Territorial knowledge and cartographic evolution

Francesca Romana Lugeri; Barbara Aldighieri; Piero Farabollini; Fabrizio Bendia; Alberto Cardillo; Francesca Romana Lugeri; Barbara Aldighieri; Piero Farabollini; Fabrizio Bendia; Alberto Cardillo

doi:10.3934/geosci.2022025

AIMS Geosciences

2022, Volume 8, Issue 3: 452-466. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022025

Previous Article Next Article

Review

Territorial knowledge and cartographic evolution

1.
Dep. Geological Survey of Italy. Instiute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) Rome, Itay
2.
Italian National Research Council | CNR Institute of Environmental Geology and Geoengineering IGAG–Milano, Italy
3.
School of Sciences and Technologies, Section of Geology, University of Camerino (Macerata), Italy
4.
BIO-SOST Dep. Instiute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Rome, Italy

Received: 28 March 2022 Revised: 27 May 2022 Accepted: 11 July 2022 Published: 27 July 2022

The role of geological and geotematic mapping has recently come to the forefront in spatial/environmental management. This paper aims to present some cases of boundary extension in the use of contemporary cartographic tools (GIS and WEBGIS). The potential of digital maps and associated databases offers a wide range of applications, responding to the urgent need to make available to users (practitioners in the technical sectors, planners and society as a whole) the most important concepts to concretely achieve better land management, active risk prevention and sustainable resource enhancement. The application of geomorphological maps to issues closer to society can effectively create its approach to more properly technical-scientific issues, fostering a shared awareness, useful in protecting and enhancing the fragile Italian territory. The described experiences focus on GIS, which confirms its effectiveness both for social involvement in environmental issues, and in territorial/environmental management.

Keywords:

Citation: Francesca Romana Lugeri, Barbara Aldighieri, Piero Farabollini, Fabrizio Bendia, Alberto Cardillo. Territorial knowledge and cartographic evolution[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(3): 452-466. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022025

Related Papers:

[1]	Zongcheng Li, Jin Li . Linear barycentric rational collocation method for solving a class of generalized Boussinesq equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18141-18162. doi: 10.3934/math.2023921
[2]	Jin Li . Barycentric rational collocation method for semi-infinite domain problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8756-8771. doi: 10.3934/math.2023439
[3]	Jin Li . Barycentric rational collocation method for fractional reaction-diffusion equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9009-9026. doi: 10.3934/math.2023451
[4]	Haoran Sun, Siyu Huang, Mingyang Zhou, Yilun Li, Zhifeng Weng . A numerical investigation of nonlinear Schrödinger equation using barycentric interpolation collocation method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 361-381. doi: 10.3934/math.2023017
[5]	Kareem T. Elgindy, Hareth M. Refat . A direct integral pseudospectral method for solving a class of infinite-horizon optimal control problems using Gegenbauer polynomials and certain parametric maps. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3561-3605. doi: 10.3934/math.2023181
[6]	Qasem M. Tawhari . Mathematical analysis of time-fractional nonlinear Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9237-9255. doi: 10.3934/math.2025424
[7]	Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264
[8]	Yangfang Deng, Zhifeng Weng . Barycentric interpolation collocation method based on Crank-Nicolson scheme for the Allen-Cahn equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3857-3873. doi: 10.3934/math.2021229
[9]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Safyan Mukhtar, Albandari W. Alrowaily, Saleh Alshammari, Sherif. M. E. Ismaeel, S. A. El-Tantawy . Analytical solutions to time-space fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Model using the integrated Bäcklund transformation and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12357-12374. doi: 10.3934/math.2024604
[10]	Sunyoung Bu . A collocation methods based on the quadratic quadrature technique for fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 804-820. doi: 10.3934/math.2022048

Abstract

1. Introduction

Lots of physical phenomena can be expressed by non-linear partial differential equations (PDE), including, inter alia, dissipative and dispersive PDE. In this paper, we consider the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky (KS) equation

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}+ \phi\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s} = \varphi(s, t)\; 0 \le s\le 1, \; 0 \le t \le T, \; \gamma > 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(1.1)

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\phi(0, t) = 0, \; \phi(1, t) = 0, \; \phi_{ss}(0, t) = 0, \phi_{ss}(1, t) = 0, \; 0 < t < T, \end{eqnarray}$

(1.2)

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\phi(s, 0) = \varphi(s), \; 0\le s \le 1, \end{eqnarray}$

(1.3)

where $\gamma \in R$ is the constant.

The KS equation plays an important role in physics such as in diffusion, convection and so on. Lots of attention has been paid by researchers in recent years. An $H_1$ -Galerkin mixed finite element method for the KS equation was proposed in ^[1], lattice Boltzmann models for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation were studied in ^[2], Backward difference formulae (BDF) methods for the KS equation were investigate in ^[3]. Stability regions and results for the Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers and Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations were given in ^[4,5], respectively. In ^[6], an improvised quintic B-spline extrapolated collocation technique was used to solve the KS equation, and the stability of the technique was analyzed using the von Neumann scheme, which was found to be unconditionally stable. In ^[7], a septic Hermite collocation method (SHCM) was proposed to simulate the KS equation, and the nonlinear terms of the KS equation were linearized using the quasi-linearization process. In ^[8], a semidiscrete approach was presented to solve the variable-order (VO) time fractional 2D KS equation, and the differentiation operational matrices and the collocation technique were used to get a linear system of algebraic equations. In ^[9] the discrete Legendre polynomials (LPs) and the collocation scheme for nonlinear space-time fractional KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation were presented.

In order to avoid the Runge's phenomenon, barycentric interpolation ^[10,11,12] was developed. In recent years, linear rational interpolation (LRI) was proposed by Floater ^[13,14,15], and error of linear rational interpolation was also proved. The barycentric interpolation collocation method (BICM) has been developed by Wang et al.^{[22,23,24,25]}, and the algorithm of BICM has been used for linear/non-linear problems ^[21]. Volterra integro-differential equation (VIDE)^[16,20], heat equation (HE) ^[17], biharmonic equation (BE) ^[18], the Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov (KPP) equation ^[19], fractional differential equations ^[20], fractional reaction-diffusion equation ^[28], semi-infinite domain problems ^[27] and biharmonic equation ^[26], plane elastic problems ^[29] have been studied by the linear barycentric interpolation collocation method (LBICM), and their convergence rates also have been proved.

In order to solve the KS equation efficiently, the LBRIM is presented. Because the nonlinear part of the KS equation cannot be solved directly, three kinds of linearization methods, including direct linearization, partial linearization and Newton linearization, are presented. Then, the nonlinear part of the KS equation is translated into the linear part, three kinds of iterative schemes are presented, and matrix equation of the linearization schemes are constructed. The convergence rate of the LBRCM for the KS equation is also given. At last, two numerical examples are presented to validate the theoretical analysis.

2. Linearization for KS equation

In the following, the KS equation is changed into the linear equation by the linearization scheme, including direct linearization, partial linearization and Newton linearization.

2.1. Direct linearization

For the Kuramoto-Sivashinskyr equation with the initial value of nonlinear term $\phi\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s}$ is changed to $\phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}$ ,

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}+ \phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s} = \varphi(s, t), \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

and then we get the linear scheme as

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial \phi_{n}}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi_{n}}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi_{n}}{\partial s^2} = -\phi_{n-1}\frac{\partial \phi_{n-1}}{\partial s}+\varphi(s, t), a \le s\le b, 0 \le t \le T. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.2)

2.2. Partial linearization

By the partial linearization, nonlinear term $\phi\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s}$ is changed to $\phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s}$ ,

(2.3)

and then we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial \phi_{n}}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi_{n}}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi_{n}}{\partial s^2}+\phi_{n-1}\frac{\partial \phi_{n}}{\partial s} = \varphi(s, t), a \le s\le b, 0 \le t \le T. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.4)

2.3. Newton linearization

For the initial value $\phi\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s} = \phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}+(\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}+\phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s})(\phi-\phi_{0})$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}+ \phi\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}+ \phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}\phi = \varphi(s, t)+\phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}\phi_{0}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.5)

and then we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial \phi_{n}}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi_{n}}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi_{n}}{\partial s^2}+\phi_{n}\frac{\partial \phi_{n-1}}{\partial s}+\phi_{n-1}\frac{\partial \phi_{n-1}}{\partial s}\phi_{n} = \varphi(s, t)+\phi_{n-1}\frac{\partial \phi_{n-1}}{\partial s}\phi_{n-1}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.6)

where $n = 1, 2, \cdots.$

3. Differentiation matrices of KS equation

Interval $[a, b]$ is divided into $a = s_{0} < s_{1} < s_{2} < \cdots < s_{m-1} < s_{m} = b$ , for uniform partition with $h_{s} = \frac{b-a}{m}$ and nonuniform partition to be the second kind of Chebychev point. Time $[0, T]$ is divided into $0 = t_{0} < t_{1} < t_{2} < \cdots < t_{n-1} < t_{n} = T$ and $h_{t} = \frac{T}{n}$ for uniform partition. Then, we take $\phi_{nm}(s, t)$ to approximate $\phi(s, t)$ as

$\begin{eqnarray} \phi_{nm}(s, t) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m} \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} r_{i}(s) r_{j}(t) \phi_{ij} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

where $\phi_{ij} = \phi(s_{i}, t_{j})$ ,

$\begin{eqnarray} r_{i}(s) = \frac{ \frac{w_{i}}{s-s_{i}} }{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{m} \frac{w_{j}}{s-s_{j}}}, \quad r_{j}(t) = \frac{ \frac{w_{j}}{t-t_{j}} }{ \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n} \frac{w_{i}}{t-t_{i}}} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.2)

is the barycentric interpolation basis ^[26], and

$\begin{eqnarray} w_{i} = \sum\limits_{k \in J_{i}}(-1)^{k} \prod\limits_{j = k, j \neq i}^{k+d_{s}} \frac{1}{s_{i}-s_{j}}, \quad w_{j} = \sum\limits_{k \in J_{j}}(-1)^{k} \prod\limits_{i = k, k \neq j}^{k+d_{t}} \frac{1}{t_{j}-t_{i}} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

where $J_{i} = \{k \in I, i-d_{s} \le k \le i\}, I = \{0, 1, \cdots, m-d_{s} \}$ . See ^[26]. We get the barycentric rational interpolation.

For the case

$\begin{eqnarray} w_{i} = \frac{1}{\prod\nolimits_{i \neq k}\left(s_{i}-s_{k}\right)}, w_{j} = \frac{1}{\prod\nolimits_{j \neq k}\left(t_{j}-t_{k}\right)}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

we get the barycentric Lagrange interpolation.

So,

$\begin{eqnarray} r_{j}^{\prime }\left(s_{i}\right) = \frac{w_{j} / w_{i}}{s_{i}-s_{j}}, \quad j \neq i, \quad r_{i}^{\prime }\left(s_{i}\right) = -\sum\limits_{j \neq i} r_{j}^{\prime }\left(s_{i}\right), \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

$\begin{eqnarray} r_{j}^{(k)}\left(s_{i}\right) = k \left(r_{i}^{(k-1)}\left(s_{i}\right) r_{i}^{\prime}\left(s_{j}\right) - \frac{r_{i}^{(k-1)}\left(s_{j}\right) }{s_{i}-s_{j}}\right), \quad j \neq i, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.6)

$\begin{eqnarray} r_{i}^{(k)}\left(s_{i}\right) = -\sum\limits_{j \neq i} r_{j}^{(k)}\left(s_{i}\right). \end{eqnarray}$

(3.7)

Then, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathrm{{D}}^{(0, 1)}_{ij}& = & r_{i}^{\prime }\left(t_{j}\right), \end{eqnarray}$

(3.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathrm{{D}}^{(1, 0)}_{ij}& = & r_{i}^{\prime }\left(s_{j}\right), \end{eqnarray}$

(3.9)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathrm{{D}}^{(k, 0)}_{ij}& = & r_{i}^{(k) }\left(s_{j}\right), k = 2, 3, \cdots. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.10)

3.1. Matrix equation of direct linearization

Combining (3.1) and (2.2), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \left[\mathcal{{I}}_{m} \otimes \mathcal{{D}}^{(0, 1)} + \mathcal{{D}}^{(2, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+\gamma \mathcal{{D}}^{(4, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n} \right] \mathcal{\phi}_{n} = {\Psi}-diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}\cdot\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.11)

and then we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{\phi}_{n} = {\Psi}_{n-1} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.12)

where

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{{I}}_{m} \otimes \mathcal{{D}}^{(0, 1)} + \mathcal{{D}}^{(2, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+\gamma \mathcal{{D}}^{(4, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n},$

${\Psi}_{n-1} = {\Psi}-diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}\cdot\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1}$

and $\otimes$ is the Kronecher product ^[17].

3.2. Matrix equation of partial linearization

Combining (3.1) and (2.4), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \left[\mathcal{{I}}_{m} \otimes \mathcal{{D}}^{(0, 1)} + \mathcal{{D}}^{(2, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+\gamma \mathcal{{D}}^{(4, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n} \right] \mathcal{\phi}_{n} = {\Psi}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.13)

$n = 1, 2, \cdots$ , and then we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{\phi} = {\Psi} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.14)

where $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{{I}}_{m} \otimes \mathcal{{D}}^{(0, 1)} + \mathcal{{D}}^{(2, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+\gamma \mathcal{{D}}^{(4, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}$ .

3.3. Matrix equation of Newton linearization

Combining (3.1) and (2.6), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\left[\mathcal{{I}}_{m} \otimes \mathcal{{D}}^{(0, 1)} + \mathcal{{D}}^{(2, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+\gamma \mathcal{{D}}^{(4, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n} \right] \mathcal{\phi}_{n} \\&& = {\Psi} + [diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n})-diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})]\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}\cdot\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.15)

and then we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{\phi} = {\Psi}_{n-1} \end{eqnarray}$

(3.16)

where

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{{I}}_{m} \otimes \mathcal{{D}}^{(0, 1)} + \mathcal{{D}}^{(2, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+\gamma \mathcal{{D}}^{(4, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}+diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n},$

and

${\Psi}_{n-1} = {\Psi} + [diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n})-diag(\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1})]\mathcal{{D}}^{(1, 0)}\otimes\mathcal{{I}}_{n}\cdot\mathcal{\phi}_{n-1}.$

4. Convergence rate of KS equation

In this part, an error estimate of the KS equation is given with $r_n(s) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n} r_{i}(s) \phi_{i}$ to replace $\phi(s)$ , where $r_{i}(s)$ is defined as (3.2), and $\phi_{i} = \phi(s_{i})$ . We also define

$\begin{eqnarray} e(s): = \phi(s)-r_n(s) = (s-s_{i}) \cdots(s-s_{i+d})\phi\left[s_{i}, s_{i+1}, \ldots, s_{i+d}, s\right]. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

Then, we have the following.

Lemma 1. For $e(s)$ defined by (4.1) and $\phi(s)\in C^{d+2}[a, b]$ , there is

$\begin{equation} \left|e^{(k)}(s)\right| \leq C h^{d-k+1}, k = 0, 1, \cdots. \end{equation}$

(4.2)

For KS equation, rational interpolation function of $\phi(s, t)$ is defined as $r_{mn}(s, t)$

$\begin{equation} r_{mn}(s, t) = \frac{ \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m+d_{s}} \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n+d_{t}} \frac{w_{i, j}}{\left(s-s_{i}\right)\left(t-t_{j}\right)} {\phi}_{i, j}}{ \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m+d_{s}} \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n+d_{t}} \frac{w_{i, j}}{\left(s-s_{i}\right)\left(t-t_{j}\right)}} \end{equation}$

(4.3)

where

$\begin{equation} w_{i, j} = (-1)^{i-d_{s}+j-d_{t}} \sum\limits_{k_{1} \in J_{i}}\prod\limits_{h_{1} = k_{1}, h_{1} \neq j}^{k_{1}+d_{s}}\frac{1}{\left|s_{i}-s_{h_{1}}\right|} \sum\limits_{k_{2} \in J_{i}} \prod\limits_{h_{2} = k_{2}, h_{2} \neq j}^{k_{2}+d_{t}} \frac{1}{\left|t_{j}-t_{h_{2}}\right|}. \end{equation}$

(4.4)

We define $e(s, t)$ to be the error of $\phi(s, t)$ as

$\begin{eqnarray} e(s, t) :& = & \phi(s, t)-r_{mn}(s, t) \\ & = & \left(s-s_{i}\right) \cdots\left(s-s_{i+d_{s}}\right)\phi\left[s_{i}, s_{i+1}, \ldots, s_{i+d_1}, s, t\right] \\ &+&\left(t-t_{j}\right) \cdots\left(t-t_{j+d_{t}}\right)\phi\left[s, t_{j}, t_{j+1}, \ldots, t_{j+d_2}, t\right]. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

With similar analysis of Lemma 1, we have the following

Theorem 1. For $e(s, t)$ defined as (4.5) and $\phi(s, t) \in C^{d_{s}+2}[a, b]\times C^{d_{t}+2}[0, T]$ , we have

$\begin{equation} \left|e^{(k_{1}, k_{2})}\left(s, t\right)\right| \leq C (h_{s}^{d_{s}-k_{1}+1}+h_{t}^{d_{t}-k_{2}+1}), k_{1}, k_{2} = 0, 1, \cdots. \end{equation}$

(4.6)

We take the direct linearization of the KS equation as an example prove the convergence rate. Let $\phi(s_{m}, t_{n})$ be the approximate function of $\phi(s, t)$ and $L$ be a bounded operator. There holds

$\begin{eqnarray} L \phi(s_{m}, t_{n}) = \varphi(s_{m}, t_{n}), \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \lim\limits_{m, n\rightarrow \infty} \phi(s_{m}, t_{n}) = \phi(s, t). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

Then, we get the following

Theorem 2. For $\phi(s_{m}, t_{n}):L\phi(s_{m}, t_{n}) = \varphi(s, t)$ and $L$ defined as (4.7), there

$|\phi(s, t)-\phi(s_{m}, t_{n})|\le C(h^{d_{s}-3}+\tau^{d_{t}}).$

Proof. As

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{array}{ll} &L \phi(s, t)-L \phi(s_{m}, t_{n}) \\[0.5cm]& = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}- \phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}-\varphi(s, t) \\[0.5cm]&- \left[\frac{\partial \phi(s_{m}, t_{n})}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi(s_{m}, t_{n})}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi(s_{m}, t_{n})}{\partial s^2}+ \phi_{0}(s_{m}, t_{n})\frac{\partial \phi_{0}(s_{m}, t_{n})}{\partial s}-\varphi(s, t)\right] \\[0.5cm]& = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}(s_{m}, t_{n}) +\gamma \left[\frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}- \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right] \\[0.5cm]&+ \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}-\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}(s_{m}, t_{n})+\left[\phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}- \phi_{0}(s_{m}, t_{n})\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}(s_{m}, t_{n}) \right] \\[0.5cm]&: = E_{1}(s, t)+E_{2}(s, t)+E_{3}(s, t)+E_{4}(s, t). \end{array} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.9)

Here,

$E_{1}(s, t) = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}(s_{m}, t_{n}),$

$E_{2}(s, t) = \gamma \left[\frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}- \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right],$

$E_{3}(s, t) = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}-\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}(s_{m}, t_{n}),$

$E_{4}(s, t) = \phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}- \phi_{0}(s_{m}, t_{n})\frac{\partial \phi_{0}}{\partial s}(s_{m}, t_{n}) .$

With $E_{2}(s, t)$ , we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{array} {ll} E_{2}(s, t)& = \gamma \left[\frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}- \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right] \\& = \gamma \left[\frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}- \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t)+ \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t)- \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right] \\& = \frac{ \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m-d_{s}} (-1)^{i}\frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}[s_{i}, s_{i+1}, \ldots, s_{i+d_1}, s_{m}, t]} { \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m-d_{s}} \lambda_{i}(s)} \\ \nonumber&+ \frac{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n-d_{t}}(-1)^{j}\frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}[ t_{j}, t_{j+1}, \ldots, t_{j+d_2}, s_{m}, t_{n}]} { \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n-d_{t}}\lambda_{j}(t)} \\& = \frac{\partial^4 e}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t)+\frac{\partial^4 e}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t_{n}). \end{array} \end{equation}$

For $E_{2}(s, t)$ we get

$\begin{equation} |E_{2}(s, t)|\le \left|\frac{\partial^4 e}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, x)+\frac{\partial^4 e}{\partial s^4}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right|\le C (h^{d_{s}-3}+\tau^{d_{t}+1}). \end{equation}$

(4.10)

Then, we have

$\begin{equation} |E_{1}(s, t)|\le \left|\frac{\partial e}{\partial t}(s_{m}, t)+\frac{\partial e}{\partial t}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right|\le C (h^{d_{s}+1}+\tau^{d_{t}}). \end{equation}$

(4.11)

Similarly, for $E_{3}(s, t)$ we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} E_{3}(s, t) = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}(s, t)- \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}(s_{m}, t_{n}) = \frac{\partial^2 e}{\partial s^2}(s, t_{n})+ \frac{\partial^2 e}{\partial s^2}(s_{m}, t_{n}), \end{array} \end{equation}$

(4.12)

and

$\begin{equation} |E_{3}(s, t)|\le \left| \frac{\partial^2 e}{\partial s^2}(s, t_{n})+ \frac{\partial^2 e}{\partial s^2}(s_{m}, t_{n}) \right|\le C (h^{d_{s}-1}+\tau^{d_{t}+1}). \end{equation}$

(4.13)

For $E_{4}(s, t)$ we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{ll} |E_{4}(s, t)|& = \left|\phi_{0}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s}- \phi_{0}(s_{m}, t_{n})\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right| \\ &\le \left|\frac{\partial e}{\partial t}(s_{m}, t)+\frac{\partial e}{\partial t}(s_{m}, t_{n})\right|\le C (h^{d_{s}+1}+\tau^{d_{t}}). \end{array} \end{equation}$

(4.14)

Combining (4.9) and (4.11)–(4.14) together, the proof of Theorem 2 is completed. □

5. Numerical examples

All the examples are carried on a computer with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60 GHz 1.80 GHz operating system, 16 G radon access running memory and a 512 G solid state disk memory. All simulation experiments were realized by the software Matlab (Version: R2016a). In this part, two examples are presented to test the theorem.

Example 1. Consider the KS equation

$\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}+ \phi\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s} = \varphi(s, t)$

with the condition is

$\phi(0, t) = 0, \phi(1, t) = 0,$

and

$\phi(s, 0) = \sin(2\pi s).$

$\phi_{ss}(0, t) = 0, \phi_{ss}(1, t) = 0,$

and

$\varphi(s, t) = e^{-t}\sin(2\pi s)[2\pi e^{-t}\cos(2\pi s)-1+16\pi^4-4\pi^2].$

The solution of the KS equation is

$\phi(s, t) = e^{-t}\sin(2\pi s).$

In Figures 1–3, errors of unform partition with direct linearization, partial linearization, Newton linearization for the KS equation are presented. In Figures 4–6, errors of non-uniform partition with direct linearization, partial linearization, Newton linearization for the KS equation are presented.

Figure 1. Errors of nonuniform partition by direct linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. Errors of nonuniform partition by partial linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. Errors of nonuniform partition by Newton linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. Errors of uniform partition by direct linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 5. Errors of uniform partition by partial linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 6. Errors of uniform partition by Newton linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

In Tables 1 and 2, errors of LBCM and LBRCM for the KS equation with boundary condition dealt with by the method of substitution and method of addition are given. From Table 1, we know that the accuracy of LBCM is higher than LBRCM, and from Table 2 the accuracy of the method of additional is higher than the method of substitution.

Table 1. Errors of LBCM for KS equation with

$m = n = 17$ .

	Method of substitution		Method of additional
Linearization	Uniform partition	Nonuniform partition	Uniform partition	Nonuniform partition
direct	1.3278e-07	5.6616e-10	1.7050e-08	4.6293e-10
partial	5.5563e-07	2.6381e-09	1.1492e-07	5.0974e-10
Newton	6.6705e-07	4.8875e-10	8.8609e-08	2.5867e-11

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 2. Errors of LBRCM for KS equation with

$m = n = 17, d_{s} = d_{t} = 12$ .

	Method of substitution		Method of additional
Linearization	Uniform partition	Nonuniform partition	Uniform partition	Nonuniform partition
direct	4.4575e-06	3.2280e-08	4.1010e-08	2.2749e-09
partial	4.4573e-06	3.2245e-08	5.4191e-07	1.5951e-07
Newton	4.4560e-06	3.2215e-08	1.2972e-06	3.5137e-07

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

In , we choose the Newton linearization to solve the KS equation, and the error of LBRCM for uniform and nonuniform partitions are presented with $t = 0.3, 0.9, 2, 4, 8, 16$ .

Table 3. Errors of Newton linearization for

$t$ .

	Uniform partition		Nonuniform partition
$t$	$(8, 8) d_{s}=d_{t}=7$	$(16, 16) d_{s}=d_{t}=15$	$(8, 8) d_{s}=d_{t}=7$	$(16, 16) d_{s}=d_{t}=15$
0.3	1.5449e-01	1.3163e-06	6.2692e-02	2.4769e-08
0.9	1.4211e-01	1.1737e-06	6.1721e-02	2.3846e-08
2	1.2162e-01	1.0785e-06	5.8680e-02	2.3685e-08
4	9.1544e-02	9.4383e-07	5.3241e-02	2.3353e-08
8	5.1798e-02	7.2283e-07	4.3721e-02	2.2440e-08
16	1.6540e-02	4.1712e-07	2.9435e-02	1.9220e-08

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

The errors of LBRCM of uniform and Chebyshev partitions are presented with $(m, n, d_{s}, d_{t}) = (8, 8, 7, 7), (16, 16, 15, 15)$ . From the table, comparing $(m, n) = (8, 8)$ with $(m, n) = (16, 16)$ , the accuracy was higher when the number became bigger.

In the following table, we take Newton linearization to present numerical results. From and , with errors of Newton linearization for uniform partition $d_{t} = 6;t = 1$ are given and convergence rate is $O(h^{d_{s}})$ . From , with space variable $s, d_{s} = 6$ , and there is superconvergence rate $O(h^{d_{s}-1})$ at $t = 1$ .

Table 4. Errors of Newton linearization for uniform partition

$d_{t} = 6$ .

$m, n$	$d_{s}=2$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=3$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=4$	$h^{\alpha}$
8, 8	4.1317e-01		3.2652e-03		3.3180e-01
16, 16	1.8608e-01	1.1508	3.1257e-02	-	3.3919e-02	3.2902
32, 32	9.5437e-02	0.9633	1.0198e-02	1.6159	3.3873e-03	3.3239
64, 64	4.7221e-02	1.0151	2.6490e-03	1.9448	3.5472e-04	3.2554

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 5. Errors of Newton linearization for uniform partition

$d_{s} = 6$ .

$m, n$	$d_{t}=2$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=3$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=4$	$\tau^{\alpha}$
8, 8	1.3997e-01		1.4004e-01		1.4008e-01
16, 16	5.4923e-03	4.6716	5.4957e-03	4.6714	5.4973e-03	4.6714
32, 32	1.2850e-04	5.4176	1.2883e-04	5.4148	1.2891e-04	5.4143
64, 64	2.9976e-06	5.4218	3.0728e-06	5.3898	3.0798e-06	5.3874

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

For and , the errors of Chebyshev partition for Newton linearization with $s$ and $t$ are presented. For $d_{t} = 6$ , the convergence rate is $O(h^{d_{s}})$ in Table 6, while in Table 7, there are also superconvergence phenomena.

Table 6. Errors of Newton linearization for Chebyshev partition

$d_{t} = 6$ .

$m, n$	$d_{s}=2$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=3$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=4$	$h^{\alpha}$
8, 8	5.4754e-01		2.9399e-02		8.5922e-02
16, 16	1.0318e-01	2.4078	4.6815e-03	2.6507	1.2658e-03	6.0849
32, 32	9.6912e-02	0.0904	8.0675e-04	2.5368	1.9577e-05	6.0148
64, 64	4.8014e-01	-	1.7672e-03	-	2.2716e-05	-

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 7. Errors of Newton linearization for Chebyshev partition

$d_{s} = 6$ .

$m, n$	$d_{t}=2$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=3$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=4$	$\tau^{\alpha}$
8, 8	6.1344e-02		6.1386e-02		6.1415e-02
16, 16	8.1492e-05	9.5561	8.1163e-05	9.5629	8.0977e-05	9.5669
32, 32	1.4204e-07	9.1642	1.4183e-07	9.1606	1.5487e-07	9.0303
64, 64	6.3190e-06	-	3.8960e-06	-	1.4861e-06	-

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Example 2. Consider the KS equation

$\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\gamma \frac{\partial^4 \phi}{\partial s^4}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial s^2}+ \phi\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s} = 0,$

with the analytic solution

$\phi(s, t) = c+\frac{15\sqrt{11}}{19\sqrt{19}}\left[-3\tanh \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(s-ct+s_{0}) +\tanh^3 \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(s-ct+s_{0})\right],$

and boundary condition

$\phi(-10, t) = c+\frac{15\sqrt{11}}{19\sqrt{19}}\left[-3\tanh \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(-10-ct+s_{0}) +\tanh^3 \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(-10-ct+s_{0})\right],$

$\phi(10, t) = c+\frac{15\sqrt{11}}{19\sqrt{19}}\left[-3\tanh \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(10-ct+s_{0}) +\tanh^3 \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(10-ct+s_{0})\right],$

and initial condition

$\phi(s, 0) = c+\frac{15\sqrt{11}}{19\sqrt{19}}\left[-3\tanh \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(s+s_{0}) +\tanh^3 \frac{\sqrt{11}}{2\sqrt{19}}(s+s_{0})\right],$

with $c = 2, x_{0} = 10$ .

In –, errors of direct linearization, partial linearization, Newton linearization with $m = n = 19$ KS equation are presented, respectively.

Figure 7. Errors of direct linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 8. Errors of partial linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 9. Errors of Newton linearization with

$m = n = 19$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

In the following table, direct linearization is chosen to present numerical results. From and , errors of direct linearization for uniform partition $d_{t} = 7$ with different $d_{s}$ are given and the convergence rate is $O(h^{d_{s}}-1)$ . From , with space variable $s, d_{s} = 7$ , and there are also superconvergence phenomena.

Table 8. Errors of direct linearization for uniform partition for

$d_{t} = 7$ .

$m, n$	$d_{s}=2$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=3$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=4$	$h^{\alpha}$
8, 8	1.3587e+00		8.9361e-01		6.3703e-01
16, 16	2.1617e-01	2.6520	2.7467e-01	1.7019	2.5682e-01	1.3106
32, 32	6.7743e-02	1.6740	6.8822e-02	1.9967	4.7078e-02	2.4476
64, 64	2.5175e-02	1.4281	1.3216e-02	2.3806	4.3739e-03	3.4281

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 9. Errors of direct linearization for uniform partition for

$d_{s} = 7$ .

$m, n$	$d_{t}=2$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=3$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=4$	$\tau^{\alpha}$
8, 8	3.6253e-01		3.6380e-01		3.6446e-01
16, 16	1.8147e-01	0.9984	1.8124e-01	1.0052	1.8121e-01	1.0081
32, 32	6.4076e-02	1.5019	6.4158e-02	1.4982	6.4141e-02	1.4983
64, 64	8.9037e-04	6.1692	8.9840e-04	6.1581	8.9863e-04	6.1574

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

For and , the errors of Chebyshev partition for direct linearization with $s$ and $t$ are presented. For $d_{t} = 7$ , the convergence rate is $O(h^{d_{s}})$ in Table 10, while in Table 11, there are also superconvergence phenomena.

Table 10. Errors of direct linearization for Chebyshev partition for

$d_{t} = 7$ .

$m, n$	$d_{s}=2$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=3$	$h^{\alpha}$	$d_{s}=4$	$h^{\alpha}$
8, 8	6.5990e-01		4.0742e-01		3.6175e-01
16, 16	1.1154e-01	2.5646	1.7539e-01	1.2160	2.1752e-01	0.7338
32, 32	4.3052e-02	1.3735	8.6654e-03	4.3391	1.2511e-03	7.4418
64, 64	3.9204e-02	0.1351	2.3776e-03	1.8658	3.5682e-04	1.8099

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 11. Errors of direct linearization for Chebyshev partition for

$d_{s} = 7$ .

$m, n$	$d_{t}=2$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=3$	$\tau^{\alpha}$	$d_{t}=4$	$\tau^{\alpha}$
8, 8	4.3760e-01		4.3745e-01		4.3739e-01
16, 16	1.1801e-01	1.8908	1.1801e-01	1.8902	1.1801e-01	1.8900
32, 32	9.9842e-04	6.8850	9.9854e-04	6.8849	9.9801e-04	6.8857
64, 64	2.5749e-06	8.5990	2.5052e-06	8.6388	4.8401e-06	7.6879

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

6. Conclusions

In this paper, LBRCM is used to solve the (1+1) dimensional SK equation. Three kinds of linearization methods are taken to translate the nonlinear part into a linear part. Matrix equations of the discrete SK equation are obtained from corresponding linearization schemes. The convergence rate of LBRCM is also presented. In the future work, LBRCM can be developed for the (2+1) dimensional SK equation and other partial differential equations classes, including Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov (KPP) equation and, fractional reaction-diffusion equation and so on.

Acknowledgments

The work of Jin Li was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2022MA003).

The authors also gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	Dent BD, Torguson JS, Hodler TW (2009) Cartography: Thematic Map Design, 6 Eds, New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[2]	Slocum TA, McMaster RB, Kessler FC, et al. (2008) Thematic Cartography and Geovisualization, 3 Eds., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[3]	Peterson G (2009) GIS Cartography: A Guide to Effective Map Design. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003046325
[4]	Harris T, Rouse J, Bergeron S (2010) The Geospatial Semantic Web, Pareto GIS, and the Humanities. In Bodenhamer D, Corrigan J, Harris T, Eds, The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, Indiana University Press, 124–142.
[5]	Moore A (2015) 'Web Cartography – Map Design for Interactive and Mobile Devices'. J Spat Sci 60: 195–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2015.1006113 doi: 10.1080/14498596.2015.1006113
[6]	ISPRA (2022) Carta della Natura. Visualizzatore cartografico. Available from https://sinacloud.isprambiente.it/portal/home/.
[7]	Sieber R (2006) Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 96: 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
[8]	Haimes P, Baba T, Medley S (2015) Mobile map applications and the democratisation of hazard information. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818427.2818440
[9]	McKinster J, Trautmann N, Barnett M (2013) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers. Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 353.
[10]	Lugeri FR, Farabollini P, Amadio V, et al. (2018) Unconventional Approach for Prevention of Environmental and Related Social Risks: A Geoethic Mission. Geosciences 8: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020054 doi: 10.3390/geosciences8020054
[11]	Giddens A, Offe C, Touraine (1987) Ecologia politica. Milan: Feltrinelli.
[12]	Lugeri FR, Farabollini P (2018) Discovering the Landscape by Cycling: A Geo-Touristic Experience through Italian Badlands. Geosciences 8: 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8080291 doi: 10.3390/geosciences8080291
[13]	Lugeri FR, Farabollini P, Greco R, et al. (2015) The Geological Characterization of Landscape in Major TV Series: A Suggested Approach to Involve the Public in the Geological Heritage Promotion. Sustainability 7: 4100–4119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7044100 doi: 10.3390/su7044100
[14]	Lugeri FR, Farabollini P, Lugeri N (2019) Landscape analysis as a tool for risk reduction. AIMS Geosci 5: 617–630. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.617 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.617
[15]	Catton Jr WR, Dunlap RE (1978) Environmental Sociology. A New Paradigm. Am Sociol 13: 41–49.
[16]	Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107050327
[17]	Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
[18]	Naveh Z, Lieberman AS (1994) Landscape Ecology Theory and Application. Series on Environmental Management. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
[19]	Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill RV (2001) Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York, USA: Springer.
[20]	Lugeri FR, Amadio V, Bagnaia R, et al. (2011) Landscapes and Wine Production Areas: A Geomorphological Heritage. Geoheritage 3: 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0035-z doi: 10.1007/s12371-011-0035-z
[21]	Amadio V, Amadei M, Bagnaia R, et al. (2002) The role of geomorphology in landscape ecology: the landscape unit map of Italy, Scale 1: 250,000. In Allison RJ (Ed.), Applied Geomorphology: Theory and Practice, London, UK: Wiley, 265–282.
[22]	Amadei M, Bagnaia R, Laureti L, et al. (2004) Carta della natura alla scala 1: 50,000: metodologie di realizzazione. Manuali e linee guida 30/2004. Roma: APAT.
[23]	Commission of the European Communities (1991) CORINE Biotopes manual. Vol. 1, 2, 3. EUR.
[24]	Cardillo A, Augello R, Canali E, et al. (2021) Carta della Natura della regione Emilia-Romagna: cartografia e valutazione degli habitat alla scala 1: 25.000. Rapporti 354/2021. Roma: ISPRA.
[25]	Troll C (1950) Die geografische Landschaft und ihre Erforschung. Studium Generale, Springer, Heidelberg, 3: 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-38240-0_20 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-38240-0_20
[26]	Nilsson C, Grelsson G (1995) The fragility of ecosystems: a review. J Appl Ecol 32: 677–692. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404808 doi: 10.2307/2404808
[27]	Rossi PF, Amadio V, Rossi O, et al. (2006) The map of Italian nature: The detection of the hotspots of ecological attention. Technical Report Number 2006–0539. Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University.
[28]	Gregori L (2004) Percorsi geoturistici ed enografici in Umbria. Conference Proceedings of 2 Convegno Geologia & Turismo. Bologna, Italy: Regione Emilia-Romagna, 58–60.
[29]	Cita BM, Colacicchi R, Chiesa S, et al. (2004) Italian wines and geology. Coll. Paesaggi Geologici, Milan, Italy: BE-MA editrice.
[30]	Globo, CNR-IDPA. WineGIS: terroir dei vini italiani e sistemi informativi geografici. Available from: http://www.winegis.it/it.
[31]	ONAV. Perennial guide to Italian wines. Available from: https://www.guidaprosit.it/.
[32]	Biraghi F, De Amicis M, Aldighieri B (2019) Geodatabase sulle tipologie di vini e uve in Italia. In: Cristaino D, Gull P, Lazzari M, et al. Eds., GIS Day Calabria 2019-X edizione, 205–212.
[33]	Aldighieri B, Testa B (2012) OPENALP- Permanent Naturalistic Alpine Observatory: a way to increase the alpine land value. In Giusti C (Ed.), Geomorphosites 2009. Raising theprofile of geomorphological heritage through iconography, inventory and promotion. Paris-Sorbonne University. Febbraio 2012, 11–16.
[34]	Aldighieri B, Di Bona Bonel A, Testa B (2015) Openalp3dolomiti: una piattaforma per la valorizzazione del territorio. In: D'Andrea M, Rossi R (Eds.), Geologia e Turismo 5℃ongresso Nazionale Geologia e Turismo, Bologna, 6–7 giugno 2013. Atti, ISPRA, Roma: 371–378.
[35]	Farabollini P, Aringoli D, Bendia F, et al. (2022). The Geo-Itinerary of the 'Anello della Sibilla' between sciences, history and myth: a vehicle for the renaissance of the territories affected by the earthquake. Rendiconti on line della Società Geologica Italiana. Submitted for publication.
[36]	ISPRA (2018) Quaderno 13 della Carta Geomorfologica d'Italia 1: 50.000. Servizio Geologico d'Italia, ISPRA Periodici tecnici. I Quaderni, serie III, del SGI. Vol. 13-I. Progetto CARG: modifiche ed integrazioni al Quaderno n. 4/1994/2018. Available from: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/periodici-tecnici/i-quaderni-serie-iii-del-sgi/carta-geomorfologica-ditalia-alla-scala-1-50.000-aggiornamento-ed-integrazioni-delle-linee-guida-della-carta-geomorfologica-ditalia-alla-scala-1-50.000-fascicolo-i.
[37]	Magnaguagno F (2009) Natura Umana e progetto Versante NORD: un nuovo approccio al disagio giovanile. Atti del Convegno Nazionale "Montagna solidale: i versanti della Montagnaterapia". Campus Selva dei Pini, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Pomezia. Available from: https://www.montagnaterapia.it/convegni.html.

This article has been cited by:

Jin Li, Yongling Cheng, Barycentric rational interpolation method for solving 3 dimensional convection–diffusion equation, 2024, 304, 00219045, 106106, 10.1016/j.jat.2024.106106

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Geosciences

0.8

Metrics

Article views(1909) PDF downloads(77) Cited by(1)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)

AIMS Geosciences

Territorial knowledge and cartographic evolution

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Linearization for KS equation

2.1. Direct linearization

2.2. Partial linearization

2.3. Newton linearization

3. Differentiation matrices of KS equation

3.1. Matrix equation of direct linearization

3.2. Matrix equation of partial linearization

3.3. Matrix equation of Newton linearization

4. Convergence rate of KS equation

5. Numerical examples

6. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Geosciences

Territorial knowledge and cartographic evolution

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Linearization for KS equation

2.1. Direct linearization

2.2. Partial linearization

2.3. Newton linearization

3. Differentiation matrices of KS equation

3.1. Matrix equation of direct linearization

3.2. Matrix equation of partial linearization

3.3. Matrix equation of Newton linearization

4. Convergence rate of KS equation

5. Numerical examples

6. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog