
Citation: Mohammad Hashemi, Fatemeh Bizhani, Hiva Danesh, Behzad Narouie, Mehdi Sotoudeh, Mohammad Hadi Radfar, Mehdi Honarkar Ramezani, Gholamreza Bahari, Mohsen Taheri, Saeid Ghavami. MiR-608 rs4919510 C>G polymorphism increased the risk of bladder cancer in an Iranian population[J]. AIMS Genetics, 2016, 3(4): 212-218. doi: 10.3934/genet.2016.4.212
[1] | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Fozaiyah Alhubairah, Khaled M. Saad, Ekram E. Ali, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli . Monophonic sets and rough directed topological spaces: Applications with some directed networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(8): 17623-17641. doi: 10.3934/math.2025787 |
[2] | Hakeem A. Othman, Mohammed M. Al-Shamiri, Amin Saif, Santanu Acharjee, Tarik Lamoudan, Rashad Ismail . Pathless directed topology in connection to the circulation of blood in the heart of human body. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18158-18172. doi: 10.3934/math.2022999 |
[3] | R. Abu-Gdairi, A. A. El-Atik, M. K. El-Bably . Topological visualization and graph analysis of rough sets via neighborhoods: A medical application using human heart data. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26945-26967. doi: 10.3934/math.20231379 |
[4] | Ufuk Sevim, Leyla Goren-Sumer . Consensus of double integrator multiagent systems under nonuniform sampling and changing topology. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16175-16190. doi: 10.3934/math.2023827 |
[5] | Fawaz E. Alsaadi, Faisal Ali, Imran Khalid, Masood Ur Rehman, Muhammad Salman, Madini Obad Alassafi, Jinde Cao . Quantifying some distance topological properties of the non-zero component graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3512-3524. doi: 10.3934/math.2021209 |
[6] | Zeeshan Saleem Mufti, Ali Tabraiz, Qin Xin, Bander Almutairi, Rukhshanda Anjum . Fuzzy topological analysis of pizza graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12841-12856. doi: 10.3934/math.2023647 |
[7] | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . Computation of eccentric topological indices of zero-divisor graphs based on their edges. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11509-11518. doi: 10.3934/math.2022641 |
[8] | Usman Babar, Haidar Ali, Shahid Hussain Arshad, Umber Sheikh . Multiplicative topological properties of graphs derived from honeycomb structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1562-1587. doi: 10.3934/math.2020107 |
[9] | Shama Liaqat, Zeeshan Saleem Mufti, Yilun Shang . Newly defined fuzzy Misbalance Prodeg Index with application in multi-criteria decision-making. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20193-20220. doi: 10.3934/math.2024984 |
[10] | Gültekin Soylu, Müge Çerçi . Metrization of soft metric spaces and its application to fixed point theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6904-6915. doi: 10.3934/math.2024336 |
Graph theory was introduced by Leonhard Euler for obtaining solution of the mathematical problem named "Seven Bridge of Königsberg" in 1736 [4]. The practices of the theory are used in the solution of many complex problems of modern life. Topology is an important branch of mathematics because of its contribution to the other branches of mathematics. Recently, the topology has been used as the appropriate frame for all sets connected by relations. Because rough sets and graphs are also based relational combinations, the topological structures of rough sets [2] and relation between rough sets and graphs are studied by some researchers [5,6,8].
An interesting research topic in graph theory is to study graph theory by means of topology. Some researches have created topologies from graphs using various methods. In 2013, M. Amiri et. al. have created a topology using vertices of an undirected graph [3]. In 2018, K.A. Abdu and A. Kılıçman have investigated the topologies generated by directed graphs [1].
In this paper, we aim at studying to create a topological space by using a simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. We present some properties of the topology that we create by using such graphs. We show that a topology can be generated by every simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Moreover, we examine the topologies generated by using certain graphs. We define an equivalence relation on the set of the graphs with same vertices set. Finally, we give necessary and sufficient condition for continuity and openness of functions defined from one graph to another by using the topologies generated by these graphs. As a result of this, we present condition for the topological spaces generated by two different graphs to be homeomorphic.
In this section, some fundamental definitions and theorems related to the graph theory, approximation spaces and topological spaces used in the work are presented.
Definition 1. [4] A graph is an ordered pair of (U(G),E(G)), where U(G) is set of vertices, E(G) is set of edges linking to any unordered pair of vertices of G. If e is an edge linking to the vertices u and v, then it is said e links to vertices u and v. u and v called as ends of e. Moreover, it is said that these vertices are adjacent. A set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices of a graph is called an independent set. If the set of edges and vertices of a graph are finite, this graph is a finite graph. An edge whose ends are only one vertice is called a loop. An edge with distinct ends is a link.
Definition 2. [4] A graph is called simple graph, if there is at most one edge linking to arbitrary two vertices of the graph and it has not a loop.
Definition 3. [4] Let G=(U,E) be a graph. If vertices set U can divided into two subsets A and B so that each edge of G has one end in A and one end in B, G is called bipartite graph. In other words, a graph G is bipartite iff vertices set U of G can divided into two independent sets.
Definition 4. [4] A walk is a sequence of finite number of adjacent vertices such that v0e1v1e2v2...ekvk in a graph G=(U,E). A walk that each edge and vertice is used at most one time is called a path.
Definition 5. [4] A cycle is a path with the same starting and ending point and it is denoted with Cn.
Theorem 1. [7] Let X be a nonempty set and β be a class of subsets of X. If following conditions are satisfied, the collection β is a base just for one topology.
1. X=⋃B∈βB
2. For B1∈β and B2∈β, the set B1∩B2 is union of some set belonging to β.
Definition 6. Let G=(U,E) be a graph. Then the set of vertices becoming adjacent to a vertice u is called adjacency of u and it is denoted AG(u). Minimal adjacency of u is defined as
[u]G=⋂u∈AG(v)AG(v). |
Theorem 2. Let G=(U,E) be a simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Then the class βG={[u]G:u∈U} is a base for a topology on U.
Proof. Firstly, we shall show that ⋃u∈U[u]G=U. From definition of [u]G, u∈[u]G is obtained for every u∈U. Since the graph G is a graph without isolated vertices, the class {[u]G:u∈U} covers to the set U. That is,
⋃u∈U[u]G=U. |
Secondly, we shall show that there exists V⊆U such that [u]G∩[v]G=⋃w∈V⊆U[w]G, for every [u]G, [v]G∈βG. Let [u]G,[v]G∈βG. Then [u]G∩[v]G=∅ or [u]G∩[v]G≠∅. If [u]G∩[v]G=∅, it is seen that [u]G∩[v]G=⋃w∈∅[w]G since ⋃w∈∅[w]G=∅. If [u]G∩[v]G≠∅, there exists at least one w∈U such that w∈[u]G∩[v]G. Then w belongs to both [u]G and [v]G. Since w∈[u]G, it is seen that w∈AG(t), for all t∈U such that u∈AG(t). Similarly, since w∈[v]G, it is seen that w∈AG(t′), for all t′∈U such that v∈AG(t′).
Hence, w∈AG(t) and w∈AG(t′)⇒w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)
⇒⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G (Since w∈[w]G)⇒w∈⋃w∈V⊆U[w]G. (V=AG(t)∩AG(t′)) |
Then it is obtained that
[u]G∩[v]G⊆⋃w∈V⊆U[w]G | (3.1) |
On the other hand,
k∈⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G⇒k∈[w]G, for ∃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′) |
⇒k∈⋂w∈AG(w′)AG(w′)⇒k∈AG(w′), for all w∈AG(w′)⇒k∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)⇒k∈⋂u∈AG(t)AG(t) and k∈⋂v∈AG(t′)AG(t′)⇒k∈[u]G and k∈[v]G⇒k∈[u]G∩[v]G. |
Then it is obtained that
⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G⊆[u]G∩[v]G. | (3.2) |
Therefore, the following equation is obtained from (3.1) and (3.2):
[u]G∩[v]G=⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G. |
Consequently, βG is a base for a topology on U.
Corollary 1. Each simple undirected graph without isolated vertices creates a topology on vertices set of the graph.
Definition 7. Let G=(U,E) be a simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Then the topology generated by βG={[u]G:u∈U} is called the topology generated by the graph G. This topology is in the form of:
τG={G⊆U:G=⋃[u]G∈βG[u]G,u∈V⊆U}. |
Here, the class of closed sets of this topology is in the form of:
KG={Gc:G∈τG}. |
Example 1. The graph whose vertices set is U={x,y,z,t,u,v} is given in Figure 1.
The minimal adjacencies of each vertice are as follows:
[x]G={x,z},[y]G={y,t},[z]G={z},[t]G={t},[u]G={z,u},[v]G={t,v}. |
Thus,
βG={{z},{t},{x,z},{y,t},{z,u},{t,v}} |
and
τG={U,∅,{z},{t},{x,z},{y,t},{z,u},{t,v},{z,t},{y,z,t},{z,t,v},{x,z,t},{z,t,u},{x,y,z,t},{x,z,u},{x,z,t,v},{y,z,t,u},{y,t,v},{x,z,t,u},{x,y,z,t,u},{x,y,z,t,v},{y,z,t,v},{z,t,u,v},{x,z,t,u,v},y,z,t,u,v}}. |
τG is topology generated by G. The class of closed sets of this topology is
KG={U,∅,{x,y,t,u,v},{x,y,z,u,v},{y,t,u,v},{x,z,u,v},{x,y,t,v},{x,y,z,u},{x,y,u,v},{x,u,v},{x,y,u},{y,u,v},{x,y,v},{u,v},{y,t,v},{y,u},{x,v},{x,z,u},{y,v},{v},{u},{x,u},{x,y},{y},{x}}. |
Class of both open and closed sets is as follows:
CO(U)={U,∅,{x,z,u},{y,t,v}}. |
Here, it is seen that both open and closed sets different from U and ∅ are {x,z,u} and {y,t,v}. Moreover, the graph G is bipartite and these sets are independent sets whose intersection is ∅ and union is U.
Theorem 3. Let KA,B=(U,E) be a complete bipartite graph. Then the topology generated by KA,B is a quasi-discrete topology.
Proof. Since KA,B is a bipartite graph, A∩B=∅ and A∪B=U. For every x∈U, x∈A or x∈B. Let x∈A. Since KA,B is a complete bipartite graph, we have AKA,B(x)=B and [x]KA,B=A. Let x∈B. Then we have AKA,B(x)=A and [x]KA,B=B. Hence, the base of the topology generated by KA,B is as follows:
βKA,B={A,B}. |
Therefore, the topology generated by KA,B is as follows:
τKA,B={A,B,∅,U}. |
τKA,B is a quasi-discrete topology on U.
Theorem 4. Let Kn=(U,E) be a complete graph, where U={v1,v2,...,vn}. Then the topology generated by Kn is discrete topology on U.
Proof. The minimal neighborhoods of vertices set U={v1,v2,...,vn} are as follows respectively:
[v1]G={v1},[v2]G={v2},...,[vn]G={vn}. |
Therefore,
βKn={{vn}:vn∈U} |
and the topology generated by Kn is as follows:
τKn=P(U). |
It is seen that τKn is discrete topology on U.
Example 2. Let us investigate the topological space generated by C5 given Figure 2 whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,v3,v4,v5}.
The adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle C5 are as follows:
AG(v1)={v2,v5},AG(v2)={v1,v3},AG(v3)={v2,v4},AG(v4)={v3,v5},AG(v5)={v1,v4}. |
The minimal adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle C5 are as follows:
[v1]G=⋂v1∈AG(u)AG(u)={v1},[v2]G={v2},[v3]G={v3},[v4]G={v4},[v5]G={v5}. |
Thus,
βC5={{v1},{v2},{v3},{v4},{v5}}. |
The class βC5 is a base for the discrete topology on U. Thus, the topological space generated by this graph is discrete topological space on U.
Theorem 5. Let Cn=(U,E) be a cycle whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,...,vn}, where n≥3 (n≠4). Then the topological space generated by the cycle Cn=(U,E) is a discrete topological space.
Proof. The graph Cn is as in Figure 3.
The adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle Cn are as follows:
AG(v1)={vn,v2},AG(v2)={v1,v3},AG(v3)={v2,v4},...,AG(vn−1)={vn−2,vn},AG(vn)={vn−1,v1}. |
The minimal adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle Cn are as follows:
[v1]G=⋂v1∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={v1},[v2]G=⋂v2∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={v2},...,[vn−1]G=⋂vn−1∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={vn−1},[vn]G=⋂vn∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={vn}. |
Thus, we have
βCn={{vn}:Vn∈U}. |
The class βCn is a base for discrete topology on U. Thus, it is seen that the topological space generated by the graph Cn is the discrete topological space on U.
When we assume n=4, the graph C4 is a complete bipartite graph. The topological space generated the graph C4 whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,v3,v4} is τC4={U,∅,{v1,v4},{v2,v3}}. This topology is not discrete topology, but it is quasi-discrete topology.
Remark 1. Two different graph G and G′with same vertices set can create the same topology. It is seen clearly that although the graphs Kn and Cn with same vertices set is different these graphs create same topology.
Theorem 6. Let G be set of all simple undirected graphs whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,...,vn} without isolated vertices. The relation ∼ defined on G as "G1∼G2⇔τG1=τG2" is a equivalence relation.
Proof. ⅰ) Since τG1=τG1,G1∼G1
ⅱ) Let G1∼G2.From definition "∼", it is seen that τG1=τG2. Since τG2=τG1, we obtain that G2∼G1.
ⅲ) Let G1∼G2 and G2∼G3. Then it is seen that τG1=τG2and τG2=τG3. Thus, we obtain that τG1=τG3. Consequently, we obtain that G1∼G3.
Since G is symmetric, transitive and reflexive, it is an equivalence relation.
Theorem 7. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′)\ be two graphs without isolated vertices. Let τG and τG′ be the topologies generated by G and G′ respectively and f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function. Then f is continuous iff for every u∈U,
f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′. |
Proof. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a continuous function. Then βG={[u]G:u∈U} and βG′={[u′]G′:u′∈U′} are bases of topologies τG and τG′, respectively. Since f is continuous, there is B∈βG such that f(B)⊆[f(u)]G′ for every u∈U. [u]G is the minimal element containing u of βG. Thus, it is obtained that
f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′. |
Conversely, let f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′ for every u∈U. It is seen that [f(u)]G′∈βG′f(v), for every u∈U. Since f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′ and [u]G∈βGv, the function f is a continuous function.
Example 3. Let us investigate the graphs G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) is given in Figure 4. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function defined by
f(x)=f(z)=a,f(l)=b,f(y)=c,f(t)=d,f(k)=e. |
The minimal adjacencies of vertices of G are follows:
[x]G={x,z},[y]G={y,l},[z]G={x,z},[t]G={t},[l]G={l},[k]G={k}. |
The minimal adjacencies of vertices of G′ are as follows:
[a]G′={a,d},[b]G′={b},[c]G′={b,c},[d]G′={d},[e]G′={e}. |
It is seen that f([v]G)⊆[f(v)]G′, for every v∈U. Therefore, f is a continuous function.
Corollary 2. Let f:(U,τKn)→(U′,τG′) be arbitrary function, where Kn=(U,E) is a complete graph and G′=(U′,E′) is arbitrary graph. Then f is continuous function.
Theorem 8. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) be two simple undirected graphs without isolated vertice and τG and τG′ the topologies generated by this graphs, respectively. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function. Then f is open function iff for every u∈U,
[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Proof. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be an open function. Then f([u]G) is an open subset of U′ for every [u]G∈βG. It is obtained that
f(u)∈[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Therefore, we have
[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Conversely, Let [f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G), for every u∈U. It is seen that for every u∈U,
f(u)∈[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Thus, f([u]G) is an open subset of U′. Consequently, we can say f is an open function.
From above theorem, it is seen that an open function may not continuous and a continuous function may also not be open. Now we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a function to be continuous and open.
Theorem 9. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) be simple undirected two graphs without isolated vertices and τG and τG′ the topologies generated by this graphs, respectively. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function. Then f is a open and continuous function iff for every u∈U,
[f(u)]G′=f([u]G). |
Proof. It is clearly seen from Theorem 3.6 and Theorem 3.7.
Corollary 3. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) be simple undirected two graphs without isolated vertice and τG and τG′the topologies generated by this graphs, respectively. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′)\ be a function. Then f is a homeomorphism iff f is a bijection that for every u∈U,
[f(u)]G′=f([u]G). |
In this paper it is shown that topologies can be generated by simple undirected graphs without isolated vertices. It is studied topologies generated by certain graphs. Therefore, it is seen that there is a topology generated by every simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Properties proved by these generated topologies are presented. An equivalence of the graphs with same vertices set is defined. Finally, necessary and sufficient condition is given for continuity and openness of a function defined to another graph from one graph. This enables us to determine whether these topological spaces is homeomorphic without needing to find the topological spaces generated by two graphs.
The first author would like to thank TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) for their financial supports during her PhD studies.
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
[1] |
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262
![]() |
[2] | Antoni S, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. (2016) Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends. Eur Urol. |
[3] |
Cancer Genome Atlas Research N (2014) Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature 507: 315-322. doi: 10.1038/nature12965
![]() |
[4] |
Shiels MS, Gibson T, Sampson J, et al. (2014) Cigarette smoking prior to first cancer and risk of second smoking-associated cancers among survivors of bladder, kidney, head and neck, and stage I lung cancers. J Clin Oncol 32: 3989-3995. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8220
![]() |
[5] |
Vermeulen SH, Hanum N, Grotenhuis AJ, et al. (2015) Recurrent urinary tract infection and risk of bladder cancer in the Nijmegen bladder cancer study. Br J Cancer 112: 594-600. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.601
![]() |
[6] |
Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, et al. (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 63: 234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
![]() |
[7] |
Giedl J, Rogler A, Wild A, et al. (2016) TERT Core Promotor Mutations in Early-Onset Bladder Cancer. J Cancer 7: 915-920. doi: 10.7150/jca.15006
![]() |
[8] |
Sankhwar M, Sankhwar SN, Bansal SK, et al. (2016) Polymorphisms in the XPC gene affect urinary bladder cancer risk: a case-control study, meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Sci Rep 6: 27018. doi: 10.1038/srep27018
![]() |
[9] | Hua Q, Lv X, Gu X, et al. (2016) Genetic variants in lncRNA H19 are associated with the risk of bladder cancer in a Chinese population. Mutagenesis: gew018 |
[10] |
Aben KK, Witjes JA, Schoenberg MP, et al. (2002) Familial aggregation of urothelial cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 98: 274-278. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10191
![]() |
[11] |
He L, Hannon GJ (2004) MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 5: 522-531. doi: 10.1038/nrg1379
![]() |
[12] |
Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281-297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
![]() |
[13] |
Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, et al. (2004) MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J 23: 4051-4060. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600385
![]() |
[14] |
Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC (2010) Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 389-402. doi: 10.1038/nrc2867
![]() |
[15] |
Landi D, Gemignani F, Barale R, et al. (2008) A catalog of polymorphisms falling in microRNA-binding regions of cancer genes. DNA Cell Biol 27: 35-43. doi: 10.1089/dna.2007.0650
![]() |
[16] |
Wei WJ, Wang YL, Li DS, et al. (2015) Association study of single nucleotide polymorphisms in mature microRNAs and the risk of thyroid tumor in a Chinese population. Endocrine 49: 436-444. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0467-8
![]() |
[17] | Jiao L, Zhang J, Dong Y, et al. (2014) Association between miR-125a rs12976445 and survival in breast cancer patients. Am J Transl Res 6: 869-875. |
[18] | Kupcinskas J, Bruzaite I, Juzenas S, et al. (2014) Lack of association between miR-27a, miR-146a, miR-196a-2, miR-492 and miR-608 gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 4: 5993. |
[19] |
Lin M, Gu J, Eng C, et al. (2012) Genetic polymorphisms in MicroRNA-related genes as predictors of clinical outcomes in colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 18: 3982-3991. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2951
![]() |
[20] |
Ryan BM, McClary AC, Valeri N, et al. (2012) rs4919510 in hsa-mir-608 is associated with outcome but not risk of colorectal cancer. PLoS One 7: e36306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036306
![]() |
[21] | Wang R, Zhang J, Ma Y, et al. (2014) Association study of miR149 rs2292832 and miR608 rs4919510 and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a largescale population. Mol Med Rep 10: 2736-2744. |
[22] |
Zhang P, Wang J, Lu T, et al. (2015) miR-449b rs10061133 and miR-4293 rs12220909 polymorphisms are associated with decreased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population. Tumour Biol 36: 8789-8795. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3422-2
![]() |
[23] | Morales S, Gulppi F, Gonzalez-Hormazabal P, et al. (2016) Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Pre-miR-27a, Pre-miR-196a2, Pre-miR-423, miR-608 and Pre-miR-618 with breast cancer susceptibility in a South American population. BMC Genet 17: 109. |
[24] | Ma XP, Yu G, Chen X, et al. (2016) MiR-608 rs4919510 is associated with prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol 2016: 1-12. |
[25] | Sclafani F, Chau I, Cunningham D, et al. (2016) Sequence Variation in Mature MicroRNA-608 and benefit from neo-adjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Carcinogenesis: bgw073. |
[26] | Jiang J, Jia ZF, Cao DH, et al. (2016) Association of the miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism with gastric cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Future Oncol 0. |
[27] |
Yang PW, Huang YC, Hsieh CY, et al. (2014) Association of miRNA-related Genetic Polymorphisms and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21: 601-609. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3709-3
![]() |
[28] | Hashemi M, Sanaei S, Rezaei M, et al. (2016) miR-608 rs4919510 C>G polymorphism decreased the risk of breast cancer in an Iranian subpopulation. Exp Oncol 38: 57-59. |
[29] |
Qiu F, Yang L, Zhang L, et al. (2015) Polymorphism in mature microRNA-608 sequence is associated with an increased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Gene 565: 180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.008
![]() |
[30] |
Huang AJ, Yu KD, Li J, et al. (2012) Polymorphism rs4919510:C>G in mature sequence of human microRNA-608 contributes to the risk of HER2-positive breast cancer but not other subtypes. PLoS One 7: e35252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035252
![]() |
[31] |
Dai ZM, Kang HF, Zhang WG, et al. (2016) The Associations of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in miR196a2, miR-499, and miR-608 With Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A STROBE-Compliant Observational Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 95: e2826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002826
![]() |
[32] |
Yin Z, Cui Z, Guan P, et al. (2015) Interaction between Polymorphisms in Pre-MiRNA Genes and Cooking Oil Fume Exposure on the Risk of Lung Cancer in Chinese Non-Smoking Female Population. PLoS One 10: e0128572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128572
![]() |
[33] |
Yin Z, Cui Z, Ren Y, et al. (2016) Association between polymorphisms in pre-miRNA genes and risk of lung cancer in a Chinese non-smoking female population. Lung Cancer 94: 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.01.013
![]() |
[34] |
Kupcinskas J, Wex T, Link A, et al. (2014) Gene polymorphisms of micrornas in Helicobacter pylori-induced high risk atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer. PLoS One 9: e87467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087467
![]() |
[35] |
Wang K, Liang Q, Wei L, et al. (2016) MicroRNA-608 acts as a prognostic marker and inhibits the cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Tumour Biol 37: 3823-3830. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4213-5
![]() |
[36] |
Xing J, Wan S, Zhou F, et al. (2012) Genetic polymorphisms in pre-microRNA genes as prognostic markers of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21: 217-227. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0624
![]() |
[37] |
Pardini B, Rosa F, Naccarati A, et al. (2015) Polymorphisms in microRNA genes as predictors of clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients. Carcinogenesis 36: 82-86. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu224
![]() |
[38] | Liu H, Zhou Y, Liu Q, et al. (2016) Association of miR-608 rs4919510 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 13,664 subjects. Oncotarget. |
[39] |
Rah H, Kim HS, Cha SH, et al. (2015) Association of breast cancer-related microRNA polymorphisms with idiopathic primary ovarian insufficiency. Menopause 22: 437-443. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000325
![]() |
[40] | Li D, Zhu G, Di H, et al. (2016) Associations between genetic variants located in mature microRNAs and risk of lung cancer. Oncotarget. |
[41] |
Zhang Y, Schiff D, Park D, et al. (2014) MicroRNA-608 and microRNA-34a regulate chordoma malignancy by targeting EGFR, Bcl-xL and MET. PLoS One 9: e91546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091546
![]() |
[42] | Hezaveh K, Kloetgen A, Bernhart SH, et al. (2016) Alterations of miRNAs and miRNA-regulated mRNA expression in GC B cell lymphomas determined by integrative sequencing analysis. Haematologica. |
[43] |
Marzec-Kotarska B, Cybulski M, Kotarski JC, et al. (2016) Molecular bases of aberrant miR-182 expression in ovarian cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 55: 877-889. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22387
![]() |
1. | Abdulgani Şahin, Gohar Ali, Further Results on Total Edge-Vertex Domination, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/5439610 | |
2. | Hakeem A. Othman, Mohammed M. Al-Shamiri, Amin Saif, Santanu Acharjee, Tarik Lamoudan, Rashad Ismail, Pathless directed topology in connection to the circulation of blood in the heart of human body, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 18158, 10.3934/math.2022999 | |
3. | B K. Mahmoud, Y Y Yousif, Compatibility and Edge Spaces in Alpha - Topological Spaces, 2021, 1963, 1742-6588, 012073, 10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012073 | |
4. | Nechervan B. Ibrahim, Alias B. Khalaf, On maximal block topological space, 2023, 45, 10641246, 8541, 10.3233/JIFS-223749 | |
5. | Hakeem Othman, Ahmed Ayache, Amin Saif, On L2−directed topological spaces in directed graphs theory, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 10005, 10.2298/FIL2329005O | |
6. | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Ekram E. Ali, Mouataz B. Mesmouli, On m-Negative Sets and Out Mondirected Topologies in the Human Nervous System, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3763, 10.3390/math12233763 | |
7. | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli, Fozaiyah Alhubairah, Upper a-Graphical Topological Spaces with the COVID-19 Form and Its Diffusion, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 84, 10.3390/axioms14020084 | |
8. | Husniyah Alzubaidi, Ljubiša D. R. Kočinac, Hakeem A. Othman, On Topologies on Simple Graphs and Their Applications in Radar Chart Methods, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 178, 10.3390/axioms14030178 | |
9. | Quang-Thinh Bui, Thanh Nha Nguyen, Tzung-Pei Hong, Bay Vo, Graph-induced topological space: from topologies to separation axioms, 2025, 1432-7643, 10.1007/s00500-025-10633-9 | |
10. | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Fozaiyah Alhubairah, Khaled M. Saad, Ekram E. Ali, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli, Monophonic sets and rough directed topological spaces: Applications with some directed networks, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 17623, 10.3934/math.2025787 |