Review Topical Sections

Phase relations of NASICON materials and compilation of the quaternary phase diagram Na2O-P2O5-SiO2-ZrO2

  • Received: 19 October 2017 Accepted: 28 November 2017 Published: 08 December 2017
  • A short overview is given on existing phase relations in the four related ternary diagrams, setting the frame for a quaternary phase diagram. On the basis of published data the three-dimensional phase region of NASICON materials is constructed and phase relations to ternary and binary systems as well as to single oxides are presented. To date, the NASICON region can be described as a compressed tetrahedron within the tetrahedral phase diagram. However, the three-dimensional presentation clearly elucidates that few reported compositions exist outside this compressed tetrahedron indicating that the phase region of NASICON materials may be larger than the solid solutions known so far. The three-dimensional representation also better elucidates the regions connecting the edges of the NASICON tetrahedron with ternary and binary compounds as well as single oxides, i.e., ZrO2 and ZrSiO4, Na3PO4, sodium silicates and sodium zirconium silicates and gives a better understanding of phase formations during the processing of the ceramics. The implications of the formation of secondary phases and glass-ceramic composites are discussed in terms of technological applications.

    Citation: Frank Tietz. Phase relations of NASICON materials and compilation of the quaternary phase diagram Na2O-P2O5-SiO2-ZrO2[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(6): 1305-1318. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.6.1305

    Related Papers:

    [1] Oluwafolajimi Adesanya, Tolulope Oduselu, Oluwawapelumi Akin-Ajani, Olubusuyi M. Adewumi, Olusegun G. Ademowo . An exegesis of bacteriophage therapy: An emerging player in the fight against anti-microbial resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 204-230. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020014
    [2] Ashrafus Safa, Jinath Sultana Jime, Farishta Shahel . Cholera toxin phage: structural and functional diversity between Vibrio cholerae biotypes. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(2): 144-151. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020009
    [3] Abdullahi Yusuf Muhammad, Malik Amonov, Chandrika Murugaiah, Atif Amin Baig, Marina Yusoff . Intestinal colonization against Vibrio cholerae: host and microbial resistance mechanisms. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 346-374. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023019
    [4] Rochelle Keet, Diane Rip . Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Western Cape, South Africa exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics and contradicts certain global resistance patterns. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(1): 40-58. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021004
    [5] Ogueri Nwaiwu, Chiugo Claret Aduba . An in silico analysis of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in Aeromonas plasmids. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 75-91. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020005
    [6] Chioma Lilian Ozoaduche, Katalin Posta, Balázs Libisch, Ferenc Olasz . Acquired antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas spp., Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter spp. in the Western Balkans and Hungary with a One Health outlook. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 436-461. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025020
    [7] Philip Serwer . Restoring logic and data to phage-cures for infectious disease. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 706-712. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.706
    [8] Rosette Mansour, Mohammad H. El-Dakdouki, Sara Mina . Phylogenetic group distribution and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolates in aquatic environments of a highly populated area. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(2): 340-362. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024018
    [9] Neda Askari, Hassan Momtaz, Elahe Tajbakhsh . Acinetobacter baumannii in sheep, goat, and camel raw meat: virulence and antibiotic resistance pattern. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 272-284. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.272
    [10] Mohammad Abu-Sini, Mohammad A. Al-Kafaween, Rania M. Al-Groom, Abu Bakar Mohd Hilmi . Comparative in vitro activity of various antibiotic against planktonic and biofilm and the gene expression profile in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 313-331. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023017
  • A short overview is given on existing phase relations in the four related ternary diagrams, setting the frame for a quaternary phase diagram. On the basis of published data the three-dimensional phase region of NASICON materials is constructed and phase relations to ternary and binary systems as well as to single oxides are presented. To date, the NASICON region can be described as a compressed tetrahedron within the tetrahedral phase diagram. However, the three-dimensional presentation clearly elucidates that few reported compositions exist outside this compressed tetrahedron indicating that the phase region of NASICON materials may be larger than the solid solutions known so far. The three-dimensional representation also better elucidates the regions connecting the edges of the NASICON tetrahedron with ternary and binary compounds as well as single oxides, i.e., ZrO2 and ZrSiO4, Na3PO4, sodium silicates and sodium zirconium silicates and gives a better understanding of phase formations during the processing of the ceramics. The implications of the formation of secondary phases and glass-ceramic composites are discussed in terms of technological applications.


    V. cholera is a gram-negative, facultative, motile anaerobe that secrets a diarrhoeagenic protein called cholera toxin [1]. The organism has over 200 serogroups, but only the O1 and O139 serogroups have been linked to the diarrheal disease commonly known as cholera [2]. In third world countries, the organism typically transmits by drinking contaminated surface water [3], whereas, in developed countries, transmissions are associated with raw or undercooked shellfish consumption [4]. Cholera is a frequent occurrence in Bangladesh, with seasonal outbreaks occurring annually [5]. Since V. cholera is predominantly an aquatic organism, the propagation and epidemiology of these outbreaks are highly influenced by contaminated water sources and flooding. In most rural areas of Bangladesh, access to potable clean drinking water is minimal, especially during annual flooding. A vast majority of the population still drinks untreated surface water in rural areas of the country and most of these annual outbreak buds in those populations.

    Furthermore, underground water sources like tube wells are often submerged and contaminated by flood water during annual flooding. Thus, it is crucial to perform a comparative study of V. cholera contamination among different surface and underground water sources as a part of consistent surveillance operation. Besides, annual cholera outbreaks are often treated with the same group of antibiotics, resulting in a high antibiotic resistance in V. cholera strains against commonly used antibiotics. A yearly evaluation of the antibiotic resistance profile of field strains is necessary for the effective therapeutic use of available antibiotics. Therefore, this research aimed at quantifying V. spp. in different water sources of Bangladesh and evaluating the antibiotic resistance profile of V. cholera to estimate and mitigate the risk of the annual cholera outbreak.

    A total of 45 environmental water samples were aseptically collected from pond, river and tube-well of different designated areas of Gazipur district, Bangladesh (Benupur, Chandabaha, Kaliakoir, Sutrapur and Begunbari). Following collection 4 samples are then serially diluted in alkaline peptone water and streak on selective media of Thiosulfate Citrate Bile Salts Sucrose (TCBS) agar, (Hi media, India) and incubated 37 °C for 24 hours. Following incubation, colonies with shiny yellow color and smooth, convex, and slightly flattened texture with opaque centers (Figure 1A, 1B) were used in viable count of V. spp. [6]. For bacteria isolation 1 mL of buffer peptone solution (1:10 dilution) was enriched in nutrient broth at 37 °C for 16 hours and then transferred in selective media (TCBS agar plate) for incubation (37 °C for 24 hours). Then one colony was randomly selected from each plate for biochemical analysis and hemolysis test (Figure 1C, 1D).

    Table 1.  Concentration (µg /disc) of antibiotic disc used for antimicrobial resistance test.
    Antibiotics Symbol Disc concentration (µg /disc)
    Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 5
    Gentamycin (GEN) 10
    Penicillin (P) 10
    Vancomycin (VA) 30
    Cephalexin (CN) 30
    Chloramphenicol (C) 30
    Tetracycline (TE) 30
    Erythromycin (E) 15
    Sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 25
    Nalidixic Acid (NA) 30
    Azithromycin (AZ) 15

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    V. spp. isolated in selective media were confirmed as V. cholera by different biochemical tests Catalase, Oxidase, MR, VP, Indole, glucose, maltose, mannitol and sucrose fermentation) according to the methodology described in [7].

    Table 2.  Bacterial concentration in different sources collected from 5 different locations.
    Sample type Bacterial conc. (Log CFU/mL)
    10−3 DF1 10−4 DF1 10−5 DF1
    River 4.96A 5.89A 6.79a
    Pond 4.98A 5.92A 6.80a
    Tube well 4.86B 5.73B 6.06b
    SEM2 0.028 0.035 0.500
    P value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Antibiotic sensitivity test was performed according to Kriby-Bauer disc diffusion method [9] and following the guideline of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [8]. A total of 11 commercially available antibiotics were used (Table 1) in this research to assess drug susceptibility and resistance of isolated species (Mast diagnostics Mersey side, UK). A single colony of pure culture isolated from the samples was incubated in nutrient broth at 37 °C for 16 hours. Then 0.1 ml of broth was spread on Mueller-Hinton agar plate using a cell spreader and an antibiotic disc was placed on top. The plates were then incubated in 37 °C for 24 hours. After incubation, the zone of inhibition near the discs was measured using a millimeter scale and categorized as resistant or sensitive according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Table 1).

    Table 3.  V. spp. concentration in water samples of 5 different location (Benupur, Chandabadha, Kaliakoir, Sutrapur and Begunbari).
    Sample type DF1 Bacterial concentration in each location (Log CFU/mL)
    Benupur Chandabaha Kaliakoir Sutrapur Begunbari
    River Burigonga 10−3 4.95 5.00 4.93 4.99 4.94
    10−4 5.88 5.93 5.87 5.90 5.88
    10−5 6.79 6.80 6.81 6.81 6.79
    Pond 10−3 4.94 4.99 5.00 4.99 5.00
    10−4 5.90 5.89 5.93 5.90 5.87
    10−5 6.80 6.79 6.80 6.77 6.72
    Tube-well 10−3 4.91 4.86 4.86 4.83 5.00
    10−4 5.81 5.76 5.71 5.68 5.89
    10−5 6.62 6.52 6.46 6.57 7.00

    Average 5.84 5.83 5.82 5.83 5.90
    SEM2 0.261 0.257 0.261 0.259 0.247

    P-value 0.996

    *Note: CFU= colony forming unite, 1DF = Dilution factor, 2SEM= Standard error of mean

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    A total of 5 replicate samples were randomly collected from each of the 5 different locations (Benupur, Chandabaha, Kaliakoir, Sutrapur, Begunbari) of each 3 water sources (river, pond and tube-well). Bacterial concentration in samples were log transformed and subjected to Shapiro-Wilk test for normality analysis. Bartlett's Test was performed to ensure the homogeneity of variance among the collected samples. The bacterial concentration in different water sources and at different locations were analyzed with one-way ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS software (version 9.2) under the following model. Yij = µ + Ti + δL + ϵij. Where, Yij = Bacterial concentration in each sample; µ = Overall mean bacterial concentration; Ti = Effect of water source; δL = Blocking effect of location and ϵij = random error. We assumed that the variation within the model, caused by from sampling location are normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a variance of σL2. Random error ϵij of the model is also normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a variance of σ2. Both variances σL2 and σ2 are independent of each other. For data analysis, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and when a significant difference is detected, the were subjected to the least significant difference test (LSD) for mean separation.

    Figure 1.  V. spp. on Nutrient's Agar (A), TCBS Agar left the yellow colony and green colony right (B), blood agar hemolytic colony (C), and non-hemolytic colony on blood agar (D).
    Figure 2.  Biochemical test results. Indole test (A), Methyl red test (B), Voges-Proskauer test (C), Simmons citrate test (D), KIA test (E), and MIU test (F).
    Table 4.  Biochemical tests result of 12 isolated strains of V. cholera.
    Tests Results
    R1 R3 R5 R6 R7 P1 P3 P5 P6 T3 T4 T7
    Nit + + + + + + + + + + + +
    Ox + + + + + + - + + + - +
    Ind + + + + - + + + + + + +
    Ci + + + + + + + + + + + +
    MR - - - + - - - + - - - -
    VP + + + + + + + + + + + +
    MIU + + + + + + + - + + + +
    Urease - - - - - - + - - - - -
    KIA Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= - Yb, Ys, G= -H2S= -
    Glucose + + + - + + - + + + - +
    Maltose + + + + + + + + + - + +
    Mannitol + + + + + + + + + + + +
    Sucrose + + + + - + + + + + + +
    Gelatin hydrolysis + + + + + + - + + + + +

    *Note: Legends: SL No.: Serial Number, Nit: Nitrate utilization test, Ox: Oxidase test, In: Indole test, Ci: Citrate test, MR: Methyl Red test, VP: Voges-Proskauer test, MIU: Motility indole urease, KIA: Kinglar iron agar +: positive, -: Negative, Y: Yellow, B: Butt, S: Slant, G: Gas.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Viable counts were performed on TCBS agar plate which selects V. spp. based on their sucrose fermentation characteristics and the result is presented in Table 2. There was significantly higher V. spp. in pond and river water than tube-well water (P < 0.001) at all 3 dilution levels (dilution factor: 103, 104 and 105). Bacterial concentration did not vary significantly based on the location of sample collection (P > 0.05) (Table 3).

    Table 5.  Comparative prevalence of V. cholera among the V. spp. isolated from different water sources.
    Bacterial isolate River water Pond water Tube well water Total isolates Percentage (%)
    V. cholera 5 (41.67%) 4 (40%) 3(37.5%) 12 40
    V. parahimulyticus 7 (58.33%) 6 (60%) 5 (62.5%) 18 60
    Total isolates 12 10 8 30

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Total of 14 biochemical tests were performed on isolates of different samples and the result of those tests are presented in Table 4. Out of the 30 isolates, 12 isolates were positive in nitrate, oxidase, indole, citrate utilization, MR, motility, glucose, sucrose, mannitol, maltose, and gelatin hydrolysis agar test (Figure 2A, 2F). V. spp. were also found to be negative in MR, urease, and kingler iron agar test. Hemolytic characteristics of the isolates were also evaluated to differentiate between V. cholera and V. parahaemolyticus (Figure 1C, 1D). V. cholera are known to cause β-hemolysis whereas V. parahaemolyticus causes α-hemolysis. Based on this characteristic 12 of the initial isolates were classified as V. cholera and remaining 18 was classified as V. parahaemolyticus.

    The comparative prevalence of V. cholera among the V. spp. isolated from different water sources are presented in Table 5. River water had the highest prevalence of V. cholera (5 out of 12 isolates; 41.67%) whereas, tube-well water had the lowest prevalence (3 out of 8; 37.5%).

    Table 6.  Outcome of antibiotic sensitivity test of 12 V. cholera isolates obtained from different water samples.
    Isolate GEN CIP CN VA P C TE E NA AZ SXT
    R1 S S S R R S S I I S S
    R3 S S S R R S S R R S S
    R5 S S S I R S I R R S S
    R6 S S S R R S I I R R S
    R7 S S S R R R R R R S S
    P1 S S S R R S R R R S S
    P3 S S S R R S R R R S M
    P5 S S S R R I I R R S S
    P6 S S I I I S I R R R S
    T3 S S I R R S S I R S S
    T4 S S R R R S S I R S S
    T7 S S R I R S I R R S S

    *Note: GEN: Gentamycin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, CN: Cephalexin, VA: Vancomycin, P: Penicillin, C: Chloramphenicol, TE: Tetracycline, E: Erythromycin, NA: Nalidixic Acid, AZ: Azithromycin, SXT: Sulfamethoxazole, R: River, P; Pond; T; Tap, s: Sensitive and r: Resistance. R1, R3, R5, R6, R7 are the V. cholera isolates collected from rivers, P1, P3, P5 and P6 are the V. cholera isolates collected from pond, T3, T4 and T7 are the V. cholera isolates collected from tube-well.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The results of antibiotic sensitivity test performed on 12 V. cholera isolates are presented in Table 6. The antibiotic sensitivity profiles of those isolates have been compiled in Table 7. All 12 isolates showed 100% sensitivity toward Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. All the isolates showed multidrug resistance (Table 6). However, these isolates were susceptible to Chloramphenicol (91.67%), and Sulfamethoxazole (91.67%). Azithromycin (66.67%). Tetracycline (33.33%), and Cephalexin (16.67%) had moderate to low sensitivity. All 12 isolates showed 100% resistance toward Penicillin, Vancomycin, Erythromycin, and Nalidixic Acid. This result is congruent with the study of [10] performed in neighboring country Nepal, where they found their isolates sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Ampicillin, and resistant to Nalidixic acid. However, unlike this study, their isolates also showed higher sensitivity toward Erythromycin and Tetracycline. The majority of resistance in environmental species are thought to have originated from historically resistant organisms. As a result, it's essential to keep track of both the frequency and the antimicrobial resistance profile of V. cholera to identify the high-risk water sources. To minimize the risk of cholera transmission through contaminated water, we recommend screening various water sources against this pathogenic bacteria before using it for washing, drinking and irrigation. Vulnerable populations, especially farmers in rural areas, should take appropriate precautions to avoid cholera transmission through water [11]. There were some limitations to our research. Due to the funding constrain, a limited number of samples were collected, which might not be sufficient to draw a precise conclusion. Our analysis still lacks molecular characterization of the isolates, which might have strengthened our conclusion.

    Table 7.  Antibiotic sensitivity profile of 12 isolates V. spp. obtained from different water samples.
    Organism Antibiotics Susceptibility (%) Resistance (%)
    V. cholera Gentamycin (GEN) 12(100%) 0(0%)
    Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 12(100%) 0(0%)
    Cephalexin (CN) 2(16.67%) 10(83.33%)
    Vancomycin (VA) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Penicillin (P) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Chloramphenicol (C) 11(91.67%) 1(8.33%)
    Tetracycline (TE) 4(33.33%) 8(66.67%)
    Erythromycin (E) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Sulfamethoxazole (SXT) 11(91.67%) 1(8.33%)
    Nalidixic Acid (NA) 0(0%) 12(100%)
    Azithromycin (AZ) 8(66.67%) 4(33.33%)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Based on the data of our experiment we conclude that V. cholera is endemic to the surface water sources like pond and river in Gazipur region of Bangladesh. Underground water like tube well has comparatively lower concentration of V. cholera Antibiotics like, Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, Chloramphenicol, Sulfamethoxazole and Azithromycin are highly effective against the V. cholera isolates collected in this study. We suggest the application of these antibiotics in therapeutics of annual cholera outbreak. Furthermore, we highly recommend prioritizing underground water over surface water as drinking water source.

    [1] Larcher D, Tarascon JM (2015) Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat Chem 7: 19–29.
    [2] Doughty DH, Butler PC, Akhil AA, et al. (2010) Batteries for Large-Scale Stationary Electrical Energy Storage. Electrochem Soc Interface 19: 49–53.
    [3] Benato R, Cosciani N, Crugnola G, et al. (2015) Sodium nickel chloride battery technology for large-scale stationary storage in the high voltage network. J Power Sources 293: 127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.037
    [4] Lu X, Xia G, Lemmon JP, et al. (2010) Advanced materials for sodium-beta alumina batteries: Status, challenges and perspectives. J Power Sources 195: 2431–2442. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.120
    [5] Hong HYP (1976) Crystal Structure and Crystal Chemistry in the System Na1+xZr2SixP3−xO12. Mater Res Bull 11: 173–182. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(76)90073-8
    [6] Goodenough JB, Hong HYP, Kafalas JA (1976) Fast Na+-Ion Transport in Skeleton Structures. Mater Res Bull 11: 203–220. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-5
    [7] Kim J, Jo SH, Bhavaraju S, et al. (2015) Low temperature performance of sodium–nickel chloride batteries with NaSICON solid electrolyte. J Electroanal Chem 759: 201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.11.022
    [8] May GJ, Hooper A (1978) The effect of microstructure and phase composition on the ionic conductivity of magnesium-doped sodium-beta-alumina. J Mater Sci 13: 1480–1486. doi: 10.1007/BF00553202
    [9] Clearfield A, Guerra R, Oskarsson A, et al. (1983) Preparation of Sodium Zirconium Phosphates of the Type Na1+4xZr2−x(PO4)3. Mater Res Bull 18: 1561–1567. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(83)90198-8
    [10] von Alpen U, Bell MF, Höfer HH (1981) Compositional Dependence of the Electrochemical and Structural Parameters in the NASICON System (Na1+xSixZr2P3−xO12). Solid State Ionics 3–4: 215–218.
    [11] Boilot JP, Salanié JP, Desplanches G, et al. (1979) Phase Transformation in Na1+xSixZr2P3–xO12 Compounds. Mater Res Bull 14: 1469–1477. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(79)90091-6
    [12] Kohler H, Schultz H, Melnikov O (1983) Composition and Conduction Mechanism of the NASICON Structure-X-Ray Diffraction Study on two Crystals at Different Temperatures. Mater Res Bull 18: 1143–1152. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(83)90158-7
    [13] Tsai CL, Hong HYP (1983) Investigation of phases and stability of solid electrolytes in the NASICON system. Mater Res Bull 18: 1399–1407. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(83)90048-X
    [14] Clearfield A, Subramanian MA, Wang W, et al. (1983) The Use of Hydrothermal Procedures to Synthesize NASICON and Some Comments on the Stoichiometry of NASICON Phases. Solid State Ionics 9–10: 895–902.
    [15] Kohler H, Schultz H (1985) NASICON Solid Electrolytes Part I: The Na+-Diffusion Path and Its Relation to the Structure. Mater Res Bull 20: 1461–1471. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(85)90164-3
    [16] Boilot JP, Collin G, Comes R (1983) Zirconium Deficiency in NASICON-Type Compounds: Crystal Structure of Na5Zr(PO4)3. J Solid State Chem 50: 91–99. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(83)90236-0
    [17] Boilot JP, Collin G, Comes R (1983) Stoichiometry and phase transitions in NASICON type compounds. Solid State Ionics 9–10: 829–834.
    [18] Boilot JP, Collin G, Colomban Ph (1987) Crystal Structure of the True NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12. Mater Res Bull 22: 669–676. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(87)90116-4
    [19] Boilot JP, Colomban Ph, Collin G (1988) Stoichiometry-Structure-Fast Ion Conduction in the NASICON Solid Solution. Solid State Ionics 28–30: 403–410.
    [20] Lucco-Borlera M, Mazza D, Montanaro L, et al. (1997) X-ray characterization of the new NASICON compositions Na3Zr2−x/4Si2−xP1+xO12 with x = 0.333, 0.667, 1.000, 1.333, 1.667. Powder Diffr 12: 171–174.
    [21] Bohnke O, Ronchetti S, Mazza D (1999) Conductivity measurements on NASICON and nasicon-modified materials. Solid State Ionics 122: 127–136. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00062-4
    [22] Naqash S, Ma Q, Tietz F, et al. (2017) Na3Zr2(SiO4)2(PO4) prepared by a solution-assisted solid state reaction. Solid State Ionics 302: 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.11.004
    [23] Engell J, Mortensen S, Møller L (1983) Fabrication of NASICON Electrolytes from Metal Alkoxide Derived Gels. Solid State Ionics 9–10: 877–884.
    [24] Warhus U (1986) Synthese und Stabilität des NASICON Mischkristallsystems (Na1+xZr2SixP3−xO12, 0 ≤ x ≤ 3) [PhD thesis]. University of Stuttgart.
    [25] Kreuer KD, Kohler H, Maier J (1989) Sodium Ion Conductors with NASICON Framework Structure, In: Takahashi T, High Conductivity Ionic Conductors: Recent Trends and Application, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 242–279.
    [26] Warhus U, Maier J, Rabenau A (1988) Thermodynamics of NASICON (Na1+xZr2SixP3−xO12). J Solid State Chem 72: 113–125. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(88)90014-X
    [27] Mason TO, Hummel FA (1974) Compatibility Relations in the System SiO2-ZrO2-P2O5. J Am Ceram Soc 57: 538–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb10808.x
    [28] Turkdogan ET, Maddocks WR (1952) Phase Equilibrium Investigation of the Na2O-SiO2-P2O5 Ternary System. J Iron Steel Inst 172: 1–15.
    [29] Milne SJ, West AR (1983) Compound formation and conductivity in the system Na2O-ZrO2-P2O5: Sodium zirconium orthophosphates. Solid State Ionics 9–10: 865–868.
    [30] Milne SJ, West AR (1985) Zr-Doped Na3PO4: Crystal Chemistry, Phase Relations, and Polymorphism. J Solid State Chem 57: 166–177. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4596(85)80006-2
    [31] Vlna M, Petrosyan Y, Kovar V, et al. (1993) Phase Coexistence in the System Na2O-P2O5-ZrO2. Chem Pap 47: 296–297.
    [32] D'Ans J, Löffler J (1930) Untersuchungen im System Na2O-SiO2-ZrO2. Z Anorg Allg Chem 191: 1–35. doi: 10.1002/zaac.19301910102
    [33] Polezhaev YM, Chukhlantsev VG (1965) Triangulation of the System Na2O-ZrO2-SiO2. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Neorg Mater 1: 1990–1993; Inorg Mater (Engl Transl) 1: 1797–1800.
    [34] Sircar A, Brett NH (1970) Phase Equilibria in Ternary Systems Containing Zirconia and Silica, IV. Preliminary Study of the System Na2O-ZrO2-SiO2. Trans Brit Ceram Soc 69: 131–135.
    [35] Wilson G, Glasser FP (1987) Subsolidus Phase Relations in the System Na2O-ZrO2-SiO2. Brit Ceram Trans J 86: 199–201.
    [36] Nicholas VA, Heyns AM, Kingon AI, et al. (1986) Reactions in the formation of Na3Zr2Si2PO12. J Mater Sci 21: 1967–1973. doi: 10.1007/BF00547935
    [37] Rudolf PR, Subramanian MA, Clearfield A, et al. (1985) The Crystal Structure of a Nonstoichiometric NASICON. Mater Res Bull 20: 643–651. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(85)90142-4
    [38] Rudolf PR, Clearfield A, Jorgensen JD (1986) Rietveld Refinement Results on Three Nonstoichiometric Monoclinic NASICONs. Solid State Ionics 21: 213–224. doi: 10.1016/0167-2738(86)90075-5
    [39] Yde-Andersen S, Lundgaard JS, Møller L, et al. (1984) Properties of NASICON Electrolytes Prepared from Alkoxide Derived Gels: Ionic Conductivity, Durability in Molten Sodium and Strength Test Data. Solid State Ionics 14: 73–79. doi: 10.1016/0167-2738(84)90014-6
    [40] Perthuis H, Colomban Ph (1986) Sol-Gel Routes Leading to Nasicon Ceramics. Ceram Int 12: 39–52. doi: 10.1016/S0272-8842(86)80008-6
    [41] Maier J, Warhus U, Gmelin E (1986) Thermodynamic and Electrochemical Investigations of the NASICON Solid Solution System. Solid State Ionics 18–19: 969–973.
    [42] Boilot JP, Collin G, Colomban Ph (1988) Relation Structure-Fast Ion Conduction in the NASICON Solid Solution. J Solid State Chem 73: 160–171. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(88)90065-5
    [43] Colomban Ph (1986) Orientational Disorder, Glass/Crystal Transition and Superionic Conductivity in NASICON. Solid State Ionics 21: 97–115. doi: 10.1016/0167-2738(86)90201-8
    [44] Park H, Jung K, Nezafati M, et al. (2016) Sodium Ion Diffusion in Nasicon (Na3Zr2Si2PO12) Solid Electrolytes: Effects of Excess Sodium. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8: 27814–27824. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09992
    [45] Kafalas JA, Cava JR (1979) Effect of Pressure and Composition of Fast Na+-Ion Transport in the System Na1+xZr2SixP3−xO12. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fast Ion Transport in Solids, 419–422.
    [46] Kreuer KD, Warhus U (1986) NASICON Solid Electrolytes: Part IV Chemical Durability. Mater Res Bull 21: 357–363. doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(86)90193-5
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Prasanga Madhushani Kumarage, Liyana Arachchilage Dinithi Sandunika De Silva, Gang-Joon Heo, Aquatic environments: A potential source of antimicrobial-resistant Vibrio spp., 2022, 133, 1365-2672, 2267, 10.1111/jam.15702
    2. Raquiba Sultana, Al Mahmud, Sayad Mahmud Koli, Jannatul Nayema, Aboni Ghosh, Susmita Banik Sushree, Pranta Shom, Tanvir Ahmed Siddiqui, Kamal Kanta Das, Mrityunjoy Acharjee, Isolation and Identification of Vibrio Species from Different Types of Water Sources Along with Their Drug Susceptible Pattern, 2024, 8, 2588-9834, 207, 10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_138_24
    3. Aaron Awere‐Duodu, Onyansaniba K. Ntim, Eric S. Donkor, Vibrio cholerae in Water Environments: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis, 2025, 17, 1758-2229, 10.1111/1758-2229.70103
    4. Bright E IGERE, ONOHUEAN Hope, P.O Adomi, T Bashiru Abeni, Phenicol antibiotic resistance status amongst environmental non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae and Clinical O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae strains: a systematic review and meta-synthesis, 2025, 29501946, 100474, 10.1016/j.microb.2025.100474
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(8034) PDF downloads(1814) Cited by(14)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog