
We investigated the leptospirosis epidemic model by using Caputo and Fabrizio fractional derivatives. Picard's successive iterative method and Sumudu transform are taken into consideration for developing the iterative solutions for the leptospirosis disease. Employing nonlinear functional analysis, the stability and uniqueness of the proposed model are established. Sensitivity analysis is taken into account to highlight the most sensitive parameters corresponding to the basic reproductive number. Various solutions to the proposed system have been interpolated by graphs with the application of Matlab software.
Citation: Amir Khan, Abdur Raouf, Rahat Zarin, Abdullahi Yusuf, Usa Wannasingha Humphries. Existence theory and numerical solution of leptospirosis disease model via exponential decay law[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8822-8846. doi: 10.3934/math.2022492
[1] | José Luis Díaz Palencia, Saeed ur Rahman, Antonio Naranjo Redondo . Analysis of travelling wave solutions for Eyring-Powell fluid formulated with a degenerate diffusivity and a Darcy-Forchheimer law. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15212-15233. doi: 10.3934/math.2022834 |
[2] | Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Hajid Alsubaie, Ayman A. Aly, Ahmed Alotaibi . A novel numerical dynamics of fractional derivatives involving singular and nonsingular kernels: designing a stochastic cholera epidemic model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3484-3522. doi: 10.3934/math.2023178 |
[3] | Parveen Kumar, Sunil Kumar, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Sara S. Alzaid . A robust numerical study on modified Lumpy skin disease model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22941-22985. doi: 10.3934/math.20241116 |
[4] | Noelia Bazarra, José R. Fernández, Jaime E. Muñoz-Rivera, Elena Ochoa, Ramón Quintanilla . Analytical and numerical analyses of a viscous strain gradient problem involving type Ⅱ thermoelasticity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 16998-17024. doi: 10.3934/math.2024825 |
[5] | Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Pushpendra Kumar, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Fractional-order dynamics of Chagas-HIV epidemic model with different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18897-18924. doi: 10.3934/math.20221041 |
[6] | Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz . Extension of Chaplygin's existence and uniqueness method for fractal-fractional nonlinear differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5763-5793. doi: 10.3934/math.2024280 |
[7] | Manal Alqhtani, Khaled M. Saad . Numerical solutions of space-fractional diffusion equations via the exponential decay kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6535-6549. doi: 10.3934/math.2022364 |
[8] | Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046 |
[9] | Abdon Atangana, Ali Akgül . Analysis of a derivative with two variable orders. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7274-7293. doi: 10.3934/math.2022406 |
[10] | Khaled zennir, Djamel Ouchenane, Abdelbaki Choucha, Mohamad Biomy . Well-posedness and stability for Bresse-Timoshenko type systems with thermodiffusion effects and nonlinear damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2704-2721. doi: 10.3934/math.2021164 |
We investigated the leptospirosis epidemic model by using Caputo and Fabrizio fractional derivatives. Picard's successive iterative method and Sumudu transform are taken into consideration for developing the iterative solutions for the leptospirosis disease. Employing nonlinear functional analysis, the stability and uniqueness of the proposed model are established. Sensitivity analysis is taken into account to highlight the most sensitive parameters corresponding to the basic reproductive number. Various solutions to the proposed system have been interpolated by graphs with the application of Matlab software.
Leptospirosis is a disease caused by infection with leptospira bacteria. These bacteria can be found worldwide in soil and water. There are many strains of leptospira bacteria that can cause disease. Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease, which means it can be spread from animals to people. Infection in people can cause flu-like symptoms and can cause liver or kidney disease. In the United States, most cases of human leptospirosis result from recreational activities involving water. Infection resulting from contact with an infected pet is much less common, but it is possible. Leptospirosis is more common in areas with warm climates and high annual rainfall but it can occur anywhere [1].
Signs of leptospirosis may include fever, shivering, muscle tenderness, reluctance to move, increased thirst, changes in the frequency or amount of urination, dehydration, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of appetite, lethargy, jaundice (yellowing of the skin and mucous membranes), or painful inflammation within the eyes. The disease can cause kidney failure with or without liver failure [2]. Leptospirosis is generally treated with antibiotics and supportive care. When treated early and aggressively, the chances for recovery are good but there is still a risk of permanent residual kidney or liver damage [3,4].
There are so many models proposed for the dynamics of humans [5,6,7,8,9,10,11] as well as vector populations [12,13]. To analyze the nature of leptospirosis, Pongsumpon [14] develop a mathematical model where they show the rate of change of both humans and rat populations. The population of humans is further split into two major groups: The juveniles and the adults. A dynamical model for leptospirosis transmission was considered by Triampo et al. [15]. In their work, they considered a number of leptospiroses infections in Thailand and worked on their numerical simulations. In [16], Zaman took the real data and studied the behavior of the theory optimal control.
The generalisation of the classical calculus is called fractional calculus. Mathematical models for the epidemic disease with integer order derivative was recently studies by the researchers [17,18,19,20]. But mathematical modelings with variable order derivatives give an advance knowledge of a system. Fractional order models are very capable to simulate the memory effects and crossover natures and gives a big degree of performance. Fractional mathematical modelings provides more insights about a epidemic under given circumstances [21,22,23,24]. Various non-classical type operators with non-singular and singular type kernels have been exemplified in the literature [25,26]. The successful applications of such non-classical operators can be seen in early literature and papers therein [27,28]. Early, only some leptospirosis models defined by variable order operators are given. The researchers in [29] proposed a mathematical structure for cancer and hepatitis co-dynamics in non-classical derivative and studied its outcomes.
Nowadays, the mathematical models involving fractional order derivative were given noticeable importance because they are more accurate and realistic as compared to the classical order models [30,31,32,33,34,35]. "Motivated by the advancement of fractional calculus, many researchers have focused to investigate the solutions of nonlinear differential equations with the fractional operator by developing quite a few analytical or numerical techniques to find approximate solutions [36,37,38,39,40]. These differential equations involves several fractional differential operators like Riemann-Liouville, Caputo, Hilfer etc." [41,42,43].
However, "these operators possess a power law kernel and have limitations in modeling physical problems. To overcome this difficulty, recently an alternate fractional differential operator having a kernel with exponential decay has been introduced by Caputo and Fabrizio [44]. This novel approach of fractional derivative is known as the Caputo-Fabrizio (C-F) operator which has attracted many research scholars due to the fact that it has a non-singular kernel. Also the C-F operator is most appropriate for modeling some class of real-world problem which follows the exponential decay law" [44]. With the passage of time, developing a mathematical model using the C-F fractional order derivative became a remarkable field of research. In recent times, several mathematicians were busy in development and simulation of CFFDE.
We develop a vector-host epidemic model in which the total population of the host (human) at time (t) is divided by susceptible Sh, infected Ih and recovered Rh humans. The population of vectors at time (t) is classified by susceptible Sv and infected Iv classes. The total amount of host is exemplified by Nh and the total amount of vectors are denoted by Nv. Here, Nh=Sh+Ih+Rh and Nv=Sv+Iv. The mathematical representation of the model is given by
{dSh(t)dt=b1−μhSh−β1ShIh−β2ShIv+λhRh,dIh(t)dt=β2ShIv+β1ShIh−μhIh−δhIh−γhIh,dRh(t)dt=γhIh−μhRh−λhRh,dSv(t)dt=b2−γvSv−β3SvIh,dIv(t)dt=β3SvIh−γvIv−δvIv. | (1.1) |
Here, b1 is the rate of recruitment in humans size, susceptible humans can get infection by two roots, one is direct transmission or via infectious individuals where β1 and β2 are the mediate transmission rates, μh is the natural mortality rate for hosts where γh is the rate of recovery of humans from the infection, δh disease death rate of infected humans due to disease, λh is the constant rate of humans immune, b2 recruitment rate for human density, δv is the mortality rate of vectors due to disease, β3 represent disease carrying due to susceptible vectors per host per unit time and γv is the natural mortality rate of vector.
Motivated by the above discussion, we modify the above model (1.1) by using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional operator, and the modified model is given as follow:
{CF0DαtSh(t)=b1−μhSh−β1ShIh−β2ShIv+λhRh,CF0DαtIh(t)=β2ShIv+β1ShIh−μhIh−δhIh−γhIh,CF0DαtRh(t)=γhIh−μhRh−λhRh,CF0DαtSv(t)=b2−γvSv−β3SvIh,CF0DαtIv(t)=β3SvIh−γvIv−δvIv. | (1.2) |
To exemplify the existence and uniqueness of equilibrium solutions of the given system, the number of novel results are utilized with the help of Sumudu transform. By equilibrium solutions existence, we are concluding the well-posedness of the given system.
Section 2 is devoted to some basic definitions regarding fractional operators. In section 3, the uniqueness of the solution is derived. Stability analysis of the given algorithm by the application of fixed point theorem is carried out in Section 4. Section 5 deals with the derivation of special solutions and numerical results for the model. The sensitivity of different parameters corresponding to basic reproduction is discussed in Section 6. Section 7 deals with the conclusion and future work.
Here we recall some definitions alongwith Caputo-Fabrizio operator of non-classical order which is defined with exponentially decay type kernel [44,45].
Definition 2.1. Assume ϕ∈G1(a,b), b>a, α∈(0,1), then the definition of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative of variable order is given by
CDαt(ϕ(t))=N(α)1−α∫taϕ′(x)exp[−αt−x1−α]dx, |
where N(α) is the normalization function with N(0)=N(1)=1. Also, when the function does not exist in G1(a,b), then the given operator can be defined by
CDαt(ϕ(t))=αN(α)1−α∫ta(ϕ(t)−ϕ(x))exp[−αt−x1−α]dx. |
Remark 2.1. If we fix ϵ=1−αα∈[0,∞), α=11+α∈[0,1], then the definition of given Caputo-Fabrizio variable order derivative is redefined by
CDαt(ϕ(t))=N(ϵ)ϵ∫taϕ′(x)exp[−t−xϵ]dx,N(0)=N(∞)=1. |
In addition,
limϵ→01ϵexp[−t−xϵ]=β(x−t). |
The related fractional Caputo-Fabrizio integral of the given derivative is simulated by Nieto and Losada [46] which is as follow:
Definition 2.2. For α∈(0,1), the integral of fractional order α of the function f is expressed by
CFIαt(ϕ(t))=2(1−α)(2−α)N(α)+2α(2−α)N(r)∫t0ϕ(s)ds,t≥0. | (2.1) |
Remark 2.2. It is to be noted that, according to the above definition, the function of order 0<r≤1, which is fractional integral of Caputo type is just average among mapping ψ and the integral of it of order 1. Therefore, that can be written as
2(1−α)(2−α)N(α)+2α(2−α)N(α)=1. | (2.2) |
The above expression will assumes the form as
N(α)=2(2−α),0≤α≤1. | (2.3) |
Nieto and Losada [46] rewrote that this Caputo-Fabrizio derivative of order 0<α<1 can be reformulated as
CDαt(ϕ(t))=11−α∫taϕ′(x)exp[−αt−x1−α]dx. | (2.4) |
Definition 2.3. The Sumudu transform of a mapping ϕ(t) defined on a set specified by
B={ϕ(t):thereexist Λ,ω1,ω2>0, |ϕ(t)|<Λexp(|t|ωi),ift∈(−1)j×[0,∞)}, | (2.5) |
is given by
H(u)=S[ϕ(t)]=∫∞0exp(−t)ϕ(ut)dt, u∈(−τ1,τ2). | (2.6) |
Definition 2.4. For the Caputo-type fractional operator of any function ϕ(t), the Sumudu transform is defined by
S[CDαϕ(t)]=u−α[H(u)−n∑i=0uα−i[CDα−i(ϕ(t))]t=0], n−1<α≤n. | (2.7) |
Similarly, the Sumudu transform for any function ϕ(t) in the sense of Caputo-Fabrizio operator is given as follow:
Definition 2.5. For any function ϕ(t) where the C-F derivative is defined, the Sumudu transform in a sense of C-F is expressed by
S(CF0Dαt)(ϕ(t))=N(α)S(ϕ(t))−ϕ(0)1−α+αu. | (2.8) |
In this section, we apply Sumudu transform to both sides of the model (1.2) using Picard's iterative mathod [22]:
N(α)S(Sh(t))−Sh(0)1−α+αu=S[b1−μhSh−β1ShIh−β2ShIv+λhRh],N(α)S(Ih(t))−Ih(0)1−α+αu=S[β2ShIv+β1ShIh−μhIh−δhIh−γhIh],N(α)S(Rh(t))−Rh(0)1−α+αu=S[γhIh−μhRh−λhRh],N(α)S(Sv(t))−Sv(0)1−α+αu=S[b2−γvSv−β3SvIh],N(α)S(Iv(t))−Iv(0)1−α+αu=S[β3SvIh−γvIv−δvIv]. | (3.1) |
Rearranging, we get
S(Sh(t))=Sh(0)+(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhSh−β1ShIh−β2ShIv+λhRh],S(Ih(t))=Ih(0)+(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β2ShIv+β1ShIh−μhIh−δhIh−γhIh],S(Rh(t))=Rh(0)+(1−α+αu)N(α)S[γhIh−μhRh−λhRh],S(Sv(t))=Sv(0)+(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b2−γvSv−β3SvIh],S(Iv(t))=Iv(0)+(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β3SvIh−γvIv−δvIv]. | (3.2) |
By operating every side of Eq (3.2) by the inverse of Sumudu transform, we obtain
Sh(t)=Sh(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhSh−β1ShIh−β2ShIv+λhRh],Ih(t)=Ih(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β2ShIv+β1ShIh−μhIh−δhIh−γhIh],Rh(t)=Rh(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[γhIh−μhRh−λhRh],Sv(t)=Sv(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b2−γvSv−β3SvIh],Iv(t)=Iv(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β3SvIh−γvIv−δvIv]. | (3.3) |
The recursive formula for given model can be exemplified by
Sh(n+1)(t)=Sh(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhSh(n)−β1Sh(n)Ih(n)−β2Sh(n)Iv(n)+λhRh(n)],Ih(n+1)(t)=Ih(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β2Sh(n)Iv(n)+β1Sh(n)Ih(n)−μhIh(n)−δhIh(n)−γhIh(n)],Rh(n+1)(t)=Rh(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[γhIh(n)−μhRh(n)−λhRh(n)],Sv(n+1)(t)=Sv(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b2−γvSv(n)−β3Sv(n)Ih(n)],Iv(n+1)(t)=Iv(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β3Sv(n)Ih(n)−γvIv(n)−δvIv(n)]. | (3.4) |
The solution of (3.4) is expressed as
Sh(t)=limn→∞Sh(n)(t),Ih(t)=limn→∞Ih(n)(t),Rh(t)=limn→∞Rh(n)(t),Sv(t)=limn→∞Sh(n)(t),Iv(t)=limn→∞Ih(n)(t). |
For simulating the given model (3.4), we use following values Sh=1.2, Ih=2.8, Rh=1.3, Sv=2.8, Iv=1.15, b1=0.121, μh=0.0121, β1=0.14, β2=0.02, β3=0.10, λh=1, δh=0.8, γh=0.25, b2=0.002, γv=0.23, δv=0.001. Then
Sh1(t)=1.2−3.04N(α)((1−α)+αt), |
Ih1(t)=2.8+5.65N(α)((1−α)+αt), |
Rh1(t)=1.3−1.23N(α)((1−α)+αt), |
Sv1(t)=2.8−5.65N(α)((1−α)+αt), |
Iv1(t)=1.15+0.043N(α)((1−α)+αt). |
{Sh2(t)=1.2−3.04N(α)(1−α)−(1−α)[3.04N(α))2−18.64N(α))3(1−α)+2.25N(α))3(1−α)2]t−[3.04α2N(α))2−18.64N(α))3]t2,Ih2(t)=2.8+5.65N(α)((1−α)+(1−α)[5.97N(α))−6.83N(α))2(1−α)+7.25N(α))3(1−2α)]t+α[5.972N(α))−6.83N(α))2(1−α)+2.125N(α))3(1−α)(2−α)]t2,Rh2(t)=1.3−1.23N(α)((1−α)−(1−α)[1.23N(α))−1.82N(α)(1−α)+0.5983N(α)(1−α)2]t−α[1.32N(α))−1.412N(α))(1−α)+0.8974N(α))2(1−α)2]t2,Sv2(t)=2.8+5.65N(α)(1−α)+(1−α)[5.65N(α)−1.22N(α))2(1−α)−0.5984N(α))2(1+α2−2α)2]t+[1.521αN(α))−1.51N(α))2−0.2992N(α))2(1−α)]t2,Iv2(t)=1.15+0.043N(α)((1−α)+(1−α)[0.043N(α))−0.03763N(α))2(1−α)]t+α[0.0215N(α))−0.0372N(α))2(1−α)−0.00086N(α))3(1−α)]t2. | (3.5) |
Suppose a Banach space (X,‖⋅‖) and a self-map K∗ of X. Now consider a random recursive algorithm of the formate, xn+1=g(K∗,xn). Assume F(K∗) be the set of fixed-point of K∗ which is non-empty and a point k∗∈F(K∗) where xn converges. Adopt {y∗n⊆X} and derive en=‖y∗n+1−g(K∗,y∗n)‖. The numerical algorithm xn+1=g(K∗,xn) is called K∗-stable if limn→∞en=0 implies that limn→∞y∗n=k∗. Analogously, we consider that the sequence {y∗n} exists an upper bound, else the sequence will be not convergent. If all such constraints are satisfied for xn+1=K∗xn which is known as Picard's iteration as given in [47], consequently the iteration will be K∗-stable. We then state the following theorem.
Theorem 4.1. Consider a Banach space (X,‖⋅‖) and self-map K∗ of X agreeing
‖K∗x−K∗y‖≤c‖x−y‖+C‖x−K∗x‖, |
∀x,y∈X, here, 0≤C,0≤c<1. Assume that K∗ is Picard K∗-stable. Now consider the recursive algorithm from (3.4) related to (1.2).
Sh(1+n)(t)=Sh(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhSh(n)−β1Sh(n)Ih(n)−β2Sh(n)Iv(n)+λhRh(n)],Ih(1+n)(t)=Ih(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β2Sh(n)Iv(n)+β1Sh(n)Ih(n)−μhIh(n)−δhIh(n)−γhIh(n)],Rh(1+n)(t)=Rh(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[γhIh(n)−μhRh(n)−λhRh(n)],Sv(1+n)(t)=Sv(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b2−γvSv(n)−β3Sv(n)Ih(n)],Iv(1+n)(t)=Iv(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β3Sv(n)Ih(n)−γvIv(n)−δvIv(n)], |
where (1−α+αu)N(α) is the non-classical Lagrange multiplier.
Theorem 4.2. Consider the self-map H given by
H(Sh(n)(t))=Sh(1+n)(t)=Sh(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[Λ−β1PnSn−μPn],H(Ih(n)(t))=Ih(1+n)(t)=Ih(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β1PnSn−α1Qn−μQn],H(Rh(n)(t))=Rh(1+n)(t)=Rh(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[α1Qn+α2SnRn−(μ+γ)Sn],H(Sv(n)(t))=Sv(1+n)(t)=Sv(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[−α2SnRn−μRn+γ(1−δ)Sn],H(Iv(n)(t))=Iv(1+n)(t)=Ih(n)(0)+S−1(1−α+αu)N(α)S[δγSn−μUn], |
is H-stable in L1(a,b) if
{{1−β1(P+J)f(γ)−β2(J1+J)f1(γ)−(μh+λh)g(γ)}<1,{1−(μh+δh+γh)g1(γ)−β1(P+J)f2(γ)−β2(J1+J)f3(γ)}<1,{1−(γh−μh−λh)g3(γ)}<1,{1−γvg4(γ)−β3(Q+P1)f4(γ)}<1,{1−β3(Q+P1)f5(γ)−(γv+δv)g5(γ)}<1. | (4.1) |
Proof. Initially we start to proving that H exists a fixed-point. For this achievement, we simulate the given below terms for all (m,n)∈M×M.
H(Sh(n)(t))−H(Sh(m)(t))=Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)+S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhShn−β1ShnIhn−β2ShnIvn+λhRhn]]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhShm−β1ShmIhm−β2ShmIvm+λhRhm]],H(Ih(n)(t))−H(Ih(m)(t))=Ih(n)(t)−Ih(m)(t)+S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β2ShnIvn+β1ShnIhn−μhIhn−δhIhn−γhIhn]]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β2ShmIvm+β1ShmIhm−μhIhm−δhIhm−γhIhm]],H(Rh(n)(t))−H(Rh(m)(t))=Rh(n)(t)−Rh(m)(t)+S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[γhIhn−μhRhn−λhRhn]]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[γhIhm−μhRhm−λhRhm]],H(Sv(n)(t))−H(Sv(m)(t))=Sv(n)(t)−Sv(m)(t)+S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b2−γvSvn−β3SvnIhn]]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b2−γvSvm−β3SvmIhm]],H(Iv(n)(t))−H(Iv(m)(t))=Iv(n)(t)−Iv(m)(t)+S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β3SvnIhn−γvIvn−δvIvn]]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[β3SvmIhm−γvIvm−δvIvm]]. | (4.2) |
Analysing the initial equation of (4.2) and take norm on both-sides,
‖H(Shn(t))−H(Shm(t))‖=‖Shn(t)−Shm(t)+S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhShn−β1ShnIhn−β2ShnIvn+λhRhn]]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhShm−β1ShmIhm−β2ShmIvm+λhRhm]]‖. | (4.3) |
Applying the triangular inequality, we receive
‖H(Shn(t))−H(Shm(t))‖≤‖Shn(t)−Shm(t)‖+‖S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhShn−β1ShnIhn−β2ShnIvn+λhRhn]−S−1[(1−α+αu)N(α)S[b1−μhShm−β1ShmIhm−β2ShmIvm+λhRhm]‖. | (4.4) |
By further simplification, (4.4) becomes as
‖H(Sh(n)(t))−H(Sh(m)(t))‖≤‖Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)‖+S−1[S(1−α+αu)N(α)(‖−β1Ihn(Shn−Shm)‖+‖−β1Shm(Ihn−Ihm)‖+(‖−β2Ivn(Shn−Shm)‖+‖−β2Shm(Ivn−Ivm)‖+‖−μh(Shn−Shm)‖+‖λh(Rhn−Rhm)‖)]. | (4.5) |
Since the same role is forming by both solutions, so we adopt in that case
‖Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)‖≅‖Ih(n)(t)−Ih(m)(t)‖,‖Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)‖≅‖Rh(n)(t)−Rh(m)(t)‖,‖Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)‖≅‖Sv(n)(t)−Sv(m)(t)‖,‖Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)‖≅‖Iv(n)(t)−Iv(m)(t)‖. |
By fixing it in Eq (4.5), we will get the following result:
‖H(Sh(n)(t))−H(Sh(m)(t))‖≤‖Sh(n)(t)−Sh(m)(t)‖+S−1[S(1−α+αu)N(α)(‖−β1Ihn(Shn−Shm)‖+‖−β1Shm(Shn−Shm)‖+(‖−β2Ivn(Shn−Shm)‖+‖−β2Shm(Svn−Svm)‖+‖−μh(Shn−Shm)‖+‖λh(Shn−Shm)‖)]. | (4.6) |
Since Shm, Svn, Ihm, Ihn, Ivn are convergent sequence, so all are bounded, then, there exist five different positive constants: J, Q, P1, P and J1 for all t such that
‖Shm‖<J,‖Svn‖<Q,‖Ihm‖<P1,‖Ihn‖<P,‖Ivn‖<J1,(m,n)∈N×N. | (4.7) |
Now by Eqs (4.6) and (4.7), we get
‖H(Sh(n)(t))−H(Sh(m)(t))‖≤[1−β1(P+J)f(γ)−β2(J1+J)f1(γ)−(μh+λh)g(γ)]‖(Sh(n)−Sh(m))‖, | (4.8) |
where f and g are functions from S−1[S(1−α+αuN(α))].
Similarly, we receive
‖H(Ih(n)(t))−H(Ih(m)(t))‖≤{1−(μh+δh+γh)g1(γ)−β1(P+J)f2(γ)−β2(J1+J)f3(γ)}‖(Ih(n)(t))−(Ih(m)(t))‖,‖H(Rh(n)(t))−H(Rh(m)(t))‖≤{1−(γh−μh−λh)g3(γ)}‖(Rh(n)(t))−(Rh(m)(t))‖,‖H(Sv(n)(t))−H(Sv(m)(t))‖≤{1−γvg4(γ)−β3(Q+P1)f4(γ)}‖(Sv(n)(t))−(Sv(m)(t))‖,‖H(Iv(n)(t))−H(Iv(m)(t))‖≤{1−β3(Q+P1)f5(γ)−(γv+δv)g5(γ)}‖(Iv(n)(t))−(Iv(m)(t))‖, | (4.9) |
where
{1−β1(P+J)f(γ)−β2(J1+J)f1(γ)−(μh+λh)g(γ)}<1,{1−(μh+δh+γh)g1(γ)−β1(P+J)f2(γ)−β2(J1+J)f3(γ)}<1,{1−(γh−μh−λh)g3(γ)}<1,{1−γvg4(γ)−β3(Q+P1)f4(γ)}<1,{1−β3(Q+P1)f5(γ)−(γv+δv)g5(γ)}<1, |
which gives that the non-linear H-self map exists a fixed point. Now we prove that H agrees with all the restrictions of Theorem 4.1. Let (4.8) and (4.9) hold, so using
c=(0,0,0,0,0),C={{1−β1(P+J)f(γ)−β2(J1+J)f1(γ)−(μh+λh)g(γ)}<1,{1−(μh+δh+γh)g1(γ)−β1(P+J)f2(γ)−β2(J1+J)f3(γ)}<1,{1−(γh−μh−λh)g3(γ)}<1,{1−γvg4(γ)−β3(Q+P1)f4(γ)}<1,{1−β3(Q+P1)f5(γ)−(γv+δv)g5(γ)}<1. |
The above expression shows that all conditions of Theorem 4.1 exist for the nonlinear map-H. So every restrictions mentioned in Theorem 4.1 are agreed for the given non-linear map-H. Hence H is Picard H-stable, which finishes the proof of Theorem 4.2.
In this portion, we are going to show the uniqueness of the special solution of Eq (1.2) applying the numerical algorithm. Here first we assume an exact solution for Eq (1.2), for which the special solution converges for a large quantity m. Here we take the Hilbert space H=L((a,b)×(0,T)) which can be formulated as follow:
f:(a,b)×(0,T)⟶R, s.t.∫∫uydudy<∞. |
Now, we adopt the given operator
G(Sh,Ih,Rh,Sv,Iv)={b1−μhSh−β1ShIh−β2ShIv+λhRh,β2ShIv+β1ShIh−μhIh−δhIh−γhIh,γhIh−μhRh−λhRh,b2−γvSv−β3SvIh,β3SvIh−γvIv−δvIv. |
The target of this portion is to prove that the inner product of
G((Z11−Z12,Z21−Z22,Z31−Z32,Z41−Z42,Z51−Z52),(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)), |
where (Z11−Z12), (Z21−Z22), (Z31−Z32), (Z41−Z42) and (Z51−Z52) are special solution of system. However,
G((Z11−Z12,Z21−Z22,Z31−Z32,Z41−Z42,Z51−Z52),(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))={(−β1(Z11−Z12)(Z21−Z22)−μh(Z11−Z12)−β2(Z11−Z12)(Z51−Z52)+λh(Z31−Z32),X1),(β1(Z11−Z12)(Z21−Z22)+β2(Z11−Z12)(Z51−Z52)−μh(Z21−Z22)−δh(Z21−Z22)−γh(Z21−Z22),X2),(γh(Z21−Z22)−μh(Z31−Z32)−(λh)(Z31−Z32),X3),(−γv(Z41−Z42)−β3(Z41−Z42)(Z21−Z22),X4).(β3(Z41−Z42)(Z51−Z52),X5). | (5.1) |
Here, we calculate the initial equation showing in the model without forgetting the general procedure:
(−β1(Z11−Z12)(Z21−Z22)−μh(Z11−Z12)−β2(Z11−Z12)(Z51−Z52)+λh(Z31−Z32),X1)≅(−β1(Z11−Z12)(Z21−Z22),X1)+(−μh(Z11−Z12),X1)+(−β2(Z11−Z12)(Z51−Z52),X1)+(λh(Z31−Z32),X1). | (5.2) |
Because the play of both solutions is nearly same, so we can consider that
(Z11−Z12)≅(Z21−Z22)≅(Z31−Z32)≅(Z41−Z42)≅(Z51−Z52). |
Then Eq (5.2) becomes
[−β1(Z11−Z12)2−μ(Z11−Z12)−β2(Z11−Z212)+λh(Z11−Z12),X1]. |
By the relation of inner product and norm, we receive the given results:
[−β1(Z11−Z12)2−μ(Z11−Z12)−β2(Z11−Z12)2+λh(Z11−Z12),X1]≅[−β1(Z11−Z12)2,X1)+(−μh(Z11−Z12),X1)+(−β2(Z11−Z12)2,X1)+(λh(Z11−Z12),X1]≤β1‖(Z11−Z12)2‖‖X1‖−μh‖(Z11−Z12)‖‖X1‖−β2‖(Z11−Z12)2‖,‖X1‖+λh‖(Z11−Z12)‖,‖X1‖=(β1¯ν1+μh+β2¯ν1+λh)‖(Z11−Z12)‖‖X1‖. | (5.3) |
Again repeating the similar manner, from the second equation of the model (5.1), we get the outputs
[β1(Z11−Z12)(Z21−Z22)+β2(Z11−Z12)(Z51−Z52)−μh(Z21−Z22)−δ(Z21−Z22)−γh(Z21−Z22),X2]≤β1‖(Z21−Z22)2‖‖X2‖−β2‖(Z21−Z22)2‖‖X2‖+(μh+δh+γh)‖(Z21−Z22)‖‖X2‖=(β1¯ν2+β2¯ν2+μh+δh+γh)‖(Z21−Z22)‖‖X2‖. | (5.4) |
Following similar manner, the third equation of the model (5.1) gives that
(γh(Z21−Z22)−μh(Z31−Z32)−λh(Z31−Z32),X3)≤(γh+μh+λh)‖(Z31−Z32)‖‖X3‖. | (5.5) |
The fourth one is
(−γv(Z41−Z42)−β3(Z41−Z42)(Z21−Z22)),X4)≤(γv+β3¯ν4)‖(Z41−Z42)‖‖X4‖. | (5.6) |
And the fifth one is
(β3(Z41−Z42)(Z21−Z22)−γv(Z51−Z52)−δv(Z51−Z52),X5)≤(β3¯ν5+γv+δv)‖(Z51−Z52)‖‖X5‖. | (5.7) |
Upon putting Eqs (5.3)–(5.7) in Eq (5.1), we get
G((Z11−Z12,Z21−Z22,Z31−Z32,Z41−Z42,Z51−Z52),(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))≤{(β1¯ν1+μh+β2¯ν1+λh)‖(Z11−Z12)‖‖X1‖,(β1¯ν2+β2¯ν2+μh+δh+γh)‖(Z21−Z22)‖‖X2‖,(γh+μh+λh)‖(Z31−Z32)‖‖X3‖,(γv+β3¯ν4)‖(Z41−Z42)‖‖X4‖,(β3¯ν5+γv+δv)‖(Z51−Z52)‖‖X5‖. | (5.8) |
But, for sufficiently bigger value of mi, where i=1,2,3,4,5 both solutions converge to the exact solution, applying the consequences of topological results, here three very tiny positive parameters exist lm1,lm2,lm3,lm4and lm5 s.t.
‖Sh−Z11‖,‖Sh−Z12‖<lm13(β1¯ν1+μh+β2¯ν1+λh)‖X1‖,‖Ih−Z21‖,‖Ih−Z22‖<lm23(β1¯ν2+β2¯ν2+μh+δh+γh)‖X2‖,‖Rh−Z31‖,‖Rh−Z32‖<lm33(γh+μh+λh)‖(Z31−Z32)‖X3‖,‖Sv−Z41‖,‖Sv−Z42‖<lm43(γv+β3¯ν4)‖X4‖,‖Iv−Z51‖,‖Iv−Z52‖<lm53(β3¯ν5+γv+δv)‖X5‖. |
Now putting the exact solution to the right-side of Eq (5.8) and using the triangular inequality with taking M=max(m1,m2,m3,m4,m5),l=max(lm5,lm4,lm3,lm2,lm1), we get
{(β1¯ν1+μh+β2¯ν1+λh)‖(Z11−Z12)‖‖X1‖,(β1¯ν2+β2¯ν2+μh+δh+γh)‖(Z21−Z22)‖‖X2‖,(γh+μh+λh)‖(Z31−Z32)‖‖X3‖,(γv+β3¯ν4)‖(Z41−Z42)‖‖X4‖,(β3¯ν5+γv+δv)‖(Z51−Z52)‖‖X5‖.<{l,l,l,l,l. |
As l is very very small positive value, so on the basis of topological result, we get
{(β1¯ν1+μh+β2¯ν1+λh)‖(Z11−Z12)‖‖X1‖,(β1¯ν2+β2¯ν2+μh+δh+γh)‖(Z21−Z22)‖‖X2‖,(γh+μh+λh)‖(Z31−Z32)‖‖X3‖,(γv+β3¯ν4)‖(Z41−Z42)‖‖X4‖,(β3¯ν5+γv+δv)‖(Z51−Z52)‖‖X5‖.<{0,0,0,0,0. | (5.9) |
But, it is obvious that
(β1¯ν1+μh+β2¯ν1+λh)≠0,(β1¯ν2+β2¯ν2+μh+δh+γh)≠0,(γh+μh+λh)≠0,(γv+β3¯ν4)≠0,(β3¯ν5+γv+δv)≠0. | (5.10) |
Therefore, we have
‖Z11−Z12‖=0,‖Z21−Z22‖=0,‖Z31−Z32‖=0,‖Z41−Z42‖=0,‖Z51−Z52‖=0, | (5.11) |
which yields that
Z11=Z12, Z21=Z22, Z31=Z32, Z41=Z42, Z51=Z52. | (5.12) |
This completes the proof of uniqueness.
This portion gives the numerical simulation results based on the numerical algorithm as Eq (3.5) for leptospirosis disease model (1.2). The numerical method employed on Eq (1.2) hinged with (3.5). The numerical simulations are performed by adopting the parameter numerical values, b1=0.121, μh=0.0121, β1=0.14, β2=0.02, β3=0.10, λh=1, δh=0.8, γh=0.25, b2=0.002, γv=0.23, δv=0.001. In this practical work, the integer order cases are plotted in the company of Figure 1. Here we have just checked that how the given model is behaving at the classical sense. After following it, in the assembly of Figure 2, we plotted the model dynamics at distinct derivative operator orders α. Here the disease shows almost same nature at each values but just the amount of the given population varies at distinct values. The assembly of Figures 3 and 4 is dedicated to the model dynamics at the values of parameters β1,β2,β3. From the given plots we can see that the impact of fractional order is measurable and every value demonstrates a unique nature of the given disease. The given parameter range is the best fit for the given model structure.
Here sensitivity analysis is performed to show that which parameters are useful in reducing the infection spread of the disease. Forward sensitivity structure is taken as a important part of epidemic modelling, albeit its analysis become austere for tough biological dynamics. Epidemiologist and ecologist have given their much attention to the calculation of sensitivity analysis of R0.
Definition 7.1. The normalized forward sensitivity index of the R0 which based on differentiably on a variable Γ is given by
SΓ=ΓR0∂R0∂Γ. | (7.1) |
There are three general techniques which are basically utilized to find the sensitivity indices: (ⅰ) By a Latin hypercube sampling technique; (ⅱ) by direct differentiation; (ⅲ) by linearising model and then simulating the obtained set of linear algebraic constraints. Here we adopt the direct differentiation technique because it gives analytical forms for the indices. These indices demonstrates the impact of different supports jointed with the infection spread and also provides us considerable knowledge about the comparative variations between R0 and various parameters. Definitely, it provides the help in texturing the control techniques.
The parameter values b1, β2, β1, λh, δh, γh, b2 and β3 have a positive impact on the reproductive number R0, which exemplify that the decay or growth of given parameters call by 10% will decrease or increase the reproductive number by 10%, 1.70%, 8.2%, 4.27%, 2.3%, 1.7%, 1.7% and 0.2% respectively. But another side, the parameters index of μh, γv and δv shows that raising their values by 10% will reduce the value of reproductive number R0 by 9.9%, 2.6% and 1.0% respectively. λh has no impact on reproduction number. Graphical representations of the sensitivity index is explored in Figures 5–11 which demonstrate the sensitivity of different parameters.
In this research, we have simulated a leptospirosis model dynamics by using a non-classical type derivative with the application of Banach contraction theorem and Picard successive approximation algorithm. Here the fractional order derivative called Caputo-Febrizo of order α has been used which exists a non-singular exponentially decay type kernel. The given analysis have been justified by applying well-known Sumudu transform alongwith proposed iterative scheme. Using the Banach theorem, the existence of unique equilibrium solution have been exemplified. With the help of Matlab, we have also presented numerical simulations to the approximate solutions which show the effectiveness of the theoretical results. From the given simulations, we concluded that the mentioned non-classical type model gives more emphatic structure as compare to the integer-order dynamics. Hence we can say that given variable order structure approaches to time responses with super-slow evolutions and super-fast transients directed to the steady-state, which impacts can not be smoothly textured by the ordinary order systems. In the future, the above model texture can be further rebuilt by more effective and advance models of dynamical systems. One may use Atangana Baleanu fractional derivative or Hilfer fractional derivative to compare the results with our model. One can also employ the fractional optimal control strategy to decrease the infected people and increased the susceptible people by choosing suitable control variables. The stochastic version of this model will also be useful to show the effect of white noise on the model.
This research was supported by King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi's Postdotoral Fellowship.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
A. R. Bharti, J. E. Nally, J. N. Ricaldi, M. A Matthias, M. M. Diaz, M. A. Lovett, et al., Leptospirosis: A zoonotic disease of global importance, Lancet Infect. Dis., 3 (2003), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00830-2 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00830-2
![]() |
[2] |
G. Zaman, M. A. Khan, S. Islam, M. I. Chohan, I. H. Jung, Modeling dynamical interactions between leptospirosis infected vector and human population, Appl. Math. Sci., 6 (2012), 1287–1302. https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2010.38086 doi: 10.4236/apm.2010.38086
![]() |
[3] |
A. I. Ko, M. G. Reis, C. M. R. Dourado, W. D. Johnson, L. W. Riley, Urban epidemic of severe leptospirosis in Brazil, Lancet, 354 (1999), 820–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)80012-9 doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)80012-9
![]() |
[4] |
A. F. B. Victoriano, L. D. Smythe, N. Gloriani-Barzaga, L. L. Cavinta, T. Kasai, K. Limpakarnjanarat, et al., Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region, BMC Infect. Dis., 9 (2009), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-147 doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-147
![]() |
[5] |
A. Din, Y. J. Li, A. Yusuf, Delayed hepatitis B epidemic model with stochastic analysis, Chaos Solitons Fract., 146 (2021), 110839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110839 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110839
![]() |
[6] |
A. Din, Y. J. Li, T. Khan, G. Zaman, Mathematical analysis of spread and control of the novel corona virus (COVID-19) in China, Chaos Solitons Fract., 141 (2020), 110286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110286 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110286
![]() |
[7] |
A. Din, Y. J. Li, M. A. Shah, The complex dynamics of hepatitis B infected individuals with optimal control, J. Syst. Sci. Complex., 34 (2021), 1301–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-021-0053-0 doi: 10.1007/s11424-021-0053-0
![]() |
[8] |
A. Din, Y. J. Li, Stationary distribution extinction and optimal control for the stochastic hepatitis B epidemic model with partial immunity, Phys. Scr., 96 (2021), 074005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/abfacc doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/abfacc
![]() |
[9] |
R. Zarin, I. Ahmed, P. Kumam, A. Zeb, A. Din, Fractional modeling and optimal control analysis of rabies virus under the convex incidence rate, Results Phys., 28 (2021), 104665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104665 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104665
![]() |
[10] |
A. Din, Y. J. Li, F. M. Khan, Z. U. Khan, P. J. Liu, On analysis of fractional order mathematical model of hepatitis B using Atangana-Baleanu Caputo (ABC) derivative, Fractals, 2021, 2240017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400175 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22400175
![]() |
[11] |
A. Din, Y. J. Li, A. Yusuf, A. I. Ali, Caputo type fractional operator applied to hepatitis B system, Fractals, 2021, 2240023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400230 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22400230
![]() |
[12] |
W. K. Reisen, Landscape epidemiology of vector-borne diseases, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 55 (2010), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085419 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085419
![]() |
[13] |
A. Kilicman, A fractional order SIR epidemic model for dengue transmission, Chaos Solitons Fract., 114 (2018), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.031 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.031
![]() |
[14] | P. Pongsuumpun, T. Miami, R. Kongnuy, Age structural transmission model for leptospirosis, In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on biomedical engineering, 2008,411–416. |
[15] | W. Triampo, D. Baowan, I. M. Tang, N. Nuttavut, J. Wong-Ekkabut, G. Doungchawee, A simple deterministic model for the spread of leptospirosis in Thailand, Int. J. Bio. Med. Sci., 2 (2007), 22–26. |
[16] | G. Zaman, Dynamical behavior of leptospirosis disease and role of optimal control theory, Int. J. Math. Comput., 7 (2010), 80–92. |
[17] |
A. Khan, R. Zarin, M. Inc, G. Zaman, B. Almohsen, Stability analysis of leishmania epidemic model with harmonic mean type incidence rate, Eur. Phys. J. Plus., 135 (2020), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00535-0 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00535-0
![]() |
[18] |
K. Khan, R. Zarin, A. Khan, A. Yusuf, M. Al-Shomrani, A. Ullah, Stability analysis of five-grade Leishmania epidemic model with harmonic mean-type incidence rate, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03249-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03249-4
![]() |
[19] |
A. Khan, R. Zarin, G. Hussain, A. H. Usman, U. W. Humphries, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, Modeling and sensitivity analysis of HBV epidemic model with convex incidence rate, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103836 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103836
![]() |
[20] |
A. Khan, R. Zarin, G. Hussain, N. A. Ahmad, M. H. Mohd, A. Yusuf, Stability analysis and optimal control of COVID-19 with convex incidence rate in Khyber Pakhtunkhawa (Pakistan), Results Phys., 20 (2021), 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103703 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103703
![]() |
[21] |
D. Baleanu, B. Ghanbari, J. H. Asad, A. Jajarmi, H. M. Pirouz, Planar system-masses in an equilateral triangle: Numerical study within fractional calculus, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 124 (2020), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2020.010236 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2020.010236
![]() |
[22] |
A. Jajarmi, D. Baleanu, A new iterative method for the numerical solution of high-order non-linear fractional boundary value problems, Front. Phys., 8 (2020), 220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00220 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00220
![]() |
[23] |
R. Zarin, A. Khan, M. Inc, U. W. Humphries, T. Karite, Dynamics of five grade leishmania epidemic model using fractional operator with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Solitons Fract., 147 (2021), 110985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110985 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110985
![]() |
[24] |
F. Mohammadi, L. Moradi, D. Baleanu, A. Jajarmi, A hybrid functions numerical scheme for fractional optimal control problems: Application to nonanalytic dynamical systems, J. Vib. Control, 24 (2018), 5030–5043. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317741769 doi: 10.1177/1077546317741769
![]() |
[25] |
H. M. Srivastava, V. P. Dubey, R. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Kumar, D. Baleanu, An efficient computational approach for a fractional-order biological population model with carrying capacity, Chaos Solitons Fract., 138 (2020), 109880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109880 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109880
![]() |
[26] |
J. Singh, Analysis of fractional blood alcohol model with composite fractional derivative, Chaos Solitons Fract., 140 (2020), 110127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110127 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110127
![]() |
[27] |
A. Khan, G. Hussain, M. Inc, G. Zaman, Existence, uniqueness, and stability of fractional hepatitis B epidemic model, Chaos, 30 (2020), 103104. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0013066 doi: 10.1063/5.0013066
![]() |
[28] |
R. Zarin, A. Khan, A. Yusuf, S. Abdel-Khalek, M. Inc, Analysis of fractional COVID-19 epidemic model under Caputo operator, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 2021, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7294 doi: 10.1002/mma.7294
![]() |
[29] |
E. Bonyah, R. Zarin, Fatmawati, Mathematical modeling of cancer and hepatitis co-dynamics with non-local and non-singular kernal, Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci., 2020 (2020), 91. https://doi.org/10.28919/cmbn/5029 doi: 10.28919/cmbn/5029
![]() |
[30] |
A. Imitaz, A. Aamina, F. Ali, I. Khan, K. S. Nisar, Two-phase flow of blood with magnetic dusty particles in cylindrical region: A Caputo Fabrizio fractional model, Comput. Mater. Con., 66 (2021), 2253–2264. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.012470 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2021.012470
![]() |
[31] |
Z. A. Khan, S. U. Haq, T. S. Khan, I. Khan, K. S. Nisar, Fractional Brinkman type fluid in channel under the effect of MHD with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2901–2910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.056 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.056
![]() |
[32] |
S. Jitsinchayakul, R. Zarin, A. Khan, A. Yusuf, G. Zaman, U. W. Humphries, T. A. Sulaiman, Fractional modeling of COVID-19 epidemic model with harmonic mean type incidence rate, Open Phys., 19 (2021), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2021-0062 doi: 10.1515/phys-2021-0062
![]() |
[33] |
A. S. Shaikh, K. S. Nisar, Transmission dynamics of fractional order Typhoid fever model using Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Chaos Solitons Fract., 128 (2019), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.08.012
![]() |
[34] |
M. Arif, F. Ali, N. A. Sheikh, I. Khan, K. S. Nisar, Fractional model of couple stress fluid for generalized Couette flow: A comparative analysis of Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 88643–88655. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925699 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925699
![]() |
[35] |
R. Zarin, H. Khaliq, A. Khan, D. Khan, A. Akgül, U. W. Humphries, Deterministic and fractional modeling of a computer virus propagation, Results Phys., 33 (2022), 105130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105130 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105130
![]() |
[36] |
A. M. S. Mahdy, Numerical solutions for solving model time-fractional Fokker-Planck equation, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ., 37 (2021), 1120–1135. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22570 doi: 10.1002/num.22570
![]() |
[37] |
K. A. Gepreel, M. Higazy, A. M. S. Mahdy, Optimal control, signal flow graph, and system electronic circuit realization for nonlinear Anopheles mosquito model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 31 (2020), 2050130. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183120501302 doi: 10.1142/S0129183120501302
![]() |
[38] |
A. M. S. Mahdy, Y. A. E. Amer, M. S. Mohamed, E. Sobhy, General fractional financial models of awareness with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Adv. Mech. Eng., 12 (2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020975525 doi: 10.1177/1687814020975525
![]() |
[39] |
A. M. S. Mahdy, K. A. Gepreel, K. Lotfy, A. A. El-Bary, A numerical method for solving the Rubella ailment disease model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 32 (2021), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183121500972 doi: 10.1142/S0129183121500972
![]() |
[40] |
A. M. S. Mahdy, M. S. Mohamed, K. Lotfy, M. Alhazmi, A. A. El-Bary, M. H. Raddadi, Numerical solution and dynamical behaviors for solving fractional nonlinear Rubella ailment disease model, Results Phys., 24 (2021), 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104091 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104091
![]() |
[41] |
Y. Zhao, A. Khan, U. W. Humphries, R. Zarin, M. Khan, A. Yusuf, Dynamics of visceral leishmania epidemic model with non-singular kernel, Fractals, 2022, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401351 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22401351
![]() |
[42] |
A. M. S. Mahdy, M. Higazy, K. A. Gepreel, A. A. A. El-Dahdouh, Optimal control and bifurcation diagram for a model nonlinear fractional SIRC, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 3481–3501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.05.028 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.05.028
![]() |
[43] |
A. M. S. Mahdy, M. S. Mohamed, K. A. Gepreel, A. Al-Amiri, M. Higazy, Dynamical characteristics and signal flow graph of nonlinear fractional smoking mathematical model, Chaos Solitons Fract., 141 (2020), 110308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110308 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110308
![]() |
[44] | M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. |
[45] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, Applications of new time and spatial fractional derivatives with exponential kernels, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. Sci., 2 (2016), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18576/pfda/020101 doi: 10.18576/pfda/020101
![]() |
[46] | J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92. |
[47] |
Z. L. Wang, D. S. Yang, T. D. Ma, N. Sun, Stability analysis for nonlinear fractional-order systems based on comparison principle, Nonlinear Dyn., 75 (2014), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1073-7 doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-1073-7
![]() |
1. | Rahat Zarin, Numerical study of a nonlinear COVID-19 pandemic model by finite difference and meshless methods, 2022, 6, 26668181, 100460, 10.1016/j.padiff.2022.100460 | |
2. | Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Ramashis Banerjee, Qualitative analysis and numerical simulation of fractal-fractional COVID-19 epidemic model with real data from Pakistan, 2022, 1745-5030, 1, 10.1080/17455030.2022.2143932 | |
3. | Fawaz K. Alalhareth, Usama Atta, Ali Hasan Ali, Aqeel Ahmad, Mohammed H. Alharbi, Analysis of Leptospirosis transmission dynamics with environmental effects and bifurcation using fractional-order derivative, 2023, 80, 11100168, 372, 10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.063 |