Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article

Soil management practices affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi propagules, root colonization and growth of rainfed maize

  • Agronomic management practices influence beneficial soil biota, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). AMF colonizes about eighty percent of land plants, promoting absorption of essential nutrients and crop growth. Here, a 5-year field experiment was carried out in Central Kenyan Highlands to determine the effect of tillage, mulching and inorganic fertilizers on the number of infective AMF propagules in the soil, mycorrhizal root colonization of maize and uptake of P and N from the soil. The study involved conventional and minimum tillage systems, mulching using dried maize stovers and inorganic fertilizers (120 kg N/ha). The experiment was set up in randomized complete block design and replicated thrice. The number of infective AMF propagules decreased in the following order; V4 stage (p < 0.0001), V6 stage (p < 0.0001), maize harvest (p = 0.0076) and before maize planting (p = 0.0061). Minimum tillage + mulch + no NP fertilizer (ZRO) treatment recorded the highest number of infective AMF propagules with an average of 90 propagules g-1 of soil whereas conventional tillage + mulch + NP fertilizer (CRF) and conventional tillage + no mulch + NP fertilizer (CWF) treatments recorded the lowest number of AMF propagules with an average of 1.33 propagules g-1 of soil. Besides, AMF colonization of maize roots at V4, V6 and harvest stages was significantly affected by tillage (p < 0.0001), mulch (p = 0.0001) and fertilizer (p < 0.0001). Results at juvenile stage showed a strong positive correlation between AMF colonization and shoot P (r = 0.933, p < 0.0001) and N (r = 0.928, p < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate a strong effect of agronomic management practices on soil AMF propagules which subsequently affected root colonization and uptake of essential nutrients such as P and N.

    Citation: Methuselah Mang’erere Nyamwange, Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru, Monicah Mucheru-Muna, Felix Ngetich. Soil management practices affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi propagules, root colonization and growth of rainfed maize[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(2): 120-134. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.2.120

    Related Papers:

    [1] Clarissa Trindade, Carla S.S. Gouveia, Maria Cristina O. Oliveira, Humberto Nóbrega, José G.R. de Freitas, Miguel A.A. Pinheiro de Carvalho . Inhibitory activity of the peel and seed of Annona cherimola Mill. against Fusarium and Aspergillus pathogens. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 155-176. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025009
    [2] Gullo Gregorio, Dattola Antonio, Zappia Rocco . Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in southern Italy. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 658-671. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.658
    [3] Alexandros Tsoupras, Eirini Panagopoulou, George Z. Kyzas . Olive pomace bioactives for functional foods and cosmetics. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 743-766. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024040
    [4] Patrick A. Blamo Jr, Hong Ngoc Thuy Pham, The Han Nguyen . Maximising phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity from Laurencia intermedia using ultrasound-assisted extraction. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 32-48. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021003
    [5] Shahindokht Bassiri-Jahromi, Aida Doostkam . Comparative evaluation of bioactive compounds of various cultivars of pomegranate (Punica granatum) in different world regions. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(1): 41-55. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.41
    [6] Andrea Ertani, Ornella Francioso, Serenella Nardi . Mini review: fruit residues as plant biostimulants for bio-based product recovery. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(3): 251-257. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.251
    [7] Teti Estiasih, Jatmiko Eko Witoyo, Khofifah Putri Wulandari, Fadhillah Dwi Juniati, Widiastuti Setyaningsih, Hanifah Nuryani Lioe, Miguel Palma, Kgs Ahmadi, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Elya Mufidah . Stability comparison of conventional and foam-mat red and purple dried roselle calyces powder as a function of pH. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 177-198. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025010
    [8] Ardiansyah, Fauziyyah Ariffa, Rizki Maryam Astuti, Wahyudi David, Dody Dwi Handoko, Slamet Budijanto, Hitoshi Shirakawa . Non-volatile compounds and blood pressure-lowering activity of Inpari 30 and Cempo Ireng fermented and non-fermented rice bran. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 337-359. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021021
    [9] Alexandros Tsoupras, Eirini A. Panagopoulou, George Z. Kyzas . Anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic and anti-oxidant bioactives of beer and brewery by-products, as ingredients of bio-functional foods, nutraceuticals, cosmetics, cosmeceuticals and pharmaceuticals with health promoting properties. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 568-606. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024032
    [10] Nubia Amaya Olivas, Cindy Villalba Bejarano, Guillermo Ayala Soto, Miriam Zermeño Ortega, Fabiola Sandoval Salas, Esteban Sánchez Chávez, Leon Hernández Ochoa . Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of essential oils of Origanum dictamnus from Mexico. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 387-394. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.387
  • Agronomic management practices influence beneficial soil biota, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). AMF colonizes about eighty percent of land plants, promoting absorption of essential nutrients and crop growth. Here, a 5-year field experiment was carried out in Central Kenyan Highlands to determine the effect of tillage, mulching and inorganic fertilizers on the number of infective AMF propagules in the soil, mycorrhizal root colonization of maize and uptake of P and N from the soil. The study involved conventional and minimum tillage systems, mulching using dried maize stovers and inorganic fertilizers (120 kg N/ha). The experiment was set up in randomized complete block design and replicated thrice. The number of infective AMF propagules decreased in the following order; V4 stage (p < 0.0001), V6 stage (p < 0.0001), maize harvest (p = 0.0076) and before maize planting (p = 0.0061). Minimum tillage + mulch + no NP fertilizer (ZRO) treatment recorded the highest number of infective AMF propagules with an average of 90 propagules g-1 of soil whereas conventional tillage + mulch + NP fertilizer (CRF) and conventional tillage + no mulch + NP fertilizer (CWF) treatments recorded the lowest number of AMF propagules with an average of 1.33 propagules g-1 of soil. Besides, AMF colonization of maize roots at V4, V6 and harvest stages was significantly affected by tillage (p < 0.0001), mulch (p = 0.0001) and fertilizer (p < 0.0001). Results at juvenile stage showed a strong positive correlation between AMF colonization and shoot P (r = 0.933, p < 0.0001) and N (r = 0.928, p < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate a strong effect of agronomic management practices on soil AMF propagules which subsequently affected root colonization and uptake of essential nutrients such as P and N.


    Cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) originates in the Andean regions of Ecuador and Peru and more generally in the American intertropical band where is found in the spontaneous and fruiting state [1]. It gradually spread to Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil, Mexico and California, becoming a characteristic species of these regions, where is still cultivated. In fact, cherimoya is cultivated in tropical countries characterized by short, mild, dry winters and hot, wet, long summers. There are only five areas in the world characterized by a Mediterranean climate [2] including the European Mediterranean Basin, were cherimoya is mainly cultivated.

    Genus Annona (family Annonaceae) includes more than 100 species of tropical and subtropical origins [1]. Among these, only five are of fruit bearing importance: Annona cherimola Mill. (cherimoya), Annona muricata L. (soursop), Annona reticulata L. (custard apple), Annona senegalensis Pers. (wild soursop) and Annona squamosa L. (conde fruit). For this reason, these are the only species being currently studied. Cherimoya is the only cultivated species whose fruit is widely marketed and is considered one of the most appreciated tropical fruits within the genus Annona spp. [3].

    Spain is the world's largest producer, with around 3000 ha of plantations [4]. In several places, production is destined for the national market due to the low resistance of the fruit to handling and transport. Its expansion is very limited due to the limited number of commercial varieties available [2]. The latest useful data indicate that there are only few specialized cherimoya orchards in southern Italy, characterized by specific pedoclimatic conditions with mild and wet winters but hot and dry summers, who differ from those of most cherimoya growing regions [5]. For years now, in the Italian markets the cultivation of fruits coming from tropical and subtropical countries has become a consolidated reality [6]. In this context cherimoya does not play such a significant role despite its organoleptic properties and health potential [7,8,9,10,11,12]. It is mainly cultivated only in several coastal areas of Sicily and Calabria and intended just for local consumption [13]. Production is primarily aimed at the fresh market, for this reason the fruits must have uniform shape and low number of seeds. At present Fino de Jete is the prevailing cultivar in European markets. It was originated from Spain, and commercially established worldwide. Recently, particular attention has also been paid to the selection of new cultivars that can enhance the positive characteristics of the existing ones like fewer seed content and more regular shape of the fruits.

    Cherimoya fruit is climacteric and ethylene plays a primary role in fruit ripening; however, ethylene production is preceded by increased respiration and decreased pulp hardness. Physicochemical changes are induced, such as an increase in titratable acidity by malic acid accumulation and total free sugar, with a consequent decrease in starch and pH.

    Fruit ripes quickly after harvesting at temperatures between 15 and 20 ℃ with a postharvest life no longer than 5 days [14]. However, Sicily is suited for tropical fruit cultivation [15] and in comparison with other common fruits there is a gap of knowledge. Furthermore Sicily is relatively closer to the large absorption market located in Europe, so could be supposed an increment of cultivated areas due to their role in human health [16]. In fact, consumption of cherimoya can contribute to the prevention of diseases associated with oxidative stress and digestive disorders due to the presence of bioactive compounds in the fruit pulp [5,17,18,19,20,21].

    The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate yields, pomological charateristics, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Fino de Jete, the commercial cultivar of cherimoya, and a new genotype obtained by breeding program in Sicily called Torre 1, in order to focus on possible prospects that cultivation of cherimoya can offer in Mediterranean climate.

    The trial was carried out in an experimental orchard located at Vivai Torre in Milazzo province of Messina (Sicily, Italy; 38°19'N, 15°24'E; 20 m a.s.l.) during two productive seasons (2016–2017). In this area the average temperatures is between 17–18 ℃ and the average rainfalls are close to 690.8 mm along 77 rainy days [22,23,24]. The station is referred to the upper thermos-Mediterranean lower sub-humid bioclimatic belt [24].

    The examined fruits belonged to the following varieties: Fino de Jete (international affirmed cv) and Torre 1 (local cv). Torre 1 was obtained by a breeding program conducted at Vivai Torre using seed reproduction and visual selection of the best genotypes. Trees were grafted on their own rootstock and planted in North-South direction with an inter-trees spacing of 6 m and 6 m between rows. Ten years trees were submitted to the organic farming techniques. Fruits were harvested in late October when not fully mature and the color is changing from dark to light green or greenish-yellow [25,26], then kept to ripen under storage conditions (20 ℃).

    Weighing and counting the total number of fruits per tree was measured to express the yield per tree. After fruit harvest, trunk circumference was measured at ~15 cm above the soil. Yield efficiency and crop load were expressed as kilogram on number of fruits per trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) or leaf area.

    A sample of eighteen fruits per CV (three fruits per tree) were handpicked and analysed for physical and chemical properties and for sensory evaluation. In particular, each fruit was submitted to the determination of fruit weight (FW), longitudinal diameter (LD), transversal diameter (TD), flesh weight (FLW), peel weight (PW), seed weight (SW), total soluble solids content (TSSC), titratable acidity (TA), TSSC/TA ratio and color index (CI). TTSC (as °Brix) was determined by digital refractometer (Palette PR-32, Atago Co., Ltd), titratable acidity (TA) was measured by titration of 10 mL juice with 0.1 N NaOH to pH 8.1 and expressed as % malic acid (mod. S compact titrator, Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain). Peel and flesh color was measured using a portable spectrophotometer (CM 700d, Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) with a D65 illuminant, previously calibrated with a white ceramic tile. Chroma value was calculated as [(a*2 + b*2)1/2] and represents the hypotenuse of a right triangle created by joining points (0, 0), (a*, b*) and (a*, 0); °Hue value was calculated as [(arctan (b*/a*)]; it is defined as the angle between the hypotenuse and 0° on the *axis [27,28].

    Three different samples of a 15 fruits homogenate were analysed for each cultivar. The fruits were thawed, peeled and the seed was removed. The pulp was finely chopped and weighed. Then 5 g of flesh homogenate was extracted for two times with 5 mL ethanol. After a clean-up step via centrifugation (10 min at 10.000 g, 4 ℃) and filtration through a Millex HV 0.45 μm filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA), the supernatants were recovered, combined and used for the determination of the total antioxidant activity, the ferric reducing activity power, the total phenolic content, the proianthocyanidin content, and the cellular antioxidant activity. Phenolic content of ethanolic extracts was determined by the reduction of phosphotungstic-phosphomolybdic acid (Folin-Ciocalteu's reagent) to blue pigments, in alkaline solution according to Folin and Denis [29]. Quantitation was by reference to a curve constructed with GA, and the results were expressed as mg GA equivalents (GAE) per 100 g FW. All measurements were done in three replicates. The total antioxidant activity (TAA) of ethanol extracts was evaluated using the ABTS radical cation decolorization assay [30,31]. ABTS• + was prepared by reacting of ABTS with potassium persulfate. Samples were analysed at five different dilutions, within the linearity range of the assay, as previous described [32,33]. TAA was expressed as mol Trolox equivalent (TE)/100 g fresh weight (FW).

    A subsample of 5 fruits per tree per cultivar was submitted to the sensory profile analysis immediately after picking by a semi-trained panel consisting of ten judges (5 females and 5 males, 22–35 years old) [34]. Effects of rapid refrigeration and map on litchi. All panellists were experienced in sensory evaluation of fruits [35,36]. The judges, in preliminary sessions, using both commercial and experimental cherimoya samples, generated 24 sensory descriptors: appearance (A); skin colour (SC), flesh colour (FC), consistency (C), fruity odour (FO), exotic fruits odour (EFO), off-odour (OFF), cherimoya odour (CO), medicinal odour (OM), grass odour (GO), sweet (S), acid (A), juicy (J), astringent (AST), pungent/fermented (PF), cherimoya flavour (CF), mellowness (M), fruity flavour (FRF) exotic fruits flavor (EXF), fermented flavour (FEF); flavour alcohol (ALF), off flavour (OF); floury (F) and overall evaluation (OVE) [37] The evaluations were carried out from 10.00 to 12.00 a.m.. In each session, judges evaluated the samples in triplicate. The sample order for each panellist was randomized and water was provided for rinsing between cherimoya samples. The judges evaluated samples, using a hedonic scale, assigning to each descriptor a score from 1 to 9 according to other author [38,39]: 9—Excellent (fully characteristic cherimoya); 7—Very good (pleasantly mild cherimoya); 5—Good (blandly faint cherimoya; limit of marketability); 3—Fair (faint off-odor, brown, limit of unacceptability); and 1—Poor (distinct off-odor, brown, no marketability).

    All data were submitted to statistical validation using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple range test for P ≤ 0.05 using XLStat® software (XLStat version 2011.1.02, Addinsoft, Paris, France).

    The two cultivars showed a different behaviour during the two seasons. Fino de Jete was the more productive tree reaching 30.4 kg tree−1 and a yield of 8.4 t ha−1. These results are comparable with varieties grown in Californian Mediterranean environment [40] and in Calabria, Italy [41] where you get respectively productions of 7.5 and 7 t ha−1. Torre 1 reached a production of 17.15 kg tree−1 and a yield of 4.8 t ha−1. Yield efficiency were consequently higher for Fino de Jete (0.06), whose production in terms of number of fruits was 80 tree−1, against 45 fruits tree−1 of Torre 1 whose yield efficiency was 0.04 (Table 1). This marked difference is due to genetic characteristics of the two cultivars.

    Table 1.  Yield components of the two observed cherimoya cultivars during two cropping seasons. Data are mean values ± SD. The values marked with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
    Cultivar Yield (kg) Yield Efficency Trunk Circumference (cm) Trunk Radius (cm) Area (cm) Area (m) Average Weight (g) Fruits Number Crop Load
    Fino de Jete 30.4 ± 5.8 a 0.06 ± 0.01 a 80.0 ± 7.3 a 12.74 ± 2.3 a 509.5 ± 11.4 a 0.509 ± 0.03 a 380.0 ± 15.0 a 80.0 ± 9.0 a 0.16 ± 0.07 a
    Torre 1 17.1 ± 3.7 b 0.04 ± 0.01 a 72.0 ± 6.5 a 11.46 ± 1.8 a 412.7 ± 12.3 a 0.413 ± 0.05 a 381.0 ± 13.0 a 45.0 ± 7.0 b 0.11 ± 0.05 a

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The examined cherimoya cultivar showed some significative differences in pomological aspects and physicochemical characteristics. In particular, Fino de Jete fruits showed during the two seasons an average weight of 608 g against 454 g of Torre 1 in accordance with average weight evaluated by other authors in Ecuador [42] where fruits characterized by the same irregular shape reached between 180 and 590 g. On the other hand, Torre 1 showed a better pulp/seed ratio. It has a lower weight in terms of flesh (341 g vs 528 g) but higher in term of peel (80.4 g against 93.3 g) and seeds (13.9 g vs 25.6 g). This is matched with less number of seeds (Figure 1). Both longitudinal and transversal diameters (LD and TD) confirmed the values of FW in accordance to other authors [42]. This could make Torre 1 a more adaptable genotype for the consumers need because of less number of seed related to the inconvenience of removing them. Peel colour is an important characteristic of cherimoya quality because it changes with the proximity of physiological maturity from dark to light green or yellowish green [25]. After the colorimetric analysis (Table 2), Fino de Jete showed a higher L* value in respect to Torre 1, indicating a greater brightness. The values of Chroma calculated for skin were almost the same (31.89 for Fino de Jete vs 33.14 of Torre 1), indicating a yellowish green tint. This means an appropriate ripening stage for commercialization [43,44]. About flesh color no substantial differences were found. Two genotypes showed similar L* and Chroma values (13.1 vs 12). Flesh firmness was higher in Fino de Jete (7.45 N vs 5.88 N) but, according to Paull [45], both could be considered appropriate values for commercial ripe. The total soluble solid content (TSSC) is responsible for fruit taste, affecting sweetness and consequently consumer appreciation. Chemical analysis (Figure 2) results are in favor of the new selected genotype Torre 1. It showed a better TSSC (21.6° Brix) compared to Fino de Jete (17° Brix). TSSC values are confirmed by other authors from Ecuador who reported values between 15.8 and 21.0 [42]. Considering the almost coinciding TA values (4.61 gL–1 of malic acid for Fino de Jete and 4.64 gL–1 of malic acid for Torre 1), Torre 1 had a better TSSC/TA ratio (3.68 vs 4.65). It can be assumed that the fruits of genotype Torre 1, according to instrumental analysis, are sweeter, characteristic typically appreciated by the consumer.

    Figure 1.  Pomological traits of the two cherimoya cultivars measured over two cropping seasons: Fruit weight (FW); Flesh weight (FLW); Peel weight (PW); Seed weight (SW). Data are mean values ± SD. The values marked with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
    Table 2.  CieLab coordinates (L*, a*, b*) of Annona cherimola from the two studied varieties {L [1-100 light: a (-100 green to +100 red): b (-100 blue to +100 yellow)]}. Data are mean values ± SD. The values marked with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
    Skin Colour Flesh Colour
    L* a* b* L* a* b*
    Fino de Jete 69.7 ± 3.5 a -8.7 ± 1.9 a 30.6 ± 3.3 a 83.5 ± 4.9 a -1.1 ± 0.5 a 13.1 ±1.8 a
    Torre 1 63.2 ± 2.4 b -11.5 ± 2.1 a 31.1 ± 2.7 a 82.0 ± 3.6 a -1.5 ± 0.6 a 12.0 ± 1.2 a

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  Chemical traits of the two cherimoya cultivars measured over two cropping seasons: Total Soluble solids content (TSSC), expressed in °Brix; Titratable acidity (TA) expressed in gl-1 of malic acid; the soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio (SSC/TA); Flesh Firmness (FF). For last, measurements made with a penetrometer on the pulp of the fruits expressed in kg/cm2. Data are mean values ± SD. The values marked with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

    Bioactive compounds analysis shows that the new genotype has a higher phenolic content compared to Fino de Jete according to the colorimetric analysis carried out on the skin (Figure 3): 80.4 mg GAE/100 g FW vs 64.6 of Fino de Jete, concentration comparable to that found on Annona muricata by other authors in Brazil (54.8 mg GAE/100 g FW) and Fiji (42 mg GAE/100 g FW) [46,47], higher than that found by Albuquerque in Portugal [48] (12 mg GAE/100 g FW) but lower than that found by Hassimotto (2005) in Brazil [49] (120 mg GAE/100 g FW). Therefore, it has a high antioxidant activity: 379.2 μmol Trolox eq/100 g FW vs 231.1 of Fino de Jete, higher than that found on Annona cherimola (230 μmol Trolox eq/100 g FW) and other tropical fruits harvested in Ecuador [42]. On the other hand, the analysis showed a higher carotenoid content in Fino de Jete: 5.5 μg β-carotene eq/100 g FW vs 2.7 of Torre 1, according to the colorimetric analysis carried out on the flesh.

    Figure 3.  Biochemical compounds of the two cherimoya cultivars measured over two cropping seasons: Antioxidant activity expressed in μmol Trolox eq/100g FW. Total phenolic concentration expressed in mg gallic acid eq/100g FW. Carotenoid content expressed in g β-carotene eq/100g FW. Data are mean values ± SD. The values marked with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

    Sensory analysis (Figure 4) showed significant differences only for the descriptors compactness, fruity odor, exotic odor, color of the pulp, off-odor, acidity, fermented flavor and off-flavor, juiciness. For the genotype Torre 1, the panelists expressed the best values in terms of compactness. This fact disagree with the analytical value of firmness. Probably, this is due to the difference between the instrumental measurement and the judge impression that is obtained by several consistence components (texture, structure and fibers). Both fruity odor and exotic fruit odor were more appreciated by judges in Torre 1; the same behavior was observed for flesh color, the difference of which was not so obvious after the colorimetric analysis; off-odor, acidity, fermented flavor and off-flavor, whose lowlights show that Torre 1 does not have such unpleasant features. Fino de Jete, however, proved to be far superior in terms of juiciness. It should be emphasized that the best relationship between total soluble solids and titratable acidity that Torre 1 highlighted by chemical analysis was not fully perceived by panel judges, who considered the fruits of both genotypes comparable under this parameter. This is probably due to an interaction between the various chemical and aromatic-taste components of cherimoya fruits.

    Figure 4.  Sensory profiles of the two cherimoya cultivars analyses. The symbol (*) indicates the descriptors for which significant differences were found.

    The new cherimoya genotype Torre 1 was found to be better in terms of pulp/seed ratio, small number of seed, TSSC/TA ratio and panel acceptance, together with a greater concentration of bioactive compounds, comparable to that found in fruits grown in tropical areas. Instead, Fino de Jete showed a higher production per tree and a better average weight and shape in fruits. Therefore, it is possible to confirm the leader position Fino de Jete already had in European market due to his yield efficiency. However, it should be noted that the new cultivar showed interesting characteristics in terms of health properties and sensory profile and may be considered suitable for the consumers. The obtained results suggest it is possible to cultivate cherimoya in the Mediterranean climate with promising yields and a good standard of fruit quality. This show how the potential of a marginal crop like cherimoya is untapped today. It is therefore possible to speculate that a careful breeding program and further studies on cultivation techniques can lead to obtain new most suitable cultivars for the European market.

    The authors gratefully acknowledge Natale Torre and Giancarlo Torre, owners of Vivai Torre, for providing fruits and for technical assistance.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Turrini A, Sbrana C, Avio L, et al. (2016) Changes in the composition of native root arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities during a short-term cover crop-maize. Biol Fert Soils 52: 642–653.
    [2] Njeru i, Bocci G, Avio L, et al. (2017) Functional identity has a stronger effect than diversity on mycorrhizal symbiosis and productivity of field grown organic tomato. Eur J Agron 86: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.007
    [3] Mader P, Edenhofer S, Boller T, et al. (2000) Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a long-term field trial comparing low-input (organic, biological) and high-input (conventional) farming systis in a crop rotation. Biol Fert Soils 31: 150–156. doi: 10.1007/s003740050638
    [4] Cavagnaro TR, Jackson LE, Six J, et al. (2005) Arbuscular mycorrhizas, microbial communities, nutrient availability, and soil aggregates in organic tomato production. Plant Soil 282: 209–225.
    [5] Verzeaux J, Nivelle E, Roger D, et al. (2017) Spore density of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is fostered by six years of a no-till systi and is correlated with environmental parameters in a silty loam soil. Agron 7: 38. doi: 10.3390/agronomy7020038
    [6] Njeru i, Avio L, Sbrana C, et al. (2014) First evidence for a major cover crop effect on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic maize growth. Agron Sustain Dev 34: 841–848. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0197-y
    [7] Borie F, Rubio R, Rouanet JL, et al. (2006) Effects of tillage systis on soil characteristics, glomalin and mycorrhizal propagules in a Chile Ultisol. Soil Tillage Res 88: 253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.06.004
    [8] Nyaga J, Jefwa JM, Muthuri CW, et al. (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with different soil fertility amendment practices in agricultural landscapes of Kenyan Highlands. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 103: 229–240. doi: 10.1007/s10705-015-9744-z
    [9] Martinez TN and Johnson NC (2010) Agricultural managient influences propagule densities and functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizas in low- and high- input agroecosystis in arid environments. Appl Soil Ecol 46: 300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.07.001
    [10] Wang FY, Hu JL, Lin XG, et al. (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and diversity in response to long-term fertilization: a field case from China. World J Microb Biot 27: 67–74. doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0427-2
    [11] Alguacil MM, Lumini E, Roldan A, et al. (2008) The impact of tillage practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in subtropical crops. Ecol Appl 18: 527–536. doi: 10.1890/07-0521.1
    [12] Kabir Z (2005) Tillage or no-tillage: Impact on mycorrhizae. Can J Plant Sci 85: 23–29. doi: 10.4141/P03-160
    [13] Oruru MB and Njeru i (2016) Upscaling arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and related agroecosystis services in smallholder farming systis. Biomed Res Int 2016: 4376240.
    [14] Verbruggen E, Roling WFM, Gamper HA, et al. (2010) Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. New Phytol 186: 968–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03230.x
    [15] Roldan A, Salinas-Garcia JR, Alguacil M, et al. (2007) Changes in soil sustainability indicators following conservation tillage practices under subtropical maize and bean crop. Soil Tillage Res 93: 273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2006.05.001
    [16] Bedini S, Avio L, Sbrana C, et al. (2013) Mycorrhizal activity and diversity in a long-term organic Mediterranean agroecosysti. Biol Fert Soils 49: 781–790. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0770-6
    [17] Jaetzold R, Schmidt H, Homet ZB, et al. (2007)Farm managient handbook of Kenya: Natural conditions and farm information (2nd ed., Vol. 11/C). Nairobi: Eastern Province, Ministry of Agriculture/ GTZ.
    [18] Mugwe J, Mugendi D, Mucheru-Muna M, et al. (2009) Determinants of the decision to adopt intergrated soil fertility managient practices by smallholder farmers in Central highlanda of Kenya. Exp Agr 45: 61–75. doi: 10.1017/S0014479708007072
    [19] Mburu SW, Koskey G, Kimiti JM, et al. (2016) Agrobiodiversity conservation enhances food security in subsistence-based farming systis of Eastern Kenya. Agriculture and Food Security 5: 19. doi: 10.1186/s40066-016-0068-2
    [20] Lehman RM, Taheri WI, Osborne SL, et al. (2012) Fall cover cropping can increase arbuscular mycorrhizae in soils supporting intensive agricultural production. Appl Soil Ecol 61: 300–304. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.008
    [21] Porter W (1979) The 'most probable number method' for enumerating infective propagules of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Aust J Soil Res 17: 515–519. doi: 10.1071/SR9790515
    [22] Mohidin H, Hanafi M, Rafii Y, et al. (2015) Determination of optimum levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of oil palm seedlings in solution culture. Bragantia 74: 247–254. doi: 10.1590/1678-4499.0408
    [23] Kissel ED and Sonon LS (2008) Soil test handbook for Georgia (Vol. 1).
    [24] Okalebo JR, Gathua WK and Woomer PL (2002) Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: a working manual second edition. Sacred Africa, Nairobi.
    [25] Phillips J and Hayman D (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parastic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of British Mycological Society 55: 158–161. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
    [26] Giovannetti M and Mosse B (1980) An evaluation technique for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84: 489–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
    [27] Cavaglieri L, Orlando J and Etcheverry M (2009) Rhizosphere microbial community structure at different maize plant growth stages and root locations. Microbiol Res 164: 391–399. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2007.03.006
    [28] Johnston-Monje D, Lundberg DS, Lazarovits G, et al. (2016) Bacterial populations in juvenile maize rhizospheres originate from both seed and soil. Plant Soil 405: 337–355. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2826-0
    [29] Reji PM, Feng Y, Githinji L, et al. (2012) Impact of no-tillage and conventional tillage systis on soil microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2012: 1–10.
    [30] Kabir Z, O'Halloran IP, Fyles JW, et al. (1998) Dynamics of the mycorrhizal symbiosis of corn (Zea mays L.): effects of host physiology, tillage practice and fertilization on spatial distribution of extra-radical mycorrhizal hyphae in the field. Agricult Ecosys Environ 68: 151–163.
    [31] Oehl F, Sieverding E, Ineichen K, et al. (2003) Impact of land use intensity on species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystis of Central Europe. Appl Environ Microb 69: 2816–2824. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2816-2824.2003
    [32] Nakhro N and Dkhar MS (2010) Populations and biomass carbon in paddy field soil. Agron J 9: 102–110. doi: 10.3923/ja.2010.102.110
    [33] Klikocka H, Narolski B, Klikocka O, et al. (2012) The effect of soil tillage and nitrogen fertilization on microbiological parameters of soil on which spring Triticale is grown. Pol J Environ Stud 21: 1675–1685.
    [34] Arihara J and Karasawa T (2000) Effects of previous crops on arbuscular mycorrhizal formation and growth of succeeding maize. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 46: 43–51. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2000.10408760
    [35] Mariela FP, Pavel MEI, Manuel SRL, et al. (2016) Dehydrogenase and mycorrhizal colonization: Tools for monitoring agroecosysti soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 100: 144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.011
    [36] Bilalis DJ and Karamanos AJ (2010) Organic maize growth and mycorrhizal root colonization response to tillage and organic fertilization. J Sustain Agr 34: 836–849. doi: 10.1080/10440046.2010.519197
    [37] Habibzadeh Y (2015) The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorous levels on dry matter production and root traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativulus L.). African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 9: 67–70.
    [38] Ryan MH, Van Herwaarden AF, Angus JF, et al. (2005) Reduced growth of autumn-sown wheat in a low-P soil is associated with high colonisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 270: 275–286. doi: 10.1007/s11104-004-1611-7
    [39] Adediran JA, Taiwo LB, Akande MO, et al. (2004) Application of organic and inorganic fertilizer for sustainable maize and cowpea yields in Nigeria. J Plant Nutr 27: 1163–1181.
    [40] Gosling P, Hodge A, Goodlass G, et al. (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agricult Ecosys Environ 113: 17–35.
    [41] Hajiboland R, Aliasgharzad N and Barzeghar R (2009) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on uptake of Zn and P by two contrasting rice genotypes. Plant Soil Environ 55: 93–100. doi: 10.17221/319-PSE
    [42] Oruru MB, Njeru i, Pasquet R, et al. (2018) Response of a wild-type and modern cowpea cultivars to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation in sterilized and non-sterilized soil. J Plant Nutr 41: 90–101. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1381728
    [43] Asghari HR and Cavagnaro TR (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizas reduce nitrogen loss via leaching. Plos One 7: 1–5.
    [44] LeighJ, Hodge A and Fitter AH (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. New Phytol 181: 199–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02630.x
    [45] Veresoglou SD, Chen B and MC Rillig (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhiza and soil nitrogen cycling. Soil Biol Biochi 46: 53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.018
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. María Teresa Fernández Ponce, Cristina Cejudo Bastante, Lourdes Casas Cardoso, Casimiro Mantell, Enrique J. Martínez de la Ossa, Clara Pereyra, Potential Use of Annona Genus Plants Leaf Extracts to Produce Bioactive Transdermal Patches by Supercritical Solvent Impregnation, 2021, 10, 2076-3921, 1196, 10.3390/antiox10081196
    2. Miriam E. Arena, Ignacio S. Povilonis, Virginia Borroni, Diana Constenla, Silvia Radice, Changes in physicochemical properties at different development stages of Hexachlamys edulis fruit, an underutilized South American species, 2021, 7, 24058440, e08323, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08323
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6028) PDF downloads(1258) Cited by(10)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog