Review Special Issues

Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world

  • Received: 27 April 2017 Accepted: 12 June 2017 Published: 21 June 2017
  • The increasing human population expected in the next decades, the growing demand of livestock products—which production requires higher amounts of feed products fabrication, the collective concern about food quality in industrialized countries together with the need to protect the fertility of soils, in particular, and the environment, in general, constitute as a whole big challenge that worldwide agriculture has to face nowadays. Some soil bacteria harbor mechanisms to promote plant growth, which include phytostimulation, nutrient mobilization, biocontrol of plant pathogens and abiotic stresses protection. These bacteria have also been proved as promoters of vegetable food quality. Therefore, these microbes, also so-called Plant Probiotic Bacteria, applied as biofertilizers in crop production, constitute an environmental friendly manner to contribute to produce the food and feed needed to sustain world population. In this review, we summarize some of the best-known mechanisms of plant probiotic bacteria to improve plant growth and develop a more sustainable agriculture.

    Citation: Esther Menendez, Paula Garcia-Fraile. Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 502-524. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.502

    Related Papers:

    [1] Isaac O. Ajao, Hammed A. Olayinka, Moruf A. Olugbode, OlaOluwa S. Yaya, Olanrewaju I. Shittu . Long memory cointegration and dynamic connectedness of volatility in US dollar exchange rates, with FOREX portfolio investment strategy. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2023, 7(4): 646-664. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2023031
    [2] Chikashi Tsuji . The historical transition of return transmission, volatility spillovers, and dynamic conditional correlations: A fresh perspective and new evidence from the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2024, 8(2): 410-436. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2024016
    [3] Lorna Katusiime . Time-Frequency connectedness between developing countries in the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of East Africa. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2022, 6(4): 722-748. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022032
    [4] Kim Hiang Liow, Jeongseop Song, Xiaoxia Zhou . Volatility connectedness and market dependence across major financial markets in China economy. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2021, 5(3): 397-420. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2021018
    [5] Ke Liu, Changqing Luo, Zhao Li . Investigating the risk spillover from crude oil market to BRICS stock markets based on Copula-POT-CoVaR models. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(4): 754-771. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.4.754
    [6] Yinghua Ren, Weiwen Gu . The Impact on RMB Internationalization Process: Exchange Rate Expectation and Foreign Trade. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2017, 1(1): 114-124. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2017.1.114
    [7] Cunyi Yang, Li Chen, Bin Mo . The spillover effect of international monetary policy on China's financial market. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2023, 7(4): 508-537. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2023026
    [8] Dumisani Pamba, Sophia Mukorera, Peter Moores-Pitt . The asymmetric effects of cross-border equity flow volatility on equity market returns in SANEK countries. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2025, 9(1): 40-75. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2025002
    [9] Korhan Gokmenoglu, Baris Memduh Eren, Siamand Hesami . Exchange rates and stock markets in emerging economies: new evidence using the Quantile-on-Quantile approach. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2021, 5(1): 94-110. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2021005
    [10] Albert A. Agyemang-Badu, Fernando Gallardo Olmedo, José María Mella Márquez . Conditional macroeconomic and stock market volatility under regime switching: Empirical evidence from Africa. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2024, 8(2): 255-285. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2024010
  • The increasing human population expected in the next decades, the growing demand of livestock products—which production requires higher amounts of feed products fabrication, the collective concern about food quality in industrialized countries together with the need to protect the fertility of soils, in particular, and the environment, in general, constitute as a whole big challenge that worldwide agriculture has to face nowadays. Some soil bacteria harbor mechanisms to promote plant growth, which include phytostimulation, nutrient mobilization, biocontrol of plant pathogens and abiotic stresses protection. These bacteria have also been proved as promoters of vegetable food quality. Therefore, these microbes, also so-called Plant Probiotic Bacteria, applied as biofertilizers in crop production, constitute an environmental friendly manner to contribute to produce the food and feed needed to sustain world population. In this review, we summarize some of the best-known mechanisms of plant probiotic bacteria to improve plant growth and develop a more sustainable agriculture.


    The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the current COVID-19 pandemic that began in December 2019 in Wuhan city of China. Historically viral diseases have been causing a disastrous effect on global health and the economy [1][3]. Based on global statistics, as of Jul 7, 2021, around 185 million confirmed cases and 4 million reported deaths due to COVID-19 [4][6]. The first case in the Caribbean region was reported on Mar 10, 2020, in Jamaica, and as of Jul 7, 2021, 957,946 confirmed cases and 12,877 deaths had been reported in the entire region. Diagnosis is confirmed by a specific molecular method known as real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Management is dependent on the patient's disease state and ranges from observation in mild cases to mechanical ventilation in severe cases [2]. Coronavirus is an RNA enveloped virus composed of five genomic proteins, namely spike protein (S), membrane protein (M), nucleocapsid protein (N), an envelope protein (E), and the hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) protein. The spike (S) protein on its surface gives it a “crown” like appearance, hence the name “corona” [7]. In humans, OC43, NL63, HKU1, and 229E have caused mild respiratory illness. SARS and MERS have been the reason for severe respiratory diseases in the past [8]. SARS was first recognized in Guangdong province, China, in November 2002 and advanced to 30 countries, infecting 79,000 people by 2003 with a fatality rate of 9.5%. SARS-CoV was traced and isolated from Himalayan palm civets found in the livestock market in Guangdong, China [9]. MERS-CoV was initially identified in 2012, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in a patient with pneumonia and features of renal failure. The patient's sputum analysis was done by RT-PCR, revealing the viral RNA to be MERS-CoV which infected 91 patients and had a high fatality rate of 34%. Bats and Arabian dromedary camels were identified as potential hosts for MERS-CoV [10].

    In late December 2019, a cluster of patients presented to local hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei province of China, with fever, cough, and malaise. These patients had a common exposure to wild animals and were involved in the live animal trade in Huanan wholesale seafood market. A diagnosis of severe atypical pneumonia of unknown etiology was established and subsequently notified to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. The Chinese government closed and sanitized the Huanan seafood market, followed by contact tracing for suspect cases. On Jan 7, 2020, the suspect virus was identified as novel CoV-2019. The next few weeks experienced an exponential increase in the number of patients presenting with similar clinical manifestations. Wuhan has been a major transportation hub caused an epidemic to spread to other countries such as Thailand, South Korea, Singapore, and Japan. Travel restrictions, quarantine, and isolation of suspect cases were quickly initiated in many countries [11]. COVID-19 has an epidemic doubling time of 1.8 days forcing the WHO to announce COVID-19 as a global pandemic and provide frequent updates on disease statistics, case definitions, and preventive strategies [5]. In terms of COVID-19 transmission dynamics, a study by Coccia et al. found that cities with high atmospheric stability, as measured by low wind speed, and frequently high levels of air pollution – exceeding safe levels of ozone or particulate matter – had a higher number of COVID-19-related infected individuals and deaths [12]. The authors further documented that transmission dynamics of COVID-19 is due to air pollution-to-human transmission rather than human-to-human transmission [13]. A systematic review by Chattu et al. has highlighted that to combat the COVID-19 epidemic, the focus areas must be on equity, health promotion, and sustainable development [14]. A recent study found that the best-performing countries in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic issue have a smaller population and/or stronger public governance, as well as high healthcare spending [15].

    If SARS-CoV-2 gets entrenched in the community, COVID-19 vaccines will be critical in the future for lowering morbidity and death and generating herd immunity [16]. However, even if vaccine supplies were available, the US public health system was unprepared and understaffed to handle the duty of delivering >450 million doses of vaccine in a timely manner. Failure to invest sufficiently in public health has been prevalent across the country at all levels of government [17].

    In the Caribbean region, vaccine hesitancy is a significant impediment to vaccine uptake and herd immunity, which is essential to protect the most susceptible populations. Therefore, the educational campaigns also should include information about the contribution of an individual's immunization to herd immunity. Besides, transparency about vaccine effectiveness and adverse events to set public expectations will likely improve trust in a COVID-19 vaccine, but messaging should take care to avoid unintentional overemphasis on the risk of rare adverse events [18]. In the United States, in the initial phase of the immunization campaign, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) advised that both 1) health care professionals and 2) residents of long-term care institutions be administered the COVID-19 vaccine [19]. Using nationally representative data from general adult populations in Ireland and the United Kingdom, the vaccine hesitancy/resistance was 35% and 31%, respectively [20].

    Similarly, a French study found a vaccine hesitancy among the working-age population ranged from 9.3% to 43.2%, depending on the vaccine characteristics [21]. Besides, from a developing country perspective, a study from Uganda on the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine found a low level of interest for vaccine and clinical trial interest [22]. In the United States, Viswanath et al. have concluded in their study that Race/ethnicity, risk perceptions, exposure to diverse media for COVID-19 news, party identity, and trust in scientists were found as variables influencing COVID-19 vaccination uptake [23]. The vaccine hesitancy in the Caribbean region is also found to be high, and furthermore, the region has suffered a lot because of the impact of the pandemic due to its geographical, financial, and technological limitations. In this context, we aimed to present the containment of COVID-19 from the Caribbean perspective with the following objectives: 1) to discuss the epidemiology (including transmission dynamics), clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and case-management, and 2) to describe the surveillance systems, various preventive measures and vaccination plan including vaccine hesitancy of the population.

    A literature search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed. We used PubMed's MeSH terms COVID-19, global statistics, Caribbean, pandemic, transmission, quarantine, vaccine, and surveillance. Abstracts were screened, focusing on the search results in relevance to this review. Cochrane reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were prioritized. Articles focusing on COVID-19, global and Caribbean statistics, and management strategies were prioritized. This review search included COVID-19 relevant articles, references, keywords, and the ‘similar article’ tab on the PubMed database. This approach generated 72 relevant research articles, including 32 reviews, 29 original articles, 11 website searches, and one case report published from 2003 to 2021. During the search, contradictory views, results, and subjective conclusions were thoroughly evaluated and referred to relevant source studies before being presented. To access the COVID-19 data, we have referred to the websites of the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA), Caribbean Tourism, and WHO Dashboard for COVID-19. The region-specific and country-specific data on infections and deaths were collected and shown in graphs and tables. The main findings, such as the burden of the COVID-19 in the region, the case management, the vaccination and vaccine hesitancy, and public health surveillance aspects, are discussed below.

    The health and financial impact of COVID-19 on a region are dependent on the epidemic curve, duration of the pandemic, the regional population, government, and health authority's measure on disease containment. Based on July 1, 2021, WHO regional situation reports, United States has the highest number of infected cases, followed by India, Brazil, Russia, and France (Figure 1). The case fatality rate (CFR) was highest in Brazil at 2.80% [5]. The Caribbean region's CFR is at a lower percentage (1.34%.) in comparison to the worldwide CFR (2.17%) (Figures 2 and 3).

    Figure 1.  Global statistics and comparisons of confirmed COVID-19 cases.
    Figure 2.  Global statistics and comparison of COVID-19 deaths.
    Figure 3.  Global statistics and comparison of COVID-19 case fatality rate.

    The Caribbean region has around 700 islands with approximately 2,25,996 km2 of total area with a population of 43,507,721 [24]. The Caribbean region was hit with its first COVID-19 case on Mar 10, 2020, in Jamaica. This was followed by a rapid spread across the region with noticeable spikes on Mar 21 (55 new cases arrived in Trinidad and Tobago from cruise ship), Mar 26 (33 confirmed cases), and Mar 29 (32 confirmed cases). As of July 7, 2021, there have been 957,946 confirmed cases and 12,877 deaths in the Caribbean region. The region-wise statistical analysis (Figure 4) shows the Dominican Republic constitutes 42.53% of confirmed cases in the Caribbean region, followed by Cuba (13.51%) and Puerto Rico (10.48%). These northern Caribbean islands are close to the United States and have frequent flight access to European regions, causing a higher percentage of confirmed imported cases. The confirmed cases in Southern Caribbean islands were from positive cases arriving from cruise ships followed by limited cases of local transmission [2],[25].

    Figure 4.  Caribbean region confirmed COVID-19 cases.
    Figure 5.  Caribbean region deaths due to COVID-19.
    Figure 6.  The case fatality rate in the Caribbean region due to COVID-19.

    The Dominican Republic and Cuba have managed to keep the CFR (Figures 5 and 6) at the lowest among its member states, owing mainly to its positive health factors. These countries have free healthcare services and also poses a high doctor-to-population ratio. The region's national emergency structure is diverse and linked closely with local organizations enabling easier contact tracing, immediate testing of suspect cases at regional health centers, and faster hospital admissions and case management. These factors have positively impacted COVID-19 patient management and reduced CFR due to COVID-19 complications [26],[27].

    At the other end of the spectrum is the CFR in Haiti (Figure 6), standing at an alarmingly high rate of 2.41% compared to its other Caribbean countries. Based on the Human Development Index, Haiti is ranked 169 out of 189 countries. This financial crisis, along with ongoing political crises, frequent episodes of natural calamities, and an ill-equipped health care system, has caused a delirious effect on the management of the present COVID-19 pandemic [28].

    Caribbean demographics based on CARPHA statistics show the median age of COVID-19 patients was 50 years (modal range 55–59 years), and women were predominately affected, unlike the global male preponderance for COVID-19. The median onset of illness was 8 days (range 5 to 13 days) [24]. Due to limited comorbid data availability, it is important to correlate with previously proven susceptible factors to SARS and MERS-CoV infection, including smoking, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or chronic illness. The striking target to the elderly population is attributed to underlying chronic disorders and declined immune function [29]. Declined immune function has been linked to cytokine storm syndrome (elevated circulating inflammatory cytokines) and hyper-inflammation syndrome. These syndromes are triggered by viral infections and are also predictors of fatality in COVID-19 patients [30]. Children in the Caribbean were less affected due to higher antibodies, lower prior exposure to the virus, and relatively low levels of inflammatory cytokines in their systems [31].

    Extensive structural analyses revealed atomic-level interactions between the coronavirus and the host. Cross-species and human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 is mainly dependent on the spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) and its host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2). High expression of ACE2 was identified in the lung (type II alveolar cells), esophagus, ileum, colon, kidney (proximal convoluted tubules), myocardium, bladder (urothelial cells), and also recently the oral mucosa. ACE2 receptors provide entry of the virus into the host cells and subsequent viral replication. The main factors involved in viral pathogenesis of 2019-nCov are spike 1 subunit protein, priming by transmembrane protease serine-2 (essential for entry and viral replication), ACE2 receptor-2019-nCov interaction, and downregulation of ACE2 protein. These factors contribute to atrophy, fibrosis, inflammation, and vasoconstriction resulting in host tissue injury [32].

    Modes of transmission: The Caribbean region is famous for its cultural heterogeneity, diverse ecosystem, and highly demanding tourist beach resorts and cruise voyages. The initial cases across the island countries were mainly imported cases. These patients had flown down to their homeland after visiting either European countries or the United States [3]. This was followed by human-to-human transmission occurring through common routes such as direct, contact, and airborne transmissions through aerosols and medical procedures. Infected cases based on the transmission mode constituted 28% imported cases, 53% local transmission, 58% sporadic cases, and 42% cluster transmission [25]. Cough, sneeze, droplet inhalation, contact with oral, nasal, and eye mucous membranes are the common modes of spread. Viral shedding occurs from the respiratory tract, saliva, feces, and urine, resulting in other sources of virus spread. The viral load is higher and of longer duration in severe COVID-19 patients. The spread of COVID-19 from patients to health workers and flight attendees who were in close contact with the infected patients was also reported [33]. An Italian study by Coccia et al. suggests that high concentrations of air pollutants, associated with low wind speeds, may promote a longer permanence of viral particles in the polluted air of cities, thus favoring an indirect means of diffusion of COVID-19 [34]. Cities with more than 100 days per year exceeding PM10 or ozone restrictions, cities located in hinterland zones (i.e., distant from the coast), cities with a low average wind speed, and cities with a lower average temperature had a greater number of COVID-19 infections. Furthermore, the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy resulted in more than 75% of infected persons and 81% of fatalities in industrialized districts with high levels of air pollution [35].

    Clinical features and diagnosis: COVID-19 manifests with varied signs and symptoms depending on the host viral load and virus-host interaction. The most common symptoms include fever, cough, and malaise. Other less reported features include headache, vomiting, diarrhea, ageusia, and conjunctivitis [36]. The COVID-19 was clinically classified into: mild to moderate disease (non-pneumonia and pneumonia), severe disease (dyspnea, respiratory frequency over 30/min, oxygen saturation less than 93%, PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 300, and/or lung infiltrates more than 50% of the lung field within 24–48 hours) and critical (respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multi-organ dysfunction/failure) [37]. The progress of COVID-19 from mild illness to severe form depends on the circulatory levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, GCSF, GMCSF, TNFα, and VEGFA [38]. Complications include severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), shock, and multi-organ failure [1]. Suspected COVID-19 case presenting with or without symptoms requires molecular laboratory confirmation using RT-PCR test. RT-PCR tests are preferred since they have dual analysis and sequencing. Specimen samples can be obtained from the respiratory passages (Nasopharyngeal swabs, anterior nares, and sputum), oropharyngeal swabs, rectal swabs, fecal specimens, and urine. Suppose the initial RT-PCR test result is negative in a strongly suspected case of COVID-19. In that case, a repeat specimen collection is required from deeper and higher viral load sites such as tracheal aspirates, broncho-alveolar lavage, pleural fluid, and in extreme cases, a lung biopsy would be warranted. The negative result can be attributed to technical errors, improper specimen collection, storage, and transport [39],[40].

    Laboratory findings vary from leukocytosis, leukopenia, lymphopenia, elevated AST, reduced albumin, elevated LDH, elevated CRP, and elevated ESR [41]. The most consistent laboratory finding observed is lymphopenia in adults and raised procalcitonin in children. Urine assays have revealed hematuria, proteinuria, and leukocyturia [42].

    Chest X-ray and Computerized Tomography (CT) scans are a sensitive routine imaging tool for COVID-19. Most standard patterns observed on chest CT were ground-glass opacity, ill-defined margins, smooth or irregular interlobular septal thickening, air bronchogram, crazy-paving pattern, and thickening of the adjacent pleura [43].

    Management of COVID-19: Management of COVID-19 cases is dependent on the triage approach based on the severity of clinical manifestations. Observation, isolation, and quarantine form the basis for managing mild cases. Moderately ill patients are treated with high-flow nasal cannula along with antiviral therapy. Patient isolation and close observation, including monitoring oxygen saturation, are essential in every case. If the patient develops refractory hypoxemia, then administration of Nitric oxide inhalation, neuromuscular blockers, and endotracheal intubation is initiated. Mechanical ventilation using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is needed in severe cases [44],[45].

    Complicated COVID-19 patients can present with shock, renal failure, cardiac failure, and pulmonary edema. In the presence of shock with acute renal failure, the negative fluid balance needs to be achieved by dialysis. Antimicrobials and antifungals are used for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. This prevents illness from SARS-CoV-2 and also reduces the risk of acquiring secondary infection. Fluid management is important to reduce pulmonary edema. Glucocorticoids are best avoided due to their harmful effects in viral pneumonia and ARDS. Rescue therapy by administration of intravenous infusion of vitamin C has been suggested to attenuate vascular injury and systemic inflammation in sepsis and ARDS [46][49].

    Role of Caribbean Public Health Agency: Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA) was established legally in July 2011 by Caribbean community member states. It began its operation in January 2013. It issues regional response to public health institutions during natural disasters, surveillance and management of non-communicable and communicable diseases, and contributes to global health agreements in compliance with international health regulations. Once WHO announced COVID-19, a pandemic, CARPHA upgraded the disease transmission risk as “very high” based on international risk assessment guidelines and initiated the following actions: 1) coordinating regional preparedness and activating incident management team, 2) issued situation reports to its members states, 3) developed travelers' air and seaport guidelines, 4) released updated case definitions, statistical and preventive strategies to the health authorities, and 5) security cluster tracing of passengers from high-risk countries [2],[25].

    Vaccination: The CARPHA- CRS (Caribbean Regulatory System) collaborates with the WHO and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) to recognize regulatory authorities used in its procedure for the verification of COVID-19 products that have been assessed by trusted authorities and recommended for emergency use authorization [28]. Information technology is also an important part of the vaccination drive. It creates awareness among the people, providing an important technical framework to better respond to challenges arising to the global health system [28]. As per the information by CARPHA on Jun 28, 2021, 14 Caribbean countries have received the COVID-19 vaccine from the COVAX facility. COVAX is co-led by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Vaccine Alliance, and WHO, with UNICEF as a key delivery partner and PAHO as the procurement agent in the Americas. This facility aims to ensure fairer global vaccine distribution [50] and address the prevailing inequities [51], but the end result can only be assessed after some time based on fulfilling its commitments to the nations [52].

    Based on data collected by the Global Change Data Labs from Our World in Data site, between 2.6% and 66% of persons in the CARPHA Member States have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Based on the PAHO Dashboard of COVID-19 Vaccination in the Americas as of Jun 25, 2021, among the CARPHA Member States, vaccine administration (at least one dose) ranges from 8.4 to 142 doses per capita. Approximately 2,211,162 doses have been administered, with an average of 62 doses per capita among CMS (Table 1) [2].

    Table 1.  Vaccination coverage in the CARPHA member states.
    Country Vaccine(s) Number of Doses Doses per 100 persons
    Anguilla AstraZeneca — Vaxzevria 15,789 85.7
    Antigua & Barbuda AstraZeneca — not specified 63,755 64.6
    Aruba Information not available 125,182 116.8
    Bahamas AstraZeneca — not specified 79,246 20
    Barbados AstraZeneca — not specified 161,059 56
    Bonaire Pfizer BioNTech — Comirnaty 26,941 134
    Belize AstraZeneca — not specified 106,010 26.2
    Bermuda Information not available 78,413 108.9
    Cayman Islands Pfizer BioNTech — Comirnaty 89,619 142
    Curacao Pfizer BioNTech — Comirnaty 165,545 100.5
    Dominica Beijing CNBG — Inactivated; AstraZeneca — not specified 39,309 52.9
    Grenada AstraZeneca — not specified 31,494 27.9
    Guyana Information not available 335,091 42.4
    Jamaica AstraZeneca — not specified 249,938 8.4
    Montserrat AstraZeneca — Vaxzevria 2,640 48.9
    Saba Information not available 1,300 67.3
    Sint Eustatius Information not available 2,348 74.8
    Sint Maarten Pfizer BioNTech — Comirnaty 38,290 86.2
    St. Kitts & Nevis AstraZeneca — not specified 35,659 65.8
    St. Lucia AstraZeneca — not specified 51,849 28.1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Vaccine hesitancy: Vaccination is an effective way to curtail the burden of COVID-19, in which success depends on a high acceptance of the vaccine. A study by Syed et al. in their survey on vaccine acceptance indicated a high acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among Malaysians [53]. A French study among the working age population found that vaccine hesitancy was lower when herd immunity benefits were communicated; and in working versus non-working individuals. The study further noted that predicted hesitancy was highest for vaccines made in China with 50% efficacy and a 1 in 10,000 risk of serious side effects (vaccine acceptance 27.4% [26.8–28.0]), and lowest for a vaccine made in the EU with 90% efficacy and a 1 in 100,000 risk of serious side effects (vaccine acceptance 61.3% [60.5–62.1]) [54]. A Libyan study by Elhadi et al. reported that regarding vaccine acceptance and efficacy, 12,006 (79.6%) reported their willingness to take the vaccine with an efficacy of 90% or more, 9143 (60.6%) with an efficacy of 70% or more, and only 6212 (41.2%) with an efficacy of 50% [55]. Another study from Australia conducted by Seale and colleagues found encouraging results about the public perceptions and behaviors where 80% (n = 1143) agreed with the statement that getting vaccinated for COVID-19 would be a good way to protect against COVID-19 infection [56]. As emphasized by Harrison et al., public confidence in vaccination programs depends on the work they do for the community — social, political, moral, and biological. The concept of public health and its programs must be broader than the delivery of the vaccine technology itself [57].

    Surveillance: Active surveillance to COVID-19 has been the mainstay for disease detection and contain transmission. All epidemiological investigations and disease outbreak containment/restriction measures were implemented under the national infectious disease Act [58]. Multipronged surveillance strategies adoption includes case definition, contact tracing of COVID-19 confirmed patients, and active surveillance among high-risk patients (with pneumonia, ICU patients). COVID-19 transmission containment measures are case isolation, quarantine of suspect and probable cases, active monitoring of contacts, country-wise border and travel controls, and community education regarding preventive measures [59]. Surveillance in hospitals includes testing for COVID-19 in the following groups: 1) Hospitalized patients with pneumonia 2) ICU patients with infective etiology 3) Patients presenting with flu-like illness at OPD's (government hospitals/private care clinics) 4) Deaths from infectious causes [60].

    Surveillance for travelers is mainly aimed to reduce chain transmissions from imported cases. Border control measures include thermal scans, temperature screening (exit and entry screening) for all travelers, denial of travelers entering high-risk countries, and mandatory 14-day self-quarantine [61]. Surveillance for closed contacts includes 14-day quarantine at designated government quarantine centers or homes, monitoring health status daily, video-call quarantined individuals, and phone surveillance to monitor and verify their location [2]. Confirmed COVID-19 patients need to be interviewed to obtain detailed demographics, activity patterns, and clinical manifestation. These details should be from the pre-symptom onset till hospital isolation. This mainly gives access to tracing close contacts (defined as individuals who have spent prolonged time and are within 2 m of a confirmed COVID-19 patient), secondary transmission, and cluster transmission [59],[61].

    Preventive measures: Many countries in the Caribbean region declared public health emergencies and imposed stringent public health measures in their respective countries [62]. Closure of schools, universities, cultural centers, social, recreational centers, dine-in restaurants, bars, and sporting centers was announced immediately [63]. Stay at home was ordered initially, and this was also followed by a state of emergency and curfew imposed in some Caribbean islands. Closure of non-essential business and adjusted opening hours to grocery stores, supermarkets, and pharmacies were formalized. Public gatherings in funerals were forbidden. Closure of borders to air travel and cruises were announced [64]. A study by Mohsen et al. suggested that media coverage can be considered as an effective way to mitigate the COVID-19 spreading [65].

    As it is a highly contagious virus, effective precautions were implemented. The public health officials, regional health authorities, hospitals, local health departments, and community health service personnel have worked diligently with the universities, workplaces, and public to educate and provide frequent updates and resources to restrict the spread of COVID-19. Detailed public health measures included close follow-up of discharged patients following successful treatment, and any suspected, probable cases were screened and notified [66].

    Due to effective transmission of the COVID-19 virus from person to person, the following preventive strategies were recommended to the public: Regular and thorough cleaning of hands, preferably with alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Maintaining adequate social distancing, avoiding touching faces, practicing good respiratory and oral hygiene, elderly and patients with comorbid conditions were reported to have a higher risk of death and were thus advised to stay away from public places and prefer homestay. Online/e-learning strategies are being implemented in schools and universities. The face masks were strictly imposed on persons venturing out in public [67]. Further, efficient healthcare sector and environmental sustainability minimize case fatality rates of COVID-19 [68].

    COVID-19 disease transmission can be contained only by effective control of person-to-person transmission, patient isolation and confinement, social distancing, and preventive community containment measures. Successful disease isolation depends on early case detection (before the onset of peak viral shedding). A patient with fever or respiratory illness symptoms and a contact or travel history is considered a highly sensitive case for SARS [2].

    Quarantine includes restriction of movement combined with medical observation of close contacts of infected patients during the incubation period. Quarantine is usually done at home or in designated places such as hotels or set up camps. Quarantined contacts record their temperatures and are observed by the public health care teams daily and are further investigated if they develop symptoms. The main reason for quarantine is to avoid human-to-human transmission, which forms the vital link of disease spread [2],[25]. Community containment measures are designed to reduce personal interactions within a community, region, or city. Setting up isolation rooms for staff with strict use of personal protective equipment (PPE, which includes gloves, gowns, eye protection, and N95 respirators), restricting visitor entry, negative pressure rooms, infection control precautions, and a separate triage facility were all recommended and implemented as hospital containment measures. [2],[64].

    The psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Caribbean has been inclined due to prolonged isolation, quarantine, and lockdown periods across the region. Health care professions are at a high risk of anxiety, depression, and distress due to prolonged work exhaustion, lack of personal protective equipment, concern about infecting their families, and witness to patients' death. Corrective guidance, the family's safety, effective disease prevention measures, and positive attitude from their working colleagues can improve the psychological outcome during this pandemic. They have impacted public needs easy access to clinical services, regulatory implementation of infection control measures, and establishment of counseling service centers. Providing psychological first aid is crucial for those who are affected and bereaved family members [69],[70]. Thus far, a limited number of cases have reported intrauterine and perinatal infection caused by vertical transmission in women who developed COVID-19 in late pregnancy. Infants born to COVID-19 suspected or confirmed mothers should be isolated, observed, and evaluated [71]. Confirmed COVID-19 mothers should be cautious during breastfeeding to avoid droplet transmission and contact transmission to the baby. However, no virus has been reported in the maternal milk of COVID-19 positive mothers [72]. Public health measures were implemented early across the region and mainly followed the WHO's guidelines and strategies, restricting the drastic outcome of this zoonotic disease. Data providing real-time disease prevalence, statistical evaluation of high risk, local description on age, and country-wise detailed clinical statistics would improve the disease containment, identify the high-risk population, and reduce the CFR in certain Caribbean countries. Strong regional collaboration between the Caribbean member states is necessary to provide optimal real-time data to the public and implement effective guidance in their respective countries. The role of CARPHA and government health services in restricting disease transmission across the region has been commendable. Many island countries have now started to ease the restrictions in a phased manner.

    [1] Pimentel D (2012) World overpopulation. Environ Dev Sustain 14: 151. doi: 10.1007/s10668-011-9336-2
    [2] Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, et al. (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 20260–20264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108
    [3] Béné C, Barange M, Subasinghe R, et al. (2015) Feeding 9 billion by 2050-Putting fish back on the menu. Food Sec 7: 261. doi: 10.1007/s12571-015-0427-z
    [4] Khush G (2001) Green revolution: the way forward. Nat Rev Genet 2: 815–822.
    [5] Araus J, Li J, Parry M, et al. (2014) Phenotyping and other breeding approaches for a New Green Revolution. J Integr Plant Biol 56: 422–424. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12202
    [6] Garcia-Fraile P, Carro L, Robledo M, et al. (2012) Rhizobium promotes non-legumes growth and quality in several production steps: towards a biofertilization of edible raw vegetables healthy for humans. PLoS One 7: e38122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038122
    [7] Flores-Felix JD, Silva LR, Rivera LP, et al. (2015) Plants probiotics as a tool to produce highly functional fruits: the case of Phyllobacterium and vitamin C in strawberries. PLoS One 10: e0122281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122281
    [8] Haas D, Keel C (2003) Regulation of antibiotic production in root-colonizing Pseudomonas spp. and relevance for biological control of plant disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol 41: 117–153.
    [9] Kloepper J, Schrot M (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria 2: 879–882.
    [10] Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 395–412. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.030
    [11] Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, et al. (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolucionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79: 293–320. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14
    [12] Brewin NJ (1991) Development of the legume root nodule. Ann Rev Cell Biol 7: 191–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.001203
    [13] Suzaki T, Kawaguchi M (2014) Root nodulation: a developmental program involving cell fate conversion triggered by symbiotic bacterial infection. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21: 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.06.002
    [14] Pawlowski K, Demchenko KN (2012) The diversity of actinorhizal symbiosis. Protoplasma 249: 967–979. doi: 10.1007/s00709-012-0388-4
    [15] Vessey JK, Pawlowski K, Bergman B (2005) Root-based N2-fixing symbioses: Legumes, actinorhizal plants, Parasponia sp. and cycads. Plant Soil 274: 51–78. doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-5881-5
    [16] Khalid A, Arshad M, Shaharoona B, et al. (2009) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Sustainable Agriculture, In: Microbial Strategies for Crop Improvement, Berlin: Springer, 133–160.
    [17] Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28: 1327–1350. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9
    [18] García-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Rivas R (2015) Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioeng 2: 183–205. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.183
    [19] Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, et al. (2016) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability-a review. Molecules 21: 573. doi: 10.3390/molecules21050573
    [20] Malusá E, Vassilev N (2014) A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98: 6599–6607. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5828-y
    [21] Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (1998) Interactions of gramineous plants with Azoarcus spp. and other Diazotrophs: identification, localization, and perspectives to study their function. Crit Rev Plant Sci 17: 29–54.
    [22] Sabry SRS, Saleh SA, Batchelor CA, et al. (1997) Endophytic establishment of Azorhizobium caulinodans in wheat. Proc Biol Sci 264: 341–346. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0049
    [23] Tejera N, Lluch C, Martínez-Toledo MV, et al. (2005) Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter and Azospirillum strains from the sugarcane rhizosphere. Plant Soil 270: 223–232. doi: 10.1007/s11104-004-1522-7
    [24] Yadegari M, Rahmani HA, Noormohammadi G, et al. (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria increase growth, yield and nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris. J Plant Nutr 33: 1733–1743. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2010.503776
    [25] Isawa T, Yasuda M, Awazaki H, et al. (2010) Azospirillum sp. strain B510 enhances rice growth and yield. Microbes Environ 25: 58–61.
    [26] Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS (2013) Co-inoculation of soybeans and common beans with rhizobia and azospirilla: strategies to improve sustainability. Biol Fert Soils 49: 791–801. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0771-5
    [27] Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Pradhan M, et al. (2014) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of native Azospirillum strains from rice fields to improve crop productivity. Protoplasma 251: 943–953. doi: 10.1007/s00709-013-0607-7
    [28] Ramakrishnan K, Selvakumar G (2012) Effect of biofertilizers on enhancement of growth and yield on Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) Int. J Res Bot 2: 20–23.
    [29] Wani SA, Chand S, Ali T (2013) Potential use of Azotobacter chroococcum in crop production: an overview. Curr Agri Res J 1: 35–38. doi: 10.12944/CARJ.1.1.04
    [30] Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Dangar TK, et al. (2014) Phenotypic and molecular characterisation of efficient nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter strains from rice fields for crop improvement. Protoplasma 251: 511–523. doi: 10.1007/s00709-013-0547-2
    [31] Beneduzi A, Peres D, Vargas LK, et al. (2008) Evaluation of genetic diversity and plant growth promoting activities of nitrogen-fixing bacilli isolated from rice fields in South Brazil. App Soil Ecol 39: 311–320. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.01.006
    [32] Habibi S, Djedidi S, Prongjunthuek K, et al. (2014) Physiological and genetic characterization of rice nitrogen fixer PGPR isolated from rhizosphere soils of different crops. Plant Soil 379: 51–66. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2035-7
    [33] Rana A, Saharan B, Joshi M, et al. (2011) Identification of multi-trait PGPR isolates and evaluating their potential as inoculants for wheat. Ann Microbiol 61: 893–900. doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0211-z
    [34] Kao CM, Chen SC, Chen YS, et al. (2003) Detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in rice fields with PCR-based technique. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 48: 521–552. doi: 10.1007/BF02931334
    [35] Govindarajan M, Balandreau J, Kwon SW, et al. (2007) Effects of the inoculation of Burkholderia vietnamensis and related endophytic diazotrophic bacteria on grain yield of rice. Microb Ecol 55: 21–37.
    [36] Berge O, Heulin T, Achouak W, et al. (1991) Rahnella aquatilis, a nitrogen-fixing enteric bacterium associated with the rhizosphere of wheat and maize. Can J Microbiol 37: 195–203. doi: 10.1139/m91-030
    [37] Taulé C, Mareque C, Barlocco C, et al. (2012) The contribution of nitrogen fixation to sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), and the identification and characterization of part of the associated diazotrophic bacterial community. Plant Soil 356: 35–49.
    [38] Simonet P, Normand P, Moiroud A, et al. (1990) Identification of Frankia strains in nodules by hybridization of polymerase chain reaction products with strain-specific oligonucleotide probes. Arch Microb 153: 235–240. doi: 10.1007/BF00249074
    [39] Muñoz-Rojas J, Caballero-Mellado J (2003) Population dynamics of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus in sugarcane cultivars and its effect on plant growth. Microb Ecol 46: 454–464. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-0110-3
    [40] Elbeltagy A, Nishioka K, Sato T, et al. (2001) Endophytic colonization and in planta nitrogen fixation by a Herbaspirillum sp. isolated from wild rice species. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 5285–5293.
    [41] Valverde A, Velazquez E, Gutierrez C, et al. (2003) Herbaspirillum lusitanum sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1979–1983.
    [42] Alves GC, Videira SS, Urquiaga S, et al. (2015) Differential plant growth promotion and nitrogen fixation in two genotypes of maize by several Herbaspirillum inoculants. Plant Soil 387: 307–321. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2295-2
    [43] Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP (2016) Evidence of nitrogen fixation and growth promotion in canola (Brassica napus L.) by an endophytic diazotroph Paenibacillus polymyxa P2b-2R. Biol Fert Soils 52: 119–125.
    [44] Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena MH, Velázquez E, et al. (2015) Bacterial associations with legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 34: 17–42. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2014.897899
    [45] Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, et al. (2006) Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture: regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Ann Bot 97: 883–893. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl027
    [46] Ahmed A, Hasnain S (2010) Auxin producing Bacillus sp.: Auxin quantification and effect on the growth Solanum tuberosum. Pure Appl Chem 82: 313–319.
    [47] Sokolova MG, Akimova GP, Vaishlya OB (2011) Effect of phytohormones synthesized by rhizosphere bacteria on plants. App Biochem Microbiol 47: 274–278. doi: 10.1134/S0003683811030148
    [48] Liu F, Xing S, Ma H, et al. (2013) Cytokinin-producing, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that confer resistance to drought stress in Platycladus orientalis container seedlings. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 9155–9164. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5193-2
    [49] Ortiz-Castro R, Valencia-Cantero E, López-Bucio J (2008) Plant growth promotion by Bacillus megaterium involves cytokinin signaling. Plant Signal Behav 3: 263–265. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.4.5204
    [50] Kang SM, Khan AL, Waqas M, et al. (2015) Gibberellin-producing Serratia nematodiphila PEJ1011 ameliorates low temperature stress in Capsicum annuum L. Eur J Soil Biol 68: 85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.02.005
    [51] Asaf S, Khan MA, Khan AL, et al. (2017) Bacterial endophytes from arid land plants regulate endogenous hormone content and promote growth in crop plants: an example of Sphingomonas sp. and Serratia marcescens. J Plant Interact 12: 31–38. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2016.1274060
    [52] Suarez C, Cardinale M, Ratering S, et al. (2015) Plant growth-promoting effects of Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus on summer barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Appl Soil Ecol 95: 23–30.
    [53] Bent E, Tuzun S, Chanway CP, et al. (2001) Alterations in plant growth and in root hormone levels of lodgepole pines inoculated with rhizobacteria. Can J Microbiol 47: 793–800. doi: 10.1139/w01-080
    [54] Bakaeva MD, Chetverikov SP, Korshunova TY, et al. (2017) The new bacterial strain Paenibacillus sp. IB-1: A producer of exopolysaccharide and biologically active substances with phytohormonal and antifungal activities. App Biochem Microbiol 53: 201–208.
    [55] Galland M, Gamet L, Varoquaux F, et al. (2012) The ethylene pathway contributes to root hair elongation induced by the beneficial bacteria Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196. Plant Sci 190: 74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.03.008
    [56] Shaharoona B, Naveed M, Arshad M, et al. (2008) Fertilizer-dependent efficiency of Pseudomonas for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79: 147–155. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1419-0
    [57] Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Khalid M, et al. (2013) Efficacy of Rhizobium and Pseudomonas strains to improve physiology, ionic balance and quality of mung bean under salt-affected conditions on farmer's fields. Plant Physiol Biochem 63: 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.11.024
    [58] Flores-Felix JD, Menendez E, Rivera LP, et al. (2013) Use of Rhizobium leguminosarum as a potential biofertilizer for Lactuca sativa and Daucus carota crops. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176: 876–882. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201300116
    [59] Brígido C, Nascimento FX, Duan J, et al. (2013) Expression of an exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene in Mesorhizobium spp. reduces the negative effects of salt stress in chickpea. FEMS Microbiol Lett 349: 46–53.
    [60] Flores-Félix JD, Marcos-García M, Silva LR, et al. (2015) Rhizobium as plant probiotic for strawberry production under microcosm conditions. Symbiosis 67: 25–32. doi: 10.1007/s13199-015-0373-8
    [61] Menéndez E, Escribano-Viana R, Flores-Félix JD, et al. (2016) Rhizobial biofertilizers for ornamental plants, In: Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Beneficial Plant-Microbe Interaction, Springer International Publishing, 13–21.
    [62] Brígido C, Glick BR, Oliveira S (2016) Survey of plant growth-promoting mechanisms in native Portuguese Chickpea Mesorhizobium isolates. Microb Ecol 73: 900–915.
    [63] Kong Z, Glick BR, Duan J, et al. (2015) Effects of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase-overproducing Sinorhizobium meliloti on plant growth and copper tolerance of Medicago lupulina. Plant Soil 391: 383–398. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2434-4
    [64] Khan AL, Waqas M, Kang SM, et al. (2014) Bacterial endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 produces gibberellins and IAA and promotes tomato plant growth. J Microbiol 52: 689–695.
    [65] Verma VC, Singh SK, Prakash S (2011) Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophytic Streptomyces from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. J Basic Microb 51: 550–556. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201000155
    [66] Boudjeko T, Tchinda RAM, Zitouni M, et al. (2017) Streptomyces cameroonensis sp. nov., a Geldanamycin producer that promotes Theobroma cacao growth. Microbes Environ 32: 24–31.
    [67] Estrada GA, Baldani VLD, de Oliveira DM, et al. (2013) Selection of phosphate-solubilizing diazotrophic Herbaspirillum and Burkholderia strains and their effect on rice crop yield and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil 369: 115–129. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1550-7
    [68] Jog R, Pandya M, Nareshkumar G, et al. (2014) Mechanism of phosphate solubilization and antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. isolated from wheat roots and rhizosphere and their application in improving plant growth. Microbiology 160: 778–788.
    [69] Sheng XF (2005) Growth promotion and increased potassium uptake of cotton and rape by a potassium releasing strain of Bacillus edaphicus. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1918–1922. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.026
    [70] Han HS, Lee KD (2005) Phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria effect on mineral uptake, soil availability and growth of eggplant. Res J Agric Biol Sci 1: 176–180.
    [71] Han HS, Supanjani S, Lee KD (2006) Effect of co-inoculation with phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria on mineral uptake and growth of pepper and cucumber. Plant Soil Environ 52: 130–136.
    [72] Sugumaran P, Janarthanam B (2007) Solubilization of potassium containing minerals by bacteria and their effect on plant growth. World J Agric Sci 3: 350–355.
    [73] Singh G, Biswas DR, Marwaha TS (2010) Mobilization of potassium from waste mica by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and its assimilation by maize (Zea mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a hydroponics study under phytotron growth chamber. J Plant Nutr 33: 1236–1251.
    [74] Velázquez E, Silva LR, Ramírez-Bahena MH, et al. (2016) Diversity of potassium-solubilizing microorganisms and their interactions with plants, In: Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, Springer India, 99–110.
    [75] Zhang C, Kong F (2014) Isolation and identification of potassium-solubilizing bacteria from tobacco rhizospheric soil and their effect on tobacco plants. Appl Soil Ecol 82: 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.05.002
    [76] Subhashini DV (2015) Growth promotion and increased potassium uptake of tobacco by potassium-mobilizing bacterium Frateuria aurantia grown at different potassium levels in vertisols. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46: 210–220. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2014.967860
    [77] Bagyalakshmi B, Ponmurugan P, Marimuthu S (2012) Influence of potassium solubilizing bacteria on crop productivity and quality of tea (Camellia sinensis). Afr J Agric Res 7: 4250–4259.
    [78] Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35: 1044–1051. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020
    [79] Radzki W, Gutierrez Manero FJ, Algar E, et al. (2013) Bacterial siderophores efficiently provide iron to iron-starved tomato plants in hydroponics culture. Anton Van Leeuw 104: 321–330. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9954-9
    [80] Ghavami N, Alikhani HA, Pourbabaei AA, et al. (2016) Effects of two new siderophore producing rhizobacteria on growth and iron content of maize and canola plants. J Plant Nutr 40: 736–746.
    [81] Egamberdiyeva D (2007) The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Appl Soil Ecol 36: 184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.005
    [82] El-Akhal MR, Rincon A, Coba de la Pena T, et al. (2013) Effects of salt stress and rhizobial inoculation on growth and nitrogen fixation of three peanut cultivars. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 15: 415–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00634.x
    [83] Lee SW, Lee SH, Balaraju K, et al. (2014) Growth promotion and induced disease suppression of four vegetable crops by a selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strain Bacillus subtilis 21-1 under two different soil conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 36: 1353–1362. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1514-z
    [84] Sivasakthi S, Usharani G, Saranraj P (2014) Biocontrol potentiality of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR)-Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis: A review. Afr J Agric Res 9: 1265–1277.
    [85] Li H, Ding X, Wang C, et al. (2016) Control of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease by Enterobacter asburiae BQ9 as a result of priming plant resistance in tomatoes. Turk J Biol 40: 150–159. doi: 10.3906/biy-1502-12
    [86] Singh RP, Jha PN (2016) The multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 augments induced systemic resistance and enhanced salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PloS One 11: e0155026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155026
    [87] Calvo J, Calvente V, de Orellano ME, et al. (2007) Biological control of postharvest spoilage caused by Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea in apple by using the bacterium Rahnella aquatilis. Int J Food Microbiol 113: 251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.003
    [88] Allard S, Enurah A, Strain E, et al. (2014) In situ evaluation of Paenibacillus alvei in reducing carriage of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport on whole tomato plants. App Environ Microbiol 80: 3842–3849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00835-14
    [89] Xu S, Kim BS (2016) Evaluation of Paenibacillus polymyxa strain SC09-21 for biocontrol of Phytophthora blight and growth stimulation in pepper plants. Trop Plant Pathol 41: 162–168. doi: 10.1007/s40858-016-0077-5
    [90] Yao L, Wu Z, Zheng Y, et al. (2010) Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. Eur J Soil Biol 46: 49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.11.002
    [91] Kumar H, Bajpai VK, Dubey RC, et al. (2010) Wilt disease management and enhancement of growth and yield of Cajanus cajan (L) var. Manak by bacterial combinations amended with chemical fertilizer. Crop Protect 29: 591–598.
    [92] Pastor N, Masciarelli O, Fischer S, et al. (2016) Potential of Pseudomonas putida PCI2 for the protection of tomato plants against fungal pathogens. Curr Microbiol 73: 346–353. doi: 10.1007/s00284-016-1068-y
    [93] Raymond J, Siefert JL, Staples CR, et al. (2004) The natural history of nitrogen fixation. Mol Biol Evol 21: 541–554. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh047
    [94] Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L, et al. (2016) Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact 15: 203. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7
    [95] Borriss R (2015) Bacillus, a plant-beneficial bacterium, In: Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Springer International Publishing, 379–391.
    [96] Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B (2003) Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 as a model for nitrogen-fixing grass endophytes. J Biotechnol 106: 169–178.
    [97] Kao CM, Chen SC, Chen YS, et al. (2003) Detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in rice fields with PCR-based technique. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 48: 521–552. doi: 10.1007/BF02931334
    [98] Tan Z, Hurek T, Vinuesa P, et al. (2001) Specific detection of Bradyrhizobium and Rhizobium strains colonizing rice (Oryza sativa) roots by 16S-23S ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer-targeted PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 3655–3664. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3655-3664.2001
    [99] Yanni YG, Rizk RY, El-Fattah FKA, et al. (2001) The beneficial plant growth-promoting association of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii with rice roots. Aust J Plant Physiol 28: 845–870.
    [100] Yanni YG, Dazzo FB, Squartini A, et al. (2016) Assessment of the natural endophytic association between Rhizobium and wheat and its ability to increase wheat production in the Nile delta. Plant Soil 407: 367–383. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2895-0
    [101] Moulin L, Munive A, Dreyfus B, et al. (2001) Nodulation of legumes by members of the beta-subclass of Proteobacteria. Nature 411: 948–950. doi: 10.1038/35082070
    [102] Oldroyd GE, Downie JA (2008) Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 519–546. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092839
    [103] Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111: 743–767. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct048
    [104] Spaepen S (2015) Plant Hormones Produced by Microbes, In: Lugtenberg B, Editor, Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 247–256.
    [105] Costacurta A, Vanderleyden J (1995) Synthesis of phytohormones by plant-associated bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 21: 1–18. doi: 10.3109/10408419509113531
    [106] Trewavas A (1981) How do plant growth substances work? Plant Cell Environ 4: 203–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1981.tb01048.x
    [107] Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R (2007) Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31: 425–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x
    [108] Hayat R, Ali S, Amara U, et al. (2010) Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Ann Microbiol 60: 579–598. doi: 10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1
    [109] Arkhipova TN, Prinsen E, Veselov SU, et al. (2007) Cytokinin producing bacteria enhance plant growth in drying soil. Plant Soil 292: 305–315. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9233-5
    [110] Bottini R, Cassán F, Piccoli P (2004) Gibberellin production by bacteria and its involvement in plant growth promotion and yield increase. App Microbiol Biotechnol 65: 497–503.
    [111] Nagahama K, Ogawa T, Fujii T, et al. (1992) Classification of ethylene-producing bacteria in terms of biosynthetic pathways to ethylene. J Ferment Bioeng 73: 1–5. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(92)90221-F
    [112] Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190: 63–68. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532
    [113] Joo GJ, Kim YM, Kim JT, et al. (2005) Gibberellins-producing rhizobacteria increase endogenous gibberellins content and promote growth of red peppers. J Microbiol 43: 510–515.
    [114] Ghosh PK, Sen SK, Maiti TK (2015) Production and metabolism of IAA by Enterobacter spp. (Gammaproteobacteria) isolated from root nodules of a legume Abrus precatorius L. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 4: 296–303.
    [115] Ma W, Penrose DM, Glick BR (2002) Strategies used by rhizobia to lower plant ethylene levels and increase nodulation. Can J Microbiol 48: 947–954. doi: 10.1139/w02-100
    [116] Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S, et al. (2007) Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34: 635–648. doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0240-6
    [117] Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, et al. (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119: 329–339. doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9162-4
    [118] Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169: 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009
    [119] Gamalero E, Glick BR (2015) Bacterial modulation of plant ethylene levels. Plant Physiol 169: 13–22. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00284
    [120] Nascimento FX, Brígido C, Glick BR, et al. (2016) The role of rhizobial ACC deaminase in the nodulation process of leguminous plants. Int J Agron 2016.
    [121] Honma M, Shimomura T (1978) Metabolism of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Agric Biol Chem 42: 1825–1831.
    [122] Magnucka EG, Pietr SJ (2015) Various effects of fluorescent bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas containing ACC deaminase on wheat seedling growth. Microbiol Res 181: 112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.04.005
    [123] Zerrouk IZ, Benchabane M, Khelifi L, et al. (2016) A Pseudomonas strain isolated from date-palm rhizospheres improves root growth and promotes root formation in maize exposed to salt and aluminum stress. J Plant Physiol 191: 111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.12.009
    [124] Zahir ZA, Ghani U, Naveed M, et al. (2009) Comparative effectiveness of Pseudomonas and Serratia sp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt-stressed conditions. Arch Microbiol 191: 415–424.
    [125] Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM (1998) Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol 116: 447–453. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.2.447
    [126] Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, et al. (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2: 587. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-587
    [127] Zaidi A, Khan M, Ahemad M, et al. (2009) Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hungarica 56: 263–284. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.56.2009.3.6
    [128] Dastager SG, Deepa CK, Pandey A (2010) Isolation and characterization of novel plant growth promoting Micrococcus sp NII-0909 and its interaction with cowpea. Plant Physiol Biochem 48: 987–992. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.09.006
    [129] Pindi PK, Satyanarayana SDV (2012) Liquid microbial consortium-a potential tool for sustainable soil health. J Biofertil Biopest 3: 1–9.
    [130] Peix A, Rivas-Boyero AA, Mateos PF, et al. (2001) Growth promotion of chickpea and barley by a phosphate solubilizing strain of Mesorhizobium mediterraneum under growth chamber conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 33: 103–110. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00120-6
    [131] Liu FP, Liu HQ, Zhou HL, et al. (2014) Isolation and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from betel nut (Areca catechu) and their effects on plant growth and phosphorus mobilization in tropical soils. Biol Fert Soils 50: 927–937. doi: 10.1007/s00374-014-0913-z
    [132] Panda P, Chakraborty S, Ray DP, et al. (2016) Screening of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria from tea rhizosphere soil based on growth performances under different stress conditions. Int J Biores Sci 3: 39–56. doi: 10.5958/2454-9541.2016.00005.0
    [133] Jaiswal DK, Verma JP, Prakash S, et al. (2016) Potassium as an important plant nutrient in sustainable agriculture: a state of the art, In: Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, Springer India, 21–29.
    [134] Sheng XF, He LY (2006) Solubilization of potassium-bearing minerals by a wild-type strain of Bacillus edaphicus and its mutants and increased potassium uptake by wheat. Can J Microbiol 52: 66–72. doi: 10.1139/w05-117
    [135] Sangeeth KP, Bhai RS, Srinivasan V (2012). Paenibacillus glucanolyticus, a promising potassium solubilizing bacterium isolated from black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) rhizosphere. J Spices Arom Crops 21.
    [136] Basak BB, Biswas DR (2009) Influence of potassium solubilizing microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginosus) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) grown under two Alfisols. Plant Soil 317: 235–255.
    [137] Neilands JB (1995) Siderophores: structure and function of microbial iron transport compounds. J Biol Chem 270: 26723–26726. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.26723
    [138] Ahmed E, Holmstrom SJ (2014) Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications. Microb Biotechnol 7: 196–208. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12117
    [139] Saha M, Sarkar S, Sarkar B, et al. (2016) Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environ Sci Poll Res 23: 3984–3999. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4294-0
    [140] Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218: 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5
    [141] Zubair M, Shakir M, Ali Q, et al. (2016) Rhizobacteria and phytoremediation of heavy metals. Environ Technol Rev 5: 112–119. doi: 10.1080/21622515.2016.1259358
    [142] Liddycoat SM, Greenberg BM, Wolyn DJ (2009) The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on asparagus seedlings and germinating seeds subjected to water stress under greenhouse conditions. Can J Microbiol 55: 388–394. doi: 10.1139/W08-144
    [143] Paul D, Nair S (2008) Stress adaptations in a Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium (PGPR) with increasing salinity in the coastal agricultural soils. J Basic Microbiol 48: 378–384. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200700365
    [144] Yaish MW, Antony I, Glick BR (2015) Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria from date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and their potential role in salinity tolerance. Anton Van Leeuw 107: 1519–1532.
    [145] Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2000) Plant growth-promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Can J Microbiol 46: 237–245. doi: 10.1139/w99-143
    [146] Pérez-Montaño F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, et al. (2014) Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: from microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol Res 169: 325–336. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011
    [147] Abou-Shanab RA, Angle JS, Delorme TA, et al. (2003) Rhizobacterial effects on nickel extraction from soil and uptake by Alyssum murale. New Phytol 158: 219–224. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00721.x
    [148] Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Freitas H (2009) Isolation and characterization of Ni mobilizing PGPB from serpentine soils and their potential in promoting plant growth and Ni accumulation by Brassica spp. Chemosphere 75: 719–725. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.056
    [149] Dimkpa C, Svatoš A, Merten D, et al. (2008) Hydroxamate siderophores produced by Streptomyces acidiscabies E13 bind nickel and promote growth in cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L.) under nickel stress. Can J Microbiol 54: 163–172.
    [150] Carrillo-Castaneda G, Juarez MJ, Peralta-Videa J, et al. (2002) Plant growth-promoting bacteria promote copper and iron translocation from root to shoot in alfalfa seedlings. J Plant Nutr 26: 1801–1814. doi: 10.1081/PLN-120023284
    [151] Thomashow LS (1996) Biological control of plant root pathogens. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7: 343–347. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80042-5
    [152] Ulloa-Ogaz, AL, Muñoz-Castellanos LN, Nevárez-Moorillón GV (2015) Biocontrol of phytopathogens: Antibiotic production as mechanism of control, In: Méndez-Vilas A, The Battle Against Microbial Pathogens: Basic Science, Technological Advances and Educational Programs, 305–309.
    [153] Fernando WD, Nakkeeran S, Zhang Y (2005) Biosynthesis of antibiotics by PGPR and its relation in biocontrol of plant diseases, In: PGPR: Biocontrol and Biofertilization, Springer Netherlands, 67–109.
    [154] Mazzola M, Fujimoto DK, Thomashow LS, et al. (1995) Variation in sensitivity of Gaeumannomyces graminis to antibiotics produced by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and effect on biological control of take-all of wheat. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 2554–2559.
    [155] Durán P, Acuña JJ, Jorquera MA, et al. (2014) Endophytic bacteria from selenium-supplemented wheat plants could be useful for plant-growth promotion, biofortification and Gaeumannomyces graminis biocontrol in wheat production. Biol Fert Soils 50: 983–990. doi: 10.1007/s00374-014-0920-0
    [156] Maksimov IV, Abizgil'dina RR, Pusenkova LI (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as alternative to chemical crop protectors from pathogens (review). Appl Biochem Microbiol 47: 333–345. doi: 10.1134/S0003683811040090
    [157] Silo-Suh LA, Lethbridge BJ, Raffel SJ, et al. (1994) Biological activities of two fungistatic antibiotics produced by Bacillus cereus UW85. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 2023–2030.
    [158] Araújo FF, Henning AA, Hungria M (2005) Phytohormones and antibiotics produced by Bacillus subtilis and their effects on seed pathogenic fungi and on soybean root development. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21: 1639–1645. doi: 10.1007/s11274-005-3621-x
    [159] Arora NK, Khare E, Oh JH, et al. (2008) Diverse mechanisms adopted by Pseudomonas fluorescens PGC2 during the inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani and Phytophthora capsici. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24: 581–585. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9505-5
    [160] El-Tarabily KA, Sykes ML, Kurtböke ID, et al. (1996) Synergistic effects of a cellulase-producing Micromonospora carbonacea and an antibiotic-producing Streptomyces violascens on the suppression of Phytophthora cinnamomi root rot of Banksia grandis. Can J Bot 74: 618–624. doi: 10.1139/b96-078
    [161] El-Tarabily KA (2006) Rhizosphere-competent isolates of streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinomycetes capable of producing cell-wall-degrading enzymes to control Pythium aphanidermatum damping-off disease of cucumber. Can J Bot 84: 211–222. doi: 10.1139/b05-153
    [162] Martínez-Hidalgo P, Galindo-Villardón P, Trujillo ME, et al. (2014) Micromonospora from nitrogen fixing nodules of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). A new promising Plant Probiotic Bacteria. Sci Rep 4: 6389.
    [163] Martínez-Hidalgo P, García JM, Pozo MJ (2015) Induced systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea by Micromonospora strains isolated from root nodules. Front Microbiol 6.
    [164] Hirsch AM, Valdés M (2010) Micromonospora: An important microbe for biomedicine and potentially for biocontrol and biofuels. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 536–542. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.023
    [165] Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van RJ, et al. (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 775–806.
    [166] Chattopadhyay A, Bhatnagar NB, Bhatnagar R (2004) Bacterial insecticidal toxins. Crit Rev Microbiol 30: 33–54. doi: 10.1080/10408410490270712
    [167] Muqarab R, Bano A (2016) Plant defence induced by PGPR against Spodoptera litura in tomato. Plant Biol 19: 406–412.
    [168] Sharma IP, Sharma AK (2017) Effective control of root-knot nematode disease with Pseudomonad rhizobacteria filtrate. Rhizosphere 3: 123–125. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.02.001
    [169] Schippers B, Bakker AW, Bakker PAHM (1987) Interactions of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices. Ann Rev Phytopathol 25: 339–358. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.25.090187.002011
    [170] Pal KK, Tilak KVBR, Saxcna AK, et al. (2001) Suppression of maize root diseases caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium graminearum by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 156: 209–223. doi: 10.1078/0944-5013-00103
    [171] Yu X, Ai C, Xin L, et al. (2011) The siderophore-producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper. Eur J Soil Biol 47: 138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.001
    [172] Gamalero E, Marzachì C, Galetto L, et al. (2016) An 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase-expressing endophyte increases plant resistance to flavescence dorée phytoplasma infection. Plant Biosyst 151: 331–340.
    [173] Borriss R (2011) Use of plant-associated Bacillus strains as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents in agricultura, In: Bacteria in agrobiology: Plant growth responses, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 41–76.
    [174] Senthilkumar M, Swarnalakshmi K, Govindasamy V, et al. (2009) Biocontrol potential of soybean bacterial endophytes against charcoal rot fungus, Rhizoctonia bataticola. Curr Microbiol 58: 288. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9329-z
    [175] Herrera SD, Grossi C, Zawoznik M, et al. (2016) Wheat seeds harbour bacterial endophytes with potential as plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents of Fusarium graminearum. Microbiol Res 186: 37–43.
    [176] Andreolli M, Lampis S, Zapparoli G, et al. (2016) Diversity of bacterial endophytes in 3 and 15 year-old grapevines of Vitis vinifera cv. Corvina and their potential for plant growth promotion and phytopathogen control. Microbiol Res 183: 42–52.
    [177] Pretty J, Sutherland WJ, Ashby J, et al. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. Int J Agric Sust 8: 219–236. doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0534
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mamo Solomon Emire, Bisrat Zeleke Shiferaw, Srikanth Umakanthan, Attitudes towards receiving COVID-19 vaccine and its associated factors among Southwest Ethiopian adults, 2021, 2023, 18, 1932-6203, e0280633, 10.1371/journal.pone.0280633
    2. Malik Sallam, Mariam Al-Sanafi, Mohammed Sallam, A Global Map of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Rates per Country: An Updated Concise Narrative Review, 2022, Volume 15, 1178-2390, 21, 10.2147/JMDH.S347669
    3. Gizaw Sisay, Bahru Mantefardo, Aster Beyene, Time from symptom onset to severe COVID-19 and risk factors among patients in Southern Ethiopia: a survival analysis, 2022, 50, 0300-0605, 030006052211193, 10.1177/03000605221119366
    4. Bedasa Taye Merga, Galana Mamo Ayana, Belay Negash, Addisu Alemu, Mohammed Abdurke, Ahmedmenewer Abdu, Bikila Balis, Miressa Bekana, Gelana Fekadu, Temam Beshir Raru, Health-care Workers’ Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccines in Eastern Ethiopia: Using Contingent Valuation Method, 2022, Volume 14, 1178-6981, 395, 10.2147/CEOR.S361199
    5. Hsuan-Wei Lee, Cheng-Han Leng, Ta-Chien Chan, Srikanth Umakanthan, Determinants of personal vaccination hesitancy before and after the mid-2021 COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan, 2022, 17, 1932-6203, e0270349, 10.1371/journal.pone.0270349
    6. Cathy Bulley, Vaibhav Tyagi, Eleanor Curnow, Kath Nicol, Lisa Salisbury, Kim Stuart, Brendan McCormack, Ruth Magowan, Olivia Sagan, Jan Dewing, Support after COVID-19 study: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study to develop recommendations for practice, 2022, 12, 2044-6055, e056568, 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056568
    7. Huong Thi Le, Thao Thi Phuong Nguyen, Corey Jacinto, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Linh Gia Vu, Hien Thu Nguyen, Minh Le Vu, Xuan Thi Thanh Le, Thao Thanh Nguyen, Quan Thi Pham, Nhung Ta, Quynh Thi Nguyen, Carl A Latkin, Cyrus SH Ho, Roger CM Ho, Factors Associated with Community Awareness on COVID-19 in a Developing Country: Implications for Optimal Risk Communication, 2022, Volume 15, 1179-1594, 415, 10.2147/RMHP.S356690
    8. Srikanth Umakanthan, Sam Lawrence, Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Germany: a cross-sectional, population-based study, 2022, 98, 0032-5473, 756, 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141365
    9. Srikanth Umakanthan, Maryann M. Bukelo, Somu Sekhar Gajula, The Commonwealth Caribbean COVID-19: Regions Resilient Pathway During Pandemic, 2022, 10, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.844333
    10. Walid Al-Qerem, Anan Jarab, Alaa Hammad, Alaa Hussein Alsajri, Shadan Waleed Al-Hishma, Jonathan Ling, Asal Saad Alabdullah, Ali Salama, Rami Mosleh, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adult Iraqi Population Towards COVID-19 Booster Dose: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2022, Volume 16, 1177-889X, 1525, 10.2147/PPA.S370124
    11. Tilahun Beyene Handiso, Markos Selamu Jifar, Shemsu Nuriye Hagisso, Coronavirus’s (SARS-CoV-2) airborne transmission: A review, 2022, 10, 2050-3121, 205031212210941, 10.1177/20503121221094185
    12. Rukiye Çelik, Birgül Erdoğan, Gizem Çakır, Naime Altay, Ebru Kılıçarslan Törüner, Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Emotional State of School Children, 2025, 15, 2459-1459, 182, 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1542187
    13. Marshall Kerr Tulloch-Reid, Jacqueline Duncan, Keri-Ann Facey, Akil Williams, Marsha Ivey, Shelly-Ann Hunte, Eden Agustus, Simon Anderson, Maria Jackson, Using data systems to conduct health research in the Caribbean: challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2025, 49, 1020-4989, 1, 10.26633/RPSP.2025.29
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(10190) PDF downloads(1537) Cited by(53)

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog