
St. Martin's Island was declared an ecologically critical area of Bangladesh in 1999, but this has had limited effect on the conservation of the island's natural coral resources, on which a thriving tourism industry and the local inhabitants depend. The introduction of a tourism entrance fee can benefit conservation management on the island, but research on the amount that tourists are willing to pay is absent. The objective of this paper is to determine an appropriate entrance fee amount tourists would be willing to pay (WTP) for visiting St. Martin's Island using contingent valuation method questionnaire surveys and interviews of tourists on the island (n = 327) and the factors that influence their decision. Significance testing and regression analysis were used to assess survey data. A large majority of respondents suggested that they would be willing to pay between 0.78 and 7.8 USD; however, 24.5% said that they would pay nothing and indicated that such reluctance to pay was based on a belief that the responsibility should not fall on themselves as individuals, rather than a lack of financial capacity. Evidence suggests that even greater tourism entrance fees would still be accepted and amenable to tourists. If a fee of 4.29 USD was introduced, between 350,000 and 3.51 million USD, or 1.93 million USD, could be generated annually. The level of education, income, and a general concern for the environment significantly influenced WTP amounts. This study is aimed at assisting policy decision-makers and conservation managers of St. Martin's Island; required policy actions are briefly discussed.
Citation: Seema Rani, Michael Bennett, Md. Kawser Ahmed, Xiongzhi Xue, Keliang Chen, Mohammad Shamsul Alam, Antaya March, Pierre Failler. Potential of establishing a tourism entrance fee for the conservation management of St. Martin's Island, Bangladesh[J]. Green Finance, 2025, 7(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/GF.2025001
[1] | Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez, Julio Vena-Oya, Jesús Barreal, Barbara Józefowicz . How to finance sustainable tourism: Factors influencing the attitude and willingness to pay green taxes among university students. Green Finance, 2024, 6(4): 649-665. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024025 |
[2] | Alexander Ryota Keeley, Shunsuke Managi . The importance of financial cost for renewable energy projects: economic viability assessment of renewable hybrid mini-grid systems in Indonesia. Green Finance, 2019, 1(2): 139-155. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.139 |
[3] | Liudmila S. Kabir, Zhanna A. Mingaleva, Ivan D. Rakov . Technological modernization of the national economy as an indicator of green finance: Data analysis on the example of Russia. Green Finance, 2025, 7(1): 146-174. doi: 10.3934/GF.2025006 |
[4] | Mukul Bhatnagar, Sanjay Taneja, Ercan Özen . A wave of green start-ups in India—The study of green finance as a support system for sustainable entrepreneurship. Green Finance, 2022, 4(2): 253-273. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022012 |
[5] | Shahinur Rahman, Iqbal Hossain Moral, Mehedi Hassan, Gazi Shakhawat Hossain, Rumana Perveen . A systematic review of green finance in the banking industry: perspectives from a developing country. Green Finance, 2022, 4(3): 347-363. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022017 |
[6] | Hans Bennink . Prospects of green financing in democratic societies. Green Finance, 2023, 5(2): 154-194. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023007 |
[7] | Javier Solana . Climate change litigation as financial risk. Green Finance, 2020, 2(4): 344-372. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020019 |
[8] | Amanda-Leigh O'Connell, Johan Schot . Operationalizing transformative capacity: State policy and the financing of sustainable energy transitions in developing countries. Green Finance, 2024, 6(4): 666-697. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024026 |
[9] | Yangyang Cheng, Zhenhuan Xu . Fiscal policy promotes corporate green credit: Experience from the construction of energy conservation and emission reduction demonstration cities in China. Green Finance, 2024, 6(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024001 |
[10] |
Pierre Failler, Claire Montocchio, Adeline Borot de Battisti , Thomas Binet, Jean-Philippe Maréchal, MyriamThirot .
Sustainable financing of marine protected areas: the case of the Martinique regional marine reserve of “Le Prêcheur” . Green Finance, 2019, 1(2): 110-129. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.110 |
St. Martin's Island was declared an ecologically critical area of Bangladesh in 1999, but this has had limited effect on the conservation of the island's natural coral resources, on which a thriving tourism industry and the local inhabitants depend. The introduction of a tourism entrance fee can benefit conservation management on the island, but research on the amount that tourists are willing to pay is absent. The objective of this paper is to determine an appropriate entrance fee amount tourists would be willing to pay (WTP) for visiting St. Martin's Island using contingent valuation method questionnaire surveys and interviews of tourists on the island (n = 327) and the factors that influence their decision. Significance testing and regression analysis were used to assess survey data. A large majority of respondents suggested that they would be willing to pay between 0.78 and 7.8 USD; however, 24.5% said that they would pay nothing and indicated that such reluctance to pay was based on a belief that the responsibility should not fall on themselves as individuals, rather than a lack of financial capacity. Evidence suggests that even greater tourism entrance fees would still be accepted and amenable to tourists. If a fee of 4.29 USD was introduced, between 350,000 and 3.51 million USD, or 1.93 million USD, could be generated annually. The level of education, income, and a general concern for the environment significantly influenced WTP amounts. This study is aimed at assisting policy decision-makers and conservation managers of St. Martin's Island; required policy actions are briefly discussed.
Abbreviations: COVID-19: 2019 novel coronavirus; LSSR: Large scale social restriction; OLI: Operational land imager; SPM: Suspended particulate matter; LEDAPS: Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System; LaSRC: Land Surface Reflectance Code; NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity unit; RMSE: Root means square error; USGS: United States Geological Survey
Anthropogenic activities are still the main source liable for deteriorating the water quality, although we have seen many actions to preserve susceptible aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems [1]. In Indonesia, it currently produces around 200,000 tons of waste annually, with only 64% reaching landfills while the remaining goes to the surroundings, including aquatic ecosystems [2]. Downs and Piégay [3] found that combining human activities and climate factors had a negative impact on aquatic ecosystems. In-situ measurements are a common method of assessing water quality, but they are time-consuming and labor-intensive, making it difficult to conduct long-term observations of the aquatic environment [4,5]. Additionally, it calculates only point-to-point information and is not present spatially for the whole water body area [6]. Therefore, the use of remote sensing-based satellite data offers an effective technique for the rapid and simple study of surface water quality. Remote sensing data provides spatial and temporal information about water quality from local to broad scales [7]. Studies of the quality of water bodies using remote sensing methods have been conducted since the Landsat satellites were introduced.
One of the most prominent water quality parameters is suspended particulate matter (SPM) [8]. The SPM is the most ordinary issue in surface water bodies [9]. These suspended particles decrease the effluence of the sun's light for aquatic species. Furthermore, it is a good benchmark for the eutrophication event [10]. The turbidity of a body of water increases as SPM values in water rise [11]. Several factors can affect the turbidity level due to climate shifts, weather changes, and anthropogenic activities [12,13]. Assessment of suspended matter values from satellite images has become a substantial tool for research to predict and observe suspended sediment variation in bodies of water [14,15,16,17]. The turbidity in a body of water is evaluated by how SPM values change water characteristics. It is also found that the SPM values or turbidity exhibit a good association with the visible band of the spectrum, while the red and NIR bands are more susceptive to turbidity [18].
The COVID-19 outbreak has become a lethiferous disease worldwide, affecting more than 200 nations [19]. The COVID-19 pandemic deteriorated many countries and severely affected the global economy [20]. The Indonesian government applied a tight restriction policy (known as large-scale social restriction, LSSR) on April 10, 2020, and this policy led to the closure of offices, mobility, educational places, industries, markets, and social activities [21]. This restriction period was extended into several phases till the whole year 2021, which formed a partial restriction period with a tight COVID-19 protocol. Finally, on May 17, 2022, considering a significant reduction of COVID-19 cases in this country, the Indonesian president announced not to wear a mask in outdoor activities.
Numerous studies have found that decreasing water and air pollution improves global environmental quality [22,23,24,25]. In Indonesia, some studies reported that air quality improved during the COVID-19 period [26,27,28,29]. However, to date, there have been no studies about how the water quality improved in the Indonesian region during the COVID-19 period. Therefore, it will be a novel study to discuss how water quality conditions in Indonesia. In addition, we chose a unique river within a tropical wetland area, which would be different from other existing studies around the world. To identify whether the decrease in human activities during the COVID-19 period resulted in the improved water quality in the Musi River, South Sumatra, Indonesia, the current study employed remote sensing-based satellite data to analyze alterations in the SPM concentration as a water quality benchmark.
The river chosen for the present study is a part of the South Sumatra wetland region, in the province of South Sumatra, Indonesia and lies between 2 57'0"N and 3 0'0"N latitudes and 104 42'0"E–104 51'0"E longitudes (Figure 1).
There are four major kinds of wetlands in South Sumatra, such as tidal swamps, freshwater swamps, lakes, rivers, and peatlands [30]. The Musi River is the primary freshwater contributor to the Musi Estuary. The river flows from southwestern to northeastern, originating from the Barisan Mountains Range that was once a spine of Sumatra Island in Bengkulu Province, to the Bangka Strait and finally flows to the South China Sea. It is approximately 750 km long and becomes the heart of South Sumatra province because it drains most of the South Sumatra region. The water river is used for various needs such as industry, transportation, and households. People used the water for their daily needs, including washing, bathing, and using the restroom directly in the river. Moreover, companies and factories located around the Musi River have contributed to river pollution due to their dumping activities of waste into the river [31]. The annual mean temperature in this region is 24 ℃, with the mean annual rainfall of 2,579 mm.
In the current study, three Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images of the Musi River area from May 20, 2019 to May 28, 2022 were obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Table 1 showed the specification of the Landsat 8 satellite images that used in this study. We used the month of May because the COVID-19 restriction policy in the study area was started in that month thus to reduce the bias in selecting the other months, we chose the same month for all periods of study. In this study, all the satellite images downloaded were of level-2 type, meaning that they had a major improvement in the absolute geo-location accuracy of the global ground reference dataset, which enhanced the interoperability of the Landsat archive over time. This level-2 type has also been updated with global digital elevation modeling sources and validation updates. Surface reflectance is used to quantify the proportion of incoming solar radiation that is thrown from the surface of the earth to the Landsat sensor. The Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System (LEDAPS) and Land Surface Reflectance Code (LaSRC) surface reflectance algorithms compensate for the spectral, spatial, and temporal effects of atmospheric aerosols, gaseous, and water vapor, which are required to analyze the earth's land surface. Therefore, to obtain surface reflectance values from Landsat 8 level-2 type images, we used a scale factor of 0.0000275 and an additional offset of −0.2 per pixel.
Product ID | Band used | RMSE | %Cloud | Period |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20190520_20200828_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.087 | 9.20 | 2019 (before COVID-19 period) |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20200522_20200820_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.056 | 8.05 | 2020 (During COVID-19 period) |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20220528_20220603_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.030 | 7.56 | 2022 (After COVID-19 period) |
Based on a prior study, Fachrurrozi [31] measured the turbidity value of the Musi River and reported it varied from 7 to 9 NTU. The NTU is the acronym of Nephelometric Turbidity unit. The specific unit used to gauge the turbidity of water or the suspended matters in water. Furthermore, Trisnaini et al. [32] measured turbidity values in the Musi River around dense areas and found them to be lower than 50 NTU. These studies stated that the turbidity value in the Musi River is below 110 mg/L. Several studies have explained that using a single band for turbidity analysis can obtain a good result if the band is selected in the right way [33,34]. Therefore, the current study applied a SPM algorithm to evaluate the SPM values for water, and it showed good performance when the SPM values were less than 110 mg/L [35]. The SPM is computed by using the red band based on Eq (1) below:
(1) |
where A and B are empirical constants: and A = 289.29 and B = 0.1686. ρW is water-leaving reflectance from the red band (655 nm). The empirical constant of A came from the previous study by Nechad et al. [35] that found this value (A = 289.29) gave the best fit to total suspended matter and the subsurface reflectance calculations. While, the empirical constant of B was set to 0.1686 because the satellite sensor and its process would possibly have dissimilar measurement errors from the data calibration. A higher SPM value from the Eq 1 showed more turbid water or dirty water, while the lower SPM value indicated cleaner water. Our study found there was a high association between the SPM and the band ratio of the water-leaving radiances at 655 nm (Figure 2). It could be concluded that the model showed a good performance, with the R-squared of 0.95, the RMSE of 15% and the standard deviation of 2.5 mg/L. The accuracy assessment of this study was carried out using the Pearson's correlation between the satellite-based SPM data and the in-situ SPM measurement. Thus, we have applied the Pearson's correlation coefficient (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root means square error (RMSE) analyses in this study. Our finding obtained the values of R2 was 0.92, MAE was 0.04, and RMSE was 0.08, indicating a good accuracy.
The spatial and temporal distribution of SPM values in the Musi River from 2019 to 2022, including before, during, and after COVID-19 periods, was depicted in Figure 3. It could be observed that a reduction in SPM values during the COVID-19 period was found compared to before the COVID-19 period. The dense urban area that mostly located at the middle and downstream areas led to higher number of pollutants entried into the river due to domestic and industrial activities (Figure 3(a)). During the COVID-19 period, the upstream area showed higher SPM values than the downstream area. It might be due to the natural process such as soil erosion at the upstream area. The higher altitude of the upstream area contributed to high risk of soil erosion and especially during the rainfall. In contrast, the downstream area sustained a great reduction due to anthropogenic activities restriction (Figure 3(b)). After the COVID-19 period, the SPM values started to rebound at the same level at before the COVID-19 period, it was shown by the SPM values from the middle to downstream areas gradually increased (Figure 3(c)).
To analyze further the reduction in SPM concentrations of the Musi River, we analyzed the situation of the river around the busy port area before and during the COVID-19 periods using Sentinel-2 data (Figures 4(a), (b)). The result found there was a decrease in vessel traffic along the Musi River. The number of black vessels that carried coal products has been reduced, as have the white vessels that are commonly used as public transport for people. Traffic condition along the Musi River near the main port. Due to the low number of vessels sailed along the Musi River, it would certainly diminish the total discharge of the water pollutants originating from the vessels into the river. This result was consistent with other studies [36].
Effects of inter-monthly and rainfall factors could also contribute to decreases in SPM values, as stated in a study by Moquet et al. [37]. Time series Landsat 8 images from different years but in the same month were chosen, and precipitation data were also evaluated and obtained, no significant difference was found during the study period. This showed that the COVID-19 restriction policy (large-scale social restriction policy) has greatly affected the water quality of the Musi River and significantly reduced the pollution level. Furthermore, the pollution from industrial sources, domestic sources, and other related human activities was less during the COVID-19 restriction policy, and thus it improved the water quality of the river.
A comparison of the SPM values in the Musi River in several study periods was tabulated in Table 2. Our results revealed that the highest average SPM values of 8.33 mg/L were observed in May 2019, followed by 2022 (7.06 mg/L) and 2020 (4.56 mg/L). It was recorded that SPM values during the COVID-19 period varied from 1 mg/L to 11 mg/L with an average SPM of 4.56 mg/L, which was lower than before the COVID-19 period. Furthermore, a comparison between the pre-COVID-19 period and the COVID-19 period obtained a reduction of the total average SPM concentration from 8.33 mg/L to 4.56 mg/L (Table 2).
Date of satellite images | SPM values | Notes | |||
Min | Max | Average | SD | ||
20/05/2019 | 2.67 | 10.50 | 7.06 | 0.71 | Before COVID-19 period |
22/05/2020 | 1.03 | 11.19 | 4.56 | 0.67 | During COVID-19 period |
28/05/2022 | 3.03 | 21.83 | 8.33 | 1.31 | After COVID-19 period |
Spatial analysis exhibited that higher SPM values were found in the southwestern area (the most congested areas in the South Sumatra Region). Specifically, this occurred during the year 2019 and then this SPM was decreased during the COVID-19 period in 2020, where this spatial pattern was more concentrated in the northeastern area. We assumed the lower SPM value in the northeastern region during the COVID-19 period, as compared with before the COVID-19 period, might be due to the application of the COVID-19 restriction policy. This might be due to the fact that since it was near to industrial areas, the COVID-19 period resulted in the closure of industrial activities, thus the pollution levels decreased in those areas. A quantitative analysis between mean SPM values of the pre-COVID-19 period and SPM values during the COVID-19 period in the northeastern regions showed a notable reduction in SPM concentrations during the COVID-19 period as compared with the pre-COVID-19 period (Figure 2(a), (b)). In the COVID-19 period, which in this study we took two years interval, we found a substantial increase in SPM concentration of about 54%, as compared with the COVID-19 period (Figure 2(c)). The changes of SPM also associated with other water quality parameters like Cu, As, Fe and Ni metals. It was because the heavy metals were transported together with organic or sediment masses. Suspended sediments brought metals into river flow through runoff event. Surface sediments carried metals from anthropogenic sources into the river. A previous study by Rahutami et al. [38] found there was a linear increase between the SPM with Fe, Cr, and Pb concentrations in the Musi river.
Additionally, heavy metals in water mostly accumulated in the SPM due to direct contact with the water and the precipitation of metal-absorbed [39]. Thus, the SPM is the main process for the deposition of heavy metals in floor sediments. This is a prominent process for the understanding of heavy metals in the water-sediment interface. A study by Helali et al. [40] in the Gulf of Tunis found that heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Fe, and Zn) were primarily caused by commercial and fishing activities. In the Musi river, a previous study by Tjahjono et al. [41] has found that Pb concentration in the water could be associated with the SPM value. The highest SPM value was found in the busy port around the Musi river where the Pb content has exceeded the water quality standard (0.03 mg/L). The concentration of Pb in the water showed that the presence of oil spills due to water activities. Furthermore, the Cd concentration in the Musi river was constant but it still exceeded the quality standard (0.01 mg/L). The high Cd concentration was due to the excessive use of fertilizers around the basin. The correlation analysis based on this study showed a weak correlation between both metals and SPM. But, in another study by Wang et al. [42] which located in the Huanghe River, China, they found a high significant correlation between Pb and SPM (r = 0.84, p < 0.01). It could be assumed that when the SPM was high, dissolved metals were prone to be scavenged via aggregating into compact particles, thus dissolved metals reduced to the sea [43].
Although this study showed lower SPM values than before the COVID-19 period in 2019, there was an increase in the pollution level during that period. This might be due to the fact that the withdrawal of restriction policies in social activities, industrial and commercial sectors has allowed the intrusion of waste into the lake, which changed the pollution loads in the Musi River. Therefore, the restriction of human activities such as commercial and industries has contributed to the reduction of SPM value in the Musi River. Due to the restriction policy and lack of in-situ data, the validation with in-situ data was not carried out in this current work. But our results were comparable with the other studies carried out in Indonesian regions. Because there was a lack of studies in our region discussing the SPM changes during the COVID-19 period, we compared our results with other studies outside the country. For instance, Yunus et al. [44] analyzed the SPM level changes during the lockdown period in Vembanad lake, India and found a 15.9% decrease in SPM compared to before the lockdown period. Another study by Liu et al. [13] also revealed the SPM changes in Min River, China and reported a 48% decrease in SPM. Those above-mentioned results were the same as the outputs of our study. In contrast, Tokatlı and Varol [45] analyzed the water quality changes in the Meriç-Ergene River Basin, Turkey and found no significant differences between before the lockdown and during lockdown periods. This might be due to nonstop agricultural activities and domestic wastewater discharges into the water body during the lockdown period. The agricultural wastes (organic and chemical fertilizers) were the main effluents in the river which located near agricultural areas [46].
Hence, the COVID-19 restriction not only resulted in an increase in water quality but also an improvement in air quality [47]. Several studies revealed air quality parameters such as PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO showed major reductions that led to an improvement in the air quality index during lockdown period in Tehran [48], China [49] and Germany [50]. The lower SPM concentrations in the South Sumatera wetland helped to improve the sun light effluence and surely had positive effects on freshwater ecosystems and the environmental condition of the water body. For future studies, the data was extracted from satellite only, and thus it might be hard to obtain accurate data on the physical and chemical properties. Hence, in situ fieldwork was needed to arrange an appropriate management policy to face the COVID-19 pandemic period. Therefore, a study was done to analyze the spatial and temporal data on water quality of the South Sumatera wetland. Despite other human activity factors, the COVID-19 restriction policy in this study area was likely to start a recovery process for the ecosystem. But authorities should give more attention to the alteration of river pollution, which is how this restriction has affected water bodies. Therefore, it was also recommended that this policy could increase the self-recovery of the ecosystems.
COVID-19 has become a serious threat to our lives, with more than 150 million people infected and around 3 million deaths announced all over the world in May 2021. Due to the large transmission of COVID-19, many nations implemented a total lockdown with full restrictions on social, economic, industrial, spiritual, schools, and other activities. But on the other hand, this restriction successfully had a good impact on the environment by decreasing air and water pollution. In this recent study, we tried to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 period on the Musi River by using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Even though we could not determine the particular origins of river pollution, the output of this study revealed that water quality (SPM as an indicator) could improve significantly as human activities were diminished. The analysis of the SPM value in Musi River using Landsat 8 images revealed that SPM values during the COVID-19 period (average SPM of 4.56 mg/L) were lower than before the COVID-19 period (8.33 mg/L) and the next two years (average of 7.06 mg/L). Mean reduction of 45% was reported in SPM values during the COVID-19 period compared to before the COVID-19 period. It was also found that after the COVID-19 period with the loosening restriction policy, domestic waste started to enter the Musi River again, which, followed by industrial waste, were the main activities that aggravated the water pollution in the Musi River. As a result, the current study provided important insights into the future management of the Musi River and other wetland and aquatic environments. In addition, the authorities should know about the improved water quality due to the decreased human activities and should arrange an effective action plan for the future Musi River management policy.
This research is an additional output of the research grant that is funded by PNBP, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, year 2021 SP DIPA-023.17.2.677515/2022 on November 17, 2021, In accordance with Rector's Decree Number: 0390/UN9.FT/TU.SK/2022, on May 13, 2022.
Conflict of interest on behalf of all authors. The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Ahmad SA, Hanley N (2009) Willingness to pay for reducing crowding effect damages in marine parks in Malaysia. Singap Econ Rev 54: 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590809003124 doi: 10.1142/S0217590809003124
![]() |
[2] |
Arin T, Kramer RA (2002) Divers' willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: an exploratory study. Ocean Coastal Manage 45: 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00049-2 doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00049-2
![]() |
[3] | Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, et al. (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–4614. |
[4] |
Asafu-Adjaye J, Tapsuwan S (2008) A contingent valuation study of scuba diving benefits: Case study in Mu Ko Similan Marine National Park, Thailand. Tourism Manage 29: 1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.005
![]() |
[5] | Ashik TM (2023) All that ails St Martin's Island. The Daily Star. News Article published on 22 May 2023. Accessed on: 6 April 2024. Available from: https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/views/news/all-ails-st-martins-island-3326651. |
[6] | Asih ENN, Nugraha WA (2020) Marine tourism in Gili Labak Island: Willingness to pay method as an effort to preserve coral reef in Gili Labak Island, Madura, Indonesia. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conserv Legis 13: 3789–3797. |
[7] |
Baral N, Stern MJ, Bhattarai R (2008) Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecol Econ 66: 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.004
![]() |
[8] | Barker NH (2003) Ecological and socio-economic impacts of dive and snorkel tourism in St. Lucia, West Indies (Doctoral dissertation, University of York). Available from: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/9867/1/423741.pdf. |
[9] | Baskara KA, Hendarto RM, Susilowati I (2017) Economic's valuation of marine protected area (MPA) of Karimunjawa, Jepara-Indonesia. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conserv Legis 10: 1554–1568. |
[10] | Billah M (2022) Why govt plans to save St Martins is falling by the wayside. The Business Standard. Online Article published on 4 January 2022. Accessed on: 6 April 2024. Available from: https://www.tbsnews.net/features/panorama/why-govt-plans-save-st-martins-falling-wayside-352819. |
[11] | Blackwell BD, Asafu-Adjaye J (2020) Adding jewels to the crown: The marginal recreational value of Noosa National Park and implications for user fees. Discussion Paper Series No. 622, University of Queensland, School of Economics. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Boyd-Blackwell-2/publication/342623509_Adding_jewels_to_the_crown_The_marginal_recreational_value_of_Noosa_National_Park_and_implications_for_user_fees/links/5efd7159299bf18816fa4ada/Adding-jewels-to-the-crown-The-marginal-recreational-value-of-Noosa-National-Park-and-implications-for-user-fees.pdf. |
[12] | Burke L, Maidens J (2004) Reefs at Risk in the Caribbean. World Resources Institute. ISBN 1-56973-567-0. Available from: https://www.wri.org/research/reefs-risk-caribbean. |
[13] | Burke L, Selig L (2002) Reefs at risk in Southeast Asia. World Resources Institute. ISBN 1-56973-490-9. Available from: https://www.wri.org/research/reefs-risk-southeast-asia. |
[14] | Burke L, Reytar K, Spalding M, et al. (2011) Reefs at risk revisited. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI). ISBN 978-1-56973-762-0. Available from: https://bvearmb.do/handle/123456789/1787 |
[15] |
Carson RT, Groves T (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ Resour Econ37: 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5 doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5
![]() |
[16] |
Casey JF, Schuhmann PW (2019) PACT or no PACT are tourists willing to contribute to the Protected Areas Conservation Trust in order to enhance marine resource conservation in Belize? Mar Policy 101: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.002
![]() |
[17] |
Casey JF, Brown C, Schuhmann P (2010) Are tourists willing to pay additional fees to protect corals in Mexico? J Sustain Tour 18: 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580903513079 doi: 10.1080/09669580903513079
![]() |
[18] |
Cerrano C, Milanese M, Ponti M (2017) Diving for science‐science for diving: volunteer scuba divers support science and conservation in the Mediterranean Sea. Aquatic Conserv: Marine Freshwater Ecosyst 27: 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2663 doi: 10.1002/aqc.2663
![]() |
[19] | Cesar H, Burke L, Pet-Soede L (2003) The economics of worldwide coral reef degradation. International Coral Reef Action Network. Available from: https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122412/records/6473698a08fd68d546062c52 |
[20] |
Chaudhry P, Tewari VP (2016) Estimating recreational value of Mahatama Gandhi Marine National Park, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Interdiscipl Environ Rev 17: 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IER.2016.074877 doi: 10.1504/IER.2016.074877
![]() |
[21] | Clery E, Rhead R (2013) Education and attitudes towards the environment. Background paper prepared for the Education for all global monitoring report 2013/4, Teaching and learning: achieving quality for all, UNESCO. Available from: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/8226149/education-and-attitudes-towards-the-environment/9141679/. |
[22] | Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Shultz WD (1986) Valuing environmental goods: A state of the arts assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa NJ: Rowan and Allenheld. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/VALUING-ENVIRONMENTAL-GOODS%3A-A-STATE-OF-THE-ARTS-OF-Cummings-Brookshire/dc7577ca2bdea29c00911e440067763547534f0b. |
[23] |
Depondt F, Green E (2006) Diving user fees and the financial sustainability of marine protected areas: Opportunities and impediments. Ocean Coastal Manage 49: 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.02.003
![]() |
[24] |
Dharmaratne GS, Sang FY, Walling LJ (2000) Tourism potentials for financing protected areas. Annals Tourism Res 27: 590–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00109-7 doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00109-7
![]() |
[25] | Dixit IAM, Kumar L, Kumar P (2010) Valuing the services of coral reef systems for sustainable coastal management: A case study of the Gulf of Kachchh, India. In Valuation of Regulating Services of Ecosystems (pp. 187–210) Routledge. ISBN 9780203847602. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203847602-17/valuing-services-coral-reef-systems-sustainable-coastal-management-case-study-gulf-kachchh-india-india-arun-dixit-lalit-kumar-pushpam-kumar. |
[26] |
Failler P, Montocchio C, de Battisti AB, et al. (2019) Sustainable financing of marine protected areas: the case of the Martinique regional marine reserve of "Le Prêcheur". Green Financ 1: 110–129. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2019.2.110 doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.110
![]() |
[27] |
Faizan M, Sasekumar A, Chenayah, S (2016) Estimation of local tourists willingness to pay. Reg Stud Mar Sci 7: 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2016.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2016.06.005
![]() |
[28] |
Franzen A, Meyer R (2010) Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur Sociol Rev 26: 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018 doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp018
![]() |
[29] | Frey UJ, Pirscher F (2019) Distinguishing protest responses in contingent valuation: A conceptualization of motivations and attitudes behind them. PloS One 14: e0209872. |
[30] | Frost J (2017) Nonparametric tests vs. parametric tests. Statistics by Jim Blog. Available from: https://statisticsbyjim.com/hypothesis-testing/nonparametric-parametric-tests/ |
[31] |
Gazi MY, Mowsumi TJ, Ahmed MK (2020) Detection of coral reefs degradation using geospatial techniques around Saint Martin's Island, Bay of Bengal. Ocean Sci J 55: 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-020-0029-3 doi: 10.1007/s12601-020-0029-3
![]() |
[32] | Government of India (2016) Lakshadweep tourism policy – 2016. Department of Tourism, Lakshadweep Administration. Available from: https://www.lakshadweeptourism.com/documents/Tourism%20Policy%202016.pdf. |
[33] |
Grafeld S, Oleson K, Barnes M, et al. (2016) Divers' willingness to pay for improved coral reef conditions in Guam: An untapped source of funding for management and conservation? Ecol Econ 128: 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.005
![]() |
[34] |
Habib MHR, Rahman M, Uddin MM, et al. (2024) Application of AHP and geospatial technologies to assess ecotourism suitability: A case study of Saint Martin's Island in Bangladesh. Reg Stud Mar Sci 70: 103357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103357 doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103357
![]() |
[35] |
Han F, Yang Z, Wang H, et al. (2011) Estimating willingness to pay for environment conservation: a contingent valuation study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Environ Monit Assess 180: 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1798-4 doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1798-4
![]() |
[36] | Hasan R (2022) Saint Martin's Island: 2022 Travel Guide. BTA Holidays. Online Article published on 20 August 2022. Accessed on: 6 April 2024. Available from: https://bangladesh-travel-assistance.com/saint-martins-island/. |
[37] | Islam MN, van Amstel A, Ahmed MK (2021) Climate change-induced livelihood vulnerability and adaptation of St. Martin's Island's community, Bangladesh. Bangladesh II: Climate Change Impacts, Mitigation and Adaptation in Developing Countries, 267–282. Available from: https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/bangladesh-ii-climate-change-impacts-mitigation-and-adaptation-in-2. |
[38] | Khan H, Giurca Vasilescu L (2008) The willingness to pay for recreational services: An empirical investigation with the application of multivariate analysis of two public parks in Northern Pakistan. SSRN 1279466. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 1279466. |
[39] |
Mathieu LF, Langford IH, Kenyon W (2003) Valuing marine parks in a developing country: a case study of the Seychelles. Environ Dev Econ 8: 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X0300196 doi: 10.1017/S1355770X0300196
![]() |
[40] | Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington D.C.: Resources for The Future. |
[41] |
Murphy SE, Campbell I, Drew JA (2018) Examination of tourists' willingness to pay under different conservation scenarios; Evidence from reef manta ray snorkeling in Fiji. PloS One 13: e0198279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198279 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198279
![]() |
[42] |
Perera NM (2016) Co-existence of coral reef conservation and tourism at Pigeon Island National Park. J Tropical Forestry Environ 6: 20–35. https://doi.org/10.31357/jtfe.v6i1.2614 doi: 10.31357/jtfe.v6i1.2614
![]() |
[43] |
Peters H, Hawkins JP (2009) Access to marine parks: A comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean Coastal Manage 52: 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.12.001
![]() |
[44] |
Strieder Philippssen J, Soares Angeoletto FH, Santana RG (2017) Education level and income are important for good environmental awareness: a case study from south Brazil. Ecología Austral 27: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.17.27.1.0.300 doi: 10.25260/EA.17.27.1.0.300
![]() |
[45] | Rajasuriya A, Zahir H, Muley EV, et al. (2002) Status of coral reefs in South Asia: Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Coral Reef Symposium, Bali, 23–27 October 2000, 2: 841–845. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27668118_Status_of_coral_reefs_in_South_Asia_Bangladesh_India_Maldives_Sri_Lanka. |
[46] | Rajasuriya A, Zahir H, Venkataraman K, et al. (2004) Status of coral reefs in South Asia: Bangladesh, Chagos, India, Maldives and Sri Lanka. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283437263_Status_of_coral_reefs_in_South_Asia_Bangladesh_Chagos_India_Maldives_and_Sri_Lanka. |
[47] |
Rani S, Ahmed MK, Xiongzhi X, et al. (2020) Economic valuation and conservation, restoration & management strategies of Saint Martin's coral island, Bangladesh. Ocean Coastal Manage 183: 105024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105024 doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105024
![]() |
[48] | Rankin J, Robinson A (2018) Accounting for protest zeros in contingent valuation studies: A review of literature, HEG Working Paper, No. 18–01, University of East Anglia, Health Economics Group (HEG), Norwich. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/197777/1/1027441459.pdf. |
[49] |
Roberts RM, Jones KW, Seidl A, et al. (2017) Conservation finance and sustainable tourism: the acceptability of conservation fees to support the Tambopata National Reserve, Peru. J Sustain Tour 25: 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1257630 doi: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1257630
![]() |
[50] |
Rudd MA, Tupper MH (2002) The impact of Nassau grouper size and abundance on scuba diver site selection and MPA economics. Coastal Manage 30: 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/089207502753504670 doi: 10.1080/089207502753504670
![]() |
[51] |
Schuhmann PW, Skeete R, Waite R, et al. (2019) Visitors' willingness to pay marine conservation fees in Barbados. Tourism Manage 71: 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.011 doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.011
![]() |
[52] |
Seenprachawong U (2003) Economic valuation of coral reefs at Phi Phi Islands, Thailand. Int J Global Environ Issues 3: 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2003.002413 doi: 10.1504/IJGENVI.2003.002413
![]() |
[53] | Shams J (2023) Strict steps to save Saint Martin's. The Business Post. News Article published 10 June 2023. Accessed on: 5 April 2024. Available from: https://businesspostbd.com/front/strict-steps-to-save-saint-martins-2023-06-10. |
[54] |
Souter DW, Linden O (2000) The health and future of coral reef systems. Ocean Coastal Manage 43: 657–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00053-3 doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00053-3
![]() |
[55] | Staff Correspondent - NewAge Bangladesh (2022) Govt plan to limit tourists to St Martins draws flak. NewAge Bangladesh. News Article published on: 11 June 2022. Accessed on: 6 April 2024. Available from: https://www.newagebd.net/article/172989/govt-plan-to-limit-tourists-to-st-martins-draws-flak. |
[56] |
Sultana I, Alam SMI, Das DK (2018) An Annotated Avifaunal Checklist of the Saint Martin's Island of Bangladesh. J Asiatic Society Bangladesh Sci 44: 149–158. https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbs.v44i2.46557 doi: 10.3329/jasbs.v44i2.46557
![]() |
[57] | Tapsuwan S (2005) Valuing the willingness to pay for environmental conservation and management: A case study of scuba diving levies in Moo Koh Similan Islands Marine National Park, Thailand. ACE05: 34th Australian Conference of Economists, Melbourne, Australia, 26-28 September 2005. Sydney, Australia: Economic Society of Australia. Available from: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ: 102859. |
[58] |
Terk E, Knowlton N (2010) The role of SCUBA diver user fees as a source of sustainable funding for coral reef marine protected areas. Biodiversity 11: 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2010.9712651 doi: 10.1080/14888386.2010.9712651
![]() |
[59] | Thai National Parks (2021) Similan Islands. Online web article. Accessed on: 7 April 2024. Available from: https://www.thainationalparks.com/mu-ko-similan-national-park. |
[60] |
Thur SM (2010) User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: An application to the Bonaire National Marine Park. Mar Policy 34: 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.008 doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.008
![]() |
[61] |
Tisdell CA, Wilson C, Swarna Nantha H (2008) Contingent valuation as a dynamic process. J Socio-Econ 37: 1443–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2007.04.005
![]() |
[62] |
Togridou A, Hovardas T, Pantis JD (2006) Determinants of visitors' willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecol Econ 60: 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.006
![]() |
[63] | Tomascik T (1997) Management Plan for Coral Resources of Narikel Jinjira (St. Martin's Island) Final Report. National Conservation Strategy Implementation Project – 1, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tomas-tom-Tomascik/publication/304077895_MANAGEMENT_PLAN_FOR_CORAL_RESOURCES_OF_NARIKEL_JINJIRA_St_Martin's_Island/links/5765925208aedbc345f3820c/MANAGEMENT-PLAN-FOR-CORAL-RESOURCES-OF-NARIKEL-JINJIRA-St-Martins-Island.pdf. |
[64] |
Uddin MM, Schneider P, Asif MRI, et al. (2021) Fishery-based ecotourism in developing countries can enhance the social-ecological resilience of coastal fishers—a case study of Bangladesh. Water 13: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030292 doi: 10.3390/w13030292
![]() |
[65] |
Uyarra MC, Gill JA, Côté IM (2010) Charging for nature: marine park fees and management from a user perspective. Ambio 39: 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0078-4 doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0078-4
![]() |
[66] |
Wielgus J, Balmford A, Lewis TB, et al. (2010) Coral reef quality and recreation fees in marine protected areas. Conserv Lett 3: 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00084.x doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00084.x
![]() |
[67] |
Wielgus J, Chadwick-Furman NE, Zeitouni N, et al. (2003) Effects of coral reef attribute damage on recreational welfare. Marine Resour Econ 18: 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.18.3.42629397 doi: 10.1086/mre.18.3.42629397
![]() |
[68] |
Zakai D, Chadwick-Furman NE (2002) Impacts of intensive recreational diving on reef corals at Eilat, northern Red Sea. Biol Conserv 105: 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00181-1 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00181-1
![]() |
[69] | Zinat MA, Roy P (2015) Biodiversity of St Martin's under threat. The Daily Star. Online news article published on 16 October 2015. Accessed on: 7 April 2024. Available from: https://www.thedailystar.net/backpage/biodiversity-st-martins-under-threat-157891. |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Irma A. Jiménez-Ramírez, Gema Pijeira-Fernández, Delia M. Moreno-Cálix, Clelia De-la-Peña, Same modification, different location: the mythical role of N6-adenine methylation in plant genomes, 2022, 256, 0032-0935, 10.1007/s00425-022-03926-y |
Product ID | Band used | RMSE | %Cloud | Period |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20190520_20200828_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.087 | 9.20 | 2019 (before COVID-19 period) |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20200522_20200820_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.056 | 8.05 | 2020 (During COVID-19 period) |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20220528_20220603_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.030 | 7.56 | 2022 (After COVID-19 period) |
Date of satellite images | SPM values | Notes | |||
Min | Max | Average | SD | ||
20/05/2019 | 2.67 | 10.50 | 7.06 | 0.71 | Before COVID-19 period |
22/05/2020 | 1.03 | 11.19 | 4.56 | 0.67 | During COVID-19 period |
28/05/2022 | 3.03 | 21.83 | 8.33 | 1.31 | After COVID-19 period |
Product ID | Band used | RMSE | %Cloud | Period |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20190520_20200828_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.087 | 9.20 | 2019 (before COVID-19 period) |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20200522_20200820_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.056 | 8.05 | 2020 (During COVID-19 period) |
LC08_L2SP_124062_20220528_20220603_02_T1 | Band 4 (0.630 to 0.680 µm) | 0.030 | 7.56 | 2022 (After COVID-19 period) |
Date of satellite images | SPM values | Notes | |||
Min | Max | Average | SD | ||
20/05/2019 | 2.67 | 10.50 | 7.06 | 0.71 | Before COVID-19 period |
22/05/2020 | 1.03 | 11.19 | 4.56 | 0.67 | During COVID-19 period |
28/05/2022 | 3.03 | 21.83 | 8.33 | 1.31 | After COVID-19 period |