Review

Phosphorus sorption in tropical soils

  • Received: 24 April 2020 Accepted: 21 July 2020 Published: 15 September 2020
  • Phosphorus is an important primary nutrient required by plants in large quantities. The various forms of P that plants can take up are the primary monobasic phosphate ion (H2PO4-), secondary dibasic phosphate ion (HPO42-) and phosphate ion (PO43-). In tropical soils, phosphorus adsorption is a major process that controls its availability to crops. Soils with low phosphorus adsorption capacity are often unable to supply adequate phosphorus to the growing crops thereby affecting their yields. This paper reviews the phosphorus adsorption phenomenon in a tropical soil. The review showed that Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) isotherm, Dubinin-Radushkevich, and Temkin isotherm are the mostly used isotherms models for describing phosphorus adsorption. From the review, soil acidity and alkalinity, soil temperature and the electrical potential of clay surface are the main factors influencing phosphorus adsorption. Also, precipitation was discovered to be the main mechanism of P adsorption in tropical soils. Fertilization practices such as the addition of organic manure, crop residues, rock phosphate, water-soluble P fertilizers and incorporation of phosphorus solubilizing organism are highly recommended to increase P solubility and availability in highly weathered soil.

    Citation: Emmanuel Hanyabui, Samuel Obeng Apori, Kwame Agyei Frimpong, Kofi Atiah, Thomas Abindaw, Muhammed Ali, Joshua Yeboah Asiamah, John Byalebeka. Phosphorus sorption in tropical soils[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 599-616. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.599

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zhi Yuan Sia, Huck Ywih Ch'ng, Jeng Young Liew . Amending inorganic fertilizers with rice straw compost to improve soil nutrients availability, nutrients uptake, and dry matter production of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated on a tropical acid soil. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(4): 1020-1033. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.1020
    [2] Aliou Badara Kouyate, Vincent Logah, Robert Clement Abaidoo, Francis Marthy Tetteh, Mensah Bonsu, Sidiki Gabriel Dembélé . Phosphorus sorption characteristics in the Sahel: Estimates from soils in Mali. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 995-1009. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023053
    [3] Emmanuel Hanyabui, Samuel Obeng Apori, Kwame Agyei Frimpong, Kofi Atiah, Thomas Abindaw, Muhammed Ali, Joshua Yeboah Asiamah, John Byalebeka . Phosphorus sorption in tropical soils. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 599-616. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.599
    [4] Widowati, Sutoyo, Hidayati Karamina, Wahyu Fikrinda . Soil amendment impact to soil organic matter and physical properties on the three soil types after second corn cultivation. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(1): 150-168. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.150
    [5] Ki A. Sarwono, Rohmatussolihat Rohmatussolihat, Muh Watman, Shanti Ratnakomala, Wulansih D. Astuti, Rusli Fidriyanto, Roni Ridwan, Yantyati Widyastuti . Characteristics of fresh rice straw silage quality prepared with addition of lactic acid bacteria and crude cellulase. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 481-499. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022030
    [6] Gunavathy Selvarajh, Huck Ywih Ch'ng, Norhafizah Md Zain . Effects of rice husk biochar in minimizing ammonia volatilization from urea fertilizer applied under waterlogged condition. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 159-171. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021010
    [7] Arianna Bozzolo, Diego Pizzeghello, Alessandra Cardinali, Ornella Francioso, Serenella Nardi . Effects of moderate and high rates of biochar and compost on grapevine growth in a greenhouse experiment. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(1): 113-128. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.113
    [8] Kartika Kartika, Jun-Ichi Sakagami, Benyamin Lakitan, Shin Yabuta, Isao Akagi, Laily Ilman Widuri, Erna Siaga, Hibiki Iwanaga, Arinal Haq Izzawati Nurrahma . Rice husk biochar effects on improving soil properties and root development in rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.) exposed to drought stress during early reproductive stage. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 737-751. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021043
    [9] Thornthan Sawangwan, Chompoonuth Porncharoennop, Harit Nimraksa . Antioxidant compounds from rice bran fermentation by lactic acid bacteria. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 578-587. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021034
    [10] Muhammad Fuad Anshori, Bambang Sapta Purwoko, Iswari Saraswati Dewi, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Sintho Wahyuning Ardie . Salinity tolerance selection of doubled-haploid rice lines based on selection index and factor analysis. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 520-535. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022032
  • Phosphorus is an important primary nutrient required by plants in large quantities. The various forms of P that plants can take up are the primary monobasic phosphate ion (H2PO4-), secondary dibasic phosphate ion (HPO42-) and phosphate ion (PO43-). In tropical soils, phosphorus adsorption is a major process that controls its availability to crops. Soils with low phosphorus adsorption capacity are often unable to supply adequate phosphorus to the growing crops thereby affecting their yields. This paper reviews the phosphorus adsorption phenomenon in a tropical soil. The review showed that Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) isotherm, Dubinin-Radushkevich, and Temkin isotherm are the mostly used isotherms models for describing phosphorus adsorption. From the review, soil acidity and alkalinity, soil temperature and the electrical potential of clay surface are the main factors influencing phosphorus adsorption. Also, precipitation was discovered to be the main mechanism of P adsorption in tropical soils. Fertilization practices such as the addition of organic manure, crop residues, rock phosphate, water-soluble P fertilizers and incorporation of phosphorus solubilizing organism are highly recommended to increase P solubility and availability in highly weathered soil.


    1. Introduction

    Phosphorus (P) is one of the important soil macronutrients that is required by plants for optimum growth. It is responsible for cell division and protein synthesis in plants [1,11,17]. Soil available P in the tropics especially Malaysia is relatively low because of P fixation by aluminium (Al) and iron (Fe) which leads to low in yield production in agriculture. Generally, adsorption of P by plants is poor due to fixation by Al and Fe, and adsorption of P by clay minerals [2]. Hence, liming is one of the common ways to overcome this problem. However, Thomas et al. [3] pointed that liming only overcome the acid soils' symptom rather than the main chemistry aspect behind it. Thus, this practice is not economical and not environment-friendly.

    Rice straw is an abundant agricultural by product which has a great potential for use in compost production [28]. These rice straws are usually being disposed through open burning but burning of these wastes brings negative effects to the natural environment. Burning causes haze and air pollution [4,5], thus it is an unsustainable waste management practice [6]. For this reason, composting is a green technology that can convert agriculture wastes such as rice straw into value added materials for sustainable farming. According to Lu et al. [7] and Zeng et al. [8], composting is able to produce an organic amendment that can be used for soil remediation, improving the soil condition and fertility.

    Application of compost as a soil amendment is eco-friendly and could be effective in reducing P fixation problem [4]. Therefore, through composting, one is able to produce an economical and high quality organic amendment with a large surface area filled with negative charges to minimize P fixation in tropical acid soils. Besides, Ohno and Amirbahman [9] and Ohno et al. [10] concluded that organic amendments application improved soil fertility especially P via increasing the soil pH to near neutral, thus increasing the P availability in the tropics.

    Many researches have been done in order to discover effective techniques to improve P availability by using either inorganic or organic phosphate in order to conserve or improve soil P. However, there is a little information on the use of compost with a large surface area and high degree of negative charges which could minimize P fixation in tropical acid soils. This is possible due to the fact that organic amendment with large surface of negative charges has high affinity for Al and Fe. Hence, P will become readily available for efficient plants uptake. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of application of compost produced from rice straw and goat manure slurry on improving P availability in tropical acid soil via laboratory incubation study.


    2. Materials and methods


    2.1. Soil sampling and characterization

    The experiment was carried out at University Malaysia Kelantan Jeli Campus, Malaysia. Soil samples were sampled at 0–40 cm from a grassland which has not been cultivated since 2007. The sampling area was 50 m × 50 m from which soil samples were randomly taken. This soil type (Rengam Series, Typic Paleudult) was selected because it is commonly cultivated with different crops in Malaysia although the soil is characterized by high P-fixing due to high Al and Fe contents [4]. They were bulked, air dried, crushed and sieved to pass through a 2 mm sieve for characterization purpose. Prior to the commencement of laboratory incubation study, soil samples were analyzed for soil bulk density using a core-ring method [11]. Soil texture was determined by the hydrometer method [12]. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined in a 1:2.5 soil-water ratio using a digital pH meter and EC meter [13]. Total organic matter was determined by using loss-on-ignition (LOI) as described by Chefetz et al. [14] and the soil total C was derived from the total organic matter using a conversion factor of 0.58 [11]. Soil available P was extracted by using the Mehlich No. 1 double acid [15,11] and the concentration of soil available P was determined by the molybdenum blue method [16] using UV-spectrophotometer at 882 nm. Exchangeable cations (K, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Zn) were extracted by using Mehlich No.1 double acid and the contents of exchangeable cations were determined using Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) [11]. Soil exchangeable acidity and exchangeable Al were extracted using KCl and determined by titration method [17].


    2.2. Compost characterization

    The rice straw compost used in this study was produced by composting rice straw and goat manure slurry in our previous study [18]. The rice straw compost was analyzed for pH, EC, total organic matter and total C by using the aforementioned procedures in Section 2.1. Total N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Zn and Fe contents in the compost were extracted by using dry ashing method as described by Cottenie [19]. The concentrations of total cations were eventually determined by AAS while the molybdenum blue method was used to determine the concentration of total P. The C/N and C/P ratios of rice straw compost were calculated using the respective total C, N and P content.


    2.3. Laboratory incubation study

    During the laboratory incubation study, 300 g of air-dried soil were weighed and added into beakers. Rice straw compost was applied at the rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha–1. The moisture content of the soil-compost mixture was maintained at 60% field capacity throughout the incubation period by adding distilled water when necessary. The beakers were sealed with parafilm to prevent moisture loss and perforated with two holes to ensure good aeration [20]. The list of treatments was as follows:

    ⅰ. T0: 300 g soil only,

    ⅱ. T1: 300 g soil + 200 kg ha–1 CIRP,

    ⅲ. T2: 300 g soil + 200 kg ha–1 CIRP + 5 t ha–1 rice straw compost,

    ⅳ. T3: 300 g soil + 200 kg ha–1 CIRP + 10 t ha–1 rice straw compost,

    ⅴ. T4: 300 g soil + 200 kg ha–1 CIRP + 15 t ha–1 rice straw compost,

    ⅵ. T5: 300 g soil + 200 kg ha–1 CIRP + 20 t ha–1 rice straw compost.

    Christmas Island rock phosphate (CIRP) was the source of P fertilizer and there was no application of N and K fertilizers in this study. The CIRP was applied at 60 kg P2O5 ha–1 (200 kg of CIRP ha–1) and rice straw compost was applied at the rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha–1. These rates were based on the standard recommendation for maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation [21]. During the laboratory incubation study, the rates were scaled down according to the volume of the soil in beaker. Treatments were incubated in the laboratory at ambient temperature for 30, 60, and 90 days. At the end of 30, 60 and 90 days of incubation (DAI), soil samples were sampled destructively and analyzed for pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, available P, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, Mg, and extractable Fe as per the standard methods.


    2.4. Statistics analysis

    The laboratory incubation study was conducted in a factorial completely randomized design with two factors, namely rate of rice straw compost (5, 10, 15, and 20 t ha–1) and time of incubation (30 days, 60 days, and 90 days). Statistical analysis for all the data was performed using SPSS software version 24.0 (SPSS Inc, US). The effects of different rates of rice straw compost additions on all the replicated measurement were tested via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences among treatment means were separated using the Tukey's HSD test. All result was considered significant at P ≤ 0.05.


    3. Results and discussion


    3.1. Characteristics of soil and rice straw compost

    The selected physico-chemical properties of Rengam soil series (Typic Paleudult, clayey, kaolinitic, isohyperthermic) soil used in the present study are shown in Table 1. The texture of the soil used in the laboratory incubation study was a sandy clay loam with a bulk density of 1.03 g m–3. Generally, the soil was acidic (pH of 5.19) and had low concentration of available P (0.81 ppm). The soil also showed relatively high concentrations of Al and Fe due to low soil pH (Table 1).

    Table 1. Selected physico-chemical properties of Rengam series soil.
    Property Value obtained
    Bulk density (g cm–3) 1.03
    Soil texture Sand: 75%
    Clay: 24%
    Silt: 1%
    ≥Sandy clay loam (Typic Paleudult, clayey, kaolinitic, isohyperthermic)
    pH (Water) 5.19
    Total organic matter (%) 3.36
    Total C (%) 1.95
    Available P (ppm) 0.81
    Exchangeable acidity (cmolc kg–1) 0.57
    Exchangeable Al (cmolc kg–1) 1.23
    Exchangeable K (ppm) 180.16
    Exchangeable Ca (ppm) 959.2
    Exchangeable Mg (ppm) 1774.13
    Exchangeable Fe (ppm) 186.44
    Exchangeable Zn (ppm) 0.85
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The pH of rice straw compost was 7.55. The C/N and C/P ratios of rice straw compost were 19.92 and 125.38, respectively (Table 2). These ratios suggest net mineralization of the organic amendments [22]. The rice straw compost also contained relatively high concentration of exchangeable cations especially K (8.71%), Ca (0.55%), Mg (0.345) and Na (10.6%) (Table 2).

    Table 2. Selected chemical properties of rice straw compost.
    Property Rice straw compost
    pH 7.55
    Electrical conductivity (dS m–1) 1.53
    Total organic matter (%) 73.53
    Total C (%) 42.63
    Total N (%) 2.14
    Total P (%) 0.34
    C/N ratio 19.92
    C/P ratio 125.38
    Total K (%) 8.71
    Total Ca (%) 0.55
    Total Mg (%) 0.345
    Total Na (%) 10.60
    Total Zn (µg/g) 54.20
    Total Cu (µg/g) 8
    Total Fe (µg/g) 1362.40
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.2. Effects of amending rice straw compost with CIRP and incubation time on selected chemical properties and P availability in Rengam acidic soil

    Days of incubation significantly affect soil pH, electrical conductivity, exchangeable K, and exchangeable Ca of the soil (Table 3). At 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, treatments with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4, and T5) significantly increased the soil pH and EC compared to treatments without addition of rice straw compost (T0—soil only and T1—soil with CIRP only) (Table 4). The pH of treatments with rice straw compost increased with an increase in the rate of application of the rice straw compost (Table 6). The highest pH was observed in T5 at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, ranging from 6.32 to 6.35, while T0 (soil only without addition of CIRP and rice straw compost) had the lowest soil pH (4.47–5.17) at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI (Table 6). The significant higher soil pH and EC observed in 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI was because of the rapid proton (H+) ions were absorbed by negative surface charge on organic materials (rice straw compost) (Table 6) [23,24]. Furthermore, the significantly higher soil pH for treatments with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4, and T5) was due to further decomposition of rice straw compost in the soil during incubation periods and that produce various organic acids and solubilize the inherent of the basic cations such as K, Ca, and Mg of added rice straw compost into the soil. A significant increase in the soil pH was observed in T1 (soil with CIRP only) as incubation period increases which was due to the dissolution of Ca and Mg contained in in CIRP with help of microorganism activity (Table 5) [20]. On the other hand, there was a decrease in the soil pH of T0 (soil only) due to the total organic matter and exchangeable Ca significantly decreased in soil of T0 (soil only) (Table 6), whereas the decreasing of exchangeable acidity at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, respectively was due to microorganism activity and no replacement or addition the resource used (Table 6). The soil EC was higher in treatments with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4, and T5) compared to treatments without addition of rice straw compost (T0 and T1) (Table 6), indicating that rice straw compost had more soluble salts. This was confirmed by the data in Table 2 which shows that rice straw compost had higher concentrations of K, Ca, and Mg.

    Table 3. Mean square values of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effects of the treatments, days of incubation, and interaction between treatments and days of incubation on the soil pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, and exchangeable Fe.
    Source of Variations df Mean square
    pH EC Total organic matter Total C Exchangeable acidity Exchangeable Al Available P Exchangeable K Exchangeable Ca Exchangeable Mg Exchangeable Fe
    Treatments 5 2.973* 0.031* 90.039* 30.274* 0.601* 1.850* 12.769* 186,569,111.700* 377,272.723* 20,373,522.570* 23,832.500*
    DAI 2 0.148* 0.042* 0.363 0.124 0.001 0.055 0.017 293,584,014.980* 490,717.392* 312,616.880 1,283.606
    Treatments*
    DAI 10 0.086* 0.004* 0.068 0.023 0.006 0.013 0.015 41,080,682.420* 44,396.210* 390,669.161 886.443
    Error 36
    Note: 1. *indicates significant at P ≤ 0.05, implies the particular factor (treatments, days of incubation, and interaction between treatments with days of incubation) significantly affect the variables (pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, and exchangeable Fe) tested in this study.
    2. DAI indicates days of incubation.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4. Mean square values of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effects of treatments on the soil pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, and exchangeable Fe during 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI.
    Source of Variations df Mean square
    pH EC Total organic matter Total C Exchangeable acidity Exchangeable Al Available P Exchangeable K Exchangeable Ca Exchangeable Mg Exchangeable Fe
    30 DAI 5 0.583* 0.002* 27.842* 9.359* 0.137* 0.817* 4.269* 1,126,762.048* 243,394.468* 6,461,683.849* 12,748.750*
    60 DAI 5 0.854* 0.013* 32.149* 10.815* 0.226* 0.495* 4.114* 163,825,084.600* 63,744.827 7,797,016.756* 6,845.361*
    90 DAI 5 1.709* 0.024* 30.183* 10.154* 0.250* 0.564* 4.415* 103,778,629.900* 158,925.848* 6,896,160.292* 6,011.276*
    Note: 1. *indicates significant at P ≤ 0.05, implies the variables (pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, and exchangeable Fe) tested in this study exerted significant difference between the treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) during 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, respectively.
    2. DAI indicates days of incubation.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5. Mean square values of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the treatment effects on soil pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, and exchangeable Fe as incubation period increases.
    Source of Variations df Mean square
    pH EC Total organic matter Total C Exchangeable acidity Exchangeable Al Available P Exchangeable K Exchangeable Ca Exchangeable Mg Exchangeable Fe
    T0 2 0.390* 0.001 0.046 0.015 0.011 0.089 0.006 1,210,664.658* 19,076.338 123.110 703.680
    T1 2 0.182* 0.004* 0.001 0.000 0.012 0.020 0.008 1,725,188.853 32,366.458* 20,833.404 440.718
    T2 2 0.000 0.019 0.162 0.055 0.006* 0.009 0.017 24,539,328.440* 178,813.670* 296,352.871 384.736*
    T3 2 0.002 0.009* 0.312 0.104 0.000 0.003 0.044* 61,682,568.020* 45,521.831 318,495.058 896.646
    T4 2 0.002 0.014* 0.096 0.033 0.001 0.000 0.013 119,100,427.20* 365,028.924* 1,107,870.240 1,845.302
    T5 2 0.001 0.014* 0.084 0.029 0.002 0.000 0.002 290,729,249.80* 71,891.218 522,288.000 1,444.740
    Note: 1. *indicates significant at P ≤ 0.05, implies the variables (pH, EC, total organic matter, total C, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, and exchangeable Fe) tested in this study exerted significant difference between the treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) when the incubation period increases from 30 DAI until 90 DAI. 2. DAI indicates days of incubation.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6. Effects of amending rice straw compost with CIRP on selected soil chemical properties and soil available P in Rengam acidic soil under 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI.
    Treatment pH Electrical conductivity (EC) Total organic matter Total C Available P Exchangeable acidity Exchangeable Al Exchangeable K Exchangeable Ca Exchangeable Mg Exchangeable Fe
    dS m–1 % ppm cmol kg–1 ppm
    30 DAI
    T0 5.17±0.006c 0.084±0.006d 4.97±0.037b 2.63 ± 0.019b 0.61 ± 0.093d 0.73 ± 0.007a 1.52 ± 0.035a 221.73 ± 13.964d 1119.73 ± 52.340c 1258.67 ± 84.359d 252.80 ± 10.043a
    T1 5.86±0.022b 0.095±0.000c 6.06 ± 0.376b 3.21±0.199b 1.17±0.087d 0.573±0.007b 1.27±0.064b 245.87±0.933cd 1152.67±45.690bc 1469.33±130.667d 283.73±3.654a
    T2 6.22±0.040a 0.125±0.002b 11.33±1.947a 6.01±1.032a 2.31±0.121c 0.33±0.18c 0.65±0.018c 755.33±65.075bc 1568.40±67.419ab 2666.67±134.191cd 183.73±3.654b
    T3 6.21±0.032a 0.136±0.003a 11.53±2.278a 6.11±1.208a 2.84±0.072bc 0.27±0.013cd 0.53±0.007cd 1023.87±50.006b 1447.47±165.712abc 3191.87±133.758bc 140.53±19.637b
    T4 6.26±0.153a 0.136±0.002a 11.07±0.926a 5.87±0.491a 3.38±0.183ab 0.24±0.009de 0.36±0.080de 1591.87±146.943a 1845.73±49.813a 4477.33±461.767ab 137.33±13.397b
    T5 6.32±0.044a 0.144±0.002a 11.53±1.397a 6.11±0.740a 3.55±0.163a 0.19±0.027e 0.21±0.013e 1589.33±203.097a 1646.53±111.812a 4752.00±551.536a 132.80±13.742b
    60DAI
    T0 4.96±0.003c 0.093±0.003b 4.88±0.105c 2.83±0.061c 0.69±0.003f 0.80±0.151a 1.19±0.214a 1090.67±314.43d 1001.33±55.561a 1266.67±20.177d 226.35±4.544ab
    T1 5.89±0.003b 0.120±0.012b 6.10±0.064bc 3.54±0.037bc 1.27±0.003e 0.69±0.027a 1.11±0.044a 1453.33±506.819d 1009.47±50.964a 1351.33±191.403d 261.63±9.097a
    T2 6.24±0.003a 0.227±0.017a 11.67±1.768a 6.77±1.025a 2.38±0.015d 0.28±0.007b 0.58±0.156b 4605.33±636.885cd 1093.07±63.587a 2042.67±223.503cd 169.07±2.677bc
    T3 6.25±0.035a 0.233±0.020a 12.17±1.650a 7.06±0.957a 2.89±0.003c 0.25±0.009b 0.51±0.055b 7648.00±125.73bc 1275.6±53.249a 2766.67±39.350bc 167.33±6.492bc
    T4 6.3±0.100a 0.250±0.029a 11.40±0.643ab 6.61±0.373ab 3.41±0.003b 0.22±0.009b 0.35±0.012b 11400.00±2124.760b 1223.33±55.206a 3605.33±573.887b 139.73±24.551c
    T5 6.34±0.026a 0.223±0.007a 11.83±1.105a 6.86±0.641a 3.58±0.019a 0.15±0.018b 0.20±0.009b 20628.00±529.714a 1351.2±190.447a 5508.00±248.269a 150.13±26.789c
    90DAI
    T0 4.47±0.067c 0.053±0.020b 4.72±0.123d 2.74±0.072d 0.60±0.041d 0.85±0.064a 1.25±0.087a 1458.93±210.190d 968.00±10.377c 1271.33±433.492c 252.95±16.664a
    T1 5.45±0.131b 0.167±0.023ab 6.08±0.0536c 3.53±0.031c 1.21±0.060c 0.68±0.053a 1.15±0.100a 1644.40±461.460d 950.73±9.033c 1512.27±97.249bc 264.07±19.744a
    T2 6.23±0.170a 0.283±0.069a 11.22±0.331b 6.51±0.192ab 2.46±0.108b 0.24±0.009b 0.55±0.018b 6344.00±846.993c 1234.00±43.471b 2288.93±542.915bc 161.45±4.149b
    T3 6.26±0.055a 0.230±0.010a 11.96±0.030a 6.93±0.017a 2.66±0.051b 0.26±0.009b 0.47±0.145b 9700.00±696.440bc 1208.67±47.250bc 2551.60±233.691bc 172.85±8.555b
    T4 6.31±0.090a 0.260±0.006a 11.12±0.160b 6.45±0.093b 3.51±0.211a 0.24±0.020b 0.35±0.021b 13348.00±732.779ab 1261.60±58.407b 3308.13±203.018b 181.44±21.694b
    T5 6.3±0.021a 0.280±0.010a 11.55±0.135ab 6.70±0.078ab 3.60±0.081a 0.14±0.003b 0.21±0.044b 15453.33±1400.020a 1579.33±104.085a 5436.00±614.769a 176.39±8.782b
    Note: Mean values within column with different letter(s) indicate significant difference between treatments by Tukey's HSD test at P ≤ 0.05. Columns represent the mean values ± SE. DAI indicates days after incubation.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 6 shows that there were significant difference between treatments with rice straw compost and treatment without rice straw compost on total organic matter and total C at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI. However, there was no significant difference in the total organic matter and total C for treatments with rice straw compost when the incubation time increases (Table 5) due to slow mineralization process that decomposed the rice straw compost [25]. Treatments with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4, and T5) significantly reduced exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, and exchangeable Fe compared with treatments without rice straw compost (T0 and T1) (Table 6). The reduction in exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al and precipitation of exchangeable and soluble Al and Fe as insoluble Al and Fe hydroxides [4,22] for treatment with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4 and T5) were due to the increase in soil pH at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, respectively (Table 6). The soil with CIRP alone (T1) was highest in exchangeable Fe at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI compared to other treatments because the CIRP may had released Fe into the soil [4].

    Table 6 shows that there were significant difference between treatments with rice straw compost and treatment without rice straw compost on soil available P at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, respectively. This implies rice straw compost plays an important role on P availability by decreasing the P adsorption due to the competing adsorption sites by organic anion and dissolving the mineral associated P by low-molecular-weight organic acids [29]. However, there was no significant difference in the soil available P (net increase/loss) when the incubation time increases under treatments with rice straw compost (Table 5). This implies the effectiveness of rice straw compost in minimizing the loss of P due to P fixation in soil. This finding contradicted with study reported by Kahura et al. [26] who were using biochar as organic amendment in which they reported that soil available P decreased with the increase in incubation period due to P fixation in soil. The absence of significant increase of soil available P when the incubation time increases (Table 5) could be due to slow microbially mediated mineralization of soil organic P to inorganic P [20]. That is to say, if the organic P in rice straw compost mineralizes readily, the soil available P will increase rapidly. Treatment with soil only without any CIRP and rice straw compost (T0) had the lowest soil available P relative to other treatments, thus confirming that P was deficient in this soil. Treatment T5 (soil with 200 kg ha–1 CIRP and 20 t ha–1 rice straw compost) showed the highest soil available P compared to other treatments with rice straw compost (T2, T3, and T4) at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI (Table 6). This was due to the increase of application rate of rice straw compost which could had increased the soil pH and eventually precipitated the exchangeable and soluble Al and Fe as insoluble Al and Fe hydroxides, thus increasing the soil P availability. Ch'ng et al. [27] concluded that the soil available P increased under treatments applied with poultry manure biochar and pineapple leaves compost because of the efficient retention of P in the soil as a result of chelation of Al and Fe by the biochar and compost. Exchangeable cations (K, Ca, and Mg) of treatments with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4, and T5) were significantly increased at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI compared to treatments without rice straw compost (T0 and T1) (Table 6). This was due to high inherent basic cations contents contained in the rice straw compost which might had contributed to the increment in the exchangeable cations content in soil across the incubation periods (Tables 5 and 6). Therefore, high content of basic cations in soil treated with rice straw compost (T2, T3, T4, and T5) reduced the exchangeable acidity of the soil compared to treatments without rice straw compost (T0 and T1).


    4. Conclusions

    In this study, application of rice straw compost with CIRP was found to increase soil available P at three respective incubation periods in the Rengam acidic soil. This was possible because amending rice straw compost with CIRP increased the soil pH, and, at the same time, they reduced exchangeable acidity, exchangeable Al, and exchangeable Fe. As the soil pH increased, the rice straw compost effectively fixed the Al and Fe in the soil instead of P, thus increasing the available P in the soil. Generally, all the treatments with rice straw compost were observed to significantly improve the chemical properties in the soil compared to treatments without addition of rice straw compost at 30 DAI, 60 DAI, and 90 DAI, respectively. Similar observation was found in soil available P, but there was no significant difference in the soil available P (in terms of soil available P gain/loss) when the incubation time increases under treatments with rice straw compost. The findings suggest that the application of rice straw compost altered soil chemical properties in a way that enhanced the availability of P in the Rengam acidic soil.


    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank Malaysia Ministry of Education for financial assistance and Universiti Malaysia Kelantan for providing research facilities. This research was supported by grant from the Malaysia Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (Grant No.: R/FRGS/A07.00/01459A/001/2016/000370).


    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.




    [1] Njoyim EBT, Mvondo-Ze AD, Alakeh MN, et al. (2016) Phosphorus adsorption isotherms in relation to soil characteristics of some selected volcanic affected soil of foumbot in the west region of Cameroon. Int J Soil Sci 11: 19-28. doi: 10.3923/ijss.2016.19.28
    [2] Yaser H, Rahim DT (2013) Comparison of phosphorus adsorption isotherms in soil and its relation to soil properties. Int J Agric Res Rev 3: 163-171.
    [3] Tening AS, Foba-Tendo JN, Yakum-Ntaw SY, et al. (2013) Phosphorus fixing capacity of a volcanic soil on the slope of mount Cameroon. Agric Biol J North Am 4: 166-174. doi: 10.5251/abjna.2013.4.3.166.174
    [4] Buresh RJ, Smithson PC, Hellums DT (1997) Building soil phosphorus capital in Africa. In: Replenishing soil fertility in Africa, 51: 111-149.
    [5] Bolan NS, Barrow NJ, Posner AM (1985) Describing the effect of time on sorption of phosphate by iron and alumonium hydroxides. J Soil Sci 36: 187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1985.tb00323.x
    [6] Pierzynski G, McDowell R, Sims JT (2005) Chemistry, cycling, and potential moment of inorganic phosphorus in soils. In: JT Sims, AN Sharpley, eds, Phosphorus: Agriculture and the Environment. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, 53-86.
    [7] Maluf M, Silva CA, Curi N, et al. (2018) Adsorption and availability of phosphorus in response to humic acid rates in soils limed with CaCO3 or MgCO3. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 42: 7-20.
    [8] Menezes-Blackburn D, Giles C, Darch T, et al. (2017) Opportunities for mobilizing recalcitrant phosphorus from agricultural soils: a review. Plant Soil 427: 5-16.
    [9] Sarvajayakesavalu S, LuY, Withers PJA, et al. (2018) Phosphorus recovery: a need for an integrated approach. Ecosyst Health Sust 1-10.
    [10] Bolland MDA, Allen DG, Barrow NJ (2001) Sorption of phosphorus by soils: How it is measured in Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Bulletin 4591, 31.
    [11] Guedes RS, Melo LCA, Vergütz L, et al. (2016) Adsorption and desorption kinetics and phosphorus hysteresis in highly weathered soil by stirred flow chamber experiments. Soil Tillage Res 162: 46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.04.018
    [12] Wang Q, Li Y (2010) Phosphorus adsorption and desorption behavior on sediments of different origins. J Soils Sediments 10: 1159-1173. doi: 10.1007/s11368-010-0211-9
    [13] Fink JR, Inda AV, Bayer C, et al. (2014) Mineralogy and phosphorus adsorption in soils of south and central-west Brazil under conventional and no-tillage systems. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 36: 379. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i3.17937
    [14] Fageria NK, He Z, Baligar VC (2017) Phosphorus management in crop production. CRC Press.
    [15] Limousin G, Gaudet JP, Charlet L, et al. (2007) Sorption isotherms: A review on physical bases, modeling and measurement. Appl Geochem 22: 249-275. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.09.010
    [16] Jamal A, Muhammad D, Rahman M, et al. (2018) Application of adsorption isotherms in evaluating the influence of humic acid and farmyard manure on phosphorous adsorption and desorption capacity of calcareous soil. World Sci News 107: 136-149.
    [17] Menzies N, Lucia S (2009) The science of phosphorus nutrition: forms in the soil, plant uptake, and plant response. Science 18.
    [18] Menezes-Blackburn D, Paredes C, Zhang H, et al. (2016) Organic acids regulation of chemical-microbial phosphorus transformations in soils. Environ Sci Technol 50: 11521-11531. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03017
    [19] Zahedifar M, Karimian N, Ronaghi A, et al. (2011) Soil-Plant Nutrient Relationship at Different Growth Stages of Spinach as Affected by Phosphorus and Manure Applications. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42: 1765-1781. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2011.587567
    [20] Thajeel AS (2013) Isotherm, Kinetic and Thermodynamic of Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions onto Local Activated Carbon. J Aquat Sci Technol 1: 53-77.
    [21] Hussain A, Anwar-Ul-Haq AM, Nawaz M (2003) Application of the Langmuir and Freundlich Equations for P Adsorption Phenomenon in Saline-Sodic Soils. Int J Agric Biol 3: 349-356.
    [22] Surchi K (2011) Agricultural Wastes as Low-Cost Adsorbents for Pb Removal: Kinetics, Equilibrium and Thermodynamics. Int J Chem 3: 103-112.
    [23] Aslam M, Rahmatullah MS, Yasin M (2000) Application of Freundlich adsorption Isotherm to Determine Phosphorus Requirement of several Rice soils. Int J Agri Biol 2: 286-288.
    [24] Arshad M, Rahmatullah MS, Yousaf M (2000) Soil properties related to phosphorus sorption as described by modified Freundlich equation in some soils. Int J Agri Biol 2: 290-292.
    [25] Chen Q, Tian Y, Yan C, et al. (2017) Study on Shale Adsorption Equation Based on Monolayer Adsorption, Multilayer Adsorption, and Capillary Condensation. J Chem 1-11.
    [26] Keller J, Staudt R (2005) Gas Adsorption Equilibria. USA: Springer Science Business Media.
    [27] Chowdhury S, Mishra R, Saha P, et al. (2010) Adsorption thermodynamics, kinetics and isosteric heat of adsorption of malachite green onto chemically modified rice husk. J Desalin 265: 159-168.
    [28] Tan IAW, Ahmad AL, Hameed BH (2008) Adsorption of basic dye using activated carbon prepared from oil palm shell: batch and fixed bed studies. Desalination 225: 13-28. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.07.005
    [29] Hatice K (2010) The effects of physical factors on the adsorption of synthetic organic compounds by activated carbons and activated carbon fibers. All Theses 930.
    [30] Asomaning SK (2020) Processes and Factors Affecting Phosphorus Sorption in Soils. In: Sorption in 2020s. IntechOpen.
    [31] Borggaard OK, Jdrgensen SS, Moberg JP, et al. (1990) Influence of organic matter on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides in sandy soils. J Soil Sci 41: 443-449. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x
    [32] Borggaard OK, Szilas C, Gimsing AL, et al. (2004) Estimation of soil phosphate adsorption capacity by means of a pedotransfer function. Geoderma 118: 55-61. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00183-6
    [33] Melo F, Singh B, Schaefer C, et al. (2001) Chemical and Mineralogical Properties of Kaolinite-Rich Brazilian Soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1324. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2001.6541324x
    [34] Ajibola A, Adeoye OA, Bello SO (2017) Adsorption of dyes using different types of clay: a review. Appl Water Sci 7: 543-568.
    [35] Burgos DW, Pisutpaisal N, Mazzarese CM, et al. (2002) Adsorption of Quinoline to Kaolinite and Montmorillonite. Environ Eng Sci 19: 59-68. doi: 10.1089/10928750252953697
    [36] Braumann T (1986) Determination of hydrophobic parameters by reversed-phase liquid chromatography: theory, experimental techniques, and application in studies on quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Chromatogr A 373: 191-225. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)80213-7
    [37] Agmon N, Bakker HJ, Campen RK, et al. (2016) Protons and hydroxide ions in aqueous systems. Chem Rev 116: 7642-7672. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00736
    [38] Yang X, Sun Z, Wang D, et al. (2007) Surface acid-base properties and hydration/dehydration mechanisms of aluminum (hydr)oxides. J Colloid Interface Sci 308: 395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.023
    [39] Barale M, Mansour C, Carrette F (2008) Characterization of the surface charge of oxide particles of PWR primary water circuits from 5 to 320 ℃. J Nucl Mater 381: 302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.09.003
    [40] Moghimi AH, Hamdan J, Shamshuddin J, et al. (2013) Physicochemical Properties and Surface Charge Characteristics of Arid Soils in Southeastern Iran. Appl Environ Soil Sci 1-11.
    [41] Taubaso C, Dos Santos Afonso M, Sánchez R (2004) Modelling soil surface charge density using mineral composition. Geoderma 121: 123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.11.005
    [42] Chen C (2016) A mineralogical approach to use the non-qualified fine aggregates in asphalt concrete pavement. In press, 4-244.
    [43] Hlady V, Buijs J (1996) Protein adsorption on solid surfaces. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7: 72-77. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80098-X
    [44] Horsfall M, Spiff IA (2005) Effects of temperature on the sorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from aqueous solution by Caladium bicolor (Wild Cocoyam) biomass. Electron J Biotechnol 8: 163-169.
    [45] Del Campillo MC, van der Zee S, Torrent J (1999) Modelling long-term phosphorus leaching and changes in phosphorus fertility in excessively fertilized acid sandy soils. Eur J Soil Sci 50: 391-399. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00244.x
    [46] Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, et al. (2011) Phosphorus Dynamics: From Soil to Plant. Plant Physiol 156: 997-1005. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175232
    [47] Sato S, Comerford NB (2005) Influence of soil pH on inorganic phosphorus sorption and desorption in a humid brazilian Ultisol. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 29: 685-694.
    [48] Helfenstein J, Jegminat J, McLaren TI, et al. (2018) Soil solution phosphorus turnover: derivation, interpretation, and insights from a global compilation of isotope exchange kinetic studies. Biogeosci Discuss 15: 105-114. doi: 10.5194/bg-15-105-2018
    [49] Gregor M (2005) Mullite-corundum-spinel-cordierite-plagioclase xenolithsin the Skaergaard Marginal Border Group: multi-stageinteraction between metasediments and basaltic magma. Contrib Mineral Petr 49: 196-215.
    [50] Kanwar JS, Grewal JS (1971) Phosphorus fixation in indian soils: A review. Environ Sci 1-50.
    [51] Dabrowski A (2001) Adsorption from theory to practice. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 93: 135-224. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8686(00)00082-8
    [52] Pena F, Torrent J (1990) Predicting phosphate sorption in soils of mediterranean regions. Fert Res 32: 17-19.
    [53] Gustafsson JP, Mwamila LB, Kergoat K (2012) The pH dependence of phosphate sorption and desorption in Swedish agricultural soils. Geoderma 189: 304-311.
    [54] Oelkers EH, Valsami-Jones E (2008) Phosphate mineral reactivity and global sustainability. Elements 4: 83-87. doi: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.2.83
    [55] Arai Y, Sparks DL (2007) Phosphate reaction dynamics in soils and soil minerals: a multiscale approach. Adv Agron 94: 135-179. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94003-6
    [56] Luengo C, Brigante M, Antelo J, et al. (2006) Kinetics of phosphate adsorption on goethite: comparing batch adsorption and ATR-IR measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 300: 511-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.04.015
    [57] Devau N, Le Cadre E, Hinsinger P, et al. (2010) A mechanistic model for understanding root-induced chemical changes controlling phosphorus availability. Ann Bot (Lond) 105: 1183-1197. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq098
    [58] Condron LM, Turner BL, Cade-Menun BJ (2005) Chemistry and dynamics of soil organic phosphorus. In Sims JT, Sharpley AN, eds, Agronomy Monographs, 245-354.
    [59] Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (2007) Inositol Phosphates: Linking Agriculture and the Environment. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, in press, 304.
    [60] Rasul GAM (2011) The role of magnesium in increasing of phosphorus fertilizer efficiency and wheat yield. Mesopotamia J Agric 39: 33-39. doi: 10.33899/magrj.2011.30168
    [61] Negassa W, Leinweber P (2009) How does the Hedley sequential phosphorus fractionation reflect impacts of land use and management on soil phosphorus: a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172: 305-325. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200800223
    [62] Reddy MS, Kumar S, Babita K (2002) Bio-solubilization of poorly soluble rock phosphates by Aspergillus tubingenis and Aspergillus niger. Bioresource Technol 84: 187-189. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00040-8
    [63] Swamy CA, Raghunandan BL, Chandrashekhar M, et al. (2010) Bioactivation of Rock Phosphate vis seed treatment with P solubilizing microbes (PSM) in enhancing P nutrition in cowpea and ragi. Indian J Sci Technol 3: 689-692. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i6.9
    [64] Geonadi D, Siswanto H, Sugiarto Y (2000) Bioactivation of poorly soluble rock phosphate with a phosphorous solubilizing fungus. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 927-932. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.643927x
    [65] Weeks JJ, Hettiarachchi GM (2019) A Review of the Latest in Phosphorus Fertilizer Technology: Possibilities and Pragmatism. J Environ Qual 48: 1300-1313. doi: 10.2134/jeq2019.02.0067
    [66] Puente ME, Bashan Y, Li C, et al. (2004) Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. I. Root colonization and weathering of igneous rocks. Plant Biol 6: 629-642.
    [67] Balemi T, Negisho K (2012) Management of soil phosphorus and plant adaptation mechanisms to phosphorus stress for sustainable crop production: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12: 547-562.
    [68] Randhawa PS, Condron LM, Di J, et al. (2005) Effect of green manure addition on soil organic phosphorus mineralisation. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 73: 181-189. doi: 10.1007/s10705-005-0593-z
    [69] Richardson AE (2007) Making microorganisms mobilize soil phosphorus. Dev Plant Soil Sci 102: 85-90.
    [70] Ayaga G, Todd A, Brookes PC (2006) Enhanced biological cycling of phosphorus increases its availability to crops in low-input sub-Saharan farming systems. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.019
    [71] Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, et al. (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418: 671-677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014
    [72] Rowe H, Withers PJA, Baas P (2016) Integrating legacy soil phosphorus into sustainable nutrient management strategies for future food, bioenergy and water security. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104: 393-412. doi: 10.1007/s10705-015-9726-1
    [73] Haygarth PM, Jarvie HP, Powers SM, et al. (2014) Sustainable phosphorus management and the need for a long-term perspective: the legacy hypothesis. Environ Sci Technol 48: 8417-8419. doi: 10.1021/es502852s
    [74] Bai Z, Li L, Yang X, et al. (2013) The critical soil P levels for crop yield, soil fertility and environmental safety in different soil types. Plant Soil 372: 27-37. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1696-y
    [75] Rabalais NN, Diaz RJ, Levin LA, et al. (2010) Dynamics and distribution of natural and humancaused hypoxia. Biogeoscience 7: 585-619. doi: 10.5194/bg-7-585-2010
    [76] Sattari SZ, Bouwman AF, Giller KE, et al. (2012) Residual soil phosphorus as the missing piece in the global phosphorus crisis puzzle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 6348-6353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113675109
    [77] Hadgu F, Gebrekidan H, Kibret K, et al. (2014) Study of phosphorus adsorption and its relationship with soil properties, analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich models. Agric For Fish 3: 40-51.
    [78] Tamungang NE, Mvondo-Zé AD, Alakeh MN, et al. (2014) Phosphorus Adsorption Isotherms in Relation to Soil Characteristics of Some Selected Volcanic Affected Soils of Foumbot in the West Region of Cameroon. Int J Soil Sci 11: 19-28.
    [79] Maluf HJGM, Silva CA, Curi N, et al. (2018) Adsorption and availability of phosphorus in response to humic acid rates in soils limed with CaCO3 or MgCO3. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 42: 7-80.
    [80] Ayenew B, Tadesse AM, Kibret K, et al. (2018) Phosphorous status and adsorption characteristics of acid soils from Cheha and Dinsho districts, southern highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res 7: 17. doi: 10.1186/s40068-018-0121-1
    [81] Mihoub A, Bouhoun MD, Saker ML (2016) Phosphorus Adsorption Isotherm: A Key Aspect for Effective Use and Environmentally Friendly Management of Phosphorus Fertilizers in Calcareous Soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 47: 1920-1929.
    [82] Anjembe B, Ibrahim NB, Kurayemen C (2017) Phosphorus adsorption isotherms of some low activity clay soils as influenced by soil properties and their effect on fertilizer p recommendations and yield of soybean (glycine max (l.) merr.) in benue state, Nigeria. Eur J Agric For Res 5: 16-30.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zhi Yuan Sia, Huck Ywih Ch'ng, Jeng Young Liew, Amending inorganic fertilizers with rice straw compost to improve soil nutrients availability, nutrients uptake, and dry matter production of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated on a tropical acid soil, 2019, 4, 2471-2086, 1020, 10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.1020
    2. Zhi Yuan Sia, Huck Ywih Ch'ng, Jeng Young Liew, Amending inorganic fertilizers with rice straw compost to improve soil nutrients availability, nutrients uptake, and dry matter production of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated on a tropical acid soil, 2019, 4, 2471-2086, 1020, 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.1020
    3. Prisca Divra Johan, Osumanu Haruna Ahmed, Latifah Omar, Nur Aainaa Hasbullah, Phosphorus Transformation in Soils Following Co-Application of Charcoal and Wood Ash, 2021, 11, 2073-4395, 2010, 10.3390/agronomy11102010
    4. Huck Ywih Ch’ng, Syajariah Sanusi, Suhaimi Bin Othman, Effect of Christmas Island rock phosphate and rice straw compost application on soil phosphorus availability and maize (Zea maysL.) growth in a tropical acid soil of Kelantan, Malaysia, 2020, 5, 2391-9531, 150, 10.1515/opag-2020-0015
    5. Prisca Divra Johan, Osumanu Haruna Ahmed, Ali Maru, Latifah Omar, Nur Aainaa Hasbullah, Optimisation of Charcoal and Sago (Metroxylon sagu) Bark Ash to Improve Phosphorus Availability in Acidic Soils, 2021, 11, 2073-4395, 1803, 10.3390/agronomy11091803
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(9593) PDF downloads(167) Cited by(33)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog