Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

The generalization ability of logistic regression with Markov sampling

  • Received: 08 May 2023 Revised: 07 July 2023 Accepted: 17 July 2023 Published: 20 July 2023
  • In the case of non-independent and identically distributed samples, we propose a new ueMC algorithm based on uniformly ergodic Markov samples, and study the generalization ability, the learning rate and convergence of the algorithm. We develop the ueMC algorithm to generate samples from given datasets, and present the numerical results for benchmark datasets. The numerical simulation shows that the logistic regression model with Markov sampling has better generalization ability on large training samples, and its performance is also better than that of classical machine learning algorithms, such as random forest and Adaboost.

    Citation: Zhiyong Qian, Wangsen Xiao, Shulan Hu. The generalization ability of logistic regression with Markov sampling[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5250-5266. doi: 10.3934/era.2023267

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jhuma Biswas, Amal K. Paul . Optimization of factors influencing exopolysaccharide production by Halomonas xianhensis SUR308 under batch culture. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 564-579. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.564
    [2] Thomas Trunk, Hawzeen S. Khalil, Jack C. Leo . Bacterial autoaggregation. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 140-164. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.140
    [3] Thomas Bintsis . Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 665-684. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.665
    [4] Hafidh Shofwan Maajid, Nurliyani Nurliyani, Widodo Widodo . Exopolysaccharide production in fermented milk using Lactobacillus casei strains AP and AG. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(2): 138-152. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022012
    [5] Sugenendran Supramani, Rahayu Ahmad, Zul Ilham, Mohamad Suffian Mohamad Annuar, Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar . Optimisation of biomass, exopolysaccharide and intracellular polysaccharide production from the mycelium of an identified Ganoderma lucidum strain QRS 5120 using response surface methodology. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(1): 19-38. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.19
    [6] Nur Raihan Abdullah, Faez Sharif, Nur Hafizah Azizan, Ismail Fitri Mohd Hafidz, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar . Pellet diameter of Ganoderma lucidum in a repeated-batch fermentation for the trio total production of biomass-exopolysaccharide-endopolysaccharide and its anti-oral cancer beta-glucan response. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 379-400. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020023
    [7] Patrick Di Martino . Extracellular polymeric substances, a key element in understanding biofilm phenotype. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(2): 274-288. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.2.274
    [8] Marzena Połaska, Barbara Sokołowska . Bacteriophages—a new hope or a huge problem in the food industry. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 324-346. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.324
    [9] Ramesh C. Ray, Sudhanshu S. Behera, Omojola Awogbemi, Balwinder Singh Sooch, Hrudayanath Thatoi, Subhashree Rath, Noé Aguilar-Rivera . Beyond enzymes and organic acids, solid-state fermentation as an alternative for valorizing fruits and vegetable wastes into novel bio-products in a circular economy: A critical review. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 462-500. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025021
    [10] Hisako Nakagawa, Tadaaki Miyazaki . Beneficial effects of antioxidative lactic acid bacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 1-7. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.1
  • In the case of non-independent and identically distributed samples, we propose a new ueMC algorithm based on uniformly ergodic Markov samples, and study the generalization ability, the learning rate and convergence of the algorithm. We develop the ueMC algorithm to generate samples from given datasets, and present the numerical results for benchmark datasets. The numerical simulation shows that the logistic regression model with Markov sampling has better generalization ability on large training samples, and its performance is also better than that of classical machine learning algorithms, such as random forest and Adaboost.



    In recent years, the trend of using natural polymers in many fields has led to the development of research on producing exopolysaccharides (EPSs) from bacteria. The unique structural features have made bacterial EPSs of particular interest in the fields of chemistry, medicine and food industry [1]. Because of their ability to increases hold water, EPSs are widely used as viscous, stabilizing and emulsifying agents in the food industry [2] to improve the rheological property, texture and sensibility of bread and fermented milk products such as yogurt and cheese [3]. In addition to its technological properties, EPSs also have potential health benefits as antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory antiviral activities [4],[5] and cholesterol lowering effects [6].

    Among EPS producing bacteria, Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have has grasped the attention of researchers thank to their strong ability to produce EPSs. The LAB strains as Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc and Weissellale are often used to produce EPSs [7]. LAB are recognized as safe microorganisms (GRAS-Generally Recognized As Safe) and also capable of creating EPSs with many different structures without any health risks [8]. In LAB, EPSs play an important role in controlling cell surface physicochemical characteristics [9], protecting bacterial cells from dehydration, negative environmental impacts, antibiotics, phagocytosis, and phage attacks [10][12]. EPSs take part in the structural components of extracellular matrix, in which cells are encapsulated during the development of cell membrane [13].

    Previously, there have been several reviews to describe the stress response in LAB [14][16] focusing almost exclusively on the function of stress proteins (HS proteins, Csp, etc.) and their regulators (HrcA, CtsR) or that of proteins linked physically to the cell membrane (transport systems, sensors, housekeeping proteases, etc.). However, in order to understand clearly the role of stresses in EPS biosynthesis, a series of key questions must be addressed:

    -Why are EPSs related to stress resistance?

    -What type of stress to apply?

    -Is it possible to control EPS biosynthesis using environmental stress?

    Therefore, in this review, we will discuss EPS synthesis; the physiological functions of EPSs as well as the impact of environmental stresses on EPS production and the expression of genes involved in EPS biosynthesis in LAB. This assessment will clarify the relationship between environmental stresses and changes in LAB EPS synthesis. It also suggests that environmental stress can improve the productivity of EPSs from LAB and produce customized EPSs with desired functionality.

    LAB synthesize two types of EPSs including homopolysaccharides and heteropolysaccharides [17]. Homopolysaccharide synthesis is a relatively simple biochemical process involving a specific GT (glucansucrase or fructansucrase) and an extracellular sugar donor (sucrose for the synthesis of glucans, but it can also be other fructose-containing oligosaccharide (e.g. raffinose) for the synthesis of fructans) [18],[19]. Heteropolysaccharide synthesis is a complex process which involves the specific role of several gene products (enzymes) encoded by the eps gene cluster and housekeeping genes. These gene products can be categorized into four groups (or modules) basing on their functions: polysaccharide assembly machinery (the priming glycosyltranferases, Wzx or flippase, Wzy or polymerase and EpsA), phosphoregulatory system managing polysaccharide assembly (EpsB, EpsC and EpsD), glycosyltranferases and sugar nucleotide biosynthetic pathways. Genes encoding acetyl- and pyruvyl transferase involved in the chemical decoration of EPSs also present in the cluster (Figure 1) [20].

    Figure 1.  Schematic genetic organization of the eps gene clusters [20].

    In general, EPS biosynthesis is summarized in 3 main steps (Figure 2). Firstly, it is the generation of activated sugar precursors (or sugar nucleotides such as uridine diphosphate glucose and thymidine diphosphate glucose) for repeating units. The sugar nucleotides are synthesized in multistep pathways from glycolytic intermediates, generally glucose-6-phosphate or fructose-6-phosphate. This complex process requires the function of several housekeeping gene products such as phosphoglucomutase (converts glucose-6-phosphate to glucose-1-phosphate) [21]; UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and dTDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (converts glucose-1-phosphate to sugar nucleotides UDP-glucose and dTDP-glucose, respectively) [22]. The producing potential of different sugar nucleotides is intrinsically determined by the gene content of each LAB, which ultimately dictates the type of monomers found in EPSs. EPSs produced by LAB consist of repeating units which is usually composed of two or more (usually 3–8) types of monosaccharides [22][24].

    Figure 2.  The steps of biosynthesis of EPS and related enzymes.

    Secondly, the synthesis process of repeating units begins by attaching the first sugar nucleotide to the isoprenoid lipid carrier, undecaprenyl phosphate, which is attached to the cytoplasmic membrane of the cell, and being catalyzed by priming glycosyltransferase. This is followed by the sequential addition of sugar nucleotides to form repeating units and glycosyltransferases encoded by gense in the eps gene clusters catalyze for this process [25]. Finally, it is the polymerization and export of repeating units from the inner part to the outer part of cell membrane. Basically, three different proteins which are also encoded in the eps gene cluster carry out polymerization and export process: A flippase (encoded by wzx or cpsJ) or a translocase moves the lipid carrier-repeating unit complex from the inner surface of cytoplasm membrane to periplasmic. Then, a polymerase (encoded by wzy or cpsH) catalyzes the coupling of repeating units [21]. Lastly, a chain length determination protein separates lipid carrier-repeating unit complex to stop polymerization and export process simultaneously determines the chain length of final EPSs [21].

    EPSs are synthesized to serve various functions in the bacteria. One of these is to ensure bacteria survive under stress conditions. The function of EPSs in LAB's stress resistance is discussed in the next section.

    EPSs are the important structural component of LAB cell wall [26]. EPSs form a layer surrounding cells to protect them against adverse environmental conditions such as dehydration, extreme temperature, acid, osmotic stress, phagocytosis, macrophages, and antibiotics [25],[27],[28]. Other roles of EPSs include biofilm formation, cell adhesion mechanisms [29] and the determinant of strain-specific characteristics in host interaction [30].

    To adapt to environmental stresses, LAB can alter their cell surface by producing more EPSs [31]. The increased production of EPSs results in thicker and firmer cell walls (Figure 3). As a result, it increases the LAB's resistance to stresses. This feature may be useful to exploit for improving the stamina of the probiotic starters as well as the ability to produce EPSs in LAB. Numerous studies have also demonstrated that, after being pre-stressed, LAB's viability is improved significantly [31],[32].

    Figure 3.  Fermented system for studying roles of environmental factors on EPS production.

    As discussed, LAB enhance EPSs synthesis to create a physical barrier on the cell surface which separates the cell from stress. Especially, in low pH conditions, this EPS layer restricts the access of exogenous acids to bacterial cells due to the anions bound to EPSs as phosphate groups [33]. Phosphate residues confer a net negative charge to EPSs [27]. The presence of phosphate in EPSs is also observed in many studies [34][37]. According to these viewpoints, LAB may produce anionic EPSs carrying phosphate groups under acid stress conditions and they cause negative charge on cell surface to prevent proton diffusion into cells (Figure 4).

    In the case of osmotic stress, a sudden increase in osmotic pressure made by stress results in water movement from the inside to the outside of cell, causing a detrimental loss of cell turgor pressure and changing intracellular solute concentration, which ultimately can seriously affect cell viability [38]. In response to osmotic stress, LAB synthesize EPSs to protect themselves by holding water around cells to prevent dehydration (Figure 4) [39]. The water holding capacity of EPSs is due to the presence of OH groups in their structure. Another substance such as glycerol known for high water holding capacity can sometimes be included in the structure of EPSs. The presence of glycerol was recorded in EPSs produced by Latilactobacillus sakei [34]. Furthermore, external protective compounds such as water stress proteins which aid in the survival of cells from desiccation can accumulate in extracellular glycan and show homologies with carbohydrate-modifying enzymes [40].

    Figure 4.  The role of EPSs in acid, osmotic, oxidative stress resistance.

    A lot of bacteria respond to carbon dioxide stress by producing EPSs to create a barrier for slowing the diffusion of toxic substance into cells, which in this case would be carbon dioxide [41],[42]. Similarly, EPSs also provides support for LAB to resist metal stress. The negatively charged groups in EPSs bind cations and protect bacterial cells against toxic metals [43]. In addition, it has been shown that EPSs are related to oxidative stress resistance in LAB. The supplementation of EPSs into culture medium could appreciate the growth of L. mesenteroides by 10 times under oxidative stress and influence promoting the aerobic growth of oxygen-sensitive strains such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [44]. In oxidative stress conditions, the production of harmful reactive oxygen species may be increased. EPSs can scavenge of these reactive oxygen species to prevent cell damage (Figure 4) [45]. Furthermore, EPSs also reduce oxidative stress by extrusion of dissolved oxygen from aqueous culture medium [44].

    The ability to protect cells from environmental stresses depends on EPS-phenotype. Terms such as ‘ropy’, ‘mucoid’, and ‘slime’ have been used to describe the different EPS producing phenotypes of LAB [46]. LAB strains with the ropy-exopolysaccharide production show better resistance to stress. According to a report, the ropy phenotype of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is related to better tolerance to low pH [29].

    Together with the cell protection function, the positive advantages of EPSs are highlighted through the essential contribution to the human health such as prebiotic, anticoagulant, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, cholesterol lowering effects and even anticancer activity [47].

    LAB's EPSs have been showed an essential functional role in blood coagulation prevention. The strong anticoagulant activity of EPSs in sulphate derivatives has been demonstrated. Heparin Cofactor II is a potent inhibitor of thrombin in the coagulation pathway and the sulphated EPSs provides an acidic medium condittion to facilitate the inhibitory effect of Heparin Cofactor II on thrombin [48],[49]. The sulphated sites and stereochemistry of EPSs activate HC II according to the allosteric mechanism [50]. One study proved that EPS47FE and EPS68FE which are secreted by L. plantarum 47FE and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus 68FE, respectively, exhibit strong anticoagulant and fibrinolytic activity [51].

    Prebiotic effects were also observed at LAB's EPSs [52],[53]. EPSs from LAB can be used by probiotic strains [54] and have the capacity to stimulate the growth of probiotic bacteria and maintain the balance of intestinal microflora [55],[56]. The prebiotic potential of LAB's EPSs has demonstrated in many studies. The α-D-glucan synthesized by L. plantarum can stimulate probiotic bacteria growth. It is low-digested by artificial gastric juice and show to put non-probiotic bacteria off growing that Enterobacteriaceae is a representative instance [57]. In vitro EPSs produced by Weissella cibaria, Weissella confusa, L. plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus could be used as a prebiotic ingredient in the food industry to modulate gut microbiota towards health benefits [58].

    Another health promoting functions of EPSs produced by LAB are cholesterol lowering effects [50]. In an in vitro assay, EPSs produced by L. plantarum BR2 show cholesterol lowering properties (45%) [59]. Based on animal and in vitro experiments, several hypotheses to explain the cholesterol lowering mechanism of EPSs have been proposed including bile removal, anabolism and cholesterol conversion, co-precipitation effects, etc...[60],[61].

    Free radicals usually cause serious health problems. Therefore, EPSs are such an important natural antioxidant to prevent the free radicals. LAB's EPSs also exhibit high antioxidant activity. One evidence showed that EPSs from Lactobacillus gasseri FR4 have a good free radical activity, while hydroxyl and superoxide radical capture activities are dependent on EPS concentration [62]. Additionally, under in-vivo conditions, LAB'S EPSs have been shown to increase the activity of hepatic superoxide effutase, serum catalase, and glutathione S-transferase simutaneously reducing serum malondialdehydes and monoamine oxide activity. These are excellent antioxidant and anti-aging evidence created by EPSs [63],[64].

    In recent decades, the immunomodulatory potential of EPSs has received a lots of scientific consideration. Many in-vitro studies have demontrated that EPSs produced by different LAB species have the immunomodulatory ability [17]. The phosphate group (a good inducer of the immune response) plays a critical role and characterizes the immunomodulatory effects of EPSs. Phosphate molecules can activate various immune cells (such as macro-phages and lymphocytes) and initiate immune responses [65]. According to these results, it can be speculated that EPS generated under acid stress (it seems that acidic EPSs [65]) may exhibit stronger immunological properties.

    Cancer is one of the health problems getting a lot of attention today and it is usually treated via chemotherapy method. However, chemotherapy can cause some unexpected effects which can range from minor to severe and life-threatening [66]. Therefore, other pharmaceutical products are being researched to help cure cancer that LAB's EPSs are the helpful ones due to its anti-tumor effects [65]. EPSs from L. plantarum 70810 can significantly inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells such as HepG-2, BGC-823, especially HT-29 [67]. In vitro evaluation of anticancer properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus EPSs in colon cancer cell lines demontrated that they were able to inhibit the expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and tumor survival [68]. In another study, EPSs from Levilactobacillus brevis MSR10 are used to synthesize the silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). According to the results obtained, these AgNPs not only had high antimicrobial and antioxidant capabilities but also significantly reduced the percentage of live HT-29 cells [69].

    Many recent researches have been conducted to show the antiviral bioavailability of EPSs and they are considered to be an immune stimulant affect in a number of ways in the immune system, contributing to the protection of human cells against certain viruses [65]. A study has proven that EPSs extracted from L. plantarum LRCC5310 were able to resist human rotavirus in vitro [70].

    Under environmental stresses, LAB have different adaptation mechanisms which involve the accumulation of compatible solutes and energy storage compounds; regulation of energy production pathways, as well as the modulation of cell envelope, i.e., membrane, cell wall, surface layers, and EPSs [71]. In this review, we divide environmental stresses into common groups including nutrient factors (carbon sources, nitrogen source, carbon dioxide, oxigen, mineral salts, etc.); physiological factors (pH, osmotic stress, temperature, etc.) and co-cultivation to discuss the impact of stresses on EPS production in LAB.

    The composition of nutrients is one of the factors which affects the growth and metabolism of cells [72]. Thus, EPS synthesis is also influenced by culture medium compositions [73]. The starvation or oversupply of nutrients such as nitrogen, sugars, carbon dioxide, etc. may change EPS synthesis [74][76]. Effects of nutritional stress on EPS synthesis in LAB have been proved by prior studies. Marshall et al. demonstrated that EPS production in Lactobacillus lactis subsp. cremoris LC 330 is stimulated by nitrogen limitation [77]. In contrast, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus was recorded increased EPS production in additional nitrogen-enriched [78].

    Excessive sugar presence in the culture medium also increases EPS production in LAB. The possible explanations for the increased EPS synthesis under stress of high sugar concentration are osmosis, unlimited supply of sugar building blocks and high energy availability [75]. The increased sucrose concentration in the MRS medium was suitable for EPS overproduction in Lactobacillus confusus TISTR 1498 [79]. It has also been showed that Lactobacillus strains (L. delbrueckii bulgaricus, Lactobacillus helveticus and Lacticaseibacillus casei) yield the highest EPSs when growing on fermentation medium comprising 20% sucrose as carbon source [80]. Likewise, the synthesis of EPSs in Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis LTH2590 rose by increasing the sucrose concentration in the medium and reached about 40 g/L at sucrose concentration of 160 g/L [81]. In the case of Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-1299, culture medium with sucrose concentration over 5 g/L caused more dextran production [82]. Similar to succorse, the high concentration of glucose is also advantageous for the production of EPSs. As previously reports, the EPS production of Streptococcus thermophilus (W22) and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (B3, G12) was stimulated by high glucose concentration [83]. It was also shown that the presence of excess sugar in medium has a improving effect on EPS production in L. casei and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, although the growth is apparently decreased [84],[85].

    In some LAB strains, carbon dioxide can used as a carbon source for growth because it is a substrate in carbamoyl phosphate synthesis and other metabolic reactions in LAB [86]. Carbon dioxide regulates physiology and energy metabolism by regulating enzymes involved in glycolysis [87]. The impact of carbon dioxide stress on EPS production in LAB has also recorded in several studies. EPS production depended entirely on carbon dioxide concentration and the maximum EPS yield, produced by Bifidobacterium longum JBL05, increased proportionally to carbon dioxide concentration in the range of 0–20% [88]. L. casei growing in carbon dioxide-rich environment was surrounded by a membrane like EPS component [89]. In contrast to carbon dioxide stress, under dissolved oxygen concentration above 0.05 ppm, B. longum declined growth and EPS accumulation [90]. These results suggest that the EPS synthesis of B. longum varies under different stress conditions. Although oxidative stress reduces the accumulation of EPSs in B. longum, it increases EPS production in B. scardovii and B. adolescentis. One evidence has shown an increase in EPS production and the cell surface hydrophobicity of B. scardovii and B. adolescentis under oxidative stress [91].

    EPS production in LAB may be stimulated by various physical stresses as a cellular defense response, which could also enhance the formation of biofilms [92]. The rate of EPSs in biofilms can account for about 50–90% of total organic matter amount [93],[94] and EPSs, together with proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, form the structure of a biofilm matrix [95]. Low pH was found to significantly decrease the formation of biofilm in L. rhamnosus GG, while it enhanced biofilm formation in Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains [96],[97]. Although studies have not focused on the effect of low pH stress on EPS production in LAB bacteria, an increase in EPS production under low pH has been observed in several reports. The EPS production of Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 15807 under controlled pH of 6.2 was lower than that observed at pH 4.5 [98]. Likewise, EPS production in Ligilactobacillus salivarius UCO_979C-2, adapted variant strain, after 24 h at pH 2.6 was 690 mg/L, compared to native L. salivarius UCO_979C-1 strain that was only 450 mg/L at pH 6.4 [99].

    The negative effects of osmotic stress on cells may be limited because of the presence of EPSs. Therefore, the presence of substances caused high osmotic pressures, such as NaCl, can stimulate EPS synthesis on the cell wall. As previously described by Seesuriyachan et al., the EPS synthesis of L. confusus TISTR 1498 did not depend on biomass and stress of high NaCl concentration could enhance EPS production in solid state fermentation [79]. Similarly, Leuconostoc mesenteroides/pseudomesenteroides 406 achieved maximum EPS yield in the presence of 5% NaCl [100]. In contrast, the inhibition of EPS production by NaCl was recorded in L. helveticus ATCC 15807 [98].

    Excessive temperature causes protein denaturation, nucleic acid and membrane damage [101]. However, when bacteria are exposed to extreme temperature, they reprogram their metabolism to deal with temperature changes [102]. One of the metabolic changes is an increase in EPS synthesis. High temperature stress is also recorded to affect EPS production in LAB. Nguyen et al. demonstrated that sub-lethal thermal stress increases EPS production and improves the viability of B. bifidum [31].

    In biotechnology, co-culture has been shown to make microorganisms more resistant to environmental changes and can perform more complex metabolic activities through the culture combination of various strains [103],[104]. Consequently, co-culture can also affect EPS synthesis. The effect of co-cultivation on improving EPS production of LAB is often studied in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens JCM 6985 enhanced the production of kefiran, an exopolysaccharide, in co-culture with S. cerevisiae IFO 0216 [105]. The EPS production of L. rhamnosus strains was also increased by 39–42% and a higher level of EPS operon expression was observed for L. rhamnosus RW-9595M in co-culture [106]. Similarly, L. paracasei co-cultured with Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in the overexpression of gene (coding for polyprenyl glycosylphosphotransferase) involved in EPS production [107]. In facts, the enhancement of EPS production by LAB in co-culture with Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced by direct and physical contact with components on the surface of yeast cell [105]. In a high viscosity environment, LAB can be stressed by themselves own acids. LAB adhesion to yeast cell will activate EPS production in LAB because this adhesion leads to efficient lactic acid consumption by yeast cells [105].

    In general, the biosynthesis of EPS can be altered either up or down under different stress conditions. These changes may be related to expression level of genes involved in EPS synthesis. To clarify this hypothesis, we have discussed the expression of esp genes under environmental stresses. Details are presented in section 6.

    Bacteria respond to stresses by activating various regulatory mechanisms including activities involved in metabolisms, cell envelope and gene expression, giving them the potentiality to adapt to extreme environmental conditions (Figure 5) [108]. Changes in gene expression establish the principal component of the bacterial response [109] and can alter the biosynthesis of EPSs under stress conditions [110].

    The correlation between stress and the expression of genes involved in EPS biosynthesis has been documented in LAB. Increasing expression of gtf01207 gene, encoding for a priming glycosyltransferase related to EPS synthesis, was observed in B. animalis subsp. Lactis after exposure to stress of acid, bile salts and osmosis [92],[111]. According to another study, when the pH of culture medium decreased from pH 6.5 to pH 5.5, the expression level of epsNMLKJ genes in Streptococus thermophilus ASCC 1275 increased. However, the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of sugar nucleotides such as dTDP-rhamnose and UDP-GlcNAc reduced [112]. Also in this study, when temperature increases from 37 °C to 40 °C, there are not changes in the expression level of epsNMLKJ cluster, but the expression of eps1C and eps1D genes increase while that of eps2C and eps2D decrease [112]. Expression of gtf gene encoding for enzyme which produces beta-glucan (membrane-linked glycosyltransferase enzyme) in Lacticaseibacillus paracasei caused 60 times higher heat tolerance, 20 times higher acid tolerance compare to control strain [113]. Evaluation of gene expression is not only based on mARN but also on genetic products which are enzymes formed after decoding. Glyceraldehyd-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, proved to be necessary for EPS production of Xanthomonas campestris pv. [81], increased heterological expression in L. rhamnosus HN001 during heat stress. In contrast, the heterological expression levels of glyceraldehyd-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphoglycerate kinase, related to EPS biosynthesis of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Glycines) [114], decreased under osmotic stress [115]. In general, environmental stress can alter the expression of genes involved in EPS biosynthesis. The result of this response may increase EPS production in LAB.

    Figure 5.  The mechanism of transcription regulation against environmental stress in LAB.

    In order to survive under environmental stress conditions, LAB react by synthesizing EPSs to form a protective barrier around the cells. This EPS synthesis is catalyzed by enzymes encoded by genes in the eps cluster and the impact of environmental stresses can alter the expression of these genes resulting in increased EPS production. Accordingly, environmental stress may be considered as a major factor to control LAB's EPS biosynthesis. The impact of different stresses on EPS synthesis is summarized in Table 1. In general, the synthesis of EPSs in LAB under stress conditions depends on the type of stress and bacterial species. Within the same species, EPS production may not be the same under different stress conditions. For instance, EPS production in L. helveticus ATCC 15807 is stimulated by stress at low pH but inhibited by sodium chloride stress. Conversely, a specific stress may stimulate EPS production in one species but inhibit it in another (Table 1).

    Table 1.  Impact of stress conditions on LAB EPS synthesis.
    Stress exposure Strains Effect on EPS production: Inhibition (-) Stimulation (+) References
    Low pH L. rhamnosus GG Lebeer et al., 2007 [97]
    L. reuteri + Slížová et al., 2015 [98]
    L. helveticus ATCC 15807 + Torino et al., 2005 [99]
    L. salivarius UCO_979C-2 + Sanhueza et al., 2015 [100]
    High temperature B. bifidum + Nguyen et al., 2014 [31]
    Sodium chloride L. helveticus ATCC 15807 Torino et al., (2005) [99]
    Leuconostoc mesenteroides/pseudomesenteroides 406 + Silvia-Simona GROSU-TUDOR, 2014 [101]
    L. confusus TISTR 1498 + Seesuriyachan, 2012 [80]
    Carbon dioxide B. longum JBL05 + Ninomiya et al., 2009 [89]
    L. casei + Santillan et al., 2015 [90]
    Oxidation B. longum Golowczyc et al., 2011 [91]
    B. scardovii; B. adolescentis + Qian, Borowski, & Calhoon, 2011 [92]
    Excessive nitrogen source L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus + García-Garibay & Marshall, 2008 [78]
    Excessive carbon source L. confusus TISTR 1498 + Seesuriyachan et al., 2012 [80]
    L. (delbrueckii bulgaricus, helveticus and casei) + Hussein et al., 2015 [81]
    F. sanfranciscensis LTH2590 + Korakli, Pavlovic, & Vogel, 2003 [82]
    Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-1299 + Dols, Remaud-Simeon, & Monsan, 1997 [83]
    S. thermophilus W22 and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (B3, G12) + Yuksekdag & Aslim, 2008 [84]
    L. Casei CG11 + Cerning et al., 1994 [85]
    L. rhamnosus C83 + Gamar, Blondeau, & Simonet, 2003 [86]
    Co-cultivation L. kefiranofaciens JCM 6985 + Tada et al., 2007 [106]
    L. rhamnosus (ATCC 9595, R0011, and RW-9595M) + Bertsch, Roy, & LaPointe, 2019 [107]
    L. paracasei ATCC 334 + Yamasaki-Yashiki, Sawada, Kino-oka, & Katakura, 2016 [108]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The EPSs produced by LAB can be the key ingredients showing promising functional roles for various utilities in food, medicine, etc. However, low EPS productivity could be a problem limiting commercial applications of these EPSs. Currently, EPS production improvement studies often focus on optimizing culture mediums, using genetic engineering, using cheap fermentation substrates, and environmental stress [116]. As discussed, EPSs protect LAB from negative environmental effects. Consequently, environmental stresses can promote EPS synthesis in LAB. This feature can be useful to exploit to improve the stamina of probiotic starters and the yield of EPSs.

    In addition, the biological activities of EPSs such as prebiotic, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, ... are related to the monosaccharide compositions of EPSs. It has been proved that EPSs with distinct monosaccharide compositions vary in their therapeutic effects [117]. For instance, the proportion of monosaccharides (galactose > rhamnose > glucose) in the composition of EPSs produced by L. reuteri Mh-001 was demonstrated to relate to their anti-inflammatory activity, in particular galactose content enhances EPS anti-inflammatory effects on the macrophages [118]. Similarly, rhamnose-containing EPSs have been used in cosmetic applications because of owning to their emulsifying activity [119]. For further studies, we believe that environmental stresses may be an effective method which positively alters EPS biosynthesis to generate a new EPS type with higher biological activity for industrial applications.



    [1] A. Bayaga, Multinomial logistic regression: Usage and application in risk analysis, J. Appl. Quant. Methods, 5 (2010), 288–297.
    [2] A. Selmoune, Z. Liu, J. Lee, To pay or not to pay? Understanding public acceptance of congestion pricing: A case study of Nanjing, Electron. Res. Arch, 30 (2022), 4136–4156. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2022209 doi: 10.3934/era.2022209
    [3] Z. Ahmad, Z. Almaspoor, F. Khan, S. E. Alhazmi, M. El-Morshedy, O. Y. Ababneh, et al., On fitting and forecasting the log-returns of cryptocurrency exchange rates using a new logistic model and machine learning algorithms, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 18031–18049. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022993 doi: 10.3934/math.2022993
    [4] N. Dwarika, Asset pricing models in South Africa: A comparative of regression analysis and the Bayesian approach, Data Sci. Financ. Econ., 3 (2023), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.3934/DSFE.2023004 doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2023004
    [5] D. McAllester, Generalization bounds and consistency, Predicting Struct. Data, 2007. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7443.003.0015
    [6] N. Kordzakhia, G. D. Mishra, L. Reiersølmoen, Robust estimation in the logistic regression model, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 98 (2001), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00312-8 doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00312-8
    [7] M. Rashid, Inference on Logistic Regression Models, Ph.D thesis, Bowling Green State University, 2008.
    [8] D. Dai, D. Wang, A generalized Liu-type estimator for logistic partial linear regression model with multicollinearity, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 11851–11874. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023600 doi: 10.3934/math.2023600
    [9] Z. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Fu, Learning restricted bayesian network classifiers with mixed non-i.i.d. sampling, in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, (2010), 899–904. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2010.199
    [10] H. Sun, Q. Wu, Least square regression with indefinite kernels and coefficient regularization, Appl. Comput. Harmon A, 30 (2011), 96–109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2010.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2010.04.001
    [11] H. Sun, Q. Guo, Coefficient regularized regression with non-iid sampling, Int. J. Comput. Math., 88 (2011), 3113–3124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2011.587511 doi: 10.1080/00207160.2011.587511
    [12] X. Chu, H. Sun, Regularized least square regression with unbounded and dependent sampling, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 900–914. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/139318. doi: 10.1155/2013/139318
    [13] Z. C. Guo, L. Shi, Learning with coefficient-based regularization and l1-penalty, Adv. Comput. Math., 39 (2013), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-012-9288-6 doi: 10.1007/s10444-012-9288-6
    [14] B. Jiang, Q. Sun, J. Q. Fan, Bernstein's inequality for general Markov chains, preprint, arXiv: 1805.10721.
    [15] D. S. Modha, E. Masry, Minimum complexity regression estimation with weakly dependent observations, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 42 (1996), 2133–2145. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.556602 doi: 10.1109/18.556602
    [16] F. Merlevède, M. Peligrad, E. Rio, Bernstein inequality and moderate deviations under strong mixing conditions, Inst. Math. Stat. (IMS) Collect., 2009 (2009), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-IMSCOLL518 doi: 10.1214/09-IMSCOLL518
    [17] J. Q. Fan, B. Jiang, Q. Sun, Hoeffding's lemma for Markov Chains and its applications to statistical learning, preprint, arXiv: 1802.00211.
    [18] P. J. M. Laarhoven, E. H. L. Aarts, Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications, Springer, Dordrecht, 1987.
    [19] J. Thongkam, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, et.al., Support vector machine for outlier detection in breast cancer survivability prediction, in Asia-Pacific Web Conference, Springer, (2008), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89376-9_10
    [20] A. L. B. Miranda, L. P. F. Garcia, A. C. P. L. F. Carvalho, A. C. Lorena, Use of classification algorithms in noise detection and elimination, in International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems, Springer, (2009), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02319-4_50
    [21] J. Xu, Y. Y. Tang, B. Zou, Z. Xu, L. Li, Y. Lu, et al., The generalization ability of SVM classification based on Markov sampling, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 45 (2014), 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2346536 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2346536
    [22] J. D. Head, M. C. Zerner, A Broyden—Fletcher—Goldfarb—Shanno optimization procedure for molecular geometries, Chem. Phys. Lett., 122 (1985), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(85)80574-1 doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(85)80574-1
    [23] M. Vidyasagar, Learning and Generalization: With Applications to Neural Networks, Springer, London, 2003.
    [24] S. P. Meyn, R. L. Tweedie, Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability, Springer, Berlin, 2012.
    [25] P. Doukhan, Mixing: Properties and Examples, Springer, Berlin, 2012.
    [26] P. Zhang, N. Riedel, Discriminant analysis: A unified approach, in Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05), 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2005.51
    [27] V. N. Vapnik, An overview of statistical learning theory, IEEE T. Neur. Net. Lear., 10 (1999), 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.788640 doi: 10.1109/72.788640
    [28] F. Cucker, S. Smale, Best choices for regularization parameters in learning theory: On the bias-variance problem, Found. Comput. Math., 2 (2002), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102080010030 doi: 10.1007/s102080010030
    [29] G. Stempfel, L. Ralaivola, Learning SVMs from sloppily labeled data, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04274-4_91
    [30] M. P. Qian, G. L. Gong, Applied random processes, Peking University Press, Beijing, 1998.
    [31] W. K. Hastings, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57 (1970), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
    [32] S. Geman S, D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 6 (1984), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Kippeum Lee, Hyeon Ji Kim, Soo A Kim, Soo-Dong Park, Jae-Jung Shim, Jung-Lyoul Lee, Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 Protects against Skin Aging through Skin–Gut Axis Communication, 2021, 26, 1420-3049, 1651, 10.3390/molecules26061651
    2. Daniel Abarquero, Erica Renes, José María Fresno, María Eugenia Tornadijo, Study of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria and their industrial applications: a review, 2022, 57, 0950-5423, 16, 10.1111/ijfs.15227
    3. Jiali Wang, Chengshun Lu, Qiang Xu, Zhongyuan Li, Yajian Song, Sa Zhou, Le Guo, Tongcun Zhang, Xuegang Luo, Comparative Genomics Analysis Provides New Insights into High Ethanol Tolerance of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus LTJ12, a Novel Strain Isolated from Chinese Baijiu, 2022, 12, 2304-8158, 35, 10.3390/foods12010035
    4. Caixia Pei, Hua Lu, Jiayin Ma, Jerry Eichler, Ziqiang Guan, Linlu Gao, Li Liu, Hui Zhou, Jinghua Yang, Cheng Jin, AepG is a glucuronosyltransferase involved in acidic exopolysaccharide synthesis and contributes to environmental adaptation of Haloarcula hispanica, 2023, 299, 00219258, 102911, 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102911
    5. Seul-Gi Jeong, In Seong Choi, Ho Myeong Kim, Ji Yoon Chang, Hae Woong Park, Supercooling Pretreatment Improves the Shelf-Life of Freeze-Dried Leuconostoc mesenteroides WiKim32, 2022, 32, 1017-7825, 1599, 10.4014/jmb.2209.09022
    6. Trung-Son Le, Phu-Tho Nguyen, Song-Hao Nguyen-Ho, Tang-Phu Nguyen, Thi-Tho Nguyen, My-Ngan Thai, To-Uyen Nguyen-Thi, Minh-Chon Nguyen, Quoc-Khanh Hoang, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Expression of genes involved in exopolysaccharide synthesis in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum VAL6 under environmental stresses, 2021, 203, 0302-8933, 4941, 10.1007/s00203-021-02479-0
    7. Jinsong Wu, Xiangpeng Han, Meizhi Ye, Yao Li, Xi Wang, Qingping Zhong, Exopolysaccharides synthesized by lactic acid bacteria: biosynthesis pathway, structure-function relationship, structural modification and applicability, 2022, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2022.2043822
    8. Jieran An, Yuchen Zhang, Zhaoer Zhao, Ran Huan, Huaxi Yi, Hui Wang, Chunguang Luan, Shengbao Feng, Heqiang Huang, Shanwen Li, Deliang Wang, Zhengyuan Zhai, Yanling Hao, Zhenjiang Zech Xu, Molecular Organization and Functional Analysis of a Novel Plasmid-Borne cps Gene Cluster from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YC41 , 2023, 2165-0497, 10.1128/spectrum.04150-22
    9. Odysseas Sotirios Stergiou, Konstantinos Tegopoulos, Despoina Eugenia Kiousi, Margaritis Tsifintaris, Aristotelis C. Papageorgiou, Chrysoula C. Tassou, Nikos Chorianopoulos, Petros Kolovos, Alex Galanis, Whole-Genome Sequencing, Phylogenetic and Genomic Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus L33, a Potential Probiotic Strain Isolated From Fermented Sausages, 2021, 12, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.746659
    10. Ceren Mutlu, Cihadiye Candal-Uslu, Hazal Özhanlı, Sultan Arslan-Tontul, Mustafa Erbas, Modulating of food glycemic response by lactic acid bacteria, 2022, 47, 22124292, 101685, 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101685
    11. Hae Ran Park, Ji Hee Lee, Hyun Jung Ji, Sangyong Lim, Ki Bum Ahn, Ho Seong Seo, Radioprotection of deinococcal exopolysaccharide BRD125 by regenerating hematopoietic stem cells, 2022, 12, 2234-943X, 10.3389/fonc.2022.898185
    12. Corinna Stühmeier-Niehe, Luca Lass, Miriam Brocksieper, Panagiotis Chanos, Christian Hertel, Pre-Treatment of Starter Cultures with Mild Pulsed Electric Fields Influences the Characteristics of Set Yogurt, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 442, 10.3390/foods12030442
    13. Thi-Tho Nguyen, Phu-Tho Nguyen, Minh-Nhut Pham, Hary Razafindralambo, Quoc-Khanh Hoang, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Synbiotics: a New Route of Self-production and Applications to Human and Animal Health, 2022, 14, 1867-1306, 980, 10.1007/s12602-022-09960-2
    14. Navneet Kaur, Priyankar Dey, Bacterial Exopolysaccharides as Emerging Bioactive Macromolecules: From Fundamentals to Applications, 2022, 09232508, 104024, 10.1016/j.resmic.2022.104024
    15. Yifan Zhong, Shanshan Wang, Hanqiu Di, Zhaoxi Deng, Jianxin Liu, Haifeng Wang, Gut health benefit and application of postbiotics in animal production, 2022, 13, 2049-1891, 10.1186/s40104-022-00688-1
    16. Elena Bancalari, Monica Gatti, Benedetta Bottari, Diego Mora, Stefania Arioli, Disclosing Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus intraspecific diversity in exopolysaccharides production, 2022, 102, 07400020, 103924, 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103924
    17. Tongthong Tongthong, Warerat Kaewduangduen, Pornpimol Phuengmaung, Wiwat Chancharoenthana, Asada Leelahavanichkul, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus dfa1 Attenuate Cecal Ligation-Induced Systemic Inflammation through the Interference in Gut Dysbiosis, Leaky Gut, and Enterocytic Cell Energy, 2023, 24, 1422-0067, 3756, 10.3390/ijms24043756
    18. Chiara La Torre, Alessia Fazio, Paolino Caputo, Antonio Tursi, Patrizia Formoso, Erika Cione, Influence of Three Extraction Methods on the Physicochemical Properties of Kefirans Isolated from Three Types of Animal Milk, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 1098, 10.3390/foods11081098
    19. Hafize Fidan, Tuba Esatbeyoglu, Vida Simat, Monica Trif, Giulia Tabanelli, Tina Kostka, Chiara Montanari, Salam A. Ibrahim, Fatih Özogul, Recent developments of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria: Facts and gaps, 2022, 47, 22124292, 101741, 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101741
    20. Maria Kanwal, Rao Arsalan Khushnood, Fazal Adnan, Abdul Ghafar Wattoo, Amna Jalil, Assessment of the MICP potential and corrosion inhibition of steel bars by biofilm forming bacteria in corrosive environment, 2023, 137, 09589465, 104937, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104937
    21. Yolanda González-García, Juan C. Meza-Contreras, José A. Gutiérrez-Ortega, Ricardo Manríquez-González, In Vivo Modification of Microporous Structure in Bacterial Cellulose by Exposing Komagataeibacter xylinus Culture to Physical and Chemical Stimuli, 2022, 14, 2073-4360, 4388, 10.3390/polym14204388
    22. Ahmed Zayed, Mai K. Mansour, Mohamed S. Sedeek, Mohamed H. Habib, Roland Ulber, Mohamed A. Farag, Rediscovering bacterial exopolysaccharides of terrestrial and marine origins: novel insights on their distribution, biosynthesis, biotechnological production, and future perspectives, 2021, 0738-8551, 1, 10.1080/07388551.2021.1942779
    23. Phu-Tho Nguyen, Thi-Tho Nguyen, Thi-To-Uyen Nguyen, Quoc-Khanh Hoang, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Improve the viability and extracellular polymeric substances bioactivity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum VAL6 using the environmental adaptation, 2022, 131, 09603085, 149, 10.1016/j.fbp.2021.11.006
    24. Hadi Pourjafar, Fereshteh Ansari, Alireza Sadeghi, Shohre Alian Samakkhah, Seid Mahdi Jafari, Functional and health-promoting properties of probiotics’ exopolysaccharides; isolation, characterization, and applications in the food industry, 2022, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2022.2047883
    25. Ho Myeong Kim, Seul-Gi Jeong, In Min Hwang, Hae Woong Park, Efficient Citrus (Citrus unshiu) Byproduct Extract-Based Approach forLactobacillus sakeiWiKim31 Shelf-Life Extension, 2021, 6, 2470-1343, 35334, 10.1021/acsomega.1c04335
    26. Thi-Tho Nguyen, Phu-Tho Nguyen, Thi-To-Uyen Nguyen, Thi-Bich-Nhu Nguyen, Nhi-Binh Bui, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Efficacy of the incorporation between self-encapsulation and cryoprotectants on improving the freeze-dried survival of probiotic bacteria, 2022, 132, 1365-2672, 3217, 10.1111/jam.15473
    27. Hikmate Abriouel, Julia Manetsberger, Natacha Caballero Gómez, Nabil Benomar, In silico genomic analysis of the potential probiotic Lactiplantibacillus pentosus CF2-10N reveals promising beneficial effects with health promoting properties, 2022, 13, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.989824
    28. Sivasankari Marimuthu, Sharon Mano Pappu J, Karthikeyan Rajendran, Artificial neural network modeling and statistical optimization of medium components to enhance production of exopolysaccharide by Bacillus sp. EPS003, 2023, 53, 1082-6068, 136, 10.1080/10826068.2022.2098322
    29. Maria Dimopoulou, Marguerite Dols-Lafargue, Exopolysaccharides Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria in Wine and Other Fermented Beverages: For Better or for Worse?, 2021, 10, 2304-8158, 2204, 10.3390/foods10092204
    30. Soyoung Park, Kandasamy Saravanakumar, Anbazhagan Sathiyaseelan, Ki-Seok Han, Jooeun Lee, Myeong-Hyeon Wang, Polysaccharides of Weissella cibaria Act as a Prebiotic to Enhance the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, 2022, 0273-2289, 10.1007/s12010-022-04104-2
    31. Ririn Puspadewi, Anggi Gumilar, Tiara Damara Kartikasari, The Ability of Lactobacillus Plantarum to Produce Exopolysaccharides with Additional Nutrients, 2022, 1104, 1755-1307, 012011, 10.1088/1755-1315/1104/1/012011
    32. Fitsum Dejene, Belayneh Regasa Dadi, Dagimawie Tadesse, Elena Sorrentino, In Vitro Antagonistic Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Fermented Beverage and Finfish on Pathogenic and Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganism in Ethiopia, 2021, 2021, 1687-9198, 1, 10.1155/2021/5370556
    33. Bakhtiyar Islamov, Olga Petrova, Polina Mikshina, Aidar Kadyirov, Vladimir Vorob’ev, Yuri Gogolev, Vladimir Gorshkov, The Role of Pectobacterium atrosepticum Exopolysaccharides in Plant–Pathogen Interactions, 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 12781, 10.3390/ijms222312781
    34. Youssef M. M. Mohammed, Mona M. G. Saad, Samir A. M. Abdelgaleil, Production, characterization and bio-emulsifying application of exopolysaccharides from Rhodotorula mucilaginosa YMM19, 2021, 11, 2190-572X, 10.1007/s13205-021-02898-2
    35. Evandro L de Souza, Kataryne ÁR de Oliveira, Maria EG de Oliveira, Influence of lactic acid bacteria metabolites on physical and chemical food properties, 2023, 49, 22147993, 100981, 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100981
    36. Aneliya Georgieva, Mariana Petkova, Emanoila Todorova, Velitchka Gotcheva, Angel Angelov, P. Mollov, G. Ivanov, K. Mihalev, G. Kostov, S. Dragoev, Isolation and selection of sauerkraut lactic acid bacteria producing exopolysaccharides, 2023, 58, 2117-4458, 02001, 10.1051/bioconf/20235802001
    37. Raquel Bello-Morales, Sabina Andreu, Vicente Ruiz-Carpio, Inés Ripa, José Antonio López-Guerrero, Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Still Promising Antivirals, 2022, 14, 1999-4915, 1337, 10.3390/v14061337
    38. Chu Wu, Yun Wang, Yujie Yang, Pestalotiopsis Diversity: Species, Dispositions, Secondary Metabolites, and Bioactivities, 2022, 27, 1420-3049, 8088, 10.3390/molecules27228088
    39. Olga V. Averina, Elena U. Poluektova, Mariya V. Marsova, Valery N. Danilenko, Biomarkers and Utility of the Antioxidant Potential of Probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria as Representatives of the Human Gut Microbiota, 2021, 9, 2227-9059, 1340, 10.3390/biomedicines9101340
    40. Shuo Yang, Xiaoqing Xu, Qing Peng, Lan Ma, Yu Qiao, Bo Shi, Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria, as an alternative to antibiotics, on regulation of intestinal health and the immune system, 2023, 24056545, 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.02.004
    41. Min Li, Weicheng Li, Dongyu Li, Juanjuan Tian, Luyao Xiao, Lai-Yu Kwok, Wei Li, Zhihong Sun, Structure characterization, antioxidant capacity, rheological characteristics and expression of biosynthetic genes of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IMAU11823, 2022, 384, 03088146, 132566, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132566
    42. Thi-Tho Nguyen, Phu-Tho Nguyen, Thi-Thuy-Vy Nguyen, Thi-To-Uyen Nguyen, Thi-Bich-Nhu Nguyen, Nhi-Binh Bui, Quoc-Khanh Hoang, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Correlation Between the Amount of Extracellular Polymeric Substances and the Survival Rate to Freeze-Drying of Probiotics, 2022, 79, 0343-8651, 10.1007/s00284-022-02862-0
    43. Muhammad Latif, Syed Asad Hussain Bukhari, Abdullah A. Alrajhi, Fahad S. Alotaibi, Maqshoof Ahmad, Ahmad Naeem Shahzad, Ahmed Z. Dewidar, Mohamed A. Mattar, Inducing Drought Tolerance in Wheat through Exopolysaccharide-Producing Rhizobacteria, 2022, 12, 2073-4395, 1140, 10.3390/agronomy12051140
    44. Giovanna Iosca, Luciana De Vero, Giulia Di Rocco, Giancarlo Perrone, Maria Gullo, Andrea Pulvirenti, Anti-Spoilage Activity and Exopolysaccharides Production by Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 1914, 10.3390/foods11131914
    45. Cristina Mihaela Nicolescu, Marius Bumbac, Claudia Lavinia Buruleanu, Elena Corina Popescu, Sorina Geanina Stanescu, Andreea Antonia Georgescu, Siramona Maria Toma, Biopolymers Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria: Characterization and Food Application, 2023, 15, 2073-4360, 1539, 10.3390/polym15061539
    46. Sakineh Abbasi, Parisa Mohammadi, Improving drought tolerance and glycyrrhizin content of licorice plant by EPS-producing cyanobacteria, 2023, 197, 09266690, 116578, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116578
    47. Fedrick C. Mgomi, Yi-ran Yang, Geng Cheng, Zhen-quan Yang, Lactic acid bacteria biofilms and their antimicrobial potential against pathogenic microorganisms, 2023, 25902075, 100118, 10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100118
    48. Jie Xiong, Dong-mei Liu, Yan-yan Huang, Exopolysaccharides from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: isolation, purification, structure–function relationship, and application, 2023, 1438-2377, 10.1007/s00217-023-04237-6
    49. Luis-Fernando Patlan-Velázquez, Luis-Guillermo González-Olivares, Mariano García-Garibay, Sergio Alatorre-Santamaría, Lorena Gómez-Ruiz, Gabriela Rodríguez-Serrano, Alma Cruz-Guerrero, Effect of biogenic exopolysaccharides in characteristics and stability of a novel Requeson-type cheese, 2024, 59, 22124292, 103896, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103896
    50. Aaron Leininger, Sidan Lu, Jinyue Jiang, Yanhong Bian, Harold D. May, Zhiyong Jason Ren, The convergence of lactic acid microbiomes and metabolites in long-term electrofermentation, 2024, 22, 26664984, 100459, 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100459
    51. Nourhan S. Shehata, Bassma H. Elwakil, Salma S. Elshewemi, Doaa A. Ghareeb, Zakia A. Olama, Selenium nanoparticles coated bacterial polysaccharide with potent antimicrobial and anti-lung cancer activities, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-48921-9
    52. Shangjie Yao, Rongkun Tu, Yao Jin, Rongqing Zhou, Chongde Wu, Jiufu Qin, Improvement of the viability of Tetragenococcus halophilus under acidic stress by forming the biofilm cell structure based on RNA‐Seq and iTRAQ analyses, 2024, 104, 0022-5142, 3559, 10.1002/jsfa.13240
    53. Nayeli Martha-Lucero, Gustavo Viniegra-González, Luis González-Olivares, Alma Cruz-Guerrero, Biofilm formation by agave epiphytic lactic acid bacteria fed with agave fructans, 2023, 39, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-023-03749-3
    54. Abdelbasset Lakhdar, Mohamed Trigui, Francesco Montemurro, An Overview of Biostimulants’ Effects in Saline Soils, 2023, 13, 2073-4395, 2092, 10.3390/agronomy13082092
    55. Seda Nur Köktürk, Hülya Yardimci, Postbiotics and their therapeutic effects: a review, 2024, 35, 2770-3150, 175, 10.1097/MRM.0000000000000383
    56. Naimisha Chowdhury, Romen Singh Naorem, Dibya Jyoti Hazarika, Gunajit Goswami, Abhisek Dasgupta, Sudipta Sankar Bora, Robin Chandra Boro, Madhumita Barooah, An oxalate decarboxylase-like cupin domain containing protein is involved in imparting acid stress tolerance in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBNC, 2024, 40, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-023-03870-3
    57. Saumi Pandey, Vinod K. Kannaujiya, Bacterial extracellular biopolymers: Eco-diversification, biosynthesis, technological development and commercial applications, 2024, 279, 01418130, 135261, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135261
    58. Ramesh Sharma, Pinku Chandra Nath, Biswanath Bhunia, Tarun Kanti Bandyopadhyay, 2023, Chapter 23, 978-981-99-6830-5, 441, 10.1007/978-981-99-6831-2_23
    59. S. Chaitanya Kumari, Dastagir Mohammed, K. Anuradha, 2024, 9780443139321, 113, 10.1016/B978-0-443-13932-1.00020-9
    60. Arun Kumar, Manti Kumar Saha, Vipin Kumar, Anupam Bhattacharya, Sagar Barge, Ashis K. Mukherjee, Mohan C. Kalita, Mojibur R. Khan, Heat-killed probiotic Levilactobacillus brevis MKAK9 and its exopolysaccharide promote longevity by modulating aging hallmarks and enhancing immune responses in Caenorhabditis elegans, 2024, 21, 1742-4933, 10.1186/s12979-024-00457-w
    61. Özge Kahraman-Ilıkkan, Selin Akad Dinçer, Elif Şeyma Bağdat, Işılsu Çağlar, Enes Dertli, Hümeyra İspirli, Feride İffet Şahin, The wound healing effect and DNA damage repair of exopolysaccharide extracted from Weissella cibaria MED17, 2024, 31, 22126198, 100400, 10.1016/j.bcdf.2023.100400
    62. Yamid A. Pinchao, Liliana Serna-Cock, Oswaldo Osorio Mora, Probiotic capacity of commensal lactic acid bacteria from the intestine of Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), 2024, 10, 24058440, e29431, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29431
    63. Nina Katarina Grilc, Julijana Kristl, Špela Zupančič, Can polymeric nanofibers effectively preserve and deliver live therapeutic bacteria?, 2025, 245, 09277765, 114329, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114329
    64. Geum-Jae Jeong, Fazlurrahman Khan, Nazia Tabassum, Young-Mog Kim, Alteration of oral microbial biofilms by sweeteners, 2024, 7, 25902075, 100171, 10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100171
    65. Niamat Ullah, Syed Zia Ul Hasnain, Rabia Baloch, Adnan Amin, Aygun Nasibova, Dragica Selakovic, Gvozden Luka Rosic, Sokhib Islamov, Nasibakhon Naraliyeva, Nidal Jaradat, Afat O Mammadova, Exploring essential oil-based bio-composites: molecular docking and in vitro analysis for oral bacterial biofilm inhibition, 2024, 12, 2296-2646, 10.3389/fchem.2024.1383620
    66. Marco Montemurro, Marzia Beccaccioli, Giuseppe Perri, Carlo Giuseppe Rizzello, Massimo Reverberi, Erica Pontonio, A chestnut-hemp type-II sourdough to improve technological, nutritional, and sensory properties of gluten-free bread, 2023, 404, 01681605, 110322, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110322
    67. Sri Wahyuni, Asnani Asnani, Andi Khaeruni, Novi Dian Puspita Dewi, Sarinah Sarinah, R. H. Fitri Faradilla, Study on physicochemical characteristics of local colored rice varieties (black, red, brown, and white) fermented with lactic acid bacteria (SBM.4A), 2023, 60, 0022-1155, 3035, 10.1007/s13197-023-05813-0
    68. Sabine Michielsen, Gabriel T Vercelli, Otto X Cordero, Herwig Bachmann, Spatially structured microbial consortia and their role in food fermentations, 2024, 87, 09581669, 103102, 10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103102
    69. Haktan Aktaş, Bülent Çetın, Multidimensional evaluation of techno-functional properties of yoghurt bacteria, 2024, 148, 09586946, 105795, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105795
    70. Jiali Wang, Chengshun Lu, Qiang Xu, Zhong-Yuan Li, Ya-Jian Song, Sa Zhou, Shuxian Zhao, Jiqi Li, Xue-Gang Luo, Tong-Cun Zhang, Genomic Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus Pentosus LTJ12, a Novel Strain with High Alcohol Tolerance Isolated from Chinese Baijiu, 2022, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4194729
    71. Shah Saud, Tang Xiaojuan, Shah Fahad, The consequences of fermentation metabolism on the qualitative qualities and biological activity of fermented fruit and vegetable juices, 2024, 21, 25901575, 101209, 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101209
    72. H. Nakibapher Jones Shangpliang, Jyoti Prakash Tamang, Metagenomics and metagenome-assembled genomes mining of health benefits in jalebi batter, a naturally fermented cereal-based food of India, 2023, 172, 09639969, 113130, 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113130
    73. Hassimi Abu Hasan, Nurul Farhana Mohd Rahim, Jahira Alias, Jamilah Ahmad, Nor Sakinah Mohd Said, Nur Nadhirah Ramli, Junaidah Buhari, Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah, Ahmad Razi Othman, Hajjar Hartini Wan Jusoh, Hafizan Juahir, Setyo Budi Kurniawan, A Review on the Roles of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPSs) in Wastewater Treatment: Source, Mechanism Study, Bioproducts, Limitations, and Future Challenges, 2024, 16, 2073-4441, 2812, 10.3390/w16192812
    74. Nowshin Tarannum, Tanim Jabid Hossain, Ferdausi Ali, Tuhin Das, Kartik Dhar, Iqbal Hossain Nafiz, Antioxidant, antimicrobial and emulsification properties of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria of bovine milk: Insights from biochemical and genomic analysis, 2023, 186, 00236438, 115263, 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115263
    75. Mohamed Amine Gacem, Kamel Krantar, Sawsen Hadef, Badreddine Boudjemaa, 2024, 9780323952514, 107, 10.1016/B978-0-323-95251-4.00003-X
    76. Anna Jańczuk, Aneta Brodziak, Jolanta Król, Tomasz Czernecki, Properties of Yoghurt Fortified in Lactoferrin with Effect of Storage Time, 2023, 13, 2076-2615, 1610, 10.3390/ani13101610
    77. Gabriela N. Tenea, Jazmin Hidalgo, Jocelyne Pepinos, Clara Ortega, Genome characterization of Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides UTNElla29 isolated from Morus nigra (L.) fruits: A promising exopolysaccharides producing strain, 2024, 206, 00236438, 116594, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116594
    78. Shengnan Liang, Xinyu Wang, Chun Li, Libo Liu, Biological Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides and Their Applications in the Food and Pharmaceutical Industries, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 1621, 10.3390/foods13111621
    79. Zongling Chen, Xingyu Huo, Jiali Wan, Jinming Che, Meiyi Deng, Yingnan Bao, Hailin Yang, Yanjun Tong, Shoushuai Feng, Enhancing acid resistance of Escherichia coli based on directed morphology evolutionary of key transcription factor bolA, 2024, 62, 22124292, 105291, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105291
    80. O. A. Svitich, A. V. Poddubikov, N. O. Vartanova, A. Yu. Leonova, E. A. Kurbatova, Biofilm Formation by Lactobacillus Strains of Modern Probiotics and Their Antagonistic Activity against Opportunistic Bacteria, 2024, 177, 0007-4888, 476, 10.1007/s10517-024-06211-y
    81. Rajesh Jeewon, Aadil Ahmad Aullybux, Daneshwar Puchooa, Nadeem Nazurally, Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei, Ying Zhang, Marine Microbial Polysaccharides: An Untapped Resource for Biotechnological Applications, 2023, 21, 1660-3397, 420, 10.3390/md21070420
    82. Bio-Prospecting Xylose-Utilizing, Exopolysaccharide (EPS)-Producing Bacteria and EPS Quantification through Submerged Fermentation using Xylose as the Major Carbon Source, 2024, 2814-1822, 13, 10.47430/ujmr.2493.003
    83. Siqun Tang, Jilai Gong, Biao Song, Juan Li, Weicheng Cao, Jun Zhao, Remediation of biochar-supported effective microorganisms and microplastics on multiple forms of nitrogenous and phosphorous in eutrophic lake, 2024, 956, 00489697, 177142, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177142
    84. Polina Mikshina, Maria Kharina, Alya Sungatullina, Tatyana Petrova, Timur Sibgatullin, Elena Nikitina, Influence of flaxseed mucilage on the formation, composition, and properties of exopolysaccharides produced by different strains of lactic acid bacteria, 2024, 281, 01418130, 136092, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136092
    85. Se-Young Kwun, Jeong-Ah Yoon, Ga-Yeon Kim, Young-Woo Bae, Eun-Hee Park, Myoung-Dong Kim, Isolation of a Potential Probiotic Levilactobacillus brevis and Evaluation of Its Exopolysaccharide for Antioxidant and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities, 2024, 34, 1017-7825, 167, 10.4014/jmb.2304.04043
    86. Phu-Tho Nguyen, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Environmental stress for improving the functionality of lactic acid bacteria in malolactic fermentation, 2024, 4, 29501946, 100138, 10.1016/j.microb.2024.100138
    87. Sharon Y. Geerlings, Kees van der Ark, Bart Nijsse, Sjef Boeren, Mark van Loosdrecht, Clara Belzer, Willem M. de Vos, Omics-based analysis of Akkermansia muciniphila cultivation in food-grade media, 2024, 3, 2771-5965, 10.20517/mrr.2024.06
    88. Gökhan Kürşad İncili, Roghayieh Razavi, Ali Adnan Hayaloğlu, Ahmadreza Abedinia, Seyedeh Sahar Mirmoeini, Mehran Moradi, 2025, 9780443135675, 55, 10.1016/B978-0-443-13567-5.00003-4
    89. Akshay Ramani, Subhadip Manik, Tanmay Hazra, Sheweta Barak, Deepak Mudgil, 2023, Chapter 9, 978-981-99-5458-2, 167, 10.1007/978-981-99-5459-9_9
    90. Kevser Karaman, Sibel Turan Sirke, Şeyda Nur Türkay Rifaioglu, Molecular identification of lactic acid bacteria from traditional fermented foods and screening exopolysaccharide production by using food wastes, 2024, 0015-5632, 10.1007/s12223-024-01187-8
    91. Pascal Drouin, Érica Benjamim da Silva, Julien Tremblay, Eric Chevaux, Emmanuelle Apper, Mathieu Castex, Inoculation with Lentilactobacillus buchneri alone or in combination with Lentilactobacillus hilgardii modifies gene expression, fermentation profile, and starch digestibility in high-moisture corn, 2023, 14, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1253588
    92. Vishal Ahuja, Shikha Chauhan, Diptarka Dasgupta, Puneet Wadhwa, Tirath Raj, Yung-Hun Yang, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Microbial exopolysaccharide composites with inorganic materials and their biomedical applications: A review, 2024, 7, 26668939, 100482, 10.1016/j.carpta.2024.100482
    93. Angel Angelov, Aneliya Georgieva, Mariana Petkova, Elena Bartkiene, João Miguel Rocha, Manol Ognyanov, Velitchka Gotcheva, On the Molecular Selection of Exopolysaccharide-Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria from Indigenous Fermented Plant-Based Foods and Further Fine Chemical Characterization, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 3346, 10.3390/foods12183346
    94. Monic Andrew, Gurunathan Jayaraman, Production optimization and antioxidant potential of exopolysaccharide produced by a moderately halophilic bacterium Virgibacillus dokdonensis VITP14 , 2024, 1082-6068, 1, 10.1080/10826068.2024.2370879
    95. Sizhe Qiu, Aidong Yang, Hong Zeng, Christos A. Ouzounis, Flux balance analysis-based metabolic modeling of microbial secondary metabolism: Current status and outlook, 2023, 19, 1553-7358, e1011391, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011391
    96. Giorgia Rampanti, Andrea Cantarini, Federica Cardinali, Vesna Milanović, Cristiana Garofalo, Lucia Aquilanti, Andrea Osimani, Technological and Enzymatic Characterization of Autochthonous Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Viili Natural Starters, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 1115, 10.3390/foods13071115
    97. Thuy-Trang Pham, Thanh-Dung Nguyen, Thi-Tho Nguyen, Minh-Nhut Pham, Phu-Tho Nguyen, To-Uyen Thi Nguyen, Thanh-Tam Ngoc Huynh, Huu-Thanh Nguyen, Rhizosphere bacterial exopolysaccharides: composition, biosynthesis, and their potential applications, 2024, 206, 0302-8933, 10.1007/s00203-024-04113-1
    98. Saba Kavian, Mehdi Zarei, Ali Niazi, Reza Ghasemi-Fasaei, Amir Ghaffar Shahriari, Tibor Janda, Morphophysiological and Biochemical Responses of Zea mays L. under Cadmium and Drought Stresses Integrated with Fungal and Bacterial Inoculation, 2023, 13, 2073-4395, 1675, 10.3390/agronomy13071675
    99. Lebea N. Nthunya, Tshepiso J. Mpala, Anita Etale, Oranso T. Mahlangu, Mahloro Hope Serepa-Dlamini, Eduardo A. Lopez-Maldonado, Heidi Richards, Biofouling control of thermophilic bacteria in membrane distillation, 2024, 320, 19443986, 100627, 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100627
    100. Qianru Lin, Mingwang Liu, Hao Ni, Yue Hao, Yiqun Yu, Yiran Chen, Qing Wu, Yi Shen, Lei Zhang, Mingsheng Lyu, Shujun Wang, High-degree polymerizate IMOs of dextranase hydrolysates enhance Lactobacillus acid metabolism: Based on growth, and metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses, 2023, 187, 00236438, 115345, 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115345
    101. Felipe Martins de Souza, Ram K. Gupta, Bacteria for Bioplastics: Progress, Applications, and Challenges, 2024, 9, 2470-1343, 8666, 10.1021/acsomega.3c07372
    102. Jihen Elleuch, Marwa Drira, Imtinen Ghribi, Farah Hadjkacem, Guillaume Pierre, Hamadi Khemakhem, Philippe Michaud, Imen Fendri, Slim Abdelkafi, Lead removal from the aqueous solution by extracellular polymeric substances produced by the marine diatom Navicula salinicola , 2024, 0959-3330, 1, 10.1080/09593330.2024.2338456
    103. Nina Čuljak, Barbara Bellich, Alice Pedroni, Katarina Butorac, Andreja Leboš Pavunc, Jasna Novak, Martina Banić, Jagoda Šušković, Paola Cescutti, Blaženka Kos, Limosilactobacillus fermentum strains MC1 and D12: Functional properties and exopolysaccharides characterization, 2024, 273, 01418130, 133215, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133215
    104. Siqun Tang, Jilai Gong, Biao Song, Weicheng Cao, Juan Li, Remediation of biochar-supported effective microorganisms and microplastics on multiple forms of heavy metals in eutrophic lake, 2024, 465, 03043894, 133098, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133098
    105. Yingxue Yue, Yuqi Wang, Yu Han, Yifan Zhang, Ting Cao, Guicheng Huo, Bailiang Li, Genome Analysis of Bifidobacterium Bifidum E3, Structural Characteristics, and Antioxidant Properties of Exopolysaccharides, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 2988, 10.3390/foods12162988
    106. Leandro Wagner Figueira, Ana Bessa Muniz, Anelise Cristina Osorio Cesar Doria, Thalita Mayumi Castaldelli Nishime, Konstantin Georgiev Kostov, Cristiane Y. Koga-Ito, Inhibitory effect of helium cold atmospheric plasma on cariogenic biofilms, 2024, 16, 2000-2297, 10.1080/20002297.2024.2397831
    107. Yeong Yeol Kim, Jong-Cheol Kim, Seulbi Kim, Jung Eun Yang, Ho Myeong Kim, Hae Woong Park, Heterotypic stress-induced adaptive evolution enhances freeze-drying tolerance and storage stability of Leuconostoc mesenteroides WiKim33, 2024, 175, 09639969, 113731, 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113731
    108. E. A. Pozhidaeva, E. S. Popov, N. S. Rodionova, Y. A. Dymovskikh, Y. V. Durova, M. S. Grebennikova, S. Sadullozoda, S. Voinash, Y. Ospanov, Study of regime parameters of the process of cultivation of a consortium of probiotic microorganisms providing increased synthesis of exopolysaccharides, 2024, 126, 2117-4458, 01044, 10.1051/bioconf/202412601044
    109. Mahdi Asghari Ozma, Seyyed Reza Moaddab, Hedayat Hosseini, Ehsaneh Khodadadi, Reza Ghotaslou, Mohammad Asgharzadeh, Amin Abbasi, Fadhil S Kamounah, Leili Aghebati Maleki, Khudaverdi Ganbarov, Hossein Samadi Kafil, A critical review of novel antibiotic resistance prevention approaches with a focus on postbiotics, 2023, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2023.2214818
    110. Digambar Kavitake, Swati Tiwari, Irshad Ahmad Shah, Palanisamy Bruntha Devi, Cedric Delattre, G. Bhanuprakash Reddy, Prathapkumar Halady Shetty, Antipathogenic potentials of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria and their food and health applications, 2023, 152, 09567135, 109850, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109850
    111. Zakaria A. Mohamed, Rehab O. Elnour, Saad Alamri, Mohamed Hashem, Increased production of extracellular polysaccharides in Arthrospira platensis as a protective response against saxitoxin: Implications to outdoor mass production, 2023, 74, 22119264, 103184, 10.1016/j.algal.2023.103184
    112. Inga Bazukyan, Dimitrina Georgieva-Miteva, Tsvetelina Velikova, Svetoslav G. Dimov, In Silico Probiogenomic Characterization of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis A4 Strain Isolated from an Armenian Honeybee Gut, 2023, 14, 2075-4450, 540, 10.3390/insects14060540
    113. Cecilia Castro-López, Alfonso García-Galaz, Hugo S. García, Aarón F. González-Córdova, Belinda Vallejo-Cordoba, Adrián Hernández-Mendoza, Potential probiotic lactobacilli strains isolated from artisanal Mexican Cocido cheese: evidence-based biosafety and probiotic action-related traits on in vitro tests, 2023, 54, 1517-8382, 2137, 10.1007/s42770-023-01059-2
    114. Rina Su, Xinyuan Cui, Hao Guan, Wencan Ke, Ying Liang, Hu Chen, Neha Sheoran, Mengya Jia, Yiling Yang, Lizhuang Hao, Guojun Zhao, Xusheng Guo, Effect of psychrotrophic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L75 with exoploysaccharides-producing property on fermentation, bacterial community, and antioxidant activity of oat silage at low temperature, 2024, 318, 03778401, 116150, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116150
    115. Sampat Nehra, Raj Kumar Gothwal, Alok Kumar Varshney, Pooran Singh Solanki, Poonam Meena, P.C. Trivedi, P. Ghosh, 2023, 9789815050264, 145, 10.2174/9789815050264123020012
    116. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Ji Hoon Song, Robie Vasquez, Jae Seung Lee, In Ho Kim, Dae-Kyung Kang, Methods for Detection, Extraction, Purification, and Characterization of Exopolysaccharides of Lactic Acid Bacteria—A Systematic Review, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 3687, 10.3390/foods13223687
    117. Sangram Keshari Samal, Debadas Sahoo, Diptikanta Acharya, Alterations in structural components of extracellular polymeric substance of epilithic bacteria Brevundimonas faecalis BC1 growing on monumental rock under thermal stress , 2024, 0892-7014, 1, 10.1080/08927014.2024.2432970
    118. Tatyana S Tikhomirova, Maxim R Taraskevich, Yuriy A Lepekhin, Marina P Shevelyova, Vitaliy A Nemashkalov, Optimization and scaling up of extracellular polysaccharide production by submerged culture of Ganoderma lucidum on starch-containing medium using response surface methodology and laboratory bioreactors of various designs, 2024, 77, 1472-765X, 10.1093/lambio/ovae115
    119. Himanshi Kain, Ena Gupta, Prashant Sharma, Akanksha Haldiya, Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Ravi Ranjan Kumar Neeraj, Pradeep Sharma, S. L. Kothari, Sandip Patil, Shaowei Dong, Anupam Jyoti, Sanket Kaushik, Rolling down the pilus formation of gram-positive bacteria: underlining the importance of Sortase C as a drug target, 2024, 0892-7014, 1, 10.1080/08927014.2024.2426167
    120. Shagun Sharma, Vandana Jhalora, Shubhita Mathur, Renu Bist, A Comparison of Antibiotics’ Resistance Patterns of E. coli and B. subtilis in their Biofilms and Planktonic Forms, 2025, 25, 18715265, 10.2174/0118715265278809240101073539
    121. Hao Liting, Zhou Hongliang, He Yuanyuan, Fu Bowei, Li Miao, Hao Xiaodi, Optimizing vanadium(V) removal in groundwater: Influence of packing modes in bioreactors with machine learning predictions, 2025, 69, 22147144, 106820, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106820
    122. Chandni Upadhyaya, Hiren Patel, Ishita Patel, Trushit Upadhyaya, Extremophilic Exopolysaccharides: Bioprocess and Novel Applications in 21st Century, 2025, 11, 2311-5637, 16, 10.3390/fermentation11010016
    123. Vladimir V. Martirosyan, Marina N. Kostyuchenko, Mikhail V. Reynov, Olga E. Tyurina, Olesia A. Savkina, Study of Exopolysaccharide Production by Lactic Acid Bacteria used in the Baking Industry and Comparison of Methods for Their Determination, 2024, 2, 2949-6497, 10.37442/fme.2024.4.67
    124. Xiaona He, Yu Cui, Qiaoyu Jia, Yongliang Zhuang, Ying Gu, Xuejing Fan, Yangyue Ding, Response mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria under environmental stress and their application in the food industry, 2025, 64, 22124292, 105938, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.105938
    125. Helena Mylise Copeland, Susan Maye, George MacLeod, Dermot Brabazon, Christine Loscher, Brian Freeland, Statistical optimisation and analysis of biomass and exopolysaccharide production by Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LRH30, 2025, 41, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-025-04273-2
    126. Stylianos Exarhopoulos, Euripides Krystallis, Eleni Rousi, Olga Groztidou, Despoina Georgiou, Eleni P. Kalogianni, Athanasios Goulas, Georgia Dimitreli, Effect of Thermal Treatment and the Addition of Texture Modifiers on the Rheological Properties and the Microflora of Reconstituted Kefir Powder, 2025, 5, 2673-6209, 7, 10.3390/macromol5010007
    127. Arif Nurkanto, Asrul Fanani, Dian Alfian Nurcahyanto, Jendri Mamangkey, Sarah Marissa, Khatarina Meldawati Pasaribu, Fifi Afiati, Ni Wayan Sri Agustini, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Muhammad Taufik, Herman Irawan, Yelin Adalina, Mia Kusmiati, Erlindha Gangga, Anti-hypercholesterolemia properties of exopolysaccharide from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MI01: computational and in-vivo approaches, 2025, 26660164, 101146, 10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101146
    128. Ahmad Almatroudi, Biofilm Resilience: Molecular Mechanisms Driving Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Contexts, 2025, 14, 2079-7737, 165, 10.3390/biology14020165
    129. Xinyu Yang, Zhijie Yang, Yanbo Wang, Hong Zeng, Bei Wang, Proteomics and metabolomics elucidate the biosynthetic pathway of acid stress-induced exopolysaccharides and its impact on growth phenotypes in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HMX2, 2025, 476, 03088146, 143431, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.143431
    130. Georgia Dimitreli, Stylianos Exarhopoulos, Parthena Apidopoulou, Olga Groztidou, Despoina Georgiou, Eleni P. Kalogianni, Athanasios Goulas, Effect of Final Fermentation pH and Pre-Drying Storage Temperature on Properties of Kefir Powder Produced by Kefir Grains, 2025, 15, 2076-3417, 2509, 10.3390/app15052509
    131. Tchouli Noufeu, Yueqin Li, Ndeye Fatou Toure, Hui Yao, Xiaoqun Zeng, Qiwei Du, Daodong Pan, Overview of Glycometabolism of Lactic Acid Bacteria During Freeze-Drying: Changes, Influencing Factors, and Application Strategies, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 743, 10.3390/foods14050743
    132. Aidalú Hernández-Martínez, Carlos Jiménez-Pérez, Alma Cruz-Guerrero, John F. Trant, Sergio Alatorre-Santamaría, 2025, Production of Exopolysaccharides Through Fermentation of Secondary Whey with Kefir Grains, 44, 10.3390/blsf2024040044
    133. Hatice Oto, H. Ceren Akal, Gökçe Eminoğlu, Enhancing synbiotic dairy beverages with chemically cross-linked inulin for improved texture and stability, 2025, 0022-1155, 10.1007/s13197-025-06243-w
    134. Jiayi Lin, Chi Zhao, Jvliang Dai, Yu Zhang, Fangming Lan, Lixin Luo, Unravelling the response mechanism of extracellular polysaccharides synthesis and salt stress resistance in Tetragenococcus halophilus JY1biofilm formation, 2025, 66, 22124292, 106327, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106327
    135. Angela Maria Catania, Alessandra Dalmasso, Patrizia Morra, Emanuele Costa, Maria Teresa Bottero, Pierluigi Aldo Di Ciccio, Effect of gaseous ozone treatment on cells and biofilm of dairy Bacillus spp. isolates, 2025, 16, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1538456
    136. Siyuan Liu, Yi Wang, Chun Xu, Suppressive effects of lemon myrtle extract against the colonization and virulence factors of Candida spp., 2025, 67, 13490079, 100657, 10.1016/j.job.2025.100657
    137. Anita Morris, Charles Boeneke, Joan M. King, Comparison of Storage Stability and In Vitro Digestion of Rice Flour-Based Yogurt Alternatives Made with Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lgg to Milk-Based Yogurt, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 1129, 10.3390/foods14071129
    138. Silvia Ruta, Giovanni Belvedere, Giuseppe Licitra, Luís Augusto Nero, Cinzia Caggia, Cinzia L. Randazzo, Margherita Caccamo, Recent insights on the multifaceted roles of wooden tools in cheese-making: A review of their impacts on safety and final traits of traditional cheeses, 2025, 435, 01681605, 111179, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2025.111179
    139. Namita Ashish Singh, Vidhi Jain, Nitish Rai, Rahul Jain, Bioprospecting for probiotics and other technological aspects of the bacteria isolated from goat milk, 2025, 78, 1472-765X, 10.1093/lambio/ovaf050
    140. M. L. Mohedano, K. Zarour, I. Diez-Ozaeta, M. T. Dueñas, P. López, P. Russo, 2025, 978-1-83767-000-0, 30, 10.1039/9781837673292-00030
    141. Kiseok Han, Kumar Vishven Naveen, Xin Zhang, Anbazhagan Sathiyaseelan, Hye-Yong Kim, Cellular Antioxidant Potential and Cytotoxic Activities of Extracellular Polysaccharides Isolated from Lactobacillus graminis Strain KNUAS018, 2025, 6, 2673-4176, 33, 10.3390/polysaccharides6020033
    142. Rita Yaswir, Eti Yerizel, Netti Suharti, Cimi Ilmiawati, Effect of probiotic-fermented milk containing Lactiplantibacillus pentoses strain HBUAS 53657 on serum glutathione peroxidase activity and pancreatic histopathology in hyperglycemic rats, 2024, 7, 2654-3222, 174, 10.32889/actabioina.174
    143. Min Zhang, Dong Zhao, Huan Yang, Xue Jiao, Rongqing Zhou, Jia Zheng, Chongde Wu, Lactic acid bacteria - derived exopolysaccharide: Biosynthesis and antibacterial characterization, 2025, 160, 09242244, 105033, 10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105033
    144. Dhananga Senanayake, Priya Ramarao-Milne, Gunjan Pandey, Mya Myintzu Hlaing, Jayani Chandrapala, Peter J. Torley, Netsanet Shiferaw Terefe, Genomic insights into exopolysaccharide biosynthesis pathways in novel Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Leuconostoc mesenteroides strains, 2025, 00236438, 117863, 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117863
    145. Sizhe Qiu, Aidong Yang, Xinyu Yang, Haojie Ni, Wenlu Li, Zhennai Yang, Hong Zeng, Yanbo Wang, Proteome trade-off between primary and secondary metabolism shapes acid stress induced bacterial exopolysaccharide production, 2025, 91, 10967176, 254, 10.1016/j.ymben.2025.05.002
    146. Saumi Pandey, Vinod K. Kannaujiya, Biochemical, thermal, and functional characterization of released polymeric substances of Neowestiellopsis sp. strain VKB03, 2025, 90, 22119264, 104114, 10.1016/j.algal.2025.104114
    147. Hania M. El-Messiry, Amira M. Hamdan, Nevine B. Ghanem, Mohamed Hagar, Exopolysaccharide produced from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HAN99 and its nanoparticle formulations in agricultural applications, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-03913-9
    148. Turkson Antwi Boasiako, Yutong Han, Isaac Duah Boateng, Emmanuel Ohene Afoakwa, Yongkun Ma, Enzyme-assisted ultrasonication pretreated co-fermentation (Lactobacillus plantarum and Acetobacter pasteurianus) of jujube-based vinegar production: Optimization, volatile metabolomics, sensory, and integration of microbial pathways using metagenomics, 2025, 69, 22124292, 106951, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106951
    149. Dana Byrtusová, Boris Zimmermann, Achim Kohler, Volha Shapaval, Enhanced co-production of extracellular biopolymers and intracellular lipids by Rhodotorula using lignocellulose hydrolysate and fish oil by-product urea, 2025, 18, 2731-3654, 10.1186/s13068-025-02664-z
    150. Rui dos Santos Ferreira Filho, Janaína Fernandes de Medeiros Burkert, Carlos André Veiga Burkert, From shake flasks to a bench‐scale bioreactor: scaling up exopolysaccharide production in fed‐batch cultivation of Ensifer meliloti SEMIA 135, 2025, 0268-2575, 10.1002/jctb.7916
    151. P. Ertürkmen, Alessandro Di Cerbo, Microbiota Composition of Buffalo Colostrum and Characterization of Potential Probiotic Bacteria With High Exopolysaccharide Production and Cholesterol Assimilation Capacity, 2025, 2025, 0146-9428, 10.1155/jfq/4406517
    152. María A. Guraya, Cecilia Accoroni, María A. Espósito, Pablo A. Torresi, María A. Reinheimer, Ezequiel Godoy, Impact of Solid-State Fermentation with Aspergillus niger on the Chemical Composition of Yellow Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Flour and Its Application for Obtaining Protein Products, 2025, 2692-1944, 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.5c00237
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1720) PDF downloads(81) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog