Research article

Baby-skin care habits from different socio-economic groups and its impact on the development of atopic dermatitis

  • Received: 06 November 2017 Accepted: 04 January 2018 Published: 08 January 2018
  • Skin care practices of children vary among communities and are based on experience, tradition and culture. It was aimed to determine the baby-skin care approaches of mothers from three different socio-economic groups and its effect on the development of atopic dermatitis. The study comprised mothers with children under 2 years of age from three different socioeconomic groups in Istanbul in the first half of 2014. A questionnaire with 38 items related to demographic variables, feeding habits, and baby-skin care were distributed to the mothers and asked to fill at sight. The study comprised of 207 children with 69 from lower socio-economic group, 92 children from group middle socio-economic and 46 children from higher socio-economic group. Mean age was 8.48, 8.74, and 10.98 months, respectively. Atopic dermatitis was reported in 19% of the children from higher socio-economic and 9% of the children in other two groups each. The proportion of using no care products after bath was found to be lower in children with atopic dermatitis from all three groups. The proportion of using wet wipes for diaper care was significantly lower in children with atopic dermatitis in comparison to children without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis was more common among children from higher socioeconomic group and skin care after bath seems to be an important factor in the development of atopic dermatitis.

    Citation: Fatma Akpinar, Ayla Balci, Gulcan Ozomay, Ayca Sozen, Esra Kotan, Gulendam Kocak, Feyzullah Cetinkaya. Baby-skin care habits from different socio-economic groups and its impact on the development of atopic dermatitis[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(1): 1-9. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.1.1

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ali Moussaoui, Pierre Auger, Christophe Lett . Optimal number of sites in multi-site fisheries with fish stock dependent migrations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(3): 769-783. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.769
    [2] Azmy S. Ackleh, H.T. Banks, Keng Deng, Shuhua Hu . Parameter Estimation in a Coupled System of Nonlinear Size-Structured Populations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2005, 2(2): 289-315. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.289
    [3] Diène Ngom, A. Iggidir, Aboudramane Guiro, Abderrahim Ouahbi . An observer for a nonlinear age-structured model of a harvested fish population. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 337-354. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.337
    [4] Karl Peter Hadeler . Structured populations with diffusion in state space. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(1): 37-49. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.37
    [5] Hua Guo, Yuan Tian, Kaibiao Sun, Xinyu Song . Dynamic analysis of two fishery capture models with a variable search rate and fuzzy biological parameters. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 21049-21074. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023931
    [6] Sophia R.-J. Jang . Discrete host-parasitoid models with Allee effects and age structure in the host. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(1): 67-81. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.67
    [7] Yanfeng Liang, David Greenhalgh . Estimation of the expected number of cases of microcephaly in Brazil as a result of Zika. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 8217-8242. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019416
    [8] Santanu Bhattacharya, Nandadulal Bairagi . Dynamic optimization of fishing tax and tourism fees for sustainable bioeconomic resource management. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 1751-1789. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025064
    [9] Dong Liang, Jianhong Wu, Fan Zhang . Modelling Population Growth with Delayed Nonlocal Reaction in 2-Dimensions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2005, 2(1): 111-132. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.111
    [10] Davide De Gaetano . Forecasting volatility using combination across estimation windows: An application to S&P500 stock market index. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 7195-7216. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019361
  • Skin care practices of children vary among communities and are based on experience, tradition and culture. It was aimed to determine the baby-skin care approaches of mothers from three different socio-economic groups and its effect on the development of atopic dermatitis. The study comprised mothers with children under 2 years of age from three different socioeconomic groups in Istanbul in the first half of 2014. A questionnaire with 38 items related to demographic variables, feeding habits, and baby-skin care were distributed to the mothers and asked to fill at sight. The study comprised of 207 children with 69 from lower socio-economic group, 92 children from group middle socio-economic and 46 children from higher socio-economic group. Mean age was 8.48, 8.74, and 10.98 months, respectively. Atopic dermatitis was reported in 19% of the children from higher socio-economic and 9% of the children in other two groups each. The proportion of using no care products after bath was found to be lower in children with atopic dermatitis from all three groups. The proportion of using wet wipes for diaper care was significantly lower in children with atopic dermatitis in comparison to children without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis was more common among children from higher socioeconomic group and skin care after bath seems to be an important factor in the development of atopic dermatitis.


    [1] Nikolovski J, Stamatas G, Kollias N, et al. (2007) Infant skin barrier maturation in the first year of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 56: AB153. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.007
    [2] Levin J, Friedlander SF, Del Rosso JQ (2013) Atopic dermatitis and the stratum corneum: part 2: other structural and functional characteristics of the stratum corneum barrier in atopic skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 6: 49–54.
    [3] Cork MJC, Murphy R, Carr J, et al. (2002) The rising prevalence of atopic eczema and environmental trauma to the skin. Dermatol Pract 10: 22–26.
    [4] Callard RE, Harper JI (2007) The skin barrier, atopic dermatitis and allergy: a role for Langerhans cells? Trends Immunol 28: 294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.05.003
    [5] Leung DY, Bieber T (2003) Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 361: 151–160. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12193-9
    [6] Blume-Peytavi U, Cork MJ, Faergemann J, et al. (2009) Bathing and cleansing in newborns from day 1 to first year of life: recommendations from a European round table meeting. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23: 751–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03140.x
    [7] Carlsten C, Dimich-Ward H, Ferguson A, et al. (2013) Atopic dermatitis in a high-risk cohort: natural history, associated allergic outcomes, and riskfactors. Ann Allergy Asthma Im 110: 24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.10.005
    [8] Kvenshagen BK, Carlsen KH, Mowinckel P, et al. (2014) Can early skin care normalise dry skin and possibly prevent atopic eczema? A pilot study in young infants. Allergol Immunopath 42: 539–543.
    [9] Bergmann RL, Edenharter G, Bergmann KE, et al. (1998) Atopic dermatitis in early infancy predicts allergic airway disease at 5 years. Clin Exp Allergy 28: 965–970. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00371.x
    [10] Horii KA, Simon SD, Liu DY, et al. (2007) Atopic dermatitis in children in the United States, 1997-2004: visit trends, patient and provider characteristics, and prescribing patterns. Pediatrics 120: 527–534. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0378
    [11] Danby SG, AIEnezi T, Sultan A, et al. (2013) Effect of olive and sunflower seed oil on the adult skin barrier: implications for neonatal skin care. Pediatr Dermatol 30: 42–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01865.x
    [12] Visscher M, Odio M, Taylor T, et al. (2009) Skin care in the NICU patient: effects of wipes versus cloth and water on stratum corneum integrity. Neonatology 96: 226–234. doi: 10.1159/000215593
    [13] Arnedopena A, Bellidoblasco J, Puigbarbera J, et al. (2007) Domestic water hardness and prevalence of atopic eczema in Castellon (Spain) school children. Salud Publica Mex 49: 295–301. doi: 10.1590/S0036-36342007000400009
    [14] Perkin MR, Craven J, Logan K, et al. (2016) Association between domestic water hardness, chlorine, and atopic dermatitis risk in early life: A population-based cross-sectional study. J Allergy Clin Immun 138: 509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.031
    [15] Engebretsen KA, Bager P, Wohlfahrt J, et al. (2017) Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in infants by domestic water hardness and season of birth: Cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immun 139: 1568–1574.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.021
    [16] Fernandes JD, Machado MC, Oliveira ZN (2011) Children and newborn skin care and prevention. An Bras Dermatol 86: 102–110. doi: 10.1590/S0365-05962011000100014
    [17] Stamatas GN, Tierney NK (2014) Diaper dermatitis: etiology, manifestations, prevention, and management. Pediatr Dermatol 31: 1–7.
    [18] Udompataikul M, Limpa-o-vart D (2012) Comparative trial of 5% dexpanthenol in water-in-oil formulation with 1% hydrocortisone ointment in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: a pilot study. J Drugs Dermatol 11: 366–374.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Inna Senina, John Sibert, Patrick Lehodey, Parameter estimation for basin-scale ecosystem-linked population models of large pelagic predators: Application to skipjack tuna, 2008, 78, 00796611, 319, 10.1016/j.pocean.2008.06.003
    2. Daniel R. Goethel, Terrance J. Quinn, Steven X. Cadrin, Incorporating Spatial Structure in Stock Assessment: Movement Modeling in Marine Fish Population Dynamics, 2011, 19, 1064-1262, 119, 10.1080/10641262.2011.557451
    3. Sibylle Dueri, Blaise Faugeras, Olivier Maury, Modelling the skipjack tuna dynamics in the Indian Ocean with APECOSM-E – Part 2: Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis, 2012, 245, 03043800, 55, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.008
    4. Lisa A. Kerr, Daniel R. Goethel, 2014, 9780123970039, 501, 10.1016/B978-0-12-397003-9.00021-7
    5. Jeerawan Suksamran, Yongwimon Lenbury, Stability analysis and traveling wave solution of a reaction–diffusion model for fish population incorporating time-dependent recruitment intensity, 2019, 2019, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-019-2140-2
    6. Alistair J. Hobday, Jock W. Young, Osamu Abe, Daniel P. Costa, Robert K. Cowen, Karen Evans, Maria A. Gasalla, Rudy Kloser, Olivier Maury, Kevin C. Weng, Climate impacts and oceanic top predators: moving from impacts to adaptation in oceanic systems, 2013, 23, 0960-3166, 537, 10.1007/s11160-013-9311-0
    7. Qiang-Jun Xie, Ze-Rong He, Chun-Guo Zhang, Harvesting Renewable Resources of Population with Size Structure and Diffusion, 2014, 2014, 1085-3375, 1, 10.1155/2014/396420
    8. Inna Senina, Patrick Lehodey, John Sibert, John Hampton, Integrating tagging and fisheries data into a spatial population dynamics model to improve its predictive skills, 2020, 77, 0706-652X, 576, 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0470
    9. Inna N. Senina, Patrick Lehodey, John Hampton, John Sibert, Quantitative modelling of the spatial dynamics of South Pacific and Atlantic albacore tuna populations, 2020, 175, 09670645, 104667, 10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.104667
    10. Blaise Faugeras, Olivier Maury, Modeling fish population movements: From an individual-based representation to an advection–diffusion equation, 2007, 247, 00225193, 837, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.012
    11. Chontita Rattanakul, Yongwimon Lenbury, Jeerawan Suksamran, Analysis of advection-diffusion-reaction model for fish population movement with impulsive tagging: stability and traveling wave solution, 2019, 2019, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-019-2153-x
    12. James T Thorson, Albert J Hermann, Kevin Siwicke, Mark Zimmermann, Sam Subbey, Grand challenge for habitat science: stage-structured responses, nonlocal drivers, and mechanistic associations among habitat variables affecting fishery productivity, 2021, 78, 1054-3139, 1956, 10.1093/icesjms/fsaa236
    13. Nicolas Barrier, Matthieu Lengaigne, Jonathan Rault, Renaud Person, Christian Ethé, Olivier Aumont, Olivier Maury, Mechanisms underlying the epipelagic ecosystem response to ENSO in the equatorial Pacific ocean, 2023, 00796611, 103002, 10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103002
    14. RBC Lundgreen, A Nielsen, M Krüger-Johnsen, D Righton, M Mion, K Radtke, M Plikshs, AJ Leskelä, J Raitaniemi, CA Griffiths, M Casini, U Krumme, K Hüssy, Examining fish movement in terms of advection or diffusion: a case study of northeastern Atlantic cod, 2022, 691, 0171-8630, 115, 10.3354/meps14065
    15. Nicolas Barrier, Olivier Maury, Roland Seferian, Yeray Santana‐Falcón, Alex Tidd, Matthieu Lengaigne, Assessing the Time of Emergence of Marine Ecosystems From Global to Local Scales Using IPSL‐CM6A‐LR/APECOSM Climate‐To‐Fish Ensemble Simulations, 2025, 13, 2328-4277, 10.1029/2024EF004736
    16. Laureline Dalaut, Nicolas Barrier, Matthieu Lengaigne, Jonathan Rault, Alejandro Ariza, Mokrane Belharet, Adrien Brunel, Ralf Schwamborn, Mariana Travassos-Tolotti, Olivier Maury, Which processes structure global pelagic ecosystems and control their trophic functioning? Insights from the mechanistic model APECOSM, 2025, 00796611, 103480, 10.1016/j.pocean.2025.103480
    17. Johannes Krotz, Juan M. Restrepo, Jorge Ramirez, A Dynamic Likelihood Approach to Filtering Transport Processes: Advection-Diffusion Dynamics, 2025, 00219991, 114089, 10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114089
    18. 2025, 1, 10.5194/sp-5-opsr-13-2025
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4888) PDF downloads(927) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog