Citation: Volodymyr Ivanov, Viktor Stabnikov, Olena Stabnikova, Anatoliy Salyuk, Evhenii Shapovalov, Zubair Ahmed, Joo Hwa Tay. Iron-containing clay and hematite iron ore in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(5): 821-832. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.5.821
[1] | Gaozhong Sun, Tongwei Zhao . Lung adenocarcinoma pathology stages related gene identification. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(1): 737-746. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020038 |
[2] | Shuyi Cen, Kaiyou Fu, Yue Shi, Hanliang Jiang, Jiawei Shou, Liangkun You, Weidong Han, Hongming Pan, Zhen Liu . A microRNA disease signature associated with lymph node metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2557-2568. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020140 |
[3] | Yuan Yang, Lingshan Zhou, Xi Gou, Guozhi Wu, Ya Zheng, Min Liu, Zhaofeng Chen, Yuping Wang, Rui Ji, Qinghong Guo, Yongning Zhou . Comprehensive analysis to identify DNA damage response-related lncRNA pairs as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in gastric cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 595-611. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022026 |
[4] | Bin Ma, Lianqun Cao, Yongmin Li . A novel 10-gene immune-related lncRNA signature model for the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9743-9760. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021477 |
[5] | Ji-Ming Wu, Wang-Ren Qiu, Zi Liu, Zhao-Chun Xu, Shou-Hua Zhang . Integrative approach for classifying male tumors based on DNA methylation 450K data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19133-19151. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023845 |
[6] | Jinqi He, Wenjing Zhang, Faxiang Li, Yan Yu . Development of metastasis-associated seven gene signature for predicting lung adenocarcinoma prognosis using single-cell RNA sequencing data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5959-5977. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021298 |
[7] | Mengyang Han, Xiaoli Wang, Yaqi Li, Jianjun Tan, Chunhua Li, Wang Sheng . Identification of coagulation-associated subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and establishment of prognostic models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10626-10658. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023470 |
[8] | Yanping Xie, Zhaohui Dong, Junhua Du, Xiaoliang Zang, Huihui Guo, Min Liu, Shengwen Shao . The relationship between mouse lung adenocarcinoma at different stages and the expression level of exosomes in serum. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1548-1557. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020080 |
[9] | Ziyu Wu, Sugui Wang, Qiang Li, Qingsong Zhao, Mingming Shao . Identification of 10 differently expressed lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for prostate adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2037-2047. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020108 |
[10] | Siqi Hu, Fang Wang, Junjun Yang, Xingxiang Xu . Elevated ADAR expression is significantly linked to shorter overall survival and immune infiltration in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18063-18082. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023802 |
Baló's concentric sclerosis (BCS) was first described by Marburg [1] in 1906, but became more widely known until 1928 when the Hungarian neuropathologist Josef Baló published a report of a 23-year-old student with right hemiparesis, aphasia, and papilledema, who at autopsy had several lesions of the cerebral white matter, with an unusual concentric pattern of demyelination [2]. Traditionally, BCS is often regarded as a rare variant of multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinically, BCS is most often characterized by an acute onset with steady progression to major disability and death with months, thus resembling Marburg's acute MS [3,4]. Its pathological hallmarks are oligodendrocyte loss and large demyelinated lesions characterized by the annual ring-like alternating pattern of demyelinating and myelin-preserved regions. In [5], the authors found that tissue preconditioning might explain why Baló lesions develop a concentric pattern. According to the tissue preconditioning theory and the analogies between Baló's sclerosis and the Liesegang periodic precipitation phenomenon, Khonsari and Calvez [6] established the following chemotaxis model
˜uτ=DΔX˜u⏟diffusion ofactivated macrophages−∇X⋅(˜χ˜u(ˉu−˜u)∇˜v)⏟chemoattractant attractssurrounding activated macrophages+μ˜u(ˉu−˜u)⏟production of activated macrophages,−˜ϵΔX˜v⏟diffusion of chemoattractant=−˜α˜v+˜β˜w⏟degradation∖production of chemoattractant,˜wτ=κ˜uˉu+˜u˜u(ˉw−˜w)⏟destruction of oligodendrocytes, | (1.1) |
where ˜u, ˜v and ˜w are, respectively, the density of activated macrophages, the concentration of chemoattractants and density of destroyed oligodendrocytes. ˉu and ˉw represent the characteristic densities of macrophages and oligodendrocytes respectively.
By numerical simulation, the authors in [6,7] indicated that model (1.1) only produces heterogeneous concentric demyelination and homogeneous demyelinated plaques as χ value gradually increases. In addition to the chemoattractant produced by destroyed oligodendrocytes, "classically activated'' M1 microglia also can release cytotoxicity [8]. Therefore we introduce a linear production term into the second equation of model (1.1), and establish the following BCS chemotaxis model with linear production term
{˜uτ=DΔX˜u−∇X⋅(˜χ˜u(ˉu−˜u)∇˜v)+μ˜u(ˉu−˜u),−˜ϵΔX˜v+˜α˜v=˜β˜w+˜γ˜u,˜wτ=κ˜uˉu+˜u˜u(ˉw−˜w). | (1.2) |
Before going to details, let us simplify model (1.2) with the following scaling
u=˜uˉu,v=μˉu˜ϵD˜v,w=˜wˉw,t=μˉuτ,x=√μˉuDX,χ=˜χ˜ϵμ,α=D˜α˜ϵμˉu,β=˜βˉw,γ=˜γˉu,δ=κμ, |
then model (1.2) takes the form
{ut=Δu−∇⋅(χu(1−u)∇v)+u(1−u),x∈Ω,t>0,−Δv+αv=βw+γu,x∈Ω,t>0,wt=δu1+uu(1−w),x∈Ω,t>0,∂ηu=∂ηv=0,x∈∂Ω,t>0,u(x,0)=u0(x),w(x,0)=w0(x),x∈Ω, | (1.3) |
where Ω⊂Rn(n≥1) is a smooth bounded domain, η is the outward normal vector to ∂Ω, ∂η=∂/∂η, δ balances the speed of the front and the intensity of the macrophages in damaging the myelin. The parameters χ,α and δ are positive constants as well as β,γ are nonnegative constants.
If δ=0, then model (1.3) is a parabolic-elliptic chemotaxis system with volume-filling effect and logistic source. In order to be more line with biologically realistic mechanisms, Hillen and Painter [9,10] considered the finite size of individual cells-"volume-filling'' and derived volume-filling models
{ut=∇⋅(Du(q(u)−q′(u)u)∇u−q(u)uχ(v)∇v)+f(u,v),vt=DvΔv+g(u,v). | (1.4) |
q(u) is the probability of the cell finding space at its neighbouring location. It is also called the squeezing probability, which reflects the elastic properties of cells. For the linear choice of q(u)=1−u, global existence of solutions to model (1.4) in any space dimension are investigated in [9]. Wang and Thomas [11] established the global existence of classical solutions and given necessary and sufficient conditions for spatial pattern formation to a generalized volume-filling chemotaxis model. For a chemotaxis system with generalized volume-filling effect and logistic source, the global boundedness and finite time blow-up of solutions are obtained in [12]. Furthermore, the pattern formation of the volume-filling chemotaxis systems with logistic source and both linear diffusion and nonlinear diffusion are shown in [13,14,15] by the weakly nonlinear analysis. For parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel volume-filling chemotaxis model with linear squeezing probability, asymptotic behavior of solutions is studied both in the whole space Rn [16] and on bounded domains [17]. Moreover, the boundedness and singularity formation in parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel volume-filling chemotaxis model with nonlinear squeezing probability are discussed in [18,19].
Very recently, we [20] investigated the uniform boundedness and global asymptotic stability for the following chemotaxis model of multiple sclerosis
{ut=Δu−∇⋅(χ(u)∇v)+u(1−u),χ(u)=χu1+u,x∈Ω,t>0,τvt=Δv−βv+αw+γu,x∈Ω,t>0,wt=δu1+uu(1−w),x∈Ω,t>0, |
subject to the homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions.
In this paper, we are first devoted to studying the local existence and uniform boundedness of the unique classical solution to system (1.3) by using Neumann heat semigroup arguments, Banach fixed point theorem, parabolic Schauder estimate and elliptic regularity theory. Then we discuss that exponential asymptotic stability of the positive equilibrium point to system (1.3) by constructing Lyapunov function.
Although, in the pathological mechanism of BCS, the initial data in model (1.3) satisfy 0<u0(x)≤1,w0(x)=0, we mathematically assume that
{u0(x)∈C0(ˉΩ)with0≤,≢u0(x)≤1inΩ,w0(x)∈C2+ν(ˉΩ)with0<ν<1and0≤w0(x)≤1inΩ. | (1.5) |
It is because the condition (1.5) implies u(x,t0)>0 for any t0>0 by the strong maximum principle.
The following theorems give the main results of this paper.
Theorem 1.1. Assume that the initial data (u0(x),w0(x)) satisfy the condition (1.5). Then model (1.3) possesses a unique global solution (u(x,t),v(x,t),w(x,t)) satisfying
u(x,t)∈C0(ˉΩ×[0,∞))∩C2,1(ˉΩ×(0,∞)),v(x,t)∈C0((0,∞),C2(ˉΩ)),w(x,t)∈C2,1(ˉΩ×[0,∞)), | (1.6) |
and
0<u(x,t)≤1,0≤v(x,t)≤β+γα,w0(x)≤w(x,t)≤1,inˉΩ×(0,∞). |
Moreover, there exist a ν∈(0,1) and M>0 such that
‖u‖C2+ν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,∞))+‖v‖C0([1,∞),C2+ν(ˉΩ))+‖w‖Cν,1+ν/2(ˉΩ×[1,∞))≤M. | (1.7) |
Theorem 1.2. Assume that β≥0,γ≥0,β+γ>0 and
χ<{min | (1.8) |
Let (u, v, w) be a positive classical solution of the problem (1.3), (1.5). Then
\begin{equation} \|u(\cdot, t)-u^{\ast}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}+\|v(\cdot, t)-v^{\ast}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)} +\|w(\cdot, t)-w^{\ast}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\rightarrow 0, \; \; \mathit{\text{as}}\, t\rightarrow \infty. \end{equation} | (1.9) |
Furthermore, there exist positive constants \lambda = \lambda(\chi, \alpha, \gamma, \delta, n) and C = C(|\Omega|, \chi, \alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta) such that
\begin{equation} \|u-u^{\ast}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\leq C e^{-\lambda t}, \, \|v-v^{\ast}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\leq C e^{-\lambda t}, \, \|w-w^{\ast}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)} \leq C e^{-\lambda t}, \; \; t \gt 0, \end{equation} | (1.10) |
where (u^{\ast}, v^{\ast}, w^{\ast}) = (1, \frac{\beta+\gamma}{\alpha}, 1) is the unique positive equilibrium point of the model (1.3).
The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we prove the local existence, the boundedness and global existence of a unique classical solution. In section 3, we firstly establish the uniform convergence of the positive global classical solution, then discuss the exponential asymptotic stability of positive equilibrium point in the case of weak chemotactic sensitivity. The paper ends with a brief concluding remarks.
The aim of this section is to develop the existence and boundedness of a global classical solution by employing Neumann heat semigroup arguments, Banach fixed point theorem, parabolic Schauder estimate and elliptic regularity theory.
Proof of Theorem 1.1 (ⅰ) Existence. For p\in (1, \infty) , let A denote the sectorial operator defined by
Au: = -\Delta u \; \mathrm{for}\; u\in D(A): = \Big\{\varphi\in W^{2, p}(\Omega)\Big|\frac{\partial}{\partial \eta}\varphi\Big|_{\partial\Omega} = 0\Big\}. |
\lambda_{1} > 0 denote the first nonzero eigenvalue of -\Delta in \Omega with zero-flux boundary condition. Let A_{1} = -\Delta+\alpha and X^{l} be the domains of fractional powers operator A^{l}, \; l\geq 0 . From the Theorem 1.6.1 in [21], we know that for any p > n and l\in(\frac{n}{2p}, \frac{1}{2}) ,
\begin{equation} \|z\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\leq C\|A_{1}^{l}z\|_{ L^{p}(\Omega)}\, \, \mathrm{for\; all}\, \, z\in X^{l}. \end{equation} | (2.1) |
We introduce the closed subset
S: = \left\{u\in X\big| \|u\|_{L^{\infty}((0, T);L^{\infty}(\Omega))}\leq R+1\right\} |
in the space X: = C^{0}([0, T];C^{0}(\bar{\Omega})) , where R is a any positive number satisfying
\|u_{0}(x)\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\leq R |
and T > 0 will be specified later. Note F(u) = \frac{u}{1+u} , we consider an auxiliary problem with F(u) replaced by its extension \tilde{F}(u) defined by
\tilde{F}(u) = \begin{cases} F(u)u\; \; &\text{if}\; \; u\geq 0, \\ -F(-u)(-u)\; \; &\text{if}\; \; u \lt 0. \end{cases} |
Notice that \tilde{F}(u) is a smooth globally Lipshitz function. Given \hat{u}\in S , we define \Psi\hat{u} = u by first writing
\begin{equation} w(x, t) = (w_{0}(x)-1)e^{-\delta\int_{0}^{t}\tilde{F} (\hat{u})\hat{u}ds}+1, \; \; x\in\Omega, \; t \gt 0, \end{equation} | (2.2) |
and
w_{0}\leq w(x, t)\leq 1, \; \; x\in\Omega, \; t \gt 0, |
then letting v solve
\begin{equation} \left\{\begin{array}{ll} -\Delta v+\alpha v = \beta w+\gamma \hat{u}, &x\in\Omega, \; t\in(0, T), \\ \partial_{\eta}v = 0, &x\in\partial\Omega, \; t\in(0, T), \\ \end{array} \right. \end{equation} | (2.3) |
and finally taking u to be the solution of the linear parabolic problem
\left\{\begin{array}{ll} u_{t} = \Delta u-\chi \nabla\cdot(\hat{u}(1-\hat{u})\nabla v)+\hat{u}(1-\hat{u}), &x\in\Omega, \; t\in(0, T), \\ \partial_{\eta}u = 0, &x\in\partial\Omega, \; t\in(0, T), \\ u(x, 0) = u_{0}(x), &x\in\Omega.\\ \end{array} \right. |
Applying Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23] for the problem (2.3), there exists a constant C such that
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \|v\|_{W_{p}^{2}(\Omega)}&\leq C(\beta\|w\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}+\gamma\|\hat{u}\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)})\\ &\leq C(\beta|\Omega|^{\frac{1}{p}}+\gamma (R+1)) \end{aligned} \end{equation} | (2.4) |
for all t\in(0, T) . From a variation-of-constants formula, we define
\Psi(\hat{u}) = e^{t\Delta}u_{0}-\chi\int^{t}_{0}e^{(t-s)\Delta}\nabla\cdot\left(\hat{u}(1-\hat{u})\nabla v(s)\right)ds+\int^{t}_{0}e^{(t-s)\Delta}\hat{u}(s)(1-\hat{u}(s))ds. |
First we shall show that for T small enough
\|\Psi(\hat{u})\|_{L^{\infty}((0, T);L^{\infty}(\Omega))}\leq R+1 |
for any \hat{u}\in S . From the maximum principle, we can give
\begin{equation} \|e^{t\Delta}u_{0}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\leq \|u_{0}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}, \end{equation} | (2.5) |
and
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \int^{t}_{0}\|e^{t\Delta}\hat{u}(s)(1-\hat{u}(s))\|_{L^{\infty} (\Omega)}ds \leq& \int^{t}_{0}\|\hat{u}(s)(1-\hat{u}(s))\|_{L^{\infty} (\Omega)}ds\\ \leq&(R+1)(R+2)T \end{aligned} \end{equation} | (2.6) |
for all t\in(0, T) . We use inequalities (2.1) and (2.4) to estimate
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &\chi\int^{t}_{0}\|e^{(t-s)\Delta}\nabla\cdot(\hat{u}(1-\hat{u})\nabla v(s))\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}ds\\ \leq& C\int^{t}_{0}(t-s)^{-l} \|e^{\frac{t-s}{2}\Delta}\nabla\cdot(\hat{u}(1-\hat{u})\nabla v(s))\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds \\ \leq& C\int^{t}_{0}(t-s)^{-l-\frac{1}{2}} \|(\hat{u}(1-\hat{u})\nabla v(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds \\ \leq& C T^{\frac{1}{2}-l}(R+1)(R+2)(\beta|\Omega|^{\frac{1}{p}}+\gamma (R+1)) \end{aligned} \end{equation} | (2.7) |
for all t\in(0, T) . This estimate is attributed to T < 1 and the inequality in [24], Lemma 1.3 iv]
\| e^{t\Delta}\nabla z\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}\leq C_{1}(1+t^{-\frac{1}{2}})e^{-\lambda_{1}t}\| z\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}\; \mathrm{for\; all}\; \; z\in C^{\infty}_{c}(\Omega). |
From inequalities (2.5), (2.6) and (2.7) we can deduce that \Psi maps S into itself for T small enough.
Next we prove that the map \Psi is a contractive on S . For \hat{u}_{1}, \hat{u}_{2}\in S , we estimate
\begin{align*} \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; &\|\Psi(\hat{u}_{1})-\Psi(\hat{u}_{2})\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)} \\ \leq & \chi \int^{t}_{0}(t-s)^{-l-\frac{1}{2}}\|\left[\hat{u}_{2}(s)(1-\hat{u}_{2}(s))-\hat{u}_{1}(s)(1-\hat{u}_{1}(s))\right] \nabla v_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds\\ &+\chi \int^{t}_{0}\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)(1-\hat{u}_{1}(s))(\nabla v_{1}(s)- \nabla v_{2}(s))\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds \\ &+\int^{t}_{0}\|e^{(t-s)\Delta}[\hat{u}_{1}(s)(1-\hat{u}_{1}(s))-\hat{u}_{2}(s)(1-\hat{u}_{2}(s))]\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}ds \\ \leq & \chi \int^{t}_{0}(t-s)^{-l-\frac{1}{2}}(2R+1)\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{X}\|\nabla v_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds\\ &+\chi \int^{t}_{0}(R+1)(R+2)\left(\beta \|w_{1}(s)-w_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}+\gamma \|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}\right)ds \\ & +\int^{t}_{0}(2R+1)\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{X}ds \\ \leq & \chi \int^{t}_{0}(t-s)^{-l-\frac{1}{2}}(2R+1)\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{X}\|\nabla v_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds\\ &+2\beta\delta \chi \int^{t}_{0}(R+1)(R+2)t\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}+\gamma \|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{L^{p}(\Omega)}ds\\ & +\int^{t}_{0}(2R+1)\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{X}ds \\ \leq & \left(C\chi T^{\frac{1}{2}-l}(2R+1)(\beta|\Omega|^{\frac{1}{p}}+\gamma (R+1))+2\beta\delta \chi T(R^{2}+3R+\gamma+2)+T(2R+1)\right)\|\hat{u}_{1}(s)-\hat{u}_{2}(s)\|_{X}. \end{align*} |
Fixing T\in(0, 1) small enough such that
\left(C\chi T^{\frac{1}{2}-l}(2R+1)(\beta|\Omega|^{\frac{1}{p}}+\gamma (R+1))+2\beta\delta \chi T(R^{2}+3R+\gamma+2)+T(2R+1)\right)\leq \frac{1}{2}. |
It follows from the Banach fixed point theorem that there exists a unique fixed point of \Psi .
(ⅱ) Regularity. Since the above of T depends on \|u_{0}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)} and \|w_{0}\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)} only, it is clear that (u, v, w) can be extended up to some maximal T_{\max}\in(0, \infty] . Let Q_{T} = \Omega \times (0, T] for all T\in (0, T_{\max}) . From u\in C^{0}(\bar{Q}_{T}) , we know that w\in C^{0, 1}(\bar{Q}_{T}) by the expression (2.2) and v\in C^{0}([0, T], W_{p}^{2}(\Omega)) by Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23]. From parabolic L^{p} -estimate and the embedding relation W_{p}^{1}(\Omega)\hookrightarrow C^{\nu}(\bar{\Omega}), \; p > n , we can get u\in W^{2, 1}_{p}(Q_{T}) . By applying the following embedding relation
\begin{equation} W^{2, 1}_{p}(Q_{T})\hookrightarrow C^{\nu, \nu/2}(\bar{Q}_{T}), \; p \gt \frac{n+2}{2}, \end{equation} | (2.8) |
we can derive u(x, t)\in C^{\nu, \nu/2}(\bar{Q}_{T}) with 0 < \nu\leq 2-\frac{n+2}{p} . The conclusion w\in C^{\nu, 1+\nu/2}(\bar{Q}_{T}) can be obtained by substituting u\in C^{\nu, \nu/2}(\bar{Q}_{T}) into the formulation (2.2). The regularity u\in C^{2+\nu, 1+\nu/2}(\bar{Q}_{T}) can be deduced by using further bootstrap argument and the parabolic Schauder estimate. Similarly, we can get v\in C^{0}((0, T), C^{2+\nu}(\bar{\Omega})) by using Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23]. From the regularity of u we have w\in C^{2+\nu, 1+\nu/2}(\bar{Q}_{T}) .
Moreover, the maximal principle entails that 0 < u(x, t)\leq 1 , 0\leq v(x, t)\leq\frac{\beta+\gamma}{\alpha} . It follows from the positivity of u that \tilde{F}(u) = F(u) and because of the uniqueness of solution we infer the existence of the solution to the original problem.
(ⅲ) Uniqueness. Suppose (u_{1}, v_{1}, w_{1}) and (u_{2}, v_{2}, w_{2}) are two deferent solutions of model (1.3) in \Omega\times [0, T] . Let U = u_{1}-u_{2} , V = v_{1}-v_{2} , W = w_{1}-w_{2} for t\in (0, T) . Then
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int_{\Omega}U^{2}dx+\int_{\Omega}|\nabla U|^{2}dx\\ \leq& \chi\int_{\Omega}|u_{1}(1-u_{1})-u_{2}(1-u_{2})|\nabla v_{1}||\nabla U|+u_{2}(1-u_{2})|\nabla V||\nabla U| dx\\ &+\int_{\Omega}|u_{1}(1-u_{1})-u_{2}(1-u_{2})||U|dx \\ \leq & \chi\int_{\Omega}|U||\nabla v_{1}||\nabla U|+\frac{1}{4}|\nabla V||\nabla U| dx +\int_{\Omega}|U|^{2}dx \\ \leq &\int_{\Omega}|\nabla U|^{2}dx+\frac{\chi^{2}}{32}\int_{\Omega}|\nabla V|^{2}dx+ \frac{\chi^{2} K^{2}+2}{2}\int_{\Omega}|U|^{2}dx, \end{aligned} \end{equation} | (2.9) |
where we have used that |\nabla v_{1}|\leq K results from \nabla v_{1}\in C^{0}([0, T], C^{0}(\bar{\Omega})).
Similarly, by Young inequality and w_{0}\leq w_{1}\leq 1 , we can estimate
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}|\nabla V|^{2}dx+\frac{\alpha}{2}\int_{\Omega}| V|^{2}dx\leq\frac{\beta^{2}}{\alpha} \int_{\Omega}|W|^{2}dx+\frac{\gamma^{2}}{\alpha} \int_{\Omega}|U|^{2}dx, \end{equation} | (2.10) |
and
\begin{equation} \frac{d}{dt}\int_{\Omega}W^{2}dx\leq \delta\int_{\Omega}|U|^{2}+|W|^{2}dx. \end{equation} | (2.11) |
Finally, adding to the inequalities (2.9)–(2.11) yields
\frac{d}{dt}\left(\int_{\Omega}U^{2}dx+\int_{\Omega}W^{2}dx\right)\leq C\left(\int_{\Omega}U^{2}dx+\int_{\Omega}W^{2}dx\right)\; \mathrm{for\; all}\; t \in (0, T). |
The results U\equiv 0 , W\equiv0 in \Omega\times(0, T) are obtained by Gronwall's lemma. From the inequality (2.10), we have V\equiv 0 . Hence (u_{1}, v_{1}, w_{1}) = (u_{2}, v_{2}, w_{2}) in \Omega\times(0, T) .
(ⅳ) Uniform estimates. We use the Agmon-Douglas-Nirenberg Theorem [22,23] for the second equation of the model (1.3) to get
\begin{equation} \|v\|_{C^{0}([t, t+1], W_{p}^{2}(\Omega))}\leq C\left(\|u\|_{L^{p}(\Omega \times [t, t+1])}+\|w\|_{L^{p}(\Omega \times [t, t+1])}\right) \leq C_{2} \end{equation} | (2.12) |
for all t\geq 1 and C_{2} is independent of t . From the embedded relationship W_{p}^{1}(\Omega)\hookrightarrow C^{0}({\bar{\Omega}}), \; p > n , the parabolic L^{p} -estimate and the estimation (2.12), we have
\|u\|_{W_{p}^{2, 1}(\Omega\times[t, t+1])}\leq C_{3} |
for all t\geq 1 . The estimate \|u\|_{C^{\nu, \frac{\nu}{2}}(\bar{\Omega}\times [t, t+1])}\leq C_{4} for all t\geq 1 obtained by the embedded relationship (2.8). We can immediately compute \|w\|_{C^{\nu, 1+\frac{\nu}{2}}(\bar{\Omega}\times [t, t+1])}\leq C_{5} for all t\geq 1 according to the regularity of u and the specific expression of w . Further, bootstrapping argument leads to \|v\|_{C^{0}([t, t+1], C^{2+\nu}(\bar{\Omega}))}\leq C_{6} and \|u\|_{C^{2+\nu, 1+\frac{\nu}{2}}(\bar{\Omega}\times [t, t+1])}\leq C_{7} for all t\geq 1 . Thus the uniform estimation (1.7) is proved.
Remark 2.1. Assume the initial data 0 < u_{0}(x)\leq 1 and w_{0}(x) = 0 . Then the BCS model (1.3) has a unique classical solution.
In this section we investigate the global asymptotic stability of the unique positive equilibrium point (1, \frac{\beta+\gamma}{\alpha}, 1) to model (1.3). To this end, we first introduce following auxiliary problem
\begin{equation} \left\{\begin{array}{ll} u_{\epsilon t} = \Delta u_{\epsilon}-\nabla\cdot(u_{\epsilon}(1-u_{\epsilon})\nabla v_{\epsilon})+u_{\epsilon}(1-u_{\epsilon}), & x\in\Omega, \; t \gt 0, \\ -\Delta v_{\epsilon}+\alpha v_{\epsilon} = \beta w_{\epsilon}+\gamma u_{\epsilon}, &x\in\Omega, \; t \gt 0, \\ w_{\epsilon t} = \delta\frac{u_{\epsilon}^{2}+\epsilon}{1+u_{\epsilon}} (1-w_{\epsilon}), &x\in\Omega, \; t \gt 0, \\ \partial_{\eta}u_{\epsilon} = \partial_{\eta}v_{\epsilon} = 0, &x\in\partial\Omega, \; t \gt 0, \\ u_{\epsilon}(x, 0) = u_{0}(x), \; w_{\epsilon}(x, 0) = w_{0}(x), &x\in\Omega. \end{array} \right. \end{equation} | (3.1) |
By a similar proof of Theorem 1.1, we get that the problem (3.1) has a unique global classical solution (u_{\epsilon}, v_{\epsilon}, w_{\epsilon}) , and there exist a \nu\in(0, 1) and M_{1} > 0 which is independent of \epsilon such that
\begin{equation} \|u_{\epsilon}\|_{C^{2+\nu, 1+\nu/2}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty))}+\|v_{\epsilon}\|_{C^{2+\nu, 1+\nu/2}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty))} +\|w_{\epsilon}\|_{C^{\nu, 1+\nu/2}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty))}\leq M_{1}. \end{equation} | (3.2) |
Then, motivated by some ideas from [25,26], we construct a Lyapunov function to study the uniform convergence of homogeneous steady state for the problem (3.1).
Let us give following lemma which is used in the proof of Lemma 3.2.
Lemma 3.1. Suppose that a nonnegative function f on (1, \infty) is uniformly continuous and \int_{1}^{\infty}f(t)dt < \; \infty . Then f(t)\rightarrow 0 as t\rightarrow \infty.
Lemma 3.2. Assume that the condition (1.8) is satisfied. Then
\begin{equation} \|u_{\epsilon}(\cdot, t)-1\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}+ \|v_{\epsilon}(\cdot, t)-v^{\ast}\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)} +\|w_{\epsilon}(\cdot, t)-1\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}\rightarrow 0, \; \; t\rightarrow \infty, \end{equation} | (3.3) |
where v^{\ast} = \frac{\beta+\gamma}{\alpha} .
Proof We construct a positive function
E(t): = \int_{\Omega}(u_{\varepsilon}-1-\ln u_{\epsilon}) +\frac{1}{2\delta\epsilon}\int_{\Omega}(w_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}, \; \; t \gt 0. |
From the problem (3.1) and Young's inequality, we can compute
\begin{equation} \frac{d}{dt}E(t)\leq {\frac{\chi^{2}}{4}}\int_{\Omega}|\nabla v_{\epsilon}|^{2}dx-\int_{\Omega}(u_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx-\int_{\Omega}(w_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx, \; \; t \gt 0. \end{equation} | (3.4) |
We multiply the second equations in system (3.1) by v_{\epsilon}-v^{\ast} , integrate by parts over \Omega and use Young's inequality to obtain
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}|\nabla v_{\epsilon}|^{2}dx\leq\frac{\gamma^{2}}{2\alpha}\int_{\Omega}(u_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx +\frac{\beta^{2}}{2\alpha}\int_{\Omega}(w_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx, \; \; t \gt 0, \end{equation} | (3.5) |
and
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}(v_{\epsilon}-v^{\ast})^{2}dx\leq\frac{2\gamma^{2}}{\alpha^{2}}\int_{\Omega}(u_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx+\frac{2 \beta^{2}}{\alpha^{2}}\int_{\Omega}(w_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx, \; \; t \gt 0. \end{equation} | (3.6) |
Substituting inequality (3.5) into inequality (3.4) to get
\begin{equation} \nonumber \frac{d}{dt}E(t)\leq -C_{8}\left(\int_{\Omega}(u_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx+\int_{\Omega}(w_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx\right), \; \; t \gt 0, \end{equation} |
where C_{8} = \min\left\{1-\frac{\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{8\alpha}, 1-\frac{\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}{8\alpha}\right\} > 0.
Let f(t): = \int_{\Omega}(u_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}+(w_{\epsilon}-1)^{2}dx . Then
\int_{1}^{\infty}f(t)dt\leq \frac{E(1)}{C_{8}} \lt \infty, \; \; t \gt 1. |
It follows from the uniform estimation (3.2) and the Arzela-Ascoli theorem that f(t) is uniformly continuous in (1, \infty) . Applying Lemma 3.1, we have
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}(u_{\epsilon}(\cdot, t)-1)^{2}+ (w_{\epsilon}(\cdot, t)-1)^{2}dx\rightarrow 0, \; \; t\rightarrow \infty. \end{equation} | (3.7) |
Combining inequality (3.6) and the limit (3.7) to obtain
\int_{\Omega}(v_{\epsilon}(\cdot, t)-v^{\ast})^{2}dx \rightarrow 0, \; \; t\rightarrow \infty. |
Proof of Theorem 1.2 As we all known, each bounded sequence in C^{2+\nu, 1+\frac{\nu}{2}}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty)) is precompact in C^{2, 1}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty)) . Hence there exists some subsequence \{u_{\epsilon_{n}}\}_{n = 1}^{\infty} satisfying \epsilon_{n}\rightarrow0 as n\rightarrow \infty such that
\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow \infty}\|u_{\epsilon_{n}}-u_{\ast}\|_{C^{2, 1}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty))} = 0. |
Similarly, we can get
\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow \infty}\|v_{\epsilon_{n}}-v_{\ast}\|_{C^{2}(\bar{\Omega})} = 0, |
and
\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow \infty}\|w_{\epsilon_{n}}-w_{\ast}\|_{C^{0, 1}(\bar{\Omega}\times[1, \infty))} = 0. |
Combining above limiting relations yields that (u_{\ast}, v_{\ast}, w_{\ast}) satisfies model (1.3). The conclusion (u_{\ast}, v_{\ast}, w_{\ast}) = (u, v, w) is directly attributed to the uniqueness of the classical solution of the model (1.3). Furthermore, according to the conclusion, the strong convergence (3.3) and Diagonal line method, we can deduce
\begin{equation} \|u(\cdot, t)-1\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}+ \|v(\cdot, t)-v^{\ast}\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)} +\|w(\cdot, t)-1\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}\rightarrow 0, \; \; t\rightarrow \infty. \end{equation} | (3.8) |
By applying Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality
\begin{equation} \|z\|_{L^{\infty}}\leq C\|z\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}^{2/(n+2)}\|z\|_{W^{1, \infty}(\Omega)}^{n/(n+2)}, \; \; z\in W^{1, \infty}(\Omega), \end{equation} | (3.9) |
comparison principle of ODE and the convergence (3.8), the uniform convergence (1.9) is obtained immediately.
Since \lim_{t\rightarrow \infty}\|u(\cdot, t)-1\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)} = 0 , so there exists a t_{1} > 0 such that
\begin{equation} u(x, t)\geq \frac{1}{2}\; \; \mathrm{for\; all}\; \; x\in \Omega, \; \; t \gt t_{1}. \end{equation} | (3.10) |
Using the explicit representation formula of w
w(x, t) = (w_{0}(x)-1)e^{-\delta\int_{0}^{t}F(u)uds}+1, \; \; x\in\Omega, \; t \gt 0 |
and the inequality (3.10), we have
\begin{equation} \|w(\cdot, t)-1\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\leq e^{-\frac{\delta}{6}(t-t_{1})}, \; \; t \gt t_{1}. \end{equation} | (3.11) |
Multiply the first two equations in model (1.3) by u-1 and v-v^{\ast} , respectively, integrate over \Omega and apply Cauchy's inequality, Young's inequality and the inequality (3.10), to find
\begin{equation} \frac{d}{dt}\int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx\leq \frac{\chi^{2}}{32}\int_{\Omega}|\nabla v|^{2}dx-\int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx, \; \; t \gt t_{1}. \end{equation} | (3.12) |
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}|\nabla v|^{2}dx+\frac{\alpha}{2}\int_{\Omega}(v-v^{\ast})^{2}dx\leq \frac{\beta^{2}}{\alpha}\int_{\Omega}(w-1)^{2}dx +\frac{\gamma^{2}}{\alpha}\int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx, \; \; t \gt 0. \end{equation} | (3.13) |
Combining the estimations (3.11)–(3.13) leads us to the estimate
\begin{equation} \nonumber \frac{d}{dt}\int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx\leq \left(\frac{\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}{32\alpha}-1\right)\int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx +\frac{\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{32\alpha}e^{-{\frac{\delta}{3}(t-t_{1})}}, \; \; t \gt t_{1}. \end{equation} |
Let y(t) = \int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx . Then
y'(t)\leq \left(\frac{\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}{32\alpha}-1\right)y(t) +\frac{\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{32\alpha}e^{-{\frac{\delta}{3}(t-t_{1})}}, \; \; t \gt t_{1}. |
From comparison principle of ODE, we get
y(t)\leq \left(y(t_{1})-\frac{3\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{32\alpha(3-\delta)-\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}\right) e^{-\left(1-\frac{\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}{32\alpha}\right)(t-t_{1})} +\frac{3\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{32\alpha(3-\delta)-\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}e^{-\frac{\delta}{3}(t-t_{1})}, \; \; t \gt t_{1}. |
This yields
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}(u-1)^{2}dx\leq C_{9} e^{-\lambda_{2} (t-t_{1})}, \; \; t \gt t_{1}, \end{equation} | (3.14) |
where \lambda_{2} = \min\{1-\frac{\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}{32\alpha}, \frac{\delta}{3}\} and C_{9} = \max\left\{|\Omega|-\frac{3\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{32\alpha(3-\delta)-\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}, \frac{3\chi^{2}\beta^{2}}{32\alpha(3-\delta)-\chi^{2}\gamma^{2}}\right\} .
From the inequalities (3.11), (3.13) and (3.14), we derive
\begin{equation} \int_{\Omega}\left(v-\frac{\beta+\gamma}{\alpha}\right)^{2}dx\leq C_{10}e^{-\lambda_{2}(t-t_{1})}, \; \; t \gt t_{1}, \end{equation} | (3.15) |
where C_{10} = \max\left\{\frac{2\gamma^{2}}{\alpha^{2}}C_{9}, \frac{2\beta^{2}}{\alpha^{2}}\right\} . By employing the uniform estimation (1.7), the inequalities (3.9), (3.14) and (3.15), the exponential decay estimation (1.10) can be obtained.
The proof is complete.
In this paper, we mainly study the uniform boundedness of classical solutions and exponential asymptotic stability of the unique positive equilibrium point to the chemotactic cellular model (1.3) for Baló's concentric sclerosis (BCS). For model (1.1), by numerical simulation, Calveza and Khonsarib in [7] shown that demyelination patterns of concentric rings will occur with increasing of chemotactic sensitivity. By the Theorem 1.1 we know that systems (1.1) and (1.2) are {uniformly} bounded and dissipative. By the Theorem 1.2 we also find that the constant equilibrium point of model (1.1) is exponentially asymptotically stable if
\tilde{\chi} \lt \frac{2}{\bar{w}\tilde{\beta}} \sqrt{\frac{2D\mu\tilde{\alpha}\tilde{\epsilon}}{\bar{u}}}, |
and the constant equilibrium point of the model (1.2) is exponentially asymptotically stable if
\tilde{\chi} \lt 2\sqrt{\frac{2D\mu\tilde{\alpha}\tilde{\epsilon}}{\bar{u}}}\min \left\{\frac{1}{\bar{w}\tilde{\beta}}, \frac{1}{\bar{u}\tilde{\gamma}}\right\}. |
According to a pathological viewpoint of BCS, the above stability results mean that if chemoattractive effect is weak, then the destroyed oligodendrocytes form a homogeneous plaque.
The authors would like to thank the editors and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11761063, 11661051).
We have no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Andre L, Pauss A, Ribeiro T (2018) Solid anaerobic digestion: state-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles. Bioresource Technol 247: 1027–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.003
![]() |
[2] |
Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, et al. (2000) High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J Agr Eng Res 76: 51–60. doi: 10.1006/jaer.2000.0529
![]() |
[3] |
Ge X, Xu F, Li Y (2016) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: recent progress and perspectives. Bioresource Technol 205: 239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.050
![]() |
[4] |
Yang L, Xu F, Ge X, et al. (2015) Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44: 824–834. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.002
![]() |
[5] |
Wei P, Mudde RF, Uijttewaal WSJ, et al. (2019) Characterising the two-phase flow and mixing performance in a gas-mixed anaerobic digester: importance for scaled-up applications. Water Res 149: 86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.077
![]() |
[6] |
Wang H, Tao Y, Temudo M, et al. (2015) An integrated approach for efficient biomethane production from solid bio-wastes in a compact system. Biotechnol Biofuels 8: 62. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0237-8
![]() |
[7] | Marks PJ, Wujcik WJ, Loncar AF (1994) Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 4.0. Available from: https://frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-14.html. |
[8] |
Vamini B, Vianney T, Jo YS (2017) Water for small-scale biogas digesters in Sub-Saharan Africa. GCB Bioenergy 9: 339–357. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12339
![]() |
[9] |
Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G (2013) A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresource Technol 143: 632–641. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030
![]() |
[10] |
Yenigun O, Demirel B (2013) Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem 48: 901–911. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.04.012
![]() |
[11] |
Niu Q, Qiao W, Qiang H, et al. (2013) Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresource Technol 137: 358–367. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.080
![]() |
[12] |
Niu Q, Kubota K, Qiao W, et al. (2015) Effect of ammonia inhibition on microbial community dynamic and process functional resilience in mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure. J Chem Technol Biot 90: 2161–2169. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4527
![]() |
[13] | Salyuk AI, Zhadan SO, Shapovalov EB (2014) Thermophilic methane digestion of chicken manure. Ukrainian Food J 3: 587–594. |
[14] | Salyuk AI, Zhadan SO, Shapovalov EB (2015) Thermophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure in a wide range of substrate moisture contents. J Food Packag Sci Tech Technol 4: 36–40. |
[15] |
Zhang W, Lau A (2007) Reducing ammonia emission from poultry manure composting via struvite formation. J Chem Technol Biot 82: 598–602. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1701
![]() |
[16] |
Krakat N, Demirel B, Anjum R (2017) Methods of ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Sci Technol 76: 1925–1938. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.406
![]() |
[17] | Zhang L, Lee Y, Jahng D (2012) Ammonia stripping for enhanced biomethanization of piggery wastewater. J Hazard Mater 199: 36–42. |
[18] |
Surmeli RO, Bayrakdar A, Calli B (2017) Removal and recovery of ammonia from chicken manure. Water Sci Technol 75: 2811–2817. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.116
![]() |
[19] |
Markou G (2015) Improved anaerobic digestion performance and biogas production from poultry litter after lowering its nitrogen content. Bioresource Technol 196: 726–730. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.067
![]() |
[20] |
Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, et al. (2010) Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle. Bioresource Technol 101: 6368–6373. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.071
![]() |
[21] |
Laureni M, Palatsi J, Llovera M, et al. (2013) Influence of pig slurry characteristics on ammonia stripping efficiencies and quality of the recovered ammonium-sulfate solution. J Chem Technol Biot 88: 1654–1662. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4016
![]() |
[22] |
Alshameri A, He H, Zhu J, et al. (2018) Adsorption of ammonium by different natural clay minerals: characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms. Appl Clay Sci 159: 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007
![]() |
[23] |
Zhu R, Chen Q, Zhou Q, et al. (2016) Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. Appl Clay Sci 123: 239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.024
![]() |
[24] |
Borisover M, Davis JA (2015) Adsorption of inorganic and organic solutes by clay minerals, In: Tournassat C, Steefel C, Bourg I, et al., Natural and Engineered Clay Barriers, Elsevier 6: 33–70. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100027-4.00002-4
![]() |
[25] |
Khosravi A, Esmhosseini M, Khezri S (2014) Removal of ammonium ion from aqueous solutions using natural zeolite: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Res Chem Intermediat 40: 2905–2917. doi: 10.1007/s11164-013-1137-9
![]() |
[26] |
Rožić M, Cerjan-Stefanovic S, Kurajica S, et al. (2000) Ammonical nitrogen removal from water by treatment with clays and zeolites. Water Res 34: 3675–3681. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00113-5
![]() |
[27] | Ma JY, Pan JT, Gao TL, et al. (2016) Enhanced anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by bentonite addition. Res Environ Sci 29: 442–448. |
[28] |
Chen H, Awasthi MK, Liu T, et al. (2018) Influence of clay as additive on greenhouse gases emission and maturity evaluation during chicken manure composting. Bioresource Technol 266: 82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.073
![]() |
[29] |
Ivanov V, Stabnikov V, Guo CH, et al. (2014) Wastewater engineering applications of BioIronTech process based on the biogeochemical cycle of iron bioreduction and (bio)oxidation. AIMS Environ J 1: 53–66. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2014.2.53
![]() |
[30] |
Ivanov V, Stabnikov V, Tay JH (2018) Removal of the recalcitrant artificial sweetener sucralose and its by-products from industrial wastewater using microbial reduction/oxidation of iron. ChemEngineering 2: 37. doi: 10.3390/chemengineering2030037
![]() |
[31] |
Stabnikov VP, Tay STL, Tay JH, et al. (2004) Effect of iron hydroxide on phosphate removal during anaerobic digestion of activated sludge. Appl Biochem Micro 40: 376–380. doi: 10.1023/B:ABIM.0000033914.52026.e5
![]() |
[32] |
Binner I, Dultz S, Schellhorn M, et al. (2017) Potassium adsorption and release properties of clays in peat-based horticultural substrates for increasing the cultivation safety of plants. Appl Clay Sci 145: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.013
![]() |
[33] | Visser A, Nozhevnikova AN, Lettinga G (1993) Sulphide inhibition of methanogenic activity at various pH levels at 55 ℃. J Chem Technol Biot 57: 9–14. |
[34] |
Koster IW, Rinzema A, De Vegt AL, et al. (1986) Sulfide inhibition of the methanogenic activity of granular sludge at various pH levels. Water Res 20: 1561–1567. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90121-1
![]() |
[35] | Muhlbauer RV, Swestka RJ, Burns RT, et al. (2008) Development and testing of a hydrogen sulfide detection system for use in swine housing. ASABE 6: 084203. |
[36] | Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2005) Available from: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hydrogensulfide/hazards.html. |
[37] | Yuzir A, Yaacob SS, Tijani H, et al. (2017) Addition of ferric chloride in anaerobic digesters to enhance sulphide removal and methanogenesis. Desalin Water Treat 79: 64–72. |
[38] | Stabnikov VP, Ivanov VN (2006) The effect of various iron hydroxide concentrations on the anaerobic fermentation of sulfate-containing model wastewater. Appl Biochem Micro 42: 284–288. |
[39] |
Stabnikov V, Ivanov V (2017) Biotechnological production of biogrout from iron ore and cellulose. J Chem Technol Biot 92: 180–187. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4989
![]() |
[40] | Stucki JW (2006) Properties and behaviour of iron in clay minerals, In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G, Developments in Clay Science, Elsevier Science Ltd 1: 423–475. |
[41] | Markos N (2003) Bentonite-iron interactions in natural occurrences and in laboratory-the effects of the interactions on the properties of bentonite: a literature survey. Working report 2003-55, Posiva Oy. |
[42] |
Mueller B (2015) Experimental interactions between clay minerals and bacteria: a review. Pedosphere 25: 799–810. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30061-8
![]() |
[43] |
Kostka JE, Dalton DD, Skelton H, et al. (2002) Growth of iron (Ⅲ)-reducing bacteria on clay minerals as the sole electron acceptor and comparison of growth yields on a variety of oxidized iron forms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 6256–6262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6256-6262.2002
![]() |
[44] | Ahmed Z, Ivanov V, Hyun SH, et al. (2001) Effect of divalent iron on methanogenic fermentation of fat-containing wastewater. Environ Engrg Res 6:139–146. |
[45] |
Li Z, Wrenn BA, Venosa AD (2006) Effects of ferric hydroxide on methanogenesis from lipids and long-chain fatty acids in anaerobic digestion. Water Environ Res 78: 522–530. doi: 10.2175/106143005X73064
![]() |
[46] |
Ivanov V, Stabnikova EV, Stabnikov VP, et al. (2002) Effects of iron compounds on the treatment of fat-containing wastewaters. Appl Biochem Micro 38: 255–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1015475425566
![]() |
[47] |
Bampalioutas K, Vlysidis A, Lyberatos G, et al. (2019) Detoxification and methane production kinetics from three-phase olive mill wastewater using Fenton's reagent followed by anaerobic digestion. J Chem Technol Biot 94: 265–275. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5772
![]() |
[48] |
Baek G, Kim J, Shin SG, et al. (2016) Bioaugmentation of anaerobic sludge digestion with iron-reducing bacteria: process and microbial responses to variations in hydraulic retention time. Appl Microbiol Biot 100: 927–937. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7018-y
![]() |
[49] |
Park CM, Novak JT (2013) The effect of direct addition of iron(Ⅲ) on anaerobic digestion efficiency and odor causing compounds. Water Sci Technol 68: 2391–2396. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.507
![]() |
[50] |
Yue ZB, Ma D, Wang J, et al. (2015) Goethite promoted anaerobic digestion of algal biomass in continuous stirring-tank reactors. Fuel 159: 883–886. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.059
![]() |
[51] | Capson-Tojo G, Girard C, Rouez M, et al. (2018) Addition of biochar and trace elements in the form of industrial FeCl3 to stabilize anaerobic digestion of food waste: dosage optimization and long-term study. J Chem Technol Biot 94: 505–515. |
[52] |
García-Balboa C, Cautivo D, Blázque, ML, et al. (2010) Successive ferric and sulphate reduction using dissimilatory bacterial cultures. Water Air Soil Poll 207: 213–226. doi: 10.1007/s11270-009-0130-9
![]() |
[53] |
Wang MW, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2018) Sustainable strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: driving dissimilatory iron reduction with Fenton sludge. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6: 2220–2230. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03637
![]() |
[54] |
Flores-Alsina X, Solon K, Mbamba CK, et al. (2016) Modelling phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions for dynamic simulations of anaerobic digestion processes. Water Res 95: 370–382. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.012
![]() |
[55] |
Yap SD, Astals S, Lu Y, et al. (2018) Humic acid inhibition of hydrolysis and methanogenesis with different anaerobic inocula. Waste Manage 80: 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.001
![]() |
[56] |
Khadem AF, Azman S, Plugge CM, et al. (2017) Effect of humic acids on the activity of pure and mixed methanogenic cultures. Biomass Bioenerg 99: 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.012
![]() |
[57] |
Stepanov N, Senko O, Perminova I, et al. (2019) A new approach to assess the effect of various humic compounds on the metabolic activity of cells participating in methanogenesis. Sustainability 11: 3158. doi: 10.3390/su11113158
![]() |
[58] |
Greenland DJ (1971) Interactions between humic and fulvic acids and clays. Soil Sci 111: 34–41. doi: 10.1097/00010694-197101000-00004
![]() |
[59] | Boguta P, D'Orazio V, Senesi N, et al. (2019) Insight into the interaction mechanism of iron ions with soil humic acids. The effect of the pH and chemical properties of humic acids. J Environ Manage 245: 367–374. |
[60] | Tay JH, Tay STL, Ivanov V, et al. (2008) Compositions and methods for the treatment of wastewater and other waste. US Patent 7393452. |
1. | Lu Xu, Chunlai Mu, Qiao Xin, Global boundedness and asymptotic behavior of solutions for a quasilinear chemotaxis model of multiple sclerosis with nonlinear signal secretion, 2023, 28, 1531-3492, 1215, 10.3934/dcdsb.2022118 |