In this paper, the initial value problem of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the Erdélyi-Kober fractional derivatives was studied. Based on the transmutation method, the well-posedness of initial value problem of the higher order linear model was proved and an explicit solution was presented. Then some new Gronwall type inequalities involving Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral were established. By applying these results and some fixed point theorems, the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of the nonlinear differential equation were proved. The method is applicable to the fractional differential equation with any order γ∈(n−1,n].
Citation: Kangqun Zhang. Existence and uniqueness of positive solution of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Erdélyi-Kober operators[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1358-1372. doi: 10.3934/math.2024067
[1] | Mohamed Jleli, Bessem Samet . Nonexistence for fractional differential inequalities and systems in the sense of Erdélyi-Kober. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21686-21702. doi: 10.3934/math.20241055 |
[2] | Wei Fan, Kangqun Zhang . Local well-posedness results for the nonlinear fractional diffusion equation involving a Erdélyi-Kober operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25494-25512. doi: 10.3934/math.20241245 |
[3] | Dumitru Baleanu, S. Hemalatha, P. Duraisamy, P. Pandiyan, Subramanian Muthaiah . Existence results for coupled differential equations of non-integer order with Riemann-Liouville, Erdélyi-Kober integral conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13004-13023. doi: 10.3934/math.2021752 |
[4] | Miao Yang, Lizhen Wang . Lie symmetry group, exact solutions and conservation laws for multi-term time fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30038-30058. doi: 10.3934/math.20231536 |
[5] | Ayub Samadi, Chaiyod Kamthorncharoen, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Mixed Erdélyi-Kober and Caputo fractional differential equations with nonlocal non-separated boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32904-32920. doi: 10.3934/math.20241574 |
[6] | Min Jiang, Rengang Huang . Existence of solutions for q-fractional differential equations with nonlocal Erdélyi-Kober q-fractional integral condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6537-6551. doi: 10.3934/math.2020421 |
[7] | Abdulaziz M. Alotaibi, Mohamed M. A. Metwali, Hala H. Taha, Ravi P Agarwal . Existence, uniqueness, continuous dependence on the data for the product of n-fractional integral equations in Orlicz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8382-8397. doi: 10.3934/math.2025386 |
[8] | Wedad Albalawi, Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty . Qualitative study of Caputo Erdélyi-Kober stochastic fractional delay differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8277-8305. doi: 10.3934/math.2025381 |
[9] | Hasanen A. Hammad, Hassen Aydi, Maryam G. Alshehri . Solving hybrid functional-fractional equations originating in biological population dynamics with an effect on infectious diseases. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14574-14593. doi: 10.3934/math.2024709 |
[10] | Mengjiao Zhao, Chen Yang . An Erdélyi-Kober fractional coupled system: Existence of positive solutions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 5088-5109. doi: 10.3934/math.2024247 |
In this paper, the initial value problem of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the Erdélyi-Kober fractional derivatives was studied. Based on the transmutation method, the well-posedness of initial value problem of the higher order linear model was proved and an explicit solution was presented. Then some new Gronwall type inequalities involving Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral were established. By applying these results and some fixed point theorems, the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of the nonlinear differential equation were proved. The method is applicable to the fractional differential equation with any order γ∈(n−1,n].
In this paper, the initial value problem of the nonlinear differential equation
{t−βγ∗Dα,γβu(t)−λu(t)=f(t,u(t)),limt→0tβ(α+n−k)Πki=1(α+n−i+1βtddt)u(t)=uk,k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1 | (1.1) |
is studied, where ∗Dα,γβ is given in Definition 2.3 and called a Caputo type modification of the Erdélyi-Kober fractional derivative (EKFD) with γ-th order, γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N+, β∈R+ and α∈R+.
Caputo type fractional derivative is an important subject with numerous applications to several fields outside mathematics, such as engineering, biology, economics, physics, etc., because it describes the property of memory and heredity of many materials. In general, every type of fractional derivative has its own merits and also the shortages. The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative (RLFD) is a natural generalization of the integer order derivative and usually employed in mathematical texts and not so frequently in applications, and the Caputo fractional derivative (CFD) is often used to formulate mathematical models of some applied problems by means of fractional differential equations since its physical interpretation is clear. The EKFD as a generalization of RLFD and CFD is often applied both in the mathematical texts and applications. The so-called Caputo type modification of the EKFD was first introduced by Gorenflo, Luchko and Mainardi in [1] and applied to describe of the scale-invariant solutions of the diffusion-wave equation. In fact, fractional differential equations with Caputo type initial data are natural and useful in modeling the reality. Finding simple and effective methods to solve these kinds of models is fundamental and has become more and more active [2,3]. Integral transform method is suitable for solving Cauchy problems of fractional differential equations with constant coefficients [4] in half space. For fractional differential equations with variable coefficients, Kiryakova and her collaborators established the explicit solution by use of the transmutation method [5,6]. In [7], the series method works only for relatively special domain, although it allows for finding solutions of fractional differential equations with arbitrary order. For more analytical approaches and numerical algorithm, one can refer to [8,9] and the references therein. As the deepening of research on calculus theory and its applications, the so-called Caputo type modification of the EKFD has attracted more and more attention [10,11,12]. In this paper, we develop some new related Gronwall integral inequality to enrich the analytical methods and overcome the difficulties that are caused by nonlinearity of equations and the low regularity of solutions. Recently, this idea has been generalized for studying the qualitative theory of fractional differential equations [13,14,15,16,17].
In order to establish the solution of problem (1), we focus on a weakly singular integral whose kernel involves Mittag-Leffler functions. Some new related Gronwall type integral inequalities are established, then based on these inequalities and fixed point theorems, we show the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of nonlinear fractional differential equations with higher order Caputo type modification of the EKFDs. This method is not confined with the order of the equation.
The main contributions of this work are that:
(ⅰ) The well posedness of the initial value problem of linear fractional differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the EKFDs is established.
(ⅱ) The established new Gronwall-type integral inequalities extends the results in [18].
(ⅲ) The equivalence between the nonlinear differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the EKFDs and a nonlinear Volterra-type integral equation with a complicated singular kernel is established.
(ⅳ) The existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of the nonlinear fractional differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the EKFDs are obtained.
This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the basic knowledge of some fractional calculus and Mittag-Leffler functions are recalled. In Section 3, we show the well posedness of the initial value problem of fractional differential equation. In Section 4, we analyze an integral whose kernel involves Mittag-Leffler functions and singular power functions, and then derive some new useful Gronwall-type inequalities. In Section 5, we study nonlinear fractional differential equations by use of Gronwall-type inequalities and fixed point theorems. In final, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of the nonlinear fractional differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the EKFD operators.
In this section, we start by writing down definitions of the Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral (EKFI) given in [5,11,19], and then give some recalls of fractional calculus that will be used later.
Definition 2.1. The EKFI of f(t)∈Cμ is defined by
Iα,γβf(t)=t−β(α+γ)Γ(γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβαf(τ)d(τβ), |
with arbitrary parameters μ∈R, γ∈R+, α∈R and β∈R+, where weighted space of continuous functions C(n)μ is defined by
C(n)μ={f(t)=tp˜f(t):p>μ,˜f(t)∈C(n)[0,∞)},n∈N. |
The special case for γ=0, the EKFI is defined as the identity operator. For γ<0, the interpretation is derived by
Iα,γβf(t)=(α+γ+1)Iα,γ+1βf(t)+1βIα,γ+1β(tddt)f(t). |
For α=0, β=1, the EKFI is reduced to the well-known Riemann-Liouville fractional integral with a power weight.
Definition 2.2. The Riemann-Liouille type modification of the EKFD of order γ of a function f(t)∈C(n)μ, μ>−β(α+1) is defined by
Dα,γβf(t)=DnIα+γ,n−γβf(t), |
where Dn=Πni=1(α+i+1βtddt), γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N.
Definition 2.3. The Caputo type modification of the EKFD of order γ of a function f(t)∈C(n)μ, μ>−β(α+1) is defined by
∗Dα,γβf(t)=Iα+γ,n−γβDnf(t), |
where γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N and Dn=Πni=1(α+i+1βtddt).
Lemma 2.4. For f(t)∈Cμ, μ≥−β(α+1), the right-hand sided EKFD ∗Dα,γβ and Dα,γβ satisfy
Dα,γβIα,γβf(t)=∗Dα,γβIα,γβf(t)=f(t). |
Lemma 2.5. For f(t)∈C(n)μ, μ≥−β(α+γ+1) and γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N+, the right-hand sided EKFD ∗Dα,γβ and integral Iα,γβ satisfy
Iα,γβ∗Dα,γβf(t)=f(t)−n−1∑k=0pkt−β(1+α+k), |
where constants pk=limt→0tβ(1+α+k)Πn−1i=k+1(1+α+i+1βtddt)f(t), k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, and the right-hand sided EKFD Dα,γβ and integral Iα,γβ satisfy
Iα,γβDα,γβf(t)=f(t)−n−1∑k=0ckt−β(1+α+k), |
where constants ck=Γ(n−k)Γ(α−k)limt→0tβ(1+α+k)Πn−1i=k+1(1+α+i+1βtddt)(Iα+γ,n−γβf)(t), k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, and Γ(⋅) is a Gamma function.
The Mittag-Leffler function is defined by the convergent series
Eα,β(t)=∞∑k=0tkΓ(αk+β),ℜ(α)>0,ℜ(β)>0, | (2.1) |
where α∈C, β∈C, ℜ(⋅) denotes the real part of a complex number. The Mittag-Leffler function is an entire function that is a natural extension of the exponential, trigonometric and incomplete gamma functions. Particularly, it is easy to verify that Eα,β(t) is positive for t>0, α∈R+, β∈R+. The following asymptotic expansions of the Mittag-Leffler function are given in [20].
Lemma 2.6. For 0<α<2, β∈R and πα2<μ<min{π,πα}, we have
Eα,β(t)=1αt1−βαexp(t1α)−N∑r=11Γ(β−rα)tr+O(1tN+1) | (2.2) |
for large |t| and |argt|≤μ.
For α≥2, β∈R, we have
Eα,β(t)=1α∑nt1nexp[exp(2nπiα)t1α]1−β−N∑r=11Γ(β−rα)tr+O(1tN+1) | (2.3) |
for large |t|, |argt|≤πα2 and where the first sum is taken over all integers n such that |argt+2nπ|≤πα2.
Fixed point theory is one of the most powerful and fruitful tools of various theoretical and applied fields, such as linear inequalities, variational inequalities, the approximation theory, integral and differential equations and inclusions, nonlinear analysis, the dynamic systems theory, mathematics of fractals, mathematical physics, economics and mathematical modeling. In particular, the fixed point theory is always considered a core subject of nonlinear analysis. The following results can be found in [21,22].
Theorem 2.7. Assume S0 is a Banach space, S1 is a closed, convex subset of S0, S2 is an open subset of S1, and p∈S2. Suppose that M:¯S2→S1 is a continuous, compact map, then either
(a) F has a fixed point in ¯S2; or
(b) there are s∈∂S2 (the boundary of S2 in S1) and ν∈(0,1) with s=νM(s)+(1−ν)p.
Theorem 2.8. Assume S0 is a Hausdorff locally convex linear topological space, S1 is a convex subset of S0, S2 is an open subset of S1, and p∈S2. Suppose that M:¯S2→S1 is a continuous, compact map, then either
(a) F has a fixed point in ¯S2; or
(b) there are s∈∂S2 (the boundary of S2 in S1) and ν∈(0,1) with s=νM(s)+(1−ν)p.
In this section, we consider the initial value problem of the linear fractional differential equation
{t−βγ∗Dα,γβu(t)−λu(t)=f(t),limt→0tβ(α+n−k)Πki=1(α+n−i+1βtddt)u(t)=uk,k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, | (3.1) |
where uk (k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1) are positive numbers.
We refer to [23] for a study of the initial value problem involving Riemann-Liouille type modification of EKFD
{t−βγDα,γβu(t)−λu(t)=g(t),limt→0Γ(n−k)Γ(γ−k)tβ(1+α+k)Πn−1i=k+1(1+α+i+1βtddt)(Iα+γ,n−γβu)(t)=ˉuk,k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, | (3.2) |
where α∈R, β∈R+, γ∈(n−1,n] and n∈N+. The explicit solution was established by the transmutation method.
Lemma 3.1. Let f∈Cβμ, μ≥max{0,−α−γ}−1, then there exists a solution u∈C(n)βμ of problem (3.2) with the form
u(t)=n−1∑k=0ˉuktβ(γ−k−1)Eγ,α+2γ−k(λtβγ)+t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)g(τ)dτβ. |
The parameter that appears in initial conditions of the initial value problem and is defined by the Riemann-Liouille type modification of the EKFDs whose physical interpretation is not clear. For this reason, the Caputo type modification of the EKFDs is introduced and the following problem is considered:
{t−βγ∗Dα,γβu(t)−λu(t)=f(t),limt→0tβ(1+α+k)Πn−1i=k+1(1+α+i+1βtddt)u(t)=˜uk,k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, | (3.3) |
where α∈R, β∈R+, γ∈(n−1,n] and n∈N+.
In order to use of the result given in Lemma 3.1, we recall the relation between ∗Dα,γβ and Dα,γβ, which was established in [12] by use of operational methods.
Lemma 3.2. The Caputo type modification of the EKFD ∗Dα,γβ coincides with Riemann-Liouille type modification of the EKFD Dα,γβ for a function u∈Cnν, γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N, ν≥−β(α+1), if and only if for conditions ˜uk=ˉuk,k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1 are fulfilled.
Since ∗Dα,γβ and Dα,γβ are on the right-hand sided EKFDs of order γ, then applying Lemmas 2.4 and 2.5, we have
∗Dα,γβu(t)=Dα,γβIα,γβ∗Dα,γβu(t)=Dα,γβ(u(t)−n−1∑k=0˜ukt−β(1+α+k)), |
then, there exists
Iα,γβ∗Dα,γβu(t)=Iα,γβDα,γβ(u(t)−n−1∑k=0˜ukt−β(1+α+k)), |
which is equivalent to
n−1∑k=0˜ukt−β(1+α+k)=n−1∑k=0¯ukt−β(1+α+k)+n−1∑k=0˜ukIα,γβDα,γβt−β(1+α+k), |
in terms of Lemma 2.5. According to formulas (45) and (67) in [11], there exists
Iα,γβDα,γβt−β(1+α+k)=t−β(1+α+k). |
Then, these yield ¯uk=0. Hence, the problem (3.3) is equivalent to the following problem
{t−βγDα,γβu(t)−λu(t)=f(t)+t−βγn−1∑k=0˜ukDα,γβ(t−β(1+α+k)),limt→0Γ(n−k)Γ(γ−k)tβ(1+α+k)Πn−1i=k+1(1+α+i+1βtddt)(Iα+γ,n−γβu)(t)=0,k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, |
where α∈R, β∈R+, γ∈(n−1,n] and n∈N+. Based on the above analysis and Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, we confirm the well-posedness of the initial value problem of inhomogeneous linear differential equation involving Caputo type modification of the EKFDs.
Theorem 3.3. Let f∈Cβμ, μ≥max{0,−α−γ}−1, then there exists a solution u∈C(n)βμ of problem (3.3) with the form
u(t)=t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)(f(τ)+τ−βγn−1∑k=0˜ukDα,γβ(τ−β(1+α+k)))dτβ. |
According to formula (67) in [11], there exists
Dα,γβtq=Γ(α+γ+1+qβ)Γ(α+1+qβ)tq,q>−β(α+1). |
then, we obtain
Dα,γβ(t−β(n+α−k))=Γ(γ+k+1−n)Γ(k+1−n)t−β(n+α−k). |
Hence, set
I=∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβαEγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)Dα,γβ(τ−β(n+α−k))dτβ, |
and we arrive at
I=Γ(γ+k+1−n)Γ(k+1−n)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(k−n)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)dτβ=Γ(γ+k+1−n)Γ(k+1−n)∞∑j=0λjΓ(γj+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ+γj−1τβ(k−n)dτβ=Γ(γ+k+1−n)Γ(k+1−n)∞∑j=0(λtβγ)jtβ(γ+k−n)Γ(γj+γ)∫10(1−τ)γ+γj−1τk−ndτ=Γ(γ+k+1−n)Γ(k+1−n)tβ(γ+k−n)∞∑j=0(λtβγ)jB(γj+γ,k−n+1)Γ(γj+γ)=Γ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(γ+k−n)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ), |
where B(⋅,⋅) denotes a Beta function.
Finally, applying the above results and Theorem 3.3 with uk=˜un−1−k, we obtain Theorem 3.4.
Theorem 3.4. Set f∈Cβμ, μ≥max{0,−α−γ}−1, then there exists an explicit solution u∈C(n)βμ of problem (3.1), which is given in the form
u(t)=n−1∑k=0ukΓ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(k−n−α)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ)+t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)f(τ)dτβ. |
Remark 3.5. If the continuous function f(t) is nonnegative and constants λ, uk(k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1) are positive, then the explicit solution of problem (5) presented in Theorem 3.4 is positive.
Gronwall type inequalities play an important role in solving solutions of numerous differential and integral equations. The classical form of this type of inequality [24] is described as follows.
Theorem 4.1. Assume u(t), vi(t) (i=1,2) and g(t) are continuous, nonnegative functions on [0,+∞) with p≥1 such that
u(t)≤v1(t)+v2(t)(∫t0g(s)up(τ)dτ)1p, |
then,
u(t)≤v1(t)+v2(t)(∫t0w(τ)g(τ)vp1(τ)dτ)1p1−(1−w(t))1p, |
where w(t)=exp(−∫t0g(τ)vp2(τ)dτ).
In order to establish a new useful Gronwall inequalities for studying the problem (1.1), we recall Kalla's results with the form
∫t0K(τt)τγf(τ)dτ,t>τ>0 |
that one can refer to see ([25,26,27,28,29]). Some extended theories of this integral are developed and have been applied to different topics, like as Gronwall inequalities and other operational calculus, integral transforms, and classes of integral and differential equations.
Consider integral
∫t0K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)f(τ)dτ,t>τ>0 | (4.1) |
with parameters α∈R, β∈R+, γ∈(n−1,n] and n∈N+, the kernel is expressed by
K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)=(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)+β−1Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ), | (4.2) |
where Eγ,γ(⋅) denotes the Mittag-Leffler function, function f(⋅) is given. It is easy to find that integral (4.1) is a direct generalization of Kalla's and closely connected with EKFD formally. To establish some new related Gronwall inequalities based on (4.1)–(4.2), one should consider the more complicated kernel with singularity compared with the form [3,14,17,18].
In the following, we show our results.
Theorem 4.2. Let λ∈R+, α∈R, β∈R+, γ∈(n−1,n] and n∈N+, assume vi(t) (i=1,2), g(t) and u(t) are continuous, nonnegative functions on (0,+∞) with
u(t)≤v1(t)+v2(t)∫t0K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)g(τ)u(τ)dτ, |
then,
u(t)≤V1(t)+V2(t)(∫t0w(τ)(gV1)r(τ)dτ)1r1−(1−w(t))1r, | (4.3) |
where w(t)=exp(−∫t0(gV2)r(τ)dτ), V1(t)=v1(t), V2(t)=Cv2(t)h(t)t1−βp+1q, constant C=C(α,β,γ,p) only depends on α,β,γ,p, and
h(t)={tβ(α+2γ+1p)−1,t∈(0,1),{tβ(α+γ+1+1p)−1exp(λ1γtβ),t∈[1,+∞),γ∈(0,2),tβ(α+2γ+1p)−1∑k≤γ4tβγkexp(λ1−γγtβ(1−γ)),t∈[1,+∞),γ∈[2,+∞) |
for (1−β)q+p>0, p(α+γ+1−1β)+1>0, 1p+1q+1r=1, p,q,r∈R+.
Proof: By a direct computation, it is easy to verify that
∫t0Kp(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)dτβ=∫t0((tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)+β−1Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ))pdτβ=∫t0(τβ(γ−1)(tβ−τβ)α+γ+1−1βEγ,γ(λτβγ))pdτβ=tp(β(α+2γ+1p)−1)∫10(τγ−1(1−τ)α+γ+1−1βEγ,γ(λtβγτγ))pdτ. | (4.4) |
In terms of the series expansion (2.2) and the asymptotic behavior of the entire function Eα,β(t) in Lemma 2.6, we have
∫t0Kp(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)dτβ≤C1hp(t) | (4.5) |
for C1=C1(α,β,γ,p), p(α+γ+1−1β)+1>0 and any t∈[0,+∞).
Meanwhile, by a direct computation, we obtain
∫t0τq(1−β)pdτ=pp+q(1−β)tq(1−β)p+1 | (4.6) |
for (1−β)q+p>0.
Then, the H¨older inequality and (4.5)–(4.6) yield
u(t)≤v1(t)+v2(t)∫t0K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)g(τ)u(τ)dτ≤v1(t)+v2(t)(∫t0(gu)r(τ)dτ)1r(∫t0Kp(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)dτβ)1p(∫t0τq(1−β)pdτ)1q≤V1(t)+V2(t)(∫t0(gu)r(τ)dτ)1r, | (4.7) |
where V1(t)=v1(t), V2(t)=Cv2(t)h(t)t1−βp+1q for 1p+1q+1r=1, p,q,r∈R+.
Hence, in terms of (4.7), Theorem 4.1 yields (4.3).
Thus, we complete the proof.
In solving the fractional differential equations with nonlinear term f(t,u(t)), the Gronwall type integral inequality is a powerful tool [15,18]. Here and in the following, we define an invertible operator Θ by
Θ(δ)=∫δϵdtθ(t),ϵ>0,δ>0 | (4.8) |
for some positive and nondecreasing function θ(t).
Theorem 4.3. Let λ∈R+ α∈R, β∈R+, γ∈(n−1,n] and n∈N+, assume functions vi(t)∈C[0,T], i=1,2 are nondecreasing and nonnegative, g(t)∈C[0,T] is nonnegative, f(t)∈C[0,T] is nondecreasing and nonnegative, and u(t)∈C[0,T] is nonnegative, such that
u(t)≤v1(t)+v2(t)∫t0K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)g(τ)f(u(τ))dτ |
for arbitrary positive number T, then
u(t)≤(Θ−1(Θ(2r−1Vr1(t))+2r−1Vr2(t)∫t0gr(τ)dτ))1r, |
where V1(t)=v1(t), V2(t)=Cv2(t)h(t)t1−βp+1q, C=C(α,β,γ,p) is a constant which only depends on α,β,γ,p, and
h(t)={tβ(α+2γ+1p)−1,t∈(0,1),{tβ(α+γ+1+1p)−1exp(λ1γtβ),t∈[1,+∞),γ∈(0,2),tβ(α+2γ+1p)−1∑k≤γ4tβγkexp(λ1−γγtβ(1−γ)),t∈[1,+∞),γ∈[2,+∞) |
for (1−β)q+p>0, p(α+γ+1−1β)+1>0, 1p+1q+1r=1, p,q,r∈R+.
Proof: Similar to the proof in proving (4.7) of Theorem 4.2, we have
u(t)≤V1(t)+V2(t)(∫t0(g(τ)f(u(τ)))rdτ)1r≤V1(T0)+V2(T0)(∫t0(g(τ)f(u(τ)))rdτ)1r |
for some T0∈(0,T]. Take U=ur, then the last inequality becomes
U(t)≤2r−1(Vr1(T0)+Vr2(T0)∫t0(g(τ)f(u(τ)))rdτ). | (4.9) |
Next, we show
{dΘ(V(t))≤2r−1Vr2(T0)gr(t),V(0)=2r−1Vr1(T0), | (4.10) |
where Θ is given by (4.8) with ϵ=V(0), and
V(t)=2r−1(Vr1(T0)+Vr2(T0)∫t0(g(t)f(u(t)))rdτ). |
In addition, if we let θ(t)=fr(t1r), then
V′(t)≤2r−1Vpr22(T0)gr(t)θ(U(t))≤2r−1Vr2(T0)gr(t)θ(V(t)) |
holds and (4.10) is derived.
In terms of initial value problem (4.10), we obtain
Θ(V(t))≤Θ(2r−1Vr1(T0))+2r−1Vr2(T0)∫t0gr(τ)dτ. | (4.11) |
Since Θ is inversible, then (4.11) is equivalent to the following equation
V(t)≤Θ−1(Θ(2r−1Vr1(T0))+2r−1Vr2(T0)∫t0gr(τ)dτ). |
Furthermore, applying (4.9), there exists
U(t)≤Θ−1(Θ(2r−1Vr1(T0))+2r−1Vr2(T0)∫t0gr(τ)dτ). |
For the arbitrariness of t∈[0,T0], we conclude
u(T0)≤(Θ−1(Θ(2r−1Vr1(T0))+2r−1Vr2(T0)∫T00gr(τ)dτ))1r. |
Furthermore, for the arbitrariness of T0∈[0,T], we obtain
Θ(2r−1Vr1(t))+2r−1Vr2(t)∫t0gr(τ)dτ∈Dom(Θ−1). |
This completes the proof.
In this section, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of the initial value problem of the nonlinear differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the Erdélyi-Kober operators in terms of Theorems 4.2 and 4.3 with parameters γ-th order, γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N+, β∈R+ and
α≥maxk∈(0,1,2,⋯,n−1){n−k−γk−2γ−1,n−k−1β(γ+γk+1)}. |
Theorem 5.1. Set C0 as a positive number, f as a nonnegative and continuous function that satisfies f(t,u)|u=0=0, |f(t,u)−f(t,v)|≤C0|u−v| and initial conditions uk>0 for all k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, then there exists a unique positive solution u(t)∈C(0,+∞) of problem (1.1) and ∗Dα,γβu(t)∈C(0,+∞).
Proof: Set S1={u(t)∈C[0,T]:tβ(α+n)u(t)≥u0}, T∈(0,+∞). Consider the map M:S1→S1 defined by
(Mu)(t)=n−1∑k=0ukΓ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(k−n−α)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ)+t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)f(τ,u(τ))dτβ. |
Since f is nonnegative, then Remark 3.5 implies Mu is positive.
Based on Theorem 4.2, we obtain that any fixed point of map M is a solution of the Volterra-type integral equation
u(t)=n−1∑k=0ukΓ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(k−n−α)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ)+t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)f(τ,u(τ))dτβ. |
We know that the fixed point of the Volterra-type integral equation is also a solution of problem (1.1). Set
S2={u(t)∈S1:u(t)<V1(t)+C0V2(t)(∫t0w(τ)Vr1(τ)dτ)1r1−(1−w(t))1r,t≥0}, |
where
{V1(t)=n−1∑k=0ukΓ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(k−n−α)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ),V2(t)=h(t)t1−βp+1q−β(α+γ),w(t)=exp(−C0∫t0Vr2(τ)dτ), |
and h(t) is given in Theorem 4.2 for (1−β)q+p>0, p(α+γ+1−1β)+1>0, 1p+1q+1r=1, p,q,r∈R+. Take a similar procedure used in [18], and we derive that M:¯S2→S1 is continuous and compact.
If u∈¯S2 is any solution of equation
u(t)=(1−ν)V1(t)+ν(Fu)(t)=V1(t)+νt−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)f(τ,u(τ))dτβ |
for ν∈(0,1), then it is easy to verify that
u(t)≤V1(t)+C0νt−β(α+γ)∫t0K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)u(t)dτ. |
Applying (10), we have
u(t)≤V1(t)+C0V2(t)(∫t0w(τ)Vr1(τ)dτ)1r1−(1−w(t))1r. |
Hence, by use of Theorem 2.7, we claim that F has a fixed point in ¯S2, then this fixed point is a positive solution of problem (1.1). Since the arbitrariness of T∈(0,+∞), then we claim that there exists a positive solution u∈C(0,+∞) of problem (1.1).
Furthermore, consider the continuity of function f(⋅,⋅) and the expression
t−βγ∗Dα,γβu(t)=λu(t)+f(t,u(t)), |
and we obtain ∗Dα,γβu(t)∈C(0,+∞).
If there exists two solutions u and v in ¯U to problem (15), then it follows
|u(t)−v(t)|=t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)|f(τ,u(τ))−f(τ,v(τ))|dτβ≤C0t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)|u(τ)−v(τ)|dτβ, |
then by use of Theorem 4.2 with V1(t)=0, we obtain u=v. This yields the uniqueness of the solution.
Thus, we complete the proof.
Theorem 5.2. Set w(t)∈C[0,T] and the nondecreasing function g(t)∈C[0,T] as nonnegative, assume f(t,u(t))≤w(t)g(u(t)), which is nonnegative and continuous, and initial conditions uk>0 for all k=0,1,2,⋯,n−1, then there exists a positive solution u(t)∈C(0,T] of problem (1.1) and ∗Dα,γβu(t)∈C(0,T].
Proof: For any positive number T>0, we form a map M:S1→S1, which is defined by
(Mu)(t)=n−1∑k=0ukΓ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(k−n−α)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ)+t−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)f(τ,u(τ))dτβ, |
where S1={u(t)∈C(0,T]:tβ(α+n)u(t)≥u0,T>0}. It is easy to verify that Mu is positive if f is nonnegative. Set
S2={u∈S1:ur(t)<Θ−1(Θ(2r−1Vr1(t))+2r−1Vr2(t)∫t0wr(τ)dτ),0<t≤T}, |
where
{V1(t)=∑n−1k=0ukΓ(γ+k+1−n)tβ(k−n−α)Eγ,γ−n+k+1(λtβγ),V2(t)=h(t)t1−βp+1q−β(α+γ), |
and h(t) is defined in Theorem 4.3 for (1−β)q+p>0, p(α+γ+1−1β)+1>0, 1p+1q+1r=1, p,q,r∈R+. By applying the usual techniques used in Theorem 5.1, we obtain that the map M:¯S2→S1 is continuous and compact. It follows of Theorem 3.4 that the fixed points of operator M are solutions of problem (1.1).
If u∈¯S2 is any solution of the Volterra-type integral equation
u(t)=(1−γ)V1(t)+γ(Fu)(t)=V1(t)+γt−β(α+γ)∫t0(tβ−τβ)γ−1τβ(α+γ)Eγ,γ(λ(tβ−τβ)γ)f(τ,u(τ))dτβ |
for γ∈(0,1), then it is easy to verify that
u(t)≤V1(t)+γt−β(α+γ)∫t0K(α,β,γ,λ,t,τ)w(τ)g(u)(τ)dτ. |
Applying Theorem 4.3 that we obtain
u(t)<(Θ−1(Θ(2r−1(V1(t))r)+2r−1Vr2(t)∫t0wr(s)ds))1r. |
Hence, Theorem 2.8 yields that F has a fixed point in ¯U.
Meanwhile, Eq (1.1) and the continuity of function f(⋅,⋅) implies ∗Dα,γβu(t)∈C(0,T].
Thus, we confirm the result of Theorem 5.2.
In this paper, the positive solution of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Caputo type modification of the EKFD was studied. First, the well-posedness of the initial value problem of the higher order linear model was proved and an explicit positive solution was presented based on the transmutation method. Second, some new Gronwall type inequalities involving EKFI with singular kernels were established. At last, by applying the derived results and some fixed point theorems, the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of this kinds of nonlinear differential equation were obtained. The method is applicable to such kinds of fractional differential equations with any order γ∈(n−1,n], n∈N+.
The author declares he has not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions.
This work was supported by Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China and NNSF of China (No. 11326152).
The author declares to have no competing interests.
[1] |
R. Gorenflo, Y. Luchko, F. Mainardi, Wright functions as scale-invariant solutions of the diffusion-wave equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 118 (2000), 175–191. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00288-0 doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00288-0
![]() |
[2] |
N. Bouteraa, M. Inc, M. Hashemi, S. Benaicha, Study on the existence and nonexistence of solutions for a class of nonlinear Erdélyi-Kober type fractional differential equation on unbounded domain, J. Geom. Phys., 178 (2022), 104546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104546 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104546
![]() |
[3] |
K. Zhang, Existence results for a generalization of the time-fractional diffusion equation with variable coefficients, Bound. Value Probl., 2019 (2019), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-019-1125-0 doi: 10.1186/s13661-019-1125-0
![]() |
[4] |
K. Li, J. Peng, Laplace transform and fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 2019–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.035 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.035
![]() |
[5] | V. Kiryakova, Generalized fractional calculus and applications, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0013091500006325 |
[6] | V. Kiryakova, Transmutation method for solving hyper-Bessel differential equations based on the Poisson-Dimovski transformation, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 11 (2008), 299–316. |
[7] |
C. Friedrich, Relaxation and retardation functions of the Maxwell model with fractional derivatives, Rheola. Acta, 30 (1991), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01134604 doi: 10.1007/BF01134604
![]() |
[8] |
A. Goswami, J. Singh, D. Kumar, An efficient analytical approach for fractional equal width equations describing hydro-magnetic waves in cold plasma, Physica A, 524 (2019), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.058 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.058
![]() |
[9] |
D. Zhao, J. Singh, D. Kumar, S. Rathore, X. Yang, An efficient computational technique for local fractional heat conduction equations in fractal media, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 10 (2017), 1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.010.04.17 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.04.17
![]() |
[10] |
V. Kiryakova, Y. Luchko, Riemann-Liouville and Caputo type multiple Erdélyi-Kober operators, Cent. Eur. J. Phys., 11 (2013), 1314–1336. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-013-0217-1 doi: 10.2478/s11534-013-0217-1
![]() |
[11] | V. Kiryakova, Y. Luchko, Multiple Erdélyi-Kober integrals and derivatives as operators of generalized fractional calculus, In: Basic theory, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019,127–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110571622-006 |
[12] | Y. Luchko, J. J. Trujillo, Caputo-type modification of the Erdélyi-Kober fractional derivative, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 10 (2007), 249–267. |
[13] |
R. Almeida, A Gronwall inequality for a general Caputo fractional operators, Math. Inequal. Appl., 20 (2017), 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-2017-20-70 doi: 10.7153/mia-2017-20-70
![]() |
[14] | S. S. Dragomir, Some Gronwall type inequalities and applications, New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2003. |
[15] |
Q. Feng, F. Meng, Some new Gronwall-type inequalities arising in the research of fractional differential equations, J. Inequal. Appl., 2013 (2013), 429. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-429 doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-429
![]() |
[16] | D. Henry, Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0089647 |
[17] |
Z. M. Odibat, Analytic study on linear systems of fractional differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 1171–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.06.035 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.06.035
![]() |
[18] |
K. Zhang, Positive solution of nonlinear fractional differential equations with Caputo-like counterpart hyper-Bessel operators, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 2845–2857. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6086 doi: 10.1002/mma.6086
![]() |
[19] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, New York: Academic Press, 1999. |
[20] |
H. J. Haubold, A. M. Mathai, R. K. Saxena, Mittag-Leffler functions and their applications, J. Appl. Math., 2011 (2011), 298628. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/298628 doi: 10.1155/2011/298628
![]() |
[21] | R. P. Agarwal, M. Meehan, D. O'Regan, Fixed point theory and applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543005 |
[22] | A. Granas, J. Dugundji, Fixed point theory, New York: Springer, 2003. |
[23] |
B. Al-Saqabi, V. Kiryakova, Explicit solutions of fractional integral and differential equations involving Erdélyi-Kober operators, Appl. Math. Comput., 95 (1998), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(97)10095-9 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(97)10095-9
![]() |
[24] |
D. Millett, J. S. W. Wong, On discrete analogues of some generalizations of Gronwall's inequality, Monatsh. Math., 69 (1965), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297622 doi: 10.1007/BF01297622
![]() |
[25] | S. L. Kalla, Integral operators involving Fox's H-function, Acta Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología, 3 (1969), 117–122. |
[26] | S. L. Kalla, Integral operators involving Fox's H-function Ⅱ, Nota Cie., 7 (1969), 72–79. |
[27] | S. Kalla, On operators of fractional Integration Ⅰ, Mat. Notae., 22 (1970), 89–93. |
[28] | S. Kalla, On operators of fractional Integration Ⅱ, Mat. Notae., 25 (1976), 29–35. |
[29] | V. Kiryakova, A brief story about the operators of generalized fractional calculus, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 11 (2008), 203–220. |
1. | Wei Fan, Kangqun Zhang, Local well-posedness results for the nonlinear fractional diffusion equation involving a Erdélyi-Kober operator, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 25494, 10.3934/math.20241245 | |
2. | Mohamed A Abdoon, Mohamed Elbadri, Abdulrahman B M Alzahrani, Mohammed Berir, Abubker Ahmed, Analyzing the inverted fractional rössler system through two approaches: numerical scheme and LHAM, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 115220, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad7f01 | |
3. | Peng E, Tingting Xu, Linhua Deng, Yulin Shan, Miao Wan, Weihong Zhou, Solutions of a class of higher order variable coefficient homogeneous differential equations, 2025, 20, 1556-1801, 213, 10.3934/nhm.2025011 | |
4. | Wedad Albalawi, Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty, Qualitative study of Caputo Erdélyi-Kober stochastic fractional delay differential equations, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 8277, 10.3934/math.2025381 |