Research article

On the study of the recurrence relations and characterizations based on progressive first-failure censoring

  • Received: 22 August 2023 Revised: 18 November 2023 Accepted: 23 November 2023 Published: 30 November 2023
  • MSC : 62E10, 62N99

  • In this research, the progressive first-failure censored data (PFFC) from the Kumaraswamy modified inverse-Weibull distribution (KMIWD) were used to obtain the recurrence relations and characterizations for single and product moments. The recurrence relationships allow for a rapid and efficient assessment of the means, variances and covariances for any sample size. Additionally, the paper outcomes can be boiled down to the traditional progressive type-II censoring. Also, some special cases are limited to some lifetime distributions as the exponentiated modified inverse Weibull and Kumaraswamy inverse exponential.

    Citation: Najwan Alsadat, Mahmoud Abu-Moussa, Ali Sharawy. On the study of the recurrence relations and characterizations based on progressive first-failure censoring[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 481-494. doi: 10.3934/math.2024026

    Related Papers:

    [1] Refah Alotaibi, Mazen Nassar, Zareen A. Khan, Ahmed Elshahhat . Analysis of Weibull progressively first-failure censored data with beta-binomial removals. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24109-24142. doi: 10.3934/math.20241172
    [2] Bing Long, Zaifu Jiang . Estimation and prediction for two-parameter Pareto distribution based on progressively double Type-II hybrid censored data. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15332-15351. doi: 10.3934/math.2023784
    [3] Ahmed Elshahhat, Vikas Kumar Sharma, Heba S. Mohammed . Statistical analysis of progressively first-failure-censored data via beta-binomial removals. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22419-22446. doi: 10.3934/math.20231144
    [4] Mohamed S. Eliwa, Essam A. Ahmed . Reliability analysis of constant partially accelerated life tests under progressive first failure type-II censored data from Lomax model: EM and MCMC algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 29-60. doi: 10.3934/math.2023002
    [5] Naif Alotaibi, A. S. Al-Moisheer, Ibrahim Elbatal, Salem A. Alyami, Ahmed M. Gemeay, Ehab M. Almetwally . Bivariate step-stress accelerated life test for a new three-parameter model under progressive censored schemes with application in medical. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3521-3558. doi: 10.3934/math.2024173
    [6] Nora Nader, Dina A. Ramadan, Hanan Haj Ahmad, M. A. El-Damcese, B. S. El-Desouky . Optimizing analgesic pain relief time analysis through Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches to new right truncated Fréchet-inverted Weibull distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31217-31245. doi: 10.3934/math.20231598
    [7] Haiping Ren, Xue Hu . Estimation for inverse Weibull distribution under progressive type-Ⅱ censoring scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 22808-22829. doi: 10.3934/math.20231162
    [8] Heba S. Mohammed, Osama E. Abo-Kasem, Ahmed Elshahhat . Computational analysis of generalized progressive hybrid log-logistic model and its modeling for physics and engineering applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 10709-10739. doi: 10.3934/math.2025487
    [9] Refah Alotaibi, Mazen Nassar, Zareen A. Khan, Ahmed Elshahhat . Analysis of reliability index $ \mathfrak{R} = P(Y < X) $ for newly extended xgamma progressively first-failure censored samples with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32200-32231. doi: 10.3934/math.20241546
    [10] Jia Chen, Renato De Leone . A survival tree for interval-censored failure time data. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18099-18126. doi: 10.3934/math.2022996
  • In this research, the progressive first-failure censored data (PFFC) from the Kumaraswamy modified inverse-Weibull distribution (KMIWD) were used to obtain the recurrence relations and characterizations for single and product moments. The recurrence relationships allow for a rapid and efficient assessment of the means, variances and covariances for any sample size. Additionally, the paper outcomes can be boiled down to the traditional progressive type-II censoring. Also, some special cases are limited to some lifetime distributions as the exponentiated modified inverse Weibull and Kumaraswamy inverse exponential.



    In industrial and reliability experiments, it is important to save cost and money when observing the product's failure time. Censoring is the most suitable technique for achieving this aim through the lifetime experiments, where we observe some lifetimes or failure times and not all the lifetimes of the units under the test. There are different methods of censoring. One of the most popular types of censorship is type-II censoring where n items are placed on the lifetime test and the test is continued until the occurrence of the mth failure time, where 1mn. Progressive censoring of type-II (PTIIC) is the modified version of type-II censoring, where researchers can exclude some of the survived units during the experiment running. PTIIC can be explained as follows: Assume that n units are subjected to a lifespan test, and that m failures will be detected by the test's completion. When the initial failure occurs, R1 of the survived units are chosen at random and excluded from the test, when the second failure happens, R2 of the survived units are chosen at random and excluded from the test. This process will continue until the mth failure is obtained at that time the remaining survived units (nmR1R2Rm) are removed from the test. For extensive reading about PTIIC see [1,2], where they presented a variety of progressive censorship features.

    When the lifespan of an item is relatively ongoing and its testing establishments are few, but the testing units are inexpensive, one can test n×k units by storing them in sets of k, with each group tested as one unit. The lifespan test is then run by testing each of these unit sets separately until the point at which each set has its first failure. First-failure censoring is the term for this type of censorship, which was first developed by Balasooriya [3]. Different authors have conducted the study of the first-failure censoring, such as Wu et al. [4] and Wu and Yu [5]. Blending the first-failure censoring and PTIIC will result in the PFFC scheme, in which we test groups of units with the privilege of removing some survived groups of units during the test operation; this was contributed by Wu and Kus [6]. Different works have discussed the concept of PFFC; see [7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

    PFFC can be described as follows: Suppose a lifetime test is administered to n separate groups with k items in each group. Upon the occurrence of the first failure X(R1,R2,,Rm)1:m:n,k, R1 groups and the group exhibiting the first failure are arbitrarily eliminated from the test. At the occurrence of the second failure X(R1,R2,,Rm)2:m:n,k, R2 groups and the group exhibiting the second failure are arbitrarily eliminated from the test and so on until the mth failure X(R1,R2,,Rm)m:m:n,k is occurred. The unobserved groups

    Rm=nmR1R2Rm1

    are eliminated from the test. Then

    X(R1,R2,,Rm)1:m:n,k<<X(R1,R2,,Rm)m:m:n,k

    are called PFFC sample with the censoring scheme (R1,R2,,Rm), where n=m+mi=1Ri. Suppose that the failuretimes of the n×k units under the test follow a continuous distribution with CDF F(x) and PDF f(x), then the joint pdf for (X(R1,R2,,Rm)1:m:n,k,,X(R1,R2,,Rm)m:m:n,k) is defined as follows:

    fX1:m:n,,Xm:m:n(x1,x2,,xm)=I(n,m1)kmmi=1f(xi)[¯F(xi)]Ni,0<x1<<xm<, (1.1)

    where,

    I(n,m1)=n(nR11)(nR1R2Rm1m+1),
    Ni=kRi+k1.

    In mathematical statistics, recurrence relations are of great use in variety of domains as they reduce the number of direct computations quite considerably. They are also useful in obtaining the moment generating functions, moments and in characterizing distributions. Different authors have discussed the recurrence relations with characterizations: Aggarwala and Balakrishnan [14] obtained the RR for both product and single moments of PTIIRC from exponential distribution; El-Din et al. [15,16] derived RR of moments of the Gompertz and generalized Pareto distributions based on general PTIIRC with characterizations; Sadek et al. [17] discussed the characterization and the RR based on general PTIIRC; and El-Din and Sharawy [18] derived RR for the generalized exponential distribution based on general PTIIRC. However, no studies about the RR under the PFFC exist in the literature. In this paper, we derive the RR and characterizations for the KMIWD based on PFFC.

    A new contribution for enhancing the existing distributions has been added to the literature (see for example [19,20,21,22]). In 2015, Aryal and Elbatal [23] proposed a new modified distribution called the KMIWD. This is an extremely flexible model that approaches different distributions with different parameters. It has many applications in engineering, computer sciences and hydrology. The PDF of the KMIWD is given by

    f(x,a,b,α,β,θ)=ab(βx2+θαxα+1)exp[a(βx+θxα)]{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b1, (1.2)

    where,

    a,b,α,β,θ>0,x>0.

    The corresponding CDF of KMIWD is given by

    F(x,a,b,α,β,θ)=1{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b. (1.3)

    The relation between (1.2) and (1.3) is given by

    {exp[a(βx+θxα)]1}f(x)=ab(βx2+θαxα+1)[1F(x)]. (1.4)

    Many existence distributions can be obtained from the KMIWD by changing its parameters as follows in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Subdistributions that can be obtained from KMIWD.
    Case Values of parameters Distribution
    1 b=1 exponentiated modified inverse Weibull
    2 α=2 Kumaraswamy modified inverse Rayleigh
    3 α=1 Kumaraswamy inverse exponential
    4 β=0 Kumaraswamy inverse Weibull
    5 a=1 and b=1 the modified inverse Weibull
    6 a=1, b=1 and β=0 the inverse Weibull

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The ith single moment for Xq:m:n,k based on the PFFC is defined as follows

    μ(N1,,Nm)(i)q:m:n,k=E[X(N1,,Nm)q:m:n,k]i=I(n,m1)...0<x1<<xm<xiqkmf(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1
    ×f(x2)[¯F(x2)]N2f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxm, (1.5)

    while the ith and rth product moment for Xq:m:n,k and Xs:m:n,k (Xq:m:n,k<Xs:m:n,k) based on the PFFC has the following definition:

    μ(N1,,Nm)(i,r)q,s:m:n,k=E[X(N1,,Nm)iq:m:n,kX(N1,,Nm)rs:m:n,k]=I(n,m1)...0<x1<<xm<xiqxjskm
    ×f(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1f(x2)[¯F(x2)]N2f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxm. (1.6)

    Our paper is motivated by the unfortunate lack of literature on recurrence relations and characterization based on the PFFC, particularly under a significant and general distribution like the KMIWD. This is how the rest of the article is organized: In Section 2, both the single and product RR are obtained based on the PFFC. The characterizations are analyzed in Section 3. Finally, Section 4 concludes the proposed work in this article.

    In this section, we propose the single and product RR of KMIWD based on PFFC. In Theorem 2.1, we propose the recurrence relation associated with the single moment of PFFC.

    Theorem 2.1. For 2rm1,mn and i0, then

    h=0l=0(i1)(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl)r:m:n,k=(i1)abμ(N1,,Nm)(i)r:m:n,k
    +β(Nr+1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i1)r:m:n,k+θα(i1)(Nr+1iα2)μ(N1,,Nm)(iα2)r:m:n,k(nR1Rr1r+1)
    [βμ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,,Nm)(i1)r1:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,,Nm)(iα2)r1:m1:n,k]
    +(nR1Rrr)
    [βμ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(i1)r:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(iα2)r:m1:n,k]. (2.1)

    Proof. From (1.4) and (1.5), we get

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl)r:m:n,k1abμ(N1,,Nm)(i)r:m:n,k
    =I(n,m1)0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<kmW1(xr1,xr+1)f(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1f(xr1)
    ×[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmx1dxr1dxr+1dxm, (2.2)

    where,

    W1(xr1,xr+1)=xr+1xr1xir(βx2r+θαxα+1r)[¯F(xr)]Nr+1dxr. (2.3)

    Using integrating by parts, we get

    W1(xr1,xr+1)=βxi1r+1[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1βxi1r1[¯F(xr1)]Nr+1i1
    +θαxiα2r+1[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1θαxiα2r1[¯F(xr1)]Nr+1iα2
    +β(Nr+1i1)xr+1xr1xi1rf(xr)[¯F(xr)]Nrdxr+θα(Nr+1)iα2xr+1xr1xiα2rf(xr)[¯F(xr)]Nrdxr. (2.4)

    By substituting the obtained expression of W1(xr1,xr+1) from (2.4) in (2.2) and simplifying, yields (2.1). This brings the proof to a close.

    In the coming theorems, we discuss the product moments of PFFC.

    Theorem 2.2. For 1r<sm1,mn and i,j0,

    h=0l=0(i1)(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl,j)r:m:n,k=(i1)abμ(N1,,Nm)(i,j)r,s:m:n,k+β(Nr+1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i1,j)r,s:m:n,k
    +θα(i1)(Nr+1iα2)μ(N1,,Nm)(iα,j)r,s:m:n,k(nR1Rr1r+1)
    ×[βμ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(i1,j)r1,s1:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(iα2,j)r1,s1:m1:n,k]
    +(nR1R2Rrr)
    [βμ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(i1,j)r,s1:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(iα2,j)r,s1:m1:n,k]. (2.5)

    From (1.6), we get

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl,j)r:m:n,k1abμ(N1,,Nm)(i,j)r:m:n,k
    =[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm. (2.6)

    Substituting by the obtained expression of W1(xr1,xr+1) from (2.4) in (2.6) and simplifying, yields (2.5). This brings the proof for a close.

    Theorem 2.3. For 1r<sm1,mn and i,j0, then

    h=0l=0(j1)(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(i,jhαl)r:m:n,k=(j1)abμ(N1,,Nm)(i,j)r:m:n,k+β(Ns+1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i,j1)r,s:m:n,k
    +θα(j1)(Ns+1jα2)μ(N1,,Nm)(i,jα2)r,s:m:n,k(nR1Rs1s+1)
    ×[βμ(N1,,Ns2,(Ns1+Ns+1),Ns+1,Nm)(i,j1)r,s1:m1:n,k+(j1)θαjα2μ(N1,,Ns2,(Ns1+Ns+1),Ns+1,Nm)(i,jα2)r,s1:m1:n,k]
    +(nRp+1Rp+2Rss)
    [βμ(N1,,Ns1,(Ns+Ns+1+1),Ns+2,,Nm)(i,j1)r,s:m1:n,k+(j1)θαjα2μ(N1,,Ns1,(Ns+Ns+1+1),Ns+2,,Nm)(i,jα2)r,s:m1:n,k].

    Proof. The proof can easily derived similarly as in Theorem 2.2.

    During this section, we proposed the characterization of the KMIWD depending RR for PFFC.

    In Theorem 3.1, we discuss the characterization of the KMIWD.

    Theorem 3.1. Let X be a continuous variable with [¯F()=1F(.)]. Then X has KMIWD iff

    {exp[a(βx+θxα)]1}f(x)=ab(βx2+θαxα+1)[¯F(x)],x0. (3.1)

    Proof. Necessary direction: From (1.2) and (1.3), we can easily obtain (3.1).

    Sufficiency direction: Suppose that (3.1) is true, then we get

    d[¯F(x)]¯F(x)=ab(βx2+θαxα+1){exp[a(βx+θxα)]1}dx=ab(βx2+θαxα+1)exp[a(βx+θxα)]1exp[a(βx+θxα)]dx.

    By integrating, we get

    ln|¯F(x)|=bln|1exp[a(βx+θxα)]|+C,

    where C is an arbitrary constant.

    Now, we get C=0, when x=0.

    Therefore,

    ln|¯F(x)|=ln{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b.

    Hence,

    F(x)=1{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b.

    Which is the CDF of KMIWD. This brings the proof to a close.

    In Theorem 3.2, we discuss the characterization of the KMIWD depending on the single moment of PFFC.

    Theorem 3.2. With a survival function [¯F()], let X be a continuous random variable where X1:nX2:n ≤…≤Xn:n be a random ordered sample with size n. Then X has KMIWD iff for 2rm1,mn and i0,

    h=0l=0(i1)(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl)r:m:n,k=i1abμ(N1,,Nm)(i)r:m:n,k+β(Nr+1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i1)r:m:n,k
    +(i1)θα(Nr+1iα2)μ(kR1+k1,,kRm+k1)(iα2)r:m:n,k(nR1Rr1r+1)
    ×[βμ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(i1)r1:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(iα2)r1:m1:n,k]
    +(nR1Rrr)
    [βμ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(i1)r:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(iα2)r:m1:n,k]. (3.2)

    Proof. Necessary direction: Theorem 2.1 provides the proof for the necessary side for this theorem.

    Sufficiency direction: Assume that X be a random variable has a continous PDF f() and CDF F().

    Let (3.2) is satisfied, then we have:

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl)r:m:n,k=1abμ(N1,,Nm)(i)r:m:n,k+β(Nr+1i1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i1)r:m:n,k
    +θα(Nr+1iα2)μ(kR1+k1,,kRm+k1)(iα2)r:m:n,k(nR1Rr1r+1)
    ×[βi1μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(i1)r1:m1:n,k+θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(iα2)r1:m1:n,k]
    +(nR1Rrr)
    [βi1μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(i1)r:m1:n,k+θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(iα2)r:m1:n,k], (3.3)

    where,

    μ(N1,,Nm)(i1)r:m:n,k=I(n,m1)...0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<kmW2(xr1,xr+1)f(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1
    ×f(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm, (3.4)

    where,

    W2(xr1,xr+1)=xr+1xr1xi1rf(xr)[¯F(xr)]Nrdxr. (3.5)

    By integrating (3.5) by parts, we obtain

    W2(xr1,xr+1)=1Nr+1xi1r+1[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1+1Rr+1xi1r1[¯F(xr1)]Nr+1+i1Nr+1xr+1xr1xi2r[¯F(xr)]Nr+1dxr.

    Now by substituting in Eq (3.4), we get

    μ(N1,,Nm)(i1)r:m:n,k=i1Nr+1I(n,m1)...0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<kmf(x1)
    ×[¯F(x1)]N1xr+1xr1xi2r[¯F(xr)]Nr+1dxrf(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1
    f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm
    +I(n,m1)Nr+1...0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<xi1r1kmf(x1)
    ×[¯F(x1)]N1f(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1+Nr+1f(xr+1)
    ×[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm
    I(n,m1)Nr+1...0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<xi1r+1kmf(x1)
    ×[¯F(x1)]N1f(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr+1)
    ×[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+Nr+1+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm
    =I(n,m1)i1Nr+1...0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<kmf(x1)
    ×[¯F(x1)]N1xr+1xr1xi2r[¯F(xr)]Nr+1dxrf(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1
    f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm
    +(nR1Rrr)Nr+1μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,Nm)(i1)r:m1:n,k
    (nR1Rr1r+1)Nr+1μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,,Nm)(i1)r1:m1:n,k (3.7)

    and

    μ(N1,,kRm+k1)(iα2)r:m:n,k=I(n,m1)iα1kRr+k...0<x1<<xr1<xr+1<<xm<km
    ×f(x1)[1F(x1)]N1xr+1xr1xiα1r[¯F(xr)]Nr+1dxrf(xr1)
    ×[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxr1dxr+1dxm
    +(nR1Rrr)Nr+1μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(iα2)r:m1:n,k
    (nR1Rr1r+1)Nr+1μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr11+Nr+1),Nr+1,,Nm)(iα2)r1:m1:n,k. (3.8)

    Now by substituting for μ(N1,,Nm)(i1)r:m:n,k and μ(N1,,Nm)(iα2)r:m:n,k from (3.7) and (3.8) in (3.3), we obtain

    I(n,m1)...0<x1<<xm<xir[h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(hαl)r:m:n,k1]km
    ×f(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1f(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr)[¯F(xr)]Nr+1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1
    ×f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxm
    =I(n,m1)αθ2...0<x1<<xm<xir(βx2r+θαxα+1r)kmf(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1
    ×f(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1[¯F(xr)]Nr+1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxm.

    We get

    I(n,m1)...0<x1<<xm<xirf(xr)[¯F(xr)]Nr+1km
    ×{{exp[a(βx+θxα)]1}f(xr)(βx2r+θαxα1r)[¯F(xr)]}f(x1)[¯F(x1)]N1
    ×f(xr1)[¯F(xr1)]Nr1f(xr+1)[¯F(xr+1)]Nr+1f(xm)[¯F(xm)]Nmdx1dxm
    =0.

    Using Muntz-Szasz theorem in [24], we get

    [{exp[a(βx+θxα)]1}]f(xr)=(βx2r+θαxα+1r)[¯F(xr)].

    By Theorem 3.1, we obtain

    F(x)=1{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b.

    Which is the CDF of KMIWD. This brings the proof to a close.

    Special cases:

    (1) This theorem is going to hold for the PTIIRC when k=1,

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(R1,,Rm)(ihαl)r:m:n=1abμ(R1,,Rm)(i)r:m:n+β(Rr+1i1)μ(R1,,Rm)(i1)r:m:n
    +θα(Rr+1iα2)μ(R1,,Rm)(iα2)r:m:n(nR1Rr1r+1)
    [βi1μ(R1,,Rr1+Rr+1,,Rm)(i1)r1:m1:n+θαiα2μ(R1,,Rr1+Rr+1,,Rm)(iα2)r1:m1:n]
    +(nR1R2Rrr)
    [βi1μ(R1,,(Rr+Rr+1+1,,Rm)(i1)r:m1:n+θαiα2μ(R1,,Rr+Rr+1+1,,Rm)(iα2)r:m1:n].

    (2) For k=1 and r=m,

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(R1,,Rm)(ihαl)m:m:n=1abμ(R1,,Rm)(i)m:m:n+β(Rm+1i1)μ(R1,,Rm)(i1)m:m:n
    +θα(Rm+1iα2)μ(R1,,Rm)(iα2)m:m:n(nR1Rm1m+1)
    [βi1μ(R1,,Rm1+Rm+1)(i1)m1:m1:n+θαiα2μ(R1,,Rm1+Rm+1)(iα2)m1:m1:n].

    (3) For k=1 and 2mn,

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(R1,,Rm)(ihαl)1:m:n=1abμ(R1,,Rm)(i)1:m:n+β(R1+1i1)μ(R1,,Rm)(i1)1:m:n
    +θα(R1+1iα2)μ(R1,,Rm)(iα2)1:m:n(nR11)
    [βi1μ((R1+R2+1),R3,,Rm)(i1)1:m1:n+θαiα2μ((R1+R2+1),R3,,Rm)(iα2)1:m1:n].

    (4) For k=1,m=1 and n=1,2,,

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(n1)(ihαl)1:1:n=1abμ(n1)(i)1:1:n+(βi1)μ(n1)(i1)1:1:n+(θαiα2)μ(n1)(iα2)1:1:n.

    (5) For k=1,m=1,n=1 and R1==Rm=0,

    h=0l=0(aβ)h(aθ)labh!l!μ(ihαl)=μ(i)ab+βμ(i1)i1+θαμ(iα2)iα2,

    using Theorem 3.1 we get

    E(Xi)=ab!h=0l=0(1)h+l[aθ(h+1)]lh!l!(bh1)![β(αli)![aβ(h+1)]αl+1i+θα(αl+αi1)![aβ(h+1)]αl+αi].

    The mathematical expectation, variance, skewness and kurtosis of the KMIWD:

    Mean(X)=E(x),
    Variance(X)=E(x2)E2(x),
    Skewness(X)=E(x3)3E(x)E(x2)+2E3(x)Var32(x),
    Kurtosis(X)=E(x4)4E(x)E(x3)+6E(x2)E2(x)3E4(x)Var2(x).

    In this subsection, we characterize the KMIWD using product moments of PFFC.

    Theorem 3.3. Let X is a continuous random variable has a survival function [¯F()]. Let X1:n≤…≤Xn:n be a random ordered sample of size n. Then X has KMIWD iff, for 1r<sm1,mn and i,j0,

    h=0l=0(i1)(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(ihαl,j)r:m:n,k=(i1)abμ(N1,,Nm)(i,j)r,s:m:n,k
    +β(Nr+1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i1,j)r,s:m:n,k+(i1)θα(Nr+1iα2)μ(N1,,Nm)(iα2,j)r,s:m:n,k
    (nR1Rr1r+1)
    ×[βμ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,Nm)(i1,j)r1,s1:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr2,(Nr1+Nr+1),Nr+1,,Nm)(iα2,j)r1,s1:m1:n,k]
    +(nR1Rrr)
    [βμ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(i1,j)r,s1:m1:n,k+(i1)θαiα2μ(N1,,Nr1,(Nr+Nr+1+1),Nr+2,,Nm)(iα2,j)r,s1:m1:n,k]. (3.10)

    Proof. Necessary direction: Theorem2.2 leads to prove the necessary side for this theorem.

    Sufficiency direction: The proof is easily obtained as in Theorem 3.2, we derive the CDF of KMIWD as follows

    F(x)=1{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b.

    That is the CDF of KMIWD and the proof is now complete.

    Theorem 3.4. Let X be a random continuous variable having a survival function [¯F()]. Let X1:nX2:n ≤…≤Xn:n be a random ordered sample with size n having KMIWD iff, for 1r<sm1,mn and i,j0,

    h=0l=0(j1)(aβ)h(aθ)lh!l!μ(N1,,Nm)(i,jhαl)r:m:n,k=(j1)abμ(N1,,Nm)(i,j)r:m:n,k+β(Ns+1)μ(N1,,Nm)(i,j1)r,s:m:n,k
    +(j1)θα(Ns+1jα2)μ(N1,,Nm)(i,jα2)r,s:m:n,k(nR1Rs1s+1)
    ×[βμ(N1,,Ns2,(Ns1+Ns+1),Ns+1,Nm)(i,j1)r,s1:m1:n,k+(j1)θαjα2μ(N1,,Ns2,(Ns1+Ns+1),Ns+1,Nm)(i,jα2)r,s1:m1:n,k]
    +(nR1R2Rss)
    [βμ(N1,,Ns1,(Ns+Ns+1+1),Ns+2,,Nm)(i,j1)r,s:m1:n,k+(j1)θαjα2μ(N1,,Ns1,(Ns+Ns+1+1),Ns+2,,Nm)(i,jα2)r,s:m1:n,k]. (3.11)

    Proof. Necessary direction: Theorem 2.3 leads to prove the necessary side for this theorem.

    Sufficiency direction: The proof is easily obtained as well as in Theorem 3.2 we get the CDF of KMIWD as follows

    F(x)=1{1exp[a(βx+θxα)]}b.

    That is the CDF of KMIWD and the proof is now complete.

    In this research, some Recurrence relationships for single moments and for product moments of the PFFC data from the KMIWD have been established. Further, the characterization of the KMIWD have been studied. The results showed that for all censoring techniques and sample sizes, we can easily and recursively acquire both the single and product moments of any PFFC with direct computations which saves time, money and effort. Recurrence relationships for the product and single moments for different special cases have been obtained as the case of the progressive type-II censoring. Also, this work can be reduced to a special distribution, as shown in Table 1.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    We extend our gratitude to the referees for their useful comments which helped in improving the paper. Also, this research is supported by researchers supporting project number (RSPD2023R548), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

    There are no conflicts of interest declared by the authors.



    [1] N. Balakrishnan, R. Aggarwala, Progressive censoring: theory, methods, and applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2000. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1334-5
    [2] N. Balakrishnan, Progressive censoring methodology: an appraisal, Test, 16 (2007), 211–259. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-007-0061-y doi: 10.1007/s11749-007-0061-y
    [3] U. Balasooriya, Failure-censored reliability sampling plans for the exponential distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 52 (1995), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659508811684 doi: 10.1080/00949659508811684
    [4] J. W. Wu, W. L. Hung, C. H. Tsai, Estimation of the parameters of the Gompertz distribution under the first failure-censored sampling plan, Statistics, 37 (2003), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331880310001598864 doi: 10.1080/02331880310001598864
    [5] J. W. Wu, H. Y. Yu, Statistical inference about the shape parameter of the Burr type XII distribution under the failure-censored sampling plan, Appl. Math. Comput., 163 (2005), 443–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.02.019 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.02.019
    [6] S. J. Wu, C. Kuş, On estimation based on progressive first-failure-censored sampling, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 53 (2009), 3659–3670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.03.010
    [7] A. A. Soliman, A. H. A. Ellah, N. A. Abou-Elheggag, A. A. Modhesh, Estimation from Burr type XII distribution using progressive first-failure censored data, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 83 (2013), 2270–2290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2012.690157 doi: 10.1080/00949655.2012.690157
    [8] M. Dube, R. Garg, H. Krishna, On progressively first failure censored Lindley distribution, Comput. Stat., 31 (2016), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-015-0622-6 doi: 10.1007/s00180-015-0622-6
    [9] E. A. Ahmed, Estimation and prediction for the generalized inverted exponential distribution based on progressively first-failure-censored data with application, J. Appl. Stat., 44 (2017), 1576–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2016.1214692 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1214692
    [10] T. Kayal, Y. M. Tripathi, L. Wang, Inference for the Chen distribution under progressive first-failure censoring, J. Stat. Theory Pract., 13 (2019), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-019-0052-9 doi: 10.1007/s42519-019-0052-9
    [11] M. A. W. Mahmoud, M. G. M. Ghazal, H. M. M. Radwan, Bayesian estimation and optimal censoring of inverted generalized linear exponential distribution using progressive first failure censoring, Ann. Data Sci., 10 (2023), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-020-00259-z doi: 10.1007/s40745-020-00259-z
    [12] M. S. Kotb, A. Sharawy, M. M. M. El-Din, E-Bayesian estimation for Kumaraswamy distribution using progressive first failure censoring, Math. Modell. Eng. Probl., 5 (2021), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.080503
    [13] M. H. Abu-Moussa, N. Alsadat, A. Sharawy, On estimation of reliability functions for the extended Rayleigh distribution under progressive first-failure censoring model, Axioms, 12 (2023), 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070680 doi: 10.3390/axioms12070680
    [14] R. Aggarwala, N. Balakrishnan, Recurrence relations for single and product moments of progressive type-II right censored order statistics from exponential and truncated exponential distributions, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 48 (1996), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052331 doi: 10.1007/BF00052331
    [15] M. M. El-Din, A. Sadek, M. M. M. El-Din, A. M. Sharawy, Characterization for Gompertz distribution based on general progressively type-II right censored orderstatistics, Int. J. Adv. Stat. Probab., 5 (2017), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijasp.v5i1.7524 doi: 10.14419/ijasp.v5i1.7524
    [16] M. M. El-Din, A. Sadek, M. M. M. El-Din, A. M. Sharawy, Characterization of the generalized Pareto distribution by general progressively type-II right censored order statistics, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 25 (2017), 369–374. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2017.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.joems.2017.05.002
    [17] A. Sadek, M. M. M. El-Din, A. M. Sharawy, Characterization for generalized power function distribution using recurrence relations based on general progressively type-II right censored order statistics, J. Stat. Appl. Probab. Lett., 5 (2018), 7–12. http://doi.org/10.18576/jsapl/050102 doi: 10.18576/jsapl/050102
    [18] M. M. M. El-Din, A. M. Sharawy, Characterization for generalized exponential distribution, Math. Sci. Lett., 10 (2021), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.18576/msl/100103 doi: 10.18576/msl/100103
    [19] H. M. Alshanbari, A. A. A. H. El-Bagoury, A. M. Gemeay, E. H. Hafez, A. S. Eldeeb, A flexible extension of pareto distribution: properties and applications, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2021 (2021), 9819200. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9819200 doi: 10.1155/2021/9819200
    [20] A. Z. Afify, A. M. Gemeay, N. M. Alfaer, G. M. Cordeiro, E. H. Hafez, Power-modified kies-exponential distribution: properties, classical and Bayesian inference with an application to engineering data, Entropy, 24 (2022), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070883
    [21] H. M. Alshanbari, A. M. Gemeay, A. A. A. H. El-Bagoury, S. K. Khosa, E. H. Hafez, A. H. Muse, A novel extension of Fréchet distribution: application on real data and simulation, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 7917–7938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.013 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.013
    [22] N. Alsadat, A. Ahmad, M. Jallal, A. M. Gemeay, M. A. Meraou, E. Hussam, et al., The novel Kumaraswamy power Frechet distribution with data analysis related to diverse scientific areas, Alex. Eng. J., 70 (2023), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.03.003
    [23] G. Aryal, I. Elbatal, Kumaraswamy modified inverse Weibull distribution: theory and application, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 9 (2015), 651–660. http://doi.org/10.12785/amis/090213 doi: 10.12785/amis/090213
    [24] J. S. Hwang, G. D. Lin, Extensions of Muntz-Szasz theorem and applications, Analysis, 4 (1984). 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1524/anly.1984.4.12.143
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Qin Gong, Bin Yin, Pablo Martin Rodriguez, Statistical inference of entropy functions of generalized inverse exponential model under progressive type-II censoring test, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0311129, 10.1371/journal.pone.0311129
    2. Refah Alotaibi, Mazen Nassar, Zareen A. Khan, Ahmed Elshahhat, Analysis of Weibull progressively first-failure censored data with beta-binomial removals, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 24109, 10.3934/math.20241172
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1555) PDF downloads(57) Cited by(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog