
In this paper, a unique and novel numerical approach—the fractional-order Caputo-Fabrizio derivative in the Caputo sense—is developed for the solution of fractional differential equations with a non-singular kernel. After converting the differential equation into its corresponding fractional integral equation, we used Simpson's 1/3 rule to estimate the fractional integral equation. A thorough study is then conducted to determine the convergence and stability of the suggested method. We undertake numerical experiments to corroborate our theoretical findings.
Citation: Sadia Arshad, Iram Saleem, Ali Akgül, Jianfei Huang, Yifa Tang, Sayed M Eldin. A novel numerical method for solving the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9535-9556. doi: 10.3934/math.2023481
[1] | Ibrahim-Elkhalil Ahmed, Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Doaa Atta, Meshari Alesemi . A fractional dual-phase-lag thermoelastic model for a solid half-space with changing thermophysical properties involving two-temperature and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6964-6992. doi: 10.3934/math.2024340 |
[2] | Kamal Shah, Muhammad Sher, Muhammad Sarwar, Thabet Abdeljawad . Analysis of a nonlinear problem involving discrete and proportional delay with application to Houseflies model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7321-7339. doi: 10.3934/math.2024355 |
[3] | Rabia Noureen, Muhammad Nawaz Naeem, Dumitru Baleanu, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Musawa Yahya Almusawa . Application of trigonometric B-spline functions for solving Caputo time fractional gas dynamics equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25343-25370. doi: 10.3934/math.20231293 |
[4] | Sara S. Alzaid, Pawan Kumar Shaw, Sunil Kumar . A study of Ralston's cubic convergence with the application of population growth model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11320-11344. doi: 10.3934/math.2022632 |
[5] | Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber . Chaos control and numerical solution of time-varying fractional Newton-Leipnik system using fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25863-25887. doi: 10.3934/math.20231319 |
[6] | Reetika Chawla, Komal Deswal, Devendra Kumar, Dumitru Baleanu . A novel finite difference based numerical approach for Modified Atangana- Baleanu Caputo derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17252-17268. doi: 10.3934/math.2022950 |
[7] | Shabir Ahmad, Aman Ullah, Ali Akgül, Manuel De la Sen . A study of fractional order Ambartsumian equation involving exponential decay kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9981-9997. doi: 10.3934/math.2021580 |
[8] | Abdelatif Boutiara, Mohammed M. Matar, Jehad Alzabut, Mohammad Esmael Samei, Hasib Khan . On $ \mathcal{A B C} $ coupled Langevin fractional differential equations constrained by Perov's fixed point in generalized Banach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 12109-12132. doi: 10.3934/math.2023610 |
[9] | Muath Awadalla, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Dowlath Fathima, Adnan Khan, Jihan Alahmadi . A mathematical fractional model of waves on Shallow water surfaces: The Korteweg-de Vries equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10561-10579. doi: 10.3934/math.2024516 |
[10] | M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Osama Y. Ababneh, Rasool Shah, Amjad khan, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Numerical analysis of fractional-order Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations with non-singular kernel operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2308-2336. doi: 10.3934/math.2023120 |
In this paper, a unique and novel numerical approach—the fractional-order Caputo-Fabrizio derivative in the Caputo sense—is developed for the solution of fractional differential equations with a non-singular kernel. After converting the differential equation into its corresponding fractional integral equation, we used Simpson's 1/3 rule to estimate the fractional integral equation. A thorough study is then conducted to determine the convergence and stability of the suggested method. We undertake numerical experiments to corroborate our theoretical findings.
Fractional calculus is primarily concerned with fractional integration and differentiation operations. It is an outstanding approach to situations where existing local operators are incapable of producing effective results, as it has been observed that the fractional order models are better matched with the real data than the classical integer-order derivatives [10,25]. The theory of fractional-order calculus was initially studied and further explored in the 18th and 19th centuries. One of the distinct features of fractional derivatives is their capacity to provide a pertinent and practical choice to model important physical problems. Many physical applications are not correctly modeled using the local differential operators. Therefore, the theory of the fractional-order derivative has attracted the attention of applied mathematicians to use fractional differential equations (FDEs) as a powerful tool in various areas, particularly in the fields of physics and engineering [11,47]. Fractional-order differential equations hold a strong foothold in some major domains, particularly in control theory [35], diffusion problems [55], control relaxation processes and viscous fluid flow [47], signal processing [45], dynamics ([34,56]) and bio-engineering [39]. In addition, fractional-order models applied in micro-grids [14] are used in wireless networks [67]. Similarly, in fractional calculus, fractional-order models provide unprecedented significance in studying the dynamics of biological systems [7,60]. Kilbas et al. addressed the theory of fractional differential equations and their applications [33].
Fractional derivative operators (FDOs) are significantly relevant to real data analysis, which has drawn great attention from various mathematicians and modelers in the applied sciences. A variety of fractional operators are widely used in the literature, although few of them are comparatively more common, including Riemann-Liouville, Hadamard, Weyl, ([50,53]), Caputo [22], and Jumarie ([28,29]). The kernel of the most commonly used fractional operators namely Caputo and Riemann-Liouville contains singularity, and hence, they may not always be able to express the non-locality of real-world situations properly. Thus, new fractional derivatives with nonsingular kernels have been defined in order to accurately model the nonlocal systems. Although fractional derivatives with singularity have many advantages, they are still not applicable in many situations. For example, the Caputo derivative requires higher regularity conditions for differentiation, and this is only classified for distinguishable functions. In the case of the Riemann-Liouville derivative, the constant refers to a non-zero value. The fractional-order Jumarie derivative will not exist if the function is discontinuous at the origin [8]. Researchers are investigating some more efficient fractional operators. To overcome the challenge of singularity and to find efficient and robust modeling results in recent years, a more efficient fractional-order Caputo-Fabrizio derivative has been introduced with the non-singular kernel by Caputo and Fabrizio. It is considered a constructive approach with the fact of transforming to integer power using Laplace transformation, therefore for some cases, we can easily calculate the exact solution [13]. The analysis of fractional operators and some of their new properties have been discussed in [51]. Major properties of the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative are presented in [36] and the progress of this newly introduced fractional operator is discussed in ([12,57]). To study more applications, we refer to ([21,58,59,61,62,63,64,65,66]). In contrast to ordinary integer derivatives, fractional-order derivatives have gained popularity in recent years as effective solutions to difficult problems.[26] proclaim that uncertain fractional-order Caputo derivatives produce outstanding outcomes in real financial markets. As experimental investigations and the relevant sensitivity analyses justified the author's claims. In another study [37], a novel uncertain fractional currency model is successfully developed and the Mittag-Leffler function is used to calculate the solution of the fractional differential equation using the Caputo derivative. The monotonicity theorem for UFDEs in the sense of Caputo is the central subject of the research [27]. A unique uncertain fractional order mean-reverting model is provided with a floating interest rate that better reflects the actual uncertain financial market. In order to determine the optimal solutions for a class of nonlinear programming problems, a fractional order mathematical model with the steepest descent path is given in [18]. A research [42] has developed an efficient numerical method, the iterative reproducing kernel algorithm, to generate numerical solutions to the fractional order Bernoulli and Riccati differential equations while taking the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative into account. Besides this, a method for solving fractional Volterra partial integro-differential equations utilizing the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative is presented in [15] as a new, effective approach. Using the Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto quadrature rule in combination with unique operational matrices, an effective technique is produced. Similarly, the exponential Euler difference form for fractional differential equations in the Caputo-Fabrizio sense with variable lags is established in [65]. The study demonstrates that the developed difference form falls within the umbrella of implicit Euler differences, and to resolve this implicit difference, the fractional PECE technique is then presented. Furthermore, to solve a group of cubic and quadratic logistic equations with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order derivatives in Hilbert space, a modified replicating kernel approach is presented in [16]. While analyzing the population growth model, the effects of the fractional order Caputo-Fabrizio are investigated in comparison to the conventional Caputo derivatives. The findings demonstrate that utilizing the novel Caputo Fabrizio derivative, the proposed sophisticated technique has numerous benefits in terms of stability. In another study [52], cylindrical geometry is used to explore the unsteady fractional advection-diffusion equation. The fractional order model of advection-diffusion employs the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional derivative. In order to deal with a class of fuzzy fractional differential equations containing the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, an improved numerical-analytical method is proposed in [23]. The outcomes demonstrate the precision and high caliber of the suggested approach, particularly in nonlinear situations. With the help of the Caputo-Fabrizio operator, the analytic-approximate solutions for the fractional Volterra integro-differential equations are examined in [64]. The analysis of the derived solutions shows that the methodology is suitable to handle numerous physical problems in the Caputo-Fabrizio sense. In [54] fractional order derivatives such as Captuo-Fabrizio, Caputo, and conformable fractions have been employed with the cubic B-spline approach to approximate polynomial solutions for fractional Painleve and Bagley-Torvik equations. Moreover, in [19], study has investigated the complex behaviour of the COVID-19 Omicron version using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional operators. The existence and singularity of the model's system of solutions have been discussed. Further, a numerical technique is developed by incorporating an exponential law kernel for the study and dynamical transmission of the virus. The outcome of the research showed that the fractional model of COVID-19 is reliable.
In further fractional literature, multiple major studies have been made by incorporating Caputo-Fabrizio models. In this context, a fractional-order reaction–diffusion model named the Allen Cahn model has been studied under Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives [46]. The effectiveness of the proposed numerical solutions of these modified models has been extended by utilizing the Crank-Nicholson scheme. Moreover, the Caputo-Fabrizio advection-diffusion equation is investigated in the half-plane using the Laplace transform in [40]. The particular solution of the diffusion process is computed against the Dirichlet problem. Similarly, basic and efficient solutions to the Cauchy and Dirichlet problems with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative for a heat conduction equation are investigated on a line segment in [9]. A nonlinear differential equation with the Caputo-Fabrizio operator in Banach spaces is investigated in [30] using the Banach contraction mapping principle, and further favorable conditions for its solution have been presented. Likewise, a fractional-order schistosomiasis disease model is analyzed with the help of an exponential law kernel as well as the Mittag-Leffler kernel in Liouville-Caputo sense [61]. Numerical simulations of the fractional SIR model with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative are formulated in [62] using an iterative scheme with Laplace transform. Besides this, with the help of fractional operators, mainly Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu a malarian model has been investigated in [3]. In [49], a fractional mathematical model is investigated numerically through the Genocchi collocation technique using the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. A nonlinear fractional order model of COVID-19 has been investigated by incorporating the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative due to the significance of modeling and regulating the COVID-19 pandemic in [44]. [31] considers the Mittag-Leffler kernel and the exponential decay kernel to investigate the Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers (KdV-B) partial differential equation (PDE) involving nonlocal operators. The existence of the solution of the KdV-B PDE for both fractional operators is proven using fixed point theorems of -type z contraction; further, the modified double Laplace transform is used to construct a series solution. In [32], the modified coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation is studied along with the fractional order derivatives of Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio with a time variable. The proposed model explains the nonlinear evolution of the waves caused by modest dispersion effects. Additionally, it has been found that the coupled system generates a wave solution that reveals the evolution of shock waves due to the steeping influence on temporal evolution. A viscous thermal Maxwell model utilizing the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative is studied in [1]. More specifically, they worked on fluidic-thermal transport via micro-tube when magnetic and electric fields were present. In this study, it has been claimed that the model's efficiency could be controlled by adjusting the fractional-order of the Caputo-Fabrizio operator.
Constructing numerical and analytical solutions for FDEs is a difficult task for many mathematicians. Many physical problems involving fractional models do not have existing exact solutions, so numerous researchers developed a keen interest in developing numerical solutions for fractional-order differential equations. A new scheme called, Adams-Bashforth with the Caputo-Fabrizio operator is constructed in [48] which consists of three steps to solve both fractional nonlinear and linear differential equations. Also, it has various applications in solving fractional-order chaotic systems. A fractional-order Caputo-Fabrizio derivative is used to analyze the surface waver model [5]. Researchers have proven the validity of the fixed point theorem for the solution of the modified system, and further, a particular solution for this system is derived with the help of the iterative method. The Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order Fokker-Planck equation is numerically solved using the "Ritz method" in [20]. Further, the coefficients of basis functions are obtained by solving a nonlinear algebraic system. [51] also derives the Legendre operational matrix based on Caputo-Fabrizio using the Tau method.
The study [4] presents the fractional mass-spring-damper system with Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives.[41] discusses the fractional dynamics of oxygen diffusion using the Laplace homotopy method, and the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and Liouville-Caputo operators are used to investigate the equation of oxygen dispersion across tissues. In addition, to visualize the useful application of the proposed scheme, they compared it with conventional methods. The Modified-Caputo-Fabrizio derivative is proposed in [63] to calculate the solution of fractional-order differential equations. Analytical solutions based on the homotopy analysis method (HAM) and the multi-step homotopy analysis method (MHAM) are explored. In [24] authors developed the fractional Euler method with the order of convergence one, to solve differential equations with fractional-order Caputo-Fabrizio operator and solve the HIV model using the proposed method. In [25] trapezoidal scheme is devised to find an efficient solution to the fractional differential equation using the Caputo-Fabrizio operator with convergence order two further, the stability and convergence of the derived method are analyzed. Motivated by this study, we developed Simpson's 1/3 method for solving fractional order differential equations with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with an order of accuracy of four in this paper. According to the authors' knowledge, there is no work on solving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations with Simpson's 1/3 method. The advantage of the proposed fractional Simpson's 1/3 method is that it has greater accuracy than existing methods and is easy to implement.
The following structure describes how this article is set up. In order to solve differential equations of fractional order, Section 2 presents a novel numerical method based on Simpson's 1/3 rule and incorporates the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. Section 3 discusses the constructed scheme's convergence and stability. Numerical tests in Section 4 are provided to confirm the reliability of our generated method.
In 2015, Caputo and Fabrizio succeeded in introducing the fractional order derivative Caputo-Fabrizio by replacing the singular kernel (z−ζ)−α with e(−α(z−ζ)1−α) in the Caputo derivative [13]. For z∈H1(a,b), 0<α<1, the α th–order Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and its corresponding integral of z(ζ), represented by CFDαz(ζ) and CFIαz(ζ) respectively are defined by
CFDαz(ζ):=11−α∫taexp[−α1−α(ζ−δ)]˙z(δ)dδ. | (2.1) |
CFIαz(ζ):=(1−α)z(ζ)+α∫ζaz(δ)dδ. | (2.2) |
In this section, we construct the fractional Simpson's 1/3 scheme to find out the solution to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations. The 1/3 Simpson rule is a closed scheme of numerical integration that approximates integration function with a quadratic polynomial. Taking into account, the following α order fractional differential equation
{CFDαz(ζ)=g(z(ζ)),a<ζ<b<∞,z(a)=z0, | (2.3) |
whereas g refers to a continuous vector function that successfully fulfills the Lipschitz condition
|g(z(ζ1))−g(z(ζ2))|≤L‖z(ζ1)−z(ζ2)‖,L>0. | (2.4) |
Applying Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator on Eq (2.3) and using Proposition 3 in [2], we get
z(ζ)=z0+CFIαg(z(ζ)),a<ζ<b<∞, |
Equation (2.2) yields
z(ζ)=z0+(1−α)g(z(ζ))+α∫ζag(z(s))ds. | (2.5) |
Theorem 2.1. [36] Let us suppose we have a continuous function g:[0,T]×R→R with 0<α<1,T>0 that meets the Lipschitz condition (2.4). The initial value problem (2.3) has a unique solution on C[0,T] for any given (γα+λαT)L<1, whereγα=2(1−α)(2−α)M(α),λα=2α(2−α)M(α).
First, we will use a second-degree polynomial P2 to approximate the integral function g in Eq (2.5), and the function will be evaluated at ζ0, ζ1, and ζ2, with ζ0<ζ1<ζ2. The interval is divided into two subintervals such as ζ1−ζ0=ζ2−ζ1=τ, for a total width of 2τ.The formula for an interpolant with a second-degree polynomial is given as follows:
I2g(z(ζ))=∫bag(z(ζ))dζ≈∫ζ2ζ0P2(z(ζ))dζ, |
this gives
I2g(z(ζ))=∫ζ2ζ0[(ζ−ζ1)(ζ−ζ2)(ζ0−ζ1)(ζ0−ζ2)g(z(ζ0))+(ζ−ζ0)(ζ−ζ2)(ζ1−ζ0)(ζ1−ζ2)g(z(ζ1))+(ζ−ζ0)(ζ−ζ1)(ζ2−ζ0)(ζ2−ζ1)g(z(ζ2))]dζ. |
Integrating the interpolant's first term, as we have, τ=ζ2−ζ02 and substituting "ζ=s+ζ0", gives us
∫ζ2ζ0(ζ−ζ1)(ζ−ζ2)(ζ0−ζ1)(ζ0−ζ2)dζ=12τ2∫ζ0+2τζ0(ζ−ζ1)(ζ−ζ2)dζ |
=12τ2∫2τ0(s+ζ0−ζ2)(s+ζ0−ζ1)ds |
=12τ2∫2τ0(s−2τ)(s−τ)ds |
=12τ2∫2τ0[s2−3τs+2τ2]ds |
=(12τ2)(2τ33)=τ3. |
After simplifying the rest of the terms, we have
I2(g)=τ3[g(z(ζ0))+4g(z(ζ1))+g(z(ζ2))]. | (2.6) |
Using Eq (2.5), we get
z(ζn)=z0+(1−α)g(z(ζn))+τ3[g(z(ζ0))+4g(z(ζ1))+g(z(ζ2))],n=0,1,2. |
The accuracy of the numerical integration can be considerably enhanced by subdividing the integration interval into smaller intervals and applying the quadrature rule to each pair of sub-intervals. For this, we divide [a,b] interval into n sub-intervals. This method is applicable when we have two adjacent sub-intervals at the same time. So, for even integer n≥2, we define
τ=b−an,tk=a+kτ,k=0,1,2,...,n. |
Applying Simpson's 1/3 rule to the sub-intervals [ζ2k,ζ2(k+1)], k=0,1,2,...,n−22 gives
In(g)=∫ζ2ζ0g(z(ζ))dζ+∫ζ4ζ2g(z(ζ))dζ+...+∫ζnζn−2g(z(ζ))dζ |
=n−22∑k=0∫ζ2k+2ζ2kg(z(ζ))dζ |
=n−22∑k=0(τ3[g(z(ζ2k))+4g(z(ζ2k+1))+g(z(ζ2k+2))]). |
Using Eq (2.5), we get the following Simpson's 1/3 rule for the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation (2.3):
zn+1=ζ0+(1−α)g(zn+1)+ατ3[g(z(ζ0))+4n∑i=2,4,6g(z(ζi))+2n−1∑j=1,3,5g(z(ζj))+g(z(ζn+1))],n=0,1,2,3,...,N−1. | (2.7) |
We refer zn as the approximate solution of z(ζn), then scheme (2.7) can be written as
zn+1=ζ0+(1−α)g(zn+1)+ατn+1∑k=0akg(zk),n=0,1,2,3,...,N−1, | (2.8) |
where the weights ak of fractional Simpson's 1/3 rule are given as follows:
ak={1/3,k=0,2/3,k=1,3,5,...,4/3,k=2,4,6,...1/3,k=n+1. |
In this section, we investigate the proposed numerical systems' convergence and stability. The symbol C denotes any general constant. To start with, we'll estimate the error.
Lemma 3.1. Take into account g(z(ζ))∈C4([a,b]), such that
| ∫ζn+1ζ0g(z(s))ds−ατn+1∑j=0ajg(ζj)|≤Cτ4, |
where C=(b−a)f(4)(δ)180,τ=b−aN, and ζk=a+τk,k=0,1,...,n+1 on [a,b].
Proof. The integrand function will be expanded about the midpoint ζ1 of the interval.
g(z(ζ))=g(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)g(1)(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)22!g(2)(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)33!g(3)(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)44!g(4)(δ(ζ)), |
where δ∈[ζ1,ζ], integrating the above equation, we get
∫bag(z(ζ))dζ=∫ζ1+τζ1−τ[g(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)g(1)(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)22!g(2)(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)33!g(3)(z1)+(ζ−ζ1)44!g(4)(δ(ζ))]dt=2τg(z1)+0.g(1)(z1)+2τ32⋅3g(2)(z1)+0.g(3)(z1)+2τ55⋅4!g(4)(δ1), |
we arrive
∫bag(z(ζ))dζ=2τg(z1)+τ33g(2)(z1)+τ560g(4)(δ1),δ1∈[a,b]. | (3.1) |
Similarly, using Taylor's series, expand the function about t1 at the endpoints of the interval
g(z0)=g(z1)−τg(1)(z1)+τ22!g(2)(z1)−τ33!g(3)(z1)+τ44!g(4)(δ2), |
g(z2)=g(z1)+τg(1)(z1)+τ22!g(2)(z1)+τ33!g(3)(z1)+τ44!g(4)(δ3). |
The above expressions for g(z0) and g(z2) are substituted into Eq (2.6) to get
I=τ3[6g(z(ζ1))+τ2g(2)(z1)+τ44!(g(4)(δ2)+g(4)(δ3))]. | (3.2) |
Let for a≤δ≤b,g4(δ)=max|(g(4)(δ(ζ)))|. Subtracting Eq (3.2) from Eq (3.1), we found the following integration error
E∼g(4)(δ)(τ560−τ536)=−τ590g(4)(δ). | (3.3) |
Hence, the error for composite Simpson's 1/3 rule is
En(g)=I(g)−In(g)=−n−22∑k=0τ590g(4)(δk)for someδk∈[ζ2k,ζ2k+2]=−τ590(n2)(2n)n−22∑k=0g(4)(δk)=−τ5180ng(4)(δ),δ∈[a,b], |
putting n=b−aτ generates
En(g)=−[(b−a)g(4)(δ)180]τ4,δ∈[a,b]. | (3.4) |
Hence
|En(g)|≤Cτ4. |
Theorem 3.2. Conditional stability exists for the newly constructed fractional numerical approach (2.8).
Proof. In order to prove the aforementioned statement, we use the technique of perturbation and perturb z0 and zn (n=0,1,2...,k+1) by ˜z0 and ˜zn. This process transforms our numerical scheme in the following way:
zn+1+˜zn+1=z0+˜z0+(1−α)g(zn+1+˜zn+1)+ατn+1∑k=0akg(zk+˜zk). | (3.5) |
From Eqs (2.8) and (3.5) we have
˜zn+1=˜z0+(1−α)[(g(zn+1+˜zn+1)−g(zn+1))]+ατn+1∑k=0ak[g(zk+˜zk)−g(zk)]. |
Using the triangle inequality and the Lipschitz condition with the fact that |ak|<1, we arrive
‖˜zn+1‖=‖˜z0+(1−α+ατ)[g(zn+1+˜zn+1)−g(zn+1)]+ατn∑k=0ak[g(zk+˜zk)−g(zk)]‖‖˜zn+1‖≤‖˜z0‖+(1−α+ατ)‖g(zn+1+˜zn+1)−g(zn+1)‖+ατn∑k=0‖g(zk+˜zk)−g(zk)‖‖˜zn+1‖≤‖˜z0‖+(1−α+ατ)L‖˜zn+1‖+ατLn∑k=0‖˜zk‖‖˜zn+1‖−(1−α+ατ)L‖˜zn+1‖≤‖˜z0‖+ατLn∑k=0‖˜zk‖(1−(1−α+ατ)L)‖˜zn+1‖≤‖˜z0‖+ατLn∑k=0‖˜zk‖ |
For all permissible variables α,τ,L with (1−α+ατ)L<1, we have
‖˜zn+1‖≤g(τ,α)‖˜z0‖+ατLg(τ,α)n∑k=0‖˜zk‖, |
where
g(τ,α)=11−(1−α+ατ)L. | (3.6) |
There is a constant Cτ for each sufficient τ
1<g(τ,α)<Cτ. |
Therefore,
‖˜zn+1‖≤Cτ‖˜z0‖+CτατLn∑k=0‖˜zk‖. |
Now using the Gröwnwall inequality [17], we have
‖˜zn+1‖≤C‖˜z0‖. |
Theorem 3.3. The newly constructed fractional numerical approach is conditionally convergent of order 4, that is (2.8).
‖z(ζn+1)−zn+1‖≤ˆCτ4. |
Proof. To demonstrate convergence, take into account the difference between the actual and approximate solution.
z(ζn+1)−zn+1=(1−α)(g(z(ζn+1))−g(zn+1))+α[∫ζn+10g(z(ζk)dζ−τn+1∑k=0akg(zk)]=(1−α)(g(z(ζn+1))−g(zn+1))+α[∫ζn+10g(z(ζk)dζ−τn+1∑k=0akg(z(ζk))]+ατn+1∑k=0ak[g(z(ζk))−g(zk)]. |
Applying triangle inequality, Lipschitz condition, and Lemma 3.1,
‖z(ζn+1)−zn+1‖≤(1−α)L‖z(ζn+1)−zn+1‖+αCτ4+ατLn+1∑k=0ak‖z(ζk)−zk‖=(1−α+ατ)L‖z(ζn+1)−zn+1‖+αCτ4+ατLn∑k=0ak‖z(ζk)−zk‖ |
using the fact 0≤ak<1, for all the permissible parameters α,τ,L such that (1−α+ατ)L<1, we have
‖z(ζn+1)−zn+1‖≤g(τ,α)αCτ4+ατLg(τ,α)n∑k=0‖z(ζk)−zk‖, |
where g(τ,α) is given in Eq (3.6), by using the Gröwnwall inequality, we have
‖z(ζn+1)−zn+1‖≤ˆCτ4, |
where ˆC=αCCτ.
In order to demonstrate the usefulness and coherence of the suggested numerical scheme, examples are provided in this section. In these instances, L2−norm is used to calculate the error.
ε(τ)=√τN−1∑n=1|z(ζn)−zn|2, | (4.1) |
where zn is the numerical solution and z(ζn) shows the exact solution. The order is computed using
O=log2(ε(2τ)/ε(τ)). |
Consider the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio differential equation shown below with z(0)=0.
CFD45z(ζ)=58e−4ζ−58+52ζ,ζ∈[a,b]. |
The exact solution is z(ζ)=ζ2. With the derived numerical scheme (2.8) we solve this problem for a=0, b=1. Comparison for α=0.8 and τ=1/100 between the solutions of the newly developed scheme and the exact solution is shown in Figure 1. We check the order of convergence by varying the step size from τ=1/10 to 1/10000. In Table 1, we identify the error for α=4/5, and it can be seen that error decreases with lowering the step size. We can examine the convergence rate from Table 1 which is compatible with our theoretical results.
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.8595 ×10−2 | |
1/100 | 1.8188 ×10−3 | 3.3539 |
1/1000 | 1.8322×10−4 | 3.3112 |
1/10000 | 1.8337×10−5 | 3.3207 |
Consider another fractional Caputo-Fabrizio fractional equation with initial condition z(0)=0.
CFD0.5z(ζ)=6ζ2−18ζ+19−19exp(−ζ),ζ∈[0,1]. |
z(ζ)=ζ3−32ζ2+12ζ is the exact solution. Figure 2 shows the comparison of the exact and approximate solution profiles obtained at α=0.5 and τ=1/100. We calculated the error and evaluated the convergence order by decreasing the time step size from τ=1/10 to 1/10000. Table 2 lists the error for fractional-order α=0.5, we can see that as the step size decreases, the error decreases. From Table 2, we can note that our numerical experiments are consistent with the theoretical analysis.
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 3.1692 ×10−3 | |
1/100 | 8.7282 ×10−5 | 5.1823 |
1/1000 | 7.800×10−6 | 3.4839 |
1/10000 | 7.8345×10−7 | 3.3157 |
Consider another fractional Caputo-Fabrizio fractional equation with initial condition z(0)=1.
CFDαz(ζ)=z(ζ)−h(ζ),ζ∈[0,1], |
where
h(ζ)=αexp(ζ)(−1+exp(ζ−1+α)). |
z(ζ)=ζexp(ζ) is the exact solution. The comparison of the exact and approximate solution profiles is depicted in Figure 3 at α=0.5 and τ=1/100. The error and evaluated the convergence order by decreasing the time step size from τ=1/10 to 1/10000 is presented in Table 3 for fractional-order α=0.5.
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.8307 ×10−1 | |
1/100 | 6.1131 ×10−3 | 4.9043 |
1/1000 | 5.9410×10−4 | 3.3631 |
1/10000 | 5.9238×10−5 | 3.3261 |
Consider another fractional Caputo-Fabrizio fractional equation with initial condition z(0)=1.
CFDαz(ζ)=2z(ζ)+g(ζ),ζ∈[0,1], |
where
g(ζ)=(α−α2−1)exp(αζα−1)−(1+2α(−1+α))(−1+2αζ)−α((1−3α+4α2)cos(ζ)+αsin(ζ))α+2α2(α−1). |
The exact solution is z(ζ)=ζ+cos(ζ). Table 4 shows the error and evaluated the convergence order by decreasing the time step size from τ=1/10 to 1/10000 for fractional-order α=0.9. Figure 4 compares the exact and approximated solutions for alpha=0.9 and tau=1/1000.
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 2.6850 ×10−1 | |
1/100 | 1.0907 ×10−2 | 4.6215 |
1/1000 | 6.9686×10−4 | 3.9682 |
1/10000 | 6.5394×10−7 | 3.4136 |
Taking into consideration the fractional order Malthusian growth model
CFDαP(ζ)=κP(ζ),0<α≤1, |
where P(ζ) denotes the population at time ζ and κ is a positive constant. The exact solution is
P(ζ)=P(0)1+κ(α−1)exp(ακζ1+κ(α−1)). |
Figure 5 depicts the population for different values of fractional-order 0<α≤1, with P(0)=1 and κ=1 for both approximate solution and exact solution. Figure 6 compares the exact and approximate solutions. Error and convergence order is given in Table 5.
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.7694 | |
1/100 | 1.9222 ×10−1 | 3.2024 |
1/1000 | 2.0803×10−2 | 3.2078 |
1/10000 | 3.1529×10−3 | 2.7220 |
Taking the fractional order blood alcohol model for 0<α,β≤1
{CFDαA(ζ)=−kα1A(ζ),CFDαB(ζ)=kβ1A(ζ)−kβ2B(ζ). |
where k1,k2 are constants in the positive range and A(ζ) indicates the amount of alcohol in the stomach, B(ζ) represents the amount of alcohol in the blood, The actual solution is
A(ζ)=A(0)1+kα1(α−1)exp(−αkα1ζ1+kα1(α−1)), |
B(ζ)=A(0)kβ1(kβ2β−kα1α)+kα1kβ2(β−α)[β+kα1(β−α)1+kα1(α−1)exp(−αkα1ζ1+kα1(α−1))−β1+kβ2(1−β)exp(−βkβ2ζ1+kβ2(1−β))]. |
The approximate solution of the fractional alcohol model for various fractional-order values of 0<α,β≤1, with A(0)=245.8769,B(0)=0 and k1=0.109456,k2=0.017727 is given in Figure 7. Moreover, a comparison between the estimated result and the actual data is presented in Figure 8 [38].
Consider the fractional order logistic model [6]
{CFDαy(ζ)=y(ζ).[1−y(ζ)],0<α≤1,y(0)=y0. |
The exact solution is [43]
y(ζ)−y2(ζ)(1−y(ζ))2/α=y0−y20(1−y0)2/α.eζ. |
Figures 9 plots the solution of Caputo-Fabrizio and Caputo logistic function with y(0)=1/2.
In this paper, we present a numerical technique to solve fractional differential equations precisely to the fourth order. It takes into account the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with a non-singular kernel for fractional-order α. The fractional differential equations are approximated numerically using Simpson's 1/3 rule. Theoretical simulations show that, under the given circumstances, the suggested system is conditionally stable and convergent. Finally, we draw the conclusion that the evidence shows that the numerical and analytical outcomes are generally in good accord.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
M. Abdulhameed, D. Vieru, R. Roslanc, Magnetohydrodynamic electroosmotic flow of Maxwell fluids with Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives through circular tubes, Comput. Math. Appl., 74 (2017), 2503–2519. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.07.040 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.07.040
![]() |
[2] |
T. Abdeljawad, D. Baleanu, On fractional derivatives with exponential kernel and their discrete versions, Rep. Math. Phys., 80 (2017), 11–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(17)30059-9 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(17)30059-9
![]() |
[3] |
H. Abboubakar, P. Kumar, N. A. Rangaig, S. Kumar, A malaria model with Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu derivatives, Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput., 12 (2021), 2150013. http://doi.org/10.1142/S1793962321500136 doi: 10.1142/S1793962321500136
![]() |
[4] |
J. F. G. Aguilar, H. Y. Martinez, C. C. Ramon, I. C. Ordunia, R. F. E. Jimenez, V. H. O. Peregrino, Modeling of a mass-spring-damper system by fractional derivatives with and without a singular Kernel, Entropy, 17 (2015), 6289–6303. http://doi.org/10.3390/e17096289 doi: 10.3390/e17096289
![]() |
[5] |
B. S. T. Alkahtani, A. Atangana, Controlling the wave movement on the surface of shallow water with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional order, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 89 (2016), 539–546. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.012
![]() |
[6] |
I. Area, J. J. Nieto, Fractional-order logistic differential equation with Mittag–Leffler-type kernel, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 273. http://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040273 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040273
![]() |
[7] |
S. Arshad, D. Baleanu, J. Huang, Y. Tang, M. M. Al Qurashi, Dynamical analysis of fractional order model of immunogenic tumors, Adv. Mech. Eng., 8 (2016), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016656704 doi: 10.1177/1687814016656704
![]() |
[8] |
A. Atangana, A. Secer, A note on fractional order derivatives and table of fractional derivatives of some special function, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 279681. http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/279681 doi: 10.1155/2013/279681
![]() |
[9] | D. Avci, M. Yavuz, N. Ozdemir, Fundamental solutions to the Cauchy and Dirichlet problems for a heat conduction equation equipped with the Caputo-Fabrizio differentiation, In: Heat conduction: methods, applications and research, Nova Science Publishers, 2019, 95–107. |
[10] | D. Baleanu, S. Arshad, A. Jajarmi, W. Shokat, F. A. Ghassabzade, M. Wali, Dynamical behaviours and stability analysis of a generalized fractional model with a real case study, J. Adv. Res., in press. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.010 |
[11] | M. Bologna, P. Grigolini, B. J. West, Physics of fractal operators, New York: Springer, 2003. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21746-8 |
[12] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, Applications of new time and spatial fractional derivatives with exponential kernels, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 2 (2016), 1–11. http://doi.org/10.18576/pfda/020101 doi: 10.18576/pfda/020101
![]() |
[13] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. http://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
![]() |
[14] |
S. Das, I. Pan, Kriging based surrogate modeling for fractional order control of microgrids, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 6 (2015), 36–44. http://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2336771 doi: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2336771
![]() |
[15] |
H. Dehestani, Y. Ordokhani, An efficient approach based on Legendre–Gauss–Lobatto quadrature and discrete shifted Hahn polynomials for solving Caputo–Fabrizio fractional Volterra partial integro-differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 403 (2022), 113851. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113851 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2021.113851
![]() |
[16] |
N. Djeddi, S. Hasan, M. Al-Smadi, S. Momani, Modified analytical approach for generalized quadratic and cubic logistic models with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 5111–5122. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.041 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.041
![]() |
[17] |
J. Dison, S. Mekee, Weakly singular discrete Gronwall inequalities, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 66 (1986), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19860661107 doi: 10.1002/zamm.19860661107
![]() |
[18] |
F. Evirgen, M. Yavuz, An alternative approach for nonlinear optimization problem with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, ITM Web Conf., 22 (2018), 01009. http://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20182201009 doi: 10.1051/itmconf/20182201009
![]() |
[19] |
M. Farman, H. Besbes, K. S. Nisar, M. Omri, Analysis and dynamical transmission of Covid-19 model by using Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 66 (2023), 597–606. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.026 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.026
![]() |
[20] |
M. A. Firoozjaee, H. Jafari, A. Lia, D. Baleanu, Numerical approach of Fokker-Planck equation with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative using Ritz approximation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 339 (2018), 367–373. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.05.022 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.05.022
![]() |
[21] |
J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, M. G. López-López, V. M. Alvarado-Martínez, J. Reyes-Reyes, M. Adam-Medina, Modeling diffusive transport with a fractional derivative without singular kernel, Physic A, 447 (2016), 467–481. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.066 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.066
![]() |
[22] |
A. Horani, R. Khalil, M. Sababheh, A. Yousef, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), 65–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002
![]() |
[23] |
N. Harrouche, S. Momani, S. Hasan, M. Al-Smadi, Computational algorithm for solving drug pharmacokinetic model under uncertainty with non-singular kernel type Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 4347–4362. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.016 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.016
![]() |
[24] |
A. Jajarmi, D. Baleanu, A new fractional analysis on the interaction of HIV with CD+4 T-cells, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 113 (2018), 221–229. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.009
![]() |
[25] |
A. Jajarmi, S. Arshad, D. Baleanu, A new fractional modelling and control strategy for the outbreak of dengue fever, Physica A, 535 (2019), 122524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122524 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122524
![]() |
[26] |
T. Jin, X. Yang, H. Xia, H. Ding, Reliability index and option pricing formulas of the first-hitting time model based on the uncertain fractional order differential equation with Caputo type, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21500122 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21500122
![]() |
[27] |
T. Jin, X. Yang, Monotonicity theorem for the uncertain fractional differential equation and application to uncertain financial market, Math. Comput. Simulat., 190 (2021), 203–221. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.05.018 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.05.018
![]() |
[28] |
G. Jumarie, On the solution of the stochastic differential equation of exponential growth driven by fractional Brownian motion, Appl. Math. Lett., 18 (2005), 817–826. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2004.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2004.09.012
![]() |
[29] |
G. Jumarie, Modified Riemann-Liouville derivative and fractional Taylor series of non-differentiable functions further results, Comput. Math. Appl., 51 (2006), 1367–1376. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.02.001
![]() |
[30] |
A. Keten, M. Yavuz, D. Baleanu, Nonlocal Cauchy problem via a fractional operator involving power kernel in Banach spaces, Fractal Fract., 3 (2019), 27. http://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract3020027 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract3020027
![]() |
[31] |
A. Khan, T. Akram, A. Khan, S. Ahmad, K. Nonlaopon, Investigation of time fractional nonlinear KdV-Burgers equation under fractional operators with non-singular kernels, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 1251–1268. http://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023063 doi: 10.3934/math.2023063
![]() |
[32] |
K. Khan, A. Ali, M. De la Sen, M. Irfan, Localized modes in time-fractional modified coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation with singular and non-singular kernels, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 1580–1602. http://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022092 doi: 10.3934/math.2022092
![]() |
[33] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, London and New York: Elsevier, 2006. |
[34] | J. Klafter, S. C. Lim, R. Metzler, Fractional dynamics: recent advances, Singapore: World Scientific, 2011. http://doi.org/10.1142/8087 |
[35] |
C. Li, J. Lu, J. Wang, Observer-based robust stabilisation of a class of non-linear fractional-order uncertain systems: an linear matrix inequalitie approach, IET Control Theory Appl., 6 (2012), 2757–2764. http://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0312 doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0312
![]() |
[36] |
J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015) 87–92. http://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010202 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010202
![]() |
[37] |
Q. Liu, T. Jin, M. Zhu, C. Tian, F. Li, D. Jiang, Uncertain currency option pricing based on the fractional differential equation in the Caputo sense, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 407. http://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6080407 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6080407
![]() |
[38] |
C. Ludwin, Blood alcohol content, Undergraduate Journal of Mathematical Modeling: One + Two, 3 (2011), 1. http://doi.org/10.5038/2326-3652.3.2.1 doi: 10.5038/2326-3652.3.2.1
![]() |
[39] |
R. L. Magin, Fractional calculus in bioengineering, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 32 (2006), 1–104. http://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v32.i1.10 doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v32.i1.10
![]() |
[40] |
I. A. Mirza, D. Vierub, Fundamental solutions to advection-diffusion equation with time-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.09.026 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.09.026
![]() |
[41] |
V. F. Morales-Delgado, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, K. M. Saad, M. A. Khan, P. Agarwal, Analytic solution for oxygen diffusion from capillary to tissues involving external force effects: A fractional calculus approach, Physica A, 523 (2019), 48–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.02.018 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.02.018
![]() |
[42] |
S. Momani, N. Djeddi, M. Al-Smadi, S. Al-Omari, Numerical investigation for Caputo-Fabrizio fractional Riccati and Bernoulli equations using iterative reproducing kernel method, Appl. Numer. Math., 170 (2021), 418–434. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2021.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2021.08.005
![]() |
[43] |
J. J. Nieto, Solution of a fractional logistic ordinary differential equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 123 (2022), 107568. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107568 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107568
![]() |
[44] |
S. Noeiaghdam, S. Micula, J. J. Nieto, A novel technique to control the accuracy of a nonlinear fractional order model of covid-19: Application of the CESTAC method and the CADNA library, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1321. http://doi.org/10.3390/math9121321 doi: 10.3390/math9121321
![]() |
[45] |
H. M. Ozaktas, O. Arikan, M. A. Kutay, G. Bozdagt, Digital computation of the fractional Fourier transform, IEEE Transactionson Signal Processing, 44 (1996), 2141–2150. http://doi.org/10.1109/78.536672 doi: 10.1109/78.536672
![]() |
[46] |
A. J. J. Obaid, Comparing the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional-order: Allen Cahn model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 89 (2016), 552–559. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026
![]() |
[47] | K. B. Oldham, J. Spanier, The fractional calculus, New York: Academic Press, 1974. |
[48] |
K. M. Owolabi, A. Atangana, Analysis and application of new fractional Adams-Bashforth scheme with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 105 (2017), 111–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.10.020 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.10.020
![]() |
[49] |
P. Pandey, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, M. K. A. Kaabar, Z. Sirid, A. A. Mousa, Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 pandemic in India using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Comput. Biol. Med., 145 (2022), 105518. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105518 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105518
![]() |
[50] | I. Podlubny, Geometric and physical interpretation of fractional integration and fractional differentiation, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 5 (2002), 367–386. |
[51] |
J. RongLoh, A. Isah, C. Phang, Y. T. Toh, On the new properties of Caputo-Fabrizio operator and its application in deriving shifted Legendre operational matrix, Appl. Numer. Math., 132 (2018), 138–153. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2018.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2018.05.016
![]() |
[52] |
Q. Rubbab, M. Nazeer, F. Ahmad, Y. Chu, M. I. Khan, S. Kadry, Numerical simulation of advection–diffusion equation with caputo-fabrizio time fractional derivative in cylindrical domains: Applications of pseudo-spectral collocation method, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 1731–1738. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.022 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.022
![]() |
[53] | S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Maritchev, Integrals and derivatives of the fractional order and some of their applications, (Russian), Minsk, Belarus: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1987. |
[54] |
L. Shi, S. Tayebi, O. A. Arqub, M. S. Osman, P. Agarwal, W. Mahamoud, et al., The novel cubic B-spline method for fractional Painleve and Bagley-Trovik equations in the Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio, and conformable fractional sense, Alex. Eng. J., 65 (2023), 413–426. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.039 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.039
![]() |
[55] |
W. R. Schneider, W. Wyess, Fractional diffusion and wave equations, J. Math. Phys., 30 (1989), 134–144. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.528578 doi: 10.1063/1.528578
![]() |
[56] | V. E. Tarasov, Fractional dynamics: applications of fractional calculus to dynamics of particles, fields and media, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14003-7 |
[57] |
X. Yang, H. M. Srivastava, J. A. M. Tenreiro, A new fractional derivative without singular kernel: application to the modelling of the steady heat flow, Thermal Sci., 20 (2016), 753–756. http://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI151224222Y doi: 10.2298/TSCI151224222Y
![]() |
[58] |
M. Yavuz, N. Özdemir, European vanilla option pricing model of fractional order without singular kernel, Fractal Fract., 2 (2018), 3. http://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract2010003 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract2010003
![]() |
[59] |
M. Yavuz, N. Özdemir, Comparing the new fractional derivative operators involving exponential and Mittag Leffler kernel, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. S, 13 (2020), 995–1006. http://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020058 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020058
![]() |
[60] |
T. A. Yıldız, S. Arshad, D. Baleanu, New observations on optimal cancer treatments for a fractional tumor growth model with and without singular kernel, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 117 (2018), 226–239. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.10.029 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.10.029
![]() |
[61] |
M. Yavuz, E. Bonyah, New approaches to the fractional dynamics of schistosomiasis disease model, Physica A, 525 (2019), 373–393. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.069 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.069
![]() |
[62] |
M. Yavuz, N. Ozdemir, Analysis of an epidemic spreading model with exponential decay law, Mathematical Sciences & Applications E-Notes, 8 (2020), 142–154. http://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.691638 doi: 10.36753/mathenot.691638
![]() |
[63] |
H. Yépez-Martínez, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, A new modified definition of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order derivative and their applications to the Multi Step Homotopy Analysis Method (MHAM), J. Comput. Appl. Math., 346 (2019), 247–260. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.07.023 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.07.023
![]() |
[64] |
F. Youbi, S. Momani, S. Hasan, M. Al-Smadi, Effective numerical technique for nonlinear Caputo-Fabrizio systems of fractional Volterra integro-differential equations in Hilbert space, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 1778–1786. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.086 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.086
![]() |
[65] |
T. Zhang, Y. Li, Exponential Euler scheme of multi-delay Caputo–Fabrizio fractional-order differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 124 (2022), 107709. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107709 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107709
![]() |
[66] |
D. Zhao, M. Luo, Representations of acting processes and memory effects: general fractional derivative and its application to theory of heat conduction with finite wave speeds, Appl. Math. Comput., 346 (2019), 531–544. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.10.037 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.10.037
![]() |
[67] |
A. Zappone, E. Jorswieck, Energy efficiency in wireless networks via fractional programming theory found, Trends Commun. Inf. Theory, 11 (2014), 185–396. http://doi.org/10.1561/0100000088 doi: 10.1561/0100000088
![]() |
1. | Nikhil Pachauri, Velamuri Suresh, MVV Prasad Kantipudi, Reem Alkanhel, Hanaa A. Abdallah, Multi-Drug Scheduling for Chemotherapy Using Fractional Order Internal Model Controller, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 1779, 10.3390/math11081779 | |
2. | Ahlem Benzahi, Nadjet Abada, Nouria Arar, Sahar Ahmed Idris, Mohammed S. Abdo, Wasfi Shatanawi, Caputo-Fabrizio type fractional differential equations with non-instantaneous impulses: Existence and stability results, 2024, 87, 11100168, 186, 10.1016/j.aej.2023.12.036 | |
3. | H. Çerdik Yaslan, Pell polynomial solution of the fractional differential equations in the Caputo–Fabrizio sense, 2024, 0019-5588, 10.1007/s13226-024-00684-3 | |
4. | Hassan Kamil Jassim, Mohammed Abdulshareef Hussein, Mohamed R. Ali, 2023, 2899, 0094-243X, 060008, 10.1063/5.0157148 | |
5. | Amine Moustafid, Cancer Modeling by Fractional Derivative Equation and Chemotherapy Stabilizing, 2024, 7, 2651-4001, 125, 10.33434/cams.1486049 | |
6. | Hassan Kamil Jassim, Ali Thamir Salman, Hijaz Ahmad, Muslim Yusif Zayir, Ali Hussein Shuaa, 2023, 2899, 0094-243X, 060007, 10.1063/5.0157146 | |
7. | Boyu Liu, Wenyan Wang, An efficient numerical scheme in reproducing kernel space for space fractional partial differential equations, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 33286, 10.3934/math.20241588 | |
8. | Emadidin Gahalla Mohmed Elmahdi, Yang Yi, Jianfei Huang, Two linearized difference schemes on graded meshes for the time-space fractional nonlinear diffusion-wave equation with an initial singularity, 2025, 100, 0031-8949, 015215, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad95c4 | |
9. | Jocelyn Sabatier, Fractional Dynamical Behaviour Modelling Using Convolution Models with Non-Singular Rational Kernels: Some Extensions in the Complex Domain, 2025, 9, 2504-3110, 79, 10.3390/fractalfract9020079 | |
10. | Junseok Kim, A normalized Caputo–Fabrizio fractional diffusion equation, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 6195, 10.3934/math.2025282 | |
11. | Barun Singh Katoch, Surjeet Singh Chauhan Gonder, 2025, 3283, 0094-243X, 040003, 10.1063/5.0265023 | |
12. | Manal Alqhtani, Lakhlifa Sadek, Khaled Mohammed Saad, The Mittag-Leffler–Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Derivative and Its Numerical Approach, 2025, 17, 2073-8994, 800, 10.3390/sym17050800 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.8595 ×10−2 | |
1/100 | 1.8188 ×10−3 | 3.3539 |
1/1000 | 1.8322×10−4 | 3.3112 |
1/10000 | 1.8337×10−5 | 3.3207 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 3.1692 ×10−3 | |
1/100 | 8.7282 ×10−5 | 5.1823 |
1/1000 | 7.800×10−6 | 3.4839 |
1/10000 | 7.8345×10−7 | 3.3157 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.8307 ×10−1 | |
1/100 | 6.1131 ×10−3 | 4.9043 |
1/1000 | 5.9410×10−4 | 3.3631 |
1/10000 | 5.9238×10−5 | 3.3261 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 2.6850 ×10−1 | |
1/100 | 1.0907 ×10−2 | 4.6215 |
1/1000 | 6.9686×10−4 | 3.9682 |
1/10000 | 6.5394×10−7 | 3.4136 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.7694 | |
1/100 | 1.9222 ×10−1 | 3.2024 |
1/1000 | 2.0803×10−2 | 3.2078 |
1/10000 | 3.1529×10−3 | 2.7220 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.8595 ×10−2 | |
1/100 | 1.8188 ×10−3 | 3.3539 |
1/1000 | 1.8322×10−4 | 3.3112 |
1/10000 | 1.8337×10−5 | 3.3207 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 3.1692 ×10−3 | |
1/100 | 8.7282 ×10−5 | 5.1823 |
1/1000 | 7.800×10−6 | 3.4839 |
1/10000 | 7.8345×10−7 | 3.3157 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.8307 ×10−1 | |
1/100 | 6.1131 ×10−3 | 4.9043 |
1/1000 | 5.9410×10−4 | 3.3631 |
1/10000 | 5.9238×10−5 | 3.3261 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 2.6850 ×10−1 | |
1/100 | 1.0907 ×10−2 | 4.6215 |
1/1000 | 6.9686×10−4 | 3.9682 |
1/10000 | 6.5394×10−7 | 3.4136 |
τ | E(τ) | order (O) |
1/10 | 1.7694 | |
1/100 | 1.9222 ×10−1 | 3.2024 |
1/1000 | 2.0803×10−2 | 3.2078 |
1/10000 | 3.1529×10−3 | 2.7220 |