Play-based preschool education has emerged as a promising model for enhancing early childhood learning engagement and outcomes. However, traditional assessment models often fail to account for the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of learners, including cognitive differences, temporal interaction patterns, and individualized developmental trajectories. To address the neglect of learner dynamic heterogeneity in play-based preschool education, this paper proposed an adaptive assessment framework that integrated dynamic graph neural networks (GNNs) and evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). The framework modeled curriculum–learner relationships by constructing heterogeneous interaction graphs, extracting temporal structural representations using GNNs, and balancing three pedagogical objectives—knowledge acquisition, engagement, and adaptability—through an EMO algorithm. A closed-loop feedback mechanism drove the co-evolution of both the model and the curriculum. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed framework significantly improved post-test scores (by 0.2–0.7 points), learner engagement (correlation R2 = 0.608), and individualized satisfaction, particularly among visual and kinesthetic learners. Comparative analyses further highlighted the robustness, scalability, and adaptability of the proposed method, establishing it as a computationally grounded and dynamically optimized intelligent curriculum design paradigm for early childhood education.
Citation: Wei Wei, Li Qian She, AnKun Du. Dynamic graph neural networks and evolutionary multi-objective optimization for adaptive quality evaluation in gamified preschool education[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(11): 27440-27461. doi: 10.3934/math.20251206
Play-based preschool education has emerged as a promising model for enhancing early childhood learning engagement and outcomes. However, traditional assessment models often fail to account for the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of learners, including cognitive differences, temporal interaction patterns, and individualized developmental trajectories. To address the neglect of learner dynamic heterogeneity in play-based preschool education, this paper proposed an adaptive assessment framework that integrated dynamic graph neural networks (GNNs) and evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). The framework modeled curriculum–learner relationships by constructing heterogeneous interaction graphs, extracting temporal structural representations using GNNs, and balancing three pedagogical objectives—knowledge acquisition, engagement, and adaptability—through an EMO algorithm. A closed-loop feedback mechanism drove the co-evolution of both the model and the curriculum. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed framework significantly improved post-test scores (by 0.2–0.7 points), learner engagement (correlation R2 = 0.608), and individualized satisfaction, particularly among visual and kinesthetic learners. Comparative analyses further highlighted the robustness, scalability, and adaptability of the proposed method, establishing it as a computationally grounded and dynamically optimized intelligent curriculum design paradigm for early childhood education.
| [1] |
S. Drissi, A. Chefrour, K. Boussaha, H. Zarzour, Exploring the effects of personalized recommendations on student's motivation and learning achievement in gamified mobile learning framework, Educ. Inf. Technol., 29 (2024), 15463–15500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12477-6 doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12477-6
|
| [2] | L. Rodrigues, P. T. Palomino, A. M. Toda, A. C. T. Klock, W. Oliveira, A. P. Avila-Santos, et al., Personalization improves gamification: Evidence from a mixed-methods study, In: Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 5 (2021), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474714 |
| [3] |
W. Oliveira, J. Hamari, L. Shi, A. M. Toda, L. Rodrigues, P. T. Palomino, S. Isotani, Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda, Educ. Inf. Technol., 28 (2023), 373–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4 doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4
|
| [4] |
F. Abbes, S. Bennani, A. Maalel, Generative AI and gamification for personalized learning: Literature review and future challenges, SN Comput. Sci., 5 (2024), 1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03491-z doi: 10.1007/s42979-024-03491-z
|
| [5] |
Y. M. Cheng, What makes learners enhance learning outcomes in MOOCs? Exploring the roles of gamification and personalization, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ., 21 (2024), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0097 doi: 10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0097
|
| [6] |
L. Rodrigues, A. M. Toda, W. Oliveira, P. T. Palomino, J. Vassileva, S. Isotani, Automating gamification personalization to the user and beyond, IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 15 (2022), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3162409 doi: 10.1109/TLT.2022.3162409
|
| [7] |
A. C. M. Leung, R. Santhanam, R. C. W. Kwok, W. T. Yue, Could gamification designs enhance online learning through personalization? Lessons from a field experiment, Inf. Syst. Res., 34 (2023), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1123 doi: 10.1287/isre.2022.1123
|
| [8] |
W. Oliveira, J. Hamari, S. Joaquim, A. M. Toda, P. T. Palomino, J. Vassileva, et al. The effects of personalized gamification on students' flow experience, motivation, and enjoyment, Smart Learn. Environ., 9 (2022), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00194-x doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00194-x
|
| [9] |
A. I. Zourmpakis, S. Papadakis, M. Kalogiannakis, Education of preschool and elementary teachers on the use of adaptive gamification in science education, Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., 14 (2022), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2022.120556 doi: 10.1504/ijtel.2022.120556
|
| [10] |
G. M. Dhananjaya, R. H. Goudar, A. A. Kulkarni, V. N. Rathod, G. S. Hukkeri, A digital recommendation system for personalized learning to enhance online education: A review, IEEE Access, 12 (2024), 34019–34041. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3369901 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3369901
|
| [11] |
L. Rodrigues, P. T. Palomino, A. M. Toda, A. C. T. Klock, M. Pessoa, F. D. Pereira, et al., How personalization affects motivation in gamified review assessments, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 34 (2024), 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00326-x doi: 10.1007/s40593-022-00326-x
|
| [12] |
S. Bennani, A. Maalel, H. B. Ghezala, Adaptive gamification in E‐learning: A literature review and future challenges, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., 30 (2022), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22477 doi: 10.1002/cae.22477
|
| [13] |
H. Dehghanzadeh, M. Farrokhnia, H. Dehghanzadeh, K. Taghipour, O. Noroozi, Using gamification to support learning in K‐12 education: A systematic literature review, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 55 (2024), 34–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13335 doi: 10.1111/bjet.13335
|
| [14] |
H. M. Lee, P. A. Loo, Gamification of learning in early age education, J. La Edusci, 2 (2021), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i2.380 doi: 10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i2.380
|
| [15] |
M. Cevikbas, G. Kaiser, Promoting personalized learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic review study, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 11393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811393 doi: 10.3390/su141811393
|
| [16] |
R. D. Ford, Adventures in gamification and personalized learning: A case study in game-based course design, Engl. Leadership Q., 43 (2021), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.58680/elq202131099 doi: 10.58680/elq202131099
|
| [17] |
A. Marougkas, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, C. Sgouropoulou, How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade, Multimed. Tools. Appl., 83 (2024), 18185–18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7 doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7
|
| [18] |
X. Qi, G. Sun, L. Yue, Applying self-optimised feedback to a learning management system for facilitating personalised learning activities on massive open online courses, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 12562. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612562 doi: 10.3390/su151612562
|
| [19] |
M. S. Castellano, I. Contreras‐McKay, A. Neyem, E. Farfán, O. Inzunza, N. E. Ottone, et al., Empowering human anatomy education through gamification and artificial intelligence: An innovative approach to knowledge appropriation, Clin. Anat., 37 (2024), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24074 doi: 10.1002/ca.24074
|
| [20] |
A. Khaldi, R. Bouzidi, F. Nader, Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review, Smart Learn. Environ., 10 (2023), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
|
| [21] |
M. A. Altaie, D. N. A. Jawawi, Adaptive gamification framework to promote computational thinking in 8–13 year olds, J. e-Learn. Knowl. Soc., 17 (2021), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135552 doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1135552
|
| [22] |
A. Marougkas, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, C. Sgouropoulou, Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade, Electronics, 12 (2023), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832 doi: 10.3390/electronics12132832
|
| [23] |
W. Ma, W. Ma, Y. Hu, X. Bi, The who, why, and how of ai-based chatbots for learning and teaching in higher education: A systematic review, Educ. Inf. Technol., 30 (2025), 7781–7805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13128-6 doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13128-6
|
| [24] |
R. R. Major, M. M. da Silva, Gamification in MOOCs: A systematic literature review, Cogent Educ., 10 (2023), 2275820. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2275820 doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2275820
|
| [25] |
A. N. Saleem, N. M. Noori, F. Ozdamli, Gamification applications in E-learning: A literature review, Tech. Know. Learn., 27 (2022), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x
|
| [26] |
P. R. Shankar, Artificial intelligence in health professions education, Arch. Med. Health Sci., 10 (2022), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_234_22 doi: 10.4103/amhs.amhs_234_22
|
| [27] |
K. Fuchs, Challenges with gamification in higher education: A narrative review with implications for educators and policymakers, Int. J. Chang. Educ., 1 (2024), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE32021604 doi: 10.47852/bonviewIJCE32021604
|
| [28] |
B. M. Jafari, M. Zhao, A. Jafari, Rumi: An intelligent agent enhancing learning management systems using machine learning techniques, J. Softw. Eng. Appl., 15 (2022), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2022.159019 doi: 10.4236/jsea.2022.159019
|
| [29] |
R. Isaeva, N. Karasartova, K. Dznunusnalieva, K. Mirzoeva, M. Mokliuk, Enhancing learning effectiveness through adaptive learning platforms and emerging computer technologies in education, J. Ilm. Ilmu Ter. Univ. Jambi, 9 (2025), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.37967 doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.37967
|
| [30] |
P. Halachev, Gamification as an e-learning tool: A literature review, E-Learn. Innov. J., 2 (2024), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.57125/ELIJ.2024.09.25.01 doi: 10.57125/ELIJ.2024.09.25.01
|
| [31] |
P. Gejandran, N. Abdullah, Gamification in e-learning: A systematic review of benefits, challenges, and future possibilities, J. Logist. Inform. Serv. Sci., 11 (2024), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0206 doi: 10.33168/JLISS.2024.0206
|
| [32] |
P. A. Fernando, H. K. S. Premadasa, Use of gamification and game-based learning in educating Generation Alpha: A systematic literature review, Educ. Technol. Soc., 27 (2024), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202404_27(2).RP03 doi: 10.30191/ETS.202404_27(2).RP03
|
| [33] |
J. Huang, Y. Zhong, X. Chen, Adaptive and personalized learning in STEM education using high-performance computing and artificial intelligence, J. Supercomput., 81 (2025), 981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-025-07481-7 doi: 10.1007/s11227-025-07481-7
|
| [34] |
S. Drissi, A. Chefrour, K. Boussaha, H. Zarzour, Exploring the effects of personalized recommendations on student's motivation and learning achievement in gamified mobile learning framework, Educ. Inf. Technol., 29 (2024), 15463–15500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12477-6 doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12477-6
|
| [35] |
Y. Tian, C. Lu, X. Zhang, K. C. Tan, Y. Jin, Solving large-scale multiobjective optimization problems with sparse optimal solutions via unsupervised neural networks, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 51 (2021), 3115–3128. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2979930 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2979930
|
| [36] | F. Ming, W. Gong, B. Xue, M. Zhang, Y. Jin, Automated configuration of evolutionary algorithms via deep reinforcement learning for constrained multiobjective optimization, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2025, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2025.3603251 |