Carbon Accounting: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research

Jillene Marlowe; Amelia Clarke; Jillene Marlowe; Amelia Clarke

doi:10.3934/GF.2022004

Green Finance

2022, Volume 4, Issue 1: 71-87. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022004

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Carbon Accounting: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research

Jillene Marlowe ^{1
,
,},
Amelia Clarke ²

1.
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Grenfell Campus, Newfoundland, Canada
2.
University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Received: 15 October 2021 Revised: 29 December 2021 Accepted: 12 January 2022 Published: 27 January 2022
JEL Codes: G3, M14, M41, M48, Q5, R5, L5

Carbon accounting is an evolving approach to support decision-making for climate action and reporting of progress. This systematic literature review of 27 journal articles in the field of carbon accounting provides an overview of the current state of the field. It illustrates the lack of transparency, reliability, and comparability within current measurement systems; the lack of research on how greenhouse gas inventories are linked to monitoring, decision-making, reporting and disclosure systems; and the role of the accounting profession. Based on the findings, we provide a summary of where research gaps exist and thus suggestions for future research directions.
- carbon accounting,
- accounting profession,
- measurement,
- sustainability accounting,
- GHG inventory,
- carbon budget,
- climate mitigation
Citation: Jillene Marlowe, Amelia Clarke. Carbon Accounting: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research[J]. Green Finance, 2022, 4(1): 71-87. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022004

Related Papers:

Abstract

Carbon accounting is an evolving approach to support decision-making for climate action and reporting of progress. This systematic literature review of 27 journal articles in the field of carbon accounting provides an overview of the current state of the field. It illustrates the lack of transparency, reliability, and comparability within current measurement systems; the lack of research on how greenhouse gas inventories are linked to monitoring, decision-making, reporting and disclosure systems; and the role of the accounting profession. Based on the findings, we provide a summary of where research gaps exist and thus suggestions for future research directions.

References

[1]	Andrade JCS, Dameno A, Pérez J, et al. (2018) Implementing city-level carbon accounting: A comparison between Madrid and London. J Clean Prod 172: 795-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.163 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.163
[2]	Baltar de Souza Leão E, do Nascimento LFM, Andrade JCS, et al. (2020) Carbon accounting approaches and reporting gaps in urban emissions: An analysis of the greenhouse gas inventories and climate action plans in Brazilian cities. J Clean Prod 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118930
[3]	Bowen F, Wittneben B (2011) Carbon accounting: Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields. Account Audit Account J 24: 1022-1036. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111184742 doi: 10.1108/09513571111184742
[4]	Burritt RL, Schaltegger S, Zvezdov D (2011) Carbon management accounting: Explaining practice in leading German companies. Aust Account Rev 21: 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00121.x doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00121.x
[5]	Simpson P (2018) How environmental disclosure fuels greater ambition. Available from: https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/companies/earth-day-how-environmental-disclosure-fuels-greater-ambition.
[6]	Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) (2019) TCFD implementation guide. Available from: https://www.sasb.org/knowledge-hub/tcfd-implementation-guide/.
[7]	Chen G, Shan Y, Hu Y, et al. (2019) Review on city-level carbon accounting. Environ Sci Technol 53: 5545-5558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b07071 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07071
[8]	Cook A (2009) Emission rights: From costless activity to market operations. Account Org Soc 34: 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.12.001
[9]	CPA Canada (2021) Business and accounting resources: Sustainability reporting updates. Available from: https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/business-and-accounting-resources/financial-and-non-financial-reporting/sustainability-environmental-and-social-reporting/publications/sustainability-reporting-updates.
[10]	Davis J, Mengersen K, Bennett S, et al. (2014) Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. Springerplus 3: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511 doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-511
[11]	Dragomir VD (2012) The disclosure of industrial greenhouse gas emissions: a critical assessment of corporate sustainability reports. J Clean Prod 29-30: 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.01.024 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.01.024
[12]	Du L, Wei C, Cai S (2012) Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis. China Econ Rev 23: 371-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHIECO.2012.02.004 doi: 10.1016/J.CHIECO.2012.02.004
[13]	Elsevier (2021) Scopus: Who Uses Scopus. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/who-uses.
[14]	Engels A (2009) The European emissions trading scheme: An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon. Account Org Soc 34: 488-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.005
[15]	European Union (2013) EUR-Lex. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013L0034.
[16]	Fong WK, Matsumoto H, Lun YF (2008) Establishment of city level carbon dioxide emission baseline database and carbon budgets for developing countries with data constraints. J Asian Archit Build Eng 7: 403-410. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.7.403 doi: 10.3130/jaabe.7.403
[17]	Greenhouse Gas Protocol (2021a) Greenhouse Gas Protocol: About us. Available from: https://ghgprotocol.org/about-us.
[18]	Greenhouse Gas Protocol (2021b) Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate standard. Available from: https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard.
[19]	Griffin PA, Lont DH, Sun EY (2017) The Relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemp Account Res 34: 1265-1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12298 doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12298
[20]	Harris S, Weinzettel J, Bigano A, et al. (2020) Low carbon cities in 2050? GHG emissions of European cities using production-based and consumption-based emission accounting methods. J Clean Prod 248: 119206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119206 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119206
[21]	Haslam C, Butlin J, Andersson T, et al. (2014) Accounting for carbon and reframing disclosure: A business model approach. Account Forum 38: 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.04.002
[22]	IFRS (2017) IFRS-IASB chair's speech: The times, they are a-changin'. Available from: https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2017/09/iasb-chairmans-speech-the-times-the-are-achangin/.
[23]	IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/.
[24]	Isman M, Archambault M, Racette P, et al. (2018) Ecological footprint assessment for targeting climate change mitigation in cities: A case study of 15 Canadian cities according to census metropolitan areas. J Clean Prod 174: 1032-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.189 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.189
[25]	Jia J, Gong Z, Chen C, et al. (2018) Urban carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) accounting based on the GPC framework: A case of the underdeveloped city of Nanchang, China. Int J Climate Change Strat Manage 10: 812-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0074 doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0074
[26]	Kennedy S, Sgouridis S (2011) Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and zero carbon cities. Energy Policy 39: 5259-5268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.038 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.038
[27]	Knox H (2014) Footprints in the City: models, materiality, and the cultural politics of climate change. Anthropol Quart 87: 405-431.
[28]	Kramers A, Wangel J, Johansson S, et al. (2013) Towards a comprehensive system of methodological considerations for cities' climate targets. Energy Policy 62: 1276-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.093 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.093
[29]	Le Breton M, Aggeri F (2018) Counting before acting? The performativity of carbon accounting called into question-calculation acts and dispositifs in a big French construction company. Management 21: 832-855. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.212.0834 doi: 10.3917/mana.212.0834
[30]	Linton S, Clarke A, Tozer L (2021) Strategies and governance for implementing deep decarbonization plans at the local level. Sustainability 13: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010154 doi: 10.3390/su13010154
[31]	Linton S, Clarke A, Tozer L (2022) Technical pathways to deep decarbonization in cities: Eight best practice case studies of transformational climate mitigation. Energy Res Soc Sci 86: 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2021.102422 doi: 10.1016/J.ERSS.2021.102422
[32]	Lippert I (2015) Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum 66: 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2014.09.009 doi: 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2014.09.009
[33]	Liu LC, Liang QM, Wang Q (2015) Accounting for China's regional carbon emissions in 2002 and 2007: production-based versus consumption-based principles. J Clean Prod 103: 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.009
[34]	Livermore J (2019) What's your organization's carbon budget? Nat Gas Electricity 36: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.22147 doi: 10.1002/gas.22147
[35]	Lovell H, Mackenzie D (2012) Accounting for carbon: The role of accounting professional organisations in governing climate change. In Newell P, Boykoff M, Boyd E, The New Carbon Economy, John Wiley and Sons, 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118315835.ch6
[36]	Mahmoudian F, Lu J, Yu D, et al. (2021) Inter-and intra-organizational stakeholder arrangements in carbon management accounting. British Account Rev 53: 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100933 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2020.100933
[37]	Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz SC (2014) Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account Rev 89: 695-724. https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCR-50629 doi: 10.2308/ACCR-50629
[38]	Meng J, Mi Z, Yang H, et al. (2017) The consumption-based black carbon emissions of China's megacities. J Clean Prod 161: 1275-1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.02.185 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.02.185
[39]	Parvez M, Hazelton J, James G (2019) Greenhouse gas emissions disclosure by cities: The expectation gap. Sustain Account Manage Policy J 10: 685-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2017-0138 doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2017-0138
[40]	Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Available from: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/fhm/dhr/chir/NSsynthesisguidanceVersion1-April2006.pdf.
[41]	ProQuest (2021) Academic: Credible, Authoritative Resources that Inspire and Engage. Available from: https://about.proquest.com/en/libraries/academic/.
[42]	Pulselli RM, Marchi M, Neri E, et al. (2019) Carbon accounting framework for decarbonisation of European city neighbourhoods. J Clean Prod 208: 850-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.102 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.102
[43]	Salon D, Sperling D, Meier A, et al. (2010) City carbon budgets: A proposal to align incentives for climate-friendly communities. Energy Policy 38: 2032-2041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.005 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.005
[44]	Siemieniako D, Kubacki K, Mitrega M (2021) Inter-organisational relationships for social impact: A systematic literature review. J Bus Res 132: 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.026 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.026
[45]	Snyder H (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res104: 333-339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
[46]	Song D, Su M, Yang J, et al. (2012) Greenhouse gas emission accounting and management of low-carbon community. Sci World J 2012. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/613721 doi: 10.1100/2012/613721
[47]	Sperling JB, Ramaswami A (2018) Cities and "budget-based" management of the energy-water-climate nexus: Case studies in transportation policy, infrastructure systems, and urban utility risk management. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37: 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12765 doi: 10.1002/ep.12765
[48]	Stechemesser K, Guenther E (2012) Carbon accounting: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 36: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.02.021 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.02.021
[49]	Sudmant A, Gouldson A, Millward-Hopkins J, et al. (2018) Producer cities and consumer cities: Using production- and consumption-based carbon accounts to guide climate action in China, the UK, and the US. J Clean Prod 176: 654-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.12.139 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.12.139
[50]	Sun X, Clarke A, MacDonald A (2020) Implementing community sustainability plans through partnership: Examining the relationship between partnership structural features and climate change mitigation outcomes. Sustainability 12: 6172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156172 doi: 10.3390/su12156172
[51]	Value Reporting Foundation (2021) Value Reporting Foundation. Available from: https://www.valuereportingfoundation.org/.
[52]	Vesty GM, Telgenkamp A, Roscoe PJ (2015) Creating numbers: carbon and capital investment. Audit Account J 28: 302-324. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1507 doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1507
[53]	Wang S, Chen B (2018) Three-Tier carbon accounting model for cities. Applied Energy 229: 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.109 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.109
[54]	Wang Z, Li Y, Cai H, et al. (2018) Comparative analysis of regional carbon emissions accounting methods in China: Production-based versus consumption-based principles. J Clean Prod 194: 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.018
[55]	Wegener M, Labelle R, Jerman L (2019) Unpacking carbon accounting numbers: A study of the commensurability and comparability of corporate greenhouse gas emission disclosures. J Clean Prod 211: 652-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.11.156 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.11.156
[56]	Xue MM, Liang QM, Wang C (2019) Price transmission mechanism and socio-economic effect of carbon pricing in Beijing: A two-region social accounting matrix analysis. J Clean Prod 211: 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.116 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.116

Reader Comments

your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)