
Citation: Anna Chizhayeva, Yelena Oleinikova, Margarita Saubenova, Amankeldy Sadanov, Alma Amangeldi, Aida Aitzhanova, Aigul Alybaeva, Makpal Yelubaeva. Impact of probiotics and their metabolites in enhancement the functional properties of whey-based beverages[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 521-542. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.521
[1] | Araya Ranok, Chanida Kupradit . Effect of whey protein and riceberry flour on quality and antioxidant activity under gastrointestinal transit of gluten-free cookies. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 434-448. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.434 |
[2] | Saber Ibrahim, Amany Badr El-Deen Abd El-Aziz, Hanan Hassan Abdel-Khalek . Effect of γ irradiation on the antibacterial activity of poly lactic acid films encapsulated with essential oils against some common food borne pathogens. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 715-733. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.715 |
[3] | Jaquelinne Pires Vital da Costa, Camila Fernanda Dias de Oliveira, Francielo Vendruscolo . Cheese whey as a potential substrate for Monascus pigments production. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 785-798. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.785 |
[4] | Hathairat Chokthaweepanich, Chuleeporn Chumnanka, Sribud Srichaijaroonpong, Rungnapa Boonpawa . Effect of harvesting age and drying condition on andrographolide content, antioxidant capacity, and antibacterial activity in Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 137-150. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023007 |
[5] | Teti Estiasih, Jatmiko Eko Witoyo, Khofifah Putri Wulandari, Fadhillah Dwi Juniati, Widiastuti Setyaningsih, Hanifah Nuryani Lioe, Miguel Palma, Kgs Ahmadi, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Elya Mufidah . Stability comparison of conventional and foam-mat red and purple dried roselle calyces powder as a function of pH. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 177-198. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025010 |
[6] | Ziad Jaradat, Batool Khataybeh, Abdull Majid Al Ghzawi, Qutaiba Ababneh, Anas Al Nabusli . Molecular identification of major bacteria in honey and the effect of microwave treatment on its microbial quality and antibacterial activity. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 594-613. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022037 |
[7] | Francesco Sottile, Stefano Massaglia, Valentina Maria Merlino, Cristiana Peano, Giulia Mastromonaco, Ferdinando Fornara, Danielle Borra, Oriana Mosca . Consumption vs. non-consumption of plant-based beverages: A case study on factors influencing consumers' choices. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 889-913. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023047 |
[8] | Dahye Kim, Kyung Dong Lee, Ki Choon Choi . Role of LAB in silage fermentation: Effect on nutritional quality and organic acid production—An overview. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 216-234. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021014 |
[9] | Muhd Arif Shaffiq Sahrir, Nornasuha Yusoff, Kamalrul Azlan Azizan . Allelopathy activity under laboratory, greenhouse and field conditions: A review. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 78-104. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023004 |
[10] | Ilaria Marotti, Francesca Truzzi, Camilla Tibaldi, Lorenzo Negri, Giovanni Dinelli . Evaluation of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) as a novel microgreen from the anti-inflammatory potential of polyphenols. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021001 |
The human body is a symbiotic community of numerous eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, including archaebacteria, protists, helminthes, and viruses [1]. At the same time, man is, to a greater extent, a community of prokaryotic than eukaryotic cells. The number of eukaryotic cell species in human tissues and organs is not many more than 200; total content of these cells in the range of 5–10 trillion. The content of bacterial species, which inhabit the human body, reaches 10 thousand, and strains—up to 50 thousand; the total number of bacteria is within hundreds of trillions, and along with viruses—exceeds quadrillion [2]. The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is the largest biotope in the human body, the total number of microorganisms that inhabit the large intestine is about 1014–1015 CFU/mL [3,4].
The human metagenome consists of the genes of Homo sapiens himself and the genes of colonizing its body microorganisms that are called microbiome [5,6,7,8]. The number of genes in the total metagenome of the intestinal microbiota is more than 100 times higher than in the human genome [9,10,11].
Studies of the last decade, carried out using a metagenomic approach, have shown the digestive tract in healthy adults to include up to 1000 species of microorganisms, 90% of which belonging to the bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Figure 1). Other taxonomic groups of bacteria presented within the intestinal microbiota in healthy adult include phyla Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and some other phyla forming the minor and variable segment of the microbiota [12,13,14,15,16].
In the course of molecular and genetic research MetaHIT Projects (Human Intestinal Tract Metagenomics) launched in 2008 and funded by the European Commission and American Human Microbiome Project [17,18], scientists concluded that there are at least 160 bacterial species in one person’s intestine [19,20,21,22,23]. It has also been suggested that they constitute the ‘minimal gut genome’. Based on the taxonomic diversity of microbiota, scientists in 2011 discovered 3 enterotype microflora. In general, the first enterotype was characterized by the prevalence of the genus Bacteroides in human intestinal microbiota, the second by Prevotella, the third by Ruminococcus, and a number of others. The theory of the existence of enterotypes is still a subject of intense debate and discussion, but their practical benefit may be to develop a personalized approach in the treatment and prevention of various pathologies [24,25,26].
Microbiota of GIT plays the main role in ensuring normal human activity [27], affects the growth and development of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms [28,29,30,31,32], participates in maintaining normal ‘tension’ of human immunity [33,34,35]; regulates metabolic processes [36,37]; treated as an abandoned endocrine organ [38]; is associated with brain activity (e.g. stress response) et al. [39,40,41]. Microbiota can produce a wide range of neuroactive molecules—serotonin, melatonin, gammaaminobutyric acid, catecholamine, histamine and acetylcholine [42,43]. In addition, intestinal bacteria give 90% of the energy required for the functioning of digestive tract cells [5,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].
Modern metagenomic methods of research allow monitoring of all (cultivated and uncultivated) species diversity, quantitative ratio of different species and strains of microorganisms in normal and at different dysbiosis of microbiota. The resulting microbiota imbalance, that is, any change in the composition of resident commensal bacteria in the intestine, compared to that found in healthy people, can be a risk factor for many metabolic diseases [5,47,49,50,51,52,53,54]. A separate issue for researchers is the search for common patterns and dynamics of intestinal microflora, variability of individual changes [55]. Potentially, some therapies and drugs can be prescribed to almost all patients, and others should be developed for a certain group of people or even optimized for each individual person. This approach, called personalized medicine, is actively developing and consists in individualization of methods of therapy, including dysbiotic conditions.
According to recent data, the variability of the human microbiome is only 10% related to the genetic characteristics of the individual; the differences in the microbiome between individuals are predominantly related to the effects of various endogenous and exogenous factors on it [56]. Among the exogenous factors that can trigger dysbiosis, one of the most significant is the human diet [47,48,50]. Diet plays an important role in forming the composition and activity of a complex microbial population in the intestine, providing it with macroelements such as carbohydrates, proteins and fats [57,58], affects intestinal permeability, mucosal immune function, intestinal mobility and sensitivity, and intestinal nervous system activity [59,60,61,62]. Functional food reduce the risk of developing nutritional-related diseases, prevent or compensate for nutrient deficiencies in the human body, preserve and improve health due to the presence of physiologically functional food ingredients in their composition. Functional food products restoring human nutritive status belong to non-specific methods of correction of microbial ecology of digestive tract and its immunobiological stability [63,64]. In our review, we would like to consider the impact of probiotic microorganisms, their metabolites and natural plant components on enhancing the functional properties of whey-based beverages normalizing gut microbiota and human health. The selection of whey as a base for functional beverages is based on its beneficial nutritional and biological value. Whey is a coproduct in the production of cheese or casein in the dairy industry. Up to 50% of milk solids remain in it, up to 250 different compounds (nitrous, micro- and macro-compounds, milk fat, mineral salts, lactose, vitamins, enzymes (lactoperoxidase, hydrolases, transferases, lyases, proteases and lipases) and organic acids). Whey proteins are very valuable components; they contain all essential amino acids, have a good digestibility and protein efficiency index above 3.0. Milk whey really quenches thirst, in the form of a beverages it can replace most of the lost organic and inorganic salts in extracellular fluid, is quickly adsorbed due to the absence of a fat emulsion. Whey is used to treat various diseases such as arthritis, impaired liver function and dyspepsia. Milk whey is an excellent nutrient medium for probiotic bacteria. In addition, in many countries it is a coproduct of the dairy industry, and cheap technological solutions are required for its disposal, especially for small industries.
Milk whey contains several unique components, such as immunoglobulins (Igs), lactoferrin (Lf), glycomacropeptide (GMP) and sphingolipids, which have some important antimicrobial and antiviral properties, described in some detail by researchers Charu Gupta and Dhan Prakash in their review of the therapeutic potential of milk whey [66]. All these compounds are able to survive after passing through the stomach and small intestine and have their biological effect on the large intestine [65]. Table 1 summarizes the antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral actions of essential whey proteins.
Protein of whey | Antimicrobial properties | Antiviral properties | Antifungal properties |
Immunoglobulin-G (IgG) | Intestinal pathogens such as Clostridium divicile et al. | Rotavirus | - |
Lactoferrin (Lf), Lactoferricin | Gram-positive bacteria, food pathogens such as E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes et al. | HIV, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes viruses, human papilloma virus (HPV), alpha virus and hepatitis C, B and G viruses | Yeast, fungi |
Lactoglobulins | Intestinal pathogens | Herpes simplex virus (HSV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) | Fungi |
Glycomacropeptide (GMP) | Intestinal pathogens, such as E.coli (EHECO157), Salmonella enteritidis, Morganella morganii, Vibrio cholerae et al. | - | - |
Lactoperoxidase (Lp) | Food pathogens, H.pylori et al. | Orthomyxoviridae, (HSV), (HIV) | Yeast, fungi |
Thus, immunoglobulins-G (IgGs), Lp and Lf concentrated from whey participate in host immunity, provide antimicrobial action in the intestinal tract. IgGs binds to bacterial toxins (produced by Clostridium divicile et al.), thereby reducing diarrhea, dehydration, and muscle aches. Milk whey proteins as part of complex therapy help in the fight against rotoviral diarrhea, which is a common infection in children [67].
Lactglobulin is a potential agent for preventing the transmission of genital herpes virus infection and the spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) [68]. The uniqueness of whey proteins is also due to their high content of glutathione (GSH), cysteine and methionine. Glutathione protects cells from free radical damage, infections, toxins, contamination and exposure to UV radiation, is a central element of the body’s immune and antioxidant defense systems.
The antibacterial properties of lactoferrin present in whey are due to its ability to bind iron, thus rendering it inaccessible to pathogens and thus inhibit their metabolism and growth [69]. At the same time, lactobacilli can use iron bound to lactoferrin. Lactoferrin and lactoferricin show inhibitory activity against a wide range of microorganisms, including Gram-positive bacteria, yeast, fungi and protozoa parasites [70]. They also inhibit the growth of food pathogens such as E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes [71]. In addition, lactoferrin has important antiviral activity, it directly interacts with the selected viral pathogen, inhibits virus replication and its ability to attach to epithelial cells of the large intestine. Lf shows antiviral properties to HIV, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes viruses, human papilloma virus (HPV), alpha virus and hepatitis C, B and G viruses [72]. Glycomacropeptide GMP inhibits the binding of cholera toxin to receptors in the intestinal tract.
Phospholipids such as sphingolipids are metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract and produce sphingosine and lysosphingomyelin. These compounds are potent bactericidal agents in vitro. Sphingomyelin has anticancer properties because it is able to inhibit colon cancer.
Another important protein component of whey and a natural protective barrier against infectious microorganisms and viruses is lactoperoxidase (Lp). Lp catalyzes the peroxidation of thiocyanate into the hypothiocinate ion, which is a strong oxidant and destroys bacterial cell membranes [72]. Shin et al in their study proved that oral administration of lactoperoxidase isolated from whey in attenuated pneumonia in mice infected with influenza virus inhibited infiltration of inflamed cells in the lungs [73].
In the global market, for the correction of intestinal microbiota, both native whey (Lactoserum) and various preparations based on whey components are available to consumers. Product labeled Protectamin® (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Hamburg, Germany) or Immunocal, contain whey proteins and are used to protect against Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and other viruses [74]. Antimicrobial properties of lactoperoxidase have found application in Lactoperoxidase System preservative for dairy and meat industry.
Thus, milk whey or diet with supplements based on individual components of milk whey positively and effectively influence the balance of intestinal microbiota, contribute to immune improvement of human body and restoration of healthy state of gastrointestinal tract due to antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral properties.
Unfortunately, direct whey use is still not widespread. Increasing demand of modern consumers for innovative products from natural ingredients, having high nutritional qualities and benefits for health, contributes to the development of the market of milk whey beverages.
According to Katarzyna Sryplonek and Malgorzata Jasienska and other researchers, whey-based beverages can be divided into several main groups, including: non-fermented and fermented beverages, milk-type beverages, probiotic beverages, refreshing soft drinks, alcoholic beverages, dietary beverages, protein-rich sports beverages, direct-use beverages and powder beverages [75,76,77]. In our view, this division is rather conditional, as whey-based beverages fermented by probiotic microorganisms can be assigned to the three above-mentioned groups at once. Since our review focuses on functional whey-based beverages with antibacterial, antiviral and antifungal properties, we will consider only some of the above-mentioned whey beverages in more detail.
In the event of dysbiotic disorders, metagenomic studies of intestinal microbiota can help to develop scientifically sound approaches to the restoration of microbiocenosis using microbial therapy—the introduction of individual species of microorganisms or their consortium depending on the type of pathology. In order to preserve and restore microbial ecology, medical practice uses a variety of probiotics, symbiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, combiotics, genetic engineering probiotics, fecal content transplantation [5,46,63,64].
The global market for such micro-environmental products was estimated at $22.6 billion in 2010; $28.8 billion in 2015; with the prospect of increasing to $45 billion by 2018 [78]. We will not dwell in our review on curative commercial probiotic drugs, but consider the possibility of using fermented functional whey-based beverages to prevent and therapy dysbiosis.
Fermented milk whey can act as a means of delivering probiotic cells in the human body. Also, fermentation allows to increase in milk whey its therapeutic potential, functional properties, nutritional and tasting attractiveness, shelf life, microbial stability, detoxification and safety for the consumer. Fermented whey favorable for those who are contraindicated with lactose load, it has more consumer attractiveness than native, because it has a more pleasant taste and aroma, it is nutritious, cool, less acidic and low in calories, has a light, non-viscous structure, can be easily carbonated, like soft drinks [79,80,81].
Typically, members of normal human microflora—probiotic bacteria belonging to the genera Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, Pediococcus, Propionibacterium, Leuconostoc, Acetobacterium, lactose branching yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus/Candida kefyr, Kluyveromyces lactis var. lactis, Debaryomyces hansenii and Dekkera anomala; lactose-free yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Pichia fermentans, Kazakhstania unispora, Saccharomyces turicensis, Debaryomyces occidentalis and their associations are used for fermentation of milk whey and production of functional beverages [82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]. Criteria of selection of species and strains of microorganisms—starters, for fermentation of milk whey and production of functional beverages are shown in Figure 2.
It should be emphasized that in 2001–2002, the World Health Organization, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), other major societies and expert groups conclude that overall probiotics can be considered absolutely safe, have GRAS status (Generally Recognized As Safe) and without limitation used in the food and pharmaceutical industry [93,94].
It is necessary to bear in mind the known feature of modern diseases, namely the multipurpose of their development. In this situation, it becomes apparent that rationally combined probiotic microorganisms having a wide range of physiological effects should be selected as starter for functional beverages [95]. G. Zoppi et al., proved that multi-strains (multi-species) probiotics are most promising because they show higher efficacy in the prevention of antibiotic-associated dysbacteriosis in children than traditional mono-strain preparations [96]. Other clinical studies show that the administration of multi-species probiotic VSL #3 to patients with ulcerative colitis and ileitis reduces the need for antibacterial agents and prevents the development of bacterial complications, which is not available to mono-strain probiotics [97]. The use of combined starters based on multi-strain symbiotic cultures increases their survival and functionality in the gastrointestinal tract after consumption of fermented beverages. This effect can be explained by cooperative interaction with exchange of bacterial metabolism products: amino acids, free peptides, formiate and СО2.
Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli benefit human health through antagonism to pathogenic bacteria and the ability to modulate the local and systemic immune response; participate in stabilization and preservation of intestinal barrier, in absorption of calcium, magnesium and iron; are capable of converting various nutritional components into biologically active molecules [98,99,100,101]. By normalizing intestinal microbiocenosis, probiotic bacteria influence not only the regulation of intestinal activity, but also other organs and systems, thus maintaining the general homeostasis of the host body. As a source of antioxidants, lactobacilli and bifidobacteria increase the body’s antioxidant status. In individual strains of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, the ability to produce gamma-aminobutyricacid (GABA), to exert psychotropic action and to show activity reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety was revealed [102,103,104]. To reduce stress, improve the psychoemotional state of a person and increase his working capacity can be introduced into the body with food of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline or their precursors—tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine. One of the sources of introduction into the body of neurotransmitters can be fermented drinks based on milk whey obtained using lactic acid bacteria—producers of neurotransmitters.
At the same time, the potentially possible positive effects of the presence of probiotics in the human body largely depend on the ability and activity of specific strains of bacteria.
During fermentation with probiotic bacteria, milk whey gains a more significant therapeutic effect in the correction of dysbiosis, improving its functional properties as described in Figure 3.
Due to metabolic activity of probiotic microorganisms during fermentation of protein and carbohydrate components, milk whey is enriched with organic acids (acetic, citric, dairy, etc.), aromatic compounds (diacetyl, etc.), H2O2, bacteriocins, bacteriocin-like peptides, biosurfactants and other metabolites having direct and/or mediated antimicrobial, antifungal or antiviral action [83,105].
Organic acids have antimicrobial properties (particularly against E. coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, etc.) and antifungal properties (against Candida, Fusarium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, etc.) [106,107,108,109]. It should be noted that organic acids are ‘weak acids’, more than 90% of their molecules in the lumen of the intestine are in anionic dissociated form. These natural metabolites are important for regulating adsorption and metabolism in the large intestine. In some physiological and pathological conditions, they initially penetrate rapidly through the membrane of opportunistic and pathogenic bacteria, which colonize the intestinal mucosa, change intracellular pH, reduce energy potential, accumulate toxic anions; lead to ultra-structural defects of the bacterial cell, which eventually suppresses its life functions [110,111]. There is evidence that the inhibitory effect of organic acids is directly dependent on pH, and there is evidence that at low values, stronger antimicrobial activity is observed in lactic and propionic acid, at pH > 4.5 in acetic acid [112,113]. In order to have a fungicidal effect, for example with respect to C. albicans, organic acids must be in a high concentration [114,115].
Inhibitory action against major opportunistic microorganisms of probiotic metabolites such as hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl and bacteriocins is known. Hydrogen peroxide, which accumulates in medium during growth of catalase-negative microorganisms, has inhibitory effect on growth of catalase-positive bacteria due to strong oxidative effect on molecular structures of their proteins. It is noted that high molecular weight bacteriocins suppress closely related species of bacteria that live in the same biotope, and microcins (low molecular weight metabolites) have a wider spectrum of antimicrobial activity and therefore a more significant bacteriostatic effect [110,111,116,117,118,119]. The involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in the development of physiological and pathological conditions is currently being actively studied. In many experimental studies it has been shown that NO refers to key signaling molecules of the gastrointestinal tract, it is synthesized not only by cells of the human body, but also by some bacteria-commensals (E. coli, Lactobacillus) [120,121]. The cytotoxic effect of NO is enhanced by association with acidic medium (bifidobacteria lower pH to 5.0, lactobacilli to 4.0). It is under these conditions that nitrites are formed—highly toxic endogenous metabolites, which disrupt the normal functioning of many opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms, and the ability of a number of representatives of normal microflora to be resistant to these compounds has been proved [122]. A feature of these nitrites is also that they potentiate the simultaneous antibacterial effect of hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid, which are formed by saccharolytic bacteria [121].
Antibiotics produced by lactic acid bacteria (Reuterin), bacteriocins or bacteriocin-like substances (Nisin, Leukocin, Sakacin, Pediocin PAl/AcH, Enterocins AS-48, A and B, Lactacin B, Lactocin 27, Plantaricin A, Platacin B and Helveticin J., etc.)—antimicrobial agents that are active against bacteria and fungi. They can affect microorganisms by inhibiting cell wall synthesis, increasing the cell permeability of target cell membranes, or inhibiting the activities of RNase or DNase. They have been found to be non-toxic to animals and humans, do not change the nutritional properties of food products, are effective at low concentration, do not lose activity when cooled, and can also be used for bio-preservation of food products [123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130].
Probiotics can be attributed to anti-endotoxin agents. It has been experimentally proved that bifidobacteria have endotoxin binding ability, reduce endotoxin-dependent induction and release of interleukin (IL) 8 [131]. It is believed that bacterial lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans of various strains of normophlora have immunoregulatory effects. In parallel, it has been established that the key importance of anti-endotoxin immunity is not the absolute protection of the body from endotoxin, but the limitation of its concentration and biological activity to the level necessary for the realization of physiological functioning of the immune system [132].
It is known that the introduction of live probiotic bacteria, including lactic acid bacteria, into the human body through the consumption of fermented products and beverages, including milk whey, has a positive effect on human health [133]. Living microorganisms compete in the gut with pathogens for nutrients or adhesion sites. Saturation of adhesion sites and co-agammaegation allow Lactobacillus spp. prevent Candida spp. adhesion to epithelial cell wall. [115]. Thus, the presence of Lactobacillus cells can alter the host’s immune response in the case of Candida colonization to attract granulocytes and stimulate immune defense. In addition, the presence of Lactobacillus and direct interaction leads to down regulation of several C. albicans genes associated with adhesion, invasion, and opposition to host protection [134].
Lactic acid bacteria cells (Lactobacilus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus) can induce cytokine production (IFN-g, IL-6 and TNF-α) by immunocompetent cells in healthy people, which contributes to more effective protection of the body from infections [135].
The functional properties of whey can be enhanced not only by fermentation, but also by the addition of various bioactive ingredients, as shown in Figure 4.
Prebiotics (oligosaccharides, oligofructans, dietary fibres, sorbents, etc.) are used to increase the functional effectiveness and stability of probiotics during fermentation of milk whey, when it is ingested or stored. Prebiotics increase the survival and activity of probiotic microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract (protecting against antibiotics, hydrochloric acid, gastric juice, bile acids, digestive enzymes), as well as selectively modulate the main microbiota, providing health benefits. The process of reactivation of starter bacteria immobilized on sorbent (plant fibres) is also accelerated by ‘group’ behavior (‘quorum sense’) of cells closely located on sorbent (plant fibres), and biodegradable sorbent also serves as a source of nutrition both for introduced bacteria and for representatives of resident microflora [136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144]. The industrial use of prebiotics from plant sources such as Arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) and Raftilose ® (commercially available inulin) carbohydrates is known to enhance the vitality of Lactobacillus sp. in bioyogurt during storage in a refrigerator [139]. These prebiotic substances increase the survival of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract and colonization to the intestinal epithelium. In addition, prebiotics have such stability that they can be incorporated into the food matrix as a carrier for delivering the desired substances and living cells of probiotics [145,146,147].
Whey-based functional beverages may contain a variety of natural plant components: fruit or fruit juices (e.g. pomegranate, acai, acerola, noni and mangosteen), berries (e.g. cranberries, blueberries, strawberries, sea buckthorn, silk, etc.) and whey extracts or CO2-extracts of berries, vegetable juices or puree (Girasol, beet, carrots, pumpkin, etc.) or botanical extracts (e.g. Aloe vera, ginger, ginkgo and melissa) [84,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168], which increase the nutritional and functional value of the beverage, improve its organoleptic and texture, as well as have antimicrobial, antiviral and antifungal properties. It is known that in the presence of fruit-berry and fruit-vegetable juices, the viability of probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria decreases after 2 weeks of storage. Their survival rate is increased by introducing grape seed extract, green tea extract or vitamin C extract or other vegetable components [169,170,171,172] into the beverage composition. Antimicrobial activity of plant extracts is based on phenolic compounds (simple phenols, phenolic acids, quinones, flavones, flavonoids, flavonols, tannins and coumarins), terpenoids and essential oils, alkaloids, lectins, polypeptides, etc. [173].
Lucera et al. showed the possibility of using essential oils of sage, juniper, lemon for apple juice preservation [174]. The antimicrobial effect of these essential oils was observed in the acid range of pH and could result from a combination of different active complexes. The combination of different preservation systems allows taking advantage of each while at the same time significantly reducing the amount of antimicrobial agent.
Functional beverages are special drinks intended for systematic consumption in the composition of food rations by all age groups of a healthy population, having scientifically sound and confirmed properties, reducing the risk of developing nutritional diseases, preventing deficiency or filling nutrient deficiency in the human body, preserving and improving health due to the presence of physiologically functional food ingredients in their composition. Four main groups are distinguished in functional beverages category: sports, energy, nutraceuticals and healthy. The ratio of the beverages to one or another grouping is determined by the largest component proportion in the beverages composition that provides its functional properties. It is possible to assign beverage to the functional group when meeting the requirements for the content of one or more functional ingredients in them in amount of 10 to 50% of the recommended daily norm.
Despite many technological solutions developed in different countries for preparing probiotic functional beverages containing whey, their industrial production has not become widespread. Yakult and Sofyl (manufactured by Yakult), Chamyto (Nestlé), Activia, Actimel, Danito (Danone) and a few other brands are available on the market.
Perhaps in part, this is due to recent disputes over the effectiveness and usefulness of probiotics. In 2012, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), on labels of products containing live probiotic microorganisms, does not recommend the use of designations of any positive medical effects from their use; according to EFSA experts, traditional probiotics lack real objective evidence of their effects on health and well-being, as well as due to the increase in the number of observations of side effects in such probiotics when they are used [175]. A similar ban in 2014 was adopted by Food & Drug Administration USA [176]. In recent years, in order to maintain and restore the microbial ecology of humans, a variety of low molecular weight compounds of microbial origin have been rapidly introduced, which have been called metabiotics (or metabolite probiotics, postbiotics, biological drugs, pharmacabiotics) in the scientific literature [5,63,177,178,179,180,181]. Metabiotics are structural components of probiotic microorganisms, and/or their metabolites, and/or signaling molecules with known chemical structure, which are able to optimize physiological functions, metabolic, epigenetic, informational, regulatory, transport, immune, neurogormonal, and/or behavioral responses associated with the activity of the host body’s symbiotic (indigenic) microbiota. Metabiotics, compared to probiotics based on living organisms, have a longer retention period, clear application targets, they are better dosed, their safety is better controlled, they are better absorbed, metabolized, distributed across the body, tissues and organs, faster and more eliminated from the body. New types of locally active antimicrobial compounds, (such as phagobiotics, bacteriocins, other antimicrobial peptides, new antibiotic variants, etc.) are examples of metabiotics that affect intestinal microbiotic correction. They will further improve the specificity, efficacy and safety of microecological techniques for the prevention and treatment of various diseases, including those associated with human symbiotic microbiota imbalance. These metabiotics will be able to act both as independent drugs and as enriching additives in functional foods and beverages, including milk whey. An example of functional beverage with metabiotics is Calpis sour milk (Calpis Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), containing two peptides: valine-proline-proline (VPP) and isoleucine-proline-proline (IPP), inhibiting ACE and responsible for antihypertensive activity. These peptides are obtained from caseins during fermentation of milk with Lactobacillus helveticus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
At present, however, the mass production and use of metabiotics for various purposes is also limited in many countries due to a number of objective reasons. Among the most important of these, according to Shenderov B., are the variety of biological and pharmacological effects and targets of many known low molecular weight molecules of microbial origin, lack of economically reasonable methods of industrial isolation and evaluation of physical and chemical structure of potential metabiotics, and reacting the biologically and pharmacologically active microbial compounds included in them with other food and endogenous molecules; insufficient use of OMIC-technologies and gnotobiological models to assess the safety and effectiveness of this new class of biologically active additives and pharmacological agents of microbial origin, shortage of biotechnological enterprises and skilled personnel, lack of sufficient number of museums of microorganisms and microbiocenoses of human origin [182].
Monitoring of species diversity, quantitative ratio of different species and strains of intestinal microbiota in normal and in different pathological conditions allows investigating in detail the mechanisms of such disorders and creating methods of control over them. Understanding the patterns of human interaction and the intestinal microflora that inhabits it helps to significantly advance the development of new approaches to microbial therapy and the prevention of dysbiotic disorders, and many other dysbiosis-induced metabolic diseases. Among non-specific methods of intestinal microbiota correction functional food products are found. Whey in untreated form and fermented with probiotic microorganisms is a very effective functional beverages with an antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral effect; able to regulate not only the activities of the intestine, but also other organs and systems, contributing to the maintenance of general homeostasis of the host organism. Introduction into whey of probiotics, prebiotics, various bioactive natural plant ingredients or metabiotics with certain properties and chemical structure contributes to improvement functional properties of whey beverages, as well as their stability. The functional beverages thus produced can serve as a target agent optimizing host-specific physiological functions, including those associated with symbiotic microbiota activity.
This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP05132352, BR05236330).
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Dominguez-Bello MG, Godoy-Vitorino F, Knight R, et al. (2019) Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut 68: 1108-1114. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317503
![]() |
[2] | Gevers D, Knight R, Petrosino JF, et al. (2012) The human microbiome project: A community resource for the healthy human microbiome. P LoS Biol 10: e1001377. |
[3] | Prakash S (2011) Gut microbiota: Next frontier in understanding human health and development of biotherapeutics. Biologics 5: 71-86. |
[4] |
Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, et al. (2006) Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444: 1022-1023. doi: 10.1038/4441022a
![]() |
[5] |
Weinstock GM (2012) Genomic approaches to studying the human microbiota. Nature 489: 250-256. doi: 10.1038/nature11553
![]() |
[6] | Tkachenko EI (2014) Paradigm of dysbiosis in the modern gastroenterology. The role of microbiota in the treatment and prevention of diseases in the xxi century. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol (in Rus) 105: 4-8. |
[7] |
Prescott SL (2017) History of medicine: Origin of the term microbiome and why it matterns. Hum Microbiome J 4: 24-25. doi: 10.1016/j.humic.2017.05.004
![]() |
[8] |
Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, et al. (2019) Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176: 649-662. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.001
![]() |
[9] |
Almeida A, Mitchell AL, Boland M, et al. (2019) A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 568: 499-518. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0965-1
![]() |
[10] |
Weinstock GM (2012) Genomic approaches to studying the human microbiota. Nature 489: 250-256. doi: 10.1038/nature11553
![]() |
[11] |
Li J, Jia H, Cai X, et al. (2014) An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol 32: 834-841. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2942
![]() |
[12] | Yudin SM, Yegorova AM, Makarov VV (2018) Analysis of human microbiota. Russian and Foreign Experience. Int J Appl Fundam Res 11: 175-180. |
[13] | Sekelja M, Berget I, Naes T, et al. (2010) Unveiling an abundant core microbiota in the human adult colon by a phylogroup-independent searching approach. ISME J 5: 519-531. |
[14] | Flint HJ, Juge N (2015) Role of microbes in carbohydrate digestion. Food Sci Technol 29: 24-26. |
[15] |
Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Petito V, et al. (2013) Commensal Clostridia: Leading players in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Gut Pathog 5: S23. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-23
![]() |
[16] |
Thursby E, Juge N (2017) Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 474: 1823-1836. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160510
![]() |
[17] | Amrane S, Hocquart M, Afouda P, et al.(2019) Lagier Metagenomic and culturomic analysis of gut microbiota dysbiosis during Clostridium difficile infection. Sci Rep 9: 12807. |
[18] |
Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486: 207-214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234
![]() |
[19] |
Blottière HM, de Vos WM, Ehrlich SD, et al. (2013) Human intestinal metagenomics: State of the art and future. Curr Opin Microbiol 16: 232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.006
![]() |
[20] | MetaHIT Project 2020. Available from: http://www.metahit.eu. |
[21] |
Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, et al. (2010) Human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464: 59-65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821
![]() |
[22] |
Gloux K, Leclerc M, Iliozer H, et al. (2007) Development of high-throughput phenotyping of metagenomic clones from the human gut microbiome for modulation of eukaryotic cell growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 3734-3737. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02204-06
![]() |
[23] |
Jones BV, Begley M, Hill C, et al. (2008) Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 13580-13585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804437105
![]() |
[24] |
Zoetendal EG, Rajilic-Stojanovic M, de Vos WM (2008) High-throughput diversity and functionality analysis of the gastrointestinal tract micro biota. Gut 57: 1605-1615. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.133603
![]() |
[25] |
Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, et al. (2011) Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473: 174-180. doi: 10.1038/nature09944
![]() |
[26] |
Siezen RJ, Kleerebezem M (2011) The human gut microbiome: Are we our enterotypes? Microb Biotechnol 4: 550-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00290.x
![]() |
[27] |
Koren O, Knights D, Gonzalez A, et al. (2013) A guide to enterotypes across the human body: Meta-analysis of microbial community structures in human microbiome datasets. P LoS Comput Biol 9: e1002863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002863
![]() |
[28] |
Integrative HMPRNC (2019) The integrative human microbiome project. Nature 569: 641-648. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1238-8
![]() |
[29] |
Wang WL, Xu SY, Ren ZG, et al. (2015) Application of metagenomics in the human gut microbiome. World J Gastroenterol 21: 803-814. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.803
![]() |
[30] |
Endt K, Stecher B, Chaffron S, et al. (2010) The microbiota mediates pathogen clearance from the gut lumen after non-typhoidal Salmonella diarrhea. P LoS Pathog 6: e1001097. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001097
![]() |
[31] |
Fukuda S, Toh H, Taylor TD, et al. (2012) Acetate producing bifidobacteria protect the host from enteropathogenic infection via carbohydrate transporters. Gut Microbes 3: 449-454. doi: 10.4161/gmic.21214
![]() |
[32] |
Fukuda S, Toh H, Hase K, et al. (2011) Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature 469: 543-547. doi: 10.1038/nature09646
![]() |
[33] | Ivashkin VT, Sheptulin AA, Sklyanskaya OA (2002) Diarrhea syndrome (in Rus). 2 Eds. Moscow: Geotar-media, 58-63. |
[34] |
Maynard CL, Elson CO, Hatton RD, et al. (2012) Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature 489: 231-241. doi: 10.1038/nature11551
![]() |
[35] |
Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G, et al. (2013) The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immuneeffects of cyclophosphamide. Science 342: 971-976. doi: 10.1126/science.1240537
![]() |
[36] | Kuchumova SY, Poluektova YA, Sheptulin AA, et al. (2011) Physiological value of intestinal microflora. Ros Zhurn Gastroenterol Gepatol Koloproktol (in Rus) 21: 17-27. |
[37] |
Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F (2012) Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489: 242-249. doi: 10.1038/nature11552
![]() |
[38] |
Cani PD (2014) Metabolism in 2013: The gut microbiota manages host metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10: 74-76. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.240
![]() |
[39] |
Clarke G, Stilling RM, Kennedy PJ, et al. (2014) Mini review: Gut microbiota: The neglected endocrine organ. Mol Endocrinol 28: 1221-1238. doi: 10.1210/me.2014-1108
![]() |
[40] | Al-Asmakh M, Anuar F, Zadjali F, et al. (2012) Gut microbial communities modulating brain development and function. Gut Microbes 3: 366-373. |
[41] |
Kim B, Hong VM, Yang J, et al. (2016) A review of fermented foods with beneficial effects on brain and cognitive function. Prev Nutr Food Sci 21: 297-309. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2016.21.4.297
![]() |
[42] |
de Carvalho NM, Costa EM, Silva S, et al. (2018) Fermented foods and beverages in human diet and their influence on gut microbiota and health. Fermentation 4: 90. doi: 10.3390/fermentation4040090
![]() |
[43] | Li L, Zhong S, Cheng B, et al. (2020) Cross-talk between gut microbiota and the heart: A new target for the herbal medicine treatment of heart failure? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2020: 9097821. |
[44] | Lyte M (2011) Probiotics function mechanistically as delivery vehicles for neuroactive compounds: Microbial endocrinology in the design and use of probiotics. Bio Essays: News Rev Mol, Cell Dev Biol 33: 574-581. |
[45] |
Jia Q, Wang L, Zhang X, et al. (2020) Prevention and treatment of chronic heart failure through traditional Chinese medicine: Role of the gut microbiota. Pharmacol Res 151: 104552. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104552
![]() |
[46] |
Gaci N, Borrel G, Tottey W, et al. (2014) Archaea and the human gut: New beginning of an old story. World J Gastroenterol 20: 16062-16078. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16062
![]() |
[47] | Ardatskaya MD, Bel'mer SV, Dobritsa VP, et al. (2015) Dysbiosis (dysbacteriosis) of the intestine: modern condition of the problem, complex diagnosis and therapeutic correction. Exp Clin Gastroenetrol (in Rus) 117: 13-50. |
[48] |
Falony G, Joossens M, Viera-Silva S, et al. (2016) Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352: 560-564. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3503
![]() |
[49] |
Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder M, et al. (2016) Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science 352: 565-569. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3369
![]() |
[50] | Proal AD, Lindseth IA, Marshall TG (2017) Microbe-microbe and host-microbe interactions drive microbiome dysbiosis and inflammatory processes. Discovery Med 23: 51-60. |
[51] |
Blum HE (2017) The human microbiome. Adv Med Sci 62: 414-420. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2017.04.005
![]() |
[52] |
Bik EM, Ugalde JA, Cousins J, et al. (2018) Microbial biotransformations in the human distal gut. Br J Pharmacol 175: 4404-4414. doi: 10.1111/bph.14085
![]() |
[53] | Shenderov BA, Midtvedt T (2014) Epigenomic programing: a future way to health? Microbial Ecology in Health & Disease 25: 24145. |
[54] |
Nicolson GL, Mattos de GF, Settineri R, et al. (2016) Clinical effects of hydrogen administration: from animal and human diseases to exercise medicine. Intern J Clin Medicine 7: 32-76. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2016.71005
![]() |
[55] | Lazebnik LB, Konev YuV (2014) Large intestine microbiota and components of metabolic syndrome. Exp Clin Gastroenterol (in Rus) 5: 33-39. |
[56] |
Malla MA, Dubey A, Kumar A, et al. (2019) Exploring the human microbiome: The potential future role of next-generation sequencing in disease diagnosis and treatment. Front Immunol 9: 2868. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02868
![]() |
[57] |
D'Argenio V (2018) Human microbiome acquisition and bioinformatic challenges in metagenomic studies. Int J Mol Sci 19: 383. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020383
![]() |
[58] |
Conlon MA, Bird AR (2014) The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health. Nutrients 7: 17-44. doi: 10.3390/nu7010017
![]() |
[59] |
Derrien M, Vlieg JE (2015) Fate, activity, and impact of ingested bacteria within the human gut microbiota. Trends Microbiol 23: 354-366. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.002
![]() |
[60] |
Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Gupta A (2015) Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J. Clin. Investig 125: 926-938. doi: 10.1172/JCI76304
![]() |
[61] | Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, et al. (2015) The gut-brain axis: Interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol Q Publ Hell Soc Gastroenterol 28: 203-209. |
[62] |
Fung TC, Olson CA, Hsiao EY (2017) Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease. Nat Neurosci 20: 145-155. doi: 10.1038/nn.4476
![]() |
[63] |
Powell N, Walker MM, Talley NJ (2017) The mucosal immune system: Master regulator of bidirectional gut-brain communications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14: 143-159. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.191
![]() |
[64] | Shenderov BA, Sinitsa AV, Zakharchenko MM (2017) Metabiotics: Yesterday, today, tomorrow (in Rus). St. Petersburg: OOO "Kraft", 80. |
[65] | Ardatskaya MD (2015) Probiotics, prebiotics and methabiotics in the correction of microecological bowel disorders. Med Counc (in Rus) 3: 94-99. |
[66] |
Gupta C, Prakash D (2017) Therapeutic Potential of Milk Whey. Beverages 3: 31-45. doi: 10.3390/beverages3030031
![]() |
[67] |
Yu YJ, Margues C (2016) Effects of whey peptide extract on the growth of probiotics and gut microbiota. J Funct Foods 21: 507-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.10.035
![]() |
[68] |
Wolber FM, Broomfield AM, Fray L, et al. (2005) Supplemental dietary whey protein concentrate reduces rotavirus-induced disease symptoms in suckling mice. J Nutr 135: 1470-1474. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1470
![]() |
[69] |
Chatterton D, Smithers G, Roupas P, et al. (2006) Bioactivity of β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin-technological implications for processing. Int Dairy J 16: 1229-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.06.001
![]() |
[70] |
Troost FJ, Steijns J, Saris WH, et al. (2001) Gastric digestion of bovine lactoferrin in vivo in adults. J Nutr 131: 2101-2104. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.8.2101
![]() |
[71] |
Takakura N, Wakabayashi H, Ishibashi H, et al. (2003) Oral lactoferrin treatment of experimental oral candidiasis in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47: 2619-2623. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2619-2623.2003
![]() |
[72] |
Floris R, Recio I, Berkhout B, et al. (2003) Antibacterial and antiviral effects of milk proteins and derivatives thereof. Curr Pharm Des 9: 1257-1275. doi: 10.2174/1381612033454810
![]() |
[73] |
Shin K, Wakabayashi H, Yamauchi K, et al. (2005) Effects of orally administered bovine lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase on influenza virus infection in mice. J Med Microbio 54: 717-723. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46018-0
![]() |
[74] |
Micke P, Beeh KM, Buhl R (2002) Effects of long-term supplementation with whey proteins on plasma glutathione levels of HIV-infected patients. Eur J Nutr 41: 12-18. doi: 10.1007/s003940200001
![]() |
[75] | Sryplonek K, Jasińska M (2017) Development of fermented beverages based on acid whey. Folia Pomer Univ Technol Stetin Agric Aliment Pisc Zootech 338(44)4: 191-204. |
[76] | Jeličić I, Božanić R, Tratnik L (2008) Whey-based beverages-a new generation of dairy products. Mljekarstvo 58: 257-274. |
[77] | Chavan RS, Shraddha RC, Kumar A, et al. (2015) Whey based beverage: Its functionality, formulations, health benefits and applications. J Food Process Technol 10: 1-8. |
[78] |
Nguyen HT, Truong DH, Kouhonde S, et al. (2016) Biochemical engineering approaches for increasing viability and functionality of probiotic bacteria. Int J Mol Sci 17: 867. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060867
![]() |
[79] | Guleria S, Kumar A, Sharma S, et al. (2017) Metagenomics of fermented foods: Implications on probiotic development, In: Kalia V, Shouche Y, Purohit H, et al., Mining of Microbial Wealth and MetaGenomics, Singapore: Springer, 333-355. |
[80] | Rajesh K (2018) Enhanced shelf life with improved food quality from fermentation processes. J Food Technol Pres 2: 1-7. |
[81] |
Bell V, Ferrão J,Pimentel L, et al. (2018) One Health, Fermented Foods, and Gut Microbiota. Foods 7: 195. doi: 10.3390/foods7120195
![]() |
[82] | Ranadheera CS, Vidanarachchi JK, Rocha RS, et al. (2017) Probiotic delivery through fermentation: Dairy vs. non-dairy beverages. Fermentation 3: 67. |
[83] | Hernandez-MendozaA, Robles VJ, Angulo JO, et al. (2007) Preparation of a whey-based probiotic product with Lactobacillus reuteri and Bifidobacterium bifidum. Food Technol Biotechnol 45: 27-31. |
[84] | Kumar S (2015) Development, quality evaluation and shelf life studies of probiotic beverages using whey and aloe vera juice. J Food Process Technol 6: 486. |
[85] | Sabokbar N, Khodaiyan F (2015) Characterization of pomegranate juice and whey based novel beverage fermented by kefir grains. J Food Sci Technol 52: 3711-3718. |
[86] |
Leite A, Mayo B, Rachid C, et al. (2012) Assessment of the microbial diversity of Brazilian kefir grains by PCR-DGGE and pyrosequencing analysis. Food Microbiol 31: 215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.011
![]() |
[87] | Saubenova MG, Oleinikova YeA, Amangeldi AA (2019) Biological value of fermented products. Int J Appl Fundam Res 8: 124-129. |
[88] | Oleinikova Ye, Amangeldi A, Aitzhanova A, et al. (2019) Influence of dairy microorganisms and their consortia on indigenous microflora. Int J Eng Res Appl 9: 46-49. |
[89] | Tamime AY (2006) Production of kefir, koumiss and other related products. In: Tamime, AY (ed.), Fermented Milk, UK: Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd, 174-216. |
[90] | Chizhayeva A, Dudikova G, Amangeldi A (2016) Use of lactobacilli consortium for biological protection of food from pathogens. J Food Proc & Technol 7: 74. |
[91] |
Leite AM, Miguel MA, Peixoto RS, et al. (2013) Microbiological, technological and therapeutic properties of kefir: A natural probiotic beverage. Braz J Microbiol 44: 341-9. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822013000200001
![]() |
[92] | Grunskaya VA, Gabrielyan DS (2018) Microbiological aspects of production of enriched fermented dairy products using milk whey. Molochnokhozyaystvennyy Vestnik (in Rus) 3: 91-103. |
[93] | Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report (2002) Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food, London, Ontario, Canada, 11. |
[94] | FAO/WHO (2001) The food and agriculture organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria, 1. |
[95] | Ursova NI (2013) Therapeutic Potential of Modern Probiotics. Pediatr Pharmacol 10: 46-56. |
[96] |
Zoppi G, Cinquetti M, Benini A, et al. (2001) Modulation of the intestinal ecosystem by probiotics and lactulose in children during treatment with ceftriaxone. Curr Therap Res 62: 418-435. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(01)89006-8
![]() |
[97] |
Chapman TM, Plosker GL, Figgitt DP (2006) VSL#3 probiotic mixture: a review of its use in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Drugs 66: 1371-1387. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666100-00006
![]() |
[98] | Sánchez B, Delgado S, Blanco-Míguez A, et al. (2017) Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res 61: 1-15. |
[99] | Dinev T, Beev G, Tzanova M, et al. (2017) Review antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum against pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms: A review. Bulg J Vet Med Online first: 1-16. |
[100] | Hamzehlou P, Sepahy A, Mehrabian S, et al. (2018) Production of vitamins B3, B6 and B9 by lactobacillus isolated from traditional yogurt samples from 3 cities in Iran, winter 2016. Appl Food Biotechnol 5: 105-118. |
[101] |
Li P, Zhou Q, Gu Q (2016) Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum LZ227, a potential probiotic strain producing B group vitamins. J Biotechnol 234: 66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.020
![]() |
[102] |
Yunes RA, Poluektova EY, Dyachkova MS, et al. (2016) GABA production and structure of gadB/gadC genes in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains from human microbiota. Anaerobe 42: 197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.011
![]() |
[103] | Averina OV, Danilenko VN (2017) Human intestinal microbiota: role in the formation and functioning of the nervous system. Microbiology (in Rus) 86: 1-19. |
[104] | Danilenko VN, Yunes RA, Poluektova EU (2014) Strains Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis synthesizing gamma-aminobutyric acid. Russian Patent 2575625, C1.2014: 1-28. |
[105] | Thapa N, Tamang J P (2015) Functionality and therapeutic values of fermented foods. In: Tamang JP, Health Benefits of Fermented Foods, New York: CRC Press, 111-168. |
[106] | Belguesmia Y, Rabesona H, Mounier J, et al. (2014) Characterization of antifungal organic acids produced by Lactobacillus harbinensis K.V9.3.1Np immobilized in gellan-xanthan beads during batch fermentation. Food Control 36: 205-211. |
[107] |
Peyer LC, Axel C, Lynch KM, et al. (2016) Inhibition of Fusarium culmorum by carbonxylic acid released from lactic acid bacteria in a barley malt substrate. Food Control 69: 227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.010
![]() |
[108] |
Wang L, Yue T, Yuan Y, et al. (2015) Anew in sight in to the adsorption mechanism of patulin by the heat-inactive lactic acid bacteria cells. Food Control 50: 104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.08.041
![]() |
[109] | Muthulakshmi S, Naveen KK, Chandranayaka S, et al. (2016) Antifungal and Zearalenone Inhibitory Activity of Pediococcus pentosaceus Isolated from Dairy Products on Fusarium graminearum. Front Microbiol 7: 890. |
[110] |
Alakomi HL, Skytta E, Saarela M, et al. (2000) Lactic acid permebilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Applied Environ Microbiol 66: 2001-2005. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2001-2005.2000
![]() |
[111] |
Pan X, Chen F, Wu T, et al. (2009) The acid, bile tolerance and antimicrobial property of Lactobacillus acidophilus NIT. Food Control 20: 598-602. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.08.019
![]() |
[112] |
Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Geisen R, et al. (2001) Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 73: 365-73. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.365s
![]() |
[113] |
Schell MA, Karmirantzou M, Snel B, et al. (2002) The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflect its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 14422-14427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212527599
![]() |
[114] | Lourenco A, Pedro NA, Salazar SB, et al. (2018) Effect of acetic acid and lactic acid at low pH in growth and azole resistance of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Front Microbiol 9: 3265. |
[115] |
Zangl I, Pap I, Aspӧck C,et al. (2020) The role of Lactobacillus species in the control of Candida via biotrophic interactions. Microb Cell 7: 1-14. doi: 10.15698/mic2020.01.702
![]() |
[116] | Salminen S, Salminen E (1997) Lactulose lactic acid bacteria intestinal microecology and mucosal protection. Scand J Gastroenterol 222: 45-48. |
[117] |
Lanning DK, Rhee KJ, Knight KL (2005) Intestinal bacteria and development of the B-lymphocyte repertoire. Trends Immunol 26: 419-425. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.06.001
![]() |
[118] |
Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2005) Developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 777-788. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1273
![]() |
[119] |
Strompfova V, Laukova A (2007) In vitro study on bacteriocin production of Enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe 13: 228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.07.002
![]() |
[120] |
Chavez AM, Menconi MJ, Hodin RA, et al. (1999) Cytokine-induced intestinal epithelial hyperpermeability: role of nitric oxide. Crit Care Med 27: 2246-2251. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00030
![]() |
[121] |
Sobko T, Reinders CL, Jansson EA, et al. (2005) Gastrointestinal bacteria generate nitric oxide from nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 13: 163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2005.06.001
![]() |
[122] |
Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Cole JA, et al. (2004) Nitrate, bacteria and human health. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 593-602. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro929
![]() |
[123] |
Messaoudi S, Manai M, Kergourlay G, et al. (2013) Lactobacillus salivarius: Bacteriocin and probiotic activity. Food Microbiol 36:296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.05.010
![]() |
[124] |
Sharma A, Srivastava S (2014) Anti-Candida activity of two-peptide bacteriocins, plantaricins (Pln E/F and J/K) and their mode of action. Fungal Biol 118: 264-275. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.12.006
![]() |
[125] |
Galvez A, Abriouel H, López RL, et al. (2007) Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 120: 51-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.001
![]() |
[126] |
Ananou S, Valdivia E, Bueno MM, et al. (2004) Effect of combined physicochemical preservatives on enterocin AS-48 activity against the enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus CECT 976 strain. J Appl Microbiol 97: 48-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02276.x
![]() |
[127] |
Seo S, Jung D, Wang X, et al. (2013) Combined effect of lactic acid bacteria and citric acid on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium. Food Sci Biotech 22: 1171-1174. doi: 10.1007/s10068-013-0199-1
![]() |
[128] | Ananou S, Maqueda M, Martinez-Bueno M, et al. (2007) Biopreservation, an ecological approach to improve the safety and shelf-life of foods. In: Méndez-Vilas A (Ed.), Communicating Current Research and Educational Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology, Formatex: RJCES, 1: 475-486. |
[129] |
Settanni L, Corsetti A (2008) Application of bacteriocins in vegetable food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 121: 123-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.09.001
![]() |
[130] |
Arques JL, Rodríguez E, Nuñez M, et al. (2008) Antimicrobial activity of nisin, reuterin and the lactoperoxidase system on Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in Cuajada, a semisolid dairy product manufactured in Spain. J Dairy Sci 91: 70-75. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0133
![]() |
[131] |
Gill H S (2003) Probiotic to enhance anti-infective defenses in the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 17: 755-73. doi: 10.1016/S1521-6918(03)00074-X
![]() |
[132] | Lihoded VG, Bondarenko VM (2007) Antiendotoxin immunity in the regulation of the number of intestinal microflora (in Rus), Moscow: Medicine, 216. |
[133] | Wedajo B (2015) Lactic Acid Bacteria: Benefits, Selection Criteria and Probiotic Potential in Fermented Food. J Prob Health 3: 129. |
[134] |
James KM, MacDonald KW, Chanyi RM, et al. (2016) Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation and modulation of gene expression by probiotic cells and supernatant. J Med Microbiol 65: 328-336. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000226
![]() |
[135] |
Solis B, Nova E, Goxmez S, et al. (2002) The effect of fermented milk on interferon production in malnourished children and in anorexia nervosa patients undergoing nutritional care. Eur J Clin Nutr 56: 27-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601659
![]() |
[136] | Valcheva R, Dieleman LA. (2016) Prebiotics: Definition and protective mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroentrol 30: 27-37. |
[137] | Grizard D,Barthomeuf C (1999) Non-digestible oligosaccharides used as prebiotic agents: mode of production and beneficial effects on animal and human health. Reprod Nutr Dev 39: 588. |
[138] |
Anal AK, Singh H (2007) Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci Technol 18: 240-251. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.004
![]() |
[139] | Abesinghe N, Vidanarachchi JK, Silva S (2012) The effect of Arrowroot (Marantaarundinacea) extract on the survival of probiotic bacteria in set yoghurt. Int J Sci Res Publ 2: 1-4. |
[140] | Alybayeva AJ, Elubayeva ME, Oleinikova YeA, et al. (2019) Sinbiotic fermented dairy products in human nutrition. Achiev Sci Educ (in Rus) 8: 19-23. |
[141] | Oleinikova YeA, Elubayeva ME, Amangeldi AA, et al. (2019) Adhesion of the consortium of lactic acid microorganisms to raw food fibres. Eur Union Sci 9: 6-8. |
[142] | Fallourd MJ, Viscione L (2009) Ingredient selection for stabilization and texture optimization of functional beverages and the inclusion of dietary fibre, In: Paquin P, Functional and Specialty Beverage Technology, Oxford: Woodhead Publishing, 3-38. |
[143] | Lopes SM, Krausova G, Carneiro JW, et al. (2017) A new natural source for obtainment of inulin and fructooligosaccharides from industrial waste of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Food Chem 225: 54-161. |
[144] |
Lopes SM, Francisco MG, Higashi B, et al. (2016) Chemical characterization and prebiotic activity of fructooligosaccharides from Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) roots and In vitro adventitious root cultures. Carbohyd Polym 152: 718-725. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.043
![]() |
[145] | Rad AH, Azizi A, Dargahi R, et al. (2018) Development of synbiotic milk chocolate enriched with Lactobacillus paracasei, D-tagatose and galactooligosaccharide. Appl Food Biotechnol 5: 59-68. |
[146] | Buitron DI, Sepulveda L, Martinez T, et al. (2018) Biotechnological approach for the production of prebiotics and search for new probiotics and their application in the food industry. Appl Food Biotechnol 5: 185-192. |
[147] | Ryabtsevа SA, Akhmedova VR, Anisimov GS (2018) Ice cream as a carrier of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Food Proc: Tech Technol (in Rus) 48: 5-27. |
[148] | Grunskaya VA, Gabrielyan DS, Gabrielyan SS (2018) Use of cheese whey in formulations of fermented beverages. Molochnokhozyaystvennyy Vestnik (in Rus) 1: 107-116. |
[149] | Krasnikova LV, Zhukova AD (2014) Study of features of probiotic cultures fermentation mixture of milk and serum containing extracts of berries. Sci J RI ITMO Ser Food Prod Proc Appar (in Rus) 4: 87-95. |
[150] |
Gruenwald J (2009) Novel botanical ingredients for beverages. Clin Dermatol 27: 210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2008.11.003
![]() |
[151] | Kozhukhova MA, Terkun EA, Holoshenko OV (2012) Influence of vegetable additives on cryostability of lacto- and bifidobacteria. News of higher education institutions. Food Technol (in Rus) 1: 51-53. |
[152] | Dudikova GN, Chizhayeva AV, Velyamov MT, et al. (2015) Multifunctional food additives and natural ingredients from fruit-berry and grape raw materials of Kazakhstan. In: Materials Int Sci & Pract Conference Food Security and Scientific Support for the Development of the Domestic Industry of Competitive Food Ingredients(in Rus), St. Petersburg, 68-70. |
[153] | Merkulova EP, Kozhukhova MA (2009) Lactofermented whey-based beverages. News of higher education institutions. Food Technol (in Rus) 4: 40-42. |
[154] | Sakhale BK, Pawar VN, Ranveer RC (2012) Studies on the development and storage of whey based RTS beverage from mango cv. Kesar. Food Process Technol 3: 1000148. |
[155] | Sirohi D, Patel S, Choudhary PL, et al. (2005) Studies on preparation and storage of whey based mango herbal Pudina (Mentha arvensis) beverage. J Food Sci Technol 42: 157-161. |
[156] | Dhamsaniya NK, Varshney AK(2013) Development and evaluation of whey based RTS beverage from ripe banana juice. Food Process Technol 4(2): 1000203. |
[157] | Cherevach EI, Tenkovskaya LA (2015) The development of technology of functional beverages based on whey and plant extracts. Food Proc: Tech Technol 39: 99-105. |
[158] | Brykalov AV, Pilipenko NY (2014) Development of technology of whey based drinks, enriched with plant components. Sci J Kub SAU 98: 1-12. |
[159] | Shavan RS, Shraddha RC, Kumar A, et al. (2015) Whey based beverage: Its functionality, formulations, health benefits and applications. J Food Process Technol 6: 495-503. |
[160] |
Yasmin A, Baak M, Butt M, et al. (2015) Supplementation of prebiotics to a whey-based beverage reduces the risk of hypercholesterolaemia in rats. Int Dairy J 48: 80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2015.01.012
![]() |
[161] | Pilipenko NY (2013) Development of technology of whey-juice drinks with functional properties. In: Autoref. Cand. Tech Sciences (in Rus), Stavropol: KGAU, 24. |
[162] | Irkitova AN, Vechernina NA (2010) Biotechnology of probiotic beverage based on milk (cheese) whey. News of the Altai State University (in Rus) 3: 30-32. |
[163] | Menh GV (2012) Research and development of whey based products technology using fruits of small-fruit apples, In: Dis. Dr Tech Sciences (in Rus), Kemerovo: FSBOU VPO KemTIFP, 141. |
[164] | Pavluk RI, Pogarskaya VV, Abramova TS, et al. (2014) Development of functional health nanonapites based on milk serum. East Eur J Adv Technol (in Rus) 6: 59-64. |
[165] |
Salmeron I, Thomas K, Pamdiella SS (2015) Effect of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria on the physicochemical composition and acceptance of fermented cereal beverages. J Funct Foods 15: 106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.012
![]() |
[166] | Beisenbaev AYu, Shingisov AU, Shambulova GD (2016) Developed technology of preparation whey of functional purpose. Int J Appl Fundam Res (in Rus) 7: 11-18. |
[167] | Ogneva OA (2015) Development of technologies of fructo-vegetable products with bifidogenic properties. In: Dis Cand Tech Sciences (in Rus), Krasnodar: FSBOU Kuban State Agrarian University, 129. |
[168] | Contareva VYu (2011) Development of technology of fermented milk drink with bifidogenic properties and immunostimulatory effect. In: Dis Dr Tech Sciences (in Rus), Persianovsky: Don State Agrarian University, 170. |
[169] | Gerasimova TV (2012) Development of the technology of fermented milk drinks using vegetable extracts enriched with biologically active substances, In: Dis. Cand. Tech Sciences (in Rus), Stavropol: North Caucasus State University of Science and Technology, 173. |
[170] | Dudikova GN, Chizhayeva AV (2016) Functional milk drinks with extracts of black currants and sea buckthorn. Balanced diet, nutritional supplements and biostimulants (in Rus) 1: 59-64. |
[171] | Shah NP, Ding WK, Fallourd MJ, et al. (2010) Improving the stability of probiotic bacteria in model fruit juices using vitamins and antioxidants. J Food Sci 75: 278-282. |
[172] | Sharma V, Mishra HN (2013) Fermentation of vegetable juice mixture by probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Nutra Foods 12: 17-22. |
[173] |
Mousavi ZE, Mousavi SM, Razavi SH, et al. (2011) Fermentation of pomegranate juice by probiotic lactic acid bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27: 123-128. doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0436-1
![]() |
[174] | Ciocan D, Ioan B (2007) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii, Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Sectiunea Genetica Si Biologie Moleculara 8: 151-156. |
[175] | Lucera A, Costa C, Conte A, et al. (2012) Food applications of natural antimicrobial compounds. Front Microbiol 3: 287. |
[176] |
Katan A (2012) Why the European Food Safety Authority was right to reject health claims or probiotics. Benefitial Microbes 3: 85-89. doi: 10.3920/BM2012.0008
![]() |
[177] |
Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. (2014) The International scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11: 506-514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66
![]() |
[178] | Shenderov BA (2017) Metabiotics-new technology for the prevention of diseases associated with human microecological imbalance. Vestnik Vosstanovitelnoy Meditsiny (in Rus) 4: 40-49. |
[179] | Sharma M, Shukla G (2016) Metabiotics: One step ahead of probiotics; an insight into mechanisms involved in anticancerous effect in colorectal cancer. Front Microbiol 7: 1940. |
[180] | Vakhitov TY, Sitkin SI (2014) The concept of superorganism in biology and medicine. Exp Clin Gastroenterol (in Rus) 107: 72-85. |
[181] |
Caselli M, Vaira G, Calo G, et al. (2011) Structural bacterial molecules as potential candidates for an evolution of the classical concept of probiotics. Adv Nutr 2: 372-376. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000604
![]() |
[182] |
Shenderov BA, Tkachenko EI, Lazebnik LB, et al. (2018) Metabiotics-novel technology of protective and treatment of diseases associated with microecological imbalance in human being. Exp Clin Gastroenterol 151: 83-92. doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-151-3-83-92
![]() |
1. | Jaquelinne Pires Vital da Costa, Camila Fernanda Dias de Oliveira, Francielo Vendruscolo, Cheese whey as a potential substrate for Monascus pigments production, 2020, 5, 2471-2086, 785, 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.785 | |
2. | Muzahidul I. Anik, Niaz Mahmud, Abdullah Al Masud, Md Ishak Khan, Md Nurul Islam, Shihab Uddin, M. Khalid Hossain, Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Aging and Age-Related Diseases: A Review, 2022, 2576-6422, 10.1021/acsabm.2c00411 | |
3. | Aida Aitzhanova, Yelena Oleinikova, Jérôme Mounier, Nolwenn Hymery, Marcia Leyva Salas, Alma Amangeldi, Margarita Saubenova, Mereke Alimzhanova, Kazhybek Ashimuly, Amankeldy Sadanov, Dairy associations for the targeted control of opportunistic Candida, 2021, 37, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-021-03096-1 | |
4. | Zahra Khoshdouni Farahani, Seyed Mohamad ali Ebrahimzadeh Mousavi, Seyed Mahdi Seyedain Ardebili, Hossein Bakhoda, Functional beverage based on alginate/insoluble fraction of Persian gum, WPI and PPC beads loaded with jujube extract: physicochemical, rheometry and sensory properties, 2022, 57, 0950-5423, 499, 10.1111/ijfs.15423 | |
5. | Aneela Hameed, Muhammad Junaid Anwar, Saima Perveen, Muhammad Amir, Iqra Naeem, Muhammad Imran, Muzzamal Hussain, Ishtiaque Ahmad, Muhamad Inam Afzal, Saima Inayat, Chinaza Godswill Awuchi, Functional, industrial and therapeutic applications of dairy waste materials, 2023, 26, 1094-2912, 1470, 10.1080/10942912.2023.2213854 | |
6. | Margarita Saubenova, Alexander Rapoport, Zhanerke Yermekbay, Yelena Oleinikova, Antimicrobial Peptides, Their Production, and Potential in the Fight Against Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens, 2025, 11, 2311-5637, 36, 10.3390/fermentation11010036 | |
7. | Hagar Fathy, 2025, Chapter 8, 978-981-96-3662-4, 181, 10.1007/978-981-96-3663-1_8 |
Protein of whey | Antimicrobial properties | Antiviral properties | Antifungal properties |
Immunoglobulin-G (IgG) | Intestinal pathogens such as Clostridium divicile et al. | Rotavirus | - |
Lactoferrin (Lf), Lactoferricin | Gram-positive bacteria, food pathogens such as E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes et al. | HIV, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes viruses, human papilloma virus (HPV), alpha virus and hepatitis C, B and G viruses | Yeast, fungi |
Lactoglobulins | Intestinal pathogens | Herpes simplex virus (HSV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) | Fungi |
Glycomacropeptide (GMP) | Intestinal pathogens, such as E.coli (EHECO157), Salmonella enteritidis, Morganella morganii, Vibrio cholerae et al. | - | - |
Lactoperoxidase (Lp) | Food pathogens, H.pylori et al. | Orthomyxoviridae, (HSV), (HIV) | Yeast, fungi |
Protein of whey | Antimicrobial properties | Antiviral properties | Antifungal properties |
Immunoglobulin-G (IgG) | Intestinal pathogens such as Clostridium divicile et al. | Rotavirus | - |
Lactoferrin (Lf), Lactoferricin | Gram-positive bacteria, food pathogens such as E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes et al. | HIV, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes viruses, human papilloma virus (HPV), alpha virus and hepatitis C, B and G viruses | Yeast, fungi |
Lactoglobulins | Intestinal pathogens | Herpes simplex virus (HSV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) | Fungi |
Glycomacropeptide (GMP) | Intestinal pathogens, such as E.coli (EHECO157), Salmonella enteritidis, Morganella morganii, Vibrio cholerae et al. | - | - |
Lactoperoxidase (Lp) | Food pathogens, H.pylori et al. | Orthomyxoviridae, (HSV), (HIV) | Yeast, fungi |