Minimizing the displacement of integrated system of wind and tidal turbines based on the soil types under cyclic loads

Navid Majdi Nasab; Alan Wang; Navid Majdi Nasab; Alan Wang

doi:10.3934/geosci.2023028

AIMS Geosciences

2023, Volume 9, Issue 3: 513-527. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023028

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Minimizing the displacement of integrated system of wind and tidal turbines based on the soil types under cyclic loads

Navid Majdi Nasab ^{1
,
,},
Alan Wang ²

1.
Mechanical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Manukau Institute of Technology, 2023 Auckland, New Zealand
2.
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Received: 11 April 2023 Revised: 21 June 2023 Accepted: 27 June 2023 Published: 17 July 2023

Hybrid offshore platforms are complex structures that need to tolerate cyclic loads. These loads occur when the turbine is working between cut-in and cut-out speeds and depend on the turbine's rotational speeds. However, selecting a proper soil for the structure to be secured in is very important for the stability of the hybrid system. This study aimed to calculate the displacement of an integrated offshore structure capable of supporting a hybrid assembly of one wind plus two tidal turbines under cyclic loads. The monopile has been found to be a suitable foundation type, as the most inexpensive solution in water depths less than 30 meters, for integrating both types of turbines. The deflection of the structure was compared for different types of soil with finite element analysis. Several simulations were conducted using OPTUM G3 software for calculating the stability of each type of soil in the rotational speed range of turbines. The results enable determining the amount of deflection for each soil type. The displacement range for soft clay is 0.0052 to 0.0098 m, and displacement is between 0.007 and 0.0158 m for medium sand. The minimum displacement of firm clay, which is 0.0115 meters at 5 rpm, is higher than all minima of other soil types. Thus, soft clay and medium sand show more stability, and firm clay is less stable in the rotational speed range of the turbines.

Keywords:

wind,
friction angle,
tidal,
deflection,
tilt

Citation: Navid Majdi Nasab, Alan Wang. Minimizing the displacement of integrated system of wind and tidal turbines based on the soil types under cyclic loads[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(3): 513-527. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023028

Related Papers:

[1]	Wenda Pei, Yong Zeng . Liouville-type theorem for the stationary fractional compressible MHD system in anisotropic Lebesgue spaces. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1306-1322. doi: 10.3934/era.2025058
[2]	Jie Zhang, Gaoli Huang, Fan Wu . Energy equality in the isentropic compressible Navier-Stokes-Maxwell equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6412-6424. doi: 10.3934/era.2023324
[3]	Guochun Wu, Han Wang, Yinghui Zhang . Optimal time-decay rates of the compressible Navier–Stokes–Poisson system in $\mathbb R^3$ . Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3889-3908. doi: 10.3934/era.2021067
[4]	Shuguan Ji, Yanshuo Li . Quasi-periodic solutions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with nonlocal diffusion. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7182-7194. doi: 10.3934/era.2023363
[5]	Jingjing Zhang, Ting Zhang . Local well-posedness of perturbed Navier-Stokes system around Landau solutions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2719-2739. doi: 10.3934/era.2021010
[6]	Jie Qi, Weike Wang . Global solutions to the Cauchy problem of BNSP equations in some classes of large data. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5496-5541. doi: 10.3934/era.2024255
[7]	Yue Cao . Blow-up criterion for the 3D viscous polytropic fluids with degenerate viscosities. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(1): 27-46. doi: 10.3934/era.2020003
[8]	Guoliang Ju, Can Chen, Rongliang Chen, Jingzhi Li, Kaitai Li, Shaohui Zhang . Numerical simulation for 3D flow in flow channel of aeroengine turbine fan based on dimension splitting method. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 837-851. doi: 10.3934/era.2020043
[9]	Wei Shi, Xinguang Yang, Xingjie Yan . Determination of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with damping. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(10): 3872-3886. doi: 10.3934/era.2022197
[10]	Mufit San, Seyma Ramazan . A study for a higher order Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equation with weakly singularity. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3092-3112. doi: 10.3934/era.2024141

Abstract

1. Introduction

Recently, nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs) has been developed as specific modules of the class of partial differential equations (PDEs). It is distinguished that investigating exact solutions for NLEEs, via many dissimilar methods shows an active part in mathematical physics and has become exciting and rich zones of research analysis for physicist and mathematicians. Lots of significant dynamic processes and phenomena in biology, chemistry, mechanics and physics can be expressed by nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs). In NLEEs, nonlinear wave phenomena of diffusion, dispersion, reaction, convection and dissipation are very important. It is necessary to define exact traveling solutions for these nonlinear equations to analyze various properties of these equations. Nowadays, NLEEs has become a significant area of research. Mostly, the existence of soliton solutions for NLEEs is of much important because of their widely applications in various areas of mathematical biology, chaos, neural physics, optical fibers and solid state physics etc.

Solitons are considered in the fields as optical communication, plasma, medical imaging, super continuum generation and nonlinear optics etc. They can transmit without changing their amplitude, velocity and wave form for a long distance. Optical soliton forms the excellent transporter minutes in the telecommunication engineering. Nowadays, some methods have been established for discovering exact traveling and solitary wave solutions of NLEEs. Various influential methods for instance, auxiliary equation method ^[1,2], homogeneous balance method ^[3,4], the Exp-function method ^[5,6], the tanh-function method ^[7], Darboux transformation method ^[8,9], the modified extended tanh-function method ^[10], the first integral method ^[11,12], Jacobi elliptic function method ^[13,14], the modified simple equation method ^[15,16,17], the exp(-F(x))-expansion method ^[18], the $(G'/G)$ -expansion method ^{[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]}, the variational iteration method ^[27] the homotopy perturbation method ^{[28,29,30,31,32]}, the F-expansion method ^[33,34,35] and many more ^{[36,37,38,39,40,41]}. Many models are existing to report this dynamic in the structure of optical fibers. The Schrodinger equation, the important model in submicroscopic phenomena and developed a fundamental importance to quantum mechanics. Such model denotes to the form of wave functions that manage the motion of small particles and classifies how these waves are transformed by external impacts. It has been measured and considered in several designs.

In optical fibers, most of these models are frequently stated in the time domain, and when fields at dissimilar frequencies spread through the fiber the common practice is also to transcribe a distance equation for each field component. The nonlinear transformation of dielectric of the fiber termed as the Kerr effect is applied to neutralize the dispersion effect, in this state, the optical pulse might lean to form a steady nonlinear pulse known as an optical soliton. The bit rate of transmission is restricted by the dispersion of the fiber material. Soliton transmission is an area of huge interest since of the wide applications in ultrafast signal routing systems, transcontinental and short-light-pulse telecommunication ^{[42,43,44,45]}. In this work, we used the generalized Kudryashov method to construct the exact traveling wave solutions for the Kaup-Newell equation (KNE) and Biswas-Arshad equation (BAE). The KNE is a significant model with many applications in optical fibers. The dynamics of solitons in optical tools is observed as an important arena of research in nonlinear optics that has added much attention in the past few decades ^{[46,47,48,49]}. The transmission of waves in optical tools with Kerr dispersion rests important in construction to the so-called time evolution equations ^[50,51,52]. The three models that invent from the Nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLSE) which are termed as the Derivative Nonlinear Schrodinger Equations (DNLSE) are classified into three classes: I, II, and III. Connected in this study is the DNLSE-I which is in its place known as the KNE. This class will be the focal point of the current study and a lot of inquiries have correctly been approved in the literature. Recently, Biswas and Arshad ^[53] constructed a model from the NLSE known as Biswas-Arshed equation (BAE). The BAE is one of the important models in the telecommunications industry. The extreme remarkable story of this model is that the self-phase modulation is ignored and likewise GVD is negligibly slight. The plus point of this method is that it offers further novel exact solutions in optical solitons form.

The draft of this paper is organized like this. Section 2, contained the description of the generalized Kudryashov method. In section 3, application of GKM for KNE is presented. Section 4 presents the application of GKM for BAE. Section 5 contains results and discussion. Conclusion of the paper is discussed in section 6.

2. Description of generalized Kudryashov method

The steps of GKM ^[54] are as follows

Let NLEE in the form

$\begin{eqnarray} W(q, q_x, q_t, q_{xt}, q_{tt}, q_{xx}, \cdots) = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

where $q = q(x, t)$ is a function.

Step 1. Applying the following wave transformation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = g(\eta), \; \; \; \eta = (x-vt), \end{equation}$

(2.2)

into (2.1), so (2.1) converts to nonlinear ODE in the form

$\begin{eqnarray} H(q, q', q'', q''', \cdots) = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

here, $q$ is a function of $\eta$ and $q' = dq/d\eta$ and $v$ is the wave-speed.

Step 2. Let (2.3) has the solution in form

$\begin{eqnarray} g(\eta) = \frac{\sum^N_{i = 0} a_i S^i(\eta)}{\sum^M_{j = 0} b_j S^j(\eta)}\; , \end{eqnarray}$

(2.4)

where $a_i$ , $b_j$ are constants and $(i\leq 0 \leq N)$ , $(j\leq 0 \leq M)$ such that $a_N\neq 0$ , $b_M\neq0$ .

$\begin{eqnarray} S(\eta) = \frac{1}{1+Ae^{\eta}}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.5)

is the solution in the form

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{dS(\eta)}{d\eta} = S^{2}(\eta)-S(\eta), \end{eqnarray}$

(2.6)

where $A$ is constant.

Step 3. Using balancing rule in (2.3) to obtain the values of $N$ and $M$ .

Step 4. Utilizing (2.4) and (2.6) into (2.3), we get an expression in $S^{i}$ , where $(i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, \cdots)$ . Then collecting all the coefficients of $S^{i}$ with same power $(i)$ and equating to zero, we get a system of alebraic equations in all constant terms. This system of algebraic equations can be solved by Maple to unknown parameters.

3. Kaup-Newell equation

The governing equation ^[55] is given as:

$\begin{eqnarray} iq_{t}+aq_{xx}+ib(|q|^{2}q)_{x} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

Here, $q(x, t)$ is a complex valued function, indicates the wave pfofile and rests on variables, space $x$ and time $t$ . It includes the non-Kerr dispersion, evolution and and GVD terms. Also, $a$ is the coefficient of GVD and $b$ is the coefficient of self-steepening term.

Suppose (3.1) has the following solution

$\begin{eqnarray} q(x, t) = g(\eta){e^{ {i\phi(x, t)}}}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.2)

where

$\begin{eqnarray} \eta = \alpha x-ct\; \; , \; \; \phi(x, t) = -\kappa x+\omega t. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

Here $g(\eta)$ , $\kappa$ , $c$ and $\omega$ are the amplitude, frequency, speed and wave number of the pulse, respectively. Putting (3.2) into (3.1), and splitting into imaginary and real parts.

The imaginary part has the form

$\begin{eqnarray} -c g'-2a\kappa\alpha g'+3b\alpha g^{2}g' = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

We can get easily the value of $c$ as under

$\begin{eqnarray*} c = -2\alpha\kappa a, \end{eqnarray*}$

and the constraint condition as under

$\begin{eqnarray*} 3\alpha bg^{2} = 0. \end{eqnarray*}$

The real part has the form

$\begin{eqnarray} a\alpha^{2}g''+\kappa b g^{3}-(a\kappa^{2}+\omega)g = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

Now, balancing the $g''$ and non-linear term $g^{3}$ in (3.5), we get $N = M+1$ . So for $M = 1$ , we get $N = 2$ .

3.1. Application of GKM

The solution of (3.5) by generalized Kudryashov method as given in (2.4), reduces to the form

$\begin{eqnarray} g(\eta) = \frac{a_0 + a_1 S(\eta) +a_2 S^2(\eta)}{b_0 +b_1 S(\eta)}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.6)

$a_0$ , $a_1$ , $a_2$ , $b_0$ and $b_1$ are constants. Subtitling the (3.6) into (3.5) and also applying (2.6), we get an expression in $S(\eta)$ . Collecting the coefficients of same power of $S^{i}$ and equating to zero, the system of equations is obtained, as follows.

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} b\kappa a_0^3+(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_0 b_0^2 = 0, \\ 3b\kappa a_0^2 a_1+(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_1 b_0^2+a \alpha^2 a_1 b_0^2+2(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_0 b_0 b_1-a \alpha^2 a_0 b_0 b_1 = 0, \\ 3b\kappa a_0 a_1^2+3b\kappa a_0^2 a_2-3 a \alpha^2 a_1 b_0^2+(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_2 b_0^2+4 a \alpha^2 a_2 b_0^2+3 a \alpha^2 a_0 b_0 b_1\\+2(-a \kappa^2-\omega) a_1 b_0 b_1-a \alpha^2 a_1 b_0 b_1+(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_0 b_1^2+a \alpha^2a_0 b_1^2 = 0, \\ b\kappa a_1^2+6b\kappa a_0 a_1 a_2+2 a \alpha^2 a_1 b_0^2-10 a \alpha^2 a_2 b_0^2-2a \alpha^2 a_1 b_0 b_1+a \alpha^2 a_1 b_0 b_1\\+2(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_2 b_0 b_1 +3 a \alpha^2 a_2 b_0 b_1-a \alpha^2 a_0 b_1^2+(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_1 b_1^2 = 0, \\ 3b \kappa a_1^2 a_2+3b\kappa a_0a_2^2+6a\alpha^2a_2b_0^2-9a\alpha^2 a_2b_0b_1+(-a \kappa^2-\omega)a_2 b_1^2+a\alpha^2a_2b_1^2 = 0, \\ 3b\kappa a_1a_2^2+6a\alpha^2a_2 b_0 b_1-3a\alpha^2a_2 b_1^2 = 0, \\ b\kappa a_2^3+2 a \alpha^2 a_2 b_1^2 = 0.\\ \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.7)

By solving the above system, we get various types of solutions. These solutions are deliberated below.

Case 1.

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = 0, \; a_1 = a_1, \; a_2 = -a_1, \; b_0 = -\frac{1}{2\; b_1}, \; b_1 = b_1, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a = a, \; \kappa = -\frac{2\; a\; \alpha^2\; b_1^2}{a_1^2\; b}, \; \omega = -\frac {a\; \alpha^2\big(4\; a^2\; \alpha^2\; b_1^{4}-a_1^4\; b^2\big)}{a_1^4\; b^2}. \end{equation*}$

Case 1 corresponds the following solution for Kaup-Newell equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \bigg( \frac{-\frac{a_1}{(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})} -\frac{a_1}{(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})^2}}{-\frac{1}{2\; b_1} +\frac{b_1} {(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}}\bigg)\times e^{\iota \left(\frac{2\; a\; \alpha^2\; b_1^2}{a_1^2\; b} x- \frac {a\; \alpha^2\big(4\; a^2\; \alpha^2\; b_1^{4}-a_1^4\; b^2\big)}{a_1^4\; b^2} t\right)}. \end{equation}$

(3.8)

Case 2.

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = a_0, \; a_1 = -\frac{(b_1+2b_0)a_0}{b_0}, \; a_2 = 0, \; b_0 = b_0, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a = a, \; \kappa = -\frac{\; a\; \alpha^2\; b_0^2}{2\; b\; a_0^2}, \; \omega = -\frac{a\; \alpha^2\big(2b^2\; a_0^4+b_0^4 a_2\alpha^2\big)}{4\; b^2\; a_0^4}. \end{equation*}$

Case 2 corresponds the following solution for Kaup-Newell equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \bigg( \frac{a_0-\frac{(b_1+2b_0)a_0}{b_0(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}}{b_0+\frac{b_1}{(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}}\bigg)\times e^{\iota \left(\frac{\; a\; \alpha^2\; b_0^2}{2\; b\; a_0^2} x- \frac{a\; \alpha^2\big(2b^2\; a_0^4+b_0^4 a_2\alpha^2\big)}{4\; b^2\; a_0^4} t\right)}. \end{equation}$

(3.9)

Case 3.

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = -\frac{b_0 a_2}{2b_1}, \; a_1 = \frac{a_2(2b_0- b_1)}{2b_1}, \; a_2 = a_2, \; b_0 = b_0, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a = a, \; \kappa = -\frac{2\; a\; \alpha^2\; b_1^2}{\; b\; a_2^2}, \; \omega = -\frac{a \alpha^2 \big(b^2 a_2^4+8a^2\alpha^2 b_1^4\big)}{2b^2a_2^4}. \end{equation*}$

Case 3 corresponds the following solution for Kaup-Newell equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \bigg(\frac{-\frac{b_0 a_2}{2b_1}+\frac{a_2(2b_0- b_1)}{2b_1(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}+\frac{a_2}{(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})^2}}{b_0+\frac{b_1} {(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}}\bigg)\times e^{\iota \bigg(\frac{2\; a\; \alpha^2\; b_1^2}{\; b\; a_2^2} x- \frac{a \alpha^2 \big(b^2 a_2^4+8a^2\alpha^2 b_1^4\big)}{2b^2a_2^4} t\bigg)}. \end{equation}$

(3.10)

Case 4.

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = \frac{1}{2}a_2, \; a_1 = -a_2, \; a_2 = a_2, \; b_0 = -\frac{1}{b} b_1, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a = a, \; \kappa = -\frac{2 a \alpha^2 b_1^2}{ba_2^2}, \; \omega = -\frac{2 a \alpha^2\big(b^2 a_2^4+2 a^2 \alpha^2 b_1^4\big)}{b^2a_2^4}. \end{equation*}$

Case 4 corresponds the following solution for Kaup-Newell equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \bigg(\frac{\frac{1}{2}a_2 -\frac{a_2}{(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}+\frac{a_2}{(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})^2} }{-\frac{1}{b} b_1+\frac{b_1} {(1+Ae^{\alpha x-ct})}}\bigg)\times e^{\iota \left( \frac{2 a \alpha^2 b_1^2}{ba_2^2}x- \frac{2 a \alpha^2\big(b^2 a_2^4+2 a^2 \alpha^2 b_1^4\big)}{b^2a_2^4} t\right)}. \end{equation}$

(3.11)

4. Biswas-Arshed equation

The BAE with Kerr Law nonlinearity ^[56] is

$\begin{equation} \alpha_{1}q_{xx}+\alpha_{2}q_{xt}+iq_{t}+i(\beta_{1}q_{xxx}+\beta_{2}q_{xxt}) = i(\lambda(|q|^{2}q)_{x}+\mu(|q|^{2})_{x}q+\theta|q|^{2}q_{x}). \end{equation}$

(4.1)

Here $q(x, t)$ representing the wave form. On the left of (4.1) $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ are the coefficients of GVD and STD, respectively. $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are the coefficients of 3OD and STD, respectively. On the right of (4.1) $\mu$ and $\theta$ represents the outcome of nonlinear disperssion and $\lambda$ represents the outcome of self-steepening in the nonappearance of SPM.

Let us assumed that the solution of (4.1) is as under

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = g(\eta)\; {e^{ {i\phi(x, t)}}}. \end{equation}$

(4.2)

where

$\begin{equation} \phi(x, t) = -\kappa x+\omega t+\theta_0, \; \; \eta = x-vt. \end{equation}$

(4.3)

Here $g(\eta)$ shows amplitude, $\phi(x, t)$ is phase component. Also $\kappa$ , $v$ , $\theta_0$ , $\omega$ denote the soliton frequency, speed, phase constant and wave number, respectively.

Substituting (4.2) into (4.3) and splitting it into imaginary and real parts.

The imaginary part has the form

$\begin{equation} (\beta_2v\kappa^2-3\beta_1\kappa^2+2\beta_2\omega\kappa-v+2\alpha_2v\kappa-2\alpha_1\kappa+\alpha_2\omega)g'+(-\beta_2v+\beta_1)g'''\nonumber\\-(2\mu+\theta+3\lambda)g^2g' = 0. \end{equation}$

We can get easily the value of $v$ as under

$\begin{equation*} v = \frac {\beta_1}{\beta_2}, \end{equation*}$

and the constraints conditions as under

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \beta_2v\kappa^2+2\beta_2\omega\kappa-3\beta_1\kappa^2-v-2\alpha_1\kappa+2\alpha_2v\kappa+\alpha_2\omega = 0, \\3\lambda+2\mu+\theta = 0. \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray*}$

The real part has the form

$\begin{equation} (\alpha_1-\alpha_2v+3\beta_1\kappa-2\beta_2v\kappa-\omega\beta_2)g''-(\omega+\alpha_1\kappa^2+\beta_1\kappa^3-\alpha_2\omega\kappa-\beta_2\omega\kappa^2)g -(\lambda+\theta)\kappa g^3 = 0. \end{equation}$

(4.4)

Using balancing principal on (4.4), we attain $M+1 = N$ . So for $M = 1$ , we obtain $N = 2$ .

4.1. Application of GKM

Hence, solution of (4.4) by GKM as given in (2.4) will be reduced into the following form

$\begin{equation} g(\eta) = \frac{a_0 + a_1 S(\eta) +a_2 S^2(\eta)}{b_0 +b_1 S(\eta)}. \end{equation}$

(4.5)

$a_0$ , $a_1$ , $a_2$ , $b_0$ and $b_1$ are constants.

Substituting (4.5) into (4.4) and also applying (2.6), we acquire an expression in $S(\eta)$ . Collecting the coefficients of with same power $S^{i}$ and equating to zero, the following system equations is got.

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} -2\omega\beta_2b_1^2a_2-4\beta_2 v\kappa b_1^2a_2+\kappa\theta a_2^3+2\alpha_1b_1^2a_2+6\beta_1\kappa b_1^2a_2-2\alpha_2 vb_1^2a_2+\kappa\lambda a_2^3 = 0, \\ 3\omega\beta_2 b_1^2a_2+3\alpha_2 vb_1^2a_2+6\beta_2 v\kappa b_1^2a_2-9\beta_1\kappa b_1^2a_2+6\alpha_1 b_0a_2b_1-12\beta_2 v\kappa b_0a_2b_1-3\alpha_1 b_1^2a_2\\ +3\kappa\theta a_1a_2^2+3\kappa\lambda a_1a_2^2+18\beta_1\kappa b_0a_2b_1-6\alpha_2 vb_0a_2b_1-6\omega\beta_2 b_0a_2b_1 = 0, \\ \alpha_1 b_1^2a_2+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2 b_1^2a_2+3\kappa\lambda a_0a_2^2-\alpha_2 vb_1^2a_2+\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_1^2a_2+18\beta_1\kappa a_2b_0^2\\ +3\kappa\lambda a_1^2a_2+3\kappa\theta a_1^2a_2+6\alpha_1 a_2b_0^2+3\kappa\theta a_0a_2^2-\beta_1\kappa^3 b_1^2a_2-6\omega\beta_2 a_2b_0^2-27\beta_1\kappa b_0a_2b_1\\ -2\beta_2 v\kappa b_1^2a_2-9\alpha_1 b_0a_2b_1+3\beta_1\kappa b_1^2a_2-6\alpha_2 va_2b_0^2-12\beta_2 v\kappa a_2b_0^2+9\alpha_2 vb_0a_2b_1-\\\alpha_1\kappa^2 b_1^2a_2 -\omega\beta_2 b_1^2a_2+18\beta_2 v\kappa b_0a_2b_1-\omega b_1^2a_2+9\omega\beta_2 b_0a_2b_1 = 0, \\ -2\beta_2 v\kappa b_1a_1b_0-6\beta_2 v\kappa b_0a_2b_1+4\beta_2 v\kappa b_0b_1a_0+2\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_0b_1a_2+2\beta_2\omega\kappa^2 b_0b_1a_2\\+\omega\beta_2b_1^2a_0-2\omega\beta_2b_0^2a_1-2\omega b_0b_1a_2-\alpha_1\kappa^2b_1^2a_1-\beta_1\kappa^3b_1^2a_1+\alpha_1b_1a_1b_0+3\alpha_1b_0a_2b_1\\-2\alpha_1b_0b_1a_0+10\alpha_2va_2b_0^2+\alpha_2vb_1^2a_0-2\alpha_2vb_0^2a_1- 30\beta_1\kappa a_2b_0^2-3\beta_1\kappa b_1^2a_0+6\beta_1\kappa b_0^2a_1\\+10\omega\beta_2a_2b_0^2-10\alpha_1a_2b_0^2-\omega b_1^2a_1+\kappa\theta a_1^3+\kappa\lambda a_1^3+2\alpha_1b_0^2a_1-\alpha_1b_1^2a_0-2\alpha_1\kappa^2b_0b_1a_2\\-2\beta_1\kappa^3b_0b_1a_2+\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_1^2a_1+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_1^2a_1-\alpha_2vb_1a_1b_0-3\alpha_2vb_0a_2b_1+2\alpha_2vb_0b_1a_0\\+3\beta_1\kappa b_1a_1b_0+9\beta_1\kappa b_0a_2b_1-6\beta_1\kappa b_0b_1a_0+20\beta_2v\kappa a_2b_0^2+2\beta_2v\kappa b_1^2a_0-4\beta_2v\kappa b_0^2a_1\\-\omega\beta_2b_1a_1b_0-3\omega\beta_2b_0a_2b_1+2\omega\beta_2b_0b_1a_0+6\kappa\lambda a_0a_1a_2+6\kappa\theta a_0a_1a_2 = 0, \\ 2\beta_2v\kappa b_1a_1b_0-6\beta_2v\kappa b_0b_1a_0+2\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_0b_1a_1+2\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_0b_1a_1-\omega\beta_2b_1^2a_0+3\omega\beta_2b_0^2a_1\\+3\kappa\lambda a_0^2a_2+3\kappa\lambda a_0a_1^2+3\kappa\theta a_0^2a_2+3\kappa\theta a_0a_1^2-2\omega b_0b_1a_1-\alpha_1\kappa^2b_0^2a_2-\alpha_1\kappa^2b_1^2a_0\\-\beta_1\kappa^3b_0^2a_2-\beta_1\kappa^3b_1^2a_0-\alpha_1b_1a_1b_0+3\alpha_1b_0b_1a_0-4\alpha_2va_2b_0^2 -\alpha_2vb_1^2a_0+3\alpha_2vb_0^2a_1\\+12\beta_1\kappa a_2b_0^2+3\beta_1\kappa b_1^2a_0-9\beta_1\kappa b_0^2a_1-4\omega\beta_2a_2b_0^2+4\alpha_1a_2b_0^2-\omega b_1^2a_0-\omega b_0^2a_2-3\alpha_1b_0^2a_1\\+\alpha_1b_1^2a_0-2\beta_1\kappa^3b_0b_1a_1+\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_0^2a_2+\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_1^2a_0+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_0^2a_2+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_1^2a_0+\alpha_2vb_1a_1b_0\\-3\alpha_2vb_0b_1a_0-3\beta_1\kappa b_1a_1b_0+9\beta_1\kappa b_0b_1a_0-8\beta_2v\kappa a_2b_0^2-2\beta_2v\kappa b_1^2a_0+6\beta_2v\kappa b_0^2a_1\\+\omega\beta_2b_1a_1b_0-3\omega\beta_2b_0b_1a_0-2\alpha_1\kappa^2b_0b_1a_1 = 0, \\ -\omega b_0^2a_1-\alpha_1b_0b_1a_0-\omega\beta_2b_0^2a_1-\alpha_2vb_0^2a_1+\omega\beta_2b_0b_1a_0+\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_0^2a_1-\beta_1\kappa^3b_0^2a_1\\-2\beta_2v\kappa b_0^2a_1-2\beta_2v\kappa b_0^2a_1-2\alpha_1\kappa^2b_0b_1a_0+\alpha_2vb_0b_1a_0+3\beta_1\kappa b_0^2a_1-2\beta_1\kappa^3b_0b_1a_0\\-2\omega b_0b_1a_0+\alpha_1b_0^2a_1-\alpha_1\kappa^2b_0^2a_1+3\kappa\theta a_0^2a_1-3\beta_1\kappa b_0b_1a_0+2\beta_2v\kappa b_0b_1a_0\\+2\alpha_2\omega\kappa b_0b_1a_0+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_0^2a_1+2\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_0b_1a_0+3\kappa\lambda a_0^2a_1 = 0, \\ \alpha_2\omega\kappa b_0^2a_0+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2b_0^2a_0+\kappa\theta a_0^3-\alpha_1\kappa^2b_0^2a_0-\beta_1\kappa^3b_0^2a_0+\kappa\lambda a_0^3-\omega b_0^2a_0 = 0.\\ \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

On solving above system, get various types of solutions. These solutions are deliberated below.

Case 1.

$\begin{equation*} \kappa = \kappa, \; \lambda = -\theta, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \omega = -\alpha_2v-\omega\beta_2+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2-2\beta_2v\kappa-\beta_1\kappa^3+\alpha_2\omega\kappa+3\beta_1\kappa+ \alpha_1-\alpha_1\kappa^2, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = 0\; , a_1 = a_1, \; a_2 = 0, \; b_0 = -b_1, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

Above these values correspond to the following solution for Biswas-Arshed equation.

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = -\frac{a_1}{b_1}\left[\frac{1}{Ae^{ (x-vt)}}\right]\times e^{ i\left\{-\kappa x+\omega t+\theta_0\right\}}. \end{equation}$

(4.7)

Case 2.

$\begin{equation*} \kappa = \kappa, \lambda = \frac{1}{2}\times \frac{-2\kappa\theta a_0^2-\alpha_1b_0^2-3\beta_1\kappa b_0^2+\omega\beta_2b_0^2+\alpha_2vb_0^2+2\beta_2v\kappa b_0^2}{\kappa a_0^2}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \omega = -\frac{1}{2}\alpha_1-\frac{3}{2}\beta_1\kappa +\frac{1}{2}\omega\beta_2-\alpha_1\kappa^2+\frac{1}{2}\alpha_2v-\beta_1\kappa^3+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2+\beta_2v\kappa+\alpha_2\omega\kappa, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = a_0, \\ a_1 = \frac{-a_0(b_1+2b_0)}{b_0}, \; a_2 = 0, \; b_0 = b_0, b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

Above these values correspond to the following solution for Biswas-Arshed equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \frac{a_0}{b_0}\left[\frac{b_0Ae^{ (x-vt)}-(b_0+b_1)}{b_0Ae^{ (x-vt)}+(b_0+b_1)}\right]\times e^{ i\left\{-\kappa x+\omega t+\theta_0\right\}}. \end{equation}$

(4.8)

Case 3.

$\begin{equation*} \kappa = \kappa, \; \lambda = \frac{-2\alpha_1b_1^2-\kappa\theta a_2^2-6\beta_1\kappa b_1^2+2\omega\beta_2b_1^2+2\alpha_2vb_1^2+4\beta_2v\kappa b_1^2}{\kappa a_2^2}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \omega = \alpha_2\omega\kappa+\beta_2\omega\kappa^2-\alpha_1\kappa^2-\beta_1\kappa^3-2\alpha_1-6\beta_1\kappa+2\omega\beta_2+2\alpha_2v+4\beta_2v\kappa, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = \frac {1}{2}a_2, \; a_1 = -a_2, \\ a_2 = a_2, \; b_0 = -\frac {1}{2}b_1, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

Above these values correspond to the following solution for Biswas-Arshed equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \frac{a_2}{b_1}\left[ \frac{1+A^2e^{ 2(x-vt)}}{1-A^2e^{ 2(x-vt)}}\right]\times e^{ i\left\{-\kappa x+\omega t+\theta_0\right\}}. \end{equation}$

(4.9)

Case 4.

$\begin{equation*} \kappa = 0, \lambda = \lambda, \; \omega = \alpha_1-\omega\beta_2-\alpha_2v, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = -a_1, \; a_1 = a_1, \; a_2 = 0, \; b_0 = 0, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

Above these values correspond to the following solution for Biswas-Arshed equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = -\frac{a_1}{b_1}\left[Ae^{ (x-vt)}\right]\times e^{ i\left\{\omega t+\theta_0\right\}}. \end{equation}$

(4.10)

Case 5.

$\begin{equation*} \kappa = -\frac{-\alpha_1+\omega\beta_2+\alpha_2v}{-3\beta_1+2\beta_2v}, \lambda = -\theta, \end{equation*}$

$\omega = -\frac{1}{(-3\beta_1+2\beta_2v)^3}\times\bigg[-4\alpha_1^2\alpha_2v^2\beta_2+2\alpha_1\alpha_2^2v^3\beta_2- 9\alpha_2\omega\alpha_1\beta_1^2+\\ 9\alpha_2\omega^2\beta_2\beta_1^2+9\alpha_2^2\omega v\beta_1^2+ 2\alpha_2^2\omega v^3\beta_2^2+6\omega\beta_2\alpha_1^2\beta_1-6\omega\beta_2^2\alpha_1^2v- 6\omega^2\beta_2^2\alpha_1\beta_1\\ +6\omega^2\beta_2^3\alpha_1v+ 3\beta_1\alpha_1^2\alpha_2v+2\omega^3\beta_2^3\beta_1- 2\omega^3\beta_2^4v-\beta_1\alpha_2^3v^3 +2\alpha_1^3\beta_2v+4\alpha_2\omega\alpha_1\beta_2^2v^2\\ -9\alpha_2\omega^2\beta_2^2\beta_1v-12\alpha_2^2\omega v^2\beta_1\beta_2-2\beta_1\alpha_1^3+6\alpha_2\alpha_1\beta_1\beta_2v\bigg],$

$\begin{equation*} a_0 = 0, \; a_1 = a_1, \; a_2 = a_2, \; b_0 = b_0, \; b_1 = b_1. \end{equation*}$

Above these values correspond to the following solution for Biswas-Arshed equation

$\begin{equation} q(x, t) = \left[\frac{a_1Ae^{ (x-vt)}+(a_1+a_2)}{A^2e^{ 2(x-vt)}+(2b_0+b_1)Ae^{ (x-vt)}+(b_0+b_1)}\right]\times e^{ i\left\{-\kappa x+\omega t+\theta_0\right\}}. \end{equation}$

(4.11)

5. Results and discussions

In this study, we effectively construct novel exact solutions in form of optical solitons for Kaup-Newell equation and Biswas-Arshed equation using the generalized Kudryashov method. This method is considered as most recent scheme in this arena and that is not utilized to this equation earlier. For physical analysis, 3-dim, 2-dim and contour plots of some of these solutions are included with appropriate parameters. These acquired solutions discover their application in communication to convey information because solitons have the capability to spread over long distances without reduction and without changing their forms. Acquired results are novel and distinct from that reported results. In this paper, we only added particular figures to avoid overfilling the document. For graphical representation for KNE and BAE, the physical behavior of (3.8) using the proper values of parameters $\alpha = 0.3$ , $a_1 = 0.65$ , $b_1 = 0.85$ , $p = 0.98$ , $q = 0.95$ , $k = 2$ , $A = 3$ , $b = 2$ , $c = 4$ . and $t = 1$ are shown in , the physical behavior of (3.9) using the appropriate values of parameters $\alpha = 0.75$ , $a_0 = 1.5$ , $b_0 = 1.7$ , $b_1 = 0.98$ , $A = 3$ , $b = 1.6$ , $a_0 = 2$ , $c = 2.5$ . and $t = 1$ are shown in , the physical behavior of (3.11) using the proper values of parameters $\alpha = 0.75$ , $a_0 = 1.5$ , $b_0 = 1.7$ , $b_1 = 0.98$ , $A = 3$ , $b = 1.6$ , $a_0 = 2$ , $c = 2.5$ . and $t = 1$ are shown in , the absolute behavior of (4.9) using the proper values of parameters $\alpha = 0.75$ , $a_0 = 1.5$ , $b_0 = 1.7$ , $A = 2.3$ , $b = 1.6$ , $c = 2.5$ , $v = 2.5$ , $\theta_0 = 4$ . and $t = 1$ are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 1. (A): 3D graph of (3.8) with

$\alpha = 0.3$ ,

$a_1 = 0.65$ ,

$b_1 = 0.85$ ,

$p = 0.98$ ,

$q = 0.95$ ,

$k = 2$ ,

$A = 3$ ,

$b = 2$ ,

$c = 4$ . (A-1): 2D plot of (3.8) with

$t = 1$ . (A-2): Contour graph of (3.8).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. (B): 3D graph of (3.9) with

$\alpha = 0.75$ ,

$a_0 = 1.5$ ,

$b_0 = 1.7$ ,

$b_1 = 0.98$ ,

$A = 3$ ,

$b = 1.6$ ,

$a_0 = 2$ ,

$c = 2.5$ . (B-1): 2D plot of (3.9) with

$t = 1$ . (B-2): Contour graph of (3.9).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. (C): 3D graph of (3.11) with

$\alpha = 0.75$ ,

$a_0 = 1.5$ ,

$b_0 = 1.7$ ,

$b_1 = 0.98$ ,

$A = 3$ ,

$b = 1.6$ ,

$a_0 = 2$ ,

$c = 2.5$ . (C-1): 2D plot of (3.11) with

$t = 1$ . (C-2): Contour graph of (3.11).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. (D): 3D graph of (4.9) with

$\alpha = 0.75$ ,

$a_0 = 1.5$ ,

$b_0 = 1.7$ ,

$A = 2.3$ ,

$b = 1.6$ ,

$c = 2.5$ ,

$v = 2.5$ ,

$\theta_0 = 4$ . (D-1): 2D plot of (4.9) with

$t = 1$ . (D-2): Contour graph of (4.9).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

6. Conclusions

The study of the exact solutions of nonlinear models plays an indispensable role in the analysis of nonlinear phenomena. In this work, we have constructed and analyzed the optical solitons solutions of the Kaup-Newell equation and Biswas-Arshad equation by using Kudryashove method. The transmission of ultrashort optical solitons in optical fiber is modeled by these equations. We have achieved more general and novel exact solutions in the form of dark, singular and bright solitons. The obtained solutions of this article are very helpful in governing solitons dynamics. The constructed solitons solutions approve the effectiveness, easiness and influence of the under study techniques. we plotted some selected solutions by giving appropriate values to the involved parameters. The motivation and purpose of this study is to offer analytical techniques to discover solitons solutions which helps mathematicians, physicians and engineers to recognize the physical phenomena of these models. This powerful technique can be employed for several other nonlinear complex PDEs that are arising in mathematical physics. Next, the DNLSE classes II and III will be scrutinized via the similar methods to more evaluate them, this definitely will offer a huge understanding of the methods along with the classes of DNLSE. These solutions may be suitable for understanding the procedure of the nonlinear physical phenomena in wave propagation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology Lahore, Pakistan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	Nasab NM, Kilby J, Bakhtiaryfard L (2020) Wind Power Potential Assessment for Three Locations in New Zealand. Chem Eng Trans 81: 73–78. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2081013 doi: 10.3303/CET2081013
[2]	Li L, Gao Y, Yuan ZM, et al. (2018) Dynamic response and power production of a floating integrated wind, wave and tidal energy system. Renewable Energy 116: 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.080 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.080
[3]	Noori M, Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2015) Economic input–output based sustainability analysis of onshore and offshore wind energy systems. Int J Green Energy 12: 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.890103 doi: 10.1080/15435075.2014.890103
[4]	Heptonstall P, Gross R, Greenacre P, et al. (2012) The cost of offshore wind: Understanding the past and projecting the future. Energy Policy 41: 815–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.050 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.050
[5]	Nasab NM, Kilby J (2021) Feasibility Study: Effect of Tidal Turbines Cut-in Speed for Power Generation in New Zealand. Chem Eng Trans 88: 13–18. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2188002 doi: 10.3303/CET2188002
[6]	Majdi Nasab N, Islam MR, Muttaqi K, et al. (2021) Optimization of a Grid-Connected Microgrid Using Tidal and Wind Energy in Cook Strait. Fluids 6: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6120426 doi: 10.3390/fluids6120426
[7]	Gruszczynski A (2017) Hybrid Offshore Wind and Tidal. Available from: http://www.esru.strath.ac.uk/EandE/Web_sites/16-17/WindAndTidal/index.html.
[8]	Nasab NM, Kilby J, Bakhtiaryfard L (2022) Integration of wind and tidal turbines using spar buoy floating foundations. AIMS Energy 10: 1165–1189. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2022055 doi: 10.3934/energy.2022055
[9]	Zhang Y, Liu H, Wu WB, et al. (2021) Interaction model for torsional dynamic response of thin-wall pipe piles embedded in both vertically and radially inhomogeneous soil. Int J Geomech 21: 04021185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000216 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000216
[10]	Fellenius B (2017) Basics of foundation design, Lulu. com.
[11]	Majdi Nasab N (2022) A Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Power Generation System Using Offshore-wind Turbine and Tidal Turbine. Auckland University of Technology.
[12]	Chen D, Gao P, Hunag SS, et al. (2020) Static and dynamic loading behavior of a hybrid foundation for offshore wind turbines. Mar Struct 71: 102727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102727 doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102727
[13]	Wang X, Zeng XW, Li XY, et al. (2019) Investigation on offshore wind turbine with an innovative hybrid monopile foundation: An experimental based study. Renewable Energy 132: 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.127 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.127
[14]	Peng J, Clarke B, Rouainia M (2011) Increasing the resistance of piles subject to cyclic lateral loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137: 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000504 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000504
[15]	Lehane B, Pedram B, Doherty JA, et al. (2014) Improved performance of monopiles when combined with footings for tower foundations in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140: 04014027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001109 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001109
[16]	Haiderali A, Madabhushi G (2016) Improving the lateral capacity of monopiles in submarine clay. Proc Inst Civil Engineers-Ground Improv 169: 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.14.00039 doi: 10.1680/jgrim.14.00039
[17]	Wang X, Zeng XW, Li XY, et al. (2020) Liquefaction characteristics of offshore wind turbine with hybrid monopile foundation via centrifuge modelling. Renewable Energy 145: 2358–2372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.106 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.106
[18]	Bienen B, Dührkop J, Grabe J, et al. (2012) Response of piles with wings to monotonic and cyclic lateral loading in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138: 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000059 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000059
[19]	Anastasopoulos I, Theofilou M (2016) Hybrid foundation for offshore wind turbines: Environmental and seismic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 80: 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.015 doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.015
[20]	Bhattacharya S (2019) Design of foundations for offshore wind turbines, Wiley Online Library.
[21]	IEC 61400. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_61400.
[22]	BS EN IEC 61400-3-1: 2019 Wind energy generation systems. Design requirements for fixed offshore wind turbines. BSI Standards Limited. Available from: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/29360.
[23]	DNV G (2014) Environmental conditions and environmental loads. Recommend Practice DNV-RP-C205.
[24]	Karimirad M (2014) Offshore energy structures: for wind power, wave energy and hybrid marine platforms. Springer.
[25]	Nasab NM, Kilby J, Bakhtiaryfard L (2022) Analysis and Design of Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind and Tidal Turbine Structures. Water 14: 3555. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213555 doi: 10.3390/w14213555
[26]	OPTUM CE. Available from: https://optumce.com/.
[27]	Nasab NM, Kilby J, Bakhtiaryfard L (2020) The Potential for Integration of Wind and Tidal Power in New Zealand. Sustainability 12: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051807 doi: 10.3390/su12051807
[28]	Bowles L (1996) Foundation analysis and design, McGraw-hill.
[29]	Arany L, Bhattacharya S, Adhikari S, et al. (2015) An analytical model to predict the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines on three-spring flexible foundations using two different beam models. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 74: 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.007 doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.007
[30]	Augustesen AH, Brødbæk KT, Møller M, et al. (2009) Numerical modelling of large-diameter steel piles at Horns Rev. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Civil-Comp Press.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)