Research article

Hausdorff measure of the free boundary for the $ p $-obstacle problem with subcritical exponents

  • Published: 10 November 2026
  • This paper investigates a class of $ p $-obstacle problems with subcritical exponents having the form

    $ \begin{align} \mathrm{div}\left( a(x)|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u\right) = m_1\chi_{\{u>0\}}-m_2u^{\lambda-1}\chi_{\{u>0\}} \ \text{in}\ \Omega, \end{align} $

    where $ \Omega $ is a smooth bounded domain in $ \mathbb{R}^N (N \geq 2) $, $ m_1 $ and $ m_2 $ are positive constants, the coefficient function $ a \in C^2(\Omega) $ has a positive lower bound, and $ 2 \leq p < \lambda < p^*: = \frac{Np}{N-p} $ when $ p < N $ and $ N \geq 3 $ or $ 2\leq p < \lambda < +\infty $ when $ N = 2 $. By using the mountain-pass lemma, combined with the penalty method, we first establish the existence of non-negative weak solutions. Then, using the De Giorgi-Nash iteration, we prove the $ L^\infty $ bound and local $ C^{1, \alpha} $ continuity for the solutions. In addition, we prove local porosity of the free boundary based on the optimal growth and non-degeneracy of solutions near the free boundary. Furthermore, by means of Lebesgue measure estimates for gradient level sets, we show that at least one solution corresponds to the free boundary having a locally finite $ (N-1) $-dimensional Hausdorff measure.

    Citation: Jing Yu, Jun Zheng. Hausdorff measure of the free boundary for the $ p $-obstacle problem with subcritical exponents[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2026, 34(12): 9352-9385. doi: 10.3934/era.2026393

    Related Papers:

  • This paper investigates a class of $ p $-obstacle problems with subcritical exponents having the form

    $ \begin{align} \mathrm{div}\left( a(x)|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u\right) = m_1\chi_{\{u>0\}}-m_2u^{\lambda-1}\chi_{\{u>0\}} \ \text{in}\ \Omega, \end{align} $

    where $ \Omega $ is a smooth bounded domain in $ \mathbb{R}^N (N \geq 2) $, $ m_1 $ and $ m_2 $ are positive constants, the coefficient function $ a \in C^2(\Omega) $ has a positive lower bound, and $ 2 \leq p < \lambda < p^*: = \frac{Np}{N-p} $ when $ p < N $ and $ N \geq 3 $ or $ 2\leq p < \lambda < +\infty $ when $ N = 2 $. By using the mountain-pass lemma, combined with the penalty method, we first establish the existence of non-negative weak solutions. Then, using the De Giorgi-Nash iteration, we prove the $ L^\infty $ bound and local $ C^{1, \alpha} $ continuity for the solutions. In addition, we prove local porosity of the free boundary based on the optimal growth and non-degeneracy of solutions near the free boundary. Furthermore, by means of Lebesgue measure estimates for gradient level sets, we show that at least one solution corresponds to the free boundary having a locally finite $ (N-1) $-dimensional Hausdorff measure.



    加载中


    [1]

    C. Wang, On a class of superlinear obstacle problems, J. Differ. Equations, 434 (2025), 113318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2025.113318

    doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2025.113318
    [2]

    L. Karp, T. Kilpeläinen, A. Petrosyan, H. Shahgholian, On the porosity of free boundaries in degenerate variational inequalities, J. Differ. Equations, 164 (2000), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1999.3754

    doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1999.3754
    [3]

    K. Lee, H. Shahgholian, Hausdorff measure and stability for the $p$-obstacle problem $(2 < p < \infty)$, J. Differ. Equations, 195 (2003), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2003.06.002

    doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2003.06.002
    [4]

    P. Zhao, J. Zheng, Remarks on Hausdorff measure and stability for the $p$-obstacle problem $(1 < p < 2)$, Proc. Math. Sci., 122 (2012), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-012-0053-z

    doi: 10.1007/s12044-012-0053-z
    [5]

    J. Zheng, Z. Zhang, P. Zhao, Porosity of free boundaries in the obstacle problem for quasilinear elliptic equations, Proc. Math. Sci., 123 (2013), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-013-0137-4

    doi: 10.1007/s12044-013-0137-4
    [6]

    S. Challal, A. Lyaghfouri, Porosity of free boundaries in $A$-obstacle problems, Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., 70 (2009), 2772–2778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2008.04.002

    doi: 10.1016/j.na.2008.04.002
    [7]

    S. Challal, A. Lyaghfouri, J.F. Rodrigues, On the $A$-obstacle problem and the Hausdorff measure of its free boundary, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 191 (2012), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-010-0177-7

    doi: 10.1007/s10231-010-0177-7
    [8]

    Y. W. Hu, J. Zheng, L. S. Tavares, A free boundary problem associated with scalar Ginzburg-Landau equation, Math. Nachr., 299 (2026), 1197–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.70134

    doi: 10.1002/mana.70134
    [9]

    J. Andersson, E. Lindgren, H. Shahgholian, Optimal regularity for the obstacle problem for the $p$-Laplacian, J. Differ. Equations, 259 (2015), 2167–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.03.019

    doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.03.019
    [10]

    E. DiBenedetto, Degenerate Parabolic Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0895-2

    [11]

    H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70914-7

    [12]

    O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, N. N. Ural'tseva, Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1968.

    [13]

    J. Zheng, L. S. Tavares, A free boundary problem with subcritical exponents in Orlicz spaces, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 201 (2022), 695–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-021-01134-1

    doi: 10.1007/s10231-021-01134-1
    [14]

    J. Zheng, B. H. Feng, P. H. Zhao, Regularity of minimizers in the two-phase free boundary problems in Orlicz-Sobolev spaces, Z. Anal. Anwend., 36 (2017), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.4171/ZAA/1578

    doi: 10.4171/ZAA/1578
    [15]

    R. Leit$\tilde{a}$o, O. S. de Queiroz, E. V. Teixeira, Regularity for degenerate two-phase free boundary problems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 32 (2015), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.03.004

    doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.03.004
    [16]

    A. Ambrosetti, P. H. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal., 14 (1973), 349–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7

    doi: 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7
    [17]

    G. M. Lieberman, The natural generalization of the natural conditions of Ladyzhenskaya and Ural'tseva for elliptic equations, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 16 (1991), 311–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309108820761

    doi: 10.1080/03605309108820761
    [18]

    P. Koskela, S. Rohde, Hausdorff dimension and mean porosity, Math. Ann., 309 (1997), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002080050129

    doi: 10.1007/s002080050129
    [19]

    O. Martio, M. Vuorinen, Whitney cubes, $p$-capacity, and Minkowski content, Expositiones Math., 5 (1987), 17–40.

    [20]

    Y. W. Hu, J. Zheng, Porosity of the free boundary in a minimum problem, J. Nonlinear Var. Anal., 8 (2024), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.23952/jnva.8.2024.1.06

    doi: 10.23952/jnva.8.2024.1.06
    [21]

    L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, 2022.

    [22]

    L. C. Evans, Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, Routledge, New York, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203747940

  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Metrics

Article views(89) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog