
This paper is concerned with the following modified Kirchhoff type problem
−(a+b∫R3|∇u|2)Δu−uΔ(u2)−λu=|u|p−2u,x∈R3,
where a,b>0 are constants and λ∈R. When p=163, we prove that the existence of normalized solution with a prescribed L2-norm for the above equation by applying constrained minimization method. Moreover, when p∈(103,163), we prove the existence of mountain pass type normalized solution for the above modified Kirchhoff equation by using the perturbation method. And the asymptotic behavior of normalized solution as b→0 is analyzed. These conclusions extend some known ones in previous papers.
Citation: Zhongxiang Wang. Existence and asymptotic behavior of normalized solutions for the modified Kirchhoff equations in R3[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8774-8801. doi: 10.3934/math.2022490
[1] | Sisi Qi, Youyu Sheng, Ruiming Hu, Feng Xu, Ying Miao, Jun Zhao, Qinping Yang . Genome-wide expression profiling of long non-coding RNAs and competing endogenous RNA networks in alopecia areata. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 696-711. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021037 |
[2] | Xudan Ma, Qijun Zhang, Haihong Zhu, Kefeng Huang, Weina Pang, Qin Zhang . Establishment and analysis of the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network based on competitive endogenous RNA identifies functional genes in heart failure. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4011-4026. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021201 |
[3] | Ziyu Wu, Sugui Wang, Qiang Li, Qingsong Zhao, Mingming Shao . Identification of 10 differently expressed lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for prostate adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2037-2047. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020108 |
[4] | Yong Ding, Jian-Hong Liu . The signature lncRNAs associated with the lung adenocarcinoma patients prognosis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1593-1603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020083 |
[5] | Lishui Shen, Xiaofeng Hu, Ting Chen, Guilin Shen, Dong Cheng . Integrated network analysis to explore the key mRNAs and lncRNAs in acute myocardial infarction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 6426-6437. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019321 |
[6] | Jie Chen, Jinggui Chen, Bo Sun, Jianghong Wu, Chunyan Du . Integrative analysis of immune microenvironment-related CeRNA regulatory axis in gastric cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3953-3971. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020219 |
[7] | Shuai Miao, Lijun Wang, Siyu Guan, Tianshu Gu, Hualing Wang, Wenfeng Shangguan, Weiding Wang, Yu Liu, Xue Liang . Integrated whole transcriptome analysis for the crucial regulators and functional pathways related to cardiac fibrosis in rats. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 5413-5429. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023250 |
[8] | Yun-xiang Li, Shi-ming Wang, Chen-quan Li . Four-lncRNA immune prognostic signature for triple-negative breast cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3939-3956. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021197 |
[9] | Xiaoliang Jiang, Junjian Xiao, Qile Zhang, Lihui Wang, Jinyun Jiang, Kun Lan . Improved U-Net based on cross-layer connection for pituitary adenoma MRI image segmentation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 34-51. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023003 |
[10] | Xiaodong Xia, Manman Wang, Jiao Li, Qiang Chen, Heng Jin, Xue Liang, Lijun Wang . Identification of potential genes associated with immune cell infiltration in atherosclerosis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2230-2242. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021112 |
This paper is concerned with the following modified Kirchhoff type problem
−(a+b∫R3|∇u|2)Δu−uΔ(u2)−λu=|u|p−2u,x∈R3,
where a,b>0 are constants and λ∈R. When p=163, we prove that the existence of normalized solution with a prescribed L2-norm for the above equation by applying constrained minimization method. Moreover, when p∈(103,163), we prove the existence of mountain pass type normalized solution for the above modified Kirchhoff equation by using the perturbation method. And the asymptotic behavior of normalized solution as b→0 is analyzed. These conclusions extend some known ones in previous papers.
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were a type of ncRNAs longer than 200 bps, which could not be translated to proteins [1,2]. LncRNAs comprised antisense RNA, intronic transcripts, promoter-related lncRNA, long intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNA), and UTR associated lncRNAs [3]. Previous studies indicated lncRNAs played crucial roles in cancer progression and were involved in regulating cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy and metastasis [4,5]. LncRNAs could regulate targets transcription via recruiting epigenetic modification regulators [6] and transcription factors [7]. LncRNAs could also regulate targets post-transcriptional expression via sponging miRNAs [8]. For instance, lncRNA PTENP1 could increase PTEN levels via sponging PTEN-targeting miRNAs [9,10]. PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 interacted with androgen receptor to promote transcriptional activity [11].
Pituitary adenomas (PA) is one of the most frequent types of intracranial neoplasms [12]. Surgery remains the first line of treatment for the majority of patients, but it cannot effectively control invasive pituitary adenomas [13]. In the past decades, emerging efforts were paid to understand the mechanisms underlying PA. Fukuoka et al. identifed EGFR as a therapeutic target for ACTH-secreting PA [14]. ADAM12 and MMP-14 were reported to regulate PA cavernous sinus invasion [15]. Meanwhile, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) were also found to play crucial roles in PA progression. For instance, miR-23b and miR-130b was reduced in PA [16]. miR-26a regulated cell cycle in ACTH-secreting PA by suppressing PRKCD [17]. Very interestingly, recent studies showed lncRNAs were dysregulated and played either oncogenetic or tumor suppressive roles in pituitary adenomas. For example, IFNG-AS1 interacted with ESRP2 to promote PA progression [18]. SNHG1 could sponge miR-302/372/373/520 cluster to active Wnt signaling in PA [19]. LncRNA MEG3 served as a tumor suppressor in PA [20]. Exploring the roles of lncRNAs in PA might shed light on the biology behind this disease and could prove novel potential biomarkers for PA prognosis.
In this study, we performed analysis of GSE26966 dataset to identify differently expressed lncRNAs in PA. In order to reveal the mechanism and function roles of them, we constructed lncRNA co-expression, lncRNA-protein interaction, and ceRNA networks in PA. We thought this study could provide novel clues to verify lncRNAs could be potential targets in PA diagnosis and therapy.
GSE26966 [21] dataset was used to identify dysregulated lncRNAs in PA, which was downloaded from GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). GSE26966 included nine normal samples and 14 PA tissues. This dataset was normalized using robust multi-array average (RMA) method under R 2.6.2 statistical software with affy package from BioConductor. LncRNAs and mRNAs with fold changes (FC) ≥ 2 and P values less than 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Protein-protein interaction network (PPI) was constructed by STRING online software (https://string-db.org/). Combined score > 0.4 was considered as reliable. The PPI network was visualized using software Cytoscape software (http://www.cytoscape.org).
Functional and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted using the DAVID software (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp). The p value < 0.05 was set as the threshold.
Human pituitary tumour tissue samples were obtained from patients who underwent surgery at Department of Neurosurgery of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Shanghai, China) between 2015 and 2017. Non-neoplastic pituitary gland specimens were obtained from autopsy. Tissues were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. All cases were pathologically diagnosed. All of the patients were provided written informed consent. The use of human specimens in this study was permitted by the local ethics committee at Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using the Takara PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit. QPCR analysis using SYBR Green Supermix reagent (Invitrogen). The PCR primers used in this study included, ACTB-F 5'-CCTCTCCCAAGTCCACACAG-3' and -R 5'-GGGCACGAAGGCTCATCATT-3'; SNHG5-F 5'-CGCTTGGTTAAAACCTGACACT-3' and -R 5'-CCAAGACAATCTGGCCTCTATC-3'; SNHG7-F 5'-GTTGGGGTGTTGGCATTCTTGTT-3' and -R 5'-TGGTCAGCCTGGTCACTCTGG-3'; KCNQ1OT1-F 5'-AGGGTGACAGTGTTTCATAGGCT-3' and -R 5'-GAGGCACATTCATTCGTTGGT-3'; MEG3-F 5'-CTGCCCATCTACACCTCACG-3' and -R 5'-CTCTCCGCCGTCTGCGCTAGGGGCT-3'; Relative gene expression was analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCt method.
Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using T-test or Mann-Whitney U-test according to the test condition. A p < 0.05 was considered statistical significance with a 95% confidence level.
In this study, we identify differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in PA using GSE26966 dataset, which included 9 normal and 14 PA samples. We found 115 lncRNAs were overexpressed and 98 lncRNAs expression were suppressed in PA compared to normal samples (Figure 1A). Meanwhile, a total of 1258 mRNAs were overexpressed and 2584 mRNAs expression were reduced in PA (Figure 1B). Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed to show differentially expressed genes in PA.
Meanwhile, we constructed lncRNA co-expression networks to reveal the potential functions and mechanisms of differently expressed lncRNAs in PA. We next calculated Spearman Rank Correlation of lncRNA-mRNA pairs using online Co-LncRNA system (http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/Co-LncRNA/) and selected lncRNA-mRNA pairs with absolute value ≥ 0.9 for co-expression network construction. This network included 118 lncRNAs and 542 mRNAs (Figure 2).
A few lncRNAs were observed to play more important roles in PA tumorigenesis, such as MEG3, SNHG7, MIR612, PWAR6, RP11-119F7.5, KCNQ1OT1, CELP, LINC00511, and LOC100129175. These lncRNAs co-expressed with more than 20 mRNAs. Among them, the roles of MEG3 had been widely reported, which played as a tumor suppressor in PA.
The mechanisms underlying PA remained largely unclear. In the present study, we considered co-expressing mRNAs with absolute value ≥ 0.9 were the potential targets of differentially expressed lncRNAs in PA. Then, we performed bioinformatics analysis for dysregulated lncRNAs using their co-expressing mRNAs. Our analysis showed these lncRNAs were significantly related to regulating mechanical stimulus, gene expression, in utero embryonic development, transcription, long-term synaptic potentiation, JAK-STAT cascade, cell cycle arrest, negative regulation of transcription, aging, and response to X-ray (Figure 3A). KEGG pathway analysis showed lncRNAs were involved in FoxO pathway, HIF-1 pathway, Insulin pathway, Oxytocin pathway, Adipocytokine pathway, Rap1 pathway, TGF-beta pathway, Hippo pathway, Prolactin pathway, and MAPK pathway (Figure 3B).
In order to reveal the mechanisms of lncRNAs underlying PA tumorigenesis, we further constructed lncRNAs-RBPs interaction network and ceRNA network in PA. Starbase dataset was used to identify lncRNAs interacting proteins, which based on Clip-sequence analysis. As present in Figure 4, the lncRNAs-RBPs interaction network included 33 RBPs and 53 lncRNAs. Three lncRNAs (SNHG5, RP6-24A23.7 and SNHG7) interacted with more than 20 RBPs and three RBPs (FUS, eIF4AIII, and UPF) interacted with more than 20 lncRNA, which were regarded as key regulators in this network.
LncRNAs mediated Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNAs) networks were constructed based on miRNA-targets prediction. The positively co-expressing lncRNA-mRNA pairs were considered for ceRNA construction. Next, the miRNAs targeted by both lncRNA and mRNA were identified as the bridge mediated the regulation between lncRNA and mRNA using TargetScan and Starbase dataset. A total of 25 lncRNAs, 58 miRNAs and 67 mRNAs were included in this ceRNA. KCNQ1OT1, SNHG7, LINC00472, and C9orf72 sponges more than 20 miRNAs and played crucial roles in PA (Figure 5).
We further validate our findings by detecting the expression levels of several key lncRNAs of regulatory networks in the PA samples using RT-PCR, including KCNQ1OT1, SNHG7, SNHG5, and MEG3 expression in PA. Microarray analysis showed these lncRNAs were remarkably down-regulated in PA. RT-PCR validation showed that the expressions of KCNQ1OT1, SNHG7, SNHG5, and MEG3 were down-regulated in PA samples (Figure 6A–E). Our results were consistent with the analysis of microarray.
Pituitary adenomas (PA) is one of the most frequent types of intracranial neoplasms [12]. However, the mechanisms underlying PA progression and novel biomarkers for the prognosis of PA remained largely unclear. Recently, lncRNAs were reported to play crucial roles in the tumorigenesis, cancer proliferation, and metastasis. In PA, a few lncRNAs were revealed to be involved in the cancer progression. For instance, H19 inhibits PA cell proliferation by disrupting 4E-BP1/Raptor interaction [22], IFNG-AS1 played oncogenic roles in PA by binding to ESRP2 [18], and E2F1 regulating CCAT2 was reported as an oncogene in PA via interacting with PTTG1 [23]. Of note, a recent study performed comprehensive analysis for dysregulated lncRNAs and mRNAs in PA using RNA-sequence [24]. However, the expression pattern and potential functions of lncRNAs in PA remained to be further investigated.
This study identified differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in PA by reannotating and analyzing GSE26966 dataset. A total of 1258 overexpressed and 2584 down-regulated mRNAs, 115 overexpressed and 98 down-regulated lncRNAs were identified in PA. We observed a few lncRNAs served as key lncRNAs in PA, including such as MEG3, SNHG7, MIR612, PWAR6, RP11-119F7.5, KCNQ1OT1, CELP, LINC00511, and LOC100129175. Among these lncRNAs, MEG3 was highly expressed in normal samples but decreased in cancer samples [25]. MEG3 played important roles in cancer initiation, growth, chemo-resistance, and metastasis. In PA, MEG3 levels were decreased in tumor tissues compared to normal samples [26]. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed MEG3 remarkably inhibited tumor growth by inducing G1 phase arrest [20]. SNHG7 was observed to be overexpressed and served as an oncogene in multiple cancers, including lung cancer [27], gastric cancer [28], and bladder cancer [29]. GO and KEGG analysis showed these lncRNAs were involved in regulating mechanical stimulus, gene expression, JAK-STAT cascade, cell cycle arrest, FoxO pathway, HIF-1 pathway, Insulin pathway, Oxytocin pathway, and MAPK pathway.
LncRNAs were involved in the regulation of chromatin interactions, gene transcription, mRNA stability and translation by interacting with other types of RNA, proteins and DNAs [30]. For example, XIST regulated X chromosome inactivation by localizing to the X chromosome to recruit multiple proteins, including HDAC3 [31]. LncRNA p21 was induced by p53 and regulate gene expression by binding to hnRNP-K under DNA damage. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNAs) played a crucial role in the regulation of tumor-related pathways. LncRNA GAS5 regulate PTEN expression by sponging miR-222-3p in thyroid cancer [32]. SNHG16 induced esophagus cancer growth and metastasis by acting as a ceRNA to sponge miR-140-5p [33]. LncRNA ZFAS1 promoted osteosarcoma progression and metastasis by sponging miR-486. In present study, we constructed lncRNAs-RBPs interaction network and ceRNA network in PA. The lncRNAs-RBPs interaction network included 33 RBPs and 53 lncRNAs. From which, we identified SNHG5, RP6-24A23.7 and SNHG7 as core lncRNAs by potentially interacting with more than 20 RBPs. Meanwhile. We found FUS, eIF4AIII, and UPF may play key roles in mediating the effects of dysregulated lncRNAs on PA progression. Meanwhile, we found KCNQ1OT1, SNHG7, LINC00472, and C9orf72 played key roles in PA which sponged about 20 miRNAs. Recent studies showed KCNQ1OT1 was dysregulated in multiple cancers. In lung cancer, KCNQ1OT1 modulated miRNA-27b-3p/HSP90AA1 axis to promote tumor progression [34]. In breast cancer, KCNQ1OT1 was overexpressed in tumor samples and induced cancer proliferation by regulating miR-145/CCNE2 axis [35]. However, the roles of KCNQ1OT1 in PA remained unclear. Our study for the first time revealed KCNQ1OT1 may play key roles in PA. Finally, we validate KCNQ1OT1, SNHG7, MEG3, and SNHG5expression in PA.
In conclusion, this study identified differently expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs by using GSE26966 database. Furthermore, we constructed lncRNA-mRNA co-expression, lncRNA-RBP interaction and ceRNA networks. Bioinformatics analysis showed these lncRNAs were involved in regulating mechanical stimulus, gene expression, JAK-STAT cascade, cell cycle arrest, FoxO signaling, HIF-1 signaling, Insulin signaling, Oxytocin signaling, and MAPK signaling. We also showed KCNQ1OT1, SNHG7, MEG3, and SNHG5 were down-regulated in PA. Our findings could provide a novel insight to understand the mechanisms of lncRNAs underlying PA pathogenesis and identify new biomarkers for PA.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] | G. Kirchhoff, Mechanik, Teubner, Leipzig, 1883. |
[2] | S. Bernstein, Sur une classe d'ˊequations fonctionelles aux dˊerivˊees partielles, Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS. Sˊer. Math. (Izvestia Akad. Nauk SSSR), 4 (1940), 17–26. |
[3] |
S. I. Pohoˇzaev, A certain class of quasilinear hyperbolic equations, Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 96 (1975), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.96.8.166 doi: 10.1136/vr.96.8.166
![]() |
[4] | J. L. Lions, On some questions in boundary value problems of mathematical physics, in Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations (Proceedings of International Symposium, Inst. Mat., Univ. Fed. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1977), In: North-Holland Math. Stud., vol. 30, North-Holland, Amsterdam, (1978), 284–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)70870-3 |
[5] |
A. Arosio, S. Panizzi, On the well-posedness of the Kirchhoff string, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 348 (1996), 305–330. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01532-2 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01532-2
![]() |
[6] |
G. B. Li, C. L. Xiang, Nondegeneracy of positive solutions to a Kirchhoff problem with critical Sobolev growth, Appl. Math. Lett. , 86 (2018), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2018.07.010 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2018.07.010
![]() |
[7] |
S. S. Lu, An autonomous Kirchhoff-type equation with general nonlinearity in RN, Nonlinear Anal. RWA, 34 (2017), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.09.003
![]() |
[8] |
Q. L. Xie, Singular perturbed Kirchhoff type problem with critical exponent, J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 454 (2017), 144–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.04.048 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.04.048
![]() |
[9] | C. Vetro, Variable exponent p(x)-Kirchhoff type problem with convection, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125721 |
[10] |
A. Fiscella, E. Valdinoci, A critical Kirchhoff type problem involving a nonlocal operator, Nonlinear Anal. , 94 (2014), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2013.08.011 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2013.08.011
![]() |
[11] |
M. Q. Xiang, Vicenţiu D. Rˇadulescu, B. L. Zhang, Nonlocal Kirchhoff problems with singular exponential nonlinearity, Appl. Math. Optim. , 84 (2021), 915–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-020-09666-3 doi: 10.1007/s00245-020-09666-3
![]() |
[12] |
M. V. Goldman, M. Porkolab, Upper hybrid solitons ans oscillating two-stream instabilities, Phys. Fluids, 19 (1976), 872–881. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.861553 doi: 10.1063/1.861553
![]() |
[13] |
R. W. Hasse, A general method for the solution of nonlinear soliton and kink Schrödinger equations, Z. Phys. B, 37 (1980), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1159/000225502 doi: 10.1159/000225502
![]() |
[14] |
M. Colin, L. Jeanjean, Solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equation: a dual approach, Nonlinear Anal. , 56 (2004), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2003.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2003.09.008
![]() |
[15] |
M. Colin, L. Jeanjean, M. Squassina, Stability and instability results for standing waves of quasilinear Schrödinger equations, Nonlinearity, 23 (2010), 1353–1385. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/23/6/006 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/23/6/006
![]() |
[16] |
J. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, Soliton solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations II, J. Differential Equations, 187 (2003), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00064-5 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00064-5
![]() |
[17] |
J. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, Solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations via the Nehari method, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 29 (2004), 879–901. https://doi.org/10.1081/PDE-120037335 doi: 10.1081/PDE-120037335
![]() |
[18] |
J. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, Multiple sign-changing solutions for quasilinear elliptic equations via perturbation method, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 39 (2014), 2216–2239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2014.942738 doi: 10.1080/03605302.2014.942738
![]() |
[19] |
J. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, Quasilinear elliptic equations via perturbation method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 141 (2013), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2012-11293-6 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2012-11293-6
![]() |
[20] | C. Huang, G. Jia, Existence of positive solutions for supercritical quasilinear Schrödinger ellitic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 472 (2019), 705–727. |
[21] |
V. Moroz, J. van Schaftingen, A guide to the Choquard equation, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 19 (2017), 773–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-016-0373-1 doi: 10.1007/s11784-016-0373-1
![]() |
[22] |
J. K. Xia, Z. Q. Wang, Saddle solutions for the Choquard equation, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 58 (2019), 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-019-1546-8 doi: 10.1007/s00526-019-1546-8
![]() |
[23] |
D. D. Qin, Vicenţiu D. Rˇadulescu, X. H. Tang, Ground states and geometrically distinct solutions for periodic Choquard-Pekar equations, J. Differential Equations, 275 (2021), 652–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.11.021
![]() |
[24] |
B. B. V. Maia, On a class of p(x)-Choquard equations with sign-changing potential and upper critical growth, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl., 70 (2021), 1175–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-020-00553-y doi: 10.1007/s12215-020-00553-y
![]() |
[25] |
Z. H. Feng, X. Wu, H. X. Li, Multiple solutions for a modified Kirchhoff-type equation in RN, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 38 (2015), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3102 doi: 10.1002/mma.3102
![]() |
[26] |
K. Wu, X. Wu, Infinitely many small energy solutions for a modified Kirchhoff-type equation in RN, Comput. Math. Appl., 70 (2015), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.05.014 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.05.014
![]() |
[27] | X. M. He, Multiplicity of Solutions for a Modified Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Type Equation in RN, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2015 (2015). |
[28] |
Z. X. Wang, G. Jia, Existence of solutions for modified Kirchhoff-type equation without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 4614–4637. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021272 doi: 10.3934/math.2021272
![]() |
[29] |
L. Jeanjean, T. J. Luo, Sharp non-existence results of prescribed L2-norm solutions for some class of Schrödinger-Poisson and quasi-linear equations, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 64 (2013), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-012-0272-2 doi: 10.1007/s00033-012-0272-2
![]() |
[30] |
C. Huang, G. Jia, Infinitely many sign-changing solutions for modified Kirchhoff-type equations in R3, Complex Var Elliptic Equ., 66 (2021), 2090–2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2020.1807964 doi: 10.1080/17476933.2020.1807964
![]() |
[31] |
M. I. Weinstein, Nonlinear Schrödinger equations and sharp interpolation estimates, Commun. Math. Phys., 87 (1983), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01208265 doi: 10.1007/BF01208265
![]() |
[32] |
L. Jeanjean, Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal., 28 (1997), 1633–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00021-1 doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00021-1
![]() |
[33] |
T. Bartsch, S. De Valeriola, Normalized solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Arch. Math., 100 (2013), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-012-0468-x doi: 10.1007/s00013-012-0468-x
![]() |
[34] |
H. Berestycki, P. L. Lions, Nonlinear scalar field equations, II existence of infinitely many solutions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 82 (1983), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250556 doi: 10.1007/BF00250556
![]() |
[35] | T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 10, New York University, New York, 2003. |
1. | Hengzhou Lin, Dahui Zuo, Jiabin He, Tao Ji, Jianzhong Wang, Taipeng Jiang, Long Noncoding RNA WEE2-AS1 Plays an Oncogenic Role in Glioblastoma by Functioning as a Molecular Sponge for MicroRNA-520f-3p, 2021, 28, 0965-0407, 591, 10.3727/096504020X15982623243955 | |
2. | Peng Zhao, Jianhua Cheng, Bin Li, Ding Nie, Hongyun Wang, Chuzhong Li, Songbai Gui, Yazhuo Zhang, LncRNA PCAT6 regulates the progression of pituitary adenomas by regulating the miR-139-3p/BRD4 axis, 2021, 21, 1475-2867, 10.1186/s12935-020-01698-7 | |
3. | Chao Peng, Shuaikai Wang, Jinxiu Yu, Xiaoyi Deng, Huiyu Ye, Zhishan Chen, Hongru Yao, Hanjia Cai, Yanli Li, Yong Yuan, Riccardo Alessandro, lncRNA–mRNA Expression Patterns in Invasive Pituitary Adenomas: A Microarray Analysis, 2022, 2022, 2314-6141, 1, 10.1155/2022/1380485 | |
4. | Sajad Najafi, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Bashdar Mahmud Hussen, Hazha Hadayat Jamal, Mohammad Taheri, Mohammad Hallajnejad, Oncogenic Roles of Small Nucleolar RNA Host Gene 7 (SNHG7) Long Noncoding RNA in Human Cancers and Potentials, 2022, 9, 2296-634X, 10.3389/fcell.2021.809345 | |
5. | Haixia Wang, Hongbin Mou, Xiaolan Xu, Changhua Liu, Gang Zhou, Bo Gao, LncRNA KCNQ1OT1 (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1 opposite strand/antisense transcript 1) aggravates acute kidney injury by activating p38/NF-κB pathway via miR-212-3p/MAPK1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase 1) axis in sepsis, 2021, 12, 2165-5979, 11353, 10.1080/21655979.2021.2005987 | |
6. | Parisa Esmaeili Motlagh, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Solat Eslami, Guive Sharifi, Mohammad Taheri, Expression assays of selected lncRNAs in non-functioning pituitary adenomas, 2024, 15, 2730-6011, 10.1007/s12672-024-01338-w | |
7. | Neda Rahimian, Amirhossein Sheida, Mohammadreza Rajabi, Mohammad Mahdi Heidari, Mohammad Tobeiha, Pegah Veradi Esfahani, Sahar Ahmadi Asouri, Michael R. Hamblin, Omid Mohamadzadeh, Alireza Motamedzadeh, Mahmood Khaksary Mahabady, Non-coding RNAs and exosomal non-coding RNAs in pituitary adenoma, 2023, 248, 03440338, 154649, 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154649 | |
8. | Farbod Esfandi, Seyed Amirmohsen Mirjafari, Negar Rezazadeh, Vidasadat Seyyedesfahani, Amir Nicknam, Solat Eslami, Guive Sharifi, Nader Akbari Dilmaghani, Arezou Sayad, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Differential expression of cancer-related lncRNAs in different subtypes of pituitary adenomas, 2024, 260, 03440338, 155421, 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155421 | |
9. | Ling Wang, Dingkai Xu, Regulation of long noncoding RNAs in the pathogenesis and clinical implications of pituitary adenomas, 2023, 11, 2050-4527, 10.1002/iid3.1047 | |
10. | Xiaohui Xing, Peng Xu, Xiaoyang Xing, Zhentao Xu, Zhen Huang, Zhongchen Li, Xueyuan Li, Yilei Xiao, Effects of ADSC-Derived Exosome LRRC75A-AS1 on Anti-inflammatory Function After SCI, 2024, 0273-2289, 10.1007/s12010-023-04836-9 | |
11. | Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Farzaneh Abbasi, Amir Nicknam, Bashdar Mahmud Hussen, Solat Eslami, Nader Akbari Dilmaghani, Mohammad Taheri, Guive Sharifi, Dysregulation of PVT1 and NEAT1 lncRNAs in pituitary adenomas, 2023, 248, 03440338, 154573, 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154573 | |
12. | Michelle Lynn Brinkmeier, Akima Semone George, Leonard Yan Ming Cheung, Ryan Edward Mills, Philippa Melamed, Sally Ann Camper, Long Noncoding RNAs Expressed in Mouse Pituitary Development and Mature Hormone-Producing Cells, 2024, 165, 1945-7170, 10.1210/endocr/bqae147 |