi: 10.1007/s12346-022-00689-5
![]() |
[10] |
J. Chu, X. Chen, Y. Liu, Integrability, lump solutions, breather solutions and hybrid solutions for the (2+1)-dimensional variable coefficient Korteweg-de Vries equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 112 (2024), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09062-w doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-09062-w
![]() |
[11] |
L.L. Zhang, X. Lü, S.Z. Zhu, Painlevé analysis, Bäcklund transformation and soliton solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional variable-coefficient Boussinesq Equation, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 63 (2024), 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05670-3 doi: 10.1007/s10773-024-05670-3
![]() |
[12] |
E. T. Bell, Exponential polynomials, Ann. Math., 35 (1934), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/1968431 doi: 10.2307/1968431
![]() |
[13] |
F. Lambert, I. Loris, J. Springael, R. Willox, On a direct bilinearization method: Kaup's higher-order water wave equation as a modified nonlocal Boussinesq equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 27 (1994), 5325. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/27/15/028 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/27/15/028
![]() |
[14] |
F. Lambert, J. Springael, Construction of Bäcklund transformations with binary Bell polynomials, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 66 (1997), 2211–2213. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.66.2211 doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.66.2211
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Zhang, W. W. Wei, T. F. Cheng, Y. Song, Binary Bell polynomial application in generalized (2+1)-dimensional KdV equation with variable coefficients, Chinese Phys. B, 20 (2011), 110204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/20/11/110204 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/20/11/110204
![]() |
[16] |
Y. H. Wang, C. Temuer, Y. Q. Yang, Integrability for the generalised variable-coefficient fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation with Bell polynomials, Appl. Math. Lett., 29 (2014), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2013.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2013.10.007
![]() |
[17] |
U. K. Mandal, A. Das, W. X. Ma, Integrability, breather, rogue wave, lump, lump-multi-stripe, and lump-multi-soliton solutions of a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation, Phys. Fluids, 36 (2024), 037151. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0195378 doi: 10.1063/5.0195378
![]() |
[18] |
K. Hosseini, F. Alizadeh, E. Hinçal, M. Ilie, M. S. Osman, Bilinear Bäcklund transformation, Lax pair, Painlevé integrability, and different wave structures of a 3D generalized KdV equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 112 (2024), 18397–18411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-09944-7 doi: 10.1007/s11071-024-09944-7
![]() |
[19] |
T. Umar, K. Hosseini, B. Kaymakamzade, S. Boulaaras, M. S. Osman, Hirota D-operator forms, multiple soliton waves, and other nonlinear patterns of a 2D generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, Alex. Eng. J., 108 (2024), 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.070 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.070
![]() |
[20] |
E. Asadi, K. Hosseini, M. Madadi, Superposition of soliton, breather and lump waves in a non-Painleve integrabale extension of the Boiti–Leon–Manna–Pempinelli equation, Phys. Scr., 99 (2024), 125242. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad8f74 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad8f74
![]() |
[21] |
A. M. Wazwaz, N-soliton solutions for the combined KdV–CDG equation and the KdV–Lax equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 203 (2008), 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2008.04.047 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.04.047
![]() |
[22] |
A. Biswas, G. Ebadi, H. Triki, A. Yildirim, N. Yousefzadeh, Topological soliton and other exact solutions to KdV–Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon equation, Results Math., 63 (2013), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-011-0226-6 doi: 10.1007/s00025-011-0226-6
![]() |
[23] |
H. Ma, H. Huang, A. Deng, Soliton molecules, asymmetric solitons and hybrid solutions for KdV–CDG equation, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math., 5 (2022), 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100214 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100214
![]() |
[24] | K. Hosseini, A. Akbulut, D. Baleanu, S. Salahshour, M. Mirzazadehh, K. Dehingia, The Korteweg-de Vries–Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon dynamical model: Its conservation laws, solitons, and complexiton, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 2022. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.003 |
[25] |
H. Almusawa, A. Jhangeer, Exploring wave interactions and conserved quantities of KdV–Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon equation using Lie theory, Mathematics, 12 (2024), 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12142242 doi: 10.3390/math12142242
![]() |
[26] | M. D. Kruskal, N. Joshi, R. Halburd, Analytic and asymptotic methods for nonlinear singularity analysis: A review and extensions of tests for the Painlevé property, In: Integrability of nonlinear systems, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1997,171–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0113696 |
[27] |
D. Baldwin, W. Hereman, Symbolic software for the Painlevé test of nonlinear ordinary and partial differential equations, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 13 (2006), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.2006.13.1.8 doi: 10.2991/jnmp.2006.13.1.8
![]() |
[28] |
J. Hietarinta, A search for bilinear equations passing Hirota's three soliton condition. Ⅰ. KdV type bilinear equations, J. Math. Phys., 28 (1987), 1732–1742. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.527815 doi: 10.1063/1.527815
![]() |
[29] |
W. X. Ma, Comment on the 3+1 dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 16 (2011), 2663–2666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.10.003
![]() |
[30] |
W. X. Ma, N-soliton solution of a combined pKP–BKP equation, J. Geom. Phys., 165 (2021), 104191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104191 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104191
![]() |
[31] |
W. X. Ma, Complexiton solutions to the Korteweg-de Vries equation, Phys. Lett. A, 301 (2002), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00971-4 doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00971-4
![]() |
[32] |
F. Alizadeh, K. Hosseini, S. Sirisubtawee, E. Hinçal, Classical and nonclassical Lie symmetries, bifurcation analysis, and Jacobi elliptic function solutions to a 3D-modified nonlinear wave equation in liquid involving gas bubbles, Bound. Value Probl., 2024 (2024), 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-024-01921-8 doi: 10.1186/s13661-024-01921-8
![]() |