Research article Special Issues

Detection and localization of image forgeries using improved mask regional convolutional neural network

  • Received: 24 January 2019 Accepted: 26 April 2019 Published: 22 May 2019
  • The research on forgery detection and localization is significant in digital forensics and has attracted increasing attention recently. Traditional methods mostly use handcrafted or shallow-learning based features, but they have limited description ability and heavy computational costs. Recently, deep neural networks have shown to be capable of extracting complex statistical features from high-dimensional inputs and efficiently learning their hierarchical representations. In order to capture more discriminative features between tampered and non-tampered regions, we propose an improved mask regional convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) which attach a Sobel filter to the mask branch of Mask R-CNN in this paper. The Sobel filter acts as an auxiliary task to encourage predicted masks to have similar image gradients to the groundtruth mask. The overall network is capable of detecting two different types of image manipulations, including copy-move and splicing. The experimental results on two standard datasets show that the proposed model outperforms some state-of-the-art methods.

    Citation: Xinyi Wang, He Wang, Shaozhang Niu, Jiwei Zhang. Detection and localization of image forgeries using improved mask regional convolutional neural network[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 4581-4593. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019229

    Related Papers:

    [1] Claudia Chaufan, Natalie Hemsing . Is resistance to Covid-19 vaccination a “problem”? A critical policy inquiry of vaccine mandates for healthcare workers. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 688-714. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024035
    [2] Sheikh Mohd Saleem, Sudip Bhattacharya . Reducing the infectious diseases burden through “life course approach vaccination” in India—a perspective. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(3): 553-562. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021045
    [3] Boris G Andryukov, Natalya N Besednova . Older adults: panoramic view on the COVID-19 vaccination. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(3): 388-415. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021030
    [4] Itse Olaoye, Aniebet Ekong, Abiona Samuel, Eirini Kelaiditi, Kyriaki Myrissa, Tsemaye Jacdonmi, Famokun Gboyega . Public beliefs and willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccines among adults in South-Western Nigeria: A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(1): 1-15. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023001
    [5] Mehreen Tariq, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Seyed M Moghadas . Ten years of Pan-InfORM: modelling research for public health in Canada. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 265-274. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021020
    [6] Joseph Inungu, Kechi Iheduru-Anderson, Ossam J Odio . Recurrent Ebolavirus disease in the Democratic Republic of Congo: update and challenges. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(4): 502-513. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.502
    [7] Testimony J Olumade, Oluwafolajimi A Adesanya, Iyanuoluwa J Fred-Akintunwa, David O Babalola, Judith U Oguzie, Olusola A Ogunsanya, Uwem E George, Oluwawapelumi D Akin-Ajani, Damilola G Osasona . Infectious disease outbreak preparedness and response in Nigeria: history, limitations and recommendations for global health policy and practice. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(4): 736-757. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020057
    [8] Marc H V Van Regenmortel . Why Does the Molecular Structure of Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Isolated from Individuals Infected with HIV-1 not Inform the Rational Design of an HIV-1 Vaccine?. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(2): 183-193. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.2.183
    [9] Flora Douglas, Edwin van Teijlingen, Cairns Smith, Mandy Moffat . Implementing health policy: lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 887-905. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.887
    [10] Safaa Badi, Loai Abdelgadir Babiker, Abdullah Yasseen Aldow, Almigdad Badr Aldeen Abas, Mazen Abdelhafiez Eisa, Mohamed Nour Abu-Ali, Wagass Abdelrhman Abdella, Mohamed Elsir Marzouq, Musaab Ahmed, Abubakr Ali M Omer, Mohamed H Ahmed . Knowledge and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination in Sudan: A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 310-323. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023023
  • The research on forgery detection and localization is significant in digital forensics and has attracted increasing attention recently. Traditional methods mostly use handcrafted or shallow-learning based features, but they have limited description ability and heavy computational costs. Recently, deep neural networks have shown to be capable of extracting complex statistical features from high-dimensional inputs and efficiently learning their hierarchical representations. In order to capture more discriminative features between tampered and non-tampered regions, we propose an improved mask regional convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) which attach a Sobel filter to the mask branch of Mask R-CNN in this paper. The Sobel filter acts as an auxiliary task to encourage predicted masks to have similar image gradients to the groundtruth mask. The overall network is capable of detecting two different types of image manipulations, including copy-move and splicing. The experimental results on two standard datasets show that the proposed model outperforms some state-of-the-art methods.


    Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) has been considered a major nosocomial pathogen, especially in intensive care units (ICUs), which can produce numerous infections such as septicemia, nosocomial meningitis, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, wound infection, infection of skin and soft tissue, and high-mortal pneumonia [1]. Interestingly, it can be identified in a range of food items, such as fruits, raw vegetables, milk, and dairy products [2]. There are few science reports of infections due to A. baumannii in animals and only a scarce number of studies have reported such cases [3].

    Of this genus, A. baumannii strains revealed more resistant patterns than other species and often express a multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype. Consequently, during the past 30 years, strains of A. baumannii have obtained resistance against newly developed antimicrobial agents. This fact has become prevalent in some hospitals in the world and has been identified as a complicated nosocomial pathogen [4]. Antimicrobial agents are essential for treating infectious diseases in both humans and animals [5].

    Based on the degree of antimicrobial resistance for Acinetobacter spp., there are three different terms: multidrug resistant (MDR), extensive drug resistant (XDR), and pan-drug resistant (PDR). MDR Acinetobacter spp. refers to resistance pattern to a minimum of three classes of antimicrobial drugs such as penicillin and cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone, and aminoglycoside [6]. Another multidrug resistance definition belongs to the resistance pattern to more than two of the following five antibiotic drug classes: antipseudomonal cephalosporin (ceftazidime or cefepime), antipseudomonal carbapenem (imipenem or meropenem), ampicillin-sulbactam, fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin), and aminoglycoside (gentamicin, tobramycin, or amikacin) [7].

    Acinetobacter is defined as an organism of low virulence, which among the possible virulence factors, one can mention cell surface hydrophobicity, outer membrane proteins (OMPs), toxic slime polysaccharides, and verotoxins. Many factors like extracellular enzymes, cytotoxins and secreted vascular permeability are produced by A. baumannii that are involved in the pathogenesis and cause harm to host tissues particularly in respiratory tract infections [8].

    The pathogenesis in bacteria can be due to the prevalence of virulence factors, which are involved in some performances such as colonizing on the epithelium, evading and inhibiting the host's immune response through biofilm formation, and obtaining nutrition from the host [9]. However, there is little information about the virulence factors in A. baumannii and identifying these factors can develop novel therapeutic alternatives for the control of clinically relevant pathogen [10].

    Only few research studies have stimulated data regarding A. baumannii in veterinary medicine. The issue of emerging pathogen in veterinary medicine with a high potential for multidrug resistance and prevalence of A. baumannii is becoming alarmingly evident [10]. Actually, Acinetobacter spp. have been isolated from different animal sources such as birds, fish, and rainbow trout. Moreover, some chicken septicemia, mastitis and metrititis in cows, abortions in cattle, pigs and horses, keratoconjunctivitis in cattle, omphalitis in calves, ear infections in cats, and respiratory infections and balanoposthitis in horses have been identified [10].

    Based on research by Vaneechoutte et al. [11], seven A. baumannii isolates were identified from jugular catheter tips placed in horses, but the organism was only indicated as responsible for local infection or colonization. Francey et al. [12] identified the clinical characteristics of several pets, which suffer from different A. baumannii infections such as urinary, respiratory, wound and bloodstream infections, reporting an overall attributable mortality of 47%.

    Studies regarding the association of A. baumannii strains with foodborne illnesses are somewhat limited. Therefore, the present investigation was done to study the prevalence rate and phenotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance of the A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat, and camel raw meat samples.

    A total of 124 sheep, 162 goat, and 95 camels fresh raw meat samples were randomly selected from 106 meat shops in Isfahan and Shahrekord. All samples were taken from the femur muscle of animal species. Thirty grams of meat were collected from each animal. The cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2015 to September 2016. It is notable that all the samples were approved (healthy) by the specialized veterinarians of Shahrekord Azad University.

    Specimens were collected by a laboratory technician, properly labeled, and transferred immediately to the microbiology laboratory. Each of these samples were streaked on blood agar (Merck, Germany) and MacConkey agar (Merck, Germany), and then incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 hours. Further, non-hemolytic, opaque and creamy colonies on blood agar and non-lactose fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar were sub-cultured on MacConkey agar and incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C to achieve pure colonies. The isolated organisms were identified based on colonial and microscopic characteristics and different biochemical tests according to standard laboratory methods. Stock cultures were conserved in both agar slant and 20% sterile buffered glycerin and were maintained at -70 °C [13].

    A DNA Extraction Kit (Cinnagen, Iran) was used to extract genomic DNA from the bacterial isolates according to the manufacturer's instructions. To confirm and recognition of the isolates, conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by amplification of 16S–23S ribosomal DNA and the primer pairs shown in Table 1.

    PCRs were carried out in 50 µL volume, the ingredients of which consisted of 5 µL of 10X PCR buffer, 2 mM of MgCl2, 150 µM of dNTPs mix, one unit of Taq DNA polemerase (Fermentas-Lithuania), 1 µM of reverse and forward primers, and 3 µL of template DNA (being the DNA of the isolates). PCR program was set to a cycle of 6 min at 94 °C, 30 repetitive cycles, of 95 °C for 60 s, 58 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 40 s, as well as a last cycle of 72 °C for 5 min, respectively (Table 3) [15]. (Tavakol 2018). All PCR reactions were performed in a thermocycler (Eppendrof Mastercycler 5330; Eppendorf-Nethel-Hinz GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), and products of PCR amplification were visualized by electrophoresis in 1.5% agaros gel. Ultimately, fragment amplifications with a size of 208 bp illustrated the presence of A. baumannii in isolated samples.

    Susceptibility of antimicrobial agents was assessed by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method using Mueller–Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India, MV1084), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. After incubating the inoculated plate aerobically at 37 °C for 18–24 h, the A.baumannii isolates' susceptibility to each antimicrobial agents were measured and the results were interpreted in accordance with interpretive criteria provided by CLSI (2017) [16]. The antibimicrobial agents in this investigation were trimethoprim (5 µg/disk); tetracycline (30 µg/disk); ceftazidime (30 µg/disk); cephalothin (30 µg/disk); co-trimoxazole (23.75/1.25 µg/disk); tobramycin (10 µg/disk); amikacin (30 u/disk); gentamicin (10 µg/disk); streptomycin (10 µg/disk); erythromycin (15 µg/disk); rafampicin (5 µg/disk); azithromycin (15 µg/disk); nitrofurantoin (300 µg/disk); chloramphenicol (30 µg/disk); mupirocin (30 µg/disk); imipenem (10 µg/disk); levofloxacin (5 µg/disk), and ciprofloxacin (5 µg/disk). For quality control purposes, the A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility.

    Table 1.  Primers used for detection of virulence genes in A. baumannii [14].
    Gene Primer name Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Size of product (bp)
    afa/draBC afa1 GCTGGGCAGCAAACTGATAACTCTC 750
    afa2 CATCAAGCTGTTTGTTCGTCCGCCG
    cnf1 cnf1 AAGATGGAGTTTCCTATGCAGGAG 498
    cnf2 CATTCAGAGTCCTGCCCTCATTATT
    cnf2 cnf2a AATCTAATTAAAGAGAAC 543
    cnf2b CATGCTTTGTATATCTA
    csgA M464 ACTCTGACTTGACTATTACC 200
    M465 AGATGCAGTCTGGTCAAC
    cvaC ColV-CF CACACACAAACGGGAGCTGTT 680
    ColV-CR CTTCCCGCAGCATAGTTCCAT
    fimH FimH F TGCAGAACGGATAAGCCGTGG 508
    FimH R GCAGTCACCTGCCCTCCGGTA
    fyuA FyuA f TGATTAACCCCGCGACGGGAA 880
    FyuA R CGCAGTAGGCACGATGTTGTA
    ibeA ibe10 F AGGCAGGTGTGCGCCGCGTAC 170
    fibe10 R TGGTGCTCCGGCAAACCATGC
    iutA AerJ F GGCTGGACATCATGGGAACTGG 300
    AerJ R CGTCGGGAACGGGTAGAATCG
    kpsMT II kpsII F GCGCATTTGCTGATACTGTTG 272
    kpsII R CATCCAGACGATAAGCATGAGCA
    PAI RPAi F GGACATCCTGTTACAGCGCGCA 930
    RPAi R TCGCCACCAATCACAGCCGAAC
    papC pap1 GACGGCTGTACTGCAGGGTGTGGCG 328
    pap2 ATATCCTTTCTGCAGGGATGCAATA
    PapG II, III pGf CTGTAATTACGGAAGTGATTTCTG 1070
    pGr ACTATCCGGCTCCGGATAAACCAT
    sfa/focDE sfa1 CTCCGGAGAACTGGGTGCATCTTAC 410
    sfa2 CGGAGGAGTAATTACAAACCTGGCA
    traT TraT F GGTGTGGTGCGATGAGCACAG 290
    TraT R CACGGTTCAGCCATCCCTGAG
    A. baumannii detection 16S-23S (F) CATTATCACGGTAATTAGTG 208
    ribosomal DNA (R) AGAGCACTGTGCACTTAAG

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The virulence genes, antibiotic resistance coding genes, and integrons are presented in tables 1 and 2. PCR programs (temperature and volume) for detection of 16S–23S ribosomal DNA and all mentioned genes in A. baumannii are summarized in Table 3 [15]. The PCR amplified products (10µL) were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.5% agaros gel (Fermentas, Germany) in 1X TBE buffer (Fermentas, Germany) at 80V for 30 minutes, stained with DNA Safe Stain (Cinnagen, Iran), which were subsequently examined under ultra violet illumination (Uvitec, England). In current study, in order to detect the molecular mass of PCR products the 100-bp ladder (Fermentas, Germany) was used as a standard factor, and to finalize the PCR results (confirm or reject), the PCR products of the primary positive samples were purified by a PCR product purification kit (Roche Applied Science, Germany) and sent to the Macrogen Co. (South Korea) for sequencing.

    Table 2.  Primers used for detection of antibiotic resistance genes in A. baumannii [17].
    Gene Primer Sequence (5′-3′) Size of product (bp)
    aadA1 (F) TATCCAGCTAAGCGCGAACT 447
    (R) ATTTGCCGACTACCTTGGTC

    aac(3)-IV (F) CTTCAGGATGGCAAGTTGGT 286
    (R) TCATCTCGTTCTCCGCTCAT

    sul1 (F) TTCGGCATTCTGAATCTCAC 822
    (R) ATGATCTAACCCTCGGTCTC

    blaSHV (F) TCGCCTGTGTATTATCTCCC 768
    (R) CGCAGATAAATCACCACAATG

    CITM (F) TGGCCAGAACTGACAGGCAAA 462
    (R) TTTCTCCTGAACGTGGCTGGC

    cat1 (F) AGTTGCTCAATGTACCTATAACC 547
    (R) TTGTAATTCATTAAGCATTCTGCC

    cmlA (F) CCGCCACGGTGTTGTTGTTATC 698
    (R) CACCTTGCCTGCCCATCATTAG

    tet(A) (F) GGTTCACTCGAACGACGTCA 577
    (R) CTGTCCGACAAGTTGCATGA

    tet(B) (F) CCTCAGCTTCTCAACGCGTG 634
    (R) GCACCTTGCTGATGACTCTT

    dfrA1 (F) GGAGTGCCAAAGGTGAACAGC 367
    (R) GAGGCGAAGTCTTGGGTAAAAAC

    Qnr (F) GGGTATGGATATTATTGATAAAG 670
    (R) CTAATCCGGCAGCACTATTTA

    Imp (F) GAATAGAATGGTTAACTCTC 188
    (R) CCAAACCACTAGGTTATC

    Vim (F) GTTTGGTCGCATATCGCAAC 382
    (R) AATGCGCAGCACCAGGATAG

    Sim (F) GTACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG 569
    (R) GTACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG

    Oxa-51-like (F) TAATGCTTTGATCGGCCTTG 353
    (R) TGGATTGCACTTCATCTTGG

    Oxa-23-like (F) GATCGGATTGGAGAACCAGA 501
    (R) ATTTCTGACCGCATTTCCAT

    Oxa-24-like (F) GGTTAGTTGGCCCCCTTAAA 246
    (R) AGTTGAGCGAAAAGGGGATT

    Oxa-58-like (F) AAGTATTGGGGCTTGTGCTG 599
    (R) CCCCTCTGCGCTCTACATAC

    IntI F: CAG TGG ACA TAA GCC TGT TC 160
    R: CCC GAC GCA TAG ACT GTA

    IntII F: TTG CGA GTA TCC ATA ACC TG 288
    R: TTA CCT GCA CTG GAT TAA GC

    IntIII F: GCC TCC GGC AGC GAC TTT CAG 1041
    R: ACG GAT CTG CCA AAC CTG ACT

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  PCR conditions for virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes and integrons detection in A. baumannii.
    draBC, cnf1, csgA, cvaC, iutA, fyuA 1 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 4 min.
    30 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 50 s
    58 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 45 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 8 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    1.5 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2.5 µL DNA template
    cnf2, kpsMT II, PAI, papC 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    34 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 50 s
    58 °C ------------ 70 s
    72 °C ------------ 55 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 10 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2 mM Mgcl2
    150 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.75 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    3 µL DNA template
    fimH, ibeA, PapG II-III, sfa/focDE, traT 1 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 4 min.
    34 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 60 s
    56 °C ------------ 45 s
    72 °C ------------ 60 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 10 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    5 µL DNA template
    16S-23S ribosomal DNA 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    30 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 60 s
    58 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 40 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 5 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2mM Mgcl2
    150 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    1 µM of each primers F & R
    1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    3 µL DNA template
    aadA1, aac(3)-IV, sul1, blaSHV, CITM, cat1, cmlA, tet(a), tet(B), dfrA1, and qnr. 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    33 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 70 s
    55 °C ------------ 65 s
    72 °C ------------ 90 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 8 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2 mM Mgcl2
    150 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0. 5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2 µL DNA template
    imp, vim, and sim 1 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 4 min.
    30cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 45 s
    58 °C ------------ 60s
    72 °C ------------ 40 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 5min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    1.5 mM Mgcl2
    100 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    1 µM of each primers F & R
    1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2.5 µL DNA template
    Oxa-23-like, Oxa-24-like, Oxa-51-like, Oxa-58-like) 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 5 min.
    32 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 50 s
    60 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 70 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 10 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2.5 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2 µL DNA template
    Int I/II/III 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    35 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 60 s
    56 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 45 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 6 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    1.5 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2.5 µL DNA template

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The obtained data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 18 and P values were calculated using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to identify statistically significant association between distribution of virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance properties of the A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat, and camel meat samples. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    A total of 381 samples, 124 samples of sheep meat, 162 samples of goat meat and 95 samples from camel meat were obtained; of these, A. baumannii were isolated from 51 (41.12%) sheep meat samples, 19 (11.72%) from goat meat samples and 5 (2.26%) from camel meat samples (Table 4). Moreover, there is significant difference between sheep meat with other samples infected with A. baumannii (P = 0.025)

    Table 4.  Incidence of A. baumannii strains in sheep, goat and camel raw meat samples.
    Samples No. Samples No. A. baumannii Isolation rate
    Sheep meat 124 51 41.12%
    Goat meat 162 19 11.72%
    Camel meat 95 5 2.26%
    Total 381 75 19.68%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Interestingly, the highest virulence factor genes, which were detected in all strains isolated from samples were fimH (Table 5). Based on statistical analysis, there was significant association between the presence of fimH, cnfI, afa/draBC genes in this virulence factor gene with other genes in sheep samples (P = 0.031). In addition, there was significant association between fimH, cnfI, sfa/focDE genes with other genes in goat meat samples (P = 0.042), and strong association was observed between the presence of fimH, cnfI, sfa/focDE, afa/draBC virulence factor genes with others genes in camel isolated samples (P = 0.029). According to this table, it can be concluded that almost all virulence factor genes were represented in sheep samples except fyuA. For goat and camel samples, the presence of PAI and papGIII genes was not detected.

    Table 6 demonstrates the frequency of antibiotic resistance genes in sheep, goat, and camel meat samples, which revealed that none of the three meat sample groups represented the qnr gene. The highest and lowest antibiotic resistance genes were aac(3)-IV, sul1 and sim in sheep meat sample with resistance values of 80.39%, 80.39% and 1.96%, respectively. Moreover, in the studied samples, all genes represented except qnr. Statistical analysis revealed significant association between the presence of dfrA1, sulI, aac(3)-IV genes in sheep isolated samples (P = 0.019); in goat samples, strong association between dfrA1 gene (P = 0.021) were observed, and in all sample groups, dfrA1, sulI, aac(3)-IV genes showed significant difference in comparison to other antibiotic resistance genes (P = 0.025).

    Integron genes are presented in Table 7 and it can be concluded that the most frequent gene in all sample groups was the Integron Class I, but Integron Class III was not found in goat and camel positive samples. Overall, 85.33% of isolated A. baumannii strains represented Class I Integron genes. Statistics confirmed significant association between the presence of Integron Class I in sheep, goat and camel isolated samples (P = 0.019, 0.032 and 0.041, respectively); moreover, the presence of Integron Class I revealed significant difference in comparison to other Integron genes (P = 0.029).

    Antimicrobial susceptibility tests conducted using the Kirby-Bauer test revealed that more than 50% of A. baumannii stains isolated from sheep samples were resistant to streptomycin, gentamycin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim (Table 8). The highest resistance was observed in A. baumannii stains isolated from goat and camel meat samples belong to trimetoprim.

    Statistical analysis showed significant difference between resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics in isolated strains of sheep meat samples (P = 0.032). Overall, there were statistically significant differences amongst the incidences of resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics in all strains (P = 0.026).

    Table 5.  Frequency of virulence factor genes in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Sample/frequency fimH fyuA iutA cvaC csgA Cnf2 Cnf1 afa/draBC
    Sheep/51 42 - 17 12 11 17 24 27
    Goat/19 14 7 7 3 7 3 11 6
    Camel/5 3 - - 1 - - 1 1
    Sample/frequency traT Sfa/focDE PapG III PapG II papC ibeA PAI KpsMT II
    Sheep/51 2 27 3 11 8 10 2 13
    Goat/19 3 4 - 3 6 3 - 4
    Camel/5 1 1 - - 1 1 - -

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6.  Frequency of antibiotic resistance genes in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Sample/frequency aadA1 aac(3)-IV sul1 blaSHV blaCITM tetA tetB dfrA1 qnr
    Sheep/51 28 40 40 24 21 18 26 36 -
    Goat/19 9 9 11 10 10 7 5 15 -
    Camel/5 1 2 2 2 1 2 - 3 -
    Sample/frequency vim sim Imp cat1 cmlA Oxa-51-like Oxa-23-like Oxa-24-like Oxa-58-like
    Sheep/51 3 1 2 2 5 5 3 6 4
    Goat/19 2 - 1 3 - 2 1 - 3
    Camel/5 - - - - 2 1 - 1 2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 7.  Frequency of Integron genes in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Class I Class II Class III Sample/frequency
    49 16 1 Sheep/51
    11 6 - Goat/19
    4 1 - Camel/5

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 8.  Antibiotic resistance pattern in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Sample/frequency streptomycin gentamicin amikacin tobramycin co-trimoxazole cephalotin ceftazidime tetracycline trimetoprim
    Sheep/51 28 38 21 20 36 19 16 42 32
    Goat/19 7 8 10 9 11 10 12 11 14
    Camel/5 - 2 - 1 2 - - 2 3
    Sample/frequency ciprofloxacin lovofloxacin imipenem meropenem cloramphenicol nitrofurantoin azithromycin rifampin erythromycin
    Sheep/51 12 7 5 7 6 7 4 6 22
    Goat/19 7 3 - 2 3 4 2 4 8
    Camel/5 1 - - - 2 1 - - 1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In literatures, Acinetobacter are denoted as a heterogeneous group of organisms that are found almost everywhere, frequently distributed in the environment. The isolated strains of this species have frequently originated from animals including birds, fish, and rainbow trout [6]. Researchers have rarely assessed the infections due to A. baumannii in animals. Among previous findings, we could mention the study on A. baumannii isolates from different animals including ducks, pigeons, chickens, donkeys, rabbits, pets (cats and dogs), mules, livestock (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs), horses, lice and arthropods, which outbreaks in human medicine have been reported in several years [18],[19].

    In the present study, antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance genes and Integron genes were assessed, which most sheep meat samples with A. baumannii represented fimH, aac(3)-IV, sul1 and Integron Class I genes. Nonetheless, among all isolated stains, all genes except qnr were represented. Eventually, more than 50% of A. baumannii stains isolated from sheep meat samples were resistant to streptomycin, gentamycin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and trimetoprim. The most resistance pattern in A. baumannii stains isolated from goat and camel meat samples belongs to trimetoprim. Some research findings in other research groups revealed the same result as our investigation; however, some research findings contradicted with our findings. For example, Francey et al. showed the clinical characteristics of several pets with various A. baumannii infections such as urinary, respiratory, wound and bloodstream infections. Their findings revealed an overall attributable mortality of 47% [12]. A research discovery presented that all 16 A. baumannii isolates from food-producing animals were sensitive to imipenem, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam; however, those samples were resistant to ceftazidime [20]. In another survey on 16 A. baumannii isolates, the outcomes proved 100% sensitivity to carbapenems, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam; nonetheless, those samples were resistant to amoxicillin, cefradine, trimethoprim, and chloramphenicol [21].

    In a research project by Rafei et al. (2015) [22], a total of 73 water samples, 51 soil samples, 37 raw cow milk samples, 50 cow meat samples, 7 raw cheese samples, and 379 animal samples were analyzed to detect the presence of A. baumannii. A. baumannii was found in 6.9% of water samples, 2.7% of milk samples, 8.0% of meat samples, 14.3% of cheese samples, and 7.7% of animal samples. All isolates in this survey presented a susceptible phenotype to most of the antibiotics tested with seldom findings regarding carbapenemase-encoding genes, except one that harbored a blaOXA-143 gene. This study verified that animals could be a potential reservoir for A. baumannii and dissemination of new emerging carbapenemases.

    Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) that possessed A. baumannii with some other species had been assessed and isolated from mastitic milk samples of dairy cattle. Findings revealed that half of the GNB isolates were resistant to 5 or more of the 12 tested antimicrobial agents [23]. Some antibiotic agents were evaluated in 57 A. baumannii bulk tank milk (BTM) isolated samples; their findings showed resistance patterns to cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and colistin [24].

    In the current survey, it can be inferred that although most of the isolated samples were resistant against antibiotics, more than half of A. baumannii stains isolated from sheep samples were resistant against streptomycin, gentamycin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and trimetoprim. For goat and camel meat positive samples, the highest resistance belongs to trimetoprim. The most represented antibiotic resistance genes in sheep meat samples were fimH, aac(3)-IV, sul1 and Integron Class I. Interestingly, the dfrA1 gene has been represented in most samples in all three sample groups; however, none of the isolated stains revealed the qnr gene. Entirely, almost 90% of each isolated cluster were represented with Integron Class I. A. baumannii were isolated mainly from sheep, goat and camel meat samples in Iran; hence, animals should be considered as a potential reservoir of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. Due to various factors involved in the infection in different animal species, further studies are crucial for gaining a better understanding of the origins of this infection in humans. Some limitation factors noted in the current study were restricted sample population, retrospective data analysis, unreliable species identification methods, or unique reports of accidental observations.



    [1] W. Luo, Z. Qu, F. Pan, et al., A survey of passive technology for digital image forensics, FCS, 1 (2007), 166–179.
    [2] J. G. R. Elwin, T. Aditya and S. M. Shankar, Survey on passive methods of image tampering detection, INCOCC,Erode, 2(2010), 431–436.
    [3] G. K. Birajdar and V. H. Mankar, Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: A survey, Digit. Inve, 10 (2013), 226–245.
    [4] L. Verdoliva, D. Cozzolino and G. Poggi, A feature-based approach for image tampering detection and localization, WIFS, Atlanta, GA, (2014), 149–154.
    [5] U. H. Panchal and R. Srivastava, A comprehensive survey on digital image watermarking techniques, ICCSNT, (2015), 591–595.
    [6] Al-Qershi, M. Osamah and B. E. Khoo, Passive detection of copy-move forgery in digital images: State-of-the-art, Foren. Sci. Int., 23 (2013), 284–295.
    [7] H. Huang, W. Guo and Y. Zhang, Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images using SIFT algorithm, CIIA, (2008), 272–276.
    [8] T. Mahmood, A. Irtaza, Z. Mehmood, et al., Copy-move forgery detection through stationary wavelets and local binary pattern variance for forensic analysis in digital images, Forensic Sci. Int., 279 (2017), 8–21.
    [9] Y. Q. Shi, C. Chen and C. Wen, A natural image model approach to splicing detection, In Proceeding MM&Sec '07 Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Multimedia & security, (2007), 51–62.
    [10] X. Zhao, S. Wang, S, Li, et al., Passive image-splicing detection by a 2-D noncausal markov model, IEEE Trans. CSVT, 25 (2015), 185–199.
    [11] R. Girshick, Fast R-CNN, ICCV, (2015), 1440–1448.
    [12] B. H. Jawadul and A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, CNN based region proposals for efficient object detection, ICIP, (2016), 3658–3662.
    [13] B. Zhou, A. Lapedriza, J. Xiao, et al., Learning deep features for scene recognition using places database, ANIPS, 1(2015), 13–20
    [14] L. Jonathan, E. Shelhamer and T. Darrell, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel., 39 (2014), 640–651.
    [15] J. Chen, X. Kang, Y. Liu, et al., Median filtering forensics based on convolutional neural networks, IEEE Sig. Pro. Lett., 22 (2015), 1849–1853.
    [16] Y. Qian, J. Dong, W. Wang, et al., Deep learning for steganalysis via convolutional neural networks, Pro. SPIE. ISOE, 94 (2015), 9–14.
    [17] B. Belhassen and M. C. Stamm, A deep learning approach to universal image manipulation detection using a new convolutional layer, IH&MMSec, (2016), 5–10.
    [18] R. Yuan and J. Ni, A deep learning approach to detection of splicing and copy-move forgeries in images, WIFS, (2016), 1–6.
    [19] P. Zhou, X. Han, V. I. Morariu and L. S. Davis, Learning rich features for image manipulation detection,IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Salt Lake, (2018), 1053–1061.
    [20] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, et al., Mask R-CNN. ICCV, 99 (2017), 1–11.
    [21] R. S. Zimmermann and J. N. J. a. p. a. Siems, Faster Training of Mask R-CNN by Focusing on Instance Boundaries, arXiv: 1809.07069.
    [22] C. Lopez-Molina, H. Bustince, J. Fernández, et al., A t-norm based approach to edge detection, IWCANN, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2009), 302–309.
    [23] T.Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, et al., Microsoft coco: Common objects in context, ECCV, Springer, Cham, (2014), 740–755.
    [24] B. Wen, Y. Zhu, R. Subramanian, et al., Coverage novel database for copy-move forgery detection. ICIP, (2016), 161–165.
    [25] Y. F. Hsu and S. F. Chang, Detecting image splicing using geometry invariants and camera characteristics consistency, ICME, (2006), 549–552.
    [26] L. Jonathan, E. Shelhamer and T. Darrell, Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation, CVPR, 39 (2015), 3431–3440.
    [27] T.Y. Lin, P. Dollar, R. Girshick, et al., Feature pyramid networks for object detection, CVPR, (2017), 2117–2125.
    [28] N. Krawetz and H. F. J. H. F. S. Solutions, A Picture's Worth, Hacker Fact. Solut., 6 (2007), 1–31.
    [29] B. Mahdian and S. Saic, Using noise inconsistencies for blind image forensics, Image Vis. Comput., 7 (2009), 1497–1503.
    [30] P. Ferrara, T. Bianchi, A. De Rosa, et al., Image forgery localization via fine-grained analysis of CFA artifacts, IEEE Trans. Inf. Foren. Secur., 7(2012), 1566–1577.
    [31] J. H. Bappy, A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, J. Bunk, et al., Exploiting spatial structure for localizing manipulated image regions, ICCV, (2017), 4970–4979.
    [32] R. Salloum, Y. Ren and C.-C. J. Kuo, Image splicing localization using a multi-task fully convolutional network (MFCN), J. Vis. Com. Image Repre., 51 (2018), 201–209.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Bhaskar Shenoy, Anar Andani, Shafi Kolhapure, Ashish Agrawal, Jaydeep Mazumdar, Endemicity change of hepatitis A infection necessitates vaccination in food handlers: An Indian perspective, 2021, 2164-5515, 1, 10.1080/21645515.2020.1868820
    2. Alessandra Fallucca, Vincenzo Restivo, Maria Chiara Sgariglia, Marco Roveta, Cecilia Trucchi, Hepatitis a Vaccine as Opportunity of Primary Prevention for Food Handlers: A Narrative Review, 2023, 11, 2076-393X, 1271, 10.3390/vaccines11071271
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(8389) PDF downloads(1744) Cited by(52)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog