Biomedical diagnosis perspective of epigenetic detections using alpha-hemolysin nanopore

Yong Wang; Li-qun Gu; Yong Wang; Li-qun Gu

doi:10.3934/matersci.2015.4.448

AIMS Materials Science

2015, Volume 2, Issue 4: 448-472. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.448

Previous Article Next Article

Review Topical Sections

Biomedical diagnosis perspective of epigenetic detections using alpha-hemolysin nanopore

Yong Wang ^,,
Li-qun Gu ^,

Department of Biological Engineering, Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

Received: 28 September 2015 Accepted: 02 November 2015 Published: 16 December 2015

The α-hemolysin nanopore has been studied for applications in DNA sequencing, various single-molecule detections, biomolecular interactions, and biochips. The detection of single molecules in a clinical setting could dramatically improve cancer detection and diagnosis as well as develop personalized medicine practices for patients. This brief review shortly presents the current solid state and protein nanopore platforms and their applications like biosensing and sequencing. We then elaborate on various epigenetic detections (like microRNA, G-quadruplex, DNA damages, DNA modifications) with the most widely used alpha-hemolysin pore from a biomedical diagnosis perspective. In these detections, a nanopore electrical current signature was generated by the interaction of a target with the pore. The signature often was evidenced by the difference in the event duration, current level, or both of them. An ideal signature would provide obvious differences in the nanopore signals between the target and the background molecules. The development of cancer biomarker detection techniques and nanopore devices have the potential to advance clinical research and resolve health problems. However, several challenges arise in applying nanopore devices to clinical studies, including super low physiological concentrations of biomarkers resulting in low sensitivity, complex biological sample contents resulting in false signals, and fast translocating speed through the pore resulting in poor detections. These issues and possible solutions are discussed.

Keywords:

Citation: Yong Wang, Li-qun Gu. Biomedical diagnosis perspective of epigenetic detections using alpha-hemolysin nanopore[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(4): 448-472. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.448

Related Papers:

[1]	Mahmoud S. Mehany, Faizah D. Alanazi . An $ \eta $-Hermitian solution to a two-sided matrix equation and a system of matrix equations over the skew-field of quaternions. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 7684-7705. doi: 10.3934/math.2025352
[2]	Abdur Rehman, Muhammad Zia Ur Rahman, Asim Ghaffar, Carlos Martin-Barreiro, Cecilia Castro, Víctor Leiva, Xavier Cabezas . Systems of quaternionic linear matrix equations: solution, computation, algorithm, and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 26371-26402. doi: 10.3934/math.20241284
[3]	Vladislav N. Kovalnogov, Ruslan V. Fedorov, Denis A. Demidov, Malyoshina A. Malyoshina, Theodore E. Simos, Spyridon D. Mourtas, Vasilios N. Katsikis . Computing quaternion matrix pseudoinverse with zeroing neural networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 22875-22895. doi: 10.3934/math.20231164
[4]	Wenxv Ding, Ying Li, Anli Wei, Zhihong Liu . Solving reduced biquaternion matrices equation $ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k}A_iXB_i = C $ with special structure based on semi-tensor product of matrices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3258-3276. doi: 10.3934/math.2022181
[5]	Abdur Rehman, Cecilia Castro, Víctor Leiva, Muhammad Zia Ur Rahman, Carlos Martin-Barreiro . Solving two-sided Sylvester quaternionic matrix equations: Theoretical insights, computational implementation, and practical applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(7): 15663-15697. doi: 10.3934/math.2025702
[6]	Yang Chen, Kezheng Zuo, Zhimei Fu . New characterizations of the generalized Moore-Penrose inverse of matrices. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4359-4375. doi: 10.3934/math.2022242
[7]	Abdur Rehman, Ivan Kyrchei, Muhammad Zia Ur Rahman, Víctor Leiva, Cecilia Castro . Solvability and algorithm for Sylvester-type quaternion matrix equations with potential applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 19967-19996. doi: 10.3934/math.2024974
[8]	Anli Wei, Ying Li, Wenxv Ding, Jianli Zhao . Three special kinds of least squares solutions for the quaternion generalized Sylvester matrix equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5029-5048. doi: 10.3934/math.2022280
[9]	Dong Wang, Ying Li, Wenxv Ding . The least squares Bisymmetric solution of quaternion matrix equation $ AXB = C $. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13247-13257. doi: 10.3934/math.2021766
[10]	Qi Xiao, Jin Zhong . Characterizations and properties of hyper-dual Moore-Penrose generalized inverse. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35125-35150. doi: 10.3934/math.20241670

Abstract

1. Introduction

In this paper, we establish the following four symmetric quaternion matrix systems:

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11}, C_{11}X_1D_{11} = E_{11},\\ X_2A_{22} = B_{22}, C_{22}X_2D_{22} = E_{22},\\ F_{11}X_1H_{11}+X_2F_{22} = G_{11}, \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(1.1)

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11}, C_{11}X_1D_{11} = E_{11},\\ X_2A_{22} = B_{22}, C_{22}X_2D_{22} = E_{22},\\ F_{11}X_1+H_{11}X_2F_{22} = G_{11}, \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(1.2)

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11}, C_{11}X_1D_{11} = E_{11},\\ A_{22}X_2 = B_{22}, C_{22}X_2D_{22} = E_{22},\\ F_{11}X_1+H_{11}X_2F_{22} = G_{11}, \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(1.3)

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11}, C_{11}X_1D_{11} = E_{11},\\ A_{22}X_2 = B_{22}, C_{22}X_2D_{22} = E_{22},\\ F_{11}X_1+X_2F_{22} = G_{11}, \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(1.4)

where $ A_{ii}, \ B_{ii}, \ C_{ii}, \ D_{ii}, \ E_{ii}, \ F_{ii}(i = \overline{1, 2}) $, $ H_{11} $, and $ G_{11} $ are known matrices, while $ X_i (i = \overline{1, 2}) $ are unknown.

In this paper, $ \mathbb{R} $ and $ \mathbb{H}^{m\times n} $ denote the real number field and the set of all quaternion matrices of order $ m\times n $, respectively.

$\begin{align*} &\mathbb{H} = \{v_{0}+v_{1}\mathbf{i}+v_{2}\mathbf{j}+v_{3}\mathbf{k} | \mathbf{i}^{2} = \mathbf{j}^{2} = \mathbf{k}^{2} = \mathbf{ijk} = -1, v_{0}, v_{1}, v_{2}, v_{3}\in \mathbb{R}\}. \end{align*}$ $

Moreover, $ r(A) $, $ 0 $ and $ I $ represent the rank of matrix $ A $, the zero matrix of suitable size, and the identity matrix of suitable size, respectively. The conjugate transpose of $ A $ is $ A^{\ast} $. For any matrix $ A $, if there exists a unique solution $ X $ such that

$\begin{align*} AXA = A, XAX = X, (AX)^{\ast} = AX, (XA)^{\ast} = XA, \end{align*}$ $

then $ X $ is called the Moore-Penrose ($ M-P $) inverse. It should be noted that $ A^{\dagger} $ is used to represent the $ M-P $ inverse of $ A $. Additionally, $ L_{A} = I-A^{\dagger}A $ and $ R_{A} = I-AA^{\dagger} $ denote two projectors toward $ A $.

$ \mathbb{H} $ is known to be an associative noncommutative division algebra over $ \mathbb{R} $ with extensive applications in computer science, orbital mechanics, signal and color image processing, control theory, and so on (see ^[1,2,3,4]).

Matrix equations, significant in the domains of descriptor systems control theory ^[5], nerve networks ^[6], back feed ^[7], and graph theory ^[8], are one of the key research topics in mathematics.

The study of matrix equations in $ \mathbb{H} $ has garnered the attention of various researchers; consequently they have been analyzed by many studies (see, e.g., ^[9,10,11,12]). Among these the system of symmetric matrix equations is a crucial research object. For instance, Mahmoud and Wang ^[13] established some necessary and sufficient conditions for the three symmetric matrix systems in terms of $ M-P $ inverses and rank equalities:

$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1}V = C_1,\ VB_1 = C_2,\\ A_3X+YB_3 = C_3,\\ A_2Y+ZB_2+A_5VB_5 = C_5,\\ A_4W+ZB_4 = C_4,\\ \end{array} \right. \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1}V = C_1,\ VB_1 = C_2,\\ A_3X+YB_3 = C_3,\\ A_2Z+YB_2+A_5VB_5 = C_5,\\ A_4Z+WB_4 = C_4,\\ \end{array} \right. \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1}V = C_1,\ VB_1 = C_2,\\ A_3X+YB_3 = C_3,\\ A_2Y+ZB_2+A_5VB_5 = C_5,\\ A_4Z+WB_4 = C_4. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{equation}$ $

(1.5)

Wang and He ^[14] established the sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence of solutions to the following three symmetric coupled matrix equations and the expressions for their general solutions:

$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1}X+YB_1 = C_1,\\ A_2Y+ZB_2 = C_2,\\ A_3W+ZB_3 = C_3,\\ \end{array} \right. \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1}X+YB_1 = C_1,\\ A_2Z+YB_2 = C_2,\\ A_3Z+WB_3 = C_3,\\ \end{array} \right. \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1}X+YB_1 = C_1,\\ A_2Y+ZB_2 = C_2,\\ A_3Z+WB_3 = C_3. \\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{equation}$ $

(1.6)

It is noteworthy that the following matrix equation plays an important role in the analysis of the solvability conditions of systems (1.1)–(1.4):

$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} A_1U+VB_1+A_2XB_2+A_3YB_3+A_4ZB_4 = B. \end{aligned} \end{equation}$ $

(1.7)

Liu et al. ^[15] derived some necessary and sufficient conditions to solve the quaternion matrix equation (1.7) using the ranks of coefficient matrices and $ M-P $ inverses. Wang et al. ^[16] derived the following quaternion equations after obtaining some solvability conditions for the quaternion equation presented in Eq (1.8) in terms of $ M-P $ inverses:

$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11}, C_{11}X_1D_{11} = E_{11},\\ X_2A_{22} = B_{22}, C_{22}X_2D_{22} = E_{22},\\ F_{11}X_1+X_2F_{22} = G_{11}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{equation}$ $

(1.8)

To our knowledge, so far, there has been little information on the solvability conditions and an expression of the general solution to systems (1.1)–(1.4).

In mathematical research and applications, the concept of $ \eta $-Hermitian matrices has gained significant attention ^[17]. An $ \eta $-Hermitian matrix, for $ \eta \in \{\mathbf{i}, \mathbf{j}, \mathbf{k}\} $, is defined as a matrix $ A $ such that $ A = A^{\eta^{*}} $, where $ A^{\eta^{*}} = -\eta A^{*}\eta $. These matrices have found applications in various fields including linear modeling and the statistics of random signals ^[1,17]. As an application of (1.1), this paper establishes some necessary and sufficient conditions for the following matrix equation:

$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11}, C_{11}X_1C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} = E_{11},\\ F_{11}X_1F_{11}^{\eta^{*}}+(F_{22}X_1)^{\eta^{*}} = G_{11} \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{equation}$ $

(1.9)

to be solvable.

Motivated by the study of Systems (1.8), symmetric matrix equations, $ \eta $-Hermitian matrices, and the widespread use of matrix equations and quaternions as well as the need for their theoretical advancements, we examine the solvability conditions of the quaternion systems presented in systems (1.1)–(1.4) by utilizing the rank equalities and the $ M-P $ inverses of coefficient matrices. We then obtain the general solutions for the solvable quaternion equations in systems (1.1)–(1.4). As an application of (1.1), we utilize the $ M-P $ inverse and the rank equality of matrices to investigate the necessary and sufficient conditions for the solvability of quaternion matrix equations involving $ \eta $-Hermicity matrices. It is evident that System (1.8) is a specific instance of System (1.1).

The remainder of this article is structured as follows. Section 2 outlines the basics. Section 3 examines some solvability conditions of the quaternion equation presented in System (1.1) using the $ M-P $ inverses and rank equalities of the matrices, and derives the solution of System (1.1). Section 4 establishes some solvability conditions for matrix systems (1.2)–(1.4) to be solvable. Section 5 investigates some necessary and sufficient conditions for matrix equation (1.9) to have common solutions. Section 6 concludes the paper.

2. Preliminaries

Marsaglia and Styan ^[18] presented the following rank equality lemma over the complex field, which can be generalized to $ \mathbb{H} $.

Lemma 2.1. ^[18] Let $ A \in \mathbb{H}^{m\times n} $, $ B \in \mathbb{H}^{m\times k} $, $ C \in \mathbb{H}^{l\times n} $, $ D \in \mathbb{H}^{j\times k}, $ and $ E \in \mathbb{H}^{l\times i} $ be given. Then, the following rank equality holds:

$ \ r

$\begin{pmatrix} A&BL_{D}\\ R_{E}C&0 \end{pmatrix}$ = r

$\begin{pmatrix} A&B&0\\ C&0&E\\ 0&D&0 \end{pmatrix}$ -r

$\begin{pmatrix} D \end{pmatrix}$ -r

$\begin{pmatrix} E \end{pmatrix}$ . $

Lemma 2.2. ^[19] Let $ A \in \mathbb{H}^{m\times n} $ be given. Then,

$\begin{align*} &(1)\quad (A^{\eta})^{\dagger} = (A^{\dagger})^{\eta}, (A^{\eta^{*}})^{\dagger} = (A^{\dagger})^{\eta^{*}};\\ & (2)\quad r(A) = r(A^{\eta^{*}}) = r(A^{\eta});\\ & (3)\quad (L_A)^{\eta^{*}} = -\eta(L_A)\eta = (L_A)^{\eta} = L_{A^{\eta^{*}}} = R_{A^{\eta^{*}}},\\ & (4)\quad (R_A)^{\eta^{*}} = -\eta(R_A)\eta = (R_A)^{\eta} = R_{A^{\eta^{*}}} = L_{A^{\eta^{*}}};\\ & (5)\quad (AA^{\dagger})^{\eta^{*}} = (A^{\dagger})^{\eta^{*}}A^{\eta^{*}} = (A^{\dagger}A)^{\eta} = A^{\eta}(A^{\dagger})^{\eta};\\ & (6)\quad (A^{\dagger}A)^{\eta^{*}} = A^{\eta^{*}}(A^{\dagger})^{\eta^{*}} = (AA^{\dagger})^{\eta} = (A^{\dagger})^{\eta}A^{\eta}. \end{align*}$ $

Lemma 2.3. ^[20] Let $ A_{1} $ and $ A_{2} $ be given quaternion matrices with adequate shapes. Then, the equation $ A_{1}X = A_{2} $ is solvable if, and only if, $ A_{2} = A_{1}A_{1}^{\dagger}A_{2} $. In this case, the general solution to this equation can be expressed as

$ X = A_{1}^{\dagger}A_{2}+L_{A_{1}}U_{1}, $

where $ U_{1} $ is any matrix with appropriate size.

Lemma 2.4. ^[20] Let $ A_{1} $ and $ A_{2} $ be given quaternion matrices with adequate shapes. Then, the equation $ XA_{1} = A_{2} $ is solvable if, and only if, $ A_{2} = A_{2}A_{1}^{\dagger}A_{1} $. In this case, the general solution to this equation can be expressed as

$ X = A_{2}A_{1}^{\dagger}+U_{1}R_{A_{1}}, $

where $ U_{1} $ is any matrix with appropriate size.

Lemma 2.5. ^[21] Let $ A, B, $ and $ C $ be known quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes. Then, the matrix equation

$\begin{align*} AXB = C \end{align*}$ $

is consistent if, and only if,

$\begin{align*} R_{A}C = 0,CL_{B} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

In this case, the general solution to this equation can be expressed as

$\begin{align*} X = A^{\dagger}CB^{\dagger}+L_{A}U+VR_{B}, \end{align*}$ $

where $ U $ and $ V $ are any quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes.

Lemma 2.6. ^[15] Let $ C_{i}, D_{i} $, and $ Z \; (i = \overline{1, 4}) $ be known quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes.

$\begin{equation} C_{1}X_{1}+X_{2}D_{1}+C_{2}Y_{1}D_{2}+C_{3}Y_{2}D_{3}+C_{4}Y_{3}D_{4} = Z. \end{equation}$ $

(2.1)

Denote

$\begin{align*} &R_{C_{1}}C_{2} = C_{12},R_{C_{1}}C_{3} = C_{13},R_{C_{1}}C_{4} = C_{14},D_{2}L_{D_{1}} = D_{21},D_{31}L_{D_{21}} = N_{32},D_{3}L_{D_{1}} = D_{31},\\ &D_{4}L_{D_{1}} = D_{41},R_{C_{12}}C_{13} = M_{23},S_{12} = C_{13}L_{M_{23}},R_{C_{1}}ZL_{D_{1}} = T_{1},C_{32} = R_{M_{23}}R_{C_{12}},A_{1} = C_{32}C_{14},\\ & A_{2} = R_{C_{12}}C_{14},A_{3} = R_{C_{13}}C_{14},A_{4} = C_{14},D_{13} = L_{D_{21}}L_{N_{32}},B_{1} = D_{41},B_{2} = D_{41}L_{D_{31}},\\ &B_{3} = D_{41}L_{D_{21}},B_{4} = D_{41}D_{13},E_{1} = C_{32}T_{1},E_{2} = R_{C_{12}}T_{1}L_{D_{31}},E_{3} = R_{C_{13}}T_{1}L_{D_{21}},E_{4} = T_{1}D_{13}, \\ &A_{24} = (L_{A_{2}},L_{A_{4}}),B_{13} = \begin{pmatrix} R_{B_{1}}\\R_{B_{3}} \end{pmatrix},A_{11} = L_{A_{1}},B_{22} = R_{B_{2}},A_{33} = L_{A_{3}},B_{44} = R_{B_{4}},E_{11} = R_{A_{24}}A_{11},\\ &E_{22} = R_{A_{24}}A_{33},E_{33} = B_{22}L_{B_{13}},E_{44} = B_{44}L_{B_{13}},N = R_{E_{11}}E_{22},M = E_{44}L_{E_{33}},K = K_{2}-K_{1},\\ &E = R_{A_{24}}KL_{B_{13}},S = E_{22}L_{N},K_{11} = A_{2}L_{A_{1}},G_{1} = E_{2}-A_{2}A_{1}^{\dagger}E_{1}B_{1}^{\dagger}B_{2},K_{22} = A_{4}L_{A_{3}},\\ &G_{2} = E_{4}-A_{4}A_{3}^{\dagger}E_{3}B_{3}^{\dagger}B_{4},K_{1} = A_{1}^{\dagger}E_{1}B_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{1}}A_{2}^{\dagger}E_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger},K_{2} = A_{3}^{\dagger}E_{3}B_{3}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{3}}A_{4}^{\dagger}E_{4}B_{4}^{\dagger}. \end{align*}$ $

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ Equation (2.1) is consistent.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$\begin{align*} R_{A_{i}}E_{i} = 0,E_{i}L_{B_{i}} = 0(i = \overline{1,4}),R_{E_{11}}EL_{E_{44}} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align*} \quad \quad \quad&r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{2}&C_{3}&C_{4}&C_{1}\\D_{1}&0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{1})+r(C_{2},C_{3},C_{4},C_{1}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{2}&C_{4}&C_{1}\\D_{3}&0&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(C_{2},C_{4},C_{1})+r\begin{pmatrix} D_{3}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{3}&C_{4}&C_{1}\\D_{2}&0&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(C_{3},C_{4},C_{1})+r\begin{pmatrix} D_{2}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{4}&C_{1}\\D_{2}&0&0\\D_{3}&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{2}\\D_{3}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix}+r(C_{4},C_{1}),\\ & r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{2}&C_{3}&C_{1}\\D_{4}&0&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(C_{2},C_{3},C_{1})+r\begin{pmatrix} D_{4}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix},\\ & r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{2}&C_{1}\\D_{3}&0&0\\D_{4}&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{3}\\D_{4}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix}+r(C_{2},C_{1}), \\ & r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{3}&C_{1}\\D_{2}&0&0\\D_{4}&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{2}\\D_{4}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix}+r(C_{3},C_{1}),\\\\ & r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{1}\\D_{2}&0\\D_{3}&0\\D_{4}&0\\D_{1}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{2}\\D_{3}\\D_{4}\\D_{1} \end{pmatrix}+r(C_{1}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} Z&C_{2}&C_{1}&0&0&0&C_{4}\\D_{3}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\D_{1}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&-Z&C_{3}&C_{1}&C_{4}\\0&0&0&D_{2}&0&0&0\\0&0&0&D_{1}&0&0&0\\D_{4}&0&0&D_{4}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{3}&0\\D_{1}&0\\0&D_{2}\\0&D_{1}\\D_{4}&D_{4} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} C_{2}&C_{1}&0&0&C_{4}\\0&0&C_{3}&C_{1}&C_{4} \end{pmatrix}. \end{align*}$ $

Under these conditions, the general solution to the matrix equation (2.1) is

$\begin{align*} &X_{1} = C_{1}^{\dagger}(Z-C_{2}Y_{1}D_{2}-C_{3}Y_{2}D_{3}-C_{4}Y_{3}D_{4})-C_{1}^{\dagger}U_{1}D_{1}+L_{C_{1}}U_{2},\\ &X_{2} = R_{C_{1}}(Z-C_{2}Y_{1}D_{2}-C_{3}Y_{2}D_{3}-C_{4}Y_{3}D_{4})D_{1}^{\dagger}+C_{1}C_{1}^{\dagger}U_{1}+U_{3}R_{D_{1}},\\ &Y_{1} = C_{12}^{\dagger}TD_{21}^{\dagger}-C_{12}^{\dagger}C_{13}M_{23}^{\dagger}TD_{21}^{\dagger}-C_{12}^{\dagger}S_{12}C_{13}^{\dagger}TN_{32}^{\dagger}D_{31}D_{21}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-C_{12}^{\dagger}S_{12}U_{4}R_{N_{32}}D_{31}D_{21}^{\dagger}+L_{C_{12}}U_{5}+U_{6}R_{D_{21}},\\ &Y_{2} = M_{23}^{\dagger}TD_{31}^{\dagger}+S_{12}^{\dagger}S_{12}C_{13}^{\dagger}TN_{32}^{\dagger}+L_{M_{23}}L_{S_{12}}U_{7}+U_{8}R_{D_{31}}+L_{M_{23}}U_{4}R_{N_{32}},\\ &Y_{3} = K_{1}+L_{A_{2}}V_{1}+V_{2}R_{B_{1}}+L_{A_{1}}V_{3}R_{B_{2}},\ or\ Y_{3} = K_{2}-L_{A_{4}}W_{1}-W_{2}R_{B_{3}}-L_{A_{3}}W_{3}R_{B_{4}}, \end{align*}$ $

where $ T = T_{1}-C_{4}Y_{3}D_{4}, U_{i}(i = \overline{1, 8}) $ are arbitrary matrices with appropriate sizes over $ \mathbb{H} $,

$\begin{align*} &V_{1} = (I_{m},0)[A_{24}^{\dagger}(K-A_{11}V_{3}B_{22}-A_{33}W_{3}B_{44})-A_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}B_{13}+L_{A_{24}}U_{12}],\\ &W_{1} = (0,I_{m})[A_{24}^{\dagger}(K-A_{11}V_{3}B_{22}-A_{33}W_{3}B_{44})-A_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}B_{13}+L_{A_{24}}U_{12}],\\ &W_{2} = [R_{A_{24}}(K-A_{11}V_{3}B_{22}-A_{33}W_{3}B_{44})B_{13}^{\dagger}+A_{24}A_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{B_{13}}]\begin{pmatrix} 0\\I_{n} \end{pmatrix},\\ &V_{2} = [R_{A_{24}}(K-A_{11}V_{3}B_{22}-A_{33}W_{3}B_{44})B_{13}^{\dagger}+A_{24}A_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{B_{13}}]\begin{pmatrix} I_{n}\\0 \end{pmatrix},\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &V_{3} = E_{11}^{\dagger}KE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{11}^{\dagger}E_{22}N^{\dagger}KE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{11}^{\dagger}SE_{22}^{\dagger}KM^{\dagger}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-E_{11}^{\dagger}SU_{31}R_{M}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}+L_{E_{11}}U_{32}+U_{33}R_{E_{33}},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &W_{3} = N^{\dagger}KE_{44}+S^{\dagger}SE_{22}^{\dagger}KM^{\dagger}+L_{N}L_{S}U_{41}+L_{N}U_{31}R_{M}-U_{42}R_{E_{44}}, \end{align*}$ $

$ U_{11}, U_{12}, U_{21}, U_{31}, U_{32}, U_{33}, U_{41}, $ and $ U_{42} $ are arbitrary quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes, and $ m $ and $ n $ denote the column number of $ C_{4} $ and the row number of $ D_{4} $, respectively.

3. Solvability conditions and expression of general solution for system (1.1)

Some necessary and sufficient conditions for System (1.1) to be solvable will be established in this section. The general solution of System (1.1) will also be derived in this section. Moreover, we provide an example to illustrate our main results.

Theorem 3.1. Let $ A_{ii}, B_{ii}, C_{ii}, D_{ii}, E_{ii}, F_{ii}, H_{11}, $ and $ G_{11} $ (i = 1, 2) be given quaternion matrices. Put

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} A_{1} = C_{11}L_{A_{11}},P_{1} = E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11},B_{2} = R_{A_{22}}D_{22},\\ P_{2} = E_{22}-C_{22}B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}D_{22},\hat{B_{1}} = R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22},\hat{A_{2}} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}},\\ \hat{A_{3}} = {F_{11}}L_{A_{11}},\hat{B_{3}} = R_{D_{11}}H_{11},\hat{A_{4}} = L_{C_{22}},\hat{B_{4}} = R_{A_{22}}F_{22},H_{11}L_{\hat{B_{1}}} = \hat{B_{11}},\\ P = G_{11}-F_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}H_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_{11}}A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}H_{11}-B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}F_{22}-C_{22}^{\dagger}P_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}, \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.1)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} \left\{\begin{array}{c} \hat{B_{22}}L_{\hat{B_{11}}} = N_{1},\hat{B_{3}}L_{\hat{B_{1}}} = \hat{B_{22}},\hat{B_{4}}L_{\hat{B_{1}}} = \hat{B_{33}},R_{\hat{A_{2}}}\hat{A_{3}} = \hat{M_{1}},S_{1} = \hat{A_{3}}L_{\hat{M_{1}}}, T_1 = PL_{\hat{B_{1}}},\\ C = R_{\hat{M_{1}}}R_{\hat{A_{2}}},C_{1} = C\hat{A_{4}},C_{2} = R_{\hat{A_{2}}}\hat{A_{4}},C_{3} = R_{\hat{A_{3}}}\hat{A_{4}},C_{4} = \hat{A_{4}},D = L_{\hat{B_{11}}}L_{N_{1}},\\ D_{1} = \hat{B_{33}},D_{2} = \hat{B_{33}}L_{\hat{B_{22}}},D_{4} = \hat{B_{33}}D,E_{1} = CT_{1},E_{2} = R_{\hat{A_{2}}}T_{1}L_{\hat{B_{22}}}, \\ E_{3} = R_{\hat{A_{3}}}T_{1}L_{\hat{B_{11}}}, E_{4} = T_{1}D, \hat{C_{11}} = ( L_{C_{2}},L_{C_{4}}),D_{3} = \hat{B_{33}}L_{\hat{B_{11}}},\hat{D_{11}} = \begin{pmatrix} R_{D_{1}}\\ R_{D_{3}} \end{pmatrix},\\ \hat{C_{22}} = L_{C_{1}},\hat{D_{22}} = R_{D_{2}},\hat{C_{33}} = L_{C_{3}},\hat{D_{33}} = R_{D_{4}},\hat{E_{11}} = R_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{C_{22}},\\ \hat{E_{22}} = R_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{C_{22}},\hat{E_{33}} = \hat{D_{22}}L_{\hat{D_{11}}},\hat{E_{44}} = \hat{D_{33}}L_{\hat{D_{11}}},M = R_{\hat{E_{11}}}\hat{E_{22}},\\ N = \hat{E_{44}}L_{\hat{E_{33}}},F = F_{2}-F_{1},E = R_{\hat{C_{11}}}FL_{\hat{D_{11}}},S = \hat{E_{22}}L_{M},\hat{F_{11}} = C_{2}L_{C_{1}},\\ G_{1} = E_{2}-C_{2}C_{1}^{\dagger}E_{1}D_{1}^{\dagger}D_{2},\hat{F_{22}} = C_{4}L_{C_{3}},G_{2} = E_{4}-C_{4}C_{3}^{\dagger}E_{3}D_{3}^{\dagger}D_{4},\\ F_{1} = C_{1}^{\dagger}E_{1}D_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{C_{1}}C_{2}^{\dagger}E_{2}D_{2}^{\dagger},F_{2} = C_{3}^{\dagger}E_{3}D_{3}^{\dagger}+L_{C_{3}}C_{4}^{\dagger}E_{4}D_{4}^{\dagger}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.2)

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ System (1.1) is solvable.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$\begin{align*} &R_{A_{11}}B_{11} = 0,R_{A_{1}}P_{1} = 0,P_{1}L_{D_{11}} = 0,B_{22}L_{A_{22}} = 0,R_{C_{22}}P_{2} = 0,\\ &P_{2}L_{B_{2}} = 0,R_{C_{i}}E_{i} = 0,E_{i}L_{D_{i}} = 0(i = \overline{1,4}),R_{\hat{E_{11}}}EL_{\hat{E_{44}}} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} &r(B_{11},A_{11}) = r(A_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\ B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.3)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} &r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} B_{22}\\A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(A_{22}), \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.4)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r(E_{22},C_{22}) = r(C_{22}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}\\D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{22},A_{22}), \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.5)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22},D_{22},A_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned}\quad\quad\quad \end{align}$ $

(3.6)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&-D_{11}&0&0\\ F_{22}&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\ 0&C_{11}&E_{11}&0&0\\ 0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&0&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} \\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&D_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.7)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0\\ F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\0&A_{11}&0&0\\ C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.8)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}\\C_{22}G_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.9)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},A_{22}), \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.10)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&0&B_{22}\\H_{11}&0&-D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&A_{22}\\0&C_{11}&E_{11}&0\\0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.11)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\0&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.12)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} & r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&B_{22}\\H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix},\end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.13)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0\\0&0&H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0&0&0\\F_{22}&0&F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&A_{22}\\ 0&C_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&-E_{11}&0\\0&A_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&-B_{11}D_{11}&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&0&0&0&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\left(\begin{array}{cccccccc} H_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & D_{11} & 0 \\ F_{22} & 0 & 0 & 0 & D_{22} & A_{22} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & H_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & F_{22} & D_{22} & A_{22} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22} & F_{22} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & A_{22} \end{array}\right)+r\left(\begin{array}{c} C_{11} \\ A_{11} \\ C_{22} F_{11} \end{array}\right). \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.14)

Proof. $ (1)\Leftrightarrow (2) $: The System (1.1) can be written as follows.

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} A_{11}X_1 = B_{11},\ X_{2}A_{22} = B_{22},\quad\quad \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.15)

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} C_{11}X_1D_{11} = E_{11},\ C_{22}X_2D_{22} = E_{22}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.16)

and

$\begin{align} F_{11}X_1H_{11}+X_2F_{22} = G_{11}. \end{align}$ $

(3.17)

Next, the solvability conditions and the expression for the general solutions of Eq (3.15) to Eq (3.17) are given by the following steps:

Step 1: According to Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4, the system (3.15) is solvable if, and only if,

$\begin{align} R_{A_{11}}B_{11} = 0,\ B_{22}L_{A_{22}} = 0. \end{align}$ $

(3.18)

When condition (3.18) holds, the general solution of System (3.15) is

$\begin{align} X_1 = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}+L_{A_{11}}U_1,\ X_2 = B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}+U_2R_{A_{22}}. \end{align}$ $

(3.19)

Step 2: Substituting (3.19) into (3.16) yields,

$\begin{align} A_{1}U_{1}D_{11} = P_{1},\ C_{22}U_2B_{2} = P_{2}, \end{align}$ $

(3.20)

where $ A_{1}, P_1, B_{2}, P_{2} $ are defined by (3.1). By Lemma 2.5, the system (3.20) is consistent if, and only if,

$\begin{align} R_{A_{1}}P_{1} = 0,\ P_{1}L_{D_{11}} = 0,\ R_{C_{22}}P_{2} = 0,\ P_{2}L_{B_{2}} = 0. \end{align}$ $

(3.21)

When (3.21) holds, the general solution to System (3.20) is

$\begin{align} U_{1} = A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{1}}W_{1}+W_{2}R_{D_{11}}, U_2 = C_{22}^{\dagger}P_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger}+L_{C_{22}}W_{3}+W_{4}R_{B_{2}}. \end{align}$ $

(3.22)

Comparing (3.22) and (3.19), hence,

$\begin{align} \begin{aligned} X_{1} = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}+L_{A_{11}}A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}W_{1}+L_{A_{11}}W_{2}R_{D_{11}},\\ X_{2} = B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}+C_{22}^{\dagger}P_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger}R_{A_ {22}}+L_{C_{22}}W_{3}R_{A_{22}}+W_{4}R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}. \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.23)

Step 3: Substituting (3.23) into (3.17) yields

$\begin{align} W_{4}\hat{B_{1}}+\hat{A_{2}}W_{1}H_{11}+\hat{A_{3}}W_{2}\hat{B_{3}}+\hat{A_{4}}W_{3}\hat{B_{4}} = P, \end{align}$ $

(3.24)

where $ \hat{B_{i}}, \hat{A_{j}}(i = \overline{1, 4}, j = \overline{2, 4}) $ are defined by (3.1). It follows from Lemma 2.6 that Eq (3.24) is solvable if, and only if,

$\begin{align} R_{C_{i}}E_{i} = 0, E_{i}L_{D_{i}} = 0(i = \overline{1,4}),R_{\hat{E_{11}}}EL_{\hat{E_{44}}} = 0. \end{align}$ $

(3.25)

When (3.25) holds, the general solution to matrix equation (3.24) is

where $ C_{i}, E_{i}, D_{i}(i = \overline{1, 4}), \hat{E_{11}}, \hat{E_{44}} $ are defined as (3.2), $ T = T_{1}-\hat{A_{4}}W_{3}\hat{B_{4}}, V_{i}(i = \overline{1, 8}) $ are arbitrary matrices with appropriate sizes over $ \mathbb{H} $,

$\begin{align*} &\hat{V_{1}} = (I_{m},0)[\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})-\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}\hat{D_{11}}+L_{\hat{C_{11}}}U_{12}],\\ &V_{1} = (0,I_{m})[\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})-\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}\hat{D_{11}}+L_{\hat{C_{11}}}U_{12}],\\ &V_{2} = [R_{\hat{C_{11}}}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})\hat{D_{11}}^{\dagger}+\hat{C_{11}}\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{\hat{D_{11}}}]\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ I_{n} \end{pmatrix},\\ &\hat{V_{2}} = [R_{\hat{C_{11}}}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})\hat{D_{11}}^{\dagger}+\hat{C_{11}}\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{\hat{D_{11}}}]\begin{pmatrix} I_{n} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &\hat{V_{3}} = \hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}F\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}-\hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{22}}M^{\dagger}F\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}-\hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}S\hat{E_{22}}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}\hat{E_{44}}\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}-\hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}SU_{31}R_{N}\hat{E_{44}}\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad+L_{\hat{E_{11}}}U_{32}+U_{33}R_{\hat{E_{33}}},\\ &V_{3} = M^{\dagger}F\hat{E_{44}}^{\dagger}+S^{\dagger}S\hat{E_{22}}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}+L_{M}L_{S}U_{41}+L_{M}U_{31}R_{N}-U_{42}R_{\hat{E_{44}}}, \end{align*}$ $

$ U_{11}, U_{12}, U_{21}, U_{31}, U_{32}, U_{33}, U_{41}, $ and $ U_{42} $ are any quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes, and $ m $ and $ n $ denote the column number of $ C_{22} $ and the row number of $ A_{22} $, respectively. We summarize that System (1.1) has a solution if, and only if, (3.18), (3.21), and (3.25) hold, i.e., the System (1.1) has a solution if, and only if, (2) holds.

$ (2)\Leftrightarrow (3) $: We prove the equivalence in two parts. In the first part, we want to show that (3.18) and (3.21) are equivalent to (3.3) to (3.5), respectively. In the second part, we want to show that (3.25) is equivalent to (3.6) to (3.14). It is easy to know that there exist $ X_{1}^{0}, X_{2}^{0}, U_{1}^{0}, $ and $ U_{2}^{0} $ such that

$\begin{align*} &A_{11}X_{1}^{0} = B_{11},\ X_{2}^{0}A_{22} = B_{22},\\ &A_1U_{1}^{0}D_{11} = P_{1},\ C_{22}U_{2}^{0}B_{2} = P_{2} \end{align*}$ $

holds, where

$\begin{align*} &X_{1}^{0} = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}, U_{1}^{0} = A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger},\\ &X_{2}^{0} = B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}, U_{2}^{0} = C_{22}^{\dagger}P_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger}, \end{align*}$ $

$ P_{1} = E_{11}-C_{11}X_{1}^{0}D_{11}, P_{2} = E_{22}-C_{22}X_{2}^{0}D_{22}, $ and $ P = G_{11}-F_{11}X_{1}^{0}H_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_{11}}U_{1}^{0}H_{11}-X_{2}^{0}F_{22}-U_{2}^{0}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}. $

Part 1: We want to show that (3.18) and (3.21) are equivalent to (3.3) to (3.5), respectively. It follows from Lemma 2.1 and elementary transformations that

$\begin{align*} &(3.18) \Leftrightarrow r(R_{A_{11}}B_{11}) = 0 \Leftrightarrow r(B_{11},A_{11}) = r(A_{11}) \Leftrightarrow (3.3),\\ &(3.21) \Leftrightarrow r(R_{A_{1}}P_{1}) = 0 \Leftrightarrow r(P_{1},A_{1}) = r(A_{1}) \Leftrightarrow r(E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11},C_{11}L_{A_{11}})\\ &\quad\quad\quad\quad = r(C_{11}L_{A_{11}}) \Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix} \Leftrightarrow (3.3),\\ &(3.21) \Leftrightarrow r(P_{1}L_{D_{11}}) = 0 \Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} P_{1}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}) \Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix}\\ &\quad\quad\quad\quad = r(D_{11}) \Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}) \Leftrightarrow (3.4),\\ &(3.18) \Leftrightarrow r(B_{22}L_{A_{22}}) = 0 \Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} B_{22}\\A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(A_{22}) \Leftrightarrow (3.4).\quad \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

Similarly, we can show that (3.21) is equivalent to (3.5). Hence, (3.18) and (3.21) are equivalent to (3.3) and (3.5), respectively.

Part 2: In this part, we want to show that (3.25) is equivalent to (3.6) and (3.14). According to Lemma 2.6, we have that (3.25) is equivalent to the following:

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}}\\ \hat{B_{1}}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(\hat{B_{1}})+r(\hat{A_{2}},\hat{A_{3}},\hat{A_{4}}),\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.26)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&\hat{A_{4}}\\\hat{B_{3}}&0&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(\hat{A_{2}},\hat{A_{4}})+r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{B_{3}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.27)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}}\\H_{11}&0&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(\hat{A_{3}},\hat{A_{4}})+r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.28)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{4}}\\H_{11}&0\\\hat{B_{3}}&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}\\\hat{B_{3}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}+r(\hat{A_{4}}), \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.29)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&\hat{A_{3}}\\\hat{B_{4}}&0&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(\hat{A_{2}},\hat{A_{3}})+r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{B_{4}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.30)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}\\\hat{B_{3}}&0\\\hat{B_{4}}&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{B_{3}}\\\hat{B_{4}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}+r(\hat{A_{2}}), \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.31)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{3}}\\H_{11}&0\\\hat{B_{4}}&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}\\\hat{B_{4}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}+r(\hat{A_{3}}), \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.32)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} r\begin{pmatrix} P\\H_{11}\\\hat{B_{3}}\\\hat{B_{4}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}\\\hat{B_{3}}\\\hat{B_{4}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned} \end{align}$ $

(3.33)

$\begin{align} &\begin{aligned} &r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&0&0&\hat{A_{4}}\\\hat{B_{3}}&0&0&0&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0&0&0&0\\0&0&-P&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}}\\0&0&H_{11}&0&0\\0&0&\hat{B_{1}}&0&0\\\hat{B_{4}}&0&\hat{B_{4}}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned} = r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{B_{3}}&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0\\0&H_{11}\\0&\hat{B_{1}}\\\hat{B_{4}}&\hat{B_{4}} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{A_{2}}&0&\hat{A_{4}}\\0&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}} \end{pmatrix}, \end{align}$ $

(3.34)

respectively. Hence, we only prove that (3.26)–(3.34) are equivalent to (3.6)–(3.14) when we prove that (3.25) is equivalent to (3.6)–(3.14). Now, we prove that (3.26)–(3.34) are equivalent to (3.6)–(3.14). In fact, we only prove that (3.26), (3.30), and (3.34) are equivalent to (3.6), (3.10), and (3.14); the remaining part can be proved similarly. According to Lemma 2.1 and elementary transformations, we have that

$\begin{align*} &(3.26) = r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}}\\ \hat{B_{1}}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(\hat{B_{1}})+r(\hat{A_{2}},\hat{A_{3}},\hat{A_{4}}) \\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}-F_{11}X_{1}^{0}H_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_{11}}U_{1}^{0}H_{11}-X_{2}^{0}F_{22}-U_{2}^{0}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&L_{C_{22}}\\R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r(R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22})+r(F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}},F_{11}L_{A_{11}},L_{C_{22}}) \\ &\Leftrightarrow\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}-F_{11}X_{1}^{0}H_{11}-X_{2}^{0}F_{22}-U_{2}^{0}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&F_{11}&I&0\\R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&B_{2}\\0&A_{11}&0&0\\0&0&C_{22}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(R_{A_{22}}F_{22},B_{2})+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&I\\A_{11}&0\\0&C_{22} \end{pmatrix}\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&I&U_{2}^{0}B_{2}&0\\ F_{22}&0&0&B_{2}&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0&0&0\\ C_{22}X_{2}^{0}F_{22}&0&C_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22},D_{22},A_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&I\\A_{11}&0\\0&C_{22} \end{pmatrix}\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22},D_{22},A_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\F_{11}C_{22} \end{pmatrix} \Leftrightarrow (3.6). \end{align*}$ $

Similarly, we have that $ (3.27) \Leftrightarrow (3.7), (3.28) \Leftrightarrow (3.8), (3.29) \Leftrightarrow (3.9) $.

$\begin{align*} &(3.30) = r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&\hat{A_{3}}\\\hat{B_{4}}&0&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(\hat{A_{2}},\hat{A_{3}})+r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{B_{4}}\\\hat{B_{1}} \end{pmatrix}\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}-F_{11}X_{1}^{0}H_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_{11}}U_{1}^{0}H_{11}-X_{2}^{0}F_{22}-U_{2}^{0}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}&F_{11}L_{A_{1}}\\R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0\\R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ & = r(F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}},F_{11}L_{A_{11}})+r\begin{pmatrix} R_{A_{22}}F_{22}\\R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22} \end{pmatrix}\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}-F_{11}X_{1}^{0}H_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\ F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\ 0&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},A_{22})\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},A_{22}) \Leftrightarrow (3.10).\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

Similarly, we have that $ (3.31) \Leftrightarrow (3.11), (3.32) \Leftrightarrow (3.12), (3.33) \Leftrightarrow (3.13). $

$\begin{align*} &(3.34) = r\begin{pmatrix} P&\hat{A_{2}}&0&0&\hat{A_{4}}\\\hat{B_{3}}&0&0&0&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0&0&0&0\\0&0&-P&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}}\\0&0&H_{11}&0&0\\0&0&\hat{B_{1}}&0&0\\\hat{B_{4}}&0&\hat{B_{4}}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{B_{3}}&0\\\hat{B_{1}}&0\\0&H_{11}\\0&\hat{B_{1}}\\\hat{B_{4}}&\hat{B_{4}} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} \hat{A_{2}}&0&\hat{A_{4}}\\0&\hat{A_{3}}&\hat{A_{4}} \end{pmatrix}\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} P&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}&0&0&L_{C_{22}}\\ R_{D_{11}}H_{11}&0&0&0&0\\ R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&-P&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&L_{C_{22}}\\ 0&0&H_{11}&0&0\\ 0&0&R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0\\ R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} R_{D_{11}}H_{11}&0\\R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0\\ 0&H_{11}\\0&R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}\\ R_{A_{22}F_{22}}&R_{A_{22}}F_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}&0&L_{C_{22}}\\ 0&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&L_{C_{22}} \end{pmatrix}\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} P&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&0&0&L_{C_{22}}&0&0&0\\ H_{11}&0&0&0&0&D_{11}&0&0\\ R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&B_{2}&0\\ 0&0&-G_{11}+X_{2}^{0}F_{22}+U_{2}^{0}R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&L_{C_{22}}&0&0&0\\ 0&0&H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&0&0&B_{2}\\ R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0\\ 0&A_{1}&0&0&0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&D_{11}&0&0\\R_{A_{22}}&0&0&B_{2}&0\\ 0&H_{11}&0&0&0\\0&R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&B_{2}\\ R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&R_{A_{22}}F_{22}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&0&L_{C_{22}}\\ 0&F_{11}L_{A_{11}}&L_{C_{22}}\\A_{1}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ &\Leftrightarrow r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0\\0&0&H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0&0&0\\F_{22}&0&F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&A_{22}\\ 0&C_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&-E_{11}&0\\0&A_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&-B_{11}D_{11}&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&0&0&0&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0\\0&H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0&0&0\\F_{22}&F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix} \Leftrightarrow (3.14).\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

□

Theorem 3.2. Let System (1.1) be solvable. Then, the general solution of System (1.1) is

$\begin{align*} &X_{1} = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}+L_{A_{11}}A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}W_{1}+L_{A_{11}}W_{2}R_{D_{11}},\\ &X_{2} = B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}+C_{22}^{\dagger}P_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger}R_{A_{22}}+L_{C_{22}}W_{3}R_{A_{22}}+W_{4}R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}, \end{align*}$ $

where

$\begin{align*} &W_{1} = \hat{A_{2}}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{11}}^{\dagger}-\hat{A_{2}}^{\dagger}\hat{A_{3}}\hat{M_{1}}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{11}}^{\dagger}-\hat{A_{2}}^{\dagger}S_{1}\hat{A_{3}}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}\hat{B_{22}}\hat{B_{11}}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-\hat{A_{2}}^{\dagger}S_{1}V_{4}R_{N_{1}}\hat{B_{22}}\hat{B_{11}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{A_{2}}}V_{5}+V_{6}R_{\hat{B_{11}}},\\ &W_{2} = \hat{M_{1}}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{22}}^{\dagger}+S_{1}^{\dagger}S_{1}\hat{A_{3}}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{M_{1}}}L_{S_{1}}V_{7}+V_{8}R_{\hat{B_{22}}}+L_{\hat{M_{1}}}V_{4}R_{N_{1}},\\ &W_{3} = F_{1}+L_{C_{2}}\hat{V_{1}}+\hat{V_{2}}R_{D_{1}}+L_{C_{1}}\hat{V_{3}}R_{D_{2}},\ or\ W_{3} = F_{2}-L_{C_{4}}V_{1}-V_{2}R_{D_{3}}-L_{C_{3}}V_{3}R_{D_{4}},\\ &W_{4} = (P-\hat{A_{2}}W_{1}H_{11}-\hat{A_{3}}W_{2}\hat{B_{3}}-\hat{A_{4}}W_{3}\hat{B_{4}})\hat{B_{1}}^{\dagger}+V_{3}R_{\hat{B_{1}}},\\ &\hat{V_{1}} = (I_{m},0)[\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})-\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}\hat{D_{11}}+L_{\hat{C_{11}}}U_{12}],\\ &V_{1} = (0,I_{m})[\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})-\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}\hat{D_{11}}+L_{\hat{C_{11}}}U_{12}],\\ &V_{2} = [R_{\hat{C_{11}}}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})\hat{D_{11}}^{\dagger}+\hat{C_{11}}\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{\hat{D_{11}}}]\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ I_{n} \end{pmatrix},\\ &\hat{V_{2}} = [R_{\hat{C_{11}}}(F-\hat{C_{22}}V_{3}\hat{D_{22}}-\hat{C_{33}}\hat{V_{3}}\hat{D_{33}})\hat{D_{11}}^{\dagger}+\hat{C_{11}}\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{\hat{D_{11}}}]\begin{pmatrix} I_{n} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &\hat{V_{3}} = \hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}F\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}-\hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{22}}M^{\dagger}F\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}-\hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}S\hat{E_{22}}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}\hat{E_{44}}\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}-\hat{E_{11}}^{\dagger}SU_{31}R_{N}\hat{E_{44}}\hat{E_{33}}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad+L_{\hat{E_{11}}}U_{32}+U_{33}R_{\hat{E_{33}}},\\ &V_{3} = M^{\dagger}F\hat{E_{44}}^{\dagger}+S^{\dagger}S\hat{E_{22}}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}+L_{M}L_{S}U_{41}+L_{M}U_{31}R_{N}-U_{42}R_{\hat{E_{44}}}, \end{align*}$ $

$ T = T_{1}-\hat{A_{4}}W_{3}\hat{B_{4}}, \; V_{i}(i = \overline{4, 8}) $ are arbitrary matrices with appropriate sizes over $ \mathbb{H} $, $ U_{11}, U_{12}, U_{21} $, $ U_{31}, U_{32}, U_{33}, U_{41} $, and $ U_{42} $ are any quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes, and $ m $ and $ n $ denote the column number of $ C_{22} $ and the row number of $ A_{22} $, respectively.

Next, we consider a special case of the System (1.1).

Corollary 3.3. ^[16] Let $ A_{ii}, B_{ii}, C_{ii}, D_{ii}, E_{ii}, F_{ii}(i = 1, 2), $ and $ G_{11} $ be given matrices with appropriate dimensions over $ \mathbb{H} $. Denote

$\begin{align*} &T = C_{11}L_{A_{11}}, K = R_{A_{22}}D_{22},\ B_{1} = R_{K}R_{A_{22}}F_{22},A_{1} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{T}, C_{3} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}},D_{3} = R_{D_{11}},\\ &C_{4} = L_{C_{22}},D_{4} = R_{A_{22}}F_{22},A_{\alpha} = R_{A_1}C_3, B_{\beta} = D_3L_{B_1},C_{c} = R_{A_{\alpha}}C_4, D_{d} = D_4L_{B_1}, E = R_{A_1}E_1L_{B_1},\\ &A = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}+L_{A_{11}}T^{\dagger}(E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11})D^{\dagger},B = B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}+C_{22}^{\dagger}(E_{22}-C_{22}B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}D_{22})K^{\dagger}R_{A_{22}},\\ &E_{1} = G_{11}-F_{11}A-BF_{22},M = R_{A_{\alpha}}C_{c},N = D_{d}L_{B_{\beta}},S = C_{c}L_{M}. \end{align*}$ $

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ Equation (1.8) is consistent.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$\begin{align*} &R_{A_{11}}B_{11} = 0, B_{22}L_{A_{22}} = 0, R_{C_{22}}E_{22} = 0, E_{11}L_{D_{11}} = 0,\\ &R_{T}(E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11}) = 0,(E_{22}-C_{22}B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}D_{22})L_{K} = 0,\\ &R_{M}R_{A_{\alpha}}E = 0, EL_{B_{\beta}}L_{N} = 0, R_{A_{\alpha}}EL_{D_{d}} = 0, R_{C_c}EL_{B_{\beta}} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align*} &r(B_{11},A_{11}) = r(A_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\ B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} B_{22}\\A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(A_{22}),\\ &r(E_{22},C_{22}) = r(C_{22}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}\\D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{22},A_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22},D_{22},A_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix},\quad\quad\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} 0&F_{22}D_{11}&D_{22}&A_{22}\\C_{11}&E_{11}&0&0\\A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}&0&0\\ C_{22}F_{11}&C_{22}G_{11}D_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}D_{11},D_{22},A_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},A_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&G_{11}D_{11}&B_{22}\\0&F_{22}D_{11}&A_{22}\\C_{11}&E_{11}&0\\A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22}D_{11},A_{22}) +r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}.\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

Finally, we provide an example to illustrate the main results of this paper.

Example 3.4. Conside the matrix equation (1.1)

$\begin{align*} &A_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} a_{111}\\a_{121} \end{pmatrix},B_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} b_{111}&b_{112}\\b_{121}&b_{122} \end{pmatrix},C_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} c_{111}\\c_{121} \end{pmatrix},D_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} d_{111}\\d_{121} \end{pmatrix},\\ &E_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} e_{111}\\e_{121} \end{pmatrix}, A_{22} = \begin{pmatrix} a_{211}&a_{212} \end{pmatrix},B_{22} = \begin{pmatrix} b_{211}&b_{212}\\b_{221}&b_{222} \end{pmatrix},\\ &C_{22} = \begin{pmatrix} c_{211}&c_{212}\\c_{221}&c_{222} \end{pmatrix}, D_{22} = \begin{pmatrix} d_{211} \end{pmatrix}, E_{22} = \begin{pmatrix} e_{211}\\e_{221} \end{pmatrix},F_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} f_{111}\\f_{121} \end{pmatrix}, \\ &H_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} h_{111}&h_{112}\\h_{121}&h_{122} \end{pmatrix}, F_{22} = \begin{pmatrix} f_{211}&f_{212} \end{pmatrix},G_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} g_{111}&g_{112}\\g_{121}&g_{122} \end{pmatrix},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

where

$\begin{align*} &a_{111} = 0.9787+0.5005\boldsymbol{i}+0.0596\boldsymbol{j}+0.0424\boldsymbol{k}, a_{121} = 0.7127+0.4711\boldsymbol{i}+0.6820\boldsymbol{j}+0.0714\boldsymbol{k},\\&b_{111} = 0.5216+ 0.8181\boldsymbol{i}+0.7224\boldsymbol{j}+0.6596\boldsymbol{k}, b_{112} = 0.9730+0.8003\boldsymbol{i}+0.4324\boldsymbol{j}+0.0835\boldsymbol{k},\\ &b_{121} = 0.0967+0.8175\boldsymbol{i}+ 0.1499\boldsymbol{j}+0.5186\boldsymbol{k}, b_{122} = 0.6490+0.4538\boldsymbol{i} 0.8253\boldsymbol{j}+0.1332\boldsymbol{k},\\&c_{111} = 0.1734+0.8314\boldsymbol{i}+0.0605\boldsymbol{j}+0.5269\boldsymbol{k}, c_{121} = 0.3909+0.8034\boldsymbol{i}+0.3993\boldsymbol{j}+0.4168\boldsymbol{k},\\&d_{111} = 0.6569+0.2920\boldsymbol{i}+0.0159\boldsymbol{j}+0.1671\boldsymbol{k},d_{121} = 0.6280+0.4317\boldsymbol{i}+0.9841\boldsymbol{j}+0.1062\boldsymbol{k},\\&e_{111} = 0.3724+0.4897\boldsymbol{i}+0.9516\boldsymbol{j}+0.0527\boldsymbol{k},e_{121} = 0.1981+0.3395\boldsymbol{i}+0.9203\boldsymbol{j}+0.7379\boldsymbol{k},\\&a_{211} = 0.2691+0.4228\boldsymbol{i}+0.5479\boldsymbol{j}+0.9427\boldsymbol{k},a_{212} = 0.4177+0.9831\boldsymbol{i}+0.3015\boldsymbol{j}+0.7011\boldsymbol{k},\\&b_{211} = 0.6663+0.6981\boldsymbol{i}+0.1781\boldsymbol{j}+0.9991\boldsymbol{k},b_{212} = 0.0326+0.8819\boldsymbol{i}+0.1904\boldsymbol{j}+0.4607\boldsymbol{k},\\ &b_{221} = 0.5391+0.6665\boldsymbol{i}+0.1280\boldsymbol{j}+0.1711\boldsymbol{k},b_{222} = 0.5612+0.6692\boldsymbol{i}+0.3689\boldsymbol{j}+0.9816\boldsymbol{k},\\ &c_{211} = 0.1564+0.6448\boldsymbol{i}+0.1909\boldsymbol{j}+0.4820\boldsymbol{k},c_{212} = 0.5895+0.3846\boldsymbol{i}+0.2518\boldsymbol{j}+0.6171\boldsymbol{k},\\ &c_{221} = 0.8555+0.3763\boldsymbol{i}+0.4283\boldsymbol{j}+0.1206\boldsymbol{k},c_{222} = 0.2262+0.5830\boldsymbol{i}+0.2904\boldsymbol{j}+0.2653\boldsymbol{k},\\&d_{211} = 0.8244+0.9827\boldsymbol{i}+0.7302\boldsymbol{j}+0.3439\boldsymbol{k},e_{211} = 0.5847+0.9063\boldsymbol{i}+0.8178\boldsymbol{j}+0.5944\boldsymbol{k},\\ &e_{221} = 0.1078+0.8797\boldsymbol{i}+0.2607\boldsymbol{j}+0.0225\boldsymbol{k},f_{111} = 0.4253+0.1615\boldsymbol{i}+0.4229\boldsymbol{j}+0.5985\boldsymbol{k},\\&f_{121} = 0.3127+0.1788\boldsymbol{i}+0.0942\boldsymbol{j}+0.4709\boldsymbol{k},h_{111} = 0.6959+0.6385\boldsymbol{i}+0.0688\boldsymbol{j}+0.5309\boldsymbol{k},\\ &h_{112} = 0.4076+0.7184\boldsymbol{i}+0.5313\boldsymbol{j}+0.1056\boldsymbol{k},h_{121} = 0.6999+0.0336\boldsymbol{i}+0.3196\boldsymbol{j}+0.6544\boldsymbol{k},\\&h_{122} = 0.8200+0.9686\boldsymbol{i}+0.3251\boldsymbol{j}+0.6110\boldsymbol{k},f_{211} = 0.7788+0.4235\boldsymbol{i}+0.0908\boldsymbol{j}+0.2665\boldsymbol{k},\\&f_{212} = 0.1537+0.2810\boldsymbol{i}+0.4401\boldsymbol{j}+0.5271\boldsymbol{k},g_{111} = 0.4574+0.5181\boldsymbol{i}+0.6377\boldsymbol{j}+0.2407\boldsymbol{k},\\&g_{112} = 0.2891+0.6951\boldsymbol{i}+0.2548\boldsymbol{j}+0.6678\boldsymbol{k},g_{121} = 0.8754+0.9436\boldsymbol{i}+0.9577\boldsymbol{j}+0.6761\boldsymbol{k},\\&g_{122} = 0.6718+0.0680\boldsymbol{i}+0.2240\boldsymbol{j}+0.8444\boldsymbol{k}. \end{align*}$ $

Computing directly yields the following:

$\begin{align*} &r\begin{pmatrix} B_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 2,r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 2,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 1,r\begin{pmatrix} B_{22}\\A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 2,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 2,r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}\\D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 3,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 5,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&-D_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\0&C_{11}&E_{11}&0&0\\0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&0&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&D_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 7,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0\\F_{22}&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\0&A_{11}&0&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 6,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}\\C_{22}G_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 5,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\B_{11}H_{11}&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22},A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 5,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&0&B_{22}\\H_{11}&0&-D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&A_{22}\\0&C_{11}&E_{11}&0\\0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} +r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 6,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&B_{22}\\H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}&0&A_{22}\\0&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 5,\ r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&B_{22}\\H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = 4,\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0\\0&0&H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0&0&0\\F_{22}&0&F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&A_{22}\\ 0&C_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&-E_{11}&0\\0&A_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&-B_{11}D_{11}&0\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&0&0&0&E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&D_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0\\0&H_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&F_{22}&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&0&0&0\\F_{22}&F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix} = 11.\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

All rank equations in (3.3) to (3.14) hold. So, according to Theorem 3.1, the system of matrix equation (1.1) has a solution. By Theorem 3.2, the solution of System (1.1) can be expressed as

$\begin{align*} X_{1} = &\begin{pmatrix} 0.4946+0.1700\boldsymbol{i}-0.1182\boldsymbol{j}-0.3692\boldsymbol{k}&0.4051-0.0631\boldsymbol{i}-0.2403\boldsymbol{j}-0.1875\boldsymbol{k} \end{pmatrix},\\ X_{2} = &\begin{pmatrix} -0.0122+0.2540\boldsymbol{i}-0.3398\boldsymbol{j}-0.3918\boldsymbol{k}\\0.7002-0.3481\boldsymbol{i}-0.2169\boldsymbol{j}+0.0079\boldsymbol{k} \end{pmatrix}. \end{align*}$ $

4. The solvability conditions and the general solutions to the Systems (1.2)–(1.4)

In this section, we use the same method and technique as in Theorem 3.1 to study the three systems of Eqs (1.2)–(1.4). We only present their results and omit their proof.

Theorem 4.1. Consider the matrix equation (1.2) over $ \mathbb{H} $, where $ A_{ii}, B_{ii}, C_{ii}, D_{ii}, E_{ii}, F_{ii}, G_{11} $, and $ H_{11} (i = \overline{1, 2}) $ are given. Put

$\begin{align*} &A_{1} = C_{11}L_{A_{11}},P_{1} = E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11},B_{2} = R_{A_{22}}D_{22}, P_{2} = E_{22}-C_{22}B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}D_{22},\\ &\hat{A_{1}} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}},\hat{A_{2}} = F_{11}L_{A_{1}},\hat{B_{2}} = R_{D_{11}},\hat{A_{3}} = H_{11}L_{C_{22}},\hat{B_{3}} = R_{A_{22}}F_{22},\hat{B_{4}} = R_{B_{2}}R_{A_{22}}F_{22},\\ &B = G_{11}-F_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_{11}}A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}-H_{11}B_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}F_{22}-H_{11}C_{22}^{\dagger}P_{2}B_{2}^{\dagger}R_{A_{22}}F_{22},R_{\hat{A_{1}}}\hat{A_{2}} = A_{12},\\&R_{\hat{A_{1}}}\hat{A_{3}} = A_{13},R_{\hat{A_{1}}}H_{11} = A_{14},\hat{B_{3}}L_{\hat{B_{2}}} = N_{1}, R_{A_{12}}A_{13} = M_{1},S_{1} = A_{13}L_{M_{1}},R_{\hat{A_{1}}}B = T_{1},\\ &C = R_{M_{1}}R_{A_{12}},\hat{C_{1}} = CA_{14}, \hat{C_{2}} = R_{A_{12}}A_{14},\hat{C_{3}} = R_{A_{13}}A_{14},\hat{C_{4}} = A_{14},D = L_{\hat{B_{2}}}L_{N_{1}},\hat{D_{1}} = \hat{B_{4}},\\ &\hat{D_{2}} = \hat{B_{4}}L_{\hat{B_{3}}},\hat{D_{3}} = \hat{B_{4}}L_{\hat{B_{2}}},\hat{D_{4}} = \hat{B_{4}}D,\hat{E_{1}} = CT_{1},\hat{E_{2}} = R_{A_{12}}T_{1}L_{\hat{B_{3}}},\hat{E_{3}} = R_{A_{13}}T_{1}L_{\hat{B_{2}}},\hat{E_{4}} = T_{1}D,\\ &C_{24} = (L_{\hat{C_{2}}},L_{\hat{C_{4}}}),D_{13} = \begin{pmatrix} R_{\hat{D_{1}}}\\ R_{\hat{D_{3}}} \end{pmatrix}, C_{12} = L_{\hat{C_{1}}},D_{12} = R_{\hat{D_{2}}},C_{33} = L_{\hat{C_{3}}},D_{33} = R_{\hat{D_{4}}},E_{24} = R_{C_{24}}C_{12},\\ &E_{13} = R_{C_{24}}C_{33},E_{33} = D_{12}L_{D_{13}},E_{44} = D_{33}L_{D_{13}},M = R_{E_{24}}E_{13},N = E_{44}L_{E_{33}},F = F_{2}-F_{1},\\ &E = R_{C_{24}}FL_{D_{13}},S = E_{13}L_{M},\hat{F_{11}} = \hat{C_{2}}L_{\hat{C_{1}}},\hat{G_{1}} = \hat{E_{2}}-\hat{C_{2}}\hat{C_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{1}}\hat{D_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{D_{2}},F_{33} = \hat{C_{4}}L_{\hat{C_{3}}},\\ &\hat{G_{2}} = \hat{E_{4}}-\hat{C_{4}}\hat{C_{3}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{3}}\hat{D_{3}}^{\dagger}\hat{D_{4}},F_{1} = \hat{C_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{1}}\hat{D_{1}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{C_{1}}}\hat{C_{2}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{2}}\hat{D_{2}}^{\dagger},F_{2} = \hat{C_{3}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{3}}\hat{D_{3}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{C_{3}}}\hat{C_{4}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{4}}\hat{D_{4}}^{\dagger}. \end{align*}$ $

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ System (1.2) is consistent.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$\begin{align*} &R_{A_{11}}B_{11} = 0,R_{A_{1}}P_{1} = 0,P_{1}L_{D_{11}} = 0,B_{22}L_{A_{22}} = 0,R_{C_{22}}P_{2} = 0,\\ &P_{2}L_{B_{2}} = 0,R_{\hat{C_{i}}}\hat{E_{i}} = 0,\hat{E_{i}}L_{\hat{D_{i}}} = 0(i = \overline{1,4}),R_{E_{24}}EL_{E_{44}} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align*} &r(B_{11},A_{11}) = r(A_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\ B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix},r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}), \\ &r(B_{22},A_{22}) = r(A_{22}),r(E_{22},C_{22}) = r(C_{22}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22}B_{22}\\D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{22},A_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}D_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}\\E_{11}&C_{11}&0\\B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}\\C_{11}&0\\A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}D_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}&0\\F_{22}D_{11}&0&0&A_{22}\\E_{11}&C_{11}&0&0\\B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22},A_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}\\C_{11}&0\\A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&C_{11}&E_{11}\\0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}\\0&C_{11}\\0&A_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}&0&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&0&A_{22}&F_{22}D_{11}\\0&C_{11}&0&E_{11}\\0&A_{11}&0&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22}D_{11},A_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}\\0&C_{11}\\0&A_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}D_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}&0&0\\F_{22}D_{11}&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}\\E_{11}&C_{11}&0&0&0&\\0&0&C_{22}&-E_{22}&-C_{22}B_{22}\\B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}\\C_{11}&0\\0&C_{22}\\A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},D_{22},A_{22}),\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}D_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}B_{22}\\F_{22}D_{11}&0&A_{22}\\E_{11}&C_{11}&0\\B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},A_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}&0&0&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&F_{22}D_{11}\\0&C_{11}&0&0&E_{11}\\0&A_{11}&0&0&B_{11}D_{11}\\C_{22}&0&-E_{22}&-C_{22}B_{22}&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}\\0&C_{11}\\0&A_{11}\\C_{22}&0 \end{pmatrix}+r(D_{22},A_{22},F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}B_{22}&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&A_{22}&F_{22}D_{11}\\C_{11}&0&E_{11}\\A_{11}&0&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r (A_{22},F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&0&0&H_{11}&0&0&H_{5}B_{22}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{22}&0\\0&0&H_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}&0&-H_{11}B_{22}&0&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&0&0&0&0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&-F_{22}D_{11}\\ 0&0&C_{22}&0&0&E_{22}&0&0&0\\0&0&0&C_{11}&0&0&0&0&E_{11}\\0&0&0&A_{11}&0&0&0&0&B_{11}D_{11}\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&0&A_{22}&0\\0&D_{22}&A_{22}&0&F_{22}D_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&0&0&H_{11}\\0&H_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}\\0&C_{22}&0&0\\0&0&C_{11}&0\\0&0&A_{11}&0\\A_{11}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}.\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

Under these conditions, the general solution of System (1.2) is

where

$\begin{align*} &W_{1} = \hat{A_{1}}^{\dagger}(B-\hat{A_{2}}W_{1}\hat{B_{2}}-\hat{A_{3}}W_{3}\hat{B_{3}}-H_{11}W_{4}\hat{B_{4}})+L_{\hat{A_{1}}}U_{1},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &W_{2} = A_{12}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}-A_{12}^{\dagger}A_{13}M_{1}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}-A_{12}^{\dagger}S_{1}A_{13}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}\hat{B_{3}}\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-A_{12}^{\dagger}S_{1}U_{2}R_{N_{1}}\hat{B_{3}}\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{12}}U_{3}+U_{4}R_{\hat{B_{2}}},\\ &W_{3} = M_{1}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{3}}^{\dagger}+S_{1}^{\dagger}S_{1}A_{13}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{M_{1}}L_{S_{1}}U_{5}+U_{6}R_{\hat{B_{3}}}+L_{M_{1}}U_{2}R_{N_{1}},\\ &W_{4} = F_{1}+L_{\hat{C_{2}}}V_{1}+V_{2}R_{\hat{D_{1}}}+L_{\hat{C_{1}}}V_{3}R_{\hat{D_{2}}},\ or\ W_{4} = F_{2}-L_{\hat{C_{4}}}\hat{V_{1}}-\hat{V_{2}}R_{\hat {D_{3}}}-L_{\hat{C_{3}}}\hat{V_{3}}R_{\hat{D_{4}}}, \end{align*}$ $

where $ T = T_{1}-H_{11}W_{4}\hat{B_{4}}, U_{i}(i = \overline{1, 6}) $ are arbitrary matrices with appropriate sizes over $ \mathbb{H} $,

$\begin{align*} &V_{1} = (I_{m},0)[C_{24}^{\dagger}(F-C_{12}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})-C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}D_{13}+L_{C_{24}}U_{12}],\\&\hat{V_{1}} = (0,I_{m})[C_{24}^{\dagger}(F-C_{12}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})-C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}D_{13}+L_{C_{24}}U_{12}], \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad\\ &\hat{V_{2}} = [R_{C_{24}}(F-C_{12}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})D_{13}^{\dagger}+C_{24}C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{D_{13}}]\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ I_{n} \end{pmatrix},\\ &V_{2} = [R_{C_{24}}(F-C_{12}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})D_{13}^{\dagger}+C_{24}C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{D_{13}}]\begin{pmatrix} I_{n}\\ 0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &V_{3} = E_{24}^{\dagger}FE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{24}^{\dagger}E_{13}M^{\dagger}FE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{24}^{\dagger}SE_{13}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-E_{24}^{\dagger}SU_{31}R_{N}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}+L_{E_{24}}U_{32}+U_{33}R_{E_{33}},\\ &\hat{V_{3}} = M^{\dagger}FE_{44}^{\dagger}+S^{\dagger}SE_{13}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}+L_{M}L_{S}U_{41}+L_{M}U_{31}R_{N}-U_{42}R_{E_{44}},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

$ U_{11}, U_{12}, U_{21}, U_{31}, U_{32}, U_{33}, U_{41}, $ and $ U_{42} $ are any quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes, and $ m $ and $ n $ denote the column number of $ H_{11} $ and the row number of $ A_{22} $, respectively.

Theorem 4.2. Consider the matrix equation (1.3) over $ \mathbb{H} $, where $ A_{ii}, B_{ii}, C_{ii}, D_{ii}, E_{ii}, F_{ii}, G_{11} \; H_{11} (i = \overline{1, 2}) $ are given. Put

$\begin{align*} &A_{1} = C_{11}L_{A_{11}},P_{1} = E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11},A_{2} = C_{22}L_{A_{22}},P_{2} = E_{22}-C_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}B_{22}D_{22},\\ &\hat{A_{1}} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}},\hat{A_{2}} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}},\hat{B_{2}} = R_{D_{11}},\hat{A_{11}} = H_{11}L_{A_{22}}L_{A_{2}},\hat{A_{22}} = H_{11}L_{A_{22}},\hat{B_{4}} = R_{D_{22}}F_{22},\\ &B = G_{11}-F_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_{11}}A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}-H_{11}A_{22}^{\dagger}B_{22}F_{22}-H_{11}L_{A_{22}}A_{2}^{\dagger}P_{2}D_{22}^{\dagger}F_{22},\\ &R_{\hat{A_{1}}}\hat{A_{2}} = A_{12},R_{\hat{A_{1}}}\hat{A_{11}} = A_{13},R_{\hat{A_{1}}}\hat{A_{22}} = A_{33},F_{22}L_{\hat{B_{2}}} = N_{1},R_{A_{12}}A_{13} = M_{1},S_{1} = A_{13}L_{M_{1}},\\ &R_{\hat{A_{1}}}B = T_{1},C = R_{M_{1}}R_{A_{12}},\hat{C_{1}} = CA_{33},\hat{C_{2}} = R_{A_{12}}A_{33},\hat{C_{11}} = R_{A_{13}}A_{33},\hat{C_{22}} = A_{33},\\ &D = L_{\hat{B_{2}}}L_{N_{1}},\hat{D_{1}} = \hat{B_{4}},\hat{D_{2}} = \hat{B_{4}}L_{F_{22}},\hat{D_{11}} = \hat{B_{4}}L_{\hat{B_{2}}},\hat{D_{22}} = \hat{B_{4}}D,\hat{E_{1}} = CT_{1},\\ &\hat{E_{2}} = R_{A_{12}}T_{1}L_{F_{22}},\hat{E_{11}} = R_{A_{13}}T_{1}L_{\hat{B_{2}}},\hat{E_{4}} = T_{1}D,C_{24} = (L_{\hat{C_{2}}},L_{\hat{C_{22}}}),D_{13} = \begin{pmatrix} R_{\hat{D_{1}}}\\ R_{\hat{D_{11}}} \end{pmatrix},\\ &C_{21} = L_{\hat{C_{1}}},D_{12} = R_{\hat{D_{2}}},C_{33} = L_{\hat{C_{11}}},D_{33} = R_{\hat{D_{22}}},E_{11} = R_{C_{24}}C_{21},E_{22} = R_{C_{24}}C_{33},\\ &E_{33} = D_{12}L_{D_{13}},E_{44} = D_{33}L_{D_{13}},M = R_{E_{11}}E_{22},N = E_{44}L_{E_{33}},\\ &F = F_{2}-F_{1},E = R_{C_{24}}FL_{D_{13}},S = E_{22}L_{M},\hat{F_{11}} = \hat{C_{2}}L_{\hat{C_{1}}},\\ &\hat{G_{1}} = \hat{E_{2}}-\hat{C_{2}}\hat{C_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{1}}\hat{D_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{D_{2}},\hat{F_{22}} = \hat{C_{22}}L_{\hat{C_{11}}},\hat{G_{2}} = \hat{E_{4}}-\hat{C_{22}}\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{11}}\hat{D_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{D_{22}},\\ &F_{1} = \hat{C_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{1}}\hat{D_{1}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{C_{1}}}\hat{C_{2}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{2}}\hat{D_{2}}^{\dagger},F_{2} = \hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{11}}\hat{D_{11}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{C_{22}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{4}}\hat{D_{22}}^{\dagger}. \end{align*}$ $

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ System (1.3) is consistent.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$\begin{align*} &R_{A_{11}}B_{11} = 0,R_{A_{1}}P_{1} = 0,P_{1}L_{D_{11}} = 0,R_{A_{22}}B_{22} = 0,R_{A_{2}}P_{2} = 0,P_{2}L_{D_{22}} = 0,\\ &R_{\hat{C_{i}}}\hat{E_{i}} = 0,R_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{E_{11}} = 0,R_{\hat{C_{22}}}\hat{E_{4}} = 0,\hat{E_{i}}L_{\hat{D_{i}}} = 0(i = \overline{1,2}),\\ &\hat{E_{11}}L_{\hat{D_{11}}} = 0, \hat{E_{4}}L_{\hat{D_{22}}} = 0,R_{E_{11}}EL_{E_{44}} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align*} &r(B_{11},A_{11}) = r(A_{11}),r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\ B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix},r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}),\\ &r(B_{22},A_{22}) = r(A_{22}),r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22}\\B_{4}D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{22}\\A_{22} \end{pmatrix},r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}\\D_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0\\B_{22}F_{22}&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}\\A_{11}&0\\0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}\\F_{22}&0&0\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0\\0&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}\\A_{11}&0\\0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}&G_{11}D_{11}\\A_{22}&0&B_{22}F_{22}D_{11}\\0&C_{11}&E_{11}\\0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}\\0&C_{11}\\0&A_{11}\\A_{22}&0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&0&F_{22}D_{11}\\0&C_{11}&E_{11}\\0&A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}\\A_{22}&0&0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}\\0&C_{11}\\0&A_{11}\\A_{22}&0 \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}&0\\F_{22}&0&0&D_{22}\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0&0\\0&0&C_{22}&-E_{22}\\0&0&A_{22}&-B_{22}D_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&H_{11}\\A_{11}&0\\0&C_{22}\\0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22},D_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}\\F_{22}&0\\B_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}&0&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&0&D_{22}&F_{22}D_{11}\\C_{22}&0&-E_{22}&0\\0&C_{11}&0&E_{11}\\A_{22}&0&0&B_{22}F_{22}D_{11}\\0&A_{11}&0&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} H_{11}&F_{11}\\C_{22}&0\\0&C_{11}\\A_{22}&0\\0&A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(D_{22},F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&F_{22}D_{11}\\C_{11}&E_{11}\\A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}&0&0&0&H_{11}&0\\ F_{22}&0&0&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&-G_{11}D_{11}&H_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}&0\\ 0&0&F_{22}D_{11}&0&0&0&B_{22}\\ B_{11}&A_{11}&0&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&C_{22}&0&0&E_{22}\\ 0&0&-E_{11}&0&C_{11}&0&0\\ 0&0&-B_{22}F_{22}D_{11}&A_{22}&0&0&0\\ 0&0&-B_{11}D_{11}&0&A_{11}&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0&0&A_{22}&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&0\\0&D_{22}&F_{22}D_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&0&0&H_{11}\\0&H_{11}&F_{11}&H_{11}\\0&C_{22}&0&0\\0&A_{22}&0&0\\0&0&C_{11}&0\\0&0&A_{11}&0\\A_{11}&0&0&0\\0&0&0&A_{22} \end{pmatrix}.\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

Under these conditions, the general solution of System (1.3) is

$\begin{align*} &X_{1} = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}+L_{A_{11}}A_{1}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{11}}L_{A_{1}}W_{1}+L_{A_{11}}W_{2}R_{D_{11}},\\ &X_{2} = A_{22}^{\dagger}B_{4}+L_{A_{22}}A_{2}^{\dagger}P_{2}D_{22}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{22}}L_{A_{2}}W_{3}+L_{A_{22}}W_{4}R_{D_{22}}, \end{align*}$ $

where

$\begin{align*} &W_{1} = \hat{A_{1}}^{\dagger}(B-\hat{A_{2}}W_{1}\hat{B_{2}}-\hat{A_{11}}W_{3}F_{22}-\hat{A_{22}}W_{4}\hat{B_{4}})+L_{\hat{A_{1}}}U_{1},\\ &W_{2} = A_{12}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}-A_{12}^{\dagger}A_{13}M_{1}^{\dagger}T\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}-A_{12}^{\dagger}S_{1}A_{13}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}F_{22}\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-A_{12}^{\dagger}S_{1}U_{2}R_{N_{1}}F_{22}\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{12}}U_{3}+U_{4}R_{\hat{B_{2}}},\\ &W_{3} = M_{1}^{\dagger}TF_{22}^{\dagger}+S_{1}^{\dagger}S_{1}A_{13}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{M_{1}}L_{S_{1}}U_{5}+U_{6}R_{F_{22}}+L_{M_{1}}U_{2}R_{N_{1}},\\ &W_{4} = F_{1}+L_{\hat{C_{2}}}V_{1}+V_{2}R_{\hat{D_{1}}}+L_{\hat{C_{1}}}V_{3}R_{\hat{D_{2}}},\ or\ W_{4} = F_{2}-L_{\hat{C_{22}}}\hat{V_{1}}-\hat{V_{2}}R_{\hat {D_{11}}}-L_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{V_{3}}R_{\hat{D_{22}}}, \end{align*}$ $

where $ T = T_{1}-\hat{A_{22}}W_{4}\hat{B_{4}}, U_{i}(i = \overline{1, 6}) $ are arbitrary matrices with appropriate sizes over $ \mathbb{H} $,

$\begin{align*} &V_{1} = (I_{m},0)[C_{24}^{\dagger}(F-C_{21}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})-C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}D_{13}+L_{C_{24}}U_{12}],\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad\\ &\hat{V_{1}} = (0,I_{m})[C_{24}^{\dagger}(F-C_{21}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})-C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}D_{13}+L_{C_{24}}U_{12}],\\ &\hat{V_{2}} = [R_{C_{24}}(F-C_{21}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})D_{13}^{\dagger}+C_{24}C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{D_{13}}]\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ I_{n} \end{pmatrix},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &V_{2} = [R_{C_{24}}(F-C_{21}V_{3}D_{12}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})D_{13}^{\dagger}+C_{24}C_{24}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{D_{13}}]\begin{pmatrix} I_{n}\\ 0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &V_{3} = E_{11}^{\dagger}FE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{11}^{\dagger}E_{22}M^{\dagger}FE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{11}^{\dagger}SE_{22}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-E_{11}^{\dagger}SU_{31}R_{N}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}+L_{E_{11}}U_{32}+U_{33}R_{E_{33}},\\ &\hat{V_{3}} = M^{\dagger}FE_{44}^{\dagger}+S^{\dagger}SE_{22}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}+L_{M}L_{S}U_{41}+L_{M}U_{31}R_{N}-U_{42}R_{E_{44}},\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

$ U_{11}, U_{12}, U_{21}, U_{31}, U_{32}, U_{33}, U_{41}, $ and $ U_{42} $ are any matrices with appropriate sizes, and $ m $ and $ n $ denote the column number of $ H_{11} $ and the row number of $ D_{22} $, respectively.

Theorem 4.3. Consider the matrix equation (1.4) over $ \mathbb{H} $, where $ A_{ii}, B_{ii}, C_{ii}, D_{ii}, E_{ii}, F_{ii}(i = \overline{1, 2}), $ and $ G_{11} $ are given. Put

$\begin{align*} &\hat{A_{1}} = C_{11}L_{A_{11}},P_{1} = E_{11}-C_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}D_{11},\hat{A_{2}} = C_{22}L_{A_{22}},P_{2} = E_{22}-C_{22}A_{22}^{\dagger}B_{22}D_{22},\\ &A_{5} = F_{11}L_{A_1}L_{\hat{A_{1}}},A_{6} = F_{11}L_{A_{11}},A_{7} = L_{A_{22}}L_{\hat{A_{2}}},A_{8} = L_{A_{22}},B_{5} = R_{D_{11}},B_{7} = R_{D_{22}}F_{22},\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &B = G_{11}-F_{11}A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}-F_{11}L_{A_1}\hat{A_{1}}^{\dagger}P_{1}D_{11}^{\dagger}-A_{22}^{\dagger}B_{22}F_{22}-L_{A_{22}}\hat{A_{2}}^{\dagger}P_{2}D_{22}^{\dagger}F_{22},\\ &R_{A_{5}}A_{6} = A_{11},R_{A_{5}}A_{7} = A_{2},R_{A_{5}}A_{8} = A_{33},F_{22}L_{B_{5}} = N_{1},R_{A_{11}}A_{2} = M_{1},S_{1} = A_{2}L_{M_{1}},\\ &R_{A_{5}}B = T_{1},C = R_{M_{1}}R_{A_{11}},\hat{C_{1}} = CA_{33},\hat{C_{2}} = R_{A_{11}}A_{33},\hat{C_{11}} = R_{A_{2}}A_{33},\hat{C_{4}} = A_{33},\\ &D = L_{B_{5}}L_{N_{1}},\hat{D_{1}} = B_{7},\hat{D_{2}} = B_{7}L_{F_{22}},\hat{D_{3}} = B_{7}L_{B_{5}},\hat{D_{4}} = B_{7}D,\hat{E_{1}} = CT_{1},\hat{E_{2}} = R_{A_{11}}T_{1}L_{F_{22}},\\ &\hat{E_{11}} = R_{A_{2}}T_{1}L_{B_{5}},\hat{E_{4}} = T_{1}D,C_{1} = (L_{\hat{C_{2}}},L_{\hat{C_{4}}}),D_{13} = \begin{pmatrix} R_{\hat{D_{1}}}\\ R_{\hat{D_{3}}} \end{pmatrix},D_{1} = L_{\hat{C_{1}}},D_{2} = R_{\hat{D_{2}}},\\ &C_{33} = L_{\hat{C_{11}}},D_{33} = R_{\hat{D_{4}}},E_{11} = R_{C_{1}}D_{1},E_{2} = R_{C_{1}}C_{33},E_{33} = D_{2}L_{D_{13}},E_{44} = D_{33}L_{D_{13}},\\ &M = R_{E_{11}}E_{2},N = E_{44}L_{E_{33}},F = \hat{F_{2}}-\hat{F_{1}},E = R_{C_{1}}FL_{D_{13}},S = E_{2}L_{M},F_{11} = \hat{C_{2}}L_{\hat{C_{1}}},\quad\quad\\ &\hat{G_{1}} = \hat{E_{2}}-\hat{C_{2}}\hat{C_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{1}}\hat{D_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{D_{2}},F_{33} = \hat{C_{4}}L_{\hat{C_{11}}},\hat{G_{2}} = \hat{E_{4}}-\hat{C_{4}}\hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{11}}\hat{D_{3}}^{\dagger}\hat{D_{4}},\\ &\hat{F_{1}} = \hat{C_{1}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{1}}\hat{D_{1}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{C_{1}}}\hat{C_{2}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{2}}\hat{D_{2}}^{\dagger},\hat{F_{2}} = \hat{C_{11}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{11}}\hat{D_{3}}^{\dagger}+L_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{C_{4}}^{\dagger}\hat{E_{4}}\hat{D_{4}}^{\dagger}. \end{align*}$ $

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ Equation (1.4) is consistent.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$\begin{align*} &R_{A_{11}}B_{11} = 0,R_{\hat{A_{1}}}P_{1} = 0,P_{1}L_{D_{11}} = 0,R_{A_{22}}B_{22} = 0,\\ &R_{\hat{A_{2}}}P_{2} = 0,P_{2}L_{D_{22}} = 0,\ R_{\hat{C_{i}}}\hat{E_{i}} = 0,\hat{E_{i}}L_{\hat{D_{i}}} = 0(i = \overline{1,2}),\\ &R_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{E_{11}} = 0,R_{\hat{C_{4}}}\hat{E_{4}} = 0,\hat{E_{11}}L_{\hat{D_{3}}} = 0,\hat{E_{4}}L_{\hat{D_{4}}} = 0,R_{E_{11}}EL_{E_{44}} = 0. \end{align*}$ $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align*} &r(B_{11},A_{11}) = r(A_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}&C_{11}\\ B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{11}),\ r(B_{22},A_{22}) = r(A_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}&C_{22}\\B_{22}D_{22}&A_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{22}\\A_{22} \end{pmatrix}, r\begin{pmatrix} E_{22}\\D_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(D_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} B_{11}&A_{11}\\A_{22}G_{11}-B_{22}F_{22}&A_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0\\B_{11}&A_{11}\\A_{22}G_{11}&A_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}&E_{11}\\A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}\\-A_{22}F_{11}&B_{22}F_{22}D_{11}-A_{22}G_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} 0&F_{22}D_{11}\\C_{11}&E_{11}\\A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11}&A_{22}G_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&D_{22}\\C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}\\B_{11}&A_{11}&0\\A_{22}G_{11}&A_{22}F_{11}&B_{22}D_{22} \end{pmatrix} = r(F_{22},D_{22})+r\begin{pmatrix} C_{22}F_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11}&F_{11}\\F_{22}&0\\B_{11}&A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} 0&D_{22}&F_{22}D_{11}\\C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}&C_{22}G_{11}D_{11}\\C_{11}&0&E_{22}\\A_{22}F_{11}&0&A_{22}G_{11}D_{11}-B_{22}F_{22}D_{11}\\A_{11}&0&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{22}F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{22}F_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(D_{22},F_{22}D_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}&G_{11}D_{11}\\0&F_{22}D_{11}\\C_{11}&E_{11}\\A_{11}&B_{11}D_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}\\C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix}+r(F_{22}D_{11}),\\ \end{align*}$ $

$\begin{align*} & r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&F_{22}D_{11}&0&B_{22}\\ B_{11}&A_{11}&0&0&0\\ C_{22}G_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}&C_{22}G_{11}D_{11}&-C_{22}F_{11}&E_{22}\\ 0&0&-E_{11}&C_{11}&0\\ A_{22}G_{11}&A_{22}F_{11}&A_{22}G_{11}D_{11}-B_{22}F_{22}D_{11}&-A_{22}F_{11}&0\\ 0&0&-B_{11}D_{11}&A_{11}&0\\ A_{22}G_{11}&A_{22}F_{11}&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}&0&0\\0&F_{22}D_{11}&D_{22} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} -C_{22}F_{11}&C_{22}F_{11}\\-A_{22}F_{11}&A_{22}F_{11}\\0&C_{11}\\0&A_{11}\\A_{11}&0\\A_{11}&0\\-A_{22}F_{11}&0 \end{pmatrix}.\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

Under these conditions, the general solution of System (1.4) is

$\begin{align*} &X_{1} = A_{11}^{\dagger}B_{11}+L_{A_1}\hat{A_{1}}^{\dagger}P_{1}\hat{B_{1}}^{\dagger}+L_{A_1}L_{\hat{A_{1}}}W_{1}+L_{A_1}W_{2}R_{\hat{B_{1}}},\\ &X_2 = A_2^{\dagger}B_{22}+L_{A_2}\hat{A_{2}}^{\dagger}P_{2}\hat{B_{2}}^{\dagger}+L_{A_2}L_{\hat{A_{2}}}W_{3}+L_{A_3}W_{4}R_{\hat{B_{2}}}, \end{align*}$ $

where

$\begin{align*} &W_{1} = A_{5}^{\dagger}(B-A_{6}W_{1}B_{5}-A_{7}W_{3}F_{22}-A_{8}W_{4}B_{7})+L_{A_{5}}U_{1},\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &W_{2} = A_{1}^{\dagger}TB_{5}^{\dagger}-A_{1}^{\dagger}A_{2}M_{1}^{\dagger}TB_{5}^{\dagger}-A_{1}^{\dagger}S_{1}A_{2}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}F_{22}B_{5}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-A_{1}^{\dagger}S_{1}U_{2}R_{N_{1}}F_{22}B_{5}^{\dagger}+L_{A_{1}}U_{3}+U_{4}R_{B_{5}},\\ &W_{3} = M_{1}^{\dagger}TF_{22}^{\dagger}+S_{1}^{\dagger}S_{1}A_{2}^{\dagger}TN_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{M_{1}}L_{S_{1}}U_{5}+U_{6}R_{F_{22}}+L_{M_{1}}U_{2}R_{N_{1}},\\ &W_{4} = \hat{F_{1}}+L_{\hat{C_{2}}}V_{1}+V_{2}R_{\hat{D_{1}}}+L_{\hat{C_{1}}}V_{3}R_{\hat{D_{2}}},\ or\ W_{4} = \hat{F_{2}}-L_{\hat{C_{4}}}\hat{V_{1}}-\hat{V_{2}}R_{\hat{D_{3}}}-L_{\hat{C_{11}}}\hat{V_{3}}R_{\hat{D_{4}}},\quad\quad\quad \end{align*}$ $

where $ T = T_{1}-A_{8}W_{4}B_{7}, U_{i}(i = \overline{1, 6}) $ are arbitrary matrices with appropriate sizes over $ \mathbb{H} $,

$\begin{align*} &V_{1} = (I_{m},0)[C_{1}^{\dagger}(F-D_{1}V_{3}D_{2}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})-C_{1}^{\dagger}U_{11}D_{1}+L_{C_{1}}U_{12}],\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\\ &\hat{V_{1}} = (0,I_{m})[C_{1}^{\dagger}(F-D_{1}V_{3}D_{2}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})-C_{1}^{\dagger}U_{11}D_{1}+L_{C_{1}}U_{12}],\\ &\hat{V_{2}} = [R_{C_{1}}(F-D_{1}V_{3}D_{2}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})D_{1}^{\dagger}+C_{1}C_{1}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{D_{1}}]\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ I_{n} \end{pmatrix},\\ &V_{2} = [R_{C_{1}}(F-C_{2}V_{3}D_{2}-C_{33}\hat{V_{3}}D_{33})D_{1}^{\dagger}+C_{1}C_{1}^{\dagger}U_{11}+U_{21}R_{D_{1}}]\begin{pmatrix} I_{n}\\ 0 \end{pmatrix},\\ &V_{3} = E_{11}^{\dagger}FE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{11}^{\dagger}E_{2}M^{\dagger}FE_{33}^{\dagger}-E_{11}^{\dagger}SE_{2}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}\\ &\quad\quad-E_{11}^{\dagger}SU_{31}R_{N}E_{44}E_{33}^{\dagger}+L_{E_{11}}U_{32}+U_{33}R_{E_{33}},\\ &\hat{V_{3}} = M^{\dagger}FE_{44}^{\dagger}+S^{\dagger}SE_{2}^{\dagger}FN^{\dagger}+L_{M}L_{S}U_{41}+L_{M}U_{31}R_{N}-U_{42}R_{E_{44}}, \end{align*}$ $

$ U_{11}, U_{12}, U_{21}, U_{31}, U_{32}, U_{33}, U_{41}, $ and $ U_{42} $ are any quaternion matrices with appropriate sizes, and $ m $ and $ n $ denote the column number of $ A_{22} $ and the row number of $ D_{22} $, respectively.

5. An application of the system (1.1)

In this section, we use the Lemma 2.2 and the Theorem 3.1 to study matrix equation (1.9) involving $ \eta $-Hermicity matrices.

Theorem 5.1. Let $ A_{11}, B_{11}, C_{11}, E_{11}, F_{11}, F_{22}, $ and $ G_{11}(G_{11} = G_{11}^{\eta^{*}}) $ be given matrices. Put

$\begin{align*} &A_{1} = C_{11} L_{A_{11}}, P_{1} = E_{11}-C_{11} A_{11}^{\dagger} B_{11} C_{11}^{\eta^{*}}, B_{2} = A_{1}^{\eta^{*}}, P_{2} = P_{1}^{\eta^{*}},\hat{B}_{1} = R_{B_{2}}\left(F_{22} L_{A_{11}}\right)^{\eta^{*}}, \\ &\hat{A}_{3} = F_{11} L_{A_{11}}, \hat{A}_{2} = \hat{A}_{3} L_{A_{1}}, \hat{A}_{4} = L_{C_{11}},\hat{B}_{3} = \left(F_{11} \hat{A}_{4}\right)^{\eta^{*}},\hat{B}_{4} = \left(F_{22} L_{A_{11}}\right)^{\eta^{*}}, F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} L_{\hat{B}_{1}} = \hat{B}_{11},\\ &P = G_{11}-F_{11} A_{11}^{\dagger} B_{11} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}}-\hat{A}_{3} A_{1}^{\dagger} P_{1}\left(F_{11} C_{11}^{\dagger}\right)^{\eta^{*}}-\left(F_{22} A_{11}^{\dagger} B_{11}\right)^{\eta^{*}}-C_{11}^{\dagger} P_{2} B_{2}^{\dagger} \hat{B}_{4},\hat{B}_{22} L_{B_{11}} = N_{1},\\ & \hat{B}_{3} L_{\hat{B}_{1}} = \hat{B}_{22}, \hat{B}_{4} L_{\hat{B}_{1}} = \hat{B}_{33}, R_{\hat{A}_{2}} \hat{A}_{3} = \hat{M}_{1}, S_{1} = \hat{A}_{3} L_{M_{1}},T_{1} = PL_{\hat{B_{1}}}, C = R_{M_{1}} R_{\hat{A}_{2}},C_{1} = C\hat{A}_{4}, \\ & C_{2} = R_{\hat{A}_{2}} \hat{A}_{4}, C_{3} = R_{\hat{A}_{3}} \hat{A}_{4}, C_{4} = \hat{A}_{4}, D = L_{\hat{B}_{11}} L_{N_{1}},D_{1} = \hat{B}_{33},D_{2} = \hat{B}_{33} L_{\hat{B}_{22}}, D_{4} = \hat{B}_{33} D, \\ & E_{1} = C T_{1}, E_{2} = R_{\hat{A}_{2}} T_{1} L_{\hat{B}_{11}}, E_{4} = T_{1} D,\hat{C}_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} L_{C_{2}}, L_{C_{4}} \end{pmatrix},D_{3} = \hat{B}_{33} L_{\hat{B}_{11}},\hat{D}_{11} = \begin{pmatrix} R_{D_{1}}\\R_{D_{3}} \end{pmatrix}, \\ &\hat{C}_{22} = L_{C_{1}}, \hat{D}_{22} = R_{D_{2}},\ \hat{C}_{33} = L_{C_{3}}, \hat{D}_{33} = R_{D_{4}}, \hat{E}_{11} = R_{\hat{C}_{11}} \hat{C}_{22}, \hat{E}_{22} = R_{\hat{C}_{11}} \hat{C}_{33}, \\ &\hat{E}_{33} = \hat{D}_{22} L_{\hat{D}_{11}}, \hat{E}_{44} = \hat{D}_{33} L_{\hat{D}_{11}}, M = R_{\hat{E}_{11}} \hat{E}_{22}, N = \hat{E}_{44} L_{\hat{E}_{33}},\ F = F_{2}-F_{1}, E = R_{\hat{C}_{11}} F L_{\hat{D}_{11}}, \\ &S = \hat{E}_{22} L_{M},\hat{F_{11}} = C_{2} L_{C_{1}}, G_{1} = E_{2}-C_{2} C_{1}^{\dagger} E_{1} D_{1}^{\dagger} D_{2}, \hat{F_{22}} = C_{4} L_{C_{3}}, G_{2} = E_{4}-C_{4} C_{3}^{\dagger} E_{3} D_{3}^{\dagger} D_{4}, \\ &F_{1} = C_{1}^{\dagger} E_{1} D_{1}^{\dagger}+L_{C_{1}}^{\dagger} C_{2}^{\dagger} E_{2} D_{2}^{\dagger}, F_{2} = C_{3}^{\dagger} E_{3} D_{3}^{\dagger}+L_{C_{3}} C_{4}^{\dagger} E_{4} D_{4}^{\dagger} . \end{align*}$ $

Then, the following statements are equivalent:

$ \mathrm{(1)} $ System (1.9) is solvable.

$ \mathrm{(2)} $

$ R_{A_{11}} B_{11} = 0, R_{A_{1}} P_{1} = 0, P_{1}\left(R_{C_{11}}\right)^{\eta^{*}} = 0, R_{C_{i}} E_{i} = 0, E_{i} L_{D_{i}} = 0(i = \overline{1,4}), R_{\hat{E}_{11}} E L_{\hat{E}_{44}} = 0 . $

$ \mathrm{(3)} $

$\begin{align*} &r(B_{11}, A_{11}) = r(A_{11}), r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11} & C_{11} \\ B_{11} C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11}\\A_{11} \end{pmatrix} ,\ r\begin{pmatrix} E_{11}\\C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} = r(C_{11}),\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{\eta^{*}}} \\ B_{11} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11} & 0 & 0 \\ C_{11} G_{11} & C_{11} F_{11} & E_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11} B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} = r\left(F_{22}^{\eta^{*}}, C_{11}^{\eta^{*}}, A_{11}^{\eta^{*}}\right)+r\binom{A_{11}}{C_{11} F_{11}},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & -C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ 0 & C_{11} & E_{11} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & A_{11} & B_{11} C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ C_{11} G_{11} & C_{11} F_{11} & 0 & E_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11} B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} = \\ &r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11} \\ A_{11} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} +r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ 0 & A_{11} & 0 & 0 \\ C_{11} G_{11} & C_{11} F_{11} & E_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11} B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} +r\binom{A_{11}}{C_{11} F_{11}},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ C_{11} G_{11} & E_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11} B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}}, \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11} & F_{11} & B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ B_{11} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11} & 0 \end{pmatrix} = r\binom{F_{11}}{A_{11}}+r\left(F_{22}^{\eta^{*}}, A_{11}^{\eta^{*}}\right), \\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11} & F_{11} & 0 & B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & -C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ 0 & C_{11} & E_{11} & 0 \\ 0 & A_{11} & B_{11} C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} +r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11} \\ C_{11} \\ A_{11} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11} & F_{11} & B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ 0 & A_{11} & 0 \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} +r\binom{F_{11}}{A_{11}}, \\ &r\begin{pmatrix} G_{11} & B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix},\\ &r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \\ 0 & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -E_{11} & 0 \\ 0 & A_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -B_{11} C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ C_{11} G_{11} & C_{11} F_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 & E_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11} B_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \\ & = r\begin{pmatrix} F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & F_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} \end{pmatrix}+r\begin{pmatrix} C_{11} \\ A_{11} \\ C_{11} F_{11} \end{pmatrix}. \end{align*}$ $

Proof. Evidently, the system of Eq (1.9) has a solution if and only if the following matrix equation has a solution:

$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &A_{11}\hat{X_1} = B_{11}, C_{11}\hat{X_1}C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} = E_{11},\\ &\hat{X_2}A_{11}^{\eta^{*}} = B_{11}^{\eta^{*}}, C_{11}\hat{X_2}C_{11}^{\eta^{*}} = E_{11}^{\eta^{*}},\\ &F_{11}X_1F_{11}^{\eta^{*}}+\hat{X_2}^{\eta^{*}}F_{22}^{\eta^{*}} = G_{11}. \end{aligned} \end{equation}$ $

(5.1)

If (1.9) has a solution, say, $ X_1 $, then $ (\hat{X_1}, \ \hat{X_2}) : = (X_1, \ X_{1}^{\eta^{*}}) $ is a solution of (5.1). Conversely, if (5.1) has a solution, say $ (\hat{X_1}, \ \hat{X_2}) $, then it is easy to show that (1.5) has a solution

$\begin{align*} X_1 : = \dfrac{\hat{X_1}+X_{2}^{\eta^{*}}}{2}. \end{align*}$ $

According to Theorem 3.1, we can deduce that this theorem holds. □

6. Conclusions

We have established the solvability conditions and the expression of the general solutions to some constrained systems (1.1)–(1.4). As an application, we have investigated some necessary and sufficient conditions for Eq (1.9) to be consistent. It should be noted that the results of this paper are valid for the real number field and the complex number field as special number fields.

Author contributions

Long-Sheng Liu, Shuo Zhang and Hai-Xia Chang: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, validation, writing an original draft, writing a review, and editing. All authors of this article have contributed equally. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation(No. 11601328) and Key scientific research projects of univesities in Anhui province(No. 2023AH050476).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Dupont C, Armant DR, Brenner CA (2009) Epigenetics: Definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin Reprod Med 27: 351-357. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237423
[2]	Dawson MA, Kouzarides T (2012) Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell 150: 12-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013
[3]	Esteller M (2008) Molecular origins of cancer: Epigenetics in cancer. New Engl J Med 358: 1148-1159+1096. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072067
[4]	Laird PW (2005) Cancer epigenetics. Hum Mol Genet 14: R65-R76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi113
[5]	Okugawa Y, Grady WM, Goel A (2015) Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers. Gastroenterology 149: 1204-1225e1212. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.011
[6]	Deng D, Liu Z, Du Y (2010) Epigenetic Alterations as Cancer Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Biomarkers. Adv Genet 71: 126-176.
[7]	Herceg Z, Hainaut P (2007) Genetic and epigenetic alterations as biomarkers for cancer detection, diagnosis and prognosis. Mol Oncol 1: 26-41. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.01.004
[8]	Dekker C (2007) Solid-state nanopores. Nat Nanotechnol 2: 209-215. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.27
[9]	Keyser UF (2011) Controlling molecular transport through nanopores. J R Soc Interface 8: 1369-1378. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0222
[10]	Siwy ZS, Howorka S (2010) Engineered voltage-responsive nanopores. Chem Soc Rev 39: 1115-1132. doi: 10.1039/B909105J
[11]	Garaj S, Hubbard W, Reina A, et al. (2010) Graphene as a subnanometre trans-electrode membrane. Nature 467: 190-193. doi: 10.1038/nature09379
[12]	Siwy ZS, Davenport M (2010) Nanopores: Graphene opens up to DNA. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 697-698. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.198
[13]	Tada K, Haruyama J, Yang HX, et al. (2011) Graphene magnet realized by hydrogenated graphene nanopore arrays. Appl Phys Lett 99: 183111. doi: 10.1063/1.3653286
[14]	Ding S, Gao C, Gu LQ (2009) Capturing single molecules of immunoglobulin and ricin with an aptamer-encoded glass nanopore. Anal Chem 81: 6649-6655. doi: 10.1021/ac9006705
[15]	Gu LQ, Shim JW (2010) Single molecule sensing by nanopores and nanopore devices. Analyst 135: 441-451. doi: 10.1039/B907735A
[16]	Fertig N, Meyer C, Blick RH, et al. (2001) Microstructured glass chip for ion-channel electrophysiology. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 64: 409011-409014.
[17]	Li J, Stein D, McMullan C, et al. (2001) Ion-beam sculpting at nanometre length scales. Nature 412: 166-169. doi: 10.1038/35084037
[18]	Storm AJ, Chen JH, Ling XS, et al. (2003) Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision. Nat Mater 2: 537-540. doi: 10.1038/nmat941
[19]	Kasianowicz JJ, Brandin E, Branton D, et al. (1996) Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 13770-13773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13770
[20]	Laszlo AH, Derrington IM, Brinkerhoff H, et al. (2013) Detection and mapping of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine with nanopore MspA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 18904-18909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310240110
[21]	Laszlo AH, Derrington IM, Ross BC, et al. (2014) Decoding long nanopore sequencing reads of natural DNA. Nat Biotechnol 32: 829-833.
[22]	Wang Y, Montana V, Grubišić V, et al. (2015) Nanopore sensing of botulinum toxin type B by discriminating an enzymatically cleaved peptide from a synaptic protein synaptobrevin 2 derivative. ACS Appl Mater Inter 7: 184-192. doi: 10.1021/am5056596
[23]	Liu J, Eren E, Vijayaraghavan J, et al. (2012) OccK channels from Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibit diverse single-channel electrical signatures but conserved anion selectivity. Biochemistry 51: 2319-2330. doi: 10.1021/bi300066w
[24]	Mohammad MM, Iyer R, Howard KR, et al. (2012) Engineering a rigid protein tunnel for biomolecular detection. J Am Chem Soc 134: 9521-9531. doi: 10.1021/ja3043646
[25]	Cheneke BR, van den Berg B, Movileanu L (2015) Quasithermodynamic contributions to the fluctuations of a protein nanopore. ACS Chem Biol 10: 784-794. doi: 10.1021/cb5008025
[26]	Wang HY, Li Y, Qin LX, et al. (2013) Single-molecule DNA detection using a novel SP1 protein nanopore. Chem Commun (Camb) 49: 1741-1743. doi: 10.1039/c3cc38939a
[27]	Wang S, Haque F, Rychahou PG, et al. (2013) Engineered nanopore of phi29 dna-packaging motor for real-time detection of single colon cancer specific antibody in serum. ACS Nano 7: 9814-9822. doi: 10.1021/nn404435v
[28]	Wu D, Bi S, Zhang L, et al. (2014) Single-molecule study of proteins by biological nanopore sensors. Sensors (Basel) 14: 18211-18222. doi: 10.3390/s141018211
[29]	Venkatesan BM, Bashir R (2011) Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 615-624. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.129
[30]	Hall AR, Scott A, Rotem D, et al. (2010) Hybrid pore formation by directed insertion of +Ý-haemolysin into solid-state nanopores. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 874-877. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.237
[31]	Bell NA, Engst CR, Ablay M, et al. (2012) DNA origami nanopores. Nano Lett 12: 512-517. doi: 10.1021/nl204098n
[32]	Iqbal SM, Akin D, Bashir R (2007) Solid-state nanopore channels with DNA selectivity. Nat Nanotechnol 2: 243-248. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.78
[33]	Tinazli A, Tang J, Valiokas R, et al. (2005) High-affinity chelator thiols for switchable and oriented immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins: a generic platform for protein chip technologies. Chemistry 11: 5249-5259. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500154
[34]	Wei R, Pedone D, Zurner A, et al. (2010) Fabrication of metallized nanopores in silicon nitride membranes for single-molecule sensing. Small 6: 1406-1414. doi: 10.1002/smll.201000253
[35]	Yusko EC, Johnson JM, Majd S, et al. (2011) Controlling protein translocation through nanopores with bio-inspired fluid walls. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 253-260. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.12
[36]	Wang D, Harrer S, Luan B, et al. (2014) Regulating the transport of DNA through Biofriendly Nanochannels in a thin solid membrane. Sci Rep 4: 3985.
[37]	Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, et al. (2008) The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol 26: 1146-1153.
[38]	Cherf GM, Lieberman KR, Rashid H, et al. (2012) Automated forward and reverse ratcheting of DNA in a nanopore at 5-A precision. Nat Biotechnol 30: 344-348. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2147
[39]	Kasianowicz JJ, Brandin E, Branton D, et al. (1996) Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 13770-13773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13770
[40]	Manrao EA, Derrington IM, Laszlo AH, et al. (2012) Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase. Nat Biotechnol 30: 349-353. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2171
[41]	An N, Fleming AM, White HS, et al. (2012) Crown ether-electrolyte interactions permit nanopore detection of individual DNA abasic sites in single molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 11504-11509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201669109
[42]	Wallace EV, Stoddart D, Heron AJ, et al. (2010) Identification of epigenetic DNA modifications with a protein nanopore. Chem Commun(Camb) 46: 8195-8197. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02864a
[43]	Shim J, Kim Y, Humphreys GI, et al. (2015) Nanopore-based assay for detection of methylation in double-stranded DNA fragments. ACS Nano 9: 290-300. doi: 10.1021/nn5045596
[44]	Bayley H, Cremer PS (2001) Stochastic sensors inspired by biology. Nature 413: 226-230. doi: 10.1038/35093038
[45]	Gu LQ, Shim JW (2010) Single molecule sensing by nanopores and nanopore devices. Analyst 135: 441-451. doi: 10.1039/B907735A
[46]	Howorka S, Siwy Z (2009) Nanopore analytics: sensing of single molecules. Chem Soc Rev 38: 2360-2384. doi: 10.1039/b813796j
[47]	Luan B, Peng H, Polonsky S, et al. (2010) Base-by-base ratcheting of single stranded DNA through a solid-state nanopore. Phys Rev Lett 104.
[48]	Asandei A, Chinappi M, Lee JK, et al. (2015) Placement of oppositely charged aminoacids at a polypeptide termini determines the voltage-controlled braking of polymer transport through nanometer-scale pores. Sci Rep 5: 10419. doi: 10.1038/srep10419
[49]	Mereuta L, Roy M, Asandei A, et al. (2014) Slowing down single-molecule trafficking through a protein nanopore reveals intermediates for peptide translocation. Sci Rep 4: 3885.
[50]	Deamer D (2010) Nanopore analysis of nucleic acids bound to exonucleases and polymerases. Annu Rev Biophys 39: 79-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131250
[51]	Olasagasti F, Lieberman KR, Benner S, et al. (2010) Replication of individual DNA molecules under electronic control using a protein nanopore. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 798-806. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.177
[52]	Chu J, Gonzalez-Lopez M, Cockroft SL, et al. (2010) Real-time monitoring of DNA polymerase function and stepwise single-nucleotide DNA strand translocation through a protein nanopore. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49: 10106-10109. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005460
[53]	Benner S, Chen RJ, Wilson NA, et al. (2007) Sequence-specific detection of individual DNA polymerase complexes in real time using a nanopore. Nat Nanotechnol 2: 718-724. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.344
[54]	Asandei A, Iftemi S, Mereuta L, et al. (2014) Probing of various physiologically relevant metals: Amyloid-β peptide interactions with a lipid membrane-immobilized protein nanopore. J Membrane Biol 247: 523-530. doi: 10.1007/s00232-014-9662-z
[55]	Asandei A, Schiopu I, Iftemi S, et al. (2013) Investigation of Cu²⁺ binding to human and rat amyloid fragments Aβ (1-16) with a protein nanopore. Langmuir 29: 15634-15642. doi: 10.1021/la403915t
[56]	Ying YL, Wang HY, Sutherland TC, et al. (2011) Monitoring of an ATP-binding aptamer and its conformational changes using an α-hemolysin nanopore. Small 7: 87-94. doi: 10.1002/smll.201001428
[57]	Clarke J, Wu HC, Jayasinghe L, et al. (2009) Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol 4: 265-270. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.12
[58]	Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, et al. (2008) The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 26: 1146-1153. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1495
[59]	Bayley H (2006) Sequencing single molecules of DNA. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10: 628-637. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.040
[60]	Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function. Cell 116: 281-297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
[61]	Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ (2009) Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell 136: 642-655. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035
[62]	Calin GA, Croce CM (2006) MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 857-866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997
[63]	Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, et al. (2008) Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res 18: 997-1006. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.282
[64]	Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, et al. (2008) Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 10513-10518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804549105
[65]	Wang Y, Zheng D, Tan Q, et al. (2011) Nanopore-based detection of circulating microRNAs in lung cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 668-674. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.147
[66]	Tian K, He Z, Wang Y, et al. (2013) Designing a polycationic probe for simultaneous enrichment and detection of microRNAs in a nanopore. ACS Nano 7: 3962-3969. doi: 10.1021/nn305789z
[67]	Zhang X, Wang Y, Fricke BL, et al. (2014) Programming nanopore ion flow for encoded multiplex microRNA detection. ACS Nano 8: 3444-3450. doi: 10.1021/nn406339n
[68]	Cao C, Ying YL, Gu Z, et al. (2014) Enhanced resolution of low molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol) in nanopore analysis. Anal Chem 86: 11946-11950. doi: 10.1021/ac504233s
[69]	Baral A, Kumar P, Pathak R, et al. (2013) Emerging trends in G-quadruplex biology-role in epigenetic and evolutionary events. Mol BioSyst 9: 1568-1575. doi: 10.1039/c3mb25492e
[70]	Frees S, Menendez C, Crum M, et al. (2014) QGRS-Conserve: A computational method for discovering evolutionarily conserved G-quadruplex motifs. Human Genomics 8: 8. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-8-8
[71]	Paeschke K, Bochman ML, Daniela Garcia P, et al. (2013) Pif1 family helicases suppress genome instability at G-quadruplex motifs. Nature 497: 458-462. doi: 10.1038/nature12149
[72]	Qiu J, Wang M, Zhang Y, et al. (2015) Biological function and medicinal research significance of g-quadruplex interactive proteins. Curr Top Med Chem 15: 1971-1987. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150515150803
[73]	Fleming AM, Burrows CJ (2013) G-quadruplex folds of the human telomere sequence alter the site reactivity and reaction pathway of guanine oxidation compared to duplex DNA. Chem Res Toxicol 26: 593-607. doi: 10.1021/tx400028y
[74]	An N, Fleming AM, Middleton EG, et al. (2014) Single-molecule investigation of G-quadruplex folds of the human telomere sequence in a protein nanocavity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 14325-14331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415944111
[75]	An N, Fleming AM, Burrows CJ (2013) Interactions of the human telomere sequence with the nanocavity of the α-hemolysin ion channel reveal structure-dependent electrical signatures for hybrid folds. J Am Chem Soc 135: 8562-8570. doi: 10.1021/ja400973m
[76]	Wolna AH, Fleming AM, Burrows CJ (2014) Single-molecule analysis of thymine dimer-containing G-quadruplexes formed from the human telomere sequence. Biochemistry 53: 7484-7493. doi: 10.1021/bi501072m
[77]	Shim JW, Gu LQ (2008) Encapsulating a single G-quadruplex aptamer in a protein nanocavity. J Phys Chem B 112: 8354-8360. doi: 10.1021/jp0775911
[78]	Shim JW, Tan Q, Gu LQ (2009) Single-molecule detection of folding and unfolding of the G-quadruplex aptamer in a nanopore nanocavity. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 972-982. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn968
[79]	Shim J, Gu LQ (2012) Single-molecule investigation of G-quadruplex using a nanopore sensor. Methods 57: 40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.026
[80]	Yang J, Xu ZP, Huang Y, et al. (2004) ATM and ATR: Sensing DNA damage. World J Gastroentero 10: 155-160.
[81]	Diculescu VC, Paquim AMC, Brett AMO (2005) Electrochemical DNA sensors for detection of DNA damage. Sensors 5: 377-393. doi: 10.3390/s5060377
[82]	Fojta M (2002) Electrochemical sensors for DNA interactions and damage. Electroanalysis 14: 1449-1463. doi: 10.1002/1521-4109(200211)14:21<1449::AID-ELAN1449>3.0.CO;2-Z
[83]	Paleček E, Bartošík M (2012) Electrochemistry of nucleic acids. Chem Rev 112: 3427-3481. doi: 10.1021/cr200303p
[84]	An N, Fleming AM, White HS, et al. (2015) Nanopore detection of 8-oxoguanine in the human telomere repeat sequence. ACS Nano 9: 4296-4307. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00722
[85]	Boiteux S, Guillet M (2004) Abasic sites in DNA: Repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 3: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.10.002
[86]	Wilson Iii DM, Barsky D (2001) The major human abasic endonuclease: Formation, consequences and repair of abasic lesions in DNA. Mutat Res-DNA Repair 485: 283-307. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8777(01)00063-5
[87]	Reardon JT, Sancar A (2005) Nucleotide Excision Repair. In: Moldave K, editor. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, 183-235.
[88]	Gates KS (2009) An overview of chemical processes that damage cellular DNA: Spontaneous hydrolysis, alkylation, and reactions with radicals. Chem Res Toxicol 22: 1747-1760. doi: 10.1021/tx900242k
[89]	Greco NJ, Tor Y (2005) Simple fluorescent pyrimidine analogues detect the presence of DNA abasic sites. J Am Chem Soc 127: 10784-10785. doi: 10.1021/ja052000a
[90]	Lucotti A, Tommasini M, Pezzoli D, et al. (2014) Molecular interactions of DNA with transfectants: A study based on infrared spectroscopy and quantum chemistry as aids to fluorescence spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering analyses. RSC Adv 4: 49620-49627. doi: 10.1039/C4RA08845J
[91]	Sun HB, Qian L, Yokota H (2001) Detection of abasic sites on individual DNA molecules using atomic force microscopy. Anal Chem 73: 2229-2232. doi: 10.1021/ac0013249
[92]	Bowler FR, Diaz-Mochon JJ, Swift MD, et al. (2010) DNA analysis by dynamic chemistry. Angew Chem Int Edit 49: 1809-1812. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905699
[93]	Atamna H, Cheung I, Ames BN (2000) A method for detecting abasic sites in living cells: Age-dependent changes in base excision repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 686-691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.686
[94]	Kojima N, Takebayashi T, Mikami A, et al. (2009) Construction of highly reactive probes for abasic site detection by introduction of an aromatic and a guanidine residue into an aminooxy group. J Am Chem Soc 131: 13208-13209. doi: 10.1021/ja904767k
[95]	Zeglis BM, Boland JA, Barton JK (2008) Targeting abasic sites and single base bulges in DNA with metalloinsertors. J Am Chem Soc 130: 7530-7531. doi: 10.1021/ja801479y
[96]	Wang Y, Liu L, Wu C, et al. (2009) Direct detection and quantification of abasic sites for in vivo studies of DNA damage and repair. Nucl Med Biol 36: 975-983. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.07.007
[97]	Hada M, Sutherland BM (2006) Spectrum of complex DNA damages depends on the incident radiation. Radiat Res 165: 223-230. doi: 10.1667/RR3498.1
[98]	An N, Fleming AM, White HS, et al. (2012) Crown ether-electrolyte interactions permit nanopore detection of individual DNA abasic sites in single molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 11504-11509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201669109
[99]	Jin Q, Fleming AM, Johnson RP, et al. (2013) Base-excision repair activity of uracil-DNA glycosylase monitored using the latch zone of α-hemolysin. J Am Chem Soc 135: 19347-19353. doi: 10.1021/ja410615d
[100]	Johnson RP, Fleming AM, Jin Q, et al. (2014) Temperature and electrolyte optimization of the α-hemolysin latch sensing zone for detection of base modification in double-stranded DNA. Biophys J 107: 924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.006
[101]	Lin YH, Tseng WL (2009) Highly sensitive and selective detection of silver ions and silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution using an oligonucleotide-based fluorogenic probe. Chem Commun (Camb): 6619-6621.
[102]	Ono A, Cao S, Togashi H, et al. (2008) Specific interactions between silver(I) ions and cytosine-cytosine pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Commun (Camb): 4825-4827.
[103]	Wen Y, Xing F, He S, et al. (2010) A graphene-based fluorescent nanoprobe for silver(I) ions detection by using graphene oxide and a silver-specific oligonucleotide. Chem Commun (Camb) 46: 2596-2598. doi: 10.1039/b924832c
[104]	Torigoe H, Okamoto I, Dairaku T, et al. (2012) Thermodynamic and structural properties of the specific binding between Ag(+) ion and C:C mismatched base pair in duplex DNA to form C-Ag-C metal-mediated base pair. Biochimie 94: 2431-2440. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.06.024
[105]	Miyake Y, Togashi H, Tashiro M, et al. (2006) MercuryII-mediated formation of thymine-HgII-thymine base pairs in DNA duplexes. J Am Chem Soc 128: 2172-2173. doi: 10.1021/ja056354d
[106]	Tanaka Y, Oda S, Yamaguchi H, et al. (2007) 15N-15N J-coupling across Hg(II): direct observation of Hg(II)-mediated T-T base pairs in a DNA duplex. J Am Chem Soc 129: 244-245. doi: 10.1021/ja065552h
[107]	Torigoe H, Ono A, Kozasa T (2010) Hg(II) ion specifically binds with T:T mismatched base pair in duplex DNA. Chemistry 16: 13218-13225. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001171
[108]	Wen S, Zeng T, Liu L, et al. (2011) Highly sensitive and selective DNA-based detection of mercury(II) with alpha-hemolysin nanopore. J Am Chem Soc 133: 18312-18317. doi: 10.1021/ja206983z
[109]	Ono A, Torigoe H, Tanaka Y, et al. (2011) Binding of metal ions by pyrimidine base pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Soc Rev 40: 5855-5866. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15149e
[110]	Brena RM, Huang TH, Plass C (2006) Quantitative assessment of DNA methylation: Potential applications for disease diagnosis, classification, and prognosis in clinical settings. J Mol Med (Berl) 84: 365-377. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0034-0
[111]	Kriaucionis S, Heintz N (2009) The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 324: 929-930. doi: 10.1126/science.1169786
[112]	Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, et al. (2009) Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462: 315-322. doi: 10.1038/nature08514
[113]	Li WW, Gong L, Bayley H (2013) Single-molecule detection of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA through chemical modification and nanopore analysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 52: 4350-4355.
[114]	Shim J, Humphreys GI, Venkatesan BM, et al. (2013) Detection and quantification of methylation in DNA using solid-state nanopores. Sci Rep 3: 1389.
[115]	Wallace EV, Stoddart D, Heron AJ, et al. (2010) Identification of epigenetic DNA modifications with a protein nanopore. Chem Commun (Camb) 46: 8195-8197. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02864a
[116]	Wanunu M, Cohen-Karni D, Johnson RR, et al. (2011) Discrimination of methylcytosine from hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA molecules. J Am Chem Soc 133: 486-492. doi: 10.1021/ja107836t
[117]	Yu M, Hon GC, Szulwach KE, et al. (2012) Tet-assisted bisulfite sequencing of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat Protoc 7: 2159-2170. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.137
[118]	Yu M, Hon GC, Szulwach KE, et al. (2012) Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian genome. Cell 149: 1368-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.027
[119]	Booth MJ, Branco MR, Ficz G, et al. (2012) Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science 336: 934-937. doi: 10.1126/science.1220671
[120]	Wang Y, Luan BQ, Yang Z, et al. (2014) Single Molecule Investigation of Ag+ Interactions with Single Cytosine-, Methylcytosine- and Hydroxymethylcytosine-Cytosine Mismatches in a Nanopore. Sci Rep 4: 5883.
[121]	Torigoe H, Miyakawa Y, Ono A, et al. (2011) Thermodynamic properties of the specific binding between Ag+ ions and C:C mismatched base pairs in duplex DNA. Nucleos Nucleot Nucl 30: 149-167. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2011.553210
[122]	Kistenmacher TJ, Rossi M, Marzilli LG (1979) Crystal and molecular structure of (nitrato)(1-methylcytosine)silver(I): An unusual cross-linked polymer containing a heavy metal and a modified nucleic acid constituent. Inorg Chem 18: 240-244. doi: 10.1021/ic50192a007
[123]	Urata H, Yamaguchi E, Nakamura Y, et al. (2011) Pyrimidine-pyrimidine base pairs stabilized by silver(I) ions. Chem Commun (Camb) 47: 941-943. doi: 10.1039/C0CC04091F
[124]	Wang Y, Ritzo B, Gu L-Q (2015) Silver (i) ions modulate the stability of DNA duplexes containing cytosine, methylcytosine and hydroxymethylcytosine at different salt concentrations. RSC Adv 5: 2655-2658. doi: 10.1039/C4RA14490B
[125]	Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, et al. (2004) Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature 429: 457-463. doi: 10.1038/nature02625
[126]	Bestor TH (2000) The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Hum Mol Genet 9: 2395-2402. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.16.2395
[127]	Kang I, Wang Y, Reagan C, et al. (2013) Designing DNA interstrand lock for locus-specific methylation detection in a nanopore. Sci Rep 3: 2381.
[128]	Calin GA, Croce CM (2006) MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 857-866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997
[129]	Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP, Rykova EY (2010) Circulating nucleic acids as a potential source for cancer biomarkers. Curr Mol Med 10: 142-165. doi: 10.2174/156652410790963295
[130]	Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, et al. (2008) Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 10513-10518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804549105
[131]	Oremek GM, Sapoutzis N (2003) Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP), a tumor marker for small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 23: 895-898.
[132]	Molina R, Auge JM, Bosch X, et al. (2009) Usefulness of serum tumor markers, including progastrin-releasing peptide, in patients with lung cancer: correlation with histology. Tumour Biol 30: 121-129. doi: 10.1159/000224628
[133]	Albrethsen J, Moller CH, Olsen J, et al. (2006) Human neutrophil peptides 1, 2 and 3 are biochemical markers for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 42: 3057-3064. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.039
[134]	Bassani-Sternberg M, Barnea E, Beer I, et al. (2010) Soluble plasma HLA peptidome as a potential source for cancer biomarkers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 18769-18776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008501107
[135]	Stella Tsai CS, Chen HC, Tung JN, et al. (2010) Serum cellular apoptosis susceptibility protein is a potential prognostic marker for metastatic colorectal cancer. Am J Pathol 176: 1619-1628. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090467
[136]	Stoeva SI, Lee JS, Smith JE, et al. (2006) Multiplexed detection of protein cancer markers with biobarcoded nanoparticle probes. J Am Chem Soc 128: 8378-8379. doi: 10.1021/ja0613106
[137]	Zheng W, He L (2010) Multiplexed detection of protein cancer markers on Au/Ag-barcoded nanorods using fluorescent-conjugated polymers. Anal Bioanal Chem 397: 2261-2270. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3834-1
[138]	Jin H, Liu GL (2012) Fabrication and optical characterization of light trapping silicon nanopore and nanoscrew devices. Nanotechnology 23.
[139]	Merchant CA, Drndić M (2012) Graphene nanopore devices for DNA sensing. In: Gracheva ME, editor. Methods in Molecular Biology, 211-226.
[140]	Park S, Lim J, Pak YE, et al. (2013) A solid state nanopore device for investigating the magnetic properties of magnetic nanoparticles. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 13: 6900-6909. doi: 10.3390/s130606900
[141]	Wu GS, Zhang Y, Si W, et al. (2014) Integrated solid-state nanopore devices for third generation DNA sequencing. Sci China Technol Sc 57: 1925-1935. doi: 10.1007/s11431-014-5644-8
[142]	Inoue K, Kawano R, Yasuga H, et al. Logic operation in DNA nano device: Electrical input/output through biological nanopore; 2013; Freiburg. Chemical and Biological Microsystems Society. 1881-1883.
[143]	Lim MC, Lee MH, Kim KB, et al. (2015) A mask-free passivation process for low noise nanopore devices. J Nanosci Nanotechno 15: 5971-5977. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2015.10500
[144]	Mulero R, Prabhu AS, Freedman KJ, et al. (2010) Nanopore-Based Devices for Bioanalytical Applications. J Assoc Lab Automat 15: 243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jala.2010.01.009
[145]	Cockroft SL, Chu J, Amorin M, et al. (2008) A single-molecule nanopore device detects DNA polymerase activity with single-nucleotide resolution. J Am Chem Soc 130: 818-820. doi: 10.1021/ja077082c
[146]	Kawano R, Osaki T, Sasaki H, et al. (2010) A polymer-based nanopore-integrated microfluidic device for generating stable bilayer lipid membranes. Small 6: 2100-2104. doi: 10.1002/smll.201000997
[147]	Shim JW, Gu LQ (2007) Stochastic sensing on a modular chip containing a single-ion channel. Anal Chem 79: 2207-2213. doi: 10.1021/ac0614285
[148]	Kang XF, Cheley S, Rice-Ficht AC, et al. (2007) A storable encapsulated bilayer chip containing a single protein nanopore. J Am Chem Soc 129: 4701-4705. doi: 10.1021/ja068654g
[149]	Eisenstein M (2012) Oxford Nanopore announcement sets sequencing sector abuzz. Nat Biotechnol 30: 295-296. doi: 10.1038/nbt0412-295
[150]	Quick J, Quinlan AR, Loman NJ (2014) A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinION^TM portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer. GigaScience 3: 22. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-22
[151]	Ashton PM, Nair S, Dallman T, et al. (2015) MinION nanopore sequencing identifies the position and structure of a bacterial antibiotic resistance island. Nat Biotechnol 33: 296-302.
[152]	Madoui MA, Engelen S, Cruaud C, et al. (2015) Genome assembly using Nanopore-guided long and error-free DNA reads. BMC Genomics 16.
[153]	Loman NJ, Quick J, Simpson JT (2015) A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods 12: 733-735. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3444
[154]	Palshikar P, Sharma A, Chauhan CS, et al. (2013) Biophotonics: A novel approach biomedical diagnosis. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 21: 350-354.
[155]	Liu A, Ye B (2013) Application of gold nanoparticles in biomedical researches and diagnosis. Clin Lab 59: 23-36.
[156]	Nahar J, Imam T, Tickle KS, et al. (2012) Computational intelligence for microarray data and biomedical image analysis for the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Expert Syst Appl 39: 12371-12377. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.045
[157]	Kang JW, Lue N, Kong CR, et al. (2011) Combined confocal Raman and quantitative phase microscopy system for biomedical diagnosis. Biomed Opt Express 2: 2484-2492. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.002484
[158]	Chen KI, Li BR, Chen YT (2011) Silicon nanowire field-effect transistor-based biosensors for biomedical diagnosis and cellular recording investigation. Nano Today 6: 131-154. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.02.001
[159]	Balas C (2009) Review of biomedical optical imaging - A powerful, non-invasive, non-ionizing technology for improving in vivo diagnosis. Meas Sci Technol 20: 104020. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/10/104020
[160]	Ellis DI, Goodacre R (2006) Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis: Biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 131: 875-885. doi: 10.1039/b602376m
[161]	Bottiroli G, Croce AC (2004) Autofluorescence spectroscopy of cells and tissues as a tool for biomedical diagnosis. Photoch Photobio Sci 3: 189-210. doi: 10.1039/b310627f
[162]	Urbanova M, Plzak J, Strnad H, et al. (2010) Circulating nucleic acids as a new diagnostic tool. Cell Mol Biol Lett 15: 242-259.
[163]	Liu KJ, Brock MV, Shih Ie M, et al. (2010) Decoding circulating nucleic acids in human serum using microfluidic single molecule spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132: 5793-5798. doi: 10.1021/ja100342q
[164]	Thompson L, Turko I, Murad F (2006) Mass spectrometry-based relative quantification of human neutrophil peptides 1, 2, and 3 from biological samples. Mol Immunol 43: 1485-1489. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.08.001
[165]	Wanunu M, Dadosh T, Ray V, et al. (2010) Rapid electronic detection of probe-specific microRNAs using thin nanopore sensors. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 807-814. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.202
[166]	Squires A, Meller A (2013) DNA Capture and Translocation through Nanoscale Pores-a Fine Balance of Electrophoresis and Electroosmosis. Biophys J 105: 543-544. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.008
[167]	Wanunu M, Morrison W, Rabin Y, et al. (2010) Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 160-165. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.379
[168]	Hatlo MM, Panja D, van Roij R (2011) Translocation of DNA molecules through nanopores with salt gradients: the role of osmotic flow. Phys Rev Lett 107: 068101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.068101
[169]	He Y, Tsutsui M, Scheicher RH, et al. (2013) Mechanism of How Salt-Gradient-Induced Charges Affect the Translocation of DNA Molecules through a Nanopore. Biophys J 105: 776-782. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.065
[170]	Chou T (2009) Enhancement of charged macromolecule capture by nanopores in a salt gradient. J Chem Phys 131: 034703. doi: 10.1063/1.3170952

This article has been cited by:

Mahmoud S. Mehany, Faizah D. Alanazi, An $ \eta $-Hermitian solution to a two-sided matrix equation and a system of matrix equations over the skew-field of quaternions, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 7684, 10.3934/math.2025352

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)