Monotonicity and inequalities related to complete elliptic integrals of the second kind

Fei Wang; Bai-Ni Guo; Feng Qi; Fei Wang; Bai-Ni Guo; Feng Qi

doi:10.3934/math.2020176

AIMS Mathematics

2020, Volume 5, Issue 3: 2732-2742. doi: 10.3934/math.2020176

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Monotonicity and inequalities related to complete elliptic integrals of the second kind

1.
Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China
2.
School of Mathematics and Informatics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
3.
School of Mathematical Sciences, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

In the paper, the authors present some monotonicity properties of certain functions defined in terms of the complete elliptic integrals of the second kind and some elementary functions and, consequently, improve several known inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals of the second kind.

Keywords:

monotonicity,
inequality,
complete elliptic integral of the second kind

Citation: Fei Wang, Bai-Ni Guo, Feng Qi. Monotonicity and inequalities related to complete elliptic integrals of the second kind[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2732-2742. doi: 10.3934/math.2020176

Related Papers:

[1]	Aidi Yao . Two-dimensional pseudo-steady supersonic flow around a sharp corner for the generalized Chaplygin gas. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11732-11758. doi: 10.3934/math.2022654
[2]	Jianhong Zhuang, Yaqing Liu, Ping Zhuang . Variety interaction solutions comprising lump solitons for the (2+1)-dimensional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Kotera-Sawada equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5370-5386. doi: 10.3934/math.2021316
[3]	Yonghui Zou, Xin Xu, An Gao . Local well-posedness to the thermal boundary layer equations in Sobolev space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9933-9964. doi: 10.3934/math.2023503
[4]	Guangyue Huang, Botao Wang . Rigidity results for closed vacuum static spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28728-28737. doi: 10.3934/math.20231470
[5]	Yellamma, N. Manjunatha, Umair Khan, Samia Elattar, Sayed M. Eldin, Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan, R. Sumithra, K. Sarada . Onset of triple-diffusive convective stability in the presence of a heat source and temperature gradients: An exact method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13432-13453. doi: 10.3934/math.2023681
[6]	Abdelkader Laiadi, Abdelkrim Merzougui . Free surface flows over a successive obstacles with surface tension and gravity effects. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 316-326. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.316
[7]	Jin Yang, Zhenzhen Wei . The optimal problems for torsional rigidity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4597-4613. doi: 10.3934/math.2021271
[8]	Yusuke Ishigaki, Yoshihiro Ueda . Stability of stationary solutions to outflow problem for compressible viscoelastic system in one dimensional half space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 33215-33253. doi: 10.3934/math.20241585
[9]	Jin Liu, Botao Wang . A rigidity result for $2$ -dimensional $\lambda$ -translators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24947-24956. doi: 10.3934/math.20231272
[10]	Jae-Myoung Kim . Time decay rates for the coupled modified Navier-Stokes and Maxwell equations on a half space. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13423-13431. doi: 10.3934/math.2021777

Abstract

1. Introduction

The study of the propagation of Rayleigh waves in the layered non-homogeneous earth is central interested in theoretical seismologists. As a result of intensive studies of many authors, a good amount of information about the propagation of Rayleigh waves with different variations in density and rigidity is available. A book of Ewing, Jardetzky and Press (1957) ^[1], Achenbach (1973) ^[2], Miklowitz (1978) ^[3], Pilant (1979) ^[4] and many other different books contains a vast amount of information on the propagation of Rayleigh waves. After these books were published, many publications on these topics are available in different journals. Wang et al. (2008) ^[5] studied the propagation and localization of Rayleigh waves in disordered piezoelectric phononic-crystals. Liu and Liu (2004) ^[6] studied the propagation characteristics of Rayleigh waves in orthotropic fluid-saturated porous media. Abd-All et al. (2011) ^[7] studied the propagation of Rayleigh waves in generalized magneto-thermo-elastic orthotropic material under initial stress and gravity field. Rayleigh wave propagation in layered heterogeneous media has been studied in detail by Wilson (1942) ^[8], Biot (1965) ^[9], Newlands (1950) ^[10] and Stonely (1934) ^[11]. Dutta (1963) ^[12] illustrated Rayleigh wave propagation in a two-layer anisotropic media whereas propagation of Rayleigh wave in an elastic half-space of orthotropic and viscoelastic material has been discussed by Abd-Alla (1999) ^[13] and Abd-Alla (2015) ^[14]. Sharma and Mohinder (2004) ^[15] studied Rayleigh-lamb waves in the magneto-thermo-elastic homogeneous isotropic plate. Mitra (1957) ^[16] studied Rayleigh waves in multi-layered media. In some of the studies reported their solution is expressed in Whittaker function (1990) ^[17] and the computation is involved with the asymptotic expansion of the function. The effects of tidal waves are studied by different authors such as Z. Hu et al. (2015, 2015, 2017) ^[18,19,20], Chen et al. (2018) ^[21] and Suzuki et al. (2019) ^[22]. The expansion is valid on larger depth but does not give good result in shallow depth. Newlands (1950) ^[10] found a new approach to the problem and obtained a solution that may be used in shallow depth. Following Newlands, in this paper attempt has been made to study the effect of rigid boundary on the propagation of Rayleigh wave in an incompressible heterogeneous medium over an incompressible half-space. The non-homogeneity has been taken in variation in the rigidity.

In this paper, the author dealt with the effect of the rigid boundary of propagation on Rayleigh waves in an incompressible heterogeneous layer over an initially stressed incompressible half-space. The heterogeneity has been taken in rigidity as and density as and in the upper layer. The equation of the upper layer has been solved by the Newlands method (1950).

2. Formulation of the problem

Suppose an incompressible medium of thickness H under rigid layer with shear modulus rigidity $\mu = \mu_{0}(1+bz)^{m}$ and density $\rho = \rho_{0}$ lying over another incompressible half-space with constant shear modulus $\mu_2$ and density $\rho_2$ , being taken as the vertical distance from the origin at the interface of an incompressible medium and incompressible half-space whereas the rigid surface exits at $z = -H$ . The downward direction of $z$ has been taken as positive in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Geometry of the problem.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Consider the wave propagating along x-axis with wave velocity C and wave-length $\dfrac{2\pi}{k}$ . Let $u$ and $w$ are the displacement component in the x- and z- direction respectively at the point (x, y, z) at any time. Suppose that apart from a factor $e^{ik(x-Ct)}$ and $u$ , $w$ are functions of z only.

3. Equation of motion and solution

3.1. Equation of motion and solution for upper layer

The equation of motion in two diminutions for an elastic solid are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}\left\lbrace \lambda\Delta+2\mu\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x} \right\rbrace+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\left\lbrace \mu\left( \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial z}+\dfrac{\partial w}{\partial x}\right) \right\rbrace = \rho\dfrac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial t^{2}}\\ \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\left\lbrace \lambda\Delta+2\mu\dfrac{\partial w}{\partial z} \right\rbrace+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}\left\lbrace \mu\left( \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial z}+\dfrac{\partial w}{\partial x}\right) \right\rbrace = \rho\dfrac{\partial^{2} w}{\partial t^{2}} \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1)

where, since the medium is incompressible,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \vartriangle = \left( \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial w}{\partial z}\right) = 0\\ \triangledown^{2}\varphi = 0 \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2)

Substituting,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u = \dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial z}\\ w = \dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}-\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3)

where $\phi$ and $\psi$ being scalar and vector potentials, by $\mu = \mu_{0}(1+bz)^{m}$ , incompressibility condition $\Delta = 0$ , together with $lim_{\lambda \rightarrow \infty, \Delta \rightarrow 0}\lambda\Delta \rightarrow P_1$ , where $P_1$ the hydrostatic stress, Eq (1) takes the form as Again, substituting,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}[ -P_1+2\mu_0 b m(1+bz)^{m-1} w+\rho k^{2}C^{2}\phi]+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}[\mu\nabla^{2} \psi+\rho k^{2}C^{2}\psi] = 0\\ \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}[ -P_1+2\mu_0 b m(1+bz)^{m-1} w+\rho k^{2}C^{2}\phi]-\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}[\mu\nabla^{2} \psi+\rho k^{2}C^{2}\psi] = 0 \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4)

which are satisfied by

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} P_1 = 2\mu_0 b m(1+bz)^{m-1} w+\rho k^{2}C^{2}\phi\\ \mu\nabla^{2} \psi = \rho k^{2}C^{2}\psi \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5)

From Eq (5)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \dfrac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial z^{2}} + k^{2}\left[ \dfrac{\rho c^{2}}{\mu_{0}(1+bz)^{m}}-1\right] \psi(z) = 0\\ \dfrac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial z^{2}}-k^{2}\Phi = 0 \end{split} \end{equation}$

(6)

Taking $Z = (1+bz)$ in Eq (6), we have

$\begin{equation} \dfrac{d^{2} \psi}{dZ^{2}}-\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left( 1-\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_{0} Z^{m}}\right) \psi = 0 \end{equation}$

(7)

In power of $\left(\dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}$ , the series solution of Eq (7), may be written as

$\begin{equation} \psi(Z) = \psi_{0}(Z)+ \left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\psi_{1}(Z)+......+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2n}\psi_{n}(Z)+... \end{equation}$

(8)

Hence,

$\begin{equation} \left[\psi_{0}^{\prime\prime}(Z)+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\psi_{1}^{\prime\prime}(Z)+...... \right] -\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left[1-\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_{0} Z^{m}} \right] \left[\psi_{0}(Z)+ \left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\psi_{1}(Z)+..... \right] = 0 \end{equation}$

(9)

Thus, if

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_{0}^{\prime\prime}(Z) = 0 \\ \psi_{1}^{\prime\prime}(Z) = \left[ 1-\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_{0} Z^{m}}\right]\psi_{0} \\ .\\ .\\ \psi_{n+1}^{\prime\prime}(Z) = \left[ 1-\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_{0} Z^{m}}\right]\psi_{n} (Z) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(10)

Since the series [Eq (9)] converges and involves with two constants, then it is a valid solution. We have,

$\begin{equation} \psi_n^{\prime}(1) = \psi_n(1) = 0 \end{equation}$

(11)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_n^{\prime}(Z) = \dfrac{A_{2}}{b}, \psi_0 (Z) = A_1+\dfrac{A_2}{b}(Z-1) = A_1+A_2z \end{split} \end{equation}$

(12)

Due to linearity of Eq (7), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi = A_1\left[\psi_{0}^{(1)}(Z)+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\psi_{1}^{(1)}(Z)+... \right]+A_2\left[\psi_{0}^{(2)}(Z)+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\psi_{1}^{(2)}(Z)+... \right] = A_1 \psi^{1}+A_2 \psi^{2} \end{split} \end{equation}$

(13)

Where,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_0^{(1)} = 1\\ \psi_0^{(2)} = \dfrac{Z-1}{b} = z \end{split} \end{equation}$

(14)

Now,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_1 = \int_{1}^{Z} d\xi \int_{1}^{\xi} \left( 1-\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_{0} t^{m}}\right) \psi_0(t )dt = \int_{1}^{Z} d\xi \int_{1}^{\xi}\left( 1-\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_{0} t^{m}}\right)\left[ A_1+\dfrac{A_2}{b}(t-1)\right] dt\\ = A_1\left\lbrace\dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}[Zlog Z-(Z-1)]\right\rbrace+A_2\left\lbrace\dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left[\dfrac{Z^{2}}{2}-Z+\dfrac{1}{2}-( Zlog Z-(Z-1))\right] \right\rbrace \end{split} \end{equation}$

(15)

And the solution of $\psi^{(1)}$ and $\psi^{(2)}$ are readily obtained as follows:

Case Ⅰ : When m = 1

$\begin{equation} \psi_1 = A_1\left\lbrace\dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0} [Zlog Z-(Z-1)]\right\rbrace+\dfrac{A_2}{b}\left\lbrace\dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left[\dfrac{1}{2}-\dfrac{Z^{2}}{2}+ ZlogZ\right] \right\rbrace \end{equation}$

(16)

The solutions are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_{Z}^{(1)} = 1+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right) ^{2}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace Zlog Z-(Z-1)\right\rbrace \right] \\ \psi_Z^{2} = (Z-1)+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2} \left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace \dfrac{1}{2}-\dfrac{Z^{2}}{2}+ ZlogZ\right\rbrace \right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(17)

Case Ⅱ: when m = 2

$\begin{equation} \psi_1 = A_1\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace log Z-(Z-1)\right\rbrace \right] +\dfrac{A_2}{b}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace ( Z+1)log Z+2(1-Z)\right\rbrace\right] \end{equation}$

(18)

The solution are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_Z^{(1)} = 1+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace log Z-(Z-1)\right\rbrace \right]\\ \psi_Z^{(2)} = (Z-1)+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6} -\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace ( Z+1)log Z+2(1-Z)\right\rbrace\right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(19)

Case Ⅲ: when m = 3

$\begin{equation} \psi_1 = A_1\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace 1-\dfrac{Z}{2}-\dfrac{1}{2Z}\right\rbrace \right] +\dfrac{A_2}{b}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace log Z+\dfrac{1}{2Z}-\dfrac{Z}{2}\right\rbrace\right] \end{equation}$

(20)

The solution are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_Z^{(1)} = 1+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace 1-\dfrac{Z}{2}-\dfrac{1}{2Z}\right\rbrace \right]\\ \psi_Z^{(2)} = (Z-1)+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\left\lbrace log Z+\dfrac{1}{2Z}-\dfrac{Z}{2}\right\rbrace\right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(21)

Case Ⅳ: when any value of m except 1, 2 and 3

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_1 = A_1\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\dfrac{1}{(1-m)}\left\lbrace (Z-1)+\dfrac{1}{(2-m)}\left(1-\dfrac{1}{Z^{m-2}} \right) \right\rbrace \right] \\+\dfrac{A_2}{b}\left[ \dfrac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\dfrac{1}{(2-m)}\left\lbrace (Z-1)+\dfrac{1}{(3-m)}\left(1-\dfrac{1}{Z^{m-3}} \right)\right\rbrace+\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\dfrac{1}{(1-m)}\left\lbrace (1-Z)+\dfrac{1}{(2-m)}\left(\dfrac{1}{Z^{m-2}}-1 \right)\right\rbrace\right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(22)

The solutions are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_Z^{(1)} = 1+\left( \dfrac{k}{b}\right)^{2}\left[\dfrac{(Z-1)^{2}}{2} +\dfrac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\dfrac{1}{(1-m)}\left\lbrace (Z-1)+\dfrac{1}{(2-m)}\left(1-\dfrac{1}{Z^{m-2}}\right)\right\rbrace\right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(23)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \psi_Z^{(2)} = (Z-1)+\Bigg (\frac{k}{b}\Bigg)^{2}\Bigg [\frac{(Z-1)^{3}}{6}+\frac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\frac{1}{(2-m)}\Bigg\{(Z-1)+\frac{1}{(3-m)}\Bigg(1-\frac{1}{Z^{(m-3)}}\Bigg)\Bigg\}\\ +\frac{\rho C^{2}}{\mu_0}\frac{1}{(1-m)}\Bigg\{(1-Z)+\frac{1}{(2-m)}\Bigg(\frac{1}{Z^{(m-2)}}-1\Bigg)\Bigg\}\Bigg] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(24)

Hence the final solutions are

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \phi = [Q_1 cosh(kz)+Q_2 sinh(kz)]cos k(x-Ct)\\ \psi = [A_1\psi^{(1)}(z)+A_2\psi^{(2)}(z)]sin k(x-Ct) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(25)

Hence the displacement and stress component along x- and z- direction in the incompressible layer sandwiched between the rigid surface and a half-space are given by

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u = \left[-k(Q_1 cosh (kz)+Q_2 sinh (kz))+\left(A_1\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\psi^{(1)}(Z) +A_2\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\psi^{(2)}(Z)\right) \right]sin k(x-Ct)\\ w = \left[k(Q_1 sinh (kz)+Q_2 cosh (kz))+k\left(A_1\psi^{(1)}(Z) +A_2\psi^{(2)}(Z)\right) \right]cos k(x-Ct)\\ \sigma_{xz} = 2k\left[-\mu \dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}+k\left(\mu-\dfrac{\varepsilon\mu_0}{2} \right)\psi \right]\\ \sigma_{zz} = 2\left[ k^{2}\phi\left(\mu-\dfrac{\varepsilon\mu_0}{2} \right)\psi-\mu_0bm(1+bz)^{m-1}\dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}+\mu_0bm(1+bz)^{m-1}k\psi-\mu k\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial z}\right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(26)

where, $\varepsilon = \dfrac{C^{2}\rho}{\mu_0}$

3.2. Solution for the homogeneous half-space

The values of $\phi$ and $\psi$ as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \phi = Re^{-kz}cos k(x-Ct)\\ \psi = Se^{-knz}sin k(x-Ct) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(27)

Where, $n = \left(1-\dfrac{\rho_2C^{2}}{\mu_2}\right)$

Hence the displacement and stress component along x- and z- direction in the incompressible layer sandwiched between the rigid surface and a half space are given by

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u = \left[-kRe^{-kz}-Skne^{-knz} \right] sin k(x-Ct)\\ w = \left[-kRe^{-kz}-Ske^{-knz} \right] cos k(x-Ct)\\ \sigma_{xz} = 2k\left[-\mu \dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}+ k\left(\mu-\dfrac{\varepsilon\delta\mu_0}{2} \right)\psi \right]\\ \sigma_{zz} = 2\left[ k^{2}\phi\left(\mu-\dfrac{\varepsilon\delta\mu_0}{2} \right)\psi-\mu k\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial z} \right] \end{split} \end{equation}$

(28)

where, $\delta = \dfrac{\rho_2}{\rho_0}$

3.3. Boundary conditions and dispersion relation

From the Figure 1 we can use the following boundary conditions:

(ⅰ) At $z = 0$ , the displacements are continuous

$u_1 = u_2$

$w_1 = w_2$

(ⅱ) At the interface z = 0, the continuity of the stress requires that

$(\sigma_{xz})_1 = (\sigma_{xz})_2$

$(\sigma_{zz})_1 = (\sigma_{zz})_2$

(ⅲ) At z = -H, the displacement vanishes

$u_1 = 0$

$w_1 = 0$

By using the boundary condition (ⅰ) and (ⅱ), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} -kQ_1+A_2b = -kR-knS\\ Q_2-A_1 = -R-S\\ -Q_2+\left( 1-\dfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\right)A_1 = \dfrac{\mu_2 R}{\mu_0}+\left( \dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0}-\dfrac{\varepsilon\delta}{2}\right)S\\ kQ_1\left( 1-\dfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\right)-bmQ_2+bmA_1-bA_2 = kR\left( \dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0}-\dfrac{\varepsilon\delta}{2}\right)+\dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0}knS \end{split} \end{equation}$

(29)

By using the boundary condition (ⅲ), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} (Q_1 cosh (kz)+Q_2 sinh (kz))-\dfrac{1}{k}\left(A_1\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\psi^{(1)}(Z) +A_2\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\psi^{(2)}(Z)\right) = 0\\ k(Q_1 sinh (kz)+Q_2 cosh (kz))+k\left(A_1\psi^{(1)}(Z) +A_2\psi^{(2)}(Z)\right) = 0 \end{split} \end{equation}$

(30)

From the Eqs (29) and (30), we have the relation between $Q_1, Q_2, A_1$ and $A_2$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \dfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon Q_1 = D_1R+E_1S\\ \dfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon Q_2 = D_2R+E_2S\\ \dfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon A_1 = D_3R+E_3S\\ \dfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon A_2 = D_4R+E_4S\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(31)

where

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_1 = \dfrac{1}{k}\left[ k-\dfrac{bm D_2}{\varepsilon/2}+\dfrac{bm D_3}{\varepsilon/2}-k\left(\dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0} -\dfrac{\varepsilon \delta}{2}\right) \right]\\ D_2 = D_3-\dfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\\ D_3 = 1-\dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0}\\ D_4 = \dfrac{1}{b}\left( kD_1-\dfrac{\varepsilon k}{2}\right) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(32)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} E_1 = \dfrac{1}{k}\left[ kn-\dfrac{bm D_2}{\varepsilon/2}+\dfrac{bm D_3}{\varepsilon/2}-\dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0}kn\right]\\ E_2 = E_3-\dfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\\ E_3 = 1-\dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0}+\dfrac{\varepsilon \delta}{2}\\ E_4 = \dfrac{1}{b}\left( kE_1-\dfrac{\varepsilon kn}{2}\right) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(33)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} M_1 = (cosh kz)_{z = -H}\\ M_2 = (sinh kz)_{z = -H}\\ M_3 = -\dfrac{1}{k}\left[\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\psi^{(1)}(Z)\right]_{z = -H}\\ M_4 = -\dfrac{1}{k}\left[\dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}\psi^{(2)}(Z)\right]_{z = -H} \end{split} \end{equation}$

(34)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} N_1 = (sinh kz)_{z = -H}\\ N_2 = (cosh kz)_{z = -H}\\ N_3 = (\psi^{(1)}(Z))_{z = -H}\\ N_4 = (\psi^{(2)}(Z))_{z = -H} \end{split} \end{equation}$

(35)

The consistency of Eq (30) for non-trivial solution of R and S implies that,

$\begin{equation} \Sigma_{i = 1}^{4}D_iM_i\Sigma_{j = 1}^{4}E_jN_j = \Sigma_{k = 1}^{4}D_kN_k\Sigma_{l = 1}^{4}E_lM_l \end{equation}$

(36)

Equation (36) is the required equation for the dispersion of Rayleigh surface wave in an incompressible heterogeneous layer lying over an incompressible homogeneous elastic half-space under rigid layer.

4. Numerical results and discussion of the result

On the above study the authors are used to parametric relation are taken as $bH = 0.5, \dfrac{\rho_2}{\rho_0} = 1.2, \dfrac{\mu_2}{\mu_0} = 1.8$ ., respectively as given in . For equation, the dispersion curve of Rayleigh waves has been calculated in Eq (35) for different values of m starting from 0 to 5 and the authors observed that the nature of phase velocity for different values of $\dfrac{2\pi}{kH}$ in an incompressible heterogeneous under rigid layer. The results are presented in Figures 2 and . In for different values of m = 1, 2 and 3 respectively being shows that in the assumed medium under a rigid layer, Rayleigh wave velocity decreases with increases of $\dfrac{2\pi}{kH}$ .We also observed that in case of linear, quadratic and cubic variation of rigidity in an incompressible heterogeneous under rigid layer as the phase velocity of Rayleigh waves increases as rigidity increases. On the other hand in case in case of the phase velocity of Rayleigh waves increases as $\dfrac{2\pi}{kH}$ increases under rigid layer. In case the homogeneous incompressible elastic medium under rigid layer the phase velocity of Rayleigh waves more compares to m = 0, 0.5, 4 and 5.

Table 1. Parameters of Figure 2 and 3.

Figure no.	Curve no.	m
	1	1
2	2	2
	3	3
	1	0
	2	0.5
3	3	4
	4	5

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Figure 2. Dispersion curve for Rayleigh wave in an incompressible heterogeneous layer over incompressible homogeneous under rigid layer for m = 1, 2 and 3.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. Dispersion curve for Rayleigh wave in an incompressible heterogeneous layer over an incompressible homogeneous under rigid layer for m = 0, 0.5, 4 and 5.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

5. Conclusions

From the above study, the authors reveals that some of the important facts regarding the propagation of Rayleigh waves in assumed medium and half-space under rigid layer as

(ⅰ)The phase velocity of Rayleigh waves in an assumed medium under rigid layer decreases in the linear, quadratic and cubic variation of rigidity only.

(ⅱ)The phase velocity of Rayleigh waves increases for different values of m = 0, 0.5, 4 and 5.

(ⅲ)The phase velocity of Rayleigh waves in an assumed medium under a rigid layer decreases only m = 1, 2 and 3 otherwise increases.

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely thankful to the Asansol Engineering College, IIT(ISM), Dhanbad and Brainware Group of Institutions for their all kind of support. The authors are also thankful to the reviewer for their guidance to improve the work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.

References

[1]	H. Alzer and S.-L. Qiu, Monotonicity theorems and inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 172 (2004), 289-312. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.02.009
[2]	G. D. Anderson, S.-L. Qiu, M. K. Vamanamurthy, Elliptic integral inequalities, with applications, Constr. Approx., 14 (1998), 195-207. doi: 10.1007/s003659900070
[3]	G.-D. Anderson, S.-L. Qiu, M.-K. Vamanamurthy, et al. Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations, Pacific J. Math., 192 (2000), 1-37. doi: 10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1
[4]	G.-D. Anderson, M.-K. Vamanamurthy, M. Vuorinen, Conformal Invariants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps, Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997.
[5]	S. András and Á. Baricz, Bounds for complete elliptic integrals of the first kind, Expo. Math., 28 (2010), 357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.exmath.2009.12.005
[6]	Á. Baricz, Turán type inequalities for generalized complete elliptic integrals, Math. Z., 256 (2007), 895-911. doi: 10.1007/s00209-007-0111-x
[7]	P. F. Byrd and M. D. Friedman, Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
[8]	C.-P. Chen and F. Qi, The best bounds in Wallis' inequality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 133 (2005), 397-401. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07499-4
[9]	Y.-M. Chu, M.-K. Wang, Y.-P. Jiang, et al. Concavity of the complete elliptic integrals of the second kind with respect to Hölder means, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 395 (2012), 637-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.083
[10]	B.-N. Guo and F. Qi, On the Wallis formula, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 8 (2015), 30-38.
[11]	B.-N. Guo and F. Qi, Some bounds for the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds, Math. Inequal. Appl., 14 (2011), 323-334.
[12]	Y. Hua and F. Qi, A double inequality for bounding Toader mean by the centroidal mean, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci., 124 (2014), 527-531. doi: 10.1007/s12044-014-0183-6
[13]	Y. Hua and F. Qi, The best bounds for Toader mean in terms of the centroidal and arithmetic means, Filomat, 28 (2014), 775-780. doi: 10.2298/FIL1404775H
[14]	W.-D. Jiang and F. Qi, A double inequality for the combination of Toader mean and the arithmetic mean in terms of the contraharmonic mean, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.), 99 (2016), 237-242. doi: 10.2298/PIM141026009J
[15]	V. Lampret, The perimeter of a flattened ellipse can be estimated accurately even from Maclaurin's series, Cubo, 21 (2019), 51-64. doi: 10.4067/S0719-06462019000200051
[16]	X.-Y. Ma, Y.-M. Chu, F. Wang, Monotonicity and inequalities for the generalized distortion function, Acta Math. Sci., 33 (2013), 1759-1766. doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(13)60121-6
[17]	F. Qi, Limit formulas for ratios between derivatives of the gamma and digamma functions at their singularities, Filomat, 27 (2013), 601-604. doi: 10.2298/FIL1304601Q
[18]	F. Qi and R. P. Agarwal, On complete monotonicity for several classes of functions related to ratios of gamma functions, J. Inequal. Appl., 2019 (2019), 1-42. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-1955-4
[19]	F. Qi, L.-H. Cui, S.-L. Xu, Some inequalities constructed by Tchebysheff's integral inequality, Math. Inequal. Appl., 2 (1999), 517-528.
[20]	F. Qi and B.-N. Guo, Lévy-Khintchine representation of Toader-Qi mean, Math. Inequal. Appl., 21 (2018), 421-431.
[21]	F. Qi and Z. Huang, Inequalities for complete elliptic integrals, Tamkang J. Math., 29 (1998), 165-169.
[22]	F. Qi and A.-Q. Liu, Completely monotonic degrees for a difference between the logarithmic and psi functions, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 361 (2019), 366-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.05.001
[23]	F. Qi, D.-W. Niu, B.-N. Guo, Refinements, generalizations, and applications of Jordan's inequality and related problems, J. Inequal. Appl., 2009 (2019), 271923.
[24]	F. Qi, X.-T. Shi, F.-F. Liu, et al. A double inequality for an integral mean in terms of the exponential and logarithmic means, Period. Math. Hungar., 75 (2017), 180-189. doi: 10.1007/s10998-016-0181-9
[25]	F. Qi and A. Sofo, An alternative and united proof of a double inequality for bounding the arithmetic-geometric mean, Politehn. Univ. Bucharest Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys., 71 (2009), 69-76.
[26]	F. Qi, S.-W. Yao, B.-N. Guo, Arithmetic means for a class of functions and the modified Bessel functions of the first kind, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 60.
[27]	S.-L. Qiu, X.-Y. Ma, T. R. Huang, Some properties of the difference between the Ramanujan constant and beta function, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 446 (2017), 114-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.08.043
[28]	S.-L. Qiu, M. K. Vamanamurthy, M. Vuorinen, Some inequalities for the Hersch-Pfluger distortion function, J. Inequal. Appl., 4 (1999), 115-139.
[29]	S.-L. Qiu and M. Vuorinen, Some properties of the gamma and psi functions with applications, Math. Comp., 74 (2004), 723-742. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01675-8
[30]	S.-L. Qiu and M. Vuorinen, Special functions in geometric function theory, Handbook of Complex Analysis: Geometric Function Theory, 2 (2005), 621-659. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5709(05)80018-6
[31]	M. Vuorinen, Singular values, Ramanujan modular equations, and Landen transformations, Studia Math., 121 (1996), 221-230. doi: 10.4064/sm-121-3-221-230
[32]	F. Wang, J.-H. He, L. Yin, et al. Monotonicity properties and inequalities related to generalized Grötzsch ring functions, Open Math., 17 (2019), 802-812. doi: 10.1515/math-2019-0064
[33]	M.-K. Wang, Y.-M. Chu, Y.-F. Qiu, et al. An optimal power mean inequality for the complete elliptic integrals, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 887-890. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.12.044
[34]	M.-K. Wang, S.-L. Qiu, Y.-M. Chu, et al. Generalized Hersch-Pfluger distortion function and complete elliptic integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 385 (2012), 221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.06.039
[35]	G.-D. Wang, X.-H. Zhang, Y.-M. Chu, Inequalities for the generalized elliptic integrals and modular functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 331 (2007), 1275-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.070
[36]	L. Yin, X.-L. Lin, and F. Qi, Monotonicity, convexity, and inequalities related to complete (p, q, r)- elliptic integrals and generalized trigonometric functions, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 97 (2020), in press.
[37]	L. Yin and F. Qi, Some inequalities for complete elliptic integrals, Appl. Math. E-Notes, 14 (2014), 192-199.
[38]	X.-H. Zhang, G.-D. Wang, Y.-M. Chu, Remark on generalized elliptic integrals, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 139 (2009), 417-426. doi: 10.1017/S0308210507000327

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.1

Metrics

Article views(4962) PDF downloads(317) Cited by(4)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

AIMS Mathematics

Monotonicity and inequalities related to complete elliptic integrals of the second kind

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Formulation of the problem

3. Equation of motion and solution

3.1. Equation of motion and solution for upper layer

3.2. Solution for the homogeneous half-space

3.3. Boundary conditions and dispersion relation

4. Numerical results and discussion of the result

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Formulation of the problem

3. Equation of motion and solution

3.1. Equation of motion and solution for upper layer

3.2. Solution for the homogeneous half-space

3.3. Boundary conditions and dispersion relation

4. Numerical results and discussion of the result

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

AIMS Mathematics

Monotonicity and inequalities related to complete elliptic integrals of the second kind

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Formulation of the problem

3. Equation of motion and solution

3.1. Equation of motion and solution for upper layer

3.2. Solution for the homogeneous half-space

3.3. Boundary conditions and dispersion relation

4. Numerical results and discussion of the result

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Formulation of the problem

3. Equation of motion and solution

3.1. Equation of motion and solution for upper layer

3.2. Solution for the homogeneous half-space

3.3. Boundary conditions and dispersion relation

4. Numerical results and discussion of the result

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References