Citation: Amanda L. Kelley, Jay J. Lunden. Meta-analysis identifies metabolic sensitivities to ocean acidification[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(5): 709-729. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.5.709
[1] | Tao-Li Kang, Hai-Feng Huo, Hong Xiang . Dynamics and optimal control of tuberculosis model with the combined effects of vaccination, treatment and contaminated environments. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5308-5334. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024234 |
[2] | Laurenz Göllmann, Helmut Maurer . Optimal control problems with time delays: Two case studies in biomedicine. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(5): 1137-1154. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018051 |
[3] | Zhenzhen Liao, Shujing Gao, Shuixian Yan, Genjiao Zhou . Transmission dynamics and optimal control of a Huanglongbing model with time delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4162-4192. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021209 |
[4] | Na Pang . Nonlinear neural networks adaptive control for a class of fractional-order tuberculosis model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10464-10478. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023461 |
[5] | Xin Gao, Yue Zhang . Bifurcation analysis and optimal control of a delayed single-species fishery economic model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8081-8106. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022378 |
[6] | Jerzy Klamka, Helmut Maurer, Andrzej Swierniak . Local controllability and optimal control for\newline a model of combined anticancer therapy with control delays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 195-216. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017013 |
[7] | Heping Ma, Hui Jian, Yu Shi . A sufficient maximum principle for backward stochastic systems with mixed delays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 21211-21228. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023938 |
[8] | Ya-Dong Zhang, Hai-Feng Huo, Hong Xiang . Dynamics of tuberculosis with fast and slow progression and media coverage. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(3): 1150-1170. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019055 |
[9] | H. J. Alsakaji, F. A. Rihan, K. Udhayakumar, F. El Ktaibi . Stochastic tumor-immune interaction model with external treatments and time delays: An optimal control problem. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19270-19299. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023852 |
[10] | Eduardo Ibarguen-Mondragon, Lourdes Esteva, Leslie Chávez-Galán . A mathematical model for cellular immunology of tuberculosis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(4): 973-986. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.973 |
Tuberculosis (TB) is the second leading cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide [32]. Active TB refers to disease that occurs in someone infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is characterized by signs or symptoms of active disease, or both, and is distinct from latent tuberculosis infection, which occurs without signs or symptoms of active disease. Only individuals with active TB can transmit the infection. Many people with active TB do not experience typical TB symptoms in the early stages of the disease. These individuals are unlikely to seek care early, and may not be properly diagnosed when seeking care [31].
Delays to diagnosis of active TB present a major obstacle to the control of a TB epidemic [27], it may worsen the disease, increase the risk of death and enhance tuberculosis transmission to the community [24,26]. Both patient and the health system may be responsible for the diagnosis delay [24]. Efforts should be done in patient knowledge/awareness about TB, and health care systems should improve case finding strategies to reduce the delay in diagnosis of active TB [15,24,25].
Mathematical models are an important tool in analyzing the spread and control of infectious diseases [13]. There are several mathematical dynamic models for TB, see, e.g., [5,6,11,18]. In this paper we consider the mathematical model for TB proposed in [11]. We introduce a discrete time delay which represents the delay on the diagnosis of individuals with active TB and commencement of treatment. The stability of the disease free and endemic equilibriums is analyzed for any time delay.
Optimal control theory has been successfully applied to TB mathematical models (see, e.g., [19,22,23] and references cited therein). We propose and analyze an optimal control problem where the control system is the mathematical model from [11], but with a time delay in the state variable that represents individuals with active TB, and introduce two control functions. The control functions represent the fraction of early and persistent latent individuals that are treated for TB. Treatment of latent TB infection greatly reduces the risk that TB infection will progress to active TB disease. Certain groups are at very high risk of developing active TB disease once infected. Every effort should be made to begin appropriate treatment and to ensure completion of the entire course of treatment for latent TB infection [33]. Treatment of latent TB infection should be initiated after the possibility of TB disease has been excluded. It can take 2 to 8 weeks after TB infection for the body's immune system to react to tuberculin and for the infected to be detected, which justifies the introduction of a time delay on the control associated to treatment of early latent individuals. On the other hand, delays in the treatment of latent TB may also occur due to clinical and demographic patient and health care services characteristics. For these reasons, we consider discrete time delays in both control functions. To our knowledge, this work is the first to apply optimal control theory to a TB model with time delay in state and control variables.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we formulate the TB model with state delay. The stability of the disease free equilibrium is analyzed in Section 3 while stability of the endemic equilibrium is investigated in Section 4. Optimal control of TB with state and control delays is carried out in Section 5 and some numerical results given in Section 6. We end with Section 7 of conclusions.
In this section we consider a TB mathematical model proposed in [11], where reinfection and post-exposure interventions for tuberculosis are considered. The model divides the total population into five categories: susceptible (
{˙S(t)=μN−βNI(t)S(t)−μS(t),˙L1(t)=βNI(t)(S(t)+σL2(t)+σRR(t))−(δ+τ1+μ)L1(t),˙I(t)=ϕδL1(t)+ωL2(t)+ωRR(t)−τ0I(t−dI)−μI(t),˙L2(t)=(1−ϕ)δL1(t)−σβNI(t)L2(t)−(ω+τ2+μ)L2(t),˙R(t)=τ0I(t−dI)+τ1L1(t)+τ2L2(t)−σRβNI(t)R(t)−(ωR+μ)R(t). | (1) |
The initial conditions for system (1) are
S(θ)=φ1(θ),L1(θ)=φ2(θ),I(θ)=φ3(θ),L2(θ)=φ4(θ),R(θ)=φ5(θ), | (2) |
Throughout this paper, we focus on the dynamics of the solutions of (1) in the restricted region
Ω={(S,L1,I,L2,R)∈R5+0|0≤S+L1+I+L2+R=N}. |
In this region, the usual local existence, uniqueness and continuation results apply [12,14]. Hence, a unique solution
A mathematical model has a disease free equilibrium if it has an equilibrium point at which the population remains in the absence of the disease [28]. The model (1) has a disease free equilibrium given by
The basic reproduction number
R0=βμωR(ω+τ2+μ)τ1+δ[(ωR+μ)(ϕμ+ω)+(ωR+ϕμ)τ2](τ0+μ+ωR)(ω+τ2+μ)(δ+τ1+μ)=ND. | (3) |
Note that in [11] the basic reproduction number is deduced under the assumption that
It is important to analyze the stability of the disease free equilibrium, as it indicates whether the population will remain in the absence of the disease, or the disease will persist for all time [28,29]. System (1) is equivalent to
{˙S(t)=μN−βNI(t)S(t)−μS(t),˙L1(t)=βNI(t)(S(t)+σL2(t)+σR(N−S(t)−L1(t)−I(t)−L2(t)))−(δ+τ1+μ)L1(t),˙I(t)=ϕδL1(t)+ωL2(t)+ωR(N−S(t)−L1(t)−I(t)−L2(t))−τ0I(t−dI)−μI(t),˙L2(t)=(1−ϕ)δL1(t)−σβNI(t)L2(t)−(ω+τ2+μ)L2(t), | (4) |
where the equation for
{˙s(t)=−β¯I+μNNs(t)−βN¯Si(t)˙l1(t)=−βN¯I(σR−1)s(t)−βN(σR¯I+(δ+τ1+μ)N)l1(t)−βN(−¯S−σ¯L2−σR(N+¯S+¯L1+2¯I+¯L2))i(t)+β¯I(σ−σR)Nl2(t)˙i(t)=−ωRs(t)+(ϕδ−ωR)l1(t)−(ωR−μ)i(t)+(ω−ωR)l2(t)−τ0i(t−dI)˙l2(t)=(1−ϕ)δl1(t)−βNσ¯L2i(t)−βN(σ¯I+(ω+τ2+μ)N)l2(t). | (5) |
We then express system (5) in matrix form as follows:
ddt(s(t)l1(t)i(t)l2(t))=A1(s(t)l1(t)i(t)l2(t))+A2(s(t−dI)l1(t−dI)i(t−dI))l2(t−dI)) |
with
A1=[−β¯I+μNN0−β¯SN0β¯I(1−σR)N−β¯IσR+c1NNβ(¯S+σ¯L2+σR(N+¯S+¯L1+2¯I+¯L2))Nβ¯I(σ−σR)N−ωRϕδ−ωR−ωR−μω−ωR0−(−1+ϕ)δ−σβ¯L2N−β¯Iσ+c2NN], |
where
Δ(λ)=P(λ)+Q(λ)=0, | (6) |
where
P(λ)=λ4+a3λ3+a2λ2+a1λ+a0,Q(λ)=τ0(λ+μ)(λ+c1)(λ+c2)(e−λdI−1), |
with
a1=2μD+μ2(c1+c2+c4)−c4c5c6−β(τ1ωR+ωδ+δϕ(ωR+τ2+2μ)),a2=c4c5+3μ(c1+c2+c4)+c6(c4+c5)−βϕδ,a3=c1+c2+c3+μ, |
and
Remark 1. For any
Recall that an equilibrium point is asymptotically stable if all roots of the corresponding characteristic equation have negative real parts [1].
Lemma 3.1 If
Proof. The characteristic equation (6) satisfies
Lemma 3.2. If (ⅰ)
Proof. When
In the case
a3b3+τ0bc1c2−a1b−τ0b3+τ0μc1b+τ0μbc2=Acos(bdI)−Bsin(bdI)−b4+a2b2−τ0b2c1−a0−τ0b2c2−μτ0b2+τ0μc1c2=Asin(bdI)+B(cos(bdI)) |
with
b8+α3b6+α2b4+α1b2+α0=0, | (7) |
where
α1=2τ0(μ(a0+a2c1c2−a1(c1+c2))+a0(c1+c2)−a1c1c2)−2a2a0+a21,α2=2τ0(μ(a3(c1+c2)−a2−c1c2)−a2(c1+c2)+a3c1c2+a1)+2a0+a22−2a3a1,α3=2τ0(μ+c1+c2)+a32−2(a3τ0+a2). |
Let
z4+α3z3+α2z2+α1z+α0=0. | (8) |
By the Routh--Hurwitz criterion, (8) has no positive real roots if
For the parameter values of Table 1 and
z4+241.429794z3+31.065028z2−221.270089z−0.037233=0 | (9) |
Symbol | Description | Value |
Transmission coefficient | ||
Death and birth rate | ||
Rate at which individuals leave | ||
Proportion of individuals going to | ||
Endogenous reactivation rate for persistent latent infections | ||
Endogenous reactivation rate for treated individuals | ||
Factor reducing the risk of infection as a result of acquired immunity to a previous infection for | ||
Rate of exogenous reinfection of treated patients | 0.25 | |
Rate of recovery under treatment of active TB | ||
Rate of recovery under treatment of early latent individuals | ||
Rate of recovery under treatment of persistent latent individuals | ||
Total population | ||
Total simulation duration | ||
Efficacy of treatment of early latent | ||
Efficacy of treatment of persistent latent TB |
and we immediately see that the coefficient
Lemma 3.3 Let
Remark 2.Observe that there may exist specific time delays for which the disease free equilibrium
χ(λ)=λ4+17.057363λ3+20.733305λ2+4.489748λ+0.048755+2(λ+170)(λ+98170)(λ+1.014486)(e−λ0.1−1). |
The derivative
In this paper we assume that the time delay
System (1) has an unique endemic equilibrium such that
A1=[−0.0509740−28.02556100.027516−14.02345845.9707340−0.0000200.599980−0.0143060.000180011.400000−0.335130−1.023658] |
and
λ4+15.112395λ3−12.243801λ2−28.331139λ−0.966336+(30.196179λ2+30.244462λ+2λ3+1.463482)e−λdI=0. | (10) |
When
λ4+17.112395λ3+17.952378λ2+1.913323λ+0.497146=0. | (11) |
The roots of (11) are
b8+281.828573b6−51.906667b4−1.236501b2−0.000246=0. | (12) |
It is easy to verify that
λ4+15.112395λ3−12.243801λ2−28.331139λ−0.966336+(2λ3+30.196179λ2+30.244462λ+1.463482)e−0.1λ=0. | (13) |
Similarly to Remark 2, it follows from Bolzano's theorem and the monotonicity of the characteristic function associated to (13) that all roots of equation (13) have a negative real part. Therefore, the endemic equilibrium
We now consider the TB model (1) with a time delay in the state variable
dI=0.1,du1,du2∈[0.05,0.2]. | (14) |
The resulting model is given by the following system of nonlinear ordinary delay differential equations:
{˙S(t)=μN−βNI(t)S(t)−μS(t),˙L1(t)=βNI(t)(S(t)+σL2(t)+σRR(t))−(δ+τ1+ϵ1u1(t−du1)+μ)L1(t),˙I(t)=ϕδL1(t)+ωL2(t)+ωRR(t)−τ0I(t−dI)−μI(t),˙L2(t)=(1−ϕ)δL1(t)−σβNI(t)L2(t)−(ω+ϵ2u2(t−du2)+τ2+μ)L2(t). | (15) |
Recall that the recovered population is determined by
˙R(t)=τ0I(t−dI)+(τ1+ϵ1u1(t−du1))L1(t)+(τ2+ϵ2u2(t−du2))L2(t)−σRβNI(t)R(t)−(ωR+μ)R(t). |
Note, however, that this equation is not needed in the subsequent optimal control computations. We prescribe the following initial conditions for the state variables
S(0)=(76/120)N,L1(0)=(36/120)N,L2(0)=(2/120)N,R(0)=(1/120)N,I(t)=(5/120)Nfor−dI≤t≤0,uk(t)=0for−duk≤t<0(k=1,2). | (16) |
In the case
0≤uk(t)≤1∀t∈[0,T](k=1,2). | (17) |
Let us denote the state and control variable of the control system (15), respectively, by
J1(x,u)=∫T0(I(t)+L2(t)+W1u1(t)+W2u2(t))dt, | (18) |
which is linear in the control variable
J2(x,u)=∫T0(I(t)+L2(t)+W1u21(t)+W2u22(t))dt, | (19) |
which is quadratic in the control variable. In both objectives,
The optimal control problem then is defined as follows: determine a control function
H(x,y3,λ,u1,u2,v1,v2)=−(I+L2+W1u1+W2u2)+λS(μN−βNIS−μS)+λL1(βN(S+σL2+σRR)−(δ+τ1+ϵ1v1+μ)L1)+λI(ϕδL1+ωL2+ωRR−τ0y3−μI)+λL2((1−ϕ)δL1−σβNIL2−(ω+ϵ2v2+τ2+μ)L2). |
We obtain the adjoint equations
λS(T)=λL1(T)=λI(T)=λL2(T)=0. | (20) |
To characterize the optimal controls
ϕk(t)=Huk[t]+χ[0,T−duk](t+duk)Hvk[t+duk]={−Wk−ϵkλLk(t+duk)Lk(t+duk)for0≤t≤T−duk,−WkforT−duk≤t≤T. | (21) |
Then the maximum condition for the optimal controls
uk(t)={1ifϕk(t)>0,0ifϕk(t)<0,singularifϕk(t)=0onIs⊂[0,T],k=1,2. | (22) |
We do not discuss singular controls further, since both in the non-delayed and the delayed control problem we did not find singular arcs. In view of the transversality conditions (20), the terminal value of the switching function is
We choose the numerical approach "First Discretize then Optimize" to solve both the non-delayed and delayed optimal control problem. The discretization of the control problem on a fine grid leads to a large-scale nonlinear programming problem (NLP) that can be conveniently formulated with the help of the Applied Modeling Programming Language AMPL [9]. AMPL can be linked to several powerful optimization solvers. We use the Interior-Point optimization solver IPOPT developed by Wächter and Biegler [30]. Details of discretization methods for delayed control problems may be found in [10]. The subsequent computations for the terminal time
Also, the control package NUDOCCCS developed by Büskens [3] (cf. also [4]) provides a highly efficient method for solving the discretized control problem, because it allows to implement higher order integration methods. However, so far NUDOCCCS can only be implemented for non-delayed control problems. For the non-delayed TB control problem, we obtained only bang-bang controls. An important feature of NUDOCCCS is the fact that it provides an efficient method for optimizing the switching times of bang-bang controls using the arc-parametrization method [16]. This approach is called the Induced Optimization Problem (IOP) for bang-bang controls. NUDOCCCS then allows for a check of second-order sufficient conditions of the IOP, whereby the second-order sufficient conditions for bang-bang controls can be verified with high accuracy; cf. [16,17].
First, we consider the optimal control of non-delayed TB model, where formally we put
uk(t)={1for0≤t≤tk,0fortk<t≤T,k=1,2. | (23) |
To obtain a refined solution, we solve the IOP with respect to the switching times
J1(x,u)=28390.73,t1=3.677250,t2=4.866993,S(T)=1034.634,L1(T)=53.59586,I(T)=25.89556,L2(T)=780.7667,R(T)=28105.11. | (24) |
The initial value of the adjoint variable
λ(0)=(0.376159,0.452761,4.03059,0.394839). |
The control and state trajectories are displayed in Figure 2. The Hessian
(u1(t),u2(t))={(1,0)for0≤t≤t1,(1,1)fort1<t≤t2,(0,1)fort2<t≤t3,(0,0)fort3<t≤T,k=1,2. |
The objective value and the switching times are computed as
To see more distinctively the difference between delayed and non-delayed solutions, we consider state and control delays with values at their upper bounds in (14), that is,
uk(t)={1for0≤t≤tk,0fortk<t≤T,k=1,2. | (25) |
We obtain the numerical results
ϕk(t)>0for0≤t<tk,˙ϕk(tk)<0,ϕk(t)<0fortk<t≤T(k=1,2). |
However, we are not aware in the literature of any type of sufficient conditions which could be applied to the extremal solution shown in Figure 5.
We also compared the extremal solutions for the
The most significant influence on the optimal controls is exerted by the transmission coefficient
We introduced a discrete time delay
When a time delay is introduced into a mathematical model, the stability of its disease free and endemic equilibriums may change. We proved that the disease free equilibrium (DFE) of the TB model with delay in the state variable
We proposed an optimal control problem where the control system is the mathematical model for TB with time delay in the state variable
Firstly, we considered the non-delayed case (
This work was partially supported by FCT within project TOCCATA, reference PTDC/EEI-AUT/2933/2014. Silva and Torres were also supported by CIDMA and project UID/MAT/04106/2013; Silva by the post-doc grant SFRH/BPD/72061/2010. The authors are very grateful to anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and helpful comments.
[1] |
Kroeker KJ, Micheli F, Gambi MC, et al. (2011) Divergent ecosystem responses within a benthic marine community to ocean acidification. PNAS 108: 14515-14520. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107789108
![]() |
[2] |
Fabricius KE, Langdon C, Uthicke S, et al. (2011) Losers and winners in coral reefs acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Nature Climate Change 1: 165-169. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1122
![]() |
[3] |
Hale R, Calosi P, McNeill L, et al. (2011) Predicted levels of future ocean acidification and temperature rise could alter community structure and biodiversity in marine benthic communities. Oikos 120: 661-674. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.19469.x
![]() |
[4] |
Fabry VJ, Seibel BA, Feely RA, et al. (2008) Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES Journal of Marine Science: J du Conseil 65: 414-432. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn048
![]() |
[5] |
Caldeira K, Wickett ME (2003) Oceanography: anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425: 365-365. doi: 10.1038/425365a
![]() |
[6] | Raven J, Caldeira K, Elderfield H, et al. (2005) Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide: The Royal Society. |
[7] |
Hönisch B, Ridgwell A, Schmidt DN, et al. (2012) The geological record of ocean acidification. Science 335: 1058-1063. doi: 10.1126/science.1208277
![]() |
[8] |
Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, et al. (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437: 681-686. doi: 10.1038/nature04095
![]() |
[9] |
Kleypas JA, Buddemeier RW, Archer D, et al., (1999) Geochemical consequences of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide on coral reefs. Science 284: 118-120. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.118
![]() |
[10] | IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014: Cambridge University Press. |
[11] |
Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, et al. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389-395. doi: 10.1038/416389a
![]() |
[12] |
Hofmann GE, Todgham AE (2010) Living in the now: Physiological mechanisms to tolerate a rapidly changing environment. Annu Rev Physiol 72: 127-145. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135900
![]() |
[13] |
Pespeni MH, Sanford E, Gaylord B, et al. (2013) Evolutionary change during experimental ocean acidification. PNAS 110: 6937-6942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220673110
![]() |
[14] |
Kelly MW, Hofmann GE (2013) Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification. Funct Ecol 27: 980-990. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02061.x
![]() |
[15] |
Bell G, Collins S (2008) Adaptation, extinction and global change. Evol Appl 1: 3-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00011.x
![]() |
[16] |
Gienapp P, Teplitsky C, Alho J, et al. (2008) Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol ecol 17: 167-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03413.x
![]() |
[17] |
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby P, Hooten A, et al. (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. science 318: 1737-1742. doi: 10.1126/science.1152509
![]() |
[18] |
Parker L, Ross PM, O'Connor WA (2011) Populations of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, vary in response to ocean acidification. Mar Biol 158: 689-697. doi: 10.1007/s00227-010-1592-4
![]() |
[19] | Hofmann GE, Evans TG, Kelly MW, et al. (2014) Exploring local adaptation and the ocean acidification seascape–studies in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem. Biogeosci 11: 1053-1064. |
[20] | Prosser CL (1991) Comparative Animal Physiology, Environmental and Metabolic Animal Physiology: Wiley-Liss. |
[21] |
Somero G (2005) Linking biogeography to physiology: Evolutionary and acclimatory adjustments of thermal limits. Front Zool 2: 1. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-2-1
![]() |
[22] |
Somero GN (2002) Thermal physiology and vertical zonation of intertidal animals: optima, limits, and costs of living. Integr comp biol 42: 780-789. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.4.780
![]() |
[23] |
Stillman JH, Somero GN (2000) A comparative analysis of the upper thermal tolerance limits of eastern Pacific porcelain crabs, genus Petrolisthes: influences of latitude, vertical zonation, acclimation, and phylogeny. Physiol Biochem Zool 73: 200-208. doi: 10.1086/316738
![]() |
[24] | Prosser C (1955) Physiological variation in animals. Biol Rev 30: 229-261. |
[25] |
Lannig G, Eilers S, Portner HO, et al. (2010) Impact of ocean acidification on energy metabolism of oyster, Crassostrea gigas--changes in metabolic pathways and thermal response. Mar Drugs 8: 2318-2339. doi: 10.3390/md8082318
![]() |
[26] | Randall D, Burggren WW, French K (2002) Eckert animal physiology: Macmillan. |
[27] | Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, et al. (2008) Molecular biology of the cell. Garland, New York: 139-194. |
[28] |
Comeau S, Jeffree R, Teyssia JL, et al. (2010) Response of the Arctic pteropod Limacina helicina to projected future environmental conditions. PLoS ONE 5: e11362-e11362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011362
![]() |
[29] |
Thomsen Jr, Melzner F (2010) Moderate seawater acidification does not elicit long-term metabolic depression in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 157: 2667-2676. doi: 10.1007/s00227-010-1527-0
![]() |
[30] | Stumpp M, Wren J, Melzner F, et al. (2011) CO 2 induced seawater acidification impacts sea urchin larval development I: elevated metabolic rates decrease scope for growth and induce developmental delay. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 160: 331-340. |
[31] | Hand SC (1991) Metabolic dormancy in aquatic invertebrates. Advances in comparative and environmental physiology: Springer. 1-50. |
[32] | Langenbuch M, Pörtner HO (2002) Changes in metabolic rate and N excretion in the marine invertebrate Sipunculus nudus under conditions of environmental hypercapnia identifying effective acid-base variables. J Exp Biol 205: 1153-1160. |
[33] |
Pörtner H, Langenbuch M, Reipschläger A (2004) Biological Impact of Elevated Ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and earth history. J Oceanogr 60: 705-718. doi: 10.1007/s10872-004-5763-0
![]() |
[34] |
Pan TCF, Applebaum SL, Manahan DT (2015) Experimental ocean acidification alters the allocation of metabolic energy. PNAS 112: 4696-4701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416967112
![]() |
[35] | Bennett A (1991) The evolution of activity capacity. J Exp Biol 160: 1-23. |
[36] |
Seibel BA, Drazen JC (2007) The rate of metabolism in marine animals: environmental constraints, ecological demands and energetic opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362: 2061-2078. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2101
![]() |
[37] | Melzner F, Gutowska M, Langenbuch M, et al. (2009) Physiological basis for high CO2 tolerance in marine ectothermic animals: pre-adaptation through lifestyle and ontogeny? Biogeosci 6: 2313-2331. |
[38] |
Seibel BA, Walsh PJ (2001) Potential Impacts of CO2 Injection on Deep-Sea Biota. Science 294: 319-320. doi: 10.1126/science.1065301
![]() |
[39] | Melzner F, Gutowska MA, Langenbuch M, et al. (2009) Physiological basis for high CO2 tolerance in marine ectothermic animals: pre-adaptation through lifestyle and ontogeny? Biogeosciences Discuss 6. |
[40] |
Seibel BA, Walsh PJ (2003) Biological impacts of deep-sea carbon dioxide injection inferred from indices of physiological performance. J Exp Biol 206: 641-650. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00141
![]() |
[41] |
Widdicombe S, Spicer JI (2008) Predicting the impact of ocean acidification on benthic biodiversity: What can animal physiology tell us? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366: 187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.024
![]() |
[42] | Kurihara H (2008) Effects of CO2-driven ocean acidification on the early developmental stages of invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 373: 275-284. |
[43] |
Peñuelas J, Estiarte M (1998) Can elevated CO 2 affect secondary metabolism and ecosystem function? Trends ecol evol 13: 20-24. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01235-4
![]() |
[44] | Sanford E, Gaylord B, Hettinger A, et al. (2014) Ocean acidification increases the vulnerability of native oysters to predation by invasive snails. P Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 281: 20132681. |
[45] | Kroeker KJ, Micheli F, Gambi MC (2013) Ocean acidification causes ecosystem shifts via altered competitive interactions. Nature Climate Change 3: 156-159. |
[46] |
Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD (1997) Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. Am Nat 150: 798-812. doi: 10.1086/286095
![]() |
[47] | Sorte CJ, Ibáñez I, Blumenthal DM, et al. (2013) Poised to prosper? A cross-system comparison of climate change effects on native and non-native species performance. Ecol Lett 16: 261-270. |
[48] | Gibson R, Atkinson R, Gordon J, et al. (2011) Impact of ocean warming and ocean acidification on marine invertebrate life history stages: vulnerabilities and potential for persistence in a changing ocean. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 49: 1-42. |
[49] |
Nakamura M, Ohki S, Suzuki A, et al. (2011) Coral larvae under ocean acidification: survival, metabolism, and metamorphosis. PLoS ONE 6: e14521-e14521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014521
![]() |
[50] |
Pimentel M, Pegado M, Repolho T, et al. (2014) Impact of ocean acidification in the metabolism and swimming behavior of the dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) early larvae. Mar Biol 161: 725-729. doi: 10.1007/s00227-013-2365-7
![]() |
[51] |
Rivest EB, Hofmann GE (2014) Responses of the Metabolism of the Larvae of Pocillopora damicornis to Ocean Acidification and Warming. PloS one 9: e96172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096172
![]() |
[52] | Albright R (2011) Reviewing the effects of ocean acidification on sexual reproduction and early life history stages of reef-building corals. J Mar Biol 2011. |
[53] | Storey KB, Storey JM (2004) Oxygen limitation and metabolic rate depression. Functional metabolism: regulation and adaptation: 415-442. |
[54] |
Langenbuch M, Pörtner H-O (2004) High sensitivity to chronically elevated CO 2 levels in a eurybathic marine sipunculid. Aquat Toxicol 70: 55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2004.07.006
![]() |
[55] |
Hand SC, Hardewig I (1996) Downregulation of cellular metabolism during environmental stress: mechanisms and implications. Annu rev physiol 58: 539-563. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.002543
![]() |
[56] |
Beckerman A, Benton TG, Ranta E, et al. (2002) Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends ecol evol 17: 263-269. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02469-2
![]() |
[57] |
Green MA, Jones ME, Boudreau CL, et al. (2004) Dissolution mortality of juvenile bivalves in coastal marine deposits. Limnol Oceanogr 49: 727-734. doi: 10.4319/lo.2004.49.3.0727
![]() |
[58] |
Hofmann GE, Smith JE, Johnson KS, et al. (2011) High-frequency dynamics of ocean pH: a multi-ecosystem comparison. PloS one 6: e28983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028983
![]() |
[59] | Kapsenberg L, Kelley AL, Shaw EC, et al. (2015) Near-shore Antarctic pH variability has implications for the design of ocean acidification experiments. Sci Rep 5. |
[60] |
Evans TG, Chan F, Menge BA, et al. (2013) Transcriptomic responses to ocean acidification in larval sea urchins from a naturally variable pH environment. Mol ecol 22: 1609-1625. doi: 10.1111/mec.12188
![]() |
[61] |
Clarke A (2003) Costs and consequences of evolutionary temperature adaptation. Trends ecol evol 18: 573-581. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.007
![]() |
[62] | Albright R, Langdon C (2011) Ocean acidification impacts multiple early life history processes of the Caribbean coral Porites astreoides. Global Change Biol 17: 2478-2487. |
[63] |
Byrne M, Przeslawski R (2013) Multistressor impacts of warming and acidification of the ocean on marine invertebrates' life histories. Integr comp biol 53: 582-596. doi: 10.1093/icb/ict049
![]() |
[64] |
Maas A, Wishner K, Seibel B (2012) The metabolic response of pteropods to acidification reflects natural CO2/sub-exposure in oxygen minimum zones. Biogeosci 9: 747-757. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-747-2012
![]() |
[65] |
Henry RP, Wheatly MG (1992) Interaction of respiration, ion regulation, and acid-base balance in the everyday life of aquatic crustaceans. Am Zool 32: 407-416. doi: 10.1093/icb/32.3.407
![]() |
[66] | Waldbusser G, Voigt E, Bergschneider H, et al. (2011) Biocalcification in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) in Relation to Long-term Trends in Chesapeake Bay pH. Estuar Coast 34: 221-231. |
[67] |
Waldbusser GG, Hales B, Langdon CJ, et al. (2015) Ocean acidification has multiple modes of action on bivalve larvae. PloS one 10: e0128376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128376
![]() |
[68] |
Flynn EE, Bjelde BE, Miller NA, et al. (2015) Ocean acidification exerts negative effects during warming conditions in a developing Antarctic fish. Conservation Physiology 3: cov033. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov033
![]() |
[69] |
Todgham AE, Hofmann GE (2009) Transcriptomic response of sea urchin larvae Strongylocentrotus purpuratus to CO2-driven seawater acidification. J Exp Biol 212: 2579-2594. doi: 10.1242/jeb.032540
![]() |
[70] | Evans TG, Watson-Wynn P (2014) Effects of seawater acidification on gene expression: resolving broader-scale trends in sea urchins. Biol Bull 226: 237-254. |
[71] |
Kaniewska P, Campbell PR, Kline DI, et al. (2012) Major cellular and physiological impacts of ocean acidification on a reef building coral. PloS one 7: e34659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034659
![]() |
[72] |
Ogawa D, Bobeszko T, Ainsworth T, et al. (2013) The combined effects of temperature and CO2 lead to altered gene expression in Acropora aspera. Coral Reefs 32: 895-907. doi: 10.1007/s00338-013-1046-9
![]() |
[73] |
Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, et al. (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85: 1771-1789. doi: 10.1890/03-9000
![]() |
[74] |
Helmuth B (2009) From cells to coastlines: how can we use physiology to forecast the impacts of climate change? J Exp Biol 212: 753-760. doi: 10.1242/jeb.023861
![]() |
[75] | Kooijman SALM (2010) Dynamic energy budget theory for metabolic organisation: Cambridge university press. |
[76] | Rosa R, Trübenbach K, Pimentel MS, et al. (2014) Differential impacts of ocean acidification and warming on winter and summer progeny of a coastal squid (Loligo vulgaris). J exp biol 217: 518-525. |
[77] |
Fernández-Reiriz MJ, Range P, Álvarez-Salgado XA, et al. (2011) Physiological energetics of juvenile clams Ruditapes decussatus in a high CO2 coastal ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 433: 97-105. doi: 10.3354/meps09062
![]() |
[78] |
Ferrari MC, Dixson DL, Munday PL, et al. (2011) Intrageneric variation in antipredator responses of coral reef fishes affected by ocean acidification: implications for climate change projections on marine communities. Global Change Biol 17: 2980-2986. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02439.x
![]() |
[79] |
Manríquez PH, Jara ME, Mardones ML, et al. (2013) Ocean acidification disrupts prey responses to predator cues but not net prey shell growth in Concholepas concholepas (loco). PLoS One 8: e68643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068643
![]() |
[80] |
Li W, Gao K (2012) A marine secondary producer respires and feeds more in a high CO2 ocean. Mar pollut bull 64: 699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.01.033
![]() |
[81] |
Pörtner HO, Farrell AP (2008) Physiology and climate change. Science 322: 690-692. doi: 10.1126/science.1163156
![]() |
[82] | Russell BD, Harley CD, Wernberg T, et al. (2011) Predicting ecosystem shifts requires new approaches that integrate the effects of climate change across entire systems. Biol Lett: rsbl20110779. |
[83] |
Mumby PJ, Steneck RS (2008) Coral reef management and conservation in light of rapidly evolving ecological paradigms. Trends ecol evol 23: 555-563. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.011
![]() |
[84] | McElhany P, Shallin Busch D Appropriate pCO2 treatments in ocean acidification experiments. Mar Biol 160: 1807-1812. |
[85] |
Folt C, Chen C, Moore M, et al. (1999) Synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors. Limnol Oceanogr 44: 864-877. doi: 10.4319/lo.1999.44.3_part_2.0864
![]() |
1. | Eenezer Bonyah, Fahad Al Basir, Santanu Ray, 2020, Chapter 14, 978-981-15-0927-8, 301, 10.1007/978-981-15-0928-5_14 | |
2. | J. Frédéric Bonnans, Justina Gianatti, E. Augeraud, M. Banerjee, J.-S. Dhersin, A. d'Onofrio, T. Lipniacki, S. Petrovskii, Chi Tran, A. Veber-Delattre, E. Vergu, V. Volpert, Optimal control techniques based on infection age for the study of the COVID-19 epidemic, 2020, 15, 0973-5348, 48, 10.1051/mmnp/2020035 | |
3. | Abdelfatah Kouidere, Driss Kada, Omar Balatif, Mostafa Rachik, Mouhcine Naim, Optimal control approach of a mathematical modeling with multiple delays of the negative impact of delays in applying preventive precautions against the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic with a case study of Brazil and cost-effectiveness, 2021, 142, 09600779, 110438, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110438 | |
4. | C. J. Silva, D. F. M. Torres, E. Venturino, M. Ruzhansky, P. Agarwal, I. Area, E. T. Karimov, Optimal Spraying in Biological Control of Pests, 2017, 12, 1760-6101, 51, 10.1051/mmnp/201712305 | |
5. | U. Roman, Z. Gul, I. Saeed, U. Hakeem, S. Shafie, Control strategies of avian influenza pandemic model with time delay, 2017, 10, 1793-5245, 1750104, 10.1142/S1793524517501042 | |
6. | Diana Rocha, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres, Stability and optimal control of a delayed HIV model, 2018, 41, 01704214, 2251, 10.1002/mma.4207 | |
7. | S. Rosa, P. Rebelo, C.M. Silva, H. Alves, P.G. Carvalho, Optimal control of the customer dynamics based on marketing policy, 2018, 330, 00963003, 42, 10.1016/j.amc.2018.02.027 | |
8. | Rossella Della Marca, Alberto d’Onofrio, Volatile opinions and optimal control of vaccine awareness campaigns: chaotic behaviour of the forward-backward sweep algorithm vs. heuristic direct optimization, 2021, 98, 10075704, 105768, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105768 | |
9. | Ana P. Lemos-Paião, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres, 2020, Chapter 12, 978-3-030-49895-5, 323, 10.1007/978-3-030-49896-2_12 | |
10. | Adnane Boukhouima, Khalid Hattaf, El Mehdi Lotfi, Marouane Mahrouf, Delfim F.M. Torres, Noura Yousfi, Lyapunov functions for fractional-order systems in biology: Methods and applications, 2020, 140, 09600779, 110224, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110224 | |
11. | Filipe Rodrigues, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres, Helmut Maurer, Optimal control of a delayed HIV model, 2018, 23, 1553-524X, 443, 10.3934/dcdsb.2018030 | |
12. | Weronika Wojtak, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F.M. Torres, Abdon Atangana, Gisèle Mophou, Jordan Hristov, Zakia Hammouch, Uniform asymptotic stability of a fractional tuberculosis model, 2018, 13, 0973-5348, 9, 10.1051/mmnp/2018015 | |
13. | Duo-Qing Sun, Xiao-Ying Ma, Characteristic Model-Based Adaptive Control for a Class of MIMO Uncertain Nonaffine Nonlinear Systems Governed by Differential Equations, 2020, 2020, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2020/3649472 | |
14. | Legesse Lemecha Obsu, Shiferaw Feyissa Balcha, Optimal control strategies for the transmission risk of COVID-19, 2020, 14, 1751-3758, 590, 10.1080/17513758.2020.1788182 | |
15. | Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres, Modeling and optimal control of HIV/AIDS prevention through PrEP, 2018, 11, 1937-1179, 119, 10.3934/dcdss.2018008 | |
16. | Riccardo Bonalli, Bruno Hérissé, Emmanuel Trélat, Continuity of Pontryagin Extremals with Respect to Delays in Nonlinear Optimal Control, 2019, 57, 0363-0129, 1440, 10.1137/18M119121X | |
17. | Anthony A. E. Losio, Steady Mushayabasa, Modeling the Effects of Spatial Heterogeneity and Seasonality on Guinea Worm Disease Transmission, 2018, 2018, 1110-757X, 1, 10.1155/2018/5084687 | |
18. | Ana R.M. Carvalho, Carla M.A. Pinto, Non-integer order analysis of the impact of diabetes and resistant strains in a model for TB infection, 2018, 61, 10075704, 104, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.012 | |
19. | Arianna Cecchetti, Pietro Ferragamo, Alice Zampini, Ezio Venturino, Optimal Control of an Ecogenetic Model, 2017, 3, 2349-5103, 473, 10.1007/s40819-017-0365-x | |
20. | Ismail Gad Ameen, Hegagi Mohamed Ali, 2020, chapter 3, 9781799831228, 41, 10.4018/978-1-7998-3122-8.ch003 | |
21. | Nasser Sweilam, Seham AL-Mekhlafi, Salma Shatta, Dumitru Baleanu, Numerical study for a novel variable-order multiple time delay awareness programs mathematical model, 2020, 158, 01689274, 212, 10.1016/j.apnum.2020.07.016 | |
22. | Malik Zaka Ullah, Abdullah K. Alzahrani, Dumitru Baleanu, An efficient numerical technique for a new fractional tuberculosis model with nonsingular derivative operator, 2019, 13, 1658-3655, 1147, 10.1080/16583655.2019.1688543 | |
23. | Cristiana J. Silva, Carla Cruz, Delfim F. M. Torres, Alberto P. Muñuzuri, Alejandro Carballosa, Iván Area, Juan J. Nieto, Rui Fonseca-Pinto, Rui Passadouro, Estevão Soares dos Santos, Wilson Abreu, Jorge Mira, Optimal control of the COVID-19 pandemic: controlled sanitary deconfinement in Portugal, 2021, 11, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-021-83075-6 | |
24. | N H Sweilam, S M AL–Mekhlafi, Optimal control for a time delay multi-strain tuberculosis fractional model: a numerical approach, 2019, 36, 0265-0754, 317, 10.1093/imamci/dnx046 | |
25. | Mlyashimbi Helikumi, Moatlhodi Kgosimore, Dmitry Kuznetsov, Steady Mushayabasa, Backward Bifurcation and Optimal Control Analysis of a Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Model, 2019, 7, 2227-7390, 971, 10.3390/math7100971 | |
26. | Nasser Hassan Sweilam, Seham Mahyoub Al-Mekhlafi, Taghreed Abdul Rahman Assiri, Numerical Study for Time Delay Multistrain Tuberculosis Model of Fractional Order, 2017, 2017, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2017/1047384 | |
27. | Simão P. S. Santos, Natália Martins, Delfim F. M. Torres, Noether currents for higher-order variational problems of Herglotz type with time delay, 2018, 11, 1937-1179, 91, 10.3934/dcdss.2018006 | |
28. | Teklebirhan Abraha, Fahad Al Basir, Legesse Lemecha Obsu, Delfim F.M. Torres, Pest control using farming awareness: Impact of time delays and optimal use of biopesticides, 2021, 146, 09600779, 110869, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110869 | |
29. | Cristiana J. Silva, Stability and optimal control of a delayed HIV/AIDS-PrEP model, 2022, 15, 1937-1632, 639, 10.3934/dcdss.2021156 | |
30. | Zain Ul Abadin Zafar, Samina Younas, Sumera Zaib, Cemil Tunç, An efficient numerical simulation and mathematical modeling for the prevention of tuberculosis, 2022, 15, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524522500152 | |
31. | Zain Ul Abadin Zafar, Sumera Zaib, Muhammad Tanveer Hussain, Cemil Tunç, Shumaila Javeed, Analysis and numerical simulation of tuberculosis model using different fractional derivatives, 2022, 160, 09600779, 112202, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112202 | |
32. | LEGESSE LEMECHA OBSU, OPTIMAL CONTROL ANALYSIS OF A TUBERCULOSIS MODEL, 2022, 30, 0218-3390, 837, 10.1142/S0218339022500309 | |
33. | Danylo Malyuta, Taylor P. Reynolds, Michael Szmuk, Thomas Lew, Riccardo Bonalli, Marco Pavone, Behcet Acikmese, Convex Optimization for Trajectory Generation: A Tutorial on Generating Dynamically Feasible Trajectories Reliably and Efficiently, 2022, 42, 1066-033X, 40, 10.1109/MCS.2022.3187542 | |
34. | S. L. Chasanah, Y. T. Utami, D. E. Nurvazly, B. F. H. E. Syachrannie, 2022, 2563, 0094-243X, 050004, 10.1063/5.0103442 | |
35. | Willi Semmler, Jérôme Henry, Helmut Maurer, Pandemic meltdown and economic recovery – A multi-phase dynamic model, empirics, and policy, 2023, 6, 2590051X, 100106, 10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100106 | |
36. | Hanis Nasir, A time-delay model of diabetic population: Dynamics analysis, sensitivity, and optimal control, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 115002, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1473 | |
37. | Yujiang Liu, Shujing Gao, Zhenzhen Liao, Di Chen, Dynamical behavior of a stage-structured Huanglongbing model with time delays and optimal control, 2022, 156, 09600779, 111830, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111830 | |
38. | Mohamed A. Zaitri, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres, Stability Analysis of Delayed COVID-19 Models, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 400, 10.3390/axioms11080400 | |
39. | Lela Alkhazishvili, Medea Iordanishvili, The local formula of representation of a solution for a functional differential equation with the mixed initial condition considering perturbations of delays containing in the phase coordinates and in controls, 2022, 29, 1072-947X, 1, 10.1515/gmj-2021-2123 | |
40. | Juliana Couras, Iván Area, Juan J. Nieto, Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres, 2021, Chapter 23, 978-981-16-2449-0, 509, 10.1007/978-981-16-2450-6_23 | |
41. | Abou Bakari Diabaté, Boureima Sangaré, Ousmane Koutou, Optimal control analysis of a COVID-19 and Tuberculosis (TB) co-infection model with an imperfect vaccine for COVID-19, 2023, 2254-3902, 10.1007/s40324-023-00330-8 | |
42. | A. Sakkoum, M. Lhous, M. Rachik, A. Tridane, Discrete mathematical modeling and optimal control of the marital status: Islamic polygamous marriage model case, 2023, 10, 23129794, 748, 10.23939/mmc2023.03.748 | |
43. | Oluwatosin Babasola, Evans Otieno Omondi, Kayode Oshinubi, Nancy Matendechere Imbusi, Stochastic Delay Differential Equations: A Comprehensive Approach for Understanding Biosystems with Application to Disease Modelling, 2023, 3, 2673-9909, 702, 10.3390/appliedmath3040037 | |
44. | C. Yalçın Kaya, Helmut Maurer, Optimization over the Pareto front of nonconvex multi-objective optimal control problems, 2023, 0926-6003, 10.1007/s10589-023-00535-7 | |
45. | Sibaliwe Maku Vyambwera, Peter Witbooi, Victor Kovtunenko, Optimal Intervention Strategies on TB Epidemiology in a Prison Population, 2024, 2024, 1085-3375, 10.1155/aaa/6482099 | |
46. | Krzysztof Michalak, Knowledge-based optimization in epidemics prevention, 2025, 1432-7643, 10.1007/s00500-025-10494-2 | |
47. | Sayooj Aby Jose, Raja Ramachandran, Jirawattanapanit Anuwat, Jinde Cao, Ravi P. Agarwal, A fractional derivative approach to infectious disease dynamics: modeling and optimal control strategies, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-025-02394-z |
Symbol | Description | Value |
Transmission coefficient | ||
Death and birth rate | ||
Rate at which individuals leave | ||
Proportion of individuals going to | ||
Endogenous reactivation rate for persistent latent infections | ||
Endogenous reactivation rate for treated individuals | ||
Factor reducing the risk of infection as a result of acquired immunity to a previous infection for | ||
Rate of exogenous reinfection of treated patients | 0.25 | |
Rate of recovery under treatment of active TB | ||
Rate of recovery under treatment of early latent individuals | ||
Rate of recovery under treatment of persistent latent individuals | ||
Total population | ||
Total simulation duration | ||
Efficacy of treatment of early latent | ||
Efficacy of treatment of persistent latent TB |
Symbol | Description | Value |
Transmission coefficient | ||
Death and birth rate | ||
Rate at which individuals leave | ||
Proportion of individuals going to | ||
Endogenous reactivation rate for persistent latent infections | ||
Endogenous reactivation rate for treated individuals | ||
Factor reducing the risk of infection as a result of acquired immunity to a previous infection for | ||
Rate of exogenous reinfection of treated patients | 0.25 | |
Rate of recovery under treatment of active TB | ||
Rate of recovery under treatment of early latent individuals | ||
Rate of recovery under treatment of persistent latent individuals | ||
Total population | ||
Total simulation duration | ||
Efficacy of treatment of early latent | ||
Efficacy of treatment of persistent latent TB |