Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/MathOperators.js

Local well-posedness of perturbed Navier-Stokes system around Landau solutions

  • Received: 01 December 2020 Published: 22 February 2021
  • Primary: 35Q30; Secondary: 49K40

  • For the incompressible Navier-Stokes system, when initial data are uniformly locally square integral, the local existence of solutions has been obtained. In this paper, we consider perturbed system and show that perturbed solutions of Landau solutions to the Navier-Stokes system exist locally under Lquloc-perturbations, q2. Furthermore, when q3, the solution is well-posed. Precisely, we give the explicit formula of the pressure term.

    Citation: Jingjing Zhang, Ting Zhang. Local well-posedness of perturbed Navier-Stokes system around Landau solutions[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2719-2739. doi: 10.3934/era.2021010

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jingjing Zhang, Ting Zhang . Local well-posedness of perturbed Navier-Stokes system around Landau solutions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2719-2739. doi: 10.3934/era.2021010
    [2] Keqin Su, Rong Yang . Pullback dynamics and robustness for the 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with memory. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 928-946. doi: 10.3934/era.2023046
    [3] Linlin Tan, Bianru Cheng . Global well-posedness of 2D incompressible Navier–Stokes–Darcy flow in a type of generalized time-dependent porosity media. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(10): 5649-5681. doi: 10.3934/era.2024262
    [4] Jie Zhang, Gaoli Huang, Fan Wu . Energy equality in the isentropic compressible Navier-Stokes-Maxwell equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6412-6424. doi: 10.3934/era.2023324
    [5] Jianxia He, Qingyan Li . On the global well-posedness and exponential stability of 3D heat conducting incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with temperature-dependent coefficients and vacuum. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5451-5477. doi: 10.3934/era.2024253
    [6] Guochun Wu, Han Wang, Yinghui Zhang . Optimal time-decay rates of the compressible Navier–Stokes–Poisson system in $ \mathbb R^3 $. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3889-3908. doi: 10.3934/era.2021067
    [7] Guoliang Ju, Can Chen, Rongliang Chen, Jingzhi Li, Kaitai Li, Shaohui Zhang . Numerical simulation for 3D flow in flow channel of aeroengine turbine fan based on dimension splitting method. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 837-851. doi: 10.3934/era.2020043
    [8] Jie Qi, Weike Wang . Global solutions to the Cauchy problem of BNSP equations in some classes of large data. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5496-5541. doi: 10.3934/era.2024255
    [9] Nisachon Kumankat, Kanognudge Wuttanachamsri . Well-posedness of generalized Stokes-Brinkman equations modeling moving solid phases. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1641-1661. doi: 10.3934/era.2023085
    [10] Wei Shi, Xinguang Yang, Xingjie Yan . Determination of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with damping. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(10): 3872-3886. doi: 10.3934/era.2022197
  • For the incompressible Navier-Stokes system, when initial data are uniformly locally square integral, the local existence of solutions has been obtained. In this paper, we consider perturbed system and show that perturbed solutions of Landau solutions to the Navier-Stokes system exist locally under Lquloc-perturbations, q2. Furthermore, when q3, the solution is well-posed. Precisely, we give the explicit formula of the pressure term.



    The initial value problem of the Navier-Stokes system is described as follows

    {utΔu+(u)u+p=f, xR3,t0,u=0,u(x,0)=u0(x), (1.1)

    where u=(u1,u2,u3) is the velocity and p is the pressure.

    It is well known that Leray [16] proved the global existence of weak solutions for divergence free initial data u0L2(R3) and f=0. The uniqueness and regularity for the solutions still remain open, see e.g. [14] and references therein. For well-posedness results to the Navier-Stokes system, Kato [9] proved the local well-posedness for the general initial data in Ln(Rn) and the global well-posedness for the small initial data in Ln(Rn). Giga and Miyakawa [3] and Taylor [22] gave the same result in certain Morrey spaces. In 2001, Koch and Tataru [11] proved the global well-posedness evolving from small initial data in the space BMO1, in which they need uL2loc(Rn×[0,)) in order to make sense of the system. Moreover, self-similar solutions uL3(R3), but belong to L2uloc(R3), see [2,24,26]. The definition of Lquloc will be given in (1.6) later.

    For the Navier-Stokes system with u0L2uloc, there are some results on uniformly locally square integrable solutions. Basson [1] described such solutions. Lemarié-Rieusset [14,15] gave the local existence of weak solution u for when u0L2uloc. Moreover, global weak solution exists for the decaying initial data u0E2={fL2uloc :lim|x0|fL2(B(x0,1))=0}. Kikuchi and Seregin's paper [10] extend above results which include forcing terms in the equations. Very recently, Kown and Tsai [12] generalizes the global existence with non-decaying initial data whose local oscillations decay.

    For the uniformly local-L3 integrable functions space L3uloc, Lemarié-Rieusset [14] gave the applications of the space L3uloc to the Navier-Stokes system. Hineman and Wang [6] obtained the local well-posedness of Nematic liquid crystal flow for any initial data (u0,d0) with small L3uloc-norm of (u0,d0).

    The stationary Navier-Stokes system in R3 has the form

    {Δv+(v)v+p=f,v=0. (1.2)

    When f=(b(c)δ0,0,0) with b(c)=8πc3(c21)(2+6c23c(c21)ln(c+1c1)) and δ0 Dirac measure, the following formulas

    v1c(x)=2c|x|22x1|x|+cx21|x|(c|x|x1)2, v2c(x)=2x2(cx1|x|)|x|(c|x|x1)2,v3c(x)=2x3(cx1|x|)|x|(c|x|x1)2, pc(x)=4cx1|x||x|(c|x|x1)2, (1.3)

    with |x|=x21+x22+x23 and constant |c|>1 are the distributional solutions to system (1.2) in R3. The explicit stationary solutions (1.3) were given by Landau [13]. These solutions (1.3) are called Landau solutions. Landau solutions are in L2uloc space. Tian and Xin [23] proved that all (1)homogeneous, axisymmetric nonzero solutions of system (1.2) in C2(R3{0}) are Landau solutions. ˇSverˊak [21] proved that Landau solutions are the only (1)homogeneous solutions in C2(R3{0}). More details can be seen in [13,17,18,19,20,23].

    We denote u(x,t) be the solution to the Navier-Stokes system (1.1) with the given external force f=(b(c)δ0,0,0) and initial data u0=vc+w0. By a direct calculation, functions w(x,t)=u(x,t)vc(x) and π(x)=p(x,t)pc(x) satisfy the following perturbed Navier-Stokes system

    {wtΔw+(w)w+(w)vc+(vc)w+π=0,w=0,w(x,0)=w0(x). (1.4)

    The explicit formula of π is as follows

    π=13|w|2+p.v.R3ijΓ(xy)wiwj(y)dy23vcw+2p.v.R3ijΓ(xy)wivcj(y)dy, (1.5)

    for which detailed calculation can be seen in Appendix.

    Karch and Pilarczyk [7] show that perturbed solutions of Landau solutions to the Navier-Stokes system exist globally under L2- perturbations. In 2017, Karch, Pilarczyk and Schonbek [8] generalized the work of [7]. They presented a new method to show the global existence for a large class of solutions including the Landau ones. Based on these results, we are inspired to study local well-posedness of weak solutions to the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4) with initial data w0Lquloc(R3) in our work.

    First, we give some notations used in this paper. Ball B(x,r) is a ball in R3 centered at x with a radius r,

    B(x,r)=Br(x)={yR3:|yx|<r}.

    The spaces Lquloc, 1q, and Us,p(t0,t) for 1s,p and 0t0<t, defined by

    Lquloc={uL1loc(R3):uLquloc=supx0R3uLq(B1(x0))<+} (1.6)

    and

    Us,p(t0,t)={uL1loc(R3×(t0,t)):uUs,p(t0,t)=supx0R3uLs(t0,t;Lp(B1(x0)))<+}

    When t0=0, we simply use Us,pT=Us,p(0,T). Note that U,p(t0,t)=L(t0,t;Lpuloc ).

    Set L2 local energy space

    ET={uL2loc([0,T]×R3;R3):divu=0,uET<+}, (1.7)

    where

    uET:=uU,2T+uU2,2T. (1.8)

    The definition of Lq local energy solution, q2, is as follows

    Definition 1.1. (Lq local energy solution) Let w0Lquloc, divw0=0. A pair of functions (w,π) is a local energy solution to the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4) with initial data w0 in R3×(0,T) for 0<T<, if the functions satisfy the following conditions:

    (1) wU,qT, (|w|q2)U2,2T and πLqloc([0,T);L2qq+1loc(R3));

    (2) (w,π) satisfies the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4) in the sense of distributions;

    (3) the function tR3w(x,t)φ(x)dx is continuous on [0,T] for any compactly supported function φCc(R3). Furthermore, for any compact set KR3,

    w(,t)w0Lq(K)0, as t0+; (1.9)

    (4) (w,π) satisfies the following local energy inequality

    R3|w|2ξ(x,t)dx+2t0R3|w|2ξdxdst0R3(2vcw:wξ+(sξ+Δξ)|w|2+(|w|2+2π+2vcw)(w)ξ+|w|2vcξdxds, (1.10)

    for any t(0,T) and for all non-negative smooth functions ξCc((0,T)×R3);

    (5) For any x0R3, there exists a function cx0(t)Lq(0,T) such that

    π(x,t)=ˆπx0(x,t)+cx0(t), in Lqloc([0,T);L2qq+1(B(x0,32)), (1.11)

    where

    ˆπx0(x,t)=13|w(x,t)|2+p.v.B(x0,2)ijΓ(xy)wiwj(y)dy+p.v.B(x0,2)cij(Γ(xy)Γ(x0y))wiwj(y)dy23vcw(x,t)+2p.v.B(x0,2)ijΓ(xy)wivcj(y)dy+2p.v.B(x0,2)cij(Γ(xy)Γ(x0y))wivcj(y)dy (1.12)

    for Γ(x)=14π|x|.

    Our main result is as follows

    Theorem 1.2. There exist positive universal constants c3, ε1 and C with the following properties,

    (i) For every |c|c3, w0Lquloc, q2 with div w0=0, if

    Tε11+w02qLquloc, (1.13)

    there exists a Lq local energy solution (w,π) on R3×(0,T) to the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4) with initial data w0, satisfying

    wU,qT+(|w|q2)2qU2,2TCw0Lquloc. (1.14)

    (ii) Furthermore, when q3, the solution is unique.

    Remark 1.1. From (2.38) and (3.54), we could see a more detailed dependence of c3.

    Scheme of the proof and organization of the paper. In Section 2, we give some results which will be used in the proof of Theorem 1.2. In Section 3, we prove Theorem 1.2 by classical approximation theory. In Appendix, we give the details to derive the integral formula of pressure π, i.e. (1.5).

    Let us complete this section by the notations that we shall use in this article.

    Notations.

    We denote p or Lp the norm of the Lebesgue space Lp(R3) with p[1,].

    We denote Lpt(Lqx) the norm of the Lebesgue space Lpt([0,);Lqx(R3)) with p,q[1,].

    We use the homogeneous Sobolev space ˙H1(R3)={uS(R3):uL2(R3)}.

    C0(R3) denotes the set of smooth and compactly supported functions.

    The ith coordinate (i=1,2,3) of a vector u will be denoted by ui. Set (,) be the L2(R3) inner product. We use notation AB to denote ACB, where C is an absolute constant.

    We consider approximate solutions (wϵ,πϵ) to the following localized-mollified system in R3×(0,T)

    {wϵtΔwϵ+(Jϵ(wϵ))(wϵΦϵ)+(Jϵ(wϵ))(vcΦϵ)+(Φϵvc)Jϵ(wϵ)+πϵ=0,wϵ=0,wϵ(x,0)=w0(x), (2.1)

    where Jϵ(v)=vηϵ,ϵ>0, the mollifier ηϵ(x)=ε3η(xϵ) with positive ηCc(B(0,1)), ηdx=1. Localization factor Φϵ(x)=Φ(ϵx),ϵ>0 with ΦCc(R3)),

    Φ={1 in B(0,1),0 in B(0,32)c. (2.2)

    We will construct approximate solution wϵ directly in ET since w0L2uloc has no decay. First, we give a property of Landau solution vc which can be obtained by direct calculation.

    Lemma 2.1. The explicit formula of vc is (1.3), we have

    |x|vcL22|c|1:=Kc. (2.3)

    Then, we give a fundamental inequality with the singular weight in Sobolev spaces: the so-called Hardy inequality which go back to the pioneering work by G.H. Hardy [4,5].

    Lemma 2.2. For any f in ˙H1(R3), there holds

    (R3|f(x)|2|x|2dx)122fL2. (2.4)

    By the Duhamel principle, we can write the solution to system (2.1) into the following integral formulation

    wϵ(t)=etΔw0t0e(ts)ΔP(Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵ+Jϵ(wϵ)vcΦϵ+ΦϵvcJϵ(wϵ))(s)ds. (2.5)

    The following lemma give the construction of mild solution (see Chap. 5 in [25]) to system (2.1) in the space ET.

    Lemma 2.3. For each 0<ϵ<1, w0L2ulocB and vcL2uloc2C0B. If 0<T<min(1,Cϵ3B2), we can find a unique solution w=wϵ to the integral form of (2.1) such that

    w(t)=etΔw0t0e(ts)ΔP(Jϵ(w)wΦϵ+Jϵ(w)vcΦϵ+ΦϵvcJϵ(w))(s)ds (2.6)

    satisfying

    wET2C0B (2.7)

    where C>0 and C0>1 are absolute constants.

    Proof. Set the map

    Ψ(w)=etΔw0t0e(ts)ΔP(Jϵ(w)wΦϵ+Jϵ(w)vcΦϵ+ΦϵvcJϵ(w))(s)ds. (2.8)

    We will do contraction mapping in the local energy space ET which is defined in (1.7). According to Lemma 2.4 in [12], for any T>0, we have

    etΔfET(1+T12)fL2uloc , (2.9)

    for fL2uloc, and

    t0e(ts)ΔPF(s)dsET(1+T)FU2,2T, (2.10)

    for FU2,2T. Hence, by (2.8)-(2.10) and T1, we obtain

    Ψ(w)ETw0L2uloc +Jϵ(w)wΦϵU2,2T+2Jϵ(w)vcΦϵU2,2T. (2.11)

    Note that

    Jϵ(w)wΦϵU2,2TwηϵL2(0,T;L(R3))wU,2TwU2,2TηϵL2wU,2Tϵ32wU2,2TwU,2Tϵ32Tw2U,2T, (2.12)

    and

    Jϵ(w)vcΦϵU2,2TwηϵL2(0,T;L(R3))vcL2ulocϵ32TwU,2TvcL2uloc. (2.13)

    We have

    Ψ(w)ETw0L2uloc +ϵ32Tw2U,2T+ϵ32TwU,2TvcL2ulocw0L2uloc +ϵ32T(wU,2T+2vcL2uloc)wU,2TC0w0L2uloc +C1ϵ32T(wET+2vcL2uloc)wET, (2.14)

    for some constants C0,C1. Hence, for any w,zET, there holds

    Ψ(w)Ψ(z)ETC1ϵ32T(wET+zET+2vcL2uloc)wzET. (2.15)

    By Picard contraction theorem and vcL2uloc2C0B, if T satisfies

    T<ϵ3256(C0C1B)2=Cϵ3B2, (2.16)

    there exists a fixed point wET of w=Ψ(w) satisfying

    wET2C0B. (2.17)

    We will give a uniform bound of (wϵ,πϵ) on a uniform time [0,T] in the following lemma

    Lemma 2.4. For each 0<ϵ<1, let (wϵ,πϵ) be the solution to system (2.1) on R3×[0,Tϵ]. If |c|c3 and w0L2uloc with div w0=0, there exists a small constant positive ε1 independent of ϵ and w0L2uloc such that, if Tϵ˜T=ε1(1+w04L2uloc)1, then

    wϵETϵCw0L2uloc, (2.18)

    where the constant C is independent of ϵ and Tϵ.

    Proof. Note that we can derive an integral formula of pressure πϵ similar to π for which the detailed proof can be seen in Appendix

    πϵ(x,t)=13Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵ(x,t)+p.v.ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy23vcJϵ(wϵ)Φϵ(x,t)+2p.v.ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy, (2.19)

    for Γ(x)=14π|x|. For any fixed point x0, we define ˆπϵx0(x,t) on B(x0,32)×[0,T] by

    ˆπϵx0(x,t)=13Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵ(x,t)+p.v.B(x0,2)ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy+p.v.B(x0,2)cij(Γ(xy)Γ(x0y))Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy23vcJϵ(wϵ)Φϵ(x,t)+2p.v.B(x0,2)ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy+2p.v.B(x0,2)cij(Γ(xy)Γ(x0y))Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy:=π1+...+π6. (2.20)

    Therefore, πϵˆπϵx0 depends only on x0 and t. Hence, πϵ=ˆπϵx0 on B(x0,32)×[0,T]. Hence, (wϵ,ˆπϵx0) is another solution to system (2.1). We will replace πϵ by ˆπϵx0 in the following procedure.

    Take ψ(x,s)=ϕ2(x)θ(s) with suppϕ(x)B(x0,32), θ(s)Cc on [0,Tϵ) and θ(s)=1 on [0,t]. Using 2wϵψ as a text function in (2.1)1, we have

    |wϵ|2ψ(x,t)dx+2t0|wϵ|2ψdxds=|w0|2ψ(,0)dx+t0|wϵ|2(sψ+Δψ)dxds+t0|wϵ|2Φϵ(Jϵ(wϵ))ψdxds+t0|wϵ|2ψ(Jϵ(wϵ))Φϵdxds+2t0ˆπϵx0wϵψdxds+2t0ψvcwϵ(Jϵ(wϵ))Φϵdxds+2t0(Jϵ(wϵ))wϵvcΦϵψdxds+2t0Φϵvcwϵ(Jϵ(wϵ))ψdxds+2t0(Jϵ(wϵ)wϵ)ψ(vc)Φϵdxds+2t0(Φϵvc)wϵJϵ(wϵ)ψdxds+2t0(Φϵvc)ψJϵ(wϵ)wϵdxds, (2.21)

    for any 0<t<Tϵ. Then we have

    wϵ(,t)ϕ()2L2+2|wϵ|(,t)ϕ()2L2([0,t]×R3)w0L2uloc +|t0|wϵ|2|Δϕ2|dxds|+|t0|wϵ|2Φϵ(Jϵ(wϵ))ϕ2dxds|+|t0|wϵ|2ϕ2(Jϵ(wϵ))Φϵdxds|+|t02ˆπϵx0(wϵ)ϕ2dxds|+|2t0ϕ2vcwϵ((Jϵ(wϵ))Φϵdxds|+|2t0Jϵ(wϵ))wϵvcΦϵϕ2dxds|+|2t0Φϵvcwϵ(Jϵ(wϵ))ϕ2dxds|+|2t0(Jϵ(wϵ)wϵ)ϕ2(vc)Φϵdxds|+|2t0(Φϵvc)wϵJϵ(wϵ)ϕ2dxds|+|2t0(Φϵvc)ϕ2Jϵ(wϵ)wϵdxds|,:=w0L2uloc +J1+...+J10. (2.22)

    By Hölder's inequality and |Φϵ|ϵ1, we obtain

    J1Cwϵ2U2,2t (2.23)

    and

    J2,J3Cwϵ3U3,3t. (2.24)

    By Hölder's inequality, we have

    J4Cˆπϵx0wϵU1,1t. (2.25)

    According to (2.20), we have

    π1L32([0,t]×B(x0,32))Cwϵ2U3,3t. (2.26)

    Moreover, by Calderon-Zygmund theorem, there holds

    π2L32([0,t]×B(x0,32))CJϵ(wϵi)wϵjΦϵL32([0,t]×B(x0,2))Cwϵ2U3,3t. (2.27)

    Since xB(x0,32) and yB(x0,2)c, we have

    |ijΓ(xy)ijΓ(x0y)||xx0||x0y|4231|x0y|4. (2.28)

    Hence,

    π3L32([0,t]×B(x0,32))CB(x0,2)c1|x0y|4Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,s)Φϵ(y)dyL32(0,t)Ck=1124kB(x0,2k+1)|Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj|(y,s)dyL32(0,t)Ck=1124kakj=1B(xkj,1)|Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj|(y,s)dyL32(0,t)Ck=1ak24kJϵ(wϵi)wϵjU32,32tCwϵ2U3,3t, (2.29)

    where we take B(x0,2k+1)akj=1B(xkj,1) with ak23k. Therefore

    πiwϵU1,1tCπiL32([0,t]×B(x0,32))wϵU3,3tCwϵ3U3,3t, (2.30)

    for i=1,2,3. By interpolation and Young's inequality, we have

    π4wϵU1,1tCπ4U2,43twϵU2,4tCvcL2ulocwϵ2U2,4tCvcL2uloc(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t). (2.31)

    By Calderon-Zygmund theorem, there holds

    π5wϵU1,1tCπ5U2,43twϵU2,4tCvcL2ulocwϵ2U2,4tCvcL2uloc(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t). (2.32)

    Similar to (2.29), we have

    π6wϵU1,1tCπ6U2,43twϵU2,4tCk=1ak24kvcL2ulocwϵ2U2,4tCvcL2ulocwϵ2U2,4t
    CvcL2uloc(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t). (2.33)

    Combining with (2.25) and (2.30)-(2.33), we obtain

    J4Cwϵ3U3,3t+CvcL2uloc(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t). (2.34)

    Similar to (2.31), we have

    J5,J7,J8,J9,J10CvcL2uloc(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t). (2.35)

    For J6=2t0wϵwϵvcΦϵϕ2dxds, we have

    J6=2t0ϕwϵ|x|wϵϕ|x|vcΦϵdxds2t0(ϕwϵ)L2wϵϕL2|x|vcLdsCKc(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t), (2.36)

    where the first inequality holds because of Hardy inequality and Hölder's inequality.

    Therefore, we obtain

    wϵ(,t)2L2uloc+2wϵ2U2,2tCw02L2uloc+Cwϵ3U3.3t+C2(vcL2uloc+Kc)(wϵ2U2,2t+wϵ2U2,2t)Cw02L2uloc+Cwϵ3U3.3t+14wϵ2U2,2t+14wϵ2U2,2t, (2.37)

    where the last inequality holds because of the assumption that

    C2(vcL2uloc+Kc)14. (2.38)

    Using the interpolation inequality and Young's inequality,

    Cwϵ3U3,3tCwϵ3/2U6,2twϵ3/2U2,6tCwϵ6L6([0,t];L2uloc)+14wϵ2U2,2t+14wϵ2U2,2t. (2.39)

    Combining with (2.37), we have

    wϵ2L2uloc+32wϵ2U2,2tCw02L2uloc+Ct0(wϵ(,s)2L2uloc+wϵ(,s)6L2uloc)ds. (2.40)

    Hence, there exists a small constant ε1>0 such that, if wϵ exists on [0,Tϵ] for Tϵ˜T=ε1(1+w04L2uloc)1, then we have

    sup0<t<Twϵ(,t)L2ulocCw0L2uloc . (2.41)

    Combining with (2.40), we have (2.18).

    Then, we can obtain the following lemma easily. We omit the details.

    Lemma 2.5. The distribution solutions {(wϵ,πϵ)}0<ϵ<1 of (2.1) can be extended to the uniform time interval [0,˜T], where ˜T is as in Lemma 2.4.

    First, when q=2, we give the following existence result

    Proposition 3.1. Let |c|c3 and w0L2uloc with div w0=0. If

    Tε11+w04L2uloc, (3.1)

    for some small positive constant ε1 independent of ϵ and w0L2uloc, there exists a L2 local energy solution (w,π) on R3×(0,T) to the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4) with initial data w0, satisfying

    wETCv0L2uloc. (3.2)

    Proof of Proposition 3.1. Our method is inspired by Theorem 3.2 in [12]. We will prove our result in the following four steps.

    Step 1. Construct {(wϵ,πϵ)} on [0,Tϵ].

    Let (wϵ,πϵ) be the solution to the localized-mollified system (2.1). According to Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4, we construct wϵETϵ on R3×[0,Tϵ], where TϵT=ε1(1+w04L2uloc)1 with constant ε1 independent of ϵ and w0L2uloc. By Lemma 2.5, time interval can be extended to [0,˜T]. We construct pressure πϵ as follows

    πϵ(x,t)=13Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵ(x,t)+p.v.B2ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy+p.v.Bc2ij(Γ(xy)Γ(y))Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy23vcJϵ(wϵ)Φϵ(x,t)+2p.v.B2ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy+2p.v.Bc2ij(Γ(xy)Γ(y))Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy, (3.3)

    for Γ(x)=14π|x|. It is easy to check πϵL2loc([0,T);L43loc(R3)).

    Step 2. Prove that wϵET and πϵL2(0,T;L43uloc) is uniformly bounded.

    According to Lemma 2.4, we have

    wϵETCw0L2uloc, (3.4)

    where the constant C is independent of ϵ and T. We consider πϵ in B2n for each nN. We rewrite (3.3) as follows

    πϵ(x,t)=13Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵ(x,t)+p.v.B2ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy+( p.v.B2n+1B2+ p.v. Bc2n+1)ij(Γ(xy)Γ(y))Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy23vcJϵ(wϵ)Φϵ(x,t)+2p.v.B2ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy+2( p.v.B2n+1B2+ p.v. Bc2n+1)ij(Γ(xy)Γ(y))Jϵ(wϵi)vcj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy=πϵ1+...+πϵ8. (3.5)

    For πϵ1, we have

    πϵ1L2(0,T;L43(B2n))Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵL2(0,T;L43(B2n))Jϵ(wϵ)L(0,T;L2(B2n))wϵL2(0,T;L4(B2n))C(n)wϵETC(n,w0L2uloc). (3.6)

    For πϵ2, by Calderon-Zygmund theorem, there holds

    πϵ2L2(0,T;L43(B2n))Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵL2(0,T;L43(B2))C(w0L2uloc). (3.7)

    For the third term, we have

    πϵ3= p.v.B2n+1B2ijΓ(xy)Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy p.v. B2n+1B2ijΓ(y)Jϵ(wϵi)wϵj(y,t)Φϵ(y)dy:=πϵ31+πϵ32. (3.8)

    Using Calderon-Zygmund theorem, we have

    πϵ31L2(0,T;L43(B2n))Jϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵL2(0,T;L43(B2n+1))C(n,w0L2uloc). (3.9)

    On the other hand

    πϵ32L2(0,T;L43(B2n))22nJϵ(wϵ)wϵΦϵL2(0,T;L43(B2n+1))1|y|3L4(B2n+1B2)C(n,w0L2uloc). (3.10)

    For πϵ4, since xB2n and we have

    (3.11)

    Similar to (2.29)-(2.30), we obtain

    (3.12)

    Similar to (2.31), we have

    (3.13)

    Similar to (3.10), there holds

    (3.14)

    For the last term , since and we have

    (3.15)

    Therefore, we deduce

    (3.16)

    Combining with above estimates, we conclude

    (3.17)

    Step 3. Find subsequence of , then show the subsequence converge to . Similar method has been used in [10,12]. For each , we find a limit solution of up to subsequence on each . First, we construct on the compact set . By uniform bounds on and the compactness argument, we can find sequences form such that

    (3.18)

    for any as . Let on .

    Then, we extend to . By the same arguments as above, we can find sequences form such that

    (3.19)

    for any as .

    Continuing this process, we can construct sequence and its limit . By diagonal argument, we have

    (3.20)

    satisfying

    (3.21)

    for any as . Furthermore,

    (3.22)

    Next, we will prove

    (3.23)

    for each . According to formula (3.3) of , we define as follows

    And pressure

    (3.24)

    Hence, for any

    Set

    (3.25)

    and

    (3.26)

    Note that for fixed we have

    (3.27)

    By (3.21) and Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we have

    (3.28)

    as Similar to estimates in Step 3, we have

    (3.29)

    and

    (3.30)

    Combined with (3.28), these four terms become very small for sufficiently large

    Note that

    (3.31)

    as

    (3.32)

    and

    (3.33)

    Combing with (3.31), we have as

    For , there holds

    (3.34)

    Also

    (3.35)

    Take large enough, we can make and very small in the space These give the convergence (3.23).

    Step 4. Check is a local energy solution. Proof in this step is very similar to the proof of Theorem 3.2 in [12]. For simplicity, we omit the details.

    For implies that . By the existence results for in Proposition 3.1, we have with initial data . Then, we will prove

    For simplicity, we only give crucial - estimates.

    Similar to (2.30), we have

    (3.36)

    for By interpolation and Young's inequality, similar to (2.31), there holds

    (3.37)

    By Calderon-Zygmund theorem, there holds

    (3.38)

    Similar to (2.33), we have

    (3.39)

    Combining with (2.25) and (3.36)-(3.39), we obtain

    (3.40)

    Similar to (3.37), we have

    (3.41)

    For , we have

    (3.42)

    where the first inequality holds because of Hardy inequality and Hölder's inequality.

    By interpolation inequality and Young's inequality, we have

    (3.43)

    Therefore, we have

    (3.44)

    Hence, there exists a small constant such that, if exists on for , then we have

    (3.45)

    Following the procedure in the proof of Lemma 3.1, we have the existence results when .

    Then, we will prove the uniqueness when Let be two solutions to the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4) on with the same initial data The uniqueness can be proved by the method in the proof of Theorem 4.4 in Tsai [25]. We sketch it here.

    From (1.14), using interpolation theory, we have

    (3.46)

    with Then, there exists sufficient small such that

    (3.47)

    where is given in (3.54). Set , we have

    (3.48)

    Using with as a test function, multiplying the equation by , then integrating it, we have

    Crucial part is to estimate

    (3.49)

    Denote . Since

    (3.50)

    we have

    (3.51)

    By Hölder inequality, Hardy inequality and Lemma 2.1, we have

    (3.52)

    For term , we use the similar decomposition as (2.20) and obtain

    (3.53)

    There holds

    (3.54)

    Combining with (3.47) and

    (3.55)

    we have , and finish the proof of Theorem 1.2.

    Integral formula of the pressure . Our goal is to derive the integral formula of the pressure , i.e. (1.5). Our method is inspired by [25] and [27]. According to the perturbed Navier-Stokes system (1.4), we have

    (4.1)

    Fix , take a smooth compact supported function such that

    (4.2)

    Therefore, we have and . Since

    (4.3)

    we obtain

    (4.4)

    Therefore,

    (4.5)

    Note that

    (4.6)
    (4.7)
    (4.8)
    (4.9)
    (4.10)
    (4.11)

    where and denotes the th component of the outer normal vector of Ball Since on we have

    (4.12)

    For term we have the following estimate

    (4.13)

    For term integration by parts yields

    (4.14)

    where

    and

    for on The last term can be dealt as follows

    (4.15)

    By the mean value inequality, we have

    (4.16)

    Hence, we obtain For , when

    (4.17)

    When , according to the symmetry

    (4.18)

    Combining with (4.15)-(4.18), we have

    (4.19)

    Therefore, (4.14) holds. Combining with (4.6)-(4.13), we have

    (4.20)

    Take , separately, we obtain

    (4.21)

    Setting , combining with (4.5), we obtain (1.5).

    The author is grateful to Prof. Yanyan Li for bringing to our attention the question studied in this paper and much useful advice. This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 11771389, 11931010 and 11621101. We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive revision suggestions.



    [1] A. Basson, Solutions Spatialement Homognes Adaptes des quations de Navier-Stokes, Thesis. University of Evry., 2006.
    [2] Self-similar solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations: A survey of recent results. Nonlinear Analysis in Geometry and Applied Mathematics (2018) 2: 159-181.
    [3] Navier-Stokes flow in with measures as initial vorticity and Morrey spaces. Comm. Partial Differential Equations (1989) 14: 577-618.
    [4] Note on a theorem of Hilbert. Math. Z. (1920) 6: 314-317.
    [5] An inequality between integrals. Messenger of Mathematics (1925) 54: 150-156.
    [6] Well-posedness of nematic liquid crystal flow in \begin{document}\end{document}. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. (2013) 210: 177-218.
    [7] Asymptotic stability of Landau solutions to Navier-Stokes system. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. (2011) 202: 115-131.
    [8] -asymptotic stability of singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes system of equations in . J. Math. Pures Appl. (2017) 108: 14-40.
    [9] Strong -solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation in R, with applications to weak solutions. Math. Z. (1984) 187: 471-480.
    [10] N. Kikuchi and G. Seregin, Weak solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations satisfying the local energy inequality, Nonlinear Equations and Spectral Theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2,220, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 220 (2007), 141–164. doi: 10.1090/trans2/220/07
    [11] Well posednesss for the Navier-Stokes equations. Adv. Math. (2001) 157: 22-35.
    [12] Global Navier-Stokes flows for non-decaying initial data with slowly decaying oscillation. Comm. Math. Phys. (2020) 375: 1665-1715.
    [13] A new exact solution of Navier-Stokes equations. C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.) (1944) 43: 286-288.
    [14] P. G. Lemarié-Rieusset, Recent Developments in the Navier-Stokes Problem, Chapman & Hall/CRC Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 431, 2002. doi: 10.1201/9781420035674
    [15] (2016) The Navier-Stokes Problem in the 21st Century. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    [16] Sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace. Acta Math. (1934) 63: 193-248.
    [17] Homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations with isolated singularities on the unit sphere. Ⅰ. One singularity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. (2018) 227: 1091-1163.
    [18] Homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations with isolated singularities on the unit sphere. Ⅱ. Classification of axisymmetric no-swirl solutions. J. Differential Equations (2018) 264: 6082-6108.
    [19] Vanishing viscosity limit for homogeneous axisymmetric no-swirl solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations. J. Funct. Anal. (2019) 277: 3599-3652.
    [20] Homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations with isolated singularities on the unit sphere. Ⅲ. Two singularities. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. (2019) 39: 7163-7211.
    [21] On Landau's solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations, Problems in mathematical analysis, No. 61. J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) (2011) 179: 208-228.
    [22] Analysis on Morrey spaces and applications to Navier-Stokes and other evolution equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations (1992) 17: 1407-1456.
    [23] One-point singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. (1998) 11: 135-145.
    [24] Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Math. Phys. (2014) 328: 29-44.
    [25] T.-P. Tsai, Lectures on Navier-Stokes Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, vol. 192, 2018. doi: 10.1090/gsm/192
    [26] J. Zhang and T. Zhang, Global existence of discretely self-similar solutions to the generalized MHD system in Besov space, J. Math. Phys., 60 (2019), 081515, 18 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.5092787
    [27] A Liouville theorem for axially symmetric -solutions to steady Navier-Stokes equations. Nonlinear Anal. (2019) 187: 247-258.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yanyan Li, Jingjing Zhang, Ting Zhang, Asymptotic Stability of Landau Solutions to Navier–Stokes System Under $$L^p$$-Perturbations, 2023, 25, 1422-6928, 10.1007/s00021-022-00751-x
    2. YanYan Li, Xukai Yan, Anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequalities, 2023, 419, 00018708, 108958, 10.1016/j.aim.2023.108958
    3. Fangyu Han, Zhong Tan, Asymptotic stability of explicit infinite energy blowup solutions of the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, 2023, 66, 1674-7283, 2523, 10.1007/s11425-022-2059-1
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2500) PDF downloads(181) Cited by(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog