
Int his paper, we study and analysis the complex Ginzburg-Landau model or CGL model to obtain some new solitary wave structures through the modified (G′/G)-expansion method. Those solutions can explain through hyperbolic, trigonometric, and rational functions. The graphical design makes the dynamics of the equations noticeable. Herein, we state that the examined method is important, powerful, and significant in performing numerous solitary wave structures of various nonlinear wave models following in physics and engineering as well.
Citation: Huiqing Wang, Md Nur Alam, Onur Alp İlhan, Gurpreet Singh, Jalil Manafian. New complex wave structures to the complex Ginzburg-Landau model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8883-8894. doi: 10.3934/math.2021515
[1] | Imran Siddique, Khush Bukht Mehdi, Sayed M Eldin, Asim Zafar . Diverse optical solitons solutions of the fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation via two altered methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11480-11497. doi: 10.3934/math.2023581 |
[2] | Muhammad Imran Asjad, Sheikh Zain Majid, Waqas Ali Faridi, Sayed M. Eldin . Sensitive analysis of soliton solutions of nonlinear Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation with generalized projective Riccati method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10210-10227. doi: 10.3934/math.2023517 |
[3] | Xiao-Yu Li, Yu-Lan Wang, Zhi-Yuan Li . Numerical simulation for the fractional-in-space Ginzburg-Landau equation using Fourier spectral method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2407-2418. doi: 10.3934/math.2023124 |
[4] | Ikram Ullah, Muhammad Bilal, Javed Iqbal, Hasan Bulut, Funda Turk . Single wave solutions of the fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation in space-time with accuracy via the beta derivative and mEDAM approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 672-693. doi: 10.3934/math.2025030 |
[5] | Hammad Alotaibi . Solitary waves of the generalized Zakharov equations via integration algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12650-12677. doi: 10.3934/math.2024619 |
[6] | M. Ali Akbar, Norhashidah Hj. Mohd. Ali, M. Tarikul Islam . Multiple closed form solutions to some fractional order nonlinear evolution equations in physics and plasma physics. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 397-411. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.397 |
[7] | Yuting Hu, Jiangtao Peng, Mingrui Wang . On Modified Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv constants of finite abelian groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6697-6704. doi: 10.3934/math.2023339 |
[8] | Naseem Abbas, Amjad Hussain, Mohsen Bakouri, Thoraya N. Alharthi, Ilyas Khan . A study of dynamical features and novel soliton structures of complex-coupled Maccari's system. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3025-3040. doi: 10.3934/math.2025141 |
[9] | Ghazala Akram, Saima Arshed, Maasoomah Sadaf, Hajra Mariyam, Muhammad Nauman Aslam, Riaz Ahmad, Ilyas Khan, Jawaher Alzahrani . Abundant solitary wave solutions of Gardner's equation using three effective integration techniques. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8171-8184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023413 |
[10] | Jalil Manafian, Onur Alp Ilhan, Sizar Abid Mohammed . Forming localized waves of the nonlinearity of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2461-2483. doi: 10.3934/math.2020163 |
Int his paper, we study and analysis the complex Ginzburg-Landau model or CGL model to obtain some new solitary wave structures through the modified (G′/G)-expansion method. Those solutions can explain through hyperbolic, trigonometric, and rational functions. The graphical design makes the dynamics of the equations noticeable. Herein, we state that the examined method is important, powerful, and significant in performing numerous solitary wave structures of various nonlinear wave models following in physics and engineering as well.
The nonlinear wave models have been excited about the observation of numerous scientists in different areas. Everybody can express various natural phenomena. Moreover, they describe the dynamics of these phenomena and determine the physical application of these models. Several scientists have been endeavored to get different procedures that able to make the closed-form wave and solitary wave solutions of these equations. Some crucial processes as the extended mapping method [1], the extended direct algebraic sech method [2], the extended modified mapping method [3], the Sech-tanh method [4], the direct algebraic function method [5], the (G′/G)-expansion scheme [6,7,8,9,10], the finite series Jacobi elliptic cosine function Ansatz [11,12], the modified auxiliary equation method [13,14], the generalized unified method [15], the generalized exponential function [16], the general bilinear form [17], the reproducing kernel Hilbert space method [18], the residual power series method [19], the exp(−ϕ(ξ)-expansion method [20,21,22], the variation of parameters method (VPM) [23], the traditional homotopy perturbation method (HPM) [24,25], the optimal Galerkin-homotopy asymptotic method (OGHAM) [26], the Laplace variational iterative method [27,28], the improved tan(ϕ(ξ)/2)-expansion method [29], the Sumudu homotopy perturbation method [30], the sine-Gordon expansion method [31], the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method [32], the improve tan(ϕ(ξ))-expansion method [33,34], the reproducing kernel method [35], a systematic calculative algorithm [36], the extended trial equation method (ETEM) [37] and many more. The paper applied the modified (G′G)-expansion method [38] to derive the different type of solitary wave structures for the complex Ginzburg-Landau model [14,16]. The complex Ginzburg-Landau model can be represented as
iWt+s1Wxx+s2f(|W|2)W−s3|W|2W∗{2|W|2(|W|2)xx−((|W|2)x)2}−s4W=0, | (1.1) |
where x is the non-dimensional distance along the fiber, t is the time in dimensionless form, s1, s2, s3, s4 are the group of velocity dispersion parameters and the function f(|W|2) is a k-times continuously differentiable real-valued algebraic function, k=1,2,..., respectively. Authors of [39] used the generalized logistic equation method for Kerr law and dual power law Schrödinger equations, and obtained the exact optical solitons to the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation with dual-power law of nonlinearity [40], and also the dynamical behavior of mixed type lump solutions on the (3+ 1)-dimensional generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili-Boussinesq equation has been investigated in [41].
This investigation proposes to acquire new solitary wave solutions to the the complex Ginzburg-Landau model via the modified (G′G)-expansion method. The synopsis of this paper shown below. In Section 2, we mentioned the algorithm of the modified (G′G)-expansion method. In Section 3, new solitary wave solutions of the studied equation is formulated. In Section 4, result and discussions are given.
The modified (G′G)-expansion method [38] is summarized as follows:
P(u,ux,uxx,ut,utt,uxt,...)=0, | (2.1) |
where u=u(x,t), ux=∂u∂x, uxx=∂2u∂x2 and P is a polynomial in u(x,t) and their partial derivatives, in which the nonlinear terms and biggest order derivatives are involved.
Use the transformation:
u=u(x,t)=u(ξ),ξ=k(x−Vt+ξ0), | (2.2) |
where k, ξ0 and V are a constant. From Eq 2.1 and Eq 2.2, we find:
R(u,ku′,k2u″,−kVu′,k2V2u″,−k2V2u″,...)=0. | (2.3) |
● Step 1: Calculate m through the balance rule on Eq 2.3.
● Step 2: We consider the modified (G′G)-expansion method:
u(ξ)=m∑i=−mAiFi, | (2.4) |
where F=(G′G+λ2), |A−m|+|Am|≠0 and G=G(ξ) satisfies the equation:
G″+λG′+μG=0, | (2.5) |
where Ai(±1,±2,...,±m), λ and μ are free constants. From the Eq 2.5, after some manipulation we find:
F′=h−F2, | (2.6) |
where h=λ2−4μ4 and h is calculated by λ and μ. So, F now satisfies the Riccati like equation 2.6. It is found that the Riccati like equation 2.6 admits several types of solutions (see Appendix for details).
● Step 3: Applying Eq 2.4 into Eq 2.3 and Eq 2.6, collecting all terms with the same order of F together. Equating each coefficient of this polynomial to zero, yields a set of algebraic equations which can be solved to find the values of Ai(±1,±2,...,±m), λ and μ with the help of MAPLE.
Let us consider:
iWt+s1Wxx+s2f(|W|2)W−s3|W|2W∗{2|W|2(|W|2)xx−((|W|2)x)2}−s4W=0. | (3.1) |
The constants η is the phase component, a is the wave number, b is the frequency, r is the phase constant and c is the velocity of the above model, respectively. Plugging W(x,t)=eiηV(ξ), ξ=x−ct, η=−ax+bt+r into the Eq 3.1. Equation 3.1 separates the imaginary, and real parts through the above transformation:
−(2as1+c)V′=0, | (3.2) |
−(s1a2+s4+b)V+s2f(|V|2)V+(s1−4s3)V″=0. | (3.3) |
The Eq 3.2 provides c=−2as1. For researching the Kerr-law nonlinearity of Eq 3.1, we put f(|V|2)=V2 and Eq 3.3 becomes:
V3+PV+RV″=0, | (3.4) |
where P=−s1a2+s4+bs2 and R=−s1−4s3s2. In accordance with the rule of the modified (G′G)-expansion method [38], Equation 3.4 gives:
U(ξ)=A1F(ξ)+A0+A−1F−1(ξ), | (3.5) |
where the coefficients A0, A1 and A−1 are constants. By Eq 3.5 and Eq 3.4 and then equating each coefficients of Fi to zeros, we get:
● The first set:
P=12Rλ2−2Rμ,g=±√−2R,A0=0,A1=g,A−1=0. |
Using the values of the first set and Eq 3.5 into Eq 3.4, we have:
W1(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[2g√λ2−4μ×coth{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}], |
W2(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[2g√λ2−4μ×tanh{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}], |
W3(x,y,z,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)×(x+2as1t), |
W4(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[−2g√4μ−λ2×cot{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}], |
W5(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[2g√4μ−λ2×tan{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}]. |
● The second set:
P=12Rλ2−2Rμ−32ghλ2+6ghμ,h=±√−2R,A0=0,A1=g,A−1=12h(λ2−4μ). |
Similarly, we get:
W6(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[g√λ2−4μ2×tanh{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}+h√λ2−4μ×coth{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}], |
W7(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[g√λ2−4μ2×coth{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}+h√λ2−4μ×tanh{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}], |
W8(x,y,z,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[g×1x+2as1t+12h(λ2−4μ)×(x+2as1t)], |
W9(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[−g√4μ−λ22×tan{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}−h√4μ−λ2×cot{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}], |
W10(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[g√4μ−λ22×cot{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}+h√4μ−λ2×tan{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}]. |
● The third set:
P=12Rλ2−2Rμ,A0=0,A1=0,A−1=12h(λ2−4μ). |
Similarly, we find:
W11(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[h√λ2−4μ×coth{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}], |
W12(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[h√λ2−4μ×tanh{√λ2−4μ2(x+2as1t)}], |
W13(x,y,z,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[12h(λ2−4μ)×(x−ct)], |
W14(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[−h√4μ−λ2×cot{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}], |
W15(x,t)=ei(−ax+bt+r)[h√4μ−λ2×tan{√4μ−λ22(x+2as1t)}]. |
Ma et al. [38] have introduced a method which is called the modified (G′/G)-expansion approach to derive for solitary wave solutions of nonlinear wave models, where G=G(ξ) satisfies G″(ξ)+λG′(ξ)+μG(ξ)=0, where λ and μ are arbitrary constants and u(ξ)=∑mi=−mAi(G′G+λ2)i be the anstaz equation of nonlinear wave models. We apply the modified (G′/G)-expansion process on the CGL model and provided fifteen solitary wave solutions. Osman et al. [14] studied CGL model to derive only ten solitary wave solutions through the modified auxiliary equation method. If B=2 and 4ασ−B2=λ2−4μ, the solutions of Eqs. (3.7), (3.8), (3.9), (3.10), and (3.11) in [14] are similar solutions W11, W12, W13, W14 and W15. And solutions W1, W2, W3, W4, W5, W6, W7, W8, W9 and W10 are all new solitary wave solutions. Osman et al. [14] only derived trigonometric and hyperbolic solutions but failed to achieve the rational ones. The rational function solutions are vital not only for physics but also for the areas of sciences and engineering. Moreover, hyperbolic solutions are useful for analyzing the modulus instability in plasma physics. Comparison between two methods, the modified (G′/G)-expansion process is provided more solitary wave solutions rather than the modified auxiliary equation method. Finally, the newly method successfully implemented to derive new solitary wave solutions to the CGL model. The graph is an important tool for information and to demonstrate the solutions to the problems lucidly. When making the computation in daily life, we need a fundamental knowledge of building the application of graphs. Accordingly, the graphical performances of few got solutions are drawn in the Figures 1, 2 and 3, respectively. We expressed Figure 1, 2 and 3, respectively for few of the derived solutions to display more of properties for the recommended model. The representation of the examined process gives the accuracy and influence of this procedure and also the capacity for implementing various nonlinear wave models.
The solution of every PDE is always utilized for understanding the system and various phenomena described by it. The modified G'/G -expansion method is helpful to obtain the solutions in the form of hyperbolic and trigonometric forms which are exact and helpful in understanding the fractional forms of it. Finally, a transformation is used to draw a soliton solution of Eq (1.1) by the use of Maple software. So, this gives the efficient applications of modified G'/G-expansion for fractional PDEs.
The authors would like to acknowledge CAS-TWAS president's fellowship program.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
The solutions of equation 2.6 are:
● If h>0, then
F=√htanh(√hξ), | (5.1a) |
F=√hcoth(√hξ). | (5.1b) |
● If h=0, then
F=1ξ. | (5.2) |
● If h<0, then
F=−√−htan(√−hξ), | (5.3a) |
F=√−hcot(√−hξ). | (5.3b) |
[1] |
A. R. Seadawy, S. Z. Alamri, Mathematical methods via the nonlinear two-dimensional water waves of Olver dynamical equation and its exact solitary wave solutions, Results Phys., 8 (2018), 286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.12.008
![]() |
[2] |
A. R. Seadawy, Ion acoustic solitary wave solutions of two-dimensional nonlinear Kadomtsevetviashviliurgers equation in quantum plasma, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 1598-1607. doi: 10.1002/mma.4081
![]() |
[3] |
A. R. Seadawy, Three-Dimensional Weakly Nonlinear Shallow Water Waves Regime and its Traveling Wave Solutions, Int. J. Comput. Meth., 15 (2018), 1850017. doi: 10.1142/S0219876218500172
![]() |
[4] |
A. R. Seadawy, Solitary wave solutions of two-dimensional nonlinear Kadomtsevetviashvili dynamic equation in dust-acoustic plasmas, Pramana, 89 (2017), 49. doi: 10.1007/s12043-017-1446-4
![]() |
[5] |
A. R. Seadawy, Two-dimensional interaction of a shear flow with a free surface in a stratified fluid and its solitary-wave solutions via mathematical methods, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 518. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11755-6
![]() |
[6] | J. G. Liu, M. S. Osman, W. H. Zhu, L. Zhou, G. P. Ai, Different complex wave structures described by the Hirota equation with variable coefficients in inhomogeneous optical fibers, Appl. Phys. B, 125 (2019), 175. |
[7] |
M. N. Alam, X. Li, Exact traveling wave solutions to higher order nonlinear equations, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 4 (2019), 276-288. doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2019.05.003
![]() |
[8] |
C. T. Sindi, J. Manafian, Wave solutions for variants of the KdVurger and the K(n, n)urger equations by the generalized G'/G-expansion method, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 4350-4363. doi: 10.1002/mma.4309
![]() |
[9] |
M. N. Alam, M. A. Akbar, S. T. Mohyud-Din, A novel (G′/G)-expansion method and its application to the Boussinesq equation, Chin. Phys. B, 23 (2014), 020203-020210. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/23/2/020203
![]() |
[10] |
U. Khan, R. Ellahi, R. Khan, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Extracting new solitary wave solutions of Benny-Luke equation and Phi-4 equation of fractional order by using (G′/G)-expansion method, Opt. Quant. Elec., 49 (2017), 362. doi: 10.1007/s11082-017-1191-4
![]() |
[11] |
H. M. Ahmed, W. B. Rabie, M. A. Ragusa, Optical solitons and other solutions to Kaup-Newell equation with Jacobi elliptic function expansion method, Anal. Math. Phys., 11 (2021), 1-16. doi: 10.1007/s13324-020-00437-5
![]() |
[12] |
V. S. Kumar, H. Rezazadeh, M. Eslami, F. Izadi, M. S. Osman, Jacobi Elliptic Function Expansion Method for Solving KdV Equation with Conformable Derivative and Dual-Power Law Nonlinearity, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 5 (2019), 127. doi: 10.1007/s40819-019-0710-3
![]() |
[13] |
S. Wang, Remarks on an Equation of the Ginzburg-Landau Type, Filomat, 33 (2019), 5913-5917. doi: 10.2298/FIL1918913W
![]() |
[14] |
M. S. Osman, D. Lu, M. M. A. Khater, R. A. M. Attia, Complex wave structures for abundant solutions related to the complex Ginzburgandau model, Optik, 192 (2019), 162927. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.06.027
![]() |
[15] |
M. S. Osman, One-soliton shaping and inelastic collision between double solitons in the fifth-order variable-coefficient Sawadaotera equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 96 (2019), 1491-1496. doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-04866-1
![]() |
[16] |
M. S. Osman, B. Ghanbari, J. A. T. Machado, New complex waves in nonlinear optics based on the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 20. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12442-4
![]() |
[17] |
M. S. Osman, A. M. Wazwaz, A general bilinear form to generate different wave structures of solitons for a (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 6277-6283. doi: 10.1002/mma.5721
![]() |
[18] |
A. A. Omar, Modulation of reproducing kernel Hilbert space method for numerical solutions of Riccati and Bernoulli equations in the Atangana-Baleanu fractional sense, Chaos Solitons Frac., 125 (2019), 163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.025
![]() |
[19] | A. A. Omar, Application of residual power series method for the solution of time-fractional Schrodinger equations in one-dimensional space, Fund. Inform., 166 (2019), 87-110. |
[20] |
M. N. Alam, M. M. Alam, An analytical method for solving exact solutions of a nonlinear evolution equation describing the ynamics of ionic currents along microtubules, Taibah University Sci., 11 (2017), 939-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.11.004
![]() |
[21] |
M. N. Alam, F. B. M. Belgacem, Microtubules nonlinear models dynamics investigations through the exp−ϕ(ξ)-expansion method implementation, Math., 4 (2016), 6. doi: 10.3390/math4010006
![]() |
[22] |
M. N. Alam, C. Tunc, An analytical method for solving exact solutions of the nonlinear Bogoyavlenskii equation and the nonlinear diffusive predator-prey system, Alexandria Eng. J., 55 (2016), 1855-1865. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.04.024
![]() |
[23] |
W. Sikander, U. Khan, N. Ahmed, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Optimal solutions for homogeneous and non-homogeneous equations arising in physics, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.12.018
![]() |
[24] |
W. Sikander, U. Khan, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Optimal Solutions for the Evolution of a Social Obesity Epidemic Model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 257. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11512-y
![]() |
[25] |
M. Dehghan, J. Manafian, A. Saadatmandi, Solving nonlinear fractional partial differential equations using the homotopy analysis method, Numer. Meth. Part. Diff. Eq., 26 (2010), 448-479. doi: 10.1002/num.20460
![]() |
[26] | J. Manafian, An optimal Galerkin-homotopy asymptotic method applied to the nonlinear second-order bvps, Proc. Instit. Math. Mech., 47 (2021), 156-182. |
[27] | G. Singh, I. Singh, New Laplace variational iterative method for solving 3D Schrödinger equations, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 10 (2020), 2015-2024. |
[28] | G. Singh, I. Singh, New Laplace variational iterative method for solving two-dimensional telegraph equations, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 10 (2020), 2943-2954. |
[29] |
S. T. Mohyud-Din, A. Irshad, N. Ahmed, U. Khan, Exact Solutions of (3+1)-dimensional generalized KP Equation Arising in Physics, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 3901-3909. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.007
![]() |
[30] |
A. Atangana, Extension of the Sumudu homotopy perturbation method to an attractor for one-dimensional Kelleregel equations, Appl. Math. Model., 39 (2015), 2909-2916. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.09.029
![]() |
[31] |
H. M. Baskonus, H. Bulut, New wave behaviors of the system of equations for the ion sound and Langmuir waves, Waves Random Complex, 26 (2016), 613-625. doi: 10.1080/17455030.2016.1181811
![]() |
[32] |
M. Mirzazadeh, R. T. Alqahtani, A. Biswas, Optical soliton perturbation with quadratic-cubic nonlinearity by Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method and Kudryashov's scheme, Optik, 145 (2017), 74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.07.011
![]() |
[33] |
J. Manafian, Application of the ITEM for the system of equations for the ion sound and Langmuir waves, Opt. Quant. Elec., 49 (2017), 17. doi: 10.1007/s11082-016-0860-z
![]() |
[34] | J. Manafian, S. Heidari, Periodic and singular kink solutions of the Hamiltonian amplitude equation, Adv. Math. Models Appl., 4 (2019), 134-149. |
[35] |
B. Boutarfa, A. Akgul, M. Inc, New approach for the Fornberghitham type equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 312 (2017), 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.09.016
![]() |
[36] | J. Manafian, M. Shahriari, An efficient algorithm for solving the fractional dirac differential operator, Adv. Math. Models Appl., 5 (2020), 289-297. |
[37] | S. T. Demiray, H. Bulut, New exact solutions of the system of equations for the ion sound and Langmuir waves by ETEM, Math. Comput. Appl., 21 (2016), 11. |
[38] | X. Ma, Y. Pan, L. Chang, Explicit travelling wave solutions in a magneto-electro-elastic circular rod, Int. J. Comput. Sci., 10 (2013), 62-68. |
[39] |
Z. Pinar, H. Rezazadeh, M. Eslami, Generalized logistic equation method for Kerr law and dual power law Schrödinger equations, Opt. Quant. Elec., 52 (2020), 1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-2116-1
![]() |
[40] |
N. Savaissou, B. Gambo, H. Rezazadeh, A. Bekir, S. Y. Doka, Exact optical solitons to the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation with dual-power law of nonlinearity, Opt. Quant. Elec., 52 (2020), 1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-2116-1
![]() |
[41] |
J. G. Liu, M. Eslami, H. Rezazadeh, M. Mirzazadeh, The dynamical behavior of mixed type lump solutions on the (3+ 1)-dimensional generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili-Boussinesq equation, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Num. Simul., 21 (2020), 661-665. doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0373
![]() |
1. | Sanjaya K. Mohanty, Sachin Kumar, Apul N. Dev, Manoj Kr. Deka, Dmitry V. Churikov, Oleg V. Kravchenko, An efficient technique of G′G–expansion method for modified KdV and Burgers equations with variable coefficients, 2022, 37, 22113797, 105504, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105504 | |
2. | Md. Nur Alam, Soliton solutions to the electric signals in telegraph lines on the basis of the tunnel diode, 2023, 7, 26668181, 100491, 10.1016/j.padiff.2023.100491 | |
3. | Arzu Akbulut, Gaetano Luciano, Obtaining the Soliton Type Solutions of the Conformable Time-Fractional Complex Ginzburg–Landau Equation with Kerr Law Nonlinearity by Using Two Kinds of Kudryashov Methods, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/4741219 | |
4. | Ajay Kumar, Raj Shekhar Prasad, Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Juan Luis Garcia Guirao, On the implementation of fractional homotopy perturbation transform method to the Emden–Fowler equations, 2023, 97, 0973-7111, 10.1007/s12043-023-02589-y | |
5. | J. R. M. Borhan, I. Abouelfarag, K. El-Rashidy, M. Mamun Miah, M. Ashik Iqbal, Mohammad Kanan, Exploring New Traveling Wave Solutions to the Nonlinear Integro-Partial Differential Equations with Stability and Modulation Instability in Industrial Engineering, 2024, 12, 2079-3197, 161, 10.3390/computation12080161 | |
6. | Nirmoy Kumar Das, Dhanashri Barman, Ashoke Das, Towhid E Aman, PT-invariant generalised non-local nonlinear Schrödinger equation: soliton solutions, 2024, 98, 0973-7111, 10.1007/s12043-024-02827-x | |
7. | Handenur Esen, Aydin Secer, Muslum Ozisik, Mustafa Bayram, Optical soliton solutions of the nonlinear complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with the generalized quadratic-cubic law nonlinearity having the chromatic dispersion, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 095243, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad6c93 | |
8. | Sonia Akram, Jamshad Ahmad, Shalan Alkarni, Nehad Ali Shah, Analysis of lump solutions and modulation instability to fractional complex Ginzburg–Landau equation arise in optical fibers, 2023, 53, 22113797, 106991, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106991 | |
9. | Sanjaya K. Mohanty, Apul N. Dev, 2023, 2819, 0094-243X, 070007, 10.1063/5.0137050 | |
10. | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Saima Arshed, Muhammad Abdaal Bin Iqbal, Simulations of exact explicit solutions of simplified modified form of Camassa–Holm equation, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06940-4 |