
Citation: David Melkuev, Danqiao Guo, Tony S. Wirjanto. Applications of random-matrix theory and nonparametric change-point analysis to three notable systemic crises[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2018, 2(2): 413-467. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2018.2.413
[1] | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Fozaiyah Alhubairah, Khaled M. Saad, Ekram E. Ali, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli . Monophonic sets and rough directed topological spaces: Applications with some directed networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(8): 17623-17641. doi: 10.3934/math.2025787 |
[2] | Hakeem A. Othman, Mohammed M. Al-Shamiri, Amin Saif, Santanu Acharjee, Tarik Lamoudan, Rashad Ismail . Pathless directed topology in connection to the circulation of blood in the heart of human body. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18158-18172. doi: 10.3934/math.2022999 |
[3] | R. Abu-Gdairi, A. A. El-Atik, M. K. El-Bably . Topological visualization and graph analysis of rough sets via neighborhoods: A medical application using human heart data. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26945-26967. doi: 10.3934/math.20231379 |
[4] | Ufuk Sevim, Leyla Goren-Sumer . Consensus of double integrator multiagent systems under nonuniform sampling and changing topology. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16175-16190. doi: 10.3934/math.2023827 |
[5] | Fawaz E. Alsaadi, Faisal Ali, Imran Khalid, Masood Ur Rehman, Muhammad Salman, Madini Obad Alassafi, Jinde Cao . Quantifying some distance topological properties of the non-zero component graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3512-3524. doi: 10.3934/math.2021209 |
[6] | Zeeshan Saleem Mufti, Ali Tabraiz, Qin Xin, Bander Almutairi, Rukhshanda Anjum . Fuzzy topological analysis of pizza graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12841-12856. doi: 10.3934/math.2023647 |
[7] | Ali N. A. Koam, Ali Ahmad, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . Computation of eccentric topological indices of zero-divisor graphs based on their edges. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11509-11518. doi: 10.3934/math.2022641 |
[8] | Usman Babar, Haidar Ali, Shahid Hussain Arshad, Umber Sheikh . Multiplicative topological properties of graphs derived from honeycomb structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1562-1587. doi: 10.3934/math.2020107 |
[9] | Shama Liaqat, Zeeshan Saleem Mufti, Yilun Shang . Newly defined fuzzy Misbalance Prodeg Index with application in multi-criteria decision-making. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20193-20220. doi: 10.3934/math.2024984 |
[10] | Gültekin Soylu, Müge Çerçi . Metrization of soft metric spaces and its application to fixed point theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6904-6915. doi: 10.3934/math.2024336 |
Graph theory was introduced by Leonhard Euler for obtaining solution of the mathematical problem named "Seven Bridge of Königsberg" in 1736 [4]. The practices of the theory are used in the solution of many complex problems of modern life. Topology is an important branch of mathematics because of its contribution to the other branches of mathematics. Recently, the topology has been used as the appropriate frame for all sets connected by relations. Because rough sets and graphs are also based relational combinations, the topological structures of rough sets [2] and relation between rough sets and graphs are studied by some researchers [5,6,8].
An interesting research topic in graph theory is to study graph theory by means of topology. Some researches have created topologies from graphs using various methods. In 2013, M. Amiri et. al. have created a topology using vertices of an undirected graph [3]. In 2018, K.A. Abdu and A. Kılıçman have investigated the topologies generated by directed graphs [1].
In this paper, we aim at studying to create a topological space by using a simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. We present some properties of the topology that we create by using such graphs. We show that a topology can be generated by every simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Moreover, we examine the topologies generated by using certain graphs. We define an equivalence relation on the set of the graphs with same vertices set. Finally, we give necessary and sufficient condition for continuity and openness of functions defined from one graph to another by using the topologies generated by these graphs. As a result of this, we present condition for the topological spaces generated by two different graphs to be homeomorphic.
In this section, some fundamental definitions and theorems related to the graph theory, approximation spaces and topological spaces used in the work are presented.
Definition 1. [4] A graph is an ordered pair of (U(G),E(G)), where U(G) is set of vertices, E(G) is set of edges linking to any unordered pair of vertices of G. If e is an edge linking to the vertices u and v, then it is said e links to vertices u and v. u and v called as ends of e. Moreover, it is said that these vertices are adjacent. A set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices of a graph is called an independent set. If the set of edges and vertices of a graph are finite, this graph is a finite graph. An edge whose ends are only one vertice is called a loop. An edge with distinct ends is a link.
Definition 2. [4] A graph is called simple graph, if there is at most one edge linking to arbitrary two vertices of the graph and it has not a loop.
Definition 3. [4] Let G=(U,E) be a graph. If vertices set U can divided into two subsets A and B so that each edge of G has one end in A and one end in B, G is called bipartite graph. In other words, a graph G is bipartite iff vertices set U of G can divided into two independent sets.
Definition 4. [4] A walk is a sequence of finite number of adjacent vertices such that v0e1v1e2v2...ekvk in a graph G=(U,E). A walk that each edge and vertice is used at most one time is called a path.
Definition 5. [4] A cycle is a path with the same starting and ending point and it is denoted with Cn.
Theorem 1. [7] Let X be a nonempty set and β be a class of subsets of X. If following conditions are satisfied, the collection β is a base just for one topology.
1. X=⋃B∈βB
2. For B1∈β and B2∈β, the set B1∩B2 is union of some set belonging to β.
Definition 6. Let G=(U,E) be a graph. Then the set of vertices becoming adjacent to a vertice u is called adjacency of u and it is denoted AG(u). Minimal adjacency of u is defined as
[u]G=⋂u∈AG(v)AG(v). |
Theorem 2. Let G=(U,E) be a simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Then the class βG={[u]G:u∈U} is a base for a topology on U.
Proof. Firstly, we shall show that ⋃u∈U[u]G=U. From definition of [u]G, u∈[u]G is obtained for every u∈U. Since the graph G is a graph without isolated vertices, the class {[u]G:u∈U} covers to the set U. That is,
⋃u∈U[u]G=U. |
Secondly, we shall show that there exists V⊆U such that [u]G∩[v]G=⋃w∈V⊆U[w]G, for every [u]G, [v]G∈βG. Let [u]G,[v]G∈βG. Then [u]G∩[v]G=∅ or [u]G∩[v]G≠∅. If [u]G∩[v]G=∅, it is seen that [u]G∩[v]G=⋃w∈∅[w]G since ⋃w∈∅[w]G=∅. If [u]G∩[v]G≠∅, there exists at least one w∈U such that w∈[u]G∩[v]G. Then w belongs to both [u]G and [v]G. Since w∈[u]G, it is seen that w∈AG(t), for all t∈U such that u∈AG(t). Similarly, since w∈[v]G, it is seen that w∈AG(t′), for all t′∈U such that v∈AG(t′).
Hence, w∈AG(t) and w∈AG(t′)⇒w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)
⇒⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G (Since w∈[w]G)⇒w∈⋃w∈V⊆U[w]G. (V=AG(t)∩AG(t′)) |
Then it is obtained that
[u]G∩[v]G⊆⋃w∈V⊆U[w]G | (3.1) |
On the other hand,
k∈⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G⇒k∈[w]G, for ∃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′) |
⇒k∈⋂w∈AG(w′)AG(w′)⇒k∈AG(w′), for all w∈AG(w′)⇒k∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)⇒k∈⋂u∈AG(t)AG(t) and k∈⋂v∈AG(t′)AG(t′)⇒k∈[u]G and k∈[v]G⇒k∈[u]G∩[v]G. |
Then it is obtained that
⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G⊆[u]G∩[v]G. | (3.2) |
Therefore, the following equation is obtained from (3.1) and (3.2):
[u]G∩[v]G=⋃w∈AG(t)∩AG(t′)[w]G. |
Consequently, βG is a base for a topology on U.
Corollary 1. Each simple undirected graph without isolated vertices creates a topology on vertices set of the graph.
Definition 7. Let G=(U,E) be a simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Then the topology generated by βG={[u]G:u∈U} is called the topology generated by the graph G. This topology is in the form of:
τG={G⊆U:G=⋃[u]G∈βG[u]G,u∈V⊆U}. |
Here, the class of closed sets of this topology is in the form of:
KG={Gc:G∈τG}. |
Example 1. The graph whose vertices set is U={x,y,z,t,u,v} is given in Figure 1.
The minimal adjacencies of each vertice are as follows:
[x]G={x,z},[y]G={y,t},[z]G={z},[t]G={t},[u]G={z,u},[v]G={t,v}. |
Thus,
βG={{z},{t},{x,z},{y,t},{z,u},{t,v}} |
and
τG={U,∅,{z},{t},{x,z},{y,t},{z,u},{t,v},{z,t},{y,z,t},{z,t,v},{x,z,t},{z,t,u},{x,y,z,t},{x,z,u},{x,z,t,v},{y,z,t,u},{y,t,v},{x,z,t,u},{x,y,z,t,u},{x,y,z,t,v},{y,z,t,v},{z,t,u,v},{x,z,t,u,v},y,z,t,u,v}}. |
τG is topology generated by G. The class of closed sets of this topology is
KG={U,∅,{x,y,t,u,v},{x,y,z,u,v},{y,t,u,v},{x,z,u,v},{x,y,t,v},{x,y,z,u},{x,y,u,v},{x,u,v},{x,y,u},{y,u,v},{x,y,v},{u,v},{y,t,v},{y,u},{x,v},{x,z,u},{y,v},{v},{u},{x,u},{x,y},{y},{x}}. |
Class of both open and closed sets is as follows:
CO(U)={U,∅,{x,z,u},{y,t,v}}. |
Here, it is seen that both open and closed sets different from U and ∅ are {x,z,u} and {y,t,v}. Moreover, the graph G is bipartite and these sets are independent sets whose intersection is ∅ and union is U.
Theorem 3. Let KA,B=(U,E) be a complete bipartite graph. Then the topology generated by KA,B is a quasi-discrete topology.
Proof. Since KA,B is a bipartite graph, A∩B=∅ and A∪B=U. For every x∈U, x∈A or x∈B. Let x∈A. Since KA,B is a complete bipartite graph, we have AKA,B(x)=B and [x]KA,B=A. Let x∈B. Then we have AKA,B(x)=A and [x]KA,B=B. Hence, the base of the topology generated by KA,B is as follows:
βKA,B={A,B}. |
Therefore, the topology generated by KA,B is as follows:
τKA,B={A,B,∅,U}. |
τKA,B is a quasi-discrete topology on U.
Theorem 4. Let Kn=(U,E) be a complete graph, where U={v1,v2,...,vn}. Then the topology generated by Kn is discrete topology on U.
Proof. The minimal neighborhoods of vertices set U={v1,v2,...,vn} are as follows respectively:
[v1]G={v1},[v2]G={v2},...,[vn]G={vn}. |
Therefore,
βKn={{vn}:vn∈U} |
and the topology generated by Kn is as follows:
τKn=P(U). |
It is seen that τKn is discrete topology on U.
Example 2. Let us investigate the topological space generated by C5 given Figure 2 whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,v3,v4,v5}.
The adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle C5 are as follows:
AG(v1)={v2,v5},AG(v2)={v1,v3},AG(v3)={v2,v4},AG(v4)={v3,v5},AG(v5)={v1,v4}. |
The minimal adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle C5 are as follows:
[v1]G=⋂v1∈AG(u)AG(u)={v1},[v2]G={v2},[v3]G={v3},[v4]G={v4},[v5]G={v5}. |
Thus,
βC5={{v1},{v2},{v3},{v4},{v5}}. |
The class βC5 is a base for the discrete topology on U. Thus, the topological space generated by this graph is discrete topological space on U.
Theorem 5. Let Cn=(U,E) be a cycle whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,...,vn}, where n≥3 (n≠4). Then the topological space generated by the cycle Cn=(U,E) is a discrete topological space.
Proof. The graph Cn is as in Figure 3.
The adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle Cn are as follows:
AG(v1)={vn,v2},AG(v2)={v1,v3},AG(v3)={v2,v4},...,AG(vn−1)={vn−2,vn},AG(vn)={vn−1,v1}. |
The minimal adjacencies of the vertices of the cycle Cn are as follows:
[v1]G=⋂v1∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={v1},[v2]G=⋂v2∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={v2},...,[vn−1]G=⋂vn−1∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={vn−1},[vn]G=⋂vn∈AG(vi)AG(vi)={vn}. |
Thus, we have
βCn={{vn}:Vn∈U}. |
The class βCn is a base for discrete topology on U. Thus, it is seen that the topological space generated by the graph Cn is the discrete topological space on U.
When we assume n=4, the graph C4 is a complete bipartite graph. The topological space generated the graph C4 whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,v3,v4} is τC4={U,∅,{v1,v4},{v2,v3}}. This topology is not discrete topology, but it is quasi-discrete topology.
Remark 1. Two different graph G and G′with same vertices set can create the same topology. It is seen clearly that although the graphs Kn and Cn with same vertices set is different these graphs create same topology.
Theorem 6. Let G be set of all simple undirected graphs whose vertices set is U={v1,v2,...,vn} without isolated vertices. The relation ∼ defined on G as "G1∼G2⇔τG1=τG2" is a equivalence relation.
Proof. ⅰ) Since τG1=τG1,G1∼G1
ⅱ) Let G1∼G2.From definition "∼", it is seen that τG1=τG2. Since τG2=τG1, we obtain that G2∼G1.
ⅲ) Let G1∼G2 and G2∼G3. Then it is seen that τG1=τG2and τG2=τG3. Thus, we obtain that τG1=τG3. Consequently, we obtain that G1∼G3.
Since G is symmetric, transitive and reflexive, it is an equivalence relation.
Theorem 7. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′)\ be two graphs without isolated vertices. Let τG and τG′ be the topologies generated by G and G′ respectively and f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function. Then f is continuous iff for every u∈U,
f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′. |
Proof. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a continuous function. Then βG={[u]G:u∈U} and βG′={[u′]G′:u′∈U′} are bases of topologies τG and τG′, respectively. Since f is continuous, there is B∈βG such that f(B)⊆[f(u)]G′ for every u∈U. [u]G is the minimal element containing u of βG. Thus, it is obtained that
f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′. |
Conversely, let f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′ for every u∈U. It is seen that [f(u)]G′∈βG′f(v), for every u∈U. Since f([u]G)⊆[f(u)]G′ and [u]G∈βGv, the function f is a continuous function.
Example 3. Let us investigate the graphs G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) is given in Figure 4. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function defined by
f(x)=f(z)=a,f(l)=b,f(y)=c,f(t)=d,f(k)=e. |
The minimal adjacencies of vertices of G are follows:
[x]G={x,z},[y]G={y,l},[z]G={x,z},[t]G={t},[l]G={l},[k]G={k}. |
The minimal adjacencies of vertices of G′ are as follows:
[a]G′={a,d},[b]G′={b},[c]G′={b,c},[d]G′={d},[e]G′={e}. |
It is seen that f([v]G)⊆[f(v)]G′, for every v∈U. Therefore, f is a continuous function.
Corollary 2. Let f:(U,τKn)→(U′,τG′) be arbitrary function, where Kn=(U,E) is a complete graph and G′=(U′,E′) is arbitrary graph. Then f is continuous function.
Theorem 8. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) be two simple undirected graphs without isolated vertice and τG and τG′ the topologies generated by this graphs, respectively. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function. Then f is open function iff for every u∈U,
[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Proof. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be an open function. Then f([u]G) is an open subset of U′ for every [u]G∈βG. It is obtained that
f(u)∈[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Therefore, we have
[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Conversely, Let [f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G), for every u∈U. It is seen that for every u∈U,
f(u)∈[f(u)]G′⊆f([u]G). |
Thus, f([u]G) is an open subset of U′. Consequently, we can say f is an open function.
From above theorem, it is seen that an open function may not continuous and a continuous function may also not be open. Now we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a function to be continuous and open.
Theorem 9. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) be simple undirected two graphs without isolated vertices and τG and τG′ the topologies generated by this graphs, respectively. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′) be a function. Then f is a open and continuous function iff for every u∈U,
[f(u)]G′=f([u]G). |
Proof. It is clearly seen from Theorem 3.6 and Theorem 3.7.
Corollary 3. Let G=(U,E) and G′=(U′,E′) be simple undirected two graphs without isolated vertice and τG and τG′the topologies generated by this graphs, respectively. Let f:(U,τG)→(U′,τG′)\ be a function. Then f is a homeomorphism iff f is a bijection that for every u∈U,
[f(u)]G′=f([u]G). |
In this paper it is shown that topologies can be generated by simple undirected graphs without isolated vertices. It is studied topologies generated by certain graphs. Therefore, it is seen that there is a topology generated by every simple undirected graph without isolated vertices. Properties proved by these generated topologies are presented. An equivalence of the graphs with same vertices set is defined. Finally, necessary and sufficient condition is given for continuity and openness of a function defined to another graph from one graph. This enables us to determine whether these topological spaces is homeomorphic without needing to find the topological spaces generated by two graphs.
The first author would like to thank TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) for their financial supports during her PhD studies.
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
[1] | lez R, Bouchaud JP (2011) Individual and collective stock dynamics: intraday seasonalities. New J Phys 13: 345–349. |
[2] |
Anderson TW (1963) Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis. Ann Math Stat 34: 122– 148. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177704248
![]() |
[3] | Andersson E, Bock D, Fris´en M (2004) Detection of turning points in business cycles. J Bus Cycle Manage Anal 1: 93–108. |
[4] |
Andersson E, Bock D, Fris´en M (2006) Some statistical aspects of methods for detection of turning points in business cycles. J Appl Stat 33: 257–278. doi: 10.1080/02664760500445517
![]() |
[5] |
Andrews DWK, Lee I, Ploberger W (1996) Optimal changepoint tests for normal linear regression. J Econometrics 70: 9–38. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01682-8
![]() |
[6] |
Ang A, Chen J (2002) Asymmetric correlations of equity portfolios. J Financ Econ 63: 443–494. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00068-5
![]() |
[7] | Bai Z, Zhou W (2008) Large sample covariance matrices without independence structures in columns. Stat Sinica 18: 425–442. |
[8] | Bai ZD, Silverstein JW (2010) Spectral Analysis of Large Dimensional Random Matrices, Second Edition, Springer, New York. |
[9] | Basserville M, Nikiforov I (1993) Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Applications. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cli_s, NJ. |
[10] | Beibel M, Lerche HR (2000) A new look at optimal stopping problems related to mathematical finance. Stat Sinica 7: 93–108. |
[11] | Bejan A (2005) Largest eigenvalues and sample covariance matrices. M.Sc. dissertation, Department of Statistics, The University of Warwick. |
[12] | Berkes I, Gombay E, Horv´ath L, et al. (2004) Sequential change-point detection in GARCH(p,q) models. Economet Theor 20: 1140–1167. |
[13] |
Biely C, Thurner S (2008) Random matrix ensembles of time-lagged correlation matrices: derivation of eigenvalue spectra and analysis of financial time-series. Quant Financ 8: 705–722. doi: 10.1080/14697680701691477
![]() |
[14] | Bijlsma M, Klomp J, Duineveld S (2010) Systemic risk in the financial sector: A review and synthesis. CPB Netherland Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis Paper 210. |
[15] |
Billio M, Getmansky M, Lo AW, et al. (2012) Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. J Financ Economet 104: 535–559. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.010
![]() |
[16] |
Bouchaud JP, Potters M (2001) More stylized facts of financial markets: leverage effect and downside correlations. Physica A 299: 60–70. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00282-5
![]() |
[17] | Broemling LD, Tsurumi H (1987) Econometrics and Structural Change, Marcel Dekker, New York. |
[18] | Capuano C (2008) The option-iPoD. The probability of default implied by option prices based on entropy. IMF. |
[19] |
Chen J, Gupta AK (1997) Testing and locating variance change-points with application to stock prices. J Am Stat Assoc 92: 739–747. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10474026
![]() |
[20] |
Chordia T, Swaminathan B (2000) Trading volume and cross-autocorrelations in stock returns. J Financ 55: 913–935. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00231
![]() |
[21] |
Cizeau P, Potters M, Bouchaud JP (2001) Correlation structure of extreme stock returns. Quant Financ 1: 217–222. doi: 10.1080/713665669
![]() |
[22] |
Conlon T, Ruskin HJ, Crane M (2009) Cross-correlations dynamics in financial time series. Physica A 388: 705–714. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.10.047
![]() |
[23] |
Constantine AG (1963) Some non-central distribution problems in multivariate analysis. Ann Math Stat 34: 1270–1285. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177703863
![]() |
[24] |
Daniel K, Moskowitz T (2016) Momentum crashes. J Financ Econ 122: 221–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.002
![]() |
[25] |
Davis RA, Pfa_el O, Stelzer R (2014) Limit theory for the largest eigenvalue of sample covariance matrices with heavy-tails. Stoch Proc Appl 124: 18–50. doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2013.07.005
![]() |
[26] | De Brandt O, Hartmann P (2000) Systemic risk: A survey. European Central Bank. |
[27] | Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 427–431. |
[28] |
Dimson E (1979) Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. J Financ Econ 7: 197–226. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90013-8
![]() |
[29] | Doris D (2014) Modeling Systemic Risk in the Options Market. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics, New York University, New York, NY. |
[30] |
Drożdż S, Grumer F, Ruf F, et al. (2000) Dynamics of competition between collectivity and noise in the stock market. Physica A 287: 440–449. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00383-6
![]() |
[31] | Edelman A, Persson PO (2005) Numerical methods for eigenvalue distributions of random matrices. Math . |
[32] |
Edelman A, Rao NR (2005) Random matrix theory. Acta Numer 14: 233–297. doi: 10.1017/S0962492904000236
![]() |
[33] | Franses PH, van Dijk D (2000) Non-Linear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. |
[34] |
Geman S (1980) A limit theorem for the norm of random matrices. Ann Probab 8: 252–261. doi: 10.1214/aop/1176994775
![]() |
[35] |
Gopikrishnan P, Rosenov B, Plerou V, et al. (2001) Quantifying and interpreting collective behavior in fnancial markets. Physi Rev E 64: 035106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.035106
![]() |
[36] |
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438. doi: 10.2307/1912791
![]() |
[37] | International Monetary Fund (2009). Global Financial Stability Report; Responding to the Financial Crisis and Measuring Systemic Risks. Washington, D.C. |
[38] | James AT (1960) The distribution of the latent roots of the covariance matrix. Ann Math Stati 32: 874–882. |
[39] |
Jin B, Wang C, Miao B, et al. (2009) Limiting spectral distribution of large-dimensional sample covariance matrices generated by VARMA. J Multivariate Anal 100: 2112–2125. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.06.011
![]() |
[40] |
Jobst AA (2013) Multivariate dependence of implied volatilities from equity options as measure of systemic risk. International Review of Financial Analysis 28: 112–129. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.01.005
![]() |
[41] | Johnstone IM (2001) On the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in principal component analysis. Ann Stat 29: 295–327. |
[42] | Kawahara Y, Yairi T, Machida K (2007) Change-point detection in time-series data based on subspace identification. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 559–564. |
[43] |
Kritzman M, Li Y, Page S, et al. (2011) Principal components as a measure of systemic risk. J Portf Manage 37: 112–126. doi: 10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.112
![]() |
[44] |
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips P, Schmidt P, et al. (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series has a unit root? J Econometrics 54: 159–178. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
![]() |
[45] |
Laloux L, Cizeau P, Bouchaud JP (1999) Noise Dressing of Financial Correlation Matrices. Phys Rev Lett 83: 1467–1469. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1467
![]() |
[46] |
Laloux L, Cizeau P, Potters M, et al. (2000) Random matrix theory and financial correlations. Int J Theor Appl Financ 3: 391–397. doi: 10.1142/S0219024900000255
![]() |
[47] |
Lequeux P, Menon M (2010) An eigenvalue approach to risk regimes in currency markets. J Deriv Hedge Funds 16: 123–135. doi: 10.1057/jdhf.2010.10
![]() |
[48] | Lewis M (2010) The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine. W. W. Norton & Company Inc., New York, NY. |
[49] |
Liu H, Aue A, Debashis P (2015) On the Marˇcenko-Pastur law for linear time series. Ann Stat 43: 675–712. doi: 10.1214/14-AOS1294
![]() |
[50] |
Liu S, Yamada M, Collier N, et al. (2013) Change-point detection in time-series data by relative densityratio estimation. Neural Networks 43: 72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.01.012
![]() |
[51] | Longin F, Solnik B (2001) Extreme correlation of international equity markets. J Financ 5: 649–676. |
[52] | Lorden G (1971) Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution, Ann Math Stat 42: 1897–1908. |
[53] |
Marčenko VA, Pastur LA (1967) Distribution for some sets of random matrices. Math USSR-Sbornik 1: 457–483. doi: 10.1070/SM1967v001n04ABEH001994
![]() |
[54] | Mayya KBK, Amritkar RE (2006) Analysis of delay correlation matrices. Quant Financ. |
[55] | Meng H, Xie WJ, Jiang ZQ, et al. (2014) Systemic risk and spatiotemporal dynamics of the US housing market. Sci Rep-UK 4: 3655. |
[56] | Meric I, Kim S, Kim JH, et al. (2001) Co-movements of U.S., U.K., and Asian stock markets before and after September 11, 2001. J Money Invest Bank 3: 47–57. |
[57] |
Moustakides GV (1986) Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions. Ann Stat 14: 1379–1387. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350164
![]() |
[58] | Muirhead RJ (1982) Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory, Wiley, New York. |
[59] | Murphy KM, Topel RH (1985) Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. J Bus Econ Stat 34: 370–379. |
[60] |
Newey WK,West KD (1987) A Simple, Positive Semi-definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708. doi: 10.2307/1913610
![]() |
[61] | NYSE Financial Index (2014) NYSE Euronex. Available from: http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/nykid.shtml. |
[62] |
Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41: 100–115. doi: 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
![]() |
[63] | Pan RK, Sinha S (2007) Collective behavior of stock price movements in an emerging market. Phys Rev E 76: 1–9. |
[64] |
Petterson M (1998) Monitoring a freshwater fish population: Statistical surveillance of biodiversity. Environmetrics 9: 139–150. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199803/04)9:2<139::AID-ENV291>3.0.CO;2-3
![]() |
[65] |
Petzold M, Sonesson C, Bergman E, et al. (2004) Surveillance in longitudinal models: Detection of intrauterine growth restriction. Biometrics 60: 1025–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00258.x
![]() |
[66] |
Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Time series regression with a unit root. Biometrika 75: 335–346. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
![]() |
[67] | Pillai KCS (1976a) Distribution of characteristic roots in multivariate analysis. Part I: Null distributions. Can J Stat 4: 157–184. |
[68] | Pillai KCS (1976b) Distribution of characteristic roots in multivariate analysis. Part II: Non-null distributions. Can J Stat 5: 1–62. |
[69] |
Plerou V, Gopikrishnan P, Rosenow B, et al. (2002) Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. Phy Rev E 65: 066126. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.066126
![]() |
[70] | Poor V, Hadjiliadis O (2009) Quickest Detection, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. |
[71] | Preisendorfer RW (1988) Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanography. North Holland, Amsterdam. |
[72] |
Pukthuanthong K, Roll R (2009) Global market integration: An alternative measure and its application. J Financ Econ 94: 214–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.12.004
![]() |
[73] |
Pukthuanthong K, Berger D (2012) Market Fragility and International Market Crashes. J Financ Econ 105: 565–580. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.009
![]() |
[74] | Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2011) This Time Is Di_erent: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. |
[75] | Fitch cuts Greece's issuer default ratings to 'RD'. (2012, March 9). Reuters. Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/09/idUSL2E8E97FN20120309. |
[76] | Shiryaev AN (1978) Optimal Stopping Rules. Springer-Werlag, New York. |
[77] | Shiryaev AN (2002) Quickest detection problems in the technical analysis of financial data. Mathematical Finance - Bachelier Congress, 2000 (Paris). Springer, Berlin, 487–521. |
[78] |
Silverstein JW (1985) The smallest eigenvalue of large dimensional Wishart matrix. Ann Probab 13: 1364–1368. doi: 10.1214/aop/1176992819
![]() |
[79] |
Silverstein JW (1995) Strong convergence of the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of largedimensional random matrices. J Multivariate Anal 55: 331–339. doi: 10.1006/jmva.1995.1083
![]() |
[80] | Smith R, Sidel R (2010). Banks keep failing, no end in sight. Wall Street J. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB20001424052748704760704575516272337762044. |
[81] |
Solnik B, Boucrelle C, Le Fu Y (1996) International market correlation and volatility. Financ Anal J 52: 17–34. doi: 10.2469/faj.v52.n5.2021
![]() |
[82] | Sugiyama M, Suzuki T, Nakajima S, et al. (2008) Direct density ratio estimation in high-dimensional spaces, Ann I Stat Math 60: 699–746. |
[83] |
Tartakovsky AG, Rozovskii BL, Blazek RB, et al. (2006) A novel approach to detection of intrusions in computer networks via adaptive sequential and batch-sequential change-point detection methods. IEEE T Signal Proces 54: 3372–3382. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2006.879308
![]() |
[84] | Thottan M, Ji C (2003) Anomaly detection in IP networks. IEEE T Signal Proces 15: 2191–2204. |
[85] | Thurner S, Biely C (2007) The eigenvalue spectrum of lagged correlation matrices. Acta Phys Pol B 38: 4111–4122. |
[86] |
Tracy CA, Widom H (1996) On orthogonal and symplectic matrix ensembles. Commun Math Phys 177: 727–754. doi: 10.1007/BF02099545
![]() |
[87] |
Trivedi R, Chandramouli R (2005) Secret key estimation in sequential steganography, IEEE T Signal Proces 53: 746–757. bibitemTulino2004 Tulino AM, Verd S (2004) Random Matrix Theory and Wireless Communications. Found Trend Commun Inf Theory 1: 1–182. doi: 10.1561/0100000001
![]() |
[88] | Wetherhill GB, Brown DW (1991) Statistical Process Control. Chapman and Hall, London. |
[89] |
White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817–838. doi: 10.2307/1912934
![]() |
[90] |
Wigner EP (1955) Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions. Ann Math 62: 548–564. doi: 10.2307/1970079
![]() |
[91] | Wishart J (1928) The generalized product moment distribution in samples from a normal multivariate population. Biometrika 20: 32–52. |
[92] | Yamada M, Kimura A, Naya F, et al. (2013) Change-point detection with feature selection in highdimensional time-series data. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 171: 1827–1833. |
[93] | Yao JF (2012) A note on a Marˇcenko-Pastur type theorem for time series. Stat Probab Letter 82: 20–28. |
[94] | Zhang M, Kolkiewicz AW,Wirjanto TS, et al. (2015) The impacts of financial crisis on sovereign credit risk analysis in Asia and Europe. Int J Financ Eng 2: 143–152. |
1. | Abdulgani Şahin, Gohar Ali, Further Results on Total Edge-Vertex Domination, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/5439610 | |
2. | Hakeem A. Othman, Mohammed M. Al-Shamiri, Amin Saif, Santanu Acharjee, Tarik Lamoudan, Rashad Ismail, Pathless directed topology in connection to the circulation of blood in the heart of human body, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 18158, 10.3934/math.2022999 | |
3. | B K. Mahmoud, Y Y Yousif, Compatibility and Edge Spaces in Alpha - Topological Spaces, 2021, 1963, 1742-6588, 012073, 10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012073 | |
4. | Nechervan B. Ibrahim, Alias B. Khalaf, On maximal block topological space, 2023, 45, 10641246, 8541, 10.3233/JIFS-223749 | |
5. | Hakeem Othman, Ahmed Ayache, Amin Saif, On L2−directed topological spaces in directed graphs theory, 2023, 37, 0354-5180, 10005, 10.2298/FIL2329005O | |
6. | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Ekram E. Ali, Mouataz B. Mesmouli, On m-Negative Sets and Out Mondirected Topologies in the Human Nervous System, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3763, 10.3390/math12233763 | |
7. | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli, Fozaiyah Alhubairah, Upper a-Graphical Topological Spaces with the COVID-19 Form and Its Diffusion, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 84, 10.3390/axioms14020084 | |
8. | Husniyah Alzubaidi, Ljubiša D. R. Kočinac, Hakeem A. Othman, On Topologies on Simple Graphs and Their Applications in Radar Chart Methods, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 178, 10.3390/axioms14030178 | |
9. | Quang-Thinh Bui, Thanh Nha Nguyen, Tzung-Pei Hong, Bay Vo, Graph-induced topological space: from topologies to separation axioms, 2025, 1432-7643, 10.1007/s00500-025-10633-9 | |
10. | Faten H. Damag, Amin Saif, Adem Kiliçman, Fozaiyah Alhubairah, Khaled M. Saad, Ekram E. Ali, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli, Monophonic sets and rough directed topological spaces: Applications with some directed networks, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 17623, 10.3934/math.2025787 |