Citation: Andrea Ehrmann, Tomasz Blachowicz. Recent coating materials for textile-based solar cells[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(2): 234-251. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.2.234
[1] | Wenjun Liu, Zhijing Chen, Zhiyu Tu . New general decay result for a fourth-order Moore-Gibson-Thompson equation with memory. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 433-457. doi: 10.3934/era.2020025 |
[2] | Siyi Luo, Yinghui Zhang . Space-time decay rate for the 3D compressible quantum magnetohydrodynamic model. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(7): 4184-4204. doi: 10.3934/era.2025189 |
[3] | Yi Cheng, Ying Chu . A class of fourth-order hyperbolic equations with strongly damped and nonlinear logarithmic terms. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3867-3887. doi: 10.3934/era.2021066 |
[4] | Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Adel M. Al-Mahdi . Existence and stability results of a plate equation with nonlinear damping and source term. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 4038-4065. doi: 10.3934/era.2022205 |
[5] | Chahrazed Messikh, Soraya Labidi, Ahmed Bchatnia, Foued Mtiri . Energy decay for a porous system with a fractional operator in the memory. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(4): 2195-2215. doi: 10.3934/era.2025096 |
[6] | Jincheng Shi, Shuman Li, Cuntao Xiao, Yan Liu . Spatial behavior for the quasi-static heat conduction within the second gradient of type Ⅲ. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6235-6257. doi: 10.3934/era.2024290 |
[7] | Jie Qi, Weike Wang . Global solutions to the Cauchy problem of BNSP equations in some classes of large data. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5496-5541. doi: 10.3934/era.2024255 |
[8] | Xu Liu, Jun Zhou . Initial-boundary value problem for a fourth-order plate equation with Hardy-Hénon potential and polynomial nonlinearity. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 599-625. doi: 10.3934/era.2020032 |
[9] | Qin Ye . Space-time decay rate of high-order spatial derivative of solution for 3D compressible Euler equations with damping. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 3879-3894. doi: 10.3934/era.2023197 |
[10] | Huafei Di, Yadong Shang, Jiali Yu . Existence and uniform decay estimates for the fourth order wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping and interior source. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 221-261. doi: 10.3934/era.2020015 |
The Moore-Gibson-Thompson (MGT) equation is one of the equations of nonlinear acoustics describing acoustic wave propagation in gases and liquids [13,15,30] and arising from modeling high frequency ultrasound waves [9,18] accounting for viscosity and heat conductivity as well as effect of the radiation of heat on the propagation of sound. This research field is highly active due to a wide range of applications such as the medical and industrial use of high intensity ultrasound in lithotripsy, thermotherapy, ultraound cleaning, etc. The classical nonlinear acoustics models include the Kuznetson's equation, the Westervelt equation and the Kokhlov-Zabolotskaya-Kuznetsov equation.
In order to gain a better understanding of the nonlinear MGT equation, we shall begin with the linearized model. In [15], Kaltenbacher, Lasiecka and Marchand investigated the following linearized MGT equation
τuttt+αutt+c2Au+bAut=0. | (1.1) |
For equation (1.1), they disclosed a critical parameter
τuttt+αutt+c2Au+bAut=f(u,ut,utt). | (1.2) |
They proved that the underlying PDE generates a well-posed dynamical system which admits a global and finite dimensional attractor. They also overcomed the difficulty of lacking the Lyapunov function and the lack of compactness of the trajectory.
Now, we concentrate on the stabilization of MGT equation with memory which has received a considerable attention recently. For instance, Lasiecka and Wang [17] studied the following equation:
τuttt+αutt+bAut+c2Au−∫t0g(t−s)Aw(s)ds=0, | (1.3) |
where
g′(t)≤−c0g(t), | (1.4) |
they discussed the effect of memory described by three types on decay rates of the energy when
τuttt+αutt+bAut+c2Au−∫∞0g(s)Aw(t−s)ds=0. | (1.5) |
Alves et al. [1] investigated the uniform stability of equation (1.5) encompassing three different types of memory in a history space set by the linear semigroup theory. Moreover, we refer the reader to [3,6,7,12,24,25,26,28] for other works of the equation(s) with memory.
More recently, Filippo and Vittorino [11] considered the fourth-order MGT equation
utttt+αuttt+βutt+γAutt+δAut+ϱAu=0. | (1.6) |
They investigated the stability properties of the related solution semigroup. And, according to the values of certain stability numbers depending on the strictly positive parameters
Motivated by the above results, we intend to study the following abstract version of the fourth-order Moore-Gibson-Thompson (MGT) equation with a memory term
utttt+αuttt+βutt+γAutt+δAut+ϱAu−∫t0g(t−s)Au(s)ds=0, | (1.7) |
where
u(0)=u0,ut(0)=u1,utt(0)=u2,uttt(0)=u3. | (1.8) |
A natural question that arised in dealing with the general decay of fourth-order MGT equation with memory:
● Can we get a general decay result for a class of relaxation functions satisfying
Mustafa answered this question for viscoelastic wave equations in [31,32]. Messaoudi and Hassan [29] considered the similar question for memory-type Timoshenko system in the cases of equal and non-equal speeds of wave propagation. Moreover, they extended the range of polynomial decay rate optimality from
The aim of this paper is to establish the well-posedness and answer the above mention question for fourth-order MGT equation with memory (1.7). We first use the Faedo-Galerkin method to prove the well-posedness result. We then use the idea developed by Mustafa in [31,32], taking into consideration the nature of fourth-order MGT equation, to prove new general decay results for the case
The rest of our paper is organized as follows. In Section
In this section, we consider the following assumptions and state our main results. We use
First, we consider the following assumptions as in [11] for
0<g(0)<2αϱδ(αγ−δ), ϱ−∫+∞0g(s)ds=l>0. |
g′(t)≤−ξ(t)M(g(t)),∀ t≥0. | (2.1) |
Remark 1. ([31,Remark 2.8])
(1) From assumption
g(t)→0ast→+∞andg(t)≤ϱ−lt,∀ t>0. |
Furthermore, from the assumption
g(t0)=randg(t)≤r,∀ t≥t0. |
The non-increasing property of
0<g(t0)≤g(t)≤g(0)and0<ξ(t0)≤ξ(t)≤ξ(0),∀ t∈[0,t0]. |
A combination of these with the continuity of
a≤ξ(t)M(g(t))≤d,∀ t∈[0,t0]. |
Consequently, for any
g′(t)≤−ξ(t)M(g(t))≤−a=−ag(0)g(0)≤−ag(0)g(t) |
and, hence,
g(t)≤−g(0)ag′(t),∀ t∈[0,t0]. | (2.2) |
(2) If
¯M=C2t2+(B−Cr)t+(A+C2r2−Br). |
Then, inspired by the notations in [11], we define the Hilbert spaces
Hr:=D(Ar2),r∈R. |
In order to simplify the notation, we denote the usual space
H=D(A12)×D(A12)×D(A12)×H. |
Moreover, we will denote the inner product of
After that, we introduce the following energy functional
E(t)=12[‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+δα(ϱ−G(t)ϱ)‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+δαϱG(t)‖A12utt+αA12ut‖2+(γ−δα)‖A12utt‖2+(γ−δα)αϱδ‖A12ut‖2+2∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s),A12utt+αA12ut)ds+αϱδ(g∘A12u)(t)−α(g′∘A12u)(t)+αg(t)‖A12u‖2+(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2+αϱδ(β−αϱδ)‖ut‖2], |
where
(g∘v)(t):=∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)(v(t)−v(s))2dsdx. |
As in [31], we set, for any
Cν=∫∞0g2(s)νg(s)−g′(s)dsandh(t)=νg(t)−g′(t). |
The following lemmas play an important role in the proof of our main results.
Lemma 2.1. ([31] )
Assume that condition
∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t))ds)2dx≤Cν(h∘A12u)(t),∀ t≥0. |
Lemma 2.2. (Jensen's inequality) Let
P(1k∫Ωf(x)h(x)dx)≤1k∫ΩP(f(x))h(x)dx. |
Lemma 2.3. ([2])(The generalized Young inequality) If
AB≤f∗(A)+f(B), | (2.3) |
where
f∗(s)=s(f′)−1(s)−f[(f′)−1(s)]. | (2.4) |
We are now in a position to state the well-posedness and the general decay result for problem (1.7)-(1.8).
Theorem 2.4. (Well-posedness)
Assume that
u∈C([0,T];D(A12))∩C1([0,T];H). |
Theorem 2.5. (General decay)
Let
E(t)≤k2M−11(k1∫tg−1(r)ξ(s)ds),∀ t≥g−1(t), | (2.5) |
where
Remark 2. Assume that
E(t)≤{Cexp(−˜k∫t0ξ(s)ds),ifp=1,¯k(1+∫t0ξ(s)ds)−1p−1,if1<p<2. | (2.6) |
In this section, we will prove the global existence and uniqueness of the solution of problem (1.7)-(1.8). Firstly, we give the following lemmas.
Lemma 3.1.
If
Proof. Since
2αϱδ(α−σ)(γ−δα)→2αϱδ(αγ−δ)asσ→0, |
which is trivially true.
Lemma 3.2.
Assume that
12[‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+δα(ϱ−G(t)ϱ)‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+(γ−δα)‖A12utt‖2+(γ−δα)αϱδ‖A12ut‖2−α(g′∘A12u)(t)+αg(t)‖A12u‖2+(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2+αϱδ(β−αϱδ)‖ut‖2]≤E(t)≤12[‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+δα(ϱ−G(t)ϱ)‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+(γ−δα)‖A12utt‖2+(γ−δα)αϱδ‖A12ut‖2−α(g′∘A12u)(t)+2αϱδ(g∘A12u)(t)+αg(t)‖A12u‖2+(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2+αϱδ(β−αϱδ)‖ut‖2+2δαϱG(t)‖A12utt+αA12ut‖2]. |
Proof. From the definition of
E(t)=12[‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+δα(ϱ−G(t)ϱ)‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+δαϱG(t)‖A12utt+αA12ut‖2+(γ−δα)‖A12utt‖2+(γ−δα)αϱδ‖A12ut‖2+2∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s),A12utt+αA12ut)ds+αϱδ(g∘A12u)(t)−α(g′∘A12u)(t)+αg(t)‖A12u‖2+(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2+αϱδ(β−αϱδ)‖ut‖2]. |
Then, we estimate the sixth term of the above equality
2|∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s),A12utt+αA12ut)ds|≤∫t0g(t−s)[αϱδ‖A12u(t)−A12u(s)‖2+δαϱ‖A12utt+αA12ut‖2]ds=αϱδ(g∘A12u)(t)+δαϱG(t)‖A12utt+αA12ut‖2. |
A combination of the above results, we complete the proof of lemma.
Now, we prove the well-posedness result of problem (1.7)-(1.8).
Proof of Theorem 2.1. The proof is given by Faedo-Galerkin method and combines arguments from [16,39,38]. We present only the main steps.
Step
We construct approximations of the solution
um(t)=m∑j=1amj(t)wj(x), | (3.1) |
where
∫Ωumtttt(t)wjdx+α∫Ωumttt(t)wjdx+β∫Ωumtt(t)wjdx+γ∫ΩA12umtt(t)A12wjdx+δ∫ΩA12umt(t)A12wjdx+ϱ∫ΩA12um(t)A12wjdx−∫t0g(t−s)∫ΩA12um(t)A12wjdxds=0 | (3.2) |
with initial conditions
(um(0),umt(0),umtt(0),umttt(0))=(um0,um1,um2,um3). | (3.3) |
According to the standard theory of ordinary differential equation, the finite dimensional problem (3.2)-(3.3) has a local solution
Step
Multiplying equation (3.2) by
ddtEm(t)+α(β−αϱδ)‖umtt‖2−αg′(t)2‖A12um‖2+δ2αϱg(t)‖A12umtt+αϱδA12um‖2+α2(g″∘A12um)(t)=−[α(γ−δα)−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12umtt‖2+∫t0g′(t−s)(A12um(t)−A12um(s),A12umtt)ds+αϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t), |
where
Em(t)=12[‖umttt+αumtt+αϱδumt‖2+δα(ϱ−G(t)ϱ)‖A12umtt+αA12umt+αϱδA12um‖2+δαϱG(t)‖A12umtt+αA12umt‖2+(γ−δα)‖A12umtt‖2+(γ−δα)αϱδ‖A12umt‖2+2∫t0g(t−s)(A12um(t)−A12um(s),A12umtt+αA12umt)ds+αϱδ(g∘A12um)(t)−α(g′∘A12um)(t)+αg(t)‖A12um‖2+(β−αϱδ)‖umtt‖2+αϱδ(β−αϱδ)‖umt‖2]. | (3.4) |
From assumptions
∫t0g′(t−s)(A12um(t)−A12um(s),A12umtt)ds≤−(α−ε)ϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t)−δ2(α−ε)ϱ‖A12umtt‖2∫t0g′(t−s)ds=−(α−ε)ϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t)+δ(g(0)−g(t))2(α−ε)ϱ‖A12umtt‖2 |
and so
−[α(γ−δα)−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12umtt‖2+∫t0g′(t−s)(A12um(t)−A12um(s),A12umtt)ds+αϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t)≤−[α(γ−δα)−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12umtt‖2−(α−ε)ϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t)+δ(g(0)−g(t))2(α−ε)ϱ‖A12umtt‖2+αϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t)=−[α(γ−δα)−δg(0)2(α−ε)ϱ]‖A12umtt‖2+εϱ2δ(g′∘A12um)(t)−[δg(t)2(α−ε)ϱ−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12umtt‖2≤0. | (3.5) |
Therefore, we have
ddtEm(t)+α(β−αϱδ)‖umtt‖2−αg′(t)2‖A12um‖2+δ2αϱg(t)‖A12umtt+αϱδA12um‖2+α2(g″∘A12um)(t)≤0. | (3.6) |
Integrating (3.6) from
Em(t)+∫t0[α(β−αϱδ)‖umtt‖2−αg′(τ)2‖A12um‖2+δ2αϱg(τ)‖A12umtt+αϱδA12um‖2+α2(g″∘A12um)(τ)]dτ≤Em(0). | (3.7) |
Now, since the sequences
Em(t)≤C. | (3.8) |
Therefore, using the fact
(um)m∈NisboundedinL∞(0,T;D(A12))(umt)m∈NisboundedinL∞(0,T;D(A12))(umtt)m∈NisboundedinL∞(0,T;D(A12))(umttt)m∈NisboundedinL∞(0,T;H). | (3.9) |
Consequently, we may conclude that
um⇀uweak∗inL∞(0,T;D(A12))umt⇀utweak∗inL∞(0,T;D(A12))umtt⇀uttweak∗inL∞(0,T;D(A12))umttt⇀utttweak∗inL∞(0,T;H). |
From (3.9), we get that
Since the embedding
un→ustronglyinL2(0,T;H(Ω)). |
Therefore,
un→ustronglyanda.e.on(0,T)×Ω. |
The proof now can be completed arguing as in [21].
Step
It is sufficient to show that the only weak solution of (1.7)-(1.8) with
u≡0. | (3.10) |
According to the energy estimate (3.8) and noting that
E(u(t))=0,∀t∈[0,T]. |
So, we have
‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2=‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2=‖A12utt‖2=‖A12ut‖2=‖A12u‖2=‖utt‖2=0,∀t∈[0,T]. |
And this implies (3.10). Thus, we conclude that problem (1.7)-(1.8) has at most one solution.
In this section, we state and prove some lemmas needed to establish our general decay result.
Lemma 4.1.
Let
ddtE(t)≤−α(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2−[α(γ−δα)−δg(0)2(α−ε)ϱ]‖A12utt‖2+αg′(t)2‖A12u‖2−[δg(t)2(α−ε)ϱ−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12utt‖2−δ2αϱg(t)‖A12utt+αϱδA12u‖2−α2(g″∘A12u)(t)+εϱ2δ(g′∘A12u)≤0. |
Proof. Multiplying (1.7) by
ddtE(t)=−α(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2−[α(γ−δα)−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12utt‖2+αg′(t)2‖A12u‖2−δ2αϱg(t)‖A12utt+αϱδA12u‖2+∫t0g′(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s),A12utt)ds−α2(g″∘A12u)(t)+αϱ2δ(g′∘A12u)(t). | (4.1) |
We proceed to show that, for a constant
|∫t0g′(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s),A12utt)ds|≤−(α−ε)ϱ2δ(g′∘A12u)(t)+δ(g(0)−g(t))2(α−ε)ϱ‖A12utt‖2. | (4.2) |
Then, combining (4.1) and (4.2), we can obtain
ddtE(t)≤−α(β−αϱδ)‖utt‖2−[α(γ−δα)−δg(0)2(α−ε)ϱ]‖A12utt‖2+αg′(t)2‖A12u‖2−[δg(t)2(α−ε)ϱ−δg(t)2αϱ]‖A12utt‖2−δ2αϱg(t)‖A12utt+αϱδA12u‖2−α2(g″∘A12u)(t)+εϱ2δ(g′∘A12u). |
According to
Lemma 4.2.
Assume that
F1(t)=∫Ω(utt+αut+αϱδu)(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)dx |
satisfies the estimate
F′1(t)≤−δ2α‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+2αλ0δ(β−αϱδ)2‖utt‖2+2αδ(γ−δα)2‖A12utt‖2+‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+2α(ϱ−l)2δ‖A12u‖2+2αδCν(h∘A12u)(t). | (4.3) |
Proof. Taking the derivative of
F′1(t)=∫Ω[−(β−αϱδ)utt](utt+αut+αϱδu)dx−δα‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2−∫Ω(γ−δα)A12utt(A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u)dx+∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)A12u(s)ds)(A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u)dx. |
Using Young's inequality, Lemma 2.1,
∫Ω[−(β−αϱδ)utt](utt+αut+αϱδu)dx≤2αλ0δ(β−αϱδ)2‖utt‖2+δ8αλ0‖utt+αut+αϱδu‖2≤2αλ0δ(β−αϱδ)2‖utt‖2+δ8α‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2 |
and
∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)A12u(s)ds)(A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u)dx=∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t))ds)(A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u)dx+∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)A12u(t)ds)(A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u)dx≤2αδCν(h∘A12u)(t)+δ4α‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+2α(ϱ−l)2δ‖A12u‖2. |
Also, we have
−∫Ω(γ−δα)A12utt(A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u)dx≤2αδ(γ−δα)2‖A12utt‖2+δ8α‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2. |
Then, combining the above inequalities, we complete the proof of (4.3).
Lemma 4.3.
Assume that
F2(t)=−∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)∫t0g(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx |
satisfies the estimate
F′2(t)≤−G(t)4‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+[(ϱ−l)2α22ε1+4λ0g2(0)α2G(t)]‖A12ut‖2+[λ0(ϱ−l)22+(δ2α2+ϱ2)+3(ϱ−l)2]ε1‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+[α2ϱ2(ϱ−l)2λ0ε12δ2+(ϱ−l)22ε1+3(ϱ−l)2(αϱδ)2ε1+(ϱ−l)22(αϱδ)2]‖A12u‖2+[(ϱ−l)22ε1+12ε1(γ−δα)2+12(αϱδ)2(γ−δα)2]‖A12utt‖2+[(ε1α2ϱ2λ04δ2+34ε1+1+αϱδ+2α4ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)Cν+2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2](h∘A12u)(t)+[2(β−αϱδ)2ε1+4g2(0)G(t)]‖utt‖2, | (4.4) |
where
Proof. By differentiating
F′2(t)=∫Ω[βutt+γAutt+δAut+ϱAu−∫t0g(t−s)Au(s)ds−αϱδutt]×∫t0g(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx−g(0)∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)(utt+αut)dx−∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)∫t0g′(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx−∫t0g(s)ds‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2=∫Ω[(β−αϱδ)utt+δα(Autt+αAut+αϱδAu)+(γ−δα)Autt−∫t0g(s)dsAu(t)]∫t0g(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx−∫t0g(s)ds‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2−∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)∫t0g′(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx+(∫t0g(s)ds)∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)(Au(t)−Au(s))ds(utt+αut)dx+αϱδ∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s))ds)2dx−g(0)∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)(utt+αut)dx. |
Now, we estimate the terms in the right-hand side of the above identity.
Using Young's inequality, we obtain, for
∫Ω[(β−αϱδ)utt+δα(Autt+αAut+αϱδAu)+(γ−δα)Autt−∫t0g(s)dsAu(t)]∫t0g(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx≤[λ0(ϱ−l)22+(δ2α2+ϱ2)+2(ϱ−l)2]ε1‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+2(β−αϱδ)2ε1‖utt‖2+[α2ϱ2(ϱ−l)2λ0ε12δ2+(ϱ−l)22ε1+2(ϱ−l)2(αϱδ)2ε1+(ϱ−l)22(αϱδ)2]‖A12u‖2+[(ϱ−l)22ε1+12ε1(γ−δα)2+12(αϱδ)2(γ−δα)2]‖A12utt‖2+(ϱ−l)2α22ε1‖A12ut‖2+(ε1α2ϱ2λ04δ2+14ε1+1)Cν(h∘A12u)(t) |
and
(∫t0g(s)ds)∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)(Au(t)−Au(s))ds(utt+αut)dx=(∫t0g(s)ds)∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s))ds(A12utt+αA12ut)dx≤12ε1Cν(h∘A12u)(t)+(ϱ−l)22ε1‖A12utt+αA12ut‖2≤12ε1Cν(h∘A12u)(t)+(ϱ−l)2ε1‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2+(ϱ−l)2(αϱδ)2ε1‖A12u‖2. |
Also, we have
αϱδ∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s))ds)2dx≤αϱδCν(h∘A12u)(t) |
and
−g(0)∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)(utt+αut)dx≤G(t)4‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+g2(0)G(t)‖utt+αut‖2≤G(t)4‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+2g2(0)G(t)‖utt‖2+2λ0g2(0)α2G(t)‖A12ut‖2. |
Exploiting Young's inequality and
−∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)∫t0g′(t−s)[(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)]dsdx=−∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)∫t0g′(t−s)(utt+αut)(t)dsdx−αϱδ∫Ω(uttt+αutt+αϱδut)∫t0g′(t−s)(u(t)−u(s))dsdx≤G(t)2‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+2g2(0)G(t)‖utt‖2+2λ0α2g2(0)G(t)‖A12ut‖2+2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2(α2Cν+1)(h∘A12u)(t). |
A combination of all the above estimates gives the desired result.
As in [11], we introduce the following auxiliary functional
F3(t)=∫Ω(uttt+αutt)utdx+ϱ2‖A12u‖2. |
Lemma 4.4.
Assume that
F′3(t)≤−(3δ8−ε2δ4)‖A12ut‖2+ε2δ38α2ϱ2λ0‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+2γ2δ‖A12utt‖2+(ε2δ34ϱ2λ0+4α2ϱ2λ0ε2δ3+2β2λ0δ)‖utt‖2+1δCν(h∘A12u)(t)+2(ϱ−l)2δ‖A12u‖2, | (4.5) |
where
Proof. Using the equation (1.7), a direct computation leads to the following identity
F′3(t)=∫Ω(uttt+αutt)uttdx+∫Ω(utttt+αuttt)utdx+ϱ(A12u,A12ut)=(uttt,utt)+α‖utt‖2−β(utt,ut)−γ(A12utt,A12ut)−δ‖A12ut‖2+(∫t0g(t−s)A12u(s)ds,A12ut). | (4.6) |
Now, the first and third terms in the right-hand side of (4.6) can be estimated as follows:
(uttt,utt)≤ε2δ316α2ϱ2λ0‖uttt‖2+4α2ϱ2λ0ε2δ3‖utt‖2≤ε2δ38α2ϱ2λ0‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+ε2δ38α2ϱ2λ0‖αutt+αϱδut‖2+4α2ϱ2λ0ε2δ3‖utt‖2≤ε2δ38α2ϱ2λ0‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+α2(ε2δ34α2ϱ2λ0+4ϱ2λ0ε2δ3)‖utt‖2+ε2δ4‖A12ut‖2 |
and
−β(utt,ut)≤2β2λ0δ‖utt‖2+δ8λ0‖ut‖2≤2β2λ0δ‖utt‖2+δ8‖A12ut‖2, |
where
Using Young's inequality and Lemma 2.1, we get
−γ(A12utt,A12ut)≤2γ2δ‖A12utt‖2+δ8‖A12ut‖2 |
and
(∫t0g(t−s)A12u(s)ds,A12ut)=(∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t)+A12u(t))ds,A12ut)≤1δ∫Ω(∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(t)−A12u(s))ds)2dx+δ4‖A12ut‖2+2(ϱ−l)2δ‖A12u‖2+δ8‖A12ut‖2≤1δCν(h∘A12u)(t)+3δ8‖A12ut‖2+2(ϱ−l)2δ‖A12u‖2. |
Then, combining the above inequalities, we obtain the desired result.
Lemma 4.5.
Assume that
F4(t)=∫Ω∫t0f(t−s)|A12u(s)|2dsdx |
satisfies the estimate
F′4(t)≤−12(g∘A12u)(t)+3(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2, | (4.7) |
where
Proof. Noting that
F′4(t)=f(0)‖A12u‖2−∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)|A12u(s)|2dsdx=f(0)‖A12u‖2−∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)|A12u(s)−A12u(t)|2dsdx−2∫ΩA12u∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t))dsdx−(∫t0g(s)ds)‖A12u‖2=−(g∘A12u)(t)−2∫ΩA12u∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t))dsdx+f(t)‖A12u‖2. |
Exploiting Young's inequality and the fact
−2∫ΩA12u∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t))dsdx≤2(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2+12(ϱ−l)(∫t0g(t−s)ds)∫Ω∫t0g(t−s)(A12u(s)−A12u(t))2dsdx≤2(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2+12(g∘A12u)(t). |
Moreover, taking account of
f(t)‖A12u‖2≤(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2. |
Combining the above estimates, we arrive at the desired result.
Lemma 4.6.
Assume that
L(t)=NE(t)+F1(t)+N2F2(t)+N3F3(t) |
satisfies, for a suitable choice of
L(t)∼E(t) |
and the estimate, for all
L′(t)≤−c[‖utt‖2+‖A12utt‖2+‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδu‖2]−4(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2+18(g∘A12u)(t), | (4.8) |
where
Proof. Combining Lemmas 4.1-4.4 and recalling that
L′(t)≤−[α(β−αϱδ)N−2αλ0δ(β−αϱδ)2−(2(β−αϱδ)2ε1+4g2(0)G(t))N2−(ε2δ34ϱ2λ0+4α2ϱ2λ0ε2δ3+2β2λ0δ)N3]‖utt‖2−[(α(γ−δα)−δg(0)2(α−ε)ϱ)N+(δg(t)2(α−ε)ϱ−δg(t)2αϱ)N−2αδ(γ−δα)2−((ϱ−l)22ε1+12ε1(γ−δα)2+12(αϱδ)2(γ−δα)2)N2−2γ2δN3]‖A12utt‖2−α2N(g″∘A12u)(t)−[(3δ8−ε2δ4)N3−((ϱ−l)2α22ε1+4λ0g2(0)α2G(t))N2]‖A12ut‖2−(G(t)4N2−1−ε2δ3N38α2ϱ2λ0)‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+εϱν2δN(g∘A12u)(t)−[δ2α−(λ0(ϱ−l)22+(δ2α2+ϱ2)+3(ϱ−l)2)ε1N2]×‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2−[−αg′(t)2N−2α(ϱ−l)2δ−(α2ϱ2(ϱ−l)2λ0ε12δ2+(ϱ−l)22ε1+3(ϱ−l)2(αϱδ)2ε1+(ϱ−l)22(αϱδ)2)N2−2(ϱ−l)2δN3]‖A12u‖2−[εϱ2δN−2αδCν−((ε1α2ϱ2λ04δ2+34ε1+1+αϱδ+2α4ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)Cν+2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)N2−N3δCν](h∘A12u)(t). |
At this point, we need to choose our constants very carefully. First, we choose
ε1=αδ2N2[λ0α2(ϱ−l)2+2(δ2+α2ϱ2)+6α2(ϱ−l)2]andε2=1N3. |
The above choice yields
L′(t)≤−[α(β−αϱδ)N−2αλ0δ(β−αϱδ)2−(2(β−αϱδ)2ε1+4g2(0)G(t))N2−δ34ϱ2λ0−4α2ϱ2λ0δ3N23−2β2λ0δN3]‖utt‖2−[(α(γ−δα)−δg(0)2(α−ε)ϱ)N+(δg(t)2(α−ε)ϱ−δg(t)2αϱ)N−2αδ(γ−δα)2−((ϱ−l)22ε1+12ε1(γ−δα)2+12(αϱδ)2(γ−δα)2)N2−2γ2δN3]‖A12utt‖2−α2N(g″∘A12u)(t)−[3δ8N3−δ4−((ϱ−l)2α22ε1+4λ0g2(0)α2G(t))N2]‖A12ut‖2+εϱν2δN(g∘A12u)(t)−(G(t)4N2−1−δ38α2ϱ2λ0)‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2−δ4α‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδA12u‖2−[−αg′(t)2N−2α(ϱ−l)2δ−(α2ϱ2(ϱ−l)2λ0ε12δ2+(ϱ−l)22ε1+3(ϱ−l)2(αϱδ)2ε1+(ϱ−l)22(αϱδ)2)N2−2(ϱ−l)2δN3]‖A12u‖2−[εϱ2δN−2αδCν−((ε1α2ϱ2λ04δ2+34ε1+1+αϱδ+2α4ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)Cν+2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)N2−N3δCν](h∘A12u)(t). |
Then, we choose
G(t)4N2−1−δ38α2ϱ2λ0>0. |
Next, we choose
3δ8N3−δ4−((ϱ−l)2α22ε1+4λ0g2(0)α2G(t))N2>0. |
Now, as
νCν=∫∞0ν2g(s)νg(s)−g′(s)ds→0,asν→0. |
Hence, there is
νCν<116(2αδ+(ε1α2ϱ2λ04δ2+34ε1+1+αϱδ+2α4ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)N2+N3δ). |
Now, let us choose
εϱ4δN−2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2N2>0andν=δ4εϱN<ν0, |
which means
εϱ2δN−2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2N2−Cν(2αδ+(ε1α2ϱ2λ04δ2+34ε1+1+αϱδ+2α4ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2)N2+N3δ)>εϱ2δN−2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2N2−116ν=εϱ4δN−2α2ϱ2λ0G(t)δ2N2>0 |
and
α(β−αϱδ)N−2αλ0δ(β−αϱδ)2−(2(β−αϱδ)2ε1+4g2(0)G(t))N2−δ34ϱ2λ0−4α2ϱ2λ0δ3N23−2β2λ0δN3>0,(α(γ−δα)−δg(0)2(α−ε)ϱ)N+(δg(t)2(α−ε)ϱ−δg(t)2αϱ)N−2αδ(γ−δα)2−((ϱ−l)22ε1+12ε1(γ−δα)2+12(αϱδ)2(γ−δα)2)N2−2γ2δN3>0,−αg′(t)2N−2α(ϱ−l)2δ−(α2ϱ2(ϱ−l)2λ0ε12δ2+(ϱ−l)22ε1+3(ϱ−l)2(αϱδ)2ε1+(ϱ−l)22(αϱδ)2)N2−2(ϱ−l)2δN3>4(ϱ−l). |
So we arrive at, for positive constant
L′(t)≤−c[‖utt‖2+‖A12utt‖2+‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδu‖2]−4(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2+18(g∘A12u)(t). |
On the other hand, from Lemma 3.2, we find that
|L(t)−NE(t)|≤∫Ω|utt+αut+αϱδu||uttt+αutt+αϱδut|dx+N2∫Ω|uttt+αutt+αϱδut|∫t0g(t−s)×|(utt+αut+αϱδu)(t)−αϱδu(s)|dsdx+N3∫Ω|uttt+αutt||ut|dx+N3ϱ2‖A12u‖2≤cE(t). |
Therefore, we can choose
In this section, we will give an estimate to the decay rate for the problem (1.7)-(1.8).
Proof of Theorem 2.2. Our proof starts with the observation that, for any
∫t00g(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−g(0)a∫t00g′(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−g(0)a∫t0g′(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−cE′(t), |
which are derived from (2.2) and Lemma 4.1 and can be used in (4.8).
Taking
L′(t)≤−c[‖utt‖2+‖A12utt‖2+‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδu‖2]−4(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2+18(g∘A12u)(t)≤−mE(t)+c(g∘A12u)(t)≤−mE(t)−cE′(t)+c∫tt0g(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds, |
where
F′(t)=L′(t)+cE′(t)≤−mE(t)+c∫tt0g(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds. | (5.1) |
We consider the following two cases relying on the ideas presented in [31].
(ⅰ)
We multiply (5.1) by
ξ(t)F′(t)≤−mξ(t)E(t)+cξ(t)∫tt0g(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−mξ(t)E(t)+c∫tt0ξ(s)g(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−mξ(t)E(t)−c∫tt0g′(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−mξ(t)E(t)−c∫t0g′(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−mξ(t)E(t)−cE′(t). |
Therefore,
ξ(t)F′(t)+cE′(t)≤−mξ(t)E(t). |
As
ξ(t)F(t)+cE(t)∼E(t) |
and
(ξF+cE)′(t)≤−mξ(t)E(t),∀ t≥t0. |
It follows immediately that
E′(t)≤−mξ(t)E(t),∀ t≥t0. |
We may now integrate over
E(t)≤k2exp(−k1∫tt0ξ(s)ds),∀ t≥t0. |
By the continuity of
E(t)≤k2exp(−k1∫t0ξ(s)ds),∀ t>0. |
(ⅱ)
First, we define the functional
L(t)=L(t)+F4(t). |
Obviously,
L′(t)=L′(t)+F′4(t)≤−c[‖utt‖2+‖A12utt‖2+‖uttt+αutt+αϱδut‖2+‖A12utt+αA12ut+αϱδu‖2]−(ϱ−l)‖A12u‖2−38(g∘A12u)(t)≤−bE(t). |
Therefore, integrating the above inequality over
−L(t0)≤L(t)−L(t0)≤−b∫tt0E(s)ds. |
It is sufficient to show that
∫∞0E(s)ds<∞ | (5.2) |
and
E(t)≤ct−t0,∀t>t0. |
Now, we define a functional
λ(t):=−∫tt0g′(s)‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds. |
Clearly, we have
λ(t)≤−∫t0g′(s)‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds≤−cE′(t),∀ t≥t0. | (5.3) |
After that, we define another functional
I(t):=q∫tt0‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds. |
Now, the following inequality holds under Lemma 4.1 and (5.2) that
∫tt0‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds≤2∫tt0(‖A12u(t)‖2+‖A12u(t−s)‖2)ds≤4∫tt0(E(t)+E(t−s))ds≤8∫tt0E(0)ds<∞. | (5.4) |
Then (5.4) allows for a constant
0<I(t)<1; | (5.5) |
otherwise we get an exponential decay from (5.1).
Moreover, recalling that
M(θx)≤θM(x),for0≤θ≤1andx∈(0,r]. |
From assumptions
λ(t)=−∫tt0g′(s)‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds=1qI(t)∫tt0I(t)(−g′(s))q‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds≥1qI(t)∫tt0I(t)ξ(s)M(g(s))q‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds≥ξ(t)qI(t)∫tt0M(I(t)g(s))q‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds≥ξ(t)qM(1I(t)∫tt0I(t)g(s)q‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds)=ξ(t)qM(q∫tt0g(s)‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds). |
According to
λ(t)≥ξ(t)q¯M(q∫tt0g(s)‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds). |
In this way,
∫tt0g(s)‖A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)‖2ds≤1q¯M−1(qλ(t)ξ(t)) |
and (5.1) becomes
F′(t)≤−mE(t)+c∫tt0g(s)∫Ω|A12u(t)−A12u(t−s)|2dxds≤−mE(t)+c¯M−1(qλ(t)ξ(t)),∀ t≥t0. | (5.6) |
Let
F1(t):=¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))F(t)+E(t),∀ t≥0. |
Then, recalling that
F′1(t)≤−mE(t)¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))+c¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))¯M−1(qλ(t)ξ(t))+E′(t). | (5.7) |
Taking account of Lemma 2.3, we obtain
¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))¯M−1(qλ(t)ξ(t))≤¯M∗(¯H′(ε0E(t)E(0)))+¯M(¯M−1(qλ(t)ξ(t)))=¯M∗(¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0)))+qλ(t)ξ(t) | (5.8) |
where
¯M∗(¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0)))=¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))(¯M′)−1(¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0)))−¯M[(¯M′)−1(¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0)))]=ε0E(t)E(0)¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))−¯M(ε0E(t)E(0))≤ε0E(t)E(0)¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0)). | (5.9) |
So, combining (5.7), (5.8) and (5.9), we obtain
F′1(t)≤−(mE(0)−cε0)E(t)E(0)¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))+cqλ(t)ξ(t)+E′(t). |
From this, we multiply the above inequality by
ξ(t)F′1(t)≤−(mE(0)−cε0)ξ(t)E(t)E(0)¯M′(ε0E(t)E(0))+cqλ(t)+ξ(t)E′(t). |
Then, using the fact that, as
ξ(t)F′1(t)≤−(mE(0)−cε0)ξ(t)E(t)E(0)M′(ε0E(t)E(0))−cE′(t). |
Consequently, defining
F2(t)∼E(t), | (5.10) |
and with a suitable choice of
F′2(t)≤−kξ(t)(E(t)E(0))M′(ε0E(t)E(0)). | (5.11) |
Define
R(t)=λ1F2(t)E(0),λ1>0andM2(t)=tM′(ε0t). |
Moreover, it suffices to show that
F′2(t)≤−kξ(t)M2(E(t)E(0)). | (5.12) |
According to (5.10) and (5.12), there exist
λ2R(t)≤E(t)≤λ3R(t). | (5.13) |
Then, it follows that there exists
k1ξ(t)≤−R′(t)M2(R(t)),∀ t≥t0. | (5.14) |
Next, we define
M1(t):=∫rt1sM′(s)ds. |
And based on the properties of
Now, we integrate (5.14) over
−∫tt0R′(s)M2(R(s))ds≥k1∫tt0ξ(s)ds |
so
k1∫tt0ξ(s)ds≤M1(ε0R(t))−M1(ε0R(t0)), |
which implies that
M1(ε0R(t))≥k1∫tt0ξ(s)ds. |
It is easy to obtain that
R(t)≤1ε0M−11(k1∫tt0ξ(s)ds),∀ t≥t0. | (5.15) |
A combining of (5.13) and (5.15) gives the proof.
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees and the editor for their useful remarks and comments.
[1] | Schubert MB, Werner JH (2006) Flexible solar cells for clothing. Mater Today 9: 42–50. |
[2] |
Kim W, Kwon S, Lee SM, et al. (2013) Soft fabric-based flexible organic light-emitting diodes. Org Electron 14: 3007–3013. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.001
![]() |
[3] |
Jung JW, Williams ST, Jen AKY (2014) Low-temperature processed high-performance flexible perovskite solar cells via rationally optimized solvent washing treatments. RSC Adv 4: 62971–62977. doi: 10.1039/C4RA13212B
![]() |
[4] |
Jeong I, Kim HJ, Lee BS, et al. (2015) Highly efficient perovskite solar cells based on mechanically durable molybdenum cathode. Nano Energy 17: 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.025
![]() |
[5] |
O'Regan B, Grätzel M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353: 737–740. doi: 10.1038/353737a0
![]() |
[6] |
Ye M, Wen X, Wang M, et al. (2015) Recent advances in dye-sensitized solar cells: from photoanodes, sensitizers and electrolytes to counter electrodes. Mater Today 18: 155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.09.001
![]() |
[7] | Pan J, Smritakshi P, Murali B, et al. (2015) Air-stable surface-passivated perovskite quantum dots for ultra-robust, single- and two-photon-induced amplified spontaneous emission. J Phys Chem 6: 5027–5033. |
[8] |
Yang YM, Chen W, Dou L, et al. (2015) High-performance multiple-donor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nat Photonics 9: 190–198. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.9
![]() |
[9] |
Li Y, Xu G, Cui C, et al. (2018) Flexible and semitransparent organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 8: 1701791. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701791
![]() |
[10] |
Yang W, Park B, Jung E, et al. (2017) Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide-based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356: 1376–1379. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2301
![]() |
[11] |
Zhang H, Cheng J, Lin F, et al. (2016) Pinhole-free and surface-nanostructured NiOX film by room-temperature solution process for high-performance flexible perovskite solar cells with good stability and reproducibility. ACS Nano 10: 1503–1511. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07043
![]() |
[12] |
Roldán-Carmona C, Malinkiewicz O, Soriano A, et al. (2014) Flexible high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Energ Environ Sci 7: 994–997. doi: 10.1039/c3ee43619e
![]() |
[13] |
Wang D, Wright M, Elumalai NK, et al. (2016) Stability of perovskite solar cells. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 147: 255–275. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.025
![]() |
[14] |
Ji XY, Cheng HY, Grede AJ, et al. (2018) Conformal coating of amorphous silicon and germanium by high pressure chemical vapor deposition for photovoltaic fabrics. APL Mater 6: 046105. doi: 10.1063/1.5020814
![]() |
[15] | Ehrmann A, Blachowicz T (2019) Comment on 'Dye-sensitized solar cells using Aloe Vera and Cladode of Cactus extracts as natural sensitizers' [Chem. Phys. Lett. 679 (2017) 97–101]. Chem Phys Lett 714: 227–229. |
[16] |
Plentz J, Andra G, Pliewischkies T, et al. (2016) Amorphous silicon thin-film solar cells on glass fiber textiles. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 204: 34–37. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2015.11.007
![]() |
[17] |
Liu JQ, Li Y, Yong S, et al. (2019) Flexible printed monolithic-structured solid-state dye sensitized solar cells on woven glass fibre textiles for wearable energy harvesting applications. Sci Rep 9: 1362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37590-8
![]() |
[18] | Li Y, Arumugam S, Krishnan C, et al. (2019) Encapsulated textile organic solar cells fabricated by spray coating. Chemistry Select 4: 407–412. |
[19] | Liang X, Long GH, Fu CW, et al. (2018) High performance all-solid-state flexible supercapacitor for wearable storage device application. Chem Eng J 345: 186–195. |
[20] |
Ji XY, Cheng HY, Grede AJ, et al. (2018) Conformal coating of amorphous silicon and germanium by high pressure chemical vapor deposition for photovoltaic fabrics. APL Mater 6: 046105. doi: 10.1063/1.5020814
![]() |
[21] |
Grancaric AM, Jerkovic I, Koncar V, et al. (2018) Conductive polymers for smart textile applications. J Ind Text 48: 612–642. doi: 10.1177/1528083717699368
![]() |
[22] |
Kye MJ, Cho JH, Yu JC, et al. (2018) "Drop-on-textile" patternable aqueous PEDOT composite ink providing highly stretchable and wash-resistant electrodes for electronic textiles. Dyes Pigments 155: 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.03.024
![]() |
[23] |
Fu XM, Xu LM, Li JX, et al. (2018) Flexible solar cells based on carbon nanomaterials. Carbon 139: 1063–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.017
![]() |
[24] | Li LB, Zhang S, Yang ZC, et al. (2018) Recent advances of flexible perovskite solar cells. J Energy Chem 27: 673–689. |
[25] |
Tsuboi K, Matsumoto H, Fukawa T, et al. (2015) Simulation study on optical absorption property of fiber- and fabric-shaped organic thin-film solar cells with resin sealing layer. Sen-I Gakkaishi 71: 121–126. doi: 10.2115/fiber.71.121
![]() |
[26] |
Peng M, Dong B, Zou C (2018) Three dimensional photovoltaic fibers for wearable energy harvesting and conversion. J Energy Chem 27: 611–621. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.01.008
![]() |
[27] |
Koops SE, O'Regan BC, Barnes PRF, et al. (2009) Parameters influencing the efficiency of electron injection in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 131: 4808–4818. doi: 10.1021/ja8091278
![]() |
[28] |
Sabet M, Salavati-Niasari M (2014) Deposition of cadmium selenide semiconductor nanostructures on TiO2 surface via different chemical methods and investigation of their effects on dye sensitized solar cell efficiency. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 27: 619–633. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.07.031
![]() |
[29] |
Lei Y, Yang C, Hou J, et al. (2017) Strongly coupled CdS/graphene quantum dots nanohybrids for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution: Unraveling the essential roles of graphene quantum dots. Appl Catal B-Environ 216: 59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.063
![]() |
[30] | Kundu S, Sarojinijeeva P, Karthick R, et al. (2017) Enhancing the efficiency of DSSCs by the modification of TiO2 photoanodes using N, F and S, co-doped graphene quantum dots. Electromchim Acta 242: 337–343. |
[31] |
Grissom G, Jaksik J, McEntee M, et al. (2018) Three-dimensional carbon nanotube yarn based solid state solar cells with multiple sensitizers exhibit high energy conversion efficiency. Sol Energy 171: 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.053
![]() |
[32] | Sánchez-García MA, Bokhimi X, Velázquez Martinez S, et al. (2018) Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Prepared with Mexican Pre-Hispanic Dyes. J Nanotechnol 2018: 1236878. |
[33] | Juhász Junger I, Grimmelsmann N, Homburg SV, et al. (2017) Einfluss des pH-Wertes von Anthocyan-Farbstoffen auf die elektrischen Eigenschaften von Farbstoffsolarzellen. Proceedings des Fachgruppentreffen des Graduierteninstituts NRW-Ressourcen, Bochum, Germany. |
[34] |
Zhang X, Zhang J, Liu J, et al. (2015) Solution processed flexible and bending durable heterojunction colloidal quantum dot solar cell. Nanoscale 7: 11520–11524. doi: 10.1039/C5NR02617B
![]() |
[35] |
Zhang X, Johansson EMJ (2016) Utilizing light trapping interference effects in microcavity structured colloidal quantum dot solar cells: A combined theoretical and experimental approach. Nano Energy 28: 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.034
![]() |
[36] |
Zhang X, Aitola K, Hagglund C, et al. (2017) Dry-deposited transparent carbon nanotube film as front electrode in colloidal quantum dot solar cells. ChemSusChem 10: 434–441. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201601254
![]() |
[37] |
Liu M, Voznyy O, Sabatini R, et al. (2017) Hybrid organic–inorganic inks flatten the energy landscape in colloidal quantum dot solids. Nat Mater 16: 258–263. doi: 10.1038/nmat4800
![]() |
[38] |
Zhang XL, Öberg VA, Du J, et al. (2018) Extremely lightweight and ultra-flexible infrared light-converting quantum dot solar cells with high power-per-weight output using a solution-processed bending durable silver nanowire-based electrode. Energ Environ Sci 11: 354. doi: 10.1039/C7EE02772A
![]() |
[39] | Liu J, Li Y, Arumugam S, et al. (2018) Screen printed dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) on Woven polyester cotton fabric for wearable energy harvesting applications. Mater Today Proc 5: 13753–13758. |
[40] | Liu J, Li Y, Arumugam S, et al. (2018) Investigation of low temperature processed titanium dioxide (TiO2) films for printed dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) for large area flexible applications. Mater Today Proc 5: 13846–13854. |
[41] |
Juhász Junger I, Homburg SV, Grethe T, et al. (2017) Examination of the sintering process-dependent properties of TiO2 on glass and textile substrates. J Photon Energy 7: 015001. doi: 10.1117/1.JPE.7.015001
![]() |
[42] |
Herrmann A, Fiedler J, Ehrmann A, et al. (2016) Examination of the sintering process dependent micro- and nanostructure of TiO2 on textile substrates. Photonics for Solar Energy Systems VI. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 9898: 98980S doi: 10.1117/12.2227180
![]() |
[43] | Opwis K, Gutmann JS, Lagunas Alonso AR, et al. (2016) Preparation of a textile-based dye-sensitized solar cell. Int J Photoenergy 2016: 3796074. |
[44] |
Jun MJ, Cha SI, Seo SH, et al. (2016) Float printing deposition to control the morphology of TiO2 photoanodes on woven textile metal substrates for TCO-free flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv 6: 67331–67339. doi: 10.1039/C6RA09457K
![]() |
[45] |
Krämer A, Engel S, Sangiorgi N, et al. (2017) ZnO thin films on single carbon fibres fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD). Appl Surf Sci 399: 282–287. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.046
![]() |
[46] | Rezaei B, Soleimany R, Ensafi AA, et al. (2018) Photocatalytic degradation enhancements of dyes with bi-functionalized zones of modified nanoflower like TiO2 with Pt-C3N4 under sunlight irradiation. J Environ Chem Eng 6: 7010–7020. |
[47] |
Das PP, Roy A, Tathavadekar M, et al. (2017) Photovoltaic and photocatalytic performance of electrospun Zn2SnO4 hollow fibers. Appl Catal B-Environ 203: 692–703. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.035
![]() |
[48] |
Fan X, Chu ZZ, Wang FZ, et al. (2008) Wire-shaped flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 20: 592. doi: 10.1002/adma.200701249
![]() |
[49] |
Pu X, Song WX, Liu MM, et al. (2016) Wearable power-textiles by integrating fabric triboelectric nanogenerators and fiber-shaped dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 6: 1601048. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601048
![]() |
[50] |
Wen Z, Yeh MH, Guo H, et al. (2016) Self-powered textile for wearable electronics by hybridizing fiber-shaped nanogenerators, solar cells, and supercapacitors. Sci Adv 2: e1600097. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600097
![]() |
[51] | Yang Z (2016) High performance fiber-shaped solar cells. Pure Appl Chem 88: 113–117. |
[52] |
Yun MJ, Cha SI, Kim HS, et al. (2016) Monolithic-structured single-layered textile-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci Rep 6: 34249. doi: 10.1038/srep34249
![]() |
[53] |
Chai ZS, Zhang NN, Sun P, et al. (2016) Tailorable and wearable textile devices for solar energy harvesting and simultaneous storage. ACS Nano 10: 9201–9207. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05293
![]() |
[54] |
Chen J, Huang Y, Zhang NN, et al. (2016) Micro-cable structured textile for simultaneously harvesting solar and mechanical energy. Nat Energy 1: 16138. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.138
![]() |
[55] |
Weintraub B, Wei Y, Wang ZL (2009) Optical fiber/nanowire hybrid structures for efficient three-dimensional dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem 48: 8981. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904492
![]() |
[56] |
Juhász Junger I, Großerhode C, Storck JL, et al. (2018) Influence of graphite-coating methods on the DSSC performance. Optik 174: 40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.041
![]() |
[57] | Grötsch G, Cornelißen C, Streitenberger A, et al. (2018) Development of textile-based organic photovoltaics. Proceedings of Aachen-Dresden-Denkendorf International Textile Conference. |
[58] |
Mengal N, Arbab AA, Sahito IA, et al. (2017) An electrocatalytic active lyocell fabric cathode based on cationically functionalized and charcoal decorated graphite composite for quasi-solid state dye sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy 155: 110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.06.032
![]() |
[59] |
Memon AA, Arbab AA, Iftikhar A, et al. (2017) Synthesis of highly photo-catalytic and electro-catalytic active textile structured carbon electrode and its application in DSSCs. Sol Energy 150: 521–531. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.052
![]() |
[60] | Sahito IA, Sun KC, Arbab AA, et al. (2016) Flexible and conductive cotton fabric counter electrode coated with graphene nanosheets for high efficiency dye sensitized solar cell. J Power Sources 319: 90–98. |
[61] |
Arbab AA, Sun KC, Sahito IA, et al. (2016) Fabrication of textile fabric counter electrodes using activated charcoal doped multi walled carbon nanotube hybrids for dye sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 4: 1495–1505. doi: 10.1039/C5TA08858E
![]() |
[62] | Motlagh MS, Mottaghitalab V (2017) The charge transport characterization of the polyaniline coated carbon fabric as a novel textile based counter electrode for flexible dye-sensitized solar cell. Electrochim Acta 249: 308–317. |
[63] |
Juhász L, Juhász Junger I (2018) Spectral analysis and parameter identification of textile-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials 11: 1623. doi: 10.3390/ma11091623
![]() |
[64] |
Juhász Junger I, Wehlage D, Böttjer R, et al. (2018) Dye-sensitized solar cells with electrospun nanofiber mat-based counter electrodes. Materials 11: 1604. doi: 10.3390/ma11091604
![]() |
[65] | Xu Q, Li M, Yan P, et al. (2016) Polypyrrole-coated cotton fabrics prepared by electrochemical polymerization as textile counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Org Electron 29: 107–113. |
[66] |
Juhász Junger I, Tellioglu A, Ehrmann A (2018) Refilling DSSCs as a method to ensure longevity. Optik 160: 255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.01.123
![]() |
[67] |
Sahito IA, Ahmed F, Khatri Z, et al. (2017) Enhanced ionic mobility and increased efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cell by adding lithium chloride in poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanofiber as electrolyte medium. J Mater Sci 52: 13920–13929. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1473-z
![]() |
[68] |
Sun KC, Sahito IA, Noh JW, et al. (2016) Highly efficient and durable dye-sensitized solar cells based on a wet-laid PET membrane electrolyte. J Mater Chem A 4: 458–465. doi: 10.1039/C5TA07720F
![]() |
[69] |
Hölscher F, Trümper PR, Juhász Junger I, et al. (2018) Raising reproducibility in dye-sensitized solar cells under laboratory conditions. J Renew Sustain Ener 10: 013506. doi: 10.1063/1.5013181
![]() |
[70] |
Bedeloglu A, Demir A, Bozkurt Y, et al. (2009) A flexible textile structure based on polymeric photovoltaics using transparent cathode. Synthetic Met 159: 2043–2048. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2009.07.019
![]() |
[71] |
Bedeloglu A, Koeppe R, Demir A, et al. (2010) Development of energy generating photovoltaic textile structures for smart applications. Fiber Polym 11: 378–383. doi: 10.1007/s12221-010-0378-0
![]() |
[72] |
Bedeloglu A, Demir A, Bozkurt Y, et al. (2010) Photovoltaic properties of polymer based organic solar cells adapted for non-transparent substrates. Renew Energ 35: 2301–2306. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.02.030
![]() |
[73] |
Bedeloglu A, Jimenez P, Demir A, et al. (2011) Photovoltaic textile structure using polyaniline/carbon nanotube composite materials. J Text I 102: 857–862. doi: 10.1080/00405000.2010.525816
![]() |
[74] |
Krebs FC, Biancardo M, Winther-Jensen B, et al. (2006) Strategies for incorporation of polymer photovoltaics into garments and textiles. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 90: 1058–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.06.003
![]() |
[75] | Arumugam S, Li Y, Liu J, et al. (2018) Optimized process of fully spray-coated organic solar cells on woven polyester cotton fabrics. Mater Today Proc 5: 13745–13752. |
[76] |
Arumugam S, Li Y, Senthilarasu S, et al. (2016) Fully spray-coated organic solar cells on woven polyester cotton fabrics for wearable energy harvesting applications. J Mater Chem A 4: 5561–5568. doi: 10.1039/C5TA03389F
![]() |
[77] |
Zhen HY, Li K, Chen CJ, et al. (2017) Water-borne foldable polymer solar cells: one-step transferring free-standing polymer films onto woven fabric electrodes. J Mater Chem A 5: 782–788. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08309A
![]() |
[78] |
O'Connor B, Pipe KP, Shtein M (2008) Fiber based organic photovoltaic devices. Appl Phys Lett 92: 193306. doi: 10.1063/1.2927533
![]() |
[79] |
Bedeloglu A, Demir A, Bozkurt Y, et al. (2010) A photovoltaic fiber design for smart textiles. Text Res J 80: 1065–1074. doi: 10.1177/0040517509352520
![]() |
[80] |
Zou D, Lv Z, Cai X, et al. (2012) Macro/microfiber-shaped electronic devices. Nano Energy 1: 273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.005
![]() |
[81] |
Sugino K, Ikeda Y, Yonezawa S, et al. (2017) Development of fiber and textile-shaped organic solar cells for smart textiles. J Fiber Sci Technol 73: 336–342. doi: 10.2115/fiberst.2017-0049
![]() |
[82] |
Ebner M, Schennach R, Chien HT, et al. (2017) Regenerated cellulose fiber solar cell. Flex Print Electron 2: 014002. doi: 10.1088/2058-8585/aa5707
![]() |
[83] |
Wu CX, Kim TW, Guo TL, et al. (2017) Wearable ultra-lightweight solar textiles based on transparent electronic fabrics. Nano Energy 32: 367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.040
![]() |
[84] |
Liu P, Gao Z, Xu LM, et al. (2018) Polymer solar cell textiles with interlaced cathode and anode fibers. J Mater Chem A 6: 19947–19953. doi: 10.1039/C8TA06510A
![]() |
[85] |
Jinno H, Fukuda K, Xu XM, et al. (2017) Stretchable and waterproof elastomer-coated organic photovoltaics for washable electronic textile applications. Nat Energy 2: 780–785. doi: 10.1038/s41560-017-0001-3
![]() |
[86] |
Jung JW, Bae JH, Ko JH, et al. (2018) Fully solution-processed indium tin oxide-free textile-based flexible solar cells made of an organic–inorganic perovskite absorber: Toward a wearable power source. J Power Sources 402: 327–332. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.038
![]() |
[87] |
Ma MM, Tang QW, Chen HY, et al. (2017) Filling perovskite (5-AVA)y(CH3NH3)1−yPbI3 or (5-AVA)y(CH3NH3)1−yPbI3−xClx halide in a 3D gel framework for multideformable perovskite solar cell. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 160: 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.047
![]() |
[88] | Lam JY, Chen JY, Tsai PC, et al. (2017) A stable, efficient textile-based flexible perovskite solar cell with improved washable and deployable capabilities for wearable device applications. RSC Adv 7: 54361–54368. |
[89] | Wang XY, Kulkarni SA, Li Z, et al. (2016) Wire-shaped perovskite solar cell based on TiO2 nanotubes. Nanotechnology 27: 20LT01. |
[90] |
Li HJ, Li XD, Wang WY, et al. (2019) Highly foldable and efficient paper-based perovskite solar cells. RRL Solar 3: 1800317. doi: 10.1002/solr.201800317
![]() |
[91] |
Castro-Hermosa S, Dagar J, Marsella A, et al. (2017) Perovskite solar cells on paper and the role of substrates and electrodes on performance. IEEE Electr Device L 38: 1278–1281. doi: 10.1109/LED.2017.2735178
![]() |
1. | Zhiyu Tu, Wenjun Liu, Well‐posedness and exponential decay for the Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation with time‐dependent memory kernel, 2023, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.9133 | |
2. | Marina Murillo‐Arcila, Well‐posedness for the fourth‐order Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation in the class of Banach‐space‐valued Hölder‐continuous functions, 2023, 46, 0170-4214, 1928, 10.1002/mma.8618 | |
3. | Carlos Lizama, Marina Murillo-Arcila, Well-posedness for a fourth-order equation of Moore–Gibson–Thompson type, 2021, 14173875, 1, 10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.81 | |
4. | Danhua Wang, Wenjun Liu, Well-posedness and decay property of regularity-loss type for the Cauchy problem of the standard linear solid model with Gurtin–Pipkin thermal law, 2021, 123, 18758576, 181, 10.3233/ASY-201631 | |
5. | Yang Liu, Wenke Li, A class of fourth-order nonlinear parabolic equations modeling the epitaxial growth of thin films, 2021, 14, 1937-1632, 4367, 10.3934/dcdss.2021112 | |
6. | Danhua Wang, Wenjun Liu, Kewang Chen, Well-posedness and decay property for the Cauchy problem of the standard linear solid model with thermoelasticity of type III, 2023, 74, 0044-2275, 10.1007/s00033-023-01964-4 | |
7. | Doaa Atta, Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Hamid M. Sedighi, Rasmiyah A. Alharb, Thermodiffusion interactions in a homogeneous spherical shell based on the modified Moore–Gibson–Thompson theory with two time delays, 2023, 1385-2000, 10.1007/s11043-023-09598-9 | |
8. | İbrahim TEKİN, Identification of the time-dependent lowest term in a fourth order in time partial differential equation, 2023, 72, 1303-5991, 500, 10.31801/cfsuasmas.1127250 | |
9. | Husam Alfadil, Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Marin Marin, Erasmo Carrera, Goufo-Caputo fractional viscoelastic photothermal model of an unbounded semiconductor material with a cylindrical cavity, 2023, 1537-6494, 1, 10.1080/15376494.2023.2278181 | |
10. | Danhua Wang, Wenjun Liu, Global Existence and Decay Property for the Cauchy Problem of the Nonlinear MGT Plate Equation, 2024, 89, 0095-4616, 10.1007/s00245-024-10126-5 | |
11. | Flank D. M. Bezerra, Lucas A. Santos, Maria J. M. Silva, Carlos R. Takaessu, A Note on the Spectral Analysis of Some Fourth-Order Differential Equations with a Semigroup Approach, 2023, 78, 1422-6383, 10.1007/s00025-023-01999-z | |
12. | Carlos Lizama, Marina Murillo-Arcila, On the existence of chaos for the fourth-order Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation, 2023, 176, 09600779, 114123, 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114123 | |
13. | Wen-jun Liu, Zhi-yu Tu, Equivalence between the internal observability and exponential decay for the Moore-Gibson-Thompson equation, 2024, 39, 1005-1031, 89, 10.1007/s11766-024-4133-5 | |
14. | Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Marin Marin, Holm Altenbach, Thermally stressed thermoelectric microbeam supported by Winkler foundation via the modified Moore–Gibson–Thompson thermoelasticity theory, 2023, 103, 0044-2267, 10.1002/zamm.202300079 |