Review Special Issues

Resolving environmental, social, and governance challenges: A bibliometric review of ethical supply chain management

  • This review article examined how ethical supply chain management (ESCM) strikes a complex balance between business, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and environmental governance. In ethical supply chain management, resolving the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues have become the standard matter of research. This bibliometric review represents a paradigm shift toward corporate sustainability. The article offers a comprehensive strategy for navigating the challenges that make use of technology and innovation, best practices, and compliance with laws and regulations. This lens highlights how crucial ethical factors are to improve corporate sustainability and competitiveness. This work analyzed the multidisciplinary and diversified nature of ethical supply chain management in the face of ESG. In ESCM, implementing an ESG strategy improves a company's ability to innovate, its ability to create value, and its financial performance. Overall, the social and environmental performance showed a strongly positive correlation with business sustainability, suggesting a mutually reinforcing relationship between the commercial economies and generating value for society.The review's description of the literature is useful for future investigations into the ESG elements that affect corporate investments and sustainability in ESCM. This paper explained the growing interest in ESCM's CSR concerns in more detail than just a bibliometric examination. Numerous sociological and ethical considerations can account for this interest, and a number of empirical studies show how the dynamics of financial practices and CSR activities can work in concert to good effect.

    Citation: Arpita Paul. Resolving environmental, social, and governance challenges: A bibliometric review of ethical supply chain management[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2025, 5(1): 64-86. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2025004

    Related Papers:

    [1] Don J. DeGroot, Melissa E. Landon, Steven E. Poirier . Geology and engineering properties of sensitive Boston Blue Clay at Newbury, Massachusetts. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 412-447. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.412
    [2] Paul W. Mayne, Ethan Cargill, Bruce Miller . Geotechnical characteristics of sensitive Leda clay at Canada test site in Gloucester, Ontario. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 390-411. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.390
    [3] Bruno Di Buò, Marco D’Ignazio, Juha Selänpää, Markus Haikola, Tim Länsivaara, Marta Di Sante . Investigation and geotechnical characterization of Perniö clay, Finland. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 591-616. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.591
    [4] Robert Radaszewski, Jędrzej Wierzbicki . Characterization and engineering properties of AMU Morasko soft clay. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(2): 235-264. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.2.235
    [5] Mike Long, Jean Sebastien L’Heureux, Bjørn Kristian Fiskvik Bache, Alf Kristian Lund, Svein Hove, Karl Gunnar Sødal, Helene Alexandra Amundsen, Steinar Nordal, Alberto Montafia . Site characterisation and some examples from large scale testing at the Klett quick clay research site. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 344-389. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.344
    [6] Ariane Locat, Pascal Locat, Hubert Michaud, Kevin Hébert, Serge Leroueil, Denis Demers . Geotechnical characterization of the Saint-Jude clay, Quebec, Canada. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(2): 273-302. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.2.273
    [7] Sonia Fanelli, Fabien Szymkiewicz, Philippe Reiffsteck . The Cran experimental site in Brittany: 50 years of geotechnical investigations and on site testing. AIMS Geosciences, 2025, 11(3): 540-557. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2025023
    [8] Øyvind Blaker, Roselyn Carroll, Priscilla Paniagua, Don J. DeGroot, Jean-Sebastien L'Heureux . Halden research site: geotechnical characterization of a post glacial silt. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(2): 184-234. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.2.184
    [9] Tonje Eide Helle, Per Aagaard, Steinar Nordal, Michael Long, Sara Bazin . A geochemical, mineralogical and geotechnical characterization of the low plastic, highly sensitive glaciomarine clay at Dragvoll, Norway. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(4): 704-722. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.4.704
    [10] Don J. DeGroot, Tom Lunne, Ravindra Ghanekar, Siren Knudsen, Cody D. Jones, Tor Inge Yetginer-Tjelta . Engineering properties of low to medium overconsolidation ratio offshore clays. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 535-567. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.535
  • This review article examined how ethical supply chain management (ESCM) strikes a complex balance between business, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and environmental governance. In ethical supply chain management, resolving the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues have become the standard matter of research. This bibliometric review represents a paradigm shift toward corporate sustainability. The article offers a comprehensive strategy for navigating the challenges that make use of technology and innovation, best practices, and compliance with laws and regulations. This lens highlights how crucial ethical factors are to improve corporate sustainability and competitiveness. This work analyzed the multidisciplinary and diversified nature of ethical supply chain management in the face of ESG. In ESCM, implementing an ESG strategy improves a company's ability to innovate, its ability to create value, and its financial performance. Overall, the social and environmental performance showed a strongly positive correlation with business sustainability, suggesting a mutually reinforcing relationship between the commercial economies and generating value for society.The review's description of the literature is useful for future investigations into the ESG elements that affect corporate investments and sustainability in ESCM. This paper explained the growing interest in ESCM's CSR concerns in more detail than just a bibliometric examination. Numerous sociological and ethical considerations can account for this interest, and a number of empirical studies show how the dynamics of financial practices and CSR activities can work in concert to good effect.



    Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths globally, accounting for 24% cases of all cancer deaths [1,2]. The mortality-to-incidence ratio of lung cancer is 0.87 globally, indicating the poor outcomes of lung cancer [3]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% cases of lung cancers, of which lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype [4]. Lung cancer is often diagnosed at a late stage with concomitant poor prognosis [5]. The prognosis of lung cancer is associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM). It was reported that 5-year survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients with LNM was only 26–53% while 5-year survival of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma without LNM was over 95% [6,7]. Therefore, screening specific markers of lymph node metastasis of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma would be helpful for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

    Various biomolecules such as proteins, mRNA, miRNA, methylated DNA, lncRNA, etc. have been implemented as cancer biomarkers. Among which miRNA is emerging as a useful tool. The miRNAs are a class of non-coding RNAs that post-transcriptionally control gene expression via either translational repression or mRNA degradation. Evidence reveals that miRNAs play significant roles in regulatory mechanisms including tumorigenesis [8,9]. Multiple studies have shown that tumor-derived miRNAs can persist in human plasma in a very stable form, thus serving as potential biomarkers to facilitate the early detection of lung cancer [10,11]. Compared with single miRNA biomarker, a miRNA signature comprising multiple miRNAs may improve prediction accuracy and would be more powerful in classifying cancer subtypes [12,13]. To our knowledge, no studies have worked on LNM prediction in LUAD using miRNA signatures. Therefore, we constructed a miRNA signature to predict metastasis of lymph node in LUAD and hypothesized that the signature achieves high accuracy for prediction.

    Transcriptome data including microRNA expression and mRNA expression for lung adenocarcinoma patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) on July 3rd 2019. Tumor staging, sex and other corresponding clinical data were obtained from TCGA clinical information. MiRNA expressions were available for 342 patients without distant metastases. Only miRNAs with a trimmed mean of 95% larger than 5 counts were retained in the profile.

    Patients were randomly partitioned into training and validation cohorts, with t-test, Fisher's exact test and chi-square test proving no significant difference of patients' characteristics between two cohorts. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used in training cohort to minimize multicollinearity [14]. The 10-fold cross validation was applied in LASSO to select the optimal tuning parameters (λ) via the minimum criteria, and the optimal λ value of 0.054 with log(λ) = −1.268 was chosen. Logistic regression model was used to construct the final miRNA disease signature to determine patients with lymph node metastasis. The logistic regression formula formed in the training cohort was then applied to validation cohort. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under ROC curve (AUC) value was calculated to validate the performance of LMN prediction. To evaluate the clinical application value of signature, decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted by R studio. A heatmap was plotted using TB tools (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools) to differentiate miRNA expression between the patients with or without LMN [15]. All statistical analysis were conducted using SPSS Version 23.0 software or package "rmda" within the R statistical software version 3.6.0. Two-tailed tests and p values < 0.05 for significance were used.

    miRWalk database (http://www.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk/) was used to predict the transcriptional target-genes of identified miRNAs [16]. We conducted miRNA-target gene interaction networks with miRNA-target gene interacting pairs, and the miRNA-mRNA interaction network was visualized by Cytoscape (version 3.7.1) software (http://cytoscape.org/) [17].

    TCGA-LUAD cohort was randomly divided into a training set (n = 259) and a validation set (n = 83). The mean age of all patients in the study was 65.2 ± 9.9,174 (50.9%) females, 168 (49.1%) males and 123 (36.0%) had lymph node metastasis. The demographics of training and validation cohorts were well balanced, as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Clinical characteristic of the training and validation cohorts.
    Characteristics Training cohort Validation cohort p Value
    N 259 83
    LNM 89 (34.4%) 34 (41%) 0.295(a)
    Age 65.29 ± 9.97 65.06 ± 9.83 0.864(b)
    Sex
    female 134 (51.7%) 40 (48.2%)
    male 125 (48.3%) 43 (51.8%) 0.615(b)
    T stage
    T1 81 (31.1%) 21 (25.3%) 0.686(c)
    T2 147 (56.8%) 49 (59%)
    T3 21 (8.8%) 9 (10.8%)
    T4 10 (4.1%) 4 (4.9%)
    Cigarettes smoked per year(d) 39.85 ± 23.12 42.07 ± 27.54 0.609(a)
    Event
    alive 149 (57.5%) 56 (67.5%) 0.207(c)
    dead 103 (39.8%) 25 (30.1%)
    unknown 9 (2.7%) 2 (2.4%)
    (a)The p value was calculated by Fisher's exact test. (b)The p value was calculated by the t test. (c)The p value was calculated by the χ2 test. (d)Number of packets of cigarettes smoked per year by the patients.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the training cohort, a total of 387 miRNAs were put into the LASSO logistic regression program and 10 of them had non-zero coefficients as potential predictors (Figure 1A). The selected 10 miRNAs were hsa-miR-30d, hsa-miR-338, hsa-miR-582, hsa-miR-378a, hsa-miR-3065, hsa-miR-664a, hsa-miR-552, hsa-miR-3653, hsa-miR-4728 and hsa-miR-376b. To simplify the signature, each miRNA was removed from the disease signature sequentially to analyze AUC in testing cohort. Based on the fact that the removal of has-miR-3653 led to greater AUC, we excluded it in our signature. Given hsa-miR-598 [18], hsa-miR-891a [19], hsa-miR-509-3 [20] and hsa-miR-133a [21] have been reported to have significant prognostic value in LUAD, we then included them. A 13-miRNA signature was established using logistic regression. The patient risk score was derived by the summation of each miRNA expression levels times its corresponding coefficient. The risk score for lymph node metastasis was calculated as follows: Risk score = (0.00002 × miR-30d) + (-0.000053 × miR-338) + (0.000113 × miR-582) + (0.000412 × miR-378a) + (-0.000767 × miR-3065) + (-0.002072 × miR-664a) + (-0.006408 × miR-598) + (-0.002753 × miR-552) + (0.002608 × miR-891a) + (0.007073 × miR-5093) + (-0.016114 × miR-133a1) + (-0.009681 × miR-4728) + (0.042837 × miR-376b) - 0.456838.

    Figure 1.  Selection of features by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) binary logistic regression model and miRNA signature for the prediction of LNM. (A) Tuning parameters (λ) selected in the LASSO model applied 10-fold cross-validation via the minimum criteria. The Y-axis indicates the binomial deviances. The lower X-axis indicates the log(λ). Numbers along the upper X-axis represent the average number of predictors. Red dots indicate average deviance values for each model with a given λ. Vertical bars through the red dots show the upper and lower limits of the deviances. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the optimal values using the minimum criteria with 1 standard error (the 1-SE criteria). Theoptimal λ value of 0.054 with log(λ) = −1.268 was chosen; (B, C) the ROC curve of the radiomics signature. ROC, receiver operator characteristic. (D) DCA for the miRNA disease signature. The Y-axis represents net benefit. The X-axis represents threshold probability. The threshold probability is where the expected benefit of treatment is equal to the expected benefit of avoiding treatment. The red line represents 13-miRNA signature model. The blue line represents the hypothesis that all patients have lymph node metastases (LNM). The black line represents the hypothesis that no patients had LNM.

    We evaluated the accuracy of the 13-miRNA signature in training cohort and validation cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) value were 0.782 (95% CI, 0.725–0.839) and 0.691 (95% CI, 0.575–0.806) respectively (Figure 1B, C). We calculated the AUC values of different sex, age and T-stage subetaoup to validate the performance of our miRNA signature in these diverse subsets. As shown in Table 2, the AUC value was high in all subetaoups ranging from 0.600 to 0.811. Notably, the AUC value reached 0.811 in patients aged over 80 years old. Hence, the signature showed good performance in both training and validation cohorts. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) is shown in Figure 1D. If the threshold probability of a patient was between 0.2 and 0.6, the miRNA signature for predicting LNM would be more beneficial than the strategies "treat all" or "treat none". For example, at the 0.25 threshold, the net benefit was 14.6% (95% CI, 7.6–22.0%) in the treat-all model, 20.7% (95% CI, 15.7–27.0%) in our disease signature model. The net benefit of the disease signature model was significantly higher compared with the treat-none strategy at thresholds ≤ 0.63. Thus, our signature was considered clinically valuable. The differences of thirteen-miRNA expression between patients with LNM or without LNM were shown in Figure 2. The expression levels of miR-30d, miR-376b, miR-378a, miR-503-9, miR-582 and miR-891a in patients with LNM were relatively higher than patients without LNM, while the expression levels of the miR-133a, miR-3065, miR-338, miR-4728, miR-552, miR-598 and miR-664a were lower in patients with LNM. Therefore, the results of DCA and gene expression distribution both proved our miRNAs signature had good predict validation.

    Table 2.  AUC value and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) in different sex, age and T-stage subgroups.
    N AUC 95% CI
    Overall 342 0.757 (0.705, 0.809)
    Age
    ≤ 49 22 0.709 (0.483, 0.935)
    50–59 71 0.694 (0.568, 0.820)
    60–69 108 0.753 (0.657, 0.849)
    ≥ 70 122 0.811 (0.733, 0.889)
    Sex
    M 168 0.774 (0.703, 0.844)
    F 174 0.738 (0.661, 0.816)
    T-stage
    T1 102 0.697 (0.569, 0.825)
    T2 196 0.765 (0.699, 0.831)
    T3 30 0.787 (0.623, 0.952)
    T4 14 0.600 (0.284, 0.916)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  Expression of miRNAs in signature in the lymph node metastasis group versus non-lymph node metastasis group. Red indicates high relative expression and green indicates low relative expression.

    A total of 8968 mRNAs were identified from the TCGA database, of which 325 mRNAs were differentially expressed between lung adenocarcinoma patients with LNM and those without LNM (fold change > 20, P < 0.05). The next step was to deduce mRNAs targeted by miRNAs. We focused on the 13 miRNAs in our signature and 27 out of 325 differentially expressed mRNAs were identified as potential targets using miRWalk database.

    Based on the data collected, we constructed a miRNA-mRNA regulatory network using Cytoscape 3.7 (Figure 3). A total of 184 interactions were identified in this network. Among them, hsa-miR-378a, hsa-miR-4728, hsa-miR-598, hsa-miR-3065, hsa-miR-338, hsa-miR-509-3, hsa-miR-552, hsa-miR-664a, hsa-miR-891a regulated the most target mRNAs. LIPF, NEUROD4, PSG4, PPPIR3A, DAZ2, CRAISP1 were putatively regulated by most miRNAs and may have a potential role in lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

    Figure 3.  The proposed regulatory network between DEMIs and DEMs associated with lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. The rectangular and ellipses represent the miRNAs and mRNAs, respectively. The red and green rings indicated relatively up-regulated and down-regulated expression in lung adenocarcinoma patients with LNM, respectively.

    Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, contributing to 1.8 million deaths in 2018 alone [22,23]. Involvement of the regional lymph nodes is a characteristic feature of early stage of tumor growth in NSCLC, and "N status" is a major factor clinical management of this subtype [24]. NSCLC patients with LNM often have poor prognosis and high mortality. It was reported that 5-year survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients without LNM was over 95% while 5-year survival of mid-stage or late-stage cancer patients with LNM was only 30% [7]. Therefore, lymph node metastasis is closely associated with prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma and its accurate prediction is helpful to instigate early treatment to improve patient outcomes.

    MiRNA signatures of lung cancer are commonly used to predict the survival time of cancer patients [25,26]. However, survival time is easily swayed by healthcare qualities, psychological condition and treatment options etc. Lymph nodes metastases is just a status of cancer disease, which is highly related to gene expressions. Thus, prediction of lymph nodes metastases with miRNA is more reasonable and objective compared to prediction of survival time. For the first time, we developed a miRNA disease signature to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Although previous studies have identified miRNA signatures that correlate with overall survival, their clinical use was limited owing to LUAD patients' significant heterogeneity from multiple aspects like pathology, treatment plans, surgical options, healthcare services and psychological conditions. Each of these aspects may significantly influence patients' overall survival rates, thus contributing to the unreliability of survival prediction. Using the TCGA lung adenocarcinoma cohort, we constructed a 13-miRNA signature with satisfying AUC values to predict LNM of LUAD. Our signature focused on the factors associated with lymph node metastasis instead of overall survival, whose evaluation were more objective, thereby conceiving great clinical value. More importantly, the prediction of lymph node metastasis serves as a distinct approach to the evaluation of patients' prognosis and could be implemented as an important indicator for physicians to pick proper treatment plans. For patients at T1 and T2 stage, the signature had AUC values of 0.697 and 0.765 respectively, indicating its good performance in early stage lung adenocarcinoma. And the higher T stage, the better prediction accuracy was achieved. In addition, our signature worked better in elder populations, as patients above 50 years old had a higher AUC value compared to younger patients.

    The miRNAs in our signature were known to function in oncogenesis in lung cancer, or have reported to have prognostic value. In our signature, miR-582, miR-378a, miR-891a, miR-509-3, miR-376b were upregulated in LUAD patients with lymph node metastasis. Fang et al. reported that in NSCLC, miR-582-3p had an activating effect on Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the overexpression of which targets several negative receptors, AXIN2, DKK3 and SFRP1, in the pathway, thereby promoting tumorigenesis and tumor recurrence [27]. Contrarily, miR-582-5p was also reported to suppress the growth and invasion of NSCLC cell by targeting NOTCH1 and MAP3K2 [28,29]. MiR-378 overexpression could decrease the expression of HMOX1 and p53 while enhancing that of MUC5AC, vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-8, and Ang-1, thereby promoting proliferation, migration, and stimulation of endothelial cells in NSCLC cell lines [30]. Overexpression of miR-891a was observed in NSCLC and it negatively regulated HOXA5, a tumor suppressor gene whose gene product could up-regulate the expression of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene [31]. The result was further proved by a study, showing miR-891a-5p was found to present at significantly higher level in lung cancer compared with control sample [32]. MiR-509-3 could repress PLK1 expression for inhibiting cancer proliferation and sensitizes cells to DNA damage agents, which provides insights into future optimization of chemotherapy [33]. In breast cancer and renal cell carcinoma, miR-509-3 played a similar role in suppressing cell invasion and migration [34,35]. Korkmaz et al. found that overexpression of miR-376b lowered the levels of ATG4C and BECN1 to control autophagy [36].

    On the other hand, miR-30d, miR-338, miR-3065, miR-664a, miR-598, miR-552, miR-133a-1, mirR4728 were down-regulated in LUAD patients with lymph node metastasis. MiR-30d-5p, an often down-regulated miRNA in NSCLC tissues, could target cyclin E2 (CCNE2) to inhibit the growth, distribution and motility of NSCLC cells [37]. Similarly, miR-338-3p could suppress the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells by targeting integrin β3, a metastasis related protein or Sox4, an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related transcription factor [38,39]. A negative correlation was observed between the expression of miR-338-3p and insulin receptor substrate 2, an oncogene, suggesting a new way for miR-338-3p to suppress tumor [40]. MiR-3065 was reported to target some lung squamous cell carcinoma lncRNAs, but its role in oncogenesis has not yet been studied in lung adenocarcinoma [41]. The presence of miR-664 may enhance the proliferation and migration in lung cancer cell lines while inhibiting apoptosis [42]. Overexpression of miR-598 could inhibit tumor cell metastasis in NSCLC in vivo and negatively regulates Derlin-1 and EMT to suppress cancer cell invasion and metastasis in vitro [43]. Inhibitory effect of miR-598 overexpression to LNM was also observed in NSCLC cells by targeting zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 [44]. Xu et al. found a positive feedback loop between LINC01296, Twist1 and miR-598, indicating a potential target for therapeutic strategy [45]. MiR-552 was mainly reported in colorectal cancer as a negative prognostic indicator and may potentially be used to predict the origin of lung carcinoma, namely differentiating primary lung adenocarcinoma and colorectal cancer metastases [46–48]. Studies have also concluded that overexpression of miR-133a could suppress cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis in lung cancer cell lines by suppressing the expressions of matrix metalloproteinase MMP14 and oncogenic receptors including insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), TGF-beta receptor type-1 (TGFBR1), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [49,50]. Clinical studies also confirmed that the expression of miR-133a negatively associated with the status of N classification and MMP-14 expression [51]. The role of mir-4728 in lung cancer has yet been reported, but it served as a negative regulator for of MAPK signaling through directly targeting the ERK upstream kinase MST4 to suppress cancer cell proliferation in vitro [52].

    These studies demonstrated the association between expression of these miRNAs and lymph node metastasis. Identified miRNAs in our signature and the interactions between miRNA and mRNA is helpful to increase our understanding for the pathogenesis and lymph node metastasis of LUAD. Moreover, determination of these miRNAs and pathways could serve as potential therapeutic targets for treatments in lung cancer and provide insights into future clinical use.

    It should be noted that although miRNAs in our signature have demonstrated functions in cell migration, invasion and other developmental processes, there was little overlap between our miRNAs and the ones reported in other signatures that predicted overall survival, possibly due to different methodology and distinct expected outcomes. Concerning that mRNAs reported in our miRNA-mRNA regulatory network have yet been reported, investigations are warranted to look into these genes. One other limitation is that both our training and validation cohorts were obtained from TCGA database. External validation sets and experimental validation in biological function of these miRNAs may suggest further implications of lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma.

    This work was supported by Zhejiang Medical and Health Project (2019334185), Zhejiang Natural Sciences Foundation Grant (LQ17H160011, LY17H160029, LY18H160007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81602635, 81703072), Zhejiang Medical Innovative Discipline Construction Project-2016 and the Innovation research grant program for 8-year-system medical students at Zhejiang University (No.119000-5405A1).

    The authors declare no competing interests.



    [1] Ashby A, Leat M, Hudson-Smith M (2012) Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Manag 17: 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258573 doi: 10.1108/13598541211258573
    [2] UNPRI. Principles for Responsible Investment. (2006). Available from: https://www.swedfund.se/media/1038/un-priprinciples-for-responsible-investment.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2023).
    [3] Widyawati L (2020) A Systematic Literature Review of Socially Responsible Investment and Environmental Social Governance Metrics. Bus Strat Environ 29: 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393 doi: 10.1002/bse.2393
    [4] Hayat U, Orsagh M (2015) Environmental, social, and governance issues in investing. Codes Standards and Position Papers 11.
    [5] Bernow S, Klempner B, Magnin (2017) From 'why' to 'why not': Sustainable investing as the new normal. McKinsey & Company.
    [6] Husted BW, de Sousa-Filho JM (2017) The impact of sustainability governance, country stakeholder orientation, and country risk on environmental, social, and governance performance. J Cleaner Product 155: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.025
    [7] Bernardi C, Stark AW (2018) Environmental, social and governance disclosure, integrated reporting, and the accuracy of analyst forecasts. British Account Rev 50: 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.001
    [8] Orij R (2010) Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Account Audit Accountability J.
    [9] Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, et al. (2011) Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Account Rev 86: 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCR.00000005 doi: 10.2308/ACCR.00000005
    [10] Chopra SS, Senadheera SS, Dissanayake PD, et al. (2024) Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development. Sustainability 16: 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606 doi: 10.3390/su16020606
    [11] Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Yuan Z, et al.(2021) Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. The Innovation 2: 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180 doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180
    [12] Sarkar B, Debnath A, Chiu A, Ahmed W (2022) Circular economy-driven two-stage supply chain management for nullifying waste. J Cleaner Product 339: 130513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130513 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130513
    [13] Sarkar B, Sao S, Ghosh SK (2025) Smart production and photocatalytic ultraviolet (PUV) wastewater treatment effect on a textile supply chain management. Int J Product Econom 283: 109557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109557 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109557
    [14] Gupta A, Sharma U, Gupta SK (2021) The role of ESG in sustainable development: An analysis through the lens of machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC) Virtual, 2–4: 1–5. 10.1109/IHTC53077.2021.9698939
    [15] Galletta S, Mazzù S, Naciti V (2022) A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the banking industry: From the current status to future directions. Res Int Business Finance 62: 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684
    [16] Palumbo R, Manesh MF, Pellegrini MM, et al. (2021) Organizing a Sustainable Smart Urban Ecosystem: Perspectives and Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. J Cleaner Product 297: 126622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126622 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126622
    [17] Siders AR (2019) Adaptive capacity to climate change: A synthesis of concepts, methods, and findings in a fragmented field. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev Climate Change 10: e573. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.573 doi: 10.1002/wcc.573
    [18] Luo J, Han H, Jia F, et al. (2020) Agricultural co-operatives in the western world: A bibliometric analysis. J Cleaner Product 273: 122945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122945 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122945
    [19] Li L, Sun W, Hu W, et al. (2021) Impact of natural and social environmental factors on building energy consumption: Based on Bibliometrics. J Build Eng 37: 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102136 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102136
    [20] Paulraj A, Chen IJ, Blome C (2017) Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective. J Business Ethics 145: 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0 doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0
    [21] Boström M, Jönsson AM, Lockie S, et al. (2015) Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities. J Cleaner Product 107: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050
    [22] Short JL, Toffel MW, Hugill AR (2016) Monitoring global supply chains. Strat Manag J 37: 1878–1897. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2417 doi: 10.1002/smj.2417
    [23] Gjergji R, Vena L, Sciascia S, et al. (2021) The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosure on the cost of capital in small and medium enterprises: The role of family business status. Business Strat Environ 30: 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2647 doi: 10.1002/bse.2647
    [24] Ahmad H, Yaqub M, Lee SH (2024) Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: A scientometric review of global trends. Environ Develop Sustain 26: 2965–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x
    [25] Chen L, Zhang L, Huang J, et al. (2021) Social responsibility portfolio optimization incorporating ESG criteria. J Manag Sci Eng 6: 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.005
    [26] Li RYM, Li B, Zhu X, et al. (2022) Modularity Clustering of Economic Development and ESG Attributes in Prefabricated Building Research. Front Environ Sci 10: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.977887 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.977887
    [27] Amaeshi K, Osuji O, Nnodim P (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A Boundaryless Responsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications. J Business Ethics 81: 223–234. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.947583 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.947583
    [28] Çodur S, Erkayman B(2025) Blockchain Technology from The Supply Chain Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review. Spectr. Decis. Mak. Appl 2: 268–285. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap21202520 doi: 10.31181/sdmap21202520
    [29] Tufan D, Ulutaş A (2026) Supplier Selection in the Food Sector: An Integrated Approach Using LODECI and CORASO Methods. Spectrum Decision Making Appl 3: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap31202631 doi: 10.31181/sdmap31202631
    [30] Mehdiabadi A, Sadeghi A, Karbassi YA, et al. (2024) Sustainability service chain capabilities in the oil and gas industry: A fuzzy hybrid approach SWARA-MABAC. Spectrum Operat Res 2: 92–112. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202512 doi: 10.31181/sor21202512
    [31] Badi I, Bouraima MB, Stević Ž, et al. (2024) Optimizing Vendor-Managed Inventory in Multi-Tier Distribution Systems. Spectrum Operat Res 1: 33–44. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor1120243 doi: 10.31181/sor1120243
    [32] Del Bosco B, Misani N (2016) The effect of cross-listing on the environmental, social, and governance performance of firms. J World Business 51: 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.002
    [33] Aftab J, Abid N, Sarwar H, et al. (2024) Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility. Corporate Soc Respons Environ Manag 31: 1634–1653. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2654 doi: 10.1002/csr.2654
    [34] Wickert C (2021) Corporate social responsibility research in the Journal of Management Studies: A shift from a business-centric to a society-centric focus. J Manag Studies 58: E1–E17. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12775 doi: 10.1111/joms.12775
    [35] Sarwar H, Aftab J, Ishaq MI, et al. (2023) Achieving business competitiveness through corporate social responsibility and dynamic capabilities: An empirical evidence from emerging economy. J Cleaner Product 386: 135820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.202 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.202
    [36] Di Vaio A, Latif B, Gunarathne N, et al.(2023) Digitalization and artificial knowledge for accountability in SCM: A systematic literature review. J Enterp Inform Manag 37: 606–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2022-0275 doi: 10.1108/JEIM-08-2022-0275
    [37] Buallay A (2020) Sustainability reporting and firm's performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. Int J Product Perform Manag 69: 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371 doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371
    [38] Ricart JE, Rey C (2022) Purpose in corporate governance: The path towards a more sustainable world. Sustainability 14: 4384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084384 doi: 10.3390/su14084384
    [39] Chung J, Cho CH (2018) Current trends within social and environmental accounting research: A literature review. Account Perspect 17: 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12171 doi: 10.1111/1911-3838.12171
    [40] Boffo R, Patalano R (2020) Esg investing: Practices, progress and challenges.OECD. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-Challenges.pdf
    [41] Paolone F, Pozzoli M, Chhabra M, et al. (2024) Cultural and gender diversity for ESG performance towards knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from European banks. J Knowl Manag 28: 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2023-0445 doi: 10.1108/JKM-05-2023-0445
    [42] Vishali M, Muhammed Shafi MK (2025) Visualizing socially responsible investment (SRI) trends across Asian countries: A bibliometric and network analysis. Total Qual Manag Business Excell 36: 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2025.2475895 doi: 10.1080/14783363.2025.2475895
    [43] Nemoto N, Morgan PJ (2020) Environmental, social, and governance investment: Opportunities and risks for Asia.Asian Development Bank Institute.
    [44] Sloggett J, Gerritsen D (2016) A practical guide to ESG integration for equity investing. PRI Association.
    [45] Bass BM, Steidlmeier P (1999) Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quart 10: 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00016-8 doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00016-8
    [46] Detert JR, Treviñ LK, Sweitzer VL (2008) Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. J Appl Psychol 93: 374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374
    [47] Aluchna M, Roszkowska-Menkes M (2019) Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate governance at the company level. Towards a conceptual model. Eng Econom 30: 349–361. https://doi.org/10.5755/J01.EE.30.3.17511 doi: 10.5755/J01.EE.30.3.17511
    [48] O'riordan L, Fairbrass J (2008) Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. J Business Ethics 83: 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9662-y doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9662-y
    [49] Bocean CG, Nicolescu MM, Cazacu M, et al. (2022) The role of social responsibility and ethics in employees' wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 8838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148838 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148838
    [50] Panigrahi SS, Bahinipati B, Jain V (2019) Sustainable supply chain management: A review of literature and implications for future research. Manag Environ Qual Int J 30: 1001–1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0003 doi: 10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0003
    [51] Oshioste E, Okoye C, Udokwu S (2023) The effectiveness of CSR in sustainable development: A case-study of Total's oil exploration activities in the Niger-Delta region. Econom Growth Environ Sustain (EGNES). https://doi.org/10.26480/egnes.02.2023.57.65
    [52] Oyewole AT, Okoye CC, Ofodile OC, et al. (2024) Reviewing predictive analytics in supply chain management: Applications and benefits. World J Adv Res Rev 21: 568–574. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0673 doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0673
    [53] Mark-Herbert C, Von Schantz C (2007) Communicating corporate social responsibility–brand management. EJBO-Electronic J Business Ethics and Organization Studies.
    [54] Men LR (2014) Internal reputation management: The impact of authentic leadership and transparent communication. Corporate Reput Rev 17: 254–272.
    [55] Maloni MJ, Brown ME (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. J Business Ethics 68: 35–52.
    [56] Yawar SA, Seuring S (2017) Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. J Business Ethics 141: 621–643.
    [57] Mubarik M, Raja Mohd Rasi RZ, Mubarak MF, et al. (2021) Impact of blockchain technology on green supply chain practices: evidence from emerging economy. Manag Environ Qual Int J 32: 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0277 doi: 10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0277
    [58] Kurth T, Wübbels G, Portafaix A, et al. (2021) The biodiversity crisis is a business crisis. Boston Consulting Group: Boston, MA, USA.
    [59] Eyo-Udo NL, Odimarha AC, Kolade OO (2024) Ethical supply chain management: balancing profit, social responsibility, and environmental stewardship. Int J Manag Entrepreneurship Res 6: 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i4.985 doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i4.985
    [60] Hadjor TK (2010) Task force on financial literacy. 866: 1–19.
    [61] Park S R, Jang JY (2021) The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional Investors' perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. Int J Financ Studies 9: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048 doi: 10.3390/ijfs9030048
    [62] McBrien M, Zimonyi M, Astley D (2021) Climate disclosure standards board (CDSB). World scientific encyclopedia of climate change: Case studies of climate risk, action, and opportunity. World Sci 3: 29–36 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811213960_0006 doi: 10.1142/9789811213960_0006
    [63] Madison N, Schiehll E (2021)The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability 13: 3652. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073652 doi: 10.3390/su13073652
    [64] Sloggett J, Gerritsen D (2016) A practical guide to ESG integration for equity investing. PRI Association.
    [65] Hill J (2020) Environmental, Social, and governance (ESG) investing: A balanced analysis of the theory and practice of a sustainable portfolio. Academic Press.
    [66] Denyer D, Tranfield D (2009) Chapter 39 Producing a Systematic Review. In: Buchanan, D. and Bryman, A., Eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Editors Sage Publications Ltd., London. 671–689.
    [67] Jafari H (2015) Logistics flexibility: A systematic literature review. Int J Product Perform Manag 64: 947–970. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2014-0069 doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2014-0069
    [68] Transfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Mean of Systematic Review. British J Manag 14: 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
    [69] Mohamed Shaffril HA, Samsuddin SF, Abu Samah A (2021) The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Qual Quant 55: 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6 doi: 10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
    [70] Ampiaw RE, Yaqub M, Lee W (2021) Electrolyzed water as a disinfectant: A systematic review of factors affecting the production and efficiency of hypochlorous acid. J Water Process Eng 43: 102228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102228 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102228
    [71] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647
    [72] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 10: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
    [73] Truant E, Borlatto E, Crocco E, et al. (2024) Environmental, social and governance issues in supply chains. A systematic review for strategic performance. J Cleaner Product 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140024
    [74] Siao HJ, Gau SH, Kuo JH, et al. (2022) Bibliometric analysis of environmental, social, and governance management research from 2002 to 2021. Sustainability 14: 16121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316121 doi: 10.3390/su142316121
    [75] Biermann F, Kanie N, Kim RE (2017) Global Governance by Goal-Setting: The Novel Approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion Environ Sustain 26–27: 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
    [76] Sila I, Cek K (2017) The impact of environmental, social and governance dimensions of corporate social responsibility on economic performance: Australian evidence. Proced Computer Sci 120: 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.310 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.310
    [77] Shao BBM, Lin WT (2016) Assessing output performance of information technology service industries: Productivity, innovation and catch-up. Int J Product Econom 172: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.026
    [78] Mastromarco C, Simar L (2015) Effect of FDI and time on catching up: New insights from a conditional nonparametric frontier analysis. J Appl Econom 30: 826–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2382 doi: 10.1002/jae.2382
    [79] Ahmad R, Shahzad K, Ishaq MI, et al. (2023) Supply chain agility and firm performance: testing serial mediations in pharmaceutical industry. Business Process Manag J 29: 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v13n2p74 doi: 10.5539/ibr.v13n2p74
    [80] Sun L, Ong TS, Teh BH, et al. (2024) Sustainable performance measurement through digital transformation within the sustainable development framework: The mediating effect of supply chain concentration. Sustain Develop 32: 5895–5912. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3007 doi: 10.1002/sd.3007
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Gustav Grimstad, Michael Long, Davood Dadrasajirlou, Seyed Ali Ghoreishian Amiri, Investigation of Development of the Earth Pressure Coefficient at Rest in Clay During Creep in the Framework of Hyper-Viscoplasticity, 2021, 21, 1532-3641, 04020235, 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001883
    2. Georg H. Erharter, Simon Oberhollenzer, Anna Fankhauser, Roman Marte, Thomas Marcher, Learning decision boundaries for cone penetration test classification, 2021, 36, 1093-9687, 489, 10.1111/mice.12662
    3. Jean-Sebastien L’Heureux, Tom Lunne, Characterization and Engineering properties of Natural Soils used for Geotesting, 2020, 6, 2471-2132, 35, 10.3934/geosci.2020004
    4. Jordan Aaron, 2022, 9780128182352, 46, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818234-5.00157-7
    5. Stefan Ritter, Priscilla Paniagua, Caroline Berge Hansen, Gerard Cornelissen, Biochar amendment for improved and more sustainable peat stabilisation, 2022, 1755-0750, 1, 10.1680/jgrim.22.00023
    6. Gerardo W Quirós, Patricia M Peters, Kuat C Gan, Combining NSP- and CPTu-based Nkt to evaluate undrained shear strength, 2023, 9, 2471-2132, 95, 10.3934/geosci.2023007
    7. Tonje Eide Helle, Marianne Kvennås, Bob Hamel, Stein-Are Strand, Geir Svanø, Bjørn Kristian Fiskvik Bache, Anders Samstad Gylland, Eigil Haugen, Christian Sætre, Toril Wiig, Atle Horn, Potassium chloride wells used as quick-clay landslide mitigation: installation procedures, cost–benefit analysis, and recommendations for design, 2022, 59, 0008-3674, 1660, 10.1139/cgj-2021-0230
    8. Toralv Berre, Tom Lunne, Jean-Sebastien L’Heureux, Quantification of sample disturbance for soft, lightly overconsolidated, sensitive clay samples, 2022, 59, 0008-3674, 300, 10.1139/cgj-2020-0551
    9. Sølve Hov, Priscilla Paniagua, Christian Sætre, Håkon Rueslåtten, Ingvild Størdal, Martin Mengede, Caroline Mevik, Lime-cement stabilisation of Trondheim clays and its impact on carbon dioxide emissions, 2022, 62, 00380806, 101162, 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101162
    10. Michael Long, Priscilla Paniagua, Gustav Grimstad, Andrew Trafford, Samson Degago, Jean-Sebastien L'Heureux, Engineering properties of Norwegian peat for calculation of settlements, 2022, 308, 00137952, 106799, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106799
    11. Mike Long, Priscilla Paniagua, Gustav Grimstad, Andrew Trafford, Samson Degago, Jean-Sebastien L'Heureux, Engineering Properties of Norwegian Peat for Calculation of Settlements, 2021, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.3978360
    12. Priscilla Paniagua, Stefan Ritter, Mari Moseid, Gudny Okkenhaug, 2023, Bioashes and Steel Slag as Alternative Binders in Ground Improvement of Quick Clays, 9780784484661, 25, 10.1061/9780784484661.003
    13. Stefan Ritter, Priscilla Paniagua, Gerard Cornelissen, 2023, Biochar in Quick Clay Stabilization: Reducing Carbon Footprint and Improving Shear Strength, 9780784484661, 15, 10.1061/9780784484661.002
    14. Santiago Quinteros, Antonio Carraro, Jean-Sébastien L’Heureux, Anne-Lise Berggren, A. Viana da Fonseca, C. Ferreira, Disturbance of sand samples obtained by piston samplers and ground freezing, 2024, 544, 2267-1242, 03001, 10.1051/e3sconf/202454403001
    15. Iason Papaioannou, Oindrila Kanjilal, Thi Minh Hue Le, Anteneh Biru Tsegaye, Jean-Sébastien L’Heureux, 2023, Dealing with Uncertainties in Detecting and Characterizing Quick Clay in Norway, 9780784484975, 404, 10.1061/9780784484975.042
    16. Demetrious C. Koutsoftas, Discussion of “Effect of Viscoplasticity on Localization in Saturated Clays and Plastic Silts”, 2024, 150, 1090-0241, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11994
    17. Erik R. Sørlie, Quoc A. Tran, Gudmund R. Eiksund, Samson A. Degago, Heidi Kjennbakken, Tonni F. Johansen, Experimental study on erosion of clays during rapid flows, 2024, 312, 00298018, 119357, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119357
    18. Luisa Dhimitri, John J.M. Powell, A. Viana da Fonseca, C. Ferreira, Constrained modulus of fine-grained soils from in situ-based correlations and comparison with laboratory tests, 2024, 544, 2267-1242, 17003, 10.1051/e3sconf/202454417003
    19. Thi Minh Hue Le, Saman Tavakoli, Jean-Sebastien L’Heureux, Iason Papaioannou, 2024, Chapter 123, 978-981-99-9721-3, 1815, 10.1007/978-981-99-9722-0_123
    20. Solve Hov, Priscilla Paniagua, Christian Sætre, Mike Long, Gerard Cornelissen, Stefan Ritter, Stabilisation of Soft Clay, Quick Clay and Peat by Industrial By-Products and Biochars, 2023, 13, 2076-3417, 9048, 10.3390/app13169048
    21. Elin Asta Olafsdottir, Bjarni Bessason, Sigurdur Erlingsson, Amir M. Kaynia, A Tool for Processing and Inversion of MASW Data and a Study of Inter-session Variability of MASW, 2024, 47, 0149-6115, 1006, 10.1520/GTJ20230380
    22. S. Hov, K. Zabłocka, P. Paniagua, K. D. Weerdt, Elemental mapping by micro X-ray fluorescence to assess binder distribution of improved soils, 2024, 14, 2045-2543, 1, 10.1680/jgele.24.00078
    23. Marta Di Sante, Evelina Fratalocchi, Francesco Mazzieri, Bruno Di Buò, Tim Länsivaara, Comparative Analysis of Physico-Chemical and Potassium Sorption Properties of Sensitive Clays, 2024, 14, 2075-163X, 1273, 10.3390/min14121273
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(352) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog