Review Special Issues

Involvement of CXCL12 Pathway in HPV-related Diseases

  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer in women worldwide. However, the HPV infection is not sufficient to cause neoplasia, and immune mediators, such as chemokines, are important in this context, since they are involved in the regulation of leukocyte trafficking in many essential biological processes, including inflammation. Prolonged inflammation is thought to facilitate carcinogenesis by providing a microenvironment that is ideal for tumor cell development and growth. Chemokines also contribute to tumor development by promoting angiogenesis and metastasis. Among these molecules we highlight the chemokine CXCL12, also called stromal-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1-α), a pleiotropic chemokine capable of eliciting multiple signal transduction cascades and functions, via interaction with either CXCR4 or CXCR7, which have been implicated in malignant cell survival, proliferation and migration. This review will focus on our current knowledge in the pathogenesis of HPV infection, the main aspects of CXCL12 signaling, its participation in tumor development and immunodeficiencies that may enable the HPV infection. We also discuss how CXCL12 gene expression and polymorphisms may influence tumor development, especially cervical cancer. Finally, we highlight how the inhibition of CXCL12 pathway may be an attractive alternative for cancer therapeutics.

    Citation: Nádia C. M. Okuyama, Fernando Cezar dos Santos, Kleber Paiva Trugilo, Karen Brajão de Oliveira. Involvement of CXCL12 Pathway in HPV-related Diseases[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(4): 417-440. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.4.417

    Related Papers:

    [1] Laetitia Weinhard, Paolo d'Errico, Tuan Leng Tay . Headmasters: Microglial regulation of learning and memory in health and disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2018, 5(1): 63-89. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2018.1.63
    [2] Nataša Čerekovic, Palmiro Poltronieri . Plant signaling pathways activating defence response and interfering mechanisms by pathogen effectors, protein decoys and bodyguards. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 370-388. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.370
    [3] Jin Hwan Do . Apomorphine-induced pathway perturbation in MPP+-treated SH-SY5Y cells. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 271-287. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.271
    [4] Margarethe Draga, Martin Scaal, Felicitas Pröls . Signaling filopodia in avian embryogenesis: formation and function. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 683-691. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.683
    [5] Amedea B. Seabra, Halley C. Oliveira . How nitric oxide donors can protect plants in a changing environment: what we know so far and perspectives. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 692-718. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.692
    [6] Stephen Schultz, Dario Siniscalco . Endocannabinoid system involvement in autism spectrum disorder: An overview with potential therapeutic applications. AIMS Molecular Science, 2019, 6(1): 27-37. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2019.1.27
    [7] Harshita Maheshwari, Maitreyi Pathak, Prekshi Garg, Prachi Srivastava . Computational analysis reveals the therapeutic potential of Asiatic acid against the miRNA correlated differentially expressed genes of bipolar disorder. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(2): 99-115. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024007
    [8] Irene M. Waita, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Samson Muuo, Naomi Maina, Daniel Kariuki, Cleophas M. Kyama . Genetic polymorphisms in eostrogen and progesterone receptor genes in Papio anubis induced with endometriosis during early stage of the disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 86-97. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021007
    [9] Nikhita Bolar, Aline Verstraeten, Lut Van Laer, Bart Loeys . Molecular insights into bicuspid aortic valve development and the associated aortopathy. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(4): 478-508. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.4.478
    [10] Yutaka Takihara, Ryuji Otani, Takuro Ishii, Shunsuke Takaoka, Yuki Nakano, Kaori Inoue, Steven Larsen, Yoko Ogino, Masashi Asai, Sei-ichi Tanuma, Fumiaki Uchiumi . Characterization of the human IDH1 gene promoter. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023013
  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer in women worldwide. However, the HPV infection is not sufficient to cause neoplasia, and immune mediators, such as chemokines, are important in this context, since they are involved in the regulation of leukocyte trafficking in many essential biological processes, including inflammation. Prolonged inflammation is thought to facilitate carcinogenesis by providing a microenvironment that is ideal for tumor cell development and growth. Chemokines also contribute to tumor development by promoting angiogenesis and metastasis. Among these molecules we highlight the chemokine CXCL12, also called stromal-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1-α), a pleiotropic chemokine capable of eliciting multiple signal transduction cascades and functions, via interaction with either CXCR4 or CXCR7, which have been implicated in malignant cell survival, proliferation and migration. This review will focus on our current knowledge in the pathogenesis of HPV infection, the main aspects of CXCL12 signaling, its participation in tumor development and immunodeficiencies that may enable the HPV infection. We also discuss how CXCL12 gene expression and polymorphisms may influence tumor development, especially cervical cancer. Finally, we highlight how the inhibition of CXCL12 pathway may be an attractive alternative for cancer therapeutics.


    Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch) is a horticultural plant that grows worldwide and grows optimally in cool and humid climatic conditions [1]. This plant is a short-day plant, cultivated well at daytime temperatures of 22 ℃–25 ℃ [2]. Strawberry belongs to the Rosaceae family and the fruit is an aggregate with achenes embedded in the surface of the receptacle. In general, strawberries reproduce by producing runners [3].

    Drought is a universal problem, seriously hampering crop production and the quality of strawberry plants. Research aimed at obtaining drought-tolerant crops is needed to reduce the threat to food availability in the future [4]. The effects of drought on plants can be seen in the physiological processes in plants, such as changes in plant structure, leaf morphology, and cell structure. Additionally, changes in stomatal conductance, respiration, and photosynthesis due to the disruption of metabolic functions in plants can also occur [5]. The transport of nutrients from the soil to plants depends on soil moisture (availability of water in the soil). Nutrient transport from root to shoot is also limited by a decrease in transpiration rate caused by water availability restrictions. Nutrient absorption constraints due to drought have negative consequences for plants because it results in a decrease in production. A better understanding of the effects of water stress and plant nutrition is helpful in developing strategies to maximize production and reduce quality degradation of plants [6].

    Fertilizer is a substance added to the soil to enhance the plants' growth and yield. Inorganic and organic fertilizers are composed mainly of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) compounds with secondary nutrients added. Application of organic manure was found to enhance NO3 of the soil [7,8,9]. Results from Alwi Y et al. [10] showed that the plant height, leaves number, leaf area, and dry root weight on wild elephant grass (Pennisetum polystachion) increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) with NPK fertilizer. In Indonesia, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizers in the form of Urea, SP 36, and KCl is the common inorganic fertilizer used by farmers. The application of N, P, and K nutrients are essential for plants, and must always be available in the soil [11]. The composited effect fertilizer and water stress on strawberry has been intensively evaluated. However, we are still nowhere nearer to getting a comprehensive assessment of this interaction between fertilizer and water stress on strawberry plants in Indonesia.

    In this experiment, we examined the interactive effects of fertilizer sources and water stress on plant growth, leaf gas exchange, and nutrient uptake on strawberry. Our objective was to provide knowledge on efficient management of agronomical input (fertilizer and irrigation) for better growth and quality of strawberry. It was hypothesized that the use of appropriate fertilizer could improve the growth of the strawberry plant and its ability to adapt when subjected to water stress conditions.

    The experiment was conducted in the glasshouse of Indonesian Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Research Institute (ICSFRI), Batu East Java, Indonesia. This site is situated at 950 m above sea level, Latitude 7°54' 41.4'' (7.9115°5 south, Longitude 112° 32' 20'' (112.5389" east) from April 2019 until August 2019. The mean daily temperatures of 20.8 ℃ and mean relative humidity of 94.2%. This experiment was organized in randomized complete block design (RCBD), with two factors. The first factor was fertilizer sources (P), consisting of 4 levels (P1, P2, P3, P4) and the second factor was the level of water stress (W), consisting of 3 levels (W1, W2, and W3). There were 12 combinations of treatments, replicated three times, two plants per replicate and four plants per destructive, covering 288 plants. The seedlings of strawberry plant used were California strawberry. The seedlings were planted in plastic pots (17 × 12 cm) and filled with a topsoil surface layer. The recommended rates of nitrogen (N): phosphorus (P): potassium (K) fertilizer used for strawberry is 92:90:90 NPK kg/ha and goat dung fertilizer is 20 tons/ha (recommended by the Indonesian National Development Planning Agency/SMCNDPA). Throughout the experiment, fertilizer was applied one week after planting, as much as 1/3 of the recommended dosage. Additional fertilizer (at 1/3 of the recommended dosage) was applied about 5–6 and 8–9 weeks after planting. The detail fertilizer and irrigation interval treatments are given below:

    Table 1.  Fertilizer sources and water stress treatments and their combinations.
    Fertilizer Sources Water Stress
    P1 = without fertilizer W1 = daily irrigation 100% FC
    P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer W2 = 2 days irrigation interval (Ⅱ) 75% FC
    P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer W3 = 6 days irrigation interval (Ⅱ) 75% FC
    P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer
    Treatments combination
    P1W1 = without fertilizer; daily irrigation 100% FC
    P2W1 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; daily irrigation 100% FC
    P3W1 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; daily irrigation 100% FC
    P4W1 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; daily irrigation 100% FC
    P1W2 = without fertilizer; 2 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P2W2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; 2 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P3W2 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; 2 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P4W2 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; 2 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P1W3 = without fertilizer; 6 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P2W3 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; 6 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P3W3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; 6 days Ⅱ 75% FC
    P4W3 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; 6 days Ⅱ 75% FC

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The measurement of field capacity to determine the volume of watering was calculated by Hendriyani I S et al. [12]. The planting media in plastic pot was watered until the drip (saturated) and allow to stand for 1–3 days until no water drips. The planting media was weighed to determine the wet and dry weights. The wet weight of planting media was taken when no water dripped from the plastic pot. The dry weight was taken after the planting medium was dried at 100 ℃ for 24 hours to obtain a constant weight. Field capacity is calculated by the formula:

    W = (Tb-Tk)Tkx100%

    Information: W = field capacity; Tb = wet weight; Tk = dry weight

    Measurements of plant growth were plant height, leaves number, and canopy width [13,14]. The height of plant was determined by cupping all the leaves each other, then measured from the bottom of the crown to the highest end of the leaf using a ruler. The number of leaves was calculated by counting total leaves per plant from the appearance of the first leaf until the end of the research. The canopy width was recorded for the east-west and north-south in centimeters with a ruler. Measurements plant growth were done biweekly.

    The fresh weights of the strawberry plants were carried out by weighing the ten randomly selected shoot and root of strawberry plants that have been uprooted and then the roots were washed with water to remove the soil. The fresh weights of the strawberry plants were recorded using a digital balance [15] and expressed in gram (g). The dry weights (g) of the strawberry shoot and root were obtained by separating the fresh shoot and root, put in an envelope, and dried in an oven at a temperature of 70℃ for 48 hours until a constant weight was achieved [16]. The measurement unit for the dry weight of the strawberry plant was in gram (g).

    Fresh leaves (one gram) were chopped into pieces. The extracted pigment was done by grinding the cut tissue in a mortar with glass powder. The homogenate was transferred quantitatively to a Buchner filter with Whatman No.1 filter paper. The filtrate was placed in a 100 mL volumetric flask and filled to a total volume of 100 mL with 96 percent alcohol. A spectrophotometer with two wavelengths (649 and 665 nm) was used to determine the plant extract optical density. The chlorophyll content was determined by Wintermans JFGA et al. [17] using the equation:

    Where OD = Optical Density

    Chlorophylla = (13.7xOD665)-(5.76 xOD649)Chlorophyllb = (25.8xOD649)-(7.70xOD665)ChlorophyllTotal = (20.0xOD649)+(6.10xOD665)

    Leaf sample 0.5 g was extracted in sulfosalicylic acid 3% 10 mL. Then the sample was filtered with filter paper (Whatman). The filtrate was taken as much as 2 mL, added with ninhydrin and 100% glacial acetic acid 2 mL. The samples were heated in water bath 100 ℃ for 1 hour. The process was halted by soaking the samples in ice liquid for 15–20 minutes. Added with toluene 4 mL and stirred with the test-tube for 15–20 seconds. Let stand the samples until the toluene phase was separated from the sample solution phase. The toluene phase was determined by using spectrophotometer Shimadzu (UV-1601PC, Japan) at absorbance 520 nm. The proline content was determined by comparison with L-proline as the standard curve. Proline levels are expressed in µmol.g−1 [18].

    Total sugar was analyzed by taking fruit sample (0.5 g) and crushing it in mortar. The sample was homogenized in 5 mL 95% ethanol. The mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant (1 mL) was mixed with 5 mL of anthrone reagent into the test tube. The test tube was closed and vortexed until homogeneous. After that, the test tube was heated at 100 ℃ water bath for 12 minutes, transferred to the cuvette, and the absorbance was read at a wavelength of 630 nm using a spectrophotometer [19].

    Leaf gas exchange was measured using LICOR 6400 portable photosynthesis system, a closed system of the infrared gas analyzer. The gas exchange parameters containing the transpiration rate, the net photosyn thetic rate, and the stomatal conductance of the strawberry plant were recorded on fully expanded leaves in standard time (09:00 AM) during data collection. The readings of the photosynthesis rate were expressed in μmol.m−2s−1, transpiration rate (mmol.m−2s−1), and the stomatal conductance (mol.m−2s−1). The WUE was calculated as the ratio of photosynthesis to transpiration rate.

    Nutrient analysis was carried out using the methods described by [20]. For N analysis: 1 g of plant sample was weighed and put into a Kjeldahl flask and 0.7 g of copper sulphate, 1.5 g of K2SO4, and 30 mL of H2SO4 were added to the flask. The digestion block was heated until frothing ceases and boiled briskly until the solution was clear and the digestion was continued for about 30 minutes. The flask was removed from the heater and cooled, 50 mL of water was added, and transferred to a distilling flask. In the receiving conical flask, 25 mL of 0.05 M H2SO4 was placed accurately so that there will be an excess of at least 5 mL of the acid and two drops of methyl red indicator were added. Sodium hydroxide (35 mL of 35%) was added to the distilling flask and heated in the flask for approximately 30 minutes. The excess acid in the distillate was then titrated with 0.1M NaOH.

    The P and K analyses were carried out using the methods of [21]. The plant sample (0.5 g) was weighed and put into the digestion tube. Then, 5 mL of HNO3 p.a. and 0.5 ml of HClO4 were added and left one night. The next day, it was heated in digestion blocks at 100 ℃ for one hour, before increasing to 150 ℃. After the yellow steam was used up, the digestion block temperature was increased to 200 ℃. The digestion was complete after white smoke appeared, and the remaining extract was approximately 0.5 mL. The tube was removed and allowed to cool. Dilute the extract with ion-free water to an exact volume of 50 mL and shake with a tube shaker until homogeneous. This extract can then be measured for the P and K contents.

    The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test was used for testing normality. The analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) and means comparison were carried out using the SPSS computer software Version 24, developed by IBM corporation. The means comparison was performed using DMRT (Duncan Multiple Range Test) with the least significant level of 5%. The correlation analysis was determined using Pearson's correlation analysis.

    Water stress and fertilizer sources treatments had a significant effect on the plant height of strawberry plants. The interaction effects between water stress and different fertilizer types were significant (Table 2). The plant height differed significantly within different sources of fertilizer under well-watered and water-stressed treatments. Under well-watered conditions, plants with the combination 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer (P4W1) showed the highest plant height, followed by P4W2 treatment, at 18.59 cm and 15.39 cm, respectively. It was significantly higher as compared to the plants grown without fertilizer treatments. However, no significant plant height variations were detected between plants grown with P2 and P4 treatment under water stress conditions (2 days irrigation intervals). The results showed that the plant grown without fertilizer had the lowest plant height than the other treatments.

    Table 2.  Interaction effect between fertilizer sources and water stress on the plant growth of strawberry.
    Treatment Plant height (cm) Leaf numbers (n/plant) Canopy width (cm) Shoot fresh weight (g) Root fresh weight (g) Shoot dry weight (g) Root dry weight (g)
    P1W1 9.16 ± 0.25f 6.67 ± 0.33f 15.46 ±0.25e 4.45 ±0.19h 5.42±0.29g 2.10±0.10f 1.19 ±0.03g
    P2W1 16.52 ± 0.21b 15.33 ± 0.33b 28.12 ±0.54a 31.40±0.64a 13.31±0.39c 9.86±0.14b 5.39±0.16bc
    P3W1 11.50 ± 0.43e 9.33 ± 0.33c 21.30±0.42c 8.17±0.35g 5.44±0.28g 3.43±0.16de 1.28±0.02g
    P4W1 18.59 ± 0.27a 17.3 ± 0.33a 27.92±0.55a 30.36±0.26ab 18.00±0.42b 10.45±0.26a 5.14±0.09c
    P1W2 9.19 ± 0.27f 6.33 ± 0.33ef 15.49 ±0.27e 4.43±0.22h 7.33±0.12f 1.37±0.08fg 2.05±0.04f
    P2W2 14.69 ± 0.28c 14.00 ± 0.58b 24.39±0.28b 28.87±0.38c 18.15±0.10b 9.35±0.15b 5.53±0.06b
    P3W2 11.59 ± 0.27e 8.00 ± 0.57cd 22.29±0.28c 11.19±0.53f 10.20±0.19e 3.51±0.21de 3.51±0.06e
    P4W2 15.39 ± 0.28c 14.67 ±0.88b 24.19±0.27b 29.36±0.33bc 21.57±0.31a 9.49±0.23b 7.06±0.04a
    P1W3 8.19 ± 0.28g 5.33 ±0.33f 13.59±0.27f 4.23±0.20h 6.06±0.10g 1.58±0.09fg 3.27±0.08e
    P2W3 11.56 ± 0.25e 7.67 ±0.33de 18.56±0.25d 15.59±0.53e 6.12±0.01g 2.93±0.36e 1.34±0.11g
    P3W3 12.52 ± 0.21d 5.67±0.33f 17.92±0.21d 10.84±0.29f 7.13±0.24f 3.58±0.15d 2.08±0.13f
    P4W3 11.60 ± 0.42e 8.00±0.58cd 17.70±0.24d 18.94±0.60d 12.17±0.25d 6.96±0.21c 4.53±0.13d
    Notes: Water Stress: W1 = watering every day 100% FC; W2 = 2 days irrigation interval 75% FC; W3 = 6 days irrigation interval 75% FC, fertilizer sources: P1 = without fertilizer; P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer); The values in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Data are mean±SEM (standard error of differences between means).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Our findings agree with those by [22], who indicated that deficit irrigation affected plant height of Forage Sorghum. The interaction between the NPK fertilizers and deficit irrigation treatments was significant concerning plant height. According to [23], goat dung manure application enhanced plant height compared to control plants (without fertilizer) in Albemoschus esculentus (okra) plants. The usage of manure affects the accumulation of carbon and nitrogen. [24] stated NPK elements influenced the growth rates of plants, and the usage of manure affects the accumulation of carbon and nitrogen. Nitrogen plays a role in the division and enlargement of cells in the apical meristem. Apical meristem operation produces the development of the shoots such that the plant height increases.

    The leaves number was influenced by water stress and fertilizer sources and its interaction effects between water stress and types of fertilizer (Table 2). Under water stress conditions, the highest leaves number was P4W2 treatment (46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; 2 days Ⅱ 75% FC) that recorded 14.67 per plant, and the lowest was in P1W3 treatment (without fertilizer) that recorded 5.33 per plant. In W2 treatment, there was no significant effect between the application of 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer (P2) and 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer (P4). P1 (without fertilizer) had significantly fewer leaves compared to other treatments. Similar studies were reported by [25], who mentioned that decreasing irrigation supplies from 75% to 50% significantly reduced the number of leaves by 15, 6% in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Meanwhile, using fertilizer (organic and inorganic) on strawberry plants improved the number of leaves. This finding was in agreement with [26], who reported that combined manures and NPK fertilizer enhanced the number of leaves per plant on cucumber (Cucumis sativus).

    The interaction effects of water stress and fertilizer sources on the canopy's width parameters of the strawberry plant are presented in Table 2. The strawberry plant fertilized with NPK was significantly better in canopy width increment than those with goat dung fertilizer and without fertilizer, but was not significantly different with the combination of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer. The lowest canopy length is recorded in plants that are not applied with any fertilizer. This implied that the application of NPK fertilizer influenced the improvement of the canopy length of the strawberry plants. This study also documented lowered the length of strawberry plants' canopy due to water stress. The decreased canopy length was because of water stress treatments, previously reported by [27]. The canopy area of two tomato cultivars (Sufen 14 and Jinlingmeiyu) declined at drought stress treatment. [28] stated, applying goat manure increased plant canopy on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Goat manure and NPK included in the ideal proposition for the growth of a plant.

    The results showed that water stress and sources of fertilizer treatments had significant differences for shoot fresh weight (SFW) and root fresh weight (RFW). A significant interaction occurred between water stress and sources of fertilizer treatments on RFW and SFW (Table 2). Organic (goat dung) and inorganic (NPK) fertilizers improved the shoot and root fresh weight. In water-stressed conditions (2 days irrigation interval), the maximum fresh weight values were observed in the combination of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer (P4) at 29.36 g (SFW) and 21.57 g (RFW). These results increased by 84.91% and 66.03%, respectively, compared to the no-fertilization treatment under water-stressed conditions. The increasing biomass on the strawberry plant with NPK fertilizer application is similar to [29]; NPK fertilizer enhanced the biomass (fresh weight of shoot) on maize seedlings compared to without nutrient application well-watered and the drought treatments.

    Water stress and fertilizer sources treatments had a significant effect on the shoot and root dry weights of strawberry plants, and the interaction between both treatments was significant (Table 2). The duration of water stress caused the shoot and root dry weight of the strawberry plants to be reduced. Under water-stressed conditions with 6 days of irrigation interval had a shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW) of 3.76 g and 2.82 g, respectively. This value decreased when compared with the SDW and RDW on 2 days irrigation intervals at 36.55% (SDW) and 38.19% (FDW), respectively. The current study's results showed that the application of organic (goat dung) and inorganic (NPK) fertilizers increased the strawberry plant's shoot and root dry weights. The total shoot and root dry weights of strawberries under the well-watered and water stress treatments are shown in Table 2. Strawberry plants treated with the combination of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; daily irrigation 100% FC (P4W1) had higher shoot and root dry weights than those plants grown without fertilizer. Inorganic (NPK) and organic (goat dung) fertilizer treatments improved the dry weight of shoot and root. In contrast, water stress treatment reduced dry weight of shoot and root. Similar findings by [30] and [31] also showed that water stress declined total biomass on Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus), Bothriochloa ischaemum and Lespedeza davurica.

    Based on the results, chlorophyll content was significantly different within water stress and different fertilizer types treatments. Also, there were significant interactions between water stress and sources of fertilizer treatments on chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll of the strawberry plant, as shown in Figure 1. Strawberry plants fertilized with organic and inorganic fertilizer had higher chlorophyll content than control plants (without fertilizer). The results showed that the combination of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer application at well-watered conditions had the highest value of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll than other treatments. But this treatment was not significantly different from 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer treatment on chlorophyll a dan total chlorophyll. Overall, strawberry plants in the current research had chlorophyll a value higher than chlorophyll b. According to [32,33], goat manure has a higher nitrogen content, which is an essential mineral nutrient needed by plants for its growth and involved with the synthesis of chlorophyll.

    Figure 1.  Interaction effect between water stress and fertilizer sources on chlorophyll content of strawberry. W1 = watering every day 100% FC; W2 = 2 days irrigation interval 75% FC; W3 = 6 days irrigation interval 75% FC, P1 = without fertilizer; P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer. The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

    There were significant interaction effects between water stress and fertilizer sources on proline content (Figure 2). The average proline content in water stress treatment of strawberry leaves was between ½ to 5 times higher than the strawberry plant grown in well-watered conditions. This showed that water stress plants tended to increase proline content in the strawberry plants. Fertilizer treatment also had a significant effect on proline content. NPK fertilizer (P2), goat dung fertilizer (P3), and the combination of NPK and goat dung fertilizer (P4) were between 1 to 5 times higher than the plants planted without fertilizer. On the contrary, there was no significant difference in proline content when the plant was without fertilizer treatment in all water levels treatment.

    Figure 2.  Interaction effect between water stress and fertilizer sources on proline content of strawberry. W1 = watering every day 100% FC; W2 = 2 days irrigation interval 75% FC; W3 = 6 days irrigation interval 75% FC, P1 = without fertilizer; P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer. The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

    In this study, water stress treatments significantly enhanced the proline content of strawberry plants in all fertilizer treatments. This was strengthened by findings from [10], who noted that the content of proline was significantly enhanced (P ≤ 0.05) on wild elephant grass due to the treatment of water stress. Water stress levels up to 40% of field capacity recorded the maximum proline content. According to Mafakheri A et al. [34] and Pessarakli M et al. [35], proline has numerous functions in plants, for example, plays a central role in the plant stress response. The accumulation of proline on dehydration due to water deficit or increasing osmotic pressure describes the osmoregulatory function of proline in stressed plants conditions. Proline, an osmoprotectant with a sink for strength to adjust potentials of redox, was discovered to have improved accumulation in drought-tolerant cultivars of chickpea.

    From Figure 3 below, different levels of water stress and sources of fertilizer significantly affected the sugar content of strawberry fruits. However, no interaction effects were observed between water stress and sources of fertilizer treatments. It can be seen that the combination of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer had the highest sugar content, but this treatment was not significantly different from the 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer treatment. The enhancement of sugar content is facilitated by reducing the water content of fruits. The sugar content values were within the range of 3.79–5.22. The lowest sugar content was in the plants that were grown without fertilizer and 75% FC with 6 days irrigation interval treatments.

    Figure 3.  Effect of fertilizer sources (a) and water stress (b) on total sugar of strawberry fruits. W1 = watering every day 100% FC; W2 = 2 days irrigation interval 75% FC; W3 = 6 days irrigation interval 75% FC, P1 = without fertilizer; P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer. The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

    In total sugar, water stress treatments increased total sugar on strawberry fruits in all application organic and inorganic fertilizers. The total sugar of strawberry fruits was higher in water-stressed conditions compared to well-watered. This is in line with the research of Nohong B et al. [36], whereby total soluble sugars caused by water stress improved by up to 126% relative to well-watered conditions.

    Leaf gas exchange (transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis rate) indicated a significant difference in sources of fertilizer and water stress treatments. The interaction between both treatments was significant on the leaf gas exchange of strawberry plants, as shown in Table 3. The strawberry plant's leaf gas exchange parameters mostly declined when the water deficit and duration irrigation interval increased. The leaf gas exchange results in well-watered strawberry plants remained higher than those plants planted under water stress treatments.

    Table 3.  Interaction effect of fertilizer sources and water stress on leaf gas exchange of strawberry plant.
    Treatment Transpiration rate (mmol.m−2s−1) Stomatal conductance (mol.m−2s−1) Photosynthesis rate
    (µmol.m−2s−1)
    Water Use Efficiency (WUE)
    P1W1 3.30±0.06ab 0.0329±0.0026b 14.27±0.27b 4.33±0.15c
    P2W1 2.79±0.11c 0.0459±0.0058a 16.03±0.18a 5.77±0.28c
    P3W1 2.99±0.15bc 0.0340±0.0012b 14.58±0.34b 4.89±0.12c
    P4W1 3.43±0.10a 0.0443±0.0043a 16.20±0.06a 4.73±0.11c
    P1W2 2.19±0.04d 0.0250±0.0023cd 12.90±0.10d 5.90±0.14c
    P2W2 2.30±0.23d 0.0269±0.0001bc 14.27±0.33b 6.33±0.66c
    P3W2 2.06±0.20d 0.0231±0.0014cd 13.60±0.06c 6.72±0.68c
    P4W2 1.50±0.16e 0.0181±0.0003d 14.80±0.36b 10.17±1.33b
    P1W3 0.64±0.09f 0.0057±0.0021e 8.68±0.23e 13.98±1.51a
    P2W3 0.51±0.06f 0.0057±0.0021e 7.43±0.14f 14.93±1.60a
    P3W3 0.64±0.05f 0.0056±0.0017e 6.96±0.11fg 10.96±0.65b
    P4W3 0.68±0.11f 0.0062±0.0008e 6.62±0.02g 10.28±1.61b
    Notes: Fertilizer Sources: P1 = without fertilizer; P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer). Water Stress: W1 = watering every day 100% FC; W2 = 2 days irrigation interval 75% FC; W3 = 6 days irrigation interval 75% FC. The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Data are mean±SEM (standard error of differences between means).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The transpiration rate value of P4W1 treatment was higher than other treatments. The transpiration rate decreased gradually with increasing water stress. It started to decline after the treatment application of 2 days irrigation interval. The transpiration rate of this treatment ranged from 2.19 to 1.50 mmol.m−2s−1. At the 6-day irrigation interval, the transpiration rate decreased further, with a range of 0.51–0.68 mmol.m−2s−1. The transpiration rate was reduced by 32.88–85.12% compared to plants provided with water under field capacity conditions. The lowest transpiration rate was obtained in P2W3 treatment.

    According to Table 3, results showed significant interactions between water stress and fertilizer sources on the stomatal conductance between both factors. Water stress significantly reduced the stomatal conductance of strawberry plants. In well-watered conditions, the result of gs at P2W1 was not significantly different from P4W1, while in water-stressed conditions with an irrigation interval of 6 days, the gs of plants planted with fertilization was not significantly different from control plants (without fertilization). The highest and lowest gs were recorded in well-watered plants with 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer (P2W1) and water stress (6 days irrigation interval) with 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer (P3W3), respectively.

    From the present study results, it was observed that the photosynthesis rate was influenced by water stress and sources of fertilizer. There were interaction effects between water stress and sources of fertilizer on the photosynthesis rate, as shown in Table 3. Generally, the photosynthesis rate was highest under well-watered with 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer (P4W1) with a value of 16.20 µmol.m−2s−1. This result was not significantly different from P2W1 treatment. The results also indicated that as water stress increased, the photosynthesis rate declined. It decreased progressively during the length of the irrigation interval. Water stress with the 6 days irrigation interval had the lowest value on the photosynthesis rate with a decrease by 51.39% compared to well-watered treatment (watering daily).

    The interaction effects of different water stress levels within different types of fertilizer on water use efficiency (WUE) are presented in Table 3. In this study, the results indicated that WUE responded to altering water stress levels. The WUE tended to enhance with increased water stress. It was observed that the WUE for the plants grown under water stress with 6 days irrigation interval was significantly higher by 60.66% compared to well-watered (daily watering). However, no significant difference in WUE between fertilizer treatment and control (without fertilizer) was noted. The lowest WUE was obtained in strawberry plants with sufficient water without fertilizers (P1W1).

    The leaf gas exchange parameters generally decreased under water stress conditions. The leaf gas exchange results of well-watered strawberry plants persisted above those planted under water stress treatment. The length of the irrigation interval (6 days irrigation interval) had the lowest photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs). The current result was in agreement with the research by Sarazin V et al. [37]; the water deficit application decreased the transpiration rate on Helianthus annuus significantly. It was revealed that enhanced water stress conditions might be an integral function of increased tolerance of water stress. The response to water stress in plants increases the abscisic acid (ABA), which eventually causes stomatal closure to avoid water shortages [38]. Stomatal closure induced CO2 assimilation declined, especially those of CO2 fixation and synthesis of adenosine triphosphate [39]. Our results indicated that 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer treatment in water-stressed conditions (2 days irrigation interval) increased leaf gas exchange on strawberry plants. The improvement of leaf gas exchange with NPK fertilizer application was also observed in Gossypium hirsutum [40]. The application of NPK fertilizer has several advantages. Nitrogen (N) is an element that plays a role in biological processes and a major component of protein; whereas phosphorus (P) fertilizer is related to the process of plant development. Moreover, potassium is involved in drought tolerance, photosynthesis processes, and protein synthesis [41].

    As mentioned in Figure 4a, water stress and fertilizer sources and their interaction significantly influenced the nitrogen content of strawberry plants. Water stress clearly caused a declined in nitrogen content, but the application of organic and inorganic fertilizer (goat dung and NPK fertilizer) increased the nitrogen content in all irrigation regimes. The highest nitrogen content was observed in P4W1 treatment at 3.32%. Under water-stressed conditions (2- and 6-days irrigation interval), the highest nitrogen content was obtained by adding a combination of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer treatment. P1 treatment (without fertilizer) had the lowest nitrogen content compared with other treatments in all irrigation regimes.

    Figure 4.  Interaction effect between water stress and fertilizer sources on (a) nitrogen, (b) phosporus and (c) potassium content. W1 = watering every day 100% FC; W2 = 2 days irrigation interval 75% FC; W3 = 6 days irrigation interval 75% FC, P1 = without fertilizer; P2 = 92:90:90 kg/ha NPK fertilizer; P3 = 20 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer; P4 = 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer. The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

    Water stress and fertilizer sources and their interaction significantly influenced the phosphorus content of strawberry plants (Figure 4b). The content of phosphorus increased with fertilizer supply (NPK and goat dung fertilizer). In contrast, the phosphorus content was reduced with water stress application. Application of P2 and P4 treatments had no significant difference in phosphorus content. The content of phosphorus at P4W1 was significantly higher than in other treatments. Whereas, the lowest phosphorus content in this research was P1W3.

    Potassium contents in the strawberry plants are presented in Figure 4c. Statistical analysis showed that the water stress and fertilizer sources significantly influenced the potassium contents. Potassium contents decreased with increased water stress treatment, where W2 and W3 treatments showed lower potassium contents than W1 (water field capacity treatment). However, in fertilizer treatment, 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer significantly affected the potassium contents more than other fertilizer treatments. The highest potassium content was observed in P4W1, followed by P2W1 at 2.88% and 2.74%, respectively. The lowest potassium content was P1W3 treatment.

    The effects of water stress and fertilizer sources on N, P, and K content on the strawberry plant was observed significantly differently (P ≤ 0.05). The N, P, and K content were significantly reduced with increased water stress. Besides, the N, P, and K content in P1 (without fertilizer) treatment was the lowest result compared to that of organic (goat dung fertilizer), inorganic (NPK fertilizer), or combination NPK fertilizer + goat dung fertilizer treatment. This indicates that water stress reduced N, P, and K content, as Hussain H.A et al. [42] reported on maize cultivars (Xida 319). The content of N, P and K decreased under water-stressed conditions by 15.63%, 14.72%, and 17.47%, respectively, compared to well-watered treatment (control). The strawberry plant without fertilizer had the lowest N, P, and K content than other treatments. Similarly, Dania SO et al. [43] reported that N and K content significantly decreased in Moringa (Moringa oleifera) seedling without fertilizer treatments. Sudradjat et al. [44] explained that it is necessary for plants to receive nutrients that originated from inorganic and organic fertilizers. Compound fertilizers such as NPK are available in inorganic fertilizers. Inorganic fertilizers have high nutrients substance and are immediately available to plants, while organic fertilizers lead a higher role in enhancing the soil's physical, chemical, and biological properties.

    The correlation between the parameter was significant at P ≤ 0.01. The correlation between the variables was explored after applying water stress and fertilizer sources treatments (Table 4). There was a positive and negative correlation between most parameters (growth, leaf gas exchange, and nutrient uptake). The results indicated that plant height was significantly and positively correlated (P ≤ 0.01) with shoot fresh weight (r = 0.921), root fresh weight (r = 0.797), shoot dry weight leaf area (r = 0.913), root dry weight (r = 0.700), chlorophyll content (r = 0.858), indicating that the increase in plant height followed in enhancing in shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, leaf area shoot dry weight, root dry weight, chlorophyll content, nitrogen content, phosphorus content and potassium content of strawberry plants. Photosynthesis rate also had positively and strong correlated (P ≤ 0.01) with transpiration rate (r = 0.879) and stomatal conductance (r = 0.886). The strong correlation between photosynthesis rate with stomatal conductance shows to indicate an adjustment of stomatal conductance to match the essential capacity of photosynthetic [45].

    Table 4.  Correlation coefficient between parameters.
    Treatment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    1 PH 1
    2 NL .911** 1
    3 CW .936** .916** 1
    4 FWS .921** .908** .866** 1
    5 FWR .797** .841** .738** .884** 1
    6 DWS .913** .917** .858** .971** .905** 1
    7 DWR .700** .764** .666** .839** .937** .867** 1
    8 CHL .858** .865** .815** .915** .716** .891** .677** 1
    9 E .350* .488** .480** .182 .183 .274 .052 .286 1
    10 gs .485** .610** .620** .356* .285 .434** .214 .459** .920** 1
    11 A .490** .670** .654** .394* .452** .452** .360* .401* .879** .886** 1
    12 WUE -.281 -.367* -.400* -.123 -.175 -.246 -.058 -.180 -.902** -.814** -.752** 1
    13 PLC .093 -.032 -.049 .260 .076 .169 .034 .323 -.538** -.505** -.611** .477** 1
    14 NC .805** .793** .704** .918** .751** .865** .713** .921** .021 .198 .171 .082 .517** 1
    15 PC .825** .864** .817** .855** .768** .911** .709** .863** .401* .522** .499** -.373* .159 .773** 1
    16 KC .804** .670** .773** .815** .620** .771** .537** .765** -.013 .122 .097 .011 .515** .796** .753** 1
    Notes: * Correlation significant at 0.05, ** highly significant at 0.01 and ns, not significant. PH = Plant Height; LN = Leaves Number; CW = Canopy Width; FWS = Fresh Weight Shoot; FWR = Fresh Weight Root; DWS = Dry Weight Shoot; DWR = Dry Weight Root; CHL = Chlorophyll Content; E = Transpiration rate; gs = stomatal conductance; A = net photosynthesis; WUE = Water Use Efficiency; PLC = Proline Content; NC = Nitrogen Content; PC = Phosphorus Content; KC = Potassium Content.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Interestingly, Figure 5. shows the relationship between plant height, shoot dry weight, and chlorophyll content with nitrogen content of strawberry plant as affected by water stress. The nitrogen content had highly correlated to plant height (r = 0.805), shoot dry weight (r = 0.865), and total chlorophyll content (r = 0.921). Phosphorus content had highly correlated to number of leaves (r = 0.864), shoot fresh weight (r = 0.855), and shoot dry weight (r = 0.911). Potassium content had highly correlated to plant height (r = 0.804), canopy width (r = 0.773), and shoot fresh weight (r = 0.815). On the other hand, the results indicated that prolin content was negatively correlated (P ≤ 0.01) with photosynthesis rate (r = −0.611), transpiration rate (r = −0.538) and stomatal conductance (r = −0.505). In term of WUE, it also showed a significant negative correlation (P ≤ 0.01) photosynthesis rate (r = −0.752), transpiration rate (r = −0.902) and stomatal conductance (r = −0.814), indicating that the increase in water use efficiency followed in decrease in photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance.

    Figure 5.  The relationship between (a) plant height, (b) shoot dry weight and (c) total chlorophyll content with nitrogen content of strawberry plant affected by water stress.

    The present study performed that the interaction of different water stress and fertilizer types had a significant effect on all parameters (the growth, leaf gas exchange, and nutrient uptake) except in the total sugar of strawberry fruits. The results indicate that plant growth, leaf gas exchange and nutrient uptake decreased under water stress conditions whereas total proline, total sugar, and water use efficiency (WUE) enhanced under water stress conditions. The maximum value of plant height, leaves number, shoot-root fresh weight, shoot-root dry weight, photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll content, nitrogen content and phosphorus content was obtained from the application of 46:45:45 kg/ha NPK fertilizer + 10 kg/ha goat dung fertilizer at 2 days Ⅱ 75% FC. Additionally, the application of NPK and goat dung fertilizers increased growth and leaf gas exchange under water-stressed conditions. Plants that were not fertilized had the lowest growth compared to those with fertilizers. This research is intended to be beneficial in developing strategies to mitigate the impact of water stress on strawberry plants through the use of fertilizer in Indonesia.

    This research was funded by the Sustainable Management of Agricultural Research and Technology Dissemination (SMARTD) Program of Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development no. B-2816/KP.320/H.1/10/2016.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] BRASIL. Estimativa 2016: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. INCA 2015.
    [2] Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. (2015) Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA a cancer J Clin 65: 87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262
    [3] Walboomers JMM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. (1999) Human Papillomavirus Is a Necessary Cause Of Invasive Cervical Cancer Worldwide. J Patholgy 189: 12-19.
    [4] Woodman CBJ, Collins SI, Young LS (2007) The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nat Rev Cancer 7: 11-22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2050
    [5] Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, et al. (2007) Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: A meta-analysis update. Int J Cancer 121: 621-632. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22527
    [6] Lee LJ, Howitt B, Catalano P, et al. (2016) Gynecologic Oncology Prognostic importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 positivity in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 142: 293-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.019
    [7] Levovitz C, Chen D, Ivansson E, et al. (2014) TGFβ Receptor 1: An immune susceptibility gene in HPV-associated cancer. Cancer Res 74: 6833-6844. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0602-T
    [8] Mai S, Welzel G, Ottstadt M, et al. (2015) Prognostic relevance of HPV infection and p16 overexpression in squamous cell anal cancer. Radiat Oncol Biol 93: 819-827. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.004
    [9] Egawa N, Egawa K, Griffin H, et al. (2015) Human Papillomaviruses; epithelial tropisms, and the development of neoplasia. Viruses 7: 3863-3890. doi: 10.3390/v7072802
    [10] Arbyn M, Sanjosé S de, Saraiya M, et al. (2011) EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV- related disease. Int J Cancer 131: 1969-1982.
    [11] Doorbar J (2006) Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin Sci 110: 525-541. doi: 10.1042/CS20050369
    [12] Moody CA, Laimins LA (2010) Human papillomavirus oncoproteins : pathways to transformation. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 550-560. doi: 10.1038/nrc2886
    [13] Doorbar J (2013) The E4 protein —structure , function and patterns of expression. Virology 445: 80-98. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.008
    [14] DiMaio D, Petti LM (2013) The E5 proteins. Virology 445: 99-114. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.006
    [15] Beaudenon S, Huibregtse JM (2008) HPV E6 , E6AP and cervical cancer. BMC Biochem 7: 1-7.
    [16] Zhou W, Slingerland JM (2014) Links between oestrogen receptor activation and proteolysis : relevance to hormone-regulated cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 14: 26-38.
    [17] zur Hausen H (2009) Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers—a brief historical account. Virology 384: 260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.046
    [18] Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. (2007) Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 370: 890-907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0
    [19] Schiffman M, Wentzensen N (2013) Human Papillomavirus Infection and the Multistage Carcinogenesis of Cervical Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22: 553-560. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1406
    [20] Castellsagué X, Muñoz N (2003) Chapter 3: Cofactors in human papillomavirus carcinogenesis—role of parity, oral contraceptives, and tobacco smoking. J Nation Cancer Institute Monographs 31: 20-28.
    [21] Patel S, Chiplunkar S (2009) Host immune responses to cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21: 54-59.
    [22] Mbeunkui F, Johann DJJr (2010) Cancer and the tumor microenvironment: a review of an essential relationship. Cancer Chemoter Pharmacol 63: 571-582.
    [23] Vandercappellen J, Van Damme J, Struyf S (2008) The role of CXC chemokines and their receptors in cancer. Cancer Lett 267: 226-244.
    [24] Baggiolini M (2001) Chemokines in pathology and medicine. J Intern Med 250: 91-104.
    [25] Griffith JW, Sokol CL, Luster AD (2014) Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 32: 659-702. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145
    [26] Pozzobon T, Goldoni G, Viola A, et al. (2016) CXCR4 signaling in health and disease. Immunol Lett 177: 6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.06.006
    [27] Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646-674.
    [28] Wani N, Nasser MW, Ahirwar DK, et al. (2014) C-X-C motif chemokine 12/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 signaling regulates breast cancer growth and metastasis by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res16: R54.
    [29] Bergers G, Benjamin LE (2003) Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 401-410. doi: 10.1038/nrc1093
    [30] Tachibana K, Hirota S, Iizasa H, et al. (1998). The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for vascularization of the gastrointestinal tract. Nature 393: 591-594. doi: 10.1038/31261
    [31] Funakoshi A, Jimi A, Yasunami Y, et al. (1989) CXCL8/IL8 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and the autocrine activation of VEGFR2 in endothelial cells by activating NFkappaB through the CBM (Carma3/Bcl10/Malt1) complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 159: 913-918. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(89)92195-5
    [32] Martin D, Galisteo R, Gutkind JS (2009) CXCL8/IL8 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and the autocrine activation of VEGFR2 in endothelial cells by activating NF-κB through the CBM (Carma3/Bcl10/Malt1) complex. J Biol Chem 284: 6038-6042. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800207200
    [33] Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massagué J (2009) Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 274-284. doi: 10.1038/nrc2622
    [34] Zlotnik A, Burkhardt AM, Homey B (2011) Homeostatic chemokine receptors and organ-specific metastasis. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 597-606.
    [35] Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, et al. (2001) Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 410: 50-56.
    [36] Terasaki M, Sugita Y, Arakawa F, et al. (2011) CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in malignant brain tumors: a potential pharmacological therapeutic target. Brain Tumor Pathol 28: 89-97.
    [37] Balkwill F (2004) Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 540-550. doi: 10.1038/nrc1388
    [38] Zou W, Machelon V, Coulomb-L'Hermin A, et al. (2001) Stromal-derived factor-1 in human tumors recruits and alters the function of plasmacytoid precursor dendritic cells. Nat Med 7: 1339-1346. doi: 10.1038/nm1201-1339
    [39] Maksym RB, Tarnowski M, Grymula K, et al. (2009) The role of stromal derived factor-1-CXCR7 axis in development and cancer. Eur J Pharmacol 625: 31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.04.071
    [40] Wang J, Knaut H (2014) Chemokine signaling in development and disease. Development 12: 4199-4205.
    [41] Wang Z, Ma Q, Liu Q, et al. (2008) Blockade of SDF-1/CXCR4 signalling inhibits pancreatic cancer progression in vitro via inactivation of canonical Wnt pathway. Br J Cancer 99: 1695-1703. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604745
    [42] Ganju RK, Brubaker SA, Meyer J, et al. (1998) The a-Chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1a, binds to the transmembrane G-protein-coupled CXCR-4 receptor and activates multiple signal transduction pathways. J Biol Chem 273: 23169-23175. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.36.23169
    [43] Bhandari D, Robia SL, Marchese A (2009) The E3 ubiquitin ligase atrophin interacting protein 4 binds directly to the chemokine receptor CXCR4 via a novel WW domain-mediated interaction. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1324-1339. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0308
    [44] Mines MA, Goodwin JS, Limbird LE, et al. (2009) Deubiquitination of CXCR4 by USP14 is critical for both CXCL12-induced CXCR4 degradation and chemotaxis but not ERK activation. J Biol Chem 284: 5742-5752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808507200
    [45] Busillo JM, Benovic JL (2007) Regulation of CXCR4 signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768: 952-963. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.11.002
    [46] Cojoc M, Peitzsch C, Trautmann F, et al. (2013) Emerging targets in cancer management: role of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Onco Targets Ther 6: 1347-1361.
    [47] Mellado M, Rodríguez-Frade JM, Mañes S, et al. (2001) Chemokine signaling and functional responses: the role of receptor dimerization and TK pathway activation. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 397-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.397
    [48] Teicher BA, Fricker SP (2010) CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16: 2927-2931.
    [49] Graham GJ, Locati M, Mantovani A, et al. (2012) The biochemistry and biology of the atypical chemokine receptors. Immunol Lett 145: 30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2012.04.004
    [50] Freitas C, Desnoyer A, Meuris F, et al. (2014) The relevance of the chemokine receptor ACKR3/CXCR7 on CXCL12-mediated effects in cancers with a focus on virus-related cancers. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 25: 307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.04.006
    [51] Veldkamp CT, Peterson FC, Pelzek AJ, et al. (2005) The monomer—dimer equilibrium of stromal cell-derived factor-1 ( CXCL 12 ) is altered by pH , phosphate , sulfate , and heparin. Protein Sci 1: 1071-1081.
    [52] Ray P, Lewin SA, Mihalko LA, et al. (2012) Secreted CXCL12 (SDF-1) forms dimers under physiological conditions. Biochem J 442: 433-442.
    [53] Wu B, Chien EY, Mol CD, et al. (2010) Structures of the CXCR4 Chemokine. Science 330: 1066-1071.
    [54] Kramp BK, Sarabi A, Koenen RR, et al. (2011) Heterophilic chemokine receptor interactions in chemokine signaling and biology. Exp Cell Res 317: 655-663.
    [55] Thelen M, Thelen S (2008) CXCR7, CXCR4 and CXCL12: An eccentric trio? J Neuroimmunol 198: 9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.020
    [56] Laguri C, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Lortat-Jacob H (2008) Relationships between glycosaminoglycan and receptor binding sites in chemokines-the CXCL12 example. Carbohydr Res 343: 2018-2023. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.047
    [57] Rueda P, Balabanian K, Lagane B, et al. (2008) The CXCL12γ Chemokine Displays Unprecedented Structural and Functional Properties that Make It a Paradigm of Chemoattractant Proteins. Gold JA, editor. PLoS One 3: e2543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002543
    [58] Sadir R, Imberty A, Baleux F, et al. (2004) Heparan Sulfate/Heparin oligosaccharides protect stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCL12 against proteolysis induced by CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. J Biol Chem 279: 43854-43860.
    [59] Brule S, Friand V, Sutton A, et al. (2009) Glycosaminoglycans and syndecan-4 are involved in SDF-1/CXCL12-mediated invasion of human epitheloid carcinoma HeLa cells. Biochim Biophys Acta-Gen Subj 1790: 1643-1650.
    [60] Shirozu M, Nakano T, Inazawa J, et al. (1995) Struture and chromosomal localization of the human stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1) gene. Genomics 28: 495-500.
    [61] Winkler C, Modi W, Smith MW, et al. (1998) Genetic restriction of AIDS pathogenesis by an SDF-1 chemokine gene variant. ALIVE Study, Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS), Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study (MHCS), San Francisco City Cohort (SFCC). Science 279: 389-393.
    [62] Feng L, Nian S, Hao Y, et al. (2014) A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 Gene Is Associated with Coronary Heart Disease in Chinese Patients. Int J Mol Sci 15: 11054-11063. doi: 10.3390/ijms150611054
    [63] Reiche EMV, Ehara Watanabe MA, et al. (2006) The effect of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1/CXCL12) genetic polymorphism on HIV-1 disease progression. Int J Mol Med 18 785-793.
    [64] de Oliveira KB, Oda JMM, Voltarelli JC, et al. (2009) CXCL12 rs1801157 polymorphism in patients with breast cancer, hodgkin’s lymphoma, and non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Lab Anal 23: 387-393. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20346
    [65] Cai C, Wang L-H, Dong Q, et al. (2013) Association of CXCL12 and CXCR4 gene polymorphisms with the susceptibility and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma. Tissue Antigens 82: 165-170. doi: 10.1111/tan.12170
    [66] Schimanski C, Jordan M, Schlaegel F (2011) SNP rs1801157 significantly correlates with distant metastasis in CXCL12 expressing esophagogastri c cancer. Int J Oncol 39: 515-920.
    [67] Razmkhah M, Doroudchi M, Ghayumi SMA, et al. ( 2005) Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) gene and susceptibility of Iranian patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer 49: 311-315.
    [68] Hassan S, Baccarelli A, Salvucci O, et al. (2008) Plasma stromal cell-derived factor-1: host derived marker predictive of distant metastasis in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 446-454.
    [69] Phillips RJ, Burdick MD, Lutz M, et al. ( 2003) The stromal derived factor–1/CXCL12–CXC chemokine receptor 4 biological axis in non–small cell lung cancer metastases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167: 1676-1686.
    [70] Dehghani M, Kianpour S, Zangeneh A, et al. (2014) CXCL12 modulates prostate cancer cell adhesion by altering the levels or activities of  β1-containing integrins. Int J Cell Biol 2014: 981750.
    [71] Beider K, Bitner H, Leiba M, et al. (2014) Multiple myeloma cells recruit tumor-supportive macrophages through the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis and promote their polarization toward the M2 phenotype. Oncotarget 5: 11283-11296. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2207
    [72] Sei S, O’Neill DP, Stewart SK, et al. (2001) Increased level of stromal cell-derived factor-1 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from children with AIDS-related lymphoma. Cancer Res 61: 5028-5037.
    [73] de Oliveira KB, Guembarovski RL, Oda JMM, et al. (2011) CXCL12 rs1801157 polymorphism and expression in peripheral blood from breast cancer patients. Cytokine 55: 260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.04.017
    [74] Leiding JW, Holland SM (2012) Warts and all: human papillomavirus in primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130: 1030-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.049
    [75] Chow KYC, Brotin É, Ben Khalifa Y, et al. (2010) A Pivotal Role for CXCL12 Signaling in HPV-Mediated Transformation of Keratinocytes: Clues to Understanding HPV-Pathogenesis in WHIM Syndrome. Cell Host Microbe 8: 523-533.
    [76] Bachelerie F (2010) CXCL12/CXCR4-axis dysfunctions: Markers of the rare immunodeficiency disorder WHIM syndrome. Dis Markers 29: 189-198. doi: 10.1155/2010/475104
    [77] Maciejewski-Duval A, Meuris F, Bignon A, et al. (2016) Altered chemotactic response to CXCL12 in patients carrying GATA2 mutations. J Leukoc Biol 99: 1065-1076.
    [78] Bignon A, Biajoux V, Bouchet-Delbos L, et al. (2011) CXCR4, a therapeutic target in rare immunodeficiencies? Med Sci (Paris) 27: 391-397. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2011274015
    [79] Maley SN, Schwartz SM, Johnson LG, et al. (2009) Genetic variation in CXCL12 and risk of cervical carcinoma: a population-based case-control study. Int J Immunogenet 36: 367-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2009.00877.x
    [80] Tee Y, Yang S-F, Wang P, et al. (2012) G801A Polymorphism of Human Stromal Cell–Derived Factor 1 Gene Raises No Susceptibility to Neoplastic Lesions of Uterine Cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22: 1297-1302. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318265d334
    [81] Roszak A, Misztal M, Sowińska A, et al. (2015) Stromal cell-derived factor-1 G801A polymorphism and the risk factors for cervical cancer. Mol Med Rep 11: 4633-4638.
    [82] Jaafar F, Righi E, Lindstrom V, et al. (2009) Correlation of CXCL12 expression and FoxP3+ cell infiltration with human papillomavirus infection and clinicopathological progression of cervical cancer. Am J Pathol 175: 1525-1535. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090295
    [83] Huang Y, Zhang J, Cui Z-M, et al. (2013) Expression of the CXCL12/CXCR4 and CXCL16/CXCR6 axes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Chin J Cancer 32: 289-296.
    [84] Kurban S, Tursun M, Kurban G, et al. (2014) Role of CXCR7 and effects on CXCL12 in SiHa cells and upregulation in cervical squamous cell carcinomas in Uighur women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15: 9211-9216 doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9211
    [85] Zanotta N, Tornesello ML, Annunziata C, et al. (2016) Candidate soluble immune mediators in young women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection: high expression of chemokines promoting angiogenesis and cell proliferation. PLoS One 11: e0151851.
    [86] Baker R, Dauner JG, Rodriguez AC, et al. (2011) Increased plasma levels of adipokines and inflammatory markers in older women with persistent HPV infection. Cytokine 53: 282-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.11.014
    [87] Shen X, Wang S-H, Liang M, et al. (2008) The role and mechanism of CXCR4 and its ligand SDF-1 in the development of cervical cancer metastasis. Ai Zheng 27: 1044-1049.
    [88] Yadav SS, Prasad SB, Das M, et al. (2014) Epigenetic silencing of CXCR4 promotes loss of cell adhesion in cervical cancer. Biomed Res Int 2014: 581403.
    [89] Donzella GA, Schols D, Lin SW, et al. (1998) AMD3100, a small molecule inhibitor of HIV-1 entry via the CXCR4 co-receptor. Nat Med 4: 72-77. doi: 10.1038/nm0198-072
    [90] Burger JA, Stewart DJ (2009) CXCR4 chemokine receptor antagonists: perspectives in SCLC. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18: 481-490.
    [91] Sayyed SG, Hägele H, Kulkarni OP, et al. (2009) Podocytes produce homeostatic chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12, which contributes to glomerulosclerosis, podocyte loss and albuminuria in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52: 2445-2454.
    [92] Miao Z, Luker KE, Summers BC, et al. (2007) CXCR7 (RDC1) promotes breast and lung tumor growth in vivo and is expressed on tumor-associated vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 15735-15740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610444104
    [93] Wang J, Wang J, Sun Y, et al. (2005) Diverse signaling pathways through the SDF-1/CXCR4 chemokine axis in prostate cancer cell lines leads to altered patterns of cytokine secretion and angiogenesis. Cell Signal 17: 1578-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.03.022
    [94] Sowińska A, Jagodzinski PP (2007) RNA interference-mediated knockdown of DNMT1 and DNMT3B induces CXCL12 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer and AsPC1 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett 255: 153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.04.004
    [95] Uchida D, Onoue T, Kuribayashi N, et al. (2011) Blockade of CXCR4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma inhibits lymph node metastases. Eur J Cancer 47: 452-459. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.028
    [96] Gupta S, Gupta S (2015) Role of human papillomavirus in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: A review of the literature. Indian J Dent 6: 91-98. doi: 10.4103/0975-962X.155877
    [97] Meuris F, Gaudin F, Aknin M-L, et al. (2016) Symptomatic Improvement in Human Papillomavirus-Induced Epithelial Neoplasia by Specific Targeting of the CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor. J Invest Dermatol 136: 473-480.
    [98] von Knebel Doeberitz M (2001) New molecular tools for efficient screening of cervical cancer. Dis Markers 17: 123-128.
    [99] Sun Y, Schneider A, Jung Y, et al. (2005) Skeletal localization and neutralization of the SDF-1(CXCL12)/CXCR4 axis blocks prostate cancer metastasis and growth in osseous sites in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 20: 318-329.
    [100] Huang EH, Singh B, Cristofanilli M, et al. (2009) A CXCR4 Antagonist CTCE-9908 Inhibits Primary Tumor Growth and Metastasis of Breast Cancer. J Surg Res 155: 231-236.
    [101] Matsusue R, Kubo H, Hisamori S, et al. (2009) Hepatic stellate Cells cromote liver metastasis of colon cancer cells by the action of SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 2645-2653. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0599-x
    [102] Rubin JB, Kung AL, Klein RS, et al. (2003) A small-molecule antagonist of CXCR4 inhibits intracranial growth of primary brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13513-13518.
    [103] Porvasnik S, Sakamoto N, Kusmartsev S, et al. (2009) Effects of CXCR4 antagonist CTCE-9908 on prostate tumor growth. Prostate 69: 1460-1469. doi: 10.1002/pros.21008
    [104] Epstein RJ (2004) The CXCL12-CXCR4 chemotactic pathway as a target of adjuvant breast cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 901-909. doi: 10.1038/nrc1473
    [105] Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, et al. (2007) AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 11: 83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.021
    [106] Kamoun WS, Ley CD, Farrar CT, et al. (2009) Edema control by cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted kinase inhibitor, prolongs survival despite persistent brain tumor growth in mice. J Clin Oncol 27: 2542-2552. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9356
    [107] Shaked Y, Henke E, Roodhart JML, et al. (2008) Rapid chemotherapy-induced acute endothelial progenitor cell mobilization: implications for antiangiogenic drugs as chemosensitizing agents. Cancer Cell 14: 263-273.
    [108] Shaked Y, Tang T, Woloszynek J, et al. (2009) Contribution of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to the acute mobilization of endothelial precursor cells by vascular disrupting agents. Cancer Res 69: 7524-7528. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0381
    [109] Kozin S V., Kamoun WS, Huang Y, et al. (2010) Recruitment of myeloid but not endothelial precursor cells facilitates tumor regrowth after local irradiation. Cancer Res 70: 5679-5685. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4446
    [110] Kioi M, Vogel H, Schultz G, et al. (2010) Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. J Clin Invest 120: 694-705. doi: 10.1172/JCI40283
    [111] Hattermann K, Held-Feindt J, Lucius R, et al. (2010) The Chemokine Receptor CXCR7 Is Highly Expressed in Human Glioma Cells and Mediates Antiapoptotic Effects. Cancer Res 70: 3299-3308.
    [112] Zagzag D, Esencay M, Mendez O, et al. (2008) Hypoxia and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced stromal cell-derived factor-1α/CXCR4 expression in glioblastomas. Am J Pathol 173: 545-560. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071197
    [113] Batchelor TT, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, et al. (2010) Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28: 2817-2823. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3988
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Andrés Molero-Chamizo, Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina, Taste Processing: Insights from Animal Models, 2020, 25, 1420-3049, 3112, 10.3390/molecules25143112
    2. Andrés Molero-Chamizo, 2018, Chapter 1485-1, 978-3-319-47829-6, 1, 10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1485-1
    3. Andrés Molero-Chamizo, 2022, Chapter 1485, 978-3-319-55064-0, 6868, 10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_1485
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7558) PDF downloads(1308) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog