On Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities within $ \psi $-Hilfer fractional generalized derivatives

Yasemin Başcı; Dumitru Baleanu; Yasemin Başcı; Dumitru Baleanu

doi:10.3934/math.2023716

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 6: 14008-14026. doi: 10.3934/math.2023716

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

On Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities within $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional generalized derivatives

Yasemin Başcı ^{1
,
,},
Dumitru Baleanu ^2,3,4

1.
Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Golkoy 14280, Bolu, Turkey
2.
Çankaya University, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ankara 06530, Turkey
3.
Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
4.
Institutes of Space Sciences Magurele-Bucharest, Romania

Received: 27 December 2022 Revised: 30 March 2023 Accepted: 03 April 2023 Published: 14 April 2023
MSC : 26A24, 26A33, 26B15

In this manuscript, we discussed various new Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities implying the left sided $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional derivatives with the general kernel. Our results are a generalization of the inequalities of Pečarić and Vuković ^[1]. Furthermore, using the specific cases of the $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional derivative, we proceed with wide class of fractional derivatives by selecting $\psi$ , $a_1$ , $b_1$ and considering the limit of the parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$ .

Keywords:

Citation: Yasemin Başcı, Dumitru Baleanu. On Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities within $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional generalized derivatives[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14008-14026. doi: 10.3934/math.2023716

Related Papers:

[1]	Xiaogang Liu, Muhammad Ahsan, Zohaib Zahid, Shuili Ren . Fault-tolerant edge metric dimension of certain families of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1140-1152. doi: 10.3934/math.2021069
[2]	Maryam Salem Alatawi, Ali Ahmad, Ali N. A. Koam, Sadia Husain, Muhammad Azeem . Computing vertex resolvability of benzenoid tripod structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6971-6983. doi: 10.3934/math.2022387
[3]	Pradeep Singh, Sahil Sharma, Sunny Kumar Sharma, Vijay Kumar Bhat . Metric dimension and edge metric dimension of windmill graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9138-9153. doi: 10.3934/math.2021531
[4]	Chenggang Huo, Humera Bashir, Zohaib Zahid, Yu Ming Chu . On the 2-metric resolvability of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6609-6619. doi: 10.3934/math.2020425
[5]	Meiqin Wei, Jun Yue, Xiaoyu zhu . On the edge metric dimension of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4459-4465. doi: 10.3934/math.2020286
[6]	Lyimo Sygbert Mhagama, Muhammad Faisal Nadeem, Mohamad Nazri Husin . On the edge metric dimension of some classes of cacti. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16422-16435. doi: 10.3934/math.2024795
[7]	Mohra Zayed, Ali Ahmad, Muhammad Faisal Nadeem, Muhammad Azeem . The comparative study of resolving parameters for a family of ladder networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16569-16589. doi: 10.3934/math.2022908
[8]	Dalal Awadh Alrowaili, Uzma Ahmad, Saira Hameeed, Muhammad Javaid . Graphs with mixed metric dimension three and related algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16708-16723. doi: 10.3934/math.2023854
[9]	Syed Ahtsham Ul Haq Bokhary, Zill-e-Shams, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . On the metric basis in wheels with consecutive missing spokes. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6221-6232. doi: 10.3934/math.2020400
[10]	Ahmed Alamer, Hassan Zafar, Muhammad Javaid . Study of modified prism networks via fractional metric dimension. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10864-10886. doi: 10.3934/math.2023551

Abstract

1. Introduction

The fractional derivatives with constant or variable order ^[3,9] are excellent mathematical tools for the description of memory and the hereditary properties of various processes and materials^[12,19]. In fractional calculus, these derivatives are defined through fractional integrals. There are several approaches to fractional derivatives including Riemann-Liouville ^[10,14,15], Caputo, Hadamard derivatives, ^[4,6,13,17].

Efforts have been dedicated to generalizations concerning mappings of bounded variation, absolute continuity, various classes of convex functions, and their extension to fractional calculus, involving Riemann-Liouville integrals and their generalizattions as referenced in ^[1,2,12,15].

In ^[8], the author proved some integral inequalities for functions whose $k$ th $(k\in\mathbb{N})$ derivatives are convex involving Caputo derivatives and obtain the following results for $a, \Delta\in I, a < \Delta, \, \alpha, \beta\in\mathbb{R},$ $\alpha, \beta\geq 1,$ and $\psi:I\to \mathbb{R}$ :

● If $\psi^{(k)}\, (k\in\mathbb{N})$ exists and is positive and convex, then

$\begin{align} &\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi(\xi)+(-1)^k\Gamma(k-\beta+1)^CD^{\beta-1}_{\Delta-}\psi(\xi) \\ &\leq (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}(a)+\psi^{(k)}(\xi)}{2} +(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1}\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(\xi)}{2}. \end{align}$

(1.1)

● If $\psi^{(k)}$ exists and is positive, convex and symmetric about $\frac{a +\Delta}{2},$ then

$\begin{align} & \frac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{k-\alpha+1}+\dfrac{1}{k-\beta+1}\right)\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right) \\ &\le \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\beta+1)^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\beta-1}\psi(\alpha)}{2(\Delta-a)^{k-\beta+1}}+(-1)^k\dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1) ^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha-1}\psi(\Delta)}{2(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}} \\ & \leq\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(a)}{2}. \end{align}$

(1.2)

In ^[11], the authors gave a version of Hadamard's inequality using the Caputo derivative. In ^[7], the authors proved Hadamard inequalities for strongly $\alpha, m$ -convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives. In this paper, we consider the Caputo derivatives of a real valued function $\psi$ whose derivatives $\psi^{(k)}\, (k \in \mathbb{N})$ are genaralized modified $h$ -convex. Some Caputo fractional versions of Hermite-Hadamard inequalities are obtained. From which particular cases are revealed, we have also established a new integral inequality between Caputo derivatives $^{C}D^{\alpha}_{.}\psi$ and the Riemann-Liouville integrals $R^{k-\alpha}_{.}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}.$ By deriving new differential inequalities in this context, we aim to extend the applicability of fractional calculus to problems involving generalized convex functions. These results have significance in various fields, including mathematics, physics, and engineering, where fractional calculus plays a crucial role in modeling complex phenomena with memory and long-range dependence.sts Our results generalize those cited in ^[8] and unify several classes of functions, like convex and $s$ -convex functions.

2. Preliminaries

This section deals with some definitions of convexity ^[2,5,8], generalized $h$ -convexity ^[20], fractional integrals and derivatives ^[6,18].

Let $I\subset\mathbb{R}$ be an interval and $h:[0, 1]\to (0, \infty), \, \psi:I \to (0, \infty)$ be two real valued functions, then

● $\psi$ is said to be $h$ -convex, if

$\begin{equation} \psi (\rho c + (1-\rho)d)\leq h(\rho) \psi (c)+h(1-\rho)\psi (d) \end{equation}$

(2.1)

holds for all $c, d \in I$ and $\rho\in (0, 1].$ If (2.1) is reversed, then $\psi$ is said to be $h$ -concave.

● The function $\psi$ is said to be modified $h$ -convex if

$\begin{equation} \psi (\rho c + (1-\rho)d)\leq h(\rho) \psi (c)+ (1- h(\rho))\psi (d). \end{equation}$

(2.2)

● The function $\psi$ is said to be generalized modified $h$ -convex if

$\begin{equation} \psi (\rho c + (1-\rho)d)\leq \psi (d)+ h(\rho) \theta(\psi (c),\psi (d)). \end{equation}$

(2.3)

Definition 2.1 (Additivity). ^[20] A continuous bifunction $\theta$ is said to be additive, if

$\theta(a_{1}, b_{1}) + \theta(a_{2}, b_{2}) = \theta(a_{1} + a_{2}, b_{1} + b_{2}),\quad \forall a_{1}, a_{2}, b_{1},b_{2 }\in\mathbb{R}.$

Definition 2.2 (Nonnegative homogeneity). ^[20] A continuous bifunction $\theta$ is said to be nonnegatively homogeneous if, for all $\lambda > 0,$

$\theta(\lambda a_{1},\lambda a_{2}) = \lambda \theta(a_{1}, a_{2}),\quad \forall a_1, a_{2} \in\mathbb{R}.$

Remark 2.1. For different functions $h, \theta$ one can obtain various classes of generalized modified convex functions:

● By taking in (2.1) $h(z) = z^{s} (0 < s\le 1),$ we have the definition of modified generalized $s$ -convex functions.

● If, we take $\theta(r, z) = r-z,$ then we obtain the definition of a modified $h$ -convex function.

Let $[a, \Delta]\, (-\infty < a < \Delta < +\infty)$ be a finite interval on the real axis $\mathbb{R}.$ For any function $\psi\in L_{1}([a, \Delta]),$ the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals $R^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}$ and $R^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}$ of order $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$ $(\alpha > 0)$ of $\psi$ are defined by

$\begin{equation} R^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{s}(s-t)^{\alpha-1}\psi(t)dt ,\quad s > a \quad (left) \end{equation}$

(2.4)

and

$\begin{equation} R^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\displaystyle {\int}_{s}^{\Delta}(t-s)^{\alpha-1} \psi(t)dt ,\,\,\, s < \Delta \quad (right), \end{equation}$

(2.5)

respectively. Here $\Gamma(\alpha) = {\int}_{0}^{\infty}\, t^{\alpha-1}\, e^{-t}\, dt, \; \alpha > 0$ is the gamma function. We set $R^{0}_{a+}\psi = R^{0}_{\Delta-}\psi = \psi.$

Let $[a, \Delta]$ be a finite interval of the real line $\mathbb{R}$ . Let $\alpha > 0, k\in\mathbb{N},$ $k = [\alpha]+1$ and $\psi\in AC^{k}([a, \Delta])$ ( $AC^{k}([a, \Delta])$ means the space of complex-valued functions $\psi(x)$ which have continuous derivatives up to order $k-1$ on $[a, b]$ such that $\psi^{(k-1)}(x) \in AC([a, \Delta]):$ i.e., absolutely continuous) see Lemma 2.4 ^[18]. The left and right Caputo fractional derivatives of order $\alpha\, (\alpha\ge 0)$ of $\psi$ are given by the following formulas (see ^[1,4,10,13])

$^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi(\xi) = \dfrac{1}{\Gamma(k-\alpha)}\displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\xi}\psi^{(k)}(t)(\xi-t)^{k-\alpha-1}dt,\qquad \xi > a$

and

$^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi(\xi) = \dfrac{(-1)^k}{\Gamma(k-\alpha)}\displaystyle {\int}_{\xi}^{\Delta}\psi^{(k)}(t)(t-\xi)^{k-\alpha-1}dt,\qquad \xi < \Delta,$

respectively.

If $\alpha = k\in\mathbb{N},$ then

$^CD^{\alpha}_{a+}\psi(\xi) = \psi^{(k)}(\xi) \quad \mbox{and}\quad ^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta-}\psi(\xi) = (-1)^k\, \psi^{(k)}(\xi).$

In particular, if $k = 1,$ $\alpha = 0,$ then

$^CD^{0}_{a_{+}}\psi(\xi) = ^CD^{0}_{\Delta_-}\psi(\xi) = \psi(\xi).$

Lemma 2.1. ^[16] The following formulas for Caputo fractional derivatives of order $\alpha > 0, k-1 < \alpha < k\, (k\in\mathbb{N})$ of a power function at $t = a$ and $t = b$ hold

$\begin{equation} ^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}(t-a)^{p} = \dfrac{\Gamma(p+1)}{\Gamma(p-\alpha+1)}(t-a)^{p-\alpha},\,\qquad t > a \end{equation}$

(2.6)

and

$\begin{equation} ^CD^{\alpha}_{b_-}(b-t)^{p} = \dfrac{\Gamma(p+1)}{\Gamma(p-\alpha+1)}(b-t)^{p-\alpha}, \,\qquad t < b. \end{equation}$

(2.7)

Our objective in this work, is to prove some fractional integral inequalities for functions whose $k$ th $(k \in\mathbb{N})$ derivatives are generalized modified $h$ -convex functions involving the Caputo derivative operator.

3. Results

Theorem 3.1. Let $I$ be an interval of $\mathbb{R},$ $a, \Delta\in I, a < \Delta$ and $\alpha, \beta > 0,$ such that $k-1 < \alpha, \beta < k, k\in\mathbb{N}.$ Let $\psi:I\to\mathbb{R}$ be differentiable function. If, $\psi^{(k)}(k\in\mathbb{N})$ exists and is a positive generalized modified $h$ -convex function and $\theta$ is a continuous bifunction, then the following integral inequality

$\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\,\left( ^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)+ (-1)^k\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left( ^C D^{\beta-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi) & &\\ \leq ( \Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1}\left[\psi^{(k)}(\xi)+\theta\,( \psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(\xi))\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right]& &\\ +\,(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}\left[\psi^{(k)}(\xi)+ \theta\,( \psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\xi))\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right] \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

holds.

Proof. For all $\xi\in[a, \Delta]$ and for all $t\in[a, \xi],$ we have

$\begin{equation} (\xi-t)^{k-\alpha}\leq(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}, \end{equation}$

(3.2)

and

$t = \frac{\xi-t}{\xi-a}a +\frac{t-a}{\xi-a}\xi.$

Since $\psi^{(k)}$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex, (2.3) implies that

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}(t)\leq \psi^{(k)}(\xi)+h\left( \frac{\xi-t}{\xi-a}\right)\theta\,(\psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\xi)). \end{equation}$

(3.3)

Multiplying inequalities (3.2) and (3.3) on both side and integrating, we obtain

$\begin{align} & \displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\xi}(\xi-t)^{k-\alpha}\, \psi^{(k)}(t)dt\\ &\leq \displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\xi}(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha} \times \left[ \psi^{(k)}(\xi)+h\left( \dfrac{\xi-t}{\xi-a}\right)\theta\,(\psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\xi)) \right] dt. \end{align}$

(3.4)

That is

$\begin{align} \Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi\right)(\xi)\leq(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1} \times \left[ \psi^{(k)}(\xi) +\theta\,( \psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\xi))\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right]. \end{align}$

(3.5)

Let $\xi\in [a, \Delta], t\in[\xi, \Delta],$ thus

$\begin{equation} (t-\xi)^{k-\beta}\leq(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta}. \end{equation}$

(3.6)

We have

$t = \frac{t-\xi}{\Delta-\xi}\Delta +\frac{\Delta-t}{\Delta-\xi}\xi.$

Since $\psi^{(k)}$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex on $[\alpha, \Delta],$ then

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}(t)\leq \psi^{(k)}(\xi)+ h\left( \dfrac{t-\xi}{\Delta-\xi}\right) \theta\,(\psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(\xi)). \end{equation}$

(3.7)

Similarly, we obtain

$\begin{align} (-1)^k\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left( ^C D^{\beta-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi)\leq(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1} \times \left[ \psi^{(k)}(\xi) + \theta\,( \psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(\xi))\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right]. \end{align}$

(3.8)

Adding (3.5) and (3.8), the claim follows. □

Corollary 3.1. If, we set $\alpha = \beta$ in (3.1), then we obtain

$\begin{align*} &\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left[\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi\right)(\xi)+(-1)^k\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right)(\xi)\right]\\ & \leq (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+1} \left[\psi^{(k)}(\xi)+\theta\left(\psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(\xi)\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right]\\ & + (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1} \left[\psi^{(k)}(\xi)+ \theta\left( \psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\xi)\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right]. \end{align*}$

Corollary 3.2. By setting $\theta\, (r, z) = r-z, h(t) = t^{s}, s\in[0, 1]$ in (3.1), we obtain

$\begin{align} &\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi\right)(\xi)+(-1)^k\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD^{\beta-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right)(\xi)\\ &\leq \dfrac{(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1}\,\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}\,\psi^{(k)}(a)}{s+1}\\ &+ \dfrac{(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1}}{s+1}\, s\,\psi^{(k)}(\xi). \end{align}$

(3.9)

In particular, if $h(z) = z,$ then we have

$\begin{align} &\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{\alpha_{+}}\psi\right)(\xi)+(-1)^k\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD^{\beta-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right)(\xi)\\ &\leq \dfrac{(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1}\,\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}\,\psi^{(k)}(a)}{2}\\ &+ \dfrac{(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta+1}}{2}\,\psi^{(k)}(\xi). \end{align}$

(3.10)

Taking $\alpha = \beta$ in (3.10), we obtain

$\begin{align} &\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left[\left( ^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)+(-1)^k\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right)(\xi)\right]\\ &\leq \dfrac{(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+1}\,\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}\psi^{(k)}(a)}{2}\\ &+ \dfrac{(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+1}}{2}\,\psi^{(k)}(\xi). \end{align}$

(3.11)

Example 3.1. Let $\psi:[a, \Delta]\to [0, \infty),$ $\psi(\xi) = \frac{2}{(k+2)!}(\xi-a) ^{k+2},$ $a < \xi\le \Delta.$ Let $h:[0, 1]\to (0, \infty),$ $h(t)\ge t,$ $\theta(x, y) = 2x+y.$ We verify easly that $\psi^{(k)}(\xi) = (\xi-a)^{2}$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex on $[a, \Delta].$ From Corollary 3.1 and Lemma 2.1, we obtain

$\begin{equation} lhs : = \Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left( ^CD^{\alpha-1}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi) = \frac{2(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+3}}{(k-\alpha+1)(k-\alpha+2)(k-\alpha+3)}, \end{equation}$

(3.12)

and

$\begin{align} rhs: & = (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1} \left[(\xi-a)^{2} +( 0+(\xi-a)^{2})\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right]\\ & = (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+3}\left( 1+\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right). \end{align}$

(3.13)

For the right derivative $\left(^CD^{\alpha-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi),$ we consider the function $\psi(\xi) = \frac{2(\Delta-\xi) ^{k+2}}{(k+2)!},$ $a\le \xi < \Delta.$

$\begin{equation} (-1)^{k}\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left( ^CD^{\alpha-1}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi) = \frac{2(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+3}}{(k-\alpha+1)(k-\alpha+2)(k-\alpha+3)} \end{equation}$

(3.14)

and

$\begin{equation} rhs: = (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+3}\left( 1+\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right). \end{equation}$

(3.15)

Now let $I$ be an interval of $\mathbb{R},$ $a, \Delta\in I, (a < \Delta)$ and $\alpha, \beta > 0,$ such that $k-1 < \alpha, \beta < k, (k\in\mathbb{N}).$ Let $\psi:I\to\mathbb{R}.$ Assume that $|\psi^{(k+1)}|$ is generalized modified $h$ - convex on $[a, \Delta].$

It is clear that for all $\xi\in [a, \Delta], t\in [a, \xi],$ we have

$\begin{equation} (\xi-t)^{k-\alpha}\leq (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha},\qquad t\in[a,\xi]. \end{equation}$

(3.16)

Since $|\psi^{(k+1)}|$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex, we have for $t\in[a, \xi],$

$\begin{eqnarray} \qquad \qquad \textbf{Lhs = }-\left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) h\left( \dfrac{t-a}{\xi-a} \right) \right]\\ \leq |\psi^{(k+1)}(t)|\leq |\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) h\left( \dfrac{t-a}{\xi-a} \right) = \textbf{Rhs}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.17)

Multiplying (3.16) by the Rhs of inequality (3.17) and integrating the resulting inequality over $[a, \xi],$ we obtain

$\begin{align} \displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\xi}(\xi-t)^{k-\alpha}\,\psi^{(k+1)}(t)dt \leq (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha} \left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+\theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right), \end{align}$

(3.18)

by integration by parts, we have

$\begin{align*} \displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\xi}(\xi-t)^{k-\alpha}\,\psi^{(k+1)}(t)dt & = \psi^{(k)}(t)(\xi-t)^{k-\alpha}\;|_a^\xi +(k-\alpha)\displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\xi}(\xi-t)^{k-\alpha-1}\,\psi^{(k)}(t)dt\\ & = \Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD^{\alpha}_{a+}\psi\right)(\xi) -\psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}. \end{align*}$

Hence

$\begin{align} & \Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left( ^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)-\psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha} \\ &\leq\left(\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)+\theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}. \end{align}$

(3.19)

In a similar way, if we proceed with the Lhs of (3.17) as we did for the Rhs, it follows that

$\begin{align} \psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}-\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)&\left( ^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)\\ &\leq \left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+\theta\left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)| \right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}. \end{align}$

(3.20)

From (3.19) and (3.20), we obtain

$\begin{align} |\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left( ^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)-\psi^{(k)}&(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}|\\ &\leq \left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+\theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}. \end{align}$

(3.21)

Doing the same for $t\in [\xi, \Delta]$ and $\beta > 0, k-1 < \beta < k,$ and taking into acount that $|\psi^{(k+1)}|$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex, we have

$\begin{align} \textbf{Lhs = } -&\left[ |\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) h\left( \dfrac{t-\xi}{\Delta-\xi}\right) \right] \\ &\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \leq \,\psi^{(k+1)}(t)\,\le \psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)+ \theta\left(|\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) h\left( \dfrac{t-\xi}{\Delta-\xi}\right) = \textbf{Rhs}. \end{align}$

(3.22)

Hence

$\begin{align} &|\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left( ^CD^{\beta}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi)-\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta}|\\ &\leq (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta} \times\left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right]. \end{align}$

(3.23)

Combine (3.21) and (3.23) via triangular inequality, and we obtain the double inequality

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left( ^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)+\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left( ^CD^{\beta}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi)\right.\\ \left. -\left(\psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta}\right)\right|& &\\ \le (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta}\left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right]& &\\ +\, (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha} \left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+\theta( |\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right]. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.24)

Which leads to the following result:

Theorem 3.2. Let $I$ be an interval of $\mathbb{R},$ $a, \Delta\in I\, (a < \Delta)$ and $\alpha, \beta > 0,$ such that $k-1 < \alpha, \beta < k,$ $(k\in\mathbb{N})$ . Let $\psi:I\to\mathbb{R}$ be a function such that $\psi\in AC^{k+1}.$ Assume that $|\psi^{(k+1)}|$ is a generalized modified $h$ -convex function and $\theta$ a continuous bifunction, then

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left( ^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right) (\xi)+\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left( ^CD^{\beta}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right) (\xi)\right.\\ \left. -\left(\psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta}\right)\right| & &\\ \le (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta}\left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right] & &\\ +\, (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha} \left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+\theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right] \end{eqnarray}$

(3.25)

holds.

As a consequences, we have

Corollary 3.3. If in (3.25), we set $\alpha = \beta,$ then

$\begin{align} &\left|\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)(^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi(\xi)+^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi(\xi)) - \left(\psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta) (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}\right)\right| \\ &\le (\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}\left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+ \theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \right] \\ &+\,(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}\left[|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|+\theta\left( |\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|,|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right] \end{align}$

(3.26)

holds.

Corollary 3.4. By taking $\theta(z, r) = z-r, h(t) = t^{s}, s\in [0, 1]$ in (3.26), we obtain

$\begin{align} |\Gamma(k-\alpha+&1)[\left(^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right)(\xi)+\left(^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right)(\xi)]- \left( \psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}\right) |\\& \leq \dfrac{s \left((\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}\right)|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|}{s+1} +\dfrac{(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}|\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}|\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|}{s+1}. \end{align}$

(3.27)

In particular for $s = 1,$ we have

$\begin{align} |\Gamma(k-\alpha+&1)[\left(^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi\right)(\xi)+\left(^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi\right)(\xi)] - \left( \psi^{(k)}(a)(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}\right) | \\ &\leq \dfrac{\left((\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}\right)|\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi)|}{2} +\, \dfrac{(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}|\psi^{(k+1)}(a)|+(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha}|\psi^{(k+1)}(\Delta)|}{2}. \end{align}$

(3.28)

Example 3.2. Let $\psi, h, \theta$ as in the Example 3.1. We verify easily that $\psi^{(k+1)}(\xi) = 2(\xi-a)$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex on $[a, \Delta].$ From Corollary 3.3 and Lemma 2.1, we obtain

$\begin{equation} lhs : = \Gamma(k-\alpha+1)^CD^{\alpha}_{a_{+}}\psi(\xi) = \frac{2(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+2}}{(k-\alpha+1)(k-\alpha+2)}, \end{equation}$

(3.29)

and

$\begin{align} \label{aex01} rhs: = (\xi-a)^{k-\alpha} \left[2(\xi-a) +( 0+2(\xi-a))\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right] = 2\,(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha+1}\left( 1+ \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right). \end{align}$

For the right derivative $^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi(\xi),$ we have

$\begin{equation} lhs: = (-1)^{k}\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)^CD^{\alpha}_{\Delta_-}\psi(\xi) = \frac{2(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+2}}{(k-\alpha+1)(k-\alpha+2)} \end{equation}$

(3.30)

and

$\begin{equation} rhs: = 2\,(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\alpha+1}\left( 1+\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right). \end{equation}$

(3.31)

Now suppose that $\psi : [a, \Delta]\to (0, \infty)$ is a generalized modified $h$ -convex function and symmetric about $\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2},$ then for all $\xi\in[a, \Delta]$ the inequality

$\begin{equation} \psi\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right) \leq \psi(\xi)\left( 1+h\left( \dfrac{1}{2}\right)\theta(1,1)\right) \quad \end{equation}$

(3.32)

is valid. Here $\theta$ is assumed to be nonnegatively homogeneous. Indeed, set

$r = a\dfrac{\xi-a}{\Delta-a}+\Delta\dfrac{\Delta-\xi}{\Delta-a},\quad z = \Delta\dfrac{\xi-a}{\Delta-a}+\alpha\dfrac{\Delta-\xi}{\Delta-a}.$

Hence

$\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2} = \dfrac{r}{2}+\dfrac{z}{2}.$

Since $\psi$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex, symmetric about $\frac{a+\Delta}{2},$ and the bifunction $\theta$ is assumed to be nonnegatively homogeneous, it results in

$\begin{eqnarray*} \psi\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2} \right) & = & \psi\left( \frac{r}{2}+\frac{z}{2}\right)\\ &\leq&\psi(z)+ h\left( \dfrac{1}{2}\right)\theta(\psi(r),\psi(z))\\ & = & \psi(\xi)+h\left( \dfrac{1}{2}\right)\theta(\psi(\xi),\psi(\xi)) \\ & = &\psi(\xi)\left( 1+h\left( \dfrac{1}{2}\right)\theta(1,1)\right). \end{eqnarray*}$

Theorem 3.3. Let $I$ be an interval of $\mathbb{R},$ $a, \Delta\in I$ $(a < \Delta)$ and $\alpha, \beta\geq 1,$ $k-1 < \alpha, \beta < k, k\in\mathbb{N}$ . Let $\psi:I\to \mathbb{R}$ be a real valued function such that $\psi\in AC^{k}.$ If $\psi^{(k)}$ is a positive, generalized modified $h$ -convex and symmetric about $\frac{a+\Delta}{2}$ and furthermore the bifunction $\theta$ is nonnegatively homogeneous, then the following inequality holds

$\begin{eqnarray} N_{\theta}^{-1} \left\lbrace\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\beta+1}+\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\alpha+1}\right\rbrace \leq \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\beta-1}\psi\right)(a)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\beta+1}}+ \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha-1}\psi\right)(\Delta )}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}}\\ \leq \psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(a)+ \left[\theta( \psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(a))+ \theta(\psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\Delta))\right]\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.33)

If, furthermore, $\theta$ is additive, then

$\begin{align} N_{\theta}^{-1} \left\lbrace\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\beta+1}+\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\alpha+1}\right\rbrace & \leq \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\beta-1}\psi\right)(\alpha)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\beta+1}}+ \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha-1}\psi\right)(\Delta )} {(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}} \\ &\leq M_{\theta} (\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(a)) \end{align}$

(3.34)

holds. Here

$N_{\theta} = 1+h\left( \dfrac{1}{2}\right)\theta(1,1),\; M_{\theta} = 1+\theta(1,1)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz.$

Proof. For all $\xi\in [a, \Delta], k-1 < \alpha < k,$ we have $\xi = \frac{\Delta-\xi}{\Delta-a}a +\frac{\xi-a}{\Delta-a}\Delta$ and

$\begin{equation} (\xi-\alpha)^{k-\alpha}\leq(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha} \end{equation}$

(3.35)

and $\psi^{(k)}$ satisfies

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}(\xi)\leq \psi^{(k)}(a)+h\left( \dfrac{\xi-a}{\Delta-a}\right) \theta\,(\psi^{(k)} (\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(a)). \end{equation}$

(3.36)

Multiplying (3.35) and (3.36) and proceeding as above, we obtain

$\begin{align} &\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{\Delta-}^{\alpha-1}\psi\right)(a) \\ &\leq \left[ \psi^{(k)}(a)+ \theta\left( \psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(a)\right) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right] \times\,(\Delta-\alpha)^{k-\alpha+1}. \end{align}$

(3.37)

Also, we have for $\xi\in [a, \Delta], k-1 < \beta < k,$

$\begin{equation} (\Delta -\xi)^{k-\beta}\leq (\Delta-a)^{k-\beta} \end{equation}$

(3.38)

and

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}(\xi)\leq \psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+h\left( \dfrac{\Delta-\xi}{\Delta-a}\right) \theta(\psi^{(k)} (a),\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)) . \end{equation}$

(3.39)

Multiplying (3.39) and (3.38) and integrating over $[a, \Delta],$ we get

$\begin{align} \Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\beta-1}\psi\right)(a)\leq \left[\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\theta\left( \psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)\right) \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz\right] (\Delta-a)^{k-\beta+1}. \end{align}$

(3.40)

Adding (3.37) and (3.40), we obtain

$\begin{align} &\dfrac{\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\beta-1}\psi\right)(\alpha)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\beta+1}}+ \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha-1}\psi\right)(\Delta )}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}} \end{align}$

(3.41)

$\begin{align} & \leq\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(a) +\,\left[\theta(\psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(a))+\theta(\psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\Delta))\right]\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz. \end{align}$

(3.42)

Set $N_{\theta} = 1+h\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\theta(1, 1),$ thus (3.32) is written as

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right) \leq N_{\theta}\,\psi^{(k)}(\xi), \quad \xi\in[a,\Delta]. \end{equation}$

(3.43)

Multiplying by $(\xi-a)^{k-\alpha}$ on both sides of (3.43) and integrating the result over $[a, \Delta],$ it results that

$\begin{equation} N_{\theta}^{-1}\,\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\alpha+1} \leq \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha-1}\psi\right)(a)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}}. \end{equation}$

(3.44)

Multiplying (3.43) by $(\Delta-\xi)^{k-\beta},$ and integrating over $[a, \Delta],$ we obtain

$\begin{equation} N_{\theta}^{-1}\dfrac{\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\beta+1}\leq \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\beta+1)\left(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\beta-1}\psi\right)(\Delta )}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\beta+1}}. \end{equation}$

(3.45)

Adding (3.44) and (3.45), we obtain the first inequality. By combining the resulting inequality with (3.41), we obtain (3.33). Using the fact that $\theta$ is additive and nonnegatively homogeneous (3.34) results. That proves the claim. □

Corollary 3.5. By taking $\alpha = \beta$ in (3.33), then

$\begin{eqnarray} N_{\theta}^{-1}\, \dfrac{2\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{k-\alpha+1}&\leq& \dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha-1} \psi(\Delta) +^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha-1}\psi(a)\right)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}}\\ &\leq& \psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(a)\\ &+& \left[\theta(\psi^{(k)}(\Delta),\psi^{(k)}(a))+\theta(\psi^{(k)}(a),\psi^{(k)}(\Delta))\right]\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}h(z)dz \end{eqnarray}$

(3.46)

holds.

If, $\theta$ is additive, then

$\begin{eqnarray} \dfrac{2N_{\theta}^{-1}\,\psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)} {k-\alpha+1} &\leq&\dfrac{\Gamma(k-\alpha+1)\left(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha-1}\psi(\Delta) + ^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha-1}\psi(a)\right)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}} \\ &\leq& M_{\theta}\,(\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)+\psi^{(k)}(a)). \end{eqnarray}$

(3.47)

Corollary 3.6. By setting $h(t) = t^{s}, s\in[0, 1]$ in (3.47), it results that

$\begin{align*} &\dfrac{2^{s}\psi^{(k)}\left(\frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{(2^{s}+\theta(1,1))(k-\alpha+1)} \\ &\leq \dfrac{\Gamma (k-\alpha+1)\left[ \left( ^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha+1}\psi\right) (a)+ \left( ^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha+1}\psi\right)(\Delta)\right] }{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}} \\& \leq \dfrac{\psi^{(k)}(a)+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)}{s+1}(s+1+\theta(1,1)). \end{align*}$

In particular, if $h(t) = t,$ then

$\begin{align*} & \dfrac{2\psi^{(k)}\left(\frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{(2+\theta(1,1))(k-\alpha+1)} \\ & \leq \dfrac{\Gamma (k-\alpha+1)\left[ \left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha+1}\psi\right) (a)+ \left( ^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha+1}\psi\right)(\Delta)\right] }{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha+1}} \\& \leq \dfrac{\psi^{(k)}(a)+\psi^{(k)}(\Delta)}{2}(2+\theta(1,1)). \end{align*}$

Theorem 3.4. Let $\psi\in AC^{k}(a, \Delta),$ $k\in N; k-1 < \alpha < k.$ Assume that $\psi^{(k)}$ is positive, generalized modified $h$ -convex on $[a, \Delta]$ and symmetric to $\dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}.$ Assume that $\theta$ is nonnegatively homogeneous. Then

$\begin{align} \frac{\psi^{(k)}\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{ 1+h(\frac{1}{2})\theta(1,1)} \left[ \left( ^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha}\psi\right)(a)+ \left( ^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha}\psi\right)(\Delta)\right] \le R_{\Delta-}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}( a)+ R_{a+}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\Delta) \end{align}$

(3.48)

holds. Where $R_{.}^{k-\alpha}$ is the Riemann-Liouville integral operator of order $k-\alpha.$

Proof. Since $\psi^{(k)}$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex and $\theta$ is nonnegatively homogeneous, then we have for $\mu\in [0, 1]$

$\begin{align} \psi^{(k)}\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right) & = \psi^{(k)}\left(\dfrac{\mu \Delta+(1-\mu )a + \mu a+(1-\mu)\Delta}{2}\right)\\ &\le \psi^{(k)}(\mu \Delta+(1-\mu )a )+ h(\frac{1}{2})\,\theta\,(\psi^{(k)}(\mu a+(1-\mu )\Delta ),\psi^{(k)}(\mu \Delta+(1-\mu )a)) \\ & = (\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\mu \Delta+(1-\mu )a )\left[ 1+h\left( \frac{1}{2}\right) \theta(1,1)\right] . \end{align}$

(3.49)

Multiplying (3.49) by $\mu^{k-\alpha-1}\psi^{(k)}(\mu \Delta+(1-\mu)a)$ and integrating over $[0, 1],$ with respect to $\mu,$ we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi^{(k)}\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}\mu^{k-\alpha-1}\psi^{(k)}( \mu \Delta+(1-\mu )a )d\mu = \frac{\psi^{(k)}\left( \frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha}}\Gamma(k-\alpha)(^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha}\psi)(\Delta), \end{eqnarray}$

and

$\begin{align*} & \left[ 1+h\left( \frac{1}{2}\right)\, \theta(1,1)\right]\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}\mu^{k-\alpha-1} (\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\mu \Delta+(1-\mu )a ) d\mu\\ & = \frac{ 1+h(\frac{1}{2})\theta(1,1)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha}}\displaystyle {\int}_{a}^{\Delta}(x-a)^{k-\alpha-1}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(x )dx\\ & = \left[ 1+h(\frac{1}{2})\theta(1,1)\right]\frac{\Gamma(k-\alpha)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha}} R_{a_{+}}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\Delta). \end{align*}$

Hence

$\begin{equation} \frac{\psi^{(k)}\left( \frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{ 1+h(\frac{1}{2})\theta(1,1)} (^{C}D_{a_{+}}^{\alpha}f)(\Delta) \le R_{a_{+}}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\Delta). \end{equation}$

(3.50)

And similarly

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right) \le \psi^{(k)}(\mu a +(1-\mu )\Delta )\left[ 1+h\left( \frac{1}{2}\right) \theta(1,1)\right] \end{equation}$

(3.51)

by multiplying (3.51) by $\mu^{k-\alpha-1}\psi^{(k)}(\mu a+(1-\mu)\Delta),$ integration yields to

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi^{(k)}\left( \frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}\mu^{k-\alpha-1}\psi^{(k)}(\mu a+(1-\mu )\Delta )d\mu = \frac{\psi^{(k)}\left( \frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)} {(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha}}\,\Gamma(k-\alpha)(^{C}D_{\Delta_-} ^{\alpha}\psi)(a) \end{eqnarray}$

and

$\begin{align} &\left[1+h\left( \frac{1}{2}\right)\, \theta(1,1)\right]\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}\mu^{k-\alpha-1}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\mu a +(1-\mu )\Delta ) d\mu\\ & = \left[1+h\left( \frac{1}{2}\right) \theta(1,1)\right]\frac{\Gamma(k-\alpha)}{(\Delta-a)^{k-\alpha}} R_{\Delta_-}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(a), \end{align}$

(3.52)

it results that

$\begin{equation} \frac{\psi^{(k)}\left( \frac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{ 1+h(\frac{1}{2})\,\theta(1,1)}\, (^{C}D_{\Delta-}^{\alpha}\psi)(a) \le \,R_{\Delta_-}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(a). \end{equation}$

(3.53)

By adding (3.50) and (3.53), we get (3.48). That proves the claim. □

Corollary 3.7. Under the same assumptions as Theorem 3.4, if $h(t) = t^{s}, s\in [0, 1],$ then

$\begin{eqnarray} \label{eca1} \frac{2^{s}\,\psi^{(k)}\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right)}{ 2^{s}+\theta(1,1)} \left[ \left( ^CD_{\Delta-}^{\alpha}\psi\right)(a)+ \left( ^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha}\psi\right)(\Delta)\right] \le R_{\Delta_-}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(a)+ R_{a+}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\Delta). \end{eqnarray}$

If $\theta(u, v) = -\theta(v, u)$ , then

$\begin{equation} \psi^{(k)}\left( \dfrac{a+\Delta}{2}\right) \left(^CD_{\Delta_-}^{\alpha}\psi(a) +^CD_{a_{+}}^{\alpha}\psi(\Delta) \right) \le R_{\Delta_-}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\alpha)+ R_{a_{+}}^{k-\alpha}(\psi^{(k)})^{2}(\Delta) \end{equation}$

(3.54)

is valid.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we have established some estimates including once the derivatives of Caputo and another time the integrals of Riemann-Liouville and the derivatives of Caputo for a function whose derivative order $k$ th $(k \in \mathbb{N})$ is generalized modified $h$ -convex and symmetrical in the middle. Estimates of consequences for special classes of convex functions and $s$ -convex functions in $[0, 1]$ were obtained. The estimates we have just made are compared to those presented in the results ^[8].

Future research could focus on extending these results to variable order or other types of convex functions or exploring inequalities for functions that do not necessarily have symmetry. Furthermore, the application of derived inequalities to concrete problems in applied mathematics, physics, or engineering could still validate the practical significance of our theoretical contributions. Taking these limitations into account could lead to a more complete understanding and wider applicability of fractional inequalities.

Author contributions

HB: conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing, supervision; MSS: conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing, supervision; HG: conceptualization, writing review and editing, supervision; UFG: funding, writing review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Acknowledgments

The work of U.F.-G. was supported by the government of the Basque Country for the ELKARTEK24/78 and ELKARTEK24/26 research programs, respectively.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

[1]	J. Pečarić, P. Vuković, Hilbert-Pachpatte-type inequality due to fractional differential inequalities, Ann. Univ. Craiova, Math. Comput. Sci. Ser., 41 (2014), 280–291.
[2]	G. W. Leibniz, Letter from Hanover, Germany to G.F.A. L'Hospital, September 30, 1695, In: Mathematische schriften, Olms-Verlag, Hildesheim, Germany, 1849,301–302.
[3]	G. W. Leibniz, Letter from Hanover, Germany to Johann Bernoulli, December 28, 1695, In: Mathematische schriften, Olms-Verlag, Hildesheim, Germany, 1962,226.
[4]	G. W. Leibniz, Letter from Hanover, Germany to John Wallis, May 30, 1697, In: Mathematische schriften, Olms-Verlag, Hildesheim, Germany, 1962, 25.
[5]	O. P. Agrawal, A general formulation and solution scheme for fractional optimal control problems, Nonlinear Dyn., 38 (2004), 323–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S11071-004-3764-6 doi: 10.1007/S11071-004-3764-6
[6]	T. M. Atanackovic, S. Pilipovic, B. Stankovic, D. Zorica, Fractional calculus with applications in mechanics: vibrations and diffusion processes, Wiley, London, Hoboken, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118577530
[7]	D. D. Bainov, P. S. Simeonov, Integral inequalities and applications, Springer Dordrecht, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8034-2
[8]	C. Bandle, L. Losonczi, A. Gilányi, Z. Páles, M. Plum, Inequalities and applications, Conference on inequalities and applications, Noszvaj (Hungary), September 2007, Birkhäuser Basel, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8773-0
[9]	S. Corlay, J. Lebovits, J. L. Véhel, Multifractional stochastic volatility models, Math. Finance, 24 (2014), 364–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12024 doi: 10.1111/mafi.12024
[10]	G. S. F. Frederico, D. F. M. Torres, Fractional conservation laws in optimal control theory, Nonlinear Dyn., 53 (2008), 215–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-007-9309-z doi: 10.1007/s11071-007-9309-z
[11]	R. Herrmann, Fractional calculus: an introduction for physicists, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2011.
[12]	A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, 1 Ed., North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2006.
[13]	R. L. Magin, C. Ingo, L. Colon-Perez, W. Triplett, T. H. Mareci, Characterization of anomalous diffusion in porous biological tissues using fractional order derivatives and entropy, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat., 178 (2013), 39–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.02.054 doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.02.054
[14]	R. L. Magin, Fractional calculus models of complex dynamics in biological tissues, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 1586–1593. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039
[15]	A. B. Malinowska, D. F. M. Torres, Generalized natural boundary conditions for fractional variational problems in terms of the Caputo derivative, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 3110–3116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.02.032 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.02.032
[16]	F. C. Meral, T. J. oyston, R. Magin, Fractional calculus in viscoelasticity: an experimental study, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 15 (2010), 939–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.05.004
[17]	F. S. Costa, J. C. S. Soares, A. R. G. Plata, E. C. de Oliveira, On the fractional Harry Dym equation, Comp. Appl. Math., 37 (2018), 2862–2876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0484-3 doi: 10.1007/s40314-017-0484-3
[18]	F. S. Costa, E. C. Grigoletto, J. Vaz Jr., E. C. de Oliveira, Slowing-down of neutrons: a fractional model, Commun. Appl. Ind. Math., 6 (2015).
[19]	A. K. Anatoly, Hadamard-type fractional calculus, J. Korean Math. Soc., 38 (2001), 1191–1204.
[20]	A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769.
[21]	A. Atangana, Derivative with a new parameter: theory, methods and applications, San Diego: Academic Press, 2015.
[22]	B. He, Y. Li, On several new inequalities close to Hilbert-Pachpatte's inequality, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 7 (2006), 154.
[23]	F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, D. Baleanu, Caputo-type modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2012 (2012), 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-142 doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2012-142
[24]	U. N. Katugampola, New approach to a generalized fractional integral, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.062 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.062
[25]	U. N. Katugampola, A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl., 6 (2014), 1–15.
[26]	S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives, theory and applications, Translated from the 1987 Russian original, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, 1993.
[27]	G. Anastassiou, M. R. Hooshmandasl, A. Ghasemi, F. Moftakharzahed, Montgomery identities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 10 (2009), 97.
[28]	Y. Başcı, D. Baleanu, Hardy-type inequalities within fractional derivatives without singular kernel, J. Inequal. Appl., 2018 (2018), 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1893-6 doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1893-6
[29]	Y. Başcı, D. Baleanu, New aspects of Opial-type integral inequalities, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1912-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1912-4
[30]	S. Iqbal, K. Krulić, J. Pečarić, Weighted Hardy-type inequalities for monotone convex functions with some applications, Fract. Differ. Calc., 3 (2013), 31–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.7153/fdc-03-03 doi: 10.7153/fdc-03-03
[31]	S. Iqbal, K. Krulić, J. Pečarić, On refined-type inequalities with fractional integrals and fractional derivatives, Math. Slovaca, 64 (2014), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.2478/s12175-014-0246-2 doi: 10.2478/s12175-014-0246-2
[32]	S. Iqbal, K. Krulić, J. Pečarić, On a new class of Hardy-type inequalities with fractional integrals and fractional derivatives, Rad Hazu. Math. Znan., 18 (2014), 91–106.
[33]	S. Iqbal, J. Pečarić, M. Samraiz, Z. Tomovski, Hardy-type inequalities for generalized fractional integral operators, Tbilisi Math. J., 10 (2017), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/tmj-2017-0005 doi: 10.1515/tmj-2017-0005
[34]	M. Z. Sarıkaya, H. Budak, New inequalities of Opial type for conformable fractional integrals, Turk. J. Math., 41 (2017), 1164–1173. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1606-91 doi: 10.3906/mat-1606-91
[35]	G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, G. Pólya, Inequalities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.
[36]	G. A. Anastassiou, Hilbert-Pachpatte type fractional integral inequalities, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 1539–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.059 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.059
[37]	G. A. Anastassiou, Hilfer-Polya, $\psi$ -Hilfer Ostrowski and $\psi$ -Hilfer-Hilbert-Pachpatte fractional inequalities, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 463. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym130304 doi: 10.3390/sym130304
[38]	S. S. Dragomir, Y. H. Kim, Hilbert-Pachpatte type integral inequalities and their improvement, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 4 (2003), 16.
[39]	M. Z. Gao, B. C. Yang, On the extended Hilbert's inequality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 126 (1998), 751–759.
[40]	G. D. Handley, J. J. Koliha, J. E. Pečarić, New Hilbert-Pachpatte type integral inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 257 (2001), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.7350 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7350
[41]	G. D. Handley, J. J. Koliha, J. E. Pečarić, A Hilbert type inequality, Tamkang J. Math., 31 (2000), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.5556/j.tkjm.31.2000.389 doi: 10.5556/j.tkjm.31.2000.389
[42]	K. Jichang, Note on new extensions of Hilbert's integral inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 235 (1999), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6373 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6373
[43]	K. Jichang, L. Debnath, On Hilbert type inequalities with non-conjugate parameters, Appl. Math. Lett., 22 (2009), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2008.07.010 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2008.07.010
[44]	J. Jin, L. Debnath, On a Hilbert-type linear series operator and its applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 371 (2010), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.06.002
[45]	M. Krnić, J. Pečarić, General Hilbert's and Hardy's inequalities, Math. Inequal. Appl., 8 (2005), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-08-04 doi: 10.7153/mia-08-04
[46]	Z. Lü, Some new inequalities similar to Hilbert-Pachpatte's type inequalities, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 4 (2003), 33.
[47]	B. G. Pachpatte, On some new inequalities similar to Hilbert's inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 226 (1998), 166–179.
[48]	B. G. Pachpatte, Inequalities similar to certain extensions of Hilbert's inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 243 (2000), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6646 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6646
[49]	M. Th. Rassias, B. Yang, On a Hilbert-type integral inequality in the whole plane with the equivalent forms, J. Math. Inequal., 13 (2019), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.7153/jmi-2019-13-23 doi: 10.7153/jmi-2019-13-23
[50]	M. Th. Rassias, B. Yang, A. Raigorodskii, A Hilbert-type integral inequality in the whole plane related to the arc tangent function, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13020351 doi: 10.3390/sym13020351
[51]	B. Yang, I. Brnetić, M. Krnić, J. Pečarić, Generalization of Hilbert and Hardy-Hilbert integral inequalities, Math. Inequal. Appl., 8 (2005), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-08-25 doi: 10.7153/mia-08-25
[52]	B. Yang, On new generalizations of Hilbert's inequality, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 248 (2000), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.6860 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.6860
[53]	B. Yang, A half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with a non-homogeneous kernel and two variables, Mediterr. J. Math., 10 (2013), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-012-0213-5 doi: 10.1007/s00009-012-0213-5
[54]	B. Yang, On a relation between Hilbert's inequality and a Hilbert-type inequality, Appl. Math. Lett., 21 (2008), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2007.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2007.06.001
[55]	B. Yang, D. Andrica, O. Bagdasar, M. Th. Rassias, An equivalent property of a Hilbert-type integral inequality and its applications, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math., 16 (2022), 548–563.
[56]	B. Yang, M. Th. Rassias, On Hilbert-type and Hardy-type integral inequalities and applications, Springer Cham, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29268-3
[57]	B. Yang, M. Th. Rassias, On extended Hardy-Hilbert integral inequalities and applications, World Scientific, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/13164
[58]	B. C. Yang, D. Andrica, O. Bagdasar, M. Th. Rassias, On a Hilbert-type integral inequality in the whole plane with the equivalent forms, Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A-Mat., 117 (2023), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-023-01388-9 doi: 10.1007/s13398-023-01388-9
[59]	W. Yang, Some new Hilbert-Pachpatte's inequalities, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 10 (2009), 26.
[60]	C. J. Zhao, Generalizations on two new Hilbert type inequalities, J. Math., 20 (2000), 413–416.
[61]	C. J. Zhao, L. Debnath, Some new inverse type Hilbert integral inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 262 (2001), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2001.7595 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7595
[62]	C. J. Zhao, Inequalities similar to Hilbert's inequality, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 861948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/861948 doi: 10.1155/2013/861948
[63]	C. J. Zhao, L. Y. Chen, W. S. Cheung, On some new Hilbert-type inequalities, Math. Slovaca, 61 (2011), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/s12175-010-0056-0 doi: 10.2478/s12175-010-0056-0
[64]	C. J. Zhao, L. Y. Chen, W. S. Cheung, On Hilbert-Pachpatte multiple integral inequalities, J. Inequal. Appl., 2010 (2010), 820857. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/820857 doi: 10.1155/2010/820857
[65]	C. J. Zhao, W. J. Cheung, On new Hilbert-Pachpatte type integral inequalities, Taiwan. J. Math., 14 (2010), 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500405943 doi: 10.11650/twjm/1500405943
[66]	C. J. Zhao, J. Pečarić, G. S. Leng, Inverses of some new inequalities similar to Hilbert's inequalities, Taiwan. J. Math., 10 (2006), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500403856 doi: 10.11650/twjm/1500403856
[67]	M. Krnić, N. Lovričević, J. Pečarić, Jensen's functional, its properties and applications, An. St. Univ. Ovidius Constanta, 20 (2012), 225–248.
[68]	J. V. da C. Sousa, E. C. de Oliveira, On the $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional derivative, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 60 (2017), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.005
[69]	J. V. da C. Sousa, E. C. de Oliveira, A Gronwall inequality and the Cauchy-type problem by means of $\psi$ -Hilfer operator, Differ. Equ. Appl., 11 (2019), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.7153/dea-2019-11-02 doi: 10.7153/dea-2019-11-02

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(1494) PDF downloads(51) Cited by(0)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

AIMS Mathematics

On Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities within $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional generalized derivatives

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Results

4. Conclusions

Author contributions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

On Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities within ψ \psi -Hilfer fractional generalized derivatives

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Results

4. Conclusions

Author contributions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

On Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities within $\psi$ -Hilfer fractional generalized derivatives